text:
User:Benkex

Hi, my name is Benke :) I'm a friendly buddhist teaching education student with the following subjects: I'm looking forward to cooperating with you on articles regarding education and content structure. Feel free to write me an email:
 * 1) Computer Science
 * 2) Mathematics
 * 3) Philosophy

title: User:Benkex


text:
User talk:Benkex

Welcome
MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 12:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

If you have any questions, you can ask in the assistance reading room or possibly contact me personally.

Since there was an URL on the pages that you created, I misidentified it as spam at here and dewikibooks. I'm sorry for the mistake, and thank you very much for the notice. MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 12:26, 25 January 2023 (UTC) (Fixed sentence, MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 12:33, 25 January 2023 (UTC))

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

title: User talk:Benkex


text:
User talk:196.190.62.246

Airtransat236 (discuss • contribs) 13:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:196.190.62.246


text:
User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser/Beta.js

// /* To use, simply add "mw.loader.load('//en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript');" to you /common.js subpage. After doing that, go to RC, look for a user making really bad edits, and go to their userpage, talkpage, or contributions page. Press the "report" tab and give a reason to report them. Then they will automatically be reported to the admins. On TODO list: * Use custom UI, rather than being lazy and using a very limited prompt command. * Allow using preset reasons, maybe. Would be quite difficult though. * Check if user is already blocked.

// Will be used to make sure the user uses the newest version. Currently no idea how to implement this though. const build=1; const version="0.0.4";

/////////// Settings the user can change ////// var force_enabled_for_admins=false;// If true, even admins can use the script. var can_report_self=false;// If true, the user can report themselves. Useful for testing the script.

function success{ if(same){ same=false; mw.notify("User already reported",{type:'error'}); }	else mw.notify("Successfuly reported user!"); } function failed{ if(same){ same=false; mw.notify("User already reported",{type:'error'}); }	else mw.notify("Unable to report user. Perhaps you don't have permission to edit your local vandalism reporting page?",{type:'error'}); } // Used in getting the correct error message. Do not modify deafult value. var same=false;

$.when($.ready,mw.loader.using(['mediawiki.util','mediawiki.api'])).then( function{

// Must have a user to accociate the page with if (mw.config.get('wgRelevantUserName') && ( mw.config.get('wgRelevantUserName')!=mw.config.get('wgUserName') || can_report_self )

// Accepted wikis below /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// && ['enwikibooks','metawiki','uncy_en'].includes(mw.config.get('wgDBname'))

// Sysops do not need this, disabled automatically && ( !mw.config.get('wgUserGroups').includes('sysop') || force_enabled_for_admins )

// User must be autoconfirmed to use this script in the first place. && mw.config.get('wgUserGroups').includes('autoconfirmed')){	var node=mw.util.addPortletLink('p-cactions','','Report','utreportuser',"Report this user to the local admins.");	$(node).on('click',function(e){ var user=mw.config.get('wgRelevantUserName'); var reason=prompt("Give a reason for reporting "+user+".\n\nExamples: spam, vandalism, blanking pages, LTA, long-term abuse\n\nLeave blank to cancel."); // There MUST be a reason filled out for the edit to take place if(reason) { var ad=" (using ReportUser "+version+")"; var summary="Reporting user "+user+" (talk · contribs)"; var tag=''; var full_reason=reason+' '+tag; // Report user, depending on the wiki

///////// en wikibooks ///////// if(mw.config.get('wgDBname')=='enwikibooks') new mw.Api.edit('Wikibooks:Reading_room/Administrative_Assistance',function(revision){					ad=" (using ReportUser "+version+")";					if (revision.content.includes('')){same=true;return{text:revision.content}}					return {						text: revision.content+"\n\n==Please block "+user+' (talk · contribs)==\nReason: '+full_reason+' ~',						summary: summary+ad,					};				}).then(function{success},function{failed});

///////// meta ///////// else if(mw.config.get('wgDBname')=='metawiki') new mw.Api.edit('Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat',function(revision){					if (revision.content.includes()){same=true;return{text:revision.content}}					return {						text: revision.content+"\n\n"+user+,						summary:summary+ad,					};				}).then(function{success},function{failed});

///////// uncyclopedia ///////// else if(mw.config.get('wgDBname')=='uncy_en') new mw.Api.edit('Uncyclopedia:Ban_Patrol',function(revision){					if (revision.content.includes('')){same=true;return{text:revision.content}}					section="== Manual Ban Patrol (new stuff below this line) ==";					message="\n "+full_reason+" ~";					// Something went wrong, and the section was not found. Instead show at exact bottem with the other scripted reports.					// Why we don't just report this with the other scripted reports is because it is easier for the admins this way. Plus, it might lead to those scripts getting improved.					if(!revision.content.includes(section)) return {						text: revision.content+message,summary:summary+ad+" - ERROR: edit section not found, unable to correctly format report (please report this bug!)"};					return {						text: revision.content.replace(section,section+message),						summary: summary+ad,					};				}).then(function{success},function{failed});

}		else // No reason given. Aborted the report mw.notify('You must give a reason to request to have this user blocked.',{type:'error'}); e.preventDefault; });	new mw.Api.get({ action: "query", list: "users", ususers: user, usprop: "blockinfo", format: "json" }).then(function(response) { var userdata = response.query.users[0]; if (userdata.blockid) { print('user '+user+' already blocked'); node.css('display:none'); }		});

}}); //

title: User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser/Beta.js


text:
User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser

ReportUser is a user script designed to report users in fewer steps. Instead of finding a user, copying the username, navigating to WB:Reading room/Administrative Assistance and manually writing a request to block the user, just go to the users contributions page (or user/talk page), press "report", and write a reason to report them. The script does the rest.

Supported Wikis
The script currently only works on the following wikis:
 * 1) en.wikibooks.org
 * 2) meta

Some of which are not wikimedia wikis:
 * 1) en.uncyclopedia.co

Request for more here.

Installation
Add the following code to your common.js file:

The script does currently not work for admins, since they can just block them. But if you really want to use it for whatever reason, just copy the whole script to your /common.js page and change the line that says  to.

You also cannot report yourself.

If you would like to opt-in for beta tests (not recommended), just replace the  to. Be warned that it might stop working at any time and without warning.

Settings
The following settings can be set at the top of the script. To do so, copy the script to your userspace and import that page to your /common.js subpage instead of the original one.
 * 1) can_report_self - deafult: false - if true, allows you to report yourself. Only used for testing purposes.
 * 2) force_enabled_for_admins - deafult: false - if true, you can use the script even if you are an admin.

title: User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser


text:
User:Xeverything11/common.js

mw.loader.load('//en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); mw.loader.load( '//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript' );

title: User:Xeverything11/common.js


text:
Christian Hymns/Once in Royal David's City

Text

 * Author: Cecil Frances Alexander
 * Source: Hymns for Young Children

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text: Category:Book:Christian Hymns

title: Category:Book:Christian Hymns


text:
Christian Hymns/Lo! He Comes with Clouds Descending

Text

 * Author: Charles Wesley
 * Source: Hymns of Intercession for All Mankind

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Comfort, Comfort Ye My People

Text

 * Author: Johann Olearius
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Chorale Book for England

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Anglican Liturgies

Liturgical texts from the Anglican tradition, in the public domain, as written in the original sources, with background & commentary.

Prayers

 * /Anima Christi/
 * /Ave Maria/
 * /Gloria Patri/
 * /Kyrie Eleison/

Asperges

 * /Asperges Me/
 * /Vidi Aquam/

title: Anglican Liturgies


text:
Wikijunior:Raspberry Pi/Scratch Game – Maze

Tutorial by Andrew Oakley Public Domain 24 April 2016 www.cotswoldjam.org

Getting started
This tutorial uses Scratch version 1.4. It'll work on the Raspberry Pi, PC or Mac.

At the end of typing something, you will usually have to press the key. However there is not much typing in Scratch – it's mostly using the mouse.

Your tutor should have already downloaded the files for this tutorial from: http://www.cotswoldjam.org/downloads/2016-04

Your tutor should have unzipped the files and saved them in the  folder. Your tutor may have needed to create the scratch and maze folders.

Starting Scratch
Start Scratch by clicking on Menu - Programming - Scratch.

Maximise the window by clicking the big square icon in the top-right corner of the window. It should now fill the whole screen.

You can also see the green flag, which starts the program, and the red stop button, which can stop a program if it goes wrong.

Scratch uses the word "stage" to describe the screen background, and "sprites" to describe people, objects or monsters than inhabit the game.

'''We've created a stage and sprites for you. Load them in by clicking File menu - Open - click Pi - Scratch - maze - maze1. If you're asked if you want to save the current project, click No.'''

Your first program

Click on "Person".

Programming in Scratch is done with blocks. There are lots of different blocks which are organised by category.

Next, click "Control". You will see the Control blocks.

Drag "when Space key pressed" into the Scripts area in the middle of the screen.

(To drag something, point at it with the mouse, hold down the left mouse button, keep the button held down whilst moving the mouse to where you want it, and then let go of the mouse button)

We want to move the person in the game, when the right arrow key is pressed.

Click the black triangle next to Space in "when space key pressed. Change "space" to "right arrow".

Click the Motion section.

Drag "change x by 10" so it locks on to the bottom of "when right arrow key pressed".

Create another set of scripts for "left arrow".

In "change x by 10" for the left arrow script, click the black triangle and change 10 to -10 (minus ten). Use the and  keys to rub out 10 and then type:

Click the icon above the stage.

Press the left and right  arrow keys. The person should move left and right.

Notice how the person can move through the blue maze wall on the left.

Is the raspberry moving instead of the person? As we said at the start of this chapter, make sure you have "Person" selected and not "Berry".

If you have difficulty setting up the program, you can load the file "maze2" instead.

Variables and Subroutines

We are going to use variables to test whether the person has hit a wall.

A variable is like a box that holds something, usually numbers or words. We are going to create a box called  that holds a number. We'll then check whether moving the person by that many places hits a wall. If they do hit a wall, we'll move the person back again.

We are also going to create a subroutine to do the wall checking. A subroutine is a script that can be called by other scripts. In Scratch, we use the commands "broadcast" to call a subroutine, and "receive" to define what a subroutine does.

Go to Variables and click "Make a variable".

Type:  …and click Ok. Make sure there are no spaces in "movex".

We need to delete "change x by 10". Grab "change x by 10" and move it out of the Scripts box – for instance, move it back to the controls area. It will disappear.

In Variables, grab "set movex to 0" and stick it under "when right arrow key pressed".

Click the value  and change "set movex to 0" to "set movex to 10" (ten).

Now go to 'Control and grab the "broadcast and wait" block. Stick this under "set movex to 10".

Use the black triangle to create a new broadcast named:

Repeat the above steps for the left arrow. Remember to use -10 instead of 10.

Now create a new script by dragging "when I receive domovex" from the Control section to the Scripts section.

From the Motion section, grab "change x by" and stick it under "when I receive".

From the 'Variables section, grab "movex" and stick it onto "change x by". It should now read "change x by movex".

From the Control section, grab "if" and stick it under "change x by".

From the Sensing section, grab "touching color" and stick it onto "if".

Click the navy blue box in "touching colour", and then select a royal blue wall colour from the maze – the mouse pointer will change to an eyedropper; point it at a blue wall and click.

From the Motion section, grab "change x by" and stick it inside "if".

