Recent observations of rapidly accelerating West Antarctic outlet glaciers have prompted a radical shift in the way the sensitivity of marine-terminating ice sheets to ocean forcing is viewed (Rignot et al. Reference Rignot, Mouginot, Morlighem, Seroussi and Scheuchl2014). Critical to this debate is the influence of subglacial topography on marine-based ice sheet dynamics (commonly referred to as the marine ice sheet instability hypothesis) where positive ice-loss feedbacks may occur when the grounding line is both below sea level and within a basin which deepens towards the centre of the ice sheet (Weertman Reference Weertman1974, Thomas & Bentley Reference Thomas and Bentley1978). Decadal-scale changes consistent with this mechanism have been implicated in several key outlets of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) (Rignot et al. Reference Rignot, Mouginot, Morlighem, Seroussi and Scheuchl2014), suggesting that even small changes at the margins of the Antarctic ice sheets may trigger far-reaching changes in the interior of the Antarctic ice sheet through ice streams, narrow corridors of enhanced ice flow, which control the mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheets (Cuffey Reference Cuffey2011, Golledge et al. Reference Golledge, Fogwill, Mackintosh and Buckley2012, Rignot et al. Reference Rignot, Mouginot, Morlighem, Seroussi and Scheuchl2014). However, it remains unclear whether such a long-term transformation in ice sheet dynamics will take place, potentially leading to future collapse and associated rapid sea level rise (Bamber et al. Reference Bamber, Riva, Vermeersen and Le Brocq2009, Rignot et al. Reference Rignot, Mouginot, Morlighem, Seroussi and Scheuchl2014). Therefore, understanding the mechanisms that control enhanced flow is key to predicting future WAIS stability (Cuffey Reference Cuffey2011, Rignot et al. Reference Rignot, Mouginot and Scheuchl2011).
The Weddell Sea embayment (WSE) of Antarctica potentially offers significant insights into this debate. Today the extensive Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf of the Weddell Sea is partially sustained by the inflow of nine large ice streams that together drain 22% of Antarctica, yet its detailed history of deglaciation since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), and particularly during the Holocene, remains poorly constrained (Larter et al. Reference Larter, Graham, Hillenbrand, Smith and Gales2012, Stolldorf et al. Reference Stolldorf, Schenke and Anderson2012, Siegert et al. Reference Siegert, Ross, Corr, Kingslake and Hindmarsh2013, Hillenbrand et al. Reference Hillenbrand, Bentley, Stolldorf, Hein, Kuhn, Graham, Fogwill, Kristoffersen, Smith, Anderson, Larter, Melles, Hodgson, Mulvaney and Sugden2014). Whilst contemporary satellite remote sensing suggests a modest elevation of the ice sheet surface across much of the region in recent decades (Rignot et al. Reference Rignot, Mouginot and Scheuchl2011), there is a mounting body of evidence that indicates ice stream drainage patterns in the region were markedly different during the Holocene, implying that the region is sensitive to external forcings and thus may be vulnerable to past and potentially future change (Siegert et al. Reference Siegert, Ross, Corr, Kingslake and Hindmarsh2013). Evidence for this comes from interpretations of airborne radar-echo sounding (RES), marine geophysical investigations and satellite imagery, which suggests there has been substantial late Holocene reconfiguration of the ice streams in the Weddell Sea; however, the timing and, critically, the mechanisms driving these changes remain uncertain (Siegert et al. Reference Siegert, Ross, Corr, Kingslake and Hindmarsh2013). Understanding these mechanisms is critical given twenty-first century projections of ocean warming in the region (Hellmer et al. Reference Hellmer, Kauker, Timmermann, Determann and Rae2012, Fogwill et al. Reference Fogwill, Turney, Meissner, Golledge, Spence, Roberts, England, Jones and Carter2014), and the presence of extensive subglacial basins upstream of the present-day grounding line (Ross et al. Reference Ross, Bingham, Corr, Ferraccioli, Jordan, Le Brocq, Rippin, Young, Blankenship and Siegert2012).
