All,

before we take precipitate action, can we all speak to ensure we are all on
the same page about this.

Firstly - the decision to add a Hong Kong password application on the
registration screen was taken in full knowledge of the relevant law and
everyone should be aware of the process that was gone through

Secondly - if I understand David's note, the conclusion is "we believe there
is no problem but we may attract some attention". We need to determine how
concerned we are about that and whether our concern merits the inconvenience
(is that all it is?) of removing the password application;

Thirdly - we are already pregnant. The application is already there. If
removing it solves the problem, why not wait until we know we have the
problem and then remove it?

Fourthly - all David's questions are valid and should be answered.

When we have discussed it, the right decision may well be to remove the
password application.

Mark, David F.  - could you make 4pm today London time (10am yours). Justin
and I will call you Mark at 4pm.  If not, I'll ask Tracy to fix something up.
Obviously David Minns can't make that, but I have a call with David on
Thursday and can update him then.

Jonathan Marsh@ENRON
14/11/2000 07:50
To: Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron on 14/11/2000
07:50 ---------------------------

David Forster
13/11/2000 21:31
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT,
Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT,
Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

I have asked that Hong Kong be removed from the list of online PA's,
effective for tonight.

This does not prohibit us from distributing PA's directly, if it is decided
that direct distribution is OK.

However, I am keen to answer the following questions as soon as possible, so
we can establish whether or not the PA can be put back on:

1) Does listing a PA for Hong Kong constitute "targetting" Hong Kong
residents?
3) Does the Protection of Investors Ordinance apply to EnronOnline or the
products contained on EnronOnline?
2) What are the HK Securities regulations and what is requried for
compliance? Is this painful, or do we qualify with little effort?
4) What happens if we come to the attention of the HK regulator? Does it just
mean some "getting to know you" meetings, or something more serious?
5) Is the Protection of Investors Ordinance aimed at individuals, or is it
intended to cover companies as well?

Dave

From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/13/2000 03:05 PM EST
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster@ECT,
Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT,
Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

I concur in David's analysis.  Any idea who the target market is in HK?  If
we have specific customers in mind, would it be possible to approach them
directly rather than making the password application generally available?
It's not clear to me that even that would solve the problem since there would
still be some targeted HK residents, just not the public.

	David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/12/2000 08:14 PM

		 To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster@ECT
		 cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Jonathan
Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

There is one issue outstanding concerning our due diligence for Hong Kong. It
does not relate specifically to Hong Kong weather but rather whether we
should revisit  the decision to last month list a Hong Kong Password
Application on the EOL registration screen. As I raised in my email last week
the Hong Kong regulator (SFC) has issued internet trading guidelines that
state that internet sites that "target" Hong Kong residents will be expected
to comply with HK securities legislation.

Under the HK Protection of Investors Ordinance there are restrictions on
making public offers regarding (i) securities; and (ii) "investment
arrangements relating to property other than securities".  Whilst it is
difficult to see how a HK weather swap (or any other product listed on EOL )
would fall with in these definitions it is not beyond doubt that the SFC may
want to investigate EOL if they believe it is targeting offers to Hong Kong
residents. My concern is that if the SFC logged onto EOL following the
publicity surrounding the HK weather launch they will find a password
application for Hong Kong residents. The SFC could well take the view that a
HK password application is evidence that EOL is targeting Hong Kong. Again it
is the act of making the offer, not entering into the transaction that is the
subject of the Ordinance. Hence arrangements to restrict with whom we
ultimately enter into password agreements or conduct trades  may not be
viewed as conclusive in determining to whom offers are being made.

l  have had an opportunity to review a 27 September 2000 advice that Jonathan
Marsh obtained from Allen Overy (HK). In Section 2 they raise similar
concerns with regard to the Protection of Investors Ordinance.

