What landscape aspects may have been important to Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus spp.) game farms during the Mid-20th Century in the United States?
Keywords:Game farms, Sylvilagus spp, Landscape Ecology
AbstractThe Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) was an iconic game species during the mid-20thcentury in the United States. Game farms were set up to produce additional cottontail numbers for hunting purposes; however, for various reasons, many game farms were unable to propagate the necessary additional numbers of cottontails needed. The purpose of this paper is to review the landscape factors involved and offer recommendations on the importance of a landscape perspective with the use of game farms under a historical mid-20th century perspective. The results of this paper show that areas with more regional spatial scales and more than one game farm reared more cottontails and harvested than the single county, single game farm scenarios and soil for plant growth, topography and relief, and edges and boundaries of landscapes were some of the main landscape attributes that could have been important for the historical cottontail game farms. Further research could examine the number of game farms, suggestions for plot number and size, and landscape barriers to disturbance in order to help mitigate threats to cottontail game populations.
Atzenhoefer D.R. 1951. Is it profitable to stock imported rabbits? Ohio Conserv. Bull., 15: 10-11.
Baumgras P.S. 1945. Swan Creek Wildlife Management Research Project. Pittman-Robertson Quarterly, 5: 99-103.
Beule J. 1947. Pennsylvania’s cottontail problem. Pennsylvania Game News, 18: 10-13.
Bolen E.G., Robinson W.L. 2003. Wildlife ecology and management. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, USA.
Boyd R.C., Henry J.J. 1991. Cottontail rabbit habitat use on Delaware wildlife area, Ohio. Ohio J. Sci., 91: 148-153.
Braun C.E., The Wildlife Society. 2005. Techniques for Wildlife Investigations and Management: Wildlife Soc., Bethesda, USA.
Bruna J.F. 1952. Kentucky rabbit investigations. Kentucky Division of Game and Fish. Frankfurt, USA.
Chapman J.A., Hockman J.G., Ojeda M.M. 1980. Sylvilagus floridanus. Mammalian Species, 136: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504055
Dell J. 1957. An evaluation of the results of stocking imported cottontail rabbits in New York State. New York Fish and Game J., 4: 121-149.
Dramstad W., Olson J.D., Forman R.T.T. 1996. Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Island Press. Washington D.C., USA.
Edminster F. 1949. Soil conservation districts- the answer to better farm game cover. Pennsylvania Game News, 20: 3-6, 30.
Edwards W.R., Eberhardt L. 1967. Estimating cottontail abundance from livetrapping Data. J. Wildl. Manage., 31: 87-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3798362
Friley C. 1955. A study of cottontail habitat preferences on a Southern Michigan farming area. Mich. Conserv. Dep. Final Report Pittman-Robertson Proj. W-48-R.
Gerstell R. 1935. Pennsylvania’s experiments in the propagation of cottontail rabbits. Trans. 21st Am. Game Conf. 21: 226-231.
Grant P.T. 1959. Experimental cottontail rabbit production. New Jersey Outdoors, 9: 7-12.
Guthrie W.A. 1969. Game stocking - does subsidizing nature pay? Virginia Wildlife, 30: 10-11.
Handley C.O. 1952. Stocking cottontail rabbits. West Virginia Conservation, 16: 18-19.
Hickie P.F., Whitlock S.C., Michigan Department of Conservation. 1940. Cottontails in Michigan: Game division, Michigan Department of Conservation.
Hiller C.A. 1932. Rearing cottontail rabbits for restocking purposes. Trans. 19th Am. Game Conf., 19: 314-319.
Lemke C. W. 1952. How can we produce more cottontails? Wisconsin Conservation Bulletin, 17: 22-25.
Linduska J.P. 1947. Longevity of some Michigan farm game mammals. J. Mammal., 28: 126-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/1375453
Mangold R. E., Peterman W. 1954. Study of the cottontail rabbit in Northern New Jersey. Pittman-Robertson Quarterly, 14: 278.
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Game. 1933. Annual Report - Division of Fisheries and Game: 1933. Boston, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Game. 1936. Annual Report. Boston, USA.
Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Game. 1937. Public documents of Massachusetts. Boston, USA.
McDowell R.D. 1955. Restocking with “native” cottontails. J. Wildl. Manage., 19: 61-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3797553
Money D.C. 1965. Climate, soils and vegetation. University Tutorial Press. London, UK.
New York Pittman-Robertson Project. 1950. Cottontail rabbit investigations. Albany, USA.
New Jersey Outdoors. 1962. Council highlights. New Jersey Outdoors, 13: 28.
New Jersey Outdoors. 1963. Lakehurst Station receives award. New Jersey Outdoors, 14: 23.
Ohio Division of Wildlife. 1972. Publication. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, 68: 1-10.
Pearcy R., Ehleringer J. 1984. Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ., 7: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1984.tb01194.x
Sheffer D. 1955. The Rabbit propagation study at Gywnnbrook State Game Farm. Modern Game Breeding and Hunting Club
News, 24-25, 8-9.
Sheffer D. 1957. Maryland studies of rabbit stocking. Maryland Conservationist, 34: 11-13.
Sheffer D. 1958. Maryland Studies of rabbit stocking. Maryland Conservationist, 35: 28-29.
Stuber J. 1938. Cottontail rabbit propagation. Trans. 3rd North Am. Wildlife Conf., 3: 651-658.
Studholme C.R. 1948. Pennsylvania’s cottontail rabbit management study. Pennsylvania Game News, 19: 10-11, 19.
White R.E. 2013. Principles and practice of soil science: the soil as a natural resource. Blackwell. Malden, USA.
Wilson K.A. 1946. State-wide plans for the propagation and management of the cottontail rabbit. Maryland Conservationist,
Copyright (c) 2022 Kelsey Gilcrease
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)".