There can be no doubt that we are starting to get better at facing up to uncomfortable or awkward issues in the workplace.
The rise of the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements have taken topics that were once taboo and pushed them into the mainstream. In doing so, they have shown us how necessary it is to be allies to others at work.
Promoting inclusivity and diversity in the workplace is a benefit not only to staff, but also the whole organization, as it can push forward new ideas and create a competitive edge for the company over competitors.
Ideas around this subject need to target everyone from the top level down the company, while understanding disability and the language of discrimination being key. Implementing diversity and inclusivity training can support everyone work at to be a better ally in the workplace.
Indeed, even if you feel like you are already doing a lot to be an ally, it is always a good idea to continue learning and re-learning these important lessons.
In this article, we examine how anyone can be a better ally to underrepresented communities in the workplace.
The most crucial step to being an ally in the workplace is actually educating yourself. Learning – and in some cases unlearning – behaviors and mindsets is a crucial starting point, and there are many ways to do this.
Itâs a great idea to start reading about ideas about systemic inequality, as well as finding ways to diversify the thoughts and ideas that you hear. It is too easy to go into the idea of being an ally with a fixed mentality – and actually, much of this way of thinking can be unhelpful, even if it comes from a good place.
Promote creative expression
We can sometimes get stuck in the mindset that being an ally is all about political or economic matters in the workplace. In fact, there is a huge range of different ways to be authentically an ally to others in the workplace, in ways that you might not have considered. For example, promoting a colleagueâs creative expression can be valuable.
“Creative support and encouragement is pivotal, especially from those who are in similar playing fields as you,â says Dondre Green, a photographer speaking to MPB. âThis could look like sharing opportunities, advice, and budget negotiation numbers. I’ve seen even more Black creatives come together over the last few years and be put in positions to hire artists for assignments, too, which is a plus. In terms of representation, it matters.”
Listen to and lean on colleagues
It is important to resist the temptation to make assumptions about what is best for your colleagues. Even though your intentions may be good, you can end up putting your own presumptions forward and this might not end up being the best possible outcome from those you are trying to be an ally to.
Remember that being an ally isnât about doing what you think is right for an individual or community – rather it is about listening to what they need and putting that into action. And crucially, you need to think of listening as an act not only of understanding but also of empathizing.
The challenges that minorities and underrepresented groups face is often not the fault of the actions of individuals but rather systemic problems that wonât go away until they are acknowledged and faced.
Use your privilege
Often misunderstood in the context of allyship, privilege is a key issue when it comes to providing support in the workplace. Some people take the concept of âprivilegeâ to be an insult or an attack on their personal character. This isnât the case at all.
No one is saying that being privileged means that you have never faced any hardship of your own, or that you havenât worked hard to get where you are.
Rather privilege should be seen as something that each of us generally has in one form or another.
Having a university education, for example, or facing no mental health issues, are forms of privilege that some people have. True allyship involves using the privileges that you have to defend or advocate for those who donât have those same privileges.
The first step in using privilege effectively is acknowledging it. From there it can be understood, and it can then be used to the advantage of those you are being an ally to.
Many people are reluctant to be an ally in the workplace because they are worried that they might âsay the wrong thingâ or act in a way that isnât actually helpful. Donât let this discourage you. Allyship exists in a sometimes awkward space and no one is expecting you to be perfect – it is all an opportunity for everyone to learn.
Being an ally in the workplace is something that you can do that will make a genuine difference to colleagues’ lives and livelihoods.
Whether it is anything from ensuring that you are inclusive when listening to opinions in meetings, to implementing a diversity policy for future hiring; these are things that will benefit you and your business in the long-term.
This blog was contributed to Workplace Fairness on January 4, 2023. Published with permission.
About the Author: Dakota Murphey is a contributor to Workplace Fairness.
The world is currently witnessing an uprising in Iran, in the face of great state brutality, for liberation from gender, social and economic oppression.
This nationwide revolt, the latest in a series of popular uprisings, was sparked by the brutal killing two weeks ago of a young Kurdish-Iranian woman, Mahsa Zhina Amini, in custody of the stateâs Guidance Patrol, or âmorality police,â for so-called improper hijab (headscarf and coverings legally mandated in Iran for women).
Protesters have called for an end to the dictatorship, that the policing of womenâs bodies be stopped, that hijab be optional according to each individualâs personal choice, an end to discrimination against Kurdish people and other ethnic minorities in Iran, and an end to economic injustice.
Women and young people are at the forefront of these protests and students at numerous universities have boycotted classes. At least 83 protesters have been killed by security forces.
What we are witnessing in Iran is a feminist revolt that has sparked a larger anti-government uprising.
The current uprising also helps illustrate the centrality of gender justice to working-class struggle.
Last week, Kurdish shopkeepers launched a general strike across Iranian Kurdistan in protest of Zhinaâs killing, and some workers and labor unionists across the country are taking action to support the uprising as well. In a statement this week, the Council of Contract Oil Workers said they “support the popular struggles against organized and daily violence against women and against povertyâ and threatened to withhold their labor if the state does not end its “arrests, massacring of people, repression, and harassment and harm of women because of hijab.â
On September 25, the Coordination Council of teachersâ unions in Iran threw its weight behind the uprising and launched a two-day strike.
The teachers, who have been engaged in a wave of strikes and protests since last December, wrote that the uprising shows “Iran is still alive and active, and does not bow down in the face of oppression.â The Council condemned the use of schools in the country as militarized bases to suppress protesters. They called on all working and retired teachers — as well as retirees in government, army, and social service sectors, workersâ unions, athletes and artists — to stand alongside “the rights-seeking people of Iran.â
A coalition of women teachers on strike released their own statement declaring “our solidarity with other justice-seeking people and protesters to this crime for which there is no accountability and never will be.â
While on strike this week, teachers urged Iranâs broader labor movement to escalate the current uprising against the Iranian state to help secure gender justice, democratic freedoms and economic equality.
As 60 percent of teachers in Iran are women, they have an important role to play in the current uprising.
The leadership of the teachersâ unions is overwhelmingly male, but women teachers have increasingly formed core cadre in the recent strikes and protests.
Many women leaders in the teachersâ movement have made demands in recent months that are key for the success of the current popular struggle, and show the intersection of working-class and gender struggles.
They have demanded sex education around issues of healthcare and sexual harassment, as well as contraception, which is significant given Iranâs 2021 population law which imposed increased restrictions on abortions and banned the distribution of free contraceptives by the healthcare system. They have demanded expanded maternity leave and daycare centers at the workplace. And they have demanded that school administrations stop harassing them for improper hijab.
These calls from a segment of working-class Iranian women form an integral part of the broader Iranian feminist movement which has been thrust onto the global stage in recent weeks.
In many ways, the slogan of “Woman, Life, Freedomâ that has swept the countryâs streets in recent days goes hand in hand with the slogan of “Bread, Work, Freedom,â which emerged during previous nationwide uprisings in Iran against austerity and the high cost of living, both in late 2017 as well as in November 2019 when a gas price increase quickly led to anti-government protests.
