text:
Professionalism/Parler and the Capitol Insurrection of 2021

On January 6th, 2021, the United States Capitol in Washington D.C. was stormed by right-wing protestors and supporters of Donald Trump in an attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The rioters aimed to create havoc in joint session of Congress that convened to count electoral votes and officially claim Joe Biden's victory. Parler, an alt-tech social media platform that is a center for far-right content, played a key role in the planning and execution of the attack.

Growing Unrest
There was increasing unrest among conservative groups after the presidential election of 2020, in which Joe Biden was declared the winner. The race was very close, and it took over a week for Biden's victory to be clear due to the large amount of mail-in ballots cast because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Throughout the entire election week, Trump and other Republicans attempted to overturn the election results, claiming widespread voter fraud in the five key swing states that Biden managed to secure.

Donald Trump's campaign continued to subvert the election long after the results were complete. He held multiple rallies and filed over 60 lawsuits, two of which were brought to the supreme court. He also pressured key Republican governers to nullify their results by manufacturing fake evidence of fraud. Trump's frequent tweeting also galvanized his followers to call to reverse the election, which is both illegal and unconstitutional. This growing unrest caused his followers to plan the Capitol Insurrection.

Planning the Attack
As Donald Trump began to gather support and funding from various organizations, his team started putting together large rallies planned on January 6th. He gained funding from groups such as The Rule of Law Defense Fund and the Tea Party Patriots. The Women for America First non-profit organized a rally called the March to Save America, and far-right radio show host Alex Jones' media company donated $500,000 to book the Ellipse park for the event.

There were rumblings of violence and armed protests in the FBI, who were also worried of attacks at every state capitol that day. Despite this knowledge and the National Guard being deployed to the site, the severity of the take was largely unforeseen.

Alongside this, "alt-tech" platforms, which are sites that are similar alternatives to mainstream social networks, were used by the public to help plan the insurrection. These sites largely have a base of far-right extremists, conspiracy theorists, Donald Trump supporters, and conservatives. Among these apps was Parler, an alt-tech social network.

The Parler Social Network
Parler is a microblogging service that acts similarly to Twitter. It was launched in August 2018 after being founded by John Matze and Jared Thomson. The app received funding by conservative investor Rebekah Mercer and promotion by right-wing influencers and activists such as Ivanka Trump and Candace Owens, who touted it is a place to escape from the censorship of big-tech. Parler claims that it values true free speech above all else, and that it doesn't silence anyone on basis of opinion. However, this led to the app becoming a cesspool of misinformation, Holocaust denialism, Nazism, White supremacy, and QAnon conspiracies. Matze said in an interview with CNBC, "if you can say it on the street of New York, you can say it on Parler".

Parler gained traction as a social media platform following a tweet from right-wing commentator Candace Owens saying she had joined the platform. Following the implementation of new practices at companies like Facebook and Twitter, who began moderating content related to politics, Parler experienced another surge in new users. Anti-hate groups criticized Parler for creating a space with "the potential for extensive and worrying commingling of extremists and non-extremists" which can lead to radicalization.

Despite their hands-off approach to moderating content on their platform, Parler reports that they "referred violent content... to the FBI for investigation over 50 times, and... alerted law enforcement to specific threats of violence being planned at the Capitol". Furthermore, within the company's community guidelines, they specifically cite threats of violence and advocacy of imminent lawless action as violations. Parler also went on to say that the widespread backlash they received following the riots was "a coordinated and widespread disinformation campaign designed to scapegoat Parler for the riots at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021".

Two days after the insurrection, Apple and Google both announced they would pull the app from their respective app stores, due to it being labeled a public safety threat. It was soon removed from the Amazon Web Service's servers as well.

Professionalism
The case of Parler and the insurrection at the Capitol provides a unique opportunity to examine the interface of professionalism and corporate responsibility. Parler kept true to their word of being “a free speech-focused... unbiased alternative” as users with far-right ideologies were allowed to organized the riots. In the aftermath of the riots, critics were quick to blame Parler for their platform permitting users to organize an intentionally non-peaceful riot with impunity. Parler's case for free expression, despite the backlash following the riots, is not absurd at first glance. Their case raises the question of "How far is too far?" when it comes to supporting company values and reveals the failings of the FCC to effectively regulate social media within the limits of existing laws. Recently, a law called Section 230 has come under scrutiny for this very reason. The law effectively shields social media platforms from liability from what their users post to their websites.

Responsibility
Parler may also not be entirely to blame for the riots at the Capitol. There may be evidence that the policies and practices of other social media companies may have bolstered the extremism that found its voice through Parler. One of the driving factors behind the rise of Parler was the growing sentiment that larger social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter were censoring political viewpoints. These practices in addition to the banning of former President Trump's account led many far-right Americans to the platform. As these far-right individuals found a place where they could speak freely without their messages being flagged for potential misinformation, it can be argued that Facebook and Twitter effectively funneled their far-right users into an echo chamber that likely exacerbated their feelings of discontent and frustration.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
A cornerstone of governing speech online is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, Enacted in 1996. It states "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." This states that ISPs and social media sites are not responsible for the content that is shown on their website.

President Biden, while on the 2020 campaign trail criticized Section 230 and argued for its revocation. Deceitful ads were run on behalf of the Trump campaign, stating without evidence that Biden paid the Ukrainian attorney general 1 billion dollars to not investigate Biden’s son. Biden stated that Facebook should be held responsible for false and damaging statements allowed on Facebook the same way traditional publishers are. Section 230 is controversial because it can grant immunity to social media companies from fact checking misleading or false information. Section 230 however is commonly referred to as “The 26 words that made the internet.” The growth of sites like twitter Facebook and YouTube can be attributed to it as it allowed these platforms to host user posted content without being liable for exactly what information is posted. The internet would probably not look the same without this legislation which is why talks to repeal it are tumultuous

Mail In Ballots
Preceding the 2020 Presidential election, there was a consensus to shift to using mail in ballots because of the potential for voting locations to facilitate COVID-19 transmission. Donald Trump tweeted unsubstantiated that mail in ballots would lead to a fraudulent election. Twitter, for the first time ever included a hyperlink below his tweet to give information about the topic he was tweeting about, and they would continue to mark his tweets that might have been spreading misinformation about things like COVID-19. Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, gave his opinion on twitter’s strategy saying Facebook is not an arbiter of truth, essentially going in line with what Section 230 states. He provides the platform but is not responsible for all the speech that is stated on it.

The Responsibility of Social Media Companies
While Facebook can’t be expected to make sure that every post on their platform is factually correct, they curate much of the content that one sees on their social media feed. Social media sites generate revenue from keeping users on their apps, thus serve users content they think will keep them engaged. This can lead to dangerous and misleading echo chambers. Social media sites drive users into their own unchecked reality which can be a breeding ground for extremism. Facebook later implicitly acknowledged this by banning conspiracy theory driven accounts across all their platforms.

Section 230 provides good protections to social media companies to not be complicit in everything that’s posted to their sites, but when their own algorithms lead violent insurrections, the line can be blurred between what is just being posted on the site and what the social media sites are curating for the users themselves.


text:
User:Red-back spider/addInstantSaveToCodeEditor.js

/* Author : Svetlana Tkachenko svetlana@members.fsf.org This file is a part of addInstantSaveToCodeEditor. Licence: GPLv3+ Version: 0.1 Release date: 2018-02-26 Description: adds an instant save button to CodeEditor

// Check that CodeEditor is loaded mw.loader.using(['mediawiki.api', 'oojs-ui'], function {	if('.wikiEditor-ui'){		var button = new OO.ui.ButtonWidget( { label: 'Instant Save' } );		// Instant save on click		button.$element.click(function{ // Update button text button.setLabel( 'Saving...'); // Get text area contents var textbox = $('#wpTextbox1'); var context = textbox && textbox.data('wikiEditor-context'); var currentText = context.$textarea.textSelection( 'getContents' ); // Save the page via AJAX edit api var api = new mw.Api; api.postWithToken("edit", {				action: 'edit',				title: mw.config.get ('wgPageName'),				text: currentText,				summary: $('#wpSummary').val + ' (assisted)'			}).done(function (data){				// Success; Update button text				button.setLabel( 'Instant Save');			}); });		$('#wpDiffWidget').after(button.$element);	} });

//	text: $('#wpTextbox1').text

license: Creative Commons - Attribution Share-Alike - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/


text:
World Heritage Sites/Introduction

World Heritage Sites are sites with legal protection which is administered by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). They can be of either cultural or natural importance. As of June 2020, there are a total of 1,121 World Heritage Sites (869 cultural, 213 natural, and 39 mixed properties) across 167 countries.

title: World Heritage Sites/Introduction


text:
World Heritage Sites/Afghanistan

There are two World Heritage sites in Afghanistan: the Buddhas of Bamiyan and Minaret of Jam. The Buddhas of Bamiyan were destroyed by the Taliban in 2001. Both of the sites are considered to be endangered.

title: World Heritage Sites/Afghanistan


text:
Wikibooks:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 3

Djagt

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I am trying to add URLs to other wikibook pages concerning closely related topics. Also, I might at some point try to add an URL to sources for the discussed topic.

