==============================================
     Buy 2 Monitors, Get Free Shipping*
     http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BASu0AI
     ==============================================

___________________________________________________________

                      <<<COMPUTERS>>>
___________________________________________________________

     Samsung Combo Drive CDRW/DVD-ROM 8x/4x/32x/8x
     buy.com price: NEW LOW PRICE! List Price: $219.00
     Offers 8X CD-Recording, 4XCD-Rewriting, 32X CD-ROM Reading and 8X
     DVD ROM Reading.

For more info about this product, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu086x0Ab
___________________________________________________________

     Altec Lansing AVS500 5 Speaker Set -  $10 MAIL-IN REBATE ($31.95
     AFTER REBATE)
     buy.com price: $41.95 List Price: $59.99
     Turn your MP3 player or CD player into a high-end sound system!

For more info about item and rebate offer, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu086y0Ac
___________________________________________________________

     SiPix iQuest Dual Mode Digital Camera
     buy.com price: $59.99 List price: $99.99
     A full-featured USB video camera, video conferencing camera, and
     digital camera all in one!

For more info about device and rebate offer, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BASw0AK
___________________________________________________________

     CIDCO MAILSTATION EMAIL KEYBOARD
     buy.com price: $99.95  before $50.00 rebate
     MailStation(tm) allows you to get eMail from virtually anywhere
     in your home without a PC!

For more info about this product, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BASx0AL

___________________________________________________________

     KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY 64MB COMPACT FLASH CARD
     buy.com price: $73.44
     With bigger memory, you can keep shooting and moving without
     missing an image!

For more info about this item, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BASy0AM
___________________________________________________________

     Linksys 11 Mbps Wireless PC Card - SAVE 46%
     buy.com price: $79.95 List price: $148.00
     Share printers, files, and more anywhere within your wireless LAN
     infrastructure.

For more info about this product, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BASz0AN
___________________________________________________________

     Samsung SyncMaster 770TFT- SAVE 34%
     Free Shipping Offer!!! Click on link for details.
     buy.com price: $774.95 List price: $1,179.00
     An ideal display for all types of applications.

For more info about this product, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BAS10AA
_________________________________________________________

                       <<<SOFTWARE>>>
___________________________________________________________

     Microsoft Windows XP Pro Upgrade
     buy.com price: $199.00
     Designed for businesses of all sizes and for individuals who
     demand the most from their computing.

For more info about this title, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu05ju0AN
___________________________________________________________

     Microsoft Flight Simulator 2002 - SAVE 10%
     buy.com price: $47.99 List Price: $54.95
     Get the new edition of Microsoft's highly realistic, graphically
     advanced flight simulator!

For more info about this program, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu08Wy0AB

Top Seller! Also available Flight Simulator 2002 Pro:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BAS20AB

___________________________________________________________

                       <<<ELECTRONICS>>>
___________________________________________________________

    Toshiba 5-disc Carousel DVD/CD/MP3 Changer with Progressive Scan
    (3:2) - SAVE 22%
    buy.com price: $299.95 List Price: $379.95
    Bring the most intense and lifelike movie theater experience right
    into your living room!

For more details about this item, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0bIe0AJ
___________________________________________________________

    Sony 900 MHz RF Wireless Headphone System - SAVE 21%
    buy.com price: $79.95 List Price: $99.99
    Move inside and outside your house and still enjoy music and TV
    sound!

For more details about this item, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BAS30AC
___________________________________________________________

                         <<<BOOKS>>>
___________________________________________________________

     Windows Xp Home Edition Complete  - SAVE 22%
     buy.com price: $15.79 List price: $19.99
     Contains all the essentials on XP, from basic navigation to
     setting up a home network.

For more info about this book, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BAS50AE
___________________________________________________________

     Palm Handhelds! I Didn't Know You Could Do That...  - SAVE 22%
     buy.com price: $19.74  List Price: $24.99
     Discover all of the cool things you can do with your Palm
     Handheld!

For more info about this book, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BAS70AG
___________________________________________________________

     Microsoft's Windows Millennium Edition for Dummies - SAVE 22%
     buy.com price: $17.37 List Price:  $21.99
     This revised edition helps users of this updated operating system
     navigate new features with ease.

For more info about this product, click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0BAS80AH
___________________________________________________________

As always, we thank you for choosing buy.com.

Robert R. Price
President, buy.com

In addition to electronics, buy.com also offers top-of-the-line
computers, best-selling books, videos, wireless, software and much
more. Check out these stores:

Computers
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu04pB0Ab

Software
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0RVU0Ay

Electronics
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0FWL0Ae

Wireless
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0bIi0AN

Books
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0FWQ0Aj

Music
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0FWP0Ai

Games
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu04o40AM

Video
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0FWN0Ag

DVD
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu04o10AJ

Clearance
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu0bIc0AH

Anytime Help: Please use the link below for your Customer
Support questions. Please do not reply to the buy.com eMail
address. It is not an active mailbox. Click here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu04pH0Ah

All prices and product availability subject to change without
notice. Unless noted, prices do not include shipping and
applicable sales taxes.  Product quantities limited.   List price
refers to manufacturer's suggested retail price and may be
different than actual selling prices in your area.  Please visit
us at buy.com or the links above for more information
including latest pricing, availability, and restrictions on each
offer. "buy.com" and "The Internet Superstore"  are trademarks
of BUY.COM Inc. ? BUY.COM Inc. 2001.  All rights reserved.

We respect your privacy. If you would rather not receive eMail
alerting you of buy.com special offers, product announcements,
and other news, just let us know by clicking here:
http://enews.buy.com/cgi-bin5/profile?y=eEtM0BB2Pi0Blu5


Greg

Don't forget to ask some option questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 01/04/2001
10:45 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kimberly Hillis @ ECT                           01/03/2001 10:53 AM

To: Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sherry H Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Tamara Jae Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam
Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: Interview on 1/8/01 - Manu Asthana

Thank you for agreeing to interview Manu Asthana Monday, January 8, 2000.

The schedule is as follows and Manu's resume is attached below:

09:00 - 09:45 Rogers Herndon
09:45 - 10:30 Fletch Sturm
10:30 - 11:15 Dana Davis
11:15 - 12:00 Kevin Presto
12:00 - 01:30 Lunch with John Lavorato
01:30 - 02:00 Greg Whalley
02:15 - 02:45 Hunter Shively
02:45 - 03:30 John Arnold
03:30 - 04:15 Mike Maggi

Please plan to meet with Manu in EB3316.  This is the conference room next to
Dave Delainey's office.

 - Manu Asthana.doc


Start Date: 1/18/02; HourAhead hour: 8;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011808.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database


Jean,  We have appointed three new directors for LRCI, Inc.  They are yourself, Mark Haedicke, and Brian Redmond.  The records show the current directors as Mark Haedicke and Louise Kitchen, but we were unable to find any resolutions supporting this.  We will clean the records up to reflect the new directors.  Since you and Brian are on the management of Bridgeline, it is a more logical fit for you to be directors.  The resolutions for the Napoleonville Land Sale with the new directors are being circulated for signature.  You may have already seen it.  Let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.


There have been growing concerns regarding the copying and distribution of
licensed and copyrighted materials among various groups within Enron.  For
example, if you are a subscriber to Petroleum Argus, Intelligence Press,
Energy Intelligence, Opis, or any other information source, it is unlawful to
copy and distribute that information among others if only one
license/subscription is ordered.

Such activity exposes Enron to legal ramifications and reflects poorly on our
reputation as a professional and ethical company.

If you have copyrighted material that you would like distributed, please
contact either Bruce Ferrell at 853-4815, or Julie Pechersky at 853-9225 in
Market Data, to address the issue.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.


In the past few months, Enron has received numerous requests from other companies to share some of the processes and systems that we have developed within HR.  Also, several new businesses have been created recently by consulting companies to pursue what some financial analysts believe is a huge untapped market in aggregating HR services.  Recently, we completed an internal review to consider what role Enron could play in this arena and have decided to explore some very specific external opportunities.  Due to the time commitment required to pursue these opportunities, we are assigning dedicated resources to this effort.  Effective immediately, the HR community will have three major areas of focus that will be working together in order to optimize HR transformation and commercialization.  Taking the lead roles will be myself, Mary Joyce and David Oxley (see below and attached chart).

?	I will lead this new effort in addition to continuing to lead those areas of HR that are our prime candidates for commercial opportunities.  Reporting to me on this commercialization effort will be:  Brad Coleman with the overall lead; Andrea Yowman who will focus on software applications such as PEP, Expertfinder and Global Compensation; Sarah Davis who will focus on Worklife; Elyse Kalmans who will focus on Community Relations; Cynthia Barrow who will focus on Benefits and Wellness; and Yevgeny Frolov and Dan Brown who will focus on E-learning and Talent Management.  I will continue to report to Steve Kean.

?	David Oxley will take the overall lead for HR across all business units focusing on continuing to increase the value HR brings internally to Enron.  The networked recruiting, Organization Development and Training and Business Unit Compensation consulting functions, the Global PEP team, as well as the generalist consulting responsibilities for all Corp. groups, will report directly to David. The HR leads for EWS, EES, EBS, ETS and EGAS will report jointly to their business unit OTC's and to David from a functional HR perspective. In this regard David will now report to Steve Kean.

?	Mary Joyce will add Global Information Management, Corporate Compensation services and Reporting/ Analysis, to her current Executive Compensation responsibilities.  Kathy Schultea, Felecia Acevedo, Cindy Ward and Suzanne Brown will report into Mary's organization. Mary will continue to report to Steve Kean.