To assess the response of ice stream configuration in the Weddell Sea to external forcing since the LGM this study generates new high-resolution, whole-continent ice sheet model simulations for comparison with detailed terrestrial and marine geochronological constraints. The combination of these detailed geological ice sheet constraints with the high-resolution palaeo ice sheet model simulations to examine the drivers of ice sheet change over the last 20000 years allows the response of ice streams to ocean forcing and sea level rise during the transition between the glacial and interglacial world to be investigated, improving our understanding of ice dynamic responses of the ice streams in the Weddell Sea and wider WAIS to ocean perturbations. Recent studies (e.g. Larter et al. Reference Larter, Graham, Hillenbrand, Smith and Gales2012) postulate that three major cross-shelf troughs may have played a role in controlling WSE dynamics during deglaciation, the Rutford Trough (or Ronne Depression), the Hughes Trough and the Thiel Trough (or Filchner or Crary Trough). The combination of high-resolution ice sheet modelling and geological constraints in this study allows the role of these features to be explored more fully.
Ice sheet model simulations
Here the results of high-resolution ice sheet modelling experiments that investigate the dynamic response of an LGM-configuration Antarctic ice sheet to ocean forcing (Golledge et al. Reference Golledge, Fogwill, Mackintosh and Buckley2012, Reference Golledge, Levy, McKay, Fogwill, White, Graham, Smith, Hillenbrand, Licht, Denton, Ackert, Maas and Hall2013) are presented. The parallel ice sheet model (PISM) is used, a 3-D, thermomechanical, continental ice sheet model, constrained by published geological data that define lateral and vertical extents of the expanded Antarctic ice sheets around the time of the LGM (Golledge et al. Reference Golledge, Fogwill, Mackintosh and Buckley2012). The model combines the shallow-ice and shallow-shelf approximation equations across the entire domain. Therefore, the model is able to capture the dynamic behaviour within grounded ice of Antarctic ice sheets and simulate the drawdown of interior ice by ice streams at high resolution (5 km). In this study, the model uses proxy-based interpretations of oceanic (Lisiecki et al. Reference Lisiecki and Raymo2005, Imbrie et al. 2006) and atmospheric (Petit et al. Reference Petit, Jouzel and Raynaud1999) changes during the last glacial cycle and employs boundary distributions from modified Bedmap topography (Le Brocq et al. Reference Le Brocq, Payne and Vieli2010), temperature and precipitation fields from gridded datasets (Comiso Reference Comiso2000, Van de Berg Reference Van de Berg, van den Broeke, Reijmer and van Meijgaard2006), and a spatially varying geothermal heat flux interpolation (Shapiro & Ritzwoller Reference Shapiro and Ritzwoller2004).
The ice sheet model computes ice thickness and temperature changes, isostatic depression of topography, migration of grounding lines and the growth of ice shelves. Interaction between modelled ice shelves and their surrounding ocean is accounted for using a mass balance determination based on heat flux across the ice-water boundary. Our perturbation experiments use isochronous changes to oceanic heat flux and sea level values. The ice sheet model simulations are based on ocean-perturbation experiments in which the oceanic heat flux and sea level are isochronously increased from 30% to 100% of glacial to interglacial transition values, and by 25 m and 50 m, with respect to LGM values, representative of Holocene values. The response of the ice sheet is considered in terms of changes in velocity and ice thickness which together yield mass flux and, importantly, changes in ice flow direction.
Geological and geochronological constraints
To provide a temporal context for the modelled ice stream response, new and recalibrated existing geochronological data are used to reconstruct the geometric and temporal changes in the ice streams feeding the western part of the Weddell Sea following the LGM. The terrestrial record constrains altitudinal changes of the former ice stream surface, whereas offshore marine records, from radiocarbon dating of glaciomarine sediments overlying the subglacial deposits, constrain the lateral extent of the ice sheet in the WSE. Both are required to reconstruct the 3-D changes in ice stream geometry and investigate palaeo ice volume changes.