Way Forward

I would recommend that the Password Application for Hong Kong immediately be
removed from the list on the EOL registration screen, at least for the
present. The chance that this HK PA may invite the attention of the HK SFC
needs to be recognised. (This possibility exists irrespective  of the
decision to list HK weather products. Clearly on a practical level a greater
awareness in HK of EOL  generated by the launch of HK weather may be the
catalyst that attracts  SFC interest.)  Whilst our legal analysis has not
identified any  breach of HK legislation by EOL I would prefer if we
mitigated the risk of an  SFC instigated dialogue on this point.

This would mean a Hong Kong resident would need to call up to get a password
application.

If we wish to include on the parts of the EOL site that are available to the
public (ie where no password is needed) provisions that are unambiguously
directed to HK residents then it would be prudent for us to talk to the SFC
first. I note Allen & Overy also raised this as a possibility.

I recognise this is a judgment call on what is one of those grey areas. But
the prospect of publicity in HK for EOL was the determining factor in
concluding that this more conservative approach is warranted at present.

Amita Gosalia@ECT
13/11/2000 07:04 AM
To: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

Hi Guys

Have checked the outstanding item with Jonathan Marsh.  Jonathan's view was
that the legal due diligence conducted by Mallesons provided the relevant
information.  Media coverage of launch of weather products based in HK may
lead to review by the HK regulator.

OK to proceed.

Regards
Amita

From: Paul Smith@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/11/2000 08:05 ZE10
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster@ECT, Amita Gosalia@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

Dale,

What is the legality issue that needs to be addressed by Amita regarding
offerring HK Weather products. David Minns and Mark Taylor have completed all
the legal checking and sign-off required for this product launch.

Regards,
Paul

	Dale Neuner@ECT
	11/11/2000 08:58 AM

		 To: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

I have created some Hong Kong weather Products in Production for your review.
You will find them in the Product Manager; 34991 and 34992.

Since we are still waiting on a response from Amita regarding the 'legality'
issue of offering Hong Kong Products, I have not made the necessary changes
to the Australia static data components nor have I 'squirrelled' the AUS
products. Once the go ahead has been given, we will release the ticker item,
update the AUS Static Data components, secret squirrel the AUD Products, and
move the Hong Kong Products into Active in the Product Manager.

In the interim, please feel free to amend the Hong Kong Products that I added
and add the additional Products that you may need.

Dale
3-9746

From: Paul Smith@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/10/2000 01:05 PM ZE10
To: Dale Neuner@ECT
cc: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Hong Kong Weather Products

Dale,

I can't see the HK Weather Products in Stack, Product or Data Manager. This
may be to do with my permissioning. In the absense of Justin, can you pls
check.

Regards,
Paul


Note:  With Dynegy as anchor, NGPL is planning on building a lateral into St.
Louis for the first time.  MRT (a Reliant pipeline)
has been the only pipeline into this market.

NGPL Plans Lateral to Serve Illinois Power in St. Louis

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America (NGPL) announced plans to build a new
47-mile, 24-inch diameter pipeline lateral into St. Louis to serve Illinois
Power's gas distribution system. The $35 million project, which is anchored
by a contract with Illinois Power affiliate Dynegy Marketing and Trade, will
add at least 300,000 Dth/d of gas transportation capacity to the St. Louis
market.

"The pipeline project and related agreements ideally demonstrate our ongoing
strategy to expand our natural gas pipeline services into growing markets
currently not connected to NGPL and to increase throughput on our system by
adding electric load to our extensive pipeline network," said Richard D.
Kinder, CEO of Kinder Morgan Inc., the parent company of NGPL.

The new lateral will extend from Centralia, IL, to a point on Illinois
Power's gas distribution system in the East St. Louis market. The project is
scheduled for completion in June of 2002.

NGPL and Dynegy entered into a number of long-term, gas transportation and
storage contracts, including a 10-year agreement effective June 1, 2002,
which will provide Dynegy with 90,000 Dth/d of gas via the new pipeline. In
addition, NGPL and Dynegy entered into various other firm transportation
agreements totaling another 98,000 Dth/d of gas sourced from NGPL's Gulf
Coast and Amarillo lines beginning as early as Dec. 1, 2000.