?	With Drew Lynch's promotion to COO Metals and David's increased responsibilities, Robert Jones will take the HR lead for EWS Americas. Robert will report to the EWS OTC. Jon Chapman has been appointed head of HR for EEL, based in London, and will report to the EEL OTC. Both Robert and Jon will report to David from a functional HR perspective.

Additional realignment of resources will enable our team to further improve daily employee services, partner with Business Unit initiatives and maximize opportunities for commercialization.  These modifications are as follows:

?	Scott Gilchrist will lead HR for the newly formed EGAS.  As such he will focus his attention on the asset positions in South America, Latin and Central America, the Middle East and Asia.  The European assets will continue to be a part of EEL.  Scott will also work closely with Rebecca McDonald and Sandip Mallick in relation to our assets in India.  Scott will report to the EGAS OTC, Rebecca McDonald and David as above.

?	Michelle Cash has agreed to take the lead of the Corporate OLER function for an interim period to determine how it should operate and be organized.  She will report to me for this particular function, but of course will remain primarily a part of the EWS legal function reporting to Mark Haedicke.

?	Sheila Walton will lead the HR Generalist activities for all Corp functions.  Jo Ann Hill, and all of the corporate generalist functions currently under Jo Ann, will report to Sheila Walton.  Sheila will continue to report to David.

?	Sarah Davis will add the Click at Home program to her current responsibilities, and will continue to report to me.


Hi Mr. Kaminski,

Please send me your Assistants name and number so I  can schedule a time for
you and Kevin to go to lunch next week.

Thanks!

Rebekah Rushing (rebekah_rushing@enron.net)
Enron Broadband Services
Broadband Ventures group
713-853-3273 - phone
713-646-8010 - fax
----- Forwarded by Rebekah Rushing/Enron Communications on 01/05/01 02:00 PM
-----

	Kevin Garland
	01/05/01 12:04 PM

		 To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Rebekah Rushing/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Meeting Requested

Vince,

I would like to meet with you or someone in your group to discuss some of the
investment ideas and structures we are exploring.  How is your group
structured these days?  Who would be best for me to meet?  Might you be
available for lunch next week?  I will have my assistant contact you.

Thank,

Kevin Garland


I guess I forgot to send this to you. Cynthia is confirming the type of SUV.

-Grace

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cynthia Biggs <cynthia.biggs@travelpark.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Cynthia+20Biggs+20+3Ccynthia+2Ebiggs+40travelpark+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 21, 2001 3:28 PM
To:	Rodriguez, Grace
Subject:	car and hotel for bill williams 25sep

                                          AGENT CB/CB BOOKING REF YQXROD

                                          WILLIAMS/BILL III
                                          ENRON NORTH AMERICA
                                          3WTC 0306
  ENRON CORP                              INTEROFFICE ETKT RCPT
                                          HOTEL RES ONLY

  DATE:  SEP 21 2001

CAR                   25SEP NATIONAL               PORTLAND OR
                      28SEP CONFIRMATION: 611769078COUNT
                            TELEPHONE: (503) 249-4900
                            FAX: (503) 287-2152
                            STANDARD 4W-DRIVE AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD53.75DY-UNL MI
                            RATE GUARANTEED
                            BASE RATE: *ZL*USD161.26 BR-3DY
                            PICK-UP: PORTLAND INTL AIRPORT, PORTLAND
                            DROP-OFF: PORTLAND INTL AIRPORT, PORTLAND

HOTEL                 26SEP BEST WESTERN UNIVERSITY INN - MOSCOW
                      28SEP 1516 PULLMAN ROAD
                            MOSCOW, ID 83843
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 1-208 8820550
                            FAX: 1-208 8833056
                            CONFIRMATION: 161196607
                            SINGLE ROOM QUEEN SIZE BED
                            RATE: COR USD 78.50 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ENRON CORP NONSMK SECOND NIGHT RATE IS 83.50
          TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL 4PM DAY OF ARRIVAL HOTEL TIME
     LOWER HOTEL RATES MAY BECOME AVAILABLE PLEASE INQUIRE AT CHK IN

MISCELLANEOUS         26JAN HOUSTON TX
                      SAT   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

WILLIAMS/BILL III  S5C0413R1063

ASSISTANT: KATHRYN SHEPPARD 503 464-7698
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


Thinking about bull move, the only trade I really like is being long physical
and short NYMEX.  If you believe that NYMEX is doing a "buzz lightyear"
(infinity and beyond), the next question is where does that put the cash.
Back in '95, Chicago cash went to $40 and merc died out sub 5 dollars.  Also,
'95 had a huge geographic basis rift, the structural shift had Z3 trading
about $1.50 over Waha.  On the upside, cash will suffer constraints, causing
demand spikes. On the downside, cash shouldn't materially outpace NYMEX.

Reviewing geographic arbs and considering the east coast political
environment (high potential for congressional intervention) as well as ok-ish
storage, the East may be the best basis sell vs. a long west trade (Waha I'm
uncertain about, particularly if the cold doesn't hit Texas...Chicago might
be better given what's going on there except for the Alliance issue...Socal
appears to be the best geographic long...PGE citygate could really rock given
storage and increase supply competition given Alliance PL...    The
Z6/Chicago spread is trading around $1.56 for the winter  (FH) and  approx. a
dime in today's intra-month.   The Z6 vs. NGI-PGE/CG spread has the Jan-Mar
around .94 cents, Z6 over. Intra-month it is trading at $2.43, PGE/CG over
Z6   (I'm waiting on additional stats, but I think I like this trade...)

Additionally, playing the '95 scenario, we should be long every basis
downstream of Henry and short something else, maybe NYMEX, Waha, Katy
(notice smaller font)   I'm still reviewing economic stats regarding the
drivers to these trades such as, Sable Island, LNG, Chippewa (Canadian
imports) and Chicago/California storage . As well as evaluating which
geography would be the best buy....

Preliminary trades  (let me know which ones strike your interest and I'll
focus my analysis..)

Long NGI-PGE/CG, Short Z6
Long CNG North Valley,  Short Z6
Long NGPL Lousiana pool, short MOPS, TETCO STX
Long CGT, short NYMEX  (not very exciting, small basis)
Long Z6, short Chippewa
Long physical, short NYMEX

Still looking, still thinking,  but gun-to-my-head....

Frank


At the request of Bob Shults, I am attaching Enron's proposed form of
Non-Disclosure Agreement.   If the enclosed meets with your approval, please
execute the agreement and return it to the attention of Tana Jones via fax
no. (713) 646-3490.  I will then have it executed by Enron.  If you have any
comments or questions please call me at the number indicated below.  We look
forward to hearing from you.

Mark
Senior Counsel, ENA
Phone:     713-345-8897
Facsimile: 713-646-3940
E-Mail:      Mark.Greenberg@enron.com


Greg Whalley will be in attendance.   The Net Works Presentation given by
Greg Whalley & Louise Kitchen, will be on the 7th or 8th?

Many Thanks,

Liz

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Vanessa Groscrand @ ENRON                           08/10/2000 11:42 AM

To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Derrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy_Fowler@pgn.com,
Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Ben F Glisan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Hannon/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rebecca P
Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J
Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L
Pai/HOU/EES@EES, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeffrey
Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
E White/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Brenda Garza-Castillo/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia Manarin/SA/Enron@Enron,
Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy
Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kay Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly
Bobrow/NA/Enron@Enron, Rosane Fabozzi/SA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary_trosper@pgn.com,
Nicki Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Inez Dauterive/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy Young/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Cindy Stark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary E
Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES,
Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marsha
Lindsey/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy Dalton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jewel Meeks/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jana Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Liz M
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Enron Advisory Council meeting

The Enron Advisory Council meeting is scheduled on September 7-8, 2000.  The
dinner meeting will begin on Thursday, September 7 at 6:00 p.m. at the Four
Seasons Hotel in the Austin Room.  On Friday, September 8 the meeting is
scheduled from 7:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. in the 50th Floor Boardroom.

Please let me know if you plan to attend.

Vanessa Groscrand


I assume you are handling for all of ETS?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yparraguirre, Jay
Sent:	Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:10 AM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy; Barnes, Caroline
Subject:	2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.

Attached is the updated version of the 2002 plan assessments from ENW for your business unit.  This intercompany billing invoice now includes pass throughs.  Consistent with 2001, pass through billings (long distance, market data, WAN, etc.) will not be included in the standard assessments ("8xxxxxxx" accounts).  They will be posted directly to direct expenses ("5xxxxxxx" accounts) at the cost center level.  This pass through number is only a high level place holder and is not intended to replace the dollars already being budgeted for by each cost center owner.

If you have any questions, you can contact Kevin May at x52508 and he will answer any questions or direct you to the correct person.

If you are not the correct person to receive these assessments or if there is someone else that you would like to include in this process, please reply back to me with this information and I will add them to the contact list for future correspondence.

Thanks,

Jay
x53813


Thanks Mark!  I will check it out.