Marine geochronological constraints
The limited available analyses of marine sediment cores (including radiocarbon) from the outer and inner continental shelf of the WSE are used to constrain the lateral extent of the ice sheet, and provide the timing of ice sheet grounding line retreat and establishment of open water conditions (Larter et al. Reference Larter, Graham, Hillenbrand, Smith and Gales2012, Stolldorf et al. Reference Stolldorf, Schenke and Anderson2012, Hillenbrand et al. Reference Hillenbrand, Bentley, Stolldorf, Hein, Kuhn, Graham, Fogwill, Kristoffersen, Smith, Anderson, Larter, Melles, Hodgson, Mulvaney and Sugden2014). Whilst the existing marine chronology is open to interpretation, including possible reworking and the potentially significant changes in Antarctic marine radiocarbon reservoir effect over time (Hillenbrand et al. Reference Hillenbrand, Bentley, Stolldorf, Hein, Kuhn, Graham, Fogwill, Kristoffersen, Smith, Anderson, Larter, Melles, Hodgson, Mulvaney and Sugden2014), the ages are internally coherent, suggesting that they provide reliable constraints on the gradual retreat of the grounding line across the Weddell Sea. An important constraint from the outer continental shelf records grounding line retreat, and suggests open water conditions were established by c. 18.1 ka (Hillenbrand et al. Reference Hillenbrand, Bentley, Stolldorf, Hein, Kuhn, Graham, Fogwill, Kristoffersen, Smith, Anderson, Larter, Melles, Hodgson, Mulvaney and Sugden2014). Two further reliable critical constraints exist close to the sills of the extensive Thiel and Rutford cross-shelf troughs in the Weddell Sea. These record retreat in the eastern Weddell Sea at the head of the Thiel Trough before c. 8.3 ka, and at the head of the Rutford Trough in the western Weddell Sea at c. 5.3 ka (Fig. 1) (Hillenbrand et al. Reference Hillenbrand, Bentley, Stolldorf, Hein, Kuhn, Graham, Fogwill, Kristoffersen, Smith, Anderson, Larter, Melles, Hodgson, Mulvaney and Sugden2014).
Terrestrial geochronological constraints
Although the available marine radiocarbon data is sparse, a more comprehensive terrestrial record of ice stream surface changes is recorded on exposed mountains in the catchments of the Rutford and Institute ice streams. This study combines new 10Be and in situ 14C data that record changes of the Rutford Ice Stream with published in situ 10Be and 26Al cosmogenic isotope data from the catchment of the Institute Ice Stream (Bentley et al. Reference Bentley, Fogwill, Le Brocq, Hubbard, Sugden, Dunai and Freeman2010, Fogwill et al. Reference Fogwill, Hein, Bentley and Sugden2012). Terrestrial ice surface elevations through time are constructed by measuring cosmogenic nuclides in erratics glacially transported from sites located in the catchments of the Rutford Ice Stream and Institute Ice Stream, as suggested by our LGM ice sheet flow model (Fig. 2). Glacial erratics sampled from steep exposed bedrock surfaces, in the Flower Hills, Union Glacier, and the Patriot and Marble hills (Bentley et al. Reference Bentley, Fogwill, Le Brocq, Hubbard, Sugden, Dunai and Freeman2010, Fogwill et al. Reference Fogwill, Hein, Bentley and Sugden2012) (Fig. 1), serve as ‘dipsticks’ that allow us to reconstruct past surface elevation changes in the catchments of the ice streams since the LGM.
Samples were reduced to pure quartz at the University of Edinburgh cosmogenic nuclide laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (LLNL-CAMS) following standard procedures (Kohl & Nishiizumi Reference Kohl and Nishiizumi1992, Ivy-Ochs Reference Ivy-Ochs1996, Stone Reference Stone2004). The 10Be ratios were measured by the AMS facility at LLNL and the Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre (SUERC) (Xu et al. Reference Xu, Dougans, Freeman, Schnabel and Wilcken2010). Measurements were standardized to the NIST SRM-4325 Be standard material with a revised nominal 10Be/9Be ratio of 2.79x10-11 (Nishiizumi et al. Reference Nishiizumi, Imamura, Caffee, Southon, Finkel and McAninch2007). Samples were corrected for the number of 10Be atoms in their associated blanks. Blanks were spiked with 250 μg 9Be carrier (Edinburgh) and 474 μg 9Be (LLNL-CAMS). The corresponding combined process and carrier blanks 10Be/9Be ratios range between 1.6–5.47x10-15. Sample and blank 10Be/9Be analytical uncertainties and a 2.5% carrier addition uncertainty are propagated into the 1σ analytical uncertainty for nuclide concentrations.
