Hola Hermano,

How are you? I have been busy ever since trying to get everything in order
to leave. I think they want to get as much work out of me as possible until
I leave, not that I blame them. It even doesn't make me mad because I
haven't had time to think about it. Anyway the work has also been more
interesting in the last two months than the two before I left for holidays.

I now find myself in peculiar situation similar to maybe going off to
school. I am leaving somewhere where I have made a lot of close friends and
had heaps of great, and trying experiences and am preparing for the next
step in life, oh no a CAREER, ouch that hurts. I however am excited on where
this new road may lead me and as you know man I am ready to come home. I
sure wish you could have been here for the going a way party, it was so
fantastic, other than not getting laid. I am so tired of these foreign know
it all, fascist, snobby, anorexic, egotistical, meniacal, deceptive, nose
ring wearing, no dancing, big shoe sporting, tasteless,  putas! I really
can't wait to meet some nice Texas girls or someone with similar interest.

I miss you a lot too and can't wait to have some nice parties and dinners as
well, I am more of a budding Chef. My guitar playing is getting a little
better. So what's the scoop. Anything happening in work, relationship,
houseshopping, fishing hunting. So what's up there. Mom says you're working
like crazy and occasionally looking for a house. How's that going. I can
tell you, it never fails. No matter where I go I seem to run into decisions
all with the same gravity, I guess if there is third guarantee in life it is
decisions. If you haven't finished by the time I return I would like to help
you

I can't wait! I have had a great time here but I really am ready to return
home. I know now I never wish to permanenetly live outside of Texas. Anyway
I'm so busy packin and taking care of paperwork and contracts and bla bla
bla it takes all my time! My last day of work is Next Wednesday (28th) and
then I will travel and visit some friends for about three weeks. This
weekend, since I'm not at home for Mardi Gras I will go to visit a Thomas in
Cologne Germany and go to one of the greatest Karnival Celebrations in the
world. The following weekend my flatmate David and I are off to Rome and
then Budapest (Hungary). Then the last week (on my home) I will leave Zurich
on the 15th of March and stop off in Den Hague and Amsterdam (Holland) for 6
days to visit Natalie. Well I am not leaving for a while and will constantly
have acces to the internet so write back and let me know how things are
going. All the best on at work and on finding a house und so weiter. By the
way I am searching for some jobs there have you heard from anyone or can I
write to anyone?

Love ya bro,
Travis

>From: Don.Baughman@enron.com
>To: tbanks@cbre.com, travieso74@hotmail.com, cjwilson@lcc.net,
>blbond@lcc.net,        jebert@eadslink.com, lholcomb@swko.net,
>mel@myweb.net,        ejkorth@flash.net, akorth96@yahoo.com,
>jkuehler@wecon.com,        lenamonj@us.cibc.com, twomarshalls@hotmail.com,
>       baughmanpatricia@hotmail.com, jason.d.moore@carrier.utc.com,
>Michael_J_Newman@reliantenergy.com, david_nobles@ewingcc.com,
>stdfmn@shsu.edu, edo711@hotmail.com, rpearson@oilstates.com,
>patpol@aol.com, Kenneth.D.Schall@US.arthurandersen.com,
>scottsmith@masterword.com, Souto@stthom.edu, reidstav@houston.rr.com,
>  mstewart@pdq.net, stichavsky@pct-inc.com, Tina.Triolo@jacobs.com,
>shannontyer@email.msn.com, Evanv@msn.com,
>andrea.p.williams@us.pwcglobal.com, c.wilson@mail.utexas.edu,
>stewart@mallia.com, chadpol@aol.com, jolivera@enron.com,
>tswick@lcc.net, don.c.baughman@marshmc.com, seanpat@flash.net,
>Larry.Joe.Hunter@enron.com, mthiem@spain-law.com,
>o_briandave@hotmail.com, adamon@dttus.com, gsnapka@pdq.net,
>Lucy.Ortiz@enron.com, Kori.Loibl@enron.com, Michael.Nguyen@enron.com,
>  sdelaro@brazosport.cc.tx.us, j.purdom@worldnet.att.net,
>drkubala@thompson-grp.com, Matt_Doggett@dell.com,
>Wayne.Herndon@enron.com, Richard.Hrabal@enron.com,
>John.Kinser@enron.com, Patrick.Hanse@enron.com, Rudy.Acevedo@enron.com,
>    Cyril.Price@enron.com, ktracey111@aol.com, Kayne.Coulter@enron.com,
>    Larry.Jester@enron.com, Dean.Laurent@enron.com, Jeff.King@enron.com,
>     batoggero@yahoo.com, Jeff.King@enron.com, Jason.Choate@enron.com,
>   lstavinoha@themedlehgroup.com, Keller.Mayeaux@enron.com,
>Joe.Stepenovitch@enron.com, Dragcraps@aol.com, twilliams17@hotmail.com,
>    SPSIMS@MSN.COM, lmudd@firstam.com
>Subject: FW: IQ
>Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:34:21 -0600
>
>
>
>(See attached file: HowSmart.htm)
>
><< HowSmart.htm >>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Attached is a final draft of my GIR retail testimony.? As with the first
draft, please e-mail comments to:

??????? Eric Nelson at ENelson@socalgas.com
??????? Dave Follett at DFollett@sempra.com
??????? Dave Barker at DBarker@socalgas.com

Comments are needed by noon tomorrow, Thursday, May 4.? Thank you.

Thank you.

? <<nelson_testimony_502c.doc>>

Eric Nelson
(213) 244-4250
(213) 244-8088? FAX
enelson@socalgas.com

 - nelson_testimony_502c.doc


Note: forwarded message attached.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Received: by mail2.aracnet.com (mbox dquillen) (with Cubic Circle's cucipop
(v1.31 1998/05/13) Wed Mar  7 17:09:18 2001)
X-From_: steelheader75@hotmail.com  Wed Mar  7 14:28:20 2001
Return-Path: <steelheader75@hotmail.com>
Received: from hotmail.com (f32.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.31.32]) by
mail3.aracnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f27MSKk04765 for
<dquillen@aracnet.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:28:20 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Wed, 7 Mar 2001 14:28:19 -0800
Received: from 128.193.84.130 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed,
07 Mar 2001 22:28:13 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [128.193.84.130]
From: "Bill Barnes" <steelheader75@hotmail.com>
To: stroup@mailbox.orst.edu
Subject: Fwd: New Arkansas Quarter
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 14:28:13 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_6126_2950_1b53"
Message-ID: <F32t7hvvFCorX9B0kY800001698@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2001 22:28:19.0318 (UTC)
FILETIME=[E937C960:01C0A755]
Content-Length: 61551

>From: "Dennis Ruth" <classy53@home.com>
>To: "Chuck Yengst" <cty6460@aol.com>, "Chuck White" <cmwhite39@home.com>,
>"Carlena Weeks" <eve@proaxis.com>, "David Wardrop" <wardropfam@home.com>,
>"Brian Wallace" <Brian.L.Wallace@noaa.gov>, "Aurora Versolenko"
><auringv@yahoo.com>, "Joseph Sottile" <Jsottile@webtv.net>, "Charlie &
>Jenny Shade" <cjshade@ix.netcom.com>, "John Seiber"
><John_Seiber@hotmail.com>, "Pat Salts" <saltsr@datastar.net>, "Jason Salts"
><nawlins3_1999@Yahoo.com>, "Betsy Richardson" <blksheep@peak.org>, "Bill
>Resavy" <ResavyWJ@hqmc.usmc.mil>, "Bruce Reese" <brucereese@aol.com>, "Tina
>Parlee" <CParlee@email.msn.com>, "George Moody" <george.moody@noaa.gov>,
>"Paul Mlsna" <pnlmlsna@yahoo.com>, "Bob McAnany" <bobmack@wpa.net>, "Bill
>Lake" <blake007@earthlink.net>, "Lee Jager" <leejag@proaxis.com>, "Pat
>Jacks" <patjacks@aol.com>, "Martin Hoque" <MartyHoque@hotmail.com>, "Robert
>Hicks" <robertwhicks@prodigy.net>, "Randy Henninger" <rhenn-go24@home.com>,
>"Scott Goff" <scottagoff@yahoo.com>, "Mike Gilroy" <m.gilroy@gte.net>,
>"Dennis Frisbie" <dfrisbie3@home.com>, "Chuck Fisk"
><cjfisk@worldnet.att.net>, "Chris Fakes" <cfakes@mmcable.com>, "Vic Eden"
><vic33_3@yahoo.com>, "Mike Dotson" <dotsonm@naswi.navy.mil>, "Joe Covert"
><Joe.Covert@noaa.gov>, "Chris Cottone" <ccott1@hotmail.com>, "Karen
>Corbett" <corbett@proaxis.com>, "Bernie Cohenour" <oceanog@hotmail.com>,
>"Jim Clark" <jamesm@proaxis.com>, "Dave Carsten" <davecarsten@hotmail.com>,
>"Rickey Bradley" <rickeyanddiana@earthlink.net>, "Matthew Bodowsky"
><MBODOSKY@NCDC.NOAA.GOV>, "John Berger" <john.berger@cablespeed.com>,
>"Terry Battilino" <TERRYBATT@HOTMAIL.COM>, "Bill Barnes"
><steelheader75@hotmail.com>, "FRANK  BAILLIE" <xwxguynavy@prodigy.net>
>Subject: New Arkansas Quarter
>Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:21:29 -0800
>
>GlacierAll:
>
>Everyone knows about the U.S. mint is releasing 50-state quarters.
>Attached is the Arkansas design.  A tribute to "Bill" (if you get the
>hidden meaning).
>
>
>
>Regards,
>Dennis
>
>Just because I have a short attention span doesn't mean I
>
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

 - Arkansas Quarter.jpg


Claudio,

The weather bond project looks like a well - defined
project. It should result in an interesting term
paper.

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ribeiro, Claudio
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 10:08 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Hrgovcic, Joseph
Subject:	MIT Proseminar

Vince,

Last January we contacted Prof. Myers at MIT about presenting a project for the proseminar of Financial Engineering. He contacted me today about the proseminar saying that Enron could propose something.

We (at the weather desk) think about proposing some kind of weather bond. The idea is to create awareness of the weather market rather than the specific structure. We would propose a simple structure (with educational purposes).

Let me know your thoughts about this idea.

Thanks,

Claudio


Not a bad wire story - relevant for our conference call later today. Reuters
in London called me at breakfast yesterday, then Mark gave them some on the
record comments later. See quote. I had pointed them at lessons to be learnt
in relation to Spain and Netherlands, and you will see there are a couple of
mentions of those countries (though only in context of interconnection
capacity) towards the end of the piece. I think other relevant lessons would
be related to perils of allowing retail and wholesale (esp. pools for
residual capacity) markets to be divorced in regulatory terms one from the
other. Difference from California, however, is that the divorce in Spain and
Netherlands works currently to detriment of new entrants and to the benefit
of vertically integrated incumbents.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 01/12/2001 10:59
AM ---------------------------

Iona Maclean
01/12/2001 08:24 AM
To: Jackie Gentle/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT, Alex
Parsons/EU/Enron@Enron, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT,
Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Joe Gold/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Scrimshaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie
Green/LON/ECT@ECT, Eva Hoeffelman/LON/ECT@ECT, Andrew Morrison/LON/ECT@ECT,
Fiona Grant/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Europe seen shrugging off California power crisis- Reuters- Enron
mention

---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 12/01/2001 07:25
---------------------------

djcustomclips@djinteractive.com on 11/01/2001 18:14:54
Please respond to nobody@mail1.djnr.com
To: 216668@mailman.enron.com
cc:

Subject: Enron Reuters folder: UK:    ANALYSIS-Europe seen shrugging off
California power crisis.

