Agriculture, Australia, BEIR, Canada, dilute and disperse, exporting jobs, food safety, food standards, Free Trade, inequality, Japan, Japan export radioactive food, NAFTA, New Zealand, no safe dose, radiation in food, Radionuclides, radionuclides in food, rice, rice exports, rice imports, TPP, Trans-Pacific Partnership, Transparency, underdevelopment, US, US government, USA
Rice Brokers at Nihonbashi bridge in Edo, by Katsushika Hokusai (葛飾北斎) (1760–1849) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice
Economist Robert Reich has laid out the more general dangers of the TPP Trade Agreement in his recent piece “Why the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement is a Pending Disaster” (see page bottom).
However, the biggest risk is that it will allow Japan to dump all of its radioactive food on much of the world. In particular, 10 to 15 times more radiation is allowed in food in the US, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand than in Japan. The US has the weakest “standards” of all, allowing food to have around 1,200 – 1,500 Becquerels per kg , i.e. 1,200-1,500 radioactive emissions per second per kg, compared to 100 Bq/kg in Japan. (A kg is 2.2 pounds.) The amount allowed in Japan for children is even less than 100 Bq.
The TPP will allow Japan to more easily export radioactive metal products, as well. It is also a back door to allow Japan to export radioactive food and goods to Europe. Unlike most of the English speaking world, Europe got wise to Japan’s radioactive food export plot and only accepts Japanese food with 100 Bq/kg of radiation, even though the European “standard” is at 600 Bq/kg.
This may also be an economic disaster, especially for US rice farmers, as Japan dumps its radioactive produce for cheap on the world. They can then import food which is presumed to be less radioactive, as recently seen by the urgency given to import of US French fries (Japan grows potatoes.) While the US was exporting some potatoes to Japan before Fukushima, they must certainly export more now. Who ever heard of urgently flying French fries to another country, as recently happened due to a shortage of US French fries in Japan? The well-known fast-food chain doing the importing claims to use local produce, so the reason for imports appears clear – neither they nor their Japanese customers want potentially radioactive French fries.
Even if the same 100 Bq/kg Japan radiation “standard” were to be implemented for all countries – and you can be certain it will not be – 100 Bq/kg is almost certainly more contaminated than food grown in the US, Canada, New Zealand, Australia. Or, at least one hopes that food from radiation contaminated zones in Japan is more radioactive than in the US, though with wanton dumping of radioactive waste, even into US landfills, and legally leaking nuclear reactors, along with historical US nuclear weapons testing within the US, and Fukushima and Chernobyl fallout, one cannot be certain. The ill-fated WIPP is probably the most sophisticated US nuclear waste dump, and it was designed to fail over time. It just failed early. For those who missed it, this is how the US government handles highly dangerous transuranic waste (plutonium, etc):
Then the US president runs around asking other countries to dump their nuclear waste on America, in the name of security!
However, with Hiroshima-Nagasaki, Fukushima, and Pacific nuclear weapons testing, and lots of nuclear reactors and waste on a small island, one can guess that Japan is probably overall the most radioactive country in the world.
Japan whining and complaining over GM food is most surely a lure. The only real way to get rid of radioactive waste is to export it. Plants take up the radiation from soil and water, so this ploy will leave Japan with less radiation and the rest of the world more radioactive. It is an advanced version of the dilute and disperse policies so beloved by the nuclear industry. Some radiation will stay in the bones until long after death, excepting cremation. Other radiation will be gradually excreted to poison the land.
From the US Summary of Objectives on the TPP:
“The United States is participating in negotiations of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement with 11 other Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam) – a trade agreement that will open markets, set high-standard trade rules, and address 21st-century issues in the global economy. By doing so, TPP will promote jobs and growth in the United States and across the Asia-Pacific region.” http://www.ustr.gov/tpp/Summary-of-US-objectives
According to the Office of US Trade Rep: “Twenty percent of U.S. farm income comes from agricultural exports and those exports support rural communities.” http://www.ustr.gov/tpp/Summary-of-US-objectives Some will recall that after NAFTA was passed, US manufacturing, including many jobs in the auto industry, went to Canada and Mexico. For those who need details, see: http://www.epi.org/publication/fast-track-to-lost-jobs-free-trade-agreements-are-bad-deals-for-working-americans/
The dumping of US rice on Haiti for cheaper than it could be grown in Haiti was devastating to Haitian farmers, but great for Bill Clinton’s Arkansas. While cheap rice was good for Haiti’s urban poor, it actually made more urban poor by destroying the livelihoods of Haitian farmers. Japan actually tried to send Fukushima rice to Haiti, and poor Haitians had the good sense to be outraged, because they didn’t want radioactive rice. Not only will there be dumping of Japan’s radioactive food, but there will be dumping of food from all countries with lower wages-costs. Over the decades free-trade policies have led to lower wages, even while consumer costs for many basic needs have risen disproportionately. Contrary to popular opinion, there have been many “lost generations” going back for decades, including highly educated people who have remained unemployed, underemployed, or precariously employed.
