||Vitamin C Improves Tooth Cleanliness|
|Teeth and Vitamins
|The Case of the Invisible
Toothbrush: Why Some People Can Brush Less
by E. Cheraskin, M.D., D.M.D.
Park Tower 904/906, 2717 Highland Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35205-1725.
(Reprinted with permission from the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine Vol. 8, No. 3, 1993)
* The principal site for chronic disease is the mouth ... even in this day an age, 95% of the civilized population suffers with tooth decay and/or periodontal disease.
* Judged by our current successes/failures, the present explanations and solutions are filled with contradictions (i.e. more brushing and flossing doesn't necessarily guarantee less disease).
* Maybe ... just maybe ... this is all because we haven't heeded the counsel of the experts.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) (1) and other authorities, as we shall learn, argue that oral pathosis is a multifactorial problem. They identify three essential ingredients: (1) a critical microbial population, (2) an appropriate diet, and (3) a susceptible state (Figure 1). (Incidentally, other buzzwords are available such as resistance, tissue tolerance, internal milieu, coping systems, immunity, and homeostasis). And, by the way, this same chart is just as applicable to the periodontal tissues by simply substituting "periodontal disease" for "tooth decay". More importantly, in their pictorial portrayal, they underline the product relationship. If any of these three variables is absent, then oral disease does not occur. Parenthetically, this has not been translated into their arithmetic formula which suggests that the phenomenon is additive!
(Figure 1 illustrates that it takes all three of these factors ,not just one or two, for tooth decay to occur. The source is U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health NIH Publication No. 80-1146)
Be that as it may, principal attention has been devoted to the role of diet and microorganisms; only scant attention has been accorded the resistance/susceptibility factor. And, when it is considered, susceptibility and genetics become synonyms. This report is one in a series on Medical Ignorance: Myths and Magics in Modern Medicine. It will remind us of the role and emphasize the measurability of tissue tolerance in oral pathosis. Specifically, we shall devote our attention to the question, "Can you get away with brushing your teeth less?"
A Different Look at Mr. and Mrs.
The Traditional Confirmation
Figure 2 shows the frequency of daily toothbrushing on the horizontal axis and the mean debris scores on the vertical. Three points warrant special emphasis. First, those brushing least (black column) represent the greatest accumulations. Second, in the group with the most toothbrushing (white column), there is the least amount of debris. Finally, while the correlation coefficient is statistically significant (r = -0.265, p <0.01), it is not perfect. This suggests the possibility that other factors may be operative.
Hence, in answer to the first question, there does indeed appear to be a convincing relationship between tooth cleansing (tooth-brushing frequency) and tooth cleanliness (debris score). These observations are not surprising and support the current dental philosophy of the importance of local and mechanical factors in periodontal health and sickness.
(Comparing Figure 2 “Relationship of daily toothbrushing frequency and debris index” with Figure 3 “Relationship of plasma ascorbic acid and debris index” shows that vitamin C reduces tooth debris to a similar extent that brushing does.)
A Second Opinion
In other words, the query now to be posed is, "Can we alter oral debris by changing vitamin state?" Our personal experience has been quite extensive with ascorbic acid (“AA”).(5-7). So, for purposes of this experiment, "What is the correlation of the ascorbates and oral cleanliness without altering the usual oral cleansing habits?"
Figure 3 pictorially portrays the plasma ascorbic acid levels on the x-axis. The 200 subjects were divided into three near equal subsets. There were 68 with the poorest ascorbate levels (black column) ranging from 0.0 to 0.4. Sixty-seven showed the best (white column) vitamin C levels (0.8 to 1.3). The average debris scores are shown on the ordinate. Three items deserve special note. First, those with the poorest AA demonstrate the most debris (black column). Second, the group with the best ascorbate level (white column) is characterized by the least accumulations. Finally, the correlation is statistically significant (r -0.210, p <0.01), very much like that shown in Figure 2 and also not perfect.
Therefore, within the limits of these data, there appears to be a very real correlation between vitamin C state (as a possible nonmechanical contributor) and debris irrespective of tooth cleansing habits.
The Current Ecologic Thinking
Figure 4 depicts the frequency of daily toothbrushing on the abscissa and the average debris scores on the y-axis. Additionally, the 200 subjects were divided into two equal subgroups. The 100 with the relatively poorer plasma ascorbic acid levels (less than 0.6 mg%) are shown by the black columns; the other 100 with the better vitamin C state (0.6+ mg%) by the white columns. Several points warrant elaboration. In those showing the lower (poorer) plasma ascorbic acid scores, there's an obvious inverse relationship. In other words, and not surprisingly, the greater the toothbrushing frequency, the less the debris (0.87). This has already been demonstrated (Figure 2). It is also statistically confirmed (r = -0.337, p < 0.01). On the other hand, it is interesting that the data suggest that in those with relatively good AA state (the white columns), it is not too critical how frequently one brushes one's teeth. This is underscored by the lack of statistical significance (r = -0.164, p > 0.05).
