Memory by accident: a theory of learning as a byproduct of network stabilization
Basile Confavreux, William Dorrell, Nishil Patel, Andrew Saxe
Synaptic plasticity is widely considered to be crucial to the brain’s ability to learn throughout life. Decades of theoretical work have therefore been invested in deriving and designing biologically plausible learning rules capable of granting various memory abilities to neural networks. Most of these theoretical approaches optimize directly for a desired memory function; but this procedure can lead to complex, finely-tuned rules, rendering them brittle to perturbations and difficult to implement in practice. Instead, we build on recent work that automatically discovers large numbers of candidate plasticity rules operating in recurrent spiking neural networks. Surprisingly, despite the fact that these rules are selected solely to achieve network stabilization, we observe across a range of network models---feedforward, recurrent; rate and spiking---that almost all these rules endow the network with memory - seemingly by accident. To understand this phenomenon, we study an analytic toy model. We show that memory arises from the degeneracy of weight matrices that stabilize a network: where the network lands in this space of stable weights depends on its past inputs---that is, memory. Even simple Hebbian plasticity rules can utilize this degeneracy, creating a zoo of memory abilities with various lifetimes. In practice, the larger the network and the more co-active plasticity rules in the system, the stronger the memory-by-accident phenomenon becomes. Overall, our findings suggest that activity-silent memory is a near-unavoidable consequence of stabilization. Simple forms of memory, such as familiarity or novelty detection, appear to be widely available resources for plastic brain networks, suggesting that they could form the raw materials that were later sculpted into higher-order cognitive abilities.