continued from page 1B.
Laws or "A" Laws lead us directly
to Milo Wolff's concept, which in
Wolff's words is "a proposal that
was popular sixty years ago among the pioneers of quantum theory: namely
that matter consisted of wave structures in space. Thus, it was proposed
that matter substance, mass and charge, did not exist but were properties
of the wave structure. Wyle, Schroedinger, Clifford, and Einstein were
among those who believed that particles were a wave structure. Their
belief was consistent with quantum theory, since the mathematics of
quantum theory does not depend on the existence of particle substance or
charge substance. In short, they proposed that quantum waves are real and
mass/charge were mere appearances; 'Schaumkommen' in the words of
Schroedinger. The reality of quantum waves, as suggested by Cramer (1986),
supports the original concept of W. K. Clifford (1876) that all matter is
simply 'undulations in the fabric of space'."
renewal of interest in W. K. Clifford's concept now. Explanation
These simple "A" Laws show us that the abovementioned concept is probably
true. . These Aufbau (Construction) Laws or "A" Laws show us how an entire universe could be constructed
from nothing but spherical standing wave entities.
is consistent with Milo Wolff's
opinion as well because he shows that particles can be formed by scalar
quantum waves combining to form a standing wave
read Dan Fitzpatrick's e-book and
wrote, "This science is so interesting. . I can't get over the concept. .
It is as radical as it is elegant! . I'm sure my brain will now be
preoccupied with this for some time to come. . Good show! . Does anybody
know of more on this? . I'd like to see and read more of it. . I would
like to know how this flies in the community; what they think of it; what
they have to say about it."
So would I, tallyho. .. So
"Robert Dicke Explanation
was one scientist with all the tools, who knew and argued with Einstein,
but who specifically ruled out the correct answer because he listened to
his peers when he should have looked at the evidence that was all around
him. . This is a spin/orbit frequency, "tuned circuit" universe and
we are tuned to this wave universe much the same as a superheterodyne
radio. . All repelling forces can be seen as maximum space-time creations
exactly like a (high impedance)
parallel tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics 180 degrees out
of phase with each other. . All attractive forces, such as gravity, can be
viewed as a minimum of space-time creation overwhelmingly similar to a
(low impedance) series tuned
circuit with entities moving on geodesics in phase with each
Future super-computers, that will count the in phase vector
waves (minimum space-time creation) and out of phase vector waves (maximum
space-time creation) will be far superior to the tensor math of general
relativity and all of present quantum mechanics.
essentially what these "A" Laws do
now because they allow your mind to move completely out of your space-time
realm and into these other space-time realms. . String theory tells us about these extra dimensions and this new concept allows your mind to see things CORRECTLY: as 3-D and time
in every space-time realm." .
D. P. Fitzpatrick
Wolff says, "The dual particle/wave nature of the
electron has long been a paradox in physics. It is now seen that the
electron consists entirely of a structure of spherical waves whose
behavior creates their particle-like appearance. The correctness of this
structure is supported by the physical laws which originate from this wave
structure, including quantum theory, special relativity, electric force,
gravity, and magnetism. This type of structure is termed a Space
The Aufbau ("A") Laws show us that ALL permanent entities are also
space resonances (spherical standing waves). . Furthermore these Aufbau Laws show us that different
type entities are merely space resonances at different
Here's what this,
essentially, is all about:
Science depends on having
standard units of time, mass and length. . Einstein showed us,
unfortunately, that this standard was in trouble because these units
seemed to vary. . Fitzpatrick's 1966 Laws --- now the
"A" Laws show us the universe itself does indeed
standardize units of time, mass and length but only within
designated spin/orbit frequency parameters. . By also standardizing time,
mass and length at each spin/orbit frequency ---
instead of arbitrarily fixing the gauge --- future
super computers will be able to exactly copy this example and
mathematically unify the four fundamental forces to a precision undreamed
These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws keep things simple, therefore
they obey the principle of "Occam's Razor". Explanation .
Present science is anything but simple.
Fitzpatrick shows us that --- by using a
single reference frame view --- present science is forced into this
The Achilles heel of our present science is its
single, subset reference frame viewpoint. . While this simplifies the
math, it also obfuscates the correct frequency viewpoint.