When the Office of US Trade Rep says “Non-tariff trade barriers, such as duplicative testing and unscientific regulations imposed on food and agricultural goods, are among the biggest challenges facing exporters across the Asia-Pacific region“, what they mean is that they don’t want radiation testing and they consider the wacko high levels of radiation accepted by international promoters of the nuclear industry as “scientific”. The US’ own National Academy of Science has consistently stated for decades, in their BEIR reports, that there is no safe dose of ionizing radiation, and that risk increases linearly with dose. This is true for Low LET radiation. However, High LET (e.g. alpha) radiation is even more dangerous, as the National Academy of Science also explains in their BEIR report. Yet the US government has continued to ignore its own National Academy of Sciences in favor of the Nuclear Industry and UN Agencies. It has actually increased “acceptable” levels of radiation in food, in recent years, to pander to the nuclear industry. So, now it should be clear what they really mean when they say: “The United States is therefore seeking in TPP to strengthen rules intended to eliminate unwarranted technical barriers to trade (TBT) and build upon WTO commitments in this area, and to ensure that sanitary and phytosanitary measures (SPS) are developed and implemented in a transparent, science-based manner.” http://www.ustr.gov/tpp/Summary-of-US-objectives Food testing is considered a barrier to trade, as is food safety. Thus, the high levels of radiation allowed in food. Already Europe and the US use the honor system for accepting Japanese food imports. They let Japan do the radiation tests and blindly accept the results.
While Robert Reich states below that for decades free trade was a “win-win”, that is fairly debatable. Free trade has a long track record of destroying local industries. Brazil had to shut itself off from free trade in order to develop a modern economy. Poor countries, which did not, generally suffered from increasing poverty and underdevelopment. As he discusses in another article, the rich have used their extra money to buy off US politicians. The US Congress is hence almost totally out of control and working against the American people. The majority of Americans probably know this. So, it’s really hard to see how passing it before Congress would do anything, though it would enhance transparency, if Americans are willing to read, which they generally are not. If Americans had the time or inclination to read government documents, they would not be in the mess they are in right now.
It’s hard to think of another country throughout all of history, where the government has so much disdain for its own people, and for the land, as the US Government, with the probable exception of Haiti. What other country besides the US runs around begging the world for all of its high level radioactive waste? Germany, Sweden, Canada, Japan, and some other countries, are all too happy to comply in sending both high and low level radioactive waste to dump on the poor, hapless, people of South Carolina and Tennessee. Importing radioactive food from Japan is but an extension of this policy, which is effectively an extermination policy, whatever the intent. The US political and economic elites can easily replace the people and they know it. Is this why they so oppose family planning in poor countries? But, they can’t replace the land. They apparently intend to go someplace else, once they have destroyed the country and made their killing.
Based on what Robert Reich says below, the TPP may also make it more difficult for countries to exit nuclear power, without facing the sort of frivolous and secretive lawsuit, which Swedish State owned Vattenfall has launched against Germany:
“Why the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement is a Pending Disaster
Published on Wednesday, January 07, 2015, by RobertReich.org
Projected on the side of a building in Spokane, Washington in 2013, the message against ‘fast track’ authority, which would restrict lawmakers ability to weigh in or make changes to the deal, has been key in the fight against the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership agreement. The reason: If the American people knew what was in this deal they would never allow their members of Congress to vote in favor of it. Republicans who now run Congress say they want to cooperate with President Obama, and point to the administration’s Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, as the model. The only problem is the TPP would be a disaster.
If you haven’t heard much about the TPP, that’s part of the problem right there. It would be the largest trade deal in history — involving countries stretching from Chile to Japan, representing 792 million people and accounting for 40 percent of the world economy – yet it’s been devised in secret.
Lobbyists from America’s biggest corporations and Wall Street’s biggest banks have been involved but not the American public. That’s a recipe for fatter profits and bigger paychecks at the top, but not a good deal for most of us, or even for most of the rest of the world.
First some background. We used to think about trade policy as a choice between “free trade” and “protectionism.” Free trade meant opening our borders to products made elsewhere. Protectionism meant putting up tariffs and quotas to keep them out.
In the decades after World War II, America chose free trade. The idea was that each country would specialize in goods it produced best and at least cost. That way, living standards would rise here and abroad. New jobs would be created to take the place of jobs that were lost. And communism would be contained.
For three decades, free trade worked. It was a win-win-win.
But in more recent decades the choice has become far more complicated and the payoff from trade agreements more skewed to those at the top.
