> > >Dear Abby,
> > > >
> > > >I am a sailor in the United States Coast Guard.
> My
> > > >parents live in the suburb of Philadelphia and
> one of
> > > >my sisters, who lives in Bensonhurst is married
> to a
> > > >transvestite. My Father and Mother have
> recently been
> > > >arrested for growing and selling marijuana and
> are
> > > >currently dependent on my other two sisters,
> who are
> > > >prostitutes in Jersey City. I have two
> brothers, one
> > > >who is currently serving a non-parole life
> sentence in
> > > >Attica, for the rape & murder of a teenage boy
> in
> > > >1994, the other currently being held in the
> Wellington
> > > >Remand Center on charges of incest with his
> three children.
> > > >
> > > >I have recently become engaged to marry a
> former Thai
> > > >prostitute who lives in the Bronx and indeed is
> still
> > > >a part-time "working girl" in a brothel,
> however, her
> > > >time there is limited as she has recently been
> > > >infected with an STD.
> > > >
> > > >We intend to marry as soon as possible and are
> > > >currently looking into the possibility of
> opening our
> > > >own brothel, with my fiancee utilizing her
> knowledge
> > > >of the industry working as the manager. I am
> hoping
> > > >my two sisters would be interested in joining
> our
> > > >team. Although I would prefer them not to
> prostitute
> > > >themselves, at least it would get them off the
> streets
> > > >and, hopefully, the heroin.
> > > >
> > > >My problem is this: I love my fiancee and look
> forward
> > > >to bringing her into the family, and of course
> I want
> > > >to be totally honest with her.
> > > >
> > > >Should I tell her about my cousin who graduated
> from
> > > >KU?
> > > >
> > > >Signed,
> > > >Worried about my reputation
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of
my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action
in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.


The attached chart summarizes the tax implications of the various options for
choice of legal entity for financial trading in Argentina.    The chart
addressed income taxes only.  Moving the operations to Brazil will result in
additional transactions taxes that are not addressed  in this analysis.  As
you can see, the tax impact of each option depends the specific set of facts
as to how Enron is operating its trading activity.  Of particular importance
is the concept  that the US will tax the earnings of foreign jurisdictions
even if there are no US employees involved in the transactions to the extent
a US affiliate of Enron is deemed to be providing substantial assistance to
the foreign entity that is involved in the financial trading activities.

The current structure for financial trading in Argentina is the most tax
efficient based upon the way Enron has chosen to conduct its business.  The
earnings are limited to a single layer of tax in the US.  To the extent that
the Sao Paulo office develops into an operation that can fully support all
trading activity so that there is no support from the US, we may be able to
restructure the operations to provide more flexibility to the traders in
South America.  Even if we shift the activity to a Brazilian entity,  the
traders will have to follow guidelines to avoid taxation in Argentina as well.

Lynn


> Attached please find copies of the following schedules and annexes to the
> Purchase and Sale Agreement:
>
> 1) the  Master Parent Disclosure Letter;
>
> 2) the schedules for India;
>
> 3) the schedules for EGEP;
>
> 4) the schedules for APACHI; and
>
> 5) Annex G, listing the contracts that have been excluded for
> confidentiality reasons.
>
> Please note that the schedules for the SoCal assets will follow shortly
> under a separate cover.  In addition, we plan to circulate copies of the
> CALME and Wind schedules tomorrow.
>
> If you have any questions or any problems opening any of the attachments,
> please do not hesitate to contact either Gray Sasser at (713)758-3425 or
> Donnie Roark at (713)758-3374.
>
>
>
>
>
>  <<Master-Disclosure-Ltr.DOC>>  <<India-Schedules.DOC>>
> <<EGEP-Schedules.DOC>>   <<APACHI-Schedules.wpd>>  <<Annex G --
> Excluded-Contracts-Confidentiality.DOC>>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
> email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
> named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
> representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if
> any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have
> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
> return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You
>
>

 - WORD v1 Summer Disclosure Letter.DOC
 - 00 India Schedules.DOC
 - 285641_1.DOC
 - Lightning-Schedules3.wpd
 - Annex G -- Excluded Information Based on Confidentiality Requirements.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 03:46 PM ---------------------------

Thomas A Martin
10/20/2000 01:54 PM
To:	Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Producer Pricing Meeting

---------------------- Forwarded by Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 01:50 PM ---------------------------

Saidia Matthews@ENRON
10/19/2000 11:16 AM
To:	Edward D Gottlob/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Laura Harder/Corp/Enron@Enron, Monica Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melanie Facundo/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:	Producer Pricing Meeting

The above has been requested to attend a Producer Pricing meeting on Oct. 30th at 2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EB3533, if for any reason you're unable to attend please advise via email or call me at ext 5-3878.

Thank you,

Sy Matthews


This is the hyperlink to all active ETA's - just change the number of the country id accordingly.

http://www.enrononline.com/docs/eta/eta_826.html  UK

http://www.enrononline.com/docs/eta/eta_840.html US

COUNTRY_ID	COUNTRY_NAME
11082	Argentina
10298	Australia
40	Austria
56	Belgium
11111	Bermuda
124	Canada
11209	Cayman Islands
11096	Chile
11163	China
191	Croatia
10020	Czech Republic
208	Denmark
246	Finland
250	France
276	Germany
11248	Gibraltar
11137	Greece
11103	Hong Kong
11203	Hungary
11208	India
10138	Ireland
11095	Israel
380	Italy
10384	Japan
11109	Latvia
10947	Mexico
11128	Monaco
528	Netherlands
11200	Netherlands Antilles
578	Norway
11097	Peru
616	Poland
620	Portugal
642	Romania
11108	Russian Federation
702	Singapore
11138	Slovakia
705	Slovenia
11102	South Africa
11160	South Korea
724	Spain
752	Sweden
756	Switzerland
11105	Taiwan
11104	Turkey
840	USA
826	United Kingdom
11168	Virgin Islands (British)


Return Receipt

 Your        RE: FW: Stepenovitch
 document:

 was         Linda Stepenovitch/USA/BAC
 received
 by:

 at:         09:49:58 AM EDT Today


There are no physical desk to desk deals today.


Just thought you would want to know this feedback.

----- Forwarded by Linda Robertson/NA/Enron on 06/19/2001 01:59 PM -----

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT 06/19/2001 09:38 AM 	   To: Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON  cc: Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron  Subject: Way to go!

Ray -- Phillip Allen said that you had called him this am about the Cal order and he thinks that he is getting better info from our Washington office and appreciates the efforts.  Keep it up!  Thanks.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 03:35 PM -----

	Lexi Elliott
	02/21/2001 03:21 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Brad Alford/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jacqueline Coleman/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Stacy Durbin and Tony Pule

Steve and Brad:

We need to coordinate schedules in order to interview these last 2 candidates.

Stacy Durbin needs a round 2 interview and Tony Pule needs round 1 (he had a
death in the family and was unable to attend last week).

Please let me know when during next Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday (February
26-28) you would be available to donate 1 hour to interview these candidates.

Thank you!

lexi
3-4585


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener informacion amparada
por el secreto profesional. Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error,
por favor comuniquenoslo inmediatamente via e-mail y tenga la
amabilidad de eliminarlo de su sistema; no debera copiar el mensaje
ni divulgar su contenido a ninguna persona. Muchas gracias.

This message is confidential. It may also contain information that is
privileged or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you have
received it by mistake please let us know by e-mail immediately and
delete it from your system; should also not copy the message nor
disclose its contents to anyone. Many thanks.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

 - att1.unk


Yes


Thoughts?
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/02/2000
08:33 PM ---------------------------

Ralph Reed <ralph@censtrat.com> on 10/24/2000 03:17:17 PM
To: "Richard Shapiro (E-mail)" <rshapiro@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: grassroots memorandum

Rick, here's a preliminary and conceptual memorandum on a grassroots
strategy for the new Congress and your new Washington presence.  It is
preliminary and designed as a management tool---don't feel wedded to the
numbers.

 <<enron5.doc>>

 - enron5.doc


Bob / Mark,

Since our recent discussions over the above, I have checked the situation out
extensively with the OMLX and it appears that the best solution would now be
the following:

1. Enron Capital & Trade Resources International Corp. ("ECTRIC"), the
Delaware incorporated company, becomes  a member of the OMLX (either as a
pure Proprietary trader or as  a Market Maker - see point (a) below - Bob you
need to advise me what you want here).

