As a future educator , I think Wikipedia is a good tool. I've found it...information bound within its covers. Wikipedia does not have that constraint.
12 Answers · Education & Reference · 01/12/2007
... even for those. I'm sure that educators have other valid reasons for forbidding the sourcing of Wikipedia (such as systemic Western and youth-oriented...
9 Answers · Computers & Internet · 12/07/2009
encyclopedia.com google.com ask.com history channel website discovery channel website bing
1 Answers · Education & Reference · 28/08/2013
An answer that cites only wikipedia will never get my vote. There have been too many errors...
8 Answers · Arts & Humanities · 12/09/2007
Educators are concerned with the mechanics of language [grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc.] and its applied usage [writing and literary analysis]. Linguists also study the form of language, but go far beyond that to study the evolution of language, syntax, logical organization of thought, and language in context. http://en. wikipedia .org/wiki/Linguistics
3 Answers · Society & Culture · 12/05/2012
...not know what a sonic boom actually is! So in conclusion, if your educator is using the notoriously unreliable Wikipedia site as source material, then yes he is a moron.
6 Answers · Science & Mathematics · 07/03/2008