 * Date and time
 * 23:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * That's not how you add links to other pages. Links are created using Wikilinks, not URLs. For example, Book_Title/Chapter_Name is an absolute link, /Chapter Name/ is a relative link and does the same as the absolute link. There are other formats like ../Chapter Name/ that can be used for navigating around the hierarchy. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Digressivo

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was adding a link in Guide to a Humane Self-Chosen Death's availability

 * Date and time
 * 18:37, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * This isn't a false positive as the link was correctly blocked. You have raised a URL Request which is the right place to handle this. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

ImitationV

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 23:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * As a new user, you added multiple URLs in a single edit. This is a common vandalism pattern and so is blocked. If you make the edit without the URLs, then add them one at a time, until you've built up a larger edit history, the problem will stop. This is a global filter so we can't prevent it blocking you here. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

2001:9E8:6082:F00:E9F8:CAA0:9AC1:2DF9

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * i tried to change X86_Assembly/ACPI to ACPI in X86_Assembly/Programmable_Interrupt_Controller but got this error

 * Date and time
 * 05:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

2601:647:302:30B0:5C85:9366:B994:F184

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 04:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

2601:647:302:30B0:5C85:9366:B994:F184

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 04:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

2001:999:204:CDA:8273:10A9:B2C6:C949

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 20:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

LukCamstar

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Trying to create the page and add citations

 * Date and time
 * 02:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

ya
 * Comments

UoGtnovinc

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 19:53, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

 * Comments

Hunter2830

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 06:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

 * Comments

Henry.liu.umich

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to add a personal link to my name (Henry Liu) at the University of Michigan.

 * Date and time
 * 15:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

JJFerreiraJr

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * In creating my User Page, I included links to my own professional teacher Web page (www.kingphilip.org/JFerreira) and various pages located on my school district Web site (www.kingphilip.org). These pages are only school district Web site pages and not anything inappropriate or potentially dangerous.

 * Date and time
 * 14:04, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Olie.Campbell

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * add link to Centrelink telephone contact numbers. This is necessary due to the quantity of numbers, and the fact that Centrelink may change, add to or delete numbers in the future.  I want to have current information available to readers.

 * Date and time
 * 15:53, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Wikibooks is not a directory but a site for educational textbooks and certainly not a substitute for a government website's list of contact details. I'm not inclined to support adding things like their telephone numbers nor a link to the same. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Shaunmurphy28

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was reading it as of integration and saw different references pointing towards calculus, i tried to add an online calculator's link in case for proper reference & user help.

 * Date and time
 * 15:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Ponschab

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I want to add a link to a OpenSCAD language plugin for the IntelliJ Platform. I have not edited any other pages.

 * Date and time
 * 12:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Fashion Wale Babu

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * To give the more information about fashion and style tu users im adding the link. They can visit and get more quality information.

 * Date and time
 * 03:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Self promotional spam link = no we won't let you add it, and you have been blocked for spamming. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 10:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Comments

MarkJFernandes

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Have written book in Google Docs. It contains several relevant external links to Wikipedia and other sites. Was trying to create first page on Wikibooks for the book, but was caught in one of your spam protection systems. Book is available on Google Docs at "docs.google.com/document/d/1mz6acHaSeV7GRJTl_AfozzIhQ4xJhADrR_EubsASl-w/edit?usp=sharing" (HTTPS).

 * Decided to try publishing the first page of the book minus any external links. Have drafted it, looks fine, but still getting caught in your filter system. This time, the error message is: ` An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and hence your edit will not be saved. ... ` Please advise.

 * Date and time
 * 16:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Hi, I'm Jules. Now I'm not an admin, so I can't alter any of the filters. But I can give you some advice on a possible way to proceed, looking at the problems you've encountered. My advice is: Good luck, -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 13:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Create your sandbox. It is located at User:MarkJFernandes/sandbox. I'll assume you how to do this.
 * 2) Gradually import your book there. Since you are being caught up by filters, the best thing to do may be to import it without markup; doing so will not trigger any filters. And then add the markup later on.
 * 3) When you're more or less happy with what you've got, export it to main-space (I can help you in this regard).
 * 4) Further technical problems can be discussed at Reading room/Technical Assistance.

 * Hello, thanks so much for your help. I had previously been trying to get the sandbox to work but was having the same problems as before, and became completely confused about what to do.

 * Have managed to resolve the issues. To resolve the issues, I tried stripping the code down gradually, until I reached something about which the abuse (edit) filter system didn't complain. I then selectively added bits of code back, until I figured out that the code '' was tripping-up the system. Originally, hyperlinks were between these two tags, but after I removed external links, these ineffectual tags were still there (left behind, perhaps accidentally you might say).

 * Do you know anything about external links and how to deal with them? In the original book, I've added many hyperlinks mostly to Wikipedia articles... would like to keep them.

 * --MarkJFernandes (discuss • contribs) 13:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Hi linking to Wikipedia articles is easy. They take the general form . An example would be Potato which links to Potato on en.wp (look at the source). If you do this edit filters shouldn't be a problem. -- Jules  (Mrjulesd) 13:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Hello, thanks for your help again.

 * I've been adding the book at User:MarkJFernandes/End-user_Computer_Security/Main. Is that the same as using the sandbox? I'm a bit confused as to whether it is my sandbox or not.

 * Anyway, I've run into an unusual issue. I'm unable to add the following code:
 * Code for hyperlinked image, that is getting caught in abuse (edit) filter.png
 * even though I've managed to do pretty much the same thing for another link on the page. See the other link published in the below screenshot:
 * Indication of link successfully added to book.png
 * The error message I'm receiving is:
 * An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, ... A brief description of the error is Abuse 23.

 * Any ideas what's going wrong?

 * --MarkJFernandes (discuss • contribs) 12:00, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm going to post at Reading room/Technical Assistance. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 12:41, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

IamMe3141

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I tried to add one more hex editor to the list, including a link like there is for all entries in the list.

 * Date and time
 * 10:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

203.100.3.178

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to add a link to an external website that uses trusted sources to show the amount of cases of covid-19 around the world.

 * Date and time
 * 04:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Schlosser67

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Please update the external link to "gnuplot not so Frequently Asked Questions" with the full web citation including the archive URL at web.archive.org, as the original link is broken and the update therefore necessary. I've tried to do so, but was not allowed. PS: Now it seems to have worked after entering what seemed to be a gazillion of captchas. One should have been enough.

 * Date and time
 * 06:22, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Anni336

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 00:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Jethrohasenkamp

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I am creating a new page on how to secure the software OpenClinica and it's dependencies against attacks. I have included a number of links, mainly with the purpose of giving credit to the websites I have collected the information from myself. I assume that this is the reason I got caught by the filter, but I am new to wikibooks and cannot be sure. If needed I can remove these links, however, I think it's basic decency to give credit to these sources.

 * Date and time
 * 10:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

DavidLeeLambert

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Wanted to add links to Al Jazeera, BBC, CBC, Der Spiegel, El País, FInancial TImes, and The Guardian (in that order); triggered block adding second URL in that list.

 * Date and time
 * 21:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Hi I'm not an admin so I can't examine your edits. But the filter you're tripping is for users with less than 2 edits. Try again, and if you still have problems message me on my talk page. Jules  (Mrjulesd) 22:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Comatekeke

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I tried to add an Ada 2012 book to the page with a link to the book website and ISBN.

 * Date and time
 * 01:37, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

That filter only applies to editors with less than 2 edits. Make a couple of edits to your user page (e.g. User:Comatekeke) and try again. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 07:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Christian.Mercat

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to add a link to my wikipedia user page.

 * Date and time
 * 15:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * You don't need an external link to link to a page on Wikipedia; you can do that with  or  .  For example, a wikilink to your Wikipedia user page could use markup
 * which would produce
 * My user's page on wikipedia
 * --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 18:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 18:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Benjamin J. Burger

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I am new to Wikibooks and looking to add URL links to my title page in my Sandbox. Can you add URL hyperlinks to webpages in WikiBooks? I would like to reference pages on Wikipedia if possible?

 * Date and time
 * 21:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Alex Chitiu

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to correct an error in the page and add a citation for the correct formula.

