We have received the following executed EEI agreements:

Sempra  Energy Trading Corp. - 11/15/2000
Dayton Power and Light Company - 12/5/2000

Copies will be distributed to Legal and Credit.


absolutely...though i'm not sure how you do it.  call chris gaskill and he should be abl to help.

From:	Kevin McGowan/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:33 AM
To:	John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

John,

Could I get access to the gas message board?

KJM


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/23/2001 11:27 AM -----

>
>  <<ruling to shorten time to file protests or responses.doc>>

 - ruling to shorten time to file protests or responses.doc


OK.  Mary Cook just asked me to email her a copy of the Gas deal (VC0975.1),
FYI.

From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 05/31/2001 09:04 AM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: KCS

We're waiting for Teresa Bushman

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Diane Anderson@ENRON
	05/31/2001 08:53 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: KCS

The revised redline is OK with Fred Lagrasta per Derek Bailey


Start Date: 1/26/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002012623.txt


FYI...................

-----Original Message-----
From: Johanson, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Miller, Kent
Cc: Stevens, Bob; Bodnar, Michael
Subject: FW: Storage Charges on Allocation Error Days
Importance: High

Kent,

Steve is requesting a ~ $60,000 reimbursement for the allocation error this summer.  Please call me when you have a moment to discuss this.

We need to strategize on our counter-proposal.

Tim Johanson

-----Original Message-----
From: Sweeney, Steve [mailto:SteveSweeney@Cogentrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Johanson, Tim
Subject: Storage Charges on Allocation Error Days

Tim,

In the attached file I have calculated the following charges that I have
incurred because of NNG incorrectly listing my project storage injection
rates in your allocation system. By far the biggest cost to me is the way we
have changed or nominations of natural gas from are suppliers as the
spreadsheet will show. We made this change in the nomination for July,
August & September. In calculating our nomination we look at what we could
put firm into storage, plant usage on none run days and SMS if available. If
this was fixed back in June when we asked what was going on with storage and
over runs into storage. I would have order large volumes of the Tier I
instead of purchasing the more costly Tier II. If we nominated the higher
Tier I volumes we expected to see DDVC charge of $.40 on all days trying to
over run into storage. That would have been the case the way your system was
set up. Instead I have these higher cost to my suppliers.

Please call me with any question on the spreadsheet. You can verify
Whitewater DDVC & SMS for September. I believe it was around the 18 or 19
when the problem was fixed.

 <<Cogentrix DDVC's.xls>>

Here is UtiliCorp Calculation of Charges that I inputed for Cottage Grove.

 <<LSPOWER2001ANALYSIS.xls>>

Stephen Sweeney
Manager of Fuel
Cogentrix Energy


Start Date: 1/22/02; HourAhead hour: 24;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


The report named: Power West Price Peak <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Power+West+Price+Peak&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/17/2001>, published as of 10/17/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


I would like to take Dec 26, 31 and Jan. 2 as vacation days.

Thanks,

Kay


The PUC's decision 1) suspending DA and 2) signaling the PUC's intent to continue to consider nullifying DA contracts signed after July 1 is full of holes.
We haven't detected any downside in joining with coalitions, and trying to get other coalitions, to appeal the PUC order.
Sue Mara is working with the ARM coalition to appeal yesterday's order and is taking the lead generally on the effort to reverse things.
The appeals that we would join, and attempt others to persue on their own, would focus principally on two issues:  1) disabusing the PUC of the notion that it has the legal authority to nullify contracts retroactively, and 2) lifting the suspension on DA altogether (let me know if I've missed anything here, Sue).

Please let us know if folks have any concerns that would cause us to reconsider pursuing these challenges.

Best,
Jeff


Hi Vince,

The following has been organised for you:

Sunday
6.45pm  Dinner at Diverso restaurant 85 Piccadilly 0207 491 2222 with Ben,
Steve, Anjam

Monday
Clear until Noon
12pm  Lunch with Dale Surbey at Olivetto or Olivo
2.30pm  Interviews start
6.30pm
or 7pm  Approximate time for end of interviews

Tuesday
Clear until 10am
10am to 12pm  Energydesk.com meeting with Mikael Nordstrum
Afternoon clear

Wednesday
9am to 10.30am  RiskCare meeting in NE1002 with Michael Curran, Anjam and Dale
11.30am to 12pm  Meeting with John Sherriff

Regards,

Anjam
x35383


Are you available? I thought you might be interested since DDuran will
apparently be there.  I'm scheduled for vacation. I'll arrange an invite if
you are interested.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/14/2001 03:29
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/14/2001 01:50 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth
White/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Development Efforts

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001
01:50 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Lisa Zarsky @ ECT                           03/14/2001 01:36 PM

To: W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Churbock/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen
Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Hausinger/HOU/EES@EES, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rusty Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Raimund Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Fred
Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Greg
Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorie Leigh/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Development Efforts

Per Dave Duran's request I scheduled the following meeting.
Please mark you calendars to attend

WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2001

@ 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM

EB 3321

RE: DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS

If there are any conflicts with date and time please respond immediately to
me at 3-4321.

Thank You,

Lisa


ouch.....

 http://news.ft.com/ft/gx.cgi/ftc?pagename=View&c=Article&cid=FT3TRNSRXSC


Begining 6/4/01 most North American Gas and Power quotes will be displayed on and transactable from the TRUEQUOTE trading platform. Please call me if you have any questions or need more information. Thanks.

Savita
X31787


eBiz is one year old.  Happy Birthday to us and thanks to you, our readers.

In this issue:
Why deregulation is working in Pennsylvania
A London employee gets a cool car for referring a friend to Enron
Some interesting quotes in The Last Word

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com (http://home.enron.com ), click Publications, then click eBiz, and "eBiz June 29, 2001."


FYI, the Arter & Hadden office is all of 2.9 miles from the airport, so  it's
a very short cab ride.? If anyone is driving and needs directions,  please
let me know.? Our office has a small conference room which might not  be
large enough for all the Board attendees, so we are meeting a few floors
down, in a larger room which the building makes available to tenants.? As
Gary noted, it is called the Boardroom, and is located on the fourth  floor.?
We'll bring in some sandwich menus and order out for a late  lunch.? Look
forward to seeing you.
?
Dan
?
> "Gary Ackerman" <foothill@lmi.net> 09/05/00 02:09PM  >>>
Folks,

We have a venue and location for our new Board  meeting.? Arter & Hadden
has offered their office space.

Dan  wrote me:

"Gary, our office is at 402 West Broadway.? Phone is  (619) 238-0001 and
fax is (619) 238-8333.? The room is called "The  Boardroom" and it's on
the 4th floor.? Arter & Hadden will pick  up the charge, in thanks for
all the work which comes our direction from  WPTF.? Do you want to start
with a lunch?? Or would you prefer to  assume people will have lunched
and just have snacks and  drinks?"

I told Dan we would appreciate a late lunch, at 2 pm.?  The meeting will
start at 1 pm.

The dial-in number is  712-257-3178
PC 39908

Okay, That's  it.

gba


No, Kris moved into Steve's house off of Brightside. Dykes is at home in Cov
right now. He said try to get in touch with either him or Kris on Sat. I
have Kris' cell and home number, I'l give it to you at home. I gave him
tonight's pick. I can't get to the website to put my money in while at work.
If you have time later, give me a call and I will give you the site and my
credit card number and maybe you can put it in for me, only if you have
time. I'm just afraid that by the time I get home and put money in, it will
take to long to process and not be able to bet. Just let me know!

Later,
Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Taylor, Michael E [SMTP:Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, August 30,2001 1:34 PM
> To:	Doug Block
> Subject:	RE: drbob
>
> Sweet!  Send it out! Are they still living in Oakbrook?  We now need to
> set up a time to meet them Sat morning.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Block [mailto:Doug.Block@Halliburton.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:30 PM
> To: Taylor, Michael E
> Subject: RE: drbob
>
>
> Dykes said they will pay $50 for all 3 people
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Taylor, Michael E [SMTP:Michael.E.Taylor@ENRON.com]
> > Sent:	Wednesday, August 29,2001 5:20 PM
> > To:	doug.block@halliburton.com
> > Subject:	drbob
> >
> > Doug,
> >
> > Give me a call.  If we can get dykes we are good to go!
> >
> > Michael Taylor
> > Coal and Emissions Trading
> > Enron Global Markets
> > (713) 853-1885
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate
> > and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of
> > the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
> disclosure by
> > others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
> (or
> > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> > reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> > delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
> hereto)
> > are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create
> or
> > evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or
> any of
> > its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may
> not
> > be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> > otherwise. Thank you.
> > **********************************************************************


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042813.txt


Rod,

As requested, attached is a status up-date on the Goals & Objectives for
NBPL.

Please call should you have questions.


Anne, can you look at this deal and check to see how it was priced?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001 04:41
PM ---------------------------

Darla Saucier@ENRON
03/20/2001 01:26 PM
To: michael.grigsby@enron.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Newark Group Billing for February

Are you the trader on this deal???  See details below.  Should this deal be
in Sitara under two separate deals with the counterparties listed below???
Please advise ASAP.   They will not pay until this matter is resolved.