2. Enron Europe Finance & Trading Limited ("EEFT"), the English SFA-regulated
company which acts as agent / arranger for ECTRIC, then, via EEFT's staff in
London, places ECTRIC's bids / offers onto the Pulpex Index in the name of
and for the account of ECTRIC.  Acting purely in this "arranging" manner,
EEFT itself would not be a member of the OMLX in any capacity.

3. Please note that if Steve is going to be the EEFT person in London who
would place such orders onto Pulpex in the name of, and for the account of,
ECTRIC, then Steve will need to become a "Registered Representative" of EEFT
with the SFA before he can place such orders.  As you know, this status may
either be gained by Steve passing an examination or by certain length of
experience in the market.  I shall need to sort this out with Steve if you
decide to do this.

4. Once EEFT has placed a bid / offer onto the Exchange in the name of, and
for the account of, ECTRIC as the Member, if that gets "hit", then we can
give-up that contract immediately to ENA's account under the Exchange's
give-up procedure.

Points to note:

(a) ECTRIC could join the OMLX as either a Market Maker or as a Proprietary
Trader.  Clearly, if ECTRIC joined as a Market Maker, ECTRIC (through EEFT in
London) would be obliged to make firm two way bids / offers for 2 1/4 hours
during market opening hours - but so would ENA out of Houston which also has
Market Maker status. Hence, Enron would have two sets of MM obligations, one
with ENA and the other with ECTRIC (through EEFT in London).  Bob - Do you
want this??  Or would you prefer to leave the Market Making obligations with
ENA and just have ECTRIC as a Proprietary Trader??  The Exchange (Derek
Oliver) assures me that that there is no difference in the information
available to MMs as opposed to Prop Traders and Prop Traders can post bids
and offers as well as hit others bids and offers.  The only difference
therefore is that a Prop Trader  does not have the obligation to post bids
and offers during market hours.  Please let me know.

(b) If we go this route, the OMLX would like comfort from ECTRIC's external
US counsel  that ECTRIC would not be in breach of any US regulations by
adopting the above structure.  In obtaining this advice, we shall need to
bear in mind whether, in acting on behalf of ECTRIC, EEFT in London will
place orders by electronic link or  by telephonic link (as is presently the
case from Houston).  Mark, are you able to obtain this advice??  Please let
me know.

(c)   From discussions with Jannine of Tax Dept., there are tax implications
to any form of trading through London for the US, although these are not
insurmountable.  Jannine will no doubt write you a separate e-mail with
regard to the cost of doing such business from a Tax perspective and you
should bear the contents of that in mind before deciding whether or not to
proceed.

Kind regards

Mark


Roger to all the comments on the price cap.  I will draft a paragraph to
express our concern but keep the supportive tone.  I will await Edison's
decision on participation.  Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Amirault, Paul [mailto:PaulAmirault@aec.ca]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:58 AM
To: 'Dasovich, Jeff'; MDay; Amirault, Paul; Jeff Dasovich Enron SF;
Michael Alexander, SCE; Davies, Phil; Porter, Douglas K; Hass, Glen;
Steffes, James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject: RE: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

Mike:  the draft comments read very well, however I would echo Jeff's
comments on the price cap.  We should advise against, but still support the
RPD overall.  No other comments to add.

Paul Amirault
Vice-President, Marketing
Wild Goose Storage Inc.
403 266-8298

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:17 PM
To: MDay; Amirault, Paul; Jeff Dasovich Enron SF; Michael Alexander,
SCE; Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary; Porter, Douglas K; Hass, Glen; Steffes,
James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject: RE: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

Mike:  Comments looks good.  My only comment is that, in our view, the
price cap (which would cover ALL capacity in the secondary market) is
simply bad economic policy and won't address any problems--in fact it
will only create problems. (From a practical perspective, I'm not even
sure that the Commission can successfully "regulate" prices in the
secondary market.)

Will the commission change the price cap provisions of the decision
based comments advising against them?  Very unlikely.

But when the caps create problems (and they will), I want to have been
on record advising the Commission of why caps are bad economic policy
and pointing out the bad outcomes that caps will cause.  I think that
it's very important to point out the downside of caps and to be on
record against them.

That said, I don't want the comments to be so negative as to cloud
support for the decision; nor do I think the Commission will change the
cap based on our comments.  Other than that, EES and ENA can sign on.
Anyone have any objections to pointing out the fact that price caps are
ill-advised?

Best,
Jeff

	-----Original Message-----
	From: MDay
	Sent: Thu 10/18/2001 8:43 PM
	To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'; 'Michael
Alexander, SCE'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; 'Porter, Douglas K'
	Cc:
	Subject: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

	 <<X28621.DOC>>

	Enclosed for your review are the draft comments on the Revised
Proposed
	Decision in the Gas Restructuring Investigation.  WGSI and Enron
have
	indicated a desire to file supportive comments.  Edison has
indicated an
	interest in reviewing our draft for the purpose of considering
joining in
	our comments.  Please send edited electronic versions with
underline and
	strikeout to MBD at this address no later than noon tomorrow.
These comments
	must be filed tomorrow before 5 pm.  I am sorry for the lateness
of the
	draft, but these are not extensive comments.  Except for the
little
	bombshell about extending commission jurisdiction over gas
marketers, I see
	little in the RPD to warrant our opposition.  Even if the
Commission
	proceeds with the jurisdictional grab, I believe it can be
overturned by the
	Court of Appeals.

	I look forward to your comments.

	Mike Day

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000
04:04 PM ---------------------------

"Lubowski, Andrzej" <lubowski@visa.com> on 10/24/2000 03:01:09 PM
To: "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW: Citi, Wells, Enron, S1 and i2 form a B2B venture

Great. We will be around. Let's get together. Please, give me a call
(650-570-6509) or/and let me know your phone number in Palo Alto.
Andrzej
-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 12:58 PM
To: Lubowski, Andrzej
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: RE: FW: Citi, Wells, Enron, S1 and i2 form a B2B venture

Andrzej,

I shall be in the Bay area again  for Thanksgiving. I came to SF for one
day to
do recruiting at Berkeley. I hope you will feel better soon.

Vince

"Lubowski, Andrzej" <lubowski@visa.com> on 10/20/2000 12:45:25 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: FW: Citi, Wells, Enron, S1 and i2 form a B2B venture

Wicku,
I hoped to hear from you. Please, let me know whether your plans have
changed, and if so, when you are coming to Palo Alto.

I spent theer weeks in Europe in September (had dinner with Leszek and
Ewa),
and went to Sydney as a guest of NBC. Upon return I caught a flu, and
travelled heavily congested to New York, which led to some ear
problems.Consequently I intend to stay put for several weeks, and will have
to reschedule my trip to Houston for Dec. or January. Hope to see you here
before then.
Best to all three of you.
Andrzej

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 6:23 AM
To: Lubowski, Andrzej
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
Subject: Re: FW: Citi, Wells, Enron, S1 and i2 form a B2B venture

Andrzej,

Thanks. Please, send me the information about the dates
when you plan to visit Houston. Also, the information about
your position/title/responsibilities (as well as the info
about the other members of your team) would be useful.

I shall be in the Bay Area  between the 10th and the 20th of October.

Hope to see your then.

Wicek


Thanks for the update.

Susan

Stevens_Hollister@eott.com on 10/03/2000 01:14:44 PM
To: Susan.W.Pereira@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Bazor Ridge Gas Plant

Susan,

Harvey Petter is keeping in contact with the dispatcher, but I want you to
know that the plant will not be up until at least next week.

Stevens


Still will be used extensively for internal deals - auctions and M&A datarooms (for sale of EGA's $3-5 billion of international assets)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	Bartlett, Jeff
Subject:	RE:

Thanks.  Is it safe to say, from you notes, that DealBench is "winding down?"

