## Lattices in $SL(n,\mathbb R)$

### Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

If $\Gamma\subseteq SL(n,\mathbb{R})$ is a lattice (i.e. discrete and finite covolume), does $\Gamma$ necessarily contain some $\mathbb{R}$-diagonalizable copy of $\mathbb{Z}^{n-1}$?

I know that the answer is yes if the lattice is cocompact, and that the answer is also yes in the case $\Gamma=SL(n,\mathbb Z)$. So I wonder if every lattice satisfies this property.

-

1
What exactly does your second sentence mean??? – Igor Rivin Jul 3 at 23:46
I've edited the question to make it clearer. Hopefully I didn't change what the OP is asking. – unknown (google) Jul 4 at 0:16
Ah, much better! – Igor Rivin Jul 4 at 0:37
That is what I meant, thanks for the correction. – ALB Jul 4 at 3:24
@ALB: I am curious as to why the proof is easier for uniform lattices?! – Igor Rivin Jul 4 at 4:38
show 5 more comments

## 2 Answers

The answer is yes. It is theorem [2.13] of the following paper of Prasad and Raghunathan:

Prasad, Gopal; Raghunathan, M. S. Cartan subgroups and lattices in semi-simple groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 96 (1972), 296–317.

There is also a lot of information in this paper: http://www.math.bgu.ac.il/~barakw/papers/clorbit.pdf

Note that diagonalizable copies of $\mathbb{Z}^{n-1}$ in $\Gamma$ correspond to closed orbits for the action of the full diagonal subgroup of $SL(n,\mathbb{R})$ on $SL(n,\mathbb{R})/\Gamma$.

This is related to the Margulis conjecture which (with some caveats) states that the closure of any orbit of the full diagonal on $SL(n,\mathbb{R})/\Gamma$ is algebraic, i.e. is itself the closed orbit of some subgroup. This conjecture is the biggest open problem in homogeneous dynamics (and in particular implies the Littlewood conjecture in number theory).

-

### You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.

This is a theorem of G. Prasad and M.S. Raghunathan. See Theorem 7.2 in this paper of Steve Hurder's (rigidity of Anosov actions) -- the original reference is a bit less friendly.

-

@Alex Eskin and Igor Rivin: Ok, thank you for your precise answers and additionnal information. – ALB Jul 4 at 16:22
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 11, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 20, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "plain"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9196394681930542, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}