Thanks
Darla

---------------------- Forwarded by Darla Saucier/NA/Enron on 03/20/2001
01:02 PM ---------------------------

"Gong, Heidi" <hgong@tngus.com> on 03/14/2001 04:09:00 PM
To: "'darla.saucier@enron.com'" <darla.saucier@enron.com>
cc: "Cockrum, Alanna" <acockrum@tngus.com>

Subject: FW: Newark Group Billing for February

There is another problem on the invoice.  According to the PG&E
transportation billing Newark Sierra Paperboard used 72758 mmbtu and
California Paperboard used 14650 mmbtu.  The total mmbtu invoiced should
be 87408 mmbtu not 87800 mmbtu.  Please bill California Paperboard 14650
mmbtu instead.  Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: Gong, Heidi
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:07 PM
To: 'darla.saucier@enron.com'
Cc: Cockrum, Alanna; 'suzanne.christiansen@enron.com'
Subject: Newark Group Billing for February

Please split your invoice # 22964SA to two separate billings and fax to
the below 2 locations.  We will send the check to :
Enron North America Corp
1400 Smith St.
Houston,  TX   77002
Attn:  Veronica Espinoza

72758 mmbtu to:

Newark Sierra Paperboard Corp.
800 W. Church St.
Stockton,  CA  95203
Attn: Heidi Gong
Tel #  (209) 466-7088 x201
Fax #  (209) 464-9125
Email: hgong@tngus.com

15042 mmbtu to:

California Paperboard Corp.
525 Mathew St.
Santa Clara,  CA   95052
Attn:  Alanna Cockrum
Tel #  (408) 727-7377 x229
Fax #  (408) 988-0585
Email: acockrum@tngus.com


Hey,

I have an exam tomorrow and I'm heading home to grab my books and come back
here to study. I"m leaving in about 15 minutes. If I don't get the file,
check out my stuff below, and I should be back by 8:45 your time.

Robin Rodrigue
06/12/2000 06:18 PM
To: Ryan Watt/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: I have us Long 311 contracts...

Your position still hasn't pulled in...I think the system's just running
really slow.  I'll give you a call when I get it.

RR

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Ryan Watt                           06/12/2000 07:01 PM

To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: I have us Long 311 contracts...


Please see attached memo and forms.

Thanks,

Larry


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Chang, Fran
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 10:53 AM
To:	Crandall, Sean
Subject:	Important! DART product
Importance:	High

Sean:

Torrey Moorer in EOL IT group has created the Mid-C DART product on EOL.  In the future when a trade is done on EOL, it will be bridged into Enpower Deal Entry. However, although the "DART flag" will be on in deal entry, I believe for now it's informational only, and it's not doing anything to alert the schedulers.  I would like to know the rationale for creating this DART product and how you would like the schedulers in Day Ahead group (Cara's group) and Real Time (Bill's group) to see in their applications.  If I can get this info from you, I'll work with Enpower IT to put all necessary DART processes in place.

Thanks,

Fran Chang
West Power Risk Management
503.464.7973 (phone)
503.464.3740 (fax)


Jim,

Attached is an updated list of customer's likely interested in supporting our regulatory and legislative DA efforts.  This is slightly updated from the list we sent week before.

Let me know if you still need help soliciting customer support.

Tom


Interesting letter....

----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 03/01/2001 01:36 PM -----

	"Pisciotta, Aileen" <APisciotta@KelleyDrye.com>
	03/01/2001 10:43 AM

		 To: "'sue.nord@enron.com'" <sue.nord@enron.com>, "'scott_bolton@enron.net'"
<scott_bolton@enron.net>, "'sburns@enron.com'" <sburns@enron.com>
		 cc: "Wilson, Heather M." <HWilson@KelleyDrye.com>, "Aamoth, Robert J."
<RAamoth@KelleyDrye.com>
		 Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

Dear Sue, Scott and Steve -- The letter below from George Gilder to FCC
Chairman Powell sets important parameters for our "vision".  We anticipated
that Powell would be unimpressed, if not hostile, to "open access"
approaches, but this should put a nail in the coffin.  The watchword will be
"innovation".  I imagine that both "Telecosm" and Hamel's "Leading the
Revolution" are high on Powell's reading list!

We look forward to talking with you next week.  Aileen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Engel, Michael C.
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 6:22 PM
To: Telecommunications Practice Group
Subject: FW: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

This is an interesting letter to Commissioner Powell published last week.
Given the level of respect that the Commissioner has for Mr. Gilder (MKP has
repeatedly referenced Gilder's book Telecosm and speaks of him frequently),
it may be worth reading.  In any event, it gives a pretty good 30,000 foot
view of telecom policy considerations.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Jackson [mailto:pjackson@fcc.gov]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 12:09 PM
To: powell_interns@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [powell_interns] Gilder Letter to Chairman Powell

** Confidential **

The Wall Street Journal
Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Friday, February 23, 2001

The Broadband Economy Needs a Hero
By George Gilder and Bret Swanson

  Dear Mr. Powell:

  Whether you know it or not, your leadership and decisions over the next
four years will have more impact on the economy than those of Federal
Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

   Surely, our stock-market swoon of 2000 and stagnating economic growth in
2001 are partly due to the Fed's inexplicable liquidity leash combined with
the highest tax burden since World War II. But the chief threats to the
21st- century economy are the politicians, bureaucrats and Silicon Valley
know-nothings responsible for America's broadband connectivity crisis.

  We owe Les Vadasz of Intel an apology for making fun of his prediction
that narrowband links would prevail into the 21st century. The Internet as
we know it is about seven years old, yet fewer than 7 million of 100 million
American homes enjoy broadband and its wealth of social, commercial and
educational opportunities.

  Contrary to popular belief, the chief obstacle to progress is not
entrenched Bell operating companies, but a regulatory regime that presumes
to "level the playing field," "equalize access," and "promote competition."
The only result of these policies has been the effective nationalization and
paralysis of broadband.

  The 1996 Telecommunications Act ruled that in exchange for the right to
enter the long-distance telephone business, the Bells must open their
residential copper lines to competitors, as well as allow these competitors
to locate equipment in Bell central offices and offer digital subscriber
line (DSL) services over Bell-owned copper. In November 1999, the FCC issued
a further decree forcing the Bells to stop dragging their feet and
cooperate.

  The FCC actions spawned a new category of start-ups known as broadband
competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), which planned to compete with
the Bells. Funded by billions of dollars in Silicon Valley venture capital
and public offerings, companies like Rhythms, Northpoint, Covad and Jato
earned praise from "libertarians" in both Washington and Palo Alto, Calif.
Northpoint even had freedom-loving former FCC Chairman Reed Hundt on its
board.

  But despite all good intentions, these were not high-tech start-ups. They
became venture capital-funded lobbying and litigation shops intent on
forcing the Bells to share their copper. With more press releases on new
lawsuits than on new subscribers, one of the companies epitomized the
strategy: "Rhythms continues successful regulatory litigation." The result
of all this lawyering? The CLECs won everything. Access to copper wherever
they sued. Multimillion- dollar awards from the Bells. And bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy?

  Late last year, Northpoint filed for Chapter 11 after Verizon withdrew an
$800 million investment. Jato closed its doors. Rhythms cut its staff by
23%. Covad is slashing 800 jobs and closing 260 central offices. Of Covad's
274,000 lines in service, 92,000 are not "recognizing revenue." And all of
this is happening in the face of massive consumer demand for broadband
services.

  The problem is that DSL is risky and hard. Some studies have reported that
50% of DSL hook-ups fail on the first try. Even amicable relationships
between CLECs and Bells are a software nightmare, with a different billing
and provisioning system for each service provider. Such difficulties render
DSL not a matter of will and politics but of technical and entrepreneurial
risks. Companies are forced to invest heavily in research and engineering
personnel, but have few opportunities for outsized rewards.

  That's because Congress and the FCC set up an awkward scheme in which
everyone got a piece of the action but no one could make any money. Often
barred from carrying signals across long-distance boundaries, the Bells hand
off traffic to other long-distance carriers. CLECs rent lines from the
Bells. And Internet service providers end up doing costly customer service
and marketing to get people signed up in the first place. In short, as many
as four parties routinely battle for low- or negative-margin chunks of
$40-monthly bills.

  By summoning new competition and then mandating the rivals cooperate in
open access, the government effectively privatized the risks and socialized
the profits. By December, the Bells had signed up 1.8 million users and the
CLECs 600,000, combining for just 2.4 million DSL subscribers among the 120
million or so copper-connected U.S. homes and businesses.

  Cable modems, with 4.9 million subscribers at year-end, have done better,
but AOL Time Warner and AT&T, America's two cable behemoths, are bogged down
by the same open-access nonsense that plagues DSL. Over the past two years,
AT&T CEO Michael Armstrong acquired $140 billion in cable assets while
watching his company's $184 billion market capitalization plummet to $81
billion.

  Just last month the Federal Trade Commission ruled that AOL Time Warner
must offer "at least one non-affiliated cable broadband ISP [Internet
Service Provider] service on Time Warner's cable system before AOL itself
begins offering service, followed by two other non-affiliated ISPs within 90
days and a requirement to negotiate in good faith with others after that."
The nation's second-largest ISP, EarthLink, will now get access to AOL's
expensive cables pretty much for free.

  This regulatory morass treats the most dynamic, technically creative, and
transformative industry in the world economy as if it were some static
commodity market for corn or pork bellies.

  Mr. Chairman, in a recent speech you made the key point that innovation is

more important than price competition. When it comes to leading-edge
services and technologies, narrow price competition is almost meaningless.
Internet innovation means qualitative change, order-of-magnitude price
reductions and constantly changing services that always constitute
monopolies when first launched.

  No Internet advantage can last more than a couple of years. In 1999 and
2000, over 150 million kilometers of optical fiber were laid world-wide,
enough to stretch to the sun. Hundreds of billions of dollars have already
been invested by metropolitan fiber-optic network builders (Metromedia
Fiber, Level 3 Communications), optical hardware companies (Avanex, ONI,
Sorrento) and optical service providers (Yipes, Cogent, Sphera). These
companies are already rendering the metropolitan DSL debate moot with
thousand-fold increases in price performance over existing technology.
Similar breakthroughs are on the way in residential wireless. But none of
these deployments, including fiber to the home, can flourish under a regime
of forced sharing of entrepreneurial assets and profits.

