Covid 19 Injection
“Whatever power wishes to subjugate a person will have to exert an influence that imprints itself in his blood…That which possesses a person’s blood possesses that person, and possesses the human ‘I’” – Rudolf Steiner Supersensible Knowledge, Lecture 2, Blood is a very Special Fluid
“–Our Operating System – Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.” – Moderna
Computers are information processing machines; the mRNA and DNA injections can be seen as a part of rudimentary biological computing systems running within the body, the mRNA/DNA being like code running within cells which are being used like the hardware elements of a computer. The reference to storage, software and applications is not metaphorical, we are dealing here with synthetic biology an aspect of which is biocomputing.
The development of gene-based logic circuits forming CPUs, bio-censors etc, fabricated using living materials instead of silicone is already well advanced.
“Controlling gene expression with sophisticated logic gates has been and remains one of the central aims of synthetic biology. However, conventional implementations of biocomputers use central processing units (CPUs) assembled from multiple protein-based gene switches, limiting the programming flexibility and complexity that can be achieved within single cells. Here, we introduce a CRISPR/Cas9-based core processor that enables different sets of user-defined guide RNA inputs to program a single transcriptional regulator (dCas9-KRAB) to perform a wide range of bitwise computations, from simple Boolean logic gates to arithmetic operations such as the half adder. Furthermore, we built a dual-core CPU combining two orthogonal core processors in a single cell. In principle, human cells integrating multiple orthogonal CRISPR/Cas9-based core processors could offer enormous computational capacity.” – A CRISPR/Cas9-based Central Processing Unit to Program Complex Logic Computation in Human Cells
“First, we would like to introduce to the vaccine community the concept of synthetic gene circuits and how they could help create more effective vaccines with sophisticated programmable behaviour. Second, we would like to challenge the mammalian synthetic biology community to engineer sophisticated gene circuits for vaccination by using the emerging modified or replicating RNA technologies….
Nucleic acid vaccines have been gaining attention as an alternative to the standard attenuated pathogen or protein-based vaccine. However, an unrealized advantage of using such DNA or RNA based vaccination modalities is the ability to program within these nucleic acids regulatory devices that would provide an immunologist the power to control the production of antigens and adjuvants in a desirable manner by administering small molecule drugs as chemical triggers…
Advances in synthetic biology have resulted in the creation of highly predictable and modular genetic parts and devices that can be composed into synthetic gene circuits with complex behaviours. With the recent advent of modified RNA gene delivery methods and developments in the RNA replicon platform, we foresee a future in which mammalian synthetic biologists will create genetic circuits encoded exclusively on RNA… ‘smart vaccines’ will revolutionize the field of RNA vaccination…
Synthetic biology is a radically new style of genetic engineering in which living organisms are “programmed” using genetic circuits to systematically engineer novel and useful biological properties. The earliest accomplishments in the field included the construction of simple genetic circuits such as oscillators and toggle switches in bacterial species using mathematical modelling and rational network design. Since then, increasingly more complex circuits have been engineered…” – Synthetic Biology Devices and Circuits for RNA-based ‘Smart Vaccines’: A Propositional Review. January 2015
“You can basically do anything with synthetic RNA/DNA, it’s like a computer program, with effort that’s not too crazy you could probably stop aging/reverse it… you could probably turn someone into a freakin butterfly if you want, with the right DNA sequence, caterpillars do it.” – Elon Musk
The experimental mRNA and DNA Covid 19 injections are a form of gene therapy.
“The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever, and we will have enormous amounts of data.” – Greg Hunt Minister for Health Australia
There is no proof, evidence or concrete claim from the manufacturers, health experts or governments that the injections impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2. (See Video Below.Time Reference 25:42) Therefore they do not meet the medical or legal definition of a vaccine.
