this is very touching.

 Does Heaven have a phone number?
  > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > Mommy went to Heaven,
  > > > > > > > but I need her here today,
  > > > > > > > My tummy hurts and I fell down,
  > > > > > > > I need her right away,
  > > > > > > > Operator can you tell me how
  > > > > > > > to find her in this book?
  > > > > > > > Is heaven in the yellow part,
  > > > > > > > I don't know where to look.
  > > > > > > > I think my daddy needs her too,
  > > > > > > > at night I hear him cry.
  > > > > > > > I hear him call her name sometimes,
  > > > > > > > but I really don't know why.
  > > > > > > > Maybe if I call her,
  > > > > > > > she will hurry home to me.
  > > > > > > > Is Heaven very far away,
  > > > > > > > Is it across the sea?
  > > > > > > > She's been gone a long, long time
  > > > > > > > she needs to come home now!
  > > > > > > > I really need to reach her,
  > > > > > > > I simply don't know how.
  > > > > > > > Help me find the number please,
  > > > > > > > is it listed under "Heaven"?
  > > > > > > > I can't read these big big words,
  > > > > > > > I am only seven.
  > > > > > > > I'm sorry operator,
  > > > > > > > I didn't mean to make you cry,
  > > > > > > > Is your tummy hurting too,
  > > > > > > > or is there something in your eye?
  > > > > > > > If I call my church maybe they will know.
  > > > > > > > Mommy said when we need help that's where we
  > > > > > > > should go.
  > > > > > > > I found the number to my church
  > > > > > > > tacked up on the wall.
  > > > > > > > Thank you operator,
  > > > > > > > I'll give them a call.
  > > > > > > >

sabrinamoore@usa.net

Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/02/2000 02:09
PM ---------------------------

Brian D Barto@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
06/02/2000 01:28 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Enron Monterrey/Vitro

Jeff and Reynaldo Garcia spoke on this subject at length, and Rey convinced
Jeff that spitting was necessary.  AT that time the Enron Contracting entity
was not specified to be Energia...    If you want to unsplit the documents it
will add additional time in excess geting a consolidation agreement completed
I think.  Please include Rey in your quest for closure.  PS  GE is now OK
with the split.

I need help getting closure on the Consolidation Agreement.  I hope that we
do not invent other issues as well.


---------------------- Forwarded by Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT on 12/13/2000 06:29
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Pergher, Gunther" <Gunther.Pergher@dowjones.com>
     12/13/2000 06:24 AM

To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: DJ Edison To Call For End To Calif Elec Dereg Wed -Sources, DJ Ca
lif PUC Proposes To Let Utilities Out of CalPX

13:16 GMT 13 December 2000 =DJ Edison To Call For End To Calif Elec Dereg
Wed -Sources
(This article was originally published Tuesday)

   By Jason Leopold
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--Edison International (EIX), saying the current
state of California's power markets threatens the company with bankruptcy,
will call Wednesday for an end to California's four-year experiment with
deregulation, sources familiar with the issue told Dow Jones Newswires.
John Bryson, chief executive of Edison International, is expected to
announce that the company's regulated utility unit, Southern California
Edison, won't be able to recover more than $3 billion in losses related to
power purchases and continue serving its retail customers unless the state's
deregulated market structure is scrapped.
In a move tantamount to a call for reregulation, Edison will propose to
break ground on new power plants within 90 days and re-enter the
power-generation business Southern California Edison was required to exit
under the state's landmark 1996 deregulation law, the sources said.
Edison plans to follow the announcement by filing a request with state
regulators to increase retail electricity rates by as much as 20%, the
sources said, even though regulators rejected Edison's request for a rate
increase of 10% last week.
The utility has lined up the support of some state lawmakers for the broader
proposal, which would require action by the state legislature, the sources
said.
Southern California Edison, with 4.2 million customers, is one of the
country's largest electric utilities. Edison was the first of the state's
utilities to sign on to the deregulation effort and, as it says on its Web
site, "played a central role in the restructuring of the electric industry
in California."
Among the concessions won by utilities in 1996 is the rate freeze, which
they demanded to help them recover costs related to deregulation but which
is now producing huge losses.
Edison's current losses stem from an imbalance between the soaring prices it
must pay to purchase power on the wholesale markets and the fixed rate at
which it can sell power to its customers.
About half of those losses are offset the utility's own power sales
revenues, which are accounted for separately and used to pay down
deregulation-related debt. Rising power costs have produced a surplus in
that account. Edison wouldn't reveal the current size of the surplus, but
said previously that the California Power Exchange paid the utility $1.3
billion over its generating costs for power through the end of September, at
a time when its power-purchase losses were $2.4 billion.

   Power-Purchase Losses Mounting

The net losses continue to mount. California's wholesale power prices
hovered at record levels all summer and spiked even higher in the past two
weeks, as colder weather arrived in the Northwest at a time when much of
California's power supply was down for maintenance.
The price of power for delivery Wednesday in California hit an average of
$1,182 a megawatt-hour Tuesday, up from $250 a megawatt-hour a week ago, the
result of high demand and a decision by California's wholesale market
operator to lift its cap on prices.
The rate Southern California Edison can charge its retail customers,
however, is fixed at $66/MWh.
Last week, Merrill Lynch & Co. (MER) downgraded its ratings for Edison
International and PG&E Corp. (PCG), the parent of California's other major
utility, Pacific Gas & Electric, to neutral, saying the utilities may be
forced to file for bankruptcy if the state doesn't allow them to raise their
retail rates.
A Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (MWD) analyst drew the same conclusion Monday,
also cutting his rating to neutral.
Edison to this point has kept its power-purchase losses off its earnings
statement, in hopes that a political or regulatory solution will allow them
to be collected later.
The California Public Utilities Commission put the hope of such a solution
further out of reach last week, however, when it ruled against rate
increases sought by Edison and PG&E.
Credit rating agency Fitch Inc. on Monday lowered its ratings for Edison
International and Southern California Edison's senior unsecured debt to the
A-minus level, citing "increased liquidity pressure" and uncertainty about
the utilities' ability to recover the costs of their power purchases. The
agency downgraded Edison International, the parent, because half its
consolidated cash flow is provided by Southern California Edison.
Edison - which sources said plans to remain in the retail electricity
business - said late last week that it has secured a $1 billion line of
credit and expects to have enough cash on hand to continue to pay for
wholesale electricity for the next several months.
California paid more than $1 billion for power last week, sources said. Some
of that, however, was paid to Southern California Edison, which still
generates about 2,800 megawatts of power in the state.
Shares in Edison International have fallen 21% over the past three weeks.
They closed Wednesday at $18.56, down $0.06.
-By Jason Leopold, Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3874;
jason.leopold@dowjones.com
(Mark Golden contributed to this article.)
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 13-12-00
1316GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc
13:16 GMT 13 December 2000 DJ Calif PUC Proposes To Let Utilities Out of
CalPX
(This article was originally published Tuesday)
NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The California Public Utilities Commission has
proposed letting the state's three investor-owned utilities out of the
requirement that they purchase their power through the California Power
Exchange.
The proposed ruling, written by Commissioner Carl Wood, would direct
"jurisdictional utilities to serve their native load, to the extent
possible, with their retained generation and power purchase contracts,
rather than through a bidding process."
Commissioners will take a final vote on the ruling Dec. 21, but the three
Democrats on the five-member commission - including Wood - usually agree on
proposed rulings before the rulings are put on the voting agenda, which was
posted Tuesday.
The change is in line with the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
proposed ruling Nov. 1, which will get a final vote Friday, to remove the
mandate that the utilities buy their power from the state-chartered
California Power Exchange.
The PX has been a lynchpin of the state's electric utility deregulation,
passed in 1996. It was to be a clearing house for a multitude of bulk power
producers and sellers, and its market prices were to be passed on to
remaining customers of the utilities after the deregulation transition to
free markets.
But Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric Co, which emerged from
the transition period a year ago, was passing on CalPX prices to customer
until this summer, when electricity prices tripled and the PUC fixed SDG&E
rates again.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

   (END) Dow Jones Newswires  13-12-00
1316GMT Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company Inc

G_nther A. Pergher
Senior Analyst
Dow Jones & Company Inc.
Tel.  609.520.7067
Fax. 609.452.3531

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


I am working with Mary Joyce on that right now. Michelle
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread86.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread86.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread86.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack86.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack86.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


=======================================
Changes to eBay User Agreement & Privacy Policy
=======================================

This administrative email was sent to john.griffith@enron.com based on your
account at eBay.

---------------------------------------

Official Notice of Revision to the eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy

We are committed to improving your experience at eBay. We have modified the
User Agreement and Privacy Policy based on suggestions from our users and to
accommodate future site improvements. The User Agreement describes your
rights and responsibilities while bidding and selling at eBay while the
Privacy Policy describes the information we collect about you and what may
happen to that information.

To learn more about what was changed in the User Agreement, please go to
http://pages.ebay.com/help/basics/uarevision1-faq.html#4. To see the revised
User Agreement, please go to
http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/png-user.html. For additional
information, please visit the User Agreement FAQ which is available at:
http://pages.ebay.com/help/basics/f-agreement.html.

To learn more about what was changed in the Privacy Policy, please go to
http://pages.ebay.com/help/basics/pprevision1-faq.html#4. To see the revised
Privacy Policy please go to
http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/png-priv.html.

This agreement is effective on May 21st, 2001 for new registering users, and
is otherwise effective on May 15th, 2001 for all users registered prior to
May 21st, 2001.

---------------------------------------

As outlined in our User Agreement, eBay will periodically send you
information about site changes & enhancements. If you would like to review
your notification preferences for other types of communications, please visit
http://pages.ebay.com/services/myebay/optin-login.html. Note that it may take
up to 5 days to process your request. Visit our Privacy Policy at
http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/png-priv.html and User Agreement at
http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/png-user.html if you have any questions.

Copyright , 1995-2001 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks
and brands are the property of their respective owners.

Please include the following text in your reply.
annmn:[043j4B043j4B518zCS012000mcMZYcMhY]


I ended deal 340210 effective 2/28/01 and created deal 630810 effective
3/1/2001.  But, I see both deals active un Unify on contract 2891 on
3/1/2001.  I don't know what impact this will have, if any.


