Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 12:01 PM -----

	smara@enron.com
	Sent by: "Report mailer problems to http://www.quicken.com/support"
<nobody@nowhere.com>
	03/21/2001 11:55 AM
	Please respond to smara

		 To: undisclosed-recipients:;
		 cc:
		 Subject: Calif State Controller:General Fund Surplus Dn To

I thought you might find this story interesting.

------------------------- Article -------------------------

Wednesday, March 21, 2001 02:21 PM

<!--TEXT-->

LOS ANGELES (Dow Jones)--California State Controller Kathleen Connell
Wednesday
said the state's general fund surplus has dropped to $3.2 billion from $8.5
billion in January, mostly because of electricity purchases made by the
state's
Department of Water Resources, a press release said.

Connell also denied Gov. Gray Davis' request to transfer an additional $5.6
billion from the general fund to the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties,
the release said.

Connell noted that, given the rapid depletion of the general fund on power
purchases, the state would need to borrow $2.4 billion in order to tranfer
the
$5.6 billion from the general fund to the special fund.

"We started this year with a generous budget surplus. The energy crisis has
taken much of that away, and this transfer on top of the electricity
purchases
would put the fund at risk," Connell said.

Connell called on Davis to ensure that the CDWR completes by the end of May
2001
the revenue bond sales that will be used to buy power and repay the general
fund.

She also asked that the CDWR notify her of all power purchases made and
contracts negotiated thus far and requested that she be told within 7 days of
any purchases and contracts negotiated in the future.

Connell also said she wanted to be told within 24 hours of any power buys
that
exceed $55 million and asked that the Department of Finance be directed to
prepare new general fund cash flow estimates for the next 30 and 60 days, and
for the end of the fiscal year.

The state's Department of Water Resources has been buying power since January
in
lieu of Edison International (EIX) utility Southern California Edison and
PG&E
Corp (PCG) utility Pacific Gas and Electric Co, because suppliers refused to
sell to the nearly-bankrupt utilities.

-By Jessica Berthold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
jessicaberthold@dowjones.com

Gov. Davis' office said, in response to Connell's comments, that the state
budget was solid and the economy remained strong.

"We will be getting the money back we've paid for energy and it should have
no
significant effect on the state's finances from the Wall Street perspective,"
said Davis press secretary Steve Maviglio.

-By Jessica Berthold; Dow Jones Newswires; 323-658-3872;
jessicaberthold@dowjones.com

2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This article on the Excite Money and Investing Channel is produced by
Quicken.com, the objective source for making the most of your money.
Visit Excite Money and Investing at http://quicken.excite.com next time
you need financial news, stock quotes, portfolio services, or information
about taxes, mortgages, and insurance.


Guys and Gals --

Commercial wants our opinion (in fact they want us to contact the CPUC and
legislative members) to gauge the "true" meaning of the DA bypass of the
3c/kwh Surcharge.  This question basically has arisen because there is a
customer that we may not re-DASR if the Surcharge bypass extends in
perpetuity (or if at least is there a Window of Opportunity that keeps
customers from paying).  Put in other words, would anyone give us a "free
pass" if we move load to DA right now and promise to keep them there with no
ability to return to electric utility service?

My current analysis looks something like this --

The term "Surcharge" is only applicable until the end of the AB1890 rate
freeze (which will end no later than March.1.02 and may end earlier if (a)
federal court finds in PG&E/SCE favor or (b) California legislature mandates
an earlier end-date.  Surcharge is a "term of art" to get around the problems
of the AB1890 rate freeze.
At the end of the AB1890 rate freeze, it is my understanding that the CPUC
will modify fully the rate structure and level to ensure full cost recovery
on a going forward basis (therefore Utility Retained Generation, QF expense,
CDWR current expenses (both energy purchase and financing costs will be
included).
Other outstanding costs will include (1) Utility Undercollection from May.00
until when no additional CA-ISO costs are applied) and (2) CDWR costs
beginning Jan.17.01 until the end of AB1890 rate freeze new rates.
Understanding how these costs will be recovered and by whom will most likely
(70%) be decided by the Legislature with some decision-making by the CPUC.
Utility Undercollection Bypass - 25%
CDWR Jan.17.01 thru AB1890 end Bypass - 80% for people who never were on
Utility Service, 10% for people who used Utility Service post Jan.17.01
CDWR Net Unavoidable Bypass - 10% for people who used Utility Service post
Jan.17.01, 80% for others.

LEGISLATION IMPACTING THIS DECISION

There are three key direct access bills being considered (the Bowen bill -
SB2x27, the Kelley bill - AB2x42, and the Battin bill - SB2x??).

The Bowen bill would remove the DA suspension authority granted in AB1x1 and
replace it with the following (1) if a customer has not bought from an
electric utility on or after Jan.17.01 there are no charges [except there may
be an entrance fee to use the electric utility going forward] and (2) if a
customer wants to switch from an electric utility to an ESP they must pay "to
the department any uncollected amounts equivalent to the department's net
unavoidable cost of power procurement, including any financing costs,
attributable to that customer" to ensure the satisfaction of any power
purchase obligation or bond obligation to serve "that customer".  The
recovery period shall be coincident with the terms of bonds issued to finance
the purchases.  The CPUC has 90 days from the effective date to notify
customers of their obligations.

The Kelley bill would remove the DA suspension authority granted in AB1x1 and
replace it with the following (1) if a customer has not bought from an
electric utility on or after Jan.17.01 there are no charges, (2) every
customer is allowed to buy from an ESP a % of their load equal to the amount
served by Utility Retained Generation (not CDWR purchases) with no charges,
(3) after the effective date, any customer that buys from the electric
utility and wants to switch must pay "to ensure satisfaction of any power
purchase obligation or bond obligation incurred by the department" with the
following constraints - (a) for res and small commercial customers, if DA
load is less than load growth or (b) to self gen customers, if the customer
has given 180 days prior notification or (c) if the customer has given DWR 12
months' advance written notice (then only a fee equal to 12 months
unavoidable costs).  The CPUC has 30 days from the effective date to notify
customers of their obligations.

The Battin bill would ... still reviewing

CPUC DECISIONS IMPACTING THIS

May 5 Order - DA doesn't pay current DWR expenses.  Good for bypass of these
costs.


---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 02/29/2000 02:09 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sally Beck                           02/29/2000 01:58 PM

To: Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Goals for 2000

Rick:  Sorry, I should have sent this to you several days ago.  Is the level
of detail correct on these goals as you look to assimilate these with
others?  I have stated the goals, but not the action plan to achieve the
goals.  I am working on those in some detail right now.   --Sally

Goals for 2000
Global Risk Management Operations

I.  Build/Enhance Operational and Controls Infrastructure to Support:

A.  Merchant Activities

Japan
Southern Cone
Continental Europe
Other regions as identified

B.  Emerging Businesses/Products

Enron Broadband Services
Credit Trading
Other products as identified

C.  Joint Ventures

II.  Strengthen Mid and Back Office Talent and Controls for Global Risk
Management Operations

A.  Establish common operational standards,with effective exception reporting

B.   Strengthen and support the controls mindset in key operational personnel

C.  Develop a plan to identify, develop and provide rotational opportunities
to key operations employees

D.  Continue to coordinate with IT to develop mid and back office systems
that allow for timely and accurate compilation of data across  systems for
risk and business reporting


It occurred to me last night after you two had left that we never quantified
what constitutes a "good" girl.  And, given that oversight I may have been
remiss in stating that Wilson was not ready for said good girl.  Just as the
opinion of women in Texas differed between you Yanks and the Texas boys at
the table, I am inclined to believe that our definitions of a "good" girl may
not be in line.

P.S. -- A person in their nineties is referred to as a nonagenarian.  (We
really should have figured that one out last night.)


Hi Sara:
Thanks for trying but appears as if they were looking for a technical
trading person to participate in the associates and analysts program...too
bad. I thought perhaps ebusiness or the like would have been fun.
I'll keep you posted on any future news from them.
Kindest Regards,
Kristina

>From: Michelle.Kingsbury@enron.com
>To: "kristina fisher" <krifisher@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Online application
>Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 18:11:41 +0100
>
>
>Kristina
>
>I have spoken to my colleagues concerning possible roles in Marketing and
>Business Development that may be of interest to you. Unfortunately there
>are no roles which match your career aspirations at present. However, we
>will keep your details on file and contact you if any suitable positions
>arise.
>
>Good luck with your job search and thankyou for your interest in Enron
>
>Regards
>
>Michelle Kingsbury
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"kristina fisher" <krifisher@hotmail.com> on 27/04/2001 18:13:46
>
>To:   Michelle.Kingsbury@enron.com
>cc:
>
>Subject:  Re: Online application
>
>Dear Michelle:
>Thank you for your email and phone message. I am presently visiting my
>parents in New Orleans. I would be available for a phone conversation on
>Tuesday. The telephone number is +504.283.1652. New Orleans has a 6 hour
>time difference with London. It is best to reach me in the morning, perhaps
>
>9AM my time would work for you? Please let me know if that is convenient.
>Kindest Regards,
>Kristina
>
>
> >From: Michelle.Kingsbury@enron.com
> >To: krifisher@hotmail.com
> >Subject: Online application
> >Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:45:14 +0100
> >
> >Kristina
> >
> >Many thanks for your on line application for the Enron Europe's A&A
> >programme.
> >
> >I tried to call you  this afternoon and have left you a message on your
> >answer phone. I would be keen to have a telephone conversation with you
> >next week and am contacting you to schedule an appropriate time.
> >
> >It may be easiest if you specify a time that I could contact you.
>Currently
> >the most likely availability in my diary is for Tuesday, if this is
> >convenient for you.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Michelle Kingsbury
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Mike Driscoll
deal 577823
Prebon shows price as $97.95 ....enpower has $79.95


Sara,

The name of the Senior Counsel at MARTA is Bruce Bomberg.  The phone number
is 404-848-5200.