UK:
ANALYSIS-Europe seen shrugging off California power crisis.
By Stuart Penson

01/11/2001
Reuters English News Service
(C) Reuters Limited 2001.

LONDON, Jan 11 (Reuters) - California's electricity crisis has sent jitters
through the European power industry but the continent, better supplied than
the U.S. state, will continue down the path of liberalisation, analysts said
on Thursday.

"California is definitely going to help us recognise that there are potential
problems in Europe," said Katharina Gassner, power analyst at the UK's Oxford
Economic Research Associates (OXERA).
"But we would certainly expect those problems to be ironed out as
(liberalised) markets evolve in Europe."

Acute power shortages in California have triggered a surge in wholesale
prices, causing the state's two biggest utilities - Pacific Gas & Electric and
Southern California Edison - to run up costs of $12 billion which cannot be
passed on to customers because prices are capped under state law.

The meltdown of California's flawed experiment in power deregulation has
alerted European regulators to the pitfalls of opening up energy markets to
competition.

But analysts say Europe's ample supplies of electricity mean it will make the
switch to competitive markets without the threat of utility bankruptcies and
blackouts now faced by America's richest state.

The European Union's power markets are opening up to competition under a
European Union Directive which came into force in 1999.

California's crisis, which is sending ripples through financial markets and
topping the agenda of U.S. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, is rooted in a
shortage of power and an apparently unbalanced deregulation model, analysts
say.

Electricity consumption, fuelled by California's high-tech industrial base, is
far outstripping local supply which has not grown significantly for years.

New power projects were a rarity in the 1990s as environmental constraints,
bureaucratic delays and regulatory uncertainty put off investors.

EUROPE HAS POWER SURPLUS

By contrast, most European markets have a significant surplus of power. This
is most evident in Germany, mainland Europe's biggest market, where power
prices crashed after liberalisation in 1998.

"Anyone who assumes what is happening in California is going to happen in
Europe is really not understanding the situation," said Nigel Evans, managing
director in Europe for Energy consulting company Caminus.

"The supply/demand fundamentals in Europe are vastly different to California."

Supply is tighter in Europe's fastest growing markets, like Spain and Ireland.
But unlike in California, there is no shortage of companies prepared to build
new generation.

"I don't think there is any evidence of the system coming under real stress in
any European markets," said David Smol of UK-based consultants Ilex.

"There is lots of new investment on the block."

CALIFORNIA POWER PRICES ROCKET

The Californian price increases, mainly seen on the California Power Exchange,
have been higher than fundamentals justify, said Mark Schroeder, a vice
president of European government and regulatory affairs at U.S. energy group
Enron .

"Prices on the exchange reflect the need to recoup stranded costs rather than
true market fundamentals," he said.

The utilities cannot pass the costs on to retail customers because retail
rates, unlike liberalised wholesale prices, are frozen under state
deregulation laws.

Europe's deregulation plan contains a staggered timetable of market opening
that brings competition ultimately to all consumers, from big industrial
consumers down to private households.

But European liberalisation is not problem free. Transmission bottlenecks are
restricting supply on the borders of France, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands.

Prices in Spain and the Netherlands have been forced higher recently as a
result of constraints on interconnection, much of which is used under
long-term supply deals arranged prior to liberalisation.

"Interconnection is a problem but it's more about freeing up existing capacity
taken up by long term contracts than about building new interconnection," said
Gassner at OXERA.

The development of efficient, free markets across Europe would enable
companies to enter into swaps deals, removing the need for physical
interconnection, Gassner added.

Folder Name: Enron Reuters folder
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 85

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


We need to meet on Wednesday, the 2nd, at 2:00 pm (in the big conference on the sixth floor in ECS) to go back through the East Power contracts that we will continue to serve either through the pools or under bilateral deals.  Given the drill we went through today in preparing for the January schedules in PJM and NEPOOL, it became apparent we need to get all the team members on the same page and make sure we have a good system for notifying all relevant parties of terminations, changes, etc.

Bill/Ed - Can you please run the most recent DPR for non-terminated East Power contracts.

Casey and Stacey - will you please update the spreadsheet that you ran for Kevin last week.

Let's make sure we all agree on contracts that have been terminated.  As most of you probably have seen, a number of terminations have been received in the past several days (see below).

United Illuminating - effective January 1, 2002
HQ Energy Services - effective January 1, 2002
First Energy Solutions - effective January 2, 2002
Old Dominion - effective January 10, 2002 - we should schedule in PJM through the 10th of January (do we have any other positions with Old Dominion).
Ameren Energy
GPU Energy - effective January 21, 2002 - we should schedule in PJM through the 21st of January (they may push back, but we should remind them that they will be subject to LDs).

Thanks,

Don
3-0492


Mr. Porter:

Per the request of Cary Carrabine, attached please find an executable version
of the Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement between enovate, L.L.C. and Hess
Energy Services, L.L.C.  Also attached is a redlined version of the Agreement
which shows your changes that I have incorporated.  If everything is
satisfactory, please print two copies of the executable agreement and secure
signature on behalf of Hess Energy Services.  Please fax a copy of the
partially-executed agreement to Cary and mail the originals to him.  We will
send you a fully-executed original for your files.  Should you have any
questions, feel free to contact me at (713) 853-5707.

Stacy Dickson


Please read the attached document from Susan Scott Lindberg

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan
Sent:	Friday, July 20, 2001 10:14 AM
To:	Dernehl, Ginger
Subject:	revised memo

Delete the previous one and distribute this one:

Thank you.


I'm available.  As I  mentioned, I'm still working away on the revised
equipment contract.

Kay

Heather Kroll@ECT
10/23/2000 08:36 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Scott Healy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffery
Ader/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: CRRA LOI meeting

How does 10:00 work for everyone?  Jeff's got a meeting at 9, so he can't
make the 9:30.

Kay,  can we use your office?  All the conference rooms are full down here.

If 10:00 works for you, I'll see you up in Kay's office.

Heather


Attached is the 2002 Plan O&M schedule for NNG commercial.

Dana L. Jones
NNG Commercial Support
713-853-5787


The Network testing is being rescheduled again for Thursday January 4th at
7:30 PM.  I will keep you posted on any further updates.  Please let me know
if you have any questions or concerns.

Thanks,
Diana
---------------------- Forwarded by Diana Willigerod/PDX/ECT on 01/03/2001
10:24 AM ---------------------------

Diana Willigerod
01/02/2001 09:21 AM
To: Portland West Desk
cc:

Subject: ***RESCHEDULED**Network Update

Due to some Year End work being done we are tentatively rescheduling to Wed
January 3rd.  I will keep you updated on any further changes.

Thanks,
Diana
---------------------- Forwarded by Diana Willigerod/PDX/ECT on 01/02/2001
09:13 AM ---------------------------

Diana Willigerod
01/02/2001 08:48 AM
To: Portland West Desk
cc: Dan Dietrich/CAL/ECT

Subject: Network Update

As most of you know we have been experiencing some problems with our
Network.  Tonight starting at 7:30 Cisco doing some troubleshooting with our
Networking team in Houston.  I have co-ordinated the outages with the Real
Time Schedulers.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.

Thanks,
Diana


We are pleased to announce that as of Monday, Sept. 18, the new version of
EnronOnline will be launched to all our customers.

When our customers log in on this day, they will be given the option to
upgrade to the new version. They can choose to immediately upgrade, or to
upgrade at a later time.

If the customers choose to upgrade, they will be taken through the same steps
as when you upgraded. If the customers choose not to upgrade, they will
receive a version of EnronOnline which is the same as the "old" version, but
the colors will be blue, instead of black.

Customers who choose not to immediately upgrade can can do so at a later time
by pressing the "Upgrade to Version 2" button in the top left corner of their
screen.

Some customers may have browser or firewall restrictions which could cause
difficulties in upgrading to the new version of EnronOnline. We have
EnronOnline Help Desk and IT troubleshooters standing by to help anyone in
this situation. For assistance, please direct calls to:

   North America 713 853 4357
   Europe  + 44 20 7783 7783
   Australia/Asia + 61 2 9229 2300

EnronOnline marketing personnel will be calling customers to help guide them
through the new features, but it would be appreciated if you could also point
out some of the new features when you are talking to your customers.

As of Monday, all internal users should also use the usual
www.enrononline.com to get to the new version.

Thank you for your assistance in making EnronOnline a success.

Dave


Eric,

I would like the following sentences added under the  I. Pilot Meter and
Meter Add-on Ownership Program.

"Customer ownership of meters and add-ons reduces the cost of new facilities
through the avoidance of the tax gross-up on contributions in aid of
construction.  This can be a significant dollar amount for large
interconnections which require special facilities which are paid by the
requesting customer."

Please insert this between the 2nd and 3rd full sentences of the first
paragraph.  With this change, I do not think any additional testimony needs
to be filed on the meter issues.  This is the same approach in the PG&E
settlement and is not a Norm or Turn or Longbeach issue.  Any opposition can
be addressed in rebuttal.

