## Calculating the Lebesgue decomposition of a measure [closed]

### Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

How we should calculate the Lebesgue decomposition of a measure? Please explain it with an example such I can get the whole idea behind it.

-

Have a look at the FAQ. This question does not belong here. – Anthony Quas Dec 10 at 23:49
This is a wrong place for this sort of questions. Please, read FAQ. – Alexandre Eremenko Dec 10 at 23:52

## 1 Answer

Let e.g. $\nu$ be a finite Borel measure on $[a,b]$ and $m$ the Lebesgue measure. So the function $[a,b]\ni x\mapsto \nu\big([a,x)\big)$ is a BV function. It is therefore differentiable $m$-a.e., and its derivative $\rho(x)$ coincides with the Radon-Nikodym derivative of the absolutely continuous part of $\nu$. Knowing $\rho$ you can deduce the Lebesgue decomposition of $\nu$ wrto the Lebesgue measure: $\nu=\nu _ a+\nu _ s$ with $\nu _a\perp\nu _ s$ where $\nu_a(E)=\int_E\rho(x)dm(x)$.

-

"Pietro Majer", thsnk you a lot. – Omid Saba Dec 11 at 4:34
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 12, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.8955571055412292, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}