As nations continue to argue over CO2 emissions limits at the ongoing climate talks in Mexico, you might ask: what difference can each of us make? Compared to the pledges being traded by our countries, our own efforts can seem insignificant. But they’re not – they’re the first small steps in a long journey, as the scientists I’ve been asking to explain climate change this year have highlighted.
And, as we seek to move nearer to a safe climate, one option is to alter our behaviour to reduce our individual carbon footprints. Barry Sinervo suggests we cycle instead of driving, and Jessica Blois says we could drive more fuel efficient cars and drive less, and reduce how much petrol we burn. As well as how far we travel, the distance the goods we buy travel has an impact on CO2 emissions. Consequently some of my interviewees recommend buying locally-grown food, for example, although this is not necessarily the greenest option if it involves growing food in climate-controlled buildings.
Some, like Louis Codispoti, question whether we need to buy as much as we do at all, and hence whether the energy needed to produce what we buy is well used. How we get our electricity is also important, so Walter Immerzeel recommends we try and choose suppliers that use as much renewable energy as possible. Ove Hoegh-Guldberg has put solar panels on his roof for the same reason.
Another option is to improve how efficient our electrical devices are, so that they use less power, cutting how much coal is burnt, so Kevin Trenberth also uses energy-efficient light bulbs and makes sure his other electrical goods are as efficient as possible. Insulating your house and taking other measures to reduce your power bills will also help reduce your carbon footprint, the researchers note.
However, focussing too much on either changing our behaviour or using more efficient technology could be counter-productive, Shahzeen Attari and Jens Borken-Kleefeld warn. That’s because our willpower is not always strong enough to consistently stick to behaviour changes, and people tend to use more efficient products more than less efficient ones, balancing out the potential energy saving. Consequently, it’s important both to have efficient products and to limit their use. Attari also suggested a list of actions that we can use in order to make sure we’ve taken the most effective steps to cut our energy consumption.
The political sphere that feeds into climate negotiations is not completely closed to us, however. As Joeri Rogelj recommends, we can all use our votes to try and get parties that will tackle climate change into power in all of our countries. And we can clearly get more from our politicians. Despite the confusing squabbles over percentage CO2 emission cuts currently dominating the agenda in Cancún scientists have shown that it is feasible to completely kick the carbon habit by 2030. Perhaps we should all make a resolution for 2011 to make the politicians representing our regions aware of that, and encourage them to strive for it.
- Also, as we look forward to 2011, don’t forget to vote in the Simple Climate end of year poll!