# General question on aligning a quantization axis

I have a general question on how to work with quantization axis. Here is the setup:

I am looking at a single two-level atom placed at the origin $(0, 0, 0)$, which is unperturbed in the sense that no magnetic field is applied to it.

I now send in a coherent EM-field, resonant with the transition of the atom. With a right-handed coordinate system in mind, the field is linearly polarized along $y$ and propagagtes along $+x$.

Since there is no magnetic field applied, I am allowed to choose the quantization as I wish.

1. The easiest choice is to choose the $y$-axis directly such that the EM-field drives the $\pi$-transition of the atom.
2. If I had chosen the $z$-axis instead, then the EM-field would drive $\sigma$-transitions instead. Since no magnetic field is applied, they are equal to the $\pi$-transition, so we get exactly the same signal as we should.
3. Now say I had instead chosen to put my quantization axis along in the $(y, z)$-plane with an angle $A$ relative the $y$-axis. Is it valid to to decompose the quantization axis into a $\cos(A)$ part (driving the $\pi$-transition) and a $\sin(A)$ part (driving the $\sigma$-transitions)?
-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 15, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": false, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9360883235931396, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}