From the information provided, this is not standard of care - but giving us the image files (upload to e.g. dicomlibrary and CT report would be very helpful.Here is NCCN's very helpful patient guideline for kidney cancer.A suspicious 2 cm lesion on a kidney often, but not always is renal cell carcinoma. A 2 cm renal cell carcinoma that's confined to the kidney is usually pretty harmless and very unlikely to relapse or metastasize.The problem is that 1) staging is incomplete and 2) you won't have histology going along with this to confirm that it is indeed renal cell carcinoma and 3) your father has concerning symptoms that are as of yet unexplained.Initial evaluation and staging vitally includes comprehensive labs (CBC, metabolic panel, LDH), abdominal CT with and without contrast, chest CT (or at least, but that's discouraged in the guidelines, chest X-ray) and a thorough physical examination and history.If there are any alarming signs on history or examination, additional imaging must be done. I'd consider vomiting, nausea and weight loss to be alarming. At least brain imaging (preferably MRI) should be done to exclude brain metastases imho.Also, when not performing a partial nephrectomy, which would be preferable to ablation if possible, an initial core needle biopsy to secure histologic diagnosis is recommended. Otherwise you won't ever know what kind of 2 cm mass they burned. The NCCN guidelines stateBiopsy of small lesions confirms a diagnosis of malignancy for surveillance, cryosurgery, and radiofrequency ablation strategies. Ablative techniques may require multiple treatments to achieve the same local oncologic outcomes as conventional surgery.
Seeking information regarding dads renal cell carcinoma. Any urologists here?My dad has been having serious issues with vomiting, nausea, and weight loss. They ended up doing abdominal CT because colonoscopy and upper GI scope were normal. There was an incidental finding of a 2 cm heterogenous(I think???) lesion on one kidney. Per radiology report, it says renal cell carcinoma until proven otherwise.Today we saw the urological surgeon who said due to size of tumor and my dads age, hes a candidate for ablation and theyll give him a referral.The appointment was very rushed and I (29 F) went in with my dad because he has a history of TBI and has a hard time remembering/relaying medical info. We basically were just told that its cancer (which I figured from reading rad report) and that it can be ablated very quickly and the doctor then basically told my dad to drop his pants for a prostate exam so I made a swift exit.My questions lie in whether more imaging needs to be done on my dad to make sure theres not other cancer somewhere? The doc said most likely stage one but theyve only done the abd CT and nothing else?? I understand its a small tumor but does that automatically mean theres no metastasis?? I dont understand how they know that its only stage I without additional testing or imaging? Can anyone give me insight here about this process?We will be following up with that physician where I will be asking for clarification. It was such a whirlwind of an appt and I just didnt feel prepared to ask necessary questions.