 * Date and time
 * 09:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Hi that edit filter only applies if you have less than 2 edits. My advice is to try again. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 11:48, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Although what you actually seem to be doing is putting comments into the text. You should either fix the book, or if unsure, put comments on the Talk page. Thanks - QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks QuiteUnusual, I couldn't examine the edit so I didn't know that. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 16:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Really? I thought everyone could see the log except for private filters. Can you access this link? QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 17:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, I can see now that the detailed view is restricted to administrators only. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 17:36, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Movbe

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to fix the GitHub link for a new addition to the list of disassemblers (bddisasm). Other project on the page have links to their repositories so I think that this should be ok to add for a new one. Also, if this is approved, maybe some of the old http links should be switched to https. I can not add the link to the page in the page section because the anti SPAM filter blocks me.

 * Date and time
 * 10:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Betraxa

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I linked the official website to download the drivers, which made the guide a lot easier. This also made the drivers easier to install for users who use different operation systems on their calculator (because now you don't need a calculator to install the USB drivers).

I also removed the 'resetting of the calculator' step from the 'driver' segment, because it has nothing to do there since a calculator is not needed anymore. I did place the 'resetting of the calculator' as the first step though, since it's a crucial step.
 * Date and time
 * 01:28, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Papaciccia

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Add references where the method is presented

 * Date and time
 * 13:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Flighttime012

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 06:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Dewitt Sciullo

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I want to add a link to a docker container on dockerhub that contains maxima and jupyter notebook frontend. Since there are already instructions on how to install it on Ubuntu, it makes sense to also have instructions to how to use it as a docker container (which could be more useful for certain settings).

 * Date and time
 * 15:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Should be ok if you want to try again. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 19:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

AGG EP

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to add a link to the paper and the journal page as I thought this would be useful for readers to directly access the paper I am writing about.

 * Date and time
 * 04:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Kathleen Churchill

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Add resources for additional learning and reference the information I have used to create this page

 * Date and time
 * 05:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Sunera K

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * the refercnes are needed to indicate the content I was editing and to give credit to the writers whom work I was quoting. it is only three links.

 * Date and time
 * 06:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Dante DDM

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * This is about firefox installation. Explain how to add the repo (contains a link), and another to flatpak in case you don't know it.

 * Date and time
 * 16:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Looks like you succeeded. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 17:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Rchegini

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I’m an open source user of QEMU and found page above beginner-friendly. I thought I should pay back what helps me create an image different way than how it was explained in the article. The article by Markuta is a step-by-step explanation containing sufficient clues for a user to follow to achieve this goal.

 * Date and time
 * 15:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Jjsurendra15

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was editing Keyboard section in computer for beginners page. I was trying to complete the keyboard shortcut topic by providing an external link to the article for shortcut keys of computer list. I just wanted to provide more information to the visitor.

 * Date and time
 * 20:45, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Sgschun83

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Update radiation oncology book page with newest publication from American Radium Society

 * Date and time
 * 16:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

5050clown

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Attempting to add hyperlinks to Wikipedia articles.

 * Date and time
 * 18:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Jpyeron

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * add link to my work page www.pdinc.us on my about me page

 * Date and time
 * 11:15, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Rokucomlinker

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 22:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Dpitfield

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Description
 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 23:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Nnbeauli

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Need to add links to other relevant LMIs, also external links to my sources. This is for a grade for class and these are on the rubrik, so I need to add them to this page as well as 4 other pages I will be creating shortly.

 * Date and time
 * 23:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Walter Hahn

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 16:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

Digressivo

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was adding a link in Guide to a Humane Self-Chosen Death's availability for a free (and legal) PDF format of this book, I think that is necessary because no source is specified for this book.

 * Date and time
 * 18:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

 * Comments

2600:8800:518C:300:8DEE:1041:7FF3:825C

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Trying to add a bee club to Arizona. I would think this should be an easy task,, but not.  add www.HoneyHiveFarms.com they have beekeeping classes and club.  Under beekeeping clubs in Arizona please

 * Date and time
 * 02:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

We Fade To Grey

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I want to add link to GitHub repository with recently open source Suicide Barbie demo. The demo was released in 2007 at Breakpoint demoparty and opensourced in Jan 2021. The code might be useful for people learning to code graphics applications on PSP.

 * Date and time
 * 14:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

109.151.240.227

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was fixing the A-level Computing/AQA/Paper 1 and Paper 2 links, they did not link to their topic they just linked to Paper 1 or Paper 2

 * Date and time
 * 16:12, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Sampada21

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 10:48, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ❌ I do not think there is a justification to adding that link. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 11:05, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Qian Chu

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * This is a Wikibook for SPM, a software for functional MRI analysis. I included a small tutorial on how to concatenate different sessions of scans, and shared two internal links to other utilities that might be helpful in finding MRI machine parameters and extracting volume data.

 * Date and time
 * 16:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

✅. However, you should use relative links (which won't trigger the filter); for instance, SPM. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 17:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Sasicronj

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 04:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ❌ Appears to be copypaste. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 18:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

MauCardoso

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 18:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ❌ Spam link. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 18:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

AmelieStudent

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * There was no page for binding energy under the AQA A level physics book, so I wrote up a summary of what is included within the textbook under this chapter. The error message said it marked me as a spambot.

 * Date and time
 * 20:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * You're editing in the wrong place; create your page under the AQA A level Physics book and not as a independent page. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 20:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have copied your content to the correct page, AQA A-Level Physics/Binding Energy. I can't tell you why the filter blocked you as we don't disclose the rules used to identify problem edits, but this was a rare false positive. As Leaderboard notes, the page should be a subpage (the way I've created it). Also, for future edits, please avoid using HTML markup - Wiki markup is much friendly to other editors. Thanks - QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 14:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Lemon.web

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to make a guide on how to beat a Newgrounds flash game, when I said Newgrounds I linked the Newgrounds website and when I said alien hominid i linked the page to the alien hominid flash game so people can go to it and play it

 * Date and time
 * 14:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * I am not convinced that your content was properly formatted - it is not clear what you intended it to be. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 14:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

199.216.82.114

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Trying to update a heavily outdated page. For instance, some links were dead, and the only assembler suggested was the old TASM. Not all the work had been done.

 * Date and time
 * 20:27, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ✅ Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 21:07, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Scullucs

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Trying to add info about an IRC channel, as well as link to a relevant free book.

 * Date and time
 * 14:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ✅, false positive. Answering your questions on IRC, what happened was that you tried to add an external link (no matter what), which triggered a filter that is designed to hold off spammers that try to spam the site very frequently. And for the question "And where did my edits go?", your blocked edits were stored in a filter log, where admins can retrieve it and add it for you in the case of a mistake like this. After making one more edit, your account will be lifted of this restriction and you should not face this issue again. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 14:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

2600:1700:38D0:5C00:3045:BECC:8516:E692

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Replacing vertical bar characters with \mid in math after two other edits. The filter accused me of repeated vandalism attempts.

 * Date and time
 * 04:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ✅, false positive. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 08:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Yuchen Zheng

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 13:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

✅, however, it should be Transportation Deployment Casebook/2021/Nebraska Streetcar and not Nebraska. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 13:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

PeishiPeng

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 15:39, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Firstly, you are editing in the wrong place. Please name the page correctly (it should not have a / at the end of the name). To avoid being blocked, create the page with a smaller initial edit. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 15:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Zyan7334

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * IP Large Edits.

Trying to submit a single large change but getting an IP Large Edits error.
 * Date and time
 * 14:12, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Try again. I can provide the change you were trying to make if you want. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 16:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Wiki9898zzz

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Just added link to suicide hotlines.

 * Date and time
 * 20:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ❌, as it is offtopic to the book. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 21:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Trialpears

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I think you probably want to change MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-link-spam to remove the language of trying to rapidly add external links. The bots won't care about what the message says and all actual users who get the message will be confused since, per the filter criteria can't have made more than an edit before. Probably not the right page for this request but I don't know my way around this place.

 * Date and time
 * 09:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * This was done, let me know if that was not enough. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 21:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

 * My concern here is not my edit being initial blocked but confusing and insulting new editors with a message saying that they "are adding external links to many different Wikibooks pages in rapid succession" which isn't the case since they have at most one previous edit otherwise they wouldn't see the message.
 * Something like the following would be significantly better. "Your edit has triggered an automated throttle designed to limit spammers. Usually external links shouldn't be added to Wikibooks. For some kinds of links this may be okay, but it is often a sign of people abusing Wikibooks. If that is not your intent, we apologize.
 * If you do not believe your link to be spam and you received this message in error please report this error, but do not add the link itself. Your edit has been logged and is visible to trusted users. If you feel that the URL is needed, please request its addition here. " Trialpears (discuss • contribs) 21:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You made a good point there. I think the reason it was stated the way you quoted was because this message was imported from Wikipedia years back, who used a different filter than we do. I've changed that to more accurately reflect what it does. Does that help? Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 08:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! These issues are difficult to spot since ideally no experienced editor will see this message. Have a good day! Trialpears (discuss • contribs) 08:43, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Peacemukami

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 12:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ❌ No hits to filter. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 19:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

ZoeKMcCormick

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 18:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

✅ False positive. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 19:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Ethanfinamore

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * a game about Fighting in roblox

I was makeing a wiki page
 * Date and time
 * 18:31, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Remove the link and try again. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 19:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Kingxanthe

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * references, added a new citation in the bottom section

 * Date and time
 * 00:15, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Updating a reference in the text. it looks like you succeeded in the end. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 01:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Isabelle.quiqueree

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Charlotte Smith (1748-1806); Women's Writing before Woolf: A Social Reference

 * Date and time
 * 05:46, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

I was adding my entry for a class project which includes eternal links for a required reference list.
 * Create your userpage and then make the edit again. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 07:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Tiagocasalribeiro

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was adding a new program to the screenwriting software.