Thanks

Craig

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN [SMTP:ENelson@socalgas.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 2:09 PM
> To: 'AlexanMS@sce.com'; 'paulamirault@aec.ca';
> 'david.bayless@utility.com'; 'Tomb@crossborderenergy.com';
> 'Burkee@cts.com'; 'Craigc@calpine.com'; 'Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com';
> 'Jdasovic@enron.com'; 'Mday@gmssr.com'; 'bdingwall@unitedgas.com';
> 'Douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com'; 'Jfawcet@enron.com';
> 'rfoss@coral-energy.com'; 'plg@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'johnj@bcjlaw.com';
> 'Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu'; 'karpjos@sf.whitecase.com';
> 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'jmpa@dynegy.com';
> 'rmp@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'porterdk@sce.com'; 'RochmanM@cubjpa.org';
> 'RochmanM@spurr.org'; 'susan.scott@enron.com'; Beamish, Richard - TPRMB;
> Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB; Brill, Thomas R.; Cotton, Gary; Davis, Robert
> E.; Davis, Steven D.; Fair, Pam; Fong, Ed; Freeman, Kimberly; Gaines, Mark
> - TPMFG; Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Hay, James E.; Hubbard, Lisa J.;
> Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM; Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM;
> Peterson, Lorraine  -  TP1LMP; Purves, Ralph A.; Rawlings, Roy - TP4RMR;
> Reed, Debra L. - TP3DLR; Reed, William; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Schavrien,
> Lee; Smith, Anne S. -  TPASS; Stewart, Lee M. - TP4LMS; Sullivan, Glen J.;
> Surak, Thomas M. - TP1TMS; Suwara, J.- TPJUS; Takemura, Earl - TPEKT;
> Teeter, James S.; Van Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW;
> Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW; Cherry, Brian - TPBKC
> Cc: Barker, David - TPDTB; Follett, B. David - TPDBF
> Subject: Retail Testimony
> Importance: High
>
>  Attached is a final draft of my GIR retail testimony.  As with the
> first draft, please e-mail comments to:
>
>          Eric Nelson at ENelson@socalgas.com
>         Dave Follett at DFollett@sempra.com
>         Dave Barker at DBarker@socalgas.com
>
>  Comments are needed by noon tomorrow, Thursday, May 4.  Thank you.
>
>  Thank you.
>
>    <<nelson_testimony_502c.doc>>
>
>  Eric Nelson
> (213) 244-4250
> (213) 244-8088  FAX
> enelson@socalgas.com
>
>  << File: nelson_testimony_502c.doc >>


I agree that it is difficult to stomach the idea of supporting a rate cap and
don't  believe we should.  However, a rate cap will not necessarily kill our
value proposition in CA.  From a product standpoint, a rate cap will push us
back to a "discount off of frozen tariff" product as we will be able to
offfer some discount based on the shoulder months (assuming there are any
left) and based on how long the rate cap lasts.  As you are aware, this is
the most successful product we have had in CA.  and customers are comfortable
with it.  If the caps last long enough, we can go past the rate freeze period
and offer pretty good discounts.  Additionally, customers will probably want
to see this product post rate freeze based on this summer.  Additionally, a
rate cap will probably benefit our risk management folks through next summer.

Please don't misinterpret this message.  I believe we need to continue to
oppose the caps.  In my opinion, this is the slippery slope of re-regulation
that opens the door to massive uncertainty that we cannot hedge.  But, based
on the current political climate, it appears that they are inevitable.  IF
they occur, it is not the end of our ESP business.  As always, we continue to
adapt to the political wrangling that seems to occur daily.

Please call me if you wish to discuss this further.  Thanks.

Susan J Mara
08/12/2000 02:39 AM
To: Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES
cc: douglass@arterhadden.com, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin
Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES,
Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff
Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: PHC Statement-Attorney/Client Privilege

I have some questions and coments.

WHY DOES ENRON FEEL THE NEED TO FILE SEPARATELY? We can't we file with ARM?

WHY DO WE WANT THE DISCUSSION NARROWED TO SDG&E ONLY?  I can see pros and
cons of each way.

I DO NOT SEE HOW WE CAN SUPPORT PRICE CAPS.....If we could not support them
on the wholesale side, how can we support them on the retail side?  Doesn't
it kill the ESP business?  Doesn't it eliminate any benefits of dereulation?
If we support them, we are givibng in to the unjustified terrorism that is
taking place in CA.  We don't even now whrer the monry is coming from.  What
if they expect to get it from us.  Hey, can we sue -- we can't if we SUPPORT
price caps.

WE MUST STICK WITH THE PRINCIPLES WE'VE FOUGHT FOR ALL THESE YEARS -- SOME
THINGS ARE JUST  WORTH FIGHTNG FOR.
I recommend opposition of the price caps -- the resukt of the knee=jerk,
weekly about -face by the CPUC which cannot possibly be considered to be
reasoned decision making

Mona L Petrochko
08/11/2000 04:23 PM
To: douglass@arterhadden.com, West GA, Paul Kaufman, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES, Martin Wenzel/SFO/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang,
Edward Hamb/HOU/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: PHC Statement-Attorney/Client Privilege

Unless we receive comments by 9 a.m. p.d.t. Monday, August 14, this will be
Enron's pre-hearing conference comments relative to the Investigation opened
by the Commission.  These comments will be filed Monday.  Please make sure
Bruno is copied on your comments.

NOTE:

Rather than opposing a cap for small consumers, which I believe is imminent,
I would prefer to advocate that it apply only to small consumers, under 20
kW, and only for a limited period of time.  I would prefer to argue that the
cap should not apply to larger consumers, who  already have access to market
solutions to insulate them from market volatility.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW ASAP IF WE CANNOT SUPPORT THIS POSITION.

Dan, only one addition to PHC.  Will advise on filing.

---------------------- Forwarded by Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES on 08/11/2000
02:01 PM ---------------------------

"Daniel Douglass" <douglass@ArterHadden.com> on 08/11/2000 01:12:49 PM
To: <Bruno_Gaillard@enron.com>, <mpetroch@enron.com>
cc: "Michelle Dangott" <MDangott@ArterHadden.com>
Subject: PHC Statement

After reviewing Mona's draft and making a few other cleanup changes, the
attached proposed final draft is attached for your review.

Since Mona and I are both on vacation, Bruno will coordinate with Michelle
Dangott of my office to finalize the filing on Monday.  Bruno, if you have
any last minute changes, please call Michelle at (818) 596-2216.  Remember it
has to be finalized by no later than 10 or so Monday morning, so we can do
the final duplicating and have the filing couriered to the CPUC in the midst
of the traffic disruption caused by the Democratic convention.

My thanks to all!

Dan

 - PHC Statement - Final.doc


Please be informed that I will not be attending tomorrow's activities @ 2pm.
However,  I will be here until my regular time taking advantage of this
opportunity to begin archiving.

Thanks
Dana


here ya go.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Groves/HOU/ECT on 11/30/2000 05:41
PM ---------------------------

Les Webber @ ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

11/25/2000 06:16 PM
To: Eric Groves@ECT
cc: Doug Arnell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: LNG TRANSACTION AROUND THE ELBA ISLAND LNG TERMINAL

ERIC:

We had a brief discussion regarding the LNG sales arrangement Enron has
entered with El Paso Merchant Energy (successor to Sonat Energy Services)
centered on the firm service capacity that Merchant holds at the Elba Island
LNG Terminal, which will be reactivated to accept LNG tanker deliveries
sometime late next year or early in 2002.

Enron signed a binding Letter Agreement (which included a fairly
comprehensive Term Sheet) with Merchant on October 13, 1999.  A copy of this
agreement is attached hereto.

It was anticipated that the parties would execute a "Definitive Agreement",
which would replace the Letter Agreement and contain a number of other terms
and conditions to be mutually agreed upon.  As a precaution, the Letter
Agreement did outline a process to bring closure to this matter in case the
parties could not agree.

The parties did work together for several months on negotiating an "LNG Sale
and Purchase Agreement", which added a considerable number of important
provisions and modified a number of terms and conditions contained in the
Letter Agreement for the benefit of both parties.  However, the Quality
Letter Agreement, which is an attachment to the Letter Agreement, has become
a major source of contention for two primary reasons:
despite the fact that the parties did not intend to modify the Quality Letter
Agreement, it is apparent to Enron, and indeed to Merchant, that this
agreement does not position the Terminal with the capability of handling LNG
from any meaningful number of LNG production sources in the world.
Southern LNG, which is a party to the Quality Letter Agreement, has no
intention of agreeing to meaningfully modify its Terminal, although something
could be worked out if Enron were to eliminate a considerable portion of its
flexibility and optionality in its sales arrangement with Merchant, an
affiliate of Southern LNG.

I am attaching a copy of the LNG Sale and Purchase Agreement, as it was last
drafted in early July this year.  This draft does represent some considerable
movement from the Letter Agreement, but we found it to be acceptable with the
assumption that the quality issue would be favorably resolved.  This copy is
in the comparewrite format, but I think you will be able to work your way
through it for your purposes.

When it recently became apparent that w would not be able to close with
Merchant in terms acceptable to use, we decided we had better move back to
the Term Sheet intent, even though both parties will realize some
unattractive returns.  We have now drafted up the "Definitive LNG Sale and
Purchase Agreement', which we believe captures the full intent of the Letter
Agreement and Term Sheet.  It is attached below for your review.

Following your review of the pertinent aspects of these last two documents,
we would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss how, from a
pricing point of view, they might be better restructured.

Regards.
Les


I think it would be helpful if we met sometime soon to "take inventory" as to
our legal entity structures (thus far) for the Enron Net Works "family".
There has been a fair amount of entity formation (and, perhaps, commercial
activity) and I want to make sure the all entities and assets are where they
are suppose to be.

To that end, please contact my assistant, Darlene Forsyth (x3754) as to your
availability over the next week so we may take an hour or so to compare notes.
Thanks.

Jordan
---------------------- Forwarded by Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 03:04
PM ---------------------------

Nora Dobin@ENRON
07/18/2000 10:56 AM
To: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael K Patrick/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Brown/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brenda L
Funk/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: DealBench

As most of us have discussed, Harry Arora's group has been developing an
e-commerce site now known as DealBench.com (formerly EnronDirectFinance).
This site is being launched as an information dissemination/deal platform
whose closest competitor is Intralinks.  DealBench's customers will be banks,
law firms, and other businesses who desire a secure internet platform to
conduct business transactions online.  Customers will license use of the site
pursuant to written agreements.  Several trademark applications have been
filed by Enron Corp. for the site.  Lawyers from Vinson & Elkins in Austin
(Bob Baird and Dean Harvey) and Houston (Steve Borgman) have been assisting
us in various legal matters relating to the site.

At this point, the commercial team desires to move ahead with a limited
liability entity to own and operate the DealBench business.  Based upon input
from many of you, the proposal is to form a simple, single-member,
owner-managed Delaware limited liability company named DealBench L.L.C.  The
sole owner would be Enron Net Works LLC.  Upon formation, all assets and
liabilities of the DealBench business will be assigned to, and assumed by the
new LLC.  We understand that the private placement being contemplated by Net
Works will be through a separate legal entity and currently does not
contemplate the DealBench business.  We also understand that DealBench's
ownership by Net Works will not preclude future flexibility in DealBench's
ownership.

The commercial team desires to move forward with formation of DealBench
L.L.C. this week.  Based upon your input, we will proceed as outlined above.
If you have any other thoughts or suggestions, please let me know.  Thanks
for your help.

Regards, NJD


Bridgette,
 I would stay with the April 1, 1998 agreement.  The 10/01/00 agreement was
with the canadian el paso entity.

	Bridgette Anderson@ENRON
	02/21/2001 02:50 PM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P. - Question#2

Dan,

I have yet another El Paso question.  We currently have two masters with El
Paso Merchant Energy, L.P..  As you are probably aware, they have gone
through several name changes.  We need to know which master to keep
especially for EOL purposes.  Please advise.


Group

We have 10 MW of length from Sierra through the APX light load at $185.  Stan
purchased this NP15 length from the APX and it should be scheduled DA by
Jeremy.  There should be a ECTRT load zone in PGE3 with this length.  Use
whatever opportunities are out there (dynegy across COB or a straight export)
to maximize this position.  The deal numbers are: 581335-purchase from APX
and 581356-desk to desk deal.  Please make sure this gets taken care of.

