Physics Forums

complex analysis

Also when trying to find the integral of (1/8z^3 -1) around the contour c=1.

I found the singularities to be 1/2, 1/2exp(2pi/3), and 1/2exp(4pi/3)

What is the next step here. Do I just assume the integral is 6pi(i) after using partial fractions to find the numerators of the 3 fractions.

The answer is actually 0, but I dont understand how it was solved. I know it might have something to do with the rule that says, the sum of the integral of a C1, C2 and C3 is equal to the integral of the outside contour, but how do i know the orientation of the three contours inside the big contour C.

Thanks, hope im not asking too many questions

PhysOrg.com  science news on PhysOrg.com  >> Front-row seats to climate change>> Attacking MRSA with metals from antibacterial clays>> New formula invented for microscope viewing, substitutes for federally controlled drug

Find the function's residue at each of the poles inside the contour. Then use the residue theorem.

Quote by Pere Callahan 					 				 				Find the function's residue at each of the poles inside the contour. Then use the residue theorem.

We haven't covered residue theorem yet. Is there any other way to solve it?

complex analysis

Quote by soulsearching 					 				 				We haven't covered residue theorem yet. Is there any other way to solve it?
Of course there is. Find a parametrization of the contour and do it by hand.

In general if you want to evaluate
[tex]
\int_C dz f(z)
[/tex]

where C is the contour, you can find a parametrization

[tex]
\gamma : [0,1]\to \mathbb{C}
[/tex]
such that $\gamma([0,1])=C$ (formalities omitted - you are certainly familiar with that )

[tex]
\int_0^1 dt f(\gamma(t))|\gamma'(t)|
[/tex]

This will give a not-too eays but doable integral. Note however, that normally it works the other way around. If you have some definite real integral, you can sometimes try to interpret it as a complex integral over a closed contour and use the residue theorem to evaluate it, but that's a different story.

Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
Science Advisor

Quote by soulsearching 					 				 				What is the next step here. Do I just assume the integral is 6pi(i) after using partial fractions to find the numerators of the 3 fractions.   The answer is actually 0, but I dont understand how it was solved. I know it might have something to do with the rule that says, the sum of the integral of a C1, C2 and C3 is equal to the integral of the outside contour, but how do i know the orientation of the three contours inside the big contour C.
Hi soulsearching!

I'm a little confused (especially by the 6πi).

Are you saying that you know how to integrate (1/2z - 1) round a contour containing z = 1/2?

If so, just use the same contour for all three partition fractions!

Quote by tiny-tim 					 				 				Hi soulsearching!   I'm a little confused (especially by the 6πi).   Are you saying that you know how to integrate (1/2z - 1) round a contour containing z = 1/2?  If so, just use the same contour for all three partition fractions!

Like after breaking up the fraction into 3 fractions using partial fractions, what's the next step?

Thanks... :)

Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
Science Advisor

Quote by soulsearching 					 				 				Life after breaking up the fraction into 3 fractions using partial fractions, what's the next step?
erm … if you don't know how to integrate (1/2z - 1) round a contour containing z = 1/2, then there is no next step … you're stuck (or, rather, you have to follow Pere Callahan's method)!

So … do you know ? … you didn't say.

Quote by tiny-tim 					 				 				erm … if you don't know how to integrate (1/2z - 1) round a contour containing z = 1/2, then there is no next step … you're stuck (or, rather, you have to follow Pere Callahan's method)!  So … do you know ? … you didn't say.

I think its going to be 2pi(i) because the singularity (1/2) is inside the contour. is this right?

i did not get Pere Callahan's method. and why did you choose the contour as z=1/2? the question says integrate it around z=1

Blog Entries: 27
Recognitions:
Gold Member
Homework Help
Science Advisor

Quote by soulsearching 					 				 				i did not get Pere Callahan's method. and why did you choose the contour as z=1/2? the question says integrate it around z=1
No, I said a contour containing z = 1/2.

You're getting confused between z = 1/2 (a point) and |z| = 1/2 (a circle) … I did warn you about that in another thread … you must write |z| when you mean it, or you'll lose track.

The integral, of course, is the same for any contour that includes the same singularities.

So you could, for example, choose the contour |z| = 100!

And then integrate all three partial fractions round that.

I think its going to be 2pi(i) because the singularity (1/2) is inside the contour. is this right?
erm …
I can't remember! …

but I know it's 1/2 times something.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads for: complex analysis
Thread                                 Forum                       Replies
Calculus                    7
Differential Geometry       3
Calculus & Beyond Homework  2
Calculus & Beyond Homework  11
Calculus                    6
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 1, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": false, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "plain"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9156884551048279, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}