# theory of rational and irrational numbers

The following entry is some sort of index of articles in PlanetMath about the basic theory of rational and irrational numbers, and it should be studied together with its complement: the theory of algebraic and transcendental numbers. The reader should follow the links in each bullet-point to learn more about each topic. For a somewhat deeper approach to the subject, the reader should read about Algebraic Number Theory. In this entry we will concentrate on the properties of the complex numbers and the extension $\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{Q}$.

There is also a topic entry on rational numbers.

# 1 Basic Definitions

1. 1.

A number is said to be rational if it can be expressed as a quotient of integers (with non-zero denominator). The set of all rational numbers forms a field, denoted by $\mathbb{Q}$.

2. 2.

Such rational numbers, which are not integers, may be expressed as sum of partial fractions (the denominators being powers of distinct prime numbers).

3. 3.

The real numbers are the set of all possible decimal expansions (where we don’t allow any expansion to end in all $9$’s). For the formal definition please see the entry real number. The real numbers form a field, usually denoted by $\mathbb{R}$.

4. 4.

A real number is said to be irrational if it is not rational, i.e. it cannot be expressed as a quotient of integers.  The decimal expansion is non-periodic for any irrational, but periodic for any rational number.

5. 5.

For example, $\sqrt{2}$ is irrational.

6. 6.

Commensurable numbers have a rational ratio.  See also sine at irrational multiples of full angle.

# 2 Small Results

1. 1.

The field $\mathbb{Q}$ is, up to an isomorphism, subfield (prime subfield) in every field where no sum of unities can be 0.  One may also say that $\mathbb{Q}$ is the least field of numbers.

2. 2.

$\sqrt{2}$ is irrational. Similarly $\sqrt{d}$ is irrational as long as $d\in\mathbb{N}$ is not a perfect square.

3. 3.

The sum of two square roots of positive squarefree integers is irrational.

4. 4.

Rational and irrational:  the sum, difference, product and quotient of two non-zero real numbers, from which one is rational and the other irrational, is irrational.

5. 5.

There exists real functions, which are continuous at any irrational but discontinuous at any rational number (e.g. the Dirichlet’s function).

6. 6.

Every irrational (and also rational) number is a limit of sequence of rational numbers (see real numbers).  An example:  the sequence  $(1+\frac{1}{1})^{1},\,(1+\frac{1}{2})^{2},\,(1+\frac{1}{3})^{3},\,...$  converges to the number $e$.

7. 7.

The number e is irrational (this is not as difficult to prove as it is to show that e is transcendental). In fact, if $r\in\mathbb{Q}\setminus\{0\}$ then $e^{r}$ is also irrational. There is an easier way to show that e is not a quadratic irrational.

8. 8.

Every real transcendental number (such as $e$) is irrational, but not all irrational numbers are transcendental — some (such as $\sqrt{2}$) are algebraic.

9. 9.

“Most” logarithms of positive integers are irrational (and transcendental).

10. 10.

If $a^{n}$ is irrational then $a$ is irrational (see here).

11. 11.

A surprising fact: an irrational to an irrational power can be rational.

12. 12.

# 3 BIG Results

The irrational numbers are, in general, “easily” understood. The BIG theorems appear in the theory of transcendental numbers. Still, there are some open problems:  is Euler’s constant irrational? is $\pi+e$ rational?

Type of Math Object:
Topic
Major Section:
Reference
Groups audience:

## Mathematics Subject Classification

11R04 Algebraic numbers; rings of algebraic integers

## Recent Activity

May 17
new image: sinx_approx.png by jeremyboden
new image: approximation_to_sinx by jeremyboden
new image: approximation_to_sinx by jeremyboden
new question: Solving the word problem for isomorphic groups by mairiwalker
new image: LineDiagrams.jpg by m759
new image: ProjPoints.jpg by m759
new image: AbstrExample3.jpg by m759
new image: four-diamond_figure.jpg by m759
May 16
new problem: Curve fitting using the Exchange Algorithm. by jeremyboden
new question: Undirected graphs and their Chromatic Number by Serchinnho

## Info

Owner: alozano
Added: 2005-05-04 - 14:13
Author(s): alozano

## Versions

(v15) by alozano 2013-03-22
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 21, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 0, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.3, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.8928914666175842, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}