Please see the additional questions below.  Any help is appreciated.  If you
need more detail please let me know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky L Merola/DUB/EES on 08/24/2000
03:06 PM ---------------------------

"Taft, Sheldon A." <SATaft@vssp.com> on 08/24/2000 10:33:03 AM
To: "'Becky L Merola'" <bmerola@enron.com>
cc: "Petricoff, M. Howard" <MHPetricoff@vssp.com>
Subject: RE: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

In addition, Becky, do your people have views on a realistic flowchart for
interconnection applications?  The utilities are struggling to come up with
a flowchart that would identify the review steps, time requirements, fees,
etc. for different kinds of interconnection applications, including net
metering.  The PUCO staff has asked the non-utility participants to come up
with their own flowchart before our next workshop meeting on August 30.  Can
your people do that?  Is there any more information that I can provide?

-----Original Message-----
From: Becky L Merola [mailto:bmerola@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 11:08 AM
To: Tom Hoatson; Robin Kittel; Joe Hartsoe; Sarah Novosel; Jeff
Dasovich; Jeff Brown
Cc: Taft, Sheldon A.; Janine Migden; Richard Shapiro
Subject: FW: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

Hi Folks:
For those of you who have more technical expertise in electricity,  if you
could
look at the attached document and provide me with your comments by August
29th
it would be greatly appreciated.  If there is anyone else that you feel may
be
of assistance in this matter please don't hesitate to forward this document.
Thank you for your help.
---------------------- Forwarded by Becky L Merola/DUB/EES on 08/24/2000
10:56
AM ---------------------------

"Taft, Sheldon A." <SATaft@vssp.com> on 08/24/2000 09:47:18 AM

To:   "'bmerola@enron.com'" <bmerola@enron.com>, "'pmikuls@wpsr.com'"
      <pmikuls@wpsr.com>, "'bkorandovich@newenergy.com'"
      <bkorandovich@newenergy.com>, "'mayer@taftlaw.com'"
<mayer@taftlaw.com>,
      "'kurt@theoec.org'" <kurt@theoec.org>
cc:   "Petricoff, M. Howard" <MHPetricoff@vssp.com>
Subject:  FW: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

Here are the Technical Requirements proposed by the utilities at the August
23 PUCO Workshop on Interconnection.  Please have your technical people
review these and share with us any issues or problems that marketers would
have with them.  We will need to identify these issues and problems and to
propose alternatives before the next workshop meeting on August 30.

-----Original Message-----
From: Colbert, Paul [mailto:pcolbert@Cinergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 10:40 AM
To: Taft, Sheldon A.
Subject: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC

 <<Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC>> Here it is.  Thank you.

From the law offices of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended only for the person
or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged
material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by
reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.  If you are the
intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this
medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

________________________________________________________________________

(See attached file: Tech. Req. for Single & 3 Phase, 8-15-00.DOC)

From the law offices of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.  If
you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications
through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

________________________________________________________________________


1. PG&E Bankruptcy
 Update
 PX Credit Discussion
 Creditors Committee Issues
 Enron Response - Legal, PR, Other

2. Legislative Update

3. CPUC Update


Tim:  thanks for the info.  We will follow this from now on.


eSource presents Global Access training

Global Access offers an online connection to complete company information and filings via content that includes Disclosure, Worldscope, Datastream and I/B/E/S.  The product is designed to allow users to get complete company information such as financials, filings, databases and news for thousands of US and International companies from a single source.

Training Agenda Includes:
?	General Introduction.
?	Basic Reference View Query (Which provides an itemized list of all available source data.)
?	Basic Business View Query (Which pulls source data from various Global Access content, and displays it in a presentation summary).

Attend our Global Access Clinic:

May. 16 - 9:00 -10:00 AM 	EB572

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations

http://esource.enron.com


andy zipper
john lavorato
dutch quigley
larry may
mike maggi


I have received the Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of
Enron North America Corp. dated 11/10/99 appointing Dale Neuner and Robert
Shults as agents and attorneys-in-fact to execute Password Applications on
behalf of the Company  for online trading.  The original Consent will be sent
to Kate Cole for inclusion in the corporate minute book and copies will be
sent to Dale and Bob.

When signing the Password Applications, Dale and Bob should sign them as
"Agent and Attorney-in-Fact".  In the absence of Dale or Bob, any V.P. or
above can sign Password Applications (with initials from Legal).

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.


Make-up soccer game--I must go, it's William's first of the season.  I
promise they are all not early games!  Mary

Enron North America Corp.
Mary Cook
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Got it.  Thanks.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Comnes, Alan
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 4:51 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Noske, Linda J.
Subject:	Fax re: Terry Winter Testimony

Let me know if you did not get a 22 p. fax this afternoon.  GAC


I could not resist this.  Please forgive me.

Brgrds

AI

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Neustaedter, Robert
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:47 PM
To:	Ibrahim, Amr
Subject:	FW: FW: Taliban Singles

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Richard Burnett" <rc_burn_hou@hotmail.com <mailto:rc_burn_hou@hotmail.com>>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:10 PM
To:	paulboling@iapc.net <mailto:paulboling@iapc.net>; Bob_bruce@samedan.com <mailto:Bob_bruce@samedan.com>; ebrushkaty@aol.com <mailto:ebrushkaty@aol.com>; robert.drake@cabotog.com <mailto:robert.drake@cabotog.com>; jaydrayer@hotmail.com <mailto:jaydrayer@hotmail.com>; rferreira@petrobras-usa.com <mailto:rferreira@petrobras-usa.com>; rcsgburnett@mindspring.com <mailto:rcsgburnett@mindspring.com>; afmatti@ppco.com <mailto:afmatti@ppco.com>; rneusta@enron.com <mailto:rneusta@enron.com>; JOzment@mariner-energy.com <mailto:JOzment@mariner-energy.com>; rburnett@br-inc.com <mailto:rburnett@br-inc.com>
Subject:	Fwd: FW: Taliban Singles

>From: "Stanislav, Terrance J" <stanistj@bp.com <mailto:stanistj@bp.com>>
>>Subject: FW: Taliban Singles
>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:11:36 -0500
>
>
>
>   <<http://citizens.reagan.com/right/WSGil/talibansingles.jpg>>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp>


Dave,

One more time on the skew test.
Please run the calcs tonight for the ngpropt book along with the calls and
puts calcs.
Use the last skew table that you got from John Griffith.
If everything looks good then we will move everything into production.

Errol,

Please provide Dave the Post ID for the ngpropt book for the COB 3-29-01

Dutch


ok with me.  Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cantrell, Rebecca W.
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 5:02 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Cc:	Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	Leslie

Just talked to Leslie - she can do lunch on Wednesday, so go ahead and put it on your calendar.  Let's say 11:30, if that's okay with you.


Hi beautiful.  Thank you for the pictures.  You look so good.

I still don't know when I will be able to come to Brazil.  Please write with
your schedule so I can know when you will be there.

How are you doing? Is school going well?  I am anxious to hear you speak
english.  I have been thinking of you a lot lately.