“I.G.T. (immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer) is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle. The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.” – Carl Zimmer New York Times March 2015, Protection Without a Vaccine
Only four of the available ‘vaccines’ are discussed in this article, specifically the mRNA/DNA types. The Astrazeneca/Oxford and Johnson and Johnson injections are viral vector vaccine (I.G.T.) and deal with DNA payloads. The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines deal with mRNA payloads. So, we have two delivery methods, viral (Astrazeneca/Oxford and Johnson and Johnson) and chemical (Moderna and Pfizer). The result of both injections is that the person is genetically altered to to produce the Sars-CoV-2 spike protein. The delivery method is known as transfection. In the Moderna/Pfizer vaccines Polyethylene glycol (PEG) nano particles (or similar) are used to encapsulate the mRNA and transport it to the cell. In the AstraZeneca Oxford vaccine a chimpanzee adenovirus virus is used to transport DNA to the nucleus of the cell.
“You now become like a genetically modified organism and your body is expressing the viral protein.” Professor Dolores Cahill
So, to be clear. The AstraZeneca/Oxford and Johnson and Johnson injections deliver the genetic information to make the spike protein in the form of DNA which is then incorporated into the nucleus of the recipient’s cells (DNA Data Storage), which then produces mRNA (Software), which then produces the spike protein (Application). The Moderna and Pfizer injections skip the first two steps and introduce mRNA (Software) which directly programmes the cell to produce the spike protein (Application). Normal DNA expression is hacked.
“While epigenetic processes involving DNA methylation and histone modifications are known to be critical in learning and memory, the role of RNA modifications in cognitive function has been less well characterized.” – Neural Activity Controls Mitochondrial Transfer of RNA Modifiers to the Nucleus
Our neural activity (thinking) alters RNA expression. When we hack our RNA we are inserting something that sits between the normal mind-body relationship. How will this artificial insertion affect the interaction between the physical and finer levels, etheric, astral and higher spiritual layers of the human being? Biocomputing is still in its infancy, where is it all heading?
“Imagine a biological computer that operates inside a living cell…Here we are talking about molecular systems…that run in a test tube or maybe in the live cell…the type of work that they are doing is essentially that they are trying to sense, analyse and control molecular information.” – Microsoft
“To help address these challenges we have developed the DNA Strand Displacement (DSD) tool, a programming language for designing and simulating computational devices made of DNA. The language uses DNA strand displacement as the main computational mechanism, which allows devices to be designed solely in terms of nucleic acids. DSD is a first step towards the development of design and analysis tools for DNA strand displacement, and complements the emergence of novel implementation strategies for DNA computing.” – Microsoft Programming DNA Circuits
“The whole trend goes in a direction where a way will finally be found to vaccinate bodies so that these bodies will not allow the inclination towards spiritual ideas to develop and all their lives people will believe only in the physical world they perceive with the senses.” – Rudolf Steiner The fall Of The Spirits Of Darkness, Lecture 13
“The developers of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine have previously undisclosed ties to the re-named British Eugenics Society as well as other Eugenics-linked institutions like the Wellcome Trust.” Whitney Webb
“A minimally invasive optogenetic technique that does not require brain implants successfully manipulated the activity of neurons in mice and monkeys…The researchers first genetically engineered neurons to produce a newly developed, extremely light-sensitive protein called SOUL. They then demonstrated that it is possible to shine light through the skull to alter neuronal responses throughout the entire mouse brain, and through a thick membrane called the dura to reach superficial regions of the macaque brain.” – Implant-free Optogenetics Minimizes Brain Damage During Neuronal Stimulation
“It is a technology that enables researchers to stimulate cells with light, thereby allowing for the direct control of behaviour. Until now, this technique has been applied in animal research only but, as we argue, it holds promise for research in humans as well.” – Optogenetics as a neuromodulation tool in cognitive neuroscience
“The study suggests that with an injection of a virus carrying the ChRmine gene—either through the eye socket or through veins—it’s potentially possible to control something as integral to a personality as sociability with nothing but light.” – Singularity Hub
For information on magnetogenetics, another related control technique, please read the Iron article.