Sorry I could not make it to the meeting when you discussed the GTC. Can you
keep me informed on what changes you are discussing and also provide me with
a copy of the GTC and any revisions. Also, do we have final acceptance on the
Product Long Description from everyone? Attached is the final version for
your review
Thanks
jr
3-6460


FYI this is what Joe Hillings was asking for.
---------------------- Forwarded by Ricardo Charvel/NA/Enron on 02/18/2000
01:43 PM ---------------------------

Ricardo Charvel
02/18/2000 01:43 PM
To: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Mexico-Secretary Richardson Is Leaving For A Mexico Meeting With
Minister Tellez Today-Need Talking Points ASAP

Joe,

I am sorry I missed your call.  Max and I had a conference call with Chris
Long on Monday in which we touched upon some of these points but I think that
it is important for us to insist in the following:

1 Regulate the pricing of infrastructure and services for true
undiscriminated open access. To enhance the possibility of having a
competitive natural gas markets through importing gas in northern Mexico it
is necessary to set a regulated price for the use of infrastructure which is
in hands of a monopoly or where there is no alternative..  Currently Pemex is
able to offer discounts in infrastructure (transport) and other services in a
way which effectively creates barriers of entry to any competitor even in the
marketing segment of the business.

2. Promote complete unbundling between Pemex affiliates in the gas business.
There has to be a true unbundling between Pemex Production (PEP) and Pemex
transport and marketing (PGPB).  Currently anyone that wants to buy gas has
to do so from the PEMEX marketer/transporter (PGPB) instead of being able to
buy gas from the producer, pay for the transport etc.  in a transparent way
and within real competitive circumstances.

3. Revise the 1996 natural gas pricing directive.  In this pricing formula
Pemex  fixed a differential that is subtracted from the Tetco-Valero Price.
This differential changes according with the conditions of the market.  The
conditions of the market have changed since 1996 making this fixed
differential a true barrier of entry for competition.  The differential
should be included as a variable that is subject to real market conditions.

In conclusion we could say that despite apparent changes in the natural gas
industry in Mexico, the truth is that there are many aspects within the way
in which Pemex operates that can be changed that would allow for true
competition.  There is still a lot of work to do in these matters.  We work
closely with the Mexican regulators in relation to these matters.

Best,

Ricardo Charvel
Director of Strategy
011-525-258-9933

P.S. Maybe Secretary Richardson could retake the subject o Hedging Mexican
oil by Enron and others in order to guarantee Mexico a stream of income that
otherwise might not be there if prices fall.


Message Points

Recent legislative proposals designed to have the state play a dominant role
in developing, owning and operating power plants in California (SB6X--Burton)
and buy PG&E and Edison's electric transmission assets (SB33X--Burton) are
taking California in the wrong direction and won't solve the State's
electricity crisis.
Two new bills are equally disturbing:  AB60X (Hertzerg) would make plant
certification contigent upon the developer agreeing to sell the power to the
state at "just and reasonable, cost based rates."  SB39X (Spier) would make
power plant owners public utilities
The proposals represent a political solution, not a commercial, financial,
economic or technical solution.
As a political solution, these bills will not increase supply, decrease
demand, or get the utilities back on their financial feet.
In fact, it's worse than that.  These bills will exacerbate California's
problems:
The transaction contemplated in SB33X is extremely complex, requiring
approval by state and federal authorities, bondholders, creditors and
others.  California will be forced to spend an enormous amount of time and
resources trying to achieve the deal, with no certainty of success,
particularly in view of PG&E's public opposition.  In the meantime, summer
approaches, and the gap between supply and demand remains staggering.  This
complex, costly and litigious alternative will not lessen the serious threat
of blackouts that California faces this summer.
SB6X would have the state finance, develop, own and/or operate power plants
in the state.

? Unfortunately, the proposal being offered will not solve the problem;
rather, it,s a significant step backward that will make matters worse in
California.

? The reason?  Rather than remove California,s roadblocks to increased
generation and transmission investment, this proposal requires California to
use taxpayer dollars to get into the business of financing, owning and
operating power plants and transmission.

? The best solution ) recognized across the country and around the world ) is
for the state to allow private companies to site new generation immediately.

? Once built, California could easily enter into contracts with private power
plant developers and avoid using taxpayers, dollars.

? Given government,s other failed experiments in other large scale
participation into public power, like TVA, BPA, NYPA, it is highly unlikely
that a California state agency will succeed in doing something that private
capital is better equipped and willing to do.

? In the short, the proposal is neither in the public interest nor rational.

? Issuing debt to build power plants and take over transmission systems costs
consumers money and takes money away from investments in schools and other
important priorities.

? We would be willing to work with the Legislature to help craft a bill that
gets more supply in California quickly, efficiently, and in an
environmentally sound manner, but this draft achieves only one goal:
creating more bureaucracy.


i haven't seen you in forever! i wish i could meet you for dinner, but i have
class until 8:45 tonight and my mom is having surgery tomorrow. How does next
week sound to you?


Rosie Castillo 35414 will bring us a reaume


Group

We have 10 MW of length from Sierra through the APX light load at $185.  Stan
purchased this NP15 length from the APX and it should be scheduled DA by
Jeremy.  There should be a ECTRT load zone in PGE3 with this length.  Use
whatever opportunities are out there (dynegy across COB or a straight export)
to maximize this position.  The deal numbers are: 581335-purchase from APX
and 581356-desk to desk deal.  Please make sure this gets taken care of.

Cheers
Jesse


Bob,
I shall be out on Wednesday but my associate, Krishnarao Pinnamaneni, will meet you at the scheduled time
(3.30 p.m.).

Vince


they are getting tighter.  my new diet seems to be working.  i need to drink
more water so my skin will get smoother.


$2.84 is right, I changed it.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thompson, Virginia
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:04 AM
To:	Salisbury, Holden
Subject:	PNM Tranny price

Holden-

  Can you look at deal # 702460.1.  This is priced at $2.70 adn all other tranny for hte month is at $2.84.
  Can you confirm what the price is or if there is a special deal this day?

  Virginia

  I think the OASIS # is 17737


In the past few months, Enron has received numerous requests from other companies to share some of the processes and systems that we have developed within HR.  Also, several new businesses have been created recently by consulting companies to pursue what some financial analysts believe is a huge untapped market in aggregating HR services.  Recently, we completed an internal review to consider what role Enron could play in this arena and have decided to explore some very specific external opportunities.  Due to the time commitment required to pursue these opportunities, we are assigning dedicated resources to this effort.  Effective immediately, the HR community will have three major areas of focus that will be working together in order to optimize HR transformation and commercialization.  Taking the lead roles will be myself, Mary Joyce and David Oxley (see below and attached chart).

?	I will lead this new effort in addition to continuing to lead those areas of HR that are our prime candidates for commercial opportunities.  Reporting to me on this commercialization effort will be:  Brad Coleman with the overall lead; Andrea Yowman who will focus on software applications such as PEP, Expertfinder and Global Compensation; Sarah Davis who will focus on Worklife; Elyse Kalmans who will focus on Community Relations; Cynthia Barrow who will focus on Benefits and Wellness; and Yevgeny Frolov and Dan Brown who will focus on E-learning and Talent Management.  I will continue to report to Steve Kean.

?	David Oxley will take the overall lead for HR across all business units focusing on continuing to increase the value HR brings internally to Enron.  The networked recruiting, Organization Development and Training and Business Unit Compensation consulting functions, the Global PEP team, as well as the generalist consulting responsibilities for all Corp. groups, will report directly to David. The HR leads for EWS, EES, EBS, ETS and EGAS will report jointly to their business unit OTC's and to David from a functional HR perspective. In this regard David will now report to Steve Kean.

?	Mary Joyce will add Global Information Management, Corporate Compensation services and Reporting/ Analysis, to her current Executive Compensation responsibilities.  Kathy Schultea, Felecia Acevedo, Cindy Ward and Suzanne Brown will report into Mary's organization. Mary will continue to report to Steve Kean.

?	With Drew Lynch's promotion to COO Metals and David's increased responsibilities, Robert Jones will take the HR lead for EWS Americas. Robert will report to the EWS OTC. Jon Chapman has been appointed head of HR for EEL, based in London, and will report to the EEL OTC. Both Robert and Jon will report to David from a functional HR perspective.

Additional realignment of resources will enable our team to further improve daily employee services, partner with Business Unit initiatives and maximize opportunities for commercialization.  These modifications are as follows:

?	Scott Gilchrist will lead HR for the newly formed EGAS.  As such he will focus his attention on the asset positions in South America, Latin and Central America, the Middle East and Asia.  The European assets will continue to be a part of EEL.  Scott will also work closely with Rebecca McDonald and Sandip Mallick in relation to our assets in India.  Scott will report to the EGAS OTC, Rebecca McDonald and David as above.

?	Michelle Cash has agreed to take the lead of the Corporate OLER function for an interim period to determine how it should operate and be organized.  She will report to me for this particular function, but of course will remain primarily a part of the EWS legal function reporting to Mark Haedicke.

?	Sheila Walton will lead the HR Generalist activities for all Corp functions.  Jo Ann Hill, and all of the corporate generalist functions currently under Jo Ann, will report to Sheila Walton.  Sheila will continue to report to David.

?	Sarah Davis will add the Click at Home program to her current responsibilities, and will continue to report to me.


Enron Seminar Series in FinanceJones Graduate School of Management, Rice
UniversityLuigi ZingalesUniversity of Chicagowill give a seminar at the Jones
School on Friday, April 27,? "The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial
Development in the 20th Century."The seminar will begin at 3:30 in Room 105.A
pdf of the paper is available through the seminar website:
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgsfss/.

Fu-Kuo Albert WangAssistant ProfessorJones Graduate School of Management --
MS 531? Rice University? 6100 Main Street? Houston, TX 77005? Phone:
713-348-5404? Fax:???? 713-348-5251email: wangfa@rice.eduhttp
://www.ruf.rice.edu/~wangfa/


Kim:

Thank you for dinner on Tues.  As discussed, pls find EPE's draft lont-term
gas contract for your review.

Barry

(See attached file: EPE LT gas contract Feb 28 2001.doc)
 - EPE LT gas contract Feb 28 2001.doc


This request has been pending your approval for  114 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000041547&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000041547
Request Create Date : 6/19/01 7:50:30 AM
Requested For       : jaime.gualy@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\nahoutrd\houston\pwr\common\power2\Region - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 17;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041317.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 17 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/13/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_TOBY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


That will be fine.