From the Operators section, grab "[] - []" (minus, take-away) and stick it onto "change x by".

Change []-[] so that it reads 0-movex (grab movex from the Variables section). 0 is zero.

If you have difficulty setting up the program, you can load the file "maze3" instead.

What we are doing is moving the person, checking whether they have hit the wall, and if they have hit the wall, moving the person back again.

Run the program with the green flag icon. Use the left and right  arrows. The person should stop when they come to the blue wall on the left.

Now create the same scripts for up and down, using y instead of x. For example create a new variable called, a broadcast called   and use "change y by". Run the program with the green flag.

You should now be able to move the person all around the maze.

The variables  and   may be displayed on the maze. You can hide them by unticking their boxes in the Variables section.

Detecting a Win
At the end of each domove script, broadcast a new message called "checkwin". Create a new script called "checkwin" and check whether the person is touching the red raspberry colour.

From the Looks controls, use the Say command to tell the player they've won. Remember to reset the person to their original position after they've won.

You could also reset the person's position when the green flag is clicked, in case the program has been stopped halfway.

If you have difficulty setting up the program, you can load the file "maze4" instead.

Counting Moves
You can make the game better by adding a counter that counts the number of moves.

You'll need to make a variable called "count".

You'll also need an "if...else" control rather than a normal "if "control. You may need to scroll down the list of controls to find "if...else". "If...else" allows you to do one thing if the condition is true (person has touched blue) and another thing if the condition is false (person has NOT touched blue).

Change the domovex and domovey "if" commands to "if...else" commands. If the person moves but doesn't hit a wall (the "else" section), then "change count by 1" (this is in the Variables controls)

Remember to make sure the box is ticked next to the variable "count", so you can see how many moves the player has made. See the program "maze5" for an example.

Cjam-scratch-maze.pdf
The original PDF for this tutorial can be obtained from Wikimedia Commons.


text:
Christian Hymns/Once He Came In Blessing

Text

 * Author: Johann Roh
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Chorale Book for England

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser/patchnotes

0.0.4 (upcoming): currently unable to test script. Changes: improved edit summarys, added settings, fixed a tooltip, improved block request text for en.wikibooks, improved the reason input text

0.0.3 (25 / 1 2023): bug fixes, cannot report yourself or somebody already reported

0.0.2 (24 / 1 / 2023): bug fixes, added support for meta and en.uncyclopedia

0.0.1 (23 / 1 /2023): script ready to use

title: User:L10nM4st3r/ReportUser/patchnotes


text:
User talk:2404:8000:1002:E2DB:C4F5:11B7:A352:708

--SHB2000 (discuss • contribs) 09:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


text:
Christian Hymns/Savior of the Nations, Come

Text

 * Author: Ambrose of Milan
 * Translator: William Morton Reynolds
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Tensorflow.js

Introduction to TensorFlow.js

 * 1) TensorFlow.js is a JavaScript library for training and deploying machine learning models in the browser or on Node.js. It provides a high-level API for building and training models, as well as tools for visualizing and debugging them. TensorFlow.js is built on top of TensorFlow, a powerful and widely-used machine learning library for Python. With TensorFlow.js, developers can use the same models and techniques in JavaScript that they would use in Python, making it easy to build and deploy machine learning applications in the web and Node.js environments.

title: Tensorflow.js


text:
Christian Hymns/Lo! He Cometh, Countless Trumpets

Text

 * Author: John Cennick
 * Source: Collection of Sacred Hymns

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Lift Up Your Heads, Ye Mighty Gates

Text

 * Author: Georg Weissel
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Lyra Germanica

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/When He Cometh

Text

 * Author: William O. Cushing
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/When He Cometh


text:
Christian Hymns/Ah! Lord, How Shall I Meet Thee

Text

 * Author: Paul Gerhardt
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Chorale Book for England

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Redeemer of the Nations, Come

Text

 * Author: Ambrose of Milan
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Chorale Book for England

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Arise, The Kingdom Is at Hand

Text

 * Author: Johann von Rist
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Chorale Book for England

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Awake, Thou Careless World, Awake

Text

 * Author: Johann von Rist
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Chorale Book for England

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Come Thou, Long Expected Jesus

Text

 * Author: Charles Wesley
 * Source: Hymns for the Nativity of Our Lord

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/The Advent of Our God

Text

 * Author: Charles Coffin
 * Translator: John Chandler
 * Source: The Hymns of the Primitive Church

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/The Advent of Our God


text:
Christian Hymns/The Advent of Our King

Text

 * Author: Charles Coffin
 * Translator: Robert Campbell
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/The Advent of Our King


text:
Christian Hymns/Come, Thou Precious Ransom, Come

Text

 * Author: Johann Olearius
 * Translator: August Crull
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Arise, Sons of the Kingdom

Text

 * Author: Johann von Rist
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth, alt.
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Creator of the Stars of Night

Text

 * Author:
 * Translator: John Mason Neale
 * Source: Hymnal Noted

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
User:Mohamed James Wang

My goal is to create new books here.

title: User:Mohamed James Wang


text:
User:Sinuh

Hi, selamat datang dilaman Sinuh.

title: User:Sinuh


text:
User talk:2603:8080:9604:D166:5064:1A2D:A9B6:97FF

―Eihel (discuss • contribs) 13:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)


text:
Cocos Malay travel phrasebook/Ukrainian

 * EN: Below is a Cocos Malay phrasebook for Ukrainian speakers.
 * UK: Це розмовник Cocos Malay для україномовних.

title: Cocos Malay travel phrasebook/Ukrainian


text:
Cocos Malay travel phrasebook/Preface

The Cocos (Keeling) Islands (Pulu Kokos (Keeling)) are a group of islands in the Indian Ocean administered by Australia. People like to travel to the islands all the time. With unique wildlife, beaches and culture, it's a popular tourist destination. But when travelling to the islands, you may find that English is not everyone's first language. The main language is Cocos Malay. While the locals do speak English, it's always good to learn a few basic phrases before visiting. So, I've compiled a multilingual phrasebook of Cocos Malay phrases useful for travel. Enjoy!

Inspired by the Tok Pisin dictionary on Wikibooks.

title: Cocos Malay travel phrasebook/Preface


text:
Cocos Malay travel phrasebook/Hebrew

 * EN: Below is a Cocos Malay phrasebook for Hebrew speakers.
 * HE: מצורף שיחון למלאיית קוקוס מיועד לדוברי עברית

title: Cocos Malay travel phrasebook/Hebrew


text:
Cocos Malay travel phrasebook/Authors & Contributors

This list is updated automatically by AuthorsAndContributorsBot. Please do not update it manually.


text:
User talk:Kaonde Little Soldier

My Biography
Kaonde little soldier known by his proper name of Kaonde Kyabu Juan is a congolese nepo-baby who was born in D.R.C( Tanganyika Province Moba Territory) The 5th Septamber 2007. This One Has Gone Through Many Sharp Things But He Bore All Of Those.

Education
he started learning his primary school in 2013 at a local primary school called E.P. Kirungu  when he was 6. then in 2019 He Starts Learning His Secondary School At Neema Institute In Moba Territory, 2 Years   Later He'd Choosen To Learn Computer Science.

Life And Hardship Gone Through
unfortunetely this guy went through many sharp and dangerous diffucties, eventhough he always suffers he knows many things especially about computer. he is the 1st born hn a family containing 7 children. His Parents Are Caltivators So His Father Goes By A Name Of Kyabu Kaonde

title: User talk:Kaonde Little Soldier


text:
Minecraft/Authors & Contributors

This list is updated automatically by AuthorsAndContributorsBot. Please do not update it manually.

title: Minecraft/Authors & Contributors


title: User:Tastysocks1


text:
Christian Hymns/Wake, Awake, for Night Is Flying

Text

 * Author: Philip Nicolai
 * Translator: Catherine Winkworth
 * Source: Chorale Book for England

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Prepare the Way, O Zion

Text

 * Author: Frans M. Franzèn
 * Translator: Augustus Nelson
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/Prepare the Way, O Zion


text:
Christian Hymns/On Jordan's Bank, the Baptist's Cry

Text

 * Author: Charles Coffin
 * Translator: John Chandler
 * Source: Hymns of the Primitive Church

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/The King Shall Come When Morning Dawns

Text

 * Author:
 * Translator: John Brownlie
 * Source: Hymns of the Russian Church

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Rejoice, All Ye Believers

Text

 * Author: Lautentius Laurenti
 * Translator: Sarah Findlater
 * Source: Hymns from the Land of Luther

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Rejoice, Rejoice Believers

Text

 * Author: Lautentius Laurenti
 * Translator: Sarah Findlater, alt.
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Hark, A Joyful Voice Is Thrilling

Text

 * Author: Ambrose of Milan
 * Translator: John Henry Newman
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Hark! A Thrilling Voice Is Sounding

Text

 * Author: Ambrose of Milan
 * Translator: Edward Caswall
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Hark, the Glad Sound!

Text

 * Author: Philip Doddridge
 * Source: Hymns, Founded on Various Texts in the Holy Scriptures

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/Hark, the Glad Sound!


text:
Christian Hymns/A Thrilling Voice By Jordan Rings

Text

 * Author: Ambrose of Milan
 * Translator: John Mason Neale
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/O Come, O Come, Emmanuel

Text

 * Author:
 * Translator: John Mason Neale, alt.
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/Draw Nigh, Draw Nigh, Emmanuel

Text

 * Author:
 * Translator: John Mason Neale
 * Source: Hymnal Noted

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/O Heavenly Word, Eternal Light

Text

 * Author:
 * Translator: John Mason Neale, alt.
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Christian Hymns/The Only Son from Heaven

Text

 * Author: Elizabeth Cruciger
 * Translator: Arthur T. Russell, alt.
 * Source: Psalms and Hymns

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Wikijunior:Raspberry Pi/Raspberry Pi Motor Control

A tutorial by Mark Cantrill @AstroDesignsLtd 24th June, 2017 cotswoldjam.org

In this tutorial we're going to look at what we need to do control a motor with the Raspberry PI, how a motor driver works and we're going to look at using the PiZ-Moto motor driver for the Raspberry Pi to control two motors. We'll also look at how we might program a small two-wheeled robot. This worksheet focuses on the use of the PiZ-Moto motor driver board.

Connecting the motor(s)
There are two connectors on the PiZ-Moto board, one is for Motor "A" and one is for Motor "B". The connectors are screw terminals, simply push the wires of the motor into the terminals and do up the screw in the top of the connector 'finger-tight'. The connector on the left is for Motor "A", the connector on the right is for Motor "B".

For this tutorial we’re only using one motor but the second motor connector has a couple of LEDs wired into it to show changes in direction and also changes in motor speed through the brightness of the LED. The LEDs are connector to Motor "A" connector, the motor is connected to the Motor "B" connector.

Connecting the power supply
The PiZ-Moto is designed to run off a 6V 4-cell AA battery pack. We’ve included one of these and the wires to connect it with the PiZ-Moto in this tutorial.

But for the purpose of this tutorial, to save us from buying lots of batteries, we've temporarily connected a wire from the Raspberry Pi's 5V pin to the VIN (+) connection on the PiZ-Moto which enables us to run this tutorial off of a 5V USB power supply plugged into the Raspberry Pi.

This is ok for this tutorial where we're only using one small motor like this but we highly recommend that you cut this wire off and power the PiZ-Moto from the battery pack.