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bartlett, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:25 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE:

Zach Streight - he has both a business and technical background.  Other than Ross he is your best bet for someone historically familiar with DealBench that is still working for Enron Net Works.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:39 AM
To:	Bartlett, Jeff
Subject:	RE:

Jeff:  Ross is out for the week.  Is there someone who Ross works for that I could contact?  Thanks much.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bartlett, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:10 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:

I have passed your voicemail to Ross Mesquita (Manager, EnronOnline) who is now looking at Business opportunities for DealBench.  About 2 months ago, we decided to discontinue external commercial activities for DealBench and evaluate strategic alternatives with respect to monetizing the platform.
Feel free to follow up with Ross.
thanks,
Jeff


CALENDAR ENTRY:	EVENT

Description:
	Working from Home

Date:		7/12/2000
Duration (days):	1

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

1/25/2002 5:00:00 PM through 1/28/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________

Impact:   San Palo
Time:   Thur 1/24/2002 12:00:00 PM CT thru Sun 1/27/2002 12:00:00 PM CT
	Thur 1/24/2002 10:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 1/27/2002 10:00:00 AM PT
	Thur 1/24/2002 6:00:00 PM London thru Sun 1/27/2002 6:00:00 PM London
Outage:   New server room
Environments Impacted:   File Server, Notes servers, Print Server, Internet access.
Purpose:   Put 02 servers room in just 01 room. Rebuild all cabling (data and voice). This is set on CST.
Backout:   Back to original room.
Contact(s):   Nilson Busto  55-11-5503-1347

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Fri 1/25/2002 1:45:00 PM CT thru Fri 1/25/2002 2:45:00 PM CT
	Fri 1/25/2002 11:45:00 AM PT thru Fri 1/25/2002 12:45:00 PM PT
	Fri 1/25/2002 7:45:00 PM London thru Fri 1/25/2002 8:45:00 PM London
Outage:   Change Management Emergency Outage
Environments Impacted:   Change Management System Outage.
Purpose:   Change Management Application needs emergency maintenance.
Backout:   NA
Contact(s):   Brennan, Ryan  713-853-4545
	Ray, Edward  7138536744
	Brooks, Sean L  713-345-8077


Hi Sean,

I need a modified confirmation to be prepared ASAP for CSN.  The terms are:

Price:		$3.11 per MMBtu

Term:		November 1-30, 2001

Delivery Point:	Interconnection between Midwestern Gas Transmission and Vectren Gas Pipeline (Meter Mo. 027093)

Volume:	November 1-21, 2001 will be 900 MMBtu/d

		November 22-25, 2001 will be 500 MMBtu/d

		November 26-30, 2001 will be 900 MMBtu/d

Special
Provisions:	ENA agrees to purchase the excess volume (above actual consumption) on a daily basis at the "daily midpoint" price 		set forth in Gas Daily Platts, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, in the column "Daily Price Survey" under
		the listing Chicago-LDC, large end-users for the relevant gas day.

		CSN agrees to purchase deficient volumes (above actual nomination) on a daily basis at the "daily midpoint" price 			set forth in Gas Daily Platts, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, in the column "Daily Price Survey" under
		the listing Chicago-LDC, large end-users for the relevant gas day.

The contact at CSN is Pat Monaghan
Phone # is 812-299-8866  Ext. 1132
Fax # is 812-299-3777

I would like to see this confirmation before it is actually sent to CSN.

Thanks for your help.


I'm not sure whether we want Hoecker to make the fourth point.  What do
others think?

To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Draft Talking points about California Gas market

We thought it would be good to basically give Chair Hoecker talking points
with any numbers that Enron provides.  We will visit on these later today
when the numbers are ready (before 3:00).  Comments?
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner@ENRON on 12/12/2000 11:56 AM
To: Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca W
Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie
Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jane M
Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Talking points about California Gas market

Here is my stab at the talking points  to be sent in to FERC along with the
gas pricing info they requested for the California markets.  Let me or
Christi know if you have any disagreements, additions, whatever.  I am
supposed to be out of here at 2:15 today, so if you have stuff to add after
that, get it to Christi.  Thanks.


Sara,

Per my conversation with Sheila on yesterday and my review of our files, we
only have an agreement in place for ENA.   We still need to review the
Agreement for Prime Brokerage Clearance Services in order to get an agreement
in place for ECT Investments, Inc.

I will provide Stephanie with a copy of the executed agreement between
Deutsche Bank (f/k/a BT Alex Brown Incorporated) and ENA so that she can
forward it to Jason along with their new form of Agreement for Prime
Prokerage Clearance Services.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	09/26/2000 08:14 AM

		 To: Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Deutsche Bank Securities - BT Alex Brown (previous relationship)

Sam:  Please let me know ASAP whether Jason should be marking the Deutsche
docs based on Sheila's message!
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000 08:12 AM -----

	Sheila Glover
	09/25/2000 01:30 PM

		 To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECt, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Deutsche Bank Securities - BT Alex Brown (previous relationship)

For clarification.
Deutsche Bank is the new Name..  ENA currently has an agreement in place with
BT Alex Brown who has been assumed by Deutsche.
It apprears that only an agreement  with ENA was set up previously.  ECT
Investments should have one,  as well.
sheila

---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000 01:21
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Glover                           09/25/2000 11:43 AM

To: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Theresa T
Brogan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Deutsche Bank Securities

Equity Trading is requesting an Executing Broker Agreement be set up for ECT
Investments, Inc. and Enron North America Corp with Deutsche Bank
Securities.  We do not have one currently in place and we have done a
significant amount of business with them in 2000  (included in top 10 for
8/2000 YTD in brokerage commissions).
Thanks. Sheila


FYI

Vince
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
05:01 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
03/27/2000 04:43 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ravi
Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sherri
Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ken Rice/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Joe Hirko/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John
Griebling/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
Subject: Off-site: John Griebling's organization and Research Group

Jeff,

I would like to invite you to an off-site meeting of John Griebling's
organization
and the Research Group.

Date:   April 27 - April 29
Location:  Breckenridge, Colorado

As you know, John Griebling is managing the network design and construction
project
currently under way in EBS. The Research Group is actively involved in this
effort
which requires advanced quantitative skills in the area of stochastic
optimization and
stochastic processes (for modeling and forecasting Internet traffic flows).

The objective of this meeting is to develop common language and accomplish
transfer
of skills between the two groups, to facilitate cooperation on this project
in the future.

We are also inviting to this off-site senior management of EBS and plan to
have
on the agenda several presentations about strategic directions of EBS. The
effort
of network design and construction currently under way is  unprecedented in
terms
of its scope and complexity and it is important  for technical people, who
often have
highly specialized technical skills, to understand the broad picture.

I would appreciate if you could join us for Friday afternoon (April 28) and
Saturday (April 29). I understand  that you have commitments on Thursday and
Friday
morning. We have reorganized the tentative agenda of the meeting to devote
Friday afternoon to more general topics.

Vince


Mary Cook will be out of the office for the rest of the afternoon due to a family emergency.  She will return on Monday, August 27, 2001.  Thanks.

Esmeralda Gonzalez
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB3815
Houston, Texas 77002
e-mail: esmeralda.gonzalez@enron.com
Phone: 713-345-7621
Fax: 713-646-3393


I am definitely interested in the parking space at the Met.  Please let me
know if it is still possible for me to acquire a space.

Thanks,
Susan Scott


Start Date: 10/17/01; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001101716.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...


Let's talk at our group meeting tomorrow about the changes we should be
making to our forms based on the CFMA and our conversation with Ken Raisler.


In the past few months, there have been protests at various Enron offices.  These protests have been primarily by consumer and other advocacy groups representing different energy interests.  Attached are security and public relations procedures to help you manage a protest should one arise at your facility.  Feel free to provide this document to leaders in your organization as appropriate.

Thank You.

Mark Palmer
Vice President, Corporate Communications
713 853-4738


fyi.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marian Bryant/Corp/Enron on 07/19/2000
08:17 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Bart Myers                           07/18/2000 08:54 AM

To: Marian Bryant/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Biff Brannon/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Fixed Assets - EECC

Marian - I wanted to let you know that I have hired a new accountant that
will be responsible for fixed assets for EECC -- Biff Brannon, x66073.  He
will be the primary contact  (I will remain the secondary).  As such, I would
like Biff to be the representative from EECC to the Fixed Assets Council that
we discussed a few weeks ago.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Bart.


This is what we executed yesterday,
----- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 01/19/2001 08:29 AM -----

	Jeffrey C Gossett@ECT
	01/18/2001 06:19 PM

		 To: Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Schedule C Nap. Pad Gas

Napoleonville Pad Gas:

$3,000,000 4th quarter 2000
$1,000,000 Jan.  18th
$1,302,036 Schedule C

Jean -  Let me know if you need additional documentation.


