However, it’s important to note that, to some extent, your literature review is likely to deviate from a typical literature review. With a focus on creative practice, your research may not necessarily be guided by an explicit research question or a gap that your research aims to address.
A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Occasionally you will be asked to write one as a separate assignment (sometimes in the form of an annotated bibliography —see the bottom of the next page), but more often it is part of the introduction to an essay, research report, or thesis.
How to write a literature review. This example shows how a literature review from a PhD thesis can be analysed for its structure, purpose and content. Three sections of the thesis are analysed to show the: relationship between the introduction and the literature review.
Thesis Proposal Literature Review. Outlining the background to your intended research and showing the importance of your work is a vital part of your proposal. This is part of the purpose of your literature review and as such it must be written in an effective manner.
Consider braking the problem in 2 aspects: How to find good paper that you should add to the collection of the one that you intend to review. This is a set of resources that may help you that: 1. Look at these heuristics for understanding if you s.
Running head: LITERATURE REVIEW 1. a particular topic. It generally follows a discussion of the paper’s thesis. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources that provides an overview of statement or the study’s goals or purpose.
How to Write a Literature Review.. will be too limitin g in allowing the write r to establish an overvie w of the topic. As a result, it would be more appropriate to focus on a topic such as.
A PhD literature review is a critical assessment of the literature in your field and related to your specific research topic. When discussing each relevant piece of literature the review must highlight where the gaps are and what the strengths and weaknesses are of particular studies, papers, books, etc.