  In this environment, let the Bells compete in long-distance and extort any
temporary profits they can from their local copper cages. Let the cable
companies capitalize on their advantage for the few years it will last.
Allow the infinite spectrum of air and fiber to be exploited in any way its
owners wish. Then, sit back, and nostalgically recall those early days of
the Internet, when we naively thought a 5% economic growth rate was really
something. The broadband economy needs a hero. President Bush and Mr.
Greenspan need a technology savior. You are the man best equipped to play
that role.

  ---

Paul A. Jackson
Special Assistant to the Chairman
Office of Chairman Michael K. Powell
Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, S.W.
Suite 8B201
Washington, DC  20554
Phone: 202-418-1000
Fax: 202-418-2801
E-mail: pjackson@fcc.gov
Web Site: http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/powell/

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
This e-mail message is confidential, intended only for the named
recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney
work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have
received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please
immediately notify the sender at (202) 418-1000 and delete this e-mail
message from your computer, Thank you.

The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged,
confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware that any
other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this
communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you think
that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to the
sender. This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for
viruses and are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might
affect any computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it
is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and
no responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or
damage arising in any way from its use.


Mark,  thanks for the notice of this meeting.  I'm glad you will be attending.  FYI, the Aquila folks purchased USGT from Nanci MacKenzie about 18 months ago and I'm not sure how they have incorporated the USGT organization into the Aquila organization.  Since you are the new kid, perhaps you can inquire as to the differences in these shops so that you can effectively deal with both organizations.  I'm not sure we've ever been clear on this.  Please continue to talk about Red Rock with these folks.  What would Aquila like to see TW offer?  What are their thoughts about the West markets?  What could TW do to get Aquila to be more active on our pipe?

FYI, I am coming into the office Wed morning.  I will be in EB4179.  I need to meet with Martha and pack up this office.  I should be in by 9:00.  If your schedule permits, perhaps you and I could meet for a few minutes on Agave before your 10:00 Aquila meeting?

I'll call you when I get in.

Thanks, Kim.


Thought you'd get a kick out of this (especially after our recent "hold
music" activity!)

Try this.   It's for real.   The following is the customer
service number for Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

              1-800-578-7453

Dial the number and listen to their greeting message,
until the point when you are requested to choose an
extension, and then you can hang up.
The greeting message is priceless though, and worth the
time it takes to make the toll-free call.


Mike's in a meeting right now, but I'll check with him when he gets out. I
don't see this trade anywhere in his trade log.

Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   04/30/2001 12:26 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Trade date on 592751.01 No Bro/Swerzbin

Kate, verballed trade with Powerex, they show trade date as 4/26 as opposed
to our 4/25.  Please check with Mike.  Thanks


Here's another tidbit about EES deals in CA.  I think the deal w/ the Helix
Water District would be a good case study to feature on our CA website.  I'm
having Jeannie Mandelker write these case studies -- Peoples, Roseville,
etc.,  Any suggestions to add?
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/03/2001
04:43 PM ---------------------------

From: The Buzz@EES on 03/22/2001 09:27 PM
To: The Buzz Distribution
cc:
Subject: The Buzz, 3-22-01

 the Buzz  Thursday, March 22, 2001

In the Buzz this week:

EES and Saks Sign Long-Term Commodity Agreement: Enron Energy Services and
Saks Inc., one of the nation,s premier department store retailers, have
entered into a long-term agreement to manage the supply of electricity to all
Saks, store locations, distribution facilities and administrative offices, as
well as natural gas at selected locations. The companies are also working
together to identify energy efficiency projects that will provide additional
economic value to Saks. Click on link to view flash recognition and deal team
members: http://inet.ees.enron.com/vision/comm/buzz/saks.html

EES Forging Ahead in San Diego: Enron Energy Services has signed a long-term
(6 years and eight months) fixed price contract with Helix Water District,
which serves the San Diego suburbs of La Mesa, El Cajon, and Spring Valley.
The agreement will protect Helix from San Diego price volatility and insures
them budget certainty. Congratulations to the deal team. Click on link to
view the names of deal team members:
http://inet.ees.enron.com/vision/comm/eespeople/

EES Wins California Grant to Spur Energy-Efficient Buildings: Enron Energy
Services received a grant for $1.5 million with target savings of 7.5
megawatts for its California customers. The California Energy Commission has
signed 12 grants totaling almost $9.2 million to install &energy smart8
technology in commercial and industrial buildings throughout the state. The
agreements signed by Governor Davis will account for about 93 megawatts of
projected savings from buildings outfitted with demand responsive building
systems, which work by using software that automatically dim lights, reduce
air-conditioning use and cut other electrical loads. Under the agreements,
commercial electricity customers will agree to shave peak loads by 10 to 30
percent. They will be paid by the California Independent System Operator (Cal
ISO) to curtail electricity load in their buildings in real time. The demand
responsive program is part of a bill (AB970) passed last year, designed to
reduce at least 220 megawatts of peak load by June 1, 2001.

EES All Employee Meeting This Coming Tuesday, March 27: On Tuesday morning,
March 27, at 10:00 a.m. CST, David Delainey, our new CEO, will introduce
himself and talk to us about his vision for EES. The meeting will be held at
the Hyatt Regency Imperial Ballroom in downtown Houston.  Please don't miss
this important meeting. On Monday, non-Houston-based employees will receive
an e-mail informing them how to participate in the meeting either via live
video stream or a telephone conference bridge and a slide push.

Last Issue of George Cites Ken Lay as One of the 50 Most Powerful People in
Politics: The last issue of George magazine, which was founded by J.F.
Kennedy Jr., features an article about the &50 Most Powerful People in
Politics.8 Enron CEO Ken Lay was named No. 30 in George,s list. Click on link
to read entire article:
http://www.george.com/xp6/George/Features/Final/Power.xml

Enron Energy Services and Quaker Agreement Cited in Business Week: A brief
titled &Enron: Energizing Quaker,8 appeared as follows in a recent Business
Week: &In another coup for its rapidly growing energy outsourcing business,
Enron nabbed Quaker Oats as its latest customer. As part of the 10-year,
multimillion-dollar pact announced on February 21, 2001, subsidiary Enron
Energy Services will supply electricity and natural gas and manage the energy
infrastructure for 17 Quaker facilities in the U.S. and Canada. Enron, the
nation's largest wholesale marketer of gas and electricity, signed $16
billion worth of similar outsourcing deals last year.8

EES Sponsoring Portion of GGP Conference: EES recently partnered with our
customer General Growth Properties (GGP) in support of their annual employee
conference and trade show. GGP, one of the largest retail REITS with shopping
malls across the country, recently signed a long-term energy outsource
agreement with EES. In support of this recent agreement, EES sponsored a
portion of this year's conference. The Value Enhancement Group is currently
working on opportunities to expand this agreement, and GGP CEO John Bucksbaum
and GGP president and COO Bob Michaels were both very pleased to see EES
support this conference and help introduce Enron to GGP employees.

EES "Information Is Power Sweepstakes 2001" Gives away Two Palm Pilots: Over
1200 EES employees entered the sweepstakes by updating their profile
information on eHRonline. Congratulations to Elisa Hollis and Preston
Ochsner, who both won a VIIx Palm Pilot. You, too, can be a winner! There are
3 more Palm Pilots to be won this month! Simply go to
http://eHRonline.enron.com, type in your user identification, type in your
password, click on profile information and supply as much information as
possible in all fields. For example, give your exact location (i.e. EB1091c);
or Click on Skills Profile, hit the add button and you will get a drop down
field listing numerous skill sets that you can simply click on and add to
your profile.

Participate in the Information Is Power Sweepstakes 2001, TODAY! You will
need your eHRonline ID and password. If you don't know your eHRonline ID or
password, simply call the SAP hotline at 713 345 4727. Log in now:
http://eHRonline.enron.com

Rising Power Prices May Hurt the State of Washington: Rising energy costs in
Washington are expected to consume an additional $1.7 billion of residents
disposable income and cut job growth by one third, according to a worst case
scenario report prepared by the Washington state budget office. Aluminum
manufacturers, whose facilities use massive amounts of energy, initially
moved to the Northwest because of its cheap and plentiful power supply
bringing additional jobs and making the region the second largest aluminum
producer in the country. The leading trade group says the rising energy costs
could hurt the aluminum industry in the Northwest. Electricity in Washington
currently costs 20 percent more than it did less than a year ago and natural
gas prices have risen by more than 60 percent.

New York Attempting To Avoid West Coast Energy Pitfalls: The New York
Independent System Operator (NY-ISO) is warning state regulators that
delaying approvals for new power generation may result in future power
shortages and significant price increases. NY-ISO President and CEO William
Museler stated, &New York is headed toward a very serious situation unless it
acts immediately to get new supplies sited within its borders and embarks on
substantial customer choice programs.8 Between 1995 and 2000 the demand for
power in New York rose by 2,700 Mw while power generation only increased
1,060 MW.

If that trend continues, the 15 percent reserve would dip to a "dangerously
low" eight percent which could cause prices to rise as much as 14 percent by
2005. However, if 8,600 MWs are added to New York's power supply, prices in
New York City could decrease anywhere from 20-28 percent. New York State
Electric & Gas Corporation spokesperson Clayton Ellis is not optimistic that
additional generating capacity will be on the grid in the next four years. An
application for the Athens 1,080 MW generating plant that was filed in 1998
still has not been approved.

Power Crisis Encourages Computer Makers to Focus on Energy Savings: With
power prices continuing to rise, computer equipment makers are gearing their
newest products towards energy conservation. Makers of computer mainframes,
networking applications and PC monitors are emphasizing features that can
achieve the same speed, or more while using less energy. IBM's newest
mainframe, eServer Z900, can replace thousands of individual servers and
requires only 13 kilowatts (5 percent of the energy otherwise needed). Sun
Microsystems newest product, the Sun Ray, also slashes power consumption by
95 percent by eliminating the need for local operating systems.

