The drug testing would even the playing field for participants and create uniformity. The financial support is to help with basic amenities like food, shelter, and water for families; not drugs. These tests would help verify that taxpayer dollars are going towards families with no drug involvement and better futures. The programs don’t allow for the money to be spent on drugs, but drug involvement could lead to less jobs opportunities. Ideally the drug testing would find individuals positive for drugs and offer them rehabilitation programs.
Although, I see the reasoning behind not requiring vaccinations. Every person has the right, but if they are going to harm the rest of the human race just because they do not vaccinations I do not agree with that. I do believe that vaccinations are a good thing and should be
People who use the money they receive on things not necessary for their families constitutes as abusing their aid. Lawmakers and the public alike state that drug testing might be beneficial to prevent tax money from being funneled into illegal activity it does not guarantee that these people will not spend their money on other legal recreational activities and substances. Finally, lawmakers have yet to determine what the restriction and punishments should be for those who can not or have not passed their drug tests. The degree of punishment that would be indicative of a possible rehabilitation of the individual without also punishing the children of that home (Pollack,2006). Each of these reasons is a primary cause of the controversy that have prevented most states from enforcing drug testing before receiving benefits.
Have you ever seen the dirty, homeless people on the streets? Maybe if they had access to health care, they could clean up and look better. Nevertheless, if that homeless person could clean themselves up, they could interview for a job and start a new life. Major reasons for this is, it would save lives, in the long run it’s cost-effective, and providing free health care helps people gain access to insurance. Basic health care should be free to everyone because, it could save lives, in the long run it’s cost-effective, and providing free health care health people gain access to insurance.
People could be aware of their problems and rationalize what is going on with their bodies instead of resulting to destructive behavior, such as cutting, picking skin, or even suicide, that would harm themselves or others. Public awareness of mental health can increase chance of mental health care being provided for free to many. Sadly, many cannot access service they need due to social or economic problems they face. If mental health care was free, we wouldn’t have this issue. Many would be more aware of mental health if it is provided for free.
The government should find measures to prevent pollution and provide them with a healthier life. While the duties OF the government would be to introduce and enforce stricter laws, that alone will not be enough. For rules and regulations to be implemented, the best way is to for people whom the rules are made, to follow the rules. This makes the rights associated with the rules effective. Take pollution control.
As we have already indicated that tax is more like an income to our government to pay for other public services, in addition, government is also using that tax money to create job opportunities. E.g. tax money could be used for infrastructure, (for construction of hospitals, roads, bridges, clinics etc.,) and by so doing that, the number of unemployment will be reduced in our country.Tax money helps the nation to protect themselves as they cover the military expenses, tax money is also used to provide people who are less privileged with RDP houses, grant money, and also used to assist other learners and students in
Scientific validity It should be made sure that science and ethics do not cross the paths and for this to happen the scientists must value each and every participants equally. They must ask the question ; whether the research methods they are following are valid and feasible or is this just some random experiment that is conducted to test some drug as the volunteers are available in planet.For example Invalid research is unethical because it is a waste of resources and exposes people to risk for no reason. Fair subject
Vaccine exemptions need to be stricter in order for the USA to progress into a measles free country. A person who is not vaccinated against the disease is putting themselves at risk as well as the people around them. It can be seen, however, that there are limitations with this research. The articles that have been used are not primary sources. I have edited them and explored them in the way I wanted to.
In today's society, our environment has been talked about many times and is becoming a problem to many human beings. Many people are getting ill from hazardous environments and even causing death. NIEHS is trying to solve this problem and trying to get more money in order to maintain their activities to keep these people safe. Due to this problem, the government should give NIEHS the $680,00,000 to fund more safe environments. If the government gave this money to NIEHS, then it will help many lives especially those that work, play, and live in terrible environments.