"The victory of present science's mathematical achievements, using a
single reference frame, is a Pyrrhic victory because it has obscured the
very universal laws that enable us to easily see what is really going on
in this universe.".
reference frame idea would be fine providing all reference frames were
exactly the same but they are NOT. . They are only the same in
special situations where speed, mass and surroundings remain essentially
General Relativity has proven that when speed
and/or mass changes then the amount of space-time also changes and this
makes various different reference frames seem to act
differently --- sometimes quite differently.
And if you
insist on viewing everything ONLY from your own reference frame, as
present science insists on doing, then you most certainly will
not see how this entire universe is
In its present form this Aufbau concept is
like a slide rule that gives you a fast approximation of the same results
that general relativity gives you. . Not only that, but unbelievably, it
works in the microcosm as well as in the macrocosm. . It may turn out to
be as close to Einstein's unobtained unified field theory Explanation
as scientists will ever perfect. . It does indeed unify the four
fundamental forces. Explanation
extreme importance is the recently discovered ACCELERATION of this
expanding universe Explanation
and Einstein's "cosmological constant" Explanation
which this discovered acceleration necessitates. . Keep reading this web
page for Fitzpatrick's crystal
clear, SENSIBLE answer to this perplexing enigma.
science is correct if you want to view everything from a single reference
frame but present science does indeed restrict your view to a single,
subset reference frame. . These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws do
We've known, for almost a hundred years, that
in the microcosm, frequencies are of paramount importance. . These
easy to use Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws show us that this is a
frequency universe, not only in the microcosm but all
throughout this universe. . This is something we seem to have
Quantum scientists have learned that in
such a frequency universe you cannot quantize without
fixing the gauge. Explanation . The
rest of the scientific world, unfortunately, hasn't learned that
This means that the quantum scientists who say the
electron spin is different from the earth's spin are correct but not
entirely correct. . Motion in one gauge is not the same as motion in a
different gauge. . Present science fails to elucidate this correctly. .
Only these "A" Laws show you the
manner in which motion is gauge specific.
What you cannot quantize
without fixing the gauge. also means is that our view
of things from here, on this earth, is merely a subset view and all our
precious science laws are merely subset rules that only work within
certain parameters (gauge)
For instance, these Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws solve one of our biggest gravitational problems. .
They do this by showing us that our law of gravity is merely a subset rule
and that gravity will only be a constant force within certain parameters
(gauge) inside our Milky
Way galaxy. . More about this later.
Positive proof of the
validity of these Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws is the electron orientation in both sigma and pi types
of chemical bonding. (Read the FREE e-books.).
"A New Kind of
Science" Explanation is the name
of the latest & best selling science book written by theoretical
physicist Stephen Wolfram Explanation
. He claims, with future computers, we will find a simple & obvious
answer as to how this universe really works. But the present math and
science has been of little use in this quest. Stephen
Wolfram says we need "a New Kind
of Science ".
All things built with
Tinker Toys will have a certain symmetry of construction. . Things built
with Lego Blocks will have a different symmetry of construction. . Humans
live in a universe built essentially from point-sized quarks and
electrons. . We have discovered some aspects of this quark-electron
symmetry of construction and mistakenly labeled some of these subset rules
as universal laws. . Present science is really nothing more than the total
collection of all these subset rules and the sundry math methods matched
We can develop various types of math to match all
the various subset rules handed to us by our ancestors. . This is
precisely what modern day scientists have been busy
Because present science has made impressive
accomplishments, this old bureaucratic university system is seen as the
ultimate authority. . People --- even top scientists --- simply will not
question the supreme authority. . The evidence of how this universe really
works is all around us, yet few will question any old scientific beliefs.
. Few will look at any evidence contrary to established beliefs. . You
will see a good example of this as we look at the cause of magnetism
In the future, giant super computers will be set
up to work out exactly how all these spherical standing wave, point sized
quarks and electrons actually build our universe. . The frequency aspect
of it is so complicated that no human mind can possibly understand it. .
