- Joint Program Reprint
- Journal Article
Fires including peatland burning in Southeast Asia have become a major concern to the general public as well as governments in the region. This is because aerosols emitted from such fires can cause persistent haze events under certain weather conditions in downwind locations, degrading visibility and causing human health issues. In order to improve our understanding of the spatial-temporal coverage and influence of biomass burning aerosols in Southeast Asia, we have used surface visibility and particulate matter concentration observations, supplemented by decadal long (2003 to 2014) simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with a fire aerosol module, driven by high-resolution biomass burning emission inventories. We find that in the past decade, fire aerosols are responsible for nearly all the events with very low visibility (< 7km). Fire aerosols alone are also responsible for a substantial fraction of the low visibility events (visibility < 10 km) in the major metropolitan areas of Southeast Asia: up to 39% in Bangkok, 36% in Kuala Lumpur, and 34% in Singapore. Biomass burning in mainland Southeast Asia account for the largest contribution to total fire-produced PM2.5 in Bangkok (99%), while biomass burning in Sumatra is a major contributor to fire produced PM2.5 in Kuala Lumpur (50%) and Singapore (41%). To examine the general situation across the region, we have further defined and derived a new integrated metric for 50 cities of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): the Haze Exposure Day (HED), which measures the annual exposure days of these cities to low visibility (< 10 km) caused by particulate matter pollution. It is shown that HEDs have increased steadily in the past decade across cities with both high and low populations. Fire events alone are found to be responsible for up to about half of the total HEDs. Our results suggest that in order to improve the overall air quality in Southeast Asia, mitigation strategies targeting both biomass burning and fossil fuel burning sources need to be implemented.