This didn't work for some reason. Can you try to send it again and just copy and paste all the values.

Thanx

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooke, Ian
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	Opspackage

 << File: opspackage.xls >>


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001
09:43 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/09/2001 09:40 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Pendings as of 4/9/01


I'll keep you posted.

thanks

bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob M Hall/NA/Enron on 10/20/2000 04:53
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Tom Shelton @ ECT                           10/20/2000 02:29 PM

To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karry Kendall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassandra
Pollack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Pond/Corp/Enron@Enron, Becky Pitre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jim Coffey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M Hall/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia H Chin/NA/Enron@Enron, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Oct. 17 RRC letter re continuing audit violations

 I just received a letter from Ed Abrahamson at the Railroad Commission,
asserting that we have still not fully corrected or explained all of the
audit violations they previously alleged.  I will have delivered to each of
you this afternoon a copy of the letter, to which we must respond by October
27.  The tone of the letter indicates some frustration on the audit staff's
part, and it will behoove us to try to get the remaining matters resolved
promptly.
 I will be out of town Monday, but I will have my assistant, Monica Jackson,
set up a meeting for Tuesday afternoon to discuss how we are going to satisfy
the Commission regarding the remaining exceptions.  In the meantime, please
carefully review each item and commence doing whatever needs to be done to be
in a position to finalize our response by October 26, Thursday of next week.
I think some of the fixes will be fairly easy, but others will be more
problematic.  Please provide this memo and a copy of the letter to anyone who
should be aware or involved.


Attached is the allocation for 1/00 for Texas Operations.  Let me know if you
have any questions.


As you are aware, Enron signed an agreement with Blockbuster Inc. last summer
to launch an entertainment on-demand service.  We announced today that we are
discontinuing our exclusive relationship with Blockbuster in order to expand
the offering by developing direct relationships with content providers and
distribution partners.

We have made tremendous progress toward our goal of becoming the leading
provider of entertainment on-demand over a digital platform.  We rolled out
the trial service in Seattle, Portland, Salt Lake City and New York in
December, and today subscribers are buying movies on-demand using the service
we created.

However, the exclusive relationship with Blockbuster has not yielded the
quantity and quality of movies needed to drive demand for this exciting, new
on-demand service.  Now that we have proven the concept, we want to take our
service to the next level by adding content and subscribers on an accelerated
basis.  We feel that this can be best achieved by pursuing entertainment
on-demand independently.

We intend to initiate discussions with various content providers for
delivering their content over the Enron platform.  We remain very positive
about the potential of this business for EBS and Enron and will keep you
apprised of our progress.


Dave,

Hey,  can you create a view for me on Portland's database.  The SQL code is below.  Let me know if you need anything else.

Mat

SELECT     dbo.MOD_Load.DateTimeValue, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DateValue, dbo.LkpMOD_Scenario.ScenarioCode, dbo.LkpMOD_Region.RegionCode,
                      AVG(dbo.MOD_Load.Load_MW) AS [Ave Dly Ld], dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.MonthName, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DayNum,
                      dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.YearNum, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DayOfWeekName, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.PeakOrOffPeak
FROM         dbo.MOD_Load INNER JOIN
                      dbo.LkpMOD_Region ON dbo.MOD_Load.RegionID = dbo.LkpMOD_Region.RegionID INNER JOIN
                      dbo.LkpMOD_Scenario ON dbo.MOD_Load.ScenarioID = dbo.LkpMOD_Scenario.ScenarioID INNER JOIN
                      dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions ON dbo.MOD_Load.DateTimeValue = dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DateTimeValue
GROUP BY dbo.LkpMOD_Scenario.ScenarioCode, dbo.LkpMOD_Region.RegionCode, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DateValue,
                      dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.YearNum, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.MonthName, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DayOfWeekName,
                      dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.PeakOrOffPeak, dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DayNum, dbo.MOD_Load.DateTimeValue
HAVING      (dbo.LkpMOD_Scenario.ScenarioCode = 'BEST') AND (dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DateValue BETWEEN CONVERT(DATETIME, '2001-09-01 00:00:00',
                      102) AND CONVERT(DATETIME, '2001-12-31 00:00:00', 102))
ORDER BY dbo.LkpCalendar_Definitions.DateValue DESC, dbo.MOD_Load.DateTimeValue


Brian T. Hoskins
Enron Broadband Services
713-853-0380 (office)
713-412-3667 (mobile)
713-646-5745 (fax)
Brian_Hoskins@enron.net

----- Forwarded by Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications on 11/15/00 09:40 AM
-----

	Kori Loibl@ECT
	11/14/00 04:03 PM

		 To: Alicia Perkins/HOU/EES@EES, Purvi Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beau
Ratliff/HOU/EES@EES, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Tobin Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Another slam on Gore!

This is great!


I will begin my maternity leave on Monday, November 19.  In my absence, Katherine Chisley will be covering for Mark Pickering and myself.  For assistance with Mark's calendar, please contact Katherine Chisley at x58463.  Katherine will also have access to my email.

Thank you,
Lisa


Please review the attached and lets discuss.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/18/2000 02:35
PM ---------------------------

Robert D Morgan
04/18/2000 12:12 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian M Riley/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interconnect Agreement

In the short-term, I need two agreements:

1)  A delivery point from LRC to SkyGen Energy LLC at the Cosmar plant in
Ascension Parish, La.  Bridgeline Holdings will install, own, and operate
5369' of 8" and the 100MM/D measurement station.  Next week would be okay.

2)  A bi-directional point between HPL and Tejas. The details are still being
negotiated.  If possible, I would like it Wedesday EOB.

Item      Install  Own  Operate
 11mile of 16 Header     Tejas  Tejas  Tejas
 12 on 30 Hot Tap for Texoma   HPL  HPL  HPL
1600, of 16 between Texoma and M&R   Tejas  HPL  HPL
 Check Measurement (Flow Computer, SCADA)  Tejas  Tejas  Tejas
 OPP to protect HPL    Tejas  HPL  HPL
 Custody Measurement    Tejas  HPL  HPL
 Flow/Pressure Control    Tejas  HPL  HPL
 Over-Ride Control     Tejas  Tejas  Tejas
 Easement for Hot Tap    Tejas  HPL  HPL
 ROW for 1600'     Tejas  HPL  HPL
 Easement for Measurement    Tejas  HPL  HPL


Dear Reader of TheStreet.com,

*******************************************************

This exclusive offer has been sent to you by TheStreet.com as a
result of a partnership between TheStreet.com and Dell Computer
Corporation because you are currently or within the last year
have been a subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to one of our
web sites, www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com. If you are not
a current or former subscriber, and you believe you received this
message in error, please forward this message to members@thestreet.com,
or call our customer service department at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of you, our subscribers,
and that we have not rented or sold your name or any other information
about you to Dell Computer Corporation or any other third party.
This email was sent to you by TheStreet.com.

*******************************************************

Get a FREE monitor upgrade when you buy any Dell(TM) desktop systems
with select Dell monitors!

Hurry, offer expires 1/31/01!

Dear Business Professional,

Dell makes it easy to get the big picture. Purchase any Dell
Dimension(TM) or OptiPlex(TM) desktops or Dell Precision(TM)
Workstations with select Dell monitors and we'll give you an upgrade
to a bigger monitor FREE!

Learn more.
http://www.mmtrack.net/m/s.asp?HB2986082267X972194X50117X

$200 Price reduction on NEW PowerEdge(TM) 1550
Now starting at only $2399!
Ultra-slim general-purpose server, dual processor capable.
http://www.mmtrack.net/m/s.asp?HB2986082267X972196X50117X

NEC MultiSync 1800 18" flat-panel monitor, just $1848!
Low Price - Guarantee!?
http://www.mmtrack.net/m/s.asp?HB2986082267X972197X50117X

Switch to DellHost(TM) dedicated hosting for just $199/mo.
(plus a set-up fee)
Backed by high-performance, reliable PowerEdge(TM) Servers and
PowerApp(TM) Server Appliances.
http://www.mmtrack.net/m/s.asp?HB2986082267X972198X50117X

Thanks for choosing Dell.