They are fully authorized to hedge.  Thay already sent a copy of the Board
Resolution to Jay Williams.  Their Investment Policy also allows them to
hedge.

MARTA has been hedging interest rates and fuel since the early 80's.  As a
matter of fact their hedging program is featured in "Corporate Investing"
magazine.  I have faxed a copy of this article for your attention.

Should you need to reach her, Thay Bishop's number is 404-848-5485.

Since we are one of their new counterparties in their long-running hedging
program, they will be testing us on our confirmation and settlements
process.  Thus it is very important to send their confirm as promptly as
possible.  Your assistance in getting this confirm to them as soon as
possible is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Craig


Please proceed with number one.  They withheld the money related to operational cuts in the west.  Please contact Accounting for Texaco's exact description of the penalty and I will have Patti Sullivan contact you with the details from our perspective.

Mike

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:04 AM
To:	Grigsby, Mike
Subject:	RE: Texaco

Mike:

	It seems to me that we can proceed one of 2 ways.  Those alternatives are as follows:

		1.  We could write a letter to Texaco and demand payment for the withheld amount.

		2.  If we are paying them this month, we could withhold the $1.5 million from the
		    amount we are paying them.  Of course, we would need to provide them some
		    sort of explanation.

	My preference at this time would be to do the first item.  If you could have someone provide me with the details of the transaction they withheld the money on I could draft the letter.  If that letter brought no response, then we could consider taking the action outlined in the second item.

	I trust all is well with you.  I look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks,

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Grigsby, Mike
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 5:00 PM
To:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	Texaco

Jeff,

How should proceed with Texaco and their 1.5 million withholding?

Thanks,
Mike


Our meeting has been changed to Tuesday, December 19, 10:30a in EB-48C2.
Please be prompt.

Thanks,

adr

Audrey Robertson
12/06/2000 03:18 PM
To: Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Status Update Mtg w/Steve

Okay, you guys.  Wednesday is not going to work for Lorraine.  I'm going for
Tuesday morning, December 12th, 10:30a.

This will work for everyone, I'm positive!!!

Place this time on your calendars please and don't prepare anything for this
meeting, okay?  okay!!!

adr

Audrey Robertson
12/06/2000 02:52 PM
To: Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Status Update Mtg w/Steve

Wednesday, December 13th.

Thanks Linday (smile).

adr

Audrey Robertson
12/06/2000 02:18 PM
To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine
Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Audrey
Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Status Update Mtg w/Steve

Steve would like to meet with all of his Direct Reports on Wednesday, 10:30a
in his office.

Please mark your calendars accordingly.

Susan, we are aware  that you will be on vacation, Steve will arrange to have
you updated when you return.

Thanks in advance for placing this time on your calendars.

adr


Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 11:46 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Miller, Stephanie; Dyer, Laird; Belden, Tim
Subject:	FW: CEC Report on Natural Gas Supplies Adopted

FYI.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Schoen, Mary
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:58 AM
To:	Parquet, David; Wehn, Samuel; Comnes, Alan; Swain, Steve; Brodbeck, Kelly
Cc:	Keeler, Jeff; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan
Subject:	CEC Report on Natural Gas Supplies Adopted

The CEC just approved a report drafted by staff that states there will be adequate natural gas supply this winter for electricity generation needs.  It does qualify this statement by discussing where potential bottlenecks in delivery might occur and recommends actions to address the bottlenecks.  See below for a link to the report.

Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
415.782.7803 (phone)
415.782.7854 (fax)

For immediate release: October 3, 2001
Contact: Claudia Chandler : 916-654-4989

Energy Commission Report Projects
Improved Natural Gas Supplies For the State

Sacramento -While current natural gas prices in California have dropped to approximately half of 2000's average price, the specter remains of last December, when tight supplies caused prices to spike to 25 times their present rates. Now, as winter approaches, industry watchers wonder if the State has enough of the clean-burning fuel for the upcoming heating season, even as new gas-fired electricity generators come on line.

The Natural Gas Infrastructure Issues Report , adopted today by a 4-to-0 vote of the California Energy Commission, gives a qualified "yes" to the question of adequate supplies this winter. It identifies sufficient storage as a critical factor, and notes that utilities have substantially increased natural gas storage, largely because conservation and efficiency have dampened summer electricity demand.

Nearly 85 percent of the natural gas used by Californians comes by pipeline from gas fields located outside the State. Since California typically uses more natural gas in the winter than interstate pipelines can provide, additional supplies must be set aside in summer months to help balance supply and demand. For this reason, the report recommends that the Energy Commission continuously assess storage levels and monitor infrastructure improvements throughout the year.

The newly adopted report points out that California's natural gas supply system was designed years ago to provide enough gas for winter's peak heating demand. An increasing reliance on natural gas for generating electricity, however, has strained the system and revised old patterns of consumption.

"This report helps Californians understand what we have to do to assure that we have a reliable and reasonably priced electricity and natural gas system in the future," said Energy Commissioner Michal (spelling correct) Moore, Presiding Member of the Electricity and Natural Gas Committee that developed the document.

To help resolve possible supply problems, the document analyzes not only natural gas storage requirements but the interstate pipelines that bring the fuel from distant gas fields to the California border. These pipelines can deliver slightly more natural gas than intra-state gas pipelines ? those within our State's borders ? can receive. As a result, there are bottlenecks in getting some supplies to gas consumers that the report says must be improved.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas) are improving and expanding their intra-state pipeline systems to help eliminate these constraints. According to the report, planned expansions of the interstate pipeline network should increase natural gas delivery to the State beginning next year, and additional improvements to the natural gas system should help prevent higher-than-normal prices that plagued California last winter.

Natural gas supplies in North America appear to be sufficient to meet demand in California and the rest of the United States for the next 50 years. The report recommends that the Energy Commission continue to monitor drilling rig activity and production levels for the long-term outlook. It also suggests that the Energy Commission, along with the Public Utilities Commission, should find ways to encourage and increase the in-state supply of natural gas.

The just adopted Natural Gas Infrastructure Issues Report can be found on the Energy Commission's Web Site at:

www.energy.ca.gov/contracts <http://www.energy.ca.gov/contracts>

Or report is attached:

 << File: Gas Infrastructure Report.pdf >>


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022809.txt


Gerald,

Would you please have a look at this term sheet.


no problem

	From:  Jared Kaiser                           05/11/2001 03:45 PM

To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject:

I know you both will, but please keep the info in strictest confidence.

Jared


I know we transported on Midcon due to problems with the plant at the point.
I am not sure about the rate.

D

Lauri A Allen
02/24/2000 02:52 PM
To: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Midcon Invoices

Do you guys agree with the rate?
---------------------- Forwarded by Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT on 02/24/2000 02:51
PM ---------------------------
   Kellie Bilski                02/24/2000 02:19 PM

To: Lauri A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Midcon Invoices

Midcon is billing us $.05 from Katy to Cogen.

Lauri A Allen
02/24/2000 01:57 PM
To: Kellie Bilski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elsa Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Midcon Invoices

Kellie-

I researched the statements you sent me and found deal ticket #109925 in
Sitara which shows HPLC transporting on Midcon from Live Oak to Hardy Street
for $.04/mm for the months of August and September.

The statement for November covers gas moving from Katy tailgate to Cogen
Lyondell and is covered by Sitara deal ticket #133257.  The deal ticket shows
a zero rate, however.  Elsa/Daren- do either of you remember this deal?  It
was on November 30th for 5000mm.  Kellie- what is Midcon charging for this
haul?

Thanks.


Currently I have 2 machines (one on 41, one on 47) plus a laptop.
Jean McFarland contacted me a couple of months ago with this idea.  Basically
we would be replacing 3 computers with one laptop.  I will probably want to
get a regular sized monitor for my work station on 41 (I do not know if this
is included in the "docking station" entry).
If you like, I can get Jean to do the math on how much we would be saving, if
anything.  My machine on 47 is really out of date.  Someone else can use my
brand new computer on 41 though.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           11/08/2000 11:47 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Request for approval to purchase laptop, etc. for Susan Scott

What's the basis--do you currently use a laptop?

DENISE LAGESSE
11/07/2000 03:46 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Request for approval to purchase laptop, etc. for Susan Scott

Please approve the following purchase for Susan Scott: (and please don't take
it out of my huge raise come Feb!)

Compaq laptop (1 ea)  $2,745.00 2,745.00 total
Memory upgrade (1 ea)        575.00    575.00 total
Docking stations (2 ea)        587.00 ea 1,174.00 total

      4,494.00 grand total


Steve -

I am extremely interested in looking at Enron regulatory/government affairs
and I would appreciate the chance to talk with you if you have some time this
week.  I remembered your name from my first stint in EBS Latin America (I
worked on a few regulatory issues as part of the origination function) and I
would be interested to hear your thoughts on career opportunities within your
group as well as anything that I can do from a personal standpoint.  If you
have some time, please let me know.