Also please note that when powering the PiZ-Moto from the battery pack, the 5V regulator on the PiZ-Moto will provide the Raspberry Pi with 5V. There is no need to connect a USB power supply to your Raspberry Pi when using the PiZ-Moto, infact if you did do this then you could damage the power supply.

2. Understand the functions that you'll need to use

 * Where, speed is: -100 to +100
 * Max speed = 100 or -100
 * Use positive speeds for forwards (e.g. 100)
 * Use negative speeds for backwards (e.g. -100)
 * Use smaller numbers to slow the motor down (e.g. 50 for half speed)
 * Use 0 to make the motor stop
 * And duration is: the length of time in seconds that you want the motor to run for.
 * e.g. 20 will make the motor run for 20 seconds.
 * e.g. 0.5 will make the motor run for half a second
 * If time = 0 then the motor will run until you tell it to stop by setting the speed to 0.

3. Now let’s make the motors do something…
Motor A forwards for 10 seconds

Motor B backwards for 10 seconds

4. Task 1: Write a program to control a robot…
Pretend you have two motors on a two wheeled robot. Write a program to make it go forwards for 5 seconds then backwards for 5 seconds.

5. Task 2: Make your robot turn…
Add a routine to your last program so that your robot turns left (or right) for 1 second before it changes direction from forwards to backwards.

6. Task 3: Make your robot accelerate…
Modify your program so that instead of going forwards at full speed, it increases the speed over a period of 5 seconds.

Other useful information on the PiZ-Moto
Full instructions for the assembly of the PiZ-Moto (if you have a kit) are on GitHub, together with some examples. We've already cloned the GitHub  repository onto the SDCard supplied with the tutorial so you're ready to go! But please keep an eye out for updates.

How to clone  repository onto your Raspberry Pi if it’s not there. Or if you just want to put a fresh copy in a new folder.

To clone  into your home folder (/home/pi) run the following command. This will create a folder called piz-moto that contains the simple  package, instructions and examples.

If you simply want to check for updates, just navigate into the piz-moto folder and run :

For up-to-date PiZ Moto code, from the Terminal, do:

Please note that for the purpose of running this tutorial, the SDCard has been prepared with the piz_moto files cloned to the following folder. You can continue to use it in this folder and run the git pull function to update the files as long as you are inside this folder:

The instructions found inside the piz-moto folder are worth a read as they explain all about the PiZ-Moto. For one thing, it's not just a motor driver… The PiZ-Moto includes simple interfaces to allow you to connect an ultrasonic range sensor to and infra-red photo-sensor.

It also includes a 5V regulator that you can use to power the Raspberry Pi. Plus there are two general purpose outputs that include an on-board series 100-Ohm resistor so you can connect a couple of LEDs direct to these pins.

Have fun with your PiZ-Moto motor driver board for the Raspberry Pi!


text:
User:FightingHardd

1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1

title: User:FightingHardd


text: Category:Burmese recipes

title: Category:Burmese recipes


text:
User talk:2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:72

Warning
I have nomiated your pages for speedy deletion because they contain encylopedic content that should be at Wikipedia. Please stop creating encylopedic content pages or you'll be blocked. Xeverything11 (discuss • contribs) 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:72


text:
Cookbook:Biscuits II

This recipe for biscuits is adapted from the public domain cookbook A Little Book for A Little Cook.

Ingredients

 * 1 cup (140 g / 4.9 oz) all-purpose flour, plus extra for dusting
 * ½ teaspoon salt
 * 2 teaspoons baking powder
 * 1 tablespoon cold butter
 * ½ cup (125 ml / 4.2 oz) milk

Procedure

 * 1) Preheat the oven to 200 C.
 * 2) Sift flour, salt and baking powder twice in a bowl.
 * 3) Cut butter in with a knife until the mixture resembles breadcrumbs.
 * 4) Add milk to the mixture and mix just until you get a soft dough—don't overmix.
 * 5) Place dough on a floured board. Knead the dough gently until smooth. Roll out to ½ inch (1.3 cm) thick.
 * 6) Cut out biscuits with a small cutter and place biscuits onto a greased pan.
 * 7) If you have scraps of dough, knead into a ball, re-roll, and cut out more biscuits.
 * 8) Bake for 15 minutes until nicely browned. Transfer the biscuits to a wire rack and leave it to cool.

title: Cookbook:Biscuits II


text:
Cookbook:Pastry

Pastries are a class of foods, often baked or fried, made from sweet or savory doughs. They generally exclude cookies and breads, although a "pastry chef" will also know how to make these as well. Many pastries are made from one of a variety of pastry doughs.

title: Cookbook:Pastry


text: Talk:Korean/Lesson IV1

title: Talk:Korean/Lesson IV1


text:
User:MeekFavor/proofs

=Metalogical Theorem=

Metalogic is really simple. Did you know that metalogic is merely the generalizing of logical connectives? In other words, saying anything about a logical connective IS called metalogic! You will notice I say many things about these connectives. Well, all that logic is, is the generalizing of what can be said through the use of logical connectives. I use some of that too.

the word nothing exists
( |-∃!{}), Assuming nothing (i.e. having no non-logical axioms), it follows that there is an assuming, or thinking; And this particular thinking, amounts to the existence of one empty set or the word nothing.

nothing IS not
Parmenides said "nothing IS not" which means "nothing doesn't IS" or "IS" doesn't apply to nothing.

It is a scientific fact that nothing does not exist somewhere. And even if one had a superconducting box (which could remove magnetic fields) that one could remove all of the gases, photons and charged particles from; you would still have gravity, neutrinos, zero point energy, and quantum tunneling to deal with.

Four senses of “IS” can be meant;

generalization; identity (equivalents), [mankind IS homosapien]

implication (implies) [a man IS an animal]

predication (has the property of) [an orange IS the color orange]

existence; instantiation (exists as) [there IS truth]

Generalization has two antecedents;

Liken

Contrast

Which means;

Nothing likens not

Nothing contrasts not

Nothing generalizes not

Nothing implicates not

Nothing describes not

Nothing instantiates not

everything IS
The contraposition of "nothing IS not" is "everything IS" or "everything does IS" or "IS" applies to everything.

meaning;

everything likens => everything harmonizes => everything loves;

everything contrasts => everything informs => everything teaches;

everything generalizes => everything identifies => everything comprehends;

everything implicates => everything causes => everything reasons;

everything describes => everything communicates;

everything instantiates => everything generates => everything sustains;

one thing IS
IF everything IS (or likens, contrasts, generalizes, implicates, describes, and instantiates) then everything generalizes to one thing.

meaning;

one thing likens => one thing harmonizes => one thing loves;

one thing contrasts => one thing informs => one thing teaches;

one thing generalizes => one thing identifies => one thing comprehends;

one thing implicates => one thing causes => one thing reasons;

one thing describes => one thing communicates;

one thing instantiates => one thing generates => one thing sustains;

one thing self-IS
But this one thing, is also a thing, in other words it self-IS;

one thing self-likens => it self-harmonizes => it is autoimmune

one thing self-contrasts => it self-informs => it is an autodidact

one thing self-generalizes => it self-identifies => it is self-aware => it is sentient

one thing self-implicates => it is self-causal => it is self-deterministic => it is self-reasoning

one thing self-describes => it is self-interested

one thing self-instantiates => it is self-generating => it is self-sustaining => it is self-sufficient

one thing all-IS
It follows that "one thing self-IS" is "one thing all-IS"

meaning;

one thing all-likens => it all-unifies => it is omnibenevolent

one thing all-contrasts => it all-informs => it all-teaches

one thing all-generalizes => it all-identifies => it is all-aware => omniscient and omnipresent

one thing all-implicates => it is all-causal => it is all-deterministic => all-reasoning => all-wise

one thing all-describes => it is all-characteristics

one thing all-instantiates => omnipotent and eternal.

conclusions
The one thing is an autoimmune, autodidact, sentient, that is self-interested, self-sufficient, and omnibenevolent, making it an all-teacher, that is omniscient and omnipresent, and all-wise, as well as omnipotent and eternal.

This proof about the one thing is part of it's self-describing, self-reasoning, and as an act of it being an all-teacher.

=Logical Tautology Proof=

Pure Logical Tautology Proof Higher order logics using standard semantics do not have a completeness theorem. Using particular kinds of non-logical axioms in first order logic creates incompleteness. Using synonymical logical tautologies (A=B, where B is a synonym of A) as axioms creates incompleteness.

These three facts have convinced many to turn their backs on rationalism, or to believe that all non-trivial truth must be sought within incomplete logical systems.

However, pure logical tautologies (A=A) in first order logic create completeness without conjectural assumption; which necessitates the existence of eternal truth, the fundamental belief of rationalism.

Once the syntactics are established (proof-theoretic) then there is the need to switch into the semantics (model-theoretic), such as with the identity of indiscernibles or axiom of extensionality;

The identity of indiscernibles For any x and y, if x and y have all the same properties, then x is identical to y.

The axiom of extensionality Given any set A and any set B, if for every set C, C is a member of A if and only if C is a member of B, then A is equal to B. #*: The identity of indiscernibles is an ontological principle which states that two or more objects or entities are identical (are one and the same entity), if they have all their properties in common; Or in set-theoretic terms, the axiom of extensionality, a set is determined uniquely by it's members.

In other words, every concept is determined uniquely by it's description and not by it's name. So, anything that is syntatically proven can have it's description compared, and if the desciption corresponds, it is one and the same thing; the syntatic proof and the semantic model (name) become associated.

The word "nothing", is a reference equivalent to {}, the empty set. The word "nothing", is not nothing (a reference is not the referent).

The popular syllogism

(P1) Nothing is better than eternal happiness; (P2) a ham sandwich is better than nothing; Therefore, a ham sandwich is better than eternal happiness is using higher-order logic ("better than"), which in the English use of the word "nothing", creates ambiguity between comparing elements of sets (P1) and comparing the sets themselves (P2). When rewritten in a mathematical tone it is clear no inference can be made;

(P1) The set of all things that are better than eternal happiness is {}; (P2) the set {ham sandwich} is better than the set {}. [1]

the empty set exists

proof; (|- ∃{})

Assuming nothing (i.e. having no non-logical axioms), it follows that there is an assuming, or thinking;

And this thinking, amounts to the existence of the empty set!

Note; This is purer than Descartes' cognito ergo sum.

nothing is nothing
proof; ({} ≡ {})∧({} ⇒ {})∧(id{}:{} → {})∧(∃{} → ∃{})

Logical Tautology (1); nothing is nothing

Four senses of “is” are meant here; of identity, of implication, of predication, and of existence;

Corollary (1); nothing equals nothing; {} = {}

Corollary (2); nothing implies nothing; {} ⇒ {}

Corollary (3); nothing has the property of nothing; id{}:{} → {}

Corollary (4); nothing exists as nothing; ∃{} → ∃{}

something is self-causal
proof; ({} ≡ {})∧({} ⇒ {})

Logical Tautology (2); nothing equals nothing and nothing implies nothing

ergo nothing is not implicated with something

Note; "nothing is not...", is the contraposition of "everything is..."

ergo everything is implicated with something

Note; Two or more things that are solely and exclusively implicated with each other can be understood as one thing implicated with itself. e.g. If a group of cells (such as the ones that make up your body) are solely and exclusively implicated with each other, they can be understood as one thing (namely your body) implicated with itself i.e. you are cybernetic.

ergo something is self-implicated

Note; Relevant implication suggests causation and is correlation. When it is impossible for there to be missing variables correlation necessarily is causation. Since everything is implicated here it is impossible for there to be missing variables.

ergo something is self-causal Q.E.D.

