e., reporting contour when the noncontour stimulus was presented) for monkey L and 80% (5% misses and 15% false alarms) for monkey S. On each trial, the monkeys were presented with one out of two stimuli: a contour or noncontour image (Figure 1A), referred to as the contour and the noncontour conditions. The stimulus in the contour condition (Figure 1A, left panel) was composed from a circle contour of similarly oriented Gabor elements (n = 16) that were positioned along a circular path. The circle contour was embedded learn more in a noisy background (randomly oriented and positioned Gabors). Gabor width (2σ) was
0.25 degrees with mean distance of 0.75 degrees from center to center. The stimulus in the noncontour condition (Figure 1A, right panel) was obtained by changing the orientation of the circle Gabors to a random orientation (except for the C2 Gabor in which the orientation and position was identical). The contour and noncontour conditions were identical in terms of Gabor positions, differing only in the orientation of the circle Gabors. The effects of contour saliency on Romidepsin behavioral performance and population response were tested using another behavioral paradigm. In addition to the contour/noncontour stimuli, the monkeys were presented with five to seven stimuli in which the circle Gabors were rotated at increasing orientation jitter from the original circular
path contour (Figure 5A; the different jittering conditions: ±5,
10, 15, 17, 20, 25, 30 degrees). The orientation of the background Gabors was unchanged. To ascertain that the monkey reports the saliency of the contour in these experiments, we did the following. (1) In the contour/noncontour conditions, the monkeys were rewarded only if they made a saccade to the correct target. This way we verified that the animals could easily discriminate the contour from the noncontour in these experiments (the detection performance of the contour/noncontour conditions remained high for both monkeys: 94% and 82% for monkeys L and those S, respectively). (2) For the jittering conditions, the monkeys were rewarded for either saccade to the right or left target. Therefore, the animals’ decision was unbiased on the jittering conditions, and these trials were classified as contour detected or noncontour detected only according to the direction of the report saccade. Throughout the trial, the animal maintained tight fixation and analysis was done on trials where fixation maintained within ±1 degree. Eye position was monitored by an infrared eye tracker (Dr. Bouis Device, Kalsruhe, Germany), sampled at 1 kHz and recorded at 250 Hz. Two linked computers controlled the visual stimulation, data acquisition, and the monkey’s behavior (CORTEX software package). The protocol of data acquisition in VSDI has been described in detail elsewhere (Slovin et al., 2002).