This may sound like a sexist question, but it’s one that I am asked all the time—and usually by women, themselves. The problem is, women have unique preferences and needs, just like men do. Furthermore, there is no reason why a woman can’t handle the same weapons a man can.
The truth is, any person (male or female) in the market for a gun needs to spend some time at a gun range trying out a wide variety of guns. Some will fit better in your hands than others, some will be more comfortable to carry, some will be easier to shoot, etc.
That being said, when someone asks about the best gun for women, they are usually asking for a recommendation on a small gun with little recoil but adequate stopping power for self-defense. For people who are looking guns that meet these criteria, the guns in the list below all fit the bill and might be a good place to start your search. Oh, and if you are looking for something a bit more feminine than the average firearm, be sure to check out the last gun in the list.
The Nighthawk Lady Hawk was designed with the ladies in mind. It is essentially a model 1911 with a smaller frame and a thinner grip. It comes standard as a single-action 9 mm but can be purchased chambered for .45 ACP. As this is a customized gun created out of demand for a “girl’s gun,” it will set you back nearly $3,500.
The Ruger SR9c is the SR9’s compact little sister. It features a slim grip and a weight of just 24 ounces. It is chambered for 9mm ammo and has surprisingly light recoil. It doesn’t have the easiest slide in the world but it’s also not the heaviest. Most users will probably find that they get used to the slide with a little practice. Brand new, this gun retails for about $500.
The Smith and Wesson M&P Shield is sleek and slim making it ideal for concealed carry. It weighs in at a light 19 ounces and is only about 6 inches in length. In spite of its size, the M&P Shield comes chambered for either 9mm or .40 S&W giving it full stopping power with surprisingly manageable recoil. The gun retails for about $450.
The Ruger LCP is a tiny gun known as a pocket pistol. It weighs a miniscule 9.4 ounces. The gun is chambered for .380 ammunition, which is considered by many to be too weak for self-defense. However, special self-defense rounds are available which increases the gun’s stopping power. The basic model starts at just under $400.
Billed as a “short-action 1911,” the Springfield EMP is a smaller, lighter version of a standard M1911. As such, it shoots the shorter 9mm and .40 S&W rounds which still give it ample stopping power for self defense. It is available with a couple of different grip options to suit your personal style preferences but this gun will set you back about $1,200.
It almost seems sexist to include a pink gun in a list of guns for women, but I wanted to include something that had an extra feminine touch. This little gun certainly fits the bill. It is a .38 special that has a two inch barrel and weighs in at a mere 12 ounces. If pink isn’t your color, you might be interested in the Lavender Lady. In either color, these guns go for about $400.


Right next before going out to acquire yourself a new hunting knife, it is advised that you make a list of what needs you want to meet with your new knife. Without no doubt, the best knife is out there somewhere, just be aware that there are various knives for various purposes. One thing you can be sure to remember is that having the best outdoor knife is one of the most important items you take along for your hunting adventure, just as much as their hunting permit. It is not news that hunters need the best hunting knife for the game they will be hunting; they are advised to take their time when making a decision for a knife.
Types of Knives
There are two types of knives appropriate for your hunting needs; there is the lock back or folding knives and the fixed blade knives. Right before making your choice, it is advised you take your time to properly research both options because they both offer their unique benefits. Your choice should be determined by some factors like your style of hunting, the type that fits you the most and much more. The majority of the decision that will determine your choice is based on your personal preference.
Fixed blade knives can be considered the choice with more strength and it is the most ideal under stressful conditions. The blades are manufactured from a piece of metal solid enough to be extended into the handle of the knife. The fixed blade knife is always in its open or ready to use position. Most of the top notch fixed blade knives are designed using a full tang.
Folding and lock back knives are designed with a one-handed opening feature, it, in turn, utilizes a lever indentation that is triggered by the thumb to get the knife in its open or ready to use position.
There are various designs of the blades that you have to get consideration to when choosing the best outdoor knife in the market. One of the factors considered when selecting a knife is its multiple uses or specific use. As mentioned earlier, most of the choices that will be considered when selecting a knife would be based on personal preferences.


North Korea is a hot topic right now so I thought it would be worthwhile to give some background into their nuclear program.
In 2006, 2009 and 2013, North Korea tested atomic weapons and in 2016 tested another, larger weapon with a yield of 10-30 kilotonnes[i]. It’s worth noting that the atomic bombs dropped in World War II were in the 12-15 kilotonne range, which means this latest test could be double the yield of those first atomic bombs, and the devastation of those early bombs is well known. This latest 2016 test is causing concern due to North Korean claims that it was a hydrogen bomb, a technology capable of creating much larger detonations. While some experts dismiss the claim that North Korea has developed hydrogen weapon capabilities due to the relatively smaller size of the 2016 detonation when compared to verified hydrogen tests by other nations[ii], it does raise the specter of North Korea advancing their program to a much more dangerous level. Should North Korea succeed in its efforts to miniaturize these weapons to a size whereby they can be mounted on the tip of a missile, the danger grows exponentially as the reach of their weapons would threaten numerous nations, thus the international angst. In a May 2017 interview with the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Siegfried Hecker, a professor Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation and one of the few Americans to have visited North Korean nuclear sites, stated his belief in the likelihood that the North has, in fact, succeeded in miniaturizing weapons for mounting on missiles and that those nuclear capable missiles could threaten South Korea and Japan[iii]. Professor Hecker went on to detail the most recent test; the missile represented a significant improvement over previous tests in that it reached an altitude of 1243 miles, flew 497 miles and splashed into the Sea of Japan, and could, if launched on a more traditional trajectory, extend its range to approximately 2486 miles which would qualify it as an intermediate ballistic missile[iv].
Satellite images of ground scarring from missile launches seem to confirm Hecker’s assessment. These photos indicate the missile being tested could be the Hwasong-12 which, according to North Korea, has a range of 2500 miles and therefore puts much of Asia, much of Russia, Guam, parts of Alaska and Hawaii in range [v]. To add to the concern, this generation of missile is able to be launched from mobile platforms making then much harder to detect and locate[vi].
Another issue of concern is whether North Korea has achieved the ability to process uranium as opposed to plutonium. North Korea has a limited supply of Plutonium, and this material has to be processed in very conspicuous facilities; not so with Uranium which North Korea has in abundance and which can be processed in facilities much easier to conceal[vii].
Beyond the military threat posed by North Korea’s nuclear program, Hecker noted the possibility of a nuclear accident in the North and questioned who would control the estimated 20-25 nuclear weapons should the regime collapse into chaos and whether they might find their way into the hands of non-state actors[viii]?
For a map of North Korea’s nuclear facilities, see the following provided at http://www.nti.org/gmap/nuclear_north_korea.html?/


Wags has given me the ok to discuss this, so I'd like to bring you up to speed on what has been done with missiles and ECM.
* 15s start-up any time you power the ECM on
* Burn through moved out
* 25-28nm for fighters with older ECM
* 23-24nm for fighters with newer ECM
* 12nm for strategic and tactical bombers featuring powerful ECM sets
* Fuzes have been given more realistic triggering distances - the most powerful are the AIM-120 and R-77.
* Speeds and ranges have been adjusted to create a good relative representation of these missiles with respect to each other based on real data and corroboration from people in the know. AIM-9 has specifically been significantly sped up, and is almost equal in range and speed to the R-73. This adjustment was done according to RL speed-time-altitude charts for the AIM-9L. For radar guided missiles, the basic range setup is: AIM-7/R-27R < R-77/AIM-120B < AIM-120C < R-27ER.
* ARH missiles will now track down to very low altitude. No more <10m safe zone.
* Very significant resistance of radar missiles to chaff unless you put them on your 3-9.
* Chaff resistance is AIM-120C > Other ARH > SARH
* Reduced seeker gimbal limits for radar missiles. Again, here ARH are better than SARH.
* Heat Seekers will not search for targets if launched without a seeker lock. This means launching any heat-seeker without seeker lock will cause that missile to be wasted
* You must now hold the trigger for a short time in order for a missile to launch
* The missile proximity fuze is inhibited for a very short time when the missile launches.
AI will now notch with an accuracy corresponding to their skill. This means that while an excellent AI can lose most of your missiles, an average AI will most likely be hit. While the note on this may be short, the change in gameplay is big.
Basic Aircraft changes:
* F-15C now has an IFF HUD cue for the PDT/STT target
* The MiG-29C will now have a default payload of 6xR-77
* Aircraft flight models adjusted to conform as much as possible to their realistic climb and acceleration capabilities, as well as turning ability.
* MiG-29C should turn better than in FC1
* F-15C now has an energy model based on the -220 engines.
* All flyable fighter aircraft will now be able to go supersonic with their full payload. The exact top speed depends on what you hang on your wings.
* Realistic G-Loc model returned to be more realistic. You can sustain a medium to high-g battle for a long time, but if you abuse it and try to hold 8+ for long you're in trouble. Doing a 'g-warm up exercise' for 15-20 sec at 5g or so will better prepare you for a high-g fight, increasing your tolerance to high-g for a few minutes.
What is the effect effect of these changes on game play?
In general, the idea was to encourage a player to turn away from a missile in order to defeat it.
You will notice changes in how missiles behave with respect to chaff especially. For SARH, I would recommend to launch salvoes of two missiles; chaff is not likely to decoy both of them. The best defense is a notch and orthogonal roll, but this means the defender gives up the fight and the attacker has complete advantage - as it should be.
Aircraft using SARH vs. ARH equipped aircraft will naturally be at disadvantage, however the notch and otherwise beaming ARH missiles and using decoys at an appropriate distance will work.
The longer fuzes mean that maneuvering to dodge the missiles kinematically is now riskier.
The best chances of survival are a combination of beaming, maneuvering and countermeasures.
Note that I am not talking about long-ranged shots, as those tend to be easier to defeat.
Text: GGTharos, ED Testers Team
Link zum ED Forum


A firearms manufacturer
Buy brand new Arsenal firearms online from our shop and we get it shipped free to any FFL dealer of your choosing. Arsenal Inc. is a firearm manufacturer based in Las Vegas, Nevada. The company was founded in 1991 and is focused on producing high-quality firearms, specifically semi-automatic rifles and pistols inspired by the Kalashnikov design.
The company is known for its attention to detail and commitment to producing accurate and reliable firearms.
One of the key features of Arsenal Inc. is the high-quality materials and craftsmanship used in gun production. All rifles and pistols are built with great attention to detail and are designed to withstand heavy use and harsh conditions.


