 What does Dole hope to accomplish by juxtaposing Clinton's drug use with the War on Drugs?
Dole vs. the Times For several weeks now, pundits have debated how Bob Dole would exit the stage. Dole, it appears, will end his political career raging against the New York Times . In New Orleans, Dole charged the paper with ignoring a story about a Miami drug dealer who got invited to the White House. They don't put any anti-Clinton stories in the New York Times . Only anti-Dole stories in the New York Times ." On Sunday (the day the Times endorsed Clinton), Dole called the paper "the apologist for President Clinton for the last four years and an arm of the Democratic National Committee." In a CNN interview broadcast Monday, Dole said the Times "might as well be part of the Democratic Party. ... According to Katharine Seelye, who has covered Dole since the beginning of his campaign, the complaints date from December 1995, when Dole staff members first protested that she had misunderstood the candidate's position on abortion. The real bitterness, however, began in May, when the paper played what Dole aides billed as a major address about welfare on Page 19 of the business section. Since then, campaign honchos have peppered the paper's reporters and editors with constant phone calls and letters complaining about unfair treatment. Reporters traveling with Dole caught a glimpse of the enmity Oct. 9, when Nelson Warfield, Dole's press secretary, staged a public confrontation with Seelye. Dole, in New Jersey, had talked about Clinton being AWOL in the drug war.
 To render Clinton as untrustworthy and 'above the law'
 To render Clinton as untrustworthy and 'above the law'  To capture specific population groups within a larger Christian demographic  To garner moderate dislike toward Clinton before exposing his infidelity  To perpetuate Clinton's reputation as a deviant and addict