## Rank of ABA where B is positive definite

### Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

I have a n-by-k matrix A and a n-by-n matrix B, where B is positive definite. I can form the matrix $M = A^t B A$. Playing around, I always found $rk(M) = rk(A)$ but I can't prove this.

-

2
Hint: M and A have the same null space. – Mark Meckes Mar 31 2010 at 12:26
Thanks, I actually found that, but missed that A and M have the same number of columns to finish the proof. – Frank Meulenaar Mar 31 2010 at 12:28

## 2 Answers

$A^T BAx = 0 \implies (Ax)^TB(Ax)=0 \implies Ax=0$ by positve definiteness of $B$. So $ker(M)=ker(A)$ and hence $rk(M)=rk(A)$.

-

### You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.

This is rather tangential, but I can't help mentioning that this is related to the fact that in a hilbert space, for a (compact) linear operator one has: $Ker A^* \perp Im A$.

-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 7, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9267013072967529, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}