A version of the CRONUS-Earth online age calculator was used to determine the 10Be exposure ages (Balco et al. Reference Balco, Stone, Lifton and Dunai2008), implementing the New Zealand 10Be production rate calibration dataset (Putnam et al. Reference Putnam, Schaefer, Barrell, Vandergoes, Denton, Kaplan, Finkel, Schwartz, Goehring and Kelley2010), that uses the recently revised 10Be half-life (1.387 Ma) (Chmeleff et al. Reference Chmeleff, von Blanckenburg, Kossert and Jakob2010, Korschinek et al. Reference Korschinek, Bergmaier and Faestermann2010), and Be isotope ratio standardization of Nishiizumi (Nishiizumi et al. Reference Nishiizumi, Imamura, Caffee, Southon, Finkel and McAninch2007). The use of this revised production rate and half-life change impact the apparent exposure ages, causing them to increase by c. 12% from those previously published (Bentley et al. Reference Bentley, Fogwill, Le Brocq, Hubbard, Sugden, Dunai and Freeman2010, Fogwill et al. Reference Fogwill, Hein, Bentley and Sugden2012) (Table I). Choice of production rate model and scaling is often a pragmatic one and is an ongoing subject of debate. Here the New Zealand calibration dataset was used to allow comparison with other recent Antarctic studies and in the absence of an Antarctic production rate calibration site. Exposure ages are reported based on the Lal/Stone scaling model for Antarctica; using the same calibration dataset, ages differ by 2–4% depending on the choice of scaling model (Balco et al. Reference Balco, Stone, Lifton and Dunai2008). The calculator uses sample thickness and density to standardize nuclide concentrations to the rock surface. The whole rock density is assumed to be 2.65–2.7 g cm-3. No correction for periodic snow cover or for rock-surface erosion was included, as both of which are assumed to be negligible in these sites. An erosion rate of 0.0002 cm yr-1 increases ages by c. 2%.
aRatio of the production rate at the shielded site to that for a 2π surface at the same location calculated using the CRONUS-Earth geometric shielding calculator version 1.1.
bCalculated using 07KNSTD 10Be measurement standard and calibration with a reported 10Be/9Be ratio 2.85x10-1240 or to the NIST standard with an assumed isotope ratio of 2.79x10-11 and 10Be half-life 1.36 Ma (Chmeleff et al. Reference Chmeleff, von Blanckenburg, Kossert and Jakob2010, Korschinek et al. Reference Korschinek, Bergmaier and Faestermann2010).
cModel exposure age assuming no inheritance, zero erosion, density 2.65–2.7 g cm-3 and standard atmosphere calculated using the CRONUS-Earth 10Be-26Al exposure age calculator (Balco et al. Reference Balco, Stone, Lifton and Dunai2008) version 2.2 using a constant production rate model and scaling scheme for spallation of Lal (1991)/Stone (2000). Ages based upon global production rate (Pglobal) and New Zealand production rate (PNZ) accordingly.
dEd=University of Edinburgh, SUERC=Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, CAMS-LLNL=Centre for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry-Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Uniquely, this study also takes advantage of recent technological developments in the extraction and measurement of in situ radiocarbon (14C) from quartz (Hippe et al. Reference Hippe, Kober, Baur, Ruff, Wacker and Wieler2009, Reference Hippe, Kober, Wacker, Fahrni, Ivy-Ochs, Akçar, Schluchter and Wieler2013), a cosmogenic nuclide with a considerably shorter half-life than that of 10Be (10Be=1.36x103 kyr, 14C=5.73 kyr). As the relatively short half-life of 14C means that in situ 14C acquired on exposure during interglacials decays if the sample is covered by ice during a subsequent glacial, the apparent 14C age reflects the true minimum exposure age of the sample. Crucially, the disparity between the 10Be and 14C data allows the potential influence of prior exposure or recycling in this setting to be assessed (Lifton et al. Reference Lifton, Jull and Quade2001, White et al. Reference White, Fülöp, Bishop, Mackintosh and Cook2011).
In situ 14C extraction was performed at ETH Zürich following a modified protocol (Hippe et al. Reference Hippe, Kober, Baur, Ruff, Wacker and Wieler2009, Reference Hippe, Kober, Wacker, Fahrni, Ivy-Ochs, Akçar, Schluchter and Wieler2013). Quartz aliquots of c. 5 g were preheated at c. 700°C to remove atmospheric 14C contamination followed by the extraction of in situ 14C during heating to 1550–1600°C for 2×2 hours. The collected CO2 gas was split into two samples before AMS measurement due to large gas amounts. Samples were then measured with the MICADAS AMS system using the gas ion source (Ruff et al. Reference Ruff, Wacker, Gaggeler, Suter, Synal and Szidat2007, Synal et al. Reference Synal, Stocker and Suter2007, Wacker et al. Reference Wacker, Bonani, Friedrich, Hajdas, Kromer, Nemec, Ruff, Suter, Synal and Vockenhuber2010). The number of 14C atoms obtained for both splits were summed prior to subtraction of the long-term average processing blank of (3.15±1.19)×104 14C atoms (± 1 standard deviation, n=24).
