 What does the following quotation from the article -- "Nobody deserves it more than Barry Switzer. He took all of this [expletive]." -- most likely imply?
Maledict oratory The high costs of low language. Blasphemy would be closer to it. Linebacker Greg Lloyd, accepting the trophy in front of a national television audience, responded with enthusiasm. "Let's see if we can bring this damn thing back here next year," he said, "along with the [expletive] Super Bowl." A few hours later, Michael Irvin of the Dallas Cowboys offered this spirited defense of his coach on TV after his team won the National Football Conference title: "Nobody deserves it more than Barry Switzer. Thirty years earlier, almost to the week, Tynan was interviewed on BBC television in his capacity as literary director of Britain's National Theater and asked if he would allow the theater to present a play in which sex took place on stage. "I think there are very few rational people in this world to whom the word '[expletive]' is particularly diabolical or revolting or totally forbidden." Within 24 hours, resolutions had been introduced in the House of Commons calling for his prosecution on charges of obscenity, for his removal as a theater official, and for censure of the network for allowing an obscene word to go out on the airwaves. To much of ordinary Britain, he became the man who had said "[expletive]" on the BBC. Neither Greg Lloyd nor Michael Irvin was so stigmatized. "It's live television," NBC Vice President Ed Markey said, rationalizing the outbursts. Swearing isn't the only public act that Western civilization condones today but didn't 30 years ago.
 Switzer deserves to be rewarded for the sacrifices he made to win the NFC title
 Switzer deserves to be punished for using explicit language  Switzer deserves to be rewarded for speaking honestly and in-the-moment  Switzer deserves to be rewarded for the sacrifices he made to win the NFC title  Switzer deserves to be punished for using blasphemous language on live television