This is why Stephen Wolfram is
correct when he tells us that we will learn how everything works from
future super computers.
But NOW even before
these future, giant super computers arrive, these "A" Laws presently show us
exactly how and why this myriad mixture of waves produces
this universe that we see all around us.
Prevalent today is
our ancestor's view, in a slightly modified
form, that present science gives us from a single,
subset reference frame. . The view of present science is really only an
approximation of what's going on frequency wise. . It's a good enough
approximation if you don't want to look too far from your own reference
frame. . However, these "A" Laws,
will give you the best approximation if you want to view how things are
working in all the different TYPES of reference frames (different GAUGES) Explanation throughout this
Stop for a moment and think. . If this
universe is really a frequency universe all throughout, then we have yet
to find out what all these terms such as motion, distance, speed,
acceleration, larger and smaller really mean in terms of this frequency
Also you must only use these terms
such as motion, distance, speed, acceleration, larger and smaller within
one certain gauge because these terms are only good within certain
Stop once more and think
again. . If all the various particles in this universe are really
spherical standing waves (space resonances), as quantum science has proven, then we should see ways in
which all these spherical standing wave particles act similarly --- and we
do. . But you'll have to keep reading to find this.
for a third time and think about these waves because if everything however
small is made from waves then there can be no such thing as the smallest
particle and what you have instead is a universe composed of a frequency
spectrum of infinite span.
You will also have spherical
standing wave entities (space resonances) at regular intervals like keys on a piano with a keyboard
of infinite length.
Before you say NO to
this, you will find --- if you keep reading --- that if this is indeed
such an infinite frequency universe then all our present problems, handed
to us by our present science, get suitably solved.
this infinite frequency spectrum is this particular quark-electron
subharmonic frequency --- OUR WORLD --- from which we discern certain
spherical standing wave entities as solids. . But quantum mechanics has
shown they are really waves. . With this Aufbau Law or "A" Law concept you can easily visualize
these spherical standing wave entities (space
resonances) acting as BOTH waves and particles.
You will never understand how this entire
universe works unless you can see things as BOTH waves and particles. .
This new Aufbau Law or "A" Law
concept is the only method by which entities can be easily viewed as BOTH
waves and particles (space resonances). . Present science fails in this respect.
What both Stephen Wolfram and Daniel P. Fitzpatrick see is that our present science is nothing more than a vast
collection of subset rules matched to various types of math. . These two
scientists seem to be the very first people to realize that future super
computers, programmed with a completely revised "New
Kind of Science", will be the tools necessary for us
to get an accurate picture of what is really going on in this universe.
Yes, our present science gives us all
the math to tell us exactly how much attraction we are going to have with
magnetism or with gravity. . But present science fails to
tell us exactly why the spinning electron Explanation
gives us this invisible force of magnetism or why a preponderance of mass
gives this invisible force of gravity.
Your mind has two easy ways to view this
frequency universe. . Either the present science view from a single subset
reference frame or this "A" Law
view. . You lose things and gain things with both views.
These two views are entirely different, widely
divergent views. . But BOTH views are needed for the human mind to
properly understand this entire universe.
If Fitzpatrick's theory is right then all
binary stars of the same mass must have opposite spins from each other
with their closest sides going in the same direction (like gears
meshing and not clashing). None of the other stars,
according to Fitzpatrick's hypothesis, will be spinning this way with its closest
If I was an astronomer, with the very
latest spectrographic equipment, then I would most certainly be checking
this out now.
EINSTEIN'S MOST IMPORTANT DISCOVERY
not e=mc2 or Relativity
but it was something he
discovered about a year before he died:
In 1954 Einstein
Said: "I consider it quite possible that physics
cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous
structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air,
gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern
This is also the essense of what Fitzpatrick
is saying, "You cannot use Faraday's field
concept to unify the invisible forces. You must use Ampere's relative
motion concept, which turns out to be a phase relationship."
The words below are the final
words in Stephen Wolfram's 1,000 page, best selling book "A New Kind of
"Looking at the progress of science over the course
of history one might assume that it would only be a matter of time before
everything would somehow be predicted by science. But the Principle of
Computational Equivalence--and the phenomenon of computational
irreducibility--now shows that this will never happen.
always be details that can be reduced further--and that will allow science
to continue to show progress. But we now know that there are some
fundamental boundaries to science and knowledge.
