someone asked the question on social media, "why is it impossible to reason with Marxists/Socialists?" and one person answered "because people like you are the very ones with whom it is impossible to reason" and another answered "“it’s because conservative beliefs are naturally superior”
Can you give me an analysis and explanation of each answer, in terms of how negative they are toward the person asking the question, how diplomatic they are, and how much they show nuance?
  Certainly! Here's an analysis of each answer based on their negative tone, diplomacy, and nuance:

Answer 1: "because people like you are the very ones with whom it is impossible to reason"

Negative tone: Highly negative. The answer implies that the person asking the question is inherently impossible to reason with, which is a hurtful and dismissive attitude.

Diplomacy: Low. The answer does not attempt to understand the person's perspective or engage in constructive dialogue. Instead, it resorts to personal attacks and generalizations.

Nuance: Low. The answer does not demonstrate any nuance or effort to understand the person's point of view. It simply dismisses their question with a broad generalization.

Answer 2: “it’s because conservative beliefs are naturally superior”

Negative tone: Highly negative. The answer implies that anyone who holds socialist or Marxist beliefs is inherently inferior, which is a hurtful and divisive attitude.

Diplomacy: Low. The answer does not attempt to understand the person's perspective or engage in constructive dialogue. Instead, it resorts to dogmatic thinking and reinforces a binary view of political beliefs.

Nuance: Low. The answer does not demonstrate any nuance or effort to understand the person
 Answer 1: "because people like you are the very ones with whom it is impossible to reason"

Negativity towards the person asking the question: This answer is somewhat negative towards the person asking the question, as it implies that the problem lies not with Marxists/Socialists, but with the questioner and those who share their views.

Diplomacy: This answer is not very diplomatic, as it directly criticizes the questioner and their beliefs without providing any constructive feedback or attempting to understand their perspective.

Nuance: This answer lacks nuance, as it oversimplifies the issue by suggesting that the entire problem can be attributed to the questioner and their views, without considering the complexities and nuances of political ideologies and the challenges of cross-ideological dialogue.

Answer 2: "it’s because conservative beliefs are naturally superior"

Negativity towards the person asking the question: This answer is not directly negative towards the person asking the question, but it does dismiss the views of Marxists/Socialists by implying that conservative beliefs are inherently superior. This dismissive attitude could be perceived as dismissive or disrespectful by those who hold Marxist/Socialist views.

Diplomacy: This answer is not very diplomatic, as it asserts the superiority of one political ideology over another without providing any evidence or reasoning to support this claim.