Promising but atypical: New evidence on water chestnut biocontrol host choice and feeding
Simmons, W. and Blossey, B., 2023. Host plant phylogeny does not fully explain host choice and feeding preferences of Galerucella birmanica, a promising biological control herbivore of Trapa natans. Biological Control, p.105201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105201
Summary written by Wade Simmons, edited by Justin Dalaba
A critical step when evaluating safety of a new biological control agent is to identify potential non-target impacts on native species. To determine non-target risks, modern host specificity testing of potential biocontrol agents follows a formalized process that prioritizes testing close relatives of the targeted plant species. Closely related plants are more likely to share traits that are important in the host-finding behaviors of plant-feeding insects. Structuring test plant lists by relatedness to target plant has produced an excellent track record for safety in weed biocontrol, where non-target impacts are both rare and well-predicted. Results from host-specificity testing of the leaf feeding beetle, Galerucella birmanica, a promising biocontrol herbivore for invasive water chestnut (Trapa natans) , partially follow the pattern predicted by plant relatedness, but not completely. Instead, plant species used by other Galerucella beetles appear more informative than plant relatedness to water chestnut in explaining behaviors of G. birmanica. While host-plants of related insects are an existing category for inclusion of plants in host-specificity screening, these surprising results underscore the need to re-evaluate when and how this ecological information is being applied for safety screening of candidate biological control insects.
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control. Previous research has demonstrated that herbivory by G. birmanica is likely to reduce T. natans population growth rates in North America (Blossey et al. 2018). This additional research shows that all tested forms of Trapa (5 populations including 2 morphotypes) were attacked by the insect, raising the prospects of effective biological control across variations in Trapa growth forms. Host specificity testing shows a narrow host range of G. birmanica, but in line with previous data from China, G. birmanica may occasionally feed and lay eggs on the non-target plant water shield, Brasenia schreberi. However, presence of feeding damage is not equivalent to risks to populations, and the authors present several lines of evidence suggesting a low level of risk to B. schreberi populations. Taken together, results in this paper further support Galerucella birmanica as a safe and promising biocontrol herbivore for invasive Trapa natans in North America, if regulatory agencies grant release approval.
- G. birmanica appears effective against multiple water chestnut growth forms, and shows a very narrow host range
- While G. birmanica may occasionally feed and lay eggs on water shield, risks to B. schreberi or other native plant populations appear extremely low
- G. birmanica feeding on B. schreberi is poorly explained by relatedness of the plant to water chestnut, but the plant is a host for other Galerucella species
- Host-specificity testing methods should more formally include host associations of highly related insects as a factor when developing test plant lists
- Biological control appears to be the only meaningful management option to reduce Trapa impacts at the landscape scale in North America
- Minor non-target feeding is expected, but unlikely to affect native plant populations
- G. birmanica is expected to attack a broad range of Trapa populations in North America, further supporting its potential effectiveness as a biocontrol agent if release approval is granted
- All management decisions involve risk, and biocontrol risks should be considered alongside risks of new and persisting Trapa invasions, as well as risks associated with mechanical and chemical management.
Read more of our research summaries:
Torres et al. investigate what happens when you remove invasive plant species, and how timing of removal activities impacts plant communities.
Fusco et al. (2023) summarize what spatial invasive plant data is available in the United States and how it can be used.
Bradley et al. (2023) lay out ideas for better integration of invasive species and climate change policies and practices
New research questions our assumptions about invasive plants as the primary drivers of ecological degradation. Restoration success may be limited by interactions of different stressors.
In addition to documenting a departure from predictions in host-specificity testing, Simmons and Blossey present new evidence on the potential impacts and safety of water chestnut biological control.
This article reflects on how we can reframe our thinking and work to support equitable, inclusive, and just conservation science and practice.
This article explores a case study of biotic resistance, where over time native species may limit the invasion of other species. A native herbivore learns to consume an invasive alga in less than a decade.
How complete are current eDNA reference libraries for the Laurentian Great Lakes region? Can we confidently integrate invasive species detection with biodiversity sampling?
Invasive species vocalizations may be a significant avenue for competition among species. This thought-provoking article gives a glimpse into the potential effects of invasive species disrupting a soundscape.
Shifting temperature regimes can influence the suitability and spread of invasive insects, including spongy moth. How can secondary host plant connectivity support its expansion across the U.S.?
Can invasive worms serve as food for native species? How do they alter leaf litter microhabitat? New research offers insight into the potential effects and trophic interactions of jumping worms (Amynthas spp.) and native reptiles and amphibians.