Quaker Oats Company among the 100 Best Corporate Citizens: EES customer
Quaker Oats was recognized this week as one of the &100 Best Corporate
Citizens8 by Business Ethics magazine. Quaker distinguished itself through
its charitable works in the community, while still being at the top of its
peer group in earnings growth and total return. During 2000, $3.4 million in
cash grants and $21.9 million in product donations were donated in support of
education of children in low-income communities, nutrition education, and
hunger relief. Quaker was 51 in a field of 650 corporations evaluated for
this year,s awards.

Starwood Breaks Ground for Exciting new Project: A &monumental
groundbreaking8 of the St. Regis Museum Tower, the latest project of Starwood
Hotels & Resorts Worldwide (in partnership with Carpenter & Company), took
place this past Tuesday in San Francisco. The St. Regis Museum Tower Project
marks Starwood,s 11th St. Regis Hotel. It will include 100 residential
condominium units, as well as an African American Cultural Center, which will
open in 2003. This is the latest of several projects transforming San
Francisco,s South Market district.

Electricity Goes Nuts...Coconuts, That Is: The castaways on &Gilligan's
Island8 would have loved this invention. Community Power Corp., based in
Littleton, Colorado, has developed a machine that turns coconut shells into
electricity. The company, which develops and operates energy services for
rural communities around the world, recently shipped its first machine to a
small village of 750 people in the Philippines. The machine is called the
Small Modular Biopower System, and uses coconut shells to make clean
combustible gas that is fed into a standard combustion engine where it forms
heat, mechanical and electrical power.

Robb Walt, owner of Community Power Corp., believes a market for their
product is immense. Almost half of the world's population does not have
access to electricity or sustainable cooking fuel. Instead, nearly $40
billion is spent annually on products that many consider dangerous to the
environment, including kerosene, batteries, candles and firewood. Community
Power was able to turn the coconuts into clean combustible gas with the
technical and financial support of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL), Shell Renewables and the California Energy Commission. In 1999, the
company won a contract from the U.S. Department of Energy through NREL to
make the coconut machine. Once the machine is operational, villagers should
expect to pay a fraction of the $3 per kilowatt they currently pay using
batteries.


The ground should be warm enough to keep anything from sticking.  We got a
half a cord of wood this weekend, and chili fixin's.  YUM.


Hi,
We're going to press on the forced ranking story. I  have a couple more
questions for you. If you can have answers to me by in the  morning, June 8,
I'd appreciate it...
?
thanks, Michelle
?
?
What does the room look like in one of these peer  review committee sessions.
Are the PRC's around a conference table, if so what  kind, cherry wood,
mahogany, etc. What's on the wall in these rooms?.? Are  there charts, etc??
Are the rankings on paper or on the wall? Does everyone  have a copy of the
rankings?and employee's paper work (ie the feedback  responses, etc.)
?
?
How many employees does one PRC rep represent  generally?
?
Tell me about some of the perks that Enron offers  its employees, ie
childcare, daycare, daycamp etc. On the day that I was there,  what was that
barbeque outing all about. Was that something that was company  sponsored? If
so, how often do you sponsor it?
?
Tell me about some of the awards the company has  received. (ie best
workplace, etc.)
?
These answers don't have to be long. Just give me  the basics...
?
?
thanks much, Michelle
?
?
?
Michelle McCalope
freelance writer
phone  (713) 781-1481
fax (713) 781-7874


Thank you very much Sir. I'll incorporate you comments later today and send
it off.

Thanks also for your other comments, I'm glad you regard the book highly
enough for your group and your course.

I look forward to catching up with you soon.

Best regards.

Chris.

----- Original Message -----
From: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: Chris Strickland <chris@lacima.co.uk>
Cc: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: EPRM Article

>
> Chris,
>
> I have read the paper.  It reads very well. Two comments.
>
> 1. It probably makes sense to include a note on the standard GBM
simulation
> equation and
> the way it's typically discretized.
>
> 2. It will help the reader who did not read the earlier articles to
explain
> what CT is (perhaps a footnote).
>
>
> I am also including a message I sent to Julie today.
>
>
****************************************************************************
*****************
>  1. I would like to register 2 members of my group for both courses (in
> Houston):
>
> a. Paulo Issler
> b. Alex Huang
>
> I shall attend the course on weather only.
>
> 2. I have started the process to issue a check for 5,000 AUD for Lacima.
> Shirley sent you an update on this. The 2nd installment comes from the
> budget of our
> office in Australia. I shall talk to Paul Quilkey today about it. Please,
> let me know if there is any delay.
>
> 3. The book  will be used as textbook for the class I shall be teaching at
> Rice.
> Rice Univ bookshop is placing an order.
>
> 4. I would like to order 50 copies for my group. What is the best
> way to place the order?  Can we pay in US dollars?
>
****************************************************************************
*****************
>
> Best regards.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
> "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk> on 12/12/2000 05:21:22 PM
>
> Please respond to "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk>
>
> To:   <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
> cc:   "Julie" <julie@lacimagroup.com>
> Subject:  Fw: EPRM Article
>
>
> Hi Vince,
>
> I'm wondering if you got this last week? If you could have a quick look
and
> get back to me with any comments that would be great - Robin is chasing me
> on this one!
>
> Best regards.
>
> Chris.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Chris Strickland <chris@lacima.co.uk>
> To: <VKaminski@aol.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 4:16 AM
> Subject: EPRM Article
>
>
> > Hi Vince,
> >
> > Hope things are fine with you. I'm sorry that I only ever write to you
> when
> > I'm after something, but could you look at this simulation article - the
> > next installment in the EPRM articles.
> >
> > Many thanks and best regards.
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <VKaminski@aol.com>
> > To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>; <Les@lacima.co.uk>;
> <chris@lacima.co.uk>;
> > <robin@risk.co.uk>
> > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: VaR Article
> >
> >
> > > Les,
> > >
> > > The revised version  of the VaR article looks fine.
> > >
> > > Vince
> > >
> >
>
> (See attached file: EPRM_04_sim_mr.zip)
>
>
>
>
>


for what it's worth!

Stacey Bolton
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-853-9916 direct
713-303-2632 cell
stacey.bolton@enron.com <mailto:stacey.bolton@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Siegfried, Stuart" <Stuart.Siegfried@puc.state.oh.us>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 2:37 PM
To:	'Heather Mathis'
Cc:	Bolton, Stacey
Subject:	env disc - regional data

As you are likely  already aware, the Ohio environmental disclosure rules require that the  disclosure forms contain certain regional environmental information (in  addition to the supplier-specific information).

Attached is a  Word document that conveys the regional environmental information which is  to be included in the environmental disclosure forms focusing on activities  during the year 2002.

Please feel  free to contact me if you have any questions concerning this data  or how it is to be utilized.

Thank  you.

Stuart M.  Siegfried
Environmental Specialist
Public Utilities Commission of  Ohio
Stuart.Siegfried@puc.state.oh.us
614.466.7536
 - Regional Data '02.doc


this sunday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Petrochko, Mona L.
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:00 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Football Tickets

What is the date?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:41 PM
To:	Petrochko, Mona L.
Subject:	RE: Football Tickets

They're yours.  Just let me know as soon as you can if you'd like them.  Hope you're doing well.  Stay buckled up.  It's bumpy out there.  But at least they're starting to publicly clean house.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Petrochko, Mona L.
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Hrach, April; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Football Tickets

I'm interested.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hrach, April
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Alamo, Joseph; Brodbeck, Kelly; Browner, Victor; Calvert, Gray; Carranza, Octavio; Dasovich, Jeff; Deane, Ryan; Fillinger, Mark; Fukada, Cary; Ha, Vicky; Hrach, April; Kelly, Derek; Kistler, Dave; Kromer, Steve; Ly, Aandy; Mara, Susan; Mcdonald, Michael; Mentan, Ron; O'Neal, Aida; Parquet, David; Perrino, Dave; Petrochko, Mona L.; Qureishi, Ibrahim; Russell, Dean; Schoen, Mary; Sezgen, Osman; Springer, Jason; Turnipseed, Edith; Wehn, Samuel; Wong, Michael; Yee, Dennis; Zavala, Cristina
Subject:	Football Tickets

Checkout the great deal, 49er fans!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 8:59 AM
To:	Hrach, April
Subject:

April:  Could you please distribute this to the office?  Thanks a bunch.

Greetings Folks:

Tired of thinking about related-party transactions, SEC probes and re-stated earnings?

Well, here's a chance to take your mind off of things.  I've got a pair of exceptional 49er tickets--lowest section in 2nd tier, right on the 50 yardline. (My girlfriend's parents season tickets. I can't use them--in fact, ain't crazy about football)  They're playing the Saints, which will be a great game.

I'm selling them for face value, which is $50 each.  Like to be able to give them to someone in the office if possible.  If you're interested, please let me know ASAP.

Best,
Jeff


FYI
----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 10/19/00 01:03 PM -----

	Christian Yoder
	10/19/00 12:50 PM

		 To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Cal PX indmentity agreement

The CalPX "Credit Redisign" situation is an irritating mess that I am trying
to help straighten out.  Here is a summary of what is going on.  Please keep
this summary around and read it every time you get a question from a confused
individual  and feel free to forward it to whomever out there is confused
about things.

The CalPX  has a Surety bond with a big Surety entity.  The gist of the thing
is that If the PX ever gets into a situation where one of the players on its
exchange defaults, it can pick up the phone and call the  Surety and the
Surety will rush money to the PX withing 5 minutes, no questions asked.
Before the Surety agreed to do this bond with the PX they insisted that all
of the players that do business with the PX (called principals) sign
indemnity agreements with it.  The indemnity agreements basically say that if
the Surety ever has to pay a penny to the PX,, it can immediately call the
Principal and the principal will rush a penny to the Surety within 5.1
minutes.  The indemnity agreement says that the Principal must pay the Surety
upon demand for the share of the loss that it caused.  It also says a bunch
of stuff that makes it very clear that we might also have to pay money in
situations that are not our fault too.  It is a risky, bad agreement to sign
and in the first round of this stuff with the PX a year or so ago we did not
sign any indemnity agreement.  What happened instead was that Enron Corp
stepped in and saved the day.  It just so happens that Enron Corp. already
had a preexisting Indemnity Agreement with the Surety covering various
exposures at the 20,000 foot corporate level.  I was able to get the Enron
Corp bond people to talk to the Surety and the result was a two sentence
letter from the PX saying we were okay to trade.  We did not have to sign the
indemnity agreement.  I did not negotiate any of the terms  between Corp and
the PX on this.