Pricing, specifications and availability may change without notice.
Taxes and shipping charges are extra, and vary. May be combined with
select offers. U.S. only. Valid for Dell Small Business Center
purchases only.

?Our guarantee is to beat the software and accessories prices of CDW,
Insight, NECX and Micro Warehouse and to meet the prices of our other
competitors on the NEC MultiSync 1800 18" (18" v.i.s.) flat-panel
monitor. Price guarantee for BSD customers only. Resellers
excluded. Offer subject to change or withdrawal without notice.
Dell-branded products excluded. Customer must provide proof of
competitor's price in form of written or electronic quote, web page
or advertisement, showing price within 7 days of transaction. Dell
may limit quantity of affected products available to each customer.
Subject to product availability.

Copyright 2001 Dell Computer Corporation. U.S. only. Dell cannot be
responsible for errors in typography. Dell, Dimension, OptiPlex, Dell
Precision, PowerEdge, DellHost and PowerApp are trademarks of Dell
Computer Corporation.

*******************************************************

If you would prefer not to receive these types of offers from us
in the future, please send us an email at any time to
unsubscribe-ads@thestreet.com.  To view our privacy policy,
please click here:  http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html

*******************************************************


No need to get hostile - would you like it verbally or orally? (I 'm
referring to the notes)


Happy Holidays Everyone !!!!!!!!

The career centers holiday hours will be from 8:30 am to 4:30 pm for the
time period 12/17 to 1/18.  Starting the week of 1/22 we will be back on
the regular schedule MTW 8:30 am to 8:15 pm, Thur. 8:30 am to 6:00 pm and
Fridays 8:30 am to 4:30 pm.


Hi Gavin:

Could you do me a favor (know you're busy).  Someone told me that there's an
article in last Thursday's? NYT blaming the California fiasco on former
California Commissioner Dan Fessler, who was responsible (a few years back)
for putting in place the structure we have here.  Have you seen it?  If so
could you forward?  If not, could you try and find it and forward.  Very much
appreciated.

Best,
Jeff


---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT on 12/05/2000 12:26
PM ---------------------------

Geraldine Irvine

12/01/2000 04:30 PM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sanjeev Khanna/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Gardner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tera Moss/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: PSEG Meeting

Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss a one year supply deal for PSEG
50,000/d @ Transco Zone 6, on Tuesday, December 5, 3:00 p.m., in EB-2934.

If any questions contact Sanjeeve Khanna at Ext. 3-3849.


Later this week there will be a second report which will capsule the RTO
filings made last week.  In the meantime,
attached is the Weekly FERC Electric Report for week ending October 20.

Attached is the FERC Public Meeting Schedule for 2001.


i am out of town

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Constantine [mailto:brianc@saltgrass.com]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Erik Wollam; akoenig@hhw-law.com; knipe3@msn.com;
chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Parks, Joe
Subject: RE: fishing

I'm out...work issues. Damn...looks incredible.

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Wollam [mailto:erwollam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 9:55 AM
To: akoenig@hhw-law.com; knipe3@msn.com; chet_fenner@bmc.com; c.r.zander@att.net; Joe.Parks@bridgeline.net; Brian Constantine
Subject: fishing

#1, depo cancelled. In office, just looked at web cams. Yikes. Want to fish
tomarrow if holds. e

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


<<Nov24.doc>>  <<Nov24.txt>>
Sasha Jacob
GPC Canada
sjacob@gpc.ca
Ph:  (416) 598-0055
Fx:  (416) 598-3811
www.gpcinternational.com

 - Nov24.doc
 - Nov24.txt


Periodically, you will be receiving email notices from Mechelle Atwood requesting response to audit findings for which you were identified as the responsible party.  Please complete the required documentation in a timely manner, as closing out the audit issues is critical to wrapping up the audit process for FY2001.

If you have any questions, please contact Mechelle directly at ext. 54554.

Thanks you for your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter.


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Erazo Z., Ricardo (SIP_Stgo)" <ricardo.erazo@sipetrol.cl>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Erazo+20Z+2E+2C+20Ricardo+20+28SIP+5FStgo+29+22+20+3Cric
ardo+2Eerazo+40sipetrol+2Ecl+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:38 PM
To: Hilgert, Chris
Cc: Reid, Dan (SIP_USA); Harambour, Alberto (SIP_USA); Harambour G.,Salvador
(SIP_Stgo); Lee R., Patricio O. (Casa Matriz); Rodriguez M.,Federico
(SIP_Stgo)
Subject: Your Enap-Enron Letter Agreement Proposal

Dear Chris:

Thanks for your Letter Agreement proposal. In general, we acept their terms.
However, we suggest little modifications as you can see in the attachment.
Please, if you agree we can executed it and return it to Enron .

Sincerely yours

Ricardo Erazo
Domestic E&P Contracts Manager

-----Original Message-----
From: Reid, Dan (SIP_USA)
Sent: Lunes, 07 de Mayo de 2001 12:40
To: 'danielreid@aol.com'
Subject: FW: Revised Letter Agreement-DRAFT

 <<ENAP Letter Agreement-DRAFT (5.2.01).doc>>

-----Original Message-----
From: Hilgert, Chris
To: Alberto Harambour; Daniel Reid
Sent: 5/2/01 11:10 AM
Subject: Revised Letter Agreement-DRAFT

Gentlemen,

You will find attached a simplified letter agreement between Enron and
ENAP regarding the contemplated transaction that outlines a time frame
of sixty days to come to a term sheet to transact on.  We believe that
the confidentiality agreement currently in place dated January 21, 2000
is sufficient to cover this area as it was written with a defined "Area"
as the "Magallanes Area in Southern Chile which includes but is not
necessarily limited to, geological and geophysical data, maps, models,
and interpretations, and may also include information relating to the
business of ENAP, engineering and production data, as well as
commercial, contractual, and financial information (collectively, the
"Confidential Information")."  At most, we may need to amend the CA to
identify Enron North America and Enron South America as the
counterparties as opposed to Enron Global Exploration & Production.

I apologize for the time it took to get this to you.  Our attorney has
been out and rather swamped and we just closed a big deal on Monday that
was burying me for the last week and we have been spending some time
with our South American group formulating strategy on this deal.
Nonetheless, we look forward to your response and to getting this
process moving to create value for ENAP.  Please call me after you have
had a chance to review this.

 <<ENAP Letter Agreement-DRAFT (5.2.01).doc>>

Sincerely,
Chris Hilgert
Director
Enron Compression Services
 <<ENAP Letter Agreement-DRAFT (5.2.01).doc>>

 - ENAP Letter Agreement-DRAFT (5.2.01).doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001
12:07 PM ---------------------------

"Ryan Lee" <ralee@rmi.net> on 04/27/2001 03:33:09 PM
To: <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Coors fiels Baby!

I'd go top-shelf.  Are we getting laid in Vegas?
----- Original Message -----
From: <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>
To: <ralee@rmi.net>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Coors fiels Baby!

>
> i was going to come home this weekend if you knew them.  we would have to
> set up a service contract with those chicks.
>


Attached is a summary of the PJM RTO order.  While it is somewhat lengthy,
the order has a lot of good information in it that I wanted to share with the
group, particularly the Commission's statements regarding the existing
configuration of the northeast and the need to expand it.

We are working on summaries of the New York and New England RTO orders and
will have those out shortly.  If you would like copies of the orders, just
let us know.

We expect the mediation proceeding to begin within the next week.  We will
keep you updated.

Sarah


Hi Kate,

This deal needs to be researched.  Can you help looking into its origin?

Thanks,

Carla
---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/06/2000 11:38
AM ---------------------------

Niclas Egmar@EES
12/04/2000 09:39 AM
To: Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: 11_11 correction VIP

---------------------- Forwarded by Niclas Egmar/HOU/EES on 12/04/2000 11:39
AM ---------------------------

Niclas Egmar
12/01/2000 03:30 PM
To: Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mallory/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Daniel Kang/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Wayne
Kimball/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: 11_11 correction

I talked to Phil about a trade on  11/11/00  regarding 640 MW deal number
456233.1 could you please send me  and Jennifer Johnson some more detail
about this deal.
Is this an hour a head deal?
What hours are involved?