(Figure 4. “Relationship of debris index, plasma vitamin C and toothbrushing” shows that toothbrushing plus high plasma ascorbic acid reduces tooth debris more than brushing alone.)
Here is probably part of the explanation for the well-known fact why some of us need brush our teeth less than others.
It is evident that plaque material may be removed from the tooth surface with effective mechanical cleansing techniques as shown in the literature (8) and earlier in this report (Figure 2). Hence, this interface structure may, with proper instruction, be altered through a change in the external world (toothbrushing, flossing, irrigation).
Much less clearly understood is the importance of the inner world (gingival tissue metabolism) to foreign and external accumulations. In the past, plaque has been regarded as inert matter. Now it is recognized that this so called debris is a microcosm containing myriads of living neutrophils and other formed elements. Its environs are remarkably similar to human blood and tissue fluid. (9) As such, it should reflect metabolic changes within the host tissues.
Viewed in this perspective, the role of the organism's metabolic status as a possible contributor to plaque formation becomes more understandable. The findings of this investigation, as represented in Figure 3, suggest that plaque is indeed also related to the internal milieu as judged by vitamin C metabolism. In other words, this can be viewed as a demonstration of nonmechanical brushing.
These findings are consistent with other
published reports of nutrient-debris (plaque) relationships. For example,
Coven (10) has reported a significant connection between gingival AA and
debris score in children. Another study (11) found marked differences in
foreign accumulations between Adventist and nonAdventist teenagers. The
authors concluded that they were related to diet and not to differences
in brushing frequency. It has also been confirmed by Mandel that the plaque
represents the initial phase in calculus formation.' (12)
Notwithstanding, even in this day and age, it is still generally held that the only way plaque can be prevented from causing damage to the periodontium is to remove it mechanically.'(16) If nutrients are determinants of plaque, as the present investigation and other studies suggest, this concept may be incomplete. The need for further investigation of nutritional approaches to oral hygiene (tooth cleanliness) would thus seem to be appropriate.
A second implication arises when an attempt is made to study the role of nutrients in the genesis of periodontal pathosis. It is customary in evaluating nutrients as potential etiologic factors to do so only in subgroups having the same oral hygiene (tooth cleanliness) and age. (18) Obviously, if oral hygiene (cleanliness) is to some extent a function of diet, it should not be held constant when evaluating a nutrient as a potential etiologic factor.
Viewing brushing frequency-debris score relationships as influenced by ascorbic acid status (Figure 4) provides additional insights into plaque prevention and control. At all levels of brushing frequency, those with the better plasma AA levels exhibit cleaner teeth. In fact, the average debris score (0.92) for those who brush less than twice daily but have better vitamin C levels compares favorably with that of the poorer C subjects who brush twice or more daily (0.90 and 0.87).
The key fact underscored in this investigation is not the existence of a particular nutrient-plaque relationship, but the need to completely reevaluate existing concepts of oral hygience (tooth cleanliness).
The philosophic considerations and the practical implications of the ecology of oral health and sickness not only continues but seems to intensify. This is superbly borne out in the citations by Nigel Clarke and his co-worker. (19) “... Some individuals experience severe inflammation to minimal plaque, whereas others have minimal inflammation to heavy plaque ... Whether these variations occur as a result of differences in host response or in virulence of the microbes is undetermined; however, the probabilities point to host factors rather than to microbes ... Periodontal disease has long been recognized as a chronic disease, but the literature describes a disease that is derived entirely from the effects of a microbial colonization of the gingival crevice. If this were so, it would mean that periodontal disease is unique among chronic diseases, all of which represent the long-term cumulative effects of interaction between a host biologic system and the surrounding environment ... Perhaps dentistry has lost the perspective between the oral tissues and the entire organism ..."
Additionally, we note from the work of these Australian investigators of their interest in the relationship of ecologic principles to the specifics of oral disease. This is emphasized in the following quotation:
"... (There is a possible) causal role for the host factors and (there is the suggestion) that the type and severity of periodontal disease(s) are reflections of the competence of the host defense rather than of the virulence of commensal oral organisms ... (It can be) postulated that chronic periodontal disease results when environmental factors, specifically those that compromise the peripheral blood supply, disturb the delicate balance between host and parasite in favor of the parasite ..."
