F*** authority! could have easily been the tagline of postmodernism. Today, postmodern architecture just seems kooky and weird but it was actually born out of the protests, riots, strikes, and civil unrest of the 1960s.
When you think of the 60s (at least if you’re from the US), you probably picture hippies, vietnam war protesters, the rise of feminism, and Martin Luther King Jr. The 60s were defined by people carving out their own place in the world, fighting for their rights, and fighting the man. People found their collective voices and they all shared similar messages with their oppressors, “You don’t have authority over us, you can’t dictate our values, our differences don’t make us less important and actually, our differences should be celebrated!”
Although the modernist architecture movement had evolved with the clear goal of improving people’s lives, it was in direct conflict with the spirit of the 60s. Modernist architects aimed to find the perfect building that could serve any person, any function, and in any location (hence the name International Style). The clean, white architecture of modernism was basically intended to be a perfectly engineered blank canvas for life. The people of the 60s, however, viewed modernist architecture as an oppressive, one-size-fits-all solution to the richly varied complexities of life.
Just as an angsty teen might start dressing differently to spite his parents, architects like Michael Graves and Robert Venturi took the defining characteristics of modernist architecture (no ornamentation, no symbols, no references to other traditions) and created buildings with the exact opposite characteristics. The postmodernists revived old architectural styles and remixed them. They used bright colors and interesting forms just for the sake of being interesting. Postmodernism rejects the strict rules set by the early modernists and seeks meaning and expression in the use of building techniques, forms, and stylistic references.
I am a long time punk rocker-turned-architecture-nerd, so I find the similarities between postmodernism and punk uncanny even though postmodernism started to gain momentum 10-15 years earlier than punk. Just check out these lyrics from the song Institutionalized by Suicidal Tendencies, a classic in the world of punk:
I was sitting in my room and my mom and my dad came in and they pulled up a chair and they sat down, they go:
Mike, we need to talk to you
And I go:
Okay what’s the matter
Me and your mom have been noticing lately that you’ve been having a lot of problems,
You’ve been going off for no reason and we’re afraid you’re gonna hurt somebody,
We’re afraid you’re gonna hurt yourself.
So we decided that it would be in your interest if we put you somewhere
Where you could get the help that you need.
And I go:
Wait, what are you talking about, WE decided!?
MY best interest?! How can YOU know what MY best interest is?
How can you say what my best interest is? What are you trying to say, I’m crazy?
When I went to your schools, I went to your churches,
I went to your institutional learning facilities?! So how can you say I’m crazy?
Like many punk lyrics, this song expresses the frustration of having to meet externally imposed standards and being different. Like punk, postmodernism allowed people to express a unique identity and way of life with the buildings they inhabit, own, and design.