Actions like these show the importance of leadership by women workers.
These workers are part of a larger Iranian working class that has taken part in an uptick in strikes and labor militancy in recent years, from sectors as diverse as petrochemicals, trucking, and heavy equipment. These actions have come as a result of domestic and international crises in global capitalism, and the greed of both domestic and foreign elites.
The uprising in Iran must also be seen in an international context, as part of a larger global movement for gender equality across the world among women and trans, queer, and non-binary people who are facing different, yet interrelated types of attacks.
Solidarity protests in countries such as Chile, Lebanon and Turkey have amplified the uprising in Iran and lent protesters morale.
This blog originally appeared in full at In These Times on September 30, 2022. Republished with permission.View Workplace Fairness’ page on discrimination in the workplace.
About the Author: Alborz Ghandehari is aÂ Salt Lake City-based organizer, performance poet, and Assistant Professor of Ethnic Studies at the University of Utah.
The Supreme Courtâs decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Womenâs Health on June 24 overturned the Roe v. Wade precedent, erasing the constitutional right to an abortion.
Already for years, large parts of the U.S. have severely restricted abortionâespecially hurting those least likely to have resources to travel for care, including poor, Black, indigenous, undocumented, and disabled people.
The U.S. has the highest maternal mortality rate of any wealthy country, and Black women are three times more likely to die from childbirth-related causes than white women.
Many unions issued public statements condemning the Dobbs decision. A few turned out to protest. And we can expect many to emphasize voting for Democrats this fall.
What more can unions do?
There is a no clear pathway to winning national abortion and reproductive health access. It will surely be a long struggle, involving many organizations and strategies.
But there are specific interventions the labor movement can make, beyond turning out voters and joining rallies.
BARGAIN OVER BENEFITS
Hereâs an immediate one: workers can demand to bargain over changes in benefits, which might now include abortion access.
A committee at the NewsGuild of New York has developed a bargaining framework for the questions this raises, including ensuring that your health insurance covers abortion, bargaining for travel funds to cover an abortion out of state if it is prohibited where you live, protecting your personal information, guaranteeing additional leave for travel, and securing non-discrimination language on the basis of gender and pregnancy.
The NewsGuild committee suggests that members look at current contract language where unions could demand to bargain over impacts, based on changes to their health coverage.
If your plan used to cover health care that is now prohibited in your state, that is a substantial change in your insurance, and your employer should have to work with the union to find alternatives. Perhaps employers could cover the difference in cost for an out-of-network, out-of-state provider, provide additional time off, and pay for the travel and associated costs.
DEFEND MEMBERS IN COURT
Unions can use their legal departments or hire lawyers to defend members who get sued or prosecuted for allegedly performing, getting, or helping someone get an abortion.
In the course of their jobs, this could involve health care workers, including mental health providers; people who deliver abortion medications, like postal workers or UPS drivers; and others. Unions should defend them just as they would defend members in other work-related disciplinary proceedings.
Last year Texas criminalized abortion after six weeks of pregnancy (about when fetal cardiac activity can be detected). The law allows private citizens to sue anyone they believe was involved in an abortion, including anyone who reimbursed travel or medical costs. Oklahoma has followed suit, and a similar law is pending in Idaho.
These laws will likely be argued in courts for months or years to determine exactly where and for what the states have jurisdiction to prosecute.
Some union contracts provide legal services to support members in housing, family, and civil courts. If a member were accused outside of work of obtaining or aiding and abetting an abortion, the member legal services could be expanded to cover this as well.
And unions should support workers in defying the laws. Abortion access was originally won through sustained, public civil disobedience.
âMost of the physicians I know and have been talking to are not interested in holding back,â says Paul Prater, chair of the Illinois Nurses Association political action committee. âThey are going to provide the care people need and will deal with consequences after.â
DEFEND MEDICAL WORKERS
The risk is particularly dire for health care workers. While they can only be privately sued in the states mentioned above, in other states workers can be criminally prosecuted for providing abortion care.
In these states, if a pregnant person comes into a hospital for care and the appropriate treatment is to terminate the pregnancy, that is now a crime if there is still fetal cardiac activity or the personâs life is not immediately endangered.
Health care workers will be facing this dilemma routinely. For instance, about 2 percent of pregnancies are ectopic, where the fertilized egg has implanted somewhere outside the uterus, dooming the pregnancy and endangering the pregnant person; termination is the treatment.
In order to avoid potential legal problems, health care facilities are now avoiding or delaying these treatments, sometimes waiting on clearance from hospital lawyers. A 2022 study of two Texas hospitals found at least two dozen cases where a procedure was delayed longer than doctors wanted to, in one case until the patient required a hysterectomy.
In some states, if a health care provider suspects the pregnant person had an abortion, they are expected to report it to law enforcement. This reporting has already led to the prosecution of many people suspected of intentionally harming their fetuses, sometimes despite little evidence.
Women of color are more likely to be charged for suspected abortions. Union-led education on racial disparities could help workers not to stereotype their patients.
PROTECT MEDICAL JUDGMENT
All these laws will have a profound impact on health care workers. Not coincidentally, the states with such laws are also the states with the lowest union densityâthough there are exceptions, like union-dense Ohio, where abortion is illegal after six weeks, and Montana, with little union presence but no abortion restrictions.
The new risks could inspire more doctors and nurses to unionize.
What else should health care unions consider doing? They can demand to bargain, since the scope of work has changed for health care workersâthey could face liability for using their medical judgment. Unions could bargain for employers to provide liability coverage against civil litigation, if possible, and to defend accused workers.
Unions should also bargain for clear policies about the treatment of pregnant people and who determines what is medically necessary when.
The laws are largely untested and have huge amounts of gray area, and health care professionals get little say in their employersâ interpretation. One Missouri hospital administration denied patients the contraceptive âmorning-after pillâ after the Dobbs decision, then reversed its decision within a day.
Union legal teams can do their own legal research, to educate members on what is clear and what is still contested. For instance, what would be the process for determining that a pregnant personâs life is at risk if a termination is not performed? Who would make that call, on what grounds, and how can they be protected in that decision?
Health care unions have fought hard to protect nursesâ and physiciansâ judgment in patient care, and unions should bargain to push for the broadest possible reading of these policies.
EMBRACE ABORTION WORKERS
There has been a recent flood of unionizations in the âreproâ movement, including at Planned Parenthood North Central States region (the Dakotas, Nebraska, Iowa, and Minnesota) and other states (SEIU); Preterm Clinic, the independent abortion provider in Ohio (SEIU); Feminist Majority Foundation (Nonprofit Professional Employees Union); and about two dozen others, according to Reprojobs.
Reprojobs, a website that began as a jobs posting site for repro workers, now features articles and networks to support repro workers unionizing, including a column called âAsk a Union Organizer.â
For abortion providers, many of their organizing issues echo those of other health care workers: low pay, critical staffing shortages, and frustration over managementâs handling of Covid. They also face threats of violence from anti-abortion protestors.