The NGPL project effectively creates a new supplier for a geographical area
that until now has been served by just one natural gas transportation company
[Mississippi River Transmission], according to Larry F. Altenbaumer,
president of Illinois Power. "This new connection to Illinois Power's system
will help open competitive opportunities to natural gas customers in the
metro east area of St. Louis. It not only provides for a new delivery point
to service customers directly, but also to fuel electric generation in the
area.

"The 10-year agreement to provide firm transportation service to Dynegy
provides us a solid anchor customer for the pipeline project," said Deb
Macdonald, president of NGPL. NGPL intends to solicit expressions of interest
from other shippers in December and January. The results of the open season
will determine the final scope of the project.

"With Dynegy as our anchor customer, we will build the new lateral into the
St. Louis market regardless of whether we receive other expressions of
interest," said Macdonald. "We anticipate a strong response, however, given
the size of the market and the potential for additional gas-fired power
generation."

Interested shippers should contact Mark Menis, NGPL's director of business
development, at (630) 691-3347.


The agenda for the August 31 Distributed Generation Meeting has been posted
to the ISO Website at http://www.caiso.com/meetings/. In order to insure
sufficient space and food, please RSVP to Sue Happ either by phone at
916-608-7059 or by e-mail to shapp@caiso.com. by August 29th. Thanks!

Don Fuller
Director, Client Relations
California ISO
916-608-7055
dfuller@caiso.com


Governor's May Revise includes $5.4 million  transfer to the General Fund in
the DOJ to "expand the Energy Task Force  investigation ... to provide
additional resources for the AG to investigate and  prosecute cases of
alleged market manipulation by energy suppliers and to  litigate pending
legal actions involving energy suppliers and  marketers."

Chris Micheli, Esq.
Carpenter Snodgrass  & Associates
1201 K Street, Suite 710
Sacramento, CA?  95814
(916) 447-2251
FAX: (916) 445-5624
EMAIL: cmicheli@carpentersnodgrass.com


Whew!! Your schedule makes me tired!  I am sure that Brigeda is happy that
you are involved in so many activities with her school - and then on the
other hand, sometimes you wonder if they notice!  Work sounds crazy for you,
but how nice that you will be off from December 21 until the 2nd.

I hope that make it over the week before Christmas.  The week is kind of
crazy for us, so I am trying to find a time that will work.  Sunday the 17th
we are having a dessert party at our house, inviting neighbors, old Huntwick
friends, etc.  It is for families, and Meagan and Amanda each included 4 of
their friends in the invitiation list, along with their familities.  It will
be multi-generational - I hope fun, as it would be a nice tradition to
continue.  On Monday, I think that David plans to take Tyler and Amanda to
Longview for a visit.  A commitment that Meagan and I have to sort toys at
Northwest Assistance Ministries from 12:30 to 4:00 that day has excused us
from the trip.  So it may be best for Meagan and me to drive over to Austin
after 4:00 on Monday.  We could be back by the time David and company return
to Houston on Tuesday afternoon.  Wednesday we have matinee tickets to see A
Christmas Carol at the Alley  Theater, sans Tyler.  Thursday I am having all
of my girls in NCL over to wrap gifts for the family that we have adopted for
Christmas and then we will deliver the presents.  And Friday is Tyler's
birthday, with a 102 Dalmation theme planned (cake ordered from RJ Goodies,
but nothing else done yet!).  So I really think that our only shot to make it
to Austin is for Monday night, which would mean only Meagan and me.