Thanks alot

Niclas


let me think about it for a day

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rangel, Ina
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 3:00 PM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	Daily Lunches

John,

These are the following people that are eating daily lunches, that I'm sure can get away from their desk:

Fundamentals group under Chris Gaskill (18 people)
IT group under Colin Tonks (13 people)
Weather group (9 people)

The follwoing people are being charged directly to your cost center:
Amy Cavazos
Bharat Khanna
Bilal Bajwa
Elizabet Soto
Errol McLaughlin
Frnak Hayden
George Huan
Greg Couch
Joey Taylor
Kori Loibl
Laura Vargas
Luchas Johnson
Sean Riordan
Sherry Dawson

I am going to let all of these people know that beginning 7/1/01 the daily lunches will go back to being for the traders only due to cost and time.

Let me know if your okay with this.
Ina Rangel


I have little that Steve does not probably know by heart.  But a few comments
to Steve's point on siting new power plants.  I ASSUME "SENATE ENERGY
COMMITTEE" IS THE FEDERAL SENATE, NOT THE STATE SENATE.  I HAVE GEARED MY
SUGGESTIONS TO THINGS THE FEDS CAN OR SHOULD DO.:

THE PREAMBLE: The continuing lack of leadership by the Governor is causing
serious concern for anyone looking for a stable environment in which to make
the $billions in investments required for new power plants.  The desparate
search for blame placing (of exactly the guys that would make the
investment), the lawsuits, the simplistic, outright misrepresentations of
what happened and is happening, the threats of condemnation, etc. are doing a
good job of making the public very uneasy and effectively destroying the
"market" that resulted in the largest initiation of investment in power
plants in the state's history.  To the point, the debt lenders are getting
nervous; the equity providors are getting nervous.  (Duke:  "I would have
less third world risk developing a plant in Brazil...")  If the final result
of all of this is a public power agency that basically controls the grid and
the buying and selling of power, the cynic might observe that we will have
traded the accusations of greed of the present environment for a reversion to
the old environment of inefficiency and escalating rate bases.  In my
opinion, there is no way that the governor's present political initiatives
will result in the number of power plants that are necessary to cover the
demand.  He may be covering the near term price/supply issues with his CDWR
initiative (I note that it is winter time and power demand is down,
notwithstanding stage 3 alerts - wait until summer peak demands...), but
destroyed the desire of the long term risk takers to develop new plants in
this market.  If the politicians think the "state" can do the development, I
don't think so.  Think about it:  there just is not anyone in the IOUs or
CDWR or the Munis or any state agency that can make the decisions necessary
to make the investments required IN A TIMELY MANNER.    The public entities
do not even have the staffs to do the required work, much less the political
environment to get anything done, given the continued thirst for "doing
things right" vs "doing the right thing."  Maybe we will get back to long
term power purchase agreements for the development of new power plants.  I
point out that the Standard Offer contracts developed by the "State" and
entered into 15 - 20 YEARS AGO in a regulated environment by nearly 10,000 MW
of QFs are STILL OUT OF THE MONEY.  (Per SCE, since the PX began in 4/98,
only during August and December of last year were they in the money.  We
checked it out - they are right.  That is astounding.  And we want to go back
to that??)  Enron would be pleased to participate in long term PPAs,
especially since we are developing several sites, and can make money doing
that.  But if we want to be statesmen about this, we need must get a market
paradigm back.

THE SUGGESTIONS :

1. Federal Environmental issues:  There are 4 agencies in CA that get
involved in air issues:  US EPA, CEC, CARB, and the local AQMD.  Lot's of
rhetoric that each is just doing its own job, but the de facto result of that
many agencies looking at the inevitably overlapping issues is that the
requirements end up much tougher than they need to be.  Letting the state
deal with the last 3, and focusing on the US EPA because of where Steve will
be testifying, seems like the US EPA (probably through a change in law at the
Federal level) could do the following:

 a. Take a leadership position in rationalizing the rat warren of districts
and basins and ERC creation and transfer restrictions.  To our utter
amazement, every little district that we have gone into to develop power
plants have completely different rules and have required a completely
different approach re ERCs- SF Bay Area, South Coast, San Joaquin County,
Kern County, Placer, etc.  ERCs are the single biggest problem we have in
moving forward on the development of over 2000 MW of new plants we have on
the books.  I point out the ERC market in the east for SOX.  SOX ERCs
produced in Ohio can  be used in a new plant in Indiana.  This is not
technically crisp, but was a rational, political decision as part of the
Clean Air Act.  We need that same rationalization now in California.
Granted, CA and its politics was probably the genesis of the arbitrariness of
AQMD vs county boundaries vs basin boundaries, but if we can get the state to
the table to change this, the EPA will be involved.  Leadership by all is
necessary.  When 2.5 ppm new plants are being held up, the 100 ppm plants
will continue to be used to produce the power.  Do the math and tell me if
the pollution produced during the period of delay is worth the result.  Do it
again realizing that many of these 2.5 ppm plants will never be developed,
given the difficulty.

 b. Consider impact fees:  the concept of "pay to pollute."  In LA, there are
car pool requirements to reduce pollution.  If a company cannot or will not
carpool sufficiently, they can pay a fine that the district applies (I think)
to general programs, like electric water heaters vs gas, electric lawn mowers
vs gasoline, mass transit, etc.  Implement a similar program for power
plants. Work in concert with the local air district and the EPA to develop a
program that allows the developer to pay the market price for credits (FYI:
+$20 million for Pastoria) which the district uses to develop credits from
existing sources that have not yet been cleaned up  (see list 4 lines above,
and others.)  Necessity:  power plant proceeds while credits are being
develop.  If it takes 10 years to develop the credits, consider issues and
value of fact that the 2.5 ppm plant will eventually replace the 100 ppm
plants.

 c. Stop the crusade for ever lower BACT requirements that are based on vague
representations, inconclusive data and over zealous developer agreements.
Example:  Several years ago, Goalline Technologies developed SCONOX for NOX
reduction in a 25 MW unit in LA.  Good thing to do, but based primarily on
the results of that small unit and the salesmanship of Goalline's president,
we got ratcheted down on our 500 MW plant in Pittsburg to 2.5 ppm.  SCAQMD
calls to SCR vendors indicated "we can do that".  EPA jumped on board.
Guarantees from EPC contractors with LDs for nonperformance are different
than "we can do that" from an equipment supplier.  Now, EPA and others are
wanting 2 ppm, again based on vague data.  Sam even advises requests to
consider ~1 ppm.   (I point out that there are ZERO frame 7Fa units in
operation at these levels in California.)  GE has told us "absolutely not" to
a 2ppm guarantee.  However, I believe that requirements will in fact be
reduced again by EPA, just because they can.  Again, do the math on delaying
or stopping the development of, say, a 2.5 ppm plant (because EPA wants 2
ppm) in favor of the continued operation of a 100 ppm plant.  Hugely more
resultant pollution.

 d. Be open minded and proactive with developers' novel methods of creating
new sources of ERCs.  PG&E had a heck of a time creating ERCs for their Otay
Mesa 500 MW power plant in San Diego, ending up putting new engines in 4
harbor boats and +100 garbage trucks.  Enron has several similarly dificult
initiatives underway (Steve cannot tell anyone this, FYI only:  we are
looking at replacing engines in harbor boats in SF Bay, replacing engines in
"yard" locomotives in Sacramento and LA, replacing agricultural pumping
engines in the Central Valley, putting SCR technology in cement plants all
over CA.)  We could take years to get these programs approved as did PG&E, or
we can take several months, with EPAs (and others) leadership.