PL

--------------------------------------------------
Palmer Letzerich
Enron Broadband Ventures
Tel:  (713) 345-8050
Cell: (713) 594-6746
--------------------------------------------------


Howdy,
Neil Stuchbury from the Toronto office will be in Saturday to observe your
Real Time trading expertise.
Murray has been a consultant for the Enron Toronto office and has offered
Neil a chance to "audit class."

Thanks,

JMF


Al,

Thanks for  the messages. I have come back from Europe last night
and I am in process of going through my mail.

Friday this week would be a good day to meet. I am going back to
Europe on Sunday and shall be gone for a week.

Vince

Al Arfsten <arfsten@bflassociates.com> on 09/22/2000 10:49:49 AM
Please respond to arfsten@bflassociates.com
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Al Arfsten Say Hello

Vince:  I hope all is well with you.  I look forward to chatting with
you soon.  Maybe we should have an early coffee meeting at the Hyatt
Regency when your schedule permits.  Al Arfsten


I update all my pricing info from RISI. I do not use paperloop's price. My traders don't seem to use it either.

 From: 	Allan, David
Sent:	Monday, August 06, 2001 12:47 PM
To:	Singh, Vikram; Causholli, Monika; Daetz, Milagros; Velez, Luis
Cc:	Johnson, Jay; Carter, Karen E.; Determeyer, Peggy; Forster, Avril
Subject:	PriceWatch

Paperloop has given us an estimate for the cost of giving us online access to their complete historical pricing database on an going basis. Essentially this would cover all products that are contained in any of the price tables in Pulp & Paper Week.

Their quote is expensive so we need to think about it. We already have a fair amount of historical information, although many of their prices go back (monthly) to 1979 or 1980. And, of course, their data base includes some products we don't presently track. My question to you: Would this access make a significant difference to you in doing price analysis?

Avril: an alternate and very labor-intensive approach: I have almost all of the Pulp & Paper Weeks going back to 1979; we could ask a temp to key the data in out of the newsletters.

Dave


During the past few days several people have approached us wondering why we are continuing to do college recruiting and continuing with the floor build out given the state of the company today.  We appreciate people's concerns about adding people and spending money at a time when we ought to be reducing unnecessary expenses.  Let us begin by saying that we share these concerns and are not hiring people or undertaking significant capital expenditures without a great deal of thought.  We would also encourage people to talk to their manager or either of us if you don't understand why we are doing certain things.  In short, we have decided to continue with the college recruiting, although we have not yet decided how many, if any, we will hire.  We have decided to delay the beginning of the floor build out for a couple of weeks.

Why Are We Continuing With College Recruiting?
During the last few years we have made tremendous progress establishing a presence for Enron broadly and the Portland office specifically with leading schools in the northwest.  This past year we finally reached critical mass and had tremendous success in our recruiting efforts.  Although we are uncertain about our hiring needs this year, we feel that it is in our best long term interest to continue having a presence with the schools in the northwest.  We have already made presentations and done initial screenings at most schools.  We have identified the best people from each school and have already made plans for them to come to our office for two super Saturdays.  The cost to us to finish this process is not large compared to the benefit that we gain from honoring our commitment to the schools and students as participants in their on-campus recruiting programs.  We also realize that it is a hard year to be coming out of school looking for a job.  It is our belief that students would rather interview with us even if the possibilities of employment may be somewhat diminished.  Finally, we would like to emphasize the point that we have not yet committed to hiring anybody.  We will interview people, identify the best candidates, and make hiring decisions based on the needs of the office.  Before extending offers we will consider the potential impact that it could have on people in this office and Enron employees in other offices who have been redeployed.  Stated another way, we don't intend to hire a bunch of new people if there are people within Enron who could fill positions or if it would put the jobs of the people already here at risk.  We may end up postponing hiring decisions until we are more certain about the state of affairs in the company.

How Will the Floor Move Play Out?
We have decided to postpone the floor build out for a few weeks.  While we still think that it makes sense for the office, we have decided to pause for a couple of weeks before we start to spend significant amounts of money on this.  When talking to the build out team today it became clear that delaying would accomplish several goals.  First, it allows us to get final architectural plans in place and firm quotes from contractors so that we can more precisely peg down the costs before moving forward.  Second, it gives the build out team breathing room to iron out more of the details of the move.  Finally, it buys us a little more time to decide whether or not it makes sense to do this project given the state of affairs of the company right now.  While we still think that we are going to move forward with this project, it seems like buying a couple of weeks of time is the right thing to do right now.  In about two weeks we will reconvene with the build out team with firm budget numbers and make a decision to either move ahead, cancel, or delay again.

As always, we will try to keep people updated on things as soon as new, reliable information becomes available.  We recognize that this is a very hard time for everyone.  Please try to stay focused on the job at hand and keep up the success of this office.

Tim Belden and Chris Calger


Hi all,
    The MOS server is scheduled for upgrade between 6pm and 8pm today (10/30/2001). The trading, scheduling operations and plasma display will not be available during this time. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks
-Rao

Ramanarao Tamma
Sr. Specialist
Market Intelligence
X 33066


The following files contain a graphical view of the average deal count per
month by Commodity for EOL and OTC transactions since the launch of
EnronOnline. This information is for comparitive analysis only.  Do not
update links when opening these files.

AVERAGE DEAL COUNTS FOR COMMODITIES (excluding Global Liquids, which displays
monthly totals)

NA GAS BREAKOUT BY REGION (Non-Averaged, including Volume and Notional Value)

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please contact one of the
following:

Torrey Moorer x3-6218
Matt Motsinger x3-5221
Pete Berzins x5-7594

Matt
EnronOnline


Michelle,

I now have my computer basically set up here.  This is my new work email
address.  I spent a lot of time coming up with a good one.  Can you tell?

Jim Lokay
4Quest.com
jlokay@4quest.com
713-524-8085


These two deals, 249262 & 565833 are changed for February out.  I will tell
the risk team that all new deals at NGPL/Nipsco should be at NIPS/NGPL -
9260.  Is this correct?
PL


I will be in the office on Tuesday next week (November 21), but hope to take the day off on Wednesday.  The kids will be out of school on Wednesday and we are going to Austin to be with my family for Thanksgiving.  So we hope to be on the road on Wednesday morning to beat some of the traffic.

With that, sounds as if it would be better for us to get together on Monday, November 26.

If you want to try and talk before then, a good time to get me is in car during my morning commute.  Number is 713-417-1591, and some range between 7:00 am and 8:30 am might work.

These are certainly trying times.  You have been in my thoughts, and you have my commitment that it is certainly not out of sight, out of mind.

--Sally


Welcome to eMail News Delivery, a service from Business Wire.
Here is your Industrial Information Resources Inc. news release.
If you have received this in error please send a message to:
eMailDelivery@businesswire.com
with the following command in the body of the message:
 unsubscribe TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES
If you have questions about this service, please contact your
Business Wire Account Executive or service@businesswire.com

BW2010  JAN 15,2002       2:06 PACIFIC      05:06 EASTERN

( BW)(TX-INDUSTRIAL-INFO-RES) New Aluminum Bottle Products May Lead to
Increased Aluminum Usage in the Beverage Packaging Industry, in an
Advisory by Industrialinfo.com

    Business Editors

	   HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 15, 2002--The following is an
advisory by Industrialinfo.com (Industrial Information Resources Inc.;
Houston, Texas). About a year and a half ago, Daiwa Can Company,
Japan's largest aluminum can producer, began producing aluminum
bottles for beer and tea companies. The novelty has caught on in Japan
where the company produced approximately 480 million aluminum bottles
in 2001. Along with two other manufacturers of aluminum bottles,
capacity is expected to double over the next 2-3 years. All three
manufacturers of aluminum bottles in Japan are contemplating line
additions or expansions at this time.
	   The aluminum bottle can has all the attributes of the aluminum
beverage can, it is lightweight and recyclable, but is shaped like a
bottle. It comes with a resealable aluminum screw on cap, which is
also recyclable. Aluminum bottles are expected to take market share
back from PET (Plastic) bottles, which have grown in popularity lately
and have replaced both glass & metal in some markets. It's only a
matter of time before this product catches on in the U.S. and other
international markets.
	   Industrialinfo.com provides daily news related to the industrial
market place including forecasts, outlooks, industry alerts, and
databases for the energy and industrial markets. For more information
on trends and upcoming construction activities for the Metals &
Minerals or Energy markets as well as other industrial sectors send
inquiries to metalsandmineralsgroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us at
www.industrialinfo.com.

    --30--LS/na*

    CONTACT: Industrial Information Resources Inc., Houston
             Joseph Govreau, 713/783-5147

    KEYWORD: TEXAS JAPAN INTERNATIONAL ASIA PACIFIC
    INDUSTRY KEYWORD: FOODS/BEVERAGES MINING/METALS
    SOURCE: Industrial Information Resources Inc.

For the best viewing of the news releases please
 use the following email settings:  Courier 10 point.
 -Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer-
 (c) 2000 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
 are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
 conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
 Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
 accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
 individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
 permission.

- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.
- Notice of Copyright and General Disclaimer --
(c) 1999 Business Wire. All of the releases provided by Business Wire
are protected by copyright and other applicable laws, treaties and
conventions. Information contained in the releases is furnished by
Business Wire`s members who are solely responsible for their content,
accuracy and originality. All reproduction, other than for an
individual user`s reference, is prohibited without prior written
permission.


Great job!

Chris Long@ENRON
07/27/2000 04:34 PM

To: raislerk@sullcrom.com, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Stephen D
Burns/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Stopped anti-energy amendment!!!

Today we were successful in killing an amendment that was offered by Rep.
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) in the House Banking Committee during its markup of
the Commodities Future Modernization Act of 2000.  This amendment would have
stricken language that provided an exclusion from CFTC jurisdiction for all
non-agriculture transactions (energy, metals, broadband).  The amendment
failed, largely due to pressure from Enron, by a vote of 20-12.  Rep. Ken
Bensten (D-TX) joined Chairman Leach in speaking against the amendment.

In more positive movement, yesterday the House Commerce Committee passed its
version on the bill including a provision that exempts metal trading
multilateral trading facilities from CFTC jurisdiction.

Congress goes into recess tomorrow and we will have a better sense on how the
Rules Committee plans to reconcile differences between the versions of the
bill later this week.  The Senate is still the unknown.

Call me at any question - Chris

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Long/Corp/Enron on 07/27/2000 05:28
PM ---------------------------

Chris Long
07/26/2000 06:32 PM

To: "Edgell, Bradley" <Bradley.Edgell@mail.house.gov>
cc: Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, RAISLERK@sullcrom.com

Subject: RE: CEA Hearing tomorrow

Bradley:

We have learned that two amendments will be offered tomorrow my Rep. Maloney:

#1  - Strikes lines 15-25 from page 41 and the entire page 42 (these are the
sections of HR 4541 as reported out of the Ag. Committee which address the
exemption for all most non-agriculture commodities trade on an electronic
facility.

#2  - Request a comprehensive study on the President's working group, DOE,
and FERC.

We strongly oppose amendment #1 which intends to more heavily regulate the
energy derivatives industry.  Please have Rep. Bentsen voice his opposition
to this amendment.  My guess is that amendment #2 should and will be ruled
non-germane, however this is not a compromise we would support.

Thanks - Chris
                  (202) 466-9158

"Edgell, Bradley" <Bradley.Edgell@mail.house.gov> on 07/26/2000 05:31:08 PM
To: Chris.Long@enron.com
cc:

Subject: RE: CEA Hearing tomorrow

Chris, I will look this over and get back to you.

> ----------
> From:  Chris.Long@enron.com[SMTP:Chris.Long@enron.com]
> Sent:  Wednesday, July 26, 2000 5:21 PM
> To:  Edgell, Bradley
> Cc:  RAISLERK@sullcrom.com
> Subject:  CEA Hearing tomorrow
>
> <<File: CFTC.gov.doc>>
> Bradley:  The highlighted talking points could be used by Rep. Bentsen in
> response to an amendment focused on the energy derivative industry.
> Additional CFTC oversight is clearly not warranted, nor is a study needed.
> Call me with any questions at (202) 466-9158.
>
>
>
> (See attached file: CFTC.gov.doc)
>


TSC Order # 774601 Was Shipped on 01/23/2002
Shipped to: ETS
            Kevin Hyatt
            ECN 1334
            Room No.1334
            Houston TX 77251
            US

Shipped Via RICK - TSC MESSENGER
Tracking # Baythorne - TSC Mgr

With the following material
                                                  QUANTITY
ITEM         DESCRIPTION                           SHIPPED
------------ ------------------------------------- -------
PR70042      ENRON FIELD CUSTOM WATCH                    2
PR49038      VICTORINOX SWISS ARMY CYBER TOOL            1
PR49027      HIGH TEC PALM PILOT ORGANIZER               1

For reference purposes your order number is shown above.
Please do not reply to this email.
If you have any questions, please call Charles at 713-853-5408.
Thank You


Start Date: 3/30/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001033023.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/30/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/30/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  50.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/30/01
  TIE_POINT: SYLMAR_2_NOB
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   0.47 / Final:   0.04)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 3/30/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Where is my new Oglethorpe sheet?


I will pass it on to Maria.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Chris.Germany@enron.com [SMTP:Chris.Germany@enron.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:49 AM
> To:	Riordan, Tim F.
> Cc:	3
> Subject:	RE: Hello
>
>
> I sent this from home Tuesday night.  I'm sending it again because the
> phone service at my apartment complex is out due to construction so I
> can't
> tell if you received it.
>
> Thanks
> cg
>
>
> (See attached file: chrisgOct2001.doc)
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
> its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> ********************************************************************** <<
> File: chrisgOct2001.doc >>


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/20/2000 07:19 AM -----

	"Meringolo, Peter" <PMeringolo@brobeck.com>
	11/17/2000 04:41 PM

		 To: "'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>
		 cc: "Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
		 Subject: RE: Draft letter to the CPUC

Richard,

We are not going to send this letter until Monday.  We want to send the
formal objections to the subpoena concurrently, and Mike Smith cannot review
the EES objections until Monday.  Mike Day believes that a delay until
Monday is not a problem.  Let me know if you have any concerns.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com [mailto:Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 2:24 PM
To: PMeringolo@brobeck.com
Cc: Fergus, Gary S.
Subject: Re: Draft letter to the CPUC

Everyone has signed off on the letter. Go ahead and send.

                    "Meringolo,

                    Peter"                To:
"'Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com'" <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com>,
                    <PMeringolo@br        "'msmith1@enron.com'"
<msmith1@enron.com>, "'Mary.Hain@enron.com'"
                    obeck.com>            <Mary.Hain@enron.com>,
"'David_Aamodt@pgn.com'" <David_Aamodt@pgn.com>,
                                          "'Christian.Yoder@enron.com'"
<Christian.Yoder@enron.com>,
                    11/16/2000            "'mday@gmssr.com'"
<mday@gmssr.com>, "Fergus, Gary S."
                    03:27 PM              <GFergus@brobeck.com>, "Stephen C.
Hall (E-mail)" <schall@stoel.com>
                                          cc:

                                          Subject:     Draft letter to the
CPUC

Please let either Gary or me know your thoughts and comments regarding the
below draft letter to the CPUC.

Thanks,

Peter

> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
> ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION
> ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT
>
>
>
> Harvey Morris Esq.
> California Public Utilities Commission
> 505 Public Utilities Commission
> San Francisco, California   94102
>
>    Re:   I.00-08-002  Subpoenas Served on Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
> ("EPMI"), Enron Energy Services Operations Inc. and Enron Energy Services
> Inc. (collectively referred to as "EES"), Enron Energy Marketing
> Corporation ("EEMC"), and Portland General Electric Corporation
("Portland
> General")(collectively sometimes referred to as the "Enron Entities")
>
> Harvey,
>
>    I am writing in response to the various voicemail exchanges and
> phone calls between Michael Day, on behalf of the Enron Entities, and
> yourself during the past few weeks.  Here is the current status as we
> understand it.  Based upon the agreements we reached between October 6,
> 2000 and October 18, 2000 (date of your confirming email) the Enron
> Entities have made the following document productions in response to the
> subpoenas served by California Public Utilities Commission (the
> "Commission"):
>
> *  October 13, 2000  Bate Nos. Enron Entities 000001-000025 on behalf
> of all Enron Entities Responsive to Request Nos. 1-11, 20.
>
> *  October 27, 2000 Bate Nos. P000001-002115 on behalf of Portland
> General Responsive to Request Nos. 12, 14, 16 and 18.
>
> *  November 14, 2000 Bate No. Enron Entities 000026 (Diskette with
> EES/EEMC retail data) Responsive to Request Nos. 7 to 11, 13, 15 to 17,
> and 19.
>
> *  November 15, 2000 Bate No. P002116-002117 (Diskettes with Portland
> General Data, which include approximate 355,000 wholesale transactions)
> Responsive to Request Nos. 7 to 11, 13 to 17, and 19.
>
> We believe with these productions, we have complied with the October
> 6-18th agreement with respect to Portland General and EES/EEMC.  As you
> know, these productions were all made reserving the Enron Entities rights
> to object or challenge the subpoenas and reserving any claims, defenses,
> objections, jurisdictional or otherwise, or other responses.
>
>    We originally had hoped to have all of the Transactional Data for
> EPMI, as defined in our October 6th email, available for production by
> October 27th.  However, we were also mindful of your expressed
expectation
> that any data provided be useful and reliable.  The collection of data
you
> requested in the subpoenas is neither kept electronically in the same
> location nor organized as you requested it.  In fact during our review of
> some of the data we found significant errors that called into question
the
> methodology by which the data was extracted from existing information.
> When it became apparent that we could not accurately estimate how long it
> would take to get reliable data given the volume of transactions
involved,
> we informed you of the problem.  We now understand that if we cannot give
> you a firm date when the balance of the Transactional Data will be
> available, the Commission believes it will have no choice but to seek to
> compel production before the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission
> ("FERC").  We understand the pressure that you must be under to get data
> immediately, but we cannot, at this time, give you another date in the
> immediate future by which we are certain that we will be able to produce
> accurate data.
>
>    Moreover, during the iterim between October 18th and today, a number
> of significant events have occurred that we believe bear on the subpoenas
> served on the Enron entities.  First, we understand that many other
> parties who were served with the same subpoenas have not provided the
> detailed information requested and have objected on a variety of very
> sound legal grounds.  Second, the Commission itself has, without a
hearing
> on the motion, unilaterally revised the proposed protective order that is
> supposed to govern these productions and summarily denied other changes
> sought by other parties served.  Third, the Commission has filed its
> motion before FERC seeking an order compelling the production of the data
> from those other parties that have objected and seeking an expedited
> hearing and production schedule.  We note that the reasons stated in the
> motion before FERC as the basis for the production are materially
> different than the reasons originally stated in the ex parte application
> to the Commission's own Administrative Law Judge who issued the
subpoenas.
> Finally, FERC itself has completed its investigation and has issued a
> tentative order as of November 1, 2000.
>
>    Originally, the Enron Entities had been prepared to accept "most
> favored nation" treatment with respect to protective orders and requests
> by others to limit the scope of the subpoenas and produce information
that
> was available.  However, given both the Commission's stated urgent need
> for an immediate answer that EPMI cannot in good faith give despite
> substantial effort (date for production of reliable and accurate
> Transaction Data) and the uncertainty created by the above described
> intervening events, EPMI believes it has no choice but to serve its
formal
> objections and responses to the subpoenas and await the Commission's
> threatened motion to compel before FERC.
>
>    We also understand from our discussions with you that the Commission
> has created various lists or categories for the entities that have been
> served with subpoenas.  We understand that there is a list for those
> entities that have been cooperating, a list for those who have been
> delaying and a list for those who have been objecting and exercising
their
> rights to challenge the subpoenas.  We understand that the Commission
> intends to punish, by whatever means it has available, those entities
that
> object and exercise their rights to challenge the subpoenas.  We deplore
> these tactics, but despite all of the efforts to cooperate described
> above, we understand that EPMI may in fact be moved from the cooperating
> list to the group to be punished for exercising its rights.
>
>    If you have and questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
> contact me.
>
>                                        Sincerely,
>
>
>
>                                        Gary S.
> Fergus

