## Return to Answer

3 (spelling) changed Noncomutative to Noncommutative

The following pearl by Jacobson can under no circumstances be left out from the list:

Let $\mathbf{R}$ be a ring with center $\mathrm{Z}$. Let us suppose that you can find $n \in \mathbb{N}_{>1}$ such that $x^{n}-x \in \mathrm{Z}$ for every $x \in \mathbf{R}$. Then $\mathbf{R}$ is a commutative ring.

2 added 21 characters in body; deleted 8 characters in body; deleted 11 characters in body

The following pearl by Jacobson can under no circumstances be left out from the list:

Let $\mathbf{R}$ be a ring with center $\mathrm{Z}$ \mathrm{Z}$. Let us suppose that you can find$n \in \mathbb{N}_{>1}$such that$x^{n}-x \in \mathrm{Z}$for every$x \in \mathbf{R}$and a fixed natural number$n$greater than$1$. mathbf{R}$. Then $\mathbf{R}$ is a commutative ring.

In Herstein's Noncomutative rings you can find a delightful treatment of

Let $\mathbf{R}$ be a ring with center $\mathrm{Z}$ such that $x^{n}-x \in \mathrm{Z}$ for every $x \in \mathbf{R}$ and a fixed natural number $n$ greater than $1$. Then $\mathbf{R}$ is a commutative ring.
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 22, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.8874104022979736, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}