 Cave suggests all of the following ways for preventing a loss of control over AI EXCEPT:
Harry Armstrong, head of futures at Nesta, which publishes The Long + Short, spoke with Cave about the impact of AI. Stephen Cave: Thinking about the impact of AI is not something that any one discipline owns or does in any very systematic way. With AI, that has been the case so far; although not on the same scale. One of the dominant narratives around not only AI but technology and automation more generally is that we, as humans, are at the mercy of technological progress. One of the problems with intervention, generally, is that we cannot control the course of events. We can try to imagine how things might go very badly wrong, and then work hard to develop systems that will stop that from happening.
 developing an automatic shutdown option for AI that goes awry
 developing an automatic shutdown option for AI that goes awry  maintaining a system of accountable design  engaging in interdisciplinary conversations  anticipating problems that may arise from technology