The plant functional traits that explain species occurrence across fragmented grasslands differ according to patch management, isolation, and wetness
Landscape fragmentation significantly affects species distributions by decreasing the number and connectivity of suitable patches. While researchers have hypothesized that species functional traits could help in predicting species distribution in a landscape, predictions should depend on the type of patches available and on the ability of species to disperse and grow there.
To explore whether different traits can explain the frequency of grassland species (number of occupied patches) and/or their occupancy (ratio of occupied to suitable patches) across a variety of patch types within a fragmented landscape.
We sampled species distributions over 1300 grassland patches in a fragmented landscape of 385 km2 in the Czech Republic. Relationships between functional traits and species frequency and occupancy were tested across all patches in the landscape, as well as within patches that shared similar management, wetness, and isolation.
Although some traits predicting species frequency also predicted occupancy, others were markedly different, with competition- and dispersal-related traits becoming more important for occupancy. Which traits were important differed for frequency and occupancy and also differed depending on patch management, wetness, and isolation.
Plant traits can provide insight into plant distribution in fragmented landscapes and can reveal specific abiotic, biotic, and dispersal processes affecting species occurrence in a patch type. However, the importance of individual traits depends on the type of suitable patches available within the landscape.
KeywordsFunctional traits Habitat suitability Isolation Management Potential occurrence Wetness
- ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop, Release 10. Documentation manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
- Hemrová L, Münzbergová Z (2012) Identification of suitable unoccupied habitats: direct versus an indirect approach. Preslia 84:925–937Google Scholar
- Janeček Š, de Bello F, Horník J, Bartoš M, Černý T, Doležal J, Dvorský M, Fajmon K, Janečková P, Jiráská Š, Mudrák O, Klimešová J (2013) Effects of land-use changes on plant functional and taxonomic diversity along a productivity gradient in wet meadows. J Veg Sci 24(5):898–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klimeš L, Klimešová J, Hendriks R, van Groenendael J (1997) Clonal plant architecture: Comparative analysis of form and function. In: van Groenendael HKJ (ed) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 1–29Google Scholar
- Klimešová J, Latzel V, de Bello F, van Groenendael J (2008) Plant functional traits in studies of vegetation changes in response to grazing and mowing: towards a use of more specific traits. Preslia 80:245–253Google Scholar
- Klimešová J, Janeček Š, Horník J, Doležal J (2011) Effect of the method of assessing and weighting abundance on the interpretation of the relationship between plant clonal traits and meadow management. Preslia 83:437–453Google Scholar
- Klotz S, Kühn I, Durka W (eds) (2002) BIOLFLOR—Eine Datenbank zu biologisch-ökologischen Merkmalen der Gefäßpflanzen in Deutschland. Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 38. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, BonnGoogle Scholar
- Lewis RJ, de Bello F, Bennett JA, Fibich P, Finerty GE, Götzenberger L, Hiiesalu I, Kasari L, Lepš J, Májeková M, Mudrák O, Riibak K, Ronk A, Rychetská T, Vítová A, Pärtel M (2016) Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation. Conserv Biol 31:1–8Google Scholar
- McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software programme produced by authors. University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
- Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/