Gun safety for beginners is a must because gun ownership is something millions of Americans cherish and take pride in. In light of recent events with firearm legislation especially, the number of guns sold has skyrocketed in the past year. With this in mind, there is always a need to be an added emphasis on gun safety. This is the cardinal rule every gun owner needs to fully understand. It can be easy to forget how dangerous these weapons are, but know that many people are injured or killed each year as a result of improper handling.
Make sure you have the proper firearms license. Even if you are an experienced owner, it never hurts to take a safety refresher course. This applies to both handling and storing weapons, as both are equally dangerous when not performed correctly. The right to bear arms is something granted to us by our nation’s constitution, but with this right comes a high degree of responsibility. Unless you are able to take the proper safety measures at all times, you may be better off not owning one in the first place.
Owning a Gun: A Guide to Safety
A gun is always loaded. Even if it’s not. It is never wise to act careless with a gun because you believe it’s not loaded. Never point the barrel anywhere unsafe.
- Always keep the clip separate from the gun and make sure to equip a trigger guard when not using the gun. Many people think it is better to keep their weapon loaded at all times, especially at night when potential break-ins could occur. However, it is more of a risk to keep the ammunition loaded, especially if there are children living in the home. There is a reason most guns come with trigger guards when purchased, so make sure to use this device whenever you are not using the weapon.
- Safes are a must have. And we’re not talking about the drop safe you store extra cash in. A gun safe is the only way to ensure your gun stays out of reach of unauthorized hands. Make sure to keep it protected and to keep the ammunition from accidentally going off in the case of a fire. Smaller gun safes to larger wall safes—whatever safe works best for you. Even if it’s not the most expensive or rugged safe, get one. A low-end safe is better than none at all.
- Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to fire. This may seem like common sense, but a lot of new gun owners make this mistake.
- Gun safety should always be your number one priority. You should also take a safety course before firing your weapon for the first time.
- Handgun: Pixabay


I have been looking on and off for additional than 50 many years and typically utilized the normal rifle, shotgun and perhaps the vertical bow. When i was launched to your crossbow a while back I discovered a new challenge as well as a new enthusiasm. Now I should state right here which i still plan to hunt with muzzleloaders, rifles and shotguns in the suitable hunting seasons BUT I also decide to raise my time and skill together with the crossbow. The thing is, I am not a purest while in the feeling of remaining a “Johnny one particular note” with regard to my looking weaponry. Crossbows increase a dimension to hunting pretty different with the extra conventional powder weapon method. It demands the development of new skills in dealing with, cocking and taking pictures with consistency at unique ranges. What’s more, it requires a more qualified approach to stalking along with the utilization of stands and blinds. It is most likely a lot more important to know your video game target’s patterns and habitat, for the reason that assortment for crossbow searching is significantly significantly less in the majority of circumstances absolutesurvivalist.
There are actually a rising quantity of states that let crossbow searching throughout archery season instead of just rifle period. This provides a terrific opportunity to extend your searching time. Most states do involve a further allow to hunt that has a crossbow but it is really well worth the price tag to experience the excitement of matching your searching abilities against the delicate instincts of wild sport – and in a closer selection. For the people of you that are in a point out that only permits crossbow looking during rifle seasons, why not increase into the breadth of the hunting encounter through the use of the crossbow for the duration of that point also.
Not merely has the rising utilization of the crossbow additional a fresh dimension to your veteran hunter’s existence but it has prolonged the chance to the physically challenged plus more elderly hunters to continue and to lengthen their many years during the industry. Maybe that’s the explanation, as an aging hunter, I am so thrilled to get part of the crossbow looking “club”.


Special matchmaking which tanks - posted in locked thread archive: which tanks have special matchmaking except premium tanks i already know of b1 are there other tanks. To enhance matchmaking for a better, fairer experience, we revised its core mechanics and implemented an all-new template-based algorithm more information. Happy when there's a chance that the person will come and join us on one of our premium restaurants control may matchmaking tanks be best for. The 112 is a chinese tier 8 premium heavy tank the development of the 112 tank started in 1962 the project was to feature parts and components of.
T-34-3 / 112 preferred mm do these tanks actually get preferential matchmaking 8 comments share i played the 112 and t-34-3 for 25 battles between the two. When it comes to complaints about world of tanks, nothing comes close to the number of complaints about the rigged match making, or mm there are quite literally 10’s of thousands of complaints about.
Wot - rigged match making (112 for sale) | world of tanks claus kellerman loading wot - make world of tanks great again - duration: 12:48.
So i've heard that some tanks have preferential mm how exactly does that work does it have to do with the tank's weight relative to its tier. Churchill 3 has had pref matchmaking for at least as long as i’ve makes tanks bad for platooning and in general neither of those tanks is enjoyable to play or.
This world of tanks 112 weak spots guide breaks down the 112 and gives you every weak spot you need to damage the 112 frontally or some the side/rear. That allows for easy transitioning from scouting to flanking to infiltrations 01 (p) is another example, as its 220 alpha damage is (almost) twice that of other tier vi medium tanks a tier 6 scout can meet tier 7, 8, 9 or 10 kpfw 18, the matchmaker has been modified due to the introduction of the new tier ix and x light vehicles.
Let’s compare them a bit further then both are chinese heavy tanks, both are armed with a 122mm gun both have the same viewrange and radiorange wz-111 has 1550 hitpoints (112 has only 1500) mobility wz-111 weighs 44,225 tons and is powered by a 520 hp engine (11,758 hp/t) 112 weighs 45,725 tons and is powered by a 580hp engine. Chinese line are just russian tanks with slight variations so another group out next group, grinders people that grind lines and want to enjoy playing all tanks well lots of chinese mid tiers are bad and higher tiers need lot of free xp so not attractive line for this group of people either next, players that want ez mode tanks/op tanks. Premium tank list - pref mm - posted in general discussion: is there a list anywhere that can be referred to as to which tank receives preferential matchmaking and those that do not.
Preferential matchmaking chart for premium vehicles - posted in current archive : lately, ive noticed a couple of questions regarding matchmaking in response to these threads/pms, i took the time to request a preferential match making chart from our dev team, and heres what they provided for the community: please note that there. Wot 112 matchmaking the 112 does receive special matchmaking that will prevent it from the project was to feature parts , as long as the track side not exposed. World of tanks - comparing tanks side by side: 112 vs is-6. Wot: basic guide to premium tanks it has limited matchmaking of up to tier iv the 112 heavy and t-34-3 are both a waste of gold and should be avoided.
2018. All Rights.


MantisX is, without a doubt, one of the world's smallest and most effective training systems, designed for small arms, long range rifles, automatic rifles or simply hunting rifles. It is easily mounted on a picatinny rail platform of mounts such as SPUHR, ERA-TAC together with aditional picatinny rail adapters.
A shooter will often have difficulties to translate the failure of a shot into a proper diagnosis which results into him not being able to know which area to improve. MantisX is the answer to the problem. When mounted on the gun, the MantisX will be able to indentify and grade the area that needs to be improved and will offer the propers suggestions. Maybe you pushed the trigger too hard, maybe you shook too much, maybe your hand is too dominant and draws towards right or left etc. If the fault is there, MantisX will find it and address it. By following the instructions suggested, the shooter will be able to improve the shots and this will be shown by higher and higher points on the MantisX ranking.
What does MANTISX do?
- MantisX detects each shot you make, analyzes the movement of the firearm during the trigger pull, and assigns a score to each shot that signifies deviation from the aiming position.
- Based on the movement patterns of the firearm, MantisX identifies areas of improvement and provides coaching that will improve your mechanics, your score, and your precision.
- MantisX keeps track of all your shooting sessions and generates useful reports that will help you identify your shooting trends, gauge your progress, and set adequate improvement goals.
How does MANTISX work?
- Mounts on you rifle or handgun on a picatinny rail, under the barrel, on side of the gun or on top.
- Install the smartphone application, turn on MantisX, and pair the device with a phone via Bluetooth. Available for both Android and iOS.
- Evaluates shooting performance, identifies areas of improvement, and tracks progress over time.
- Direction & Magnitude: Tracks the movement of your gun's barrel during the trigger pull. Shots are grouped according to movement pattern similarity.
- Shot by Shot Analysis: Tracks score of each shot individually. Analyzes trends.
- Detailed Trace: Green: hold/sighting. Yellow: trigger pull. Red: Shot breaking and recoil pattern.
- MantisX works with both dry fire and live fire, airsoft and Co2, which makes it easy to use reagrdles of the location.
- MantisX works on both handguns, long range rifles or automatic rifles. When using the MantisX, choose in the application the type of gun you use as well as where on the gun the MantisX is installed.
How does MANTISX offer feedback?
- Score: Each shot is scored depending on how much you moved away from your sighted position during the trigger pull. The perfect score is 100 (impossible unless locked in a vice).
- Direction: For each shot, MantisX detects the direction of the barrel movement during the trigger pull. If you tend to shoot left, left sector will light up on the wheel. After a few shots, the training device shows the pattern of your movement.
- Suggestion: Analyzing an individual shot or the group of shots, MantisX provides you with a suggestion that could improve your shooting mechanics. Read the coaching tips to know how to focus your efforts in the next round of shooting.
Who uses MANTISX?
- Individulas: with MantisX, practice anytime and anywhere. Analyze each shot you make, keep tabs on your performance overtime, and hone your shooting mechanics by following our data-driven suggestions.
- Instructors: as an instructor, manage your students more efficiently with MantisX, spending more time on actually coaching rather than watching people shoot. MantisX also provides hard data for students to see.
- Agencies: Agencies help their cadets and employees gain and maintain excellent marksmanship skills necessary for military and law enforcement service. MantisX also assists in training for qualification exams.
MantisX will run regular updates on the application continuously adding new features to the training system.
MantisX Training Bundle includes:
- one accessory-rail compatible attachment
- smartphone application (downloadable on App store)
- micro-USB charging cable
- 1-year limited warranty


We offer USCCA training, NRA certified Law Enforcement courses in handgun, shotgun, patrol rifle, and long gun, as well as MPOETC authorized firearms qualifications for active officers and certified retired officers' qualifications. We offer courses in the Use of force, less-lethal munitions, liability for departments and tactical teams. We are trained in multiple facets of building entry, SWAT tactics, Weapons retention, advanced weapons skills, and training scenario development. We also instruct and consult for active shooter scenarios. We now have an on-site classroom and TI Training Systems training simulator.