Cheers
Jesse


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 06/02/2001 05:15 PM -----

	"Gillaspie, Eric" <EGillaspie@coral-energy.com>
	05/30/2001 08:53 AM

		 To: "Jennifer Gillaspie (E-mail)" <jennifer-gillaspie@reliantenergy.com>,
"Gerald Nemec (E-mail)" <gerald.nemec@enron.com>, "Jeff Gillaspie (E-mail)"
<Jgillaspieci3@netzero.net>, "Rodger Gilllaspie (E-mail)"
<Rodger.Gillaspie@ia.ngb.army.mil>, "Sandra Gillaspie (E-mail)"
<gillassa@fairfield.k12.ia.us>
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Trip Details

FYI, a message from Jon

Eric Gillaspie
Counsel
Shell Trading Gas and Power Company
Tel. 713-230-3576
Fax 713-265-3576
2HC 1036

-----Original Message-----
From: jonathan gillaspie [mailto:jongill78@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:46 PM
To: Gillaspie, Eric
Subject: RE: Trip Details

Eric:

Am in the process of arranging your Shanghai leg of the journey. Will set up

a package that allows you to choose meals. I think you should have a little
guidance in your explorations of the Shanghai area. Shanghai is a friggin
mad-house (16 million people) and if you ain't got the language skills
they will bend you over a rickshaw and ride you like a poodle. So- let me
set up your hotel and sightseeing for you. You can break loose from the
"tour group" vibe later in Qingdao. Keep in mind that you'll be in a
relatively small group (ie. it won't be a Greyhound bus packed full of
gawking blue-hairs). I'll send full Shanghai details when the biz is
finished later today...

In regards to the Beijing leg, we altered the itinerary to suit our needs.
We knocked out the bullshit and kept the bliss nuggets. You should have a
traditional Beijing roast duck dinner (it rocks!) and you should experience
Beijing Opera at least once in your life. We'll see the Beijing Opera in a
famous Beijing teahouse while sucking tea and brews and nibbling on pickled
chicken feet and other assorted delicacies. We knocked out the full two-hour

Beijing Opera performance that would have been later in the week. We'll be
staying in a Wangfujing hotel. Wangfujing is the trendy shopping street in
downtown Beijing; should make the wives happy. It'll be $70 USD/night.

Will send full Beijing details when we've finished the haggling and cheating

rituals that make life so wonderful in the middle kingdom.

Take care, guyeee.

Love,

Jon

>From: "Gillaspie, Eric" <EGillaspie@coral-energy.com>
>To: "'jonathan gillaspie'" <jongill78@hotmail.com>
>CC: "Jeff Gillaspie (E-mail)" <Jgillaspieci3@netzero.net>
>Subject: RE: Trip Details
>Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:15:28 -0500
>
>As far as a Shanghai tour package, my vote would be to have you set-up our
>hotel and some sightseeing possibilities, but maybe not have it as a "tour
>package", i.e. everything including our restaurants, etc. being planned for
>us...., but to be honest I got no freakin' clue what would be best so I
>trust your reasoned judgment.

>what's the scoop on the Beijing Opera?
>
>Eric Gillaspie
>Counsel
>Shell Trading Gas and Power Company
>Tel. 713-230-3576
>Fax 713-265-3576
>2HC 1036
>


Cecilia,

We need to get some new books set up in ERMS this week for Netco.  We will be taking over this responsibility from the controls group but they are reluctant to grant us access to RisktRAC now due to security reasons.  These books are needed for many downstream groups and therefore must be set up soon.  Can you set these up before they are in risktrac this time due to these limitations?  I can give you the book and portfolio codes and the TAGG short names.

Please let me know today so we can start ASAP.

Thanks

Kam

x3-5781


Do you have a specific answer to the franchise question below?  I remember
that it was an issue in the Baytown lawsuit, but did not hear the final
aspect of that argument.  In light of the final decision, is that an issue
today?  Please keep Candy in this loop, so that she can understand which
options we might have.

---------------------- Forwarded by Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001
05:57 AM ---------------------------
From: Lee L Papayoti on 05/29/2001 03:10 PM
To: William D Cosby/HOU/ECT@ENRON
cc: Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Kuehler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Baytown lateral serving Natural Gas Odorizer plant

I am familiar with the ultimate customer, NGO and know their buyer, as they
are wholly owned sub of OxyChem.  They would be more than happy to discuss a
direct connect to HPL.

BUT, I recollect from a couple of years ago the possibility of franchise
problems .... i.e. that our position was NOT to pursue a direct connect to
NGO as this might place HPL in a position of exposure with respect to the
franchise tax to the City of Baytown.

Steve - comments??

Lee

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William D Cosby @ ENRON                           05/29/2001 02:31 PM

Sent by: William D Cosby@ENRON
To: Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Kuehler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lee L
Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: natural gas odorizer pipeline

We discussed this project in our staff meeting today.  I will be talking to
Lee and getting his thoughts on the matter.  Early on, it was mentioned that
we should make an effort to serve this customer directly without Entex
involvement.  Exxon advised that we would need to move our line by Sept. 2001
+/-.

Candace L Bywaters@ECT
05/15/2001 06:31 AM
To: William D Cosby/GCO/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Re: natural gas odorizer pipeline

Pls advise.  Thanks!

Candy

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brad Blevins                           05/14/2001 03:13 PM

To: Candace L Bywaters/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: natural gas odorizer pipeline

Will do, not much new happening.  I have notified Entex that HPL is not
replacing the line, Danny says that the project is beginning to move a
little.  I'll touch base with him again.

Candace L Bywaters
05/14/2001 02:38 PM
To: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: natural gas odorizer pipeline

Steve advised me in our staff meeting today that you and Danny Cosby are
working together on  the subject topic at Baytown concerning an Exxon and
Entex involvement.

Please tell me where you are on this and include me in your work on this
project as Steve has requested such.

Thanks, guys!

Candy


Hey Guys.

I had a long talk with NCPA today and set up so that we again can do the
ZP26/NP15 Buy-Resale on a Realtime basis. We are not doing a profit split
this time, we are paying them $25/MW instead. This basically enables us to
shift 21MW across PATH15 and not be subject to Congestion as NCPA has
Grandfather Rights across the path. This is a sweet strategy when the
SP15/NP15 spread is there and PATH15 is congested. NCPA's capacity is 21MW,
but I would not recommend doing more than 20MW. There are others who know
about this opportunity but are not currently using it (WESCO especially). So
by doing only  20MW we do not remind them of NCPA.

The way this works is that we call NCPA and ask their capacity across PATH15.
And tell them you want to schedule the BR through whatever hour.

IN CAPS:
We sell to NCPA in ZP26.
We buy from NCPA in NP15.

We can buy SP15 to fill our ZP26 sale (we just shift the load from SP15 to
ZP26, so enter a EPMI CALPOOL).
PG&E is NCPA's SC, so if you are not passing Phase two give them a call.

NCPA's tel#: (916) 786-3520
PG&E tel# : (415) 973-1969

If you guys have any questions  just ask me.

Geir


On Tues. 9/21 I met with Phil Zirngibl, the Alliance manager for Ft. James.
I informed him Enron wanted the original $10mm back.  It was our belief that
FJ did not act in good faith in "expeditiously and fairly evaluating" all of
Enron's energy proposals.  Phil argued that Enron saw substantial revenue
from the commodity (gas & coal) deals that were executed.  I argued that
commodity deals were never the "intent" of the Alliance as outlined in the
"Objectives of the Parties."  I told him we didn't need an Alliance agreement
to do commodity deals.

Phil was only prepared to argue the definition of "substantial assets" as it
related to the asset sale.  I told him Kalamazoo was substantial to us
because that was where we had a significant energy project.  It was also
substantial because the mill was ranked in the top 3 in terms of natural gas
consumption.  FJ let us work on the Kzoo project for 9 months before
informing us the mill would be sold.  I told Phil this is not how Alliance
partners treat each other.
I asked Phil if he was prepared to offer any proposal to resolve the
situation.  His response was FJ was happy with the Alliance and wanted to
continue with it "as is."  My response was that was not acceptable to Enron.

I told him the list of potential mediators for the dispute was being sent to
their counsel Greg Chaffee.

Next Steps:

I think we need to pick out a couple of strong project examples to use in our
case to present to the mediator.  Rather than just show the list of potential
deals Enron pitched and the lost opportunity value, I think a stronger case
to get our original $10mm back is to say here are 3 examples, here is the
value to both parties, and FJ still did not do the project (or they chose to
do it themselves).  This should go a long way to proving "bad faith".

I will get with David Barr and start assembling this information along with
the entire project list and the various "reasons" FJ chose not to do the
projects.

Based on this initial meeting, if the parties can't resolve the dispute
within 30 days, the dispute goes to non-binding mediation.  The parties are
to meet with the mediator within 21 days of the dispute being referred to the
mediator.  Per the Alliance agreement, the mediation meeting should take
place anytime between now and November 10.

Let me know if you have questions.


Here are the numbers re my  voice mail.

Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 02:00 PM -----

	Stacey Richardson
	05/17/2001 01:58 PM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Mercado

Bad news.  Even though I was able to get the Tagg numbers (NE2988 and NE3039,
respectively), the only things in Livelink were the deal tickets.  Please
call Ellen Wallumrod at x54099 - she may be able to pull something for you.
I'm going to try and play around in Tagg and see if I can somewhere print the
confirms, but Ellen's your best bet there.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,
SBR x30569

DEBRA PERLINGIERE
05/17/2001 12:23 PM
To: Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mercado

#'s  238876 / 238892 /

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000
04:23 PM ---------------------------

Billyoung3@aol.com on 11/09/2000 03:01:43 PM
To: mschrab@enron.com, nferrie@enron.com, victoria.versen@enron.com,
RYKESTER@aol.com, sschro@wtoffshore.net, ajt3@petroquest.com,
garyp@spinexp.com, tjones@spinexp.com
cc:

Subject: Ver 375

Mark Schrab -

???????We received a call today from Petroquest demanding we increase our
nominations to stay in balance. I have been forwarding you noms daily but PQ
says you are not changing your nom with ANR.

??????We (SEC and Cheyenne) are 9,600 mmbtu behind on a month to date basis.
Please increase our nomination immediately and stay on top of it. As I sent
you earlier today, current volumes are over 14,000 mmbtu/day which generates
11,900 mmbtu/day for our share on a current basis. The addition of 9600 over
20 days adds 480/day for a total nom of 12,380 mmbtu/day (SEC/Cheyenne)
subject to daily change of production.