14C/10Be multi-isotope analysis
For this study, in situ 14C exposure ages were calculated with a sea level, high latitude (SLHL) spallogenic production rate of 11.40±0.9 at g-1 y-1 (Schimmelpfennig et al. Reference Schimmelpfennig, Schaefer, Akçar, Koffman, Ivy-Ochs, Schwartz, Finkel, Zimmerman and Schlüchter2014). As with 10Be, the production rate was scaled to altitude and latitude according to the scaling scheme of Lal/Stone. The contribution due to muon production was calculated using the freely accessible MATLAB code of the CRONUS-Earth online calculator (http.//hess.ess.washington.edu/math/al _be_v2/P_mu_total) (Balco et al. Reference Balco, Stone, Lifton and Dunai2008). In order to allow muon scaling for in situ 14C, parameters were adjusted based on the cross sections for 14C (Heisinger et al. Reference Heisinger, Lal, Jull, Kubik, Ivy-Ochs, Knie and Nolte2002a, Reference Heisinger, Lal, Jull, Kubik, Ivy-Ochs, Neumaier, Knie, Lazarev and Nolte2002b), and corrections for sample thickness and topographical shielding were applied on spallogenic production only.
Combined 14C and 10Be analysis is applied to sites in the Flower Hills and Union Glacier (in the catchment of the Rutford Ice Stream) which display a high percentage of anomalously ‘old’ apparent 10Be exposure ages (Table I). The disparity between the in situ 14C and 10Be data demonstrates that the samples have experienced a complicated exposure history, suggesting either that the cosmogenic nuclide inventories of the erratics were not fully reset by glacial erosion prior to deposition, or that following initial deposition they underwent periods of exposure at different altitudes and/or cover by cold-based ice (White et al. Reference White, Fülöp, Bishop, Mackintosh and Cook2011). Using the measured concentrations of both 10Be and 14C, an iterative model was constructed to calculate the maximum and minimum periods of ice cover each sample could have undergone to explain the differing nuclide concentrations. These periods were then compared with the equivalent periods of ice cover implied by the eustatic sea level data, following a similar approach to studies of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet (Fabel et al. Reference Fabel, Stroeven, Harbor, Kleman, Elmore and Fink2002).
Whilst only a one-way test, this assumes that the erratics experienced periods of ice cover subsequent to initial deposition at any point when sea level was lower (and ice volume greater) than it was at the point of re-exposure given by the 14C apparent exposure age (Table II). Using the measured, minimum and maximum 14C exposure ages of each sample (given by the external errors within the process, to allow for comparability with the independently dated sea level curve), three scenarios for each sample were created, under which all samples apart from UG-27 are shown to have experienced one period of extended ice cover following initial deposition, followed by subsequent re-exposure (Fig. 3). Sample UG-27 has a complex nuclide inventory, possibly reconcilable by either a single or multiple pre-exposure event at a higher altitude than present. For the remaining samples, a scenario is identified that agrees with the periods of ice cover stipulated by the cosmogenic nuclide data and the sea level reconstruction: a single extended period of ice cover following initial deposition, and subsequent re-exposure during the last deglaciation (Fig. 3). This suggests that the disparity between the 14C/10Be is probably a result of cover by cold-based ice, and demonstrates that the use of another isotope paired alongside 14C can provide insights into the depositional history of the samples, allowing for a more confident interpretation of the surface trajectory of the Rutford Ice Stream.
aNormalized to δ13C of -25‰VPDB and AD 1950.
bCalculated after eq. (1) in Hippe et al. Reference Hippe, Kober, Baur, Ruff, Wacker and Wieler2009.
cBlank corrected; calculated after eq. (2) in Hippe et al. Reference Hippe, Kober, Baur, Ruff, Wacker and Wieler2009.
dCorrected for sample thickness and topographical shielding; see Table I for correction factors.
e Exposure age assuming no inheritance, zero erosion, density 2.7 g cm-3, with a constant production rate and scaling scheme for spallation of Lal (1991)/Stone (2000).