Facing an uncertain future as parts of their jobs are criminalized state by state, workers are unionizing also partly to win some level of control in budgets and layoffs.
Workers at the at the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health research center, won their election to unionize with OPEIU Local 153 on July 14. Less than an hour after the results were announced, one organizing committee leader was fired without cause; the union continues to fight for reinstatement. Planned Parenthood affiliates in Austin and Miami have also come under fire for laying off active members of union organizing committees.
Thishi Gangoda, on the organizing committee at the Preterm Union in Cleveland, Ohio, says workers there unionized because âabortion is health care and abortion workers are health care workers. We deserve power to decide our workplace conditions.â
Abortion after six weeks of pregnancy is now illegal in Ohio. Preterm is still open for some reproductive care, early abortions, and counseling to other states, but many workers have left for lack of work, or burned out by the stress of the last several months.
Labor can recognize these workers as siblings in our movement, and organize more of them. We can back their fights for strong contracts that will allow them to continue working in politically charged, changing, and occasionally violent workplaces.
ORGANIZE CATHOLIC HOSPITALS
Compounding the impact of the overturn of Roe, Catholic hospital chains are continuing to gobble up health care facilities around the country, posing a particular risk to access to reproductive care.
âCatholic hospitals in Illinois have never provided this care,â said Prater. âCompanies like Ascension and Aurora Advocate have bought up several facilities and imposed their values on hospitals, sometimes the only ones available in a community.â
These institutions may refuse to provide even legal reproductive care, along with contraceptives and gender-affirming health care for trans people.
In 2020, four of the largest 10 hospital systems were owned by Catholic-affiliated corporations. These institutions already control 40 percent of hospital beds in some parts of the U.S., and theyâve been growing rapidly through mergers and acquisitions.
For Prater, the punchline is: unions must organize these health care workers, to defend themselves and their patients.
Meanwhile, where abortion access remains, workloads will snowball. Border states like Illinois will see a huge influx of abortions from surrounding states.
With staffing levels at a crisis point already, health care unions must fight for wages and conditions that can make these nursing and caregiving jobs sustainable and attractive, and union protections for workers to provide appropriate health care.
As she considered striking at the grocery store where she had worked for a decade, the dozens of moments that had pushed Ashley Manning to that point flooded back.
She vividly recalled the indignities she endured throughout the pandemic, starting with child care. When schools shut down, no one could watch her 12-year-old daughter. She wouldnât allow her elderly grandmother, Ruby, to do it, fearing she would get sick. And her store, a Ralphs in San Pedro, California, where she is the manager of the floral department, refused to work with her schedule, she said.
No one can cover you, she said they told her. Your contract is for six days a week, we need you six days a week.
Unable to work and care for her daughter, she burned through three months of unpaid leave at the end of 2020 as she waited for in-person school to resume. When she came back, the store was in disarray. Managers were not enforcing mask mandates or limits on the number of people in the store, she said. Customers were spitting at employees. There were no plexiglass barriers up.
By then, Manningâs grandmother had started caring for her daughter â they were out of options, schools were still closed and Manning had no leave left to take. So when one of them got COVID-19 in the summer of 2021 â they still arenât sure who got it first â Manningâs entire family got sick. Manning was hospitalized for two days, her mother for two weeks, her grandmother for three weeks. Her daughter got sick, too.
âThe only thing that [work] could do while I was gone was keep calling me: ?âWhat day are you coming back to work?ââ said Manning, 32. âIt wasnât, âAre you feeling goodâ It wasnât, âDo you feel better?â It wasnât, âWe can make adjustments.â It wasnât any of those things.â
On August 13, Manningâs grandmother died alone in the intensive care unit at a hospital in Los Angeles, two days before Manningâs birthday. No family or friends were able to see her before she passed.
âUntil this day, it could be my fault that sheâs not here,â Manning said. âI look at it that way because I was the one who was working at the grocery store.â
Manning still carried that wound with her when she considered striking against Kroger, Ralphsâ parent company. The stress of her grandmotherâs death and everything that came before it led Manning to take short-term disability from work for five months. When she returned early this year, negotiations between the union that represents her and 47,000 workers at several other Kroger-owned grocery stores in Southern and Central California were beginning to deteriorate. Their contract was up and both parties were far apart in the negotiations, which included demands for raises to account for cost of living and inflation increases over the last three years.
Krogerâs first offer: a 60 cent hourly raise.
By late March, 95 percent of workers who voted agreed to authorize a strike, Manning among them. Most of those workers were women, many of them women of color or single mothers like Manning, who were entering into the fight with their employer fueled by two years of turmoil that hit them â and, critically, their families â the hardest.
Kroger workers are part of a surge in organizing led by women, women of color and low-wage workers impelled by this once-in-a-century pandemic. Many said they feel the pandemic has unmasked the hypocrisy of some employers â they were âessentialâ workers until their employers stopped offering protections on the job, good pay and commensurate benefits.
Among them, a deep recalibration is happening, dredging up questions about why they work, for whom, and how that work serves them and their families. For many itâs the chance to define the future of work.
âMost women are carrying their families on their backs,â Manning said. âWe feel disposable. Everybody is enraged.â
All of those movements, most of them happening in companies and even industries for the first time, are ending a disparity that has long existed between men and women in union organization. In 2021, the gender gap in union representation reached its narrowest point since the data started being tracked in the early 1980s by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. About 10.6 percent of men are members of a union, compared to 9.9 percent of women; in 1983, the first year data was available, it was 24.7 percent of men and 14.6 percent of women. (BLS does not collect data on nonbinary people.)
While union membership has waned in recent decades and was slightly down in 2021 compared to 2020, moments of upheaval have in the past turned into opportunities for women to organize. Take the suffrage movement and the Triangle Shirtwaist fire that killed 146 largely young immigrant women in New York in 1911, the wave of women entering the workforce during and after World War II, and the womenâs liberation movement in the late 1960s and ?â70s that helped women join the workforce en masse. Each of those moments changed the course of womenâs involvement in the workforce, helping to pass the 19th Amendment, increase union membership and pass equal pay legislation.
The pandemic, which set off the first womenâs recession, might be that next catalyst, said Jennifer Sherer, the senior state policy coordinator at the Economic Policy Institute, a progressive think tank.
âIt feels like we are living through potentially another one of those moments, where the public and media are awake at a different level right now because of the activity in multiple sectors,â Sherer said.
The shift happening now comes along with a critical change in leadership at the nationâs major unions. After the death of former AFL-CIO president and prominent national union leader Richard Trumka in 2021, longtime labor leader Liz Shuler took over as president?â?marking the first time a woman took the helm of the largest and most powerful federation of labor unions in the country.
