 Which groups does Fiss claim his book is advocating for?
But he has, instead, chosen to address the issue as an advocate for specific groups he regards as politically disadvantaged--women, gays, victims of racial-hate speech, the poor (or, at least, the not-rich), and people who are critical of market capitalism--and to design a constitutional theory that will enable those groups to enlist the state in efforts either to suppress speech they dislike or to subsidize speech they do like, without running afoul of the First Amendment. Fiss does not avoid it. Fiss' analyses of specific cases are presented against a lightly sketched historical argument.
 women, gays, victims of racial-hate
speech, the poor, and those who are critical of market capitalism
 women, gays, victims of war crimes , the poor, and people who are critical of
market capitalism  women, gays, victims of racial-hate
speech, the rich, and people who are critical of
market capitalism.  women, gays, victims of racial-hate
speech, the poor, and those who are critical of market capitalism  women, gays, victims of racial-hate
speech, the poor, and people who are critical of communism.