 Which is not true about our judgements of people from photos, according to the article?
Through a study of 1,856 images ("controlled for race, gender, age and facial expression") they claim to have established the validity of "automated, face-induced inference on criminality, despite the historical controversy surrounding this line of enquiry." "People," he wrote, "use easily accessible facial information (eg an expression such as a smile, cues to gender and ethnic group) to make social attributions congruent with this information (eg a nice person)." Experiments at Princeton found that we take less than one tenth of a second to form an opinion of strangers from their pictures, and those opinions tend to stand firm even if we're exposed to those pictures for a longer period of time.
 We are able to make objective decisions about people, keeping our opinions of their facial structure separate from the facts
 Our judgements are easily manipulated by small, hardly noticeable changes in photos  We are able to make objective decisions about people, keeping our opinions of their facial structure separate from the facts  We judge people in a way that compares them to people we've seen before that we know more about  We are all influenced by underlying bias when we see photos of other people