âAs work is changing, as the workforce is changing, we are going to be changing with it,â Shuler told The 19th. ?âComing out of COVID-19, work is looking differently. Thatâs why the labor movement is so sorely needed: to show workers that they have a voice and a place in that change.â
The pandemic was a conduit, she said: It allowed women workers to bring up issues that had long plagued them â caregiving, family, health â that had long been treated as niche topics.
âThis has been building for a long time, and the pandemic really brought to the surface all of the issues that women have been fighting for and advocating for for a long time,â Shuler said.
Mary Kay Henry, who in 2010 became the first woman to head the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) â the second-largest industry union after the Education Association of the United States â said this moment feels like a turning point. It gets at the very core of the role women play in communities, families and the workplace.
âWomen leaders in the worksite and of organizations like mine are leading a fundamental reorganization of power that isnât just about our workplace, but is about our communities. And for us, itâs reflected in the demand to be respected, protected and paid,â said Henry, who still runs SEIU.
Taken in the broader context of the rise of the #MeToo movement, the dismantling of care and the ping ponging value of the essential workforce, the reasons for organizing are more gendered now, said Sarita Gupta, co-author of âThe Future We Need: Organizing for Democracy in the Twenty-First Century.â
âIn years past, issues like sexual harassment â thatâs not in the bargaining agreement,â Gupta said. âHow we think about these movements is not to the side of what a worker movement is, but actually integrated into the worker movement.â
Kathy Finn, the secretary-treasurer of the union representing the Kroger workers in California, has been organizing workers long enough to remember when they held what was then the longest grocery store strike in history, a four-and-a-half-month long ordeal from 2003 to 2004. Then, a grocery store job used to be a career that could support a family, Finn said. Over the past several decades, those jobs have increasingly become part-time positions with lower pay and limited benefits, a result of cost-cutting measures driven by competition, automation and decreased union participation.
Now, many moms â particularly single moms â at grocery stores feel like their employers are actively working against their needs as parents. The majority of the unionâs bargaining committee is women for the first time.
âIt definitely feels very different right now,â Finn said.
This is partly because low-income workers, mostly women, have more power to speak up about the support they need from employers. When Manning was away from work after her grandmotherâs death, the tenor of the phone calls she received from her bosses had changed from when she was sick last year, she said. They couldnât find anyone qualified to fill her spot.
When are you coming back, she said theyâd ask. We know your grandmother took care of your daughter, we can work with your schedule. We can make adjustments, they said.
Manning returned to Ralphs because she didnât have the option not to, but something snapped into focus for her. Her value, she said, felt conditional.
As she voted to strike, Manning thought of her grandmother, who never once made her question her self-worth. When Manning tried to start her own floral business, it was her grandmother who encouraged her to pursue it, who got a shed built in her backyard to house Manningâs dream.
âI feel like sheâs on board with me, this is where you need to be,â Manning said.
A couple weeks after the vote, Manning, who is on the bargaining committee, was able to help secure a historic agreement that increases hours for part-time employers, improves pension benefits and creates health and safety councils at each store â most of the demands they had been seeking.
The wage increase wonât be cents. Itâll be $4.25 an hour.
This reckoning was forged on the shop floor, through conversations between women in workplaces that once didnât welcome them at all.
In the 1990s, when womenâs labor force participation was peaking in the United States â it has stalled since â women were joining industries long dominated by men. Unionization for a lot of women meant organizing to secure basic rights. Sanchioni Butler, who at the time worked at a Ford plant in Carrollton, Texas, recalled the moment when the few women at the auto plant joined together to help improve the conditions of the womenâs bathroom so they would have somewhere to sit during breaks or during their menstrual cycles.
âWe got improvements by sticking together,â Butler said in âThe Future We Need: Organizing for Democracy in the Twenty-First Century.â ââŚWhen we fought for a shower and couch in the womenâs bathroom, that was our womenâs movement.â
It seemed then like the only way to improve conditions in a vacuum of federal policy. The Paycheck Fairness Act, for example, which aims to close loopholes in pay discrimination laws, was first proposed around the time Butler was fighting for a couch in the womenâs bathroom. It still has not passed.
âIf weâre trying to strengthen and improve womenâs position in the workforce, the idea of allowing and creating platforms for women to be able to negotiate their conditions, both through a union as well as through community-based, worker-led standards boards, for some of these essential sectors â thatâs a start,â said Erica Smiley, co-author of âThe Future We Need.â
That nascent start has blossomed into more. In 2011, The New York Times ran âRedefining the Union Boss,â a piece about the women, including SEIUâs Henry, who were heading up major unions and rekindling a hope that their leadership could drive a comeback in unionization after years of reduced membership.
In the decade since, the number of women represented by a union started rising again, peaking in 2015. And the numbers donât break out evenly across race. Union membership has been rising steadily for Latinas, the group with the largest gender pay gap in the country, while itâs leveled out or decreased for other groups. Since 2010, the number of Latinas represented by unions has risen by 31 percent. But by 2021, rates across the board were back near where they were in 2011.
Still, those numbers mask the amount of organization in 2021, which may not be reflected in statistics for several years. It often takes years to negotiate a union contract and get counted under those figures, and the upswell in organizing now is happening in workplaces that are at the very beginning of that process, workplaces that likely spent a part of 2021 disaggregated and diffuse.
âPeople are having to overcome a set of obstacles in their daily lives like never before. Theyâve lost loved ones and havenât been able to properly bury them or grieve them because of the COVID pandemic,â Henry said. âThey are dealing with staffing shortages and lack of health and safety, but are persevering and organizing on a scale that Iâve never seen before.â
Those obstacles have led people to demand responses from companies that actually reach down to the lowest wage workers, not just talk about them, said Gupta, who is also the vice president of U.S. programs at the Ford Foundation.
âThese strikes matter because they are just saying, âYou canât just talk about [diversity, equity and inclusion] in your corporate boardroom. What are the other ways you are going to support my ability to stay in the labor force?ââ Gupta said.
Some employers are hearing that message, said Maria Colacurcio, the CEO of Syndio Systems, a platform that works with more than 200 companies, including 10 percent of the Fortune 200, to identify racial and gender pay gaps and improve pay bands and benefits for employees.
Those conversations have changed, she said. Three years ago âthey were like, âIâm just here to reduce my risk of a pay equity class action.â Now 99 percent of our customers are looking at some racial comparison. And I really do think itâs because of the pressure thatâs come out of this movement from employees around: This isnât a gender problem. This is workplace equity, without regard to gender, race, ethnicity, disability, age.â
High-profile union drives, like the one led by Starbucks workers, are forcing employers to think more proactively about what they can offer workers beyond higher pay.
âItâs not a flash in the pan â there are also things getting embedded that are going to force it to be long-term,â Colacurcio said. âItâs really difficult to undo once youâve opened the windows.â
And yet, being a woman leader in a movement that has rarely allowed women to lead, has dredged up for many why this has taken so long.
Kim Cordova, the first woman president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7 in Colorado, saw it first hand this year when she faced negotiators on behalf of Kroger, the parent company of 8,000 grocery store employees in Boulder, Parker and the Denver area her union represents. It was her fight in Colorado that set the stage for what the California workers were recently able to do.
