When Causal Dynamics Matter: Adapting Causal Strategies through Meta-Aware Interventions
Moritz Willig, Tim Woydt, Devendra Singh Dhami, Kristian Kersting
Many causal inference frameworks rely on a staticity assumption, where repeated interventions are expected to yield consistent outcomes, often summarized by metrics like the Average Treatment Effect (ATE). This assumption, however, frequently fails in dynamic environments where interventions can alter the system's underlying causal structure, rendering traditional `static' ATE insufficient or misleading. Recent works on meta-causal models (MCM) offer a promising avenue by enabling qualitative reasoning over evolving relationships. In this work, we propose a specific class of MCM with desirable properties for explicitly modeling and predicting intervention outcomes under meta-causal dynamics. Through expository examples in high-impact domains of medical treatment and judicial decision-making, we highlight the severe consequences that arise when system dynamics are neglected and demonstrate the successful application of meta-causal strategies to navigate these challenges.