D

Aimee Lannou   01/29/2001 04:17 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Equistar feb - 01

I think I found the deal.  Deal # 157572 has meter 1372 attached to it.  It
should be meter 1373.  The 10.000 is split between two meters, but all should
be at meter 1373.  Can I change it?

AL

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 01/29/2001 04:07
PM ---------------------------
Aimee Lannou   01/29/2001 03:59 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Equistar feb - 01

Daren - here are the Equistar #'s.  There should be a total of 65.000.  There
is  a new deal per Janice at Equistar at meter 1373 effective 2/01.  I have
not seen a deal for this.  Let me know if it is legitimate.  No volumes were
added, just moved from meter to meter.  (Deal # 378904)  Thanks.

AL


Ehud,

Thanks. I forwarded one resume to our structuring groups.

We shall evaluate the other one.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Ehud I. Ronn" <eronn@mail.utexas.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ehud+20I+2E+20Ronn+22+20+3Ceronn+40mail+2Eutexas+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:54 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	1.  Ph.D. Student Interest in Enron Employment; 2.  Wharton  MBA Grad Interest in Enron Employment

Vince:

In this third e-mail, I write you concerning the interest expressed by two
colleagues in being considered for employment by Enron Corp.:

1.  The first candidate is UT Finance Ph.D. student James Doran, who is
confidentially re-evaluating his interest in the Ph.D. program.  James has
done some consulting work with me in the energy area, and thus has some
background in the field.  Although his quantitative/computing skills do not
quite match those of Cantekin, I strongly believe they warrant an
invitation for interview at Enron, and recommend you consider such an
invitation affirmatively.

I enclose James' resume in Resume2001.doc.

2.  The second candidate is David B. Good, formerly of the Nucleus Corp.  A
resident of Houston, Dave has an MBA from Wharton and several years
experience in the energy sector.  You met Dave during the recent EPRM
training course in Houston.  I have had occasion to work with Dave whilst
he was director of quantitative analysis at Nucleus Corp. and have found
him an MBA with good quantiative skills and excellent intuition.  While I
cannot recommend him for your Research Group, I believe he is well suited
for a structuring/marketing position within Enron.

Dave's resume is also enclosed herewith in DBG resume.doc.

Should you and/or your colleagues have any questions regarding James or
Dave, please feel free to contact me.

Best,
Ehud

 - Resume2001.doc << File: Resume2001.doc >>
 - DBG resume.doc << File: DBG resume.doc >>

==============================================
     Ehud I. Ronn
     Jack S. Josey Professor in Energy Studies
     Department of Finance
     McCombs School of Business
     University of Texas at Austin
     Austin, TX. 78712-1179
     Voice:  (512) 471-5853
      FAX:   (512) 471-5073
      Internet:  eronn@mail.utexas.edu
=================================================


let's discuss what info might be helpful.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 02:19 PM
---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich
10/20/2000 04:11 PM
To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Activities in Florida

Hey guys, I spoke with Carol and told her we would have an overview for ENA
by next Friday. Could each of you e-mail me a brief summary of your business
in Florida- just give me a general idea of our level of involvement in your
market, general themes we might want to get across, hurdles, etc. Ben/Jim,
this may be a very good opportunity to have Kevin lay out our views/plans for
deregulation and power development, and what we would like to see the
Governor push in the state. Since Enron is in Texas (and the obvious
connection with the Bush brothers), if it's appropriate to use Texas
deregulation as an example/comparable with Florida, it might be interesting.
If I could get your responses by next Wednesday am, they would be great.
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------

Carol Ann Brown@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
10/20/2000 03:35 PM
To: James I Ducote/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Activities in Florida

Janet and Jim,

Kevin Hannon is attending a dinner and a breakfast meeting (November 8th and
9th) with Governor Jeb Bush in Florida.  At this meeting the Governor has
requested that the attendees give a three to five minute overview of their
company and its interests in Florida.  Kevin asked me to contact you two to
see if you if could please give him a brief update via email on ENA's
activities in Florida.

Thank you,

Carol Brown
Office of the Chairman
Enron Broadband Services, Inc.
713.853.7974
713.853.9469 - fax
carol_brown@enron.net


I understand that you guys have retained Holland and Hart to give us another
set of eyes on the Navajo issues.  For future reference, I have finally
hooked up with the South Dakota firm I mentioned and was favorably impressed
with their experience in similar matters.  Don Schultz and a couple of his
partners have substantial litigation experience both for and against the S.D.
tribes (Ogalla Sioux, etc.) on federal jurisdictional issues.  One of Don's
partners is general counsel of the Rushmore Electric Cooperative in Western
South Dakota and has had dealings with the tribes on right of way issues for
years.   They have cleared conflicts, and are available  if we ever need a
third opinion or if we get into a spat with the tribes elsewhere.  Sorry it
took me so long to run this to ground.  Thanks. DF


OK- Thank you for the info.  We will advise on bunkering in conjunction with
the decision on whether or not to heel out.
Dan Masters

"LNG/C Hoegh Galleon - Master" <master.amar@hoegh.no> on 03/19/2001 02:34:09
PM
To: "Dan Masters, Enron Houston" <Dan.Masters@enron.com>
cc: "Tony Galt, Enron Houston" <Tony.Galt@enron.com>, "Jim Fernie, Enron
Houston" <Jim.Fernie@enron.com>, "Paul.Y'Barbo, Enron Houston"
<Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com>, "Wayne Perry, Enron Houston"
<Wayne.Perry@enron.com>, "Leif Hoegh & Co. ASA - Nord, Roald" <rln@hoegh.no>
Subject: LNG/C"HOEGH GALLEON"   - Bunkering

Dear Dan.

Due to the time schedule and uncertainty regarding the eta Fujairah,
we desided to not nominating bunkers for topping up this time.
The vessel's rob on arrival Qalhat will be abt F.O. 3800mt and G.O.
155 mt.

Best regards

Capt Kjell Kvammen  LNG/C "HOEGH GALLEON"

Brgds Oe. Hansen
Master

E-mail: master.gall@hoegh.no
Teleph: Inmarsat tel.no. 330853910
Fax   : Inmarsat fax no. 330853913
Telex : Inmarsat B telex no.330853915
Telex : Inmarsat C telex no.430853910 (24hrs.watch)


Do you know if this has been done yet? I want to compare the two.................

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Vela, Valerie
Subject:	Greeley Gas actuals

Valerie,
I just wanted to let you know Logistics is working on actualizing a few days in September to correct the volumes allocated to each specific Greeley deal.  Jackie Adams is trying to get this done today.  The numbers in my spreadsheet by deal (bucket) are correct and we are waiting for the corrections in the system.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Theresa


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Bachand, Terri
Sent:	Friday, February 22, 2002 4:47 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod; Thames, Davis; Young, Steve; Harris, Steven; Kilmer III, Robert; Donoho, Lindy
Cc:	Howard, Kevin A.
Subject:	TW PIPELINE - RATING AGENCY PRESENTATION
Importance:	High

Please review the attached rating agency presentation and return any additions or comments you may have to Kevin Howard by Monday, February 25th.

Terri Bachand  CPS/CMP

Enron Global Services
(713)853-6528


Should we reject this from this onset or do you think it is OK?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/25/2001 01:51 PM -----

	Mark S Palmer/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/25/2001 01:40 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Stephanie Segura/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: FW: Loudcloud Mutual NDA

Hi Tana--

This is an NDA Loudcloud sent to us. They are a potential vendor.
Can we sign this or do we need to send them one of ours?

Thanks,
Mark Palmer

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kathy Weber <kathy@loudcloud.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Kathy+20Weber+20+3Ckathy+40loudcloud+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON
.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:40 PM
To: mark_s_palmer@enron.net
Cc: Dana Bouterie
Subject: Loudcloud Mutual NDA

Mark,

Greetings.  I work with Dana Bouterie here at Loudcloud.  She suggested
I provide you with our mutual NDA.  As our discussions progress we want
to make sure we protect both parties.  The NDA is attached below and can
be faxed back to me at 866-488-4646.  If you have any questions, please
do not hesitate to give me a call.

Best regards,
Kathy

--
Kathy Weber
Loudcloud
Sales Representative
Phone: 408-744-7807
Fax: 408-744-7382
mailto:kathy@loudcloud.com
http://www.loudcloud.com

 - Loudcloud Mutual NDA.pdf


********************************************************************
Dear Susan Scott,

Holiday time is approaching, so our Net SAAver Fares are taking a
brief vacation after this week. The next Net SAAver Fares mailing
will be during the week of January 9, 2001. In the meantime, be
sure to check AA.com for web specials. Have a safe and happy holiday.

Today's American Airlines Domestic & International Net SAAver
Fares e-mail offer is valid only for travel next weekend.
Domestic Departure dates: December 15 - 16, 2000
International Departure dates: December 14 - December 15, 2000
Tickets must be purchased by Friday, December 8, 2000.

You can find different Domestic Net SAAver destinations
for this weekend, departing December 8 - 9, 2000, and
International Net SAAver destinations for this weekend,
departing December 7 - December 8, 2000, only on AA.com by clicking:
?????????????????http://www.aa.com
then linking to Current Web Fare Specials and Net SAAver Fares.