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com


Chris,

Below Wei explains what the option class cd column should contain. Please fix
this error before saving the file out tonight.  If you have any questions let
me know.

Thanks,
Robin
---------------------- Forwarded by Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT on 01/17/2001
02:52 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Wei Hu                           01/17/2001 02:35 PM

To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Ganapathy Ramesh/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Second Try

Robin,

I have set it up for this spreadsheet and I already ran it in stage
database.  The only error message I got was 'OPT_CLASS_CD INVALID'.
Option_class_cd should be one of the following: 'AMR', 'ASI', 'ASM', and
'EUR'.  'USD' in the spreadsheet is more like a currency_cd.

Wei

Robin Rodrigue
01/17/2001 01:55 PM
To: Wei Hu/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Second Try


We have been doing this here in Houston via a Unanimous Consent of the
Directors of the Company appointing the individual(s) as agents and
attorneys-in-fact.  Do you sugguest I proceed this way or via the Power of
Attorney below?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000 08:59 AM -----

	Cindy Buckley
	10/11/2000 06:44 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronOnline LLC and Enron North America Corp.

Hi Mark and Tana

I have been given your name by Justin Boyd as someone who can help me or
point me in the right direction.

We need to raise a power of attorney to enable Amita Gosalia of Enron House
to execute EnronOnline Password Applications for each of the above company.
Please could you let me know if you can prepare such a document and also what
if any additional information you require.  I have attached a copy of the
Power of Attorney which we use in the UK for such authority for your
information.

Unfortunately this is becoming quite urgent and any assistance you can give
will be greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you have any queries.

Thanks and regards


Okay "Superman" how many tickets can you really use?

"Buffy - The Vampire Slayer"

To: Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Opening Game @ Enron Field - 4/7

"Superman" needs 74 tickets for he and his superhero buddies. Don't ask me
all their names.  Thanks in advance
Jim

Greg Whalley
04/05/2000 05:13 PM
Sent by: Liz M Taylor
To: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel
Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Fallon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Piper/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stella L Ely/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy
Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lydia Cannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina Spiller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Opening Game @ Enron Field - 4/7

Greg Whalley has rented out the Rooftop Deck & Clubhouse at Union Station for
Opening Game on Friday, April 7.  You are cordially invited to party with
Greg "the Green Hornet" Whalley, with game time beginning @ 7:05p.m. - Astros
vs. PHI.

Please contact me about the numbers of tickets you will need.  We may be able
to accommodate some members of your team.    The rooftop can hold up to 75
people.

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor x31935


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 04/06/2001
09:32 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/06/2001 08:59 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie
Brewer/NA/Enron@Enron, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard
Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy
Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter
Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--4/6/01


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 01/06/2000 02:17 PM
---------------------------
From: Lenine Jeganathan on 01/06/2000 10:20 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: follow thi link

http://www.altavista.com/cgi-bin/query?pg=q&sc=on&q=register+domain&kl=XX&styp
e=stext


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 02:28
PM ---------------------------

suzanneadams@att.net on 04/11/2001 02:26:46 PM
To: taffy.milligan@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: MS150

Taffy and Neil made pledges for the MS150 to my
brother.  Would you please send a check made out to the
National MS Society to:

Charles Adams
2923 Goldspring Lane
Spring, TX  77373

Charles appreciates your help in this good cause, and so
do I.  Thanks again, Suzanne


who is your new woman?


We're in the middle of the Fed's two day meeting and Tues.'s trading
reflected a degree of nervousness. Everyone is positive that the Fed isn't
going to raise - right? Buyers seemed to be following Prince Hal's adage -
"Discretion is the better part of valor". People sat on the sidelines and
watched Tech fall on it's own weight - there were some buyers - CVS (CVS
Drugstores), WMT (Wal Mart) and HD (Home Depot Inc) up over 5%; RDA (Readers
Digest), ETH (Ethan Allen) and GPS (Gap Inc) over 7% - not exactly cutting
edge names. But Tues trading seemed to scorn anything next generation - HLIT
(Harmonic) down over 40% (after neg pre-announce) AFCI (Advanced Fiber
Comm.) down 16%, WMB (Williams Communications) down 13%, RHAT (Red Hat Inc)
and NSM (National Semiconductor) down 7%, PAIR (Pairgain Technologies) and
ADCT (ADC Telecomm) down 6%, TXN (Texas Instruments) and IBM down 4%
(negative analyst comments on IBM), GLW (Corning Inc), HON (Honeywell
International), INTC (Intel Corp) and SUNW (Sun Microsystems) all down 2% or
more.... some of the laggards of late were in the green - YHOO (Yahoo) and
INKT (Inktomi)both up over 4% but the real feel of the day was reflected in
the Nasdaq (down 50), the Dow Industrials (down 38) and the S&P (down 4.55).
Down - not "panic" down but a "treading water" down. In the CEUT Universe -
AMZN* (Amazon) up over 7%, CTAC* (1800 Contacts) continuing its climb up
over 1, LLL* (L-3 Communications) up 3 (shaking off unfounded talk as
William Kidd said it should), GOAM* (Goamerica) up 8%, PROX* (Proxim) up
almost 2, JBL* (Jabil Circuit) up 1 3/4, BMCS* (BMC Software) up over 1 1/2
- but these were the bright spots in a overall down day - BWAY* (Breakaway
Solutions) down 1 7/8, ITWO* (I2 Technologies) down over 3 1/2, LU* (Lucent
Technologies) down 2, JDSU* (JDS Uniphase) down over 6, ANCR* (Ancor
Communications) down 3, PMCS* (PMC Sierra) down over 5, SSTI* (Silicon
Storage) down over 14, RIMM* (Research In Motion) down over 10 (following
Jason Tsai's downgrade), MUSE* (Micromuse) down over 6, VRTS* (Veritas
Software) down 4, TMPW* (TMP Worlwide) down over 3, ICIX (Intermedia
Communications) down over 2.......... In IPOland - BUSY (Busybox.com)
(images over net) up over 10%, EFDS broke issue bid but closed even, STLW
(Stratos (Lightwave) up over 60%, CKCM (Click Commerce) up over 75% and the
star of the day - MRVL (Marvell Technologies) up over 270% - a flashback to
the last century.  Coming Wed. - Genuity (GENU) - net infrast. to ISPs -
priced below range.

Justice Dept nixes FON, WCOM deal.

ORCL - hired Private Investigators to expose MSFT's "underhanded dealings".

IBM - $1 Billion behind new products boosting web efficientcy.

AOL - lic. InterTrust Tech for downloading music for a fee online.

COMS - narrower loss also acquires Kerbango (net radio developer).

Storage Networks - IPO coming this week - EMC (biggest supplier and major
customer) reveals that they're in a big fight over contract terms and
misrepresentations.

AOL, TWX  to Justice Dept  - AOL was right to keep IM system exclusive.

LEH issues top ten list - A, BEAS, CD, GMST, HWP, JNPR, LLY, MU, NT*, TLAB.

Flooz.com - using NetByTel's speech recong for phone activated net
transactions.

Deut T - $14.5 Billion debt deal will be biggest ever.

SNE - hires Credit Suisse vet as chief strategy exec. for SNE Broadband -
looking for dig. dist. deals.

LU* - Enterprise Network Group spin off will be called Avaya.

Nortel* - Charndran named COO - now solidly #2.

Softbank Europe - makes first investment - Scand. wireless incubator.

