Volume 19, Number 5—May 2013
Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus among Domesticated Animals, China
To investigate the infections of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) in domesticated animals, we sampled a total of 3,039 animals in 2 counties in Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China, from April to November 2011. SFTSV-specific antibodies were detected in 328 (69.5%) of 472 sheep, 509 (60.5%) of 842 cattle, 136 (37.9%) of 359 dogs, 26 (3.1%) of 839 pigs, and 250 (47.4%) of 527 chickens. SFTSV RNA was detected in all sampled animal species, but the prevalence was low, ranging from 1.7% to 5.3%. A cohort study in 38 sheep was conducted to determine when seroconversion to SFTSV occured. SFTSVs were isolated from sheep, cattle, and dogs and shared >95% sequence homology with human isolates from the same disease-endemic regions. These findings demonstrate that natural infections of SFTSV occur in several domesticated animal hosts in disease-endemic areas and that the virus has a wide host range.
Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) is a newly identified pathogenic member of the Phlebovirus species in the family Bunyaviridae, which in humans causes fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) (1). The common signs and symptoms of SFTS include high fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia, and multiorgan dysfunction with an average case-fatality rate of 10%–16%, according to the information system for disease control and prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC). In severe SFTS cases, neural symptoms, hemorrhages, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and multiorgan failure can occur and may result in death (2).
SFTS has been reported in at least 13 provinces in the central, eastern, and northeastern regions of the People’s Republic of China. Most patients are farmers living in wooded, hilly, or mountainous areas, and the epidemic season is from March through November, with the peak incidence usually in June and July (1). Although Haemophysalis longicornis ticks have been implicated as vectors of SFTSV (1,3), and high seroprevalence to SFTSV has been reported in goats (4,5), the host range of the virus has not been determined. The role of domesticated animals in the circulation and transmission of SFTSV remains unclear.
To assess the prevalence of SFTSV infections in domesticated animals, combined cross-sectional and cohort studies were conducted in Laizhou and Penglai in Shandong Province. This study area was selected on the basis of its high incidence of human SFTS cases in 2010 (Technical Appendix Figure 1 [PDF - 376 KB - 3 pages]). We report the detection of viral RNA and antibodies in sheep, cattle, dogs, pigs, and chickens. Our findings may provide valuable insights for understanding SFTSV ecology and transmission among animals and from animals to humans.
Study Design and Sample Collection
Animal sampling took place in Laizhou (119°33′–120°18′E, 36°59′–37°28′N) and Penglai (120°35′–121°09′E, 37°25′–37°50′N), Shandong Province, China. The most common domesticated animal species in the region include sheep, cattle, dogs, pigs, and chickens (Technical Appendix [PDF - 376 KB - 3 pages]). Animals of these species were sampled monthly in the villages where SFTS human cases were reported in 2010. Fifty to 100 animals of each species were sampled each month from April through November of 2011 and the serum samples were collected for detection of viral RNA, antibodies, and virus isolation. Goats were not surveyed because their populations are small in the sampling area.
Each sampled animal was marked with a unique label except for the pigs, which were sampled at the time of slaughter. Sampled animals were excluded in subsequent sampling events. In addition, to monitor new infections of SFTSV, a cohort of 38 sheep (Laizhou, n = 17; Penglai, n = 21) negative for SFTSV viral RNA and antibodies was established, and the animals were sampled every 10 days from June 20 through November 30. Serum samples were aliquoted and kept in cryovials in liquid nitrogen. Viral RNA and antibodies were first screened at the local CDC laboratories in Laizhou and Penglai, respectively, and the results were confirmed later in the national laboratory of China CDC. During the sampling period, serum samples from new SFTS patients in the study region in 2011 were also collected for virus isolation and genetic analysis.