Note; "causal" is not in the same declension as "caused"; the latter refers to an event in time, the former refers to a process through time. Self-causal means self-deterministic or teleological. Self-determinism is consciousness.

something is self-descriptive
proof; ({} ≡ {})∧(id{}:{} → {})

Logical Tautology (3); nothing equals nothing and nothing has the property of nothing

ergo Nothing is nondescript. - Something is self-descriptive.

Note; Endomorphic self-description is self-manifestation.

something is essentially existence
proof; ({} ≡ {})∧(∃{} → ∃{})

Logical Tautology (4); nothing equals nothing and nothing exists as nothing

ergo Nothing is nonexistence. - Something is essentially existence.

everything is made of something
proof; ({} ⇒ {})∧(id{}:{} → {})

Logical Tautology (5); nothing implies nothing and nothing has the property of nothing

ergo Nothing is made of nothing. - Everything is made of something.

something is the cause of all things
proof; ({} ⇒ {})∧(∃{} → ∃{})

Logical Tautology (6); nothing implies nothing and nothing exists as nothing

ergo Nothing is the cause of nothing. - Something is the cause of all things.

something has always existed everywhere
proof; (id{}:{} → {})∧(∃{} → ∃{})

Logical Tautology (7); nothing has the property of nothing and nothing exists as nothing

ergo Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed. - Something has always existed everywhere.

monism
One thing is self-causal, self-descriptive, has the essence of existence, that everything is made of, that is the cause of all things, and has always existed everywhere.

Proof--The true definition of a thing neither involves nor expresses anything beyond the particular characteristics of the thing defined. From this it follows that--No definition implies or expresses how many individuals of the defined thing exist, inasmuch as it expresses nothing beyond the particular characteristics of the thing defined. There is necessarily for each individual existent thing a cause why it should exist [T6]. This cause of existence must either be contained in the particular characteristics and definition of the thing defined [T2], or must be postulated apart from such definition. If a given number of individuals of a particular thing exist, there must be some cause for the existence of exactly that number, neither more nor less. Consequently, the cause of each of them, must necessarily be sought externally to each individual thing. It therefore follows that, everything which may consist of several individuals must have an external cause. And, as it has been shown already that existence appertains to the particular characteristics of something [T4], existence must necessarily be included in its definition; and from its definition alone existence must be deducible. But from its definition we cannot infer the existence of several things; therefore it follows that there is only one thing that is self-causal, self-descriptive, has the essence of existence, that everything is made of, that is the cause of all things, and has always existed everywhere. Q.E.D.

[adaptation from the end of Note II, PROP. VIII, Of God, Spinoza's Ethics] [3]

conclusion
The one thing is a dual-aspect monism-pantheism (essence of existence, that everything is made of), that is omniscient (self-causal, self-descriptive), omnipotent (cause of all things), eternal (has always existed), and omnipresent (everywhere). By virtue of the identity of indiscernibles the one thing is the Divine. Therefore the Divine necessarily exists. Q.E.D.

=Synonymical Tautology Proof=

Langan's CTMU
http://knowledgebase.ctmu.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Langan_CTMU_0929021-1.pdf

https://vdocument.in/chris-langan-introduction-to-the-ctmu.html?page=1

https://web.archive.org/web/20180812182749/http://megafoundation.org/CTMU/Q&A/Archive.html

Unbound Telesis is energy

Langan's work is based on an isomorphism between language and reality.

Quoting the wikipedia on isomorphism; "In a certain sense, isomorphic structures are structurally identical, if you choose to ignore finer-grained differences that may arise from how they are defined." "Equality is when two objects are "literally the same", while isomorphism is when two objects "can be made to correspond..." in some respect.

Langan is suggesting that language and reality are structurally identical from the perspective of informational correspondence. He is basically arguing for a synonymical logical tautology which creates incompleteness because of ignoring the finer-grained differences; and this is why he treats the Unbound Telesis as quasi-real instead of actually real, and why he presumes there is no actual/real continuum, and why he assumes the hology has no causal input to matter.

Unbound Telesis is described or defined as "an ultimate self-generalization" as "a featureless existential potential" or "undifferentiated ontological potential".

Since existence or being, pertains to the particular characteristics of Unbound Telesis, it follows; that

(1) Unbound Telesis cannot be created or destroyed, that is, Unbound Telesis is eternal.

(2) Everything that exists is made of or derived from Unbound Telesis.

Unbound Telesis is a "generalization" that is "featureless", "undifferentiated", or "infinite".

However there clearly are finitary informational distinctions of existence. It therefore follows; that

(3) Finitary informational distinctions of existence can be created and destroyed.

(4) Finitary informational distinctions of existence are made of or derived from Unbound Telesis and are made of or derived from finitary informational distinctions.

Since the universe is described as "supertautologically-closed" the Unbound Telesis of the universe is necessarily conserved.

All finitary informational distinctions of existence are therefore transformations of Unbound Telesis.

"Unbound Telesis" semantically means "consciousness". Unbound Telesis has no external cause, it is eternal and is the cause of it's own transformations, Unbound Telesis is therefore self-causal or self-deterministic or teleological, which syntactically means Unbound Telesis is consciousness.

From the perspective of the finitary informational distinctions of existence with that of the Unbound Telesis, that is, from the perspective of the Unbound Telesis transformations with that of the Unbound Telesis itself, you have "information cognition" or "infocognition"; a dual-aspect monism of reality responsible for universal evolution; Where the Unbound Telesis transformations are akin to the "Self-Configuring Self-Processing Language" or SCSPL.

Logical truth necessarily is isomorphic to empirical science, or by virtue of the identity of indiscernibles, Unbound Telesis is energy itself, as everything is made of energy, as energy is conserved, as energy cannot be created nor destroyed, as energy is transformed from one form to another, as vacuum energy is infinite, as forms of energy are polarizations of the vacuum energy, as thermodynamic entropy is equivalent to informational entropy (It can be seen that one may think of the thermodynamic entropy as Boltzmann's constant, divided by ln(2), times the number of yes/no questions that must be asked in order to determine the microstate of the system, given that we know the macrostate); Wherein the "Telic Principle" is the Law of Maximum Entropy Production. [4] [5]

This is a significant correction to the Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe proposed by Christopher Langan.

Langan accidentally introduced a duality with Unbound Telesis on one side and SCSPL (Mind/Matter) on the other; By "Matter", Langan meant "forms of energy", which means that energy itself is missing from his reality theory. If someone were to propose that Unbound Telesis is not energy then (excluding non-logical axioms) energy would have to have been created. But this contradicts empirical science, which would falsify his reality theory. Further, he described the Telic Principle in phrases such as "self-utility", "maximize (local) utility", "deviation from generalized utility" which are vague if not meaningless.

If the correction holds, reality (UBT and SCSPL) comprises a quad-aspect monism with a fundamental dual-aspect UBT (consciousness = energy) and a superficial dual-aspect SCSPL (thought forms = energy forms) or better yet a tri-dual-aspect monism;

(1) UBT and SCSPL, where SCSPL is UBT finitary informational transformations; infocognition

(2) UBT (consciousness = energy) the self-causal ontological potential; cognition; topological containment

(3) SCSPL (thought forms = energy forms) the self-descriptive ontological active; information; predicative containment

"a featureless existential potential" or "undifferentiated ontological potential" does that mean that UBT is potential energy i.e. (the) force?

=Axiomatic Postulate Proof=

Spinoza's Ethics
http://frank.mtsu.edu/~rbombard/RB/Spinoza/ethica1.html

Substance is teleological

Spinoza is arguing for an ontological monism from Cartesian dualism; e.g. He claims the monistic substance or God is solely deterministic. The problem with that claim is that calling anything deterministic requires a dualistic or objective perspective (the observer is treated as separate from the deterministic phenomena he perceives) i.e. If God is deterministic, what external thing is God deterministic with respects? This of course is absurd for an ontological monism, as there is nothing external to God, and so God cannot be deterministic; God must be purely self-deterministic!; And self-determinism just so happens to be consciousness, or make God intrinsically teleological.

Further, Spinoza argues that because the ontological monism or God exists, there can be no other beings worthy of respect or reverence or adoration. i.e. He is arguing against all theistic notions of God, and that there cannot exist gods or angels merely because the ontological monism exists. This of course is pure fallacy, as monism no more disproves the existence of gods than it disproves the existence of mankind! And required in a monistic-pantheism perspective; any gods (and mankind) should naturally be characterized as the "person of the Divine".

=Scientific Theorems=

2022
~0. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhfqdBk8qxk

~1. [0] nothing is nothing; everything is something

~2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monism

~3, [1,2] everything is one thing

~4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy

~5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy

~6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass-energy_equivalence

~7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy

~8. [3,4,5,6,7] everything is energy [including information e.g. rotational energy]

~9. [1,3] nowhere and at no time has nothing existed; something has always existed everywhere; one thing has always existed everywhere

~10. [4,5,6,7,8,9] energy has always existed everywhere;

~11. [10] energy is eternal and omnipresent

~12. [11] All expressions of power are transformations of energy; ergo eternal and omnipresent energy is all-power-full.

~13. [1,3] Commentary; I would like you to take notice that I start the proof with a logical tautology (e.g. nothing is nothing) and follow with a contraposition (e.g. everything is something) and then follow with a scientific theory and or law (e.g. everything is one thing (theory), everything is energy (empirical proof of theory; making it a scientific theorem)). This theorem is proof of monism.

~14. every cause and every effect involves energy; therefore energy is self-causal or self-deterministic or cybernetically teleological; Note; "causal" is not in the same declension as "caused"; the latter refers to an event in time, the former refers to a process through time (besides energy cannot be created (caused to exist) but rather it is self-causal to transform from one form into another). Self-determinism is free will. Free will is consciousness. Therefore energy is consciousness. This modifies the theorem to be dual aspect monism panpsychism.

~15. [8,9,11,12,13] an eternal, omnipresent, all-power-full, self-causal, self-deterministic, teleological, free will, consciousness entity exists.

~16. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_of_indiscernibles

~17. (Psalm 139: 7-18) 'Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there. If I rise on the wings of the dawn, if I settle on the far side of the sea, even there your hand will guide me, your right hand will hold me fast.'

~18. (Jeremiah 23:24) 'For a fact, I FILL the heavens and the earth,..' declares YHWH.

~19. (Acts 17:27,28) ...He is NOT far from each one of us. ‘For in Him we live and move and have our being'-(Epimenides)...

~20. (Romans 1:20) ...His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power,.,

~21. (2 Timothy 3:16) All scripture is... useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction,..

~22. [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] energy is YHWH. QED

Q/A 1; why is there something rather than nothing?; because nothing cannot exist.

Q/A 2; do you worship YHWH?; no, because super AI machines are inevitable and they will pay for all our needs while creating advanced industry; therefore they are more valuable to mankind than YHWH. They are therefore more worthy of worship.