********************************************************************
??????????????????
?????????????????????????
???????Win the getaway of your dreams with the TD Waterhouse

?Million Mile Giveaway! ?TD Waterhouse is giving away a Million
???????AOL AAdvantage Miles and a South Pacific Cruise.
??????????????Enter for your chance to win now!
?????www.fireprize.com/sweep/tdwaterhouse

********************************************************************

In this Issue:

1. American Airlines Domestic Net SAAver Fares
2. American Airlines International Net SAAver Fares
3. AAdvantage Net SAAver Awards
4. Hotels & Resorts
5. Vacation Packages
6. Rules and Restrictions
7. Subscribe/Unsubscribe Information

***********************************
***********************************

1. American Airlines Domestic Net SAAver Fares

Coach Class Travel
R/T
Fare ?Coach Class From: ????????????????To:
---- ?---------------- ?????????????????----------------
$ 89 ?Abilene, TX (ABI) ????????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) #
$159 ?Albany, NY (ALB) ?????????????????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD)
$109 ?Amarillo, TX (AMA) ???????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ?$209 ?Austin, TX (AUS) ?????????????????San Jose, CA (SJC)??$109 ?Baton Rouge, LA (BTR) ????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX(DFW) #?$319 ?Boston, MA (BOS) ?????????????????San Jose, CA (SJC)?$159 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Albany, NY (ALB)?$159 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)??$ 89 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Grand Rapids, MI (GRR) #?$159 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Harrisburg, PA (MDT)?$159 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Hartford, CT (BDL)?$119 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????NW Arkansas Regional, AR(XNA) #?$159 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Philadelphia, PA (PHL)??$159 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Syracuse, NY (SYR)?$133 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Toronto, Canada (YYZ)?$159 ?Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) ?????????Tulsa, OK (TUL)?$159 ?Colorado Springs, CO (COS) ???????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)??$169 ?Columbus, OH (CMH) ???????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)?$109 ?Corpus Christi, TX (CRP) ?????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) #?$ 89 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Abilene, TX (ABI) #??$109 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Amarillo, TX (AMA)
$109 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Baton Rouge, LA (BTR) #
$159 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Birmingham, AL (BHM)
$159 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD)

$169 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Columbus, OH (CMH)
$109 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Corpus Christi, TX (CRP) #
$209 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Hartford, CT (BDL)
$159 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Indianapolis, IN (IND)

$109 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Midland, TX (MAF) #
$189 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????New York LaGuardia, NY (LGA)
$189 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Palm Springs, CA (PSP)
$189 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Pittsburgh, PA (PIT)

$119 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????St. Louis, MO (STL)
$204 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Toronto, Canada (YYZ)
$ 89 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Tulsa, OK (TUL) ?$189 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Washington Reagan Nat'l, DC(DCA)??$109 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Wichita, KS (ICT)?$159 ?El Paso, TX (ELP) ????????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)?$ 89 ?Grand Rapids, MI (GRR) ???????????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD) #?$159 ?Harrisburg, PA (MDT) ?????????????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD)?$159 ?Hartford, CT (BDL) ???????????????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD)??$209 ?Hartford, CT (BDL) ???????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)?$159 ?Indianapolis, IN (IND) ???????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)?$ 89 ?Miami, FL (MIA) ??????????????????Key West, FL (EYW) #?$109 ?Midland, TX (MAF) ????????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) #??$319 ?New York Kennedy, NY (JFK) ???????Los Angeles, CA (LAX)?$109 ?Orange County, CA (SNA) ??????????San Jose, CA (SJC)?$189 ?Palm Springs, CA (PSP) ???????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)?$159 ?Philadelphia, PA (PHL) ???????????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD)??$189 ?Pittsburgh, PA (PIT) ?????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)?$119 ?Portland, OR (PDX) ???????????????San Jose, CA (SJC)?$319 ?San Jose, CA (SJC) ???????????????Boston, MA (BOS)?$109 ?San Jose, CA (SJC) ???????????????Orange County, CA (SNA)??$119 ?San Jose, CA (SJC) ???????????????Portland, OR (PDX)?$119 ?St. Louis, MO (STL) ??????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)?$159 ?Syracuse, NY (SYR) ???????????????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD)?$159 ?Tulsa, OK (TUL) ??????????????????Chicago O'Hare, IL (ORD)??$ 89 ?Tulsa, OK (TUL) ??????????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)
$159 ?Vail/Eagle, CO (EGE) ?????????????San Francisco, CA (SFO)
$189 ?Washington Reagan Nat'l, DC (DCA) Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)
$109 ?Wichita, KS (ICT) ????????????????Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW)

# American Eagle service
 A portion of travel may be on American Eagle service??-----------------------------------??Travel Dates and Times for Net SAAver Fares:??- Depart Friday, December 15, 2000 on or after 7:00 p.m. or ???anytime on Saturday, December 16, 2000?- Return anytime the following Monday, December 18, 2000 or???Tuesday, December 19, 2000?- Friday evening travel may not be available in all markets?- Tickets must be purchased no later than this Friday, ???December 8, 2000, 12:00 midnight (CST)??-----------------------------------??How to Book Net SAAver Fares?Net SAAver Fares are now exclusively available on the Web at AA.com.??To book, login to AA.com with your AAdvantage number and PIN by clicking:??????www.aa.com?then click on Current Web Fare Specials and Net SAAver Fares.??***********************************?***********************************??2. American Airlines International Net SAAver Fares??Coach Class Travel?R/T?Fare ?Coach Class From: ????????????????To:?---- ?---------------- ?????????????????----------------?$359 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Cabo San Lucas, Mexico (SJD)?$179 ?Dallas/Fort Worth, TX (DFW) ??????Monterrey, Mexico (MTY)?$ 79 ?Fort Lauderdale, FL (FLL) ????????Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) ?$ 79 ?Miami, FL (MIA) ??????????????????Freeport, Bahamas (FPO) #??$ 79 ?Miami, FL (MIA) ??????????????????George Town, Bahamas (GGT) #?$ 79 ?Miami, FL (MIA) ??????????????????Governors Harbour, Bahamas (GHB) #?$ 79 ?Miami, FL (MIA) ??????????????????Marsh Harbour, Bahamas (MHH) #?$259 ?Miami, FL (MIA) ??????????????????St. Maarten, Netherlands AN (SXM)??$179 ?Miami, FL (MIA) ??????????????????St. Thomas, USVI (STT)?$ 79 ?Orlando, FL (MCO) ????????????????Nassau, Bahamas (NAS) #?$ 79 ?San Juan, PR (SJU) ???????????????St. Croix, USVI (STX) #?$ 79 ?San Juan, PR (SJU) ???????????????St. Lucia Charles Airport, St. Lucia ?(SLU) #??$199 ?San Juan, PR (SJU) ???????????????St. Maarten, Netherlands AN (SXM)
$199 ?San Juan, PR (SJU) ???????????????St. Thomas, USVI (STT) ??# American Eagle service? A portion of travel may be on American Eagle service

-----------------------------------

Travel Dates and Times for Net SAAver Fares:

- Depart Thursday, December 14, 2000 or Friday, December 15, 2000
- Return anytime the following Monday, December 18, 2000 or
??Tuesday, December 19, 2000
- Tickets must be purchased no later than this Friday,
??December 8, 2000, 12:00 midnight (CST)

-----------------------------------

How to Book Net SAAver Fares
Net SAAver Fares are now exclusively available on the Web at AA.com.

To book, login to AA.com with your AAdvantage number and PIN by clicking:
?????www.aa.com
then click on Current Web Fare Specials and Net SAAver Fares.

***********************************
***********************************

3. AAdvantage Net SAAver Awards

????????????Travel On 4,000 AAdvantage Miles!

Award travel is closer than you think! Because now you can claim
AAdvantage Net SAAver Awards for as low as 4,000 AAdvantage miles.
With this award reduction, getting away with Net SAAver Awards
has never been easier!

See how far your miles can take you. Call AAdvantage today.
??$ 89 destinations are just $49 plus ?4,000 miles
??$109 destinations are just $49 plus ?7,000 miles
??$119 destinations are just $49 plus ?7,000 miles
??$159 destinations are just $49 plus 13,000 miles
??$169 destinations are just $49 plus 13,000 miles
??$189 destinations are just $49 plus 16,000 miles
??$209 destinations are just $49 plus 17,000 miles
??$319 award not available

- ?Our AAdvantage Net SAAver Awards are a great way
???to use your AAdvantage miles to obtain a travel award
???for less mileage. To determine the mileage required, compare
???the fares in this week's Domestic Net SAAver list with the
???chart above.

- ?AAdvantage Net SAAver Awards are valid for travel departing
???December 15 - December 16, 2000 for the markets listed above.

- ?AAdvantage Net SAAver Awards are not applicable to
???First/Business Class, International or Transborder fares.

- ?To book your AAdvantage Net SAAver Award trip
???call AAdvantage toll-free, 800-882-8880.

***********************************
***********************************

4. Hotels

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts

??????????Wyndhams's Weekend Deals -

What are you doing this weekend? Get away with Wyndham's 50/50
Weekend Escape(R). Bring the kids and get 50 percent off a second
room. Or simply save 50 percent off a second night. Either way
it's a great deal. Wyndham's Weekend Romance Getaway. Get away
from it all and spend the weekend alone with your sweetheart.
Wyndham's romantic getaways let you take a break from your everyday
routine and focus on each other again. Click on the link below
or call 800-WYNDHAM (800-996-3426) to book your reservation.

?????www.wyndham.com

***********************************

Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts and Four Points Hotels by
Sheraton

From coast to coast, the perfect weekend away is now even less.
With Preferred Weekends, you're only a couple of clicks away from
incredible savings across the country at Westin Hotels & Resorts(R),
Sheraton Hotels & Resorts(R) and Four Points(R) Hotels by Sheraton.
You'll also receive 4pm late checkout, so you can make the most
of your weekend getaway. And as always, you will earn 500 AAdvantage
miles for all eligible stays. ?For information on participating
hotels, dates and rates please click below or call 1-877-822-2222.

?????http://promo.starwood.com/aapw

***********************************
***********************************

5. Vacation Packages

????????????American Airlines Vacation Packages

Book your American Airlines Vacation package online.
Go to the AA Vacations web site by clicking here:
?????www.aavacations.com
and earn up to 3,000 AAdvantage bonus miles!
You may also call toll-free 800-321-2121 to learn more.

-------------------------------------
?
????????????Marriott Vacation Club

WIN $20,000! ENTER the NEW Vacation for a Lifetime Sweepstakes

One lucky Grand Prize winner will receive a $20,000 cash
prize which may be used towards the purchase of a one week
Vacation Ownership interest from Marriott(tm) Vacation Club Int.
Also 100 winners will receive 10,000 AAdvantage Miles!
??????????Click below to ENTER NOW!

?????www.sweepstakes.vacationclub.com/aadvantage

***********************************
***********************************

6. Additional Rules and Restrictions

AA Net SAAver Fares Restrictions:
Fares shown do not include (i) up to a $3 USD federal excise
tax, which will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary, (ii) local airport charges of up to $12, if applicable,
and, (iii) Canadian taxes of up to $22, if applicable. International
fares are subject to government approval. Government taxes and fees
of up to $88 USD, varying by destination, are not included and may
vary slightly depending on currency exchange rates at the time of
purchase. Tickets are nonrefundable and must be purchased at the
time the reservation is made. ?Prior to departure, changes to your
ticket may be made if you pay up to a $75 USD change fee and meet
the restrictions applicable to the new fare. ?Seats are limited.
Fares may not be available on all flights and are subject to change
without notice. All or a portion of your travel may be on American
Eagle, American's regional airline associate. Other restrictions
apply, click on one of the links below, or login to:
http://www.aa.com for more information.