2. Federal Siting Issues:  California is at least attempting through
legislation to speed up the siting on new power plants.  Unfortunately, the
Federal agencies do not have the time line requirements to provide their
review on the speeded up schedules.  For example, a request of the Fish and
Wildlife Department for a review/permit gets put on the priority pile, first
come first serve:  shopping centers, housing developments, power plants,
power lines, etc.  I understand that our Pastoria project had 65 F&W
applications ahead of it when we applied.  And, there was no limitation on
how long they could take to get the review done.  I understand that one power
project has waited 2 years for its review.  The only way we got our permit
was Sam Wehn begged F&W to figure a way to get it done ahead of the 65 other
applications.  Fortunately, F&W figured that we could reapply under an EPA
rule in this specific case, which did have a timeline limitation.  We should
not have to rely on luck to get plants permitted.  Suggestion:  require the
federal agencies involved in power plant or transmission line permitting to
speed up their review/permitting times to be consistent with the state
initiatives to speed things up.

3. Market Issues:  I will not go into this in detail, as Steve is more able
than I to vocalize these issues.  However, from a power plant development
point of view, if we want the private sector to develop MERCHANT power
plants, and I believe we do because of the enormity of the investment
required, we must get back to a market structure.  As I am sure Steve
remembers, one of the big issues we all dealt with in "deregulation" was
stranded cost.  We can avoid those issues by getting the private sector to
make the investments.  Steve knows all the issues:  stability, liquidity,
credit worthy counterparties, lots of counterparties, etc.

	Elizabeth Linnell@ENRON
	01/26/2001 10:24 AM

		 To: Mary Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, seabron.adamson@frontier-economics.com,
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT,
mday@gmssr.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Urgent - Steve Kean to testify at Senate hearing, need info

Steve Kean will be testifying at the Senate Energy Committee's hearing on
Wednesday regarding California.  Steve and Jim Steffes asked me to contact
you for the following information.  I've listed specific requests for several
people, but am copying many more of you for your input as well.  Anything you
can provide by sometime on Monday will be appreciated!

Dave Parquet - Siting of new power plants in California.  Any insight you can
provide regarding the rules, the current climate, what would fix the current
situation, etc.

Richard Sanders - Steve thinks he might be asked about whether the market was
manipulated.  Please provide information on whether this was the case and who
the participants likely were.  What's the current climate regarding
sanctions, etc.?

Mary Schoen - Any information you can provide relating to air emission issues
in California, and specific details for our recommendations regarding air
emissions.

Steve Walton - The status on RTO West, Desert Star, Cal ISO and general
information on RO development.

Sue Mara - Specific ordering language requiring the utilities to buy only
from the PX.  Was it required through legislation or the CPUC, and what
exactly does it mean.  Who was involved in formulating the language?
Information on block forward markets.

Alan Comnes - A copy of the CDWR response and anything they might have
available regarding long term proposals from the government.

Dan Allegretti - We have the e-mail Jim sent regarding the UI deal.  Please
provide more specifics on the deal, and information regarding portfolio
management approach.

Thanks for your help!


Students,
Please read the attached letter of apology from Excite@Home
regarding the presentation no-show incident on 10/5.
Regards,
Rich

Rich Wong
Account Manager, Technology
MBA Recruiting
Haas School of Business Career Center
S-545 Student Services Building #1900
University of California
Berkeley, CA  94720-1900
Phone:  (510) 643-4211
Fax:    (510) 643-5257

 - Excite Apology Letter.doc


The attached letter has been posted to our OASIS Homepage under the Provider
Information Section (Customer Communication).

 <<WinstonStrawn.pdf>>
Roger E. Austin
Allegheny Power
Transmission Marketing
800 Cabin Hill Drive
Greensburg PA  15601
(724) 838-6042  (724) 838-6156 fax
mailto:raustin@alleghenypower.com <mailto:raustin@alleghenypower.com>

 - WinstonStrawn.pdf


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints- Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		  NO TIME TO READ?  NO PROBLEM!
		Join Audio Book Club and you can enjoy John Grisham's latest on the way to
work, get some good advice from John Gray or Suze Orman, or have Stephen King
read you a bedtime story. Whatever you're looking for, you are sure to find
it at Audio Book Club...and you'll also find one great deal! Join Audio Book
Club today and get 4 audiobooks for only 1 Penny. Click  here for more
details.

		Bible Verse of the Day
		Tuesday December 12, 2000

		Luke 1.68

		The Access Bible, NRSV, New Testament, Page 84

		"'Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, for he has looked favorably on his
people and redeemed them . . . .'"

		Visit The Access Bible from Oxford University Press Online!

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		[IMAGE]

		The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
Greeting Cards! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions.

		Get satellite television in only one step.
		Click here for more information on FREE satellite TV!

		Want Coupons, FREESTUFF, & More? Click Into CoolSavings
		Visit CoolSavings and get coupons and great deals on the latest electronic
gadgets, clothes, toys, jewelry, and more!

		Don't spend Christmas without the Grinch...
		Save up to 40% at Amazon's Dr. Seuss Shop!

		End those last minute gift hassles forever!
		Try Flooz!  The online gift currency you send by email!

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		SPIRITUAL BOOK OF THE DAY
		Iyanla Vanzant: In the Meantime

		Tip Gift
		MOVIE OF THE DAY
		Joseph - King of Dreams

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		Martin Goldsmith: The Inextinguishable Symphony

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		Creed: Human Clay

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAY
		RIM 950 Blackberry Internet Edition Wireless Handheld

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		The Cars - Live at Musikladen

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		James Stewart: It's a Wonderful Life

		Quote
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President. Now I'm
beginning to believe it.
		- Clarence Darrow

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		  The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
Greeting Cards! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions. Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


I've finished marking up the drafts, and thought perhaps a few thoughts would
give you some insight into the reasons for my revisions . Unfortunately, I
was engaged in discussions about the course to pursue in light of Arthur
Anderson's comments until almost 10pm, when I lost my typing help, so not
much headway was made in inputting the changes last night. My secretary is
supposed to be in early ( it is now nearly 8:00 and she still isn't in ! ),
and I will enlist whatever other help I can get to turn these documents
around.

For those not involved in the discussions last night, Roger advised us that
Arthur Anderson had changes to the Xonon Technology Implementation Agreement
designed to make clear ENA had no primary or secondary obligations under the
XTIA. The principal change suggested by AA - the deletion of the last
sentence of the BOLD language in Section 2.2 - removed the obligation for ENA
to pick up any obligations under the agreement owed by West LB in excess of
the "Cap". Note that this same change applies in the Agreement in Principle
related to the purchase of turbines.

XTIA Revision 4G.  AA's change did not appear to address comprehensively the
principle AA espoused, ie, clarifying ENA had no primary or secondary
obligations under the agreements. After much discussion and some
consideration, I decided to prepare alternative markups of the XTIA - one
that attempts to meet the AA directive while preserving a level of comfort
for GE. I attempted this by increasing the limit on West LB's liability in
Article 10 to $20 million from $9.9 million so that GE's recourse against
West LB is the same as it had against West LB and ENA in the prior drafts,
and by obligating West LB, in the default provisions, to pony up for an ENA
default. I also extensively modified the Section 2.2 language ( taken
verbatim from the LM 6000 deal ) to eliminate the limited recourse provisions
favoring West LB, and in doing so made it easier to conclude that references
to ENA in the agreement are references to ENA acting in an agency, and not
its individual capacity. This notion is still pretty vague in the revision
because I did not want to create too much discomfort in GE, since ENA
explicitly acting in an agency capacity would mean there was no recourse
against it ( since ultimate recourse would lie with the principal, West LB).
Roger suggested I delete the limit on ENA's liability in Article 10 to remove
the implication it had any, which I did ( and which means we have no upside
protection if we are construed to have obligations under the XTIA.

The upshot is that in my opinion the 4g revision goes as far as possible
toward placating AA while still retaining a possibility of selling it to GE.
The sheer number of changes required by the substance of AA's comment,
however, is bound to be disconcerting to GE at this stage of negotiations,
particularly when GE's expectation was for a  markup incorporating the new
business terms agreed yesterday afternoon (calling for payment of the
Development Funds to be completed by September 30,2000, with the possibility
of a refund of a portion of the Development Fund Payment if the December 31
Milestone is not timely completed) and some clean ups/clarifications.

