 Which isn't true of the test results?
The point of the second test was not to find the difference between cheap and expensive beers but instead to compare a variety of top-of-the-line beers. The other aspect of anticipated reward was the panelists' unspoken but obvious assumption that this time they would "do better" on the test. Here is what happened and what it meant: 1. Procedure. The nine testers who showed up were a subset of the original 12. The A-to-J labeling scheme was the same for all testers. The first test was designed to evaluate low-end beers and therefore had to be lager-centric. To include one holdover from the previous test, as a scientific control on our tasters' preferences.
 Hefeweizens were not popular among the testers
 some people were able to identify the beer based on taste  not all people knew beers as well as they thought they did  American beers typically scored higher  Hefeweizens were not popular among the testers