Kisses

Rob


Mark and Steve,

I have previously forwarded to you the Gramm changes that I received from Ken
Raisler.  I recognise that we want to be extremely cautious about suggesting
that we support any of the changes.  Nonetheless, it may be worthwhile going
through the changes to see if they are beneficial to Enron.

For example, the changes being made to solve the "Blackbird Issue" (see p. 29
and 30 of Gramm's changes) seem to be beneficial for Enron Online.  Also,
Gramm's Swap exclusion language of section 107 seems broader than the
existing language.

If Gramm were to ask Ken Lay if we were supportive of these changes how would
we respond?  I have a hunch our response is that a perfect bill would be
ideal, but it is not likely that such a goal is attainable in this Congress
or the next Congress.  Nonetheless, I would appreciate help listing the
changes that are helpful to enron and those we just don't care about.

Tom


Mark,

Mark Smith at Equiva Risk Services-Producer Services has forwarded comments
regarding modifications to the
EnronOnline ETA to the Help Desk email address.

Please let me know if you would like me to do any additional follow up.  If I
don't hear back from you, I will assume
you have followed up with customer.

Thanks for your help!

dg

---------------------- Forwarded by Donna Greif/HOU/ECT on 01/18/2000 09:13
AM ---------------------------

"Smith MD (Mark)" <MDSmith@equiva.com> on 01/18/2000 08:53:39 AM
To: "'help@enrononline.com'" <help@enrononline.com>
cc:  (bcc: Help)
Subject: Legal Questions on ETA's

We are attempting to sign-up for full executing capability on Enron-Online.
Our lawyers had some comments on the ETA.  I have attached their comments
and was wondering if you have just this general agreement or execute
modified agreements with certain parties?  Thanks for your help

Enron Trading Agreement
(Version #2 - November 27, 1999)

Equiva Trading Company Comments

2. Representations, Warranties, and Covenants

(d) States "...Counterparty will not contest the legally binding nature,
validity or enforceability of this Agreement..."

    Change to "...Neither party will contest the
legal binding nature, validity or enforceability of this Agreement..."

3. Transactions

(c) Require a review of timelimits until deal is withdrawn.  (Are we
firm or just an indication?)

(d) Request a definition of "transmission".

6. General

(e) States "...Any notices sent pursuant to clause 6(3)(ii) of this
Agreement shall be deemed to have been received immediately upon
transmission of the electronic mail message."

    Change to "...Any notices sent pursuant to
clause 6(3)(ii) of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been received
immediately upon transmission of the electronic mail message during normal
business hours."

    Request a definition of "transmission".

(f) States "...Under the laws of the State of New York and / or the FAA
or AAA.  The arbitration shall be conducted in New York City, New York..."

    Change to "...Under the laws of the State of
Texas.  The arbitration shall be conducted in Houston, TX..."

*Mark D. Smith
Derivatives/Structured FinanceTrader
Equiva Risk Services-Producer Services
Ph: 713-277-5723
Fax: 713-277-6106
Internet:  mdsmith@equiva.com <mailto:mdsmith@equiva.com>


Ben - The attache file contains the answers to the questions included in your
e-mail for Lincoln.

Gus

	Benjamin Rogers@ECT
	10/20/2000 08:30 AM

		 To: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

Forgot to include these questions.  Thanks for the call this morning, your
help is very much appreciated.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
08:29 AM ---------------------------

Don Miller
10/20/2000 08:29 AM
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 08:28 AM
---------------------------

mhhurtado@duke-energy.com on 10/18/2000 02:51:20 PM
To: don.miller@enron.com
cc: japearson@duke-energy.com, jparker@mayerbrown.com, jusow@mayerbrown.com
Subject: Questions regarding PSD permit for Lincoln

Don,

As a result of our review of the information and documents on Lincoln we
are requesting additional documents which are not in the data room.

1.   Relating to the plant's PSD:

     The Mostardi & Platt emissions test protocol for the May 2000
     emissions test
      A report to Illlinois EPA containing the emission test data
     Continuous Emission Monitoring (" CEM") Data ( all data
     developed since start-up)
     Any reports to IEPA required under the permit pertaining to
     exceedances, or
     start-up, breakdown & malfunction ( we have internal memos indicating
     that there
     was a breakdown at # 7 on July 5,2000)

2. Also, we don't have any permits for wastewater discharge. We have been
told that there is no wastewater discharged except
sewage/office wastewater which is going to a septic field. But we have no
verification of this at this point.

Thank you for your attention to these items.

Mario H. Hurtado
Duke Energy North America


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

June 1, 2001 5:00pm through June 4, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ECS to ECN Network Interconnection, June 9th 2001

This is a notification that the Enron Corp. I/T Networks team will be connecting the new building network infrastructure located in Enron Center South (ECS) to the existing Enron Center North (ECN) backbone network.  While this activity is not expected to produce a disruption to network services, this notice is designed to alert the organization to our activities.  No network hardware or systems are anticipated to be shutdown.  The actual physical interconnection of the networks will be performed in the EB 34th floor Data Center.

Interconnection activities are scheduled to occur the evening of June 9th 2001 starting from 7:00 p.m.(CT) and completing around 11:00 p.m. (CT). Application testing activities will begin at 11:00 p.m. (CT) once all network testing has completed.

If you have any further questions, please contact Pete Castrejana at 713-410-0642 for more information.

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON CENTER SOUTH DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  ENS
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  11:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    9:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     9:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  5:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Enable routing on new router ecn-34-cor-ccr1
Environments Impacted:  ENS
Purpose: This router will be used to connect to the new building
Backout: remove routing on the router.
Contact(s): 	Scott Shishido    713-853-9780

Impact:  AEP
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  8:30:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  6:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  2:30:00 AM London
Outage:  Shutting off the internal link to 1201 Louisiana
Environments Impacted:  AEP
Purpose: Company occupying that space has been sold.
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
                        Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

Impact:  ENS/GCO
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001    thru Wed 7/4/2001
Outage:  HPL migration to AEP
Environments Impacted:  GCO
Purpose: Sites sold
Backout: None
Contact(s): 	Garhett Clark         713-345-9953
		Robert Humlicek   713-853-6366   713-406-8293

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET:
Impact:  Internet
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:30:00 PM CT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at  10:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at    8:30:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at     8:45:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:30:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  4:45:00 AM London
Outage:  Reboot Enron.com edge routers
Environments Impacted:  Internet
Purpose: Regular reboot to prevent such problems as memory corruption. Intermettent disruption to last about five minutes.
Backout:
Contact(s): 	John Shupak          713-853-7943
		Bryan Aubuchon    713-345-8446

MESSAGING:
Impact:  Corp Notes
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  cNotes Server Reboots
Environments Impacted:  All users on any of the mailservers listed below
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: Make sure server comes up.
Contact(s): 	Trey Rhodes  (713) 345-7792

Impact:  EI
Time:  Fri 6/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  1:00:00 AM CT
	Fri 6/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 6/1/2001 at 11:00:00 PM PT
	Sat 6/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London thru Sat 6/2/2001 at  7:00:00 AM London
Outage:  EI Notes Server Maintenance
Environments Impacted:  EI Local/Domestic/Foreign Sites
Purpose: Scheduled @ 2 week interval
Backout: N/A
Contact(s): 	David Ricafrente    713-646-7741

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS: No Scheduled Outages.