 * Date and time
 * 06:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Seems like it's already been done. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 07:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Tiagocasalribeiro

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to add a link of a new screenwriting software.

 * Date and time
 * 06:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

You are no longer subject to that filter. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 10:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Beeloser

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Was adding an entry for Welsh Beekeepers

 * Date and time
 * 14:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ✅ false positive. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 14:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

2001:56A:702F:AB00:BCF3:98B5:E95D:1F66

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I changed He to She (it’s true) and moved Her from third placement to second, where She belongs. I missed the third edit and had to go back to correct placement order again. This one triggered the warning. My apologies, it was my first time doing an edit on your fine website. :)

 * Date and time
 * 08:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ✅ Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 07:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

2409:4072:6302:FD21:1C3D:AC0F:B9DD:4B72

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 05:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ❌ Clearly offtopic. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 07:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

93.136.150.158

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * "Майка" is translated as "majica". This is incorrect. "Majica" is worn on top or under a coat/jacket, while "майка" is worn under a shirt/T-shirt. The correct translation is "potkušulja". I'm getting this error when trying to correct this:

We are sorry, your edit can not be completed at this time. Your recent edits have repeatedly triggered the edit filter. To prevent users from repeatedly attempting to make unconstructive edits, your edit has been disallowed. If this is not your intention, we apologize for the inconvenience but please report this error and try your edit again later.
 * Date and time
 * 07:06, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ✅ Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 07:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! 93.136.150.158 (discuss) 07:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Kdmckale

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was updating the page to add the missing links to the newer Python versions’ “What’s New” page consistently with the content of the existing page.

 * Date and time
 * 16:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Try again. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 16:52, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Kdmckale (discuss • contribs) 16:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

2A02:A311:233D:9D80:FDE5:D12B:FA7:C236

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * add link to official site

 * Date and time
 * 11:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Epochload

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 03:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * You were correctly prevented from making this edit as it was an attempt to put spam on Wikibooks. You have now been blocked indefinitely. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

U3203424

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 10:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Please create the page with a small edit, then edit it again to paste in the rest of your text. The edit filter is picking up your edit as likely vandalism. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

JobsGovernment

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 08:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Not a false positive. You were adding spam, and now you are blocked. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 11:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

A Downfall of Gravity

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Was attempting to add a link to ffmpeg's own documentation on a guide to ffmpeg, which I'm hoping isn't spam...

Leave the rest of this page intact -->
 * Date and time
 * 10:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

A Downfall of Gravity

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Was attempting to add a link to ffmpeg's own documentation on a guide to ffmpeg, which I'm hoping isn't spam...

Leave the rest of this page intact -->
 * Date and time
 * 10:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Volker Weißmann

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Trying to add links to clang and git.

 * Date and time
 * 23:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Eviolite

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was attempting to report the page as a copyright violation (I help clean copyright issues at enwiki and stumbled upon this when investigating a different issue. It is a vio of a page on englishmonarchs.co.uk as confirmed by archives at IA dated before the creation of this page.) I triggered the filter preventing addition of extlinks.

 * Date and time
 * 03:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * I have triggered the same filter again on A History of the British Monarchy/Saxon Rulers/Ethelbald, again a copyvio from the corresponding englishmonarchs page. I have stopped attempting to mark them, but the same is true of A History of the British Monarchy/Saxon Rulers/Egbert though that page has been slightly copyedited since and had a few reworded sentences to begin with. Eviolite (discuss • contribs) 03:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will deal with the CVs. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

71.183.100.89

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was attempting to add some [citation needed] tags, but was blocked from editing. I logged into my account to make the change.

 * Date and time
 * 18:41, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

2601:241:1:3D80:A97F:B752:44B3:AB7D

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * The Williams variation starts after 1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 d6. The Title's notation is the wrong variation of the opening. The Title's notation is the french connection variation.

 * Date and time
 * 11:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

GMUbekalu

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 08:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Aries Tripu Trianto

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 02:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Walter.arevalo12

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * OpenRewi, PIL textbook: Chapter on

 * Description
 * I am user Walter.arevalo12 i am writing the whole chapter on State responsibility for the Wikibook - Open Rewi Public international Law - State responsibility. I tried to save the whole chapter and it didnt allowed me, saying "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and hence your edit will not be saved. If you believe that this edit is constructive, please report this error. A brief description of the error is IP Large Edits."

 * Date and time
 * 23:43, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Per the message, please make the first edit small. Large edits by new editors are using vandalism, hence the filter blocks it. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

JenniferIrvingHart

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 04:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Emmaauld

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I has adding references to my article, some of which has URLs included as part of my APA source.

 * Date and time
 * 14:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Kiwiderpia

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Changing ftp to http so that I can open the pdf link in browser pdf viewer

 * Date and time
 * 23:32, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

Conan

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * interwiki search https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=deepcat%3A%22Computer+security+exploits%22+deepcat%3A%22Wireless+networking%22&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1

 * Date and time
 * 08:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

PokemonTrainerGold

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I made this out of myself

but holy shit they won't allow me to publish it
 * Date and time
 * 13:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Hello, you've triggered the global filter meta:Special:AbuseFilter/201 so we can't do anything here, unless advise to split the large copy-pastes in smaller blocs. JackPotte (discuss • contribs) 20:39, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

ManuelGR

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * This is a report on behalf of a contributor of the Ada Programming book. He has no user account and has been contributing to the book for a while. Now he reports to be blocked. This is the filter log: https://en.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=94.31.100.23 This is how I got the report from him: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.ada/c/nLh1D9c51S8

 * Date and time
 * 12:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Bop34

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I changed the sentence "There is no private property (means of production) and so, everyone gets his/her due share from the production." to "There is no private property (private ownership of the means of production) and so, everyone gets his/her due share from the production." with the edit summary "Clarified a phrase as it could be interpreted as communism has no means of production" and the edit was flagged. Note I don't have any edits on this wiki so that definitly didn't help

 * Date and time
 * 03:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

96.18.219.55

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Making a user page,a basic one.

 * Date and time
 * 18:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

96.18.219.55

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Creating my Strategy Guides Proposal for my amendment option.

 * Date and time
 * 16:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Wrong location. You cannot have a page called. Use the talk page of the parent page. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 16:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Ok. 96.18.219.55 (discuss) 16:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

96.18.219.55

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Replying to his message.

 * Date and time
 * 16:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

See your talk page. Leaderboard (discuss • contribs) 16:32, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

96.18.219.55

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I was trying to tell the Reading_room/Assistance people that the admin reading room is semi-protected,and I am not going to wait 4 days after creating an account just for reporting a possible sockpuppet.

 * Date and time
 * 16:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

24.119.172.110

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * Lung Cancer Study Group trial (LCSG 773) established a benefit for RT in local control, but there was no impact on survival.

PORT Meta-analysis in 1998 analyzed individual data from 9 prospective trials. It concluded that RT had detrimental impact on survival, particularly in N0 and N1 stage. The results for Stage III and N2 disease favored RT, but were not statistically significant. As a result, clinical use of post-op RT dramatically decreased. However, radiation oncologists are critical of the meta-analysis conclusions for several reasons, including staging, patient selection, old technology and inappropriate dose/fractionation schedules. Retrospective evidence using modern RT techniques suggests a survival benefit for post-op RT in N2 patients; retrospective SEER data supports benefit for N2 patients, also suggests worse survival for N0-1 patients. Similarly, retrospective analysis of data from prospective trial (ANITA) suggest that PORT is detrimental in pN1 patients who undergo treatment with chemotherapy, but it is beneficial in pN1 patients who observed only. There was a benefit for PORT in pN2 patients regardless of whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy or not. The evidence is stronger for significant benefit in locorgeional control. Whether this can ultimately translate into survival (as it did in breast cancer) in N2 patients appears unlikely. The situation is confounded by the fact that adjuvant chemotherapy is becoming widely used, after publication of 3 positive trials (see below). Based on the existing data, current guidelines (e.g. ASCO 2021) do not recommend routine PORT for pN2 patients.
 * Date and time
 * 22:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

110.150.28.213

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * I can't edit anything. Trying to add another phrasebook, it doesn't work. It just says that as an anti-abuse measure, I can't edit. Please fix this. Every second time I edit it does this.