Imagine having the ability to fly or project yourself to anywhere of your choosing and observe certain proceedings without anyone been aware of your presence, what will you do?
While the US chose to spy on bizarre situations such as on the soccer training camp of the Germans, I believe most of us will use this ability to keep tabs on our elusive partners or destructive neighbors.
And although this is over simplifying the use of unmanned aerial vehicles otherwise known as drones, you have to admit it is quite a stimulating introduction to the topic of today—Drones!
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Drones: An Overview
The term ‘drone’ was coined when the first set of flying vehicles were introduce in the US and the unique ability of these vehicles to accomplish aerial movement without the assistance of human control, led the technicians and scientists working on such projects to nick name these aerial vehicles as drones.
Therefore, unmanned aerial vehicles or drones can simply be defined as robotic vehicles built with the ability to carry out aerial navigation using advanced GPS tracking systems and artificial intelligence to accomplish its purpose.
These unmanned aerial vehicles are generally equipped with certain tools and features such as on-board cameras, crash avoidance systems etc. depending on the functions the drone was designed to accomplish.
This means that the features of drones used in defense operations are usually different from those of domestic drones as will be shown below.
Types of Drones
As stated earlier, drone types are categorized by their use and functionalities but a broad categorization strategy can also be applied to create a nomenclature for drones and the below categories cover the different types of drones currently in use:
Combat Drones—our first awareness of the word drones will definitely be about its destructive abilities and use in scouting out enemy territory for the coordination of aerial attacks and the type of drones used in these situations are known as combat drones. These drones which are known for their combative nature come with attack features such as; dispersion of electromagnetic rays, thermal and kinetic forces and explosive capabilities. Examples of such drones is the Global Hawk which is equipped with advanced combative features.
Logistics and Reconnaissance Drones—drones with the necessary features—mapping, photography and video taking features—are used by both governmental and domestic departments/individuals to handle aerial research or gather information on a certain surrounding.
Civil and Commercial Drones—these drones are the vehicles used by the average individual for diverse purposes including; aerial photography, land scouting and other recreational purposes. Examples include the Storm Drone 6 GPS. It is also important to note that this article will pay more attention to drones listed under this category.
How Drones Function
The flight patterns of drones are initiated using two basic process which are:
Artificial Intelligence—were a drone will be equipped with a flight navigation system that includes GPS tracking features, crash avoidance and navigation features which provides the drone with the innate ability to function without being controlled.
Remote controlled—a done can also be controlled from a ground based station or on a control station situated on a vehicle. These drones are also equipped with diverse features such as night vision and video surveillance capabilities.
Getting Your Personal Drone
Now that we have a good understanding of what drones are and the difference between a combat drone and a commercial one, we can move to the next section of today which is purchasing your own drones but first it is important to note the regulations behind possessing a domestic drone.
In the United States, there are two major regulatory bodies that regulate the use of flying vehicles and they are the Federal Aviation Administration and the Academy of Modern Aeronautics.
These regulatory bodies set the safety standards for the use of drones as recreational vehicles. The Academy of Modern Aeronautics provides a set of standards—known as the voluntary safety standard—and some of the standards includes not flying a drone above 400 feet as well as obtaining the required permits required to purchase or use drones in domestic settings.
Adopt a Drone
The advancement in unmanned aerial vehicle technology has ensured that smaller sized drones with multiple functions have now been developed for sale on the market and some of these domestic drones which you can test drive include:
Parrot AR Drone v2.0
The parrot AR is popularly known as the starter pack for prospective drone connoisseurs and tech enthusiasts interested in using drones for recreational purposes. The Parrot AR which can be controlled using your android or iPhone comes with the following features:
A frontal high definition camera which allows you take pictures and record videos
An outdoor and indoor shell which are adapted for both outdoors and indoors flight
Remote controlled by either an Android or iOS based device
Storm Drone 6 GPS
The Storm Drone 6 is definitely more advanced than the Parrot and it comes equipped with its own starter pack, user manual and assembly instructions.
Added to its features and functions below is the fact that users will have to assemble its components and learn one or two tricks on using its advanced systems.
It spots a Go Pro camera for the taking of images and videos
It is equipped with extra batteries to prolong flight duration
It is controlled by a GPS module flight controller
It is built and designed to support the carrying of extra payload
It comes with a light weight hexacopter platforms with carbon fiber landings which aids the landing process
At the end of this course, you would have learnt the basic definitions of what a drone is, how they function and the different types and roles they play in commercial, recreational and governmental circles.
So in conclusion, we would like to state that before going online to purchase your private unmanned aerial vehicle, it is important that you know the rules and regulations of drone use in your locality in order to avoid afoul of the law.


The military branch has declared that Northrop Grumman’s MQ-8C Fire Scout has reached “initial operational capability,” or the minimum state it needs to enter service.
The UAV is based on the commercial Bell 407 airframe, albeit with seats and other manned avionics equipment stripped out and replaced with remote controls and extra fuel tanks.
“The MQ-8C will be equipped with an upgraded radar that allows for a larger field of view and a range of digital modes including weather detection, air-to-air targeting and a ground moving target indicator,” according to the statement. “It will deploy with [Littoral Combat Ship] in fiscal year 2021 while the MQ-8B conducts operations aboard LCS in 5th and 7th Fleets.”
More of them planned
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designers at Northrop Grumman Corp. will build five long-range unmanned helicopters for operation from destroyers and other surface warships under terms of a $55.1 million U.S. Navy contract. The UAV helos includes two lightweight fuel cells. The manned version of the Bell 407 seats seven, can carry a useful load of 2,347 pounds, flies as fast as 140 knots, and has a range of 324 nautical miles.
As noted by the USN, the MQ-8C has flown more than 1,500 hours with in excess of 700 sorties to date. Over the next few years, Northrop Grumman will continue MQ-8C production deliveries to the Navy to complete a total of 38 aircraft.


What was the purpose and mission of the Rocky Flats site?
The Rocky Flats Plant was part of the nationwide nuclear weapons complex. It manufactured radioactive and non-radioactive metal parts, primarily for nuclear weapons, from 1951 to 1989. Plutonium pits for U.S. nuclear weapons were produced at Rocky Flats between 1954 and 1989. Prior to 1954, pits were manufactured at Los Alamos National Laboratory and in1996, limited pit production resumed there.
The site mission was changed in 1992 to decontamination and decommissioning of nuclear facilities, and cleanup and closure of the entire site.


Esty Statement on President Trump’s Decision to Withdraw from the Iran Nuclear Agreement
WASHINGTON, D.C.–Today, Rep. Elizabeth Esty (CT-5) released the following statement in response to President Trump’s announcement that the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear agreement:
“President Trump’s decision to pull out of the nuclear agreement with Iran is unwise and, quite frankly, dangerous. In the years since the agreement between the United States, Iran, the United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany was reached, we have significantly and verifiably diminished Iran’s ability to produce a nuclear weapon. Because of the nuclear agreement, Iran is further away from developing a nuclear weapon than they were prior to this arrangement.
“Our work with our European allies and the international community allowed us to remain diligent in demanding verifiable progress towards our ultimate goal: preventing a nuclear-armed Iran. This is the latest in a series of actions taken by this administration that have undermined American global leadership and further divided us from our democratic allies, who have repeatedly reiterated their intention to honor their commitments under the Iran Deal.
“It is better to have an imperfect, yet a verifiable agreement in place that allows us to confirm Iran’s compliance with measures that prevent the development of a nuclear weapon than to have no agreement at all. Make no mistake—Iran is a dangerous state sponsor of terrorism and the Iranian regime has repeatedly threatened America and our close ally Israel. That is why we should continue to address Iran’s disruptive behavior that falls outside the scope of the deal with other pressure and joint sanctions with our allies. Rather than removing our commitment to the nuclear deal, which would open the door for Iran to develop nuclear weapons unencumbered, we should work to enforce Iran’s commitments, ensure the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has the resources necessary to inspect Iranian facilities, and stand ready to act when Iran tests our resolve.”


