Good neighborhoods trump green tech
Green architecture is big right now, especially in the Washington region. It all started locally about 10 years ago when a private developer built the highly visible Tower Building along I-270 in Rockville. The building boasts of using "30% less energy than typical office buildings," thanks to recycling indoor air and relying as much as possible on natural light.
But just what is "green architecture"?
For several years, an organization called the Green Building Council has been certifying environmentally friendly architecture through a process called LEED. To qualify for LEED certification, buildings rack up points for every environmentally friendly component they include. If they have enough points, they get certified.
Buildings get points for having things like natural ventilation, water-efficient landscaping and low-consumption lighting. The Tower Building, for example, has special high-tech windows that retain heat in winter and reflect it in summer, significantly lowering the amount of energy it takes to heat and cool the building.
It's a good system, except for one big flaw: Location. LEED focuses primarily on what goes into a building, but where a building is located makes a huge difference. Buildings in walkable, mixed-use, urban locations are inherently much more environmentally friendly than buildings in suburban locations, because it takes mountains more energy to access suburban locations. If everyone is driving to get there, your building will be a huge energy drain no matter how many high-tech light bulbs it contains.
Rockville's Tower Building, for all its techno-wizardry, is so isolated that it's not a good green building, despite its LEED certification.
LEED architecture without good urban design is sort of like cutting down the rain forest using hybrid-electric bulldozers. It kind of misses the point.
The good news is that as of today, the Green Building Council is officially launching a new ratings system called LEED-ND, or LEED for Neighborhood Development. LEED-ND is specifically organized to encourage development that is dense and walkable, and includes a mix of land uses. Building owners seeking certification under the program will have to show that they are encouraging environmentally friendly cities, rather than individual buildings.
It's a move in the right direction, and it is something that anyone interested in urban development will be hearing more about as time goes on. If local governments embrace LEED-ND the way they have embraced LEED, it could result in the construction of many more walkable neighborhoods in the region, and many fewer sprawling car-dependent ones. More places like Reston Town Center and Bethesda, fewer like Tysons Corner and Rockville Pike.
For more information about LEED-ND, visit the USGBC Web site.
Washington Post editors
| April 30, 2010; 12:25 PM ET
Categories: HotTopic, Local blog network, energy, environment
Save & Share: Previous: A lesson for America in Va.'s Northop win
Next: Abortion funding limit could reach further than intended
Posted by: thomaske | May 4, 2010 12:55 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: snyderd29 | May 4, 2010 2:36 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.