Note that in both revision 4g and 4ga, Section4.3 now provides that the Xonon
credit created is only exercisable by CCSI on and after December 31,2000, so
that the credit amount can reflect the deduction of any Milestone 4 refund
amount paid by GE if it does not complete that Milestone on time. I think the
dollar value of the credit should be adjusted downward if a portion of the
Development Funds paid on September 30 are in fact refunded in December. We
need to make sure to make provision in the Acquisition and Development
Agreement that any Milestone 4 refund received by West LB is paid over to
ENA, since West LB will have been repaid its advances on September 30,2000.

XTIA Revision 4GA . This alternate revision to the XTIA takes a minimalist
approach, and incorporates only the new business terms, some minor clean
up/clarifications, and the AA change to Section 2.2 and the change to Article
10 ( to remove a cap for ENA's laibility) suggested by Roger. It seems to me
it does not address meaningfully the AA admonition that ENA may not have
primary or secondary liability under the XTIA if it wants to stay outside of
the rigors of FAS 97-10. However, it has the singular advantage of looking a
lot like what GE and West LB expect to see in the revision.

Option Repurchase Agreement. This revision was complicated by the possible
refund of the a portion of the Development Funds by GE if it failed to
complete Milestone 4 by December 31,2000 ( an attempt to retain some
accountability for GE's performance given that it is being paid for that
Milestone on September 30 to satisfy CCSI ). Because the option repurchase
must occur on or before September 30, it isn't clear what will happen
December 31, so its hard to figure out what to pay if the contract is not
cancelled by September 30 or what the credits are worth on that date.

Since CCSI is the direct recipient of the credits under the XTIA, I first
thought ENA could hang onto  $2.1 million ( the amount formerly allocated to
Milestone 4 before its payment obligation was collapsed into Milestone 3) by
deducting the refund from the amount payable  to CCSI on the option
repurchase date and leaving CCSI to bear the risk of GE's repayment of any
refund in order to make CCSI whole. If GE did meet the Milestone on time and
so did not pay the refund amount directly to CCSI, I thought ENA could always
make CCSI whole by paying the $2.1 million  in December when the refund
matter was decided. That approach- subtracting the refund amount from the
September 30 payment to CCSI- was decidedly unsatisfactory since the option
repurchase formula could result - depending on the Milestones paid on the
option repurchase date - in a negative payment to CCSI for the option.

What I settled on in this draft was to go ahead and pay CCSI the amount of
the premiums it has paid to September 30 plus $200,000 if the turbine
contract has not been cancelled on September 30. This would include repayment
to CCSI on September 30 of premiums paid by CCSI under the spark spread on
September 30. Assuming CCSI made all its premium payments and West LB made
all of its Development Fund advances, ENA would have received $9.9 million
from CCSI by September 30, paid out $9.9 million plus interest to West LB by
September 30, and purchased the spark spread from CCSI for $10.1 million. If
the turbine contract is not cancelled but GE has to pay the refund, I think
the $2.1 million ought to go to West LB or its designee (ENA).

If we cancel the turbine contract and do not go forward with Pastoria, the
dollar amount of the credits vested in CCSI  and exercisable after December
31,2000, are equal to the Development Funds advanced less the refund amount.
Since the document now reads that the $2.1 refund amount goes back to West LB
or its designee, if GE pays the refund and CCSI is holding a  Xonon credit of
only $7.8 million,it seems to me it will be necessary  to pay the refund over
to CCSI instead of ENA in order to make up for the fact that it paid $9.9 in
premium and only received $7.8 in credit in September. This quick
"liquidation" of $2.1 of the credit seems to be an ancillary benefit to CCSI
occasioned by GE's refund. We could provide in the agreements that GE makes
this payment directly to CCSI or we can continue to have the right to receive
the payment from GE under the XTIA and the obligation to pay it to CCSI under
the Repurchase Agreement.


just check with bob late in the morning

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 06:14 PM -----

	Robert Bruce@ENRON
	Sent by: Robert Bruce@ENRON
	02/14/2001 10:55 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001

I will -- fyi, I am expecting today or tomorrow an explanation from Billy
Lemmons on my involvement in formulation of the business plan; am awaiting
this before I revise the agenda.  If I don't hear from Billy by tomorrow
morning I will send a revised agenda at that time -- Bob

Robert E. Bruce
Senior Counsel
Enron North America Corp.
T (713) 345-7780
F (713) 646-3393
robert.bruce@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	02/14/2001 10:41 AM

		 To: Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001

Bob:  Could you please forward changes to the Ag section to Kaye?  Thanks.
Sara

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2001 10:40 AM -----

	Alan Aronowitz
	02/13/2001 06:51 PM

		 To: Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Quick/LON/ECT@ECT, Wayne
Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Rahul Saxena/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Legal Temp 3/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: EGM Monthly Legal Report for Feb 2001

Please provide to me by e-mail by Thursday of this week your suggested
changes to the January 2001 Monthly Report, so that we can issue the February
2001Monthly Report by the end of this week. Thanks for your attention to this
matter.

Regards, Alan


Sorry, but could you re-email Federico's bio to me.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Good morning,

I wanted to thank each of you personally for taking the time to meet with
Bob and I last week.  It was great getting to know you, and to see how
you're going to use e.Planning to help proactively manage your business.
Clearly you're going to push the envelope in ways we haven't seen clients go
before... a tribute to the innovativeness of Enron and its people!  Its
great to think that our software is going to really make a difference in how
you're employing information and involving people in your planning processes
going forward.

Thanks for all your support, and I look forward to a strong and lasting
partnership with you and your teams!  Don't hesitate to ever call if there's
anything I can do for you.

As a little aside, I sent along a great slide show chronicling your floods a
few weeks back.  I am sure you've seen these already, but if not, the
pictures are pretty awesome!

Mark/Jan, I will be working up a proposal on the P.R. front after the Fourth
holiday week has passed.  I will be curious to hear if/how your preliminary
discussions with the P.R. team progressed.  I think we can do some great
things that will further Enron's "most innovative" image using business
planning as a platform.  More to come!  And yes,  Mark, we will get our
racquets warmed up during our next visit.  I must say however, your recent
match with a Wimbledon Master has me just a bit daunted right now.  I guess
that's a good psychological advantage for you!

Take care,

Jeff

Director, Global Customer Relations
Adaytum
952-876-6965 (office)
612-747-514 (mobile)
jholker@adaytum-msp.com

 <<TS_Allison_Houston_devastation.pps>>

 - TS_Allison_Houston_devastation.pps


Senate Energy is going to meet tomorrow to take up the following bills,
all of which are in spot format:

SBX2 41 (Speier) The bill would require the CPUC to also take into
account the number of inhabitants located at the site of a residential
customer, and increase baseline quantities accordingly, up to an
unspecified maximum number of inhabitants.

SBX2 68 (Battin) The bill would require the ISO to take into account the
general well being of residents in a particular area to determine the
feasibility of blackouts.

SBX2 73 (Alpert) The bill would find and declare that where
cost-effective electric supply cannot be secured by the Independent
System Operator or the state, any system outages should be managed so as
to minimize disruption to the customers.  This bill would require the
Governor, if cost-effective electric supply cannot be secured by the ISO
or the state, in collaboration with certain entities, to establish
certain purchasing guidelines and to create a system of managing any
interruptions in a manner so as to minimize disruption to the
customers.  This bill would also require the commission to create
interruptibility programs in which larger customers or communities
desiring higher levels of reliability may secure that reliability in
exchange for fees established by the commission.  The bill would require
the programs to require public utility electrical corporations to
configure their distribution so that selective and identifiable blocks
of customers can be provided differing levels of reliability, and to
alert customers of potential outages.

Following the bill hearing, the Committee is going to have an
informational hearing entitled:

"The Impacts of Creating An Energy Buyer's Cartel"


What do you think about this?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 01:18 PM -----

	Karen Lambert
	01/10/2001 11:29 AM

		 To: Lisa Cousino/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Thorne/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Bandwidth Master Contracts

Attached below is a spreadsheet report of Bandwidth contracts in the Global
Contracts database.  As we agreed, the Bandwidth group either has or will set
up new EBS Contract numbers for each of these agreements, provide the new EBS
Contract number for EOL Reporting, and provide specific notations and
information regarding inactivation of the Global Contracts database records
so that we don't have 2 "master" numbers for any given contract.

