 Which statement best describes the purpose of this text?
Because no single discipline is ideally suited to this task, the centre emphasises the importance of interdisciplinary knowledge-sharing and collaboration. It is bringing together a diverse community of some of the world's best researchers, philosophers, psychologists, lawyers and computer scientists. Do you see the interdisciplinary nature of the centre as one of its key values and one of the key impacts you hope it will have on the field? So if academia is going to rise to the challenge and provide thought leadership on this hugely important issue, then we’re going to need to do it by breaking down current disciplinary boundaries and bringing people with very different expertise together. That means bringing together the technologists and the experts at developing these algorithms together with social scientists, philosophers, legal scholars and so forth. I think there are many areas of science where more interdisciplinary engagement would be valuable. We want to create a space where many different disciplines can come together and develop a shared language, learn from each other’s approaches, and hopefully very quickly move to be able to actually develop new ideas, new conclusions, together. The current dominant political and economic ideologies, along with growing isolationist sentiment, runs contrary to the bipartisan, collaborative approaches needed to solve global issues like climate change. And so my impression is that there is a feeling within these companies that these ethical and social implications need to be taken very seriously, now. And that a broad buy-in by society into some kind of vision of the future in which this technology plays a role is required, if a dangerous – or to them dangerous – counteraction is to be avoided. There can be a bit of a conflict between being impacted by what's happening and having some sort of control over what we want to happen. But that's different when we consider ourselves at a level of a society, as a polis [city state], or as an international community. In any given country, we have regulations. Technology is emerging from a certain legal, political, normative, cultural, and social framework. For example, a kind of Hippocratic oath for AI developers. These things are within the realms of what is feasible, and I think will help to shape the future. One of the problems with intervention, generally, is that we cannot control the course of events. The reality is, societies are much too complex for us to be able to shape them in any very specific way, as plenty of ideologies and political movements have found to their cost.
 To explain how industries are approaching collaboration and making decisions in AI with regard to social responses
 To propose potential pathways that AI could take to eliminate social and environmental problems in the near future  To explain how industries are approaching collaboration and making decisions in AI with regard to social responses  To demonstrate how humans are taking advantages of AI-related opportunities while dodging the risks  To make an argument in support of more checks and balances within the institution of AI development