But those negotiations were dripping with gendered vitriol.
She was that woman to them.
âItâs tough being a union president but itâs tougher being a female president,â Cordova said. âYou have to speak louder than everybody in the room, you have to earn your respect that way â you have to fight for it. Iâm a double whammy: Iâm Latina and Iâm a female.â
The corporate negotiators went over her head, she said, reaching out to male lawyers instead of her during the negotiations.
âI am the chief spokesperson, I am the negotiator. I had to send a letter saying, âYou need to send your questions to me,ââ Cordova said.
The fight led to a 10-day strike in the January cold, after which workers secured hourly raises as high as $5.99, unheard of, she said. âWeâve seen raises to the right of the decimal point, cents not dollars.â The new agreement also addressed the two-tier pay structure that led the men who dominated meat departments to earn more than the women in the lower-paid grocery jobs.
Cordova said the movement of the past three years has been âa career-defining momentâ for her after 37 years with a union.
It feels fierce enough to last.
âThis is our year, this is our time,â Cordova said. âI donât think they are going anywhere backward.â
The Kroger strike in Colorado inspired the workers in California. Many of the problems are the same: stagnant wages, lax health and safety precautions, and people who feel like they have been pushed to the edge of what they can endure.
In Beverly Hills, Pavilions grocery store cashier Christie Sasaki remembers how hard the strikes in 2003 and 2004 were, but it felt last month like there was no option left. She is often doing the job of two or more people. Her wages have maxed out at $22.50 an hour after 32 years at Pavilions. She has nothing saved for retirement and three quarters of her paycheck goes to her rent, a 2 bedroom apartment she shares with her teenage daughter and a roommate she took on to help offset the cost.
âI would like one day to have the American dream â to be able to retire,â said Sasaki, 54. âAfter almost 33 years, I donât think I can. It brings a tear to my eye because I would like to be able to go on vacation, I would like to go out to eat.â
Her only opportunity, she said, is to get the best contract she can for herself and her colleagues. She spoke directly to Krogerâs representatives about those struggles in meetings earlier this year, surrounded for the first time by the women who have worked with her shoulder-to-shoulder.
âDuring the bargaining committee, my entire table,â she said, âis female.â
This story was originally published byThe 19th on July 5th, 2022. Reprinted with permission.
About the Author: Chabeli Carrazana is an Economy Reporter at The 19th.
The building trades unions are some of the most powerful in the labor movement. Because their members are well-paid, their dues are often higher than in other unions, giving them more resources to influence change. They also hold a certain cultural cachet, exemplifying what many people (wrongly) think the working class looks like: white men in hard hats. But this cachet is also part of the problem: These unions have been under fire for how white and male-dominated they are. Only 6% of the construction workforce is Black and, as of 2018, only 3% of workers in the construction industry were women.
While building trades unions are working to address these issues, tradeswomen say that making construction unions more accessibleâand comfortableâfor women is going to be aÂ long process. They say it will require material improvements, like widespread maternity leave protections, as well as cultural shifts, like working to end sexualÂ harassment.Â
Ash Fritzsche is in year four of an apprenticeship program with International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) LocalÂ 98Â in Philadelphia. She was working at aÂ restaurant when some of her regular customers encouraged her to begin an apprenticeship in the building trades so she could have more job security and higher pay than in the food industry. Apprenticeships are not easy programs to get into: Fritzsche toldÂ In These TimesÂ that in her year, more thanÂ 1,000Â people applied, but only fewer thanÂ 100Â were accepted into this five-year program. Workers who complete apprenticeship programs are taught their craft while they work, earning aÂ living while they complete the educational requirements and gain experience as electricians. To be accepted, workers must take an aptitude test and have an interview, which Fritzsche described asÂ âkiller, with seven guys at aÂ roundtable asking you questions, it was so intimidating.â She struggled with knowing how to dress as aÂ woman trying to break into the construction industry, having perused Reddit articles geared only towardsÂ men.
Fritzsche says her local acceptedÂ 10Â women her year, contrasting with around three in years prior. She believes that allowing in more women helped with retention:Â âIt allowed us to develop community. In previous years, at least one woman wouldnât make it, but so far allÂ 10Â of us are still in and thriving and totallyÂ ambitious.âÂ
At LocalÂ 98, apprentices start out makingÂ 30% of what journeymen make, which for her was $18Â per hour. Raises are applied everyÂ 1,000Â toÂ 2,000Â hours, and health insurance kicks in after aÂ couple of months. Fritzsche is in the final year of her five-year apprenticeship and now makes $38Â per hour, the most money sheâs ever made. She toldÂ In These TimesÂ that sheâll get another raise in October,Â âand IÂ know it. Itâs not like if IÂ show up early for work and IÂ do this or that, IÂ might get it. Itâs an automatic, earned raise, which is the way it should be.â For women workers who may face gender discrimination (includingÂ lower pay, fewer benefits and fewer opportunities to advance) at work, unions can and do even the playingÂ field.Â
LocalÂ 98Â is working to recruit more women, and recently hosted aÂ âWomen in Constructionâ campÂ to teach more thanÂ 30Â high-school aged young women about what union electrical work is like. But there is still work to be done. Because the building trades are so male-dominated, their unions are tailored to their members, who are primarily men. While benefits for unionized building trades workers are generous and desirable, most lack any kind of paid family leaveâin our society, parental caretaking still falls primarily on women. This means that women may not see the building trades as aÂ suitable career for them if they want to have aÂ family.Â
But the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades (IUPAT) is working hard to change this:Â In May, the union introduced aÂ maternity leave program. According to Jessica Podhola, the director of communications and government affairs at District CouncilÂ 3Â at IUPAT in the Kansas City area, members have to belong to their local district councilâs health and welfare fund, and to have workedÂ 100Â hours immediately before the benefit is applied to be eligible for it. The program includes wage replacement ofÂ 67% or $800Â per week, and if members cannot work during pregnancy, they can receive up to six months of paid leave. For postpartum leave, workers receive either paid time off for six or eight weeks (if they had aÂ C-section).
Podhola toldÂ In These TimesÂ that this maternity leave program isÂ âa beginning, but itâs aÂ strong beginning.â Others, meanwhile, are picking up the baton. According to Fritzsche, LocalÂ 98Â is also working on this issue: She toldÂ In These TimesÂ that the local recently extended the cap on disability from $300Â to $500Â dollars aÂ week, and it made an automatic disability clause for women in theirÂ 9thÂ month of pregnancy and for the first six weeks postpartum (or eight weeks if they had aÂ C-section).Â IBEW LocalÂ 48Â in Oregon, meanwhile, introduced aÂ new maternity leave program in JanuaryÂ 2020, which offered workersÂ 13Â weeks of paid leave prior to birth andÂ 13Â weeks of paid leave after birth, which doubled the unionâs previousÂ benefit.