Mark,

Thanks for registering for the Jaguar X-TYPE site.

Your username is Marktaylor2 and your password is fastpath.

Regards,
Jaguar X-Type team


Vince:  I apologize--I had emailed Shirley to let her know that Toni had
forwarded your email to me and that I would be handling this for you, but I
didn't copy you on the email.

Please call me with any questions,
Molly
x34804

Vince J Kaminski
10/18/2000 03:14 PM
To: Molly Magee/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Interview for the Research Group

FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
03:21 PM ---------------------------

Shirley Crenshaw
10/18/2000 12:58 PM
To: Toni Graham/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Summers/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Interview for the Research Group

Hello everyone:

Vince would like to bring Jaesoo Lew in next week for an exploratory interview
with the Research Group.  The dates that would work best for us are:
Wednesday,
the 25th (AM), Thursday, 26th  (AM) and Friday, 27th (AM).  Please see if Mr.
Lew
is available for any of these times.

Thanks!

Shirley
3-5290

 - vitae2.doc

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
10/18/2000 12:29 PM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: position

Shirley,

I would like to  invite him to an interview next week. We should use his home
phone
number and/or private E-mail address.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/18/2000
12:33 PM ---------------------------

"Jaesoo Lew" <pontgyn@hotmail.com> on 10/17/2000 09:59:01 PM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: position

Dear Dr. Kaminski

My name is Jaesoo Lew and I am referred by Dr. Wayne Lee.

Currently I've been working at Aquila Energy in Kansas City as an pricing
analyst since July 2000.  Since then, I have developed a natural gas storage
valuation model applying the swing options (forest method) pricing approach.
The price processes would be considered critical for the storage valuation
since a trinomial forest is required to value storage. Also the c++
programming using Excel DLL has been developed, too.

I attached my resume to this message for your consideration and am looking
forward to talking about an opportunity at Enron.

My home phone number is 913-649-0578, Dr. Kaminski, I will wait your call in
this week as Dr. Lee informed me.  If possible, please let me know your
expected calling day through the mail.  I appreciate your consideration.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Jaesoo Lew
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - vitae2.doc


I got your copy kicked back to me for some reason.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
01/31/2001 09:01 AM ---------------------------

Michelle Blaine
01/31/2001 08:53 AM
To: Ken Blades/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: "Williams, Justin" <justin.williams@Linklaters.com> @ ENRONRichard
Sanders, Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: RE: United India - strictly confidential and privileged

I think Justin answered your question about governing law and the first
arbitration hearing and I am going to find out from Atul about whether Indian
law governs these policies since Indian law requires us to have an Indian
fronting policy.

On another issue that came up on the call this morning Ken, I was asking
Justin about governing law specifically because I wanted to know if there was
any law (India or English) requiring insurers to disclose information
regarding risk to the insured, so we could cite some law perhaps to compel
Beachcrofts to hand over the Liburdi report.   For example, the Texas
insurance code has evolved from a vague "duty of good faith & fair dealing"
standard in some instances to specific laws preventing insurers from doing
certain things detrimental to the insured.  Justin tells me English law, in
this regard, consists only of precedential case law, but it still could be
helpful.  Because of the commercial risk (outside the ambit of arbitration in
the instance) it might be worthwhile to consider going into the London
Commercial Court to seek some sort of extraordinary relief to prevent United
India from withholding this information which is critical to running these
machines.   If, in fact,  there truly is a 50% chance of failure in these
machines, yet they won't share that evidence with us, this is a commercial
risk DPC can't afford, regardless of coverage and apart from the
arbitration.  (I'm wearing my commercial hat instead of my legal hat today).
Although Justin expressed concern about jurisdiction, United India did us the
favor of bringing  suit in London Commercial Court earlier, and thus having
availed itself to the courts and having Peter Hirst's emphatic witness
statement that makes a compelling case for the court to take jurisdiction, I
think it is worth considering  if they continue to refuse to give us the
report in response to Justin's latest correspondence.  I don't think we can
afford to sit on our hands on this one.  Why don't you and Neil kick this
around, (since you don't have enough to do already).
Cheers,
Michelle

Ken Blades
01/30/2001 08:42 PM
To: Michelle Blaine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: "Williams, Justin" <justin.williams@Linklaters.com> @ ENRON

Subject: RE: United India - strictly confidential and privileged

I assume governing law is an issue that would be raised at the initial
procedural hearing. If this is something that we're serious about then we
ought to get after it immediately.

Michelle Blaine
01/30/2001 11:15 PM
To: "Williams, Justin" <justin.williams@Linklaters.com> @ ENRON
cc: Ken Blades/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: RE: United India - strictly confidential and privileged

  No wonder I couldn't remember the governing law!  Yes that is a good idea
to determine which law is more favorable to our position.  Let's mention that
to Ken tomorrow as we may want to have Atul Rajadhyaksha look at that for
us.  I think originally we discussed that notion but its been a long time ago.
Thanks Justin,
Michelle

"Williams, Justin" <justin.williams@Linklaters.com> on 01/30/2001 09:11:26 AM
To: "'Michelle.Blaine@enron.com'" <Michelle.Blaine@enron.com>
cc: "Heneghan, Diane" <diane.heneghan@Linklaters.com>

Subject: RE: United India - strictly confidential and privileged

Michelle,

I know the problem about cases and clauses running together!

The position on the insurance is that it does not specify a governing law.
On an application of English private international law (ie conflict of laws
rules) there is uncertainty whether it would be English or Indian law. At
para 42 of Hirst's statement, he says that the contracts are impliedly
subject to English law (based on London as the arbitration forum?).
Certainly, my preference in terms of certainty would be English law.
However, it is possible there could be an advantage to Indian substantive
law and once we get UI's statement of claim, we should give thought to
whether it would be worthwhile getting Indian law input on whether there
could be advantage in arguing Indian law. I will ask Diane to add this to
the "to do" list!

Justin

-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle.Blaine@enron.com [mailto:Michelle.Blaine@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 4:55 PM
To: justin.williams@linklaters.com
Subject: Re: United India - strictly confidential and privileged

Looks good to me Justin.  Justin is there any law that governs an insurer's
duty to disclose information regarding the risk insured?  What law governs
the insurance contract? ( I should know that ,but all my cases and
arbitration clauses are beginning to run together in my mind...).

"Williams, Justin" <justin.williams@Linklaters.com> on 01/30/2001 05:45:31
AM

To:   "'Michelle.Blaine@enron.com'" <Michelle.Blaine@enron.com>
cc:   "'Ken.Blades@enron.com'" <Ken.Blades@enron.com>

Subject:  United India - strictly confidential and privileged

 <<010125_JOWW_let_Beechcroft.doc>>

Michelle,

I attach a revised version of the Liburdi request/quantum letter to
Beachcrofts, amended to take in some points made by Ken as to the agreement
on quantum. It would be great if you were able to look through this today
and let me have your comments in order that I can get it out.

Do give me a call if you need to discuss.

Justin

Justin Williams
Linklaters, London
a member firm of Linklaters & Alliance
Tel: (+44) 20 7456 4334
Fax: (+44) 20 7456 3929
justin.williams@linklaters.com
http://www.linklaters.com
http://www.linklaters-alliance.com
Go to www.linklaters.com/disputetoolkit - for free litigation and
arbitration advice

____________________________________________________________

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal
rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know
by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not
copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
____________________________________________________________

(See attached file: 010125_JOWW_let_Beechcroft.doc)


Marnie.

