Comets become the Planets and Moons.
Celestial Astronomy takes a completely different approach to explaining how Planets and Moons evolve in a Solar System. By describing the motion of Celestial bodies, Celestial Astronomy can chart a path from the beginning of the Solar System until the end and provide a systematic repeating pattern that explains the process by which each Planet and Moon's origination, evolution, and cessation took place.The main difference between Celestial Astronomy and legacy Astronomy is that legacy Astronomy tries to explain everything that is happening in space. From the closest objects to Earth, to the explanation for the whole Universe and everything in between, Astronomy seeks to answer it all. Celestial Astronomy takes the exact opposite approach. Step one is to explain the Earth and its closest neighbor the Moon, and their relationship with their parent Star the Sun.
Sort of like in school where you are required to learn 1 + 1 = 2 and A, B, C can spell CAB, Celestial Astronomy seeks to develop the core building blocks of understanding then describe what is going on in the Solar System and solve the equation for Earth and the Moon first. Legacy Astronomy randomly jumps around, trying to solve everything with little regard to a structure as to the reasoning, as if the community itself does not have a leader and a plan that must be implemented and checked to confirm its on track.
You might say that if you cannot even explain how the Earth got its Moon, how can you possibly know how the Universe started? You may have made some incorrect assumptions that you continue to build upon and the integrity of the frame of the structure may not actually be able to support all the additional pieces you are adding to it.
If you cannot add 1+1 and get 2 and you cannot spell CAB with ABC, how can you possibly claim you have a post-doctorate level understanding of something? Also, why would your post-doctorate level of understanding have not lead you to the same question somewhere along the way of developing that level of education?
Celestial Astronomy is also willing to start afresh and not necessarily rely on previous theories from historical figures in the Astronomic community. The concern is the further back in history you go the less technology, education, and information that was accurate and state of the art at the time and might or might not have been available to each individual. This may have allowed flawed results to have been introduced into the system. From there, further theories or hypotheses may have relied on those flawed results again producing a flawed framework or structure that the ongoing results rely upon.
Celestial Astronomy also takes the position that it should be easily explainable to even a child as to how the Planets and Moons evolve in the Solar System. Though it may not be technically accurate, there should be a parallel simplified explanation everyone can understand without being an Astronomer.
For example, a lot of children are taught that the Earth stays in orbit around the Sun similar to how a ball attached to a string makes a circle around you when you twirl it. Now that is not technically accurate, but it provides a basic understanding for someone who is interested in how it works. From there, the individual can decide if that is enough or do they need to learn more and be more technically accurate. Celestial Astronomy provides a pathway to learning with gradual levels of intensity and technical accuracy. Legacy Astronomy simply has two camps: those who claim to know but aren't sure and everyone else.
Celestial Astronomy is even willing to theorize that Extraterrestrials are involved in the design, creation, maintenance, and demolition of Star Systems, just like the way Earthlings build housing developments to live in and expand their societies into when they grow. Extraterrestrials would need Planets to live on and expand their societies into when they grow. There may be hidden clues in our Solar System that show their handy work right in front of our eyes. Though since legacy Astronomy will not acknowledge that possibility, they may be missing the key to explaining how the Planets and Moons evolve in a Solar System.One of the most obvious clues is that is says written right in the system with a porpheme.STAR = STARtsystemSUN = Seed UNiverseCOMET = beCOMe planETPLANET = PLAN ETMOON = MOor motiON
So we will keep a close eye on that as we look at how a Planet and Moon evolve in a Solar System.
Follow me on vocal media for more stories at: HumanoidExtraTerrestrialsLiveAmongUs.com