There is a lot of confusion out there in regards to the difference between the Native Application vs. Hybrid Application. Although it is a very broad question, there are specific ways in which the two categories differ from each other.
The primary difference between Native Application vs. Hybrid Application is in the method of accessing the platform. Native Applications require that a computer running on a specific operating system is allowed access to the platform, while Hybrid Applications allows computers running on many different operating systems to share the same platform. This is important for the purposes of providing access for applications and files across different operating systems.
Native Applications are built in a way that allows the creation of the application from the start. This means that the user can use the program right from the beginning without having to install it on a specific computer. Hybrid Applications require the user to install the program before it can be used. If you are not comfortable installing a program or are not sure if you have the right hardware to run a program, Native Applications may be your best bet for your project.
Native Applications can be installed on almost any platform. While some programs, such as Microsoft Word and Excel, may work with some operating systems, the majority will need to be downloaded and installed on the platform. The advantage to this is that the software can be updated on a frequent basis, while most Hybrid Applications will need to be upgraded from time to time as well. Since many programs will work with more than one platform, Hybrid Applications can be updated on more than one platform without being updated on all the operating systems.
Many users choose Hybrid Applications because of its cost effectiveness. Although the cost of installing and maintaining these programs can be quite high, they tend to be less costly over time because they are more frequently updated and can be used on more than one platform at once. The advantage of using a program such as the Windows Installer for your Native Application projects is that it allows your application to be easily managed and installed.
Native Applications require the use of the native operating system that the program is currently running on. For example, if you were to use a Windows Installer for Microsoft Office applications, then you would be able to get a program that was designed for Windows XP, while at the same time still working on Windows Vista. With a Hybrid Application, however, you would be unable to get the program to run on Vista because the program would require the user to run a different program on the second operating system.
On the other hand, the main advantage of a Hybrid Application is that you can use the operating system that you already have and use a program that works with almost any version of Windows or Mac. with little to no hassle. hassle at all. Unlike installing and running programs through the user’s computer, running a program through the computer’s operating system is very different from the process of getting one to run through the user’s computer.
There are also many choices building mobile applications in native and hybrid such as for Android native we can use java such as Objective C for iOS or Java for Android operating systems, and for Hybrid IONIC framework, Fluter, etc.
In the end, it comes down to whether you would prefer to go with a program that is easy to use but requires the user to get into the habit of using the program or the ease of using one that is simple to get set up, but does not need the user to use multiple programs. When it comes down to it, there really is no winner between a Hybrid Application and a Native Application. Hybrid Applications may be easier to use for most users.