Dear Mr. Dalia - Please do not be adding me to any more lists.
Jack Heaston

----- Original Message -----
From: Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1 <kadalia@BPA.GOV>
To: <RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:39 PM

> You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model
> Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.
>
> Please save this message for future  reference, especially if this is the
> first time you subscribe to an  electronic mailing list. If you ever need
> to  leave the  list,  you  will find  the  necessary instructions  below.
> Perhaps  more importantly,  saving a  copy of  this message  (and of  all
> future subscription notices  from other mailing lists) in  a special mail
> folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you
> are subscribed  to. This may  prove very useful the  next time you  go on
> vacation and  need to leave  the lists temporarily so  as not to  fill up
> your  mailbox while  you  are away!  You should  also  save the  "welcome
> messages" from the  list owners that you will  occasionally receive after
> subscribing to a new list.
>
> To send  a message to  all the people  currently subscribed to  the list,
> just send mail  to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is  called "sending mail
> to the  list", because  you send  mail to a  single address  and LISTSERV
> makes  copies  for all  the  people  who  have subscribed.  This  address
> (RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG)  is also  called the  "list address".  You must
> never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed
> to all the people  who have subscribed. All commands must  be sent to the
> "LISTSERV  address",   LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.  It   is  very
> important to understand  the difference between the  two, but fortunately
> it is  not complicated. The  LISTSERV address is  like a FAX  number that
> connects you  to a  machine, whereas  the list address  is like  a normal
> voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the
> FAX number  when you  wanted to talk  to someone on  the phone,  you will
> quickly realize  that you used the  wrong number and call  again. No harm
> will have been done. If on the  other hand you accidentally make your FAX
> call  someone's  voice  line,  the  person receiving  the  call  will  be
> inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The
> fact that  most people  will eventually  connect the  FAX machine  to the
> voice line to  allow the FAX to  go through and make the  calls stop does
> not mean  that you  should continue  to send FAXes  to the  voice number.
> People would just get mad at you.  It works pretty much the same way with
> mailing  lists, with  the difference  that  you are  calling hundreds  or
> thousands of people  at the same time, and consequently  you can expect a
> lot of people to get upset if  you consistently send commands to the list
> address.
>
> You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command
> to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
> want it to confirm  the receipt of messages you send to  the list. If you
> do not trust  the system, send a "SET RRGA-L  REPRO" command and LISTSERV
> will send you a  copy of your own messages, so that you  can see that the
> message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while
> you  may find  that this  is getting  annoying, especially  if your  mail
> program does not  tell you that the  message is from you  when it informs
> you that new mail has arrived from  RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK
> NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead,
> which  will look  different in  your  mailbox directory.  With most  mail
> programs you  will know immediately  that this is an  acknowledgement you
> can read  later. Finally,  you can  turn off  acknowledgements completely
> with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".
>
> Following  instructions from  the list  owner, your  subscription options
> have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults.
> For more  information about subscription  options, send a  "QUERY RRGA-L"
> command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.
>
> Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a
> list of the available archive files  by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command
> to  LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You  can then  order these  files
> with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx"  command, or using LISTSERV's database search
> facilities. Send an  "INFO DATABASE" command for more  information on the
> latter.
>
> This  list is  available  in digest  form.  If you  wish  to receive  the
> digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command.
>
> Please note that  it is presently possible for other  people to determine
> that  you are  signed up  to the  list through  the use  of the  "REVIEW"
> command,  which  returns   the  e-mail  address  and  name   of  all  the
> subscribers. If  you do not  want your name to  be visible, just  issue a
> "SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.
>
> More  information on  LISTSERV  commands  can be  found  in the  LISTSERV
> reference  card, which  you can  retrieve  by sending  an "INFO  REFCARD"
> command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.
>


Gerald!

Attached is Sequents/AGL Resources comments to our guaranty form.  Kindly review and if ok with you, please prepare for execution a guaranty in the amount of $6.00MM.

Thanks
Rudwell
53596.

-----Original Message-----
From: Spencer Voytek [mailto:svoytek@aglresources.com]
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2001 8:49 AM
To: Johnson, Rudwell
Cc: Forrest Alexander
Subject: Bridgline Holdings Guaranty in favor of Sequent

Rudwell,
Please see additions to your attached guaranty by my attorney.  If guaranty is acceptable by your attorney; please execute an orginal and forward and fax to my attention.

Any update on our guaranty in Bridgeline's favor?  Let me know.
Thanks.

Spencer R. Voytek
Sequent Energy Management, L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite: 1975
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: 832-397-1739
Fax: 832-397-1709


BREAKING NEWS from CNN.com

-- U.S. Attorney General John Ashcoft to announce details of new terrorist threat at 5:30 p.m. EST news conference.

Watch CNN or log on to http://CNN.com /AOL Keyword: CNN for the latest news.
**********************************************************************
For in-depth analysis of the week's news, read TIME Magazine.
To get 4 free trial issues, go to www.time.com/cnn
**********************************************************************
To unsubscribe from CNN.com's Breaking News E-Mail Alert, log on to:
http://cnn.com/EMAIL/breakingnews.html

Subscribe to CNN.com's daily news overview, weekly political review
or any CNN.com e-mail product at http://CNN.com/email
(c) 2001 Cable News Network, Inc.
An AOL Time Warner Company

CNN Interactive email id:2550170502262099


Fort Worth:
The Worthington
200 Main Street
817-870-1000

WEST VIRGINIA

The Greenbrier
300 West Main Street
White Sulphur Springs
WV, 24988-2498
304-536-7804 (W)
304-536-7874 (F)
http://www.greenbrier.com


GT,  I think I will come in on Saturday morning.  If Lisa is out of town
though and you want to chase women Friday night, my plans can change.

"Townsend, George" <gtownsend@manorisd.net> on 09/13/99 02:58:41 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: No Le Hace

G

Are you coming in on Friday or Saturday? Let me know.

GT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerald Nemec [SMTP:gnemec@ect.enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 1999 1:19 PM
> To: Townsend, George
> Subject: RE: No Le Hace
>
>
>
> That is hilarious.  You know it is a good party when you make the news.
> Just
> talked to Ernie.  He didn't have your new email and work #.  He is
> planning on
> coming up for the Rice game.  You should be hearing from him shortly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Townsend, George" <gtownsend@manorisd.net> on 09/10/99 08:24:08 AM
>
> To:   Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: No Le Hace
>
>
>
> G$,
>
> I do have your charger. Hey, did you no there was a camera at the dock
> when
> we left and we were on the 10 o clock news. The story was about drunks on
> the water.
> \
> Talk to you later
> GT
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Gerald Nemec [SMTP:gnemec@ect.enron.com]
> > Sent:   Thursday, September 09, 1999 10:43 AM
> > To:     gtownsend@manorisd.net
> > Subject:     No Le Hace
> >
> >
> >
> > GT,   Great party.  Looking forward to the next one already.
> >
> > I think I left my cell phone charger in your apartment on your table.
> If
> > I did,
> > just hold it.  I'll be back for Rice and pick it up then.  If not, I
> must
> > have
> > lost the damn thing somewhere else.
> >
> > Later,  G$
> >
>
>
>


Just wanted to review weekend sales to Southern Union.

LONGTERM FIRM SALES FOR NOVEMBER

Inside FERC +.199    5K  1-30
Gas Daily + .199    15K  10th-13th
Gas Daily + .199    40K  14th- Until nomed down
---this does not reflect prior Gas Daily sales-----

SPOT

Gas Daily HSC + $.05 ( on Tuesdays print-14th-)  25K   12th & 13th- Firm
deals above are first through the meter.

Call me if something doesn't look right.       :)

Janet


October 1, 2001

Duke Energy Field Services have scheduled a planned outage of the Wilcox
Plant on Tuesday, October 30, 2001.  All meter stations upstream of the
plant must be shut in during the afternoon of October 29, and will be
allowed to come back on the morning of October 31st.  The  affected
meters for this outage are listed below:

