The "Battle of Seattle," a large civil protest that led to sporadic rioting in 1999, is commonly portrayed as influential in the sociology of Western activism, and in the contemporary history of social movements and the left in the First World. The "Battle of Seattle" was a "Summit protest" a protest aimed at the intergovernmental and intercorporate summit meetings that occasionally occur, usually in a "world city," such as Seattle, Milan, Melbourne, etc.
Why has this event achieved influence in the scholarly literature?
The "Battle of Seattle" is sometimes considered influential as it allowed diversely structured, motivated and politically motivated groups to construct a weak shared collective identity. In contrast to the "Parties" of the past, the event seems to have been organised by a protest "network," with a far looser collective identity of programme and organisation than previous left parties or movements. It is often suggested that "the internet" allowed organisations and participants in the protest to form a collective identity. How did the internet assist in forming "collective subjectivity" for the Seattle protest?
As 1989 is commonly portrayed in the history of the left as the moment when the possibility of a collective left program for widespread and radical social change, organised through bolshevik influenced communist parties, collapsed. Has the role of "The Battle of Seattle" and subsequent "Summit Protests" been overstated in terms of the coherence of a post-1989 shared revolutionary political identity?
Did the political violence of September 11, 2001 destroy the political sentiment that developed around the "Summit Protests" in the first world?