If I had to make a guess I would say that with the huge amount of US debt and the governments dependency on companies stocks must go up and common workers real incomes go down.
That’s because the debt is huge and must be paid by companies and common citizens because government members produce no economic goods and are the biggest consumer. It’s easy to make common citizens pay, the government either taxes them or prints money. Many have no idea that by printing money their savings are getting diluted and they are therefore getting poorer. It is worthwhile to read what Warren Buffett thinks of inflation:
The arithmetic makes it plain that inflation is a far more devastating tax than anything that has been enacted by our legislature. The inflation tax has a fantastic ability to simply consume capital. It makes no difference to a widow with her savings in a 5 percent passbook account whether she pays 100 percent income tax on her interest income during a period of zero inflation or pays no income taxes during years of 5 percent inflation. Either way, she is ‘taxed’ in a manner that leaves her no real income whatsoever. Any money she spends comes right out of capital. She would find outrageous a 120 percent income tax but doesn’t seem to notice that 5 percent inflation is the economic equivalent. — Warren Buffett
Common citizens mostly think taxes are the problem. In either case by printing or taxing or a combination of both they are transferring money to the government. Monetary and price inflation is the probable outcome and people get poorer because they hold less money in relation to the total amount. That said, the long term situation is not healthy, and the government should cut their expenses drastically in order to reduce their ever growing costs that just accumulates debt and takes a toll on the whole economy.
For the case of companies, they are also penalized by the printing of money (monetary inflation, not to be confused with price inflation). But the government can not suffocate companies via taxes because otherwise they will receive less by choking their total profits and risks having companies gone out of the country and establishing themselves in friendlier tax regimes or keeping their cash outside. Ensco, Rowan and Nalco Holdings, three companies I’ve bought moved to the UK, due to that I pay no taxes on the dividends received anymore. Also many of the companies I have maintain a huge cash hoard outside and if taxes get heavier they will try to make even more business outside or move altogether. Unfortunately US citizens cannot hide anywhere in the world because as long as they are US citizens they have to pay taxes to the USA and to the country they live too (double tax). That’s why some persons make the extreme choice to adopt another nationality. That has not happened yet much but what has drastically fallen is the immigration to the USA. Fewer immigrants is also a reason why the housing market took such a long time to recover. Unlike previous housing crises immigrants have not strongly supported the housing market this time. Back to companies: the government does everything possible to create an environment where companies are able to pay them well. The best environment is when they are internationally competitive and have big benefits. At least, like that, companies keep up with inflation and have decent profits from which the government and stock holders get benefited.
In simple words, money is transferred to the government or the benefited companies from common workers. So a good place to keep money is invested, better not too much cash due to the inflationary risk associated with the government debt; low interest rates; and treasury bonds bubble. That combined with the quality and strong balance sheet of US companies makes me think they have still a lot of potential to keep growing.
Risk is that US companies lose competitiveness. In many cases international companies are catching up, but in several sectors US companies are still top class, so a good investment choice should help.