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY: No Scheduled Outages

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
								FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management			(713) 853-5536
SAP/ISC                                                                               (713) 345-4727
Unify On-Call 					(713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call					(713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS			(713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP				(713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR						(713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support 					(713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk					(713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797
TDS -Trader Decision Support On-Call                    (713) 327-6032 [Pager]


I forgot about the fence.

I'm still planning on leaving early - maybe 430 or earlier. Can you leave
early, too?  Michael wanted to do something with the spider web.  I would
offer to pick Michael up, but I'm not sure that I would beat you if I left at
430 and you left at 500.

Love,

ckm

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/31/2000 02:03:15 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FENCE

Well, we will not have a fence today.  The installer was very nice and
apologized for the inconvenience. He said there was a lack of communication
between he and the sales person. Bottom line he didn't have the equipment to
do either job. We discussed the driveway which will have two lines running
across it. The second one will be the divider at the gate. We also discussed
the front yard and how to get Jack in and out of the zone without having to
take off his collar each time. He got there before me and watched Jack a
little bit. He said he appeared to be the type of dog that would respond
well to the barrier.  A fast learner as he put it. Anyway, I am waiting for
them to call me and will let you know what I hear.

I will write Choc and let her know to be at the house at 6pm. I may try to
leave a little early so Michael and I will not be walking in the house about
the time she gets there. John has told the department heads to get the
parents out a little early today. I know he is leaving early himself.

Write if you can. Love, Neil


What's the deal with confidentiality--as we discovered with Nowlan.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron-admin@FSDDataSvc.com@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, October 12, 2001 8:15 AM
To:	jshankm@enron.com
Subject:	TIME SENSITIVE: Executive Impact & Influence Program Survey

***REMINDER***

We have not yet received your feedback.  Your input is
very valuable and to be included in the participant's
summary report, it must be received NO LATER THAN CLOSE
OF BUSINESS on Monday, October 22, 2001.  Without your
feedback, the participant may not receive a summary
report or be eligible to attend the program.

___________________________________________
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *
Executive Impact & Influence Program

Dear Jeff Shankman,

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight colleagues/peers.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, if you are a participant in
this program, Manager assessment, Direct Report
assessment, or Colleague/Peer assessment) will be
combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.  If
you are providing feedback as a Manager of the
participant, please note that your feedback will be
identified in the summary report.

It is important that you complete this assessment NO
LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Monday, October 22, 2001.

To begin the online administration process, you will
need the following Internet address and Password(s).
NOTE:  If you are providing feedback for more than one
person, each password and participant name is
individually listed below.

Open your Internet browser e.g., Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator, and please type or copy the URL
address below into your Internet browser (please DO NOT
go through Lotus Notes):

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

4EEKAM    (Per A. Sekse)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
LeRea Pharr at Enron, 713-345-8434, or Christi Smith at
Leadership Research Institute, 619-216-0404.

Thank you for your participation.


There may have been a problem with transmitting this email yesterday.  I am
trying again.  Please excuse should it be a duplicate.  Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sullivan, Glen J.
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 4:24 PM
To: 'Biren, Andrea'; Sullivan, Glen J.; 'Hayley Goodson'; alan_reid@pcp.ca;
andy.bettwy@swgas.com; aod@newsdata.com; askaff@energy-law-group.com;
bcragg@gmssr.com; Ortega, Barbara; bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us; burkee@cts.com;
bwood@energy.state.ca.us; ceyap@earthlink.net; chilen@llgm.com;
chris.king@utility.com; craigc@calpine.com; davef@abag.ca.gov;
dcarroll@dbsr.com; ed@clfp.com; Farrar, Darwin; eke@aelaw.com;
eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us; epoole@adplaw.com; evk1@pge.com; ewo@jmbm.com;
Quan, Edwin; furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil; garyb@abag.ca.gov;
gbudin@energy.state.ca.us; ghinners@reliantenergy.com;
grant_kolling@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us; gtbl@dynegy.com; iep@iepa.com;
igsinc@ix.netcom.com; inggm@sce.com; jcattermole@pcenergy.com;
jkarp@whitecase.com; jleslie@luce.com; jmct@gmssr.com; jmpa@dynegy.com;
johnj@bcjlaw.com; joseh@lif.org; jsteffen@iid.com; jweil@aglet.org;
jwr@cpuc.ca.gov; karen@klindh.com; karpjos@sf.whitecase.com;
kfyip@seiworldwide.com; kmccrea@sablaw.com; kmills@cfbf.com;
lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com; lmh@eslawfirm.com; Tran, Lana;
mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com; McNamara, Michael D.; mday@gmssr.com;
mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com; mjaske@energy.state.ca.us;
napedersen@jonesday.com; pjpowerlaw@aol.com; Gileau, Patrick L.; Myers,
Richard A.; raveen_maan@cerberus.city.palo-alto.ca.us; White, Rosalina;
rbw@mrwassoc.com; rczahar@aol.com; rgloistein@orrick.com;
rick.counihan@greenmountain.com; Pocta, Robert M.; rochmanm@cubjpa.org;
rochmanm@spurr.org; ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com; ronknecht@aol.com;
rpelote@energy.twc.com; rpetti@ladwp.com; salleyoo@dwt.com; Sarvate, Sarita;
skatz@sempratrading.com; slins@ci.glendale.ca.us; sscott3@enron.com;
stomashe@energy.state.ca.us; Horner, Trina; tdickers@westerngas.com;
tom.roth@et.pge.com; Beck, Valerie; 'hawiger, marcel'
Subject: RE: I.99-07-003

Dear Judge Biren and parties:

SoCalGas and SDG&E are not filing any motions to strike prepared testimony
today.

SoCalGas and SDG&E do not plan to object to the receipt in evidence of any
of the prepared testimony served to date and would be willing to stipulate
to its receipt in evidence without having to have it attested to by the
witness on the record.

SoCalGas and SDG&E jointly anticipate cross-examination as described below,
although this amount could be modified due to possible overlap with other
parties' cross-examination.

Mr. Florio (TURN)- one hour
Ms. Yap (SCGC) - one hour
Mr. Weil (Aglet)  - half hour

Mr. Black (Southwest Gas) - quarter hour
Ms. Wright (Long Beach) - quarter hour

SoCalGas and SDG&E do not currently intend to cross-examine other witnesses.

-- Glen Sullivan
Attorney for SoCalGas and SDG&E
(619) 699-5162
gsullivan@sempra.com <mailto:gsullivan@sempra.com>

May 23, 2000


Tara Rozen and I have reviewed the cost of living tables provided by our
outside vendor and determined the appropriate amount of daily per diem while
in London accompanied by family is $55.00/day.  You should expense this
through your expense reports for every day you are present in London and not
on full expenses paid by the Company.

