 Which statement about details within the article is NOT true.
The subject of this short book is the present direction of the law governing the freedom of speech. This is what Fiss means by the "irony" in his title: that true freedom of speech for all requires suppressing the speech of some. This is not, technically, an irony. An irony would be the observation that an attempt to increase freedom for all often entails, despite our best efforts, a decrease in freedom for a few. Fiss does not avoid it. The Irony of Free Speech is a discussion of several speech issues: campaign-finance laws, state funding for the arts, pornography, speech codes, and equal time. Fiss' analyses of specific cases are presented against a lightly sketched historical argument.
 Nearly all Americans today would agree with Fiss' rationale.
 Fiss would support a minority movement before a movement from people in a "majority" social group.  Despite his bitterness towards contemporary liberals, Fiss' ideologies are uniquely liberal in themselves.  Nearly all Americans today would agree with Fiss' rationale.  Fiss believes that inequality is a major contemporary issue.