As much as we might want to believe there is a magic formula for personal finance which simply requires plugging in the right numbers, success or failure has a lot more to do with our psychological makeup and personal habits than getting the numbers right. The math is the easy part; it’s the human element that gums things up. Consider just a few of the “essential” personal factors necessary for financial well-being:
- healthy lifestyle habits.
- stability in career and personal relationships.
- the discipline of living within one’s income, and learning to save.
- a willingness to delay gratification to achieve long-term goals, while allowing enough immediate rewards to stay motivated and content in the present.
acknowledgementof risks, and how to address them, whether it be through insurance, guarantees, or appropriate management strategies.
It’s no wonder there is a burgeoning field of research called behavioral finance, which “seeks to combine behavioral and cognitive psychological theory” to help individuals achieve better financial outcomes. This could mean re-framing a concept (seeing your retirement goal as a monthly income instead of a lump sum accumulation), or applying behavioral “nudges” like automatic withdrawals to make sure saving occurs. And it might be understanding what – or who – we can blame if things go wrong.
Getting Help – So There’s Someone to Blame
Passing the Buck: “Delegating Choices to Others To Avoid Responsibility and Blame,” is a July 2016 research article by Mary Steffel published in the professional journal “Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process.” Here’s the opening statement from the executive summary:
“In seven experiments, we found that participants who were tasked with choosing meals, hotels, investments, or tasks to complete, were two to three times as likely to delegate if the choice affected others and if the options were unappealing.”
We might think of “delegating” as passing an assignment off to a subordinate, such as a boss delegating a project to one of her reports. But delegating in this context is different: it’s seeking someone above us – in knowledge, expertise, or authority – to make the decision. And if things go wrong, there’s an implied understanding that the delegate will bear responsibility for the outcome.
Steffel’s research makes another thing very clear: Delegation must be conferred upon a real person, not an inanimate process. Arriving at a hotel choice by flipping a coin or using an Internet search engine does not qualify as delegation because the responsibility for the decision remains with the person who flipped the coin or selected the technology.
It is also important to note that “delegating up” did not improve outcomes; it just gave the initial decision-maker cover in case things went awry. And while that might sound cowardly, it might be desirable. Better for their relationship if a couple can blame a third-party “expert,” instead of having to deal with either the failure or disappointment of one person toward the other.
What about Delegating Money Decisions?
There are certainly personal finance scenarios where our choices could affect others and the options may be unappealing. First, there’s a recognition that financial decisions have consequences, not only for the
At this point, we may seek
Michael Kitces, a registered investment advisor who blogs frequently on client management issues, offers an interesting insight on how a consumer’s desire to off-load responsibility may result in less-than-optimal decisions when working with financial professionals.
“Unfortunately, the delegation blame-game also helps to explain why so many advisors with strong personalities and sales skills, but little actual competency, still succeed in gaining clients. (T)
In short, a desire to delegate may make us more susceptible to sales tactics and less objective in our assessment of both the recommendations and character of the person we’re working with. One of the best ways to mitigate against engaging a financial professional simply to off-load responsibility is to establish a relationship with one before there are hard decisions to be made. When a working relationship has time to develop without pressure, both parties have a better chance of forming a successful working arrangement.
A good financial delegate can share the responsibility for making a decision, but only you have to live with the outcome – even if there’s someone else you can blame.
This newsletter is prepared by an independent third party for distribution by your Representative(s). Material discussed is meant for general illustration and/or informational purposes only and it is not to be construed as tax, legal or investment advice. Although the information has been gathered from sources believed reliable, please note that individual situations can vary, therefore the information should be relied upon when coordinated with individual professional advice. Links to other sites are for your convenience in locating related information and services. The Representative(s) does not maintain these other sites and has no control over the organizations that maintain the sites or the information, products or services these organizations provide. The Representative(s) expressly disclaims any responsibility for the content, the accuracy of the information or the quality of products or services provided by the organizations that maintain these sites. The Representative(s) does not recommend or endorse these organizations or their products or services in any way. We have not reviewed or approved the
Lifetime Financial Growth, LLC is an Agency of The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America® (Guardian), New York, NY. Securities products and advisory services offered through Park Avenue Securities LLC (PAS), member FINRA, SIPC. PAS is an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Guardian. Lifetime Financial Growth, LLC is not an affiliate or subsidiary of PAS or Guardian. 2017-37872 EXP. 03/2019