Don

On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 Mark.Fisher@enron.com wrote:

>
> Don
>
> If you don't have censored data then the following reference should help.
>
> Thoman, Bain, and Antle. 1969. Inferences on the parameters of the Weibull
> distribution. Technometrics Vol 11, No 3.
>
> Mark Fisher
> Enron Wind
>
>
>
>
>
> "D. Mckenzie" <dmck@u.washington.edu>@lists.biostat.wustl.edu on 08/15/2001
> 05:05:08 PM
>
> Sent by:  s-news-owner@lists.biostat.wustl.edu
>
>
> To:   s-news group <s-news@wubios.wustl.edu>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  [S] confidence intervals for Weibull shape parameter
>
>
> Splus 2000 r3.
>
> I have fit a 2-parameter Weibull distribution to a data vector (fire-free
> intervals in forests) and would like to compute the probability that the
> shape parameter is greater than 1.  I can use bootstrap() [I presume] to
> compute the standard error.  Is there a closed expression for CIs? (I
> imagine a normal approximation would be pretty lame here).
>
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>                            DON MCKENZIE
>
>                         Research Ecologist
>               College of Forest Resources, Box 352100
>                       University of Washington
>                         Seattle, WA 98195
>
>                             206.616.4095
>                         dmck@u.washington.edu
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was distributed by s-news@lists.biostat.wustl.edu.  To
> unsubscribe send e-mail to s-news-request@lists.biostat.wustl.edu with
> the BODY of the message:  unsubscribe s-news
>
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized
to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron
Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of
the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be
an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the
intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as
the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>


Here are the things that we need to work on while you are here:

1)   Powder River external pool 12/99, 01/00, 02/00, 03/00

2)   FUGG Imbalance 12/99 - 07/01

 3)   PSCO  05/00 imbalance swap

4)     Please take a look at deal #149162 for 10/00.  There is an
              interconnect for 52,221 on the sale for FUGG, but there is
              nothing on the supply for FUGG.  Should this really be an
              interconnect deal?

5)    Same thing on deal #561930 for 09/00.  There is an interconnect
              for 69,461 on the sale for FUGG, but there is no supply, and the
              deal is set up at the imbalance point.  Should this really be an
              interconnect deal?

 6)    Crestone draft for 04/01 for contract #96027895, deal #414117.
The rate has been changed from .054032 to .39078.  Is this correct?
The draft is for over ($59,000).

7)    Crestone draft for 10/00 for contract #96041735, deal #423796
for 78,590 dth @ $.65922 for $51,808.10.


Has the deal between you and Patrice been booked?

---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 06/24/2000
09:14 PM ---------------------------

Richard Tomaski@ENRON
06/13/2000 05:37 PM
To: Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Russell E Murrell/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject:

After discussion with Patrice, here is the finalized agreement for the
day-ahead purchase deal (between ENA-central desk and EMW) for the Wilton
Plant.

Location:  Northern Border (Wilton) to become MEH pooling point
Price:        GD chicago large end-users plus $.015 or GD northern border
chicago point if one becomes available
Term:        6/1/2000 thru 9/30/2004
Volume:  0-75,000 mmbtu/daty
Notification: by 9:15 am of trade date

Any volumes greater than 75,000 up to 120,000 will be priced at Patrice's
purchase price plus $.015

I will draft a simple letter for both parties to sign, as a matter of record
keeping.  Call me if you have any questions.  Thanks

Richard


I just validated and saved this release to Boston Gas.  Since I have not done this in awhile, would you please make sure I did the following things?

Released 100% of the volume biddable to Boston Gas and max rate.

I will wait to hear from you before I submit my offer.

Thanks.


Hi, Jeff.? I wanted to send you my "business  card", not having one Friday
night when my friends and I met you at the  Federalist in Boston.? I no
longer work for Governor Cellucci and have a  real estate investment
management company of my own. (see below)
?
To remind you, I am a BU alumna, having graduated  from the Graduate School
of Management.? If your daughter thinks she might  like to attend BU and you
need a database of alumni, I would be happy to meet  with her for a future
reference.
?
I would be remiss, however, if I did not mention my  alma mater undergraduate
school, Simmons College.? It's located in the  Fenway and is the only women's
college in Boston.? The college is noted for  training women to be leaders in
diverse fields, from communications (my  undergraduate degree), to health
care, to management, to name only a few  majors.?We have quite a number of
notable women executives, media  celebrities, and lawyers, like myself,
too!What's nice about Simmons is that it  combines the best of higher
education worlds; i.e., it is a small liberal arts  university for women with
a co-ed social life. ?Simmons is one of 32  other colleges in Boston and was
ranked 15th among all colleges in the Northeast  by US News last year.?
?
If I sound as if I'm promoting Simmons, I am.?  The reason I left
Massachusetts?government last year was to run the  College's
Centennial....once in a hundred year opportunity, you know!? And,  besides,
Gov. Cellucci's wife Jan received her graduate degree from Simmons in
library science, so he was fine with my departure.?
?
If you think Kristy might entertain a women's  college, the website is
www.simmons.edu.? My friend Patricia  Tencza is the Undergraduate Admissions
Director.? If you or your daughter  want to email her, just mention my name.?
Her email address is Patricia.Tencza@simmons.edu.
?
I hope your trip back to Houston was  fine.?? I enjoyed meeting you.? Wish we
had a bit more time to  talk.? Regards,? Maria
?
Maria Marasco, Esq.
Managing Partner
STETS & Co.,  LLC????????????  (yes, as in Stetson the hat)
191 Holt Road
Andover, MA? 01810
978-475-0289


Have you spoken to Andy's book accountant?


Jeff,
Cynthia is out today, your email has been forward to me.  I'm working on
your request.

Rae
> ----------
> From: 	Cynthia Biggs
> Sent: 	Monday, August 06, 2001 4:33 PM
> To: 	Rae Ann Fresia
> Subject: 	FW: Yet Another Request
>
>
>
> ----------
> From: 	Dasovich, Jeff[SMTP:JEFF.DASOVICH@ENRON.COM]
> Sent: 	Monday, August 06, 2001 3:35:01 PM
> To: 	Cynthia Biggs
> Subject: 	Yet Another Request
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
> Greetings. I need a full-size or premium rental from September 2 to
> September 9, picking up and dropping off at Logan Airport in Boston. Can
> you help me out checking on a price for full-size and premium?  Greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
> **********************************************************************
> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
> delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto)
> are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or
> evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of
> its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
> be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or
> otherwise. Thank you.
> **********************************************************************
>
>


Are we providing testimony to the contrary?

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 02/09/2001 10:50 AM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: TURN Testimony -- Rate Stabilization Proceeding--Position on End of
Rate Freeze

FYI.  Note that TURN sez that the Commission should use the enactment date of
AB1X as the date that the rate freeze ended.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/09/2001 10:52 AM -----

	JMB <JBennett@GMSSR.com>
	02/09/2001 10:45 AM

		 To: "'Susan.J.Mara@enron.com'" <Susan.J.Mara@enron.com>,
"'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>, "'tjohnso8@enron.com'"
<tjohnso8@enron.com>, "'sstoness@enron.com'" <sstoness@enron.com>,
"'Harry.Kingerski@enron.com'" <Harry.Kingerski@enron.com>, "'Gordon Savage
(E-mail)'" <gsavage@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: TURN Testimony -- Rate Stabilization Proceeding

Yesterday (the 8th) was the day for parties to file testimony in the Rate
Stabilization Proceeding.  I have done a quick review of TURN's testimony,
and they did not submit tables which go back and calculate the impact of
adopting its proposed accounting changes on transition cost recovery and the
TRA undercollection balance.  In its testimony, TURN stated that it tried to
do such a calculation, but that the numerous adjustments which the UDCs had
made to their regulatory accounts since last summer made the task alot more
difficult than anticipated.  TURN estimates, however that PG&E's TCBA
balance as of 12/31/01 would be approximately $5.1 billion, while SCE's
would be $2.9 billion.  TURN states that they have requested through a data
request that the UDCs do the tables for them, but that if they do not
comply, that the commission should direct the UDCs to provide the tables.

Also, TURN has taken the position that the enactment of AB X 1 has
effectively ended the rate freeze and the date of the enactment of the
statute  is the one the Commission should pick for purposes of declaring the
rate freeze over.

I have not gone through other parties testimony yet, but wanted to let you
know what TURN has done (or not done).

Jeanne Bennett


I went motorcycle riding last night - I think I need to get some better
winter riding gear.

We will definitely go to court next Tuesday at 1:00 PM.  All we are doing is
verifying Dad's signature on the will.  Once the judge sees us it should only
take about five minutes.

That's all I have for now.


* an editorial from today's Wall Street Journal

REVIEW & OUTLOOK (Editorial)

Asides:

05/08/2001
The Wall Street Journal
Page A26
(Copyright (c) 2001, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)
California 's Electric Lottery
Golden State residents used an impressive 9% less electricity in the past two
months than they did during the same time last year, but it won't be enough
to dodge rolling blackouts this summer. Southern California Edison is
assigning each of its 4.3 million customers a number from one to 114 that
groups customers in a specific set of circuits totaling 100 megawatts. So
when, for example, the utility has to cut 500 megawatts of power, five
groupings will lose power for an hour. The numbers will be announced on radio
and TV, much like a lottery. But everyone will lose in this lottery, which
has been brought on by the stubborn refusal of California 's politicians to
override environmental objections to new power plants and then their efforts
to cap prices on the remaining power.


best GUESS P&L tonight is +7


Tom did some footwork and questioning and determined where the additional Big
Cowboy production is coming from.  Apparently, HPL cut a deal to purchase
this gas at "HPL meters" at Rocher and Big Cowboy #2, so the gas had been
pathed on the gathering agreement into our pipe.  All along, these volumes
have been flowing into the GEPL/Big Cowboy system and on to King Ranch.  Tom
and I spoke with Clem about the most correct way to reflect the physical and
determined that a Transport Usage ticket needed to be put into place, as IM
Wellhead, to transfer the volumes from HPL to GEPL and into the plant.