 * Date and time
 * 10:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

49.195.113.63

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 08:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

110.174.8.7

 * Username

 * Page you were editing

 * Description
 * was trying to change colour to on Vietnamese colours to nhạt or nhẹ meaning the same thing

 * Date and time
 * 14:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

It seems like you managed to do the edit. Cheers --Synoman Barris (discuss • contribs) 16:32, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comments

2600:387:C:5512:0:0:0:9

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description
 * Add content

 * Date and time
 * 21:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Your attempted edits appear to be non-constructive. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 23:31, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comments

Masriomarm

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Control_Systems/Open_source_tools/Python

 * Description
 * I was trying to add external link to an open source book and an external link to the author's website.

 * Date and time
 * 10:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Our policies here probably don't allow for these sorts of edits. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 10:41, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Emmawilks111

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 10:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Our policies do not allow these edits. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 15:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

77.189.243.68

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * [[User_talk:Felix_QW]]

 * Description
 * Tried to ask an editor to review their own presumably erroneous change, located at /w/index.php?title=Topics_in_Abstract_Algebra/Linear_algebra&diff=4030275&oldid=4030270.

Apparently this detector considers HTTP links into Wikibooks itself to be "external".

By the way, when creating a false positive entry such as this one, it's unclear what to do with the Subject input box.
 * Date and time
 * 22:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

You can get around this filter by using wikilinks, e.g. Topics_in_Abstract_Algebra/Linear_algebra to link to a page, or Special:Diff/4030275 to link to the diff in your edit.

Anyway, I've conveyed your message, see User talk:Felix QW. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 00:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

 * Did not know about the Special:Diff link type, Thanks! And thanks for somehow bringing my notification to the author to life. 77.181.29.218 (discuss) 02:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

170.93.140.42

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * User_talk:170.93.140.42

 * Description
 * Leave a smiley face for my IP address.

 * Date and time
 * 16:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

I think you triggered rate throttling. You could try again. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 20:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

49.149.100.118

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 03:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

The filter rate limits IP editing. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 09:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

86.5.209.14

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 21:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Sorry but IP editing is rate-limited. Could you try again? Or else getting an account would fix it. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 22:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

-Alabama-

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Characters/Hermione Granger

 * Description
 * I was trying to revert/rollback a cross-wiki vandal by SWViewer and then manually, but the filter thwarted my maintenance work. Also, filtering was also triggered right here when I tried, in this same bug report, to add a link to the diff. Your filters should be able to estimate well what is spam and what is not, as in the rest of the wikis.

 * Date and time
 * 20:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

apologies for your problems. That filter only affects users with less than 2 edits, so it shouldn't affect you in future. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 21:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

L10nM4st3r

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Guide to the Godot game engine/Resources and importing

 * Description
 * When I first created this page ages ago, I must have triggered an edit filter. When I found myself on my Filter logs, I found it, with this message: "he/she/it sucks". I don't remember adding the word "suck" or "sucks" to that page, certainly not when I first created it. It wasn't an edit but a page creation (and certainly not my first).

 * Date and time
 * 12:39, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Ohh... "Microsoft paint will do for now if you use Windows, but it sucks for transparent textures...". Yea, I didn't see that. Oh well. L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 13:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes Special:AbuseFilter/8 hits these sort of edits from new users. It shouldn't affect you any further now. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 19:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

188.57.37.30

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 17:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

You need to log-in to make those edits. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 23:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This is weird. An IP who's only other edit was reverted, trying to edit the userpage of a user not active since 2016. I'm just pointing that out, of course there might be an understandable reason, but it might just be attemped vandal.L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 09:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't now really, but Special:AbuseFilter/40 stops logged-out editors from editing the user pages of registered users in any case. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 10:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

1.6.98.139

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 07:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * These edits are probably not allowed. -- Jules (Mrjulesd) 00:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

91.64.170.153

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * More c++ idioms/function poisoning

 * Description
 * Trying to add references where this idiom has been published

 * Date and time
 * 06:59, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * The filter blocked this edit as you were just adding a URL and no other content. The addition of links like this is not generally encouraged and I wouldn't call this a false positive. It's exactly the behaviour the filter is intended to prevent. MarcGarver (discuss • contribs) 10:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

67.149.161.45

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Unicode/List of useful symbols

 * Description
 * Wikipedia has a list of box drawing characters. I tried to link to it, then I tried to just copy the table in.

Both failed though.
 * Date and time
 * 14:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * So, the filter log says "link spamming"? L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 15:21, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, I get it. Wikilinks look like this: [ [ page name]]. To link to wikipedia, use [ [ w:page name]] L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 15:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

MaggieSardino

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description
 * I am creating a bibliography which includes URLs and they are needed.

 * Date and time
 * 21:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Your edit is being stopped for multiple reasons. Please create the page with an initial small edit - just a few lines. Then add each block of your text as a separate edit so that it takes, say, 10 edits to publish the whole page. This should allow you to complete the page without triggering the automatic rejection. Once you have a longer edit history, you will not have these problems. MarcGarver (discuss • contribs) 08:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * How is a new user supposed to know this very odd behavior even exists. No such warning or instructions appears anywhere when I clicked edit. Also, please be precise... what is "a longer edit history", is that 5 edits? 10? 108.168.93.43 (discuss) 14:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi 108. A larger edit history is 10 edits (and four days) - and you must have an account too. L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 14:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

108.168.93.43

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * BASIC Programming/Random Number Generation

 * Description
 * Adding real content.

 * Date and time
 * 13:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Henkle2

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * User:Henkle2

 * Description
 * The two URL's that were flagged as errors and sent me to this page are critical to clarifying the question I posed. I do not know whether the text I entered at "User:Henkle2" was saved or not.

 * Date and time
 * 21:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * your edits were not saved. If a link is not allowed, Wikibooks thinks that you are link spamming. Please wait until your account is at least 4 days old and you have made ten edits. L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 21:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Thanks. I revised the message, removing the URL's, which made it my first message.  I was just trying to contact - User:Stampalbumbuddy/sandbox - about an entry on his page.  I'm not sure how to do that.  I am confused.  Why do I have to have separate logins for Wikipedia, wikicollecting, wikidot and wikibooks?  Why is my Wikipedia login not valid for all of them? Henkle2 (discuss • contribs) 19:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You should have the same login for all wikimedia wikis. If you were trying to link to a diff, try Special:Diff/ diff id. L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 19:59, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

N8henrie

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * en.wikibooks.org/wiki/OpenSCAD_User_Manual/Using_an_external_Editor_with_OpenSCAD?veaction=edit&section=3

 * Description
 * Link to example editor setup flagged as spam

 * Date and time
 * 17:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Please wait until you made 10 edits (and have a four day old account) L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 18:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

TheLostProbe

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Celestia/FAQs

 * Description
 * I was fixing multiple small issues in various sections of the page. This included adding and updating several links to external websites, which triggered an "automated throttle designed to limit spammers".

 * Date and time
 * 04:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * try adding your likns without the "https" at the beginning, and later adding it back (when you made ten edits and your account is four days old). L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 05:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

 * wait, what do you mean my account is four days old? i created this account ages ago... TheLostProbe (discuss • contribs) 05:59, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I hadn't noticed. But you still need ten edits on this wiki. L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 06:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Zafarella2

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description
 * adding links to manuals and repo

 * Date and time
 * 23:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * You probably were blocked by rate throttling. Try waiting a bit, and adding them later. Alternatively, try waiting until you have made ten edits total. L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 07:11, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Mutante

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * User_talk:1234qwer1234qwer4

 * Description
 * I was trying to add a harmless link to Wikimedia's own bugtracker, phabricator.wikimedia.org and you wouldn't let me.

 * Date and time
 * 00:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

115.64.113.41

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description
 * I am creating a Book Chapter for a university assignment, and was trying to add some helpful links/resources relating to mental health support and received an error report, and hence disallowed to make further edits.

I removed the links/URL's associated with the error that was issue, but still cannot edit the page.

It is not uncommon, when presenting information surrounding mental health issues to provide appropriate links so people can access support should the material resonate with them. Ultimately want to be able to submit my assignment.
 * Date and time
 * 03:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Please sign your posts with . Try making an account. If you do, it will be much less likely to disallow you from editing, after ten edits and four days have passed. L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 06:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

212.237.255.112

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * XQuery/Sequences from wikibooks dot org

 * Description
 * Setting typographical consistency on the technical terms used in the text, improving explanations and correcting some code typos.

