But when the Graves County Sheriff’s Department raided the property on 14 February 2012, they found about one hundred dogs sharing small cages. Underfed and thirsty, many were sick. Others were dead and some corpses shared cages with live dogs. Lacewell, who couldn’t be reached for comment, faced 94 counts of animal cruelty.  “It was a nasty mess,” recalled Detective Steve Halsell.  From Ireland to Oregon, large breeding operations are using online pet adoption sites — once almost purely the realm of dutiful charities saving animals from abusive homes — to peddle dogs. Many pretend to be rescue organisations, while others have actually formed legal charities to sell animals raised in factory-like facilities.  “Since the advent of the internet, people have been taking advantage of this,” said Tracy Coppola, campaigns officer at the International Fund for Animal Welfare’s (IFAW) office in Washington, DC. The problem has grown in recent years, however, as dog buyers stay away from factory-bred animals at puppy shops and turn to pet adoption sites, which they deem to be more legitimate and humane.  Animal welfare experts believe that nearly two-thirds of the dogs sold online come from puppy mills. No single organisation keeps track of just how much money is spent on animals found through adoption sites. But consumers, who regularly spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on specialty breeds of dogs, are unwittingly funding the fake rescues.  The problem is especially prevalent in the US and Ireland, home to many of the world’s puppy mills. It’s less prevalent, animal welfare experts say, in much of Europe and Australia, even though both of those continents are home to large-scale dog breeding facilities.  Just how profitable fake rescue organisations have become is unclear. In the US alone, people spent an estimated $53 billion on their pets last year — that includes everything from purchasing a dog to toys and food. Sites like adoptapet.com and petfinder.com list animals with adoption fees that that range into the thousands.  Last year, the IFAW set out to determine just how many dogs sold online come from puppy mills. The organisation spent months combing about 10,000 ads from nine websites. Of them, 62% of the dogs came from puppy mills. Many of those were being sold by breeders claiming to be rescues.  In Ireland, animal welfare workers hoped legislation passed in 2012 banning puppy mills would end the problem of factory dog farms. But government cutbacks lessened enforcement, and the mills are still breeding 90,000 dogs a year, half of them exported primarily to the UK and Europe.  Passing laws isn’t always enough to stop the problem, said Cori Menkin, senior director with the ASPCA’s puppy mills campaign in New York City. In Ohio, for instance, more factory dog farms are claiming to be rescue organisations in order to skirt an anti-puppy mill law that took effect in February.  Fake rescue groups like the one run by Lacewell in Kentucky have gone so far as to create nonprofits and collect donations — so it’s not always enough to see if a group is registered as a charity. One notorious puppy mill sought nonprofit status from the Irish government earlier this year but was rebuffed when animal activists stepped in, according to Kathrina Bentley, head of marketing for Dogs Trust in Dublin. Other puppy mills simply claim to be rescue groups on online sites without actually setting up a nonprofit.  “Unfortunately public awareness of conditions within puppy farms is low, and many pups are sold online to unsuspecting members of the public,” Bentley wrote in an email.  Before you get a puppy from an online rescue, here’s what you need to know to sort the real charitable groups from the puppy mills in disguise.  For consumers, there’s no easy way to determine from an advertisement if a dog they’re buying from a rescue group is coming straight from a factory farm. The only solution is for buyers to insist on seeing the place where the dog was kept, said Melanie Kahn, senior director at the Humane Society’s Stop Puppy Mills Campaign in Washington, DC. Fake rescues often insist on shipping the dog to the buyer or meeting in a neutral location.  “Seeing where the dog lives is really the only way to assure you’re using a reputable organisation,” Kahn said.  The ads from fake rescues employ careful language to avoid fraud. It’s accurate to claim the dogs have been taken out of puppy mills or even that they’ve been “saved” from deplorable conditions. The photos often show happy animals that may be seeing the outside of a cage for the first time.  “Anybody can put up pictures of puppies frolicking in grass, but it doesn’t mean that’s where they are being kept,” Menkin warned.  The bottom line: don’t be fooled by fancy advertisements or slick marketing.  It pays to do an online search on the kennel, rescue group or breeder to make sure they haven’t been on the wrong side of a raid. Animal welfare groups have begun keeping databases of notorious breeders, and a quick search on Google could turn up photos of some deplorable conditions at your local “rescue.”  Also do an online search for the name of the person running the site from which you plan to adopt. You can also check with local law enforcement websites to search for criminal convictions in some jurisdictions.  Two months after the Kentucky kennel was raided, Lacewell agreed to plead guilty to 50 charges of animal cruelty. Under the deal, she agreed to own no more than one dog for the next two years. Lacewell served no jail time. And in April 2014, she can legally begin selling dogs again.  Authorities rarely catch puppy mills posing as rescue organisations, but it does happen.  In 2009, the New York Attorney General investigated allegations that two upstate breeders were selling puppy mill dogs under the guise of a rescue organisation. One breeder, Maria LaRocca, admitted to buying dogs from one of the US’s most notorious large breeders.  LaRocca said her intention was to get dogs out of a bad place. “What’s the difference if I buy from puppy mills instead of them selling dogs at a pet store?” she said by phone. “I’m just... putting the dogs straight up for adoption.”  LaRocca and another breeder agreed to shutter their rescue organisations and the investigation was closed without charges.  In Seattle, Wendy Laymon, who ran a website for a company that claimed to be a non-profit pet rescue, was repeatedly fined for conditions in her own dog breeding facilities. This year she was charged and sentenced to 180 days in jail for operating a kennel without a license.
Buyer beware: Some canine adoption websites arenât what they appear to be. How to assess before you purchase a pet.