The campaign payments to spouses did not involve any taxpayer money, and the practice has been declared legal if certain requirements are met. Nevertheless, some watchdog groups see the potential for abuse when a lawmaker's family receives financial support from his political backers.  "Is there anything patently wrong with having a family member work on a campaign?" said Dave Levinthal, communications director at the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "Arguably not. But it gets into sticky territory when the candidate, him or herself, stands to benefit personally in a significant way from political donations that are being made to fuel political efforts."  In addition to the four, at least two other Chicago-area members of the U.S. House — Republicans Don Manzullo and Mark Kirk, who is now senator-elect — have put relatives on their campaign payroll.  The Tribune identified those relatives by checking the last names of campaign-fund recipients and confirming family connections. But such a list cannot be considered complete, since any candidates' relatives whose last names were different from theirs would not be included.  Lawmakers are barred from employing relatives in their official offices, but a 2001 opinion issued by the Federal Election Commission — at Jackson's request — declared the practice legal for campaign committees, as long as the relative is qualified and is paid no more than the market rate.  J. Donatella & Associates, a firm owned by Sandi Jackson, has received at least $315,000 from her husband's campaign since 2002, including $181,000 since she became a Chicago alderman in May of 2007.
WASHINGTON — Two Illinois congressmen have paid their wives hundreds of thousands of dollars out of their campaign funds in the last decade, according to records filed with the Federal