Pairwise Calibrated Rewards for Pluralistic Alignment
Daniel Halpern, Evi Micha, Ariel Procaccia, Itai Shapira
Current alignment pipelines presume a single, universal notion of desirable behavior. However, human preferences often  diverge across users, contexts, and cultures. As a result, disagreement collapses into the majority signal and minority perspectives are discounted.  To address this,  we propose reflecting diverse human preferences through a distribution over multiple reward functions, each inducing a distinct aligned policy. The distribution is learned directly from pairwise preference without annotator identifiers or predefined groups.  Instead, annotator disagreements are treated as informative soft labels. Our central criterion is \emph{pairwise calibration}: for every pair of candidate responses, the proportion of reward functions preferring one response matches the fraction of annotators with that preference. We prove that even a small outlier-free ensemble can accurately represent diverse preference distributions. Empirically, we introduce and validate a practical training heuristic to learn such ensembles, and demonstrate its effectiveness through improved calibration, implying a more faithful representation of pluralistic values.