uniform random multivariate on interval (0,1)

Printable View

• February 5th 2011, 11:27 AM
nikie1o2
uniform random multivariate on interval (0,1)
Hi guys,

Im given X, Y, Z are independent uniform random variables on the interval (0,1).
The question is find P(x<y<z).
Im thinking its a triple integration of f(x,y,z) dxdydz ? not too sure of the bounds though..

• February 5th 2011, 01:05 PM
theodds
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikie1o2
Hi guys,

Im given X, Y, Z are independent uniform random variables on the interval (0,1).
The question is find P(x<y<z).
Im thinking its a triple integration of f(x,y,z) dxdydz ? not too sure of the bounds though..

No need to integrate. You can solve this by counting, since
$<br /> (X < Y < Z) \cup (X < Z < Y) \cup \cdots \cup (Z < Y < X)<br />$
is the whole space (except for a set of measure 0) and each of those events is disjoint and equally likely. Hence, the probability is 1/6.

If you did want to integrate, which I wouldn't recommend, the integral would be of this form:

$\displaystyle \int_0 ^ 1 \int_0 ^ z \int_0 ^ y \ dx \ dy \ dz$
• February 6th 2011, 12:03 PM
nikie1o2
nice. so your saying those 6 possibilities x<y<z,x<z<y,z<x<y,z<y<x,y<x<z,y<z<x equals our sample space and there's a 1/6 probability that x<y<z. I get it.!

The next question i have to answer is whats the p(xy<z) can i solve that in a similar way ?
• February 6th 2011, 02:53 PM
theodds
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikie1o2
nice. so your saying those 6 possibilities x<y<z,x<z<y,z<x<y,z<y<x,y<x<z,y<z<x equals our sample space and there's a 1/6 probability that x<y<z. I get it.!

The next question i have to answer is whats the p(xy<z) can i solve that in a similar way ?

That one I integrate, although if you apply the same idea I initially used it makes things a bit easier. First, I would calculate 1 - P(XY > Z) and note that
$<br /> (0 < Z < XY < X < Y) \cup (0 < Z < XY < Y < X)<br />$
is the equivalent to (XY > Z) (except on a set of probability 0); moreover we have a disjoint union of equally likely sets, so it suffices to calculate
$<br /> 1 - 2 \cdot \int_0 ^ 1 \int_0 ^ x \int_0 ^ {xy} \ dz \ dy \ dx.<br />$

Another approach would be to take the -log of both sides. You end up needing to find P(Gamma(2, 1) > Exponential(1)) with this method, which is easy enough. There may be an easier way that I'm not seeing that lets you get this immediately.
• February 7th 2011, 05:36 PM
nikie1o2
ok, im just confused when you take the complement of p(XY <Z) why it = 1-P(Z<XY) is that a typo? or im just not seeing why that's correct
• February 7th 2011, 07:04 PM
theodds
Quote:

Originally Posted by nikie1o2
ok, im just confused when you take the complement of p(XY <Z) why it = 1-P(Z<XY) is that a typo? or im just not seeing why that's correct

No typo, that is what it is. Clearly $XY < Z$ or $XY \ge Z$ correct? I can make the inequality strict because equality happens on a set of probability 0; it doesn't matter at all, but I made the inequalities strict so that I could get a disjoint union.

Both the methods I listed give the same answer, which leads me to believe I'm not making a stupid mistake.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:01 AM.
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 0, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 6, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": false, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9361312985420227, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}