Antibodies in sheep, cattle, dogs, pigs, and chickens against SFTSV were detected by using a double-antigen sandwich ELISA described previously (6). In brief, a His-tagged affinity chromatography purified recombinant nucleocapsid (N) protein of SFTSV (strain HB29) expressed in Escherichia coli was used as the coating antigen for 96-well plates, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated antigen was used for detection. Serum samples obtained from 46 sheep, 55 cattle, 30 dogs, 55 pigs, and 50 chickens originating from either Beijing or Hebei provinces, where no human SFTS cases had been reported, were used as negative controls, and convalescent-phase SFTS patient serum samples were used as positive controls. All serum samples including negative controls were tested at a dilution of 1:10. After 96-well plates were coated with purified N protein (0.2 μg/well), serum samples were added, followed by HRP-conjugated N protein. TMB peroxidase substrate (3,3′,5,5′tetramethylbenzidine and hydrogen peroxide [H2O2]) was used for color development, and substrate conversion was measured by using a DTX 880 multimode detector (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) with an incidence wavelength of 450 nm and a reference wavelength of 620 nm.
Each sample was tested in triplicate within the same test run and mean optical density (OD) values for each sample were converted to a percentage of the positive control (PP) values by using the following equation: (mean of net OD of test sample/mean of net OD of positive control) × 100. The PP value frequency distribution resulting from analyses of serum samples from control animals was determined to be normal by using the χ2 goodness-of-fit test. Cutoff values were determined by adding 3 × SD to the mean of the PP values obtained from analyses of negative control serum samples. The resulted cutoff values were 15.6, 15.3, 14.4, 13.7, and 14.2 for sheep, cattle, dog, pig, and chicken serum samples, respectively. A sample was considered positive if the PP value was above the cutoff threshold. For the detection of antibodies in a dog that was found positive with viral RNA in the blood, an indirect IgG ELISA was used. Briefly, the plate was coated with purified N protein as described, 2-fold dilutions of the serum samples were added, followed by HRP-conjugated anti-dog IgG (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA). Cutoff values for the assay were determined by adding 3 × SD to the mean of OD values resulting from analyses of negative control serum samples from non-infected dogs. Endpoint titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of the serum samples.
A microneutralization assay was performed to detect neutralizing antibodies against SFTSV as described (1). Serial dilutions of sheep serum samples collected at various time points were mixed with an equal volume of 100 50% tissue culture infective doses of SFTSV (strain HB29), and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h. The mixture was then added to cultured Vero cells in a 96-well plate in quadruplicate. The plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 7 days. Viral infection was assessed by an immunofluorescence assay with mouse polyclonal antibodies against SFTSV. End-point titers were expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of the serum that prevented infection.
TaqMan Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription–PCR
A TaqMan quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on all animal serum samples by using a certified real-time RT-PCR kit for clinical diagnosis (SFDA registration no. 340166, China). This kit targets the small segment of SFTSV, with 98.6% sensitivity and 99.1% specificity as described (7). Viral RNA copy numbers were determined from amplification of a standard curve of positive control RNA, and the cutoff cycle threshold (Ct) value for a positive reaction was set at 35 cycles. The detection limit for this kit is 50 RNA copies (5 μL/test) or 10 copies/μL. A result was considered positive if a sample had a Ct value below the cutoff.
Virus Isolation and Sequence Analysis
Serum samples collected from animals or SFTS patients in acute phase, newly occurred in the study region in 2011, were inoculated onto monolayers of Vero cells for virus isolation as described (1). Cells were cultured at 37°C in an incubator supplied with 5% CO2 with media changes done twice per week. The isolated virus was sequenced and subjected to phylogenetic analysis by using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA version 5 (8), and compared with previous published viral sequences of SFTSV strains isolated from 11 SFTS patients and H. longicornis ticks in 2010 (1,3).
