During the last decade much research and many initiatives have been undertaken to make progress in areas such as risk assessment (Murray, 2017, Simmons et al., 2017), disaster preparedness (Ghosh et al., 2018, Subramaniam and Villeneuve, 2019), capacity building (Few et al., 2017, Coppola, 2018), early warning systems (Guru and Santha, 2015, Marchezini et al., 2018), disaster response (Feng and Xiang-Yang, 2018, Smith et al., 2018), training and resilience frameworks (Kwok et al., 2018, Tiernan et al., 2019). Research reported in O’Brien et al. (2012) suggests that progress in disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been limited by the failure to acknowledge and address the development processes as the root causes of disasters. Previous research has concentrated on reducing existing risks, rather than on how risks are generated and accumulated in the first place through development projects (Thomalla et al., 2018) that are taking place as a part of the reconstruction phase after a disaster or in response to the demand of urban sprawl. Furthermore, the impact of climate change is posing serious challenges to sustainable urban development, with societies experiencing frequent extreme events such as floods, heatwaves and storms (IPCC, 2014). It is evident that the economic and non-economic impacts of disasters are on the increase, and the poorest nations are struggling to maintain their development trajectory (Ramalingam, 2013, UNISDR, 2015).
In Thomalla et al. (2018), the researchers argue that one of the explanations for increasing risks and impacts is that the development and disaster risk reduction decision-making processes occur in silos, conducted by different agencies, institutions and other actors with differing priorities, perspectives and time horizons. Furthermore, work on resilience has attracted criticism for its failure to address social vulnerability and to engage with issues of equity and power (Matin et al., 2018). Hence the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG goals) (such as SDG 10, 11, 17 which call for “reduced inequalities”, “inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities” and “partnerships for goals”) and the Sendai Priority 4 that calls for build-back better in recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction, are hard to achieve due to a lack of research knowledge, current practices and policies. Therefore, there is an urgent need to transform current development practices that increase or create risks, as well as unfairly distributing risks to vulnerable communities, to a new form of development practice that is equitable and resilient. As proposed in Thomalla et al. (2018), such a transformation can be achieved through (i) exposing development-disaster risk trade-offs in development policy and decision-making; (ii) prioritizing equity and social justice in approaches to securing resilience, and (iii) enabling transformation through adaptive governance (governance that promotes cross-organisational collaboration, openness, adaptability, learning, impartiality, power sharing and public participation).
The TRANSCEND project aims to address the above challenges by conducting research to investigate processes, governance structures, policies and technology that can enable a transition towards a more risk-sensitive and transformative urban development approach.
Figure 1 shows the nature of the overall technology architecture planned for the TRANSCEND project for addressing the intended socio-technical challenges.
This aim will be achieved through five workpackages as presented in Figure 2.
WP1 : Investigate the nature of the underlying sociotechnical system that can support adaptive governance based on an inclusive participatory approach to enable development practice that is equitable and resilient.
WP2: Explore how participatory planning can be made more accessible to vulnerable communities by building community capacity and resilience.
WP3: Design and implement a “collaborative foresight and decision-making virtual workspace” which can be used for supporting both Adaptive Governance (based on requirements on WP1) and the engagement of vulnerable communities (based on requirements from WP2) to support developments which are equitable and resilient.
WP4 : Support user engagement by implementing three living labs in Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Malaysia.
WP5: Provide the overall project management;
- COPPOLA, D. 2018. Strategic Approach to Capacity Development for Implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: A Vision of Risk-Informed Sustainable Development by 2030. Concise Guide. Geneva: UNISDR.
- FENG, Y. & XIANG-YANG, L. 2018. Improving emergency response to cascading disasters: Applying case-based reasoning towards urban critical infrastructure. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 30, 244-256.
- FEW, R., SCOTT, Z., WOOSTER, K., AVILA, M. F., TARAZONA, M. & THOMSON, A. 2017. Strategic Research into National and Local Capacity Building for DRM: Synthesis Report Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies.
- GHOSH, S., GHOSH, K., GANGULY, D., CHAKRABORTY, T., JONES, G. J. F., MOENS, M.-F. & IMRAN, M. 2018. Exploitation of Social Media for Emergency Relief and Preparedness: Recent Research and Trends. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 901-907.
- GURU, B. & SANTHA, S. D. 2015. People-centred early warning systems and disaster risk reduction: A Scoping Study of Public Participatory Geographical Information Systems (PPGIS) in India. GAR 2015 Input Paper. Geneva: UNISDR.
- IPCC 2014. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.)], Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press.
- KWOK, A. H., PATON, D., BECKER, J., HUDSON-DOYLE, E. E. & JOHNSTON, D. 2018. A bottom-up approach to developing a neighbourhood-based resilience measurement framework. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 27, 255-270.
- MARCHEZINI, V., HORITA, F. E. A., MATSUO, P. M., TRAJBER, R., TREJO-RANGEL, M. A. & OLIVATO, D. 2018. A Review of Studies on Participatory Early Warning Systems (P-EWS): Pathways to Support Citizen Science Initiatives. Frontiers in Earth Science, 6.
MATIN, N., FORRESTER, J. & ENSOR, J. 2018. What is equitable resilience? World Development, 109, 197-205.
- O’BRIEN, A PATWARDHAN, M PELLING, S HALLEGATTE, A MASKREY, T OKI, U OSWALD-SPRING, T WILBANKS, PZ YANDA, F BERKHOUT, R BIGGS, HG BRAUCH, K BROWN, C FOLKE, L HARRINGTON, H KUNREUTHER, C LACAMBRA, R LEICHENKO, R MECHLER, C PAHL-WOSTL, V PRZYLUSKI, D SATTERTHWAITE, F SPERLING, L SYGNA, T TANNER, P TSCHAKERT, K ULSRUD & VIGUIÉ, V. 2012. Toward a Sustainable and Resilient Future. .Chapter 8. Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX). Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- RAMALINGAM, B. 2013. Aid on the edge of chaos: rethinking international cooperation in a complex world, Oxford University Press.
- SIMMONS, D. C., CORBANE, C., MENONI, S., SCHNEIDERBAUER, S. & ZSCHAU, J. 2017. Understanding disaster risk: risk assessment methodologies and examples In: POLJANŠEK, K., MARÍN FERRER, M., DE GROEVE, T. & CLARK, I. (eds.) Science for disaster risk management 2017: knowing better and losing less Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- SMITH, W. R., ROBERTSON, B. W., MURTHY, D., STEPHENS, K. K. & LI, J. Social Media in Citizen-Led Disaster Response: Rescuer Roles, Coordination Challenges, and Untapped Potential. In: BOERSMA, K. & TOMASZEWSKI, B., eds. 15th ISCRAM Conference, May 2018 2018 Rochester, NY, USA Rochester Institute of Technology.
- SUBRAMANIAM, P. & VILLENEUVE, M. 2019. Advancing emergency preparedness for people with disabilities and chronic health conditions in the community: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-9.
- THOMALLA, F., BOYLAND, M., JOHNSON, K., ENSOR, J., TUHKANEN, H., GERGER SWARTLING, Å., HAN, G., FORRESTER, J. & WAHL, D. 2018. Transforming Development and Disaster Risk. Sustainability, 10, 1458.
- UNISDR 2015. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.