"Ten reasons why HIV could not cause AIDS", from my inbox... ============================================== Ten reasons why HIV could not cause AIDS (Excerpt) WalterNY 1.) HIV is harmless HIV reproduces itself through what is called reverse transcription. Its receptacle attaches to the coating of the T cell and encodes its information (RNA) into the information contained in the gene (DNA). Like all viral that invade the body, at first they reproduce rapidly. In doing so they may indeed create cold symptoms. But the body has antibodies that seek out things like HIV and render it dead or harmless. When a person test positive, the test they took actually doesn’t find the virus itself but the antibodies that are in the blood and are left over after they have attacked and disabled the HIV. What that means is that when you test positive, it means your body has already encountered the virus and is now immune to it. The body has done its job. There are no viruses in the history of medicine that reemerge and re-attack the body after the bodies’ immune system has rendered them inactive. Even a high school student biology student would find fault with the HIV theory when the facts are presented. We should ask why we spent billions of dollars and nothing has come from it. Nothing except death. 2.) HIV does not kill the t-cells it affects People with AIDS are indeed losing t-cells. Because these were the cells that HIV effects, it was ASSUMED that HIV was the culprit. But Retroviruses do not kill their hosts. Only under rare laboratory conditions is it possible to make HIV kill its host cell. AIDS researchers actually use t-cells to grow the virus in their reacearch because both live together very compatibly. It was this notion that initially made Duesberg and over 600 other scientist, including 181 that have advanced degrees question the whole thing in the first place. Truth is, HIV is not a killer virus. Viruses that kill a cell couldn’t cause cancer. If HIV were a killer cell then those with AIDS indication diseases would not have some form of cancer as some of the defining diseases do. 3.) HIV does not infect enough t-cells to cause AIDS. After a retrovirus is brought under control by the immune system, the virus particles become dormant and begin to disappear. Before long the virus can hardly be found at all. I have posted before HIV only effects up to 1 cell per thousand and sometimes only 1 cell per 100,000 thousand. But t-cells reproduce at up to 5% per day. Simple mathematics proves that HIV can in no way infect enough cells to bring down the immune system. In fact, the HIV scientists even admit that this low t-cell amount is difficult to explain. Of course they can’t. It isn’t true. Very few t-cells that are infected by HIV can actually be found in the sickest persons. Gallos original hypothesis that this is all based on is the equivalent of saying that a person who nicks himself shaving is going to die. You are losing 1/1000 of your blood but you are not going to die. 4.) HIV has no AIDS causing gene. HIV simply has no specific gene or unique genetic reason to cause AIDS. All retroviruses have only three major genes and six minor genes. Because the genes are so limited in these very simple viruses, they need all the genes to replicate. HIV is almost identical to all other retroviruses genetically. There are 50 to 100 of these retroviruses in everyone’s body and they are all (including HIV) kept in check by the immune system. It would be extremely rare for genes which such similar genetic sequences to act any different than other almost identical genes. If HIV causes AIDS then why can ’t the others cause the same intense problems. It simply doesn’t make sense. 5.)There is no such thing as a slow virus They say that HIV takes up to 12 years to cause AIDS. They use words like migrate, mutate, replicate, reactivate, and hibernate. They give HIV magical powers that no other virus in the body has. Actually the words come from people like Gallo and Gajdusek who used this magical theory to by time when their hypothesis didn’t work. They based their slow virus hypothesis on studies of Epstein Barr virus and Herpes virus, but these are very different than is HIV. In both cases large amounts of virus can be found that cause specific problems related to the disorders. But HIV is dormant. How does a dormant virus cause 30 unrelated diseases ten years later? None of which are specific to HIV itself. We are buying lots of time for something else to cause AIDS at this point. They have a safety net. There is not even a shred of light at why it would take ten years for this to happen. It has never happened with any other virus in history. No one even bothers to ask that question from the HIV/AIDS side. 6.) HIV is not a new virus so it would not cause a new epidemic. They assume that since AIDS has grown dramatically since 1981 that HIV virus must cause it. They tell you about green monkey bites and promiscuous gay flight attendants but science fails to ask a simple question, How old is HIV? Using what science calls Farrs law we can assume that it is very old. What Farr said was that when a new virus comes along it spreads exponentially, like a flu epidemic. But since HIV was detected only 1,000,000 Americans ever have it each year (CDC). So if it is in 1 million people every year for ten years and simply doesn’t grow exponentially (as it doesn’t) it can’t be new. HIV is older than the country you live in. It has been and is in many people and there offspring for centuries according to Farrs law. 7.) HIV fails Koch’s postulates (pronounced like the slang for a penis). This is a universal law in science. It states 1, the germ must be found in all cases. But there are 10-20% of people that have AIDS and don’t have HIV at all. When it can be found it is in extremely small amounts and dormant. Number two states that the germ must be isolated from the host and be able to be grown in a culture. But it takes huge amounts of cell tissue to find it, then a difficult chemical process is necessary to reactivate it. The third postulate states that HIV must be able to be injected into a healthy host and must thrive in that host. But HIV injected in Chimps which have similar DNA to use does not live in these animals. It fails to live when injected in any other animal and yes people. Human health care workers who are injected with HIV accidentally, very very rarely get AIDS unless they use drugs. The statistics of the CDC prove that. The HIV orthodoxy have stated that Koch’s postulates are old and outdates but it has stood the test of time. In fact those that have ignored it have all met peril. In the case of Beri-beri, Scurvy, Pelegra, SIMON, and the failed Virus-cancer program, all ended in a dismal failure. All were supposedly infectious but were not. And Robert Gallo was responsible for the ridiculous virus-cancer investigation. All the researchers ignored Koch’s postulates and were proved to be wrong as a result. Looking at the population study AIDS fails also. The population studies that the CDC releases every year prove by themselves that HIV does not cause AIDS. 8.) AIDS has remained in its original risk groups for 12 years. If a disease does not spread it is not contagious and must be caused by something else. AIDS is still in its original risk groups of gay males, IV users, Hemophiliacs and drug transfusion patients make up of over 97% of all AIDS cases and the other less than 3% suffer from immuno deficiency at random and happen to be infected by HIV. If AIDS is caused by a virus the 3% group would grow but it doesn’t. In 1984 the army started to test new recruits, they found that HIV infection was evenly distributed 50/50 amongst men and women, and has remained that way. It should follow that AIDS should be spread 50% male and 50% female, but nine out of ten AIDS cases are still male. A germ related disease should be spread evenly and it is not. This may explain why drug use is more related to HIV infection. In the US over 80% of all psychoactive drugs are used by males. Amongst women, 60% use hard drugs. Health care workers have not begun getting AIDS. There are a handful of cases and even these are disputed. AIDS has to do with specific medical risks and behavior than HIV.