The rates of SFTSV RNA and antibody detection in Penglai and Laizhou were calculated monthly by animal species, and the statistical significance was analyzed by using either the Pearson χ2 or continuity correction χ2 test. Analyses were performed by using the SPSS software version 16.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Viral RNA copies among animal species were analyzed by using the Kruskal–Wallis test, performed by using GraphPad Prism software (ver. 5.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
According to the medical research regulation of the ministry of health, all studies involved in human samples were reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of China CDC, which uses international guidelines to ensure confidentiality, anonymity, and informed consent. Written informed consent was provided by the patients. The protocols for animal sampling have been approved by the animal care committee of China CDC.
SFTSV Infection in Domesticated Animals by Month
We sampled 472 sheep, 842 cattle, 359 dogs, 839 pigs, and 527 chickens in Laizhou and Penglai counties to assess the prevalence of SFTSV RNA and antibodies. Our results showed that 3.8% (18/472) of sheep, 4.2% (35/842) of cattle, 5.3% (19/359) of dogs, 2.6% (22/839) of pigs, and 1.7% (9/527) of chickens were viral RNA-positive (Table). The monthly positive rates of viral RNA in sampled animals varied from April to November, ranging from 2% (n = 51) to 12.7% (n = 55) in sheep, 2.1% (n = 51) to 13.2% (n = 53) in cattle, 0 (n = 53) to 12.5% (n = 40) in dogs, 0 (n = 51) to 19.1% (n = 47) in pigs, and 0 (n = 40) to 13.5% (n = 37) in chickens, in which n is referred as to denominator of all animals sampled in that month (Figure 1). Although the overall positive rates for SFTSV varied between the 2 counties, the variance was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The median RNA concentration was 2.0 × 104 copies/mL (95% CI: 1.6–2.6 × 104) in sheep; 2.0 × 104 copies/mL (95% CI: 1.5–2.9 × 104) in cattle; 2.1 × 104 copies/mL (95% CI: 0.96–4.7 × 104) in dogs; 1.7 × 104 copies/mL (95% CI: 1.4–2.1 × 104) in pigs; and 1.7 × 104 copies/mL (95% CI: 1.0–2.7 × 104) in chickens (Technical Appendix Figure 2 [PDF - 376 KB - 3 pages]), and the differences among the studied animal species were not statistically significant (p = 0.87) (Technical Appendix Figure 2 [PDF - 376 KB - 3 pages]).
Viral antibody prevalence was significantly higher (p<0.005) in sheep (69.5%, 328/472), cattle (60.4%, 509/ 842), dogs (37.9%, 136/359), and chickens (47.4%, 250/527) than in pigs (3.1%, 26/839) (Table; Technical Appendix Figure 3 [PDF - 376 KB - 3 pages]). As shown in Figure 2, monthly positive rates of antibodies in sheep varied from 30% (n = 30) to 80.4% (n = 51) in Laizhou County, and 48% (n = 50) to 100% (n = 82) in Penglai County during the sampling period; monthly positive rates in cattle varied from 37.5.3% (n = 48) to 66.3% (n = 80) in Laizhou, and from 31.3% (n = 48) to 78.7% (n = 87) in Penglai. In dogs, monthly positive rates ranged from 34.2% (n = 41) to 42.6% (n = 47) in the 2 regions, and the variation between sampling months was not statistically significant. Seroprevalence in pigs was low, and SFTSV antibodies were not detected in pig serum samples collected in August and September (n = 181). Monthly seroprevalence ranged from 28% (n = 25) to 72.7% (n = 44) in chickens in the regions.
SFTSV Infection in a Cohort of 38 Sheep
In addition to the 472 sheep described above, a cohort of 38 sheep was monitored for SFTSV seroconversion during a 6-month period. As shown in Figure 3, seroconversion occurred in the cohort during the surveillance period, with an increasing seroprevalence that peaked at 76.5% (n = 17) in Laizhou and 100% (n = 21) in Penglai in November. In this cohort, 17 sheep were viral RNA positive either once or twice (6/17) over the sampling period. Viral RNA was mainly detected in August and September, and serum virus RNA quantities ranged from 104 copies/mL to 1.7 × 105 copies/mL (Sheep PKG-13). In 5 sheep, viral RNA appeared before seoconversion; but in 2 sheep (PSL-15, LHJ-19), viral RNA and SFTSV antibodies were detected on the same sampling day. In 10 of 17 sheep, viral RNA was detected once or twice after seroconversion (Figure 4).