Telefonica - re-opening of insider trading controversy won't slow down
deal-making.

Conexant - acquires HotRail.

Brit Tel - layoffs and we're not interested in Freeserve at these levels.

Brazilian ISP and Portal Universo Online - partnered with co.s for travel
and tourism portal.

Stonebridge Tech. - net consulting firm - gets $55 million.

ERisks - risk managment - gets $14.5 million.

GS - re-thinking Zethus - online real-estate market.

SEC - tighten ability of accounting firms doing audits from making other
offering to the same client - question of credibility.

Germany - trying to control hate sites on net.

Liquid Audio and HMV.com - offering dig music downloads.

Idealab's Dot TV - domain names with .tv - giving names to stations hoping
it will catch on.

HSX - Hollywood Stock Exchange - national radio syndication deal - more to
us than the net.

Pop.com (Dreamworks and Imagine Ent. site) buys CountingDown.com (slick fan
site).

Media Metrix acquires Jupiter.

FleetBoston Fin. - financing YHOO's new headquarters in Sunnyvale CA.

NFB - extends Dime offer.

Nomura Research and EXDS - new web hosting service for online stock traders
in Japan.

WSJ Heard - Platinium Soft's Flip Filipowski's tale of getting interVentures
(net incubator) through IPO process - tough timing - firing Credit Suisse
hiring Robbie Stephens.

Expedia - MSFT and VC firm put in $60 million in private placement.

RightStart.com - online seller of children's ed and care products - nixes
IPO wants merger.

Doctors Co. offer malepractice discount to those who use iScribe (electronic
prescrib. PDA for docs) -

Pacific Health Systems and CPQ* - invest in service site for seniors -
Senior.com

There is talk: PCTL - more to come?/ Deut T or Q or Bell South for FON?/
CIEN for APAT?/

C.E. Unterberg Towbin - FutureLink roadshow in Denver/ Infovista New York
Lunch/ VINF - NY Lunch

The information contained herein is obtained from sources we believe to be
reliable but its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. C.E. Unterberg Towbin, or one or more of its
partners, may have a position in any of the securities discussed herein. All
rights reserved by C.E. Unterberg Towbin. May not be reproduced in whole or
in part without prior written authorization. This report is not an offer to
sell or solicitation of an offer to buy the securities mentioned herein.
*C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and/or has analyst
coverage.
+C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and has been involved
in a recent financing.
_____________________________
Bram Towbin
C.E. Unterberg Towbin
10 East 50th Street
New York NY 10022

Telephone: 212 572 8163
Fax: 212 759 4032
Btowbin@unterberg.com
www.unterberg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to SEC and NASD requirements, all incoming and outgoing e-mail of
C.E. Unterberg, Towbin is subject to review by the Compliance Department.

Please note that C.E. Unterberg, Towbin does not allow the use of e-mail to
request, authorize or  effect the purchase or sale of any security, to send
fund transfer instructions, or to effect any other transactions.  Any such
request, orders or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will
not be processed.

================================================================


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=09/26/2001>, published as of 09/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Toby, I think NNG's looks great.  I agree, let's do the same for TW.

This is an FYI to the TW Mktg Rep's that the TW unsubscribed report will look a little different (see how NNG's is below).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kuehl, Toby
Sent:	Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:52 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Frazier, Perry
Cc:	Licciardo, Jeanne; Abramowicz, Richard
Subject:	RE: TW Unsubscribed capacity
Importance:	High

Lindy, Perry

When we go into production, I think we would want to be similar across the pipes in look and feel for the Unsubscribed capacity.  We can set up the criteria to in several different ways.  Please see NNG's Unsubscribed site http://www.nng.enron.com/dob/etfr_avcap.html and click on Unsubscribed to view the dropdowns.   I would suggest this is the way to go for the TW Unsubscribed page. Unlike today where the user has to pull the complete page up on TW's Unsubscribed,  this will give the user capability to define what they are looking for.  Please let me know as soon as possible so Rich can set up the format for TW's Unsubscribed.  If you have any questions please let me give me a call 31527.

Toby

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abramowicz, Richard
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 2:22 PM
To:	Kuehl, Toby
Cc:	Licciardo, Jeanne
Subject:	TW Unsubscribed capacity

We will soon be posting TW's unsubscribed capacity to the internet from the new CAS system.  The CAS and EDI requirements have been defined; but we don't yet know how the data should be displayed on the internet.  Should we copy the format from NNG's long term unsubscribed capacity or from TW's current unsubscribed capacity?


Oscar -- At this point, FERC does not have jurisdiction over coops and munis (most public power entities are non-jurisdictional) and cannot "force" them to join RTOs.  TVA does not have to join an RTO either.  However, FERC does have some carrots and sticks that it can use, for example, a public that does not join an RTO could be precluded from using the jurisdictional (actually, the rest) of the transmission system.  Therefore, many will probably join just as they have currently filed "reciprocity" tariffs at FERC in order to have the advantages of using the system.  EK Coop currently has a reciprocity tariff on file with FERC, so would probably have to withdraw it at some point if it decides not to join an RTO.

Also, requirements to make publics join RTOs are in the current legislative proposals before Congress.  I am not sure that any will actually pass; however, Enron is working on this too.

Other questions are answered below.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dalton III, Oscar
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 1:57 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Roan, Michael
Cc:	Forster, David
Subject:

Christi/Mike:

In a meeting yesterday with East Kentucky Power Cooperative, they indicated that they will be joining a RTG to be headed by TVA which will essentially become and RTO for Public Power entities.  We have also heard indirectly, that EK will make some type of filing/release that they are non-jurisdictional and therefore not required to join any
RTO.

I would like your comments on whether FERC can force EK into the MISO or Alliance.

EK has mostly 161 kv line with some 345kv and is right in the middle of the North to South transfer that takes place between the Midwest and TVA.

Key questions:

1.  Can EK opt out of the process....even if they have a large transmission system
[Nicolay, Christi L.]   Currently, yes, see above for sticks.

2.  Will a RTG for public power be encouraged/discouraged.  If its discouraged by FERC, can FERC shut it down?
[Nicolay, Christi L.]  FERC cannot actually tell publics that they cannot be an RTG; however, FERC has the same sticks.  If legislatively or otherwise (through DOE) TVA ends up joining an RTO, these others in the vicinity of TVA may well follow.

3.  Where in the process is the Public Power RTG?
[Nicolay, Christi L.]  I am not familiar with this RTG (I don't think they have filed anything at FERC and they do not have to.)  JOE C.- have you heard anything?

any other comments would be helpful.

thanks

oscar


SYSTEM WARNING NOTIFICATION [200000205]

For operating day 08/25/2000 the ISO is predicting deficiencies in Operating
Reserve
due to:

anticipated high loads and temperatures across the ISO
Control Area today

Effective 07:44, 08/25/2000: The ISO is issuing a "Warning" notice and
is requesting additional Supplemental Energy bids, up to 2500 MW,
for Hour Ending 13 through Hour Ending 19.

Those who have additional energy or capacity to provide are highly
encouraged to submit bids into the supplemental energy market.

This message is from Market Operations  at the
California ISO.

Notice issued at: 08/25/2000 07:48


Please note that our E-Mail address has been  changed. Our new address is  cardonmckay@shaw.ca

Best regards,

Don & Carol McKay


Yes to both questions...


Do you do expense reports and have not taken the training?

Expense Management System (XMS) - Cost: $135
         June 4th		8:30am-11:30am	EB564
June 19th	1:00pm-4:00pm		  EB564

The Expense Management System (XMS) is a tool used to electronically submit your expense report for approval and payment through the Enron Intranet. It is user friendly, accurate and less labor intensive for you and the accounting staff.  This system will help you report your travel and entertainment expenses.

You will learn how to:
E	Create New Expense Reports
E	Enter Cash Expense Receipts
E	Adding Company Card Entries
E	Enter Personal Car Mileage
E	Foreign Currency Translation
E	Reimbursement Method
E	Designating your Approving Manager
E	Designating your Administrative Assistant
E	Submitting Your Expense Report
E	Reviewing your Expense Report
E	And Much More...

Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website, http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any questions, please call 713 853-1816.


Gerald - the attached represents the documents that WIlliam's is willing to
sign.  They will not give us a "material change" out.  My preference is to
sign the attached as it represents a free option to ENA.

Chris
x31666

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2001 02:18
PM ---------------------------

"Sanders, Dale T." <Dale.T.Sanders@Williams.com> on 01/26/2001 10:21:22 AM
To: "Chris. Meyer (E-mail)" <Chris.Meyer@enron.com>
cc: "King, Donny W (WGP SouthCentral)" <Donny.W.King@Williams.com>,
"Thompson, Tim" <Tim.Thompson@Williams.com>, "Cary, John"
<John.Cary@williams.com>
Subject: Precedent Agreement

Chris,

Here is the latest and greatest version.? The changes that we made from your
last version are reflective of the phone conversation between you and Donny
King the other day.? We had some other changes adding some information
defining the project and some other minor housekeeping changes.? Let us know
what you think.

Dale
 <<Williams comments 1-26-01.doc>>
Dale T. Sanders
Williams Gas Pipeline-SouthCentral
Senior Representative-Business Development
Phone:?? 270-688-6944
Fax:????? 270-688-6320
)? e-mail:?? <mailto:dale.t.sanders@williams.com

 - Williams comments 1-26-01.doc


Congratulations on your promotion to Senior Director, a promotion that is
very well deserved.  You do an amazing job of balancing children and work,
and contributing so much on your work on 133.