We unpathed the gathering agreement and brokered the HPL purchase to the TU
tickets and moved the gas on our transport on GEPL to the plant, effective
April 1.  This resolves our overproduction issues for April and forward.

Please let me know if you have any further questions, comments, or
information to add.

Mary


DId you talk to Burkhart??  I prefer him but if not, I will ask Mauricio.


Dave, I've had a technical conference come up at FERC on the 20th in a matter
that I'm responsible for.  Bill strongly suggested that I go to DC.  Now, I
may not be a rocket scientist, but I see pretty clearly the wisdom of
following Bill's advice.  I've let Mike Moran know and at Bill's suggestion,
asked him if he'd like a substitute to stand in for me (maybe Lou Soldano?).
Judging from the list of participants in this PRC, I assume I was partly an
ET&S representative and partly a GPG law representative.   I note that ET&S
is already pretty well represented with Neubauer,  Julia and Mike Nelson.
Without me, there is noone from law, but our people have already been PRC'd
anyway.  I'll leave it to you and Mike to decide if my spot needs to be
filled with someone from GPG law.  Sorry about this--just one more bit of
evidence that I "have issues."  DF

	From:  Dave Schafer                           07/06/2000 05:12 PM

Sent by: Lisa Costello
To: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Craig/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hill/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, John
Goodpasture/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod
Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Sheila
Knudsen/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wilson Barbee/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger
Sumlin/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ellen Coombe/Houston/Eott@Eott, Jennifer
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ann Vaughn/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Mid-Year PRC Process for Managers

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As you know, GPG,s Manager Performance Review Committee (PRC), of which you
are members, is scheduled to meet Thursday afternoon, July 20, in EB49C2 from
1:30 to approximately 5:30 PM. You,ll note that our membership has expanded
to include Jim Prentice and Steve Hotte, who will represent managers in Enron
Clean Fuels and IT, respectively.

By July 20, each manager should have a pre-rating in the Performance
Evaluation Program (PEP) system.  Our task as a committee will be to
determine a final mid-year rating for each manager and achieve appropriate
distribution of performance levels across GPG.  The PRC,s results will be
reviewed at the GPG Management Committee,s PRC the following day.

The attachment below lists the employees we are reviewing and identifies
which of them you are expected to represent.  Please be prepared to discuss
their performance, including both their strengths and areas that need
improvement.

You,ll note that not all of you have specific managers assigned.  That,s okay
your insights regarding the performance of managers with whom you have
interacted during the year will be valuable to the process.  Furthermore, PRC
members who have a large group of mangers for whom you are responsible should
feel free to ask another committee member with fewer or no managers for help
in gathering the necessary performance feedback.

Finally, for your information Mary Ellen Coombe of EOTT Energy will be
joining us on the 20th as an observer.  EOTT expects to implement its own
version of the PRC process shortly.

Please let me know if you need additional information.


whatever you want

	Mrmslane@aol.com
	11/17/2000 09:24 AM

		 To: TexBasque@aol.com, Pardevelop@aol.com, Namuathome@aol.com,
GGVSANDERS@aol.com, SandersDC2@aol.com, Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com,
Bwanarol@hotmail.com, JohnBepa@macol.net
		 cc:
		 Subject: Back to the playscape

I have shown the two playscapes that I have picked out for everyone to look
at.  I faxed to Richard, mailed to Doug and John, and Steve looked at it at
my house.  Obviously, there are much more fancy ones....and more money.  And
there are cheaper ones....that you can buy at Sam's or other warehouses and
put up yourself......

However, I picked out two that could go with our fort and sandbox out there
and really provide the swinging and climbing part of the playscape.  It was
affordable and they come out and set it up.

I would like to order soon.  They can have it too the Perd in about three
weeks.  So, please tell me what you think.

The simpler one is about 220 per family, and the bigger one is about 280 per
family.

Talk to you soon.


FYI.  I haven't read it yet, but thought I would pass it along anyway.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/11/2000 05:23
PM ---------------------------

	Don Hammond @ ECT

	10/11/2000

To: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Change order for GE transformer--Pleasanton

Attached are files incorporating suggested revisions for the change order to
Contract 24-LM6K-2-99 for the purchase of a generator step-up transformer for
the Pleasanton Project.

In lieu of the Exhibit A of the draft you sent out, I have substituted
Exhibit A, the GE proposal dated October 9, 2000.

I have substituted Exhibit B, GE's standard specifications for generator
step-up transformers, for the EE&CC specifications in the earlier draft. GE's
proposal is quoted on the basis of their standard GSU transformer
specification. I have this only in hard copy and have a call into GE to
verify this is the applicable standard and whether it is available in
electronic form. I will give you a copy, Dale.

The two additional documents were transmitted along with GE's proposal and I
have referenced them in Part I, Paragraph 2.


I did see the IPI presentation and was pretty impressed.  The presentation
was, obviously, more directed to the confirmation process, but I thought it
could also help in the creation and management of master swap agreements and
swap agreement form templates.  I need to talk to our confirm desk people to
see what issues of concern they had in the confirm process that they were
hoping this system could address.   They had one concept for form generation
I think is central for the creation of confirmations and agreements.  The
concept was this "data dictionary".  It made it all clear to me.

I spoke to them about the different areas of concern in my database asked
them to prepare another presentation more focused on those issues and come
back to us before I leave for Europe in June.


From:	Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 11:29 AM
To:	Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	Deal # QV9672

I show that this deal should be with ECC under the ISDA.  Please update and let me know if there are any problems.

Thanks

Lesli


Mark:
Here are my individual goals for 2000 which I would like to discuss with you
when you have some time.
Carol


looks good

thanks


Martin,

It's OK for Walter to use remaining hours. No real cost to Enron,
just the benefits.

Vince

From: Martin Lin@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS on 10/09/2000 03:06 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: power flow software question

Walter Coffer contacted me regarding whether we still have power flow
software available.  We do have almost all of a 200 execution-hour license
for PSS/E, which was purchased for the transmission congestion project last
summer.  This was purchased by East Power Trading.  Should Walter want to use
the remaining hours, who has authority to grant this?

Thanks,
Martin


Here are some more questions where we need your assistance.  These are
regarding Wheatland.   Thanks
Ben


if you are ignoring me, just let me know and i will leave you alone.

i got a big ol' promotion and my raise went through today...i thought
you might want to go to dinner, if that wouldn't be too weird.

b.


Can you include Bill White, Pavel Z, Rob Fuller, Chris Mahoney, Niamh Clarke,
and the rest of the crude team on this types of reports.  Thanks.  Jeff

	Clayton Seigle
	02/21/2001 10:55 AM

		 To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Schroeder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, John.l.wilson@enron.com,
Spencer Vosko/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Scott Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: OPEC

Word today is that the Saudis are committed to defending $25 OPEC basket/$28
WTI.  They are likely to endorse a further reduction in the OPEC quota of up
to 1 million b/d at the March meeting, if the data at that time supports such
a move.


Not a problem.  the schedule was only a suggestion.  work it in when you
can.  and if you get totally fried, just say so, and we can take on the
question.

Kimberly Kupiecki <kkupiecki@arpartners.com> on 09/13/2000 10:18:19 PM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc: dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu, jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu,
jcjcal02@aol.com
Subject: RE:

Hi Jeff, and team

I will due my best on the Thursday deadline, but I am pretty fried at
present.  I should be able to focus on this tomorrow eve.  I am happy to
take on the assigned question.

Cheers,

At 01:12 PM 9/13/00, you wrote:

>Not a problem, Jimmie.  About this week's case.  Been travelling.  I'm
>back.  Kim:  in your absence on Monday, we talked a little about how to
>proceed on the next case.  How's this sound:  everyone takes a question.
>If the answer to one question depends on the answer to another, the folks
>doing those questions should get together and discuss.  Everyone should
>distribute to the team a draft of the answer to the question by tomorrow
>(Thursday) night.   Then folks could look at the responses, make
>suggestions, comments, etc. and distribute via email by Noon on Saturday.
>I'll then compile in a form that we can submit on Monday.  Thoughts?
>
>I have randomly selected questions:  here are the results.  Jeff--#3;
>Jimmie--#1; Kim--#2; Dylan--#4.  If folks are comfortable with this
>distribution, let me know.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>
>
>"Jackson, James (JCJA)" <JCJA@chevron.com> on 09/13/2000 01:58:27 PM
>
>To:   "'Dylan Windham'" <dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu>,
>       jdasovic@enron.com, jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
>cc:   kkupiecki@arpartners.com
>Subject:  RE:
>
>
>Team
>My Haas e-mail is forwarded to my work e-mail.  Last week I was on vacation
>and did not see any of these e-mails.  I worked all 4 questions in what
>turned out to be a parallel path (I will say your compiled answers were a
>lot better than mine).  Anyway, please add my home e-mail address
>"jcjcal02@aol.com" (Thats a zero next to the 2) in addition to my hass
>email
>address.  This will give me access to the data regardless of where I'm at.
>This is particularly important on weekends.  Sorry I let you down on the
>first case.
>Jimmy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Dylan Windham [SMTP:dwindham@uclink4.berkeley.edu]
> > Sent:   September 11, 2000 7:44 AM
> > To:     jdasovic@enron.com; jjackson@haas.berkeley.edu
> > Cc:     kkupiecki@arpartners.com
> > Subject:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello gang,
> >
> > Here is the latest version with Kimberly's changes.  Review it and send
>me
> > any changes.
> >
> > --Dylan
> >  << File: E220 Northrop Casewrite up.doc >>

Kimberly Kupiecki
Senior Account Executive
A&R Partners
kkupiecki@arpartners.com
(650) 762 2800 main
(650) 762 2825 direct
fax (650) 762 2801


Please be informed, I will be out on vacation this Monday,  October 29.   I will be available for you, however, just call me on my cell phone (713) 822-7040 or leave me a voice mail.  I will log in from home and try to work from home as much as possible.

