## Is every subgroup of an algebraic group a stabilizer for some action?

### Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

Suppose G is an algebraic group (over a field, say; maybe even over ℂ) and H⊆G is a closed subgroup. Does there necessarily exist an action of G on a scheme X and a point x∈X such that H=Stab(x)?

Before you jump out of your seat and say, "take X=G/H," let me point out that the question is basically equivalent† to "Is G/H a scheme?" If G/H is a scheme, you can take X=G/H. On the other hand, if you have X and x∈X, then the orbit of x (which is G/H) is open in its closure, so it inherits a scheme structure (it's an open subscheme of a closed subscheme of X).

†I say "basically equivalent" because in my argument, I assumed that the action of G on X is quasi-compact and quasi-separated so that the closure of the orbit (i.e. the scheme-theoretic closed image of G×{x}→X) makes sense. I'm also using Chevalley's theorem to say the the image is open in its closure, which requires that the action is locally finitely presented. I suppose it's possible that there's a bizarre example where this fails.

-

## 2 Answers

In his book "Linear algebraic groups", 6.8, p98, Borel shows that the quotient of an affine algebraic group over a field by an algebraic subgroup exists as an algebraic variety, and he notes p.105 that Weil proved a similar result for arbitrary algebraic groups.

-

1
Great. I think the precise reference is Proposition 2 of this paper: jstor.org/stable/2372637 – Anton Geraschenko♦ Dec 14 2009 at 3:25

### You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.

The representability theorem [Demazure-Gabriel, III.2.7.1, p. 318] implies the following.

## Theorem

Let $A$ be a local artinian ring, let $G$ be a group over $A$ locally of finite type, and let $H\hookrightarrow G$ be a closed subgroup which is flat over $A$. Then the quotient $G/H$ in the category of fppf sheaves is a scheme; and the canonical morphism $G\rightarrow G/H$ is faithfully flat and of finite presentation.

Note that the group $G$ in the above theorem need not be either affine or flat over $A$; also, Demazure-Gabriel write in comprehensible language, unlike Weil.

-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 9, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 5, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9278793931007385, "perplexity_flag": "head"}