Both the Bible and evolutionist agree that the early earth was mostly all land.
I was not aware of that biblical point.
The hypothesis for earths water is during itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s formation and cometary impact, when cool enough the water precipitated out.
The question is whether evolutionist can explain how so much water just came from nowhere.
natural planetary formation, many moons of Jupiter, Saturn are ice worlds, as are comets, there is plenty of water in our solar system.
We do have oceans, and the oceans are a constant reminder of the Flood. And since there are indeed marine fossils on the peaks of every mountain, including Mt.Everest, and there are several consistant historical accounts of a great Flood, then the Flood should be considered a sound historical and scientific account by all academic professors.
unfortunately, the evidence of a Noachian flood is non-existent in the geological strata, if you believe there is, what geologic records (presumably world wide) support such a flood.
re historical records Ã¢â‚¬â€œ presume a person is floating in the ocean, how far is the horizon? About 8-ish klm say, if your in the middle of a big lake how can you be certain the whole world is similarly affected?
When history and science can agree with an issue there is no further need to argue against the evidence of such an event. There is plenty of signature evidence all over the world for such a Flood,
In your opinion, what is your favourite Ã¢â‚¬ËœscientificÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ evidence for a Noachian flood? perhaps its worth debating, yes?
After all, what killed the dinosaurs? It was either the flood or some asteroid. If indeed there was some asteroid then why does the evolution timeline continue to upscale when logically it should down-scale back to simpler forms of life rather then up-scale to more advanced forms of life.
IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m not sure I follow this point. After the Kt impact, life did indeed almost have to re-start with the mammals.
Evolutionist have no solid premise for such an asteroid theory; and since such a calamity would wipe out even all plant life, I'd say that the asteroid theory is an overkill theory that somehow still gains acceptance through politics.
The Yucatan peninsular is site for the current Kt impact culprit, iridium layer hints at a meteor impact, mass extinction is a logical conclusion of such an impact. WhatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s wrong with that evidence?
The bigger the impact the bigger the disaster, no reason to say all plant life should be wiped out.