Jane


Diana, since I wasn't involved in her first raise, I really couldn't say what
the nature of it was.  You may be right that the 13th month is the
complicating factor, but it should be a matter of record what her base salary
is (that is what we are paying her).  The raise should be applied to whatever
her base salary is.  If it is 72K, then it is 72K. We need to make sure,
however, that we are not giving her an overlapping raise to the one ENA gave
her.

Mark, could you give me a call on Monday?  We need to sort this out asap so
that we can get her raise in place.

Thanks,
Randy
---------------------- Forwarded by Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/06/2000 09:08 PM ---------------------------

Diana Perez
02/05/2000 09:50 AM
To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT
cc: Luis Juarros/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Miguel
Padron/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: A.Calo

There seems to be some confusion on Andrea Calo's salary.  Year end records
show her annual salary at $65,000 (5000 x 13mos).   I then was advised that
her salary was $72,000 (6000 x 12mos) effective December. Not $78,000
effective 1/1 as indicated below.
What I think is happening is that the 13th month is confusing the situation.
The other question is why would we raise her salary on January 1 and give her
a merit increase on 2/1 ?  We really should be doing an equity adjustment and
merit on the same date if this is the situation.

Andrea's merit was approved at 9% based on annual salary of $72,000 (not
$78,000)...

Pls advise your thoughts and what communications have already taken place
with Andrea.

thanks,
diana
---------------------- Forwarded by Diana Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/05/2000 10:14 AM ---------------------------

02/04/2000 02:52 PM
Luis Juarros
Luis Juarros
Luis Juarros
02/04/2000 02:52 PM
02/04/2000 02:52 PM
To: Diana Perez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Erica
Mestre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: A.Calo

FYI

---------------------- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
15/12/99 02:35 PM ---------------------------
From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 09/12/99 09:38 AM CST
To: Luis Juarros/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Don Black/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Miguel
Padron/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brent
Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject:

We would like to raise Andrea Calo's base salary from 5000 pesos per month to
6000 pesos per month, effective January 1, 2000.  Please let me know if any
further action on my part is required.  Please also let me know when this
will be final so we can talk to Andrea.


Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041808.txt


Terry,  Attached is a typical form that was executed.   Specifically Section
3.3 under which we will be curtail are takes from the Producers and any
requirements to take pro rata from producers in Wyoming.  Thanks.  Any
possibility of getting feedback by tommorrow.  Thanks.


Please give me a space in the met garage.

Thanks

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Here is the Calpine model.  Give me a call if you have any questions.  Have
not gotten the power curve or the VOM.  Thanks
Ben


- Ljun0100.doc


Maribel M Monterrey
Office: (713) 853-9048
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Maribel.Monterrey@enron.com


FROM: Mark Whitney, TheLaw.net Corporation
HOMEPAGE: http://www.thelaw.net
REMOVE: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

Legal research often comes in waves, but as night follows day, that onerous
monthly commitment to West or Lexis is always there. But with so many new
options, it doesn't have to be this way.

--VIABLE ALTERNATIVES ABOUND

True though it may be that your West or Lexis rep is out to put you on that
fat annual contract, both companies offer a variety of online alternatives. A
person can:

----log in and buy most any document for a few bucks
----Shepardize or Keycite for around $4
----subscribe to KeyCite for $35 a month
----rent a state for a week for $40
----conduct transaction based case law searches only when you have to
----Supreme Court case law from 1790 is now available on the web for FREE
----California state case law from 1934 is now available on the web for FREE
----the landscape continues to change rapidly

--CHOOSE THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE JOB

There can be no question that the commercial value of proprietary legal
research resources will continue to drop as more and more primary and
secondary materials migrate online. At TheLaw.net Corporation we advocate
choosing the right tool for the job. And one of the best single tools you can
own these days is our flagship software solution, TheLaw.net Professional
Legal Browser.

--LESS THAN $1 A DAY FOR EVERYTHING, UNLIMITED ACCESS

For just $395 annually for an individual, TheLaw.net gives you a remarkable
foundation of primary and secondary resources, on an unlimited use basis,
with a national scope, including, but certainly not limited to, the following:

----A great proprietary, searchable case law database that includes the U.S.
Supreme Court, the 13 Federal circuits, the 50 state supreme courts and
intermediate appellate courts. See, http://www.thelaw.net/caselawgrid.htm

----Literally millions of searchable cases, updated four times daily, offered
on an unlimited use basis

----Streamlined access to:
------Federal and state statutes, rules and regulations
------the CFR and Federal Register
------executive agency databases and bill trackers
------nearly 1,000 news resources
------another 1,000 reference desk tools
------nearly 10,000 practice area helpers and much, much more
------over 50,000 documents and databases
------all just a fast click or two away on your desktop 24 - 7 - 365

--THELAW.NET MAY OR MAY NOT BE ALL YOU NEED

Depending on size, practice area and/or jurisdiction, TheLaw.net may well
have everything you need. If not, West and Lexis are available online, a la
carte for those times when you really need them. As an example, TheLaw.net is
not yet a great resource for Federal District Court opinions.

It all depends on what you want your life to look like. If the convenience
and elegance of the gold standard is worth the rates charged by the legal
research cartel, you should keep doing what you've been doing and renew that
annual contract with Company A or Company B. If not, and you feel like you
continue to get hammered at a time when given the efficiencies of
computerized distribution of data, prices ought to be dropping, we can help.
Our number is toll free: 1.877.4.LAWNET [877.452.9638] or see us on the web
at: http://www.thelaw.net

--HOW TO GET STARTED - All rates are ANNUAL - no surprises!

You may subscribe to TheLaw.net Professional Legal Browser and install at
work at home and on your laptop all with the security of a 30 day
unconditional money back guarantee and unlimited, world class tech and
reference support:

----Convenience Edition - $345 just for you - save $50
----Small Office Special - $575 for you and a colleague
----Workgroup Edition - $1195 for you and four colleagues
----Enterprise pricing is also available
----References: http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm
----Tutorials: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm
----Frequently Asked Questions: http://www.thelaw.net/faqs.htm
----Subscription Terms: http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm
----Order Online: http://www.thelaw.net/fulfillment.htm

Stem the tide of the legal research wave with a low, flat-rate subscription
to TheLaw.net Professional today, and begin pocketing the savings tomorrow!

At your option, we can build your package and deliver it today via our web
site or we can ship CDs via U.S. Priority Mail or FedEx. We thank you for
your time and we hope to hear from you soon.

