QUESTION 3 Which of the following is an example of an outcome-based morality argument in opposition to the following statement: The government should assure everyone has access to health care regardless of ability to pay. “Giving health care away to everyone will just encourage people to be irresponsible with their personal finances and personal health.” “It is a fundamental violation of my liberty for the government to take my taxes and use them to benefit someone else.” “It’s simply unconscionable that people are forced to go without health care in a country as wealthy as the United States.” “Providing access to healthcare for everyone regardless of ability to pay will lower the disease burden and improve society for everyone. QUESTION 4 Which of the following is NOT true of the reasoning Justice Holmes employed in ruling in the Buck v. Bell case? The ability of the state to sterilize certain people for the public good is justified by the same principle as laws requiring immunizations. If proper procedures are followed, the government may forcibly sterilize criminals, but not non-criminal “feeble-minded” individuals. It is better for society to prevent some people from having socially unfit offspring than it would be to wait to execute this degenerate offspring for crimes or to let them starve because of their imbecility. If proper procedures are employed, it does not violate the 14th Amendment for the government to sterilize some of its citizens.