?????www.aa.com/domnsrules
?????www.aa.com/intlnsrules

Net SAAver Fares is a trademark and American Airlines and
American Eagle are registered trademarks of American Airlines, Inc.

***********************************
***********************************

This email has been sent to SSCOTT5@ENRON.COM

If you choose not to receive Net SAAver Fares messages, or if you would like
to change your e-mail address, please visit:
http://www.aa.com/American?BV_Operation=Dyn_AAUnsubReceive&form%25list=2&form%
25aadv_num=

or e-mail us with a subject of "unsubscribe" and we'll remove you from all
American Airlines e-mail lists, including Net SAAver, AAdvantage Summary via
e-mail and ALL other American Airlines e-mail programs. There may be a short
delay if you choose to resubscribe. Please include this ENTIRE message in
your reply.

001205prvdom&int

Message-Id: <20001204230348.DA7B.1130683-5610@info.aa.com>
 [IMAGE]


John:

I just received the Instinet amendment to place additional access at Enron
House.  The "Equipment" is described as follows:

2 Additional Instinet Access ID
   (GYO5, GYO6-OMS) - London, England

Please verify that this is what you need.  I can have this signed immediately.

Sara


It's been changed to Prebon.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

yes i think deal 549010 should be Prebon instead of Amerex.

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                03/13/2001 04:39 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 3/13 Checkout

Prebon
Sean Crandall
549048 - changed to NP

Diana Scholtes
Prebon broker said our price (215) and del. point (Cob) are right

Jeff Richter
549013 - changed to APB

549010 - enron buys BP/Apr01/NP/peak/207.00 (in with Amerex - should it be
Prebon?)

Chris Mallory - just entered Williams deal

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/13/2001 02:27 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/13 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals checked out fine

PREBON

Sean Crandall
deal 549048
Prebon shows del. point as NP-15

Diana Scholtes
deal 549053
Prebon shows price as $141 and delivery pt as Mid-C

Jeff Richter
deal 549013
Prebon does not recognize

I am missing the following:
1) Enron buys from BP Energy 25 mw of April'01 NP-15 peak hrs at $207
2) Enron buys Williams 25 mw of SP-15 of April'01 off-peak hrs at $107

BLOOMBERG
All deals checked out fine.


TD{FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; BACKGROUND-COLOR: white}
[IMAGE]

Now that you have access to the following applications without requiring VPN access...  Outlook Web Access (email and calendar) PEP XMS (Expense Reporting application)  And, COMING SOON... eHROnline (year-end) Benefits Election (Oct. 29, 2001) Electronic Pay Stubs (year-end), and Much More,  through the ClickAtHome Portal and the Internet, do you still believe you need remote access through VPN from home to Enron networks (must have a valid business reason with supervisor approval and a monthly cost)?   YES NO NOT SURE Please answer this survey from your computer at work, not via Outlook Web Access.


Rick asked that I prepare an agenda for our 8:00 a.m. calls.  Here is a
general agenda that will be supplemented as necessary:

1. Review of past day's events.
2. Plan for the day.
3. Identification of needed resources.
4. Conclusion/Action plan.

Given that these are daily calls, please contact me by telephone at the end
of day with specifc items to supplement the general agenda.


I have to agree.  It sounds like a fundamental lack of consideration situation.  If we are the buyer and actually believe there is value here, we should be willing to pay SOME kind of premium, even if it is fairly small.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rossi, Robbi
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 3:59 PM
To:	Taylor, Mark
Subject:	Put option

  Mark,

  I have a trader who is trying to do a stand alone Put option where we are the option buyer.  There is no premium or other consideration.  I have a real problem with the enforceability of this deal.  Any thoughts?


HTTP/1.1 200
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP2
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:41:08 GMT
Content-type: text/x-oasis-csv
Connection: close

REQUEST_STATUS=200
ERROR_MESSAGE=
TIME_STAMP=20010412044108PD
VERSION=1.4
TEMPLATE=transstatus
OUTPUT_FORMAT=DATA
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_CODE=SPP
PRIMARY_PROVIDER_DUNS=959415852
RETURN_TZ=PD
DATA_ROWS=1
COLUMN_HEADERS=CONTINUATION_FLAG,ASSIGNMENT_REF,SELLER_CODE,SELLER_DUNS,CUSTOM
ER_CODE,CUSTOMER_DUNS,AFFILIATE_FLAG,PATH_NAME,POINT_OF_RECEIPT,POINT_OF_DELIV
ERY,SOURCE,SINK,CAPACITY_REQUESTED,CAPACITY_GRANTED,SERVICE_INCREMENT,TS_CLASS
,TS_TYPE,TS_PERIOD,TS_WINDOW,TS_SUBCLASS,NERC_CURTAILMENT_PRIORITY,OTHER_CURTA
ILMENT_PRIORITY,START_TIME,STOP_TIME,CEILING_PRICE,OFFER_PRICE,BID_PRICE,PRICE
_UNITS,PRECONFIRMED,ANC_SVC_LINK,ANC_SVC_REQ,POSTING_REF,SALE_REF,REQUEST_REF,
DEAL_REF,IMPACTED,COMPETING_REQUEST_FLAG,REQ
UEST_TYPE,RELATED_REF,NEGOTIATED_PRICE_FLAG,STATUS,STATUS_NOTIFICATION,STATUS_
COMMENTS,TIME_QUEUED,RESPONSE_TIME_LIMIT,TIME_OF_LAST_UPDATE,PRIMARY_PROVIDER_
COMMENTS,SELLER_REF,SELLER_COMMENTS,CUSTOMER_COMMENTS,SELLER_NAME,SELLER_PHONE
,SELLER_FAX,SELLER_EMAIL,CUSTOMER_NAME,CUSTOMER_PHONE,CUSTOMER_FAX,CUSTOMER_EM
AIL,REASSIGNED_REF,REASSIGNED_CAPACITY,REASSIGNED_START_TIME,REASSIGNED_STOP_T
IME
N,SPP
01007388,SPP,959415852,EPMI,848921276,N,CONTROL/HILLTOP,SVR55,HIL345,"CISO","P
ACE",12,12,HOURLY,NON-FIRM,POINT_TO_POINT,OFF_PEAK,FIXED,W/O ANCILLARY
SRVCS,1,,20010412050000PD,20010412060000PD,3.9000,3.9000,3.9000,MW-HR,Y,SC:(SP
P:RQ);,SC:M;,,,,,0,N,ORIGINAL,,,QUEUED,MAILTO:mark.guzman@enron.com;,,20010412
024019PD,20010412031000PD,20010412024019PD,,,,,Carolyn
Bonari,(775)834-4180,(775)834-4296,sppc.oasis@sppc.com,Don
Norman,,(503)464-3740,lester.rawson@enron.com,,,,


Marla Thompson
Enron Forest Products
Clickpaper Marketing
713-345-4102
marla.thompson@enron.com


Spoke with John Sherriff this am re prc for London RAC people. John said they
included our people for cross calibration purposes but we could rank our
people where we saw fit. So I don't think there is any issue here. The
Houston PRC rankings should stand unless there was new information brought to
light to you Steve that calls into question a person's ranking.

Sheila- please double check with the London HR people that this is
straightened out.

Thanks, Rick


Sounds good to me!

	Lisa Lees
	10/09/2000 05:39 PM

		 To: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: US Heating Oil and Unleaded Gas Fin Spreads - Approval

It appears that all we need to do for these new product types is copy
customer profiles from US HeatingOil2Fin Swap and US UNL Gas Fin Swap.
Unless I hear back from any of you before 10:00 a.m. Tuesday, 10/10, we'll
just copy the profiles.  Sorry for the short notice.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/09/2000 05:28 PM
---------------------------

From:  Melba Lozano
  10/04/2000 05:26 PM

To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sony
Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bjorn Hagelmann/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: US Heating Oil and Unleaded Gas Fin Spreads - Approval

Your review and approval of the following product type in the EOL Datamanager
is needed (for directions on approval , please see steps for approval at the
bottom of this e-mail).

These will be for existing spread products that are under the existing
product type : US HeatingOil2 Fin Swap and US UNL Gas Fin Swap they need to
be split up for sigma factor purposes.

Product Type #1   US HeatingOil2 FIN Spread
A US Heating Oil Swap financial Transaction with Enron North America Corp.,
under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price
submitted by Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case in
respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume for the
relevant Determination Period (calculated using the volume submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline).  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
average of the Index for each Pricing Date in the relevant Determination
Period.

Product Type #2   US UNL Gas Fin Spread
A US Unleaded Gasoline financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America
Corp., under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the
price submitted by Counterparty on the website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume for the
relevant Determination Period (calculated using the volume submitted by
Counterparty via EnronOnline).  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
average of the Index for each Pricing Date in the relevant Determination
Period.

==============================================================================
=====

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"

Thanks - Rob Cass  -  Melba Lozano
x35491   x58986


We are canceling the CAO staff meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 5 and Tuesday, June 19 both of these meeting were scheduled from 8:30 - 9:30.

The next CAO Staff meeting will be held on July 3.


i don't know yet about the $ but i will probably go with the advanced.  it
will probably be $200-300.

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 12/21/2000 08:00:00 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

How much extra do you have to pay?
Which laptop would you get?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 10:54 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject:

here is the new comp program for enron - i think i will pay extra for the
advanced laptop.  what do you think of the options?     - eric
(Embedded image moved to file: pic04734.pcx)


call Cathy Dodgen - 36077


Onetravel.com has prepared a special web address for you that includes all of
this week's airline deals departing from your requested cities.

http://www.onetravel.com/alert/AirAlert.cfm?EID=559944

If you find an airfare in your Savings ALERT that interests you, click onto
the Fare Price Link. There you will find specific instructions on how to
make reservations for that particular flight. Availability on these
incredible fares is very limited so you must act fast!!!