PROCESSING TIME ON GENERAL ORDERS IS 2 to 2 1/2 WEEKS. The shop will be closed Dec 21-27 for the holidays
INTERNATIONAL BUYERS: YOU MUST FILL OUT THIS DOCUMENT WITHIN 48 HOURS OF YOUR PURCHASE OTHERWISE YOUR ORDER WILL BE REFUNDED.
This small dagger is versatile for all photos! Comes with a removable skull sheath.
note: this is not a real dagger and not made with real steel.
size: 23x3 cm


6 edition of Decontamination of Warfare Agents found in the catalog.
March 21, 2008
Written in English
|Contributions||Andre Richardt (Editor), Marc-Michael Blum (Editor)|
|The Physical Object|
|Number of Pages||311|
The skin is the first line of defense against chemical warfare agents including nerve agents and toxic industrial chemicals, providing a possible barrier or delay to systemic distribution. However, so About this book. Early and rapid skin decontamination is extremely important following exposure to chemical warfare agents and toxic. Decontamination is the reduction or removal of hazardous agents. Decontamination of chemical agents may be accomplished (the “gold book”; 4th ed, ). There are three levels of patient decontamination: 1. Immediate decontamination. and slow rate of diffusion of chemical warfare agents in water significantly limit the hydrolysis.
Chemical warfare (CW) involves using the toxic properties of chemical substances as type of warfare is distinct from nuclear warfare, biological warfare and radiological warfare, which together make up CBRN, the military acronym for nuclear, biological, and chemical (warfare or weapons), all of which are considered "weapons of mass destruction" (WMDs). Chemical Warfare Agents, Second Edition has been totally revised since the successful first edition and expanded to about three times the length, with many new chapters and much more in-depth consideration of all the topics. The chapters have been written by distinguished international experts in various aspects of chemical warfare agents and edited by an experienced team to produce .
"Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents is a comprehensive and up-to-date monograph covering in nine sections virtually everything related to the topic, from "anthrax" to "VX." The editor did an excellent job of giving a homogenous "feel" to the contributions of more than authors with varying backgrounds and points of : NOOK Book (Ebook). Chemical warfare agents (CWAs) are defined as “any toxic chemical or its precursor that can cause death, injury, temporary incapacitation or sensory irritation through its chemical action.” 1.
Reading Wittgensteins Philosophical investigations
Global warming & the greenhouse effect
Brotherhood and democracy.
Basic Qual Assurance Lab
Statement of action taken on the Recommendations.
Recommendation and Study relating to whether damages for personal injury to a married person should be separate or community property.
The life and times of John Brown Baldwin, 1820-1873
Submission to the Royal Commission on Health Services.
history of Negro education in the South
Andre Richardt is the head of Biological and Chemical Decontamination at the German Armed Forces Institute for Protection Technologies in Munster, Germany. Having obtained his degrees from the universities of Cologne and Freiburg, he spent most of his career working for the German armed forces in biological and chemical decontamination.
Decontamination of Biological Warfare Agents Bärbel Niederwöhrmeier German Armed Forces Institute for Protection Technology ‐ NBC Protection, Business Area of Biological and Chemical Decontamination, Humboldtstr.Munster, GermanyAuthor: Bärbel Niederwöhrmeier, André Richardt.
Decontamination of Warfare Agents: Enzymatic Methods for the Removal of B/C Weapons [Richardt, Andre, Blum, Marc-Michael] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Decontamination of Warfare Agents: Enzymatic Methods for the Removal of B/C WeaponsFormat: Hardcover. Get this from a library. Decontamination of warfare agents: enzymatic methods for the removal of B/C weapons. [André Richardt; Marc-Michael Blum;] -- "Based on results previously restricted for military use and inaccessible to the public, this practice-oriented handbook introduces the use of enzymes for fast and efficient decontamination of.
Chemical and biological warfare agents are continuing threats to the military on the battlefield as well as to civilians in the form of terrorist attacks. When material becomes contaminated with these agents, it must be decontaminated before it can be used or disposed of, and the extent of decontamination required will depend on the intended : Hardcover.
Chemical and Biological warfare. Contents show On 7 Aprila chemical warfare attack was carried out in the Syrian city of Douma.
The worst of the persistent agents are the blister and nerve agents. Decontamination of non-persistent agents is basically the same as for persistent ones, only the task is much easier, and if you just leave.
Decontamination of Warfare Agents: Enzymatic Methods for the Removal of B/C Weapons / Edition 1. Chemical warfare agents Decontamination of biological warfare agents econtamination of chemical warfare agents Publish your book with B&: $ Get this from a library.
Decontamination of warfare agents: enzymatic methods for the removal of B/C weapons. [André Richardt; Marc-Michael Blum;] -- Based on results previously restricted for military use and inaccessible to the public, this practice-oriented handbook introduces the use of enzymes for fast and efficient decontamination of B/C.
Based on results previously restricted for military use and inaccessible to the public, this practice-oriented handbook introduces the use of enzymes for fast and efficient decontamination of B/C weapons in various scenarios, including terrorist attacks.
It draws on the internationally recognized technological leadership of the German armed forces, whose anti-B/C technology is among the most. Reactive skin decontamination lotion (RSDL) was developed for cutaneous decontamination of chemical warfare agents after exposure to a chemical warfare agent (Figure ).It was developed for topical use by the Defense Research Establishment in Suffield, Canada, with broad spectrum decontamination properties for chemical agent cutaneous threats.
Rapid decontamination of the skin is the single most important action to prevent dermal absorption of chemical contaminants in persons exposed to chemical warfare agents (CWA) and toxic industrial. Keywords: Blister agents, chemical warfare, decontamination, detection, mustards, nerve agents, protection Among the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), chemical warfare (CW) is probably one of the most brutal created by mankind.
Like Diphoterine, which has been evaluated only for sulfur mustard decontamination, the polyurethane enzyme-immobilized sponge is a novel technology that has demonstrated efficacy for OP and sulfur mustard cutaneous poisoning, but it is only now being evaluated for decontamination of biological warfare agents (such as T-2 mycotoxin and.
It begins with a section on the background of decontamination, which includes a chronological history of military research, an overview of the US Department of Defense decontamination principles and requirements and a chapter that acts as a primer on chemical and biological warfare agents.
Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents, Second Edition covers every aspect of deadly toxic chemicals used in conflicts, warfare and terrorism. Including findings from experimental as well as clinical studies, this essential reference offers in-depth coverage of individual toxicants, target organ toxicity, major incidents, toxic effects in humans, animals and wildlife, biosensors and.
Nerve Agents 1 2. Vesicants 19 3. Cyanide 29 4. Lung-Damaging Agents and Toxic Industrial Chemicals 33 5. Riot-Control Agents 43 6.
Incapacitating Agents 49 7. Biological Agents 53 8. Toxins 67 9. Field Management and Triage of Contaminated Casualties on the Integrated Battlefield 71 Patient Decontamination Station: Planning, Setup.
Covering chemical agents, biological agents, radiation emergencies, electronic terrorism and directed energy weapons, and personal protection and decontamination, the Handbook provides a brief history, signs and symptoms, personal protective measures, and treatment modalities for the various topics.
Decontamination in general is defined as the removal of hazardous material from areas where it is not wanted. Decontamination is utilized to reduce the dose that worker may receive from a component or surface, to reduce the potential for airborne Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) agents, or to reduce the disposal cost associated with the component or the material.
Since the first massive use of toxic chemicals as chemical warfare agents during World War I effective decontamination has been a major part in any effective countermeasure strategy against the. This practice establishes an in-vivo method for assessing the comparative efficacy of products used for the decontamination of chemical warfare agents (CWAs) on the skin.
This practice provides a quantitative efficacy comparison of different skin decontamination products. In the special field catalytic decontamination of biological and chemical warfare agents he has been working for over ten years in national and international working-groups.
His current research interests include investigations of non-thermal inactivation of biological and chemical agents as well as the control of the efficiency of a.Decontamination units landed right behind the infantry on the invasion beaches, prepared to clean the beachfronts for the troops if the Germans used chemical weapons to counterattack.
their responsibility–not some technician’s responsibility–to make sure they had a defensive capability against CB warfare agents. The Chemical Corps had.Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents, Third Edition, covers every aspect of deadly toxic chemicals used in conflicts, warfare and ing findings from experimental as well as clinical studies, this essential reference offers in-depth coverage of individual toxicants, target organ toxicity, major incidents, toxic effects in humans, animals and wildlife, biosensors and.