(DREADDs) “These are designer receptors that can be remotely controlled, you can create a cell, you can put it somewhere in the body and you can remotely activate it. So, you have the capacity to create any product as long as you know the DNA sequence, you can insert it into a living system and you can remotely control it. It may affect the way you think, the way you act. So once you know that technology is there to edit, splice and program a cell and the technology currently exists to administer it to somebody and have it go park anywhere you program it to go park, proliferate and do its function, you can have things activated in other people’s brains…
…From the human drone technology standpoint you can attach the human brain to another human brain, you can direct motor activity or you can send communication and information.” – Dr. Charles Morgan Psycho-Neurobiology and War April 2018
Is it possible to control neuronal response and create two-way communication (information transfer) using a combination of the technologies mentioned so far and directed electromagnetic fields from phased antenna arrays?
“Remember—the winner in the AI superpower race is the AI system with access to the most data. Accessing your body and my body on a 24/7 basis generates a lot of data. I believe that Gates and the pharma and biotech industries are literally reaching to create a global control grid by installing digital interface components and hooking us up to Microsoft’s new $10 billion JEDI cloud at the Department of Defense as well as Amazon’s multibillion cloud contract for the CIA that is shared with all U.S. intelligence agencies.” – Catherine Austin Fitts The Injection Fraud, Its Not a Vaccine
So, we arrive at probably the single most important question facing humanity both now and for the future. Will we connect ourselves to the machines we make in the right or wrong way? The Battle for Humanity article attempts to show why the integration of binary/quantum-based technology that uses electricity and magnetism is the wrong way. The Covid 19 injections pave the way to that very outcome. There is an alternative path open to us, one that uses a wholly different technology based upon the etheric life forces. We can develop conscious machines based not upon the duality of electricity and magnetism but on the threefold life processes. The alternative counterpart to the transhumanist technology that is being forced into our bodies is not to go back to the dark ages, it is to develop highly advanced technology based upon the etheric life forces.
The point where your body begins to undergo genetic manipulation using bio computing technology is the line in the sand, the fork in the road. Do you want to be a natural human being or begin the process of merging yourself and your life with the artificial world of the internet (and World Wide Web), something that was from the beginning designed as a weapons system of surveillance and control?
“The internet was developed, from the outset, as a weapon. Conceived as a surveillance tool by ARPA to control insurgents in the Vietnam War…”
…military and intelligence agencies used the network technology to spy on Americans in the first version of the Internet.” – Yasha Levine Surveillance Valley
“In a discovery that challenges long-held dogma in biology, researchers show that mammalian cells can convert RNA sequences back into DNA” – Thomas Jefferson University
“Once inside the nucleus, DNA vaccines have a risk of permanently changing a person’s DNA.” – Moderna White Paper
Anyone who has looked at all the evidence will have been struck by the hugely differing options about SARS-CoV-2. The genetic code on the NCBI database that is said to represent SARS-CoV-2 contains sequences that appear to be engineered. There is also evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has never been properly isolated and so has not been proven to exist in the real world. There is also the germ vs terrain theory debate etc. What we can say is that there are sequences of genetic code on the NCBI database that represent what is referred to as SARS-CoV-2 and also that reverse transcriptase, an enzyme found in retroviruses, is successfully used to transcribe RNA to DNA. The following section is based upon the NCBI code as it is the bases for the development of the ‘vaccines’ and also the various research papers referred to below.
“viruses that are hard-wired into our genomic DNA called endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). These ERVs harbor instructions to produce reverse transcriptase. In addition to ERVs, there are mobile genetic elements residing in our DNA called LTR-retrotransposons that also encode for reverse transcriptase enzymes. To top it all off, reverse transcriptase is naturally used by our cells to extend the telomeres at the end of chromosomes.” – Science with Dr. Doug
The genetic sequence for SARS-CoV-2 from which the therapies were developed, found on the NCBI database contains what appear to be HIV inserts.
“We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag.