Finally, the importance of ascorbates is also emphasized as one of a number of contributing factors to the genesis of periodontal pathosis.
“... It has been established that 20% of gingival collagen is turned over daily Fibroblasts require ascorbate to produce collagen. Hence, the high turnover of gingival collagen probably renders gingival remodeling and repair particularly vulnerable to ascorbate deficiency. Vitamin C is also required by polymorphs in their vital defense role. The phagocytic and chemotactic functions of the white cells require vitamin C concentration within the cell ... Although debate continues concerning the required plasma ascorbate levels, it appears likely that the demand for ascorbates and essential metabolites for defense and repair of gingival tissue may be met in the presence of chronic inflammation, smoking, stress, inadequate diet, aging, or any other vaso-constrictive factors ..."
2. Clark JW, Cheraskin E and Ringsdorf WM Jr: An Ecologic Study of Oral Hygiene. Journal of Periodontalogy/Periodon tics 40: #8, 476-480, August 1969.
3. Schorah CJ: Vitamin C Status in Population Groups. In: Counsell JN and Hornig DH. Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid), 1981. Englewood, Applied Science Publishers.
4. Cheraskin E and Ringsdorf WM Jr: Vitamin C State in a Dental School Patient Population. Journal of the Southern California State Dental Association 32: #10, 375378, October 1964.
5. Cheraskin E, RingsdorfWM Jr and Sisley EL: The Vitamin C Connection. 1983, New York, Harper and Row Publishers, Inc. (hardback). 1984, New York, Bantam Books, Inc. (paperback).
6. Cheraskin E: The Vitamin C Controversy: Questions and Answers, 1988. Wichita, BioCommunications Press.
7. Cheraskin E: Vitamin C... Who Needs It?, 1993. Birmingham, Arlington Press.
8. Arnim SS: Thoughts Concerning Cause, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention of Periodontal Disease. Journal of Periodontalogy 29: #3, 217-223, July 1958.
9. Amim SS: Microcosms of the Mouth - Role in Periodontal Disease. Texas Dental Journal 82: #3, 4-10, March 1964.
10. Coven EM: Relationship of Vitamin C State and Oral Health of a Pedodontic Group in a Prepayment Program. Industrial Medicine and Surgery 24: #5, 410-4 12, May 1965.
11. Holmes CB and Collier D: Periodontal Disease, Dental Caries, Oral Hygiene and Diet in Adventist and Other Teenagers. Journal of Periodontalogy 37: #2, 100-107, March-April 1966.
12. Mandel ID: Histochemical and Biochemical Aspects of Calculus Formation. Periodontics 1: #2, 43-52, March-April 1963.
13. Cohen MM: The Effect of Large Doses of Ascorbic Acid on Gingival Tissues at Puberty. Journal of Dental Research 34: #5, 750-751,October 1955.
14.Dusterwinkle S, Cheraskin E and Ringsdorf WM Jr: Tissue Tolerance to Orthodontic Banding: A Study in Multivitamin-Trace Mineral Supplementation. Journal of Periodontalogy 37: #2, 132-145, March-April 1966.
15.Lane WB: Nutrition and Oral Response to Orthodontic Banding. University of Alabama School of Dentistry Thesis, August 1968.
16. Waerhaug J: Current Basis for Prevention of Periodontal Disease. International Dental Journal 17: #2, 267-281, June 1967.
17. Greene JC: Oral Health Care for the Prevention and Control of Periodontal Disease - Review of the Literature. World Workshop in Periodontics 1966. Ann Arbor, University ofMichigan Press, pp. 397-455.
18. Waerhaug, J: Epidemiology of Periodonal Disease - Review of the Literature. World Workshop in Periodontics 1966. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, pp. 181-222.
19. Clarke NG and Carey SE: Etiology of
Chronic Periodontal Disease: An Alternative Perspective. Journal of the
American Dental Association 110: #5, 689-691, May 1985.
Andrew Saul, PhD
AN IMPORTANT NOTE: This page is not in any way offered as prescription, diagnosis nor treatment for any disease, illness, infirmity or physical condition. Any form of self-treatment or alternative health program necessarily must involve an individual's acceptance of some risk, and no one should assume otherwise. Persons needing medical care should obtain it from a physician. Consult your doctor before making any health decision.
Neither the author nor the webmaster has authorized the
use of their names or the use of any material contained within in connection
with the sale, promotion or advertising of any product or apparatus. Single-copy
reproduction for individual, non-commercial use is permitted providing
no alterations of content are made, and credit is given.