Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement
Why did American workers, unlike their European counterparts, fail to forge a class-based movement to pursue broad social reform? Was it simply that they lacked class consciousness and were more interested in personal mobility? In a richly detailed survey of labor law and labor history, William Forbath challenges this notion of American "individualism." In fact, he argues, the nineteenth-century American labor movement was much like Europe's labor movements in its social and political outlook, but in the decades around the turn of the century, the prevailing attitude of American trade unionists changed. Forbath shows that, over time, struggles with the courts and the legal order were crucial to reshaping labor's outlook, driving the labor movement to temper its radical goals.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Judicial Review in Labors Political Culture
Government by Injunction
10 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
action activities amendment American labor anti-injunction arrests Association authority bill boycotts broad called century Chicago City Coal collective Commission common law conspiracy constitutional continued contract criminal decades decision decrees doctrine early efforts employers enforcement enjoined equity example experience federal force Frankfurter Free Gilded Age Gompers handful held holding House Illinois industrial infra issued judges judicial judiciary Knights labor injunction labor laws labor movement language leaders legislation limits major manufacturers Mass means miners narrower nineteenth note 9 officials Ohio organized parties peaceful picketing police political protect radical railroad railway reform regulation Relations reported republican role seemed social sought statute strike struck supra Chap supra Intro Supreme Court Taft trade unionists trade unions turn United upheld violating vision wage workers York