OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning
Ling Fu, Zhebin Kuang, Jiajun Song, Mingxin Huang, Biao Yang, Yuzhe Li, Linghao Zhu, Qidi Luo, Xinyu Wang, Hao Lu, Zhang Li, Guozhi Tang, Bin Shan, Chunhui Lin, Qi Liu, Binghong Wu, Hao Feng, Hao Liu, Can Huang, Jingqun Tang, Wei Chen, Lianwen Jin, Yuliang Liu, Xiang Bai
Scoring the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) has witnessed growing interest. Existing benchmarks have highlighted the impressive performance of LMMs in text recognition; however, their abilities in certain challenging tasks, such as text localization, handwritten content extraction, and logical reasoning, remain underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce OCRBench v2, a large-scale bilingual text-centric benchmark with currently the most comprehensive set of tasks ($4\times$ more tasks than the previous multi-scene benchmark OCRBench), the widest coverage of scenarios ($31$ diverse scenarios), and thorough evaluation metrics, with $10,000$ human-verified question-answering pairs and a high proportion of difficult samples. Moreover, we construct a private test set with $1,500$ manually annotated images. The consistent evaluation trends observed across both public and private test sets validate the \datasetname's reliability. After carefully benchmarking state-of-the-art LMMs, we find that most LMMs score below $50$ ($100$ in total) and suffer from five-type limitations, including less frequently encountered text recognition, fine-grained perception, layout perception, complex element parsing, and logical reasoning. The benchmark and evaluation scripts are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/qytest-5FC4.