While the proposed circular economy policy solutions and business models have a potential to reduce the magnitude of the problem, single-handedly they will not result in healthy oceans.
Recycling initiatives are the low-hanging fruit and without a doubt reduce the leakage of most packaging plastic products, such as carrier bags and other recyclable mega and macro plastic products, into the environment. However, addressing the plastic pollution crisis in its entirety has to go beyond the ‘carrier bag’ narrative.
A deliberate effort should also be made towards outlawing the import, manufacture and use of all forms of other problematic plastics such as single-use (non-recyclable) plastics and deliberately manufactured tiny plastic products (microplastics).
South Africa is actively involved in the global fight against environmental pollution and has not been shy to ratify a number of global initiatives supporting environmental sustainability, including those specifically addressing plastic pollution.
Commitments to the UN Environment’s Clean Seas Campaign and Assembly are some of the most recent and notable examples.
Over and above our own National Development Plan, South Africa has also committed to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with SDG 14 aimed at addressing marine pollution of all kinds. Ostensibly, this is a very good thing, because all these commitments supposedly complement, build on and/or echo the calls for urgent action on environmental pollution. Examples of earlier initiatives for reducing plastic bag consumption in South Africa include recycling and introduction of the plastic bag levy.
While similar initiatives have worked elsewhere, the results have been slightly underwhelming here. In a review done seven years after the plastic bag levy, plastic bag consumption was still up at about 8 billion a year, of which 96% was sent to landfills after use.
This problem is not unique to South Africa, ocean plastic pollution is a global crisis and tackling it requires a global solution on par with the Stockholm Convention or the Paris Accord.
Nonetheless, other governments have pressed on with plans to completely ban other forms of problematic plastics - single-use plastic products (such as plastic cotton buds, cutlery, plates, straws, drink stirrers, glitter and sticks for balloons), and the use of microplastics in certain consumer products.
A recently completed Water Research Commission has demonstrated the presence of substantial amounts of micro to nano-sized plastic particles in selected surface, tap, and ground water sources in South Africa.
Microplastics in water sources could originate from industrial pellets, microbeads used in personal care products, micro/nanofibres used in clothing items, as well as abrasives from synthetic sand-blasting.
These minute plastic particles end up in our rivers because wastewater treatment plants are not designed to remove such small particles. Secondary microplastic fragments are those that are derived from the degradation of larger plastic pieces.
The interest in single-use plastics and microplastics in the environment is motivated by the large amounts likely to be involved due to the known ubiquity of plastic debris and microplastics in the marine environment. Interpretation of a growing knowledge base of plastic debris in aquatic systems consistently indicates the real and potential risk of microplastics at many levels.
Curbing pollution related to these types of plastics demands immediate and aggressive action. This kind of action is provisioned for under Principle 15 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992.
This section states that, “In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by states according to their capabilities. Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.”
To date, only a handful of countries have invoked this principle and announced calls to ban single-use plastics and/or microplastics. Among these are the US, UK, Sweden, Finland, France, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg and Norway. A European Union-wide call for the ban of single-use plastics is also under way.
In the recent budget policy statement, the Department of Environmental Affairs announced their ambitious plans for curbing plastic pollution. However, much of the stimulus behind these plans rests on the assumption that economic growth can be decoupled from environmental degradation, and that poverty eradication and environmental sustainability can be simultaneously achieved.
Plastic recycling in South Africa has been going on for a while now, with the rate of recycling currently estimated to be about 41.8%. However, the rising plastic pollution problem is a clear symptom that as a country we have neither achieved the necessary balance for sustainability, nor been able to maintain the momentum from earlier efforts against plastic pollution.
Visible plastic pollution is easily tackled through consumer education and awareness.
However, microplastics require a differentiated approach. Accurate product labelling will be vital, as it must provide sufficient information for the consumer to make choices on the product.
As it is, it may be hard for the consumer to even know that a product contains microplastics - nanofibre-containing clothing items are good examples.
SA’s efforts to implement commitments to global initiatives against environmental degradation are an important first step, but enabling effective responses in marine water quality management can contribute to unlocking the economic potential of South Africa’s resources, growing our GDP and creating more sustainable jobs, while at the same time ensuring that our environment is free from litter.
* Dr Nonhlanhla Kalabaila is research manager of water use and waste management with the Water Research Commission.
** The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Independent Newspapers.