- Gluten Allergy Diagnosis
- What is Gluten Intolerance and Do You Have It?
- What Evidence Supports the Diagnosis of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity?
- What Evidence Is Against the Diagnosis of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity?
- Gluten Free Diet For Autism & Other Neurodevelopmental Conditions
However, a very large and growing percentage of the population believes that they are in some way allergic to gluten. One study found that 32% (that’s 1 out of every 3 people!) thought they had a gluten allergy in 2015. This was a 250% increase from a similar group of people that were sampled just 3 years prior in 2012 (3).
This is quite a big difference from the 1-2% prevalence of documented gluten allergies.
But because diagnosing these gluten allergies can be challenging, there’s no way to be 100% sure additional people don’t have celiac disease or other gluten related disorders without somewhat invasive testing.
The two main diseases caused by gluten allergies are celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis. These are both autoimmune conditions. This means that the immune system causes damage to parts of the body when gluten is eaten.
In celiac disease the immune system damages the intestines. And in dermatitis herpetiformis this damage occurs in the skin.
A blood test can sometimes make this wheat allergy diagnosis. However because it is not always accurate, doctors may need to do further tests for celiac disease by taking a small piece of the small intestine and for dermatitis herpetiformis by taking a small piece of the skin.
Outside of a diagnosed allergy to gluten, it is also argued that one could be intolerant of it. This is also known as non-celiac gluten sensitivity (4).
Gluten intolerance (non-celiac gluten sensitivity) is the term some people use to describe individuals who test negative for celiac disease but still feel badly when they consume gluten.
But what exactly determines gluten intolerance? What are the symptoms of being sensitive to gluten and how is it diagnosed?
Symptoms of gluten intolerance can vary and may include:
- Nausea & Vomiting
- Abdominal Pain
- Weight Loss
Some studies have suggested that people who test negative for celiac disease may still suffer from some of the disease symptoms. Furthermore, many people who decide to live gluten-free report anecdotally “feeling better” off gluten.
While this is certainly not enough evidence for advocating everyone to go gluten-free, it’s intriguing to think that there may be something that some people like about eliminating gluten from their diet. However researchers haven’t yet been able to determine solid details about what that thing is.
As long as a gluten-free diet is approached in a well rounded healthy manner, there is no harm in eliminating gluten. Therefore, if people genuinely feel better off gluten, then this is a harmless fix.
The argument for creating a diagnosis of gluten intolerance is based on the premise that unpleasant symptoms are experienced when gluten is eaten and these symptoms are relieved when gluten is removed from the diet.
However studies have found that the symptoms experienced by people with gluten intolerance are often not relieved when they stop eating gluten. Studies have also questioned if the discomfort people feel are even related to the ingestion of gluten.
Furthermore, research to date hasn’t found a physical marker to identify those who feel they have a gluten intolerance and otherwise test negative for celiac disease. This means research hasn’t yet found anything tangible that shows gluten is causing the symptoms described by individuals with non-celiac gluten sensitivity (5, 6).
This is concerning because we may not be correctly diagnosing or treating many people who believe they have a gluten intolerance. And we can’t be sure that gluten is even the cause of the discomfort some of these people experience.
One theory is that some of these people may have a form of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with sensitivity to a specific group of difficult to digest carbohydrates found in a number of foods. In particular these are fructans, galactans, polyols, fructose, and lactose - also commonly referred to as FODMAPs (fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols).
One well performed double blind study that supports this theory found that there was significant improvement in symptoms when individuals with suspected non-celiac gluten sensitivity ate a diet low in FODMAP’s. What’s more, the study showed that same people weren’t affected by gluten. By using a form of “fake gluten” (placebo), these researches found that there was not any difference in the symptoms of participants who ate real gluten compared to those that ate fake gluten (7).
This study suggests that these individuals may not be allergic to gluten, but may instead have an allergy to something else. While FODMAPs are another possibility, they also haven’t yet been determined to be the cause for everyone with these symptoms.
All of these factors combined makes the diagnosis of non-celiac gluten sensitivity quite hazy. For individuals in whom eliminating gluten is truly effective in resolving their symptoms, the problem is solved.
However, for the majority that continue to experience negative symptoms after going gluten-free the story is just beginning. More research is definitely needed to better identify what is causing these people to suffer and how to more effectively treat them.
Some people think a gluten-free diet may help many other conditions without a diagnosed allergy. A good example of this is autism.
Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder involving repetitive behavior, impaired communication, and impaired social interactions. We still don’t know what causes autism and while some medicines can help some of the associated symptoms of autism in some people, there isn’t any proven cure for the core symptoms.
What’s gluten got to do with it? Probably not much.
While there is a lot of talk in various communities about gluten being part (or all) of the cause of autism, there hasn’t been any good evidence to support this. There have not been any higher rates of celiac disease identified in children diagnosed with autism. In the limited and small studies that have been performed there wasn’t found to be any difference in children who were on gluten-free diets compared to the children who were on diets that included gluten (8,9) .
Why not have these kids eat gluten-free just in case?
Unfortunately, unless you’re very careful this can have negative consequences for your child without providing any known benefit. Proper nutrition is critical for a child’s development. The most common gluten containing grains are wheat, barley and rye.
Getting rid of gluten requires a child to eat a restrictive diet that can eliminate many common foods providing them with critical nutrients (including vitamins, amino acids and proteins) (10).
Therefore, it is generally recommended to not have children go gluten free unless they have a diagnosis of celiac disease or are working closely with a dietitian to ensure they are meeting their nutritional needs.