That is the history.  Now we come to the PX's new "Credit Redisign."   The PX
is anxious that it is not covered well enough.  So, out they come with
exactly the same set of documents demanding that everybody sign another
indemnity agreement.  Like a trained dog, I have just been trying to do the
same thing I did last time.  I have called Corp and tried to get them to make
the issue go away the same way they did last time.  Unfortunately there are
different people involved now and I have not been very aggressive about
telling the story and getting eveybody to work together.  I am now back from
a nice littel vacation and promise to push the thing through Corp. as best I
can.  I have already left two voice mails and will faithfully and doggedly
try to take care of this.  ----cgy


As discussed with you last week, Governor Pataki is holding a fundraiser for
his reelection campaign in Houston on Monday, June 4th. (His current terrm
expires in 2002.) According to the fundraiser organizing this event,
Elizabeth Blakemore (713-526-3399), there will be a reception from 5-6:30
p.m. at the home of Judy and Jack Holmes in River Oaks, followed by a dinner
at 7 for approximately 20 people at a location to be determined. Governor
Perry will be attending the reception, but not the dinner. All proceeds from
the fundraiser will go to the Pataki campaign. Tickets to the dinner are
$5,000.00 per person.

When I spoke with Blakemore last week, she indicated that the event was being
chaired by Bill Wise from El Paso, but she was willing to figure out a way to
get Ken or Jeff equal billing. She indicated that they do not yet have a
location for the dinner and suggested that it might be hosted in Ken or
Jeff's home. She also suggested that if we were willing to commit to $25,000,
we should be given co-chair status and would check with Pataki's office to
confirm that. I spoke with Blakemore today (5/11) and she confirmed that we
would definitely be given co-chair status for a $25k contribution. (She noted
that there may in fact be one or two others as well.)

I recommend that we co-host the event. As Rick correctly noted, we don't have
much of a relationship with Pataki, and this would give us a chance to begin
to establish closer ties with him. As you may be aware, NY law limits
corporate donations to NY candidates in any one year to $5,000.00 in the
aggregate. However, every individual corporation is allowed to make a
separate $5,000.00 contribution.

For the time being, I asked Blakemore to use me as her contact person. But it
makes sense to get her hooked up with someone in Houston. Let me know how you
want to proceed.


The language of the Stipulation is:  "If the MOU (or any successor mechanism acceptable to SCE) is implemented and the PE Advice Letter adopted, SCE will commit to pay the energy credit to the Enron ESPs . . . using the methodology it employed up to January 5, 2001, for energy provided to direct access customers of those ESPs through and including January 18, 2001."
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Williams, Robert C.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:54 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Shapiro, Richard; Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Sharp, Vicki; 'mday@gmssr.com'; 'jbennett@gmssr.com'; 'jklauber@llgm.com'
Subject:	Proposal Seeking Settlement with SCE

Please see the attached draft.  The purpose of this document would be to get management approval for a settlement along the lines indicated.

         << File: SCE Settlement 10-9-01--2.doc >>


Soma,

It was a pleasure working with you.
Let's stay in touch. Here are my coordinates:

Vince Kaminski
(281) 367 5377 (h)
vkaminski@aol.com

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ghosh, Soma
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 9:50 PM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J; Shanbhogue, Vasant
Subject:	Good-bye

Just wanted to write a quick note to say thankyou for your assistance and advice over the the last 5.5 yrs. It was really a privilege working with such great people. I may be back in the office within the next few weeks so hopefully I can track you down on 19 & say good-bye.

I shall be returning to the UK on Dec 23rd, and will proceed to look for a job along with the other 1,500 ex-employees.

Well it's been quite a ride & I'm pretty much ready to get off & move on.

I hope that I have the opportunity to meet with you again. Please do look me up if you are ever in London.

Kind regards,

Soma

E-mail: soma_ghosh1@hotmail.com
UK Tel: 011 44 208 942 8740


I don't know who Debbie Nicholls is either.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Korkmas, Deb
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:36 PM
To:	'michael.s.de.los.santos@us.andersen.com@ENRON'
Cc:	gillian.k.boyer@us.andersen.com; allen.c.capps@us.andersen.com; mark.c.austin@us.andersen.com; Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Paper and Steel
Importance:	High

Individuals who have attained the level Vice President (or above) are authorized by the company bylaws to sign any contracts.  Thus Greg Hermans, Ray Bowen and Bob Crane would not need special authorization.  Brenda Herod and Lisa McClendon were authorized but have left the group so you might see some old confirms with their signatures.  I don't know anything about Debbie Nicholls.

Marie, do you have any info on Debbie Nicholls?  Deb

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	michael.s.de.los.santos@us.andersen.com@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 4:30 PM
To:	Korkmas, Deb; marie_korkmas@enron.com
Cc:	gillian.k.boyer@us.andersen.com; allen.c.capps@us.andersen.com; mark.c.austin@us.andersen.com
Subject:	Paper and Steel

Deb and Marie,
     Each of you provided me with a list of authorized confirmation
signatories earlier this month.  However, while reviewing the confirmation
documentation requested in conjunction with the paper and steel process
audit we notice that the individuals listed below were not identified on
the lists of authorized confirmation signatories we received.  Could you
please verify that the individuals listed below were authorized as
confirmation signatories during the period January 1, 2001 through August
31, 2001.  We would greatly appreciate it if we could receive this
documentation as soon as possible as we are attempting to complete the
process audit  by Monday, October 29, 2001.  If you have questions please
contact me at X56955.

1.  Greg Hermans
2.  Raymond M. Bowen
3.  Debbie Nicholls
4.  Robert Crane
5.  Brenda Herod
6.  Lisa McClendon

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Mike D.
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.


I am very busy and very important but I will make an exception for you.


Jane, I still have two discrepancies with Southwest Gas which I need your
help in resolving.

1.  SWG says price on Sitara 518455 Day 7 should be $9.50 instead of $9.55 -
You have already confirmed with me that the price should be $9.55.  I
forwarded your email to my contact at SWG and she responded with the email
below.  Could you please call SWG trader Mark Anderson so that this can be
resolved?

2.  On Sitara 386140 SWG says trigger is calculated on physical, not
scheduled, volume - You have already confirmed with me that the trigger is
based on scheduled volume and that you feel SWG will not agree.  According to
my contact at SWG, their trader Bill Brown confirmed with her that the
trigger is based on physical volume.  Can you please call Bill so that this
discrepancy can be resolved?

I appreciate your help in resolving these issues.  Although I have already
forwarded your responses to Nancy at SWG, she is being very insistent that
SWG is correct and is requesting that the traders resolve these issues.

Thanks again
Laurie

---------------------- Forwarded by Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron on 01/30/2001 09:02
AM ---------------------------

Laurie Ellis
01/25/2001 11:07 AM
To: Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: December Gas

Jane, per SWG's email below, can you please call Mark Anderson to resolve the
price discrepancy I questioned (SWG says the price on Sitara 518455, Day 7,
should be $9.50 instead of $9.55).
---------------------- Forwarded by Laurie Ellis/NA/Enron on 01/25/2001 10:57
AM ---------------------------

"Nancy Frazier" <Nancy.Frazier@groupwise.swgas.com> on 01/25/2001 10:53:52 AM
To: <Laurie.Ellis@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: December Gas

Please have her contact Mark Anderson our trader.  He assured me it was
$9.50.  I'm sure she has his #.  It's up to them to resolve this.  Nancy


Can you print this for me?  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2001 09:51 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  General Announcement @ ENRON                           04/02/2001
11:53 PM

Sent by: General Announcement@ENRON
To: All Enron Worldwide
cc:
Subject: Enron's 2001 Goals

Our vision to become The World's Leading Company positions our company for
great success this year and beyond.  Our success is dependent on execution.
With that in mind, we are making Enron's 2001 corporate and business unit
goals available to employees.

Please take a few minutes to review our 2001 goals on Enron's intranet at
http://172.28.92.190/bowne/    We believe they will help you gain a better
understanding of our vision for the company and will inspire you to identify
innovative ways to help your organization and Enron achieve our objectives.
We have a lot to accomplish this year, and with your hard work and
dedication, we can realize another year of stellar performance.


Attached is a resume for a gentleman who has relocated as a trailing expat
spouse to Houston, who we are looking to find a suitable position somewhere
in Enron. I know that one or two of you have already seen his resume and at
the time didn't necessarily have a role for him. I would be very grateful if
you could take another look and see if anything has now changed.

By way of background, he was previously working with Eastern in the UK in a
back office capacity looking at their approach to the UK Gas regulatory
framework known as the Network code. He has done a little consulting work
since relocating to Houston in the online area. His references are very good.
He is available with immigration clearance as a local hire, probably at
Senior Specialist level. As an additional "incentive" I would be prepared to
underwrite his costs in the event you decided in the first 6 months that his
performance did not meet your expectations (Obviously - I am highly confident
this will not be the case!).


I am also a notary.