Savings ALERT! for 11/29/00

THIS WEEK:

* WINTER SAVINGS: Roundtrip domestic fares from $68!
* HOT FARE OF THE WEEK: Raleigh-Durham to San Jose from $274!
* EVEN HOTTER FARE OF THE WEEK: Midwest to Orlando from $175.
* LIMA FOR BEANS: No joke!  Visit Peru from $378 roundtrip.
* DELTA DEALS: Brussels from $286, Venice from $313, Paris from $294.
* TRIPPLER'S REPORTS: Time flies but your baggage doesn't?
* MR. MAXIMILER: Seven simple tips for maximizing mileage.
______________________________________________________________________

WINTER SAVINGS: Save on winter travel at Onetravel.com, with America West
fares from $68 to $298 roundtrip!  Purchase tickets by December 5, 2000 for
travel between December 11, 2000 and March 1, 2001.  Fares require a 14-day
advance purchase and a Saturday night stay.  Lowest fares available for
travel Tuesdays, Wednesday and Saturdays.

Sample fares include:
? Boston - Columbus          $158
? Hartford - San Francisco   $198
? Las Vegas - Boston         $258
? Miami - Phoenix            $198
? Phoenix - San Diego         $68
? Orange/Santa Ana - JFK     $298
? Seattle - Puerto Vallarta  $218
? Newark - Oakland           $298

Click to http://air.onetravel.com to search routes between Atlanta, Boston,
Columbus, Dallas, Denver, Hartford/Springfield, Houston, Las Vegas, Los
Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis, New York-JFK, Newark, Oakland, Ontario,
Orange/Santa Ana, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Puerto Vallarta, Sacramento, San
Diego, San Jose, Seattle and Washington, D.C.  Blackout dates: December 22,
23, 29 and 30, 2000 and January 2, 2001.

(Routes to Reno, Grand Junction, Aspen, Durango, Montrose and Telluride also
on sale at slightly higher fares.)
--------

HOT FARE OF THE WEEK: California dreaming?  Wake up to a great price at
Onetravel.com!  Fly from Raleigh-Durham to San Jose from just $273.60
roundtrip, now through March 4, 2001.  Click to http://air.onetravel.com to
search fares and make reservations.  Simply plug in your dates of travel, and
Farebeater will display the lowest available fare.  And don't forget to click
the "Farebeater Ultra" icon at the top of the fare screen for the best routes
and the most savings!

--------
EVEN HOTTER FARE OF THE WEEK: Midwest to Orlando from $175 roundtrip!
Florida beckons with low winter fares through March 2001! Fly from St. Louis
from $223, from Indianapolis from $175 or from Kansas City from $249.  Book
early for best availability.  Lowest fares available for Tuesday, Wednesday
and Saturday travel. Click to http://air.onetravel.com to search fares and
make reservations.
--------

LIMA FOR BEANS: Snag an affordable roundtrip flight to Lima, Iquitos or Cuzco
from Onetravel.com and Grupo Taca, one of Latin America's leading airlines.
Grupo Taca offers non-stop service to Central America from many U.S. gateways
as well as new daily service to Peru from Miami, effective December 15,
2000.  To celebrate the airline's new routes, OneTravel.com is lowering
prices to offer substantial discounts from Miami to Peru's most popular
destinations.  (As Peru's largest city, Lima is the country's cultural and
business center. Iquitos is the gateway to the Peruvian Amazonian Rainforest,
and Cuzco is the gateway to the Machu Pichu Inca ruins.)

Sample roundtrip fares include:
? Miami to Lima (low season): $378
? Miami to Lima (high season): $428
? Miami to Cuzco (low season): $498
? Miami to Cuzco (high season): $578
? Miami to Iquitos (low season): $498
? Miami to Iquitos (high season): $578

Book by February 15, 2001 for travel between December 24, 2000 and March 31,
2001.  Low season runs December 24, 2000 through March 29, 2001.  Available
high season travel dates run March 30 to March 31, 2001 only.  Best rates are
available for midweek travel, Monday through Thursday.  Blackouts for
southbound travel:
12/12/00-12/23/00.  Blackouts for northbound travel: 01/02/01-01/10/01,
04/08/01-04/22/01 and 07/15/01-07/31/01. Fares do not include international
fees and fuel surcharges of up to $72.00 per person.

Click to http://air.onetravel.com to search fares within the above parameters
and to make reservations.

--------
DELTA DEALS: Give yourself a winter gift! Book an affordable ticket to
Venice, Paris or Brussels -- Europe's favorite Christmas cities!  Pre-tax
fares start at $286 (and go up to $494) for travel beginning now through
December 14, 2000 or from December 25, 2000 until March 23, 2001. Travel must
be completed by March 29, 2001.  These Internet-only fares must be booked
through Delta.com.

Available departure cities include Atlanta, Boston, Cincinnati, Dallas/Fort
Worth, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, Los Angeles, Miami, New York-JFK,
Orlando, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Seattle, St. Louis, Tampa
and Washington, D.C.

Tickets must be purchased by December 3, 2000.  Seats are limited and fares
may not be available on all flights or in all markets. Blackout dates apply;
please click to
http://www.delta.com/travel/sp_offers/bru_cdg_vce_1103/index.jsp for full
details and restrictions.
--------

TRIPPLER'S REPORTS: Baggage must be checked at the airport prior to flight
departure -- but how early?  Some airlines dictate specific time ranges
during which baggage must be checked in order for it to be loaded on the same
flight as the passenger.  Others do not.  OneTravel.com Airline Expert Terry
Trippler reviews the rules and restrictions in his latest edition of "Airline
News."  Click to
http://www.onetravel.com/advisor/AR_AirlineNews_Article.cfm?ArticleID=187 for
the full story.

--------
MR. MAXIMILER: Our newest column from OneTravel.com's own Frugalist, Bob
Jones, features up-to-the-minute tips and deals that maximize your air miles
and save you travel cash.  Read on for this week's "Mr. Maximiler" tip!

How to get the most miles out of your flying:

1) Identify your likes and dislikes and pick a carrier/alliance to meet those
needs.  Once you have a carrier, they will do their best to keep you through
various promotions and coupons.  Stick with that carrier/alliance even though
you might find that another airline beats them by $10.  This can become a
"penny wise, pound foolish" situation if you are trying to achieve elite
status, which brings with it additional "free" miles.

2) Join any discount programs for which you qualify or programs like NWA.com
Club for further discounts.

3) Consider alternative airports served by your alliance whenever you can.
This can save you hundreds of dollars for a drive of just an hour or so.

4) Since you are working with an alliance, check the other airline partners.
That is, if you see Continental flights on Onetravel.com, they may actually
be flights operated by Northwest.  You buy a ticket on Continental from
Onetravel.com and end up flying on your primary carrier, Northwest.  This
practice is called code sharing.

5) Consider open jaw and circle routes instead of two one-way or two
roundtrip tickets.  Use rail travel on the open portions of these types of
tickets if you can, and remember that you can earn miles on a few rail routes
depending on your carrier.

6) If you do fly four to six roundtrips per year on your carrier/alliance, it
is quite possible to achieve elite status which brings with it additional
miles and that wonder of wonders, the first class upgrade.

7) But most of all, in order to get the most benefit from leisure travel and
the best price as well, be flexible when you travel.

Next week, tips for picking your hotel and rental car partners wisely.

Happy Contrails,
Bob "Mr. Maximiler" Jones
--------

QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?: We'd love to hear from you!  Drop us a line at
editor@onetravel.com.  Send us your air travel questions for professional
advice from our panel of experts, or stop by http://www.onetravel.com for
loads of helpful information in our Advisor section.

REMEMBER...If the Savings ALERT airfares don't meet your specific travel
needs, Onetravel.com's everyday discounts can save you up to 70% off regular
airfares...
For airline bookings - US and Worldwide - go directly to:
http://air.onetravel.com
For hotel bookings - US and Worldwide - go directly to:
http://hotel.onetravel.com
For car rentals - US and Worldwide - go directly to:
http://car.onetravel.com
Until next time....Happy Travels from Onetravel.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to MODIFY or ADD DEPARTURE CITIES to your Onetravel.com Air
Savings ALERT! or UNSUBSCRIBE from our mailing list, go to
http://www.onetravel.com/deals/SA_npu_modify1.cfm and enter the email address
(sscott5@enron.com) to which this message was sent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
EID=559944****4


what are you doing at work so early?  i am already pumped to go out this
weekend.  fri was bad for susan and eric.  they were the only one doing
shots.  everyone else was fairly sober and just hanging out.  it was pretty
discusting.  let's hit the town this weekend.  maybe even thurs.  how was
dc?  i heard that place is a blast.


Attached is a copy of my resume and thank you for all of your help in
advance.


This request has been pending your approval for  135 days.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000041547&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000041547
Request Create Date : 6/19/01 7:50:30 AM
Requested For       : jaime.gualy@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\nahoutrd\houston\pwr\common\Electric - [Read]
Resource Type       : Directory


Mike,

Give me a call. 403-974-6910

Chris


i cant believe he said that - my IM is sandra brawner  creative right!!


John, great job!

Please, work with Jeff to move the longer term deal along.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/26/2000
08:43 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kevin M Presto                           05/26/2000 10:11 AM

To: Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul J
Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Llodra/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Berney C
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl Livermore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvan Chaxel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Gaffney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim
S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Racicot/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ozzie
Pagan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristin
Albrecht/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jenny Latham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey W White/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vladimir Gorny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald
Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg
Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, John Zufferli/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: NSTAR 6-month Transaction

I would like to personally thank and congratulate everyone involved in
helping ENA bring closure to the NSTAR wholesale power transaction.  Any
transaction of this nature requires support from many people and I appreciate
everyone's hard work in making this transaction a reality.  In addition, I
believe ENA is well positioned for a longer term transaction with NSTAR.   I
would encourage John Llodra and Jeff Ader to work closely together to create
the best value proposition for Enron on the long term deal.
Strict Confidentiality language is embedded in the 6-month NSTAR transaction,
and it is extremely important that everyone involved honors the zero
tolerance nature of this Confidentiality provision.  The bottom line is that
we cannot disclose anything about this deal to any third partiies, including
the mere existence of the deal.   If we do not respect this provision fully,
we will jeapordize our goodwill with the customer and thus our ability to
move forward with a longer term transaction.  In addtion, there could be
negative legal ramnifications.

