 What would be Fiss' opinions on the current laws regarding self expression today?
These discussions are not doctrinaire, but their general inclination is to favor state intervention, on political grounds, in each of those areas--that is, to favor restrictions on campaign spending, greater regulation of pornography, and so on. Fiss' analyses of specific cases are presented against a lightly sketched historical argument.
 He thinks they unfortunately don't apply to everyone due to social constraints.
 He thinks that the current laws are changing for the better.  He thinks they are oppressive and dangerous.  He thinks they unfortunately don't apply to everyone due to social constraints.  He feels the laws are not written correctly.