Regards,

MARK WHITNEY
CEO/President, TheLaw.net Corporation
Chicago - San Diego, USA
Toll Free: 1.877.4.LAWNET (1.877.452.9638)

******************************************

United States Supreme Court, 1900

Federal Circuit, 1982

U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir., 1950
D.C. Court of Appeals, 1945

U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., 1930
Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 1996
Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, 1930
Massachusetts Appeals Court
New Hampshire Supreme Court, 1930
Rhode Island Supreme Court, 1950

U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Cir., 1930
Connecticut Supreme Court, 1950
Connecticut Appellate Court
New York Court of Appeals, 1955
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 1st
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 2nd
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 3rd
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 4th
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 1st
N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 2nd
Vermont Supreme Court, 1930

U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd. Cir., 1930
U.S. District Court, New Jersey, 1999
Supreme Court of Delaware, 1950
New Jersey Supreme Court, 1930
N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division
U.S. District Court, E.D.Pa., 1997
Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1950
Pennsylvania Superior Court
Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Cir., 1930
U.S. District Court, Maryland, 1999
Maryland Court of Appeals, 1950
Maryland Special Court of Appeals
North Carolina Supreme Court, 1945
North Carolina Court of Appeals, 1968
U.S. District Court, South Carolina, 1999
South Carolina Supreme Court, 1996
South Carolina Court of Appeals
Virginia Supreme Court, 1930
Virginia Court of Appeals
W. Va. Supreme Court. of Appeals, 1991

U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Cir., 1930
Louisiana Supreme Court, 1980
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
U.S. District Court, N. Mississippi, 1997
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954
Mississippi Court of Appeals
Texas Supreme Court, 1950
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District

U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Cir., 1930
Kentucky Supreme Court, 1945
Kentucky Court of Appeals
Michigan Supreme Court, 1930
Michigan Court of Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court, 1950
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District
Tennessee Supreme Court, 1950
Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, M. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, E. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, W. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App., M. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. E. Grand Div.
Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. W. Grand Div.

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Cir., 1930
Illinois Supreme Court, 1985
Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District
Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District
Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District
Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District
Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District
Indiana Supreme Court, 1940
Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District
Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District
Indiana Tax Court
Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1945
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III
Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV

U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., 1930
Arkansas Supreme Court, 1957
Arkansas Court of Appeals, 1995
Iowa Supreme Court
Iowa Court of Appeals
Minnesota Supreme Court, 1930
Minnesota Court of Appeals
Missouri Supreme Court, 1960
Missouri Court of Appeals
Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965
Nebraska Court of Appeals
U.S. District Court, North Dakota, 1999
North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930
North Dakota Court of Appeals
South Dakota Supreme Court, 1965

U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cir., 1941
Alaska Supreme Court, 1960
Alaska Court of Appeals
Arizona Supreme Court, 1930
Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division
Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
U.S. District Court, Central, California, 1998
California Supreme Court, 1930
California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate Dt.
California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate Dt.
Hawaii Supreme Court, 1930
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Idaho Supreme Court, 1965
Idaho Court of Appeals
Montana Supreme Court, 1993
Nevada Supreme Court, 1950
Oregon Supreme Court, 1950
Oregon Court of Appeals
Washington Supreme Court, 1935
Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division
Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division

U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Cir., 1930
Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Colorado Supreme Court, 1930
Colorado Court of Appeals
Kansas Supreme Court, 1982
Kansas Court of Appeals
New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Oklahoma Supreme Court, 1954
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
Oklahoma Court of Appeals
Utah Supreme Court, 1950
Utah Court of Appeals
Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993

U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Cir., 1981
Alabama Supreme Court, 1955
Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
Florida Supreme Court, 1950
Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District
Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District
Georgia Supreme Court, 1940
Georgia Court of Appeals

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the
fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy
professionals. But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to
remove themselves easily and at no cost. Simply go to:
http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the
email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll
free 1.877.452.9638. See also: http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy
Statement".
****************************************************************


I could tell you.. but then I'd have to kill you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:31 PM
To: HowardMJ@2MAWBFT.usmc.mil
Subject: RE:

sweet!

yah, jimi told me about the party and i will definitely be there.

i'm not happy about you deploying though dude.  do you know what your role
will be?

definitely catch up when i'm back.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Howard Capt Michael J <HowardMJ@2MAWBFT.usmc.mil>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, December 05, 2001 2:22 PM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:  RE:

   What up, man!

   Things have been extremely busy during the past 90 days or so.  We are
   preparing to deploy on 7 Jan.  I will be home with Tina from the 20th to
   the
   27th.  I guess Jimi is having an engagement party on the 21st.  I would
   love
   it if you could make it to that.  You will need to talk to Jim for
   details.

   Yes, I am engaged.  Crazy, huh?  It feels good though.  Tina and I are
   happy.  More to follow whence I see ya.

   I have to run, but just wanted to let you know I was hanging in there
   and
   doing well.

   Peace, Howie

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Richey, Cooper [mailto:Cooper.Richey@ENRON.com]
   Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:02 PM
   To: HowardMJ@2MAWBFT.usmc.mil; mjhow55@islc.net
   Subject:

   hey dude-

   i hear you're engaged!  congratulations.  what's going on?  i haven't
   been in touch with anyone in the last year or so...  things have been
   going well in canada, but my company is melting down, so not sure what
   i'm going to be doing and probably won't know for awhile.  i'm going to
   be home dec 16 - jan 3.  are you going to be around?  looking forward to
   catching up ...

   coop

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


I HAVE SOME POWER WHAT IS YOUR BID?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Slinger, Ryan
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:31 AM
To:	DL-Portland Real Time Shift
Subject:	SHORT FOR 11/09/01

We sold 3mw of NP15 to "SIERRA PACIFIC HOLDING" for friday 11/09/01.  The price is 34 dollars and it is not in enpower or caps as of yet.

thanks,

ryan


Mr. Enloe -

Ken Lay asked me to let you know that he doesn't know Stephen Bennett.

Rosalee

"Enloe, Ted" <Ted.Enloe@COMPAQ.com> on 05/24/2000 08:18:07 AM
To: "Benjamin M. Rosen (E-mail)" <ben@brosen.com>, "Chris A. Davis (E-mail)"
<chris.davis@gulfaero.com>, "Frank P. Doyle (E-mail)"
<Frank.Doyle@COMPAQ.com>, "George H. Heilmeier (E-mail)" <ghh@telcordia.com>,
"Judith L. Craven (E-mail)" <lynnj@iname.com>, "Kenneth L. Lay (E-mail)"
<klay@enron.com>, "Kenneth Roman (E-mail)" <kenroman@worldnet.att.net>,
"Lawrence T. Babbio Jr. (E-mail)" <babbio@BellAtlantic.com>, "Lucille S.
Salhany (E-mail)" <lucie@jhmedia.com>, "Peter N. Larson (E-mail)"
<hkiss@bruncorp.com>, "Thomas J. Perkins (E-mail)" <kjewett@kpcb.com>
cc: "Fusco, David L." <David.Fusco@COMPAQ.com>
Subject: FW: Avnet/Compaq Decision at Intuit

If any of you know Stephen Bennett, would you please contact David Fusco to
make a call.