 * Date and time
 * 15:31, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Please create an account and try again. -- L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 15:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Barbiecalcine

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Editing Music Theory

 * Description
 * Trying to add links - very frustrating as one would ask why bother if the system wont let me actually add links to wikipedias own pages that contain relevant info

 * Date and time
 * 00:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Try linking like this: page name -- L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 08:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

QueerEcofeminist

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * 21_Expected_Questions_For_Social_Scientists/Sexuality

 * Description
 * I am writing a book about 21 Expected questions, when I used words "Anal sex/oral sex"

the filter disallowed the action, I am not sure how to go about it now, I have no userrights here, will it be possible to write about all those sections after I have reviewer? or can there be any changes in the filter which can accommodate all of us who are writting about sexuality and will be using such filter blocked words in every line?
 * Date and time
 * 07:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * as I am a reviewer, I may be able to add the words for you, but can you explain where, or are you using the words in sentences as well as/instead of in sections. Thanks! -- L10nM4st3r / Roar at me 08:23, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

 * @L10nM4st3r, its, fine if having a reviewer is going to solve this issue then I will wait till my promotion which might happen in a day or two. As I can edit other things and come to back this section once I am able to add it. its something one can not suggest others as I am yet to writ those sections too. thanks for the help. QueerEcofeminist (discuss • contribs) 08:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You triggered a global filter. The age of your account, not whether you are a reviewer (or not) will determine whether the edit is allowed or not. MarcGarver (discuss • contribs) 15:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

41.116.130.47

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 21:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Why would you try to edit another user's page? 14:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

2607:F460:1833:43:9C37:A198:ED4:EBB4

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 12:34, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

204.129.232.191

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * History of Alaska/Statehood (1959-present)

 * Description
 * I tried edit more and an edit filter disallowed me to do so because it thinks, I'm making nonconstructive edits.

 * Date and time
 * 16:29, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Pikawil

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * PSP/Translation Projects

 * Description
 * I tried to keep the list up to date with current statuses as of October 2022, which involved adding and updating several links, triggering the "automated throttle designed to limit spammers".

 * Date and time
 * 09:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * you may need to wait a while until you add more links, and try adding them one at a time. 20:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

CrazyEyeOah

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Zelda franchise strategy guide/Items

 * Description
 * i was moving some of the info off into separate pages like was asked

 * Date and time
 * 13:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * "blanking" pages is not allowed, and what you were doing made Wikibooks (wrongly) think you were blanking. You can get around this by removing a smaller bit of content per edit. Say, 1 or 2 paragraphs at a time? 14:39, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

 * ok thanks CrazyEyeOah (discuss • contribs) 01:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Cherry-ALC

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 09:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * It appears that you've been trying to link-spam your own sandbox. Link-spamming is not okay, though. --SHB2000 (discuss • contribs) 09:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

C3328328

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Women's Writing Before Woolf: A Social Reference/Women Writers Project (Northeastern University)

 * Description
 * Create a new page that outlines the updates made to this project (the Women Writers Project) in the last two years since the original publication of the above page.

 * Date and time
 * 22:04, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

198.208.47.74

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description
 * Trying to add addition content for class project as a team. Multiple saves were done since this was a group project. The last addition was to correct content and probably cite sources. New to wikibooks so sorry if I'm doing this incorrectly.

 * Date and time
 * 13:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Please make an account to avoid this happening in the future. 17:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

68.117.161.110

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Chess Opening Theory/1. d4/1...d5/2. c4/2...c6/3. Nf3/3...Nf6/4. Nc3/4...a6/5. c5

 * Description
 * Creating new page on the main 5th move for white in the a6 Slav while not logged in (for that matter, while not having an account). Was told "[a] brief description of the error is storybots spam." Have created other pages in this same book in the past without issue, and there weren't any obvious red flags as I see it. The only external link would have been one transcluded from Template:Chess Opening Theory/Position. Then tried to report the filter false positive here (again, while not logged in) and hit the same filter, which absolutely should not happen. Finally made an account so I could report this false positive.

 * Date and time
 * 23:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Thanks. I'm looking into it now. I added new filters yesterday to counter a spammer so trying to see which word or words tripped the filter.--Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]] [[Image:Flag_of_Ukraine.svg|15px]] talk 03:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Can't figure out exactly what word tripped the filter so I have removed most of the changes I made yesterday. Should be OK now.--Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]] [[Image:Flag_of_Ukraine.svg|15px]] talk 03:42, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Tried creating Chess Opening Theory/1. d4/1...d5/2. c4/2...c6/3. Nf3/3...Nf6/4. Nc3/4...a6/5. c5 again while logged out, copped a 6 hr block. Possibly related, and possibly not (I have no idea what the filter actually filters), I just realized even the links to Special:AbuseLog in Template:Falsepositive are tyechnically external links, maybe that's what done it earlier. Anyway, I reckon I'll edit logged in going forward. GoodLineBadLine (discuss • contribs) 11:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Unblocked that account. Sorry for the problems. That filter is just weeding out keywords related to recent spam and, I think, not targeting external links. I'll change some things.--Xania [[Image:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|15px]] [[Image:Flag_of_Ukraine.svg|15px]] talk 00:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Gerson Lapid Jr

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 12:10, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Apisite

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * User:Lombard

 * Description
 * I screwed up about the kind of page, that is to be moved, by keeping it in the user category of pages.
 * (The blame could be on creamless americano coffee with coffee blossom honey.)
 * The proper page is supposed to be Lombard if anyone would like to help me and with improving it.

 * Date and time
 * 21:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * (Done by somebody else) 14:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

2A00:23C7:D29C:1201:CC44:2DC7:A044:76B4

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Caviar

 * Description
 * Valid edits flagged as vandalism

 * Date and time
 * 13:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Try making an account. It should make editing easier. 14:37, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

156.22.244.49

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 02:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Tried to edit the prostate ADT/RT page to add the TROG RADAR 03.04 trial and was rejected.

UhLukas 2859

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description
 * I was trying to add a link but a error popped up

 * Date and time
 * 20:22, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

173.215.166.110

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 13:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

Nw520

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * LaTeX/Colors

 * Description
 * I'm unable to revert Special:Diff/4185782.

 * Date and time
 * 21:35, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * ✅ 22:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Soulbust

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Chess/Computer Chess

 * Description
 * Trying to add a link to Chess.com

 * Date and time
 * 10:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * new accounts can't add external links, so to do that, you will need to wait a few days first. 12:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

204.129.232.191

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * An Internet of Enerything?

 * Description
 * When I tried to edit, I kept on triggering edit filter and it is disallowing me for some reason.

 * Date and time
 * 17:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Comments

RdmBarta

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Radiation_Oncology/Toxicity/AAPM_TG101

 * Description
 * I was attempting to update the parallel structure table to correct the 3 fraction dose thresholds as per the Erratum to the original TG101 report. See: Erratum: “Correction to stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report from the AAPM Task Group No. 101” [Med. Phys. 37(8), 4078–4101 (2010)]"

 * Date and time
 * 20:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * Hi, RdmBarta. There's a well known LTA who lurks this site that tends to add the word "radiation" among other words. You may need to wait a few days and make a few other edits before being able to make the change you were intending to. --SHB2000 (discuss • contribs) 22:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Belfie13

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * PHP_Programming/Editors

 * Description
 * add sublime text and a link to their home page

 * Date and time
 * 23:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Comments

Original Authority

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Starting and Running a Wiki Website/Hosted Wikis

 * Description
 * Adding wiki.gg and Telepedia to the list of free wiki hosts.

 * Date and time
 * 16:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Comments

154.192.19.41

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 *

 * Description

 * Date and time
 * 18:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Comments

72.42.156.172

 * Username

 * Page you were editing
 * Cryptography_Applied

 * Description
 * First time user. Standard newbie mistake, ignorance.  Not quite sure what I did wrong.  Also unsure if the work I did is saved.  Initial commit with a few reference links.  Likely offender was in a large section of, mostly unrelated, other possible mistakes.  Highly likely this is not the only mistake or violation of protocol/etiquette I made.  It is possible I failed the bot check picture by putting in an 'e' for a 'o'.