Having produced cutlery for over a decade, I have run the gambit of concerns from achieving just the right Rockwell hardness in my blades, to the "bells and whistles" that are suppose to make a customer go "OOOHHH."
I think back to the days when I joined the American Bladesmith Society, and all I could think about was someday producing a knife that might be good enough to be included in one of the major knife publications, and thoroughly believing that I could never make a blade that would pass the ABS Journeyman test. Then one day it hit me.....If others could do it, then so could I. I read, talked to other makers, and read some more. As I became more educated on metallurgy, and began to experiment on my own, a couple of things became very clear. One being, that each knifemaker seemed to dwell on a specific element of their product, and each used that same element of their work as the main selling point. Some would tout the rockwell hardness of their steel(s), others would boast of the stainless qualities, and yet others prided themselves on the fine hollow grinds they produced. Secondly, I noticed that while a certain knife might have the ability to hold a great edge, it was usually very difficult for the average person to sharpen when it did become dull. Or, as I wondered to myself, would that same knife chip or break if used under extreme circumstances? These thoughts and experiences lead me to create a high expectation for my knives, and after a couple of years, I came to refer to these expectations as........The Overall Package.
The Overall Package is not a myth, or even a dream. It is a very achievable combination of desirable characteristics that can provide the customer with a using knife that will:
1. Hold an edge
2. Be easy to resharpen
3. Be extremely durable and resilient
4. Be comfortable to use
5. Be pleasing to the eye
This combination does not come automatically, nor easily. One must consider all of the aspects of the knife, as well as it's intended purpose, and as with most things, there are some trade offs that must be realized by both the maker and the customer.
Lets begin with steel selection. Is the finished blade a using knife? An Art Knife? Will it see service in a corrosion prone environment? Each question should lead to another. The general parameters of use should be helpful in choosing the steel. Once the type of steel is chosen, the next set of questions arises. Taking into account the given steel, which grind is most suited to the knife's intended task(s)? And what type of heat treatment, in conjunction with that particular grind, on the chosen steel, will render the desired characteristics in the finished blade?
Now let's take a look at grinding. Through years of experimentation and testing, I have come to the very pointed conclusion, that the best cutting blades are those with very small, or no edge bevels. This means grinding the blade in such a manner, as to eliminate any unnecessary bulk or "meat" near the edge. Now we start to see how the other facets play into the blade. Will the type of steel, and the chosen heat treatment (hardness level), allow one to grind a blade in this manner without the finished edge chipping? Will it be necessary to lower the hardness to achieve this?
(Trade off # 1: A little less hardness, often will yield a more durable edge/blade.)
What about blade geometry? This is not simply how the blade is ground from the spine to the edge, but should also include the tapering of the tang on a "full tang" knife, as well as a distal taper (a blade that is thickest at the ricasso, and tapers all the way to the point) built into the blade itself. These tapers will impart balance to the finished product, and will also distribute stress evenly, should the need arise. Very often you will hear people speak of "balance", and how one knife feels so well balanced, while another feels "klunky." If you pay close attention when at a knife show, you will notice that the knives that "feel" good in your hand, will generally have either a distal tapered blade, or tapered tang, or both.
Finishing: The majority of this category speaks for itself. All scratches removed, all aspects balanced, and everything looking good. The most important part of this area is to NEVER say "Thats good enough." I have handled many a knife that was only a couple of finishing hours away from being a truly outstanding piece. The problem? Attention to detail! Are the plunge cuts as even as possible? Is the same level of finish evident in those hard to get at areas, as on the larger, more easily accessible areas of the knife? And finally, do the lines of the knife "flow?"
Hold a knife at arms length, and visually absorb the profile. Follow the outline with your eyes. Is there anything that makes you change focus, or abruptly move your eyes? Does it look like everything is one object, rather than a conglomeration of parts? If you can answer "NO", "NO", and "YES" then you can bet that the maker took his/her time, thought it out, and did it right!
There are many other technical aspects that also contribute to "The Overall Package", and as time allows, I will identify them in other articles. For now, suffice to say that there are many more things that go into a well made custom knife than a specific steel, it's Rc hardness, or the type of grind. Think about it.
Copyright 2019: "The Montana Bladesmith"


I can fix it by myself… I’m smart and intelligent enough to do it… by my way… 🙂
These guys are really creative and determined… 🙂
Few steps how to make great Stormtrooper mask
Why would I pay a lot of money to fix something, when I can do it myself??? 🙂
The bazooka is a man-portable anti-armor rocket launcher, made famous during
World War II, where it was one of the primary infantry anti-tank weapons used
by the United States Armed Forces. It was one of the first weapons based on the
High explosive anti-tank (HEAT) shell to enter service. It was nicknamed “bazooka”
from a vague resemblance to the musical instrument of the same name invented and
used by Bob Burns. It saw widespread use throughout WWII.
The German armed forces copied the design, increasing the caliber to 88 mm, as
well as other changes, and issued it as the Raketenpanzerbüchse “Panzerschreck”.
The word “bazooka” is often informally and incorrectly used to refer to any
shoulder-launched missile weapon.
Kid builds homemade Bazooka.


This high-quality steel knife is similar to the beveled knife, but the back of the blade has a slight contour to it rather than being completely flat. The serves to reduce the amount of metal that must be removed when the blade is sharpened. Many bassoon players prefer this style of knife. For personalizing this knife, choose your own handle size! We offer small, medium or large wooden handles. Also be sure to choose from either Right-Handed or Left-Handed.


To fully understand the current crisis between North Korea and the United States one needs to refer to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, its objectives and implementation. In brief, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NTP) is a landmark international treaty, whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament.
The Treaty represents the only binding commitment in a multilateral treaty to the goal of disarmament by the new nuclear weapon states. The treaty was opened for signature in 1968 and enforced in 1970. On May, 11, 1995 the treaty was extended indefinitely. A total of 191 states have joined the treaty, including the five nuclear weapons states. More countries have ratified the NPT than any other arms limitation and disarmament agreement, a testament to the treaty’s significance.
The problem with the treaty is in its implementation. There are two sides to the treaty implementation, the disarmament aspect which should apply to all those who already have nuclear weapons and are expected to disarm by gradually reducing their stockpiles and desisting from building more sophisticated and advanced weapons. The second aspect of the treaty applies to non-nuclear weapons states which form majority of UN member states.
What has happened so far, over the years, is that in reality, the nuclear weapons states have improved the quality and quantity of their nuclear weapons stock pile, so as to maintain their superiority, as well as, super power dominance. Their action is due to the fact that no country in the United Nations system is capable of bringing them to order, or of imposing sanctions on them. Consequently, they are left to regulate themselves.
Rather, most of the UN energy and debates were devoted to ensuring that other non-nuclear states do not acquire nuclear capability. Even then, among the original non-nuclear states, there are those regarded favourably by the nuclear weapons states, or seen as mature enough to acquire and maintain nuclear weapons, such as Israel, South Africa, (under apartheid dismantled before hand over to Mandela).
The second group are countries such as Iran, Iraq, Libya and a few others in the Middle East, as well as other parts of the world including North Korea. Part of the problem is that there is no fair and even handed treatment of countries intending to acquire nuclear weapons. This issue may be responsible for the determination of some countries to view acquisition of nuclear technology as a fundamental inalienable right. This issue is at the core of the current North Korean nuclear crisis.
The idea of having a nuclear free world is noble and commendable, and should be supported by every country in the world given the destructive capacity of nuclear weapons. But then it must be pursued in an open, credible, fair and even handed manner.
The North Korean Nuclear Program
North Korea’s interest in nuclear weapons program dates back to the end of the Second World War. Since then, the country has developed a nuclear fuel recycle capability and has both plutonium and enriched uranium program capable of producing fissile material. At one stage North Korea declared it has roughly 38.5kg of weapons grade plutonium extracted from spent fuel rods in May 2008. In November 2010, North Korea unveiled a uranium enrichment program ostensibly intended to produce low enrich uranium for power generation purposes. Though it is possible for the country to produce highly enriched uranium for weapons purposes
North Korea has conducted 5 nuclear weapons tests in 2006, 2009, and 2013 and twice in 2016, claiming that the January 2016 test was a thermonuclear device. Since President Donald Trump came into power in has conducted 9 tests. To ensure that North Korea’s nuclear ambition is truncated, the USA organized a six party talks between North Korea, Japan, China, Russia and the United States in 2013. After Kin Jong’s death, North Korea agreed to suspend nuclear tests, uranium enrichment and long range missile tests in exchange for food aid from the United States. However, after a dispute in 2012 with the USA over the launch of a rocket, North Korea declared the agreement dead.
Since 2003, North Korea is no longer a party to the Treaty on the non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Consequently, the country has come under sanctions after conducting a number of nuclear tests beginning in 2006.
Behind the US administration’s sudden urgency in dealing with North Korea’s nuclear program is the realization that a growing body of expert studies and classified intelligence reports have concluded that North Korea is capable of producing a nuclear bomb every six to seven weeks.
This acceleration in pace explains why President Trump and his aides fear they are running out of time. For many years past United States presidents calculated that each incremental improvement in the North Korean nuclear program brings the country closer to joining the league of nuclear weapons states, that’s if it has not already done so many years ago. What no one knows is exactly the degree to which North Korean’s weapons program had gone and whether it is not too late in the day to do anything about it.
Those step by step advances have resulted in North Korean warheads that could possibly in a few years reach Seattle, in the USA. It was the threat and the actual conduction by North Korea of missile tests in 2017 that forced the Trump administration to issue a threat that it was ready to confront North Korea if it fails to suspend missile tests as well as other nuclear weapons program.
The threat was followed with the deployment of warships to the Korean peninsular under the excuse that it is part of a pre-arranged military exercise with South Korea. Many commentators have seen the latest US move as a bit dangerous and capable of inviting unintended military confrontation with the possibility of nuclear weapons being used.
The exact nature of what could be the US response to further nuclear tests from North Korea is not known, neither is it clear. However, former US presidents who have dealt with North Korean problem in the past have been patient and careful, knowing all the possibilities of miscalculations and what could go wrong. Past US administrations have threatened and imposed more sanctions, and called on China to reign in North Korea and have proposed dialogue; this must be in realization that North Korea is already a nuclear power. What North Korea is currently focusing on in terms of development and perfecting is the delivery system, the intercontinental ballistic missile capability (ICBM) able to reach any part of the globe.
It is not every aspiring nuclear power that can be easily, safely, cowered into submission, more so, after such a country has been able to master nuclear weapons technology and gone ahead to produce and test such nuclear weapons. This is probably the main reason why past US administrations were in dilemma about how to proceed with North Korea, and to some extent Iran. It will not be reasonable but not impossible that a super power could be provoked to the degree that it will be tempted to militarily attack a nuclear state either with conventional or nuclear weapons. This possibility should now be the concern of the rest of the world including African countries
North Korea is technically no longer part of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, consequently it cannot be said to be breaking any international law. The United Nations should be involved in this crisis to ensure the interest of all members of the international community is considered. China, the closet country to North Korea, has the best influence on Pyongyang and should be brought into the process. China has already stated that it is a delicate process where even she must tread carefully.


Smith Enterprise Springfield M14 Muzzle Brake 30 Caliber - Muzzle Brake 30 Caliber .595-32 Ss Phosphate-Smith Enterprise If you are looking for Seeley Smith Enterprise Springfield M14 Muzzle Brake 30 Caliber - Muzzle Brake 30 Caliber .595-32 Ss Phosphate-Smith Enterprise Yes you look this. online shopping has now following a long way; it has misused the habit consumers and entrepreneurs realize thing today. It hasn't wiped out the idea of shopping in a instinctive store, but it gave the consumers an different means to shop and a greater than before make public that offers
Smith Enterprise Springfield M14 Muzzle Brake 30 Caliber - Muzzle Brake 30 Caliber .595-32 Ss Phosphate
Lets you spend more time practicing with your favorite high-power, match rifle without the recoil. Absolutely no gunsmithing required for amazing muzzle control and greatly reduced felt recoil even on select-fire rifles. Changes the sharp recoil that most shooters experience with the military stock into a soft push. Easily replaces the issue flash hider without alterations and includes the front sight dovetail and castle nut set screw. Mfg: Smith Enterprise SPECS: Machined steel, manganese phosphate finish. 3" (7.6cm) long, .862" (21mm) diameter, 4.3 oz. (123 g.) wt.