The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.” – bioRxiv Paper Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag
“18 RNA fragments of homology equal or more than 80% with human or simian retroviruses have been found in the COVID_19 genome. These fragments are 18 to 30 nucleotides long and therefore have the potential to modify the gene expression of Covid-19.
This article shows how 16 fragments (Env Pol and Integrase genes) from different strains, both diversified and very recent, of the HIV1, HIV2 and SIV retroviruses have high percentage of homology into parts of the genome of COVID_19. Moreover each of these elements is made of 18 or more nucleotides and therefore may have a function.” – Jean Claude Perez, Luc Montagnier
Why does the source code used for the development of the gene therapy injections contain sequences from a virus that’s fundamental characteristic is reverse transcription?
“in order to insert an HIV sequence into this genome, molecular tools are needed, and that can only be done in a laboratory.” – Luc Montagnier
“we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA 26 sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed” – SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
HIV 1 is considered a lentivirus. A lentivirus is characterised by long incubation periods. They have certain characteristics that make them ideal for delivering genetic information to cells.
“Numerous viral vectors have been developed for the delivery of transgenes to specific target cells. For persistent transgene expression, vectors based on retroviruses are attractive delivery vehicles because of their ability to stably integrate their DNA into the host cell genome. Initially, vectors based on simple retroviruses were the vector of choice for such applications. However, these vectors can only transduce actively dividing cells. Therefore, much interest has turned to retroviral vectors based on the lentivirus genus because of their ability to transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells. The best characterized lentiviral vectors are derived from the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1).” – HIV-1-based lentiviral vectors Ying Poi Liu 1 , Ben Berkhout
Covid 19 gene therapy trials were abandoned in Australia after some of the trial participants tested positive for HIV. The stated way that the mRNA vaccines work is to elicit an immune response from the release of a spike protein, the genetic sequence for which is derived from the NCBI database sequences. The fact that people were testing positive for HIV suggests that the mRNA in the injection is programming the recipient’s cells to produce aspects of retro viruses or the vaccine contains parts of a retrovirus. As a side point there is also much debate regarding the AIDS-HIV connection and the testing methods used. This highlights something important, true science involves many different ideas and hypothesis from scientists across the world. The single narrative presented to the public regarding these issues is not at all scientific and represents a view so limited that it makes a mockery of science.
“Retroviruses are named for an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase… Reverse transcriptase transcribes RNA into deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), a process that constitutes a reversal of the usual direction of cellular transcription (DNA into RNA). The action of reverse transcriptase makes it possible for genetic material from a retrovirus to become permanently incorporated into the DNA genome of an infected cell; the enzyme is widely used in the biological sciences to synthesize genes.” –Encyclopaedia Britannica
(Thanks To Anthony Patch)
Polyethylene glycol (lipid) is used to encapsulate the mRNA in the Moderna/Pfizer injection.
“In areas of DNA where RNA binds to one of the DNA threads in such a way that the complementary DNA thread becomes the sole thread (R-loop structures), the DNA stability will change if RNA is chemically modified by m6A.” – Modified RNA Has a Direct Effect on DNA
M6A is very much connected with many functions in relation to genetics and experiments using the SARS-CoV-2 genome.
“There were four confident m6A peaks at the SARS-CoV-2 genome at 24 hpi (Fig. 1c), whereas nine additional confident m6A peaks were detected spanning the full-length genomic RNA of SARS-CoV-2 at 56 hpi (Fig. 1d; Supplementary information, Table S2), suggesting m6A modification occurred at the late stage of infection.
