And for what does define capitalism, for what conditions profit, theirs is an investment of desire whose natureunconscious libidinal is altogether different, and is not simply explained by the conditioned profits, but on the contrary itself explains that a small time capitalist, with no great profits or hopes, fully maintains the entirety of his libidinal investments: the libido investing the great flow that is not convertible as such, not appropriated as such nonpossession and nonwealth, in the words of Bernard Schmitt, who among modern economists has for us the incomparable advantage of offering a delirious interpretation of an unequivocally delirious economic system (at least he goes all the way).