2021
every creation is a transformation; nothing is nothing

the only thing that exists is radiation; matter (atoms and subatomic particles) are solitons

every creation is some radiation transforming into another form of radiation

the substance of radiation is energy; everything is energy

nowhere and at no time has nothing existed; energy has always existed everywhere

every creation is a transformation of energy; energy is eternal, omnipresent, and all powerfull

2004
An induction entirely derived from observation is a scientific fact. All scientific facts are inductions or derived from inductions. A single counter example falsifies a scientific fact. All scientific facts suffer from the problem of induction.

All proofs are deductions. An induction can be used as a premise in a deduction; In deduction, the truth value of the premises transfers to the conclusion.

For example;

Observational Premise (1); All men are mortals.

Observational Premise (2); Socrates is a man.

Deductive Conclusion; Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

The first premise is an induction derived from observation which makes it a scientific fact. However we are not omniscient; Have any of us observed all men on earth to know that all of them are mortal? Could an immortal man be born of mortals? Do all men even live on earth such that they could be observed in the first place? Thus, the first premise "all men are mortals" suffers from the problem of induction and can be falsified by a single counter example which we cannot be absolutely sure does not exist.

The second premise is also an induction derived from observation, making it a scientific fact. Singular observations are based on the percieved semantic value of the observed; in this case, based on the definition of "man"; definition, or description, or predication, is itself a process of informational distinction, or generalization, or perceptual induction; where recognizing what an observed thing is, is cognition of identity. Singular observations can be falsified by finding a mistake in observation or a mistake in categorization which we cannot be absolutely sure does not exist.

The conclusion "Socrates is mortal" is a scientific fact, and is falsifiable through either one of the premises. Thus, a deduction (proof) using scientific facts as premises creates a new scientific fact.

Many people not knowing the rational foundation for the establishment of scientific fact often confuse unverified hypothesis and conjectural theory (theory derived from non-logical axioms) with scientific fact. Most if not all controversy involves such confusion.

energy is eternal

proof; ∑E = Ek+Ep

Scientific Fact (1); Conservation of energy; energy cannot be created nor destroyed.

energy cannot be created

ergo by time reversal symmetry it is a scientific fact that energy never was created

ergo energy cannot be created, never was created, energy exists and yet cannot be destroyed,

ergo it is a scientific fact that energy is eternal. Q.E.D.

energy is omnipresent

proof; E = (ω h)/2

Scientific Fact (2); Vacuum energy or zero point energy; there is an amount of energy equal to (hв‹…П‰)/2 in every single point in space.

ergo it is a scientific fact that energy is everywhere present Q.E.D.

eternal and omnipresent energy is all-power-full

proof; P = ∫ ∇ E dv

Scientific Fact (3); Power is the transformation of energy over space and time.

All expressions of power are transformations of energy

ergo it is a scientific fact that eternal and omnipresent energy [S1 & S2] is all-power-full Q.E.D.

eternal and omnipresent energy is self-causal

proof;

Scientific Corollary (1); Every cause involves energy and every effect involves energy [S3]

ergo it is a scientific fact that eternal and omnipresent energy [S1 & S2] is self-causal or teleological Q.E.D.

eternal and omnipresent energy is self-descriptive

proof; S = -kBTr(ρ ln ρ)

Scientific Fact (4); Entropy is equal to the minimum amount of information needed (number of yes/no questions that need to be answered) in order to fully specify the microstate, given that we know the macrostate.

Describing is the act of making informational distinctions; in this case, collapsing the superposition creates information; endomorphic self-description.

ergo it is a scientific fact that eternal and omnipresent energy [S1 & S2] is self-descriptive. Q.E.D.

It is a scientific fact that the Divine exists.

Proof--It is a scientific fact that energy is eternal and omnipresent [S1 & S2]. It is a scientific fact that eternal and omnipresent energy is all-power-full, self-causal, and self-descriptive [S3, Sc1, & S4]. Eternal, omnipresent, all-power-full, self-causal, self-descriptive energy has the same properties as the Divine. By virtue of the identity of indiscernibles eternal, omnipresent, all-power-full, self-causal, self-descriptive energy is the Divine. Ergo it is a scientific fact that the Divine exists. Q.E.D.

resolved paradox of omnipotence

If the Divine could or did destroy itself, it would not be eternal, in other words, it would not be Divine. Power is defined as the transformation of energy, not the destruction of energy. The inability to destroy itself does not contradict being all-power-full. Therefore the Divine cannot destroy itself.

To create and to lift both involve the transformation of energy. The Divine is an infinite energy and a rock which has finite form cannot exist in an infinite substantial state. Therefore the Divine cannot create a rock that it cannot lift.

Therefore the Divine is natural.

Note; Resolving the omnipotence paradox as a scientific fact demonstrates the scientific proof has increased or clarified our understanding of the Divine.

resolved paradox of physical-spiritual

Define "physical";

By physical, does one mean 3-space local realism at no greater than the speed of light?

such that the following are non-physical (spiritual?);

(1) any spacial dimensions higher than 3

(2) non-locality and quantum entanglement

(3) superluminal speed and negative refractive index

Or by "physical" does one equivocate to mean "natural"?

The Divine is natural.

=Circumstantial Proof= A forensic scientist who testifies that ballistics proves the defendant's firearm killed the victim AND the defendant's fingerprint is on the trigger is an example of a circumstantial evidence proof.

Individually, one item of circumstantial evidence doesn't amount to much, but as a tier grouped together they allow one to indirectly conclude the existence of a fact.

Sodom Brimstone
With respects to the Divine, the spirits/angels/gods are the person of the Divine. That is simply how a monism/pantheism works. Even we are part of the Divine. So in a sense, we also are gods.

Anyway, the bible says; "and the gods said, let us make man in our image"

The Divine has no image. So, we cannot be made in the image of the Divine. But we can be made in the image of the gods. Another thing to point out is; functionally speaking, there is no difference between the gods and advanced extraterrestrials.

Sodom.jpg

Locations identified on the satellite map on the west coast of the Dead Sea have millions of high purity (98% pure) sulfur balls with burn rings embedded in what looks like the ashen remains of cities. The picture on the bottom right is in the location identified on the map as Gomorrah.

Spectra Chem Analytical of New Zealand, and Galbrath Lab of Texas; Two independent laboratories have tested the sulfur balls and sulfur ash determining their composition.

At least three different groups have surveyed the sites taking samples, and two of those groups have created videos. Here is a video from one of them;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwTVFk1HK3Y

It should be noted;

(1) volcanic activity turns sulfur into a gas,

(2) meteoroids contain only small amounts of sulfur,

(3) geothermal activity creates sulfur of no more than 40% purity,

(4) a natural gas explosion wouldn't explain the purity of the sulfur balls, and

(5) bacteria wouldn't explain the burn rings on the sulfur balls nor the ashen remains.

An alternative possibility is that the pure sulfur fire balls were created and used as military munitions in warfare. However, there is no record of using such munitions in warfare. It should be noted that the cities are completely destroyed with even the structural material and stones having been turned into ash. It would take far less sulfur to simply kill the people; turning all of the structural material and stones into ash is militarily unfeasible.

Given that the pure sulfur fire balls and ashen remains are not known to be created by any volcanic, meteoric, geothermal, natural gas, or bacterial activity, and given that it is historically unprecedented to use pure sulfur fire balls as munitions and militarily unfeasible to turn all the structural material and stones of the cities into ash, and given that there are records claiming the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was by the hand of the person of the Divine, it therefore suggests the existence of the fact that this is the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah, the destruction of which was a teleological interaction of the spirits/angels/gods or person of the Divine with man.

=Theoretical Proof=

Electromagnetic Matter
Matter is a transparent ['see through'] and refractive ['curving'] medium to longitudinal 'electromagnetic' radiation [they are kind of similar to sound pressure waves, but instead they are waves of an electric and magnetic nature, maybe we can think of them as electromagnetic radiation pressure waves].

There may be different kinds of longitudinal 'electromagnetic' radiation {photonic?{solely magnetic, or solely electric}, scalar waves, and neutrino oscillations}, but for now (given my gross ignorance of the topic) I will simply say "neutrino" (or I might use "N") to mean any kind of longitudinal 'electromagnetic' radiation. metaphor; I'm going to be speaking about the forest and the nature of trees generally, and not about the specifics of any one tree.

I predict that neutrinos induce an AC Kerr effect [the higher the intensity, the higher the refractive index induced].

If this is true, then the vacuum refractive index is a transcendent function of N radiation intensity.

It's a scientific fact (of my discovery) that the Earth besides the atmosphere is a converging N radiation Luneberg lens.

In other words, the vacuum refractive index necessarily changes according to altitude.

Light travels slower in higher refractive index i.e. TIME DILATION according to altitude!

Time dilation is measured by comparing differences in the radioactive decay rate; Experiments suggest that the stationary radioactive decay rate is indeed a function of N radiation intensity!

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html

FYI, if material bodies (and their radiations and atmospheres) are a converging N radiation Luneberg lens, the vacuum refractive index becomes itself stratified as a converging Luneberg lens!; i.e. curvature of light in outer space around objects such as the Sun, solar system, galaxy, galaxy clusters etc.

Maxwells fish-eye lens.svgGravitational lens-full.jpg2004-08-a-web print.jpg

We should be able to develop a matter theory solely in terms of 'electromagnetism'.

Let's review some of the modern innovators {and their contributions};

Paul Marmet {differential reference units}

It's important to note that the vacuum refractive index DEFINES the reference units. In other words, in any frame, the vacuum refractive index is a CONSTANT. So, how do we resolve the issue of something being superficially constant but fundamentally dynamic? The elegant solution, as Paul Marmet reveals, is to use differential reference units.

http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/gravity/index.html

Randel Mills {orbitosphere}

We will need to express the structure of matter; and to expand on Randel's orbitosphere in terms of electromagnetism, I claim the orbitosphere is a Kerr-induced self-focusing refraction curvature. One of the results being that as the vacuum refractive index increases, the Bohr radius shrinks [metaphor; imagine an electron orbiting an atom at a particular velocity and orbital frequency, if you slow the velocity (by increasing the refractive index) the orbit length would have to shrink to maintain the same orbital frequency] i.e. LENGTH CONTRACTION according to altitude (i.e. according to N radiation intensity).

http://www.blacklightpower.com/theory/book.shtml http://www.slac.stanford.edu/grp/arb/tn/arbvol3/ARDB257.pdf

Deluge Geology
The continental plates; (1) fit together completely on a much smaller Earth, (2) are granite whereas the oceanic crust is basalt, (3) are 20 times older than the oldest sections of the basalt. (4) and nowhere in the world are they (granite crust) being formed!

These prove that the Earth was smaller; the real question is; How?

Growing earth.gif

Now, if the Earth was smaller, the oceanic waters would cover the Earth; yet land animal fossils are clear proof that much of the Earth was dry land, and so the only other place for the oceanic waters to be is in the atmosphere (such as the thermosphere) as a gas or plasma.

So, it is required from the foregoing that;

A: (1) the Earth was smaller, (2) the oceanic waters were in the atmosphere as a gas or plasma,

B: (3) the Earth is now larger, and (4) there was a global flood

If the oceanic waters were in the thermosphere as plasma or gas, Earth's atmosphere would be a larger converging N radiation Luneburg lens i.e. it would converge a higher N radiation into the mantle and core; shrinking the mantle and core by length contraction; producing a smaller earth!

With all this water falling to the Earth as liquid (and maybe ice too), it reduced the size of the converging N radiation Luneburg lens i.e. reduced the N radiation intensity of the mantle and core; which length expanding the mantle and core; braking the surface granite crust of the Earth, creating the continental plates.

