 Which is true about the role of trust in computing?
During the first two-thirds of the twentieth century, this type of rationalization took the form of ever-more complex managed systems, with crisp specification of roles, lines of authority, communication and control. The idea was to eliminate human error and variability in the face of change by removing thinking to the system, and thus neutralizing the variability of the human beings who worked it. But the impulse to build fully-specified systems, designed by experts, monitored and controlled so as to limit human greed and error and to manage uncertainty, was basic and widespread. What replaced planning and control in these systems was the myth of perfect markets. This approach was widespread and influential; it still is.
 Adding more signposts for trust and approval in computing systems reflects a decrease in trust in their users
 Increased trust in computers and people is what allowed AT&T to rise in its day  Adding more types of computing system reflects an increase in the trust that higher-ups have in their employees to innovate  Adding more signposts for trust and approval in computing systems reflects a decrease in trust in their users  Increased trust in computers allows for more components of systems to be automated than before