MEAS   MEAS
STATN  STATN
 NBR    NM
-----  -----------------------------------------------------------------
-
70612  HUNTER PETROLEUM - FAIN-BECK UNIT #1 BEEVILLE, TX
70621  PRIDE ENERGY CO. - GEO. WEST EST. #1, LIVE OAK CO., TX
70633  B&T OIL CO., YOWARD C.P. - BEE CO., TX
70645  MAGNUM - S. COTTONWOOD CR. DEWITT CO., TX
70655  KP EXPLORATION - SOUTHWEST GOHLKE CP - VICTORIA, TX  (REC)
70664  TEXACO - BARRE C.P. DEWITT CO., TX  (RECEIPT)
70671  DUER WAGNER & CO. - BRANDT C.P.- GOLIAD CO., TX  (RECEIPT)
70675  MOSBACHER-MORGAN #1, LIVE OAK CO. TX
70688  P. M. QUIGLEY SPARKMAN #2
70689  WOFFORD #1 CHILDREN'S HOME - BEE CO.,TX
70691  INCA OIL & GAS CO..-#1 WILKINSON,GOLIAD CO., TX
70739  TETCO - HAGIST RANCH C.P. - DUVAL CO., TX
70743  MORRIS CANNAN - EAST MAXINE UNIT #1
70776  W.S. CHESTNUT, #1 BAKER
70788  CABOT OIL & GAS - DIVISION - HOSTETTER CP., TX
70802  MARWELL PETROLEUM - THIEME HEIRS#1,DEWITT CO.,TX
70912  BRITANCO, LLC WILCOX - TULETA CP, BEE CO., TX
70913  TETCO - STRAUSS T. - C.P.
70914  TETCO - I.C.B.C.B. & G. #1 - T
70917  MORRIS CANNAN - #1C STAUSS, TX
70957  TETCO - NORMANNA CP, BEE CO., TX
71265  TETCO - ENGLE KING #1 -  BEE CO., TX
71290  BRITANCO, LLC - LOMA ALTA HAGIST CP, DUVAL CO., TX
71607  VICTORIA OPERATING - ANNA BARRE FIELD, DEWITT CO., TX  (REC)
71657  BRITANCO, LLC - LINHOLM, LIVE OAK, TX
71746  DANEX (ATWOOD EXPLORATION CO. - KLIMITCHEK, LAVACA CO., TX
71773  WAYNE A. JANSSEN - JUNKER, DEWITT CO., TX
71817  JN EXPLORATION & PROD.- BORCHERS FIELD-LAVACA CO., TX
71862  BRITANCO, LLC - #1D GOREE, BEE CO., TX
71895  GOHLKE PIPELINE SYSTEM  - DEWITT, TX  (RECEIPT)
71917  MARWELL PETROLEUM, MICHAEL-#1 BORCHESS,LAVACA CO., TX
71929  DOUGLAS PET.- #1 BUCHANAN, MCMULLEN, TX
72015  WARRIOR MANAGEMENT - #1 COUNTRYMAN, MCMULLEN, TX
72056  NATURAL EXPLORATION, INC.- #1 HARTMAN, DEWITT, TX
72103  PETRO CORP. - #1 YOUNG, BEE CO., TX
72159  SOUTHWEST OPERATING - #2 RUSCHUPT, DEWITT CO., TX
72175  PENNZOIL - #91 RAY, GOLIAD CO., TX
72184  PETRO CORP. - #1 PAGE, BEE CO., TX
72249  TRI-UNION DEV. CORP.-#1 WRIGHT /  GOLIAD COUNTY, TX  (REC)
72272  WOFFORD - #1 BEAN, BEE CO., TX
72309  TRI-UNION  #1 HESTER, GOLIAD CO.,TX
72457  GMT GAS MARKETING - #1 VAL HOLTZ, DEWITT CO., TX
72540  COASTLINE EXPLORATION, INC. -#1 GOEHRING / GOLIAD COUNTY, TX
72621  WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES  - DUVAL CO., TX
72626  WING CORP - C.P., DEWITT COUNTY, TX
72654  SIMRAY OIL & GAS - BONNE TERRE FIELD, MCMULLEN CO.
72707  COASTLINE EXPLORATION, INC. - GOLIAD CO., TX
72723  CROSSTEX ENERGY -#1 TIPTON / GOLIAD CO., TX
72747  KAISER FRANCIS - #1 BRANDT, GOLIAD CO., TX
72774  SOUTHWEST LAND & MINERALS - SINCLAIR HUNT #1, BEE
72775  ACOCK ENGR-#1 HOLZMARK, BEE CO., TX
72800  DEK. ENERGY -NEWTON-WELDER GOLIAD TX
72810  LYTLE CREEK - #1 DRAPELLA, DEWITT CO, TX
72861  SHOREHAM OIL & GAS, ROBERTS #1 - BEE CO., TX
72884  PFSI - STRIDEE #1 , LIVE OAK CO. TX.
72886  ASSOC. NATURAL GAS INC. - SPEAKS - LAVACA COUNTY, TX
72887  LUNDBERG OPERATING CO. - VICTORIA CO., TX
72922  MIDSTATES CORPORATION -  DEWITT CO., TX
72943  DEFS - LOLA FUHREKEN#1 - DEWITT CO. TX
72950  APTIAN GAS CORP., K.W. SCHREINER #1 - LIVE OAK CO., TX
72951  APTIAN GAS CORP., SCHREINER RANCH - LIVE OAK CO., TX
72963  AUBURN ENTERPRISES - KERLICK #1, DEWITT, TX
73031  MESA CHICA CORPORATION - FOSTER GAS UNIT #1, BEE C
73033  PRIME OPERATING CO.- RALLS UNIT #1 / DEWITT CO., TX
73089  UNITED OIL & MINERALS - LAVACA COUNTY, TX
73091  ELLIOTT OIL & GAS CO. - KESLINGER #1 / GOLIAD CO., TX
73124  AURORA NATURAL GAS - HOSKINS #1, LIVE OAK CO., TX
73130  TALON DEVELOPMENT CO. - GOLIAD CO. TX
73138  DOMINION PIPELINE COMPANY - SMOTHERS #1 / LAVACA CO., TX
73139  DEFS - #1 DIEBEL, GOLIAD CO., TX
73144  PETROPRO ENERGY  - SCHULTHEISS #1 - DEWITT CO., TX
73146  DALE OPERATING COMPANY - LAVACA CO., TX
73164  DEFS TRUNKLINE INTERCONNECT - GOLIAD CO., TX
73165  SANCHEZ O'BRIEN-BODDEN FROST, LIVE OAK CO., TX
73176  DEFS (LN# 21-F GATHERING) - LAVACA CO., TX
73178  DEFS (COASTAL GATHERING) - LAVACA CO., TX
73189  WEST TULETA OPERATING CORP. - BEE COUNTY, TX
73190  DEFS (LINE #21-E) - LAVACA CO., TX
73199  DEFS (COLUMBUS ENERGY) - BEE CO., TX
73214  DEFS - PETTUS, BEE CO., TX
73215  MAVERICK ENERGY - COUSINS #1, MCMULLEN CO., TX.
73224  DEFS / DELILAH #1
73232  DEFS - GOLIAD COUNTY, TX
73234  DEFS (BANDERA EXPL) - BEE CO, TX
73237  WELDER-HEYER ENERGY - PETTUS #1, GOLIAD CO. TX.
73242  COASTAL OIL & GAS - PAWLIK #1, LIVE OAK CO., TX
73244  RAGERS OIL & GAS - DEWITT COUNTY, TX
73245  MODERN EXPLORATION - CASA #1, LIVE OAK CO., TX
73271  PHILLIPS PETROLEUM- HARTSMAN #1 / DEWITT CO., TX
73276  HURD ENTERPRISES - LUKER #2, GOLIAD CO., TX (REC)
73278  U.S. ENERCORP, LLC/NEWTON-WELDER #1 -- GOLIAD CO., TX (REC)
73308  AURORA RESOURCES - ARTHUR RICHTER #1
73313  DEFS-GEODOMINION - BONORDEN #1 - LAVACA CO., TX

Should you have any questions, please contact Steve Jenkins at 713-627-
5076.

*******************************************************************

NOTE:

Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.


I will be leaving the office today at 5:30 p.m.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693


--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Buchanan, John <John.Buchanan@ENRON.com>
To: Blair, Lynn <Lynn.Blair@ENRON.com>
Sent: Thu Oct 18 09:41:14 2001
Subject: RE: FW: Could you please....

Lynn, I will get with Vernon but your message has no content or subject.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Lynn
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Mercaldo, Vernon; Buchanan, John
Subject: Re: FW: Could you please....

John please get with vernon and greg and see what we can do.

Thanks Lynn
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Why would you ask a question out of the blue?

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 03:45 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: New York Hotel

Now, would I ask a question if I already knew the answer??????????

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 03:37 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: New York Hotel

When you ask a question you usually have heard a rumor.  What did you hear?

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 03:35 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: New York Hotel

The New York Hilton sounds good and the location is good.  We are paying for
this, so we don't want to spend a fortune.  I also emailed Nellie in
Klauberg's office to see if she had any recommendations/connections.  You
know I do make sure his bills get paid!!!!!!!

Are you going to be doing business on your vacation days because if you are,
I'm not going to charge you.  I just don't think that's right.  Have you guys
had any new additions to your group?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 03:30 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: sheila.tweed@enron.com@ECT, dan.lyons@enron.com@ECT
		 Subject: Re: New York Hotel

Never stayed there.  My current favorite is the Omni, which is in one of may
favorite locations. It has a little deli like shop across the street, where I
can buy reasonably priced bagels, cokes, etc.  Last year I also stayed at the
Marriott Marquis (BIG, right on Times Square) and the Mark (too snooty).  I
stayed two other places I didn't like, but the names escape me.

I've seen some other smaller hotels which look nice, and if I check a map I
might remember the names.

Kay

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 12:37 PM
To: sheila.tweed@enron.com, dan.lyons@enron.com, kay.mann@enron.com
cc:

Subject: New York Hotel

What do you guys know about the Mayflower.  We are looking for a hotel in New
York at Christmas.
----- Forwarded by Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT on 06/06/2001 12:36 PM -----

	"Doherty, Ric" <Ric.Doherty@COMPAQ.com>
	06/06/2001 12:33 PM

		 To: "Suzanne Adams Doherty (E-mail)" <Suzanne.Adams@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: New York Hotel

Do any of your people know anything about this place....it is where Pam and
Scott stayed and really liked it...recommended by Brysch

http://www.mayflowerhotel.com/welcome.htm

Thanks,

Ric Doherty
(281) 514-7624 - office
(800) 920-8171 - pager
ric.doherty@compaq.com
ricdoherty@att.net


for your entertainment.  mhc

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000 11:23
AM ---------------------------
From: Marla Barnard@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 11/07/2000 12:49 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Che Club Meeting - This Lunchtime - was rather lonely

You really don't want me doing your laundry - just ask my husband how many
pair of pink underwear he has as a result of my laundry ability!

	Michelle Cash@ECT
	11/07/00 11:45 AM

		 To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marla
Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Neil Davies/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gerry
Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Che Club Meeting - This Lunchtime - was rather lonely

Cindy, Tim, Marly, Pam, and Neil --

I will make my house available for you do do the first week of laundry this
weekend.  How about 6:30 am on Saturday?  After that, you can schedule it at
your convenience for the rest of the 4 weeks.

I am prepared for you ; I bought Tide, Downey, and Bounce, as well as spray
starch for all the ironing that needs to be done -- don't worry, I only have
5-6 full-sized tablecloths and about 15 of Trey's shirts to be ironed.  That
shouldn't take too long.

See you then.

Michelle

David Oxley
11/06/2000 01:45 PM
To: Cindy Skinner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marla
Barnard/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Pam
Butler/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Neil Davies/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gerry Gibson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Jones/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Che Club Meeting - This Lunchtime - was rather lonely

Gerry, Michelle and I rather enjoyed our discussion at lunch time. It was
highly productive and I would like to thank those who took the time out of
their very busy schedules to attend.

In no small way related to the high calibre of the people at the meeting and
the skills of the facilitation, we accomplished a great deal. For ease of
reference and to make sure you each are clearly on you action before our next
meeting, here is a summary:

General Minutes
The group voted David, Michele and Gerry as the most intelligent and
attractive members of the HR community
Gerry had the most interesting strory about disciplining people who are
always late for meetings by having their houses visited by a radical
Californian based sect who do the reverse of an exorcism.
The average IQ of those present was measured as over 200 (thanks to Michelle).
Gerry won the tic tack tow tournament
I won the biggest feet competition

Follow up action points
It was agreed that Tim, Cindy, Marla, Neil and Pam would do the laundry for
Michelle for the next 4 weeks.
It was agreed that Tim, Cindy, Marla, Neil and Pam would clean David and
Gerry's houses every Tuseday and Thursday for the next month (Gerry is
concerned about his antique china and has requested that Neil doesn't visit
his home).
All the wrongs of the world are to be solved and the necessary actions
implemented by Tim, Cindy, Marla, Neil and Pam by next Monday at 5pm central
time (including third world debt and world hunger).

Thanks

David


Bobbie,

Here are the enovate confirms that we discussed.

Dan did a confirm for Oneok which I do not have.

Stacy


Paul further to my email/voicemail on our attempts to get an Exempt Market
Declaration issued to Enron Australia Finance Pty Ltd (EAF).  I now have a
specific request to put to you.

It appears that we would qualify for such a  Declaration thereby allowing EAF
to use the safe harbour provisions under the Australian Corporations Law for
trading through EnronOnline if EAF had get a guarantee from  Enron Europe
Finance and Trading Ltd. We would be able to take advantage of a specific
provision in the policy guideline of the Australian Securities and
Investments Commission on the grant of Declarations known as Policy Statement
70. (Below is a summary of the relevant provisions of the Policy Statement.)
Would the provision of such a guarantee be possible?

Clearly an issue to consider would be any possible impact on EEFT's
prudential requirements under the Financial Services Act. If this were an
issue perhaps could it be overcome if there was a back to back guaranty from
say Enron Corp. to EEFT. This mean that effectively EEFT would have no
additional exposure.

