A large amount of diversity in characteristics of life forms on Earth is currently explained by random genetic mutations. Such characteristics include eye color, blood type and somatotype.
However, with complete relativity and implied determinism, obviously any phenomena can only be relatively random. In this case, random is equal to lack of better explanation.
Here, a better explanation will be provided for these phenomena.
The process of evolution on Earth may have to be heavily revised. Not only does creation of new species not always require millions of years (no absolute uniformity in evolution), mutations causing
diversity in species and their characteristics may not be so random and would be much lower without extraterrestrial influence.
Driver of evolution is germinal mutation - everything else (ie. natural selection, or fitness) is steering life in particular direction and would not be possible without mutation.
Here, mutation was always considered random, while a lot of emphasis was always on competition, rather than symbiosis, in natural selection.
While competition between individuals of reproductively (or energetically) constrained species may improve survivability of these species, this cannot ensure long-term survivability of life.
Competition between individuals of different species also cannot have a positive effect, due to sexual incompatibility.
Long-term sustainability of life requires diversity, which requires mixing of genes of various species, and that, to be sustainable, requires sexual compatibility.
It is impossible, however, that genetic mutations coupled with natural selection will lead to sexual compatibility of completely different and competing species.
Thus, there would be no last universal common ancestor (LUCA), without [at least] two organisms (male and female precursors), who may have reproduced asexually, until they started living in
symbiosis, when mutations eventually evolved sexual compatibility.
The key difference between two separate species in competition and those in symbiosis is mental entanglement. If this is spin entanglement, one individual will be male, the other
female. Thus, the two universal common ancestors in symbiosis formed a male/female pair, enabling later diversification beyond LUCA.
Note that sexual reproduction of species of one scale is (or begins with) consumption (or injection) and fusion on smaller scale. Afterwards, reproduction [on small scale] is asexual (mitosis) and it
proceeds along with programmed diversification and symbiosis of organisms into different tissue and organs, forming a new [large scale] organism.
Due to entanglement, mutations will be mirrored between the individuals, increasing differences and increasing sexual tendencies (annihilation of polarization).
Note that fertility rates in polarized human individuals are currently falling due to decreasing differences between males and females, both mental and physical.
This is creating pressure and increasing probability for inter-species symbiosis and sexual tendencies, which will eventually lead to sexual compatibility and new species.
Thus, mutations leading to sexual compatibility are not random, but neither are other mutations. A form of life living in a particular environment is entangled with that environment, this is
spin entanglement at some level.
That means a mutation in the environment will be paired with a mutation in the life form, and it will not be random, rather one enabling sustainability of interaction, although a phase shift between
mutations is possible.
Effectively, mental entanglement leads to evolution of physical compatibility.
If entanglement with other species (ie. environment) is growing, entanglement between males and females of particular species will be decreasing - decreasing differences.
This is creating a positive feedback loop, accelerating evolution.
Note that life is sustainable only if a living being is entangled with living (evolving) environment. Living environment is always part of another living being.
Sustainability of life requires diversity and balance in entanglements.
Diversity of life is thus enabled with symbiosis between different species, while diversity of characteristics is enabled with hybridization between compatible species.
But if mutations are not random and species co-evolve with environment, how can such great diversity in characteristics exist between individuals of human species - living in the same environment?
Some mutations may, however, be labeled as random - ie. those caused by radioactive substances, but these are generally isolated and not long-term drivers of evolution.
Due to lack of such diversity among wild population, this diversity is hard to explain with local diversity of environments. Thus, extraterrestrial environments are likely origin.
I have previously concluded that Venus and Earth are the same species of life, while Mars may belong to different species but same class of life. Nevertheless, precursor neuron proteins
(complex life) cultivated on the surface on each of these planets shouldn't differ much.
However, they should be classified into different species, and they would be, prior to hybridization.
Homo.beta (modern humans) from Mars and Venus had at least one opportunity (likely more)
to visit Earth and they likely did (probability
is high, equal to current probability that Earth.homo.beta will visit Mars in near future).
