Due to the COVID-19 crisis, societies have slowed down their pace, and many personal, social, political, and cultural developments were put on the back burner. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic has acted like a pressure cooker for other kinds of developments in society, such as the acceleration of digitalisation of education, work, and our social lives. Moreover, it has underscored the importance and challenge of democratic and evidence-based political decision-making. Politicians have had to deal with scientific uncertainty and have had to weigh different interests. The measures that were taken, have had big consequences for the lives of citizens. Science, technology and innovation (STI) have played a crucial role in this crisis. How did governments in different countries respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, and how did they use STI to combat the crisis? Has the existing way of informed decision-making by politicians been adequate in this kind of crisis? What are the emerging issues that need to be dealt with in a post-COVID-19 world? In this report, we address these questions.
Purpose and target audience report
This report describes strengths and weaknesses in the governance of the corona pandemic related to the use of STI in countries that are part of the European Parliamentary Technology Assessment network (EPTA). Eighteen members of the EPTA network have contributed to this report, sixteen of which belong to a country, and two represent a wider European perspective. Next to European countries, Japan, the United States of America, South Korea and Chile belong to the EPTA network. How have the EPTA institutes supported parliament and policy-makers in their decision-making process? TA institutes can play a vital role in providing balanced, comprehensive and independent information that is needed for decision-making on the deployment of science and technology. Lastly, the EPTA network observes six urgent challenges that Technology Assessment (TA) institutes need to scrutinise and advise policy-makers on in a post-COVID-19 world.
The report is written for various types of audiences, including TA institutes as well as members of parliament, policy-makers, and institutions interested in TA. In meeting future crises, the outcomes of this report are a starting point to improve interactions between STI, governments, politicians and society, including the role of TA therein. This can contribute to more resilience of societies in the face of future crises, such as the climate crisis or pandemics that may lie ahead.
This joint report is part of the EPTA network’s ongoing effort to strengthen the role of Technology Assessment in parliamentary decision-making across Europe. Furthermore, it is meant to establish links between different TA activities worldwide.
Challenges, and opportunities for parliamentary TA
The COVID-19 pandemic has hit countries across the board, with severe consequences for health, the economy and society. Most countries were underprepared for this relatively novel threat, and virtually all governments turned to experts for advice. In this initial phase, in which countries were in a crisis mode, there was a firm reliance on scientific experts, mainly from the (bio)medical sciences, to guide policy-makers to find a way out of the pandemic. However, after the direct threat of the first wave of infections had been lifted, the debate within parliament and society broadened in most countries. More things than health were at stake. This fact led to controversy in the debate on measures based on uncertain or incomplete scientific evidence. Advising the government on COVID-19 quickly became highly organised within most EPTA member countries. While some EPTA institutes were included in this institutionalised system responsible for providing scientific advice, others were not. Consequently, it was up to their own initiative to contribute their expertise to inform policies and political decision-making.
The fast spread of the virus required quick decision-making. Sometimes, political decisions were based on minimal scientific information, and decisions sometimes played out differently than expected. It was challenging for politicians and policy-makers to balance between taking action and reflecting on the available evidence and the possible consequences for society. EPTA members responded to this challenge by developing different formats (faster, shorter) to provide advice to their parliaments. The Rathenau Instituut, for instance, sent a message to parliament in which it swiftly responded to the plans of the Dutch government for a COVID-19 app. Whereas in the report Valued at work it gave an analysis of digital monitoring in the workplace. This phenomenon already existed before the corona pandemic. However, the crisis made it more topical. Some EPTA institutes advised on citizen participation and democratisation in the relationship between STI, politics and society. The Rathenau Instituut applied its knowledge of digitalisation and involving citizens in a couple of accessible messages to parliament in which it responded to topical events.
Furthermore, politicians and policy-makers did not base their decisions on scientific evidence alone; other political, social, economic, legal, and moral considerations also played a role. Policy-makers often referred to scientific evidence or experts to substantiate their decisions without explaining the role of other considerations in their choices. This lack of transparency can be damaging to trust in the measures and the democratic process. EPTA institutes helped clarify the interactions between science, technology, society, and politics.
Finally, many governments seemed underprepared for the current crises and relied on ad hoc crisis management with uncertainty about the consequences of the policies. Governance structures should be more adaptable and dynamic. At the same time, it is crucial that such governance and legislation do not infringe on citizens' rights and privacy. Several EPTA members have given suggestions for more anticipatory governance using methods from the field of foresight, like Horizon Scan or Crisis Radar.