Actually, he had already determined to punish all these towns and their inhabitants, male and female, young and old, before the angels’ visit and the attempted homosexual rape (Genesis –33).
When the wickedness of Sodom is recalled in other parts of the Bible, homosexuality is not mentioned.
Marriage was understood in hierarchical terms, but although a man could have sexual relations with female slaves, he did not have the same rights over male slaves.
Pre-modern scholars who produced lists of “enormities” included .
Like pre-modern scholars of law and ethics, these books assume heteronormativity.
Essay On Christianity Vs. Islam Nuclear Power Essay
As a concept, homosexuality is relatively recent, even if there is plenty of evidence for homoerotic pleasure in the past – albeit illicit in religious terms.More liberal interpreters point to broader ethical considerations such as compassion and empathy.They argue that the condemnations of scripture do not apply to committed relationships founded on love.More often, though, the emphasis is on his condemnation of lusting after men instead of women (–81; 5–66; ; ).In the Qur'an, Lut says: In the Hadith (thousands of stories reporting the words and deeds of Muhammad and his companions that are comparable in authority to the Qurʾan itself), there is some support for the notion that the principal offences of Sodom were idolatry and avarice.He seems to have reflected contemporary views that men should be sexually assertive and women passive, and that sexual activity must be at least potentially procreative.For Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike, the story of Sodom is central to the traditional condemnation of male homosexuality.When the crowd demands Lot’s visitors, he offers his two virgin daughters in their stead.Perhaps he considers the rape of his daughters a lesser evil than the rape of his guests.The Arabic term for homosexual anal intercourse, , comes from his name rather as English derived the term sodomy from the name of the town.As in Genesis, Lut seems to argue with the men of Sodom over the relative propriety of abusing his daughters or his guests (–79; –69).