To examine the dynamic glaciological changes recorded from our geological reconstruction, firstly the changes to geometry and ice flow pattern triggered by post-LGM increases in oceanic heat flux and sea level were assessed. The patterns of ice flow predicted by the model under this scenario are shown in Fig. 2. The initial response of the LGM ice sheet to ocean and atmospheric forcing is depicted in Fig. 2a, and is marked by almost uniform grounding line retreat across the WSE, coupled with high discharge rates through all of the major cross-shelf troughs. The predicted ice sheet surface remains above 1300 m in the catchments of both ice streams.
Figure 2b shows the rapid increase in predicted ice flux in response to the prescribed ocean forcing, with acceleration of flow at the marine margins and concomitant drawdown of the ice sheet surface in the WSE. Although ice flux is greatest at the head of the deep Thiel Trough and its tributaries, ice from both the Rutford Ice Stream and Institute Ice Stream continue to discharge through the Rutford Trough and the extended Evans Trough on the western side of the WSE. Due to the location of the two ice streams relative to the grounding line, this leads to the start of a marked and rapid drawdown of the Rutford Ice Stream at this time when compared to the Institute, reflected in rapid altitudinal change in the catchment of the Rutford Ice Stream after 15 ka (Fig. 2b).
Under continued oceanic forcing, grounding line retreat in the WSE becomes markedly asymmetric, with faster retreat taking place in the Thiel Trough (eastern WSE) than in the west (Fig. 2c upper panel). Consequently, the inland ice sheet surface gradient switches from its formerly north-easterly direction to a more east-south-easterly direction, with the effect that ice discharging in the Institute and Möller ice streams is diverted towards the Thiel Trough (Fig. 2c lower panel). Thus at this point, drainage of these neighbouring ice streams becomes governed by the locations of two separate grounding lines c. 300 km apart. Their behaviour is thus decoupled from one another, allowing independent thinning trajectories during deglaciation.
The geological reconstructions presented here mirror the results of the ice sheet model simulation, and provide a chronological framework to examine the physical effects of grounding line retreat away from the marine margin. The results demonstrate that the surface of the Rutford Ice Stream and Institute Ice Stream exceeded 1300 m in altitude at the LGM, buttressed by grounded ice in the Weddell Sea (Fig. 4, see Tables I & II for details). Geologically this upper limit of the ice stream surfaces is defined based on the absence of any apparently ‘young’ (post-LGM) exposure ages above this altitude (Bentley et al. Reference Bentley, Fogwill, Le Brocq, Hubbard, Sugden, Dunai and Freeman2010, Reference Bentley, Sugden, Fogwill, Le Brocq, Hubbard, Dunai and Freeman2011, Clark Reference Clark2011), and the presence of locally derived LGM-age ice in the Patriot Hills, as demonstrated by recent analysis of the exposed blue ice in the Institute Ice Stream catchment (Turney et al. Reference Turney, Fogwill, van Ommen, Moy, Etheridge, Rubino, Curran and Rivera2013). Based upon this interpretation it is apparent that the Rutford and Institute ice streams maintained their LGM surface profiles until 16 ka, away from the marine margins of the retreating grounding line despite rising sea level and regional ocean circulation and temperature changes (Fig. 4). This is supported by comparison of the ice stream trajectories with post-LGM eustatic global sea level, which suggest a delayed response of both the Rutford and the Institute ice streams to global sea level rise.
After c. 16 ka the results suggest that the surface trajectories of the two ice streams began to diverge (Fig. 4). Initially the Institute Ice Stream thinned slowly, dropping in elevation by only 100 m between c. 20 and c. 8.5 ka. Subsequently the rate of decay increased markedly after c. 8.5 ka, thinning 380 m in c. 6000 years, to reach the present ice sheet surface elevation by c. 2 ka, supporting interpretations of the regional isostatic response derived from GPS constraints (Argus et al. Reference Argus, Blewitt, Peltier and Kreemer2011).
