The evolution of the ideas about the state by Ukrainian Orthodox intellectuals in the second half of the XVII century
Keywords:Orthodox Church, Cossacks, Ukrainian nation, the Kyiv Metropolis
The article describes evolutionary process of the ideas about the state, which were formed by Ukrainian Orthodox intellectuals in the end of the XVI - the first half of the XVII century. Established, that on the development of these ideas had considerable influenced political circumstances of Ukrainian Cossack state in the second half of the XVII century. Varied Nation orientations available in Ukrainian political elite caused at that time the political split of Ukrainian society which reflected on the church life. Some part of Church leaders tended to association with the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the convergence with the Greek Catholic Church, the rest were supporters of political union with Moscow and rapprochement with Moscow Orthodoxy. However, both groups of Ukrainian Orthodox intellectuals defended the independence of the Kyiv Metropolis.
Accordingly, representatives of both political orientations in church circles had their own opinion on the nature of the state, the governor responsibilities, composition of nation and its political rights, the relationship between the secular and ecclesiastical authority in the ideal state. Two outstanding representatives of these viewpoints were Sofonovych F. and I. Gisel. There are many ways where their views are identical, so: both agreed about the priority of ecclesiastical authority over secular, Kyiv's role as a center of Orthodox state, about the existence of a sovereign Ukrainian nation as an ethnic and religious communities. However, they also had fundamental differences: in F. Sofonovych's "Chronicle" sense of the state's existence and first responsibility of the governor was to ensure the public good, the conception of political nation extends to the whole society, the governor is the monarch in the European sense, who should be accountable to his lieges. Instead of that in I. Gisela's "Synopsis" meaning of the state was described in citizens' association in a single church, the governor is autocrat that answers only to the face of God, as the political nation was described only a minor group of nobility and its features were limited.In that way, we can assume that the concept of state, represented in work by Sofonovych F. indicates the beginning of the transition from early modern to modern Ukrainian nation and the continuation of the idea of Ukrainian sovereignty. Theory by Gisela I., whereas, the initial point of departure of Enlightenment concept of absolutism, which later was developed by Prokopovich F., and embodies the idea of an Orthodox empire which in the political sense coincides with the Russian Empire and in the spiritual one - is a continuation of Kievan Rus, where Kiev clergy plays a significant role. Both concepts were actively developing in future and had some mutual influence; also they greatly influenced the political life.
Zhylenko I. V. (2002), Kyiv’s Synopsis. Lavra anthology, Kyiv, Special Issue 2. Kyiv’s Synopsis, 194 p. (ukr).
Zatyliuk Ya. V. (2012), Ancient Russian history in the service to the Church hierarchy in Kiev in the middle - second half of XVII: political rhetoric and status Metropolis, Ukrainskyi istorychnyi zhurnal [Ukrainian Historical Journal], № 6, pp. 40-56 (ukr).
Kohut Z. (2009), From Hadiach to Andrusov: The understanding of «motherland» in Ukrainian political culture, Hadiach Union 1658: controlled version of the past and the present: Team article with the materials of International Scientific Conferencion (Poltava, 16-17 September 2008), Poltava, pp. 82-89 (ukr).
Kohut Z. (2004), Identity Roots: Studies of early modern and modern history of Ukraine, Kyiv, 352 p. (ukr).
Kryzhanivskyi O. P., Plokhii S. M. (1994), History of church and religion thought in Ukraine, in 3 volumes, Kyiv, Book 3, 335 p. (ukr).
Plokhii S. M. (2006), Nalyvaykova’s faith: Cossacks and religion in early modern Ukraine, monograph, Kyiv, 495 p. (ukr).
Sofonovych F. (1992), Chronic of ancient chroniclers, Kyiv, 336 p. (ukr).
Titov F. I. (1905), Western Russia in its struggle for faith and nationality in XVII-XVIII century. (1654-1795), Kiev, 394 p. (rus).
Shalashna N. M. (2014), The idea of the state and its relationship with the church in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Cossack era, Skhid, № 3, pp. 68-77 (ukr).
Shalashna N. M. (2014), The influence of the Theophanes Prokopovich’s teachings about the relationships between the spiritual and temporal power in the formation of state ideology in Russian Empire in the first half of the XVIII century, «Countrystudy and teacher - 2014»: Handouts of the Intern. Science. Conf. (February 28, 2014, Kharkiv), Kharkiv, pp. 52-53 (ukr).
Shevchenko I. (2001), Ukraine between East and West: Essays from history of Cultur till the XVIII century, Institute of Church History of the Lviv Theological Academy, Lviv, 250 p. (ukr).
Shpakov A. Ya. (1904), State and the church in their mutual respects in Moscow state from Florence union to establishment of the patriarchate, Kyiv, Part 1, 263 p. (rus).
Yakovenko N. (2002), Parallel World: Studies from the history of views and ideas in Ukraine XVI - XVII century, monograph, Kyiv, 416 p. (ukr).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2015 Nataliia Shalashna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Authors bear responsibility for the accuracy of facts, quotations, numbers and names used.
2. Manuscripts are not sent back.
3. The publisher does not always agree with the authors' opinion.
4. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
5. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.