Tariffs are already low. Negotiations now involve such things as intellectual property, financial regulations, labor laws, and rules for health, safety, and the environment.
It’s no longer free trade versus protectionism. Big corporations and Wall Street want some of both.
They want more international protection when it comes to their intellectual property and other assets. So they’ve been seeking trade rules that secure and extend their patents, trademarks, and copyrights abroad, and protect their global franchise agreements, securities, and loans.
But they want less protection of consumers, workers, small investors, and the environment, because these interfere with their profits. So they’ve been seeking trade rules that allow them to override these protections.
Not surprisingly for a deal that’s been drafted mostly by corporate and Wall Street lobbyists, the TPP provides exactly this mix.
What’s been leaked about it so far reveals, for example, that the pharmaceutical industry gets stronger patent protections, delaying cheaper generic versions of drugs. That will be a good deal for Big Pharma but not necessarily for the inhabitants of developing nations who won’t get certain life-saving drugs at a cost they can afford.
The TPP also gives global corporations an international tribunal of private attorneys, outside any nation’s legal system, who can order compensation for any “unjust expropriation” of foreign assets.
Even better for global companies, the tribunal can order compensation for any lost profits found to result from a nation’s regulations. Philip Morris is using a similar provision against Uruguay (the provision appears in a bilateral trade treaty between Uruguay and Switzerland), claiming that Uruguay’s strong anti-smoking regulations unfairly diminish the company’s profits.
Anyone believing the TPP is good for Americans take note: The foreign subsidiaries of U.S.-based corporations could just as easily challenge any U.S. government regulation they claim unfairly diminishes their profits – say, a regulation protecting American consumers from unsafe products or unhealthy foods, investors from fraudulent securities or predatory lending, workers from unsafe working conditions, taxpayers from another bailout of Wall Street, or the environment from toxic emissions.
The administration says the trade deal will boost U.S. exports in the fast-growing Pacific basin where the United States faces growing economic competition from China. The TPP is part of Obama’s strategy to contain China’s economic and strategic prowess.
Fine. But the deal will also allow American corporations to outsource even more jobs abroad.
In other words, the TPP is a Trojan horse in a global race to the bottom, giving big corporations and Wall Street banks a way to eliminate any and all laws and regulations that get in the way of their profits.
At a time when corporate profits are at record highs and the real median wage is lower than it’s been in four decades, most Americans need protection – not from international trade but from the political power of large corporations and Wall Street.
The Trans Pacific Partnership is the wrong remedy to the wrong problem. Any way you look at it, it’s just plain wrong.
Robert Reich, one of the nation’s leading experts on work and the economy, is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. Time Magazine has named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including his latest best-seller, Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future; The Work of Nations; Locked in the Cabinet; Supercapitalism; and his newest, Beyond Outrage. His syndicated columns, television appearances, and public radio commentaries reach millions of people each week. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, and Chairman of the citizen’s group Common Cause. His widely-read blog can be found at http://www.robertreich.org.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/01/07/why-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-pending-disaster (Robert Reich, CommonDreams, CC-BY-SA-3.0)[Emphasis our own].
Links that were embedded in the original Robert Reich-CommonDreams article: https://wikileaks.org/tpp-ip2/
http://www.citizen.org/documents/tpp-investment-fixes.pdf http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tppa-when-foreign-investors-sue-the-state/5357500 http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=15991
Article by Robert Reich which discusses dangers caused by cost-cutting in nuclear reactor construction: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/safety-on-the-cheap_b_836347.html
Related posts from last year: https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/secret-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp-environment-consolidated-text-and-our-comments/ https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/responsible-trade-program-trans-pacific-partnership-agreement/ https://miningawareness.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/japan-remains-hotbed-of-tpp-protest-as-u-s-tries-to-fast-track-trade-deal-crush-environmental-laws/
Philip Morris employs only 75,600 people worldwide? And how many do they kill?
“In 2007, PMI sold 831 billion cigarettes, or the biggest non-government tobacco company in the world by volume… With its Operations Center based in Lausanne, Switzerland, it owns 7 of the top 15 tobacco brands in the world and has a mix of international and local products, which are produced in more than 50 factories around the world. PMI employs 75,600 people worldwide“. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Morris_International
Note 1: The US “standard” of 1,200 Bq/kg is for Cs 134 plus Cs 137 only. Other radionuclides, whether tested or untested, increase the Becquerels found in the food. The US actually slightly exceeds the UN “standards”, which “only” allow for 1,000 Bq/kg of Cs 134 plus Cs 137 and several other radionuclides combined. These standards are actually supposed to be temporary and for only a portion of food intake, but apparently the food is not even tested unless it is suspected of exceeding the amount. Europe allows about half the amount of radiation in food allowed by the US. Europe had temporarily raised the amount allowed after Fukushima. There was great outrage and now it stands at 600 Bq/kg.