It is likely that, in the process of adult planetary neurogenesis, homo.beta is regenerated (re-evolved) on surface of Mars and Venus periodically (current neurogenesis on Earth is embryonic).
Mars.homo.beta has likely visited Earth 252 million years ago (and possibly even more recently), but Mars.homo.sapiens is likely still visiting Earth and was/is involved in hybridization of
Thus, the source of diversity in characteristics of individuals, and to some degree, diversity in species, is extraterrestrial DNA introduced during these visits. The DNA of 3 different, but
sexually compatible (to high degree, there are some issues with Rh- blood, which is likely indigenous to Mars.homo.beta) species has been mixed into Earth.homo.beta, whose characteristics would not
be so diversely expressed otherwise.
A somatotype represents the body structure and metabolism of an individual. There are 3 general somatotypes, but characteristics of multiple types are often present in an individual.
Endomorph/mesomorph fusion is most common, while ectomorphs are rare.
I believe this somatotype is indigenous to Earth and best adopted to its surface atmosphere.
As incubation of individuals of the same species requires specific temperature, a temperature suitable for life on Earth must have been maintained on Venus and Mars too during the development
of homo.beta. Evidently, levels of atmospheric CO2 have been changing with Sun output to maintain this temperature on Earth.
One can thus expect the same mechanism existed on Venus and Mars. This mechanism implies inverse relationship of atmospheric CO2 and O2.
The metabolism of endomorph is characterized by high oxygen uptake, required for burning of fatty acids.
Venus is closer to Sun and thus didn't require as much CO2 as Earth to maintain the needed temperature for life. As low CO2 implies high O2, the atmosphere
of Venus was perfect for endomorphs.
It is thus likely that the endomorph somatotype originated on Venus and was introduced to Earth. However, if Venus.homo.beta went extinct around 2 billion years ago, it is unlikely
that this species is responsible for this:
Assuming Venus.homo.beta went extinct 2 Ga, if endomorphs were introduced from Venus, they were introduced by Venus.homo.sapiens or Mars.homo.sapiens sometime during Phanerozoic. These must have been animals living deep in the mantle as
there was no surface life on Venus at the time, unless the introduction was performed through DNA synthesis of genomes recorded by homo.
- at that time there were probably no eukaryotes on Earth (certainly not those using oxygen in their metabolism), let alone mammals,
- if any mammals were introduced at the time, they obviously went extinct fast as they're absent from fossil records, reasonable due to unsuitable conditions on Earth for such life forms at the time.
The ectomorphs have low fat tissue as such metabolism prefers oxidation of carbohydrates over fatty acids. Ectomorphs thus have the greatest
respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and lowest oxygen uptake among individuals of species.
Since this metabolism is adopted to lower oxygen levels, it likely originated on Mars, as its atmosphere, due to larger
distance from the Sun, must have contained higher amounts of CO2 and lower amounts of O2 compared to Earth.
With the same assumption on the age of habitation of Mars by homo.beta, this one too had to be introduced by Mars.homo.sapiens, and quite recently, as ectomorphs on Earth are rare
compared to endo/meso hybrids.
Since eye color is generally not variable between individuals of same species in wild animals, it may be a feature introduced by Mars.homo.sapiens. Originally, Earth.homo.beta had brown eye
color. Eye colors from brown to green can be explained by variation of melanin amount in the iris. However, in blue eyes, degree of this variation is much smaller and genetically encoded,
all blue-eyed individuals to a single ancestor.
This fact, coupled with the fact that blue eyes are blue due to very low melanin amount makes Mars origin likely - low melanin is expected on Mars due to larger distance from the Sun (lower
All Mars.homo.beta individuals thus had dominantly blue and grey eye colors, while Venus.homo.beta must have had darker, dominantly brown eyes.
Recent research shows that Venus may have
been habitable for a much longer period of time
to 700-750 million years ago
However, all models depend on surface age of Venus and time of eruption of LIPs (Large Igneous Provinces) and are constrained by degassing of 40
Surface age estimates for Venus range from ~180 Ma to 750 Ma, and 40
Ar may not be a reliable constraint (if my hypothesis on periodic changes of decay rates is correct, than it cannot be
reliable without these changes taken into account).