Janette Elbertson@ECT
08/31/2000 02:52 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roger Balog/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy
Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
James Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne
Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron,
Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C
Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Travis
McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Martin W
Penkwitz/NA/Enron@Enron, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth
White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ed B Hearn III/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Deb Korkmas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laurie Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ogden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Merrill W Haas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri L
Cromwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny
Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J
Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Notaries

Attached is a list of Notaries in ENA Legal.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


Craig Moyer
Manatt Phelp & Phillips
(916) 552-2300


Command: MATCH
Date: 11/20/2001
Time: 4:46:15 PM
TransactionID: 401446
AgencyID: 1673
Recipient: Texas Right To Life Committee Educational Fund
6776 Southwest Frwy Ste 430
Houston, TX 77074-2111
DonorID: 18730
GiftDate: 10/24/2001
GiftAmount: 2500
Purpose:
Result: Success

If you have not already done so, please send your donation to
Texas Right To Life Committee Educational Fund
6776 Southwest Frwy Ste 430
Houston, TX 77074-2111.
If they do not receive your donation within five days we will have to deny this request.

We have received the above Request.
If everything appears correct there is no need to contact us.
However, if you did not make this request or there is an error in the above information, then email us at: enron@easymatch.com or call us at: 1-866-545-9204.


This is Mike Wolfe's son.  He graduates this semester from Texas Tech and is
moving back here to help his father since his mother passed away a few
months ago.  Kevin says he is a good kid and very smart.  Could you give it
Ashley or someone else at Enron.

Thanks <<Jerrsum2.doc>>

 - Jerrsum2.doc


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 03:55 PM
---------------------------

	Lorie Leigh
	03/13/2001 01:55 PM

To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Northwestern pdf


done

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           11/07/2000 02:01 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Exchange Deal

Daren:
I have several months that need to have the demand charges either added or
adjusted.  When Katherine gave you the numbers the first time, there were
some spot deals included in the exchange deals.  The volumes have now been
moved to the correct deals and the demand charges need to be corrected.  I
have listed the changes below.  Let me know if you would like to see the
spreadsheets.

Deal 157278
3/00 Add demand charge of $73,403.47 for excess charge
4/00 Change demand fee from $1,507.56 to $1,966.93
6/00 Change demand fee from $1,129.99 to $359.97

Deal 157288
3/00 Change demand fee from $3,526.98 to $245.82

Thanks,
Megan


As required by the Houston Fire Department, a fire drill has been scheduled for the Enron Center Campus.

	Enron Center North, 1400 Smith St., approximately  3:15 PM on Thursday, December 20th, 2001

	Enron Center South, 1500 Louisiana St., approximately 3:45 PM on Thursday, December 20th, 2001

Please advise all clients, contractors, and visitors that this will be a fire drill only. The fire alarm will sound at 3:15 PM in Enron Center North and 3:45 PM in Enron Center South. You will be asked to go to the stairwell and standby.  Do not go into the stairwell.  Further instructions will be given over the public address system.  If you experience any difficulties in hearing either the fire alarm or any announcements over the public address system, please notify the Facilities Help Desk by e-mail at facilitieshelpdesk1@enron.com.

Anyone that is mobility impaired or medically disabled may be excused from participating in this drill by sending an e-mail to Harry Grubbs.

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Harry Grubbs at 713-853-5417.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001
06:03 PM ---------------------------

Maureen Raymond@ENRON
03/23/2001 05:42 PM
Sent by: Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
To: vkaminski@aol.com, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Korea Report


Its that time of the year again to ask for some $$ (approx $800)!!  This is for co-sponsoring the after hours gig for the NWPP Schedulers Meeting.  Please let me know if this is fine.

Thanks,

Diana


I thought of a great comeback for that one but since I haven't heard from you
in a while I am going to be nice


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 07/26/2001 06:09 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	07/26/2001 05:57 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, James D
Steffes/Enron@EnronXGate, Richard Shapiro/Enron@EnronXGate, Christopher F
Calger/Enron@EnronXGate, Tim Belden/Enron@EnronXGate, Alan
Comnes/Enron@EnronXGate, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/Enron@EnronXGate, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ray Alvarez/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Power-Market Bear Mauls Plans For New Generators In West

FYI.  Story on the effect of FERC prices on supply in PNW.
Best,
Jeff

Power-Market Bear Mauls Plans For New Generators In West
By Mark Golden
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

07/26/2001
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- The crumbling price of electricity in the western
U.S., attributed by many to federal price controls, has forced power plant
developers to cancel projects, calling into question whether there will be
enough electricity to meet demand in the Northwest this winter.
The cancellations of peaking plants and temporary, oil-fired generators -
high-cost units that provide power needed only when demand is highest - have
cut projected generating capacity in the Northwest by up to 1,000 megawatts,
about 3% of the combined peak demand of Washington, Oregon, Idaho and western
Montana.
"The price caps have added uncertainty," said Scott Simms, spokesman for
Enron Corp. (ENE) unit Portland General Electric Co. "If we look forward to
this winter and you see a diminished supply scenario, you can see why we have
concerns about regional reliability. That could put us in a position of
having rotating outages in the region."
About two weeks after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission imposed limits
on western power prices on June 19, Portland General halted installation of a
new 45-megawatt gas-fired peaking turbine at its existing Boardman power
plant.
The utility was developing the extra generation both to meet its customers'
needs and to sell some output to other Northwest utilities left short of
hydroelectric supplies due to this year's drought. A turbine that size could
power about 45,000 homes.
"You can directly attribute that to FERC price controls," Simms said.
After the FERC order, at least two utilities in Washington State ended
negotiations with NRG Energy (NRG) for supplies from new plants that NRG was
ready to build in time for winter. Both utilities - Tacoma Power and
Snohomish County Public Utility District - experienced significant supply
shortages in the past 12 months, paid very high prices in the spot market and
had to raise customer electric rates by as much as 50%.
But both utilities told NRG, and later Dow Jones Newswires, that they had no
reason to sign long-term contracts to guarantee new supplies, because the
FERC had practically eliminated the financial risk of relying on the spot
market. NRG, as a result, scuttled plans to build peaking plants in
Washington that could have added 300 megawatts.
FERC's price controls, as well as supply-demand fundamentals, have
dramatically changed the economics of selling power into the West's open
market in the past few months.
The current western U.S. electricity price cap of $98 a megawatt-hour covers
the costs of generating power from easy-to-install but inefficient peaking
turbines, but not the capital costs of buying and installing new peakers. In
addition, the current price cap may soon be recalculated to a much lower
level. The cap is based largely on natural gas prices, which have been cut in
half since the cap was first formulated in June.

Not Everyone Blames FERC

The average monthly price for on-peak hours in the Northwest from August
through March is $60 a megawatt-hour - a fraction of what it was three months
ago. Many in the western electricity industry think that's because FERC's
price controls have kept prices artificially low. A smaller group thinks the
market is appropriately signaling that not all the planned gas-fired plants
are needed, because some power plants are already under construction and
consumers are conserving electricity.
Jim Kemp, a senior executive for the Canadian utility TransAlta's (TA.TO)
merchant power group, TransAlta (TA.TO), for example, doesn't attribute the
cancellation of projects to price controls.
"I see it as due to demand-side control and new units," Kemp said. "The
market is sending out a signal that we have enough. Maybe this winter we will
find that we don't have enough, but that's not the signal the market is
sending now."
The spot market for power has been far below the federal price cap for two
months. Mild weather, a slowing economy and conservation efforts throughout
the West have made power from expensive peaking plants unnecessary except for
a few hours so far this summer.
"Prices started to come down before the FERC mitigation plan started," said
Tacoma Power supply analyst David Lucio, who was negotiating with NRG. "The
need to try to execute a contract wasn't as great with the prices falling."
Lucio said there should be enough capacity to get the Northwest through the
winter, barring abnormalities like a long, extended freeze.
Construction of dozens of peaking plants in the West is going forward in
cases where developers sold supply contracts in advance. TransAlta is
continuing construction of a 154-megawatt peaking plant in Washington,
because much of the plant's capacity was sold months ago.
"The number of announced projects is far and away more than what is needed
within the time frame we're talking about," said Dick Watson, a director with
the Northwest Power Planning Council.
Still, several western utilities have asked the FERC to raise the price cap.
Puget Sound Energy (PSD) told the FERC the cap "undercuts the Commission's
efforts to ensure adequate supplies of electricity."
As previously reported, some small oil-fired generators, which are even more
expensive to operate than the permanent, gas-fired peaking plants, have even
been taken off line permanently after being installed over the past six
months. And orders for new generators have been canceled.
-By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604; mark.golden@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


And you bug me about too many direct reports.

-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON on behalf of Office of the Chairman-@ENRON
Sent: Mon 10/15/2001 8:23 PM
To: All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Cc:
Subject: Organizational Announcement

As we continue to address a number of issues facing Enron, it is critical that the company remain focused on attracting, motivating and retaining a diverse and talented workforce.  We strongly believe that our workforce is world-class -- the best in any industry, so we will continue to develop and reward this tremendous talent base.

Because the lasting strength of our company is determined by the strength of our workforce, we are elevating the role employee-focused functions play within Enron.  We are pleased to announce that effective immediately Human Resources, Employee Responsibility, and Executive and Corporate Compensation will report directly to the Office of the Chairman.

David Oxley, Vice President, will continue to oversee Enron's Global HR function.  The lead HR representatives for the individual business units will report to David in addition to their respective Office of the Chairman.  Besides managing Recruiting, Staffing, Training, Compensation and the Performance Evaluation Process, David will also add Payroll and Labor Relations to his list of responsibilities.

Cindy Olson, Executive Vice President, will have responsibility for Employee Relations and Corporate Responsibility, which includes Social Responsibility, Community Relations, Diversity, Employee Relations, Redeployment, Alumni Relations, Employee Events and Programs, Benefits, Wellness, and Worklife.

Mary Joyce, Vice President, will continue to have responsibility for Executive and Corporate Compensation in addition to Global Employee Information Management and Reporting and Analysis.

David, Cindy and Mary will each report to the Office of the Chairman.  A detailed organizational chart is attached.  Please join me in congratulating David, Cindy and Mary on their new responsibilities.