Thanks and have a great weekend.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Justin:
Thanks for the info.  Alan and I are going to work on it from this side.  It
sure looks like we could use a lawyer in New York.  After you and Alan talk
it through, let's agree on a plan to get the work done in NYC to make sure we
are coordinated.

Mark

	Justin Boyd
	07/12/2000 05:19 AM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: MG + Romulus and New York

Mark,

Here are details of the number of employees based in New York

Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 12/07/2000 11:20
---------------------------

Richard Sage
11/07/2000 23:18
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Nigel Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT, Melissa Laing/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: MG + Romulus and New York

The information I am working from shows:
MG: 60
RW: 30
but I'm defer to Melissa for accuracy.

Justin Boyd
11/07/2000 18:58
To: Nigel Sellens/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard Sage/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: MG + Romulus and New York

Gentlemen,

Please could you tell me how many employees are located in New York - this
would include both MG as well as Romulus employees.

Thanks

Justin


See below and pass it along.  Incredible montage of recent events.

Robert W. Franksen
Real Estate Administration Manager
USG CORPORATION
125 South Franklin Street
Chicago, IL  60606
(312) 606-4507 phone
(312) 606-3879 fax
rfranksen@usg.com

-----Original Message-----
From:   Hill, Deborrah
Sent:   Friday, October 12, 2001 1:07 PM
To:     Franksen, Robert
Subject:        AWESOME!!!!

<<We'll Go Forward.pps>>


Thank you for your diligence in resolving this important issue for
us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Marie Heard
Senior Legal Specialist
Enron Broadband Services
Phone:  (713) 853-3907
Fax:  (713) 646-8537
Marie_Heard@Enron.net

	Tana Jones@ECT
	06/21/00 01:48 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T
Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie
Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Original Guarantees

Per the email below, please note that if you haven't been sending your
original guarantees to Credit, it appears this should be done so in the
future.  Please forward this email on to other members of your group that
might be responsible for filing original guarantees.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 10:03 AM -----

	Lesli Campbell
	06/21/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Original Guarantees

Tana,

 I have talked with everyone involved, Anthony Campos, Mark Thorne, etc., and
everyone is in agreement that original guarantees should now come to credit.
If you could please, just make sure that they come to my attention so that
they can be briefed and entered into our Credit Agg System.  If you have any
questions please give me a call.

Thanks

Lesli
3/5983
---------------------- Forwarded by Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000
09:57 AM ---------------------------

From:  Tanya Rohauer
   06/21/2000 08:38 AM

To: Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Original Guarantees

This is what we discussed a few weeks ago
---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 08:36
AM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 06/21/2000 08:33 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Original Guarantees

Just a followup note:

We are still unclear as to whether we should continue to send original
incoming and outgoing guarantees to Global Contracts (which is what we have
been doing for about 4 years, since the Corp. Secretary kicked us out of
using their vault on 48 for originals because we had too many documents).  I
think it would be  good practice if Legal and Credit sent the originals to
the same place, so we will be able to find them when we want them.  So my
question to y'all is, do you think we should send them to Global Contracts,
to you, or directly the the 48th floor vault (if they let us!).


Tana - I understand that a new product needs to be added to the Meta-Calc
Report.  Please advise.

Thank you,
Susan Trevino
3-1462


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001
09:20 AM ---------------------------
From: Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate on 02/28/2001 09:18 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--2/28/01


Hi

Give me a call about Duke's changes.  I also disagree w (ii) and really think
even (i) is wrong since an Option can either be in the money or out of the
money and in either case the full value should be taken and netted against
other Gains and Losses.

Happy New Year
e


Dear Mr. Lay:
?
I had the pleasure to meet you while I was the  Consul General of Guatemala
in Houston from 1996 to 2000. On April 1st.2000 I  resigned to that position
and was appointed President and CEO of "D'VINCI  INTERNATIONAL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC". and its sister company "THE  HOUSTON INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS CHANNEL", both companies based in  Houston.
?
The Houston International Business Channel owns  cable Television Optel
channel 35, and is the only television company dedicated  to programming
business to business in the US, and simultaneously on-line via  our website
www.hibc.net.
?
The Houston International Business Channel has  been? appointed by the
Immigration and Naturalization Service Houston  District Office to develop a
series of 24 - 15 minute TV programs.
addressing key  issues to interest/concern to the international community to
imform about the  necessary requirements to obtain the different Visas
necessary to enter the  United States.
?
We have already filmed a Interview of Mr.  Richard Cravener District Director
of the Houston INS District. This interview  will be the opening of these
programs, and each program will be host by Mr.  Cravener?
?
Following please find an outline of this  programs:
?

Programs Broadcast

The series will be aired on:

HIBC Channel 35, Optel Cable television system, Houston Texas.

HCCTV Channel 19, Warner Cable television system, Houston Texas.

With the implementation of new technology "Digital Video  Streaming", HIBC
simultaneously broadcast its programming on-line  at www.hibc.net.
Accordingly, HIBC  effectively broadcast to a global scope.
In order to maximize the exposure of these programs, HIBC will make them
available (on-demand) via the Internet for a period of 6 months.

Sponsorship Opportunities

The cost of sponsoring these programs is $15,000 per program. HIBC will
produce and broadcast two programs per month. Your sponsorship will include
Intro and Outro credits (This program has been brought to you by  ENRON), as
well as the insertion of two 30" commercial spots during  each program. You
can sponsor the total of 24? programs,? or as  many months as you may
consider convenient?

Transforming these programs into a marketing tool

You can maximize your investment in this sponsorship, and incorporated it as
one of your strategic marketing tools by linking HIBC,s web site to yours.
In addition, you can also send video copies of these programs to your
business  associates and clients worldwide.

Editing a video introduction stated by you will enhance the delivery of this
powerful message.

I would like very much to meet with you to and discuss the possibilities of
this program.

?Thank you for your time and attention. I look forward to have the
opportunity to personally meet with you and explained in more detail all the
aspects of this program, in the mean time I remain as always,

?

Very Cordially yours,

Alfredo Aguilar G?lvez

President & CEO?

?

?

?


Conoco has nominated 5.0/d at this meter.  Conoco transport can be allocated
the entire meter flow for the days in which the meter flow
 exceed 5.0mm because they are the only party doing business at the meter.

 HPL may also be able to extract a sell for this overage which is why  I
wanted you to be aware of the daily activity thus far.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
01:57 PM ---------------------------
From: Lee L Papayoti on 08/21/2000 01:44 PM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Meter #: 1266 ; August 2000 / Allocation Exception

why are these volumes flowing?

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           08/21/2000 01:36 PM

To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sherlyn Schumack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Luong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Meter #: 1266 ; August 2000 / Allocation Exception

 Should I roll this deal to cover August 2000 activity ?

 Volumes todate are as follows:     82mm  8/16
       85mm  8/17
                      65mm  8/18
       57mm  8/19
       60mm  8/20

 Sitara ticket #: 363514

 These small meter flows are causing allocation exceptions for August.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000
01:27 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           08/11/2000 03:17 PM

To: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

 fyi

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000
03:16 PM ---------------------------
From: Robert E Lloyd on 08/11/2000 03:16 PM
To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

 The volumes are as follows:    July 1st     414 mmbtu
                July 31         12mmbtu

    Total :        426 mmbtu's

 Also, the Sitara deal # is :  363514

From: Lee L Papayoti on 08/11/2000 02:02 PM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

Please set up a ticket priced at Gas Daily Houston Ship Channel midpoint
minus $0.03

Also, can you let me know the exact volumes in question on July 1 and July
31?  Dorcheus wants to know.  Me too.

Thanks

Lee

To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

 Just a reminder that "allocation close"  is Monday, August 14th.

 A  Sitara ticket is needed to set up an Acctg. Arrangement which will
eliminate  the allocation exception for meter # 981266
 {Victoria Station # 2/ Brandywine}.

From: Lee L Papayoti on 08/09/2000 03:33 PM
To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

I'll get you a price tomorrow when I meet with him ...

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           08/09/2000 12:50 PM

To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

 I spoke with Bob Dorcheus, Brandywine about this issue and he suggest you
and he get together and agree on a
  price because the gas flowed into the plant.

 This gas flowed without a nomination.

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000
12:47 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary A Hanks                           08/09/2000 11:27 AM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

The volumes on meter #1266 for 7/1/00 and 7/31/00 are valid gas flow.  7/1/00
volumes are carry over from June activity (meter was shut in a little after
9:00 AM on 7/1/00).   7/31/00 volumes were caused by the plant bringing on
the meter before 9:00 AM on 8/1/00.

If you have any questions please call.  36449.

Thanks
Gary H
---------------------- Forwarded by Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 11:18
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           08/09/2000 11:17 AM

To: Gary A Hanks/HOU/ECT@ECT, Earl Tisdale/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B
Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter #: 1266 ; July 2000 Activity / Allocation Exception

 Please verify the volume on Meter #: 1266 for July 1st & 31st  are valid gas
flow.

