one point to note is the big three
three totally different languages all for one purpose
to confuse you
1.english is the commonly spoken language of your country (we use this to understand each other)
the average person can understand english and would protect their rights and point of veiw
when i ask if you understand you will answer yes if you do and no if you dont.
2.legaleze is a registered language of the law society (why do they need their own language?)
why does the average person think when they hear legaleze think they can understand?
why does understand mean stand under in legaleze? and why are you being spoken to in a forien language in court?
its because you speek english that you think you know what understand means and you will usually say one word
3.ucc or universal comercial code, has a combination of english, legaleze and ucc code and depending on the venue can depend on what the
each of the words in the order they were written in OR
each of the words in the language they were written OR
weather or not the words are in capatil or lower case letters
you have to ask the question
if this is to be a fair process why are there so many variables to consider?
answer: if you were told in plain english "whats happining"
you would object to "whats happening" and demand a fair trial or court with jury members involved
and it to be held in english only.
a good anallogy is
i set up a society (allows me to own and design a language)
i make that language "sound similar" to what you speek
i make the words mean the "exact" opposite to what you interperate them to mean
any contract between two parties in ucc law is instantly in my favour as you only "think" you are hearing english
so you have unwitingly entered into a contract with me and given me the rights to rewrite the contract as i see fit
if this system was fair
there would be no "english sounding" forign languages in court
what you here is what you got=fair
this is for educational purposes only and not intended as legal advice
PLEASE be warned
the system does not take kindly to people challenging its legitimacy and anyone who tries is harshly punished and made an example of to "scare" any
others from challenging their power.
this is not a game if you do not want to provoke a monster
DONT POKE THE MONSTER WITH A STICK
the reason you only hear about the people who fail to get the process correct
is that way no one will try
truth is if enough people knew the truth
the public would demand a "common law" setting for their courts
that way they would not be subject to a contract negotiation in a forign language
where as soon as they stood up and said a word
(any word) they would not be subordinate to a contract they dont understand
an anology would be
on a ship the captain is judge jury and exocutioner
you have no rights of common law
what he says goes
so why do courts have docks?
why do courts have a bench?
why do courts act like you are on a boat and the judge is captain?
because under maritime law they are all powerful and you lack "standing"
on this boat (you are crew) and have to take orders from the captain (judge)
or the captain (judge) can do what he likes
most of the freeman stuff can be understood from the angle of standing
because without it you are just crew to be flogged
this anollogy is for educational purposes
for legal matters please consult an "lawer" in your state or country
it takes time and skill to negotiate the waters in a legal case when the boat your on is on the land
courts get their power from you
you have to be there but you dont have to stand or sit or answer questions (you WILL get it wrong )or understand
whats going on
i plan on "not understanding" every word spoken untill a complete written reference is supplyed of each word used and in what context and from which
language and from whos "standing"
in a jury trial it is the jourors who weild the power (captain) and have higher standing than the judge.
what ever they decide is binding (like a captain)
in a contract negotiation "UCC" all parties are equal in standing and a judge (has to follow the letter of the law of the code and canot deviate
from the code
there is great risk and reward with the process
i personally think education of people on the mass level instead of each person having to poke the monster
its broke educate and replace with common law
or the rich never face justice
and the poor never see justice
be careful what you wish for