 By explaining neural activity in the brain, what does the author of the article imply?
What motivates those who join this movement and what future will they create? Although eclipsed by the many pragmatisms of daily life, the theory of Sharism finds basis in neuroscience and its study of the working model of the human brain. Although we can’t entirely say how the brain works as a whole, we do have a model of the functional mechanism of the nervous system and its neurons. Groups of neurons form vastly interconnected networks, which, by changing the strength of the synapses between cells, can process information, and learn. Moreover, such a simple logic can be iterated and amplified, since all neurons work on a similar principle of connecting and sharing. Originally, the brain is quite open. A neural network exists to share activity and information, and I believe this model of the brain should inspire ideas and decisions about human networks. Whenever you have an intention to create, you will find it easier to generate more creative ideas if you keep the sharing process firmly in mind. The idea-forming-process is not linear, but more like an avalanche of amplifications along the thinking path. If your internal cognitive system encourages sharing, you can engineer a feedback loop of happiness, which will help you generate even more ideas in return. However, daily decisions for most adults are quite low in creative productivity, if only because they’ve switched off their sharing paths. People generally like to share what they create, but in a culture that tells them to be protective of their ideas, people start to believe in the danger of sharing. But since the brain, and society, is a connected system, the accumulation of these micro-attitudes, from neuron to neuron and person to person, can result in observable behavior. For those who are not, what they defend as “cultural goods” and “intellectual property” are just excuses for the status quo of keeping a community closed. Much of their “culture” will be protected, but the net result is the direct loss of many other precious ideas, and the subsequent loss of all the potential gains of sharing. It makes creative action a binary choice between public and private, open and closed. This creates a gap in the spectrum of knowledge. New Technologies and the Rise of Sharism Let’s track back to 1999, when there were only a few hundred pioneer bloggers around the world, and Human history is always so: something important was happening, but the rest of the world hadn’t yet realized it.
 If humans are not constantly sharing, they will deteriorate and become unproductive
 If humans want to avoid the major illnesses like dementia and Alzheimers, they can do so by sharing more content as they grow older  If humans do not use their neurons, they will lose them (and their potential) forever  If humans can quickly acclimate to a Sharist ideology, there is a better chance that they can survive global threats  If humans are not constantly sharing, they will deteriorate and become unproductive