 Brandywine did not nominate any activity  at this meter for July 2000.


The report named: Power West Price Peak <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Power+West+Price+Peak&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=01/07/2002>, published as of 01/07/2002 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 3)


Ever wonder what happens to the ideas in the Idea Vault?  The possibilities
are almost endless, but here is how your idea might be "discovered":
Putting your idea in the Idea Vault gets it in front of everyone at Enron.
You might make a connection with someone on the other side of the world who
is working on a similar concept.
The eThink team checks regularly, and, when we know who might be able to
help, we route ideas to various people at Enron.
Various business groups check the Idea Vault in their weekly staff meetings
to see if Enron's next big initiative is waiting there.
The Enron Xcelerator is looking for fresh business initiatives, and they
might find some in the Idea Vault.

Visit the ThinkBank today and make a deposit or a withdrawal!

Tuesday, Mar. 6, at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Judy Schlesinger on eSpeak.
Judy, the manager of eSource, will be on hand to answer your questions and
explain how the eSource research group's industry specialists and resources
can help you gain a competitive advantage.

If you attended or watched the all-employee meeting on Feb. 21, you heard
Jeff and Ken introduce our new vision "To Become the World's Leading
Company."  What do you think it will take to make this happen?  Share your
ideas in the new eMeet category:  "The World's Leading Company:  What Will it
Take?"


Thanks!!
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:04 PM -----

	Mary Schoen
	02/27/2001 06:54 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael
Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: CA Emissions/Environmental Issues

Steve - We were hoping to provide a chart that plotted out the NOx emissions
from existing fossil fuel generation vs, new cleaner generation.  This chart
is not quite there.  However, it is a rough aggregate of the NOx generated by
all of the existing fossil fuel generation over 50 MW in CA.  The data points
were gathered from the EPA's Acid Rain CEMs (continuous emissions monitoring)
database.  (I am working on a chart that's message is more clear.) As you
will see, existing generation is significantly dirtier than what new,
combined cycle plants would be.  In fact, of the utility units in CA
reporting under Title IV, there are a number of steam plants with NOx
emissions of 0.1 lb/MMBtu or in some cases more.  This corresponds to about 1
lb NOx/MWh compared to 0.056 lb/MWh for a new gas combined cycle plant.  Even
the cleaner boilers that are at 0.05 lb/MMBtu are 10 times higher than the
new plants on an output basis.

In otherwords, Dave Parquet is right that there is a lot of more polluting
generation on line, while new plants have to meet ever tighter BACT
requirements.

In the most recent version of SB 28 it looks like there are a lot of
provisions focusing on the retrofitting of existing generation.  I suspect,
the regulators are well aware of the discrepancies in emissions and would
argue that the plants are going to have to clean up in the very near future.
I am digging for more information on these timelines.

Gus, Marc, and I felt like the main short term fixes/solutions would be:

1.  Expanding the hours of operations for back-up generators.  (As I have
previously stated, some of the local air districts have increased the
permitted run hours for emergency generators from 200 to 500 at only
"essential public services.")

2.  CA requiring offsetting of emissions at only the ratios required by
Federal regulations.  In many cases state requirements are more stringent.

3.  The EPA allowing the concept of the pollution mitigation bank - it is
really going to be an issue of timing - once the CA government has the funds
to start acquiring offsets they will be able to provide them prior to the
operation of a new generation facility, However, there is going to be some
initial lag time where the offsets aren't in the hands of the generation
operators (which goes against the requirements of the Clean Air Act).

4.  The Feds working with the state and local permitters to create alternate
sources of emission offsets.  There simply aren't enough in all the air
districts.  As I stated, in my previous memo the USEPA has allowed, under the
NOx SIP call, emissions allowances to be given to renewable and energy
efficiency projects. CA is going to need guidance from the USEPA in how to
create and count alternate sources of offsets in nonattainment areas.

5.  The USEPA better defining the nonattainment air sheds and pollution
transportation pathways.  Apparently, there is not a central model of the air
patterns in CA.  Thus, the 35 local air districts all having different
requirements about inter-district offsets.

However, the real issues as Dave alluded to in his memo are going to require
modifications to the Clean Air Act.  It is pretty prescriptive about what can
and can't be done, and there is not a whole lot of flexibility.

Let me know if anything in here is not clear.  I'm working on refining the
data and presentation of the data.

Mary Schoen
Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
713-345-7422


Thanks.

 I'm looking forward to working closer with everone.  Lets get together for
dinner.  I'll  ask Chris to call your better half.

Mike

Brian Redmond
07/31/2000 07:29 PM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Global Markets

Welcome back Mike.

Brian


Sheila,

Gran't number:  (281) 381 9987.

This is his cell phone number.

Vince


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000
08:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones on 05/04/2000 08:43 AM
To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Our luncheon

Anthony,

You never got back to me on whether this date was good and the total head
count.  Can youu please confirm this.  Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 08:42 AM -----

	Tana Jones
	04/14/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: Anthony Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Our luncheon

Carol St. Clair had her assistant reserve EB46C1 on May 24 from 11:30 -2:00
for our luncheon.  Can you please confirm that that date is good for your
group and also the total head count.  Suzanne will take care of ordering
lunch for us.

Thanks!


Please print the black line and put with the binder you are building.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000 12:00
PM ---------------------------

"FAYE STEDMAN" <STEDF@andrews-kurth.com> on 10/25/2000 07:56:01 PM
To: <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "PAUL PIPITONE" <PIPIP@andrews-kurth.com>

Subject: ABB Transformer Purchase and Sale Agreement

Attached please find a clean copy of the ABB Transformer Purchase and Sale
Agreement as well as a blackline to show changes made from the WESTLB/ABB
Agreement.  Sorry for the delay in getting this to you. We have had to delete
the table of contents from the clean version in order to get this to you in a
timely fashion.  A completed version will be forthcoming sometime tomorrow.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (202) 662-2780.

 - WESTLB-ABBblk.doc
 - WEST-LB-ABBcln.DOC


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/03/2000 04:57
PM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
11/03/2000 04:52 PM
To: jeff.ader@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com
cc:

Subject: FCEL consent to disclosure letter

As requested, I went the abbreviated route.

Kay


i called her and she still isn't there.  i wonder if she still has a job
here.


Martha
I think this message was sent in response to the message you tried to send
from my computer ( not the old message) ... so I don't think the IT people
got the message that you tried to send today.

Thanks

	Martha Keesler/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/17/2001 09:40 AM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Printer purchase approval for 1 Black/white Network Printer HP
4100N for Genia FitzGerald

Thanks.  Hopefully the request I sent in from your computer will work.  I'll
give them a call to let them know that you tried to send in your approval and
the address was correct on the e-mail but you had the delivery failure.

Martha

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sager, Elizabeth
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:33 AM
To: martha keesler@enron.com
Cc: FitzGerald, Genia
Subject: Printer purchase approval for 1 Black/white Network Printer HP 4100N
for Genia FitzGerald

 This is what happened last time  when I tried to to send it.
----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 09:26 AM -----

Delivery Failure Report

Your document:	Printer purchase approval for 1 Black/white Network Printer HP 4100N for
Genia FitzGerald
was not delivered to:	<enronitpurchasing@enron.com>
because:	User enronitpurchasing (enronitpurchasing@enron.com) not listed in
public Name & Address Book

What should you do?
You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above by
choosing the Resend button or the Resend command on the Actions menu.
Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure Report.
If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new failure
report.
Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was
successfully delivered to all other recipients.

ECTHOU-LN3/ECT, ECTHOU-LN3/ECT

	To:enronitpurchasing@enron.com

	cc:Martha Keesler/ENRON@enronXgate

	Date:09:06:59 AM Today

	Subject:Printer purchase approval for 1 Black/white Network Printer HP 4100N
for Genia FitzGerald

As per your instructions,I have approved the purchase request for the
following:

 One (1) Black/white Network Printer HP 4100N
 Cost Center No. 0000107061
 Price - $1,503.00 USD

This purchase was requested by Martha Keesler and the printer is for Genia
FitzGerald.

If you have any questions regarding this, please direct the e-mail to Martha
Keesler at martha.keesler@enron.com.

Thank you,
Elizabeth Sager


I assume that you have seen the attached letter from Grynberg by now.  For
some people it would be amazing.  For Grynberg, it is simply typical.

Working through the Coordinated Defendants group, it seems to me that the
two viable options are (1) telling Grynberg to get lost or (2) ignoring him.
If you have something else in mind, please let me know.  Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dawne Davis [mailto:ddavis@hollandhart.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 6:27 PM
To: ctetrault@velaw.com; dpetalas@velaw.com; khirschman@velaw.com;
phaynes@velaw.com; vbrooks@velaw.com
Subject: Letter from Figa re settlement negotiations

Attached is a letter from Phil Figa to Don Schultz regarding settlement
negotiations.

Dawne Davis
Legal Assistant
Holland & Hart
P.O. Box 1347
Cheyenne, WY  82003
307-778-4240
307-778-8175 - fax
ddavis@hollandhart.com

NOTICE:  This message is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL.  It is sent under the
terms and conditions of a Joint Defense Agreement (JDA) and is directed only
to recipients who the sender believes have agreed to be bound by the JDA.
If you do not agree to be bound by the JDA, or if you believe that this
e-mail has been sent to you in error, please reply to notify the sender that
you received the message in error, and please delete and disregard this
e-mail.  Thank you.