I talked with Mom last night and invited Dad and her to Houston for
Christmas.  I don't really think that they will come, but if they do, I hope
that doesn't mess up your Christmas.  They have only been here for one or two
Christmases with us since we have had kids.  I think that Tyler at 3 this
year will be particularly enthralled.  And next year they will have 2
grandchildren in Austin, so it just seemed that this could be a good year for
them to come.  She said she would think about it, and I told her that I
wanted her to know that we would love to have them, but that it was perfectly
okay if they decided that they did not want to come.

How about Dad playing golf this week?  What a difference!! I am so glad that
he is doing better.

I hear you about Mom.  I think that a blow-up or some drama is highly
predictable, unfortunately.  She seems to do that a lot at special occassions
for Cara, doesn't she?  I will certainly help in any way I can.  And I will
be very interested in the gosipy details.

Happy baking!    I do have to make 5 batches of fudge tonight and tomorrow
night so that I can attend a cookie exchange luncheon on Saturday armed with
27 packages of fudge.

"Cindy White" <cwhite@viviance.com> on 12/07/2000 09:25:44 AM
To: <Sally.Beck@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Baby Shower

Got your message last night--sorry I missed you--must have been in the
shower.  We are all going nuts here, too.  We have a huge deadline here at
work.  But I worked most of last weekend so am ahead of the curve.  Good
thing, since I have volunteered to be Martha Stewart at many school events
this week and next.  LAst night was "lessons and carols" by the school
choir--with me decorating, baking, and coordinating.  Today I go to school
to make Christmas stockings with the kids--Sunday is the school Christmas
Bazaar at the Four Seasons--need to bring an item for the bake sale.  Also
need to start baking 12 gingerbread houses for Brigeda's class.    Did find
a matching mold to the smaller one we have so I can at least bake two at
once--twelve bakes is MUCH better than 24!  And then there is that dollhouse
that needs my attention by the 25!

I am totally ok with us not doing the shower.  We get credit for offering
but don't have to do anything.  Both money and time are in such short supply
for me that it works out for the best.  At work we start on a contract for
Dell in January.  The company is also going to pay for Java programming
classes for some of us (if I can nail this down then I can jump up to a
programmer level on that pay scale).  I also have a private contract job
with a needlepoint store in Memphis to setup their website.

Am somewhat concerned that Mother will have one of her dramas when Cara's
baby comes...you know she will get her feelings hurt somehow.  Not to
mention the fact that she will be sharing the grandchild with "the most
selfish woman on earth."  Richard and Brigeda went out to the Lowrimore farm
(they sold it and offered us all of the firewood).  Jane couldn't have been
sweeter to Brigeda--spent a lot of time with her.  Can just imagine that
"pained" look in Mother's face at the hospital.  If you are not here may
need you to carry your cell phone so I can call for moral support--or at
least give you gossipy updates on the drama....

Are you planning to come later this month when you are off?  I'm taking off
the 21st and 22nd--they have given all of the technical production staff the
days between Christmas and New Years as comp time so I will be off until the
2nd...

Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Sally.Beck@enron.com [mailto:Sally.Beck@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:51 PM
To: 'cwhite@viviance.com'
Subject: Baby Shower

Well, she declined our kind offer, didn't she?  As busy as life is between
work and home for me right now, I can't say that it will bother me too much
to attend a shower where someone else makes the finger sandwiched and
punch!  Do be on the look out for the perfect pack of diaper pins.  I
noticed some at a rack at Randall's the other day... (Just kidding!)

Hope you all are doing fine.  I was on jury duty three days last week -
really interesting, but totally screwed up my schedule at work.  I have
been doing double-time to try to catch up, especially since I plan to be
off the week of December 18th.


Please find attached the current copy of the EnronOnline Weekly Public Report
and Key Messages, including slides and statistics for public consumption.
The information contained in the attachments can be communicated to audiences
outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent
message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone
in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the
company.

This report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone presentation, nor
that all the information be used in a single presentation or customer
communication.


