"Result-oriented" refers to an individual or organization that focuses on the end rather than the process of producing a product or providing a service. Result-oriented people are concerned with achieving success, not with how they can benefit personally from it. They make decisions by considering how their actions will affect the outcome they want to achieve.
Other words used to describe result-oriented individuals are "goal-driven," "focused on outcomes," and "mindful of consequences." These people don't sit around thinking about every step they take; instead, they concentrate on the end goal and work hard to get there. When faced with multiple choices, result-oriented people pick the option that they believe will lead them toward what they want.
Often, these people receive praise for their determination and courage. However, if they fail to reach their goals, they may experience depression or anxiety because they put so much effort into everything they do.
The term "result-oriented" was first used in academic settings to describe students who were focused on obtaining high scores on exams rather than putting in the necessary study time. Today, this phrase is often used to describe people who are concerned with achieving positive outcomes instead of being distracted by the processes involved.
Results orientation is largely a mental condition that is founded on experimentation. However, being "results-oriented" entails learning from your failures and striving for ongoing development. To do this, you must test your ideas and solicit feedback in order to get the desired results!
People who are results-oriented believe that success depends on how well you execute your plans rather than simply believing they will succeed because they have good ideas. These individuals like to test their ideas by trying different methods and seeing what works best. They also like to learn from their mistakes and not make the same one twice.
Furthermore, people who are results-oriented don't feel satisfied with just getting by; they want to excel at something too! This drives them to continually try new things and explore different avenues as a means of improving their existing skills or developing new ones.
Finally, people who are results-oriented aren't afraid to admit when they are wrong. They will apologize and seek forgiveness from others if they have done something wrong, but will never shy away from criticism. This honesty is very important since it helps them improve themselves and avoid making the same mistake again.
Overall, being results-oriented means thinking about the outcome you want (rather than just doing what you think should be done), experimenting with different methods, learning from past experiences, and admitting your mistakes.
Results-based, results-oriented, outcome-oriented, results-driven, results-focused, outcomes-based, pragmatic.
Process-oriented individuals, as opposed to result-oriented people, push themselves to learn and earn on the fly. They learn from their failures and work not to attain targets but to ensure that they achieve those objectives far better than they have in the past. These individuals make decisions based on how to accomplish a task or complete a project instead of focusing on the end result alone.
Result-oriented people, on the other hand, focus on achieving specific targets or results. They are more concerned with what happens after they succeed at something than what happened while they were trying to achieve success. These individuals tend to make decisions based on what will get them the highest return on investment (such as hiring staff or purchasing equipment), rather than focusing on tasks or projects that may not be as profitable now but would help them reach their goals later on.
Both process-oriented and result-oriented people can lead successful lives if they know how to balance both types of thinking. The key is for them to understand that neither approach is right or wrong; it's just a matter of preference. Some days you might want to focus on processes and others you might want to focus on results, but being able to switch back and forth easily is important for any individual to thrive.
In a nutshell, results-oriented thinking is when you abandon logic and instead rely on the individual outcome of a decision to evaluate if your thought process was "correct" or "incorrect." Winning does not necessarily imply that your approach was correct. It could have been luck that led to your success.
Results-oriented thinking is common in individuals who play games such as blackjack, poker, and dice. These types of games are known as "risky," because you can lose money playing them. However, some players use this type of thinking to their advantage by trying to determine "luck" factors that may have contributed to them winning at certain points in time. For example, someone who consistently wins at poker might conclude that they are due for a loss sometime soon because they haven't won recently. This player's assumption is based on using results-oriented thinking; they believe that there must be a reason why they lost last time around so this has prompted them to exclude luck as a factor in determining future outcomes.
Players of skill levels will generally agree on what kind of hand should be played in any given situation. For example, two players holding A7 and K8 would probably agree that a straight is the best hand to have, so they would likely choose to bet on that fact and wait for their opponent to call.
The outcomes section of your research paper is where you report your study's conclusions based on the data acquired as a consequence of the technique [or methods] you used. The results section should simply present the facts, without prejudice or interpretation, and should be organized logically. The results section can be divided into three basic parts: an overview or summary, the analysis of the data, and the conclusion.
An overview or summary. In this part, you report general findings that are not related to any particular study participant. For example, you may report on the overall number of males and females in your sample, or you could summarize the age distribution, or the number and percentage of participants who owned a certain type of property. These are called "descriptive statistics" because they describe what proportion of the sample had each characteristic (male, female, young, old, etc.). You would also report any significant trends that may have emerged during the course of the study. For example, if more male than female respondents started fires by accident, this might indicate a problem with how well our collection method works for women.
The analysis of the data. In this part, you discuss the significance of the findings from a statistical point of view. For example, did all or most respondents agree on a particular factor that influenced how likely they were to start a fire? If so, then this factor has potential relevance for future campaigns targeting risk reduction.