Client: Enron
Week: October 29-31, November 1-2
Attached: Progress Report

 <<PR110201AONDLT.doc>>

Demetrics Tyson
Adaytum Consulting Services
214.704.5329


I think we should participate.  I would ask David Harvin, Jeff Alexander, or Carrin to write it.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Derrick Jr., James
Sent:	Sunday, October 21, 2001 2:27 PM
To:	Cheek, Charles; Sanders, Richard B.; Williams, Robert C.
Subject:	FW: CEO apex depositions

Should we participate? If so, who would write it?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fsmith008@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Saturday, October 20, 2001 8:22 PM
To:	peter.arbour@halliburton.com; tbattle@mitchellenergy.com; cbub@chevron.com; Derrick Jr., James; ted.m.frois@exxon.com; kerry.galvin@lyondell.com; david.garten@nli-usa.com; rick.a.harrington@usa.conoco.com; hughricekelly@reliantenergy.com; bob.kilpatrick@atofina.com; calamboley@shellus.com; lemmerw@coopercameron.com; lynchjl@bp.com; mcquemg@texaco.com; Rplaeger@br-inc.com; kera@dynegy.com; bobby.reeves@oceanenergy.com; wfschwind@marathonoil.com; dtomlin@bem.tmc.edu; Jvogel@coair.com; bobtwhilden@bmc.com; brittonw@epenergy.com; Fsmith008@aol.com
Subject:	Fwd: CEO apex depositions

I am forwarding an E-mail from former Supreme Court Justice Raul Gonzalez
which may be of interest to you. If so, his phone no. and those of his
colleagues are contained in the E-mail.
Freeman E. Smith

Return-Path: <RGonzalez@lockeliddell.com>
Received: from  rly-yb03.mx.aol.com (rly-yb03.mail.aol.com [172.18.146.3]) by air-yb01.mail.aol.com (v81.9) with ESMTP id MAILINYB17-1019190815; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:08:15 -0400
Received: from  daex03.lockeliddell.com (mail.lockeliddell.com [204.0.73.15]) by rly-yb03.mail.aol.com (v81.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYB32-1019190806; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 19:08:06 2000
Received: by mail.lockeliddell.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)	id <4SX5XV4P>; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:07:03 -0500
Message-ID: <4166C31A2813D411A54C00508B8BEA9ED25E77@auex02.lockeliddell.com>
From: "Gonzalez, Raul A." <RGonzalez@lockeliddell.com>
To: "'Fsmith008@aol.com'" <Fsmith008@aol.com>
Cc: "Castaneda, Kirsten M." <kcastaneda@lockeliddell.com>,        "Powell, Gary R." <gpowell@lockeliddell.com>
Subject: CEO apex depositions
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:10:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C158F3.4CBE1F30"

Freeman, we represent Jani-King.  Their CEO was ordered to give a deposition in a case where he does not have unique or superior  knowledge of discoverable information. Our attempts to get it quash or obtain relief from the court of appeals and the Supreme Court have been unsuccessful.
This issue is of importance to the jurisprudence of the state because more and more CEO's are being requested to give depositions and there is confusion in the law as to what an apex deponent is required to state in the affidavit in order to trigger the apex deposition doctrine. Must the affidavit state that he/she does not have ANY knowledge of relevant facts, rather than saying that he/she does not have any UNIQUE OR SUPERIOR knowledge of relevant facts as the Supreme Court said in Alcatel USA ?
At this point, our best chance in getting the court's attention is for the court to be flooded with amicus briefs requesting that the court take this case to resolve the conflict that exists among various courts of appeal. If the Supreme Court does not resolve the confusion that exist is the law at this time, litigants will continue to waste of time and money in fighting apex depositions.
Can you please forward this email to your membership to see if anyone is interested enough to file a quick amicus brief?  If anyone is interested, they can contact me or Kirsten Castaneda (214-740-8533) or Gary Powell (214-740-8470) in our Dallas office.
Time is of the essence as the motion for rehearing is due next Friday.
If this is not the proper protocol, I would appreciate hearing from you.
Raul A. Gonzalez
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
(512) 305-4746
(512) 391-4746 fax
IMPORTANT/CONFIDENTIAL: This message from the law firm of Locke Liddell Sapp, LLP is intended only for the use of the addressees shown above. It contains information that may be privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that the copying, use or distribution of any information or materials transmitted in or with this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message by mistake, please immediately call us collect at (214) 740-8000 and destroy the original message. Thank you.


Dear Market Participants,

The following changes to the NYISO OASIS/MIS/CSS systems will be released
on February 26, 2002.

Preliminary changes to the MIS database will be made in preparation for
future testing and implementation of the Open Scheduling System (OSS).
These changes will have no functional effect on the current system.

Minor enhancements will be made to the Consolidated Invoice.  The date
selection box will be modified to a drop down format and negative values
on the PDF output will be represented with parenthesis instead of a minus
sign.

Bidding and Scheduling pages will be updated in style to match the look and
feel of the public web site.

The process for posting prices will be updated to make it more efficient.
This will have no effect on how prices are calculated or presented.

Changes will also be made to the real-time system in preparation for the
move of the Rockland Electric load to the PJM control area.
If you have any questions, please call your Customer Relations
representative or the Help Desk at 518-356-6060.

Regards,

Customer Relations

---
You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-628650Q@lyris.nyiso.com


Dave,

Attached please find a copy of the above-referenced Agreement which
incorporates the changes we discussed.  Please call me at 3-9720 with any
additional comments or questions.

Jason


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints - Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		== One click feeds one person ==
		Please join Emazing in helping feed thousands of people who would otherwise
go hungry this holiday season.  When you click on www.givingpool.org today,
Zthing.com will donate $1.12 to provide a meal for one person - just for
visiting the site! Click  here for more details.

		Bible Verse of the Day
		Friday November 17, 2000

		Mark 12.43

		The Access Bible, NRSV, New Testament, Page 71

		"Then he called his disciples and said to them, 'Truly I tell you, this poor
widow has put in more than all those who are contributing to the treasury.'"

		Visit The Access Bible from Oxford University Press Online!

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives
		[IMAGE]

		 SPIRITUAL BOOK OF THE DAY
		Iyanla Vanzant: In the Meantime

		MOVIE OF THE DAY
		Left Behind

		Bush vs. Gore:  the cam-pain continues.
		Seek relief on the inDecision2000 'Vine.

		Got something to say?
		Hello...I love you...Congratulations...Thinking of you...Happy birthday.
Whatever you wanna say, let Emazing's e-greetings say it for you! We have
hundreds of the coolest greetings around. They're fun, FREE, and easy to
send. Click here for more information.

		Our e-greetings aren't turkeys...
		But we have plenty with turkeys on them to celebrate your holiday
get-togethers and feasts!

		JobsOnline is giving away $10,000 instant cash!
		JobsOnline is one of the Internet's leading sites for employment information
and career resources.

		     QUOTE OF THE DAY
		I,m not like George Bush. If he wins or loses, life goes on. I,ll do anything
to win.
		- Al Gore

		 [IMAGE]

		  Does "email program" mean "geek Greek" to you?
		Don't let email confuse you! Get FREE Outlook 2000 tips from EMAZING. Soon
you'll be setting up folders, sending tricky attachments, customizing your
views, and scheduling appointments. It's as easy as 1-2-3 with these tips!
Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


Please tell all he lost....

http://www.algorelost.com/


This was just sent to participants---the meeting is going on now---the press
one
i guessstarts at 330.  -eja

>
> Market Participants:
>
> Attached please find Market Notice and part of the FERC filing that was
> made this afternoon.  Note that there will be a special conference call
> today at 3:00pm PST.  Details are in the Market Notice file below.
>
>
>          <<Market Notice_.doc>>
>
>
> This is the transmittal letter, redline, cost data and affidavit of Jim
> Detmers
>
>  <<Amendment No. 33 filing letter.DOC>>  <<Att. B-1.DOC>>  <<Att.
> B-2.DOC>>  <<Att. B-3.DOC>>  <<Att C.DOC>>  <<Att. D.XLS>>
>
>
> Don Fuller
> Director - Client Relations
>
> Sent on behalf of Don Fuller by Alice Leonard
>
> Alice Leonard
> Executive Assistant
> California Independent System Operator
> Ph: (916) 351-2209
> Fax: (916) 351-2350
> Email: aleonard@caiso.com
>

(See attached file: Market Notice_.doc)
(See attached file: Amendment No. 33 filing letter.DOC)
(See attached file: Att. B-1.DOC)
(See attached file: Att. B-2.DOC)
(See attached file: Att. B-3.DOC)
(See attached file: Att C.DOC)
(See attached file: Att. D.XLS)

 - Market Notice_.doc
 - Amendment No. 33 filing letter.DOC
 - Att. B-1.DOC
 - Att. B-2.DOC
 - Att. B-3.DOC
 - Att C.DOC
 - Att. D.XLS


Jeff,

Thought you might appreciate this.

Kevin


Karen,

Attached is the market wrap for this week.

Monika


This file contains a summary of the weekly mechanical availability numbers,
as well as, the contractual availability number received from Asset Mgmt
(Barry Riffe). It seems that in many cases, the contractual is lower than the
mechanical.