Here are the questions from Allegheny regarding Gleason.
Ben
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000
07:22 PM ---------------------------

"Irwin, Thomas J." <TIRWIN@alleghenyenergy.com> on 10/19/2000 06:59:46 PM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>
cc: "'mitch.robinson@enron.com'" <mitch.robinson@enron.com>, "Stang, H. Roy"
<hstang@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Lapcevic, Joseph P."
<JLAPCEV@alleghenyenergy.com>, "Pezze, Thomas A."
<TPEZZE@alleghenyenergy.com>, "'paul.f.burton@ssmb.com'"
<paul.f.burton@ssmb.com>
Subject: ENRON -- Information requests resulting from Gleason site visit

The following requests resulted from our site visit to Gleason Plant on
October 19, 2000:
1. Regarding the three CTs purchased and installed at Gleason, when was
the reservation agreement signed?
2. Please provide CD with Construction Drawings and Plot Plan
identified on DealBench.  Please include Seimens drawings.
3. Please point out in DealBench or provide separate the documents that
contain operating budget for Gleason.  Discussions identified a year 2000
budget versus actual report and a 2001 draft budget.  These two would be
adequate.
4. Please provide engineering details of RTU module and associated
equipment used for plant dispatch.
5. Please provide the O&M contract with Operational Energy Corporation.
6. Please provide water chemistry analysis for wells or identify
document on DealBench.
7. Please provide lease on property with Industrial Development Board.
8. Please provide any available information on Westinghouse contract.
9. Please provide chart and guarantee curves for CTs.
10. Please provide your calculations supporting the 915 hour annual
operating limit.
11. Please identify equivalent starts for each CT.
12. Please provide copy of standard operating procedure for the plant.
13. Please provide hydrological studies on aquifer used for plant water.
Please provide forecast of Price volatility for ECAR, TVA, and M


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 02/23/2001 04:53 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	02/23/2001 04:18 PM

		 To: IEP <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Governor Davis Announces Principles of Agreement with SCE

Jan will be responding to the attached remarks by Governor Davis during the
IEP press call at 3:00 PST.  Call in # is 1-800-374-2393, Pass code:
Independent Energy Producers.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

PR01:065
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
02/23/2001 02:05 PM

GOVERNOR DAVIS ANNOUNCES PRINCIPLES OF AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON

LOS ANGELES

Governor Gray Davis today announced an agreement in principle with Southern
California Edison to keep the utility solvent.

"This is the framework of a good, balanced deal," said Governor Davis. "It's
not a final deal. There's a lot of work to be done. But we're making
progress.

"This is a complex transaction with a lot of moving parts. With these terms
in place, I'm confident we'll be able to hammer out a final agreement
shortly."

The State has agreed to purchase the utility's transmission lines for an
estimated $2.76 billion (2.3 times estimated book value) and allow Edison to
issue bonds for a substantial portion of its undercollection.

In exchange, Southern California Edison has agreed to:

*    Make payments from its parent company, Edison International, to the
utility of approximately $420 million;
*    Commit the entire output of the parent company's Sunrise Mission power
project at low "cost-based" rates for 10 years (a value to ratepayers of
$500 million over the next two years);
*    Provide cost-based rates from the generating facilities they own for
another 10 years;
*    Conservation easements on 20,000 acres of watershed lands for 99 years;
and
*    Drop their pending litigation against the Public Utilities Commission
that would have resulted in immediate higher electric rates for consumers if
they had prevailed in court.

Negotiations will continue during the next several days with the utility.

###


I wanted to update you on my conversation this morning with Mark Lindsay
regarding next week,s budget meeting.

The format will be similar to last year,s.  We,ll be receiving from Mark,s
group a consolidated spreadsheet of all of our budgets, grouping them by
functionality and illustrating 2000 plan, 2000 estimate, and 2001 plan, and
the variances between.  We will be covering the EPSC and Aviation budgets
during the same meeting.  Billie and I will get together on Friday to compare
what the two of us have so far, and then we have a meeting set up for Monday
morning with you, Bill, Billie and me to go over everything in advance of
Tuesday,s meeting.

