question:  Which best describes Stephen's vision for the future of innovation?
context: The Centre for the Future of Intelligence is seeking to investigate the implications of artificial intelligence for humanity, and make sure humans take advantage of the opportunities while dodging the risks. Because no single discipline is ideally suited to this task, the centre emphasises the importance of interdisciplinary knowledge-sharing and collaboration. It is bringing together a diverse community of some of the world's best researchers, philosophers, psychologists, lawyers and computer scientists. Harry Armstrong, head of futures at Nesta, which publishes The Long + Short, spoke with Cave about the impact of AI. Do you see the interdisciplinary nature of the centre as one of its key values and one of the key impacts you hope it will have on the field? Stephen Cave: Thinking about the impact of AI is not something that any one discipline owns or does in any very systematic way. So if academia is going to rise to the challenge and provide thought leadership on this hugely important issue, then we’re going to need to do it by breaking down current disciplinary boundaries and bringing people with very different expertise together. That means bringing together the technologists and the experts at developing these algorithms together with social scientists, philosophers, legal scholars and so forth. We want to create a space where many different disciplines can come together and develop a shared language, learn from each other’s approaches, and hopefully very quickly move to be able to actually develop new ideas, new conclusions, together. The current dominant political and economic ideologies, along with growing isolationist sentiment, runs contrary to the bipartisan, collaborative approaches needed to solve global issues like climate change. If you try and push against this idea you can be labelled as being anti-progress and stuck in the past. Technology is emerging from a certain legal, political, normative, cultural, and social framework. These things are within the realms of what is feasible, and I think will help to shape the future.
output:  The regulation of technological development will provide the necessary structure for successful innovation
options:  He thinks innovation should be led by the AI developers but checked by people in other industrues  The regulation of technological development will provide the necessary structure for successful innovation  He says that international connections are the only way true innovation will happen over time  He wants people to be responsible and held accountable by different kinds of people