Neutralizing antibody levels were also measured in 17 sheep serum samples on day 1 (June 21) and on the day when viral RNA was first detected, and again at a later stage (October 20). All tested samples were negative for neutralizing antibodies on day 1 but were positive at later times (Figure 4). No visible clinical signs of infection were detected in the cohort of sheep over the testing period regardless of antigen or antibody status.
Course of SFTS Virus Infection in a Dog
During the testing, we found 1 dog with a high viral RNA load (1.7 × 107 copies/mL) and no antibodies. The dog was isolated, examined, and sampled daily from day 8 through day 22 and a sampled once more on day 90 (Figure 5). This dog had detectable viral RNA on days 8 and 10; levels declined thereafter, and levels were undetectable levels on day 12. Concurrently, SFTSV IgG titers reached 1:2,560 on day 10 and remained at that level through day 90. No signs of illness were observed during the entire period of isolation.
Virus Isolation and Sequence Analysis
Virus isolation was attempted on all viral RNA–positive serum samples (n = 103), but isolates were successfully obtained from only 1 sheep (Laizhou), 1 cattle (Laizhou), and 1 dog (Penglai), named SDLZSheep01/2011, SDLZCattle05/2011, and SDPLDog01/2011, respectively. In addition, 10 viral isolates were obtained from SFTS patient serum samples collected in 2011, 9 were from Laizhou (SDLZP01–09/2011) and 1 was from Penglai (SDPL01/2011). Phylogenetic analysis of the S segment of these SFTSV isolates indicated that the viral isolates from sheep, cattle, and dog are genetically close to the 10 SFTS patient-derived isolates in 2011 from the study areas and also to the previous published sequences of viral isolates from 11 SFTS patients reported in 2010 in 6 provinces and H. longicornis obtained in 2010 in Laizhou (Figure 6). Pairwise distances analysis showed that all sequences of the isolates from domesticated animals, human patients, and H. longicornis shared more than 95% identity, which demonstrated a close evolutionary relationship among those SFTSV isolates from domesticated animals, ticks, and SFTS patients.
In our study of >3,000 serum samples collected from 5 species of domesticated animals in 2 SFTS-endemic counties of Shandong Province, we provided evidence of natural infection and circulation of SFTSV in these animals. We found especially high (>60%) seropositivity of SFTSV-specific antibodies in sampled sheep and cattle, while almost one-half of chickens and one third of dogs tested were seropositive. We detected SFTSV RNA in all 5 species of domesticated animals at a level ranging from 1.7% to 5.3%. A cohort study with 38 sheep and a follow-up study of an infected dog provided insights into the kinetics of natural SFTSV infections in these species. Moreover, the isolation of SFTSV from a sheep, cattle, and a dog provided evidence of SFTSV viremia in domesticated animals.
A previous study in Yiyuan County, Shandong Province, showed a high seroprevalence in goats (83%) (4), and another serosurvey of domesticated animals conducted in Jiangsu Province found SFTSV antibody– positive rates of 57% in goats, 32% in cattle, 6% in dogs, 5% in pigs, and 1% in chickens but no antibodies in geese and mice (5). Our investigation, conducted in 2 other SFTS-endemic regions in China (Technical Appendix Figure 1 [PDF - 376 KB - 3 pages]), demonstrates a high seroprevalence of SFTSV in sheep (69.5%), cattle (60.4%), dogs (37.9%), and chickens (47.4%), but low rates in pigs (3.1%). Results of seroprevalence of SFTSV infection were consistent and especially high in goats and sheep but low in pigs in these studies. However, our data showed a higher seropositivity of SFTSV-specific antibodies in cattle, dogs, and chickens than the previous report in Jiangsu Province.