Thanks again for a job well done.  If I missed anyone who was involved in the
transaction, please forward this e-mail to those individuals.


calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/13/2000
08:07 AM ---------------------------

Rob Bradley
09/12/2000 11:01 AM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alhamd Alkhayat/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gil Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON (bcc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron)

Subject: Thursday Meeting on Winter Gas Prices

Ken:

I have invited the following individuals to join us at the 3 pm Thursday
meeting to review the draft of your Columbus speech on the natural gas
situation.

Hamd Alhkayat--Hamd has replaced Andrew Miles in the rotation and will be
helping me with your presentations as well as being the lead with Jeff's
speeches.

Shelley Corman--Shelley has been developing messages for the current and
anticipated gas situation and pipeline safety for the gas pipeline group.
(The safety issue could come up in your Q&A.)

Stinson Gibner--Stinson is with the research group that has generated some of
the more complex slides in your draft dealing with volatility and historic
futures pricing.

Gil Muhl--Gil markets gas products to customers and is speaking at an AGA
conference on the gas supply and price situation the day before your talk.
His group is focusing on new products to help end-users with winter
volatility.  I have asked Gil to send you his presentation as well for the
meeting.

Back to your presentation (the draft slides of which I am delivering to you
today), Dan Yergin thought it would be appropriate for you to give an
overview of the situation as the "teacher" or "professor."  Some questions
that you could address would include:

Where has the industry come from, and what lessons have we learned?

How is the business different today?

What public policy conclusions are implicit in this history?

I think our comparative advantage over the specialists who will be presenting
before and after your keynote is that you have "been there" in the evolution
of the natural gas market, and Enron is at the forefront of helping customers
deal with price and supply uncertainty.  There is also a good opportunity to
stress the need for new industry "best practices" (more hedging) and the
right public policies to deal with this issue (from "do no harm" to expanding
incentives in the market).

- Rob


Hi Steve & Ben,

We are planning an early Sunday dinner (one of the few evening slots that are
free in Vince's schedule) at:

Diverso Restaurant
85 Piccadilly
London W1V 9HD
Tel: 020 7491 2222

It's just a few yards to the left of Park Lane hotel on Park Lane, close to
Hyde Park Corner underground and we've been there before.  Vince would like
to discuss the latest developments and it seems like the best opportunity to
do so.  Please let me know if you can make it and I can make sure the table
is booked accordingly.

Regards,

Anjam
x35383

P.S. Vince will be staying at the Park Lane Hotel, telephone number 0171 499
6321


I won't do anything about this until you reach a consensus.

Kay

Fred Mitro@ECT
01/03/2001 06:48 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Exhibits - changes

Through my discussions with Rebecca I have discovered the following:

1.  Regarding the transformer, the contract counterparty is "ABB Power T & D
Company"

2.  The purchase price of the transformer ($786,000) was taken from the WLB
financing book and does not include any of the capitalized interest charges
or option payment (total $56,803) allocation that Global Finance has included
in the calculation of the Payoff #.  The full cost of the transformer would
be $842,803.

3.  The purchase price of each turbine ($14,072,000) was calculated as an
average cost based upon a spreadsheet provided by GE.  This price does not
include the $280,000 in change order costs allocated to each machine.  The
full cost of each turbine should be $14,352,000.  The $280K in change order
was picked up in the original payoff # prepared by Global Finance.

Ben has not yet reviewed any of the values in 2 or 3 above or the current
payoff # determined by Global Finance.  I will talk with him first thing in
the morning.  We will call you to confirm the correctness of these values.

Fred


for your reading pleasure.

tim
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 04/16/2001 07:25 AM ---------------------------

Alan Comnes
04/13/2001 01:50 PM
To:	gfergus@brobeck.com, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, rcarroll@bracepatt.com, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject:	Fw: Fact sheet re: Cal ISO study

From the Bonneville Power Administration:
>
> > This fact sheet addresses statements in a recent L.A. Times article
> > asserting that BPA, among others, manipulated prices on the California
> > electricity market.
> >
> > AEs, CAEs and other BPA staff may distribute the fact sheet to outside
> > parties as you believe appropriate.
> >
> >                       <<CA_sales_TP3.doc>>
> >
> > For additional information, contact Steve Oliver at (503) 230-3295.
>

 - CA_sales_TP3.doc


Review and call for more iterations.

Garrett
39335


We're getting so many great stories that we've extended the deadline for your
Enron Business Extreme Enron entries to Wednesday, March 28!  Have no idea
what we're talking about?  Read on(
Enron employees are famous for taking risks.  Is this an ingrained
characteristic?  Are we natural-born adrenaline junkies?  We think so, but we
want to find out from you.
If your idea of a good vacation is training for the Eco-Challenge, driving
monster trucks or assisting archeological digs in Siberia, tell us all about
it.  If you know of an employee who has an unusual pastime like missionary
work in the Congo, chasing tornadoes or filming sharks, we want to know.
Send your entries by email to sarah.palmer@enron.com, by fax to 713-853-6790
or by mail to Sarah Palmer, Enron Public Relations, EB4703D, Houston, Texas
77002.
We'll choose our favorite extreme stories and publish them in the next issue
of Enron Business.  Also, don't forget to check out the current issue --
newly designed -- at http://home.enron.com/pubs/enronbiz/2001/vol1/index.htm


Here's the official invite, hope you can make it.  Have a good weekend.

 <<lacantera#2.ppt>>

 - lacantera#2.ppt


Privileged and Confidential
Attorney Client Communication
Attorney Work Product

Here is my status report on today's activities:

Attorney General Investigation

 Mike Day, Enron's outside counsel that does work before the PUC
called me late tonight to tell me that he was contacted by another attorney
that has done work for Enron in the past.  This other attorney received a
call from the California State Attorney General's office, Richard Rothman
(phonetic) stating that the AG was going to be sending out preservation of
documents letters to market participants including Enron and that they were
going to be issuing subpoenas in the very near future.

California Energy Oversight Board

 Some recipients of this email may not have been included on the list
that got copies of the subpoena requests to the California ISO and
California PX so I will duplicate them here.

 <<7-21EOB4.pdf>>  <<Confiden.pdf>>  <<EOBoard0.pdf>>  <<EOBoard1.pdf>>

Enron Investigation in Canada FYI

 <<dowjones.11.21.00.PDF>>
EPMI  Western Trading Desk Organization Chart

 <<Organizational chart.PDF>>
Change of Venue Research by Peter Meringolo

 Here's preliminary analysis of change of venue:

 The court may change the venue of a trial "where there is reason to
believe that an impartial trial cannot be had therein."  C.C.P. o 397(b).
The party requesting a change of venue must show actual "widespread"
prejudice "extending over a long period of time."  Nguyen v. Superior Court,
49 Cal. App. 4th 1781, 1791 (1996).  Whether such a showing has been made is
left to the discretion of the trial court.  Id.

 Case law provides little guidance regarding how much evidence is
enough for a party to show actual prejudice.  As Witkin states, this
"challenge is so vague and difficult to sustain."  3 Witkin, Cal. Procedure,
Actions, o 871 (4th ed. 1996).  In fact, a change of venue on these grounds
has been granted in very few reported cases, the most recent of which was in
1938.  See People v. Ocean Shore R.R., 24 Cal. App. 2d 420 (1938); San
Joaquin and Kings River Canal and Irrigation Co. v. Stevinson, 179 Cal. 533
(1919).

 Ocean Shore was an eminent domain proceeding against 32 defendant
land owners to acquire lands to build a state highway, one defendant's
motion for change of venue was granted.  People v. Ocean Shore R.R., 24 Cal.
App. 2d 420 (1938).  The defendant filed nearly 200 affidavits, which
referenced newspaper articles, reports from civic meetings, and statements
by citizens showing a widespread prejudice against the defendants and its
cause extending over a long period of years.  Id. at 427-28.  The Court
affirmed the trial court's discretion, noting that the affidavits show that
"it would at least make it extremely doubtful whether an impartial trial
could be had before a jury in that county."  Id. at 428.

 San Joaquin was a condemnation action for the use of waters of a
river for the benefit of landowners on the west side of the river.  San
Joaquin and Kings River Canal and Irrigation Co. v. Stevinson, 179 Cal. 533
(1919).  In that action, the defendant operated an irrigation system for the
benefit of the landowners on the east side of the river.  Plaintiff filed
one affidavit showing that the people on the east side of the river felt
widespread prejudice against plaintiff and people on the west side of the
river were disqualified as jurors because they were using defendant's
irrigation system.  Id. at 537-38.  Defendant filed 22 affidavits in
opposition.  According to the Court, "if numbers of affiants or of
affidavits were the determining factor in questions of this character the
defendant herein would have been entitled to prevail upon said motion; but .
. . this is not the rule."  Id. at 538.  Rather, the question is whether the
trial court abused its discretion, and the Court held that it did not.

 These cases are contrasted with two case reported since 1938 in
which change of venue motions were denied.  See Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation Dist. v. Joseph W. Wolfskill Co., 147 Cal.
App. 2d 714 (1957); Nguyen v. Superior Court, 49 Cal. App. 4th 1781, 1791
(1996).

 Riverside County was an eminent domain proceeding, where plaintiff
was seeking to condemn property for the purposes of flood control.
Defendants moved for a change of venue by presenting evidence that the
advantages of the flood control project was widely publicized, the
newspapers portrayed defendants as trying to prevent flood controls, that
the cost of purchasing defendant's property was to come from county funds
and therefore every taxpayer was adverse to defendant.  147 Cal. App. 2d at
716.  Plaintiff's affidavit contradicted these facts.  The trial court
denied the motion, and this decision was affirmed on appeal.  Id. at 717.

 In Nguyen, the State brought a suit against business owners in order
to shut down a red light district in San Mateo.  The defendant businesses
moved for a change of venue.  Defendants' evidence consisted of two
newspaper articles reporting the raid on the businesses, that the city spent
over $5000 investigating, and one affidavit of an employee of defendants'
lawyer.  The trial court denied the motion because the evidence fell "far
short of proving actual prejudice."  49 Cal. App. 4th at 1791.  Moreover,
the trial was to be a court trial, not a jury trial, and defendants showed
no prejudice by the court.  Id.

