## Books on analytic functions on Banach spaces over a non-Archimedean field

### Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

I'm looking for good textbooks on analytic functions on Banach spaces over a non-Archimedean field. If you know one(s), please let me know.

-

## 3 Answers

One beautiful book is Peter Schneider's Nonarchimedean Functional Analysis, appeared in the Springer Monographs in Mathematics in 2006. A more analytic one (with less emphasis on Functional Analysis and more on Calculus) in Alain Robert's A course in $p$-adic Analysis, GTM 198. But I still think the bible is S. Bosch, U. Güntzer and R. Remmert's Non-Archimedean Analysis, appeared in the Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 261.

-

### You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.

I am not sure why the question is about "analytic functions on Banach spaces". This subject from infinite-dimensional analysis seems never studied in the non-Archimedean setting. Already the p-adic analogs of analytic functions behave quite differently from their classical counterparts. General monographs on non-Archimedean analysis contain only minimal information on p-adic analytic functions. There are good introductions in the books by Robert and Koblitz. However there are some books devoted specifically to this subject:

Hu, Pei-Chu; Yang, Chung-Chun. Meromorphic functions over non-Archimedean fields. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2000;

A. Escassut, Analytic elements in $p$-adic analysis. Singapore: World Scientific, 1995.

-

There is a Bourbaki's volume of the resume of the theory of (possibly infinite dimensional) differential and analytic manifolds over Archimedean(i.e. real and complex) and non-Archimedean fields. It contains definitions and results but no proofs on the title subject. – Makoto Kato Oct 25 at 19:01

Although they are a little older and Anatoly's remark on general monographs might apply here, maybe A. C. M. van Rooij: Non-archimedean functional analysis and W. H. Schikhof: Ultrametric Calculus still contain helpful information.

-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 2, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.18, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": true}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.8709882497787476, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}