Jeanne,

Per our conversation, I am requesting a check for the remaining dollar value
from the relocation credit card provided to me.  The name as it appears on
the card is Matthew Smith.  My new address is:  2345 Bering Dr., Apt. 514,
Houston, TX 77057.  It would be great to have the check by the end of the
week.

Thanks you.

Mat


---------------------- Forwarded by Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT on 09/21/2000 08:04
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Corry Bentley                           09/20/2000 10:01 AM

To: Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Scheduler's Regions - Sept. 20

The schedulers are responsible for the following regions:

Lisa Burnett  PJM

Jason Choate  COMED & NYPP

Gerald Gilbert  NEPOOL

Matt Lorenz  MAPP

Gretchen Lotz   SERC (TVA, JEA)

Jim Terrell        SPP  & ERCOT  (Entergy, Ercot)

Maria Valdes  ECAR  (Cinergy, AEP)

Please update your crew.
Thanks,
Corry


This email is also available at <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/>
 <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weather/>

EVENT INFORMATION
 <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c459583>
 <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c4595ba>
 <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c4595e0>
 <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c4595f8>
  <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/pics/clear.gif>
CO-LOCATED EVENTS
 <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c459769>
 <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c459786>
  <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/pics/clear.gif>
EVENT SPONSORS
  <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/pics/clear.gif>
 <http://www.commodities-now.com/>
  <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/pics/clear.gif>
 <http://www.connectingpower.com/publication.asp?pub=4>
  <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/pics/clear.gif>
 <http://www.erivatives.com/>
  <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/pics/clear.gif>

<http://www.appliederivatives.com/>
 <http://www.iipower.com/>

 <http://www.derivativesweek.com/>

 <http://www.globalreinsurance.com/>
  <http://www.eyeforenergy.com/weatheremail/pics/clear.gif>

Over 70% of European companies face weather-related risk

Today's business is all about risk and how to mitigate it. Weather derivatives have become one of the key tools industries as wide-ranging as utilities, airlines and agriculture have at hand to offset risks associated with temperature and precipitation.

So how do you take advantage of this new market in weather trading that has emerged in Europe?
What key issues do you have to be aware of to mitigate your operational and trading risks through weather?

Eyeforenergy is delighted to bring you this event which will focus on how you can best seize this exciting new market opportunity. As ever, the conference will be driven by the industry leaders in this arena, backed up by expert advice from those helping the industry make the right moves in emissions.

Speakers at this event will include:

Aquila, Mirant, Element Re, Entergy-Koch Trading,
Risk Management Solutions, Centrica, Aon Capital Markets, Utilicorp, weatherXchange, Systeia Capital Management, LIFFE, and more <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c459583>...

INSURANCE VS. TRADING: Discover which strategy is right for your company's weather risk management needs.

LIQUIDITY AND TRUST: Where can you find the weather products you need, and who can you trust to deliver them?

ACCESS TO MARKET: Learn how you can tap into the exploding weather market, whether you're trading online, through a broker or through the financial markets.

RISK MITIGATION: Hear case studies on how companies have used weather to address operational risk

A NEW SOURCE OF REVENUE: Weather isn't just a risk management tool. You'll hear how leading companies are trading weather for financial profit.

PLUS... a full networking programme to help you meet and do business with the people who can make a difference to your future.

Programme <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c459583>	 Fees/Discounts <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c4595ba>	 REGISTER NOW! <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c4595e0>	 Request More Info <http://193.128.182.100:8081/ss?click&eyeforenergy&3c4595f8>

(c) Eyeforenergy 2002
All enquiries regarding this email should be sent to events@eyeforenergy.com <mailto:events@eyeforenergy.com>


Dear Vince,

It is my great pleasure to confirm your participation at Energy & Power Risk
Management 2001 on May 14th. Please take a moment to look at the current
line-up on the attached draft program. I have held a position on the panel
discussion if you wish to take part. The current talk titles are based upon
our telephone conversations and I am happy to discuss any potential changes.
I would like to confirm the following details by Thursday, January 18th:

Final talk title
Bullet points (5-6)
Full name, job title, company title
Postal address

I am sure that you will agree that this year, Energy & Power Risk Management
,s annual event provides a wide range of highly topical sessions. I look
forward to receiving your full presentation details and meeting you in May.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Bristow
Conferences Manager, US
Risk Waters Group
270 Lafayette Street
Suite 7
New York 10012
212 925 6990 ext 225
pbristow@riskwaters.com

 - revspktemp2.doc


Why are you sending this to me?


Steve,

Sorry to cut you off, Dr. Boxleiter called me back.  He was unaware that Dad
might be released soon and also said that he thought that it would be
premature to do so.  He promised to look into Dad's release and let us know
what is going on.  Boxleiter also told me that Dad is on some different
medication: Ridilin (sic), an appetite stimulant, Rimeron, and possibly
Buspar (still).  Mom was unaware of the Ridilin.

Here are the Doctor's telephone numbers:

Boxleiter 584-3500
Herman  557-9111
Schoup  557-9111

Let me know if you and when you reach them so that we don't both badger
them.  I will do the same.  My plan is to call every day until I reach them.
Failing that, I will be in MPLS this week and able to fly down on a moment's
notice.

Take care,

Rob

P.S.  Dad was moved to room 422 which is "Skilled Care" - a Medicare thing.


HI Chris

You are right, we did not get paid for this gas.  Who is Mark Ellenberg

Margaret

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:19 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret; Wynne, Rita; Sanchez, Christina; Apollo, Beth
Subject:	RE: Sonat Park & Loan

Mark, I assume you are the person Sonat will be contacting.  Here are some items to consider,

	1.  Park balance on deal #1222  188,949 dth ( + or - 10,000 dth)
	2.  Loan balance on deal #1424  (96,000) dth
	3.  ENA sold Sonat 496,000 dth at $2.885 for Jan 2002 and did not deliver 418,708 dth (+ or - 10,000 dth, related to Item #1)
	4.  ENA sold Sonat 310,000 dth at $2.955 for May 2002, I don't know if this deal has been terminated or not.

Rita, Maria and I are looking for the Sonat pipeline statements for Jan 2002.  We have Dec 2001.  Would you see if you have those and let one of us know please?  Sonat may have stopped sending us statements, but this would answer my volume questions on items 1 and 3.

Margaret, could you see if Sonat paid us for 77,292 dth x $2.885 = $222,987.42 for the sale in Jan 2002?  I would be very surprised if they did.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sanchez, Christina
Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:32 AM
To:	Germany, Chris; McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	RE: Sonat Park & Loan

3/14/02
10:25 am

Barbara Gilbert, my scheduling rep. at Sonat, informed me that the attorneys in Sonat's Houston office will be contacting Enron's attorneys to set up a meeting to address the PAL issue.   .

Christina Sanchez

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:08 AM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	RE: Sonat Park & Loan

3/14/02
9:50 AM Per Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent.  Tammi spoke to Lisa Guthrie (205-325-3816) at Sonat to find out what flexibility Sequent would have taking out the parked gas.  Lisa said she didn't know if Enron could sell the gas.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McMichael Jr., Ed
Sent:	Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:29 PM
To:	Germany, Chris; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; 'Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail)'; Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	RE: Sonat Park & Loan

Thanks for the information.  Sell, Sell, Sell!  Sell it all to Sequent for March if you can get a good bid and have them agree to pay the moment we/they get confirmation on the nomination.  Try to get other bids to validate as best you can.  Do not talk to Sonat unless you have to - - asking permission is not advisable.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:38 PM
To:	McMichael Jr., Ed; Concannon, Ruth; 'Mark.Ellenberg@cwt.com'
Cc:	Parks, Joe; Garza, Maria; Mann, Kay; Olinger, Kimberly S.; Sanchez, Christina; Polsky, Phil; Shemin V. Proctor (E-mail); Dhont, Margaret
Subject:	Sonat Park & Loan

Ruth Concannon told me we want to try and sell the parked gas on Sonat.  This is what we have found out over the last 2 days.

ENA no longer has the ability to do nominations on Sonat's scheduling Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) believes that under normal conditions, we can sell the parked gas on Sonat without doing any nominations.  The party we sell the gas to would nominate the gas away from a specific PAL meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream contract.  Today I spoke with Tammi Depaolis at Sequent - she is interested in buying the gas and she might prepay for it.  I need to know;

1.  What volume to sell, I assume we are talking about 188,949 dth on deal #1222, which means we ignore the loaned volume of 96,000 dth on deal #1424.
2.  What period do I sell the gas for?  All out by March 31st subject to the operational conditions on the pipeline?  Or base load in April?  I prefer all out by March 31st but I would like to ask the pipeline if that's ok?
3.  How many bids do I need to get?  I called Sequent because I know they are active on Sonat.
4.  This may not matter but did Sonat ever pay us for the gas ENA sold them in January 2002 (see items in red down below).

Tammi will probably check with the pipeline to see if its ok to take our gas.  I don't want to sell gas to someone then find out the pipeline will not let them take it.

All of my previous notes are shown below in blue.