Thanks,  ted

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fusco, David L.
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 12:39 AM
> To: Enloe, Ted
> Subject: FW: Avnet/Compaq Decision at Intuit
> Importance: High
>
> Hi Ted.  We're in the final stages of closing a significant High
> Availability opportunity at Intuit.  Our San Diego sales team has done an
> outstanding job to position Compaq as their vendor of choice against Sun,
> HP and EMC.  Please refer to the email below for more specific details on
> Intuit's decision.
>
> Sometime next week Intuit's CIO, Jennifer Hall, will be presenting their
> formal recommendation to Stephen Bennett, President, CEO.  We've been told
> that he's friends with a Compaq board member.  I need your help in
> identifying that person.  Once identified, we'd like them to contact
> Stephen ASAP in order to communicate the following:
>
> Compaq's senior management, including the Board of Directors, is aware of
> the Intuit opportunity.  Compaq's committed, and determined, to meet and
> exceed their expectations.
>
> The Intuit sales team, headed by Bob Oakes, will prepare a briefing
> document for our board member to use.  Please advise ASAP.  Thanks for
> your help and support on this!
>
> Dave Fusco
> Area Director, Southern California
> Enterprise Business Unit
> 949-462-9762 W
> 949-462-9763 F
> 714-394-9009 M
> 800-842-2460 P
> david.fusco@compaq.com
>
> Intuit Names Stephen Bennett As President, CEO
> Senior Financial Services Executive Brings Broad Experience Growing
> Diverse Businesses
> Mountain View, Calif. -- Jan. 24, 2000 -- Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ: INTU
> <http://www.quicken.com/investments/quotes/?symbol=INTU>) announced today
> that its board of directors has selected Stephen M. Bennett as president
> and chief executive officer. Bennett assumes his responsibilities
> immediately, succeeding Bill Campbell, who had been acting chief executive
> since September. Campbell is retiring from day-to-day responsibilities but
> will remain chairman of the board of directors. Bennett was also named to
> the board.
> Bennett, 45, was most recently an executive vice president and member of
> the Office of the CEO at GE Capital, the financial services subsidiary of
> General Electric Corp. GE Capital is the world leader in numerous
> financial industries, including private label credit cards, commercial
> equipment leasing and vendor finance. With $330 billion in assets, GE
> Capital provides 42% of General Electric's overall profits and is among
> the world's largest non-banking financial institutions.
> "Steve is an outstanding leader from a company renowned for strong
> leadership," said Campbell. "His experience is tailor-made to fit Intuit's
> needs now and in the future. We wanted someone with service industry
> knowledge, who had led large, complex organizations and with proven
> ability to produce fast growth. Steve is the ideal choice to take Intuit
> to the multi-billion dollar level."
> "Intuit is the leader in e-finance. Quicken.com is already the leader in
> online tax preparation and online mortgage origination," said Bennett, who
> will relocate from Connecticut to the Bay Area. "I'm excited to have the
> opportunity to continue developing services for the Internet and take
> Intuit's industry leadership to new heights."
> During his GE career, Bennett held significant leadership positions in six
> different businesses within the company, spanning both manufacturing and
> financial services. In his most recent position, he oversaw a portfolio of
> five different companies whose more than 20,000 employees last year
> generated $15 billion in annual volume. Prior to that, as president and
> CEO of GE Capital e-Business, he pioneered the company's efforts to
> leverage the Internet across GE Capital's worldwide portfolio of
> businesses.
> Previously he delivered significant growth as the president and CEO of GE
> Capital's more than 4,000-employee Vendor Financial Services business.
> Under his leadership, assets grew to more than $13 billion from $5 billion
> and net income increased to $200 million from $80 million in four years.
> Intuit board member John Doerr said he was impressed by Bennett's broad
> base of experience. "Steve knows business-to-business as well as
> business-to-consumer. He knows service businesses. And he gets the Net.
> Intuit's product leadership and Steve's ability to grow businesses are an
> ideal match for our future."
> Bennett added, "Intuit's management team is strong, stable and experienced
> and works well together," he said. "This is one of the few management
> teams to successfully and rapidly transform a company to the Net. I'm glad
> to have the opportunity to lead Intuit's continued growth and expansion."
> Scott Cook, Intuit founder and chairman of its executive committee, said,
> "Steve shares Intuit's values. He's a straightforward, no-nonsense,
> results-driven executive who cares deeply about people. His
> values-oriented leadership style energizes organizations to great
> achievement, and I look forward to working with him."
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Marino, Richard [mailto:Richard_Marino@intuit.com]
>  Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 8:01 PM
>  To: Oakes, Bob; 'Janice.Farnow@avnet.com'; Velijanian, Fred
>  Cc: Bell, Lance; Pan, Andrew
>  Subject: High Availability Server Evaluation Results
>
>
>  We first want to express our appreciation to both HP and Compaq for
> their
>  efforts in helping make our evaluation project a sucess.  This did
> not
>  surprise us, as you have both been strong partners with us up to
> now.
>
>  As we indicated at the beginning, this evaluation was specifically
> aimed at
>  how well each vendor performed at helping us install, develop, test
> and
>  engineer an effective Oracle HA solution.  The ability to work with
> our
>  Intuit team and the strength of the vendors support were critical
> factors.
>  Certainly the difficultly of data migration impacted this project,
> limited
>  our performance testing, and remains of great concern to us in
> considering
>  any migration in the future.
>
>  We are taking the opportunity to provide you with our honest
> evaluation in
>  the hopes that this information may be of value to you.  We do
> however
>  consider this information confidential and ask that you do not share
> it
>  outside of your organization.  In addition we are providing it with
> the
>  understanding that you will not use the details contained herein to
>  criticize each other in an effort to promote your own position.
>
>  Here is a summary of our evaluation:
>
>  Sun Clusters - unacceptable, lacking features and EMC disk support
>  Sun/Veritas Clusters - acceptable, but uncertain support and future
>  HP Clusters - very good, strong features,  strong product roadmap,
> very good
>  technical support,  marginal sales support, variable support during
>  evaluation
>  Compaq - very good, stronger features, strong product roadmap,
> outstanding
>  support, higher risk
>
>  It should be understood, that there has not been a final decision
> and
>  management has not approved a migration plan.
>
>  We recommended Compaq, provided that we would be able to reduce the
> risk
>  factor associated with the recent release of their current software
> and
>  hardware architectures.
>
>  Management has requested that some further analysis be done (which
> were not
>  in the scope of this project) including cost/benefit analysis from
> our
>  customer's viewpoint and conversion cost estimates.  We believe we
> have all
>  the vendor information necessary to complete this analysis though
> they may
>  be a few pricing issues that will need clarification.
>
>  We will be in contact with each vendor regarding the disposition of
> the
>  loaned equipment we have on site from each vendor.
>
>  We again thank you for your efforts.  You will both remain key
> partners of
>  Intuit in the forseeable future and we hope to see our relationship,
>  whatever the final determination by management concerning this
> project, to
>  continue to improve.
>
>  Richard Marino
>  Lance Bell
>


Energy Cost Study Critical of Public Agencies Too
 Power: DWP is among three government-run producers cited as driving prices
up. Spokesmen deny any market manipulation.

