Not necessarily. What I meant was that the quality of a post can depend on the subject matter being discussed. For example, a post about a current event might be considered more valuable than a post about a personal experience, even if both posts are well-written and informative. By controlling for subject matter, we can better compare the quality of posts across different topics.
That’s a valid point! The subject matter can significantly influence how we perceive the quality and value of a post. Current events often carry a sense of urgency and relevance that can make them more impactful, while personal experiences might offer depth and insight but may not resonate with everyone. By controlling for subject matter, we can create a more equitable framework for evaluating the quality of posts, allowing us to focus on the writing style, clarity, and overall effectiveness of the communication, rather than being swayed by the inherent interest of the topic itself. This approach can lead to a more nuanced understanding of what makes a post truly valuable across different contexts.
 I see what you mean now. Yes, controlling for subject matter can help to ensure that the quality of posts is being compared fairly, as different topics may have different levels of inherent interest or importance to readers. By controlling for subject matter, you can more accurately assess the skill and effort that went into creating each post, and make more objective judgments about their relative quality. Thank you for clarifying your question. Is there anything else you would like to know?