 Who does the author believe would be most upsetting possibity to clone themselves?
Human Clones: Why Not? Cloning humans is taken to be either 1) a fundamentally evil thing that must be stopped or, at the very least, 2) a complex ethical issue that needs legislation and regulation. And for a politician, making noise about cloning is pretty close to a fleshly temptation itself. Probably almost none, because Clinton has maintained Ronald Reagan's policy of minimizing federal grants for research in human reproduction. Besides, most researchers thought cloning humans was impossible--so, for the moment, there's unlikely to be a grant-request backlog. So the pope's views on cloning are 1 st century rules applied using 15 th century religious thinking to a 21 st century issue.
 The rich with big egos
 The rich with big egos  The normal men  The elderly who wanted to cheat death  The normal women