# Poles, wavefunctions, transmission

Why is it said that $\operatorname{sech}x$ (a transmission amplitude) has a simple pole on the imaginary axis? Thanks.

-

1
Can you give some context? sech has no poles as far as I can tell, as it is a continuous, strictly positive, bound function. I would vote down but I can't. – adavid Oct 25 '11 at 19:10

1
@adavid, the imaginary axis! The poles are on the imaginary axis. – user1631 Oct 25 '11 at 20:00

1
Thanks @user1631. When I see $x$, I think $\mathbb{R}$. I guess $z$ would have got me on the right track. And next time, please do give some more context... – adavid Oct 25 '11 at 20:56
– Qmechanic♦ Nov 19 '12 at 19:15

## 1 Answer

To have a simple pole at $a$ means that $f(z) \sim 1/(z-a)^{n}$, with $n=1$. I.e., the function does not diverge with $1/z^2$ or a larger power.

For more details on the poles of $\operatorname{sech}(z)$, check out this answer. As simple as the poles of $\operatorname{sech}(z)$ may be, there is an infinite amount of them (as many as there are zeroes to $\operatorname{cosh}(z)$).

-

Thanks, and sorry about the misleading variable choice. – simpleton Oct 25 '11 at 23:25
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 11, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9385700821876526, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}