I do not have edit access to Bandwidth contract records in Global and it is
my understanding that the Bandwidth group no longer uses Global -- therefore
none of us involved in this process will have appropriate security rights to
inactivate the Global database records.  I will request appropriate security
access to inactivate the records.  Then, when instructed via e-mail from a
member of the Bandwidth team, I will inactivate the Global Contract database
records.

Our agreement is that I will continue to report Bandwidth master contract
information to EOL until Profile Manager is in production -- with the
understanding from EOL that I cannot see the contract data reported for
Bandwidth masters contracts.


Thank you for your request. You will be notified by email when your request has been processed. You can check the progress of your request by clicking http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000076494&Page=MyReq.


-----Original Message-----
From:  "Jay Sonnenberg" <jsonnenberg@bracepatt.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jay+20Sonnenberg+22+20+3Cjsonnenberg+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:35 PM
To: Kroll, Heather
Subject: Re: Asset Management Agreement

As requested.

Take care,
Jay

>>> "Kroll, Heather" <Heather.Kroll@ENRON.com> 05/21/01 02:07PM >>>
Jay,

Will you forward to me an electronic version of the Asset Management
Agreement?  In cleaning up my files, I managed to delete the final
version of the AMA.

Thanks!

Heather

 - #1142119 v13 - ASSET MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT.doc


Title: The Shifting Environmental Strategy Landscape
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2823;

***********************************************************************

In a November 27, 2001 CERA Conference Call and Web Presentation, Susan Ruth
and John Weiss discussed:

*  Measuring the Success of an Environmental Strategy

*  Evaluating Renewable Energy Investment Opportunities

*  Analyzing the Current State of Climate Change Negotiations

Please follow the above URL to view and listen to a replay of the CERA
Conference Call. When the Premiere Conferencing PlaceWare window opens, simply
enter your name and click the "View" button. A "recording key code" is not
required.

Hosted by Premiere Conferencing

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Playback
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Environmental Strategy

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Sir,
Thank you for taking questions.

Attached is a presentation which I believe is worth $40M / year with very little capital investment.  With your permission, I'd like to arrange to see you for 15 minutes to present this new venture.  With due respect, Lou Pai has been the only person who has not thought these two products would be a natural progression for Enron.

If you are willing to discuss further, I would ask Jay Lewis to also attend.

Thank you again,

Gregg Cooper

---------------------- Forwarded by Gregg Cooper/HOU/EES on 08/01/2001 10:30 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services  From:  EES Distribution                           08/01/2001 08:21 AM

To:	EES HOUSTON EMPLOYEES
cc:
Subject:

Reminder.......

Please join Jeff Skilling on Wednesday, August 1, 2001 at 2 p.m. near EB 737 to

share information about activities he and the OOC believe are important to us as a company,
and answer questions about our businesses, strategies, issues or anything of interest to you concerning Enron.

If you would like to pre-submit a question, please send them to Jeff Skilling directly or fax to him at 713-646-8381.

Hope to see everyone there!


Email and phone conversation at the same time!


(See attached file: hpl0901.xls)

 - hpl0901.xls


Darrell,

Grant Masson, Ronnie Chahal and myself made a contribution to the book
on energy derivatives to be published soon in Australia (a book by
Clewlow and Strickland).

Given our growing workload and responsibilities, the quality of the paper is
less
than satisfactory. I would like to make sure that there are no obvious and
embarrassing  errors in what we submit. I would appreciate if you could
take a quick look at the chapter and give us the feedback (under the same
arrangement as in the previous cases).

Thanks for looking at our storage model. I shall give you a call within the
next few days to update you on our work and developments at Enron.
Vince will start his senior year in 6 weeks. He wants to graduate and look
for work: he thinks getting an advanced degree in his field makes
no economic sense. He spent the summer building his
own computer (1000 MHz clock speed). I was the unskilled immigrant worker
toiling under his management.

I hope everything is well at home and that your wife's company is doing great.

Regards.

Vince


Yeah, yeah, yeah...

kathy.scully@milliman.com on 01/09/2001 08:19:06 AM
To: Matt.Smith@enron.com
cc:

Subject: Re:

SEE!  you did lie...you said you weren't going to come!  anyway, i don't know
if it matters, but i'm happy you're visiting.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Scully/NYRK/M&R on 01/09/2001 09:21
AM ---------------------------

MIME:Matt.Smith@enron.com on 01/08/2001 04:00:30 PM
To: Kathy Scully@MRUS
cc:

Subject: Re:

Basically, you don't want to talk to me anymore :(  I just want to be
loved....

Just kidding, I can't really respond right now, so I'll give you a call
later.  I don't think I'm going to come now, so the time constraint is off.

Mat


Probably. I'll find out later this week.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:06 AM
To: Cherry, Brian
Subject: RE: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
Decision of Commissioner Wood

Thanks?  Brown going to vote for it?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Brian [mailto:BKC7@pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Dasovich Jeff (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
Decision of Commissioner Wood

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Cherry, Brian
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:29 AM
> To:	Anderson, David W (Law)
> Subject:	FW: Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement
Alternate
> Decision of Commissioner Wood
>
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Cherry, Brian
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 8:28 AM
> To:	Andrew Niven (E-mail); Benjamin Campbell (E-mail); Dan
McLafferty
> (E-mail); Dan Thomas (E-mail); David Anderson (E-mail); Dede Hapner
> (E-mail); Dennis Gee (E-mail); Donald Petersen (E-mail); Frank Lindh
> (E-mail); G Jefferson (E-mail); Gary Guerrero (E-mail); Geoffrey
Bellenger
> (E-mail); George Clavier (E-mail); J Reidenbach (E-mail); Jerry Miller
> (E-mail); John Armato (E-mail); John Clarke (E-mail); Joshua Bar-Lev
> (E-mail); Karen Tomcala (E-mail); Kevin Ernst (E-mail); Kirk Johnson
> (E-mail); Les Buchner (E-mail); Les Guliasi (E-mail); Linda Agerter
> (E-mail); Lisa Lieu (E-mail); Lise Jordan (E-mail); Mark Huffman
(E-mail);
> Michael Katz (E-mail); Neha Patel (E-mail); Patrick Golden (E-mail);
Paul
> Sivley (E-mail); Randall Litteneker (E-mail); Ray Williams (E-mail);
> Richard Hall (E-mail); Rodney Boschee (E-mail); Sandra Burns (E-mail);
> Sandy Dickinson (E-mail); Shaun Halverson (E-mail); Shelly Malekos
> (E-mail); Shirley Woo (E-mail); Stuart Tartaglia (E-mail); Todd Arnett
> (E-mail); Trista Berkovitz (E-mail)
> Subject:	Natural Gas Strategy Comprehensive Settlement Alternate
> Decision of Commissioner Wood
>
> Last evening, Commissioner Wood released his alternate to Commissioner
> Bilas' Revised Proposed Decision in the Natural Gas Strategy case.
> Commissioner Wood's alternate rejects the Comprehensive Settlement
> Agreement, which would unbundled SoCalGas' intrastate transmission
system,
> and approves the Interim Settlement proposal, which would make minor
> changes to SoCalGas' windowing procedures, establish hector Road as an
> alternate receipt point, and establish pools for gas trading, among
other
> minor changes.  However, Commissioner Wood's alternate goes further,
> rejecting the unbundling of core interstate transportation from rates
and
> eliminating completely the core's contribution to ITCS (interstate
> transportation cost surcharges), which cost the core approximately
$7-10
> Million per year.
>
> I'll forward a copy of the alternate to you as soon as it is
available.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


All:

Attached is our memo on Day 10 of the trial.