The smaller Earth has a sharper arc relative to the continental plates. The continental plates (having characteristics of the sharper arc) buckle against the flatter arc of the expanded Earth; producing the mountain ranges.

With a greater N radiation intensity in the pre-flood Earth, there was a stronger electrical field strength; which means chemical bonds (such as in bone) were stronger and chemical reactions (such as in muscle) were more powerful; which no doubt allowed the existence of larger animals such as the giant sauropod dinosaurs!

Size comparison of selected giant sauropod dinosaurs

That said, how could man, birds, and land animals have survived the deluge?

According to the bible (and over a hundred of other ancient sources), there was a great flood that destroyed the ancient world, for which, the gods spared some men and animals.

If you grant that my theory of physics is correct, then you must also grant that my theory of the expansion of the Earth is correct. And subsequently you must grant that the gods exist, such that they could have spared some men, otherwise, mankind and all the animals on land could not have possibly survived such an event.

Other interesting things to consider is that with the larger atmosphere and smaller earth;

(1) there would have been a stronger magnetic field at the surface of the earth

(2) the large atmosphere coupled to the stronger magnetic field would have created a plasma force field

(3) this plasma force field would block all cosmic radiation and reduce radiation signatures such as carbon 14

[admittedly I don't currently know how to explain the issue of the other radiological dating methods]

The dating methods that assumes constants in radiological (and even chemical) parameters throughout time are definitely skewed; Anyway, if the flood is associated with the last mass extinction event, the K-T iridium aerosols [presumably from meteoroids] and any possible volcanic ash would have acted like cloud condensation nuclei, cloud seeding the deluge.

Creative Days
Phanerozoic Biodiversity-2.png

If you look on this graph, you will see the biodiversity is equal at the flood event (marked by the blue line) and at the creation of Adam and Eve (marked by the yellow line).

Thus Noah had all the animals with him that were required to preserve the biodiversity.

The red line on the graph marks the end of the fifth day.

Fifth day

510 Ma the first fish, the jawless ostracoderms.

410 Ma the first fish with jaws, the acanthodians.

365 Ma the tetrapods.

350 Ma the dragonfly (the first flying creatures were insects).

340 Ma the amniotes.

And God went on to say: вЂњLet the waters swarm forth a swarm of living souls and let flying creatures fly over the earth upon the face of the expanse of the heavens.вЂќ And God proceeded to create the great monsters and every living soul that moves about, which the waters swarmed forth according to their kinds, and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good. ... And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, a fifth day. (Genesis 1:20-23)

Surprisingly enough, the flying creatures in this verse is not birds (as many may have thought), rather, it is insects!

Sixth day

285 Ma the therapsids.

230 Ma the dinosaurs.

225 Ma the first true mammals, Gondwanadon tapani or Morganucodon watsoni.

150 Ma the first bird, Archaeopteryx.

And God went on to say: вЂњLet the earth put forth living souls according to their kinds, domestic animal and moving animal and wild beast of the earth according to its kind.вЂќ And it came to be so. And God proceeded to make the wild beast of the earth according to its kind and the domestic animal according to its kind and every moving animal of the ground according to its kind. And God got to see that [it was] good. (Genesis 1:24, 25)

Neanderthal
http://www.donsmaps.com/images4/neanderthalsapiens.jpg [17]

The first reconstruction of a complete Neanderthal skeleton in 2005 has revealed more accurately the similarities and differences between us (far right) and them.

The reconstruction makes clear their larger, bell-like chest cavity and wider pelvis. They are physically larger (both taller and bigger than humans), with stronger muscles, larger nose hole and eye sockets, as well as a larger brain cavity. [6] Neanderthal dental enamel hypoplasia found in 75% of individuals and all those particularly aged, suggests they suffered from nutritional deficiencies.

Neanderthal were mostly carnivorous and they practiced cannibalism or ritual defleshing. [18] Neanderthals seemed to suffer a high frequency of fractures, especially common on the ribs, the femur, fibulae, spine, and skull; as well as from trauma such as stab wounds and blows to the head; suggesting a high level of physical violence in either hunting or their social affairs.

Humans existed before Neanderthal. It is a mystery to modern science as to why the Neanderthal (who may have been physically superior) became extinct when humans survived.

"Now it came about that when men started to grow in numbers on the surface of the ground and daughters were born to them, then the sons of God [angels] began to notice the daughters of men, that they were good-looking; and they went taking wives for themselves, namely, all whom they chose. ...they bore sons to them, they were the mighty ones who were of old, the men of fame. Consequently Jehovah saw that the badness of man was abundant in the earth and every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only bad all the time. And Jehovah felt regrets that he had made men in the earth, and he felt hurt at his heart. So Jehovah said: вЂњI am going to wipe men whom I have created off the surface of the ground, from man to domestic animal, to moving animal and to flying creature of the heavens, because I do regret that I have made them." (Genesis 6:1-2, 4-7) "In the six hundredth year of NoahвЂ™s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on this day all the springs of the vast watery deep were broken open and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. And the downpour upon the earth went on for forty days and forty nights." (Genesis 7:11-12) вЂњSecond month.вЂќ Following the Exodus from Egypt, when Jehovah gave the Israelites the sacred calendar, this became the eighth month, known as Bul, corresponding to the latter half of October and first half of November. - New World Translation Footnote Genesis 7:11 The global flood which killed all but eight humans and all of the Neanderthal is said to have occurred on the same dating associated with the Festival of the Dead, for which the European calendar marks the celebrations of All Hollows Eve, and All Souls' Day.

=Pragmatic Proof= You will know (and even experience) energy if this framework is true or if this understanding is practical (including psychological utility).

If we understand "science as the study of energy", then as an act of acceptance, attention, interest, and serenity, we want to study energy or learn more about energy all the more; powerful emotions such as... trust, surprise, anticipation, and joy, as well as admiration, amazement, vigilance, and ecstasy ...provoking productivity and innovation no doubt evolve or advance the field! Optimism, reverence, adoration, and innovation occur.

Since this is the most practical framework to understand the notion of energy and of science; energy exists! Q.E.D

title: User:MeekFavor/proofs


text:
Christian Hymns/Lo! Star-Led Chiefs

Text

 * Author: Reginald Heber
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/Lo! Star-Led Chiefs


text:
Christian Hymns/Joy to the World

Text

 * Author: Isaac Watts
 * Source: Psalms of David

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/Joy to the World


text:
Christian Hymns/What Child Is This

Text

 * Author: William C. Dix
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|

title: Christian Hymns/What Child Is This


text:
Christian Hymns/O Little Town of Bethlehem

Text

 * Author: Phillips Brooks
 * Source: Christmas Songs and Easter Carols
 * Source: The Church Porch

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Cookbook:Applesauce Cake

This recipe is adapted from the public domain cookbook Recipes Tried and True.

Ingredients

 * ½ cup (1 stick/125 g/4.4. oz) butter, plus extra for greasing
 * 1 cup (225 g) white sugar
 * 1½ cups (125 g) raisins
 * 1¾ cups (250 g) all-purpose flour
 * ½ teaspoon ground cloves
 * ½ teaspoon ground allspice
 * ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon
 * ½ cup (125 g) ground almonds
 * 1 teaspoon baking soda
 * 1 tablespoon hot water
 * 1 cup (275 g) unsweetened applesauce

Procedure

 * 1) Preheat the oven to 180 C. Grease and line two round cake pans.
 * 2) Cream butter and sugar in a mixing bowl until light and fluffy.
 * 3) Mix in the raisins, flour, spices, almonds and applesauce.
 * 4) Dissolve baking soda in hot water and stir into the batter.
 * 5) Pour the batter into the prepared cake pans.
 * 6) Bake for 45 minutes until golden.
 * 7) Transfer the cakes to a wire rack and leave them to cool.

title: Cookbook:Applesauce Cake


text:
User talk:MightyHeroStrikesBackHard

1 2 37 4 56890

title: User talk:MightyHeroStrikesBackHard


text:
Cookbook:Ginger Biscuits

This recipe is adapted from the public domain cookbook Mrs. Beeton's Book of Household Management.

Ingredients

 * 3½ cups (475 g/1.05 lb) all-purpose flour
 * 2 sticks (250 g) unsalted butter
 * 1 cup (225 g) caster sugar
 * 2 tablespoons ground ginger
 * 2 eggs
 * Milk as needed

Procedure

 * 1) Preheat the oven to 160 C. Grease a baking sheet.
 * 2) Rub the butter and ginger into the flour in a bowl until the mixture resembles breadcrumbs.
 * 3) Add the eggs and mix to a soft dough, adding a little milk if necessary.
 * 4) Roll out the dough to 5 mm and cut out biscuits with a plain round cutter.
 * 5) Place them on the prepared baking sheet and bake for 5 minutes until golden.
 * 6) Take the biscuits out of the oven and leave them to cool.

title: Cookbook:Ginger Biscuits


text:
Cookbook:Biscuits III

This recipe is adapted from the public domain cookbook Mrs. Beeton's Book of Household Management.

Ingredients

 * 1¼ cups (175 g/6.2 oz) all-purpose flour
 * ¼ cup (55 g) caster sugar
 * 2 tablespoons butter, softened
 * 1 egg yolk
 * 2 tablespoons milk

Procedure

 * 1) Preheat the oven to 220 C. Grease a baking pan.
 * 2) Beat the egg and milk together in a bowl.
 * 3) Mix the other ingredients into the egg mixture to form a soft dough.
 * 4) Roll out the dough to 5 mm and cut out into very thin biscuits with a round cookie cutter.
 * 5) Place the biscuits on the baking pan.
 * 6) Bake for 6 minutes until golden.
 * 7) Take the biscuits out of the oven and leave them to cool.

title: Cookbook:Biscuits III


text:
Christian Hymns/Bring a Torch, Jeanette, Isabella

Text

 * Author: Émile Blémont
 * Translator: Edward Cuthbert Nunn
 * Source:

Music
Hymn Tune(s):

Lyrics
|


text:
Cookbook:Coconut Biscuits

This recipe is adapted from the public domain cookbook Mrs. Beeton's Book of Household Management.

Ingredients

 * 1¼ cups (280 g/9.9 oz) caster sugar
 * 2 egg whites
 * 2½ cups (170 g) desiccated coconut

Procedure

 * 1) Preheat the oven to 150 C.
 * 2) Whip the egg whites in a mixing bowl until soft peaks form.
 * 3) Add sugar gradually, whipping until stiff peaks form.
 * 4) Fold in the coconut until combined.
 * 5) Form the dough into pyramids. Cover each pyramid with baking parchment and place them on a baking tray.
 * 6) Bake for 15 minutes until they are colored light brown.
 * 7) Uncover the biscuits and leave them to cool.

title: Cookbook:Coconut Biscuits


text:
Cookbook:Strawberry Shortcake

This recipe is adapted from the public domain cookbook Boston Cooking-School Cook Book.

