## slice=ribbon generalization to higher genus + potential counterexamples to slice=ribbon.

### Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

I have two questions about the slice=ribbon conjecture.

(1) If a knot $K \hookrightarrow S^3$ has smooth slice genus $g$, you can ask if it bounds a smooth genus $g$ surface in $S^3 \times [0, -\infty)$, with the function defined by restriction to $[0, -\infty)$ being Morse on the surface without index=0 critical points (maximal points). When $g=0$ this is just asking if the slice knot $K$ has a ribbon disc. I was wondering if there are any knots known with $g \geq 1$ for which such a surface cannot exist. If there are none such known, is there a topological reason why the truth of the slice=ribbon conjecture would also imply the existence of such surfaces?

(2) Are there any potential counterexamples to slice=ribbon (in the same way that there are potential counterexamples to smooth 4-d Poincare [until Akbulut kills them])?

Thanks, Andrew.

-
I added a few more tags. Regarding (2) hopefully someone like Ruberman will enter the conversation. I don't know any interesting ways of generating knots that I know to be slice but for which I have reason to suspect they maybe aren't ribbon. IMO the smooth Poincare conjecture is in the same situation. We appear to have a deficit of good ways to identify the standard smooth $S^4$. – Ryan Budney Feb 10 2010 at 6:53

1
I believe (based on a conversation with Sylvain Cappell) that the answer to (2) is no. – Daniel Moskovich Feb 10 2010 at 14:45

## 2 Answers

There is a paper by Gompf and Scharlemann: Fibered knots and Property 2R, II, which gives an infinite family of two component links which are smoothly slice but not obviously ribbon.

-

See also msp.warwick.ac.uk/gt/2010/14-04/b050.xhtml – Daniel Moskovich Dec 2 2010 at 15:50
Looks like they combined two papers together. – Jim Conant Dec 2 2010 at 16:07

### You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.

This paper by Gompf exhibits a potential counter-example. Has it been established that the candidate given by Gompf is not slice?

-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 9, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9321852326393127, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}