 Who does the author believe would be most upsetting possibity to clone themselves?
Human Clones: Why Not? Cloning humans is taken to be either 1) a fundamentally evil thing that must be stopped or, at the very least, 2) a complex ethical issue that needs legislation and regulation. And for a politician, making noise about cloning is pretty close to a fleshly temptation itself. Probably almost none, because Clinton has maintained Ronald Reagan's policy of minimizing federal grants for research in human reproduction. So the pope's views on cloning are 1 st century rules applied using 15 th century religious thinking to a 21 st century issue. Even if people have the right to do it, is cloning a good idea? Cloning would only copy the genetic aspects of people who are already here. But genetic determinism is largely irrelevant to the cloning issue.
 The rich with big egos
 The rich with big egos  The normal men  The elderly who wanted to cheat death  The normal women