Summary:  Sonat has netted our Parked Gas Balance with our Loaned Gas Balance and filed a motion with the courts to retain the remaining Parked Gas Balance, 92,949 dth per my conversation with Sonat, to offset $879,030.42 ENA owes Sonat for the purchase of gas in October 2001.  According to Sonat, the payment was due November 26, 2001 but ENA did not pay.  Sonat's motion is set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th.

2/19/02  History  - Per Dave Dyer (205-326-2007) at Sonat
ENA has 2 Park & Loan (PAL) contracts with Sonat.  All PAL's with Sonat are under master contract PAL1001.  Sonat assigns a deal number to each deal under this contract.

Deal #1424 - ENA borrowed a total of 96,000 dth from Nov 3rd-5th and has not paid this back.  ENA still owes Sonat 96,000 dth.  The terms of the deal were to payback Sonat anytime with 3 days notice on any 3 days on 2002,   SONAT ONLY CHARGED ENA $96.00 FOR THIS DEAL, because Sonat needed to get gas off the system.

Deal #1222 - ENA parked 309,192 dth in August to come out in Jan 2002.  Sonat let ENA withdraw 42,951 on 11/29/01 leaving a balance of 266,241 dth.  In Jan 2002, ENA withdrew 8,588 dth per day for the 1st-9th.  That left a balance of 188,949 dth.  On Jan 8th, 2002, Sonat sent a letter stating that Sonat will hold on to the remaining to balance to offset 1) the Loaned gas on deal #1424 (96,000 dth) and 2) to offset dollars ENA has not paid Sonat for gas Sonat sold to ENA in October 2001.  According to Sonat, the remaining balance on this deal is 92,949 dth = [309,192 parked in Aug - 42,951 w/d in Nov - 77,292 w/d in Jan - 92,000 balance on #1424].  According to Sonat's letter, Sonat has filed the appropriate motion for court approval for the offsets.  According to Dave, ENA is being billed $.00305 x daily balance in this account.  ENA should have paid some bigger amount when the gas was parked in August.

Other items;
ENA purchased system supply from Sonat in October 2001.  ENA purchased 286,998 at an average price of $3.063 = $879,030.42.  According to Sonat, ENA did not pay for this before Enron declared bankruptcy.  ENA also sold Sonat gas - 16,000 dth day at $2.885 (sitara #1172076) in January 2002 and 10,000 dth day at $2.955 in May 2002 (sitara #1172087).  ENA used 77,292 dth of the parked gas on deal #1222 to supply the 16,000 dth before Sonat stopped ENA from withdrawing from the park.  ENA defaulted on 418,708 dth of the Sonat deal in January.

Sonat's in house legal counsel is Patti Frances (205-325-7696).  I left a message for Patti to call me.

2/20/02
Patti Frances returned my call.  Patti said the motion is currently set to be reviewed by the court on March 6th.  I asked Patti if there were any penalties for not performing on the Jan 2002 sale to Sonat and if Sonat was going to pay for the 77,292 dth (8,588 dth per day for Jan 1st - 9th) that ENA did supply.  Patti said she didn't think there were penalties but she would verify that and see if they were going to pay.  I also asked her if Sonat is still honoring the ENA sale to Sonat in May 2002 and if Sonat would pay ENA if ENA performed.  She will check on it and call me back.

2/25/02
Per Kay Mann - Mark Ellenberg is the legal counsel assigned to this contract.
1:10 PM.  Left a follow-up message for Patti Frances regarding our conversation on 2/20/02.

3/11/02
Per Ruth - Mark Ellenberg wants us to try and pull the gas out of the Sonat Pal.  Christina Sanchez (ENA Scheduler) will find out 1) if we still have access to Sonat's EBB and 2) if we can nominate the gas out of the PAL's.

3/13/02
Per Christina - ENA's ID's and passwords have been cancelled.  Christina called Barbara Gilbert (205-325-7310), ENA's account rep at Sonat - Barbara said she would talk about this issue with Sonat's legal counsel and see if its ok to set up ENA with an ID.  Christina also believes we could sell the gas without doing any nominations.  The party we sell the gas to would use a specific PAL's meter and reference our PAL contract as the upstream.
3:30 PM  Tammi Depaolis (832-397-1728) at Sequent is interested in buying this gas and she might prepay to get it.  She will see if they can take the gas without ENA doing a nomination.  I need to verify the volume parked and when I want Sonat to take it out.
3:40 PM  Barbara is waiting to hear from Sonat's legal department.


Jeff,

Very good for this shareholder to see.

Best regards,
Jeff

Jeff B. Love
Managing Partner - Houston  Office
Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP
3500 Chase Tower
600 Travis Street
Houston, Texas  77002-3095
Tel: (713) 226-1286
FAX: (713) 238-3707
e-mail: jlove@lockeliddell.com

Yahoo! Finance 	Finance Home  - Yahoo!  - Help     	Associated Press

Datek Online
[ Latest Headlines  | Market Overview  | News Alerts   ]

     Related Quotes    ENE   48.78  -0.77    delayed 20 mins - disclaimer

Thursday  July 12, 5:59 pm Eastern Time
Enron Beats Analysts' Expectations
Energy Company Enron Reports Earnings Increase of Almost 40 Percent in  Second Quarter
HOUSTON (AP) -- Enron Corp. (NYSE:ENE  - news ) reported a nearly 40 percent increase in  second-quarter earnings on Thursday and beat analysts' expectations due to  robust growth in its power marketing and energy management businesses in the  United States and Europe.

The Houston-based energy wholesaler and retailer earned $404 million for the  quarter ended June 30, or 45 cents per share. That compared with $289 million,  or 34 cents per share a year earlier.
Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial/First Call predicted earnings of 42  cents per share.
Despite continued growth in its natural gas and electricity trading business,  though, Enron's stock has faltered in the past year due to unmet expectations  for its high-speed Internet business.
Enron's broadband business reported a $102 million loss, compared with an $8  million loss for the same quarter a year ago.
Enron President and Chief Executive Jeff Skilling said Enron would  ``significantly'' reduce spending in its broadband unit ``to match the reduced  revenue opportunities currently available.''
Enron reported $50.1 billion in revenue for the second quarter of 2001,  almost triple the $16.9 billion reported for the same quarter a year ago.  Company officials expressed confidence of reaching $1.80 per share in earnings  for the full year 2001 and $2.15 per share for 2002.
``Our wholesale and retail energy businesses continue to dramatically expand  business activity and increase profitability,'' said Skilling.
Enron has been embroiled in the conflict over California's energy woes, with  a committee of that state's Senate issuing subpoenas to the corporation and  other generating companies earlier this year in connection with an investigation  of possible price manipulation in energy markets.
Shares of Enron rose 45 cents to close at $49.55 on the New York Stock  Exchange Thursday. Enron's stock was trading above $70-a-share at this time last  year.
Email  this story  - Most-emailed  articles  - Most-viewed  articles

More Quotes and News:	Enron Corp (NYSE:ENE  - news )
	Related News Categories: oil/energy , utilities

Help

Copyright ? 2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy  - Terms of Service
Copyright ? 2001 The Associated Press. All  rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be  published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without the prior written  authority of The Associated Press.Questions or  Comments?


k#  MDQ  Delivery Receipt
894027  8000  M2  Access (this is less than the MDQ for now)

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000 03:47
PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany
09/29/2000 03:44 PM
To: Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Scott Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Judy Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Tetco MDQ's

Tetco MDQ's for OCT

k#  MDQ  Delivery Receipt
892510  16136  M3  Access (same as last month)
892511  7500  M3  Access (same as last month)
893145  5000  M3  Access (same as last month)
892875  9400  M3  Access (same as last month)

892872  19355  M2  Access (same as last month - this # may be too high)
894029  5000  M2  Access (new)
894028  5000  M2  ELA (new)

VNGk#
830015  10555  M2  Access (MDQ is higher but only use 10,555 dth)


Hi Stacy,

I don't know if Jeff or Debra mentioned this to you, but this is a master we
need in place in connection with a gas/power asset management arrangement
with the cities of Yazoo City and Clarksdale Mississippi.  As you can see,
Jeff suggested you take a look at it before it is sent to the customer.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/15/2001 08:31
AM ---------------------------

Jeffrey T Hodge@ECT
05/14/2001 09:57 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale Master Gas Agreements

Kay:

That would be great.

Jeff

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/14/2001 08:44 AM

		 To: Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale Master Gas Agreements

Hi Jeff,

Did you want Stacy to take a look at this?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/14/2001 08:43
AM ---------------------------

DEBRA PERLINGIERE@ECT
05/11/2001 05:04 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: City of Yazoo/Clarksdale  Master Gas Agreements

Attached are drafts of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement for gas.  Upon
completion of a guaranty I will incorporate a section for same.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Carla,

I need to book the computer training room for a meeting Wednesday at 3:30.
Can you make that happen?

Let me know.

Chris


Where do I begin?  I guess I could start with several excuses or reasons to justify my behavior on Friday, but the truth is there aren't any.  I only am left with total humiliation and embarrassment for my actions, words, and behavior.  Please accept my sincere apology.

Sandra


Please plan attend the State of the Eastern Gas Trid meeting presented by Julie Gomez.  The meeting will be held on October 15, 2001 in ECN32c2 from 3-4.
Please advise if you will not be available to attend.

Daniel Quezada


Hi,

Did you receive the PPL paperwork?

Please let me know when this has been completed as we have several deals
which need to be executed.

I'll forward a copy to you if you wish,

Thanks,
David