<http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/hrorgchart18.ppt>


Project Finance Week

March 11-15, 2002 ? Metropolitan Hotel, New York City

 Click Here To Download A Complete Conference Brochure:

http://www.pmaconference.com/pfwbro_pma.pdf

Infocast's Project Finance Week continues to be rated the best introductory course on project finance available to developers, financiers, attorneys, utility representatives and vendors.

Course #1, Project Finance The Tutorial, has been revamped for the new realities of 2002, offering in-depth sessions on today's hottest financing trends, including portfolio financing, synthetic leasing, and risk management strategies for merchant financing. These in-depth sessions will be enhanced by hearing the lessons learned by active participants in many of the top project financings of 2001.

? The Contractor's Perspective On Construction,Completion And Performance Risk
? The Role Of Credit Ratings In Project Financed Transactions
? Structuring The Project As A Synthetic Lease
? Structuring Your Project And Getting Financing In The Post Enron Collapse Environment
? Real-World Acquisitions And Divestitures Of Distressed Projects
? Moving From Commercial Agreements To Financeable Contract
? Translating And Negotiating The "Underwriting" Term Sheet
? Completion Issues
? Fuel & Tariffs
? The Loan Agreement - Locating And Defusing The Land Mines
? The Security Agreements
? Consents & Opinions
? Review Of Additional Issues Common To International Projects

WORKSHOP #1: 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM

Negotiating and Documenting the Key Project Agreements

WORKSHOP #2: 1:30 PM - 5:00 PM

Predicting the Price of Power for Asset Valuation in Merchant Power Financings

Click Here To Download A Complete Conference Brochure:

http://www.pmaconference.com/pfwbro_pma.pdf

Visit our Subscription Center to edit your interests or unsubscribe.
http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=kimberly.watson@enron.com

View our privacy policy: http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
12:03 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Julie Brewer @ ENRON                           03/14/2001 11:27 AM

To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Guggenheim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M
Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kara L Boudreau/HOU/ECT, Jean
Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Royed/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Laura Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Luchas
Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Michelle
Nelson/Corp/Enron, Stewart Range/NA/Enron, Shifali Sharma/NA/Enron, Keynan
Dutton/NA/Enron, Carole Frank/NA/Enron@ENRON, Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Veronica Hill/NA/Enron, Bianca Ornelas/NA/Enron@Enron, George Huan/NA/Enron,
Amy Cavazos/NA/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ryan
O'Rourke/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Rebooks

If your name is in the right hand column, please rebook as indicated by
Credit.

Thanks.

Julie Brewer


Rick -- per my voicemail
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shapiro, Richard
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:37 AM
To:	Kean, Steven J.
Subject:	FW: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kingerski, Harry
Sent:	Monday, September 24, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Keene, Patrick
Subject:	FW: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

... some recent history.  I had left the message with Rogers Herndon.
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keller, James
Sent:	Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:12 AM
To:	Castano, Marianne
Cc:	Kingerski, Harry; Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

You are correct!  This is not a new issue, but it seems to resurface on a regular basis.  The issue has been pointed out regularly (the first time in connection with the license and regularly thereafter) and each time the business has said not to worry, if they can't cut a deal with New Power they will just pay the $1/MW.  EES has assumed it will pay the $1/MW since day one!

	Jim

Marianne Castano
08/23/2001 08:33 AM
To:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate @ ENRON, Gloria Ogenyi/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:	James E Keller/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	Re: FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Harry and Gloria:

Jim Keller and I have indeed dealt with this issue in the past (it actually came up at the time we were applying for our TX marketer license).

 It is my understanding, and Jim, please comment if my information is "stale", that we were going to choose the option set forth in Sec. 39.352(g)(3), which allows us to make a payment into the System Benefit Fund.  This approach was discussed with Dennis Benevides, and then, I believe, with Don Black, and they were OK with our pursuing this course, in lieu of having TNPC provide service to residentials on our behalf.

 Please call me if you have any questions:  814-835-0793.

Marianne

From:	Harry Kingerski/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 04:06 PM
To:	Marianne Castano/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	FW: ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Marianne - per my voicemail.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ogenyi, Gloria
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Hamb, Edward
Cc:	Blachman, Jeremy; Gahn, Scott; Letke, Eric; Wood, James; Presto, Kevin M.; Curry, Mike; Wagner, Joseph; Misra, Narsimha; Dietrich, Janet; Collins, Patricia; Keene, Patrick; Kingerski, Harry; Steffes, James D.; Ryall, Jean; Shapiro, Richard; Herndon, Rogers; Nicolay, Christi L.
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Ed,

Residential Obligation
Section 39.352(g) of Senate Bill 7 provides that for any REP serving an aggregate load in excess of 300 MW, 5% of the load must consist of residential customers. A REP can fulfil this requirement by:
1. Demonstrating that it directly serves residential load amounting to 5% of its total load
2. That another REP serves the residential load on its behalf, or
3. It pays 1 dollar per MWH of required 5% load into the System Benefit Fund.
 EES can fulfil its obligation by entering into an agreement with New Power to serve residential load on its behalf, or can pay the 1$ per MWH penalty.
There is an annual compliance reporting requirement and EES can demonstrate compliance if it has an agreement with New Power.

EES Contract,
For price to beat customers, the utilities have by Commission rule, the obligation to allow customers to come and go without restraint for the 5 year period conmmencing 1/2/02. The Commission concern may be that Enron will abuse this provision by gaming the system. The Enron contracts as currently written are within the rules as approved by the Commission. Until the utilities move to amend the relevant rules, the Commission can only exercise its displeasure by appropriate oversight and enforcement to determine what conduct amounts to abuse and gaming. I think it will ultimately be a question of degree and pattern of switching. The onus will be on the affiliated REPs to prove abuse and gaming. Fundamentally, it is in the best interest of the market to allow customers to come and go. Customer mobility is the best customer protection in a competitive market. Besides, a restraint on customer mobility could have a chilling effect on competition as it will increase customer inertia. The Commission will carefully weigh any course of action to insure that they achieve a reasonable balance. For larger than 1MW customers, they can agree to long term contracts and a restriction on their ability to come and go.

Please call with any questions,
Gloria
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hamb, Edward
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:32 AM
To:	Ogenyi, Gloria
Subject:	Re: Update: Enron Direct Telesales Initiative in NY, NJ and TX

To:	ehamb@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

get on this.  we need to discuss
---------------------- Forwarded by James M Wood/HOU/EES on 08/22/2001 10:20 AM ---------------------------
From:	Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate on 08/22/2001 09:27 AM
To:	Jeremy Blachman/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Eric Letke/HOU/EES@EES, James M Wood/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Kevin M Presto/ENRON@enronXgate, Mike Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate, Narsimha Misra/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	ERCOT Residential/Industrial Service Mix Requirements

Everyone -

I was just informed by EPMI that there may be a requirement for Retail Energy Providers in ERCOT to serve a certain mix of residential rate class/industrial rate class customers once a certain industrial threshold is crossed (300 Mw of industrial rate class load).

EWS has not set it itself up to monitor such requirements.  Therefore, I cannot comment on the accuracy or details of this requirement.  However, it is something we definitely need to look into.  In addition, we (EPMI/EWS) are getting feedback from the TX PUC that they are not pleased with how they see the pilot and the market structure unfolding.  Specifically, they are not pleased with retail energy providers' contracts that contemplate the right to switch between direct access and tariff (and visa-versa).  We will monitor and need to get more clarity on how the PUC intends to address their displeasure.

On the residential requirement front, someone needs to address this.  Specifically, is this true.  If so, what rate classes are considered industrial vs. commercial?  Is there a similar requirement for commercial load?  Is TI considered industrial?  Do we already have industrial customers in our portfolio?  Who in EES tracks and monitors issues like these as we enter markets?

Mike Curry is in the process of tracking this info down from an EPMI perspective as they are focusing on more of the pure, large industrial customers.  We will share any information Mike receives with the EES group.

RH

<Embedded Picture (Device Independent Bitmap)>
<Embedded StdOleLink>


Dan,

ENA - Texas currently has tranport contracts on PGEV and Oasis pipelines
(listed below).  Since we are transacting as Houston Pipe Line for the
majority of our trades, we need these contractsto be assigned from ENA to
HPL.  Or, we need to enter into new agreements as HPL.  What is the process
used to accomlish this?  We would like to get this set up as soon as we can.

Thanks.

Daren
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2000
12:00 PM ---------------------------
Stacey Neuweiler   03/21/2000 12:21 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Transport contracts

D-

The Oasis contract #s are:  028 27099 201
        028 27099 202
        028 27099 203
        028 27099 204

PG&E contract #s are: 5095-037
   5098-695
   9121
   5203-010

PG&E parking and lending contracts awaiting approval: PLE00004
       PLA00004


Is it really necessary to coordinate everything through ENW?  I am not sure
people will do that?  I think ENW should be informed but not be in control of
the registration.  Have the ENW people requested that they be in charge of
this process?  Will they care if we change it?

	Leslie Hansen
	12/12/2000 02:14 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Policy re Use of Third Party Trading Platforms

Mark:

I wanted to follow up to see if you have had an opportunity to consider the
proposed policy attached below.  Currently, the traders have no guidelines
governing their use of third party electronic trading platforms, and there
has been no centralized system for monitoring such use.

Please give me a call with any questions or comments.

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000 02:13 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	11/14/2000 01:09 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Policy re Use of Third Party Trading Platforms

Mark:

Mark Taylor and I have worked with Andy Zipper to develop a policy relating
to use of third party electronic trading platforms.  We propose that you and
Mark Frevert send the attached e-mail to all traders informing them of this
policy.  Note that I included a contact for questions at the bottom of the
policy.  I have listed myself for now.  We discussed sending this e-mail to
all Enron traders, including those in Europe and within other business units.