The Institute Ice Stream’s surface trajectory contrasts with that of the Rutford Ice Stream, which maintained an altitude of over 1300 m until decay was initiated at c. 14.5 ka (Fig. 4). At this time, the Rutford apparently decayed rapidly, thinning by c. 900 m between c. 14.5 ka and c. 6 ka. Although the trajectory of the Rutford Ice Stream after c. 6 ka between the lower sample sites (520–490 m) and the present ice stream surface altitude cannot be fully defined, a lack of geomorphological evidence on the steep slopes between these altitudes suggests that the downward thinning trajectory of the Rutford Ice Stream continued in response to grounding line retreat across the inner shelf of the western Weddell Sea at c. 5.3 ka (Fig. 1) (Hillenbrand et al. Reference Hillenbrand, Melles, Kuhn and Larter2012).
Whilst the terrestrial geological reconstruction presented here is unable to rule out if this thinning of either the Rutford or Institute ice streams continued below present levels into the late Holocene this is unlikely based upon independent evidence from the region which suggests relative stability since c. 4 ka (Argus et al. Reference Argus, Blewitt, Peltier and Kreemer2011, Turney et al. Reference Turney, Fogwill, van Ommen, Moy, Etheridge, Rubino, Curran and Rivera2013). The combination of stability of ice in the catchment of the Institute Ice Stream, and the regional isostatic uplift signal argues that there was no significant recent loss (and subsequent rapid re-expansion) of the deep basins upstream of the present grounding line, as has been suggested from the interpretation of regional airborne RES (Siegert et al. Reference Siegert, Ross, Corr, Kingslake and Hindmarsh2013).
Together, the ice sheet model simulations and geological reconstruction presented in the this study demonstrate asymmetry in ice dynamics between the Rutford Ice Stream and Institute Ice Stream during the last glacial-interglacial transition, which realigns during the mid Holocene between c. 8.3 and 5.3 ka. This reflects a regional-scale diversion of ice discharge in the Institute Ice Stream due to ice stream capture by the Thiel Trough palaeo ice stream after grounding line retreat between c. 8.3 and 5.3 ka, which impacted regional mass balance in this sector of the WAIS (Fig. 2c). Significantly, this analysis shows that both the Institute and Möller ice streams are susceptible to capture. Additionally, this interpretation corroborates a recent interpretation of marine geophysical evidence which suggests that the Foundation Ice Stream may also be affected by ice stream flow diversion (Larter et al. Reference Larter, Graham, Hillenbrand, Smith and Gales2012). All other modelled outlets in the western WSE continue to drain through Rutford Trough, regardless of grounding line position or dynamics.
This threshold-controlled behaviour of the Institute and Möller ice streams is probably a consequence of their central position between the two major cross-shelf troughs, implying that subglacial topography underlying the ice stream does not significantly restrict flow to a particular route. This has important ramifications for future ice sheet dynamics in the WSE, suggesting that predicted twenty-first century ocean warming in the Thiel Trough (Fogwill et al. Reference Fogwill, Hein, Bentley and Sugden2012, Hellmer et al. 2014) could re-instigate capture of these ice streams. Such a divergence may lead to a marked response due to the deep subglacial basins that exist upstream of the grounding lines (Ross et al. Reference Ross, Bingham, Corr, Ferraccioli, Jordan, Le Brocq, Rippin, Young, Blankenship and Siegert2012). Whilst previous studies have highlighted switches in ice stream direction using different approaches, including marine geophysical techniques (e.g. Larter et al. Reference Larter, Graham, Hillenbrand, Smith and Gales2012), glaciological investigations (Conway et al. Reference Conway, Catania, Raymond, Gades, Scambos and Engelhardt2002) and ice sheet modelling studies (Payne Reference Payne1999), none have been independently verified by the combined ice sheet modelling and empirical geological approach as described here.
Whilst surface exposure ages in the eastern Weddell Sea suggest that the modelled ice sheet may be too thick in this region at the LGM (Golledge et al. Reference Golledge, Fogwill, Mackintosh and Buckley2012), the limited thickening implied by empirical terrestrial data (Fogwill et al. Reference Fogwill, Bentley, Sugden, Kerr and Kubik2004, Hein et al. Reference Hein, Fogwill, Sugden and Xu2011), coupled with the greatly advanced grounding line position interpreted from marine geological data (Hillenbrand et al. Reference Hillenbrand, Bentley, Stolldorf, Hein, Kuhn, Graham, Fogwill, Kristoffersen, Smith, Anderson, Larter, Melles, Hodgson, Mulvaney and Sugden2014), can only be reconciled with a surface slope of the LGM grounded ice sheet that is similar to that of the present ice shelf. This suggests an extremely low basal shear stress (<15 kPa), and it is acknowledged that this disagreement with the observations requires further investigation.
