# A charged particle moves in a plane subject to the oscillatory potential

A charged particle moves in a plane subject to the oscillatory potential:

$U(r)=\frac{m\omega^2 r^2}{2}$

There is also a constant EM-field described by:

$\vec{A}=\frac{1}{2}[\vec{B}\times\vec{r}]$

where B is normal to the plane.

This produces the Lagrangian:

$L=\frac{m}{2}\dot{\vec{r}}^2+\frac{e}{2}\dot{\vec{r}}\vec{A}-U(r)$

Now my friend says we need to transform this into polar coordinates and that produces:

$L=\frac{m}{2}(\dot{r}^2+r^2\dot{\phi}^2)-mr^2\omega_L\dot{\phi}-U(r)$

where $\omega_L$ is the Larmor precession frequency:

$\omega_L=-\frac{eB}{2mc}$

My question is, How does he get this transformation? I don't really understand where the second term is coming from in the mechanical kinetic energy.

-

## 2 Answers

In polar coordinates $d\vec{r}=\hat{e}_r dr+\hat{e}_{\phi}rd\phi$. Devide it by $dt$ and you will have the particle velocity $\dot{\vec{r}}$. Square the latter and you will get the kinetic energy.

-
Okay this makes a lot of sense. Thanks. This notation is much easier to read. – mnky9800n Apr 21 '12 at 21:50

2
@mnky9800n: Note that you can "accept" and answer by clicking the green tick if you feel that it helped you (and you don't want to wait for another answer). – Manishearth♦ Apr 22 '12 at 2:46

$\newcommand{\er}{\hat e_r} \newcommand{\et}{\hat e_\tau} \newcommand{\d}{\dot} \newcommand{\m}{\frac{1}{2}m}$

This one gave me a feeling of déjà vu, since I's already answered a similar one. Here's the relevant part of the derivation:

My $\theta$ is your $\phi$\ (usually $\phi$ is used for the azimuthal angle in spherical coordinates--which are a 3D extension of polar coordinates)

In radial coordinates, $\d\er=\d\theta \et$, and (useless here) $\d\et= -\d r \er$. $\er,\et$ are unit vectors in radial and tangential directions respectively. Due to this mixing of unit vectors (they move along with the particle), things get a little more complicated than plain 'ol cartesian system, where the unit vectors are constant. $$\vec p= r\er$$ $$\therefore \vec v=\d{\vec p}= \d r\er + r\d\er=\d r \er + r\d\theta\et$$ $$\therefore v^2= \vec v\cdot\vec v= \d r^2+r^2\d\theta^2$$

$$\therefore KE=\frac12m\vec v\cdot\vec v=\frac12m|\vec v|^2=\frac12m (\d r^2+r^2\d\theta^2)$$

So basically it's just a few steps of math that he neglected (IIRC this is usually considered an identity).

-
{"extraction_info": {"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 0, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 16, "mathjax_display_tex": 4, "mathjax_asciimath": 0, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0}, "config": {"markdown_headings": true, "markdown_code": true, "boilerplate_config": {"ratio_threshold": 0.3, "absolute_threshold": 10, "end_threshold": 15, "enable": false}, "remove_buttons": true, "remove_image_figures": true, "remove_link_clusters": true, "table_config": {"min_rows": 2, "min_cols": 3, "format": "github"}, "remove_chinese": true, "remove_edit_buttons": true, "extract_latex": true}, "english_confidence": 0.9329257607460022, "perplexity_flag": "middle"}