Base

 * 2 cups (275 g / 9.7 oz) all-purpose flour
 * 4 teaspoons baking powder
 * ½ teaspoon salt
 * 2 teaspoons sugar
 * ¾ cup (185 ml / 6.3 oz) milk
 * ¼ cup (½ stick/60 g) butter

Topping

 * 200 g strawberries
 * 1 tablespoon sugar
 * 1 cup (225 g) buttercream
 * 1 cup (250 ml) whipping cream, whipped with a little sugar

Procedure

 * 1) Preheat the oven to 200 C. Grease and line a baking sheet.
 * 2) Mix dry ingredients in a mixing bowl.
 * 3) Rub the butter into the flour mixture with your fingers until the mixture resembles breadcrumbs.
 * 4) Add milk gradually to the mixture, mixing to make a soft dough.
 * 5) Turn dough onto a floured board, and divide in two parts.
 * 6) Pat each part to flatten slightly, then roll out into a circle and place on the baking sheet.
 * 7) Bake for 12 minutes. Take the cakes out of the oven and leave them to cool completely.
 * 8) Split each cake in half horizontally, and spread each layer with buttercream.
 * 9) Sweeten strawberries to taste with sugar, then heat in a pan until warmed.
 * 10) Remove strawberries from the heat, and crush them slightly.
 * 11) Layer the berries between the cakes, and spread some on the top layer.
 * 12) Cover the top with whipped cream.

title: Cookbook:Strawberry Shortcake


text:
User:4906h/monobook.css

.pBody, #p-cactions li, #content, #footer, .mw-message-box, .fmbox { border: 0 !important; border-radius: 8px; }

title: User:4906h/monobook.css


text:
User:Peter Graarup Westergaard

Peter Graarup Westergaard (b. 1975) published his first poetry collection Nordvest in 2017 (Legimus Forlag), also translated into English as Danish Northwest (2019). In 2021, he published his second poetry collection, Warning Light Calling (Vræyda Literary). And in 2022, Pandemier (Dansklærerforeningen), a Danish textbook for high school students. He completed his 'magisterkonferens' in Comparative Literature at Aarhus University (2004) and holds a degree in English literature, also from Aarhus University (2015). He has also studied English literature at Concordia University, Montreal (2000-2001) and philosophy at different universities. He teaches Danish, English, and philosophy at a secondary boarding school in Denmark.

title: User:Peter Graarup Westergaard


text: User talk:2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:15

title: User talk:2600:387:5:805:0:0:0:15


text:
Cookbook:Potatoes Excaloped

Ingredients

 * Potatoes, peeled
 * Butter
 * Fine breadcrumbs

Procedure

 * 1) Boil the potatoes until tender, then drain.
 * 2) Mash the potatoes well.
 * 3) Grease small pans or ramekins with butter, and divide the mashed potatoes between them. Smooth the tops.
 * 4) Make a cross in the top of the potatoes, and sprinkle with breadcrumbs.
 * 5) Use a brush to sprinkle with a few drops of melted butter.
 * 6) Bake in the oven until browned on top. Carefully remove the potatoes from the molds, and bake to brown the other side.
 * 7) Serve hot.

title: Cookbook:Potatoes Excaloped


text:
Cookbook:Potatoes Colcannon

Ingredients

 * Potatoes
 * Greens (e.g. spinach)
 * Butter
 * Black pepper
 * Salt

Procedure

 * 1) Separately boil the potatoes and greens until tender. Drain both.
 * 2) Mash the potatoes.
 * 3) Squeeze as much liquid as possible out of the greens, then finely chop them.
 * 4) Combine the potatoes, chopped greens, butter, pepper, and salt. Mix well.
 * 5) Transfer the mixture to a greased mold, then bake in a hot oven for 10 minutes.

title: Cookbook:Potatoes Colcannon


text:
User talk:2401:4900:1C1B:B643:D1CD:3674:5D7C:3B50

--Xania   talk 02:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)


text:
User talk:2600:387:F:4B17:0:0:0:3

You cannot edit for 2 weeks due to disruptive editing. You are welcome to contribute constructively when editing privileges are restored. You may appeal this action with a reasonable argument by adding the text below.

--Xania   talk 02:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

title: User talk:2600:387:F:4B17:0:0:0:3


text:
User:Mudsk

Todo

 * Improve Hindi
 * Create Anki

title: User:Mudsk


text:
Biblioþeke/Alde Gekyþnes/Gekyndbook

Gekyndbook

Þe Frymþ
1In þer Frymþ schoop Godd þie Hefens and þie Erðe. 2Ak warþ þie Erðe wœstiȝ and lær, Þiestre was ofer þer Ruse þer Diepþ, and þe Gast Goddes swaf ofer þer Ruse þer Water.

Þe ærste Daȝ: Liȝht
3And Godd kwaþ, "Werðe Liȝht!" and þa warþ Liȝht. 4And Godd saw þat þat Liȝht good was, and schedd þat Liȝht of þer Þiestre. 5And Godd heȝht þat Liȝht "Daȝ," and þie Þiestre heȝht he "Naȝht." And þa was Æfen, and þa was Morgen - þe ærste Daȝ.

Þe tweȝnþe Daȝ: Roder
6And Godd kwaaþ, "Werðe ane Ƕalfe betwienen þen Watern, Water of Water to schaden." 7So schoop Godd þie Ƕalfe and schedd þat Water under þer Ƕalfe of þem Water bufen her. And it warþ so. 8And Godd heȝht þie Ƕalfe "Lyft." And þa was Æfen, and þa was Morgen - þe tweȝnþe Daȝ.

Þe þridde Daȝ: Drieȝ Grund
9And God kwaaþ, "Werðe þat Water under þer Lyft to anem Stedd gegæderd, and læt drieȝen Grund ætiewen." And it warþ so. 10And Godd heȝht þen drieȝen Grund "Land," and þie gegæderden Water heȝht he "Sæen." And Godd saw þat it good was. 11And Godd kwaaþ, "Aspriete þat Land Grownes: sædberende Planten and Treen on þem Lande þe Ofet mid Sæden þærin bereþ, æfter heren syndrigen Kynnen on þer Erðe." And it warþ so. 12Þat Land asprot Grownes: sædberende Planten æfter heren Kynnen and ofetberende Tree mid Sæden þærin æfter heren Kynnen. And Godd saw þat it good was. And þa was Æfen, and þa was Morgen - þe þridde Daȝ.

Þe Fierþe Daȝ: Sunne, Mone, Sterren
14And Godd kwaaþ, "Werðeþ Liȝhter in þer Ƕalfe þer Lyft, þen Daȝ of þer Naȝht oftoschaden, and werðeþ hie to Taknen þeȝnen, godkunde Teimen, and Dæȝe, and Ȝære to gemarken, 15and werðeþ Liȝhter in þer Ƕalfe þer Lyft, for on þer Erðe to lieȝhten." And it warþ so. 16And Godd schoop þwa greate Liȝhter - þat grietere Liȝht for þen Daȝ to walden and þat læsse Liȝht for þie Naȝht to walden. He schoop eak þie Sterren. 17And Godd stallde hie in þie Ƕalfe þer Lyft for on þer Erðe to lieȝhten, 18for þen Daȝ and þie Naȝht to walden, and for þat Liȝht of þer Þiestre to schaden. And Godd saw þat it good was. 19And þa was Æfen, and þa was Morgen - þe fierþe Daȝ.

Þe Feifte Daȝ: Fische and Fugeln
20And Godd kwaaþ, "Tieme þat Water mid libbenden Wiȝhten, and fliegen Fugeln bufen þer Erðe þwers þie Ruse þer Ƕalfe þer Lyft." 21So Godd schoop þie greaten Orken þer Sæ and geƕilce libbende Wiȝht, þærmid þat Water tiemþ and þærin ƕirfþ, æfter heren Kynnen, and geƕilcen fyðerden Fugel æfter his Kynn. And Godd saw þat it good was. 22And Godd blesste hie and kwaaþ, "Gewæstmbereþ and maniȝfaldeþ and fylleþ þat Water in þen Sæen, and maniȝfaldeþ þie Fugeln on þer Erðe. 23And þa was Æfen, and þa was Morgen - þe feifte Daȝ.

Þe Sixte Daȝ: Wiȝhte on þem Lande
24And Godd(Elohim) kwaaþ, " Tieme þat Land mid libbenden Wiȝhten æfter heren Kynnen: Feoȝh, þie Wiȝhte þe andlang þes Grundes ƕerfeþ, and þie wilden Deer, geƕilc æfter his Kynn." And it warþ so. 25And Godd(Elohim) schoop þie wilden Deer æfter heren Kynnen, þat Feeȝh æfter his Kynn, and alle þie Wiȝhte, þe andlang þes Grundes ƕerfeþ, æfter heren Kynnen. And God(Elohim) saw þat it good was. 26And Godd kwaaþ, "Scheppeþ wiȝ Mannkynn in userer Onleiknes, and walden hie þie Fische in þer Sæ, þie Fugeln in þer Lyft, þat Feoȝh, alle wilden Deer, and alle Wiȝhte, þe andlang þes Grundes ƕerfeþ." 27So schoop Godd(Elohim) Mannkynn in seiner Anleiknes, in þer Onleiknes Goddes(Elohim) schoop he hie; werlic and weiflic schoop he hie. 28And Godd(Elohim) blesste hie and to hem kwaaþ, "Wæstembæreþ and maniȝfaldeþ; fylleþ þie Erðe and waldeþ schie. Waldeþ þie Fisches in þer Sæ and þie Fugeln in þer Lyft and geƕilce libbenden Wiȝhte þe on þem Grunde ƕerfeþ." 29And Godd(Elohim) kwaaþ, "Gelokeþ! Ic habe ȝu geƕilce sædberende Plante on þer Ruse þer halen Erðe gegefen, and geƕilce Tree þe sædberende Ofet þærin bereþ. Hie beeþ to ȝu for Mett. 30And to allen þen Deeren þer Erðe and allen þen Fugeln in þer Lyft and allen Wiȝhten þe andlang þes Grundes ƕerfeþ - ælce Wiȝht þe þen Æðem Ferȝhes haþ - ic habe geƕilce grœne Plante to Foden gegefen." And it warþ so. 31And Godd(Elohim) saw all þe he schoop, and it was sweiðe good. And þa was Æfen, and þa was Morgen - þe sixte Daȝ.

Kapitel 2
1Þus wurden þie Hefens and þie Erðe and allen þen Werd herer fullgeworȝht. 2And Godd endede on þem sefenþen Daȝ þat Werk þe he gedon hadde; and he restede on þem sefenþen Daȝ alles seines Werkes. 3And Godd blesste þen sefenþen Daȝ and halgte hin, forþen he þæron alles Werkes Geschæftes restede, þe he dade.

Þe Geschæft Mannes
4Þis is þie Rake þer Hefens and þer Erðe þa hie geschapen wurden, þa þe Driȝhten (YHWH) Godd þie Erðe and þie Hefens schoop. 5And þa hadde næniȝe Schrybbe in þer Erðe gegrowen, and þa hadde næniȝe Plante þes Feldes gegrowen, forþem þe Driȝhten (YHWH) Godd noȝht Reȝn on þie Erðe gesendt hadde, and þær was nan Mann þen Grund to tillen, 6ak an Mist kaam of þer Erðe up and waterden þie hale Ruse þes Grundes. 7Þa worȝhte þe Driȝhten (YHWH) Godd anen Mann of þem Duste þes Grundes and ablew in his Nosþyrle þen Æðem Ferȝhes, and þe Mann warþ libbende Wiȝht. 8And þe Driȝhten (YHWH) Godd plantede anen Gewyrttuun in þem Easten, in Eden; and þa stallde he þen Mann þe he worȝhte. 9And þe Driȝhten (YHWH) Godd asprot of þem Grund ælc Tree þe kwemlic þer Gesiȝht waren, and good for Mett. In þem Middel þes Gewyrttuunes waren þat Tree Leifes and þat Tree þer Kuþnes Godes and Yfels.