 * Date and time
 * 05:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

 * Comments

 * A large edit with lots of URLs caused you to trigger both a local and global "spam" filter. Try making smaller edits. You will also find it less likely to fall foul of a filter if you create an account. MarcGarver (discuss • contribs) 13:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


text:
User:Heejunnie

Japanese names

 * 1) Aika(あいか）
 * 2) Akane(茜）
 * 3) Akiko (アキコ）
 * 4) Akira(アキラ）
 * 5) Amaya （アマヤ）
 * 6) Asami (麻美）
 * 7) Atsuko （敦子）
 * 8) Aya（彩）
 * 9) Chie （千枝）
 * 10) Chika(チカ）
 * 11) Eiko （エイコ）
 * 12) Emiko(恵美子）
 * 13) Eri（エリ）
 * 14) Fumiko （文子）
 * 15) Gina（ジーナ）
 * 16) Hana（ハナ）
 * 17) Hanako（花子）
 * 18) Haruki（春樹）
 * 19) Haruko（ハルコ）
 * 20) Harumi （晴海）
 * 21) Hideko（ひでこ）
 * 22) Hikaru （ひかる
 * 23) Hiro（ヒロ）
 * 24) Jun （6月）
 * 25) Junko （じゅんこ）
 * 26) Kameko （カメコ）
 * 27) Kaori （かをり
 * 28) Kaoru （薫）
 * 29) Kasue （かすえ）
 * 30) Kasuko （かすこ）
 * 31) Katsumi (勝美）
 * 32) Kazuko(和子）
 * 33) Kazumi（かずみ）
 * 34) Keiko（ケイコ）
 * 35) Kimi （キミ）
 * 36) Kimiko （キミコ）
 * 37) Madoka （まどか）
 * 38) Maiko （舞妓）
 * 39) Maki （マキ）
 * 40) Mana（マナ）
 * 41) Mari（マリ）
 * 42) Mariko （麻理子）
 * 43) Masami （まさみ）
 * 44) Masumi （ますみ）
 * 45) Michi （ミチ）
 * 46) Mika （ミカ）
 * 47) Minako （美奈子）
 * 48) Miyako （みやこ）
 * 49) Naomi （ナオミ）
 * 50) Rika （リカ）
 * 51) Riku（リク）
 * 52) Saki （咲）
 * 53) Sakura （さくら）
 * 54) Shiori （しおり）
 * 55) Takako（タカコ）
 * 56) Toshiko（としこ）
 * 57) Yuko （ゆうこ）

title: User:Heejunnie


text:
User talk:Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker

 * Archive 2021

title: User talk:Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker


text:
World Heritage Sites/Buddhas of Bamiyan

The Buddhas of Bamiyan were two huge statues of Gautama Buddha in the Bamyan Province of Afghanistan. The Western Buddha was the larger Buddha with a height of 55 meters and was built around 618 AD. The smaller Eastern Buddha had a height of 38 meters and was built around 570 AD. They were destroyed by the Taliban in 2001 using dynamite.

title: World Heritage Sites/Buddhas of Bamiyan


text: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Thailand

title: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Thailand


text: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Thailand/Image

title: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Thailand/Image


text: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Tuvalu

title: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Tuvalu


text: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Tuvalu/Image

title: Wikijunior:Countries A-Z/Tuvalu/Image


text:
Cookbook:Caprese Salad

Caprese salad is a delicious Italian dish made with tomato and Mozzarella cheese. It is quite simple but tastes great and looks attractive.

Ingredients

 * 1 medium tomato
 * A few basil leaves
 * about ¾ the weight of Mozzarella cheese as the tomato, sliced
 * Olive oil
 * Balsamic vinegar
 * Italian seasoning or oregano and pepper (optional)

Procedure

 * 1) Cut the tomato into about 5 slices.
 * 2) Put a slice of mozzarella cheese on top of each tomato slice.
 * 3) Cut a horizontal slit halfway through each slice.
 * 4) Put a basil leaf on top of each one.
 * 5) Sprinkle herbs over each slice.
 * 6) Drizzle some vinegar and olive oil on top. Do not mix the vinegar and olive oil.
 * 7) Eat fresh.

title: Cookbook:Caprese Salad


text:
German/Grammar/Irregular verbs

Irregular verbs
Once you eliminate stem-changing verbs, German has surprisingly few verbs that are irregular in the present tense, and we'll increase our our inventory of verbs a bit by introducing many of them here. We'll postpone the rest until we cover a bit more grammar and can use them as they're meant to be used. These include sein ("to be") and werden ("to become"), which will be covered in the next section, and some of the past-like present verbs (defined below).

tun
Traditionally, German textbooks in English tend to postpone introducing this verb long past where should be, given that it is so common. This is understandable since it's a cognate to the English "do", and while it can often be used the same way, it's use in German is much more restricted than it is in English. So, rather than have students using tun inappropriately, textbook authors apparently have chosen to not tell readers about it until they've reached some mastery of other aspects of the language.

It means "to do" in the sense of to perform or carry out an action. As such it often takes an abstract noun as its object. It is not, like the English "do", used with other verbs to form negations, to add emphasis, etc. Even in the sense of performing an action, tun has strong competition from machen – "to make", which can be nearly synonymous with it.

This is the only verb in German that ends with -un, so there is a good reason to call it irregular in the infinitive.

Example: In most cases there is a more specific verb available for a given activity, and tun should only replace it when necessary. So: rather than for "You're working."
 * Du tust deine Arbeit. – "You're doing your job."
 * Du arbeitest.
 * Du tust Arbeit.

haben
The verb for "to have" is often irregular in European languages, and German is no exception. It's not as irregular as one might fear though, at least in the present tense, since it only drops the b in certain cases.

Example:
 * Ich habe einen Hund. – "I have a dog."
 * Note that haben is a transitive verb and uses the accusative case for einen Hund.

Past-like present verbs
The technical term for these is "preterite-present verbs", but this rather jargony expression masks a simple description of what they are. These verbs are conjugated in the present tense similar to the way many verbs are conjugated in the past tense. Since we haven't actually done the past tense yet, think of this as a preview of what conjugating verbs, some of them anyway, in the past tense will look like.

There are only seven of these verbs: dürfen, können, mögen, müssen, sollen, wissen, wollen. We'll need to postpone covering some of them, dürfen, können, müssen, sollen, in detail until later when we talk about modal verbs.

wissen
This verb means "to know", but only in the sense of knowing a fact, or of being aware of something. You would use kennen to to mean "to know" in the sense of being acquainted with a person, or being familiar with something.

Notice there are several differences between the way this verb is conjugated and the stem-changing verbs covered earlier. For one thing, the vowel changes in the first person singular (ich) as well as in the second and third person singular. Also, the endings are dropped in the first person singular (ich) and third person singular (er, sie, es). The vowel change pattern and the dropped endings are features of all the verbs of this type. You may also notice that the ss in the stem changes to ß in certain places, but this is simply a side-effect of the vowel change together with German spelling rules; in Switzerland there is no change, so weiss instead of weiß.

For example:
 * Ich weiß die Antwort. – "I know the answer."
 * Weißt du die Antwort? – "Do you know the answer?"

mögen
This means "to like", though be aware there are many ways to express this sentiment depending on what you like and other circumstances.

For example:
 * Ich mag Schokolade. – "I like chocolate."
 * Magst du Schokolade? – "Do you like chocolate?"

wollen
This means "to want". It's a cognate to the English future tense forming word "will", but it's a false friend; the meanings aren't really the same any more. "To want" was a common meaning of "to will" in English, but it's rare in modern English, surviving mostly in the nouns "will" and "goodwill, and in "willing", "willingly", and the phrase "do what you will".

For example:
 * Ich will Ruhe! – "I want quiet!"
 * Willst du einen Keks? – "Do you want a cookie?"

Modal verbs
In another section we will cover modal verbs, which describes the way certain verbs can be used in a sentence. Aside from wissen – "to know", the past-like present verbs are also known as "modal verbs" because they can be used this way.

title: German/Grammar/Irregular verbs


text:
User talk:Queen Animie

Hi guys I'm just a new comer in Wikipedia article hope you wish me best luck. Thanks again guys for your support 😉😉😉😊.

Why geometry?
Why geometry? Geometry is one of the most elegant fields in mathematics. It deals with visual shapes that we know from everyday life.

Guideline
Guideline When working on this project, remember that it's aimed at children. It's more important to be understood than to be precisely accurate on every detail. Use technical vocabulary when you need to, but don't use big words where simpler language would work. Whenever you have to use a word, list it in the glossary of basic terms, and define it. Either that, or note it needs to be defined in the glossary page. Giving definitions when such words are used is generally a good idea as well.

Please, if you can contribute to this book, do so. You can work on almost anything including this page, but if you want to make some significant changes please bring them up on the discussion page. Additional new elements are welcome; see the section below.

Try to restrict discussion to the main discussion page so that people can actually see your message without having to check specific pages.

title: User talk:Queen Animie


text:
Professionalism/Timnit Gebru and Ethical AI at Google

In late 2020, prominent Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was abruptly fired after being pressured to retract a paper critical of language processing models used by the company. Her dismissal has sparked outrage among employees and industry professionals, ultimately leading to a restructuring of leadership within the Google Ethical AI team. The firing of Gebru brought attention to the issues of research censorship, oppressive work environments, and abuses of power in the technology industry.

Diversification efforts
Google AI is the artificial intelligence division of Google. The stated mission of the group is to build responsible systems that are accessible to all people. The AI principles that govern the work done by Google AI were adapted in 2020 to address systemic racial bias with the objective of "learning from a diverse set of voices internally and externally." Despite these efforts, Black employees make up less than 4% of the overall technical workforce at the company.

