 According to the article, why were people outraged by Mapplethorp’s portfolio?
But he has, instead, chosen to address the issue as an advocate for specific groups he regards as politically disadvantaged--women, gays, victims of racial-hate speech, the poor (or, at least, the not-rich), and people who are critical of market capitalism--and to design a constitutional theory that will enable those groups to enlist the state in efforts either to suppress speech they dislike or to subsidize speech they do like, without running afoul of the First Amendment. These discussions are not doctrinaire, but their general inclination is to favor state intervention, on political grounds, in each of those areas--that is, to favor restrictions on campaign spending, greater regulation of pornography, and so on.
 Because it depicted sadomasochism
 Because it depicted homosexuality  Because it depicted violence against women  Because it outwardly depicted the AIDS crisis  Because it depicted sadomasochism