Corrosivity Level of Soils at Distinct Areas Where Pipeline Steel is Buried for Water Distribution, South-Africa
An engagement of different soil characterization techniques including ion chromatography, inductively coupled plasma, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) has been utilized to study nature of the soils from seven locations where corrosion previously occurred on buried pipeline steels. Moisture contents from engaged samples were below 20%, and the organic matter contents were negligible. The least resistivity was observed on soil sample (SS) 4. The energy-dispersive X-ray analysis showed notable amount of chloride in SS 4, while the XRD analysis revealed the formation of complex phases comprised goethite and hematite from SS 4. The overall view regarding corrosivity went in this order: SS 4, SS 1, SS 5, SS 7, SS 6, and SS 2. The recommended cathodic protection for soils was between −850 and −950 mV Cu/CuSO4.
KeywordsCorrosion Environment Low-carbon steel Pipelines Soil
I would like to sincerely thank Mr. Bongani Baloyi for his decisive engagement in this study. I would also like to thank Tshwane University of Technology, particularly, the Department of Chemical, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering for giving me the opportunity to study my Master’s.
- 4.I.M. Gadala, M.A. Wahab, A. Alfantazi, Numerical simulations of soil physicochemistry and aeration influences on the external corrosion and cathodic protection design of buried pipeline steels. Mater. Des. 97, 287–299 (2016)Google Scholar
- 6.M. Barbalat, L. Lanarde, D. Caron, M. Meyer, J. Vittonato, F. Castillon, S. Fontaine, P. Refait, Electrochemical study of the corrosion rate of carbon steel in soil: evolution with time and determination of residual corrosion rates under cathodic protection. Corros. Sci. 55, 246–253 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.V.D.F.C. Lins, M.L.M. Ferreira, P.A. Saliba, Corrosion resistance of API X52 carbon steel in soil environment, in Journal of Materials Research and Technology, ed. M.A. Brazilian Metallurgical (Elsevier Editora Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, 2012), pp. 161–166Google Scholar
- 10.J.R. Myers, A. Cohen, Conditions contributing to underground copper corrosion. Am. Water Works Assoc. 78, 68–71 (1984)Google Scholar
- 11.S.R.A. Saupi, M.A. Sulaiman, M.N. Masri, Effects of soil properties to corrosion of underground pipelines: a review. J. Trop. Resour. Sustain. Sci. 3, 14–18 (2015)Google Scholar
- 14.M. Yan, C. Sun, J. Xu, W. Ke, Electrochemical behavior of API X80 steel in acidic soils from Southeast China. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 10, 1762–1776 (2015)Google Scholar
- 17.E. 12954, Cathodic protection of buried or immersed metallic structures (2001)Google Scholar