By ROBERT J. LOPEZ, RICH CONNELL, Times Staff Writers

????Government-owned utilities, including the Los Angeles Department of Water
and Power, were influential in driving wholesale electricity prices to levels
that helped ignite California's exploding energy crisis during the summer and
fall, according to public and confidential records.
?????For months, Gov. Gray Davis, legislators and consumer advocates have
chiefly blamed a few private power companies for throwing the state into
darkness and economic chaos.
?????But they are just part of the equation.
?????A confidential document obtained by The Times names power providers that
have allegedly manipulated the electricity market. While the document does
identify out-of-state merchants criticized for gouging, it also discloses for
the first time the extent to which public entities allegedly have maximized
profits in the volatile spot market.
?????The document--which decodes the identities of unnamed suppliers in a
recent state study--singles out three government-run agencies as consistently
trying to inflate prices. They are: the DWP, the federally owned Bonneville
Power Administration in the Pacific Northwest and the trading arm of Canada's
BC Hydro in British Columbia.
?????Like a number of privately owned generators, these three producers
offered power at a range of high prices and, sometimes, in large amounts when
the state was most desperate. They also helped saddle California's three
largest utilities with billions of dollars in debt--leading one, Pacific Gas
& Electric, to seek bankruptcy protection last week.
?????The study by the California Independent System Operator, or Cal-ISO,
analyzed thousands of hours of bidding practices for 20 large suppliers in
the spot, or "real-time," market from May to November. The study accounted
for factors such as rising production costs, increased demand, periods of
scarcity and profits that would be earned in a healthy, competitive market.
?????Money earned above that was called excess profits.
?????No entity--public or private--earned as much in alleged excess profits
as British Columbia's Powerex, the state records show.
?????"They were the most aggressive bidders," said Anjali Sheffrin, author of
the coded study.
?????"They had the most amount to bid and the most freedom to bid it in,"
said Sheffrin, who did not discuss any companies by name.
?????The Canadian agency reaped $176 million in alleged excessive
profits--several times the amount collected by all but one of the private
generators. Second on the list was Atlanta-based Southern Co. Energy
Marketing, now called Mirant, which collected nearly $97 million in alleged
inflated earnings.
?????BC Hydro and Mirant--along with the DWP and other producers--say they
played by the rules established under California's flawed deregulation plan
and did not exploit the state's troubles.
?????But BC Hydro officials acknowledge that they did anticipate periods of
severe power shortages and planned for them by letting their reservoirs rise
overnight and then opening them to create hydroelectricity, which could be
produced inexpensively but sold for a premium.
?????"It was the marketplace that determined what the price of electricity
would be at any given time," said BC Hydro spokesman Wayne Cousins. "We
helped keep the lights on in California."
?????And the rates low for their own customers. During the past year, BC
Hydro has stashed hundreds of millions dollars in a "rainy day" account to
ensure that it has among the lowest rates in North America.
?????Los Angeles' Department of Water and Power, although eighth on the list
of alleged profiteers, was among those singled out for seeking high prices
during periods of high demand that helped inflate costs across the entire
spot market, where emergency purchases are made.
?????This, according to state documents, was accomplished by offering power
at incrementally higher prices that would rise substantially with even modest
increases in demand. The strategy also helped prop up prices, keeping them
from falling.
?????The DWP's average hourly bid, or asking price, for electricity
ultimately bought topped such private sellers as Reliant Energy of Houston
and Tulsa-based Williams Cos., two major players in the national energy
market.
?????In addition, the DWP submitted other bids at far higher prices that
could pay off handsomely with even small bumps in demand, the report said,
referring by code to DWP and four other suppliers. "The data shows they
clearly exercised market power to inflate prices further at higher load
conditions."
?????DWP General Manager S. David Freeman called the report's findings
"outrageous," insisting that the utility never tried to inflate prices.
?????"These charges go under the heading there is no good deed that goes
unpunished in this state," Freeman said, noting that DWP power helped avert
more blackouts across the state.
?????He did acknowledge, however, that the agency has charged high prices for
surplus power at the 11th hour but said that was only because it cost more to
produce.
?????"We have consistently charged [Cal-ISO] our cost, plus 15%," he said.
"It's not as though we're up there peddling a bunch of power to jam it down
their throats."
?????Freeman said that when his staff reviewed the coded report, they never
took it personally. "If you're innocent," he said, "you don't look at the
criminal file."
?????Yet another public agency criticized for its behavior in California's
deregulated market was the U.S. government's Bonneville Power Administration,
a nonprofit agency that sells wholesale electricity produced at 29 federal
dams in the Columbia-Snake River basin.
?????Bonneville actually bid slightly lower than the DWP, records show, but
reaped millions more in alleged excessive profits, apparently because it
supplied greater amounts of power during the period studied. Bonneville was
in the top five accused of taking excessive profits.
?????Bonneville officials say some of its profits are used to pay back
federal construction loans and fund an internationally recognized salmon
recovery program.
?????Stephen Oliver, a Bonneville vice president, said his agency did not act
improperly and has asked Cal-ISO for detailed information on how it reached
its conclusions. He said the grid operator often came to Bonneville pleading
for last-minute electricity and offering to pay high prices.
?????"From our point of view, we bid what we had when we had it and we
operated precisely within the terms of their rules," Oliver said.
?????Those rules--and the bidding practices criticized by Cal-ISO--so
distorted the market that Aquila Power Corp. of Missouri, which tried to act
responsibly, has bailed out.
?????It offered the lowest average hourly price of any supplier
studied--slightly more than $8 per megawatt-hour, compared to Mirant's $138,
the highest.
?????But the spot market, as initially designed, made sure that all suppliers
offering power received the highest price paid in any hour.
?????The result: Aquila collected $171 an hour for power it was willing to
sell at a single-digit price.
?????"They weren't the culprits," said Cal-ISO's Sheffrin. "Someone else
drove that up."
?????Aquila spokesman Al Butkus said the company pulled out of the California
market because it was too unpredictable. Although the company made money, he
said, it also could have lost because of possible downward swings.
?????"We looked at it and we didn't feel very comfortable with what we saw,"
he said.
?????The market has since been adjusted to prevent high bids from setting the
price for everyone. But Sheffrin said it hasn't made much difference because
the overall prices are still excessive.
?????"We're saying the patient is sick," Sheffrin said of California's
electricity market. "It needs help [and] may die."
?????


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/10/2000 02:53 PM -----

	Ann M Schmidt
	10/10/2000 11:55 AM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Schwartz/Corp/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth
Linnell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fenosa and Enron to Invest $550 Million in Dominican Republic

Fenosa and Enron to Invest $550 Million in Dominican Republic
10/10/0 12:43 (New York)

Fenosa and Enron to Invest $550 Million in Dominican Republic

     Madrid, Oct. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Union Electrica Fenosa SA,
Spain's third-biggest power company, and Enron Corp., the world's
largest energy trader, will invest together in the Dominican
Republic, kicking off the alliance by building a $550 million
power plant and re-gasification facility.
     The partners will build a natural-gas-fired power station
whose 500-megawatt capacity will represent 30 percent of the
country's current electricity demand, said Fenosa in a note,
confirmed with the company.
     The generator will run on liquefied natural gas when it
starts operating in 2002, switching to fuel from the re-
gasification plant when it starts operating in 2003.
     Fenosa has had an alliance with International Power Plc,
formerly National Power Plc, since 1998. That alliance focuses on
Europe, the U.S. and Australia, a Fenosa spokeswoman said today.
     Enron was the first U.S. utility to receive licenses to buy,
sell and import electricity in Spain, after the government started
opening energy markets to competition in 1998. It's also licensed
to market natural gas.
     The Texas-based utility is building a gas-fired power plant
in southern Spain, has a wind turbine factory near Toledo, and
plans another windmill factory in Catalonia.