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You

 - 80499000.pdf


Eliz -- I need your group to put together a search which captures the
comments of PG&E and Edison officials in trade press, anlyst reports, and
speeches which would be inconsistent with the idea that they can now recover
their shortfall.  In other words, when they were trying to get AB 1890
passed, when they were fighting Proposition 9, when they floated their "rate
reduction bonds" and when they talked to analysts and rating agencies I'm
sure they assumed that they would live under the rate freeze and take the
risk of stranded cost recovery whithin the statutory deadline.

----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 09/27/2000 11:45 AM -----

	"Dick S George" <dsgeorge@firstworld.net>
	09/27/2000 08:04 AM

		 To: "Dick George" <dsgeorge@firstworld.net>
		 cc:
		 Subject: WSJ: PG&E's Huge losses...

CC list suppressed...
September 27, 2000
California Utilities' LossesOn Electricity Pose Risk

By REBECCA SMITH

Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

California's two biggest utilities are losing so much
money buying electricity in the state's deregulated
market that they have run up deficits equivalent to half
their net worth in just four months.

If the cost of wholesale power continues to exceed the
price these utilities are allowed to bill their
customers, as currently seems likely, they could become
technically insolvent sometime next year. That would put
pressure on regulators to orchestrate a
multibillion-dollar public bailout, similar to the "too
big to fail'' response that in the past pushed
governments to rescue banks.

Such a scenario is quietly being discussed by bond-rating
concerns that recently reduced their credit outlooks for
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., a unit of San Francisco-based
PG&E Corp., and Southern California Edison, a unit of
Edison International of Rosemead, Calif. Bond- rating
concerns say they aren't sure how much additional debt
can be borne by the two affected utilities before they
will have difficulty paying their bills.

Probe of California Power Prices Begins, but New Plants
Aren't Seen as Solution (Sept. 11)

Los Angeles Utility Is Benefitting, Surprisingly, From
Deregulation (Sept. 6)

California Lawmakers Vote to Limit Electricity Costs
(Sept. 1)
"If this is just a seasonal aberration, the utilities can
get through it," says Lori Woodland, analyst for Fitch
IBCA. "If it goes on for six or nine months, it's a very
serious situation." Adds A.J. Sabatelle, senior credit
officer at Moody's Investors Service Inc.: "At some
point, you have a financial crisis."

The utilities say they are having no difficulty meeting
expenses and don't envision problems in servicing their
debts. But they are vigorously lobbying state and federal
regulators to change the rules of the game, hoping
somehow to raise rates to make up for the shortfall. The
California utilities' experience may be a harbinger of
what could happen in other states where wholesale power
prices have surpassed the amount that utilities are
allowed to charge their ratepayers.

For now, utilities are making ends meet by going to the
financial markets to borrow money. PG&E, a giant utility
that serves one out of every 20 Americans, is seeking
approval to increase its debt capacity by $1.4 billion.
It is borrowing $200 million, while Edison is tapping
$250 million from the commercial paper market. "This is
going to be a long, tough road," says Jim Scilacci, chief
financial officer for Southern California Edison.

Today's situation represents a complete turnabout from
what was expected when California deregulated its energy
market on March 31, 1998, which opened electricity
pricing to competition. California tried to give its
utilities a competitive edge nationally by deregulating
faster than other states and by creating a mechanism to
allow investor-owned utilities, such as PG&E and Edison,
to quickly pay down debts incurred to serve customers
under the old regulatory system.

To do this, the state legislature set retail rates at
high levels, which, at first, generated fat surpluses for
the utilities. As the money piled up, utilities used it
to pay down debts for generation facilities that were
otherwise unprofitable in the new deregulated world. By
the end of this June, PG&E and Edison together had
collected more than $12 billion and were on track to
finish paying down debts well ahead of the March 31,
2002, deadline set by the legislature. At that point,
rate freezes were to end and retail prices were to
fluctuate with the market.

But all that went out the window in June, when wholesale
power prices surged, topping the rates the utilities were
allowed to charge retail customers. Average prices at
state-sanctioned energy markets were four to five times
the prices of a year earlier, and three to four times the
level utilities could charge customers.

The accumulated shortfall has been so enormous at PG&E,
that analysts expect its deficit to exceed $3 billion by
Oct. 31, more than half its shareholder equity of $5.7
billion, which is defined as assets minus liabilities.
Southern California Edison finished August with a deficit
of $2 billion, equivalent to almost two-thirds its net
worth of $3.2 billion. The utilities, though they have
been accumulating deficits, aren't required to report
these as losses on their earnings statements.

That leaves utilities in a bind. They want to end the
rate freeze to be able to pass on the real cost of
electricity to consumers. But should the freeze end
before the statutory deadline of 2002, they get
clobbered. That is because they will immediately have to
book a loss on their power-purchase deficits. What's
more, they can't use the proceeds from planned
power-plant sales to cover those losses; instead, should
the freeze end, they will be obliged to refund some of
the proceeds to ratepayers. In PG&E's case, the refunds
could total $500 million, while in Edison's case, the
amount is $254 million.

Publicly at least, utility executives insist a mechanism
will be found to let them recoup the money spent on
electricity.

Consumer advocates are gearing up for the fight. Nettie
Hoge, executive director for San Francisco consumer group
Utility Reform Network, says ratepayers shouldn't end up
footing the bill for a deal cut by utilities that
benefited them before prices shot up.

Utility executives are now distancing themselves from the
legislation that got them into such a mess, which was
drafted with their assistance. PG&E Chairman Robert Glynn
says it is best not to "overanalyze" the "old deal."
Instead, he says, regulators and legislators should sit
down with utilities and construct a new agreement, since
"it's in the broad interests of the state not to have
critical energy infrastructure look like a leper."

Mr. Glynn says the current deal offers "mutually assured
destruction" to both utilities and ratepayers. Something
must be done, he says, or consumers throughout most of
the state will experience "a San Diego-style rate shock."
The utility serving that city, San Diego Gas & Electric
Co., ended its freeze a year ago and began passing
wholesale power costs directly through to ratepayers.
Legislators intervened this summer, however, and
temporarily capped retail rates when monthly power bills
nearly tripled. The utility, a unit of Sempra Energy, is
also accumulating a deficit as a result.

So long as banks and bond markets believe the utilities
will be repaid, they will be able to borrow, analysts
say. "Until we hear politicians of consequence state
otherwise, our position is that we believe the utilities
will be made whole," says Richard Cortright, a director
at Standard & Poor's corporate ratings group.

But that opinion could change if it looks like the
utilities will have to swallow a big loss. The result:
lower credit ratings that would raise borrowing costs and
could trigger a downward spiral. "You're talking about
top-rated companies, though," said Ms. Woodland of Fitch
IBCA. "To get to insolvency, a lot would have to happen."

In the meantime, utilities are doing all they can to
control the hemorrhaging. They have gotten authority from
regulators to buy more power under long-term contracts at
fixed prices, reducing their vulnerability to spot-market
volatility. And they have petitioned federal regulators
to declare California's market so badly flawed that
generators should be denied market pricing and, even,
ordered to pay refunds.

Nevertheless, several forces are working against them.
Although they can sign bilateral contracts, prices remain
high for those as well. What's more, they can't buy less
power than their customers need. If they don't buy
enough, the California Independent System Operator, the
organization responsible for reliability, will step in
and make purchases for them and send them the bill.

Perhaps the biggest problem facing PG&E and Edison,
though, is one of timing. The California legislature is
out of session until December, and regulators haven't
even really started to address the issue formally. In the
meantime, the utilities' deficit is growing by tens of
millions of dollars daily.

Write to Rebecca Smith at rebecca.smith@wsj.com


This is the last e-mail I received from Laura. Looks like she forgot the
attachment the first time.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 10/11/2000 08:37 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Laura Wente                           10/10/2000 06:08 PM

To: nancy.f.white@betzdearborn.com
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Mullen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Sorry Nancy. I sent this too quickly and left off the attachment the first
time.

Regards,
Laura

---------------------- Forwarded by Laura Wente/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 06:06
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Laura Wente                           10/10/2000 05:50 PM

To: nancy.f.white@betzdearborn.com
cc: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Ed Clark/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Mullen/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jody Blackburn/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement

Nancy,

I have attached a draft Confidentiality Agreement for your review. If it is
acceptable, please sign and fax a copy to me at 503-464-3740. We should be
able to begin work with a faxed document in place.

As we discussed, we need to analyze two sources of water for the project;
city water and the port's well water. Please overnight the containers for
collection of the water to me at:

Enron North America
121 SW Salmon, 3WTC 0306
Portland, OR 97204
(Tel.: 503-464-3830)

Ed Clark and I will collect the water samples Friday morning and overnight
them to you (Saturday delivery) to make sure that they are there first thing
Monday morning.

I was able to find a Well and Water Right Evaluation that was performed by
Robinson and Noble, Inc. If you could send your fax number to me and to Kate
Symes (ksymes@enron.com), we will fax you a copy for your review. I will also
work on getting you a conceptual design of the project for analysis of the
waste water flow.

Thank you in advance for your assistance and speedy response. I realize that
we are targeting an aggressive date (the morning of October 23) for the work
to be completed.

Sincerely,
Laura Wente
503-464-3830


The Corporate Internal Communications team would like to thank each of the 5,142 employees who took the time to complete our survey.  As promised, here are the numerical results.  We will cover the survey in its entirety - including some of your individual comments and the steps we're taking to enhance our programs - in the August issue of Enron Business.  Watch for it!

