I've got four words for you.... You are an idiot!  You're shooting off to people here because they don't agree with you're twisted interpretation of the evidence (or so-called evidence).  Yes, the initial image release did not clearly show signs of injuries on Zimmerman's head, but it was from a distance, on a survellience camera, and AFTER the paramedics had cleaned his wounds.... the later released photo (showing the cuts and blood) was taken from a digital camera, close up, and BEFORE the paramedics cleaned him up.  As someone who has a fair amount of experiance dealing with survelience cameras, I am more than familiar enough with their capibilities, and their draw-backs. For example, no matter what the quality of the camera, the weakness of the system is the quality of the recording. Even if the camera's TVR was set to 4CIF encoding @ a full 30frames per second... that still leaves a recorded image quality of approx 720×480 lines of resolution.... vs the picture released later which was reported to have been taken at from a cellular telephone, which on average is around 2.1MP, or 1600×1200 lines of resolution.  What this means is there is a total of 345,600 pixels of information in the enitre image of the garage bay that was used to first "claim" there was no cuts on GZ's head. Zooming in, or enhancing, or what ever term you want to use cannot increase the amount of information available. All they can do is run computer algorithms on the data in hopes that the computer can GUESS what the pixels between the actual recorded pixels are to try to make a POSSIBLE senario for the lost information....  Compare that to the 1,920,000 pixels of information in the later released photo that was taken at the scene, of just GZ's head (as apposed to the 345,600 pixels that made up the entire picture from the surveilence camera.) Now consider that GZ's head made up less than 5-10% (but we'll use 10% here) of that surviellence cam picture, meaning that the number of pixel information from that shot on GZ's head would be more like 34,500 pixels of information.  Basically, the entire top of GZ's head could have been tattooed, or cut, or dirty, or anything else, and the chance you would be able to identify anything at that distance, and that resloution would be less that winning the lottery.  If you don't understand the concepts here, please do a little reading up on the technologies BEFORE you try to act like an expert. I'm not claiming to be an expert here, but I'm fairly sure from your posts that I have a much higher understanding of the capibilities and limitations of the devices use to collect this evidence.  It's a shame this family lost their son, but people make bad decisions every day, and they sometimes end up costing them their lives. From my interpretation of the evidence, I have not yet heard or seen anything (other than speculation and accusations from people like yourself) that would begin to refute the claims GZ is making, and quite to the contrary, drop all of the media's spin on things, and look at the EVIDENCE that has been released at this point, it looks like the evidence completely backs his story up.  Add to this that he co-operated FULLY with the police, and I just don't see how you people can try an make him our as this crazed, black hating racist. Even worse, I can't understand where people (not pinning this one on you, more the media) keep going on that is being backed by all of these anti-semitic groups.... that has to be the best one of all! Anyone want to look it up in the dictionary? These groups would be more sympathetic to Martin than Zimmerman.... Anti-semitism is hatred of JEWS! (and if you didn't figure this out, Zimmerman is a Jewish family name, as opposed to Martin, which is a family name origionating in jolly old England)
This evening "Piers Morgan Tonight" welcomed Mark NeJame with new details on George Zimmerman, the man charged with killing Trayvon Martin. Joining Piers Morgan for a live interview, the CNN legal analyst shared an exclusive photograph which suggests Zimmerman has black heritage: "The man in the m...