The folllowing sample essay on Patrick Henery discusses it in detail, offering basic facts and pros and cons associated with it. To read the essay’s introduction, body and conclusion, scroll down.
Jonathan Edwards established the Puritan faith. Both of these powerful men have Influenced the outcome of America, one way or another. Mr.. Henry strives to convince his fellow congressmen to step out of their comfort zone, accept reality and fight for the American values. Mr.. Edwards on the other hand shook the listeners with vivid descriptions and gruesome details of the punishments of the nonbelievers.
Though they talked in different time periods and manipulated a different audience, they were successful in their own way.
Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards used different techniques to convey their message. Henry reverted to logic, and Edwards focused on emotions, when talking to the people. At the time of Patrick speech and Jonathan sermons the communities of America were very religious base. Children learned to read by reciting the bible.
In many cities people were expected to attend church on Sunday and refrain from doing other work. Both men had different purposes but they had to shape their talks according to the society. In his speech, Mr.. Henry makes countless mentions of God.
Is a Just God of nature who presides over the destines f nations and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for (Henry 205). Also, if we make proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power?C,-‘?ј (Henry 205).
At one point he even asks God for help. It, Almighty God! I know not what course others may (Henry 206). Patrick also praises God here, of an act of disloyalty toward the Majestic of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings? (Henry 203). Jonathan talks are mainly about God and religion, however, John takes a different perspective.
Mr.. Edwards describes God. He paints an image of God in people minds. Instead of using godly terminology like Patrick Henry to win the interest, Jonathan Edwards associates powerful words with God, like; omnipotent, sovereign, wrath, fury, and destruction (Edwards 102-03). He strikes fear into the hearts of the people by telling them that power Is unlimited and his anger Is uncontrollable. These two magnificent men have their own stratagems (unit 4) of conveying their message. When Patrick Henry starts his speech, he begins by complimenting his audience.
In this way Henry is able to capture their attention and interest. Well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed this Henry 203). Jonathan Edwards on the other hand start his sermon with a slap on the face. Is the case of every one of you that are out of Christ: That world of misery, that lake of burning brimstone, Is extended abroad under you?c,-. ?CLC (Edwards 102). He Is straightforward. Edwards openly states that anyone outside the Puritan belief better prepare himself for the flames of the wrath of god?CҐ,-?D (Edwards 102).
In this way he scares the daydreams out of the people? mind and can work with the full attention of the audience. Both Henry and Edwards wanted the same outcome of their talks. They both wanted the listeners to go home and think about the things they had heard, and based their choice on those Ks Henry Ana towards were along WI TN Deterrent audiences Ana teen Ana to take different methods to appeal to the people. Mr.. Henry, who had an educated and decision making audience, used analytic logic to convince his listeners.
He asks his audience, fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and (Henry 204). Henry uses logic again, when he accurately describes the frustration of the people. He acknowledges all of the peaceful efforts to gain some consideration in British Parliament or at least have fair reattempt. We try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years?C,-1?0 (Henry 204). With the use of his reason and some tactical wording Henry persuades the people that it is now time to take aggressive action against the suppressing mother country. Is no longer any room for hope. ? which we have pledged ourselves over never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained-we must (Henry 205). Jonathan Edwards who had a different audience took a much unique approach. He used fear to hammer his message into the mind of his listeners. To create his mood Edwards seed nefarious (unit 3) words and phrases, like pit of glowing as lead, and to tend downwards with great weight and pressure towards your destruction would come like a being made drunk with your ? are crying in extreme misery and perfect ? wrath and infinite and finally, have reason to wonder that you are not already in hell. ? (Edwards 102-06). Also Edwards tries very vigorously in trying to paint a vivid picture of Hell and wrath. Is gaping for them, the flames gather and flash about them, and would fain lay hold of them and swallow them (Edwards 102). Jonathan wants to harness the emotions. He wants them to sit straight on the bench; he wants all eyes and ears on him. Edwards wants the people to walk out of service that day while reconsidering their sinful deeds. Both men wanted a change.
One was unhappy with the government system, and the other disliked the religious genuineness. If one wants a change then they want to fix the mistakes or the errors of that system. Patrick Henry pointed out faults in government system, rather than pointing out the faults of the people in the government. We shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called back to win our Henry 204). Jonathan Edwards mercilessly dove into the core of the problem. He openly decried (unit 3) lives. Mr.. Edwards was not afraid to rip someone apart. Re ten thousand times more abominable in his eyes, than the most venomous serpent in ours?C,-1?: . ?C,-1?0 (Edwards 104) These two extraordinary men were able to annex their audience. On of their techniques was the usage of literary elements. Patrick Henry used the rhetorical question. He wanted his listeners to think while he spoke. This the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for (Henry 204). This kept his listeners interested. Jonathan Edwards keeps his audience with the use of metaphor.
This way, his listeners were able to relate to something they knew and put it in equation. Is of purer eyes than to bear to have you In Nils slang; you are ten ottomans tales more damnable In Nils eyes, tan ten most hateful venomous serpent is in . ?C,-1?0 (Edwards 104). In conclusion, Patrick Henry and Jonathan Edwards used a variety of different techniques to convey their message. They were working with different people but each man personalized his sermon in a unique way to fit with the audience.