## Applications of Stacks

### Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

I've been aware of stacks since grad school, and I can usually follow in rough lines a discussion about stacks, but I've often wondered what particular (purely!) scheme-theoretic argument or theorem is significantly simplified by the introduction of stacks. I'm sure there are many, but since I don't deal with stacks on a regular basis I don't encounter them as frequently, and I thought maybe some of you can enlighten me.

-

3
Cohomology of stacks provide useful "algebraic/arithmetic" constructions superior in some respects to what can be done using coarse moduli schemes. For example, if one wants to equip spaces of modular forms with $\mathbf{Z}$-structure in a manner that handles all primes in a unified manner, it can be simpler to work with moduli stacks of (generalized) elliptic curves rather than adjoining "extra level" and using fine moduli schemes. For example "$X_0(N)$" is always a regular proper Artin stack, whereas the coarse moduli scheme cousin is neither regular nor fine (but is also useful!). – BCnrd Oct 17 2010 at 1:09
I haven't met stacks often, but I used to think that they are tautological reformulations of: a) moduli problems b) quotient problems, that allow to "speak geometrically" (e.g. a moduli stack has a tangent bundle, a "moduli problem" doesn't) – Qfwfq Oct 17 2010 at 17:15

## 2 Answers

The classic application is Deligne & Mumford's paper proving the irreducibility of the coarse moduli scheme $\overline{M}_g$ of stable genus g curves over any algebraically closed field. They proved irreducibility first for the moduli stack $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_g$ of curves, and then inferred from this result the irreducibility of the scheme.

-

### You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.

The DeRham space is a stack $X_{DR}$ associated to a smooth variety $X$, so that modules on $X_{DR}$ are D-modules on $X$. This is accomplished by declaring the maps from $Y$ into $X_{DR}$ are the same as maps from $Y^{red}$ (the reduced scheme) into $X$. This has the effect of identifying points with their infinitesmal neighborhoods.

The DeRham space is often most useful as a conceptual tool. However, a specific application of it was by Ben-Zvi and Nevins, who used it (and other tools) to show that certain cusped versions $\widetilde{X}$ of $X$ had equivalent categories of D-modules. The idea being, these cusps were identifying some of the infinitesmal neighborhoods of some of the points, and so they should be intermediate between a variety and its DeRham space.

-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 14, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9525530338287354, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}