 Why does the author believe Clinton is better represented than Dole?
Dole, it appears, will end his political career raging against the New York Times . On Sunday (the day the Times endorsed Clinton), Dole called the paper "the apologist for President Clinton for the last four years and an arm of the Democratic National Committee." The Times has reacted to this assault by highhandedly quoting everything and explaining none of it, leaving its readers baffled as to why the Republican nominee is so upset at the paper. Since then, campaign honchos have peppered the paper's reporters and editors with constant phone calls and letters complaining about unfair treatment. Reporters traveling with Dole caught a glimpse of the enmity Oct. 9, when Nelson Warfield, Dole's press secretary, staged a public confrontation with Seelye.
 Clinton uses proper grammar and appears sophisticated in public
 Clinton is more experienced and knowledgeable than Dole  Clinton is more progressive while Dole wants to maintain the status quo  Clinton is surreptitiously making payments to the Times as a trade for good publicity  Clinton uses proper grammar and appears sophisticated in public