In this set of attached data, I am trying to state the monthly domestic fleet
availability by category (e.g. ramp-up month 1 and warranted month 1, etc).
As the availabilty numbers are difficult to predict without having it done
individually by turbine, I am currently taking the document you provided
(Hollis) and will recalc what is in the attached chart, thus being more
accurate.  However, the doc. you provided (commissioning summary) only has
Nov-Feb.  Do we have the data prior to Nov available?  If there is a better
method, please let me know.

Thanks,
Ilan


A judge was interviewing a woman about her pending divorce. He sat her
>down in his office and asked, "Now, what are your grounds?"
>
>She replied, "About two acres, and a nice little house in the middle and
>a stream running by."
>
>"No," he said, "I mean what is the foundation of this case?" "It's made
>of concrete, brick and mortar," she responded.
>
>"I mean," he said, "What are your relations like?" The woman said, "I
>have an aunt and an uncle living here in town, and my husband's
>parents."
>
>Becoming frustrated, the judge said, "Do you have a real grudge?" "No,"
>she replied, "Just a two-car carport."
>
>"Ma'am," he tried again, "Is there fidelity in your marriage?" "Well,
>both my son and daughter have stereos," she replied. "Though we don't
>really like that noise they call music."
>
>The judge sighed. "Ma'am, does your husband ever beat you up?" "Yes,"
>she responded, "About three times a week he gets up before me and makes
>breakfast."
>
>Finally, in frustration, the judge asked, "Lady, why do you want a
>divorce?"
>
>"Oh, I don't want a divorce," she replied. "I never wanted one. My
>husband does. He said he can't communicate with me!!!"


These have both been changed to Enmax Energy Corp. I'll let the Real Time
traders know.

Thanks,
Kate

Melissa Ann Murphy
03/30/2001 11:59 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Rhonda Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: 549171.1 and 550678.1

Hello, can you check these deals and see if the counterparty name is wrong.
They are in as Enmax Corporation and we are wondering if they should be Enmax
Energy Corporation.  The contract did not come over correctly so we wanted to
make sure the counterparty name is correct before we set up a new contract.

Thanks,
Melissa
(713) 853-1886


Daren,

Sherlyn Schumack suggested that I contact you with this matter.  I am working on some old HPL issues and have come across a deal that was initially set up, #208101, but this deal was subsequently killed (no reason found).  This deal was copied from #205533 which was good through 2/29/00.  Please set up a valid deal for March 2000 just like either one of these deals whereby HPL is buying gas from ENA on Tejas at the same points.  This deal is needed because it leads to a valid sale to Reliant Energy.  Please note that Reliant has been invoiced and settlement has already been made.

If I have not provided enough information or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call.  As I need to resolve this issue as soon as possible, your prompt attention to this matter would be most appreciated.

Buddy
X-31933


Dear Wall Street City User,

I want to take this opportunity to share some exciting news about Wall
Street City.

Beginning today you'll see a new logo on the site: "Individual
Investor.com @ Wall Street City."  We are merging Individual
Investor.com into Wall Street City. As a current user, you will continue
to have full access to all of the features that you can't live without,
including Stock Search, powerful charting tools, advanced portfolio
analytics, and historical stock, option, and mutual fund quotes.

We're excited about the change and we think you will be too. Come visit
us on the web at http//www.wallstreetcity.com.

Sincerely,
Charles Rotblut, CFA
Director of Financial Content

REMOVE ME FROM THIS FREE EMAIL LIST
To be removed from the email distribution list for the FREE
WallStreetCity's Industry Group Analysis Commentary, Stock
Search of the Week Commentary, The Week Ahead Commentary
and Updates simply click the link below and hit "Send" on
the email that is launched. (Or copy and paste the email
address below to a new outgoing email message and hit "Send"
on the email that is launched).

mailto:U-A28.146.113719@newsletter.wallstreetcity.com

If you have tried unsubscribing in the past -- and believe
that you received this message in error -- please send an
email to

mailto:yourfeedback@wallstreetcity.com

to voice your concerns and be removed from the list.


UserName: CAMPB54792

You have an electronic monthly statement in your Inbox.  To retrieve your
monthly statement you may login to Datek Online and choose Document Delivery
from the Account Services menu, or you may click on the link below:

https://tumble2.datek.com/posta?x=1-13884049-13840462-BFDNOA0U

You have received this message because you subscribed to electronic
delivery for your Datek account or because you normally receive paper
trade confirmations and have been selected to receive a sample electronic
trade confirmation in addition to the paper one.

Please note that you are under no obligation to view this document.
However, by accessing this confirmation you consent to receive it
electronically.  You may print or download this document for you records.

Enable now for FREE Electronic Trade Confirmations-if you have not
already. You'll avoid Datek's upcoming $2 paper confirmation postage and
handling fee, which is charged on a per account basis each day you execute
one or multiple trades.

Click here to enable:

https://investment.datek.com/?href=/a_option/subs/edsubs.htm

By accessing this confirmation you consent to receive this confirmation
electronically. You may print or download this document for your records.

If you are enabled and wish to stop receiving account documents via
electronic delivery, you may cancel your subscription by logging into
Datek and choosing "Settings" from the Account Services menu.

If you have any questions, please try our new @nswerbox feature.  You can
check out the Hot Issues of the day, browse through help topics and view
your Active Case List.  If you can't find an answer to your question you
can open a case and a member of our Customer Support Team will provide you
with a timely personal response.

You can always e-mail us at support@datek.com 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week or call Customer Support at 1-800-U2DATEK 8 AM to midnight (ET)
weekdays and 9 AM to 7 PM (ET) weekends.  Please call 1-201-761-7500 if
you are calling from outside of the United States.

Thank you for trading with us.

Datek Online Financial Services LLC

System response and access times may vary due to market conditions, system
performance and other factors.

Copyright 2001 Datek Online Financial Services LLC, Member NASD/SIPC


I forwarded to you most of the ibuyit stuff still in my e-mail.  Please check all to see if they have been approved.  From this point forward, I don't want to automatically approve anything without my seeing it.  Please scan the rest of my e-mails to see if there is an ibuyit request that I failed to forward to you for you to check.  Please be sure that anything that has already been approved is deleted.  Thanks.

Please go through my e-mails and print everything from Melissa Becker, put it in a folder (all should relate to follow up on the Accounting offsite in Galveston) for me.  I need to review that stuff and figure out when the next follow up meeting is going to be with either Rick and/or Melissa.  They have asked me to chair one of the follow up issues.  Some of the e-mails from Melissa relate to volunteers for my team.  I think there is also one saved voice mail with a volunteer's name.  Can you create a list (with contact numbers) of all volunteers from e-mails and voice mails to date?  Thanks.  Then please delete all e-mails from Melissa.

Also, please go through my e-mails and print everything that relates to Center for Houston's Future.  I need to review these.  Most is from Marilyn Schoppe, but a few are from others, but reference CHF.  Then delete all of these e-mails.

E-mails from Lexi Elliott regarding recruiting.  Please print all so that I can review them.  Please delete all e-mails after printing.  Thanks.

This effort plus my clean up today should help shrink the e-mails that remain.  Thanks.  --Sally


Jennifer I have completed my review of your SP's if you would like to call me
a your convenience we can discuss same depending on the arbitration issue.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


The report named: West VaR and Off-Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=27&report_name=West+VaR+and+Off-Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=01/07/2002>, published as of 01/07/2002 is now available for viewing on the website.


For your info-  I will be having a tailgate party both pre and post game, regardless of outcome.  It is located at 9th and S on the east side of 9th street towards the southwest end of the lot where there is a large billboard advertising a 30$$ ++  Jackpot ( at least that's what it had on last weekend)   Please feel free to have the group join in if you get there in enough time.  Otherwise I will see you all at the game around 10:30.  Mary Kay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	'clark.smith@elpaso.com'; 'tmcgill@nisource.com'; Hayes, Robert; McCarty, Danny; Neubauer, Dave; Miller, Mary Kay
Cc:	Stark, Cindy; 'shea.mollere@elpaso.com'; 'pmcleod@nisource.com'; Kovalcik, Tammy; Call, Josie; Cappiello, Deborah
Subject:	October 27th Husker Game

Attached please find the travel itinerary for Saturday, October 27th, the Husker's game.