>

>
> Paragraph 50(c) of Policy Statement 70 provides that persons authorised to
> carry on investment business under the Financial Services Act of the
> United Kingdom (other than persons who are "low risk firms" for the
> purposes of the Financial Supervision Rules 1990 issued by the Securities
> Investment Board) will be regulated facility providers.  As a result,
> unless EEFT is a "low risk firm"  then it could be a regulated facility
> provider.
>
> Paragraph 48(e) provides that organisations whose liabilities and
> obligations in relation to their exempt futures market activities are
> unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed by such an organisation will
> also be regulated facility providers.  As a result, provided that EEFT is
> not a "low risk firm" and it guarantees the obligations of EAF then the
> prudential regulatory requirements of ASIC should be satisfied and EAF
> could be a regulated facility provider.
>
> Please let me know if such a guarantee is going to be possible.
>
>
> Scott Farrell
> Senior Associate
> Mallesons Stephen Jaques Sydney
> Direct line (61 2) 9296 2142
> Fax (61 2) 9296 3999
>


---------------------- Forwarded by Tracy Geaccone/GPGFIN/Enron on 02/05/2001 02:25 PM ---------------------------

"Jack Hurst" <hurst@intur.net> on 01/18/2001 10:23:28 AM
To:	"Wayne Guidry" <Guidry_Wayne@emc.com>, <Tracy.Geaccone@enron.com>, "Lou and Kathleen Dionne" <lkdionne@olypen.com>, "Hurst, Julie A" <Hurst.Julie@emeryworld.com>, "Dianne Costa" <gdsown@airmail.net>
cc:

Subject:	Fw: (no subject)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sueann Haseloff" <sa_haseloff@hotmail.com>
To: <amandadent@hotmail.com>; <bandgal98@yahoo.com>; <bfrank_54@yahoo.com>;
<haseloff@hotmail.com>; <brittanybumpas@yahoo.com>; <ckey@mail.smu.edu>;
<cherquer@yahoo.com>; <clturn@chipshot.net>; <ekey@lycos.com>;
<INSERGRIEV@aol.com>; <fjhamm@yahoo.com>; <gbalser_2000@yahoo.com>;
<g_bumpas@hotmail.com>; <hkey@pisd.edu>; <jonistr@aol.com>;
<jlpauls@flash.net>; <meglee12@flash.net>; <nitagg@yahoo.com>;
<noni@eastland.net>; <peggylcase@yahoo.com>; <rdvargas@chipshot.net>;
<hammondsroyce@hotmail.com>; <mcsara@yahoo.com>; <foerster@chipshot.net>;
<s_bessonette@hotmail.com>; <suerath@aol.com>; <sukenner@yahoo.com>;
<teachsp98@yahoo.com>; <thhaseloff@excite.com>; <vicbuc2@yahoo.com>;
<whaseloff@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 2:22 PM
Subject: Fwd: (no subject)

>
>
>
> >From: Plschoppa@aol.com
> >To: gjboren@home.com, MIMIJOEJOE@aol.com, rcummins@cox.rr.com,
> >pegf@wf.quik.com, sa_haseloff@hotmail.com, Tomkwft@aol.com,
> >streitgirl@hotmail.com, Weemann1986@aol.com, CKCandKAS@aol.com,
> >jwied@interconnect.net
> >Subject: (no subject)
> >Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 17:39:24 EST
> >
> >The Lone Ranger and Tonto are camping in the desert, set up their tent,
> >and are asleep. Some hours later, The Lone Ranger wakes his faithful
> >friend.
> > >
> >"Tonto, look up at the sky and tell me what you see."
> >
> >Tonto replies, "Me see millions of stars."
> >
> >"What does that tell you?" ask The Lone Ranger.
> >
> >Tonto ponders for a minute.
> >
> >"Astronomically speaking, it tells me that there are millions of
> >galaxies and
> >potentially billions of planets.
> >Astrologically, it tells me that Saturn is in Leo.
> >Time wise, it appears to be approximately a quarter past three.
> >Theologically, it's evident the Lord is all powerful and we are small
> >and
> >insignificant.
> >Meteorologically, it seems we will have a beautiful day tomorrow.
> >What it tell you, Kemo Sabi?"
> >
> >The Lone Ranger is silent for a moment, then speaks.
> >
> >"Tonto, you Dumb Ass, someone has stolen our tent."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>


pls put on my calendar.  thanks df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 07/14/2000
11:09 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Dave Schafer                           07/14/2000 08:04 AM

Sent by: Alma Navarro
To: Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John Ballentine/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Phil
Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Dan Pribble/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schafer/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill
Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, George Rood/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bob M
Hall/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Rick Craig/OTS/Enron@Enron, John
Dushinske/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockey
Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Robert Meyers/ENRON@Gateway, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lisa Costello/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: GPG Officers' Meeting

You are invited to join Stan Horton,s staff meeting this Monday, July 17, at
10:00 a.m.  As usual, the meeting will be held via videoconference, so you
can join us in EB49C2 in Houston or in OMA717 in Omaha.  The meeting will
probably last about a half-hour.

See you Monday.

Dave Schafer


Rob:
Susan Flynn tells me that the earliest outstanding trade is dated April 8,
1999 which is what I think the ISDA should be dated.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


Sara,
     Here is the last email exchanged with Jason.  My notes below state the
last status I had:

10/6/00 -Attorney conference call with Jason Peters - transfer, arbitration
and fall back - finalized but Jason must check with Enron counsel.  Called
Jason for status 10/27/00.  Susan Baily called to say their attorneys are
backlogged (Sara Shakelton) and not pushing the IDSA remaining comments
(arbitration, transfer) until we are doing business again 11/20/00.
Emailed Jason for status since trading swaps 12/8/00.  Left voice mail
message for Jason 1/5/01 for status.  Contacted Sara for status 3/26/01 -
left message.

     Suggest we set up a conference call with our Attorney Janine Huber to
finalize any remaining issues.  What is your availability this week?

Maria

----- Forwarded by Maria R. Gelnett on 03/27/2001 03:12 PM -----

                    Maria R.
                    Gelnett              To:     jpeters@andrews-kurth.com
                                         cc:
                    10/04/2000           Subject:     ISDA Negotiation
                    12:57 PM

Jason,
     In addition, please consider:

4(d) - Removal of reference to confirm since using standard ISDA form.
5(j)(c) - Make it bilateral.

Thank you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria R. Gelnett on 10/04/2000 12:52 PM
---------------------------

Maria R. Gelnett
10/04/2000 09:26 AM

To:   Jason.Peters@enron.com @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject:  ISDA Negotiation

Per my voice mail message.
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria R. Gelnett on 10/04/2000 09:28 AM
---------------------------

Maria R. Gelnett
08/02/2000 01:36 PM

To:   susan.bailey@enron.com
cc:   Janine Huber@nyseg.com
Subject:  ISDA Negotiation

Susan,
     Here is the proposed language:

Part 1(g) - fifth line, ...if any, and the combined net worth of the Party
and its Credit Support Provider is not materially diminished as a result
thereof,

Part 5 (b) -  (k) Commodity Options.  With respect to Transactions
involving commodity options, it is a producer, processor or commercial user
of, or merchant handling, the commodity which is the subject of the
commodity option Transaction, or the products or byproducts thereof, and
that it enters into the commodity option Transaction solely for purposes
related to its business as such.

Part 6 (f) - (i)  "Negotiated Fallback", provided that references to the
fifth Business Day shall be to the first Business Day;
       (ii)  "Fallback Reference Price";
      (iii)  "No Fault Termination".

Here is NYSEG's original version of the Master and CSA.  It does not need
to be considered at this point of negotiation.

(See attached file: MSTRnyseg0600.DOC)(See attached file:
CREDITnyseg0600r.DOC)

p.s.  They originally were sent  email to Marie Heard on 3/23/00.

Please contact me to set up a time for our Attorney's to discuss
arbitration.
Thank You.

Maria Gelnett

 - MSTRnyseg0600.DOC
 - CREDITnyseg0600r.DOC


FYI.

This background came out of one of our Govt Affairs - East Power Team
meetings.  Highlights the importance of spot energy markets for Kevin's
business.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/05/2001 09:35 AM -----

	Christi L Nicolay@ECT
	03/02/2001 09:46 AM

		 To: Jeff Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Daniel Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard
Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Hoatson/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Jean Ryall/NA/Enron@ENRON, Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dan
Staines/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Roan/ENRON@enronXgate, Joe Connor/NA/Enron@Enron,
Kerry Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Thane
Twiggs/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, jader@enron.com, Michael
Brown/NA/Enron@Enron, mark.bernstein@enron.com, scott.healy@enron.com,
john.llodra@enron.com, janelle.scheuer@enron.com, George
Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Guillaume/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, joe.gordon@enron.com, splauch@enron.com,
jennifer.n.stewart@enron.com, tom.dutta@enron.com, Posey
Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Meyn/NA/Enron@Enron, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Pearce W Hammond/Corp/Enron@ENRON, ozzie.pagan@enron.com,
heather.kroll@enron.com, david.fairley@enron.com, george.mccormick@enron.com,
wjennin@enron.com, joseph.wagner@enron.com, elizabeth.johnston@enron.com,
bill.rust@enron.com, Reagan Rorschach/NA/Enron@Enron, Edith
Cross/HOU/ECT@ECT, Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, steve.wang@enron.com,
ebaughm@enron.com, terri.clynes@enron.com, oscar.dalton@enron.com,
doug.sewell@enron.com, kcompea@enron.com, mike.e.kelly@enron.com,
gary.justice@enron.com, patrick.hanse@enron.com, Brad Morse/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, bruce.sukaly@enron.com,
mike.curry@enron.com, jducote@enron.com, drew.tingleaf@enron.com,
cahn@enron.com, Russ Porter/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Berney C Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave
Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rusty
Stevens/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Moore/Corp/Enron@Enron, Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raimund
Grube/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg
Krause/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mathew Gimble/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Krimsky/Corp/Enron@Enron, Michelle Zhang/HOU/ECT, Ron Tapscott/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Williams/Corp/Enron@Enron, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Suneet Sharma/HOU/EES@EES, John Zurita/HOU/EES@EES,
Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David
Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Kevin's RTO Ideas for East

The East desk's No. 1 priority for RTOs is The Real Time Energy Market (no
day ahead balanced schedule requirement).  This means that the RTO should
post the supply and demand curve with real time prices (the best example at
this time is PJM's real time market).  A real time energy market is
fundamental for customers to get proper real time price signals upon which to
base their decisions to hedge or not on a forward basis.  It also provides
the proper price signals to the market on where generation and transmission
is needed.  Getting a real time energy market would advance Enron's ability
to provide more financial tools to customers.  This market can be nodal (or
zonal) in order to send location based price signals (for example, to NY
City), with the ability to aggregate from nodal to zone determined "proxy
buses."

While Kevin prefers the physical flowgate model with an option to collect
congestion revenues (rather than an obligation, similar to the PJM FTRs now),
the method of determining the congestion management is secondary to the
establishment of the real time energy market.  Regulatory people should use
their judgment (and talk with the desk) when determining how far to push
option-type flowgates, rather than obligation-type FTRs.  Such a physical
market transmission/congestion market can support a financial trading overlay.

If you do have an FTR type system, there should be an upfront allocation to
load.  Ideally, the load should have an "network" right from the generator to
their load (or from load to the "hubs") in order to have the ability to
manage the congestion risk in the forward market when serving end use
customers (EES) or for the ENA full requirements deals.  The nodes should be
grouped into logical "zones" and congestion within a zone should be uplifted.
This allocation to customers (or full blown auction of all rights) becomes
critical in Enron's ability to serve load and all requirements customers.
Without the proper allocation (not to incumbent utilties), the risk premium
to serve these customers becomes too high and can't be priced.

Finally, the market should have no price caps and preferably no icap market
like NEPOOL (prefer PJM's system where the load has to show the RTO that it
has contracted for enough reserves.)  We have urged the FERC in Florida to
adopt a reserve monitoring system, whereby customers are not penalized for
lack of icap unless they actually go under the reserve requirement, then they
are required to purchase icap for a certain amount of time until they
demonstrate continued compliance.

