You are here:
Seasonal and spatial patterns in coupled nitrification-denitrification rates in a large Great Lakes coastal system: The St. Louis River Estuary
Bellinger, B., T. Jicha, L. Lehto, C. Elonen, L. Monson, Dave Bolgrien, M. Starry, AND B. Hill. Seasonal and spatial patterns in coupled nitrification-denitrification rates in a large Great Lakes coastal system: The St. Louis River Estuary. Presented at Society of Wetland Scientists, Duluth, MN, June 02 - 06, 2013.
Anthropogenic inputs of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic systems are detrimental, but aquatic plants and sediments have the potential to mitigate N-loading. Sediment processes are driven by microbially mediated N-cycling. Coastal embayments purportedly play a significant role in N-cycling, but few studies have quantified potential removal. In a July 2011 study of vegetated areas of the St. Louis River Estuary (SLRE), net nitrification rates averaged 116 mgN m-2 d-1. Spatially, rates were higher in the upper estuary, notably in wetlands of Spirit Lake. Conversely, unamended denitrification (DEN) rates increased downriver. Allouez Bay had highest rates (346 mgN m-2 d-1) compared with the upper estuary (4 mgN m-2 d-1). In a 2012 spatially and temporally comprehensive survey that largely excluded vegetated areas, system-wide rates of nitrification were more uniform across the estuary, but varied from May-September (82-211 mgN m-2 d-1). Conversely, denitrification rates declined significantly from May (80 mgN m-2 d-1) to September (18 mgN m-2 d-1). Highest DEN rates were observed in the lower SLRE (74 mgN m-2 d-1) relative to the upper estuary (<17 mgN m-2 d-1), as was seen in 2011. Between 2011 and 2012, DEN rates were greater in the lower SLRE, but were lower in the upper SLRE. For both years, greatest nitrification and DEN rates were observed in waters >1m deep. The entirety of the SLRE is functioning in N-processing, but areas nearest Lake Superior have greatest potential. Specifically, vegetated areas below Spirit Lake were hotspots of N-cycling in 2011; however, effects of the 2012 June flood cannot be discounted as confounding results.
Record Details:Record Type: DOCUMENT (PRESENTATION/SLIDE)
Organization:U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS RESEARCH LAB
MID-CONTINENT ECOLOGY DIVISION