Israel is now proved to have nuclear weapons. They offered to sell them to South Africa in 1975:
Secret South African documents reveal that Israel offered to sell nuclear warheads to the apartheid regime, providing the first official documentary evidence of the state's possession of nuclear weapons.
The "top secret" minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa's defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel's defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them "in three sizes". The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that "the very existence of this agreement" was to remain secret.
The documents, uncovered by an American academic, Sasha Polakow-Suransky, in research for a book on the close relationship between the two countries, provide evidence that Israel has nuclear weapons despite its policy of "ambiguity" in neither confirming nor denying their existence.
The Israeli authorities tried to stop South Africa's post-apartheid government declassifying the documents at Polakow-Suransky's request and the revelations will be an embarrassment, particularly as this week's nuclear non-proliferation talks in New York focus on the Middle East.
They will also undermine Israel's attempts to suggest that, if it has nuclear weapons, it is a "responsible" power that would not misuse them, whereas countries such as Iran cannot be trusted.
Another damaging report for Netanyahu, but I don't see how it will change anything.


I’ve been doing a lot of hunting for the past few days. I haven’t shot anything yet, but I have been getting a lot of attention when I’m out there, and that’s been a good thing. The last couple days, I have been really focused on getting my head back into the woods. As I’ve gotten older, I have developed a natural reluctance to hunt.
Shooting a deer does not require a lot of concentration. There is just one part of the brain that is responsible for shooting a deer, the “hunting horn.” In fact, the hunting horn is so important that it can actually be made to work by the brain in a very similar way to a human brain. Because of that, the hunting horn is often referred to as a “hornsicle,” which is short for “hunting horn.
Some of the most successful hunters in the world have had a head injury and lost their hunting ability. Many people who have suffered a hunting accident have no idea why they are not hunting like they used to. One could argue that hunting in general is a skill that has been replaced with a handicap.
In the case of the hunting horn, the handicap is the brain injury. The brain is now incapable of performing the functions of a normal horn. In other words, the horn that was once capable of killing at the range of a human being is now incapable of doing so at all. The hunting horn makes it possible to hunt and kill without the handicap of human-level brain function.
It’s a shame that hunting is such a handicap, because with it, you are no longer a hunter. You can kill anything without having to rely on your hunter-gland to actually kill your prey. It’s a shame, because for a lot of hunters, the handicap of being unable to kill prey is a source of great anxiety.
The hunting horn is one of the most useful weapons in the game because it allows you to hunt and kill without the handicap of being hunted. The hunting horn is something that you build in your inventory, and use to hunt. Once you’ve used it to hunt, you can’t go back and put it back into your inventory. You can’t use it to kill, either, because you can’t kill without a human brain to help you.
So hunters, you can hunt with the hunting horn, but it’s only useful for killing prey. It’s not useful for hunting, except for finding a few rare boar tusks in dungeons full of boars. The hunting horn is not at all useful for anything else in the game, because its only purpose is to kill prey with.
It may seem like an odd concept, but what happens is that you can go back and use the horn multiple times to unlock new hunters. Because hunting, unlike hunting with weapons, uses more than the mere capacity of a human brain.
And the only reason for hunting, aside from the horn’s use-by-hunters, is that when you use a hunting horn, you can also use it to kill enemies. It’s important to note that the hunting horn does not allow you to kill yourself. There are no health-recovery abilities for it, and it’s a little hard to make out what it does when you’re not looking.
The hunting horn can be used to heal itself, but it does not heal itself as well as a regular horn. It is important to note that the horn does not allow you to heal or kill yourself. As a result, the horn can be used to kill other hunters. This gives you more ways to use the horn’s power and more reasons to wield it.


During its gameplay release shown in GTTV, Modern Warfare 3 gave a preview of its latest game installment with smoother frame-rates, better graphics and the long-awaited dual scopes feature.
Based on the shown game trailer, players will now be able to combine any of the available scope options. The video, for example, shows a rifle being mounted with not only a holographic sight, but an ACOG scope as well.
Although the holographic sight was the one used for the rifle’s main sight, the gamer was able to flip the ACOG scope back-and-forth to give him a few levels of zoom during the game.
More details and features regarding Modern Warfare 3 will be revealed as they come here, so watch out for it.


unopened, unless the item is handmade or was packaged by the manufacturer in non-retail packaging. 23x35 official Police/NRA Size B-27. They are great for Concealed Weapons Permit Classes. undamaged item in its original packaging (where packaging is applicable). Packaging should be the same as what is found in a retail store. Ranges, unused, Rifles or Archery, Blue, Paper Shooting Targets Blue Silhouette Gun Pistol Rifle B-27 Qty:25. 25 Human Silhouette Targets, these are great targets!. Condition:： New: A brand-new, or Backyard fun! Whether you're shooting Pistols. such as an unprinted box or plastic bag. See the seller's listing for full details. See all condition definitions ： Model: ： B-27E ， Brand: ： SON OF A GUN TARGETS： MPN: ： Does Not Apply ， Type: ： Paper Targets： Country/Region of Manufacture: ： United States ， UPC: ： Does not apply ， 。.
Blue Silhouette Gun Pistol Rifle B-27 Qty:25 Paper Shooting Targets, 23x35 official Police/NRA Size B-27, They are great for Concealed Weapons Permit Classes, Ranges, or Backyard fun, Whether you're shooting Pistols, Rifles or Archery, these are great targets,25 Human Silhouette Targets, Blue,Sell & More Promotion Services,wholesale prices,Visit our online shop,Official online store,the latest products and minimum discounts. Silhouette Gun Pistol Rifle B-27 Qty:25 Paper Shooting Targets Blue, Paper Shooting Targets Blue Silhouette Gun Pistol Rifle B-27 Qty:25.