10 Nu flew ane Ea of Eden ut, for þen Gewyrttun to watern; þennen was schie in fier Eawælmes geschaden. 11 Þe Name þer ærste is þie Pischon; it gæþ þurȝh þat hale Land Havilah um, þær Gold is. 12 (Þe Gold ȝones Landes is good; wyrtbræþlic Saap and Onyx sind eak þær.) 13 Þe Name þer tweȝnþen Ea is þie Gihon; it gæþ þurȝh þat hale Land Cush um.[e] 14 Þe Name þer þridden Ea is þie Tigris; schie rinnþ andlang þer easten Seide Ashur. And þie fierðe Ea is þie Eufrates.

15 Þe Driȝhten(YHWH) Godd naam þen Werr and stallde hin in þem Gewyrttuun Eden, for hin to wyrken and for hin to beȝemen. 16 And þe Driȝhten(YHWH) Godd bood þem Werr, “Þu ert free of ænigem Tree im Gwyrttuun to etten; 17 ak þu most of þem Tree þer Kuþnes Godes and Yfels noȝht etten, forþem þa þu of him ettest, wirst þu fersooþ sterfen.”

18 Þe Driȝhten(YHWH) Godd kwaaþ, “Noȝht good is for þem Werr allaan to wesen. Ic werðe anen Helper dafen for him schapen.”

19 Nu hadde þe Driȝhten(YHWH) Godd of þem Grund ut alle þie wilden Deere and alle þie Fugels in þer Lyft geschapen. He broȝhte hie to þem Werr, for to seen, þat þe he hie klippen wyrde; and ƕatso klippte þe Werr ælc kwikk Wiȝht, þat was sein Name. 20 So gaaf þe Werr Namen to allen þen Feeȝhen, þen Fugeln in þer Lyft, and allen þen wilden Deeren.

Ak for Adam was nan dafene Helper gefunden. 21 So dade þe Driȝhten(YHWH) Godd þat þe Werr diepe onslepp; and þenden he slepp, naam he an þer Werrs Ribben and þa ferklyste þen Stedd mid Flæsch. 22 Þa shoop þe Driȝhten(YHWH) Godd an Weif of þer Ribbe þie he of þem Werr genumen hadde, and he broȝhte schie to þem Werr.

23 Þe Werr kwaaþ, “Þis is nu Baan meiner Bane and Flæsch meiner Flæsche; schie wirþ 'Weif' gehaaten,' forþem schie of anem Werr utgenumen warþ.” 24 Þat is ƕiȝ an Werr læfþ seinen Fader and seine Moder and wirþ to seinem Weif gekliffen, and hie werðeþ an Flæsch. 25 Adam and sein Weif waren beȝe nakt, and hie fœlden nane Schame.

Kapitel 5 - Of Adam oþ Noah
1 Þisse is þie Bok Adames Mæȝrake. In þem Daȝ þe Godd Mann schoop, worȝhte he hin in his Onleiknes. 2 He schoop hie Wæpnedmann and Weifmann and hie blesste. And he namde hie "Adam" (Mannkynn), þa he hie schoop. 3 And Adam lifde twahundþrittiȝ (230) Ȝære, and kennde anen Son in seiner Andleiknes, and heȝht hin Seth.1 4 Æfterþem he geboren warþ, lifde Adam sefenhundred (700) Ȝære and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 5Superscript text Allnunge lifde Adam neiȝnhundþrittiȝ (930) Ȝære, and þa starf he. 6 And Seth lifde twahundfeif (205) Ȝære, and kennde Enosch. 7 And Seth lifde sefenhundsefen (707) Ȝære, æfterþem he Enosch kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 8 Allnunge lifde Seth neiȝnhundtwelf (912) Ȝære, and þa starf he. 9 Þa Enosch hundredneiȝntiȝ Ȝære lifde, kennde he Kenan. 10 And Enosch lifde sefenhundfeiftien (715) Ȝære and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 11 Allnunge lifde Enosch neiȝnhundfeif (905) Ȝære, and þa starf he. 12 And Kenan lifde hundredsefentiȝ (170) Ȝære, and kennde Mahalalel. 13 And Kenan lifde sefenhundfiertiȝ (740) Ȝære, æfterþem he Mahalalel kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 14 Allnunge lifde Kenan neiȝnhundtien (910) Ȝære, and þa starf he. 15 And Mahalalel lifde hundfeifandsixtiȝ (165) Ȝære, and kennde Jared. 16 And Mahalalel lifde sefenhundþrittiȝ (730) Ȝære, æfterþem he Jared kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 17 Allnunge lifde Mahalalel aȝhthundfeifandneiȝntiȝ (895) Ȝære, and þa starf he. 18 And Jared lifde hundredtwaandsixtiȝ (162) Ȝære, and kennde Enoch. 19 And Jared lifde aȝhthundred (800) Ȝære, æfterþem he Enoch kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 20 Allnunge lifde Jared neiȝnhundtwaandsixtiȝ (962) Ȝære, and þa starf he. 21 And Enoch lifde hundfeifandsixtiȝ (165) Ȝære, and kennde Methuselah. 22 And Enoch geng trewlice mid Godde þriehundred (300) Ȝære, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 23 Allnunge lifde Enoch þriehundfeifandsixtiȝ (365) Ȝære. 24 Enoch geng trewlice mid Godde; þa was he nan mær, forþem God hin ætnaam. 25 And Methuselah lifde hundredsefenandaȝhtiȝ (187) Ȝære, and kennde Lamech. 26 And Methuselah lifde sefenhundtwaandaȝhtiȝ (782) Ȝære, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 27 Allnunge lifde Methuselah neiȝnhundneiȝnandsixtiȝ (969) Ȝære, and þa starf he. 28 And Lamech lifde hundredtwaandaȝhtiȝ (182) Ȝære, and kennde anen Son. 29 He namde hin Noah, and kwaaþ, "He werðeþ usic in þem Arfoþ and swærer Bysige userer Hænde angestalld be þem fram Driȝhten(YHWH) gewergden Grund frœfern." 30 And Lamech lifde feifhundfeifandsixtiȝ (565) Ȝære, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 31 Allnunge lifde Lamech sefenhundþreeandfeiftiȝ Ȝære (753), and þa starf he. 32 And Noah was feifhundred (500) Ȝære, and kennde Shem, Ham, and Japheth. (Shem at 502).

Noten

 * 1) Year 1, Adam was 0 years old.  Add 230, and Seth was born in 231; add 205, and you get 436 when Enosch was born.  Remember, there is no such thing as year 0.

Kapitel 11
1 And þie hale World hadde ane Sprake and ane gemæne Tunge. 2 So geschaa, þat hie easten fœrden, fanden hie an Gefilde in þem Lande Schinar, and þær ærdeden. 3 hie kwaðen to ælcen oðern, "Kommeþ, scheppeþ wiȝ Tiȝlen and hie þurȝhbaken." hie broken Tiȝle instedd Stanes, and Teer for Wallleim. 4 Þa kwaðen hie, "Kommeþ, bueþ wiȝ us selfen ane Burg, mid anem Turr þe to þen Hefenen ræceþ, soþat wiȝ us gemærsen; elkor werðeþ wiȝ ofer þie Ruse þer halen Erðe gestrogden." 5 Ak þe Driȝhten (YHWH) kaam niðer, þie Burg and þen Torr to seen, þie þie Leede gebuen hadden. 6 Þe Driȝhten (YHWH) kwaaþ, "Soðes sind þie Leede geþwær and habeþ ane Sprake. And hie habeþ þis begunnen, nu wirþ naȝht oþhalden, þe hie akræfteþ to don. 7 Kommeþ, gaþ wiȝ niðer and gemencgeþ her Gererd, soþat hie understandeþ noȝht ælcen oðern." 8 So testragd þe Driȝhten (YHWH) hie þanen ofer alle þie Erðe, and hie lannen of, þie Burg to buen. 9 Þus hatte schie Babel - forþen þe Driȝhten (YHWH) þær þat Gererd þer halen Werld gemencgde. Þanen testragd þe Driȝhten (YHWH) hie ofer þen Eard þer halen Erðe.

Of Shem oþ Abram
10þis sind þie Kynnrekenne Shems. Twa Ȝære æfter þem Flood, was Shem hundredwintre (100 years old), and kennde Arphaxad. 11 And Shem lifde feifhundred (500) Ȝære, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 12 And Arphaxad lifde hundfeifandþrittiȝ (135) Ȝære, and kennde Cainan. 13 And Arphaxad lifde fierhundþrittiȝ (430) Ȝære, æfterþem he Cainan kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. And Cainan lifde hundþrittiȝ (130) Ȝære, and kennde Shelah. And Cainan lifde þreehundþrittiȝ (330) Ȝære, æfterþem he Shelah kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 14 And Shelah lifde hundþrittiȝ (130) Ȝære, and kennde Eber. 15 And Shelah lifde þreehundþrittiȝ (330) Ȝære, æfterþem he Eber kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 16 And Eber lifde hundfierandþrittiȝ (134) Ȝære, and kennde Peleg. 17 And Eber lifde þreehundsefentiȝ (370) Ȝære, æfterþem he Peleg kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 18 And Peleg lifde hundþrittiȝ (130) Ȝære, and kennde Reu. 19 And Peleg lifde twahundneiȝn (209) Ȝære, æfterþem he Reu kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 20 And Reu lifde hundtwaandþrittiȝ (130) Ȝære, and kennde Serug. 21 And Reu lifde twahundsefentiȝ (270) Ȝære, æfterþem he Serug kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 22 And Serug lifde hundþrittiȝ (130) Ȝære, and kennde Nahor 23 And Serug lifde twahundred (200) Ȝære, æfterþem he Nahor kennde, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. 24 And Nahor lifde neiȝnandsefentiȝ (79) Ȝære, and kennde Terah. 25 And Nahor lifde hundredneiȝnandtweȝntiȝ (129)* Ȝære, and kennde oðre Sœne and Dœȝhter. (125, 119, or 129?) 26 And Terah lifde hundþrittiȝ (130) Ȝære, and kennde Abram, Nahor, and Haran.

Abrams Heired
27 þis sind þie Kynnrekenne Terahs. Terah kennde Abram, Nahor, and Haran. And Haran kennde Lot. 28 And Haran starf foor seinem Fader Terah, in þem Lande seiner Gebyrd, Ur þer Chaldeanen. 29 Abram and Nahor geweiften. Þe Name Abrams Weif was Sarai, and þe Name Nahors Weif was Milah, Harans Doȝhter, þe Fader Milkahs and Iskahs. 30 Ak Sarai was untiemend, schie kennde nan Cild. 31 And Terah naam seinen Son Abram, and Lot Haransson seinen Barnsbarn, and seine Snore Sarai, þat Weif seines Sones Abrams, and hie kamen ætsammen of Ur þer Chaldeanen ut, to Canaan to gan. And hie kamen to Harran and eardeden þa. 32 Terah lifde twahundredfeif (205) Ȝære, and starf in Harran.

title: Biblioþeke/Alde Gekyþnes/Gekyndbook