Podhola serves on IUPATâs national womenâs committee, which was built to develop policies to propel the union forward in protecting its women members. The committee has subcommittees on maternity leave, diversity and inclusion, recruitment, and marketing and retention. But along with the structural barriers for women in the trades, thereâs also aÂ cultural component that is difficult to fight: sexual harassment and other instances of sexism at work. Kelly Ireland, aÂ plumber in LocalÂ 690Â in Philadelphia, saysÂ âyou walk through job sites and see graffiti about women. They say itâs aÂ joke, but how many decades have we asked you to stopÂ joking?âÂ
Unions are working on this, too. Ireland told In These Times that she knew of a man kicked off a job site for catcalling; the foreman fired him on the spot. And in addition to its new maternity leave policy, the IUPAT womenâs committee is working on rolling out a sexual harassment training through their apprenticeship program.
Podhola toldÂ In These TimesÂ thatÂ âchanging the culture in construction is aÂ long-term project. We are not going to be able to get it done overnight, but we can begin to create safer work spaces and frameworks for our sisters to address issues as they come up, and to begin laying the foundation for members regardless of gender about what is acceptable and what is not on aÂ modern constructionÂ site.âÂ
Fritzscheâs experience has been similar during her apprenticeship.Â âYou just watch some women burn out with the baloney they have to deal with. At the same time, the guys are incredible friends and mentors. IÂ have so many male mentors. If you can work past issues around gender, you will have access to aÂ wonderful world of friends, teachers, andÂ mentors.â
According to Podhola,Â âSome of these guys have been doing this forÂ 30Â years and theyâve only worked with aÂ woman aÂ handful of times. Itâs going to be aÂ generational shift.â To make this shift happen, more women need to enter the trades. But it can be aÂ vicious cycle: Women donât see enough tradeswomen, so donât seeÂ themselvesÂ as potentialÂ tradeswomen.Â
Ireland, who grew up with aÂ union plumber for aÂ father, never even considered aÂ future in the trades until she had her own familyâmostly because she never saw women like her doing the work.Â âIf IÂ was young and saw women in the trades, IÂ would have gone into ironwork, climbÂ skyscrapers.âÂ
All of the tradeswomen who spoke toÂ In These TimesÂ mentioned access as the largest barrier to bringing more women into the building trades: Women need to hear about these great jobs, understand that theyâre just as welcome as men, and be given the confidence and tools both to apply and to stick it out when it gets difficult. Podhola says thatÂ âitâs on the onus of labor to market, recruit, and retain as many women asÂ possible.âÂ
Workers say other solutions outside of marketing and recruitment could include more local womenâs committees that prioritize and work directly on issues that affect women workers, putting more women on interview committees so women who apply for apprenticeships see themselves in their union and, of course, quotas and affirmative action for apprenticeships.
But ultimately, tradeswomen want other women to know that they belong in the trades. Fritzsche toldÂ In These TimesÂ thatÂ âwomen make great tradespeople. We are really good at this work and we deserve this work. AÂ woman invented the circular saw. AÂ woman invented the modern band saw. During World War II, we filled factories, we took over all the trades. We are tradespeople just as much as menÂ are.â
About the Author: Mindy Isser works in the labor movement and lives in Philadelphia.
This blog originally appeared at In These Times on August 30, 2021. Reprinted with permission.
Economic conditions during the pandemic took an especially difficult toll on women, with nearly 2.2 million females leaving the workforce between February and October 2020, according to an analysis by the National Womenâs Law Center.
Of course, this difficult environment doesnât mean women should shy away from asserting their rights in the workplace or pursuing better opportunities. In fact, it means just the opposite. Itâs more vital than ever that women speak up against discriminatory practices and for equal pay and equal opportunities for advancement.
As the pandemic eases, many employees are likely to return to an office environment in the coming months, although thereâs some disconnect between leaders (who tend to prefer more office time) and workers (who have become accustomed to working from home).
With all this in mind, the question arises of how best to advance your career as a woman post-pandemic. Here are some ideas to consider.
Support union efforts.
Women have long lagged behind men in terms of union membership, which is a key mechanism for promoting wage equality.
Indeed, research indicates that unions help narrow the wage gap between men and women in the workplace. In 2016, for instance, women working in unions received 94 cents on the dollar compared with unionized men. Alternatively, non-union women were paid just 78 cents on the dollar, compared with their non-union male counterparts.
And yet, as of 2020, men continued to have a higher union membership rate (11%) than women (10.5%), with the overall rate at 10.8% â barely half of what it was in 1983 â according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The conclusion: Joining unions where they exist and advocating for unions where they donât can help women narrow the wage gap and advance their careers.
Actively fight stereotypes.
Women in the workplace are often characterized unfairly and, as a result, burdened with unrealistic expectations that go beyond those placed on their male counterparts â all while receiving less pay.
Stereotypes are rampant and need to be continually challenged, both with evidence and active pushback against sexism. For example, the pervasive myth that men are better than math was debunked by a study in which women who focused on identifying themselves as being enrolled at an exclusive private college did as well as men on math tests. Other key research put to rest a different fable: that men are better at negotiating than women.
Not surprisingly, it is societal prejudices â not a lack of ability â that tends to hold women back. These stereotypes persist, and need to be confronted at every turn.
Be willing to change jobs.
According to the research, changing jobs frequently can benefit you financially and allow you to advance your career more quickly.
Staying in the same job might get you an annual cost-of-living raise, say 3%. But moving to a different position can give you a lot bigger boost: an average increase of 10% to 20%. In fact, if you stay at the same company for an average of more than two years, youâll earn at least 50% less over your lifetime than you would have if youâd changed jobs.
Getting that new job or embarking on a new career path might require you to step out of your comfort zone and learn new skills, but it will be worth it.
Enhance your skill set.
Speaking of enhancing your skill set, continuing education is always helpful, and it doesnât have to mean going back to school for an advanced degree. Many short-term seminars and virtual opportunities are available, too.
With tech skills especially in demand, look for marketable proficiencies in areas that translate well to multiple positions, such as familiarity with an array of commonly used software (such as Excel spreadsheets, PowerPoint, etc.). Familiarity with grant writing and internet marketing, particularly search engine optimization (SEO) can help you advance, as well.
Look for training opportunities, both in person and virtually, and once youâve mastered a skill, update your physical and online resumes to reflect your expertise.
Find your tribe, and network.
Thanks to the internet, professionals looking to advance their careers can network across far greater geographic distances than ever before. Take advantage of sites like Alignable and LinkedIn, as well as your personal network on social media, to forge alliances with others on your career path. This will allow you to share tips and ideas that have brought you success and learn the same from others.
Furthermore, you should stay in touch with former supervisors and co-workers who can advocate for you in your quest for a new position, if and when the time comes. If your list of trusted colleagues includes a potential mentor, be sure to pursue that relationship. According to three decades of research, mentorship leads to higher pay, faster advancement, and greater career satisfaction for mentees.
