 What best summarizes Fiss' main motive as discussed in the article?
Shut Up, He Explained Owen Fiss is a professor at the Yale Law School and a highly regarded scholar of constitutional law. The subject of this short book is the present direction of the law governing the freedom of speech. What Professor Fiss has to say about it is worth attending to not merely because of his prominence in the field but because his argument is planted in the common assumptive ground of a lot of contemporary academic thought about the bankruptcy of individualism. The thesis of the book is Fiss', but the wisdom is conventional. Professor Fiss thinks the present direction of First Amendment law is a bad one, and he has an idea about how we might improve it. The short way to put his argument (though it is not quite the way he puts it) is to say that our approach to speech has become increasingly permissive.
 He wants to highlight problems with free speech.
 He wants to problematize the U.S. constitution and its values.  He wants to build animosity against contemporary liberals.  He wants to highlight problems with free speech.  He wants to teach minority and underrepresented groups how to gain true free speech for themselves.