Closing the Achievement Gap in Education
Published: October 15, 2019
New research shows that the difference in educational attainment between students from higher and lower socioeconomic backgrounds has not changed over the past 50 years. This achievement gap has persisted even though inflation-adjusted spending per student has quadrupled. To help narrow the achievement gap, the United States needs to reconsider its existing course and be open to new directions in education policy.
- Why haven't we closed the achievement gap?
- What can the schools do to ensure that every student has equitable access to the highest quality educational experiences?
- Read “The Achievement Gap Fails to Close” by Eric Hanushek and Paul Peterson, available here.
- Read Eric Hanushek’s interview in “No Change In Student Achievement Gap In Last 50 Years,” available here.
- Read “The War on Poverty Remains a Stalemate” by Eric Hanushek and Paul Peterson, available here.
- Read “The Unwavering SES Achievement Gap: Trends in U.S. Student Performance” by Eric Hanushek, Paul Peterson, Laura Talpey, and Ludger Woessmann, available here.
New research shows that the difference in educational attainment between students from higher and lower socioeconomic backgrounds - what’s called the achievement gap - has not changed over the past 50 years.
The gap between the haves and have-nots has remained constant, even while spending per student has quadrupled.
Since the cognitive skills measured
by standardized achievement tests
are a strong predictor of future income
and economic well-being,
a persistent achievement gap means it’s harder for low- income Americans to get ahead.
Social mobility isn’t likely to improve.
We once thought just providing more money to schools serving disadvantaged students
would work to bring their achievement up.
But after spending billions of dollars, we haven’t seen the gap improve.
The United States needs to reconsider its existing policies aimed at shrinking the achievement gap and be open to new directions in national education policy.
It should focus on results rather than thinking that more money can solve the problem.