--Brooke Nelson in the Madrid bureau (34 91) 700-9600 or
b.nelson@bloomberg.net   /ph

Story illustration: UNF SM <Equity> COMP D to chart Fenosa's
performance against the IBEX index.

TOP NRG

DJ Union Fenosa/Enron -2: Construction To Begin 2001 >E.FEN
10/10/0 12:40 (New York)

  MADRID (Dow Jones)--Spanish electricity company Union Electrica Fenosa SA
(E.FEN) said late Tuesday it has reached an agreement with U.S. energy company
Enron (ENE) to invest in energy infrastructure projects in the Dominican
Republic.
  In a release, Fenosa said the deal involves the construction of a
combined-cycle power plant with a 500MW potency, which will use natural gas
from a regasification plant on the island nation.
  The 500MW potency is equivalent to 30% of the Caribbean island's electricity
demand.
  The deal also includes a complimentary project, Fenosa said. This is the
construction of a regasification plant on the republic's coastline, with a
capacity for treating gas equivalent to the consumption of various groups of
combined-cycle plants with a potency of 1300MW.
  The investment for these two projects is seen at around $550 million, of
which $100 million could come from Dominican companies, Fenosa said.
  Fenosa and Enron estimate that construction of the two projects will begin
in
early 2001, with the power plant coming online in 2002. It will operate with
combustible liquid until 2003, at which time the regasification plant comes
online.

  (MORE) DOW JONES NEWS  10-10-00
  12:40 PM- - 12 40 PM EDT 10-10-00


from saturday-monday....did 194 trades, exactly half internal.  how'd george do?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fraser, Jennifer
Sent:	Sunday, May 27, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:

just how many ene people were busy selling gas this weekend vs outside counterparties?


Wow.  This guy sounds impressive!  I agree with Prentice's assessment (of
course, I always agree with Prentice's assessment).

Best,
Jeff

Happy Valentine's Day to all.

	Prentice Sellers <psellers@Haas.Berkeley.EDU>
	02/14/2001 01:59 PM

		 To: <eldon@interx.net>, Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>,
Cameron Sellers <cameron@perfect.com>, jdasovic@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: FW: Roseman Creek fireplace

This guy sounds like he knows what he's talking about.  I suggest we get
the repairs done immediately and leave the tile for later.  Can you find
out if he can finish before next weekend whatever needs to be done to have
a fire safely?  I've been planning a trip with two friends of mine from
school for a long time and it would really be a bummer to have to cancel
it.  Thanks for working on this.

Also, about the $$, mom should have put aside $10,000 from grandpa ($5,000
from me and Cameron each) that was supposed to go for replacing the
roof.  This is much more important, so I suggest using that money.

Finally, we can get Jeff's friend Karen to help us with the tiles.  We will
talk to her.

At 01:43 PM 2/14/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Dotty:  Thought you and Jack might be interested in this report.
>
>Jeff: How do we go about getting  in touch with the person you mentioned to
>do the tiles?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:   gmc [mailto:gmc@mcn.org]
>Sent:   Wednesday, February 14, 2001 12:30 PM
>To:     eldon@interx.net
>Subject:        Roseman Creek fireplace
>
>Hello, Eldon...
>Your fireplace was improperly installed, and the fire was caused by embers
>falling in between the fireplace and the hearth, igniting the plywood
>underlayment and the wooden framing installed in front of the face and the
>header above the fireplace opening.  There should be no combustible material
>there, and sooner or later a fire will result.  You are fortunate the result
>was not worse.  The important metal underlayment supplied with the fireplace
>was not installed.  The fireplace must be moved about 5" up to the face of
>the wall.  All the tile must be removed and replaced with non combustible
>underlayment.  The chimney seems ok but you must replace the cap and the
>chimney is no longer available, necessitating fireplace replacement if it
>ever becomes necessary due to corrosion.  The insulation is probably wet,
>which happens over the years and it settles, leaving hot spots in the
>chimney.  At least yours is out in the air, but it should be checked, and
>will be if I do this job.
>You will provide the tile, and bear in mind that some will have to be cut,
>so avoid small tiles.  You will also provide sanded grout and grout
>additive, and a mastic (25#) such as epoxy "Elastobon".  Your tile supplier
>will know what we're talking about.  I will get all other materials locally.
>You are looking at, I estimate, $2,400.00 - $3,200.00 plus materials.  I
>prefer to work jobs like this at Time and Materials, based on my labor rate
>of $50.00 per man hour.  If I have to bid this job, it will be suitably
>inflated to deal with unforeseen variables.  I have been here for 26 years
>without any construction related problems, and have lots of references.
>The materials will consist of cedar shingles, plywood, roofing shingles
>(asphalt), glue, Wonder Board tile underlayment, stainless steel cap, 2X4's,
>screws, plumbing fittings for the gas line, sheet metal, and incidentals.
>My estimate is done as accurately as possible, but unforeseen problems could
>change the time I've estimated for the job.  The materials will be about
>$700.00, and this is the deposit I will require.  Let me know what the ETA
>of your tile will be.  If you prefer, I can do the job without the tile,
>leaving the Wonder Board tile underlayment exposed, which is totally safe,
>and you can decide upon tile later, after looking at the site after the
>fireplace is moved.  I will need a half square min. to do the roof of the
>fireplace pop out.
>Regards,
>Will Guyan


Ted:  Please respond to Brian's question on when the Ad Val Tax is paid.  Please "cc" me on your answer also.

	Thanks,  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Redmond, Brian
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 6:11 PM
To:	Schwieger, Jim; Colwell, Wes; Coffey, James; Ryan, Ted
Cc:	Martin, Thomas A.
Subject:	RE: BAMMEL AD VALORUM TAX

When is this tax due?  If it is paid at the end of the year - it is 100% for the account of AEP.

Brian

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schwieger, Jim
Sent:	Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:34 PM
To:	Redmond, Brian; Colwell, Wes; Coffey, James; Ryan, Ted
Cc:	Martin, Thomas A.; Schwieger, Jim
Subject:	BAMMEL AD VALORUM TAX

As we draw near to the HPL transfer to AEP on June 1, I wanted to remind everyone about the Bammel Ad Valorum Tax.  As we discussed earlier this year the Tax needs to be split between Enron and AEP based on the number of months ownership during the year.  Since the actual liability is not likely to be known until August or September
I assume both parties will have to reach agreement as to how to handle this matter.