On the surface at least, your solutions appear reasonable. I have some questions, though.  How will titling (registration under another name?) firearms of law abiding citizens solve the problem of criminals obtaining and using guns in the commission of crimes? Will we be able to get criminals to title their guns?  Gun registration in other countries has lead to confiscation. How will this be prevented in the USA once firearms are titled?  How will the information on titled firearms be kept from criminals so that they will not know where firearms are likely to be stored?  What will prevent title information from being given to the media under the Freedom of Information Act?  The problem, as I see it, is that mentally and emotionally unstable persons or persons who become mentally and emotinally unstable are either already in possession of firearms or obtain firearms because what information that's available about their condition is not given to the government agencies responsible for maintaining the database that is used for background checks. It's a privacy issue and a thorny one that I respect, appreciate, but that needs to be resolved.  Another problem is that the media seems to be cherry picking firearm incidents in which guns are used in the commission of a crime and almost totally ignoring the daily incidents in which firearms are used legally to defend against criminal attacks. This lopsided coverage gives the impression that there is an epidemic (in the clinical sense as well) of gun violence that is a purposefully unbalanced presentation.  If the media was to handle automobile accidents in the same way as they cover gun related crimes, what impression would that make? I suspect it would appear that our highways are awash with the blood of motorists, their passengers, bicyclists, and pedestrians.  Finally, I point to a taboo concept; that of acceptable levels of carnage. As motorists, we continue to drive our automobiles on roads and highways, taking our risks that we will not be involved in an accident and will arrive safely at our destination. Obviously, for some, perhaps many people, that's not what happens. They are involved in accidents, suffer injuries and die...the innocents along with those at fault.  The same sort of thing happens with firearms.  Of course, there's the argument that the difference between automobiles and guns is that guns were developed and refined primarily to kill and dissable. Automobiles, as distinctly different from guns, were developed and refined for the basic purpose of transpotation. Automobiles are marketed as possessions that will give their owners status, an enhanced image, hours of fun, and pleasure of ownership.  Assuming I'm correct in this, the gun is quite a bit more honest in its presentation. It's primary purpose and potential lethality is known to just about anyone in the whole world above the age of 4 years old. The automobile however, is not marketed as something that kills and injures yet it, in this country, does so to an even greater degree than guns.
Authorities in greater New Orleans say two young children have been  recovered unharmed from a car where a male driver and female passenger  were found dead with multiple gunshot wounds.