Burnish your reputation.
Prospective employers look at a range of factors in considering new hires, including your employment history (this is an instance where changing jobs too frequently can hurt you) and even your credit rating.
You can combat any negatives in your employment record by seeking out positive recommendations from past employers and colleagues. This proactive step helps ensure that nothing in your past can undermine your goals. You should also carefully curate your social media accounts, as many employers will check public posts and photos before they offer you a position.
Although they canât get access to your credit score, employers may view your credit history in an attempt to learn how responsible you are, especially if youâre being considered for a financial position. If youâre thinking of applying for a new role, itâs worthwhile to check your report yourself and to take the steps to build or rebuild your credit. Then employers wonât be able to use that as an excuse to pass you by.
These are just some of the ways you can advocate for yourself and advance your career in the post-pandemic world. Other opportunities are available, too. Be on the lookout for ways to move forward in boldness and confidence, so nothing can hold you back.
This blog is printed with permission.
About the author: Molly Barnes is a full-time digital nomad. She works remotely, travels constantly, and explores different cities across the U.S. She started her site,Â www.digitalnomadlife.orgÂ as a resource for travelers, nomads, and remote workers. Molly writes resources that help office and remote workers alike reach their personal and professional goals of becoming more successful. Follow along with her and her boyfriend Jacob on their blog as they pursue a nomadic lifestyle while freelancing and traveling across the country.Â
The corporate ladder is a popularized metaphor in the workforce. The ability to progress up the chain of command at a company to secure a prosperous future through hard work. However, whatâs lesser-known, but more important, is that this staple corporate ladder has a broken rung.
The very first step up from entry-level fragments parity in the workplace. According to McKinseyâs report on Women in the Workplace, it found that women held only 38% of entry-level managerial positions while men held 62% in 2019.
The disparities in job mobility are not just a pattern within McKinseyâs report, but for each of the six years McKinsey has released the report, itâs a trend that has remained. Women are less likely to get promoted from entry-level positions. This is the broken rung that is stifling so many young womenâs careers.
So, how can we hurdle over this broken rung? The answer doesnât lie in corporate resolution. Companies move at a turtle-pace when implementing social change, instead, itâs up to us as women to empower ourselves to overcome this gender barrier and advance beyond this bias.
There are a few ways we can do this, the first of which is finding a mentor. Having a mentor increased your odds of getting a promotion by five times. Itâs essential to have an advocate when it comes time to make a decision about promotions and likely that person will be your mentor. So, get your networking cap on and start sending those well-polished introductions!
Along with finding a mentor, making continuous learning a hallmark of your professional life will make you stand out against other candidates. With a rising number of women attending business school, you can get a degree online or simply read an industry book. Find whatever method works best for you to learn something new, but make it a priority as continuous learning will set you apart.
Along with connecting and learning, make yourself visible at your company. Itâs easy to mouse in the corner during your first few months at a company, but you actually want to do the opposite. Reach out to senior-level employees, host happy hours, send an interesting article to the CEO, publish LinkedIn content on your company, or find another creative way to connect with everyone in your company. This not only will make you more comfortable by knowing the people you work with but when people know you and the work you do, theyâll be able to attest youâre the best person for a promotion when the time comes.
Lastly, but most importantly, always advocate for yourself. This means that if you see bias in the workplace call it out. If you get passed up for a promotion you know you deserve, take it up with your manager. As women, especially young women in the workplace, itâs easy to accept the fate decision-makers hand to us. However, when that fate is tainted with bias we cannot just accept it, we need to question the reasoning and unearth any wrongful bias.
While itâs ideal to think that the corporate ladder is an equal climb for every member who attempts it, thatâs not the case. For women, itâs especially hard to get over that first, broken rung because of gender bias. However, with an empowered attitude, a firmness in self-worth, and supportive network women can overcome this broken rung.
About the Author: Lily CragerÂ isÂ a content market specialist writing for GreatBusinessSchools a site thatÂ gives business students a portal that tells them everything they need to know before they commit to a business education.
Two months ago, a wave of allegations against movie producer Harvey Weinstein opened the door to a reckoning. In recent weeks, victims have spoken candidly about their abuse at the hands of powerful men, including Charlie Rose, Mark Halperin, Sen. Al Franken (D-MN), Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), and Roy Moore, just to name a few.
For the first time, some (though certainly not all) abusers are facing consequences, being fired from jobs, having their shows pulled off the air, being removed from films. Women, newly assured they are not alone, are telling their stories more often and more publicly than ever before.
On Tuesday, Slate published another example of a powerful person abusing that power and thus endangering women in the workplace.
âWhen I was 23 years old, my boss would look down the gap at the waistband of my jeans when he walked past my desk,â Slateâs executive editor Allison Benedikt wrote. âI was an entry-level fact-checker at my first magazine job, and he was an older and more powerful editor. My career, at the time, was in his hands.â
The essay, at its start, reads like a lot of the personal stories women have bravely shared in recent weeks. Benedikt, one suspects, is adding her voice to that chorus. Instead, she goes on to describe how her boss asked her out for a drink one night at a âdark bar,â which led to more dates, a kiss, and, eventually, a marriage and three children.
Benedikt, understandably, writes that she has been thinking back about the origins of her marriage in recent weeks. But she goes on to use her personal experience to diminish the experiences of women bravely coming forward and pushing us, as a culture, to address the tight grip of rape culture on all facets of our lives, including and especially the workplace.
Benedikt writes that she has heard how horrific allegations of sexual assault and harassment have piled up alongside what she calls âmurkier stories of older men âforcibly kissingâ younger women who didnât want to be kissed, men planting âunexpectedâ kisses on female colleagues, [and] men being âcreepy AFâ in Twitter DMs.â
That Benedikt is so quick to write off the experiences of other women, to think that only horrific assaults are the problem, is dangerous.Â By writing it, Benedikt â and Slate, by choosing to publish it â is endangering the women in her workplace.
As the executive editor of a large publication, sheâs signaling, from a powerful position in a large newsroom, that sheâs comfortable writing off reports of unwanted advances as âmurky.â
And her only justification for doing so is her own experience. Benedikt wonders in the essay, had she not been interested in her husbandâs advances, would that have been harassment? Was it harassment even though she was, because he was her boss?
She answers those questions, writing, âToday, many people seem to think the answer is yes.â Because it is.
It was all okay, in her eyes, because she was attracted to her then-boss and future husband.Â But âattractionâ is not the currency of harassment. Power is.
Last week, NBC fired Today Show host Matt Lauer following sexual harassment complaints from women at the network. Former talk show host, Celebrity Apprentice contestant, and current Fox News contributor Geraldo Rivera defended Lauer on Twitter, tweeting, âNews is a flirty business.â
Benedikt is asking the wrong questions. She ought to ask: What about women who donât reject advances from their boss out of fear of retribution â a desire to please their boss to keep their job?