Surface age is based largely on crater count method, which is also not reliable, if the hypothesis on periodic cratering is correct.
For all these reasons, Venus may have been habitable for an even longer period of time. Also, periodic and partial habitability (induced for adult neurogenesis) cannot be ruled out.
I have previously hypothesized that human soul oscillates between different species. If, as hypothesized, a particular soul has significant affinity for particular
blood type then it possibly has affinity for particular eye color and other DNA encoded properties as well, to some extent. This should not be surprising as bodies and souls co-evolve.
People co-evolve with animals too, thus, inter-species soul oscillation should not be surprising either.
With strong differences in DNA and particularly gene expression between species, inter-species soul oscillation might seem counter-intuitive if soul has affinity for particular body DNA.
However, this is solved with vertical [energy] oscillation of the soul. While oscillating within the same species, soul is oscillating horizontally - with no large deviation in
mass (energy), bodies between incarnations will generally have similar DNA.
Vertical oscillation of the soul is high energy (mass) oscillation and DNA between bodies will be strongly evolutionary separated, although distance will be decreasing over time.
Decrease in distance (increase in shared DNA) between species over time should then be interpreted as evidence of inter-species soul oscillation.
I have hypothesized previously that Rh negative blood type has extraterrestrial origin. It likely originates on Mars, as Venus and Earth should belong to same, or more compatible, species. This
may be true for some other types or factors as well.
Judged by somatotype, pure endomorphs are concerned with security, not caring much about freedom. In ectomorphs it is the opposite, while genuine Earthlings seek balance in both.
The current state on Earth and representation of specific somatotypes confirms the hypothesis. All countries have governments providing security (even if more or less imaginary and
cancerously - unequally) while true anarchies are non-existent. It is thus the ectomorphs, or Martian characteristics, which are mostly discriminated in society and with a strongest sense
Over the course of evolution, there have been different species of animals (ie. sharks), with most notable difference between two species in size, and with other differences being marginal.
I do not consider it likely that the same species would evolve twice on Earth at different time and only differ in size, thus, as I have previously hypothesized on the origin
of Megalodon and Great White sharks, difference in size may come from difference in size of planets of origin.
I am convinced there is complex life in every planet, every dwarf planet and every moon having a distinct gravitational maximum (soul) - generally, these are bodies in hydrostatic equilibrium.
There should be microscopic life even on some comets and asteroids, hitching a ride in state of hibernation.
Since homo.sapiens likely has means to travel long distances in the Solar System, species on Earth might have been introduced from many of these places, not only
Venus and Mars. Exploration of these worlds can confirm this.
As many experiences of homo.sapiens (alien) abduction and stories of non-sexual impregnation (ie. Mary with Jesus, in Christianity) suggest, diversity in characteristics is most likely the
result of hybridization by introduction of artificially synthesized foreign gametes into local bodies.
In any case, diversity of species and diversity in characteristics of individuals on one place is implied with life being everywhere and everlasting transformations and changes in
soul (energy) momenta (radiation of life should be understood literally as radiation of photons of certain scale).
That is the intuitive solution to paradoxes and questions concerning life and its diversity on Earth, such as:
It is obvious - while Earth might be special to us and we might be special to Earth, it's completely non-intuitive for either of us to be special to any larger universe, not even as a pair.
We can continue playing dumb and keep saying that a universe is the Universe, that its physics is non-intuitive, that living things are made of non-living things, and that we are the most special
of all life that is special to special Earth... or we can admit that we are a bit more intelligent and everything is completely relative.
- why is diversity in characteristics present mostly in humans and domesticated animals - if that's a product of random mutations, why is it not so random in the wild?
- if life has to start by chance, rather than transform, why on Earth's surface and not elsewhere, why would it have a greater chance to develop on Earth than on early Venus or Mars when these
had conditions suitable for complex life? Complex life has emerged multiple times on Earth from simple life, and yet we assume that simple life emerged only once?