In addition, we also found that the SFTSV RNA was detected in all sampled animal species, but the prevalence was low, ranging from 1.7% to 5.3%, which indicates the potential viremia in these animals. The differences in the rates of SFTSV infections among various animal species and regions were statistically significant, perhaps because of varying degrees of exposure to virus-infected ticks or differences in host susceptibility to SFTSV infection. The sheep and cattle in our study regions were grazed on pastures or hills during the day and kept in household backyards at night; the dogs and chickens roamed freely in fields. Pigs were the only animals that did not roam freely. We found that the animals in this study, particularly the sheep and cattle, were heavily infested with ticks. H. longicornis, which has been implicated as a vector of SFTSV, is the dominant tick species in these areas. SFTSV RNA had been detected by using a method of real-time RT-PCR from H. longicornis ticks collected from grass, cattle, and sheep with a detection rate of ≈2% in disease-endemic areas in previous studies (3,9), and a viral isolate was obtained from H. longicornis ticks on sheep from the same study area of Laizhou in 2010 (3). Phylogenetic analysis of the virus isolates obtained from the sheep, cattle, and dog in this study and from H. longicornis ticks in our previous study (3) showed >95% homology with SFTSV isolates obtained from patients from the same region, which suggests a potential link of SFTSV infections among humans, domesticated animals, and ticks.
Infective virus, a competent insect vector, and susceptible vertebrate hosts must coexist to establish and maintain arbovirus transmission cycles (10). Threshold viremia levels of 102.0–4.7 50% lethal dose/mL have been reported as sufficient for the infection of ticks with Colorado tick fever virus, Russian spring-summer encephalitis virus, and louping ill virus (11–14). In our study, we detected viral RNA in all domesticated animal species examined, although the viral RNA copy numbers were low (<105 copies/mL). The individual dog in which the clinical course of infection was followed showed a course of acute infection typical of a bunyavirus infection, including the stages of viremia and antibody response. Successful isolation of SFTSV from a sheep, cattle, and a dog confirms the occurrence of SFTSV viremia in these domesticated animals. However, only 3 isolates were obtained from 103 SFTSV RNA–positive serum samples, which may indicate that most infected domesticated animals might have either a low level of viremia, a short period of viremia, or that few infectious virions might be present under the condition of high level of serum antibodies.
During the cohort study of 38 sheep, seroconversion was observed, indicating ongoing circulation of SFTSV in the endemic areas. In 17 of 38 sheep, neutralizing antibodies were observed in the viral RNA in the blood. Although more evidence is needed to illustrate the underlying mechanisms, this case is not the only case of Bunyaviradae virus infection. A persistent infection of hantavirus can be established in the rodent reservoir, lasting several months or years with high titers of neutralizing antibodies in the serum (15,16). Persistent infection of SFTSV in animals has not been shown to date, and a more sensitive nucleotide acid detection method may help to define whether SFTSV infection is prolonged in domestic animals. However, the evidence suggests that SFTSV is circulating among animals and between animals and humans in the endemic areas.
The results of this study are subject to several limitations. First, only 3 viral isolates (1 from each animal species) were obtained and sequenced, which limits the ability to generalize the representativeness of SFTS viral diversity in these areas. Second, SFTSV infections in ticks on animals were not systematically studied to evaluate their relation to SFTSV-infected status or with seroconversion of studied animals, which makes it difficult to associate the infection of SFTSV in ticks directly with that in animals and human patients. Third, we cannot determine whether the virus is pathogenic to the domesticated animals in this study because no adequate examinations have been taken place.
In conclusion, we have provided evidence to show that SFTSV is circulating among several species of domesticated animals and between animals and humans in disease-endemic areas of China. The domesticated animals with high infection rates of SFTSV may act as amplifying hosts for the virus during the epidemic season. More studies are needed to elucidate the SFTSV transmission model in nature, which includes determining the duration of viremia levels and the possibility of persistent infection in each animal species, potential reservoirs, and links of SFTSV infections among humans and domesticated animals. These findings will help formulate effective measures for containing the infection of this emerging pathogen.