Many people, in the midst of the reckoning, have looked back at previous interactions in a new light, perhaps reconsidering whether both parties consented or whether it crossed a line. But Benediktâs essay reads as a justification for the origins of her marriage and a public declaration that, despite holding a prominent role in a prominent newsroom, she is sympathetic to powerful men crossing lines with young women whom they supervise.
Itâs a public declaration of how Benedikt may handle a report of sexual harassment in the workplace. She may say, as she wrote in her column, â[W]e all make each other uncomfortable sometimes, particularly when sex and attraction are involved.â
The reckoning is bringing with it new standards: Donât look down the gap at the waistband of your employeeâs jeans when you walk past. Donât abuse positions of power. Treat women like theyâre people.
The new rules are not complicated, but for so many people, even âliberalsâ and women, those standardsâunbelievablyâseem too high. Choosing to declare as much from a position of power isnât adding anything to the conversation. Itâs dangerous.
This piece was originally published at ThinkProgress on December 6, 2017. Reprinted with permission.Â
About the Author: Addy Baird is a reporter for ThinkProgress on the news cycle team. Previously, she covered local politics and health policy at POLITICO New York and worked for The Charlie Rose Show digital team.
Today is Equal Pay Day. We are 100 days into 2017, and today some women have finally reached the point where their earnings match their male counterpartsâÂ 2016 earnings. We canât forget that black and Latina women have to work even more until they reach pay parity.
While itâs shameful that women are still fighting to achieve equal pay, there are steps we can take to close the gap. The best way to close the pay gap is to form a union and bargain for a better life that includes equal pay. Through union contracts, women in their unions have closed the gap and received higher wages. In fact, union women earn $231 more a week than women who donât have a union voice.
Wage disparities have long- and short-term negative effects. It contributes to the cycle of poverty and adds another barrier to being able to take care of our families, pay off debt, pay for child careÂ and so much more.
Together, we can make equal pay for all women a reality.
This blogÂ was originally posted on aflcio.orgÂ on April 4, 2017. Reprinted with permission.
Liz Shuler was elected AFL-CIO secretary-treasurer in September 2009, the youngest person ever to become an officer of the AFL-CIO. Shuler previously was the highest-ranking woman in the Electrical Workers (IBEW) union, serving as the top assistant to the IBEW president since 2004. In 1993, she joined IBEW Local 125 in Portland, Ore., where she worked as an organizer and state legislative and political director. In 1998, she was part of the IBEWâs international staff in Washington, D.C., as a legislative and political representative.
Asking female applicants whether they were married and planned to have children in a job interview. Telling female employees how to dress (and show more skin). Overtly and concretely penalizing female employees for taking maternity leave. Promoting low-performing men over the highest-performing women. Asking women employees to have sex with their boss to advance their careers. Penalizing female employees for not taking part in alcohol-fueled corporate partying when they were pregnant or breastfeeding. Bragging about how many female subordinates a male executive had had sex with.
This sounds like the bad old days but, unfortunately, it isnât. Just a few years ago, current and former female sales representatives at a medical cosmetics company, Medicis Pharmaceutical (now owned by Valeant Pharmaceuticals), banded together to bring a class action against their employer for regularly doing all of these things, and more, including unequal pay and retaliation for reporting discrimination and harassment. Each of the approximately one hundred women in the class who filed claims received an average of $44,000 in back pay and damages, and the attorneyâs fees were not taken out of that compensation. Thatâs not small change.
But thereâs more. In theory, an individual woman could have brought the case and gotten back pay and damages. What an individual woman could almost certainly not have done was force Medicis to change its practices âÂ Medicis could have paid her money and washed its hands. Here, though, the class was able to use its leverage to get Medicis to agree to, among other things, create anti-discrimination policies and training; establish systems for investigating reports of discrimination and harassment; be transparent about how it set and measured sales goals; eliminate penalties for taking parental leave; and establish policies about alcohol at corporate events and intra-office romantic and sexual relationships. In other words, it took a class action to ensure that Medicis follows the law not just with regard to the women who sued, but with regard to all the women who come after.
In the minefield of workplace discrimination and harassment, thereâs another advantage to class actions, too. One woman bringing these types of claims may (unfortunately and wrongly) be easily dismissed as too sensitive, as not qualified for the promotion she sought, or as subject to one-off comments from a single troublesome executive. She may also be retaliated against for speaking outÂ âÂ as many of the women in this suit were. But where woman after woman after woman tells the same story, she cannot be so easily dismissed.
And yet Congress is on the verge of wiping away the ability for women to band together and challenge such discrimination and harassment in the workplace. Last week, the House GOP narrowly approved the so-called âFairness in Class Action Litigation Act.â The bill would drastically roll back the ability to bring class action lawsuits like the one against Medicis. Fourteen Republicans opposed the bill, along with every single Democrat in the House, but that wasnât enough to defeat it. After being pushed through the House Judiciary Committee â without a hearing, and with a nighttime vote â the bill now makes its way to the Senate, where a record 21 female Senators will be among those deciding its ultimate fate. While the Senate has not yet scheduled any action on the issue, civil rights groups and their allies are mobilizing to ensure the House proposal never becomes law.
There are a lot of big, important and downright frightening ideas making the rounds on Capitol Hill these days, from taking away Americansâ health insurance to eliminating Meals on Wheels and turning the Environmental Protection Agency over to oil and gas lobbyists. But itâs imperative that voters insist their Senators give proper attention to this all-out assault on the courts. Unless they do so, a key tool in battling discrimination could quickly disappear. That threat is too real, too serious and has too many dire consequences for too many Americans for Senators to do anything other than give it the deliberative attention â and debate â that it deserves.
This article originally appeared at DailyKOS.com on March 19, 2017. Reprinted with permission.
Paul Bland, Jr.,Â Executive Director, has been a senior attorney at Public Justice since 1997. As Executive Director, Paul manages and leads a staff of nearly 30 attorneys and other staff, guiding the organizationâs litigation docket and other advocacy.Â FollowÂ himÂ on Twitter: www.twitter.com/FPBland.
Leah NichollsÂ joined Public Justiceâs D.C. office in September 2012 as the Kazan-Budd Attorney. She was previously senior staff attorney for civil rights and general public interest at the Georgetown University Law Centerâs Institute for Public Representation. Leah had also been a teaching fellow and adjunct law professor at the Law Center.
Share this post
Subscribe For Updates
Find an Employment Attorney
The Workplace Fairness Attorney Directory features lawyers from across the United States who primarily represent workers in employment cases. Please note that Workplace Fairness does not operate a lawyer referral service and does not provide legal advice, and that Workplace Fairness is not responsible for any advice that you receive from anyone, attorney or non-attorney, you may contact from this site.
Workplace Fairness is a non-profit organization working to preserve and promote employee rights. This site provides comprehensive information about job rights and employment issues nationally and in all 50 states. It is for workers, employers, advocates, policymakers, journalists, and anyone else who wants to understand, protect, and strengthen workersâ rights. More about Workplace Fairness