In summary, the asynchronous response of the Rutford Ice Stream and Institute Ice Stream to post-LGM ice sheet reconfiguration reflects the combination of streaming ice flow and spatially variable bathymetric controls on the inner continental shelf, which caused tipping points to be passed during deglaciation, leading to jumps between stable flow patterns. Importantly, both of these major arteries of the WAIS show a remarkable delay in their response to external forcing, particularly sea level, implying that other internal mechanisms are at work. When aligned to marine records, these data reveal that the onset and rate of deglaciation of the Rutford Ice Stream and Institute Ice Stream are controlled independently by grounding line retreat within the Thiel and Rutford troughs, respectively. These findings support recent inference from marine and terrestrial geophysical surveys, which suggest that during deglaciation ice-drainage pathways in the WSE may well have differed from those observed today (Larter et al. Reference Larter, Graham, Hillenbrand, Smith and Gales2012, Stolldorf et al. Reference Stolldorf, Schenke and Anderson2012, Siegert et al. Reference Siegert, Ross, Corr, Kingslake and Hindmarsh2013). Importantly, these reconstructions, together with independent constraints (Argus et al. Reference Argus, Blewitt, Peltier and Kreemer2011, Turney et al. Reference Turney, Fogwill, van Ommen, Moy, Etheridge, Rubino, Curran and Rivera2013), do not suggest that the Institute Ice Stream has undergone significant drawdown during the late Holocene or subsequent significant re-expansion (Siegert et al. Reference Siegert, Ross, Corr, Kingslake and Hindmarsh2013); rather, the results suggest that late Holocene ice stream reconfiguration of the Weddell Sea was driven by spatially variable ice flux at the marine margin, which modulated the direction of individual ice streams of the WAIS during the early Holocene.
The data presented here have demonstrated that two major ice streams of the WSE had an asynchronous response to ocean-forced grounding line retreat. To understand the mechanism for these divergent trends, flow changes predicted by our high-resolution ice sheet simulation, which simulated grounding line retreat in the WSE, were analysed. The decoupling of the surface trajectories of the two ice streams was driven by differences in the rate of grounding line retreat across the WSE, resulting in the Institute Ice Stream switching direction by more than 60° and discharging ice into the Thiel Trough during the early Holocene, rather than the Rutford Trough as it does at present. The new terrestrial geochronological constraints (in situ 14C and 10Be) reveal that although these two adjacent ice streams exhibited similar surface geometries at the end of the LGM, the pattern of ice surface lowering contrasted markedly after this, with asynchronous thinning trajectories during the late to mid Holocene.
These findings highlight that spatial variability in ice flow can trigger marked changes in the pattern, flux and flow direction of extensive ice streams on millennial timescales, markedly changing regional ice sheet mass balance. A detailed understanding of these abrupt diversions is critical to improve predictions for future WAIS stability in light of the sensitivity of the Institute Ice Stream to marine ice sheet instability today, with its present grounding line below mean sea level at the head of an extensive subglacial trough. Given this evidence of potential flow switches in the WSE, and in light of projected twenty-first century regional ocean warming in the Thiel Trough, the ability to predict these abrupt and extensive diversions is a priority within the glaciological community, achievable only through the coupling of high-resolution ice sheet and ocean models.
This research was supported by the Australian Research Council (FL100100195, FT1201000004 and LP120200724), and UK National Environmental Research Council (AFI 05/03). Fieldwork was supported by Antarctic Logistics and Expeditions and the British Antarctic Survey. NRG gratefully acknowledges support from Victoria University of Wellington and GNS Science. CJF wishes to thank Dr Neil Ross for helpful discussions, Prof David Sugden for instigating this work, and Dr Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
CJF, CSMT and NRG conceived the project. NRG undertook the ice sheet modelling experiments and designed the model simulation with CJF. CJF and DHR analysed the 10Be samples at the University of Edinburgh and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, respectively. KH, RW and LW developed the 14C extraction line and gas measurement techniques at ETH Zürich. CJF, DHR, KH, EBR, RSJ and RW analysed the 10Be/14C data interpretation. All authors discussed the results and implications, and commented on the manuscript at all stages.