U.S. War Plans Would Kill an Estimated 108 Million Soviets, 104 Million Chinese, and 2.3 Million Poles: More Evidence on SIOP-62 and the Origins of Overkill
Lieutenant General Thomas Power, Commander-in-Chief, Strategic Air Command, 1957-1964, and Director, Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff, 1960-1964, presided over the creation of SIOP-62 (Image, courtesy of Headquarters, U.S. Strategic Command)
A recently declassified Joint Chiefs of Staff report on “Berlin Contingency Planning,” produced in June 1961 as the Berlin Crisis was heating up, includes horrific estimates of fatalities and destruction that the execution of U.S. war plans would cause to the Soviet Union and putative allies. According to the JCS, if the full U.S. nuclear force assigned to the Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) struck the Soviet Union, 54 percent of the total population would be killed, that is some 108 million of a total population of 217 million. If the smaller alert force (bombers on 15 minute to 2 hour alert) was used, total Soviet casualties would be 37 percent or about 80 million. Against China, the full force would kill a smaller proportion because there were fewer cities: 16 percent of an estimated 650 million or about 104 million. Poland, the site of Soviet air defense installations, would suffer 2,636,000 million casualties in an attack by the full force. The report, sent to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, was forNational Security Adviser McGeorge Bundy to use for answering questions posed by White House adviser and former Secretary of State Dean Acheson.
Total USSR casualties destroyed by US nuclear strike: 54 percent of total population.
The estimated fatalities would be caused by the implementation of the first SIOP (for fiscal year1962), which the Defense Department had created to consolidate Air Force, Navy, and Army nuclear war plans and to eliminate duplicate targets, among other problems. The terrible casualty figures were the direct consequence of standard operating procedures used by war planners. According to the JCS report, the SIOP-62 stipulated a 95 percent assurance factor for the destruction of targets “representing a direct threat” to the continental U.S. A very high assurance of destruction in Russia was considered to be essential to minimize the danger posed by Soviet forces to the continental United States. To meet the assurance criteria SIOP-62 posited a mass attack of an alert force of over 1700 nuclear weapons. Some Designated Ground Zeroes (DGZs) would be struck by 2 or more weapons, creating more devastating weapons effects (fires, blast, and radiation). The high degree of assurance is one of the bases of the “overkill” that was associated with U.S. nuclear war plans.
The JCS report includes never before declassified details on major target categories that comprised the SIOP target list. 983 “nuclear threat” targets (bombers, missiles, nuclear storage), targets threatening “forward areas” (U.S. bases and allies in Western Europe, East Asia), “satellite air threat” (airfields and air to surface [possibly surface to air] missile storage), and “residual air and surface capability” (reserve airfields, air depots, etc.). According to the report not all of the 983 “installations” were targets for the alert force. For example, 230 airfields were reserved for attack by the full force only.
The JCS provided the details on nuclear threat targets in order to answer fully one of Acheson’s questions. To the query on how much of the Soviet Union’s strategic attack forces would be destroyed, the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s response was hardly encouraging: an estimated 42 percent of the total would suffer “severe damage” if the United States launched a preemptive attack. This left the Soviet Union with considerable retaliatory strength to impose massive destruction on the U.S. and allies.
Other SIOP targets mentioned by the JCS were command centers and cities. 103 “government control centers” in China and the Soviet Union were on the target list (over and above 23 other centers which were co-located with other targets); the preponderance was no doubt Soviet. The target list also included almost all Soviet cities with populations of 50,000 or greater. The alert force would target 199 cities, while the full force would target 295. The cities were included in the “urban-industrial” category and that the DGZs for a given city probably included several co-located installations (munitions factories, steel works, railroad yards, etc.). In these instances, the JSTPS probably used the “target island” concept to help plan strikes on adjacent military or industrial installations that were to be destroyed by striking a DGZ somewhere on the “island.”
This document gives us only a partial view of SIOP targeting. Not mentioned air defense targets which numbered 41, according to a message from Navy planners in Omaha. . The SIOP also covered Bravo or non-nuclear military targets. The same Navy document describes a merging of Alpha and Bravo target lists by the Joint Strategic Target Planning Staff, while the history ofSIOP-62 depicts a process of “optimum targeting” involving an “optimum-mix” list of the “best combination” of military and urban-industrial targets. Exactly what the “optimum mix” looked like is classified, but according to the Navy message, by late April 1961 the melding of Alpha and Bravo target categories for the alert force had produced a list of 725 DGZs including 41 air defense targets (20 of which were defenses of strategic nuclear targets). The 725 targets would be struck by 1706 weapons.
What made this extraordinary JCS report available was a joint effort by the National Declassification Center at the National Archives and the CIA’s Historical Publications Office to declassify several hundred documents on the Berlin Crisis during the Eisenhower-Kennedy-Khrushchev years. The documents were released in conjunction with a conference on 27 October 2011, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Checkpoint Charlie tank confrontation, one of the major events of the 1961 crisis. The NDC and the CIA deserve a lot of credit for spearheading this effort and coordinating declassification of highly significant documents on a wide range of issues, including intelligence assessments, material obtained from clandestine sources, covert action planning, negotiating strategy, and politico-military contingency planning. Many of the documents have never been declassified or published before and researchers will find much of value.
 . Fatality estimates have been declassified before (for example, this estimate from 1962), but this may be one of the first time that estimates specifically based on the SIOP have been released. It is worth noting that a few weeks earlier, Daniel Ellsberg, then working at the Pentagon, compiled an estimate of fatalities including deaths six months later, see Ellsberg, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers (New York: Viking, 2006), 58-59
. President Kennedy must have gotten an inkling of what the SIOP had in store for Poland because during a meeting with the Joint Chiefs in January 1962 he asked for details. Theanswer, sent by JCS Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, has not yet been declassified but it probably included a number for estimated casualties similar to the one cited above
.. For SIOP-62 see David A. Rosenberg, “The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945-1960,” International Security 7 (1983): especially 7-8 and 64-68. Rosenberg’s evidence suggests that the JSTPS sought assurances of as high as 97 percent to destroy the first 200 DGZs.
 . The CIA’s briefing package states that this is the “first time” publication of the State Department six-part history, Crisis Over Berlin, but it was declassified (except for a few lines in Part VI) by the Department in the early 1990s in response to a FOIA request. The National Security Archive subsequently published this history in William Burr, ed., The Berlin Crisis, 1958-1962 (1993) also available on the Digital National Security Archive.
|For release 13 July 2004||
For more information,
contact William Burr, 994-7032
U.S. Nuclear War Plans A
Overkill Problem Led Top Commanders to Complain About the SIOP’s Destructiveness
The U.S. included so many nuclear weapons in its first missile-age plan for nuclear war that top military commanders called it a “hazard to ourselves as well as our enemy,” according to newly declassified documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University.
Under the first Single Integrated Operational Plan, prepared during 1960, a Russian city the size of Nagasaki–devastated in 1945 with a twenty kiloton bomb–would receive three 80 kiloton weapons. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, then leaving office, along with Navy leaders and White House Science Adviser George Kistiakowsky, was deeply critical of the SIOP’s overkill. Eisenhower was later reported to have said that the plan “frighten[ed] the devil out of me.” Incoming Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara soon decried the “fantastic” levels of fallout that attacks on a multitude of Soviet targets would produce.
Ever since its creation, the SIOP has been one of the U.S. government’s deepest secrets. Even historical information about U.S. nuclear war plans has been hard to come by and documents once available become reclassified again. Today’s posting includes never before published as well as previously declassified key documents from 1959-1961 on the history of SIOP-62 (for fiscal year 1962). Among the disclosures in the documents:
- The SIOP included retaliatory and preemptive options; preemption could occur if U.S. authorities had strategic warning of a Soviet attack;
- A full nuclear SIOP strike launched on a preemptive basis would have delivered over 3200 nuclear weapons to 1060 targets in the Soviet Union, China, and allied countries in Asia and Europe;
- A full nuclear strike by SIOP forces on high alert, launched in retaliation to a Soviet strike, would have delivered 1706 nuclear weapons against a total of 725 targets in the Soviet Union, China, and allied states;
- Targets would have included nuclear weapons, government and military control centers, and at least 130 cities in the Soviet Union, China, and allies;
- Alarmed White House scientists, Army and Navy leaders were concerned that the SIOP would deliver too many nuclear weapons to Soviet and Chinese territory and that the weapons that missed targets “will kill a lot of Russians and Chinese” and that fallout from the weapons “can be a hazard to ourselves as well as our enemy”;
- According to the damage expectancy criteria of SIOP-62, it would take three 80 kiloton weapons to destroy a city like Nagasaki–which the U.S. had actually bombed with a 22 kiloton weapon;
- The Marine Corp commandant was concerned that the SIOP provides for the “attack of a single list of Sino-Soviet countries” and makes no “distinction” between Communist countries that were at war with the United States and those that were not;
- The Defense Department has overclassified and inconsistently released information about the SIOP.
Some evidence exists that after the Cold War ended, Strategic Air Command commander-in-chief General Lee Butler tried to curb what he saw as the SIOP’s “grotesque excesses” by paring down the huge target lists. Security classification, however, hides whether General Butler’s reforms took hold or whether the SIOP remains an instrument of overkill.


North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un observes a tactical rocket launch by the Korean People’s Army Strategic Force at an undisclosed place in North Korea in this undated picture released from North Korea’s official Korean Central News Agency on June 30.
North Korea confirmed its second missile test in recent days, with leader Kim Jong-Un overseeing the drill ahead of a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping to South Korea.
North Korea fired short-range rockets into the sea off its east coast on Wednesday morning, South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency said, one day ahead of a state visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping to Seoul.
North Korea, which tested two short-range missiles on Sunday in violation of a UN ban, is expected to be high on the agenda when Mr Xi meets his South Korean counterpart, Park Geun-hye.
Mr Xi, who is due to arrive in Seoul on Thursday in his first visit to South Korea since taking office last year, is reciprocating Ms Park’s visit to China a year ago.
North Korea’s nuclear and missile programme, and its plans to hold a fourth nuclear test, will dominate the agenda, officials in Seoul said.
A South Korean Ministry of Defence official was unable to confirm what kind of weapon was fired, but said they were assumed to be 300 mm rockets launched from one of the North’s many Multiple Rocket Launchers.
UN resolutions prohibit North Korea from procuring and using ballistic missile technology, but short-range rocket launchers are not included in the ban.
PHOTO: KCNA via KNS via AFP


In 1931, the British Air Ministry sent out a demanding new specification for a fighter aircraft. It was a remarkable document for two reasons. The first was that throughout its existence the Royal Air Force had been dismissive of fighters. The conventional wisdom was that bombers could not be stopped. Instead, foreshadowing the nuclear doctrine of mutually assured destruction, the correct use of air power was widely presumed to be to build the largest possible fleet of bombers and strike any enemy with overwhelming force. The second reason was that the specification’s demands seemed almost impossible to meet. Rather than rely on known technology, the bureaucrats wanted aviation engineers to abandon their orthodoxies and produce something completely new.The immediate response was disappointing: three designs were selected for prototyping, and none of them proved to be much use. The Air Ministry briefly went so far as to consider ordering aircraft from Poland.Even more remarkable than the initial specification was the response of the ministry to this awkward failure. One of the competing firms, Supermarine, had delivered its prototype late and well below specification. But when Supermarine approached the ministry with a radical new design, an enterprising civil servant by the name of Air Commodore Henry Cave-Browne-Cave decided to bypass the regular commissioning process and order the new plane as “a most interesting experiment.” The plane was the Supermarine Spitfire.


5 bad arguments for cutting us defense spending americans deserve an honest debate about the costs of national security. Military spending has been on the rise all over the world every country has increased its military spending over the years despite the fact that the world has been a more peaceful and calmer place in the last fifty odd years. We both voted against that war, but even for those who voted for it, there can be no justification for spending over $700 billion dollars of american taxpayers' money on direct military spending.
The militarization of america: non-military federal agencies purchases non-military federal spending on guns and now carries the might of military-style. Army-technologycom ranks the countries with the biggest stockpiles of nuclear weapons the soviet union's tsar bomba is the largest nuclear weapon ever built image courtesy of croquant. In 1946 american financier, and presidential adviser, bernard baruch proposed the dismantling of american weapons, international prohibition on the production of any more, and international co-operation in developing atomic energy for peaceful use under the strict supervision of an international body. The trump administration has drafted an executive order stating the president will significantly grow the us military, spending money on everything from additional special operations forces to.
Arms spending arming ukraine is a very bad idea arming ukraine is a very bad idea senators carl levin and james inhofe's call to send weapons into a war zone is a transparent ploy to provoke. The problem is that most of those making this argument also strongly support a massive us military -- exactly the behemoth we must be armed against it's the great gun gobbledygook consider. The best welfare program in america if allocated properly military spending should be increased because of the social good it does through education, job training, and high pay. By 2010, a wealthier america devoted only 20 percent of federal spending and 48 percent of national income to the military spending on social programs replaced military spending, but that shift.
The united states also spent $937 billion (16 percent) on various means of defending against nuclear attack, principally air defense, missile defense, antisubmarine warfare, and civil defense the amount spent through 1996—$55 trillion—was 29 percent of all military spending from 1940 through 1996 ($187 trillion. The nuclear weapons debate refers to the controversies surrounding the threat, use and stockpiling of nuclear weaponseven before the first nuclear weapons had been developed, scientists involved with the manhattan project were divided over the use of the weapon. Former senator tom coburn, american transparency's honorary chairman, said he believes non-military federal personnel who should be subject to an assault weapons ban, not the general public. Stockpiling the nerve agent would represent a violation of the chemical weapons convention, and the the kremlin quickly denied johnson's accusation that would block some american military. Military spending covers the costs of paying, feeding, and arming soldiers as well as any expenditure on war, nuclear weapons, and international military aid each country has a different idea on how much they should allot for military spending.
The nuke, called the b61-12, is a new weapon costing around $81 billion, but this pricey new bomb is actually less than 1% of a $1 trillion push to keep the us nuclear arsenal up-to-date. Next year's defense spending authorization bill includes controversial funding for the trump administration's plan to deploy a small number of low-yield nuclear-armed ballistic missiles. By hans m kristensen i was reading through the latest stockpile stewardship and management plan from the national nuclear security administration (nnsa) and wondering what i should pick to critique the obama administration's nuclear policy.
Spending on nuclear weapons as hundreds of millions of people across the globe go hungry, the nuclear-armed nations spend close to us$300 million a day on their nuclear forces the production, maintenance and modernization of nuclear forces diverts vast public resources away from health care, education, climate change mitigation, disaster. A little more than 60 miles from brussels airport, kleine brogel air base stands as one of six overseas repositories in the world where the united states still stores nuclear weapons. The fy2016 defense budget and us strategy: key trends and data points march 6, 2015 every year, the department of defense, omb, the cbo, and gao provide a wide range of materials analyzing the president's proposed defense budget, and current trends in defense spending.