Please note the departure time of 7:00 am from Houston/Enron Aviation.  A map/directions to the Enron hanger has been attached.

Please call me at 713-853-3597 if you have any questions.  Have a great time.

 << File: October27Huskergame.doc >>

 << File: Aviationmap.jpg >>

Deb:
Please forward the contact and email information on Dennis Stell and Tim Christensen to me so I can forward the above information.  Thank you.


Definitely Thursday or Friday - just let me know so that I don't leave and
lock it up!

Kaye Ellis
02/01/2000 03:05 PM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Think Pad

Felix came by to do the replication on your think pad.  He said it will take
at least 1 1/2 hr. to do it.  Is it OK if he does it Thurs or Fri?  Your
schedule is pretty busy tomorrow.  The only time I see available tomorrow is
maybe 9:30a - 11a.  I'm sure it will be hard for you to talk on the phone
even for 30 min. with Felix in your office.

All he needs is your passwords.


Please arrange a room for an East Power Mtg at 10:00 am this morning.

Agenda:

UBS Warburg Energy Closing/Implementation
Organization/Roles
On-line products (which products and when)
Power documents (EEI and ISDA)


Without knowing what subcommittees you are going to set up for the exec.
committee members, I'll take the Analyst/Associate program.  We've been
incredibly successful with Wharton/Penn , and I'd like to replicate our
approach company wide.  I'm convinced with my help, we can do a world class
job.  I'd be happy to give my thoughts on off cycle hiring, and other ways to
improve the entire process (internal and external) around Enron.

Thanks.

Jeff


Both of those times work for me.

Darlene C Forsyth
12/01/98 02:47 PM
To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Juanita
Ruffeno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morris Richard Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet
Dobernecker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nella Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Maddox/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meeting- Canadian IDRs

As it turns out, this week will not work for several of you.  Please let me
know about the following times:

Monday, Dec. 7th 2:00-4:00 p.m.
Tuesday, Dec. 8th 2:00-4:00 p.m.

Thanks,

Darlene

Darlene C Forsyth
12/01/98 10:58 AM
To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Juanita
Ruffeno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morris Richard Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet
Dobernecker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nella Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Maddox/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meeting- Canadian IDRs

Please let me know if you are available this Thursday, 12/3 2:00-3:00 p.m.
or  Friday. 12/4 1:30-2:30 p.m..  Thanks, Darlene

Darlene C Forsyth
12/01/98 10:36 AM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Juanita
Ruffeno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morris Richard Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet Dobernecker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nella Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Maddox/HOU/ECT@ECT (bcc: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Re: Meeting- Canadian IDRs

Sorry for the confusion on this meeting, several were unavailable.  Please
let me know if you are available this Thursday, 12/3 2:00-3:00 p.m. or
Friday. 12/4 1:30-2:30 p.m..  Thanks, Darlene

Darlene C Forsyth
11/25/98 02:19 PM
To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meeting- Canadian IDRs

---------------------- Forwarded by Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT on 11/25/98
02:19 PM ---------------------------

Darlene C Forsyth
11/25/98 02:19 PM
To: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT, Laura E Scott/CAL/ECT@ECT, Juanita
Ruffeno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Morris Richard Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Janet Dobernecker/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting- Canadian IDRs

Per the below, we need to schedule a meeting to discuss Canadian IDRs.
Please let me know if you are available Monday, November 30th between 2:00 -
4:00 p.m.  We need one hour.

Thanks,

Darlene
---------------------- Forwarded by Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT on 11/24/98
09:20 AM ---------------------------
From: Morris Richard Clark on 11/23/98 06:07 PM
To: Darlene C Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting- Canadian IDRs

Darlene,

Can you please set up a meeting early next week to discuss the latest
Canadian IDR.  The participants should be as follows:  Jordan, Peter Keohane
(Calgary - via telephone), Laura Scott (Calgary - via telephone),Juanita
Ruffino, Mark Taylor, Bill Bradford, and myself.   Thanks.

Jordan - by way of copy- should we invite Ed or Beth?

Thanks.

MRC


Energy Cost Study Critical of Public Agencies Too
 Power: DWP is among three government-run producers cited as driving prices
up. Spokesmen deny any market manipulation.

By ROBERT J. LOPEZ, RICH CONNELL, Times Staff Writers

????Government-owned utilities, including the Los Angeles Department of Water
and Power, were influential in driving wholesale electricity prices to levels
that helped ignite California's exploding energy crisis during the summer and
fall, according to public and confidential records.
?????For months, Gov. Gray Davis, legislators and consumer advocates have
chiefly blamed a few private power companies for throwing the state into
darkness and economic chaos.
?????But they are just part of the equation.
?????A confidential document obtained by The Times names power providers that
have allegedly manipulated the electricity market. While the document does
identify out-of-state merchants criticized for gouging, it also discloses for
the first time the extent to which public entities allegedly have maximized
profits in the volatile spot market.
?????The document--which decodes the identities of unnamed suppliers in a
recent state study--singles out three government-run agencies as consistently
trying to inflate prices. They are: the DWP, the federally owned Bonneville
Power Administration in the Pacific Northwest and the trading arm of Canada's
BC Hydro in British Columbia.
?????Like a number of privately owned generators, these three producers
offered power at a range of high prices and, sometimes, in large amounts when
the state was most desperate. They also helped saddle California's three
largest utilities with billions of dollars in debt--leading one, Pacific Gas
& Electric, to seek bankruptcy protection last week.
?????The study by the California Independent System Operator, or Cal-ISO,
analyzed thousands of hours of bidding practices for 20 large suppliers in
the spot, or "real-time," market from May to November. The study accounted
for factors such as rising production costs, increased demand, periods of
scarcity and profits that would be earned in a healthy, competitive market.
?????Money earned above that was called excess profits.
?????No entity--public or private--earned as much in alleged excess profits
as British Columbia's Powerex, the state records show.
?????"They were the most aggressive bidders," said Anjali Sheffrin, author of
the coded study.
?????"They had the most amount to bid and the most freedom to bid it in,"
said Sheffrin, who did not discuss any companies by name.
?????The Canadian agency reaped $176 million in alleged excessive
profits--several times the amount collected by all but one of the private
generators. Second on the list was Atlanta-based Southern Co. Energy
Marketing, now called Mirant, which collected nearly $97 million in alleged
inflated earnings.
?????BC Hydro and Mirant--along with the DWP and other producers--say they
played by the rules established under California's flawed deregulation plan
and did not exploit the state's troubles.
?????But BC Hydro officials acknowledge that they did anticipate periods of
severe power shortages and planned for them by letting their reservoirs rise
overnight and then opening them to create hydroelectricity, which could be
produced inexpensively but sold for a premium.
?????"It was the marketplace that determined what the price of electricity
would be at any given time," said BC Hydro spokesman Wayne Cousins. "We
helped keep the lights on in California."
?????And the rates low for their own customers. During the past year, BC
Hydro has stashed hundreds of millions dollars in a "rainy day" account to
ensure that it has among the lowest rates in North America.
?????Los Angeles' Department of Water and Power, although eighth on the list
of alleged profiteers, was among those singled out for seeking high prices
during periods of high demand that helped inflate costs across the entire
spot market, where emergency purchases are made.
?????This, according to state documents, was accomplished by offering power
at incrementally higher prices that would rise substantially with even modest
increases in demand. The strategy also helped prop up prices, keeping them
from falling.
?????The DWP's average hourly bid, or asking price, for electricity
ultimately bought topped such private sellers as Reliant Energy of Houston
and Tulsa-based Williams Cos., two major players in the national energy
market.
?????In addition, the DWP submitted other bids at far higher prices that
could pay off handsomely with even small bumps in demand, the report said,
referring by code to DWP and four other suppliers. "The data shows they
clearly exercised market power to inflate prices further at higher load
conditions."
?????DWP General Manager S. David Freeman called the report's findings
"outrageous," insisting that the utility never tried to inflate prices.
?????"These charges go under the heading there is no good deed that goes
unpunished in this state," Freeman said, noting that DWP power helped avert
more blackouts across the state.
?????He did acknowledge, however, that the agency has charged high prices for
surplus power at the 11th hour but said that was only because it cost more to
produce.
?????"We have consistently charged [Cal-ISO] our cost, plus 15%," he said.
"It's not as though we're up there peddling a bunch of power to jam it down
their throats."
?????Freeman said that when his staff reviewed the coded report, they never
took it personally. "If you're innocent," he said, "you don't look at the
criminal file."
?????Yet another public agency criticized for its behavior in California's
deregulated market was the U.S. government's Bonneville Power Administration,
a nonprofit agency that sells wholesale electricity produced at 29 federal
dams in the Columbia-Snake River basin.
?????Bonneville actually bid slightly lower than the DWP, records show, but
reaped millions more in alleged excessive profits, apparently because it
supplied greater amounts of power during the period studied. Bonneville was
in the top five accused of taking excessive profits.
?????Bonneville officials say some of its profits are used to pay back
federal construction loans and fund an internationally recognized salmon
recovery program.
?????Stephen Oliver, a Bonneville vice president, said his agency did not act
improperly and has asked Cal-ISO for detailed information on how it reached
its conclusions. He said the grid operator often came to Bonneville pleading
for last-minute electricity and offering to pay high prices.
?????"From our point of view, we bid what we had when we had it and we
operated precisely within the terms of their rules," Oliver said.
?????Those rules--and the bidding practices criticized by Cal-ISO--so
distorted the market that Aquila Power Corp. of Missouri, which tried to act
responsibly, has bailed out.
?????It offered the lowest average hourly price of any supplier
studied--slightly more than $8 per megawatt-hour, compared to Mirant's $138,
the highest.
?????But the spot market, as initially designed, made sure that all suppliers
offering power received the highest price paid in any hour.
?????The result: Aquila collected $171 an hour for power it was willing to
sell at a single-digit price.
?????"They weren't the culprits," said Cal-ISO's Sheffrin. "Someone else
drove that up."
?????Aquila spokesman Al Butkus said the company pulled out of the California
market because it was too unpredictable. Although the company made money, he
said, it also could have lost because of possible downward swings.
?????"We looked at it and we didn't feel very comfortable with what we saw,"
he said.
?????The market has since been adjusted to prevent high bids from setting the
price for everyone. But Sheffrin said it hasn't made much difference because
the overall prices are still excessive.
?????"We're saying the patient is sick," Sheffrin said of California's
electricity market. "It needs help [and] may die."
?????