Mark Taylor, Andy Zipper and Sheri Thomas (the designated master user who
currently acts as Product Control Director for EnronOnline) have approved the
e-mail and the policy.

I look forward to your comments on the policy.  After you have approved the
e-mail and the policy, I will coordinate with Andy and Sheri to determine how
best to circulate the e-mail.

Leslie

**************************************************************************
Many of you have received offers to use third -party electronic trading
platforms like Dynegydirect.  Enron has a Policy Relating to Use of Third
Party Electronic Trading Platforms to serve as a guide to appropriate
registration for and use of such trading platforms.  The Policy provides that:

You must notify the Enron Net Works LLC (ENW) designee set out in the Policy
if you would like to trade on such a trading platform.
All registration and other documentation must be sent to the ENW designee,
who will coordinate the necessary legal and administrative review.
You are not authorized to use a third-party electronic trading platform until
you are authorized by ENW.
The Master User for all third-party electronic trading platform accounts will
be an ENW designee.
If you are currently using any third-party electronic trading platform,
please notify the ENW designee.

A full copy of the Policy Statement is attached for your review.


Let's get together this week and talk about our winter forecast for the X. I was thinking thursday afternoon around 2:30. I'll touch base with Holst and see if the west guys can join us via conference call. Let me know if that works for you.

Dorland


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 12:31 PM -----

	Enron IT Purchasing
	Sent by: Messaging Agent
	08/30/2000 10:01 AM
	Please respond to Enron IT Purchasing

		 To: Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Confirmation of your order

This is an automatic confirmation of the order you have placed using IT
Central.

Request Number:   ECTH-4NPKMD
Order For:               Sara Shackleton

1 x ( Standard 15" Flat Panel     $922 )

Enron IT Purchasing


---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 08:54
AM ---------------------------

"Michael Walker" <walkerm@kingwoodcable.com> on 05/02/2001 07:50:43 AM
To: <greg.whalley@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: TransModel Mutual NDA

Again.? Sorry,?I forgot the attachment  last night
?
Attached is?a mutual non-disclosure agreement  to facilitate our discussions
concerning the TransModel transmission status  system.? I will call you today
(Wednesday, 5/2) to discuss how we will  proceed.
?
Michael Walker
713-750-5997 (work)
713-256-6641?  (mobile)
 - TransModel Non Disclosure Agreement.doc


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 03/07/2001 11:42 AM -----

	Jeff Baker@EES
	03/07/2001 11:00 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Multi-talented Recruit

Steve,

I am an originator in Michael Mann's area of EES and was most recently with a
consulting firm dealing with new business ventures.

One of my former co-workers (Tony Ekonomou) has expressed an interest in
adding value to Enron's endeavors based on his Political/Legal/Business
background.  He is presently enjoying the business development side of new
business ventures, but can rely on his political or legal background if it
meets a need.

Kelly Noel Higgason of EES legal suggested I contact you directly to
determine the opportunity to Enron of a person of this mulit-talented
background.

Your thoughts and direction would be appreciated.

Regards.  Jeff Baker


i'm so hurt...you deleted me?  :(

it's:    sscott5_2000

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Winus Steenhuisen <winus@rocketmail.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, October 15, 2001 1:39 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:

hi, accidentially deleted you from my friend's list.
Could you please tell me what your Yahoo ID is so I
can add you back on

thanks
winus

=====
--- ATTENTION: MY MOBILE PHONE NUMBER HAS CHANGED ! ---

Winus Steenhuisen
23c, White Conduit Street
London N1-9HA
Mobile    : 00 44 (0) 79 04 54 49 64
Home      : 00 44 (0) 20 72 78 76 82

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com


Steve reviewed and offered comments; changes in bold:

The Index for a Determination Period shall be the average of the daily
settlement prices on the OM London
Exchange (formerly the OMLX exchange) of the Pulpex Futures Contract for
Northern Bleached Softwood Kraft
(the "Futures Contract") for each day on which the OM London Exchange is open
(a "Trading Day")
during the Determination Period. The Futures Contract will be the contract
with the earliest expiration date, except
on those days that fall within 10 Trading Days before that expiration date,
in which case the next successive
Futures Contract price shall be used.

Dale
3-9746


I've updated Physical Power Terminated with this latest list and run the deal splitter!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Murphy, Melissa
Sent:	Friday, January  18, 2002 11:42 AM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey
Cc:	Reeves, Leslie; Theriot, Kim S.; Allen, Thresa A.
Subject:	Power Terminations

There is one new counterparty on the attached spreadsheet.

 << File: Physical Power Terminated.xls >>

Melissa


713 304 8716

"Brashear, Charlotte" <cbrashear@velaw.com> on 01/23/2001 11:03:41 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: I'm here!

   Why don't I call you after I ask Michael?  I don't know what he has
in mind for entertainment.  Also, what is your cell phone number in case I
can't reach you at work?

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 11:02 AM
To: cbrashear@velaw.com
Subject: I'm here!

My trip cancelled, so I'm around.  I can pick Michael up at your place if
this is easier for you.

Kay
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


We need the hourly data.  If they do not release it OPG has a significant
advantage in a deregulating market.  Please push the issue.

John


Congratulations! Your company project was selected by the students for the
2001 Action Learning Project program at Rice University. The Company Day was
a huge success last week, and we appreciate all your time and effort. On
Monday, January 22, we will send you a list of your team members via email
with a hard copy to follow. Student team members will be in touch soon so
that you can plan your first meeting.

Thanks for your continued support and interest in the Jones School.

======================================
Carrie Chamberlin Miller
Director of MBA Program
Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
6100 Main Street, MS 531
Houston, Texas 77005-1892
Phone: (713) 348-5260
Fax: (713) 348-5251
E-mail: cmiller@rice.edu
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~jgs/


I am forwarding a resume of one candidate who is very
persistent and quite aggressive.

Please, take a look at him.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000
08:18 AM ---------------------------

Eric Hilton <ehilton@earthlink.net> on 06/22/2000 11:20:11 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: replied resume

Mr. Kaminski,

??????? I sent an actual resume via the postal service. I guess you never
received it. Thank you for your patience.

A few features I possess that suggest that I may be a representative your
well established company would value are:

?Seven-plus years as a manager/junior executive of logistics in a fast-paced,
demanding, and constantly evolving retail industry.
Experience in effectively developing and implementing policies and tasks
under marketing, logistics, brand management, and best practices.
BA degree in Marketing with a 3.88 GPA from the University of San Moritz,
London England.
Extensive knowledge in management with the ability to effectively manage
multiple tasks, as well as multiple associates, to achieve specific goals in
research and brand management within the company's deadline.
Seven-plus years effectively implementing and teaching dynamic and successful
customer service.

With my current employer, I am in charge of logistics research and
reports/data collection, as well as responsible for developing new and
successful ideas and implementing them under constantly evolving brand
management and best practices.

Traveling to London, England and extensively finishing my degree indicates
that I am willing to go the &extra mile8 to achieve and obtain my goals.

Perhaps, Mr. Kaminiski,? I am an associate you need at your well-respected
company. I would be very happy to meet with you, at your convenience, to
discuss the possibility of putting my education and experience to work for
Enron.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you. I have
attached my resume to this email formatted under Microsoft Word.

Warmest Regards,
Eric Hilton
?
 - MY RESUME


Frank,

Attached is the end of year review and performance agreement for Sherry
Dawson.  Also attached are the reviews for the rest of group I lead.  I'm not
sure if you need the reviews for the rest of the group, but I attached them
anyway.

Thanks,

 Errol L. McLaughlin


Senior Hyvl,

Does the following correspond to your voice mail message from
last Friday?  I believe that I was able to follow it pretty closely.

HPL,  ON  BEHALF  OF ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, BONDING COMPANIES, EMPLOYEES AND
ANY  OTHER  PARTY  EMPLOYED  OR  CONTRACTED  BY  HPL  TO PERFORM UNDER THIS
AGREEMENT  (COLLECTIVELY  REFERRED  TO IN THIS SECTION AS "HPL"), COVENANTS
AND  WARRANTS THAT IT WILL PROTECT, DEFEND, AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY, ITS
EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS, AND LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES (COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO IN
THIS  SECTION  AS THE "CITY") FROM ANY AND ALL THIRD PARTY CLAIMS, DEMANDS,
AND  LIABILITY,  INCLUDING  DEFENSE  COSTS, RELATING IN ANY WAY TO DAMAGES,
CLAIMS  OR  FINES  ARISING  BY  REASON  OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH HPL'S SOLE
NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER ACTIONABLE PERFORMANCE OR OMISSION OF HPL IN CONNECTION
WITH  OR  DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DUTIES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, EXCEPT
TO  THE  EXTENT  THAT  SUCH  CLAIMS, DEMANDS, OR LIABILITY RESULTS FROM THE
GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF THE CITY, ITS CONTRACTORS, AGENTS
OR ASSIGNS.

As usual,

THANKS FOR YOUR HELP!!!

r


When will we be creating the due diligence team?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McConnell, Mark
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Hayslett, Rod; Huber, Lee; Kilmer III, Robert; Lokey, Teb; Centilli, James; Abdmoulaie, Mansoor; Gadd, Eric
Cc:	Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	Questar Southern Trails Due Diligence

The LOI with a nonbinding bid referencing our interest in their West Leg of the Southern Trail Pipeline was faxed to Questar yesterday .  We are confident that we will be invited to the data room to perform due diligence.  We anticipate that this will occur at the end of this month.  As soon as we know the exact date, we will advise all of those involved.

We will be assembling the due diligence team this week and then we will meet to create a plan for the process while we have access to the data room.

We'll be in touch as the details unfold.  In the mean time, if you have any questions, please feel free to call Kim Watson or myself.

Mark

Mark McConnell
Transwestern Pipeline Company
713-345-7896   office
713-822-4862   cell
713-646-2551   fax
mark.mcconnell@enron.com