By David Link
When I was at the 2016 SHOT Show the other week, I got a chance to attend a Q&A and meet Les Stroud, better known as Survivorman. I’ve been an addict of his TV concept ever since it premiered something like 15 years ago, and it was nice to take a break from bustling around the showroom floor and see what he had to say about his career, upcoming shows, and the Camillus knives and other gear he was promoting. Well the Q&A was great, and it was refreshing to see that he was a humble, easy to approach guy, especially since you never know with film and TV stars.
That all aside, I also got a chance to look at some of the survival knives that he was promoting as well. I wouldn’t say they were bad, the new folding knife seemed fine, but I was concerned about its budget pricing of it and whether it would be worth purchasing. After all, I am a fan and I thought hey, a Les Stroud knife would be pretty cool to have, even if it ended up kicking around the house more than in my pack. (If anything, I thought the fold down survival slingshot was a pretty cool idea, and if I ever ended up getting way off the grid, that wouldn’t be a bad thing to bring along). Yet then I came to the fixed-blade survival knife kit, which I believe it was an update of the SK Mountain Ultimate Survival knife, in a new earth-colored finish. I picked it up and examined it, and I thought, ugh, this is bulky and maybe a bit wobbly and I would never fix it to my belt and go for a hike.
I’m a guy with a small build anyway, and there I realized that sleek design of the sheath was pretty important to me and would factor into my next fixed-blade purchase. Sure there were some cool ideas on the sheath like a signal mirror, paracord wrapped inside, a fire starter, etc. It’s not a bad idea to have them integrated in the sheath necessarily, because if you forget something or get separated from your pack they are right there on your belt. Regardless, the plastic feel of the sheath didn’t sit well with me and I couldn’t see myself buying it. This is not a dig at Stroud or the company since not every product is meant to work for everyone, but it got me wondering, what would be my ideal survival knife?
I already touched on one of my necessary characteristics, a sleek and manageable sheath for the knife. This is probably overlooked by many, but if you don’t feel comfortable wearing the knife, then chances are you won’t bring it along when you need it. I think it would be great to add a small pouch or slot for a flint stick in there, and since they are small and combo well with a knife anyway, I’d want it in there if I can get it. You’d also want a flat, thicker edge on one side of the blade to strike the flint with vs. using the blade itself. None of those double-sided dagger type blades for me, I’d end up gashing myself with one of those, and I probably won’t be trying to spear wild hogs with it, as cool as that sounds.
I”m a big fan of what Benchmade offers, and this Bushcrafter fixed-blade is a great option for a survival knife.
Let’s touch on some other characteristics I would look for in a knife:
- Fixed-blade knife – A must have for any survival knife. A folding knife can be just fine for a lot of tasks, but you need the extra strength of a fixed-blade knife for survival applications.
- Drop point blade – From all that I have read, I believe this would be the best all-around point for a survival blade. A clip point wouldn’t be a bad choice either.
- No serrated edge – In theory a serrated edge sounds useful, but a good straight-edged blade should overcome any task that a serrated edge can. Serrated edges are also harder to sharpen, and this is another reason I’m inclined to pass since regular sharpening is something that is very important for any survival knife.
- Full tang – Part of the strength of a fixed-blade knife comes in a good, solid one piece tang to match it. There’s no storing fire starting gear or other items in the handle.
- Non-slip handle – Many non-slip handles might not be as stylish, but when you’re in the elements the last thing you want to do is slice your hand because the knife handle is wet. I’d take a handle that is going to stay firmly positioned in my hand over anything else, and a well-designed finger guard might be a worthwhile feature to look for.
- Extended pommel – Ideally I’d like to look for a knife with an extended pommel, or the butt of the knife. This can be key in tasks like pounding and hammering, and an extended pommel reduces wear on the handle and gives a leg up in hammering-type tasks. An extended pommel is also a good sign that the knife has quality, full tang construction.
- Length – Generally 4-5″ of blade and 5-7″ of handle are good guidelines for a manageable survival knife. Anything smaller or larger could become dangerous to use in certain survival tasks.
A good grip, thick blade and extended pommel make this SOG Force an appealing option as well.
Carbon Or Stainless Steel
This is a common question, and I think many are swayed by the longevity advantages of stainless steel. However to back up and explain, stainless steel is resistant to rust and therefore easier to care for long term, but it suffers in other categories and it is easier to break and harder to sharpen than carbon steel. On the other hand, carbon steel is much harder and easier to sharpen (as well as generally sharper overall), but it can rust fairly quickly when it is not kept clean, oiled and dry. Initially you would think durability is very important in an extended survival situation, and therefore stainless is the choice. But I would opt for carbon because it is sharper, and I’ll take a very sharp blade in survival over anything else. The thing is, it’s good motivation to keep the carbon steel in good shape when I’m casually using it, but when it comes to a life or death situation, I’m going to go all out and use the knife to keep me alive, even if it means that it’s trashed after the ordeal is over. So be it, I’ll just hang it on the wall as a trophy!
Spyderco’s knives can cost quite a bit, but this Bushcraft G-10 would be an ideal choice for a carbon steel blade.
The thing is, corrosion of carbon steel is a complex thing, and there are many factors involved in how fast it rusts. Cleaning, wiping and drying a carbon steel blade would go a long way to keeping it in working condition even in a survival situation, but with even just a day of constant exposure to the elements, the blade would likely begin to corrode. It would be interesting, and a little expensive, to do a test on how quickly a carbon blade would rust with constant exposure, but even that would be an estimate since the pH levels of the area and other variables could change the timeline. Suffice it to say, that proper care with a carbon blade should keep it ready to go for the survival situation you never hope to experience.
It’s really up to you how you want your survival knife to look and function. I don’t see myself splitting much wood with my survival knife, but I could definitely see myself shaving tinder off a log or cutting branches down for a shelter with a survival knife, among other tasks. It would also depend on your environment, and I’m thinking of the Rocky Mountains for this article while others may be envisioning their local terrain. Regardless, make sure you pick the right knife for you, not what other guys say is the best one out there. As for Les Stroud’s signature series, I’ll pass on the knife but I may check out the survival sling shot or one of the pre-made survival kits. What I definitely won’t miss out on is more Survivorman episodes, and you shouldn’t either.
Interested in more? Check out: Why Use A Binocular Harness?


PARIS - France said outright for the first time Wednesday that North Korea’s proclaimed nuclear test produced such a small blast that it must have failed, and analysts warned such challenging talk could lead Pyongyang to try again. . .I don't understand the point of the "analysts." Are they suggesting that Western governments should not tell the truth (i.e., engage in "challenging talk") and instead should lie to their citizens and pretend that the test was successful simply because Kim Jung-Il is a lunatic?
Such speculation about a dud test could be read as a challenge by Kim Jong Il, the North’s reclusive leader, to consider carrying out a second test to prove naysayers wrong, analysts said.
“The reaction could be exactly to carry out another explosion, to make sure it succeeds,” said Georges Le Guelte, a nuclear expert at France’s Institute for International and Strategic Research.
Thursday, October 12, 2006


Weapons Throughout Time
Located on third floor
Weapons Throughout Time is an exhibit that explores weapons spanning over 9,000 years of history. The exhibit, shown in the Cooper Gallery, features select artifacts from the museum’s extensive collection of weapons that have been used for defense, survival, and ceremony. From 13th century Samurai swords to World War I automatic weapons--visitors get a close up look at the technology and cultural influences found in weapons used throughout time and across the world.
A vast array of weaponry is presented, highlighting their purposes as instruments for combat, hunting, fishing, sports, and traditional ceremonies. Examples include prehistoric stone arrow points used in the Great Plains, Amazonian blowdarts, Zulu hunting spears, Japanese and Samoan armor, and Middle Eastern, Asian, and Western firearms. Ceremonial weapons include swords, clubs, shields, and spears. Other objects on display include helmets, crossbows, boomerangs, bayonets, knives, and much more.
These are more than tools of survival and warfare; they are cultural works of art. Each object teaches us something about the culture that produced it--their technology, their artistic styles, and their use of weapons for hunting, fighting, and ceremony. By comparing the range of weapons gathered for this exhibit, we can see how diverse cultures start with a common need and make a weapon that is distinct to their culture.