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Espinoza, Veronica
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:47 AM
To:	Anderson, Diane; Bailey, Derek; Baumbach, David; Bell, Jean; Boulanger, Patricia; Brown, Angela Y.; Cisneros, Celeste; Crawford, Sharon; Deming, Richard; Dickson, Melia; Giron, Darron C.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Guillen, Andrea R.; Hunter, Larry Joe; Keiser, Kam; Love, Phillip M.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Mendoza, Nidia; Moran, Tom; Moscoso, Mirna; Mulvany, Patrick; Negrete, Flavia; Ornelas, Bianca; Osire, Ann; Otto, Randy; Pernul, Sarah; Reeves, Leslie; Rohauer, Tanya; Seib, Dianne; Sietzema, Linda; Theriot, Kim S.; Wallumrod, Ellen; Wilder, Wesley
Subject:	Credit Report-11/13/01


For future reference, Brian Barto does not participate in these calls.  No
need to retract the invite at this point.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 09/05/2000 10:45 AM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Roseann
Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, michael.barnas@ps.ge.com,
kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com
cc:

Subject: Time Change for Weekly GE Conference Call

The time has changed for the weekly GE Conference call from 9:30 a.m. CT to
1:30 CT starting tomorrow, September 6, 2000.  The dial in numbers and codes
will remain the same.

Dial In:  1-888-285-4585
Host:  121970 (Kay Mann)
Participant: 536220

We usually have seven ports, but tomorrow there are only six ports
available.  I didn't think it would be a problem since several of you are in
the same area and could go in one office.  In the future, we will have our
seven ports.  Thanks, Suzanne (x37340)


Attached are blacklines of the Credit Derivatives Policies and Procedures and
letter to Reference Entities, which have been revised to reflect Tolek's
comments (with the exception of the English law points, which we have not
addressed).  Please call or e-mail with any questions.  Best regards.

----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - enron.wpd
 - enron2.wpd


Vince,

 If you take a cab, ask them to take you to the College of Business
building at the corner of 21st and Speedway.  The main entrance to the
business school is on Speedway, across from the old gymnasium.  Come in the
main entrance, which has a large, glass structure, and you will be on the
second floor.  Go to your left and ride up the first set of escalators to
the third floor.  When you step off of the escalators, you'll be facing
north and continue in that direction through two sets of glass doors into
the northern side of the building.  This is where most faculty offices are
found.  My office is 3.218, which is in the northwest corner of the
building.

 If you have any problems, you should be able to ask directions from
most anyone in the halls.  I will look for you around 11:00 on Thursday, and
will be happy to provide any other transportation that you need.  Please let
me know if you have any other questions.

 Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 9:23 AM
To: Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com;
Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
Subject: RE: Real Options

Jim,

I can  take a cab or get a rental car from the airport  (thanks for your
kind offer).
I shall appreciate, however, if you could drop me off at the hotel before
dinner.

The time allocation for my speech is about right. I think I shall need
about 90
minutes.

Please let me know where we can meet on Thursday.  I shall be at an
off-site
on Wednesday but you can reach me on my cell phone (713 410 5396)
and by sending a cc message to my AOL address: vkaminski@aol.com.

I  look forward to meeting you.

Vince

Jim Dyer <Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu> on 05/01/2000 01:42:44 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>
Subject:  RE: Real Options

Vince,

     I could pick you up at the airport, or you could rent a car and come
to campus.  I have made tentative plans for us to go to lunch with some
other faculty between 11:30 and 12:00, and then you would have some time to
visit with Sheridan and perhaps with some other faculty members as well
between lunch and my class.

     Sheridan and a guest speaker from his class, Suresh Sundaresan from
Columbia, will be joining us for dinner.  I could provide transportation to
your hotel, and pick you up for dinner as well if you consider that to be
the most convenient alternative.

     I will have a PC available in the classroom, with Office 2000 and
windows NT.  You could use powerpoint with no difficulty from that machine,
if that's most convenient.  You could simply email the presentation, and I
would have it for you if you prefer.

     How much time would you like?  I would like to reserve about 30
minutes at the end for a general discussion of issues related to real
options, and about 30 minutes at the beginning of class for some remarks
regarding the final assignment and a class evaluation by the students
(which
is required for all classes).  At some point, we should take a brief break,
so that would leave approximately 1.5 to 2 hours for your presentation if
you would like that flexibility.  Otherwise, I could take up the "slack".

     I look forward to seeing you on Thursday.

     Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 11:21 AM
To: Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Re: Real Options

Jim,

I am scheduled to arrive in Austin on May 4 at 10:32 a.m.
I shall be glad to join you and a group of your colleagues for lunch.
I am flying back to  Houston Friday morning and we can meet for dinner
after
the class.

I shall have a Power Point presentation on my PC. I can also
prepare a set of transparencies if this is more convenient for you.

Vince

Jim Dyer <Jim.Dyer@bus.utexas.edu> on 04/27/2000 05:44:51 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:   Sheridan Titman <Sheridan.Titman@bus.utexas.edu>
Subject:  Real Options

Vince,

     I am traveling at this time, attending a NSF meeting in Washington.
However, I wanted to touch base regarding plans for your presentation in my
class on real options next Thursday (May 4).  As you recall, the class is
from 3:30 to 6:30, and you could plan to take a significant part of that
time for your presentation.  Sheridan Titman has agreed to join us after
his
class at about 6:00 for a 30 minute "panel discussion" with the students on
issues related to real options in practice.l

     I am not sure about your travel plans, but we would be happy to plan
lunch on Thursday with several of my colleagues.  I would also be delighted
to be your host for dinner on Thursday night if that is convenient for you.

     I'll be back in my office on Monday, and will look forward to
hearing from you.

     Jim

James S. Dyer
Fondren Centennial Chair in Business
Department of Management Science and Information Systems
CBA 5.202
The University of Texas at Austin
Austin, Texas 78712-1175

Email:  j.dyer@bus.utexas.edu
Telephone:  512-471-5278
Fax:  512-471-0587


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011011.txt


Please see attached. Ammednments are highlighted in purple.

Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com


All:

Attached is our memo on Day 10 of the trial.

Kimberly A. Curry
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
(202) 828-7623 (phone)
(202) 857-2107 (fax)
kcurry@bracepatt.com