Kimberly A. Curry
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
(202) 828-7623 (phone)
(202) 857-2107 (fax)
kcurry@bracepatt.com


Western Government Affairs
WEEKLY SCHEDULES
For the Week of May 7 - 11, 2001

Paul Kaufman

Mon  5/07  Portland OR office
Tue  5/08  Portland OR office
Wed  5/09  Salt Lake City UT
Thur  5/10  Houston TX
Fri  5/11  Portland OR office

Sue Mara

Mon  5/07  San Francisco CA office
Tue  5/08  Portland OR office
Wed  5/09  San Francisco CA office
Thur  5/10  San Francisco CA office
Fri  5/11  San Francisco CA office

Jeff Dasovich

Mon  5/07  Sacramento CA
Tue  5/08  TBD
Wed  5/09  TBD
Thur  5/10  TBD
Fri  5/11  TBD

Sandi McCubbin

Mon  5/07  Sacramento CA
Tue  5/08  Sacramento CA
Wed  5/09  TBD
Thur  5/10  TBD
Fri  5/11  TBD

Mona Petrochko

Mon  5/07  Vacation
Tue  5/08  Vacation
Wed  5/09  Vacation
Thur  5/10  Vacation
Fri  5/11  Vacation

Alan Comnes

Mon  5/07  Portland OR office
Tue  5/08  Portland OR office
Wed  5/09  Portland OR office
Thur  5/10  Portland OR office
Fri  5/11  Portland OR office


8:30 Wednesday would be great. Should I come to your office?

Bob

Sara Shackleton
05/09/2000 11:30 AM
To: Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Friday luncheon

Bob:  can we talk (15 or 20 minutes) either 8:30 am or 11:00 am on Wednesday
or Thursday?  SS

Bob Klein
05/09/2000 11:15 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Friday luncheon

I am available on Wednesday or Thursday morning except for 9:00 Wednesday
morning. Just let me know when and where.

Thanks,

Bob

Sara Shackleton
05/09/2000 08:23 AM
To: Bob Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Friday luncheon

Bob:  Are there any issues that might be useful for your goup that I should
address?  Also, I would like to chat with you about settlements on multiple
trades.  An interesting issue was raised in our credit lunch last week.
Please let me know when you are available.  Thanks.  Sara


I was looking at past levels, and I thouhgt to share my findings with you.

Highest levels as of the first week of April was in 1999 of 1,367 TCF.  Yesterday's AGA showed our levels @ 2,294.  In order to reach 1999's levels we ould need to withdraw about 103 BCF a week (2,294 less 1,367 divided vy the remaining 9 weeks until the first week of April).

Also, 1999 had the highest levels for the third week of January, levels were 2,039.  Year 2002 is 255 bcf ahead.


THOUGHT YOU WOULD APPRECIATE MY SITUATION HERE.   NOW YOU TELL ME - HE IS NOT
MY FRIEND HE IS BROKERING ME FOR MY BUSINESS.  HE DID THIS NOW BECAUSE OF THE
ENRON NATSOUCE DEAL.  RIGHT?   PLEASE BE HONEST - I TRUST YOU
---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001
12:34 PM ---------------------------

Ray Russin <rrussin@natsource.com> on 03/29/2001 07:07:09 AM
To: "'sandra.f.brawner@enron.com'" <sandra.f.brawner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: drinks or dinner?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Russin
> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:11 AM
> To: 'sandra.brawner@enron.com'
> Subject: drinks or dinner?
>
> hi sandra,
>
>  i just wanted to ask if we could get together next week for drinks
> or a dinner.  no business has to be discussed.  just want to get out with
> you and see how you are doing.  as always, i would love to have kenny come
> along if it is possible.  well, if you do want to get together just let me
> know.   have a nice day.
>
>
>   your friend,
>    ray
>
> ps:  you would have received this email a lot sooner but i didn't have
> your right email address.  was missing your middle initial.


***** NEW Documents Available From CAEM Free of Charge *****

The Center for the Advancement of Energy Markets (CAEM) is pleased to
announce the availability of two ground-breaking documents -- "The Role
of the Federal Government in Distributed Energy" and "The Role of the
Default Provider in Restructured Energy Markets" -- that are available
free of charge.  To access the documents, visit us at our web site --
www.caem.org

After over 6 months of intensive work by CAEM's Distributed Energy Task
Force, CAEM is releasing a comprehensive report on the "THE ROLE OF THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN DISTRIBUTED ENERGY" prepared by Nat Treadway, a
CAEM Senior Research Fellow, and Ed Reid, CAEM's Senior Technology
Fellow.

The report describes the major Federal government activities that
encourage or hamper the commercialization of distributed energy (DE) and
recommends changes that could allow DE to play a more significant role
as a choice among competing energy services.  The overarching conclusion
of the report is that unless the Federal government takes affirmative
steps to promote DE, the existing policies, regulations, and business
practices will continue to hamper its development.  The report makes a
number of recommendations that will be important to policymakers at both
the federal and state levels of government.  This 70-page report is a
must read for stakeholders interested in distributed energy.

A white paper on "THE ROLE OF THE DEFAULT PROVIDER IN RESTRUCTURING
ENERGY MARKETS" was prepared by Ron Sutherland, a CAEM Scholar, as part
of CAEM's DISCO of the Future Forum.

The paper offers an insightful analysis and critique of the current
models utilized by states to offer default service.  The conclusions are
summarized at the end of the paper, but the main result is noted here.
Each state implicitly adopts a model of competition in its electricity
and gas markets.  This model then influences (if not determines) the
choice of default provider.  The commonly accepted model of competition
permits the local utility to remain a competitor in the merchant
function, where the utility is likely to be the default provider.  In
the restructuring efforts of those few states where the utility exits
the merchant function, an energy supply company is likely to be the
default provider.  Various risks, inefficiencies or non-competitive
elements do not result from the choice of default provider, but from
other elements in the transition process.  Price caps are the major
factor contributing to risks and inefficiencies where the utility or an
independent energy provider is the default provider.  That is, it is not
the default service provider framework, per se, that is responsible for
the risks. The purpose of this study is descriptive not prescriptive,
however a tentative suggestion is offered.  Few customers will require
default service if energy service providers have incentives to offer
service at pricing and other terms that cover costs.  If the need for
default service occurs, customers will most likely obtain service if the
default provider can offer service at pricing and other terms that cover
costs.


Shudeish, I spoke with Roger Kohn, Region IX EPA permit engineer, about the
time his agency will take to do the air permit reveiw for Kingman and
Flagstaff.  He stated that EPA normally gets the allowed 45 days to do the
permit review, however, at the request of the state agency, his office will
do an expidited review.  Because of the urgency of Transwetern desiring to
initiate construction, by this email, I am asking the ADEQ to request  an
expidited review  of the Kingman and Flagstaff air permits from the EPA.

Again, thanks for your work and effort that you have put in on this project.


The apartment complex needs for you to fax them a statement saying you are no
longer living in our apartment and they need it by tomorrow morning.  If I
don't here from you via email/msngr  by the end of tonight I'm going to forge
one and fax it to them.  Actually, I can do that regardless if you don't
mind.  Just drop me a line and let me know what works for you.

Hope things are going well.  I actually worked 21 straight hours the other
day/night (7:45 am Tuesday until 4:45 am Wednesday)...I think this
constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Crenshaw, Shirley
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 7:59 AM
To:	Adam Stevens (E-mail); Alex Huang (E-mail); Amitava Dhar (E-mail); Anguel Grigorov (E-mail); Anita DuPont (E-mail); Bhalachandra Mehendale (E-mail); Bob Lee (E-mail); Candice Kao (E-mail); Chonawee Supatgiat (E-mail); Christopher Pernoud (E-mail); Dayne Zimmerman (E-mail); Elena Chilkina (E-mail); Eric Cope (E-mail); Gwyn Koepke (E-mail); Heather A. Johnson (E-mail); Jaesoo Lew (E-mail); Jason Sokolov (E-mail); Jose Marquez (E-mail); Joseph Hrgovcic (E-mail); Karthik Rajan (E-mail); Kenneth Deng (E-mail); Kevin G Moore (E-mail); Lance Cunningham (E-mail); Leann Walton (E-mail); Martin Lin (E-mail); Maureen Raymond (E-mail); Mike A Roberts (E-mail); Mitra Mujica (E-mail); Nelson Neale (E-mail); Osman Sezgen (E-mail); Paulo Issler (E-mail); Pinnamaneni Krishnarao (E-mail); Pravas Sud (E-mail); Praveen Mellacheruvu (E-mail); Rabi De (E-mail); Rakesh Bharati (E-mail); Roman Zadorozhny (E-mail); Rusty Parks (E-mail); Sandeep Kohli (E-mail); Sarah Wooddy (E-mail); Seksan Kiatsupaibul (E-mail); Sevil Yaman (E-mail); Shalesh Ganjoo (E-mail); Shane Green (E-mail); Shravan Chopra (E-mail); Sofya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Stephen Bennett (E-mail); Tanya Tamarchenko (E-mail); Therese Candella (E-mail); Tom Barkley (E-mail); Tom Halliburton (E-mail); Vasant Shanbhogue (E-mail); Vince J Kaminski (E-mail); Wichai Narongwanich (E-mail); William Smith (E-mail); Youyi Feng (E-mail); Zhendong Xia (E-mail); Zimin Lu (E-mail)
Subject:	Krishna's New Baby

It's here!


