 Why does the author believe Clinton is better represented than Dole?
Dole vs. the Times For several weeks now, pundits have debated how Bob Dole would exit the stage. Dole, it appears, will end his political career raging against the New York Times . They don't put any anti-Clinton stories in the New York Times . Only anti-Dole stories in the New York Times ." On Sunday (the day the Times endorsed Clinton), Dole called the paper "the apologist for President Clinton for the last four years and an arm of the Democratic National Committee." In a CNN interview broadcast Monday, Dole said the Times "might as well be part of the Democratic Party. ... The Times has reacted to this assault by highhandedly quoting everything and explaining none of it, leaving its readers baffled as to why the Republican nominee is so upset at the paper. The real bitterness, however, began in May, when the paper played what Dole aides billed as a major address about welfare on Page 19 of the business section. Since then, campaign honchos have peppered the paper's reporters and editors with constant phone calls and letters complaining about unfair treatment. Reporters traveling with Dole caught a glimpse of the enmity Oct. 9, when Nelson Warfield, Dole's press secretary, staged a public confrontation with Seelye. That letter, which has fallen into the hands of Slate, protests Seelye's coverage of a speech the previous day.
 Clinton uses proper grammar and appears sophisticated in public
 Clinton is more experienced and knowledgeable than Dole  Clinton is more progressive while Dole wants to maintain the status quo  Clinton is surreptitiously making payments to the Times as a trade for good publicity  Clinton uses proper grammar and appears sophisticated in public