 How would Stephen compare humans and machines?
It is bringing together a diverse community of some of the world's best researchers, philosophers, psychologists, lawyers and computer scientists. That means bringing together the technologists and the experts at developing these algorithms together with social scientists, philosophers, legal scholars and so forth. But that's different when we consider ourselves at a level of a society, as a polis [city state], or as an international community. I think this is very important because historically, we've had an overwhelming tendency to anthropomorphise. Just as we are accepting that the natural world offers this enormous range of different intelligences, we are at the same time inventing new intelligences that are radically different to humans.
 They are complementary in their abilities and can benefit from one another
 He thinks they are similar enough that a conflict will arise  They are complementary in their abilities and can benefit from one another  They operate with similar systems of intelligence but to entirely different ends  Humans are at risk of losing access to knowledge if they let machines take over most tasks