Bottom line -- "Do not let the perfect be the enemy of the good."  Congestion
does not need to be perfectly allocated to each load if that mechanism is
done in a manner that precludes Enron and others from developing efficient
real time energy markets that send a locational hourly price signal to the
generation (supply) and the load (demand).  This type of market will provide
greater services to customers and allow Enron to grow its business.

Finally, as we work toward this goal, remember that in the absence of a
real-time energy market, we need to continue to focus our efforts on
non-discriminatory treatment with respect to transmission (no native load
exception) and parking and lending, scheduling flexibility, etc.


This has been a very difficult project, but things are going well. The
clean-up is moving along and we are demobilizing many of the contractors,
while shifting our focus to compensation and long term remediation. Even
though things are progressing, we remain vigilant! The following  is the
original Q&A's that have been routinely updated over the last two months. The
last version was completed yesterday and I wanted the both of you to have a
copy!  Normally, Q&A's are not this long, but this is an exception. Those of
us who serve as spokespersons know the details, but I thought you might want
to have it as a reference.  Of course this will continue to evolve, so
additions and deletions will take place as needed. Any questions, don't
hesitate to call. Thanks


I looked at the MLS listings and there is some stuff on there. I have a realtor who seems to have her act together. Don't worry about it. How long would it take me to get to work from there?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:39 AM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	RE:

Do you want me to cruise around this weekend and get the low-down on the
different places and their cost?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:38 AM
To: RLaird@natsource.ca
Subject: RE:

I already have a minature goat. I am a little concerned about making a
housing decision in one day but what the fuck.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:08 AM
   To:     Dorland, Chris
   Subject:  RE:

   Oh I got the tire guy, the brownstones have very small lawns, perhaps a
   miniature goat may be in order....I think lambie may have one..He should
   give you one since your probably going to be his boss...

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
   Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:06 AM
   To: RLaird@natsource.ca
   Subject: RE:

   Done. I'm moving in! Can I borrow your lawn mower? I need to decide what
   I
   am going to do with my ride. I think I am going to bring it with me and
   buy
   a set of winter wheels and some killer winter tires. Don't you have a
   tire
   guy?

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
      Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 10:02 AM
      To:     Dorland, Chris
      Subject:  RE:

      1 block away....

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
      Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:02 AM
      To: RLaird@natsource.ca
      Subject: RE:

      Lee Clarke... Sounds like a fag. Garrison woods that is the place my
   mom
      was talking about. Do you live near there?

          -----Original Message----- [Dorland, Chris]
         From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
         Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:39 AM
         To:     Dorland, Chris
         Subject:  RE:

         Nice brownstones in garrison woods, the remodeled area of
   altadore,
      that
         area offers lots of options from apartment condo's to houses to
         townhouses
         etc. Kerri? Haven't seen here for a while, hear she is pretty
   serious
         with a
         guy named Lee Clarke....

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
         Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:35 AM
         To: RLaird@natsource.ca
         Subject: RE:

         I really want to live in Altadore. I hear that is where all the
   fly
         bitches
         hang. I don't know to be honest Killarney / Altadore / West
   Hillhurst
      ?
         Close to downtown. I am thinking infill / townhouse. My mom has a
      friend
         who says there are nice brownstone townhomes in Altadore. I am
      thinking
         of
         checking those out. I am looking for minimal maintenance. Do you
   have
         any
         ideas? Seen Kerri Murray lately?

         CD

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
            Sent:   Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:39 AM
            To:     Dorland, Chris
            Subject:  RE:

            Where do you want to live, which area, condo/house?

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Chris.Dorland@enron.com [mailto:Chris.Dorland@enron.com]
            Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:49 PM
            To: RLaird@natsource.ca
            Subject: RE:

            Actually lots. Keep this on the QT for now but this kid is
   moving
         back
            to
            cow town. I'll be in town next week shopping for somewhere to
      live.
         Just
            in
            time for ski season.

            Later

            Chris

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Rob Laird <RLaird@natsource.ca>@ENRON
               Sent:   Wednesday, August 08, 2001 2:56 PM
               To:     Dorland, Chris
               Subject:

               What up dog?

   **********************************************************************
            This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
         affiliate
            and
            may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
   use
      of
         the
            intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or
      disclosure
         by
            others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
      recipient
         (or
            authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the
      sender
         or
            reply
            to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
      delete
            all
            copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
      are
         not
            intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
         evidence
            a
            binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
      its
            affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and
   may
         not
            be
            relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
         otherwise.
            Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Enron Still Target in California Amid Other Problems (Update1)
2001-10-26 16:15 (New York)

Enron Still Target in California Amid Other Problems (Update1)

     (Updates with closing share price in last paragraph.)

     Sacramento, California, Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Enron Corp.,
facing an inquiry by federal securities regulators into
partnerships run by the former chief financial officer, remains a
target of investigations and lawsuits in California.

     California lawmakers and regulators have accused power
providers of manipulating the state's energy market to raise
prices. Enron, the biggest energy trader, and other power sellers
have denied the charges repeatedly.

     Next month, a California Senate committee investigating the
power market plans to hold a hearing to determine if Enron and
other generators are complying with subpoenas for trading
documents. Enron has been filing documents in Sacramento,
California.

     ``They are still putting documents in their depository, and I
don't think they've completed that process,'' said Alexandra
Montgomery, a consultant to the committee. It ``remains to be
seen'' whether Enron is complying with its subpoena, she said.

     The suits and inquiries came after wholesale power prices in
California soared, leaving the state's two largest utilities
insolvent. Under California's plan to open its electricity market
to competition, the utilities of PG&E Corp. and Edison
International weren't allowed to pass rising costs to customers.

     ``I know that we're doing our best to comply with what the
committee is asking for,'' Enron spokesman Mark Palmer. ``We are
putting documents in the depository, and we're looking forward to
a speedy resolution.''

     Shares of Houston-based Enron have fallen by more than half
since Oct. 16. The company ousted Andrew Fastow as the chief
financial officer Wednesday amid a U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission inquiry into a partnership he ran that cost Enron $35
million.

                            Grand Jury

     Enron also is one of the companies being investigated for
civil and criminal violations by California Attorney General Bill
Lockyer, who convened a grand jury in June.

     Lockyer has been criticized by Enron officials for telling
the Wall Street Journal in May that he would like to put Enron
Chairman Kenneth Lay in ``an 8 x 10 cell that he could share with
a tattooed dude who says `Hi my name is Spike, honey.' '' Lockyer
later apologized for the remark.

     The attorney general's investigation is proceeding, Lockyer
spokeswoman Sandra Michioku said. Michioku said she didn't know
when civil or criminal charges against Enron or other power
providers might be filed.

     ``Our investigation is still being pursued,'' she said. ``We
had to go to court to get Enron to turn over documents, so that
slowed things down a bit.''

     Enron's Palmer said he didn't know the status of the attorney
general's investigation.

     ``I think the attorney general demonstrated his willingness
to take a fair and impartial look a long time ago when he made his
vulgar and unfounded remarks about our chairman,'' Palmer said.

                           More Lawsuits

     Enron, along with other major power providers such as Duke
Energy Corp. and Dynegy Inc., face at least five lawsuits alleging
they manipulated California energy prices in violation of
antitrust laws.

     The cases, which include separate complaints filed by the
City of San Francisco, California Lieutenant Governor Cruz
Bustamante and various consumers, currently are in state courts
awaiting a coordination proceeding, said Michael Aguirre, a lawyer
representing Bustamante. The lawsuits should be assigned to a
judge by the end of next month, he said.

     If the complaints succeed, the companies might be ordered to
repay profits from any illegal activities and pay fines, including
triple damages.

     Enron's stock fell 95 cents, or 5.8 percent, to $15.40,
declining for the eighth day in a row. The shares have fallen 80
percent in the past 12 months.

--Daniel Taub in Los Angeles, (323) 801-1261 or


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 01/09/2001
10:59 AM ---------------------------

Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org> on 01/08/2001 05:22:41 AM
Please respond to Cheryl Blissitte <bliss@camh.org>
To: Edward Allen <eallen@eagleglobal.com>, Bernard Arocha <barocha@msn.com>,
Ellie Beard <ecabeard@aol.com>, Toni Beauchamp <TONIBEAUCHAMP@YAHOO.COM>,
Fran Berg <fberg@swbell.net>, Deborah Brochstein <deborah@brochsteins.com>,
Brad Bucher <brad@gcchem.com>, Jeff Daly <jeffrey.daly@gs.com>, Chadwick Dodd
<cdodd@Jwortham.com>, Sara Dodd <sfpdodd@aol.com>, Stephen Finley
<steve.finley@bakerhughes.com>, Heidi Gerger <HMG60@aol.com>, William
Goldberg <wgoldberg@kpmg.com>, John Guess <jfguess@usa.net>, Dana Harper
<danarharper@aol.com>, Rachel Hecker <ritexdog@aol.com>, Bruce Herzog
<bherzog@genesis-park.com>, Louise Jamail <RobotRob@aol.com>, Jill Jewett
<TheJewetts@msn.com>, Leonard Jones <ljones@rfp-co.com>, "I.H. Kempner III"
<ihkempner@imperialsugar.com>, Carmen Knapp <sailby2@aol.com>, Elwyn Lee
<ECLee@uh.edu>, Marley Lott <marley_lott@bakerbotts.com>, Ginni Mithoff
<gmithoff@infohwy.com>, Angela Myres <asmyres@msn.com>, Evi Newar
<EviNew@aol.com>, Roy Nolen <roy.nolen@bakerbotts.com>, Robert Palmquist
<robert.p.palmquist@us.arthurandersen.com>, Annise Parker
<aparker@cnl.ci.houston.tx.us>, Jeff Shankman <jshankm@enron.com>, Charles
Smith <RSMCES@aol.com>, Reginald Smith <rsmith@kslaw.com>, Stephen Susman
<ssusman@susmangodfrey.com>, Laura Walls <lmorwalls@aol.com>, Kenneth
Williams <kmwilliams@frostbank.com>, Michael Zilkha <michael@zilkha.com>
cc:
Subject:

Dear Member of CAM Board of Trustees,

You may recall that several weeks ago we surveyed the Board members to
determine preferences regarding Board meeting times. We did this because we
have had several discussions with members who have great difficulty with the
4 pm or 4:30 pm meeting time.

Since the Board appears to be fairly evenly split between a noon meeting time
and a late afternoon meeting time (10 definitely prefer Noon; 10 definitely
prefer late afternoon; and 20 have no strong preference), we have decided to
try alternating the meetings.

Therefore, our next full board meeting, which is currently scheduled for
Monday, January 22 at 4 pm, will instead take place Monday, January 22 at
NOON (March meeting will take place at 4 pm).

Please note this change on your calendar and advise Cheryl Blissitte by
email, phone (713.284.8253) or fax (713.284.8275), whether or not you will be
attending. This is especially important as we will order sandwiches for this
Noon meeting.

Thanks.

Marti