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 04:00 PM -----

	Norma Villarreal
	09/27/2000 09:59 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Toni Graham/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: RESUME - Debra Ruby

Per my voicemail,  attached is the resume for Debra Ruby. Her experience
appears to be weighted on employment law  Please feel free to call me if you
have any questions.

Norma
X31545

Amy Gambill

Attached to this email you will find a copy of my most
recent resume. I appreciate your interest and assistance in forwarding my
resume to the appropriate parties.

 - Ruby, Debra.doc


----- Forwarded by Sharonda Stephens/Corp/Enron on 01/23/2001 09:01 AM -----

	"ANN SCHMIDT, ENRON CORP." <ENRONPR@bloomberg.net>
	01/23/2001 08:56 AM

		 To: sharonda.stephens@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (BN  ) Enron Broadband's Indian CEO Sanjay Bhatnagar Resigns

 enron story

Enron Broadband's Indian CEO Sanjay Bhatnagar Resigns
1/23/1 3:58 (New York)

     Mumbai, Jan. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Sanjay Bhatnagar, chief
executive of Enron Broadband and the main architect of Enron's
Dabhol power project in India, has resigned.
     Bhatnagar was transferred to Enron Broadband, a unit of the
world's biggest energy trader, in November from chief executive of
Enron India Ltd., which set up a 740-megawatt power plant in
India's western Maharashtra state. Enron Broadband is setting up
an Internet data center in Mumbai and plans to sell connections to
the Web through optic fiber cables.
     ``He had transferred over to another of Enron's businesses
several months ago, so the transition at Enron India has already
been accomplished,'' a company statement said.
     Enron's Indian unit, Dabhol Power company, has invested $3
billion in the 740 megawatts a year project and its success could
influence further overseas investment in the industry.
     Enron, one of the first big foreign companies to enter the
country after India opened up the economy to foreign investors,
saw construction of the power plant delayed until December 1996
because of legal battles with local governments for three years.
     Sanjay Bhatnagar joined Enron Corp. 1992.

--Sumit Sharma in the Mumbai newsroom (91-22) 284 0142 or
sumitsharma@bloomberg.net /mh

Story illustration: To graph Enron Corp.'s share price, click on
{ENE US <Equity> GP <GO>}.

Company news:
ENE <Equity> CN

NI ELC
NI NRG
NI UTI
NI CMD
NI OIL
NI GAS
NI COS
NI INDIA
NI ASIA
NI ASIAX
NI US
NI WNEWS
NI NORTHAM

-0- (BN ) Jan/23/2001  8:58 GMT


Vince,

We would like to continue to receive the IIF service for a cost to the
Research Group of $15,000 per annum.  Can I ask you to approve this charge?
Please let me know if you'd like to discuss.  We decided to cancel the Oxford
Analytica service (daily country briefs and access to the website) as we are
getting consensus forecasts for FX and inflation from another source, so we
will not be subject to the $10,000 fee referenced below.

Thanks,

Gwyn

---------------------- Forwarded by Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron on 02/13/2001 01:55
PM ---------------------------

Robert Johnston@ECT
02/13/2001 09:46 AM
To: Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gwyn Koepke/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: IIF/OxAn

Hi Maureen and Gwyn-

On the Oxford Analytica front, I'm glad you have found the service useful.
Our contract with them has expired and we are currently negotiating for more
users to have access.  Our current contract is for $50K or $10K per user per
year.  We can charge $10K back to you.

On the IIF front, the invoice for $47K is due at the end of the month.  Here
I would propose that we pay two thirds (to cover our costs and the costs of
our Competitive Analysis colleagues in London), leaving $15K for you to cover.

Since we took on these services last year, we have expanded our range of
sources and projects and are consequently trying to do more with less. Thus I
need to allocate some of our costs from OxAn and IIF to other projects.

Let me know what you think about this proposal.  Maureen, congratulations on
your secondment to Enron Metals (Gwyn mentioned it to me).  FYI, our
colleague Jim Roth is providing Competitive Analysis support to Joe Gold and
John Sherriff on that project from London.

RJ


As required by the Houston Fire Department, a fire drill has been scheduled for the Enron Center Campus.

	Enron Center North, 1400 Smith St., approximately  3:15 PM on Thursday, December 20th, 2001

	Enron Center South, 1500 Louisiana St., approximately 3:45 PM on Thursday, December 20th, 2001

Please advise all clients, contractors, and visitors that this will be a fire drill only. The fire alarm will sound at 3:15 PM in Enron Center North and 3:45 PM in Enron Center South. You will be asked to go to the stairwell and standby.  Do not go into the stairwell.  Further instructions will be given over the public address system.  If you experience any difficulties in hearing either the fire alarm or any announcements over the public address system, please notify the Facilities Help Desk by e-mail at facilitieshelpdesk1@enron.com.

Anyone that is mobility impaired or medically disabled may be excused from participating in this drill by sending an e-mail to Harry Grubbs.

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Harry Grubbs at 713-853-5417.


Jennifer:
I don't think we have much interest in doing this interview since it
primarily pertains to our views of the market.  I would speak in such
generalities that it probably wouldn't be a good interview.
John

Jennifer Walker@ENRON
05/07/2001 08:57 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RISK Magazine Interview

John:
Kevin Foster with Risk Magazine is working on an article for the June issue
regarding Gas Markets in the U.S. Basically, he is interested in Enron's
opinion of:

1. Physical Supply/Demand of gas and how this is affecting financial trades
2. Where do we anticipate gas prices going over the summer?
3. The state of the industry--any major issues that may affect the market?

If this sounds like a story we would be interested in doing, please let me
know and I will coordinate a short phone interview with Kevin Foster. I know
it usually works best for your schedule to do this after 4pm, so please let
me know if Tuesday after 4 would be good for you.

Thanks for your help and please call me with any questions.

Jennifer Walker
Public Relations
x3-9964


----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 06/08/2001 01:36 PM -----

	Ken_Rice@enron.net 06/06/2001 09:16 AM 	   To: Mark.Taylor@enron.com  cc:   Subject: Re: PLEASE READ

Mark

I have a commodity futures account in which I only trade cattle and grain
futures, no energy.

Ken

                    Mark Taylor
                    (Vice                To:     NYMEX Hedge Exemption List
                    President and        cc:
                    General              Subject:     PLEASE READ
                    Counsel)
                    @ENRON
                    Sent by:
                    Enron
                    Announcements
                    @ENRON

                    06/05/01
                    06:42 PM

To:                                      Department:    ENA Legal

From:          Mark Taylor                         Date:     May 11, 2001
          Vice President and General Counsel

Subject:  Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We  are  in  the  process  of  preparing  applications  for  position limit
exemptions  for  ENA's  NYMEX  energy  commodities  futures trading.  These
applications  require  that  ENA represent whether its officers, employees,
owners,  or  agents  have  a power of attorney, control or have a financial
interest  in any related commodity future(s) account either individually or
acting with another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please  direct  any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if  you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF  YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND
TO THIS REQUEST.


Channelview I believe.  That's where I put it.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hanks, Gary
Sent:	Friday, May 25, 2001 12:41 PM
To:	Farmer, Daren J.
Subject:	Re: FW: Lufkin

Which Lyondell plant will this be going to?  5045 is not a valid meter number off of HPL.

Gary H


I would look at properties in San Antonio or Dallas.