CURE: Co-Evolving Coders and Unit Testers via Reinforcement Learning
Yinjie Wang, Ling Yang, Ye Tian, Ke Shen, Mengdi Wang
Mathematical reasoning in large language models has been successfully incentivized through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, leading to improved one-shot precision. In this work, we turn our focus to the coding domain. Beyond one-shot precision, we highlight unit test generation as another key factor for enhancing coding ability, since accurate unit tests are essential for enabling self-checking and self-correction during inference.Traditional approaches for fine-tuning LLMs on unit test generation rely heavily on ground-truth code solutions in the training data. We propose CURE, a novel reinforcement learning framework with a dedicated reward design that co-evolves coding and unit test generation capabilities based on their interaction outcomes—without any ground-truth code as supervision. This approach enables flexible and scalable training and allows the unit tester to learn directly from the coder’s mistakes.Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate that our CURE models, derived from base models of varying sizes, excel in both code generation and unit test generation. They naturally extend to downstream tasks such as test-time scaling—achieving a 6.2\% improvement over the base model—and agentic unit test generation, with a 25.1\% improvement. Our 4B model consistently outperforms Qwen3-4B while achieving 64.8\% inference efficiency in unit test generation. Notably, we also find that the CURE model can serve as an effective reward model for reinforcement learning on base models, even in the absence of any labeled supervision.