Physics Forums

Page 1 of 2   1   2  >

## Cross Product

What is the cross product of a constant and a vector? I know that the cross product between two vectors is the area of the parallelogram those two vectors form. My intuition tells me that since a constant is not a vector, it would only be multiplying with a vector when in a cross product with one. Since the vector will only grow larger in magnitude, there would be zero area in the paralleogram formed because there is no paralleogram.

PhysOrg.com  physics news on PhysOrg.com  >> Promising doped zirconia>> New X-ray method shows how frog embryos could help thwart disease>> Bringing life into focus

Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Science Advisor
Staff Emeritus
The cross product is only defined between vectors of $\mathbb{R}^3$. The cross of a constant and a vector is not defined.

Quote by Lame Joke 					 				 				"What do you get when you cross a mountain-climber with a mosquito?" "Nothing: you can't cross a scaler with a vector"

So if I had an equation that contains a term that has a cross product of a constant and a vector, do I just cross it out of the equation? ( it is in an adding term so crossing it out would be okay). That's an awesome joke(:

Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Science Advisor
Staff Emeritus

## Cross Product

Quote by quantumfoam 					 				 				So if I had an equation that contains a term that has a cross product of a constant and a vector, do I just cross it out of the equation? ( it is in an adding term so crossing it out would be okay). That's an awesome joke(:
Can you give a specific example?

Sure! An equation like F=π[hXh+cXh] where h is a vector and c is a constant.

Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Science Advisor
Staff Emeritus

Quote by quantumfoam 					 				 				Sure! An equation like π[hXh+cXh] where h is a vector and c is a constant.
That doesn't really make any sense.

F is a vector.

F=π[hXh+cXh] Sorry about not adding the equality.

Would the term containing the cross product of the constant c and vector h in the above equation just be zero? Or am I able to take cross it out of the above equation?

Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Science Advisor
Staff Emeritus

Quote by quantumfoam 					 				 				Would the term containing the cross product of the constant c and vector h in the above equation just be zero? Or am I able to take cross it out of the above equation?
No. As it stands, your equation makes no sense. You can't take the cross product of a scalar and a vector.

Damn that stinks. Even if the c was a constant?

Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Science Advisor
Staff Emeritus

Quote by quantumfoam 					 				 				Damn that stinks. Even if the c was a constant?
Does this equation appear in some book or anything? Can you provide some more context?

Well I made it up haha. Im sorry. I'm new at this. Do you think you can make an equation that makes sense? Like the one I attempted but failed at.

Blog Entries: 8
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Science Advisor
Staff Emeritus

Quote by quantumfoam 					 				 				Well I made it up haha. Im sorry. I'm new at this. Do you think you can make an equation that makes sense? Like the one I attempted but failed at.
It only makes sense if you take the cross of a vector and a vector.

What were you attempting to do?? What lead you to this particular equation?

Well, the h is a vector that represents a magnetic field strength. In the definition of a current, I=dq/dt, multiplying both sides by a small length ds would give the magnetic field produced my a moving charge. (dq/dt)ds turns into dq(ds/dt) which turns into vdq where dq is a small piece of charge and v is the velocity of the total charge. Integrating both sides to I ds=vdq would give the total magnetic field. For a constant velocity, the right side of the above equation turns into vq+ c, where c is some constant. Now I get the equation h=vq+c. Solving for qv gives me h-c=qv. In the equation for magnetic force on a moving charge, F=qvxB. I substituted h-c for qv in the above force equation. B turns into uh where u is the permeability of free space. I substitute uh for B in the magnetic force equation and get F=u[hxh-cxh]. I want the cxh term to go away.

Does that sort of help?

Blog Entries: 8 				 				 				 				         Recognitions:      Gold Member        Science  Advisor     Staff Emeritus  I don't understand any of what you said, but my physics is very bad. I'll move this to the physics section for you.

Page 1 of 2   1   2  >

Thread Tools

Similar Threads for: Cross Product
Thread                              Forum                          Replies
Calculus & Beyond Homework     1
Calculus & Beyond Homework     9
Calculus & Beyond Homework     8
Calculus & Beyond Homework     8
Introductory Physics Homework  4
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 1, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "plain"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9324575662612915, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}