 How does the author contradict their promises that sharing will produce a more equitable society?
If your internal cognitive system encourages sharing, you can engineer a feedback loop of happiness, which will help you generate even more ideas in return. People generally like to share what they create, but in a culture that tells them to be protective of their ideas, people start to believe in the danger of sharing. Non-sharing culture misleads us with its absolute separation of Private and Public space. It makes creative action a binary choice between public and private, open and closed. The small-scale granularity of the content can fill discrete gaps in experience and thus record a new human history. As a result, such a Micro-pipeline system is making Social Media a true alternative to broadcast media.
 By equating sharing with equity, those who do not share will inevitably be denied access to certain benefits
 By allowing anyone from anywhere to publish anything, a lack of credibility and accuracy in content means that people living in poverty are more likely to be taken advantage of  By equating sharing with equity, those who do not share will inevitably be denied access to certain benefits  By connecting creativity to cultural capital, those who are more logical and scientific thinkers will be marginalized  By comparing sharing to human neural activity, the author implies that humans who have a preference not to share are 'less than' and will be treated differently