Survey respondent demographics:

Houston office	54.4%
U.S. Domestic, non-Houston	24.9%
International office	20.7%

Do you believe Enron's corporate internal communications programs (eBiz, eThink, Enron Business, ETV, floor meetings, etc.) are generally effective and useful?

Yes	83.3%
No	16.7%

Do you believe the information you receive in eBiz, Enron Business, eSpeak, ETV and at employee meetings is credible?

Yes	90.9%
No	9.1%

Have you ever used the following tools as an information or research resource?  (Check all that apply.)

eBiz	43.2%
Enron Business		34.2%
eSpeak transcripts	23.5%

Do you read eBiz (Enron's corporate online informal news source)?

Yes	64.7%
No	35.3%

If yes, which of the following eBiz features do you read?  (Check all that apply.)

Business articles	58.3%
In Layman's Terms	35.2%
Short Cuts	32.9%
The Last Word	31.2%

If no, I don't read eBiz because:

I don't have time	66.1%
I get my Enron information from other sources	30.9%
I don't find the content credible	3.1%

eBiz is posted fortnightly - every two weeks.  How frequently would you like to get eBiz?

Monthly	26.9%
Every two weeks (as is)	58.0%
Weekly	11.5%
Daily (email format)	3.6%

How do you generally read Enron Business (Enron's all-employee print and online in-depth publication)?

Print	39.7%
Online	23.4%
Both	12.9%

If you read Enron Business, what do you think of the new design?

Like it	94.7%
Don't like it	5.3%

Do you ever share the print version of Enron Business with your spouse or family?

Yes	43.4%
No	56.6%

Which of the following Enron Business features do you read?  (Check all that apply.)

Business articles	63.6%
The Insider		41.1%
Extreme Enron		38.5%
Community stories	38.2%
Generally Speaking?	36.3%
Back page (contests)	32.6%

Which of these eThink tools do you use?

eSpeak	31.2%
eMeet	4.2%
The ThinkBank	7.7%

What speakers would you like to see featured on eSpeak?  (Check all that apply.)

Ken Lay/Jeff Skilling	52.8%
Business unit CEOs	52.2%
Subject matter experts	55.6%
External speakers	37.2%

How many all-employee meetings have you attended (or watched via IPTV or video teleconference) in the last year?

0	32.5%
1	36.6%
2	30.9%

If you have attended an all-employee meeting, did you find it to be informative and beneficial?

Yes	86.6%
No	13.4%

Do you think all-employee meetings should be held more than twice a year?  (i.e., quarterly)?

Yes	44.6%
No	55.4%

What information do you want covered at an all-employee meeting?  (Check all that apply.)

Business strategy	78.7%
Financial and operating results	69.1%
Human Resource issues	55.4%
Competitor information	49.6%

For Houston office only:
Irrespective of technical problems, what do you think of ETV (elevator television) as a communication medium?

Like it	90.9%
Don't like it	9.1%

Would you use ETV to advertise one of your Enron projects or campaigns?

Yes	69.6%
No	30.4%

If you have used ETV to advertise, did you find it effective?

Yes	9.1%
No	3.3%
Haven't used it	87.6%

Which ETV segments do you like?  (Check all that apply.)

Enron announcements	39.4%
Streaming cable news	34.8%
Rebroadcast interviews with Ken and/or Jeff with CNN, CNBC, Bloomberg, etc.	32.5%
The Building Guy	29.8%
Vision & Values ads	13.8%


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:10:30 -0600
From: "Tracey Bradley" <tbradley@bracepatt.com>
To: "Paul Fox" <pfox@bracepatt.com>
Cc: "Alfredo Perez" <aperez@bracepatt.com>, "Andrea Settanni"
<asettanni@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Ingebretson"
<cingebretson@bracepatt.com>, "Charles Shoneman" <cshoneman@bracepatt.com>,
"Deanna King" <dking@bracepatt.com>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, "Gene Godley" <ggodley@bracepatt.com>, "Kimberly
Curry" <kcurry@bracepatt.com>, "Mark Evans" <mevans@bracepatt.com>, "Michael
Pate" <mpate@bracepatt.com>, "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com>
Subject: Potential Bankruptcy Petition Against SCE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline

Generator to sign bankruptcy filing
Report says Coram to sign petition against SoCalEd
By Myra P. Saefong, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 6:43 PM ET Mar 15, 2001

TEHACHAPI, Calif. (CBS.MW) -- Independent electricity generator Coram Energy
Group said it will sign a bankruptcy petition Thursday against Southern
California Edison, according to a published report.

The petition is being circulated among five other "qualifying facilities,"
also known as small generating plants, Coram owner Brian O'Sullivan told Dow
Jones Newswires.

O'Sullivan said his company is running out of cash and will have to shut down
operations in about a month, according to the report. Coram Energy, which was
one of several renewable power generators that formed a creditors' committee
in February, produces wind energy at three locations in Tehachapi, Calif.

The petition could be filed in a Los Angeles bankruptcy court as early as
next week, the report said. The move could prompt the start of involuntary
bankruptcy proceedings against the utility owned by Edison International
(EIX: news, msgs, alerts) .

The report also said FPL Group (FPL: news, msgs, alerts) , owner of several
qualifying facilities in SoCal Edison's area, may also join the group.

Southern California Edison and another of California's big utilities, Pacific
Gas & Electric (PCG: news, msgs, alerts) , have combined debts of more than
$13 billion. Both suffer from having to pay high wholesale power prices to
supply electricity to their customers who pay retail rates capped by state
regulators below actual costs.

Myra P. Saefong is a reporter for CBS.MarketWatch.com in San Francisco.


---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 01/11/2001 01:33 PM
---------------------------

"Boehm, Barbara" <bboeh@opic.gov> on 01/11/2001 01:52:39 PM
To: "'rob.g.gay@enron.com'" <rob.g.gay@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Meeting next week

Rob
Tom will be traveling next week.  Is it possible to postpone our meeting
until the next week (1/22 or 1/23) so that he can attend, and to give Frank
more time to make arrangements to come over?
Barbara


calendar
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/20/2001
03:00 PM ---------------------------

Kelly Johnson
04/20/2001 09:47 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary Joyce/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Wright/Enron@EnronXGate

Subject: Special Comp Committee Meeting Notice - May 1st

Attached is a notice of special meeting of the Compensation and Management
Development Committee on May 1st at 3:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. This meeting is
addition to the April 30th meeting.


Sean Crandall changed the term of it during last night's checkout with
Prebon, but forgot to change the strip in the deal. It's fixed now to reflect
a term of 3/15 to 3/31.

Thanks,
Kate

	From:  Sharen Cason                           03/14/2001 06:53 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Deal # 549052

This deal is entered with a span of two weeks on the top half of deal entry
and one day on the lower half.  Can you check it out?

Thanks!


I am missing the following deals:

Jeff Richter-Amerex
Sell   American Electric Power  $525.00           SP 15           12/11/00-
12/11/00       50  on-peak     $.0075  fee

Sean Crandall/Dianna Scholtes- Amerex
Sell  Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.    $2000.00      MID C
12/12/00- 12/31/00   25  on-peak   $.0075  fee

Matt Motley- Prebon
Sell Constellation   $525.00       Mid-C         Q1'01   25 mw on-peak
Sell Nevada Power   $200.00    PV  Q2'01 25 mw on-peak
Sell Nevada Power   $295.00  PV Q3'01   25 mw on-peak

Matt Motley- Amerex
I am missing two deals...I will send you details in a second.

Thanks!!


Mike:
I have discussed your proposed language with Brant Reves, our credit person,
and we are okay with the concept except that we would like for the ratings
trigger to be based only on either a drop in the S&P rating or a failure to
have an S&P rating.  In addition, Brant has advised me that should we put in
place a CSA, that the following would be the credit matrix for collateral
threshold:

BB to BB+  $2,500,000
Below BB  Zero

I look forward to hearing from you.  Should we send you our form of Credit
Support Annex?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


There are two lawsuits against ECT pending in LA dictrict court in
California.The plaintiffs are Legg Mason and Farrallon. They did not give us
releases. The other plaintiffs have either given us releases or decided not
to sue us(the statute of limitations has probably already run as well) I will
be happy to answer any other questions.

	Mary J Heinitz
	01/23/2001 02:56 PM

		 To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NSM - Nakornthai Strip Mill

Lisa or Richard:
Please see message below.  Is a status update available for Keith at this
time?  Thank you.

----- Forwarded by Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT on 01/23/01 02:58 PM -----

	Keith E Power
	01/23/01 12:52 PM

		 To: Mary J Heinitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NSM - Nakornthai Strip Mill

Hi Mary - Do you know where we stand on the release of the orginal lawsuits
that were filed against ECT Securities and the other underwriters regarding
NSM?  We put out a Watch Report for Merchant assets and I've sort of referred
to that issue with a generic comment like  "Negotiations continue regarding
obtaining releases from the lawsuits that were filed against the original
underwriting group that included ECT Securities."

If memory serves me correctly, there was one release that was granted -
either from Farrallon Capital Mgmt, or Oaktree?  Do you know how many others
are outstanding.

Please let me know at your convenience.

Thnx,


It is my understanding that:
After taking into account the recent preferred with Dynegy, Enron has limited authorized shares for further private equity;
A shareholders meeting is necessary to authorize additional shares; and
A shareholders meeting requires a 30-day notice period.

In order to be safe, I think we need an additional 250 million authorized shares - in order to comfortably raise up to $2.0+ billion - although the first tranche will likely be $800 to $900 million.

Who is the right person to take the lead in this matter?

Jeff Donahue