 What does 14 mention that no other critiques mention?
Here's what the critics have to say about the auction--and each other. 2. Egg auctions will fail to produce designer babies. While fretting about what will happen if Harris succeeds, fertility experts simultaneously debunk that scenario. First, the child of an ugly man and a pretty woman is just as likely to be ugly as to be pretty. Second, everyone carries "recessive" genes, which are invisible in this generation but may become visible in the next. Third, even if both parents are attractive, a child can combine their features unattractively. 3. Egg auctions will promote the survival of the fittest. This site simply mirrors our current society, in that beauty usually goes to the highest bidder." But this reply only fuels concern that gradually, society will separate into "genetic haves and have nots." 4. Egg auctions will promote the survival of the unfittest. Harris writes that only men with "substantial financial resources" are fit to give his models' offspring "a financially secure and stable life." As Calgary Sun columnist Sydney Sharpe put it, "Any woman ... who enters into this mephistophelian pact has a few screws loose. Egg auctions will fail to promote the survival of the unfittest. Many models, if not most, have had cosmetic surgery. (One of Harris' "angels" has already been caught lying about her age.) How does Harris know whether his models have had collagen injections and nose jobs?
 this may have a negative impact on the children
 parents may be disappointed by the child born  people aren't thinking about the long-term  the children born may not be beautiful  this may have a negative impact on the children