And indeed in the
end the Principle of Computational Equivalence encapsulates both the
ultimate power and the ultimate weakness of science. For it implies that
all the wonders of our universe can in effect be captured by simple rules,
yet it shows that there can be no way to know all the consequences of
these rules, except in effect just to watch and see how they
Stephen Wolfram's basic premise -- all throughout
his massive book -- is that there are simple rules as to how this ENTIRE
says the very same thing plus he gives you these few, simple rules
predicted by Stephen Wolfram.
What you have, says Fitzpatrick, is a seemingly unlimited
spectrum of spinning, scalar, standing wave resonances, similar to the
meson resonances except these are stable. All of these spinning, scalar,
standing wave resonances have gyroscopic reaction and obey Ampere's
This is all you really need to build the universe you
see all around you.
This is an extremely simple universe providing
you look at it as a scalar, standing wave universe.
As Dr. Milo
Wolff showed, each electron is a scalar standing wave entity giving and
receiving energy to and from other surrounding electrons out to the Hubble
limit (a finite amount).
But each electron has spin, which IS also
scalar in respect to the TOTAL of the surrounding electrons but spin is
NOT scalar to individual electrons and therein lies the rub.
greater difference in TIME is simply more out of phase with the principal
scalar frequency and a greater distance (more space) is merely more out of
phase with the spin frequency.
Repulsive force equates with more
space just like the tensor math in GR.
Attractive force equates
with less space like the tensor math as well.
Believe it or not,
it is as simple as that.
Stephen Wolfram is absolutely right, it
There are two ways to view this universe
- Using our present science view obtained as everything is portrayed
in one frequency, spin/orbit, spacetime reference frame.
The advantage of using this present science method is that today's
math can be used for accurate answers providing you do keep within
certain parameters and do not venture into another frequency,
spin/orbit, spacetime realm (microcosm).
The disadvantage of this present science method is that by using this
method you are condemned to seeing 4 different fundamental forces
instead of seeing it all as one type of force.
- Viewing the various different frequency, spin/orbit reference frames
as if a type of motion existed in each of them.
(Using motion in the microcosm is far
superior to plus and minus charges and lines of force if you wish to see
the "big picture" approximation that Dirac
The advantage of using this method is that all forces can be seen
simply as one type of force. See Ampere's Universal
The disadvantage of this method is that no present math is available to
give us an accurate picture of things using this model.
Nobel prize winner Feynman understood the importance of using the
concept of motion for unification. Look
what he said about this in his famous QED
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Gravity Probe B is
now in orbit to determine what John
Wheeler calls "
Gravitomagnetism" . . A new force? . Einstein said it should be
simpler. . Believe it or not it is simple if you look at it the way Ampere
did. . I'll give you a much better way to understand what is really going
on in this universe. . But you will have to bear with me over a few rough
If you want a simple picture of how this
complicated universe is working then absolutely nothing gives you a better
model than Ampere's laws, that we'll look at.
Read this web page and it
will easily explain, to you, this rich theory where distances and
dimensions ". . .are not fixed concepts but fluid
entities that shift with our point of view".
Yes, this is a frequency or resonance universe much like that which Dr.
Milo Wolff is portraying but our concepts of distances and time will be
based entirely upon the spin/orbit frequencies of the particles from which
we are constructed.
Even the spacetime interval will change with the change to another
particle's spin/orbit frequency.
For instance, the spacetime interval represented by the constant
c in our realm, of the electron, will change to the spacetime
interval represented by the constant c2 in the realm of
the quark. .
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything greatly simplifies science. . Using
these simple Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws, you can actually understand how everything in
this universe works including special relativity (easiest to learn) and general
(hardest to learn).
Laws - that have many of the aspects of string
theory - give us the very first, simple,
understandable unified field answer because they see forces as spacetime
creations similar to general relativity.
* * * continued on page
3. * * *
CONTINUED on Page
Click above for Page 3.