We also found that SARS-CoV-2 infection alters the host m6A methylome, suggesting that m6A is involved in the host–virus interaction. Altogether, our results report the host and viral m6A methylome during SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting the potential roles of m6A during SARS-CoV-2 transmission and pathogenesis. – The m6A Methylome of SARS-CoV-2 in Host Cells
“M6A has also turned out to be critical in the brain. Through its readers, it controls the precise timing of new neuron formation during development in mice and enables axons to regenerate after nerve injury. The modification also enhances memory. When He’s team knocked out the gene for an m6A reader in mice, the otherwise normal animals had memory defects. Injecting a virus carrying the normal reader gene reversed the effect. And when the researchers chemically stimulated the neurons to mimic the addition of a new memory, they saw a burst of protein synthesis that depended on m6A, they reported last year in Nature.” – Hidden layer of gene control influences everything from cancer to memory
Looking at the history of science there is one thing we can say for certain, there has been much we did not know. Are we now at a point in history where we know everything? If there is any risk at all of the procedure permanently changing the genetic code of a large part of the human race should we not at least proceed with extreme caution?
“AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine uses a replication deficient chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAd) as a vector to deliver the full-length SARS-CoV2 spike protein genetic sequence into the host cell (Van Doremalen et al, 2020). The adenovirus vector is grown in a human cell-line (HEK293) (see chapter 1). ChAd is a non-enveloped virus, and the glycoprotein antigen is not present in the vector, but is only expressed once the genetic code within the vector enters the target cells. The vector genes are also modified to render the virus replication incompetent, and to enhance immunogenicity (Garafalo et al, 2020). Once the vector is in the nucleus, mRNA encoding the spike protein is produced that then enters the cytoplasm. This then leads to translation of the target protein which acts as an intracellular antigen.” – UK Government Greenbook
mRNA once delivered can enter the nucleus.
“Using molecular beacons to track single mRNA molecules in living cells, we have characterized the diffusion of mRNP complexes in the nucleus. The mRNP complexes move freely by Brownian diffusion at a rate that assures their dispersion throughout the nucleus before they exit into the cytoplasm, even when the transcription site is located near the nuclear periphery.” – Mechanism of mRNA transport in the nucleus
Has it been shown that the gene therapy injections being used do not alter someone’s DNA or the DNA of a recipients offspring?
The Astrazeneca Oxford/Johnson and Johnson and Moderna/Pfizer injections all use different forms of gene therapy, if they really do not permanently alter the hosts DNA then it is a matter of how long the person is under genetic manipulation/modification. Days, months or until the point that every cell in the body has been renewed? If it is the latter and people are required to have gene therapy every six to twelve months or more often then really what is the difference?
Are They Safe?
Fear is the greatest disease that modern people have. It is a trap; it is a weakness of the human character, and ninety-nine percent of all crimes are due to fear. Consequently, every one of you who wants to be a hero, he must have absolutely no fear in his heart. His heart must be full of love. – Beinsa Douno Love, Wisdom, Truth
Warning to Humanity from Former Pfizer Chief Scientist Michael Yeadon
Here is a study showing antibody dependent enhancement in relation to the Covdid19 injection.
Is the experimental gene therapy taking place worldwide in breach of the Nuremberg code in regard to medical experimentation?
The latest VAERS data shows 44,606 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,050 deaths and 7,095 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 19, 2021.
There is good reason to think that this is the tip of an iceberg. This CNA nursing home whistle-blower explains that they had no deaths in 2020 and that 14 people have died since being injected and many more injured. The deaths are being attributed to Covid 19. As other links in this article show, this is by no means an isolated case.
“46 Nursing Home Residents in Spain Die Within 1 Month of Getting Pfizer COVID Vaccine” – Childrenshealthdefense
“Whistleblower: 25% of Residents in German Nursing Home Died After Pfizer Vaccine” – Childrenshealthdefense
Many of the nursing home deaths are registered as covid deaths.
Here Dr Coleman discusses the report. It can be downloaded by clicking the diagram.
His report on how many people may be dying from the vaccines can be found here.
You can see for yourself the damage being done by the vaccines using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) system. OpenVaers shows an easier to see summary.
The UK MHRA has released the data for reactions from the COVID vaccinations up to Jan 24th. In total it reports 22,800 cases of adverse reactions to the vaccination with a total of 153 deaths.
CV Studies that failed in animals are listed below:
Studies in Ferrets: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
Mice : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/