 Which of these has the least to gain from going open access as presented in this article?
If authors like that exist, at least they should take advantage of the access revolution. Open access is the name of the revolutionary kind of access these authors, unencumbered by a motive of financial gain, are free to provide to their readers. In any case, we can be more specific about which access barriers OA removes. Copyright can also be a significant access barrier. If we remove price barriers alone, we provide gratis OA , and if we remove at least some permission barriers as well, we provide libre OA . By “open access” to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Note that all three legs of the BBB definition go beyond removing price barriers to removing permission barriers, or beyond gratis OA to libre OA. But at the same time, all three allow at least one limit on user freedom: an obligation to attribute the work to the author. If there are complexities, they lie in the transition from where we are now to a world in which OA is the default for new research. In principle, any kind of digital content can be OA, since any digital content can be put online without price or permission barriers.
 A short film producer looking to make a name for herself
 A short film producer looking to make a name for herself  An independently wealthy poet looking for people to read their work  A tenured faculty member wanting to publish their work on a very specialized topic  A graduate student in the sciences looking to publish their research