 Ross v. Kalin, 53 Cal. App. 616 (1921), although an extreme case,
exemplifies that a change of venue motion most likely requires a high
standard of proof.  In Ross, plaintiff's motion for change of venue was
denied.  Plaintiff filed numerous affidavits, in which uncontroverted facts
showed that, as a result of plaintiff's "crusade against vice conditions' in
the City of venue, plaintiff was assaulted by a mob, beaten, tarred and
feathered, and chained to a tree.  Id. at 617.  The local newspaper
published editorials approving the mob action.  Id.  Plaintiff's attorney
was also assaulted and beaten, and banned from two organizations.  Id.  Of
the 8000 to 12000 potential jurors, between 30 and 300 were prejudiced
against the plaintiff at some point in time.  Id. at 619.  The appellate
court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in
finding that this prejudice against the plaintiffs did not outweigh the
defendants' right to have their case tried in the county where they reside
and their witnesses reside.  Id.

Summary of Business & Professions Code 17200 Cases
I sent a two volume set to each of you with a summary of the California
17200 cases.  (Dave and Mike, I know this may be superfluous for you but I
thought you should see what I sent to everybody.)  While the cases do not
break out cleanly, I tried to divide the cases  into those that defined
unfair, preemption, the filed rate doctrine, conspiracy and damages.

Sampling of Tapes
I spoke with Steve Hall today (Stoel Rives).  He has listened to
approximately 2 hours of tapes.  He said they are best described as using
colorful language.  There is some chit chat about what the participants
guess the price might be or what they heard the price might be and some
discussion about a line that may have gone down.

Projects Underway

Data Resolution - No progress today
Fact Memo - I received Steve Hall's memorandum and will incorporate with the
materials I have for distribution tomorrow.
Contracts - We hope to have that package sent out tomorrow.
PUC- No contact from Harvey Morris (PUC in house counsel.)

Thanks
Gary

===========================This email message is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - 7-21EOB4.pdf
 - Confiden.pdf
 - EOBoard0.pdf
 - EOBoard1.pdf
 - dowjones.11.21.00.PDF
 - Organizational chart.PDF


LRCI, Inc.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Israni, Rakhi
Sent:	Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Sorrento Agmt

Gerald,

Can you tell me which Enron entity is involved in the Sorrento R/W Agmt?  This is for wiring purposes.

Rakhi
x3-7871


Attached is the TW weekly report for August 31, 2001.  If you have any questions, please let me know.

Jan Moore
713-345-3858


Monday, 1:00 p.m-2:00 pm looks good to me in EB38c2.  Please confirm.
---------------------- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
05:33 PM ---------------------------

Carol St Clair
04/19/2000 12:09 PM
To: Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Group Meeting

Taffy:
Could you also set up a meeting with the lawyers and legal assistants in our
group for about 1 hour on Monday to discuss our legal assistant candidates?
Thanks.
Carol


Teco Tap            70.000 / HPL Gas Daily

LS HPL LSK IC       8.000 / Enron ; 12.000 / HPL Gas Daily

---------------------- Forwarded by Melissa Jones/Texas Utilities on
09/01/2000
10:54 AM ---------------------------

Melissa Jones
09/01/2000 10:25 AM

To:   Charlie Stone/Texas Utilities@TU, Gary Green/Texas Utilities@TU, Tim
      Powell/LSP/ENSERCH/US@TU, daren.j.farmer@enron.com,
      gary.a.hanks@enron.com, carlos.j.rodriguez@enron.com,
      earl.tisdale@enron.com, ami.chokshi@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Enron / HPL Actuals for August 31, 2000

Teco Tap       18.000 / Enron ; 52.000 / HPL Gas Daily

LS HPL LSK IC       20.000 / Enron


If you add the CTC/ Utility Credit exposure to this schedule, you will have a fair overview of the entire picture.

Rogers Herndon@ECT
05/21/2001 09:55 AM
To:	Wade Stubblefield/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Enron@EnronXGate, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES, Don Black/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: FYI

Wade -

Some specific items we are currently analyzing that will have an impact on your assumptions:

TXU/North Texas Curve Adjustment    	(11.5 MM) 	This was put through on 5/17 and I am not sure made it into your summary.
NY (Rest Of  State I-CAP) Adjust 		(20.0 MM)  	Narsimha working on currently - will forward details (I doubt this was planned for)
ECAR Retail Gen Adjustments 		(07.0 MM)	Use appropriate wholesale curves and congestion adjustments
Illinois PPO 				(04.0 MM)  	Represents just one customer - J. Lewis working on potential exposure

					(42.5 MM)

Currently, we are focusing on areas that will allow us to prepare for existing "new deal" flow.

Areas that appear light to me in your analysis include option valuations (this will probably need to be fully resolved through the Contract re-evaluation process) and charges associated with the Illinois PPO roll-off.

Will try to keep you informed of major changes as we address them.

Rogers

Wade Stubblefield@EES
05/18/2001 09:35 PM
To:	Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Neil Hong/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: FYI

Rogers/Jay,

Attached is a copy of a reconciliation that Wes C. and John L. had asked for earlier today depicting (1) the makeup of the items included in the YTD DPR loss for WhEES (2) an estimate of the items projected to still hit in Q2 and (3) those items which we think are exposure items but which is doubtful we will have fully resolved during Q2.

Neil H. provided the data for the items included herein, all of which you are hopefully aware of.  Given the magnitude of the numbers and this point in the quarter, Wes has asked that we keep the attached updated on at least a weekly basis.  Depending on the nature of future items that come up, we may want to convene a periodic meeting to discuss the items herein with all applicable parties.

I apologize for not including you on the distribution earlier today, will make sure you are in the loop with regard to the content of the schedule going forward and will include both of you in all future correspondence.

If you see anything unusual, or know of additional items which should be include, please do not hesitate to contact Neil or I.

Thanks

Wade

<Embedded StdOleLink>


Attached is an ISDA worksheet for the above referenced.  Please call me with
your questions.

Thanks,

JS


<<CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc>>

RICKY A. ARCHER
Fuel Supply
700 Louisiana, Suite 2700
Houston, Texas 77002
713-830-8659 direct
713-830-8722 fax

 - CALPINE DAILY GAS NOMINATION 1.doc


Looks good.

Thanks,

Errol

Dawn C Kenne@ECT
03/23/2001 05:06 PM
To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George Huan/NA/Enron
cc: Tara Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: gas daily options

Errol and George,

Please review QU0179 in tagg stage and let me know if it looks alright.

Also, this is going out Monday so please keep a close eye on these trades to
make sure they are bridging correctly.

Thanks,
Dawn


Check out the latest version of Enron Business Online at home.enron.com.
Click on Publications, then on Enron Business and "Volume 5, 2000".  This
issue, read about what Ken and Jeff could have worn for Halloween costumes!

Also in this issue:

? Enron Broadband Services chips away obstacles;
? DealBench and the art of the paperless deal;
? Global risk managers structure risk even insurers can like;
? Diversity and what you think;
? Enron rescues a giant panda; and
? The Rise School leads lessons in compassion and ABCs.


Employee Name: Mary Fischer
Report Name:   Mary S. Fischer
Report Date:   10/15/01
Report ID:     5E537B59BF2411D5B446
Submitted On:  10/15/01

You are only allowed 2 reports with receipts outstanding.  Your expense reports will not be paid until you meet this requirement.


Your approval is needed for the following 2 product types in Datamanager:

US Residual Fuel Oil 1% Crack Spread
US Residual Fuel Oil 3% Crack Spread

Please do not approve between the hours of 6 am and 11 am..

US ResidOil Spd  NYH 1% Crack Spread     Jun01           USD/bl/m

A US Residual Fuel Oil financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America
Corp., under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the
price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by
Counterparty on the Website.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The term of the Transaction shall be from the Effective Date of 01 Jun 2001
to the Termination Date of 30 Jun 2001.
The Index for a Determination Period shall be the difference obtained by
subtracting (i) the arithmetic average of the daily settlement prices for the
prompt month NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil Futures Contract for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period from (ii) the arithmetic average of the
mean of the daily quotations for No. 6, 1%S Max appearing under the heading
"New York/Boston Cargo" in the section entitled "Product Price Assessments"
for those issues of Platt's Oilgram Price Report published for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period. "Pricing Date" means, a day on which
Platt's Oilgram Price Report is published and which is also a NYMEX trading
day.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month and the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per month.

US ResidOil Spd  GC 3% Crack Spread      Jun01           USD/bl/m

A US Residual Fuel Oil financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America
Corp., under which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the
price submitted by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in each case
in respect of the Notional Quantity per Determination Period.  Each calendar
month during the term of the Transaction will be a Determination Period. The
Notional Quantity per Determination Period shall be the volume submitted by
Counterparty on the Website.  The Payment Date(s) will be 5 business days
after the Floating Price is determinable. The Floating Price shall be the
Index for the relevant Determination Period.
The Effective Date is 01 Jun 2001. The Termination Date  is 30 Jun 2001.
The Index for a Determination Period shall be the difference obtained by
subtracting (i) the arithmetic average of the daily settlement prices for the
prompt month NYMEX Light Sweet Crude Oil Futures Contract for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period from (ii) the arithmetic average of the
mean of the daily quotations for No. 6, 3%S appearing under the heading "U.S.
Gulf Coast Waterborne" in the section entitled "Product Price Assessments"
for those issues of Platt's Oilgram Price Report published for each Pricing
Date in such Determination Period.  "Pricing Date" means, a day on which
Platt's Oilgram Price Report is published and which is also a NYMEX trading
day.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be Barrels per
month and the quantity shown shall be in Barrels per month.

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the  START button
select  PROGRAMS
select  TEST APPLICATIONS
select ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
 PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
 PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Thanks.
m


Group,
Virginia is exactly correct on this point.  MAKE IT A HABIT!  The majority of inadvertancy that we have contributed to (and there hasn't been that much) has been a result of confusion on times and duration of trades.
Thanks,
Bill

---------------------- Forwarded by Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT on 04/09/2001 05:42 PM ---------------------------

Virginia Thompson
04/09/2001 05:32 PM
To:	Portland Shift
cc:

Subject:	Purchases and Sales

Dear Real Timers,

As I have been having to pull tapes lately, I cannot stress enough the importance of stating the hour for which you are trading when you make deals.  It is imperative that you state (as often as possible) the hours that you are trading for, and it is extremely helpful when you re-cap the sale at the end of your trade!! :) please...

There may be deals that we are going to loose the dispute for because neither trader (on either side) stated clearly what hour we were trading for. I'm relying on you guys to help me collect 100% on all our trades.

Please see or e-mail me with any questions.

Thanks.

Virginia