Ethical AI team
Google Brain is a research team within Google that focuses on machine intelligence, including deep learning and natural language processing. Within Google Brain, the Ethical AI team was created in 2017 by Margaret Mitchell, a senior research scientist working on aligning AI practices to human values and fairness. Gebru joined the team as a co-lead in September 2018, after persistent recruiting efforts by Mitchell and Jeff Dean, the head of the Google Brain research group.

Black in AI
Before joining the Ethical AI team, Gebru co-founded a non-profit organization to address the lack of diversity in artificial intelligence. The organization aspires to increase the presence of Black people in AI through academic programs, conferences, advocacy, and community. Gebru has heavily advocated for increased diversity in the researchers and developers working on AI systems as an essential component to developing unbiased machine learning systems.

Algorithmic bias
In 2018, Gebru co-authored a widely publicized research paper on the racial and gender bias of automated facial analysis systems. The study analyzed three commercially available gender classification products against subjects grouped by gender and skin type. The study found that all three companies had the lowest error rates for male subjects and the highest error rates for darker female subjects. Despite widespread speculation that AI-based systems did not produce uniform results across different populations, this research was one of the first studies to show empirical evidence of bias. Media coverage of the study was extensive, and Gebru became a prolific voice in the fight for fair algorithms.

Large language models
Around two years after joining the Ethical AI team at Google, Gebru was working to co-author a paper on the negative consequences of large language models (LMs). The paper, "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?" did not pass the internal review process at Google. The paper identified major issues with LMs to be environmental and financial cost, problematic training data, misdirected research efforts, and the amplification of bias. The researchers made multiple critical references to BERT, a machine learning technique for LMs used by Google to improve search results and language processing. The paper concludes by imploring researchers to carefully consider the risks of large LMs and re-evaluate the perceived necessity of technologies that mimic human behavior.

Paper retraction and Gebru's response
On November 19, 2020, Timnit Gebru was abruptly asked to come to an afternoon meeting, but was not informed of what the meeting would be about. At the meeting, then-Vice President of Google Research Megan Kacholia informed Gebru and her co-authors that their paper had not been approved for publication. They were mandated to retract the paper.

Gebru was angered by the decision, and emailed a listserv called Google Brain Women and Allies to voice her frustration with the experience and the environment at Google in general. In the email, Gebru states that she had to request feedback on the paper, and was only granted it in the form of a confidential document with anonymous authors. She says that when she tried to engage in a discussion about the feedback, she was ignored.

Gebru also implies that the retraction was not handled in alignment with typical procedures, and that she was treated poorly because of her race and gender. She was infuriated to not be involved in the discussion about whether to retract the paper, saying of herself that from Google’s perspective, “You are not worth having any conversations about this, since you are not someone whose humanity...is acknowledged or valued in this company.”

Gebru also discusses other instances of bias at Google, where Black women such as herself make up only 1.6% of the workforce. Gebru had previously stopped posting to Google Brain Women and Allies after “all the micro and macro aggressions and harassments [she] received after posting [her] stories.” She says that at Google “there is no incentive to hire 39% women: your life gets worse when you start advocating for underrepresented people.” Her writing reflects previous instances of retaliation against activists at Google, such as after The Google Walkouts of 2018.

Gebru's firing
After emailing the listserv, Gebru expressed her disappointment to Jeff Dean and Kacholia, and sent them a list of requirements for her to continue working at Google. One requirement was to reveal the anonymous authors of the feedback on her paper. Kacholia responded on December 2, 2020, saying that the demands could not be met, and that she accepted Gebru’s resignation. From Gebru’s perspective, she had been fired, and she believed it was retaliation for the email she sent to Google Brain Women and Allies rather than because of her demands. She tweeted that Kacholia had asked her to not return to work after her Thanksgiving vacation “because certain aspects of the email [she] sent... in the brain group reflect behavior that is inconsistent with the expectations of a Google manager.”

On December 3, 2020, Jeff Dean sent an email to the Google Research Division to provide some clarity about the circumstances of the paper retraction and Gebru’s departure. Dean wrote that the paper “was only shared with a day’s notice before its deadline...and then instead of awaiting reviewer feedback, it was approved for submission and submitted,” which went against Google research procedures. Dean also mentioned that the paper neglected to incorporate recent research on language processing models that addressed some of the issues identified in the paper. However, another researcher at Google Brain later tweeted that his submissions "were always checked for disclosure of sensitive material, never for the quality of the literature review," implying that the rule that Dean believes justify the paper retraction is only selectively applied at Google.

After justifying the paper retraction, Dean states in his email that Gebru was not fired, but rather resigned of her own volition. He also expresses disappointment in the email Gebru sent to the listserv,  imploring employees to keep working on internal diversity initiatives.

Initial backlash
Many Google employees were outraged by Gebru’s firing. On December 3rd, 2020, a petition was created by Google Walkout for Real Change asking Google for answers about Google's response to Gebru's paper, increased transparency moving forward, and to renew its commitment to ethical artificial intelligence. As of April 25th 2021, the petition had 4302 signatures, 2695 of which are from Google employees. In December, the Google Ethics AI team wrote a letter to Google management. The letter, titled, “The Future of Ethical AI at Google Research” asks for engineering Vice President Megan Kacholia to be fired. The letter also requested more details from the decision to fire Gebru as well as an end to retaliatory punishment for the concerned employees speaking out. The team also requested Gebru be reinstated.

On December 16th, 2020, nine members of Congress, sent a letter to Google requesting more information about Gebru’s firing. The letter quotes Google’s memos and calls them out for being extremely vague. These members also ask for more detailed policies from Google to ensure that their research is conducted properly and helps identify discriminatory problems in its models.

After Google remains silent, employees begin to take more extreme action. On January 5th, David Baker, an engineering director at Google quit in protest of Gebru’s firing. On February 3rd, Vinesh Kannan, a Google software engineer, quit. In his resignation, he cited the firing of Gebru and April Christina Curley. Curley was a Google recruiter who had been fired in 2020.

Google responds
On February 17th, it was announced the Google Ethical AI team would be restructured. The group was not notified internally of the changes until after the news broke. Vice President Megan Kacholia was fired and replaced by Marian Croak.

Dr. Margaret Mitchell, another prominent AI researcher who founded the Google Ethical AI team, was especially vocal on twitter about Gebru’s firing. In January 2021, Mitchell’s Google email access was blocked and she was placed on administrative leave. On February 19th, 2021, Mitchell was officially fired. A Google spokesperson said that she was fired because an official review found that she violated Google’s code of conduct and security policies. When asked her reaction to Google’s statement, Mitchell replied, “I don’t know about those allegations actually. I mean most of that is news to me.” Her firing sparked another wave of outrage amongst artificial intelligence researchers. On March 8th, 2021, the Google Walkout for Real change wrote an open letter. Instead of targeting Google, the letter attempts to place outside pressure on Google. The open letter asks academic conferences to require research submissions to also include corporate research policies and forbid lawyers from editing the papers. The letter also announces the #RecruitMeNot campaign where people interviewing with Google withdraw their application, specifically citing concerns from the firing of Gebru and Mitchell. Researchers are asked to refuse funding from Google and the open letter requests whistleblower protections be strengthened on a state and national level.

Continued backlash
On February 26th, the FAccT Conference decided to remove Google from their list of sponsors, citing the recent controversy with the Ethical AI team. The conference is one of the first groups to speak out against Google and shows the industry is paying attention to the controversy. On March 12th, researchers, including Dr. Hadas Kress-Gazit and Dr. Scott Niekum, begin to withdraw from Google’s Machine Learning and Robot Safety Workshop. AI researchers outside of Google are beginning to take a more definitive stance. On April 6th, Google manager Samy Bengio announced his resignation. While he did not mention the firing of Gebru and Mitchell in his resignation letter, he had previously wrote on social media, “I stand by you, Timnit.”

Research censorship
Google had a large amount of control over the research of the Ethical AI team. The company could block research papers from being presented at research conferences, creating a potential conflict of interest. Research findings may reveal shortcomings in Google's own AI models and it is important these discoveries are presented to help fix the same issues that may exist in AI models elsewhere.

Oppressive work environments
Google management gave company image a very high priority. When forced to make tradeoffs, the short-term reputation of the company came before Google's own employees and helping make text-based AI more ethical.

Abuses of power
Google policies when submitting to research conferences were only selectively enforced. Management refused to give specific feedback to help improve the research paper so it could be approved and kept the team in the dark about who was making these decisions and why.

Further Work
This controversy is ongoing. Future work could continue to keep up with any further backlash that occurs as well as if the petition and open letters seem to have lasting effects, either at Google or elsewhere. These concerns may die out or lead to lasting policy changes at research conferences and tech companies.


text:
User:Aiwasscrowley

The Holy Books of Thelema

title: User:Aiwasscrowley