 What is an accurate assumption about the Machine in the article?
Samples: "They say the Machine has been programmed to play nothing but pure Barcza System and Indian Defenses—and the Dragon Formation if anyone pushes the King Pawn." "As for the Machine—you do know, I suppose, that it is not a humanoid metal robot, walking about clanking and squeaking like a late medieval knight in armor?" You want to know why, if the Machine works at all, it doesn't work perfectly, so that it always wins and there is no contest. What the Machine can do is examine all the likely lines of play for about eight moves ahead—that is, four moves each for White and Black—and then decide which is the best move on the basis of capturing enemy pieces, working toward checkmate, establishing a powerful central position and so on." The Machine is probably programmed to recognize such situations and do something of the same sort, though we can't be sure from the information World Business Machines has released. The equivalent of those in the Machine is the directions fed into it before it plays a game." The first practical model, reported by Bernstein and Roberts of IBM in 1958 and which looked four moves ahead, was programmed so that it had a greedy worried tendency to grab at enemy pieces and to retreat its own whenever they were attacked. Once again, you see, you have the human factor, in this case working for the Machine."
 It "thinks" in a way that is more planned than a human.
 It "thinks" in a way that is more planned than a human.  A human is more calculated than the Machine.  The Machine is accurate yet slow compared to other computers.  It has more experience than a human.