Alaska’s Prince of Wales Island is home to the Alexander Archipelago wolf, an extremely rare subspecies of gray wolf facing a plethora of threats. Environmental groups first petitioned to protect the animal under the Endangered Species Act nearly three years ago. The Fish and Wildlife Service finally announced this week that it will consider a listing — even as the state scrambles to come up with its own plan and head off federal protection.
With the Coast Range Mountains and its glaciers to the east, the Fairweather Range to the north and the ocean to the west and south, the Alexander Archipelago wolves have been isolated since the last Ice Age, cut off from their larger, lighter-colored and lighter-coated North American cousins. Only around 1,000 may now exist across the entire archipelago, and their situation is especially dire on Prince of Wales Island, considered a “significant portion” of the wolf’s range, which under the ESA could justify a listing.
But the Fish & Wildlife Service’s recent response to the 2011 petition to consider the Alexander Archipelago wolf for ESA protection, while acknowledging that enough evidence exists to warrant a possible listing, still constitutes simply a strong “maybe.” Wolf advocates are hopeful that a thorough review — the final step in the ESA process — will yield a definitive yes.
Advocates hope not only to protect the rare wolf, but also to stop old-growth logging on Prince of Wales Island altogether. The island and the wolf’s range lie within Alaska’s Tongass National Forest — the country’s largest national forest at 17 million acres and part of the largest remaining expanse of temperate rainforest in the world. Old growth forests have been logged on Prince of Wales Island since the 1950s, and they’ll take hundreds of years to recover. At its peak in the 1980s, logging removed up to 1 billion board feet of old growth trees per year from the island. Conservationists fear that another major logging operation will be too much for the island’s wolves, deer and forests to ever recover from.
“Once (the forest) is lost, it’s lost,” said Larry Edwards, a biologist who is also the Alaska Forest Campaigner for Greenpeace. Greenpeace was the lead petitioner for listing the wolf.
But Fish and Wildlife Service officials say it could take up to five years to issue a final decision on the listing, and, in the interim, says Edwards, “our priority is to stop some of the (eight) significant timber sales that are still planned in the area.”
For the moment, pressure from scientists and advocacy groups has helped put the major logging threat on hold: The Big Thorne timber sale. At 6,000 acres and 120 million board feet, it would be the largest Prince of Wales Island has seen in 20 years.
The strongest evidence against the sale came from David Person, a wildlife scientist and former wolf expert for Alaska’s department of Fish and Game. Person, who has studied the Alexander Archipelago wolf for 22 years, said in a statement to the U.S. Forest Service that Big Thorne “represents the final straw that will break the back of a sustainable wolf-deer predator-prey ecological community on Prince of Wales Island.” The logging project is a direct threat to Sitka black-tail deer because it will destroy vital winter habitat, and without enough deer to prey on, the scant remaining wolves will not survive.
In response, the USFS regional forester for Southeast Alaska, Beth Pendleton, halted the Big Thorne project and convened a task force in October 2013 to reevaluate the massive sale’s potential impacts. In official correspondence, Pendleton wrote that Person’s description of imminent collapse was “new information that I cannot ignore.”
Nonetheless, advocacy groups still worry that without an ESA listing, the agency may still approve the timber sale. “I fear that the Big Thorne task force will sort of brush over the real impacts to wolves,” said Rebecca Noblin, Alaska director for the Center for Biological Diversity, a co-petitioner with Greenpeace for the listing.
While time may be short for Alexander Archipelago wolves, the task force could reach a decision at any moment and the already woefully late ESA decision may still take years. That’s why on Wednesday, April 2, the two advocacy groups and another plaintiff filed an intent to sue the Fish and Wildlife Service unless the wolves’ ESA process is expedited.
But for Steve Brockmann, Southeast Alaska coordinator for the Fish and Wildlife Service, listing a species as endangered or threatened is like “emergency-room wildlife management.”
Instead, Brockmann said, it would be best for state agencies to use this opportunity to create a viable plan for wolf conservation —without the involvement of the feds and the imposed restrictions on land-use and hunting that would bring.
On Friday, April 4, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, which opposes a federal ESA listing for the species, will convene a public meeting to discuss the possibilities. Brockmann hopes that not just agencies, but wolf trappers and hunters will weigh in on a state-based conservation plan (although past wolf conservation plans have been inadequate or poorly implemented, according to Edwards.) For a lot of hunters, he said, the wolves aren’t even the target or the concern. “They want more deer.”
The fate of the island’s old growth forest, the Alexander Archipelago wolf and the Sitka black-tailed deer are inextricably intertwined. And without a federal ESA listing or a truly viable state-based conservation plan, they may all disappear together.
This article was originally published in High Country News (hcn.org). The author is solely responsible for the content.