Points that Mark made (no surprises here):
-  Jeff has mentioned that he wants to see reductions in all corporate cost
centers since our international activities look like they,re going away.  (We
have made significant reductions year to year on our international gov,t
affairs and PR budgets, and I think we can justify that the other cost
centers are primarily focused on domestic activities while the individual
business units budget much of those activities themselves.)
-  Even though we,re allocating more overall to the business units this year,
Jeff will be interested in the gross budget numbers, before any allocations.
-  We need to be able to explain any significant budget changes year to year
 -  Mark particularly emphasized the increase in the PR budget, most of which
is retained at Corp anyway
 -  We need to be able to explain anything that we,ve inherited from the
business units that is now staying at Corp.  This  applies to the headcount
that we,ve picked up from ENA and from Int,l (Dennis, group).

Lindsay mentioned that there,s a possibility that Causey may, in advance of
our Tuesday meeting, meet by himself with Skilling to get a general idea of
where Jeff stands on the corporate budgets as they,ve been submitted so far,
and then come back to us with instructions on any changes that need to be
made.  If this is the case, we may have to make cuts before we get to present
our case.

I'm working on our presentation based on that conversation and will forward
it to you as it progresses.


Sounds like a good plan to me!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:53 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

when we get upstairs

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:53 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

when?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

ill let you know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

What are we going to do next week?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:51 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

yeah i think so, we will make it next week, if you are going to leave any earlier let me know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:50 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I probably won't be able to leave until 4. I'm sure you'll be gone by then.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:49 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

im not sure yet, let me know what you are doing

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:48 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

When are you leaving today?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:48 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

i hope you can figure it out, let me know if you need help

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I wish! I've been sitting here trying to figure out how I can see you today.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:45 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:	RE:

is it next week yet

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rybarski, Amanda
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:44 AM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

Well then I guess I'm going to have to wear them more often.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, February 01, 2002 11:42 AM
To:	Rybarski, Amanda
Subject:

i like the glasses


Hoecker is in San Diego today and tomorrow (congressional hearings followed
by a FERC conference Tuesday). I will touch base with his staff on Tuesday
and ask him on Thursday after the regular D.C. FERC Meeting. I'll also get
started with Markey. Note that Markey, Barton, and Hoecker as well may not
want to sit on a Panel - they may demand speaking positions.

FYI - NARUC has some overlap with a couple of our potential second tier
speakers.  I got the names on background and can't list them until Chuck
Gray at NARUC has confirmed that they've been invited. Will follow up on
that in a couple days.  NARUC has its Electricity Committee meetings on
Monday, with plenary sessions on electricity on Tuesday morning (lessons
from California on state restructuring policy; Order 2000; consumer
wlelfare/response issues) and Wednesday morning (supply side responses to
price spikes, if my notes are correct).

One balance issue we haven't discussed that may help Bill - Gary Neale of
NiSource is current chairman of the NERC (North American Electric
Reliability Council Board of Trustees). Do we want a speaker who will
provide a focus on reliability issues - I think its a missing piece in our
plan (akin to leaving out NTSB and FAA out of a conference on airline
restructuring). See http://www.nerc.com/about/chairman.html

