 How would jealously possibly factor into the issue of cloning?
Human Clones: Why Not? If you can clone a sheep, you can almost certainly clone a human being. Some of the most powerful people in the world have felt compelled to act against this threat. President Clinton swiftly imposed a ban on federal funding for human-cloning research. Bills are in the works in both houses of Congress to outlaw human cloning--a step urged on all governments by the pope himself. Cloning humans is taken to be either 1) a fundamentally evil thing that must be stopped or, at the very least, 2) a complex ethical issue that needs legislation and regulation. But what, exactly, is so bad about it? Start by asking whether human beings have a right to reproduce. I say "yes." I have no moral right to tell other people they shouldn't be able to have children, and I don't see that Bill Clinton has that right either. When Clinton says, "Let us resist the temptation to copy ourselves," it comes from a man not known for resisting other temptations of the flesh. And for a politician, making noise about cloning is pretty close to a fleshly temptation itself.
 People would be "losing" a sexual advantage in not being able to reproduce a clone directly themselves.
 Clones would be genetically superior, as they'd be able to choose what traits to pass down.  People may envy the social recognition that clones would receive. They'd be missing out on the same popularity.  Clones get in between people and their spouses. They're too separate and impersonal.  People would be "losing" a sexual advantage in not being able to reproduce a clone directly themselves.