 Which isn't true of this test?
The point of the second test was not to find the difference between cheap and expensive beers but instead to compare a variety of top-of-the-line beers. The other aspect of anticipated reward was the panelists' unspoken but obvious assumption that this time they would "do better" on the test. Here is what happened and what it meant: 1. Procedure. The A-to-J labeling scheme was the same for all testers. The first test was designed to evaluate low-end beers and therefore had to be lager-centric. To include one holdover from the previous test, as a scientific control on our tasters' preferences.
 the testers come from a diverse area
 the beers being used were fancy  all testers receive the same order of beers  it has a small testing group  the testers come from a diverse area