text:
Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Windows Command Prompt Commands

Windows Command Prompt Commands
Could be possibly speedy. 1) It is redundant to Windows Batch Scripting; 2) contains copyvio by pasting output of Windows cmd.exe command helps, e.g. in Windows Command Prompt Commands/mkdir; you have to click on "[Expand]" in the page to see the content. Please don't merge anything into Windows Batch Scripting. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 09:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 * 1)  Even if this text is spread over the Internet, its original copyright is not compatible with ours. Moreover its original author had announced that he won't finish the book, so there won't be any relevant content in the medium term. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 18:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm self-nominating the book an will probably never finish it. 23:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

 * 1) per JackPotte.BukhariSaeed (discuss • contribs) 02:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


text:
Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/World History/Effects of the First World War

World History/Effects of the First World War
I just found it a likely copyvio, maybe except the first two versions, thus requesting deleting most versions, not all of them.--Jusjih (discuss • contribs) 05:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It had been copied by EikwaR, so I've just restored the older version before hidding the others. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 14:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/User:Gjoniikarrrica

This userpage appears to be a copy of an article, which was deleted five times on English Wikipedia in 2015. The user has made no other visible edits to Wikibooks. I think it is outside the project scope per WB:HOST and WB:SOAP. Green Giant (discuss • contribs) 00:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


text:
Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Start an Internet Business

 * Also Start an internet business (a redirect to this page)

This "book-stub" has been around for several years, originally in a copyvio form, but now with just a discouraging message. I appreciate that any business (let alone an internet business) will be tough but is that really in line with the Wikibooks purpose? We have several business-related books at various stages of development but this is one that we could do without (unless someone wants to make a go of it or merge it somewhere). Green Giant (discuss • contribs) 21:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1)  as nominator. Green Giant (discuss • contribs) 10:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  It has never been a book. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 21:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The topic itself isn't out of place, imo. There doesn't appear to be significant content there to justify calling it a "book", though, nor a framework for a book.  --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 23:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * This almost reads like a leaflet. It could be expanded but I doubt there will be enough to fill the "sense" of a book. Artix Kreiger (discuss • contribs) 13:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, there's no sense of incipient book-ness about it. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 14:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

 * In addition to/support of the above: it uses first person singular pronouns, seems to plug a couple of commercial sites, and is signed with "I hope this article is informative and very helpful to you." --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 14:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * then delete. It is like a leaflet or brochure. Types of things are common on the internet. Artix Kreiger (discuss • contribs) 02:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


text:
Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/:Category:Guides and manuals

I’ve been looking at this category for a few days now but I cannot see where it fits. The text on the page talks about "How to" guides as an example but it seems to me that if someone is searching for a how-to, they will probably search for the subject more than this category. There appear to be numerous books that could theoretically be categorised here but I imagine the need to create subcategories will arise. I don’t see this category as being necessary for organising books, but I might be wrong. Green Giant (discuss • contribs) 10:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1)  as nominator. Green Giant (discuss • contribs) 10:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  Doesn't fit to our classification Category:Subject:Books by subject, and the  would be more appropriate if we needed one more. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 13:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

 * 1) not fit. Artix Kreiger (discuss • contribs) 20:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


text:
Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Love Intimacy and Romance

Hello,

I uploaded this document by mistake, I want to delete this page and want to unpublish my book from Wikibooks.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irene Pearson (discuss • contribs) 08:27, 1 February 2018
 * There isn't any Love Intimacy and Romance book here. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 09:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It looks as if you did upload a cover image to Commons (which is one of our sister projects), with a back-cover-type description of the book. That image is here, and you could request its deletion by editing that page (follow the link) to add the following markup (I think):
 * --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 12:16, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , its  for a immediate. the "delete" is for a deletion discussion for community discussion. Artix Kreiger (discuss • contribs) 14:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ on Commons. Green Giant (discuss • contribs) 18:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ on Commons. Green Giant (discuss • contribs) 18:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


text:
Wikibooks:Requests for deletion/Python Programming/pyFormex

The website for the module is down, and so the page is not needed. 00:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 1)  Empty page. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 11:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 2)  virtually empty page, aside from 1 sentence. Artix Kreiger (discuss • contribs) 13:41, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 3)  A Google search shows the website for the library has moved to http://www.nongnu.org/pyformex/, so that issue doesn't justify deletion. It might be that that specific library is too niche a topic for the scope of the book, but in any case I feel like this isn't the right place for that discussion (as opposed to the talk pages of the book), at least at first. -- Duplode (discuss • contribs) 23:24, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 * 4)  The website http://www.nongnu.org/pyformex/ is not down; and pyformex is on pypi. The page is a stub, but let us keep it until someone decides to expand on it. --Dan Polansky (discuss • contribs) 09:40, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
 * 5)  The website works. While it is a clear stub, it can be developed. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 19:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)