Mr Niu is a PhD candidate under the supervision of Dexin Li, in the National Institute for Viral Diseases Control and Prevention, China CDC. His research interest is focused on epidemiologic investigation of SFTSV infections in animal hosts.
We are grateful to those who assisted in collecting blood samples from SFTSV-endemic and -nonendemic areas. We also thank Carol J. Cardona for reviewing and revising the manuscript.
This work was mainly supported by the China Mega-Project for Infectious Diseases (2011ZX10004-001) by the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health, and Mount Tai Scholarship of Shandong Province (D.L.). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
- Yu XJ, Liang MF, Zhang SY, Liu Y, Li JD, Sun YL, Fever with thrombocytopenia associated with a novel bunyavirus in China. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1523–32 and.
- Gai Z, Liang M, Ying Z, Zhang S, Jin C, Wang S, Person to person transmission of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome bunyavirus through blood contact. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:249–52 and.
- Jiang XL, Wang XJ, Li JD, Ding SJ, Zhang QF, Qu J, Isolation, identification and characterization of SFTS bunyavirus from ticks collected on the surface of domestic animals [in Chinese]. Bing Du Xue Bao. 2012;28:252–7.
- Zhao L, Zhai S, Wen H, Cui F, Chi Y, Wang L, Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus, Shandong Province, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012:18:963–95. PMID:22608264 .
- Zhang WS, Zeng XY, Zhou MH, Jiao YJ, Wen T, Guo XL, Seroepidemiology of severe fever with thrombocytopeia syndrome bunyavirus in Jiansu Province [in Chinese]. Dis Surveill. 2011;26:676–8.
- Jiao Y, Zeng X, Guo X, Qi X, Zhang X, Shi Z, Preparation and evaluation of recombinant severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus nucleocapsid protein for detection of total antibodies in human and animal sera by double-antigen sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:372–7 and.
- Sun Y, Liang M, Qu J, Jin C, Zhang Q, Li J, Early diagnosis of novel SFTS bunyavirus infection by quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay. J Clin Virol. 2012;53:48–53 and.
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9 and.
- Liu L, Guan XH, Xing XS, Shen XF, Xu JQ, Yue JL, Epidemiologic analysis on severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Hubei province, 2010. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2012;33:168–72 .
- Pfeffer M, Dobler G. Emergence of zoonotic arboviruses by animal trade and migration. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:35.
- Rehacek J. Development of animal viruses and rickettsia in ticks and mites. Annu Rev Entomol. 1965;10:1–24.
- Burgdorfer W, Varma M. Trans-stadial and transovarial development of disease agents in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol. 1967;12:347–76 and.
- Beasley S, Campbell J, Reid H. Threshold problems in infection of Ixodes ricinus with the virus of louping ill. In: Wilde J, editor. Tick borne diseases and their vectors. Edinburgh: Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine; 1978. p. 497–500.
- Shepherd AJ, Swanepoel R, Shepherd SP, Leman PA, Mathee O. Viraemic transmission of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus to ticks. Epidemiol Infect. 1991;106:373–82 and.
- Schmaljohn CS, Hooper JW. Bunyaviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, editors.Fields Virology. 4 edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 1581–602.
- Feuer R, Boone JD, Netski D, Morzunov SP, St. Jeor SC. Temporal and spatial analysis of Sin Nombre virus quasispecies in naturally infected rodents. J Virol. 1999;73:9544–54 .
Suggested citation for this article: Niu G, Li J, Liang M, Jiang X, Jiang M, Yin H, et al. Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus among domesticated animals, China. Emerg Infect Dis. [Internet] 2013 May [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1905.120245
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Comments to the Authors
Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.
- Page created: April 03, 2013
- Page last updated: April 23, 2013
- Page last reviewed: April 23, 2013
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)