Allen Mosher
Director of Policy Analysis
American Public Power Association
2301 M Street NW
Washington, DC 20037
Voice:  202-467-2944
Fax: 202-467-2992
amosher@APPAnet.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gramlr@pjm.com [SMTP:gramlr@pjm.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 8:07 AM
> To: AMosher@appanet.org; whederman@columbiaenergygroup.com;
> doornbos@socrates.berkeley.edu; hcameron@uclink.berkeley.edu;
> lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu; jeff.dasovich@enron.com;
> shapiro@haas.berkeley.edu; borenste@haas.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Update on Energy Summit:  speakers rolling in
>
> So far no one has declined, and everyone is interested.  Lynch is in,
> Littlechild is interested, Harris is interested. Allen, could you work on
> Hoecker and Markey?  I'll see what I can find out about Markey and Barton.
>
> Lee is making progress on a few more fundraising avenues so GSPP will
> handle
> that.
>
> We'll need to figure out our next tier of speakers soon.  I want to make
> sure
> that all of you have all the information you want but I'm getting the
> sense that
> conference calls are too time-consuming.   What if I give a weekly update
> and
> you can all respond to the group if you choose? I think our last call
> established a vision of the conference and the rest is day-to-day
> management for
> which we don't need a committee meeting.  I would suggest one modification
> of
> the vision, though.  We need a little better balance of policy
> perspectives to
> make sure we get the real decision-makers.  To modify the GSPP motto, we
> can
> speak truth with power better if we add a couple big players like Rep.
> Barton
> who is an important figure with conservative views.  I think the
> conference
> would be more interesting, attract more of an audience and more
> sponsorship, and
> make more progress.  Comments?  I may be out of town the next couple days
> so you
> won't hear from me.
> Rob
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Malcolm, Kim [SMTP:kim@cpuc.ca.gov]
> > Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 8:28 PM
> > To: 'gramlr@pjm.com'; Malcolm, Kim
> > Cc: lfried@uclink4.berkeley.edu
> > Subject: RE: Energy Summit
> >
> > Rob, Thanks for the detail -- the Commissioner is very interested in
> speaking
> > and she appears to be available that day.  Please call Charlene Lundy at
> 415
> > 7032444.  And let's talk soon --
> >
> >

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager at postmaster@APPAnet.org.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.

**********************************************************************


A document entitled "Third Party Connection:  Customer Profile" showed up in
my inter-office mail.
What is this in relation to?  What company?  Who requested?   Why?
Thanks.  Sara


Dear Suzanne,

I'm sorry for the delay in returning your e-mail.  We're catching up now
after taking some time off over the holidays.

Unfortunately, due to Jeff's travel schedule, a meeting in January or even
early February is not feasible.  I would be happy to schedule a meeting in
late February or early March if that timing works for you.  Please call me
should you wish to proceed on that basis.

Thank you and regards,
Sherri Sera
Assistant to Jeff Skilling
713.853.5984
713.646.8381 (fax)
sherri.sera@enron.com

"Everbach, Suzanne" <everbach@mail.cox.smu.edu> on 12/18/2000 12:35:55 PM
To: "'jeff.skilling@enron.com'" <jeff.skilling@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Congratulations/January Meeting

Dear Jeff,

Congratulations on being named Enron's new Chief Executive Officer.  What an
outstanding and well-deserved accomplishment.

Cary Maguire and Dean Niemi would like to make a trip to Houston in January
to visit with you if your schedule permits.  Cary is particularly interested
in touring the trading floor.  Would you please let me know if you would be
willing to meet with them and, if so, when the best time would be?  Thank
you.

Also, Liz Williams, SMU's Treasurer, met with Bart Schachter of Blueprint
several weeks ago.  She said his fund looks like a good opportunity.  She
shared with me that even though SMU is currently over its allocation to
venture and private equity and has therefore slowed down on new commitments,
the University's investment advisor is evaluating Blueprint.  She also told
me that decisions on venture and private equity can often take quite awhile.
I will keep you posted on any further developments that I learn.

Warm regards,

Suzanne

Suzanne Hebert Everbach
Major Gifts Director
Capital Campaign Officer
Cox School of Business
Southern Methodist University
214-768-2776
Fax 214-768-3713
everbach@mail.smu.edu


in

From:  Bryan Hull
02/07/2001 08:19 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Denver
Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, reagan_mathews@enron.net, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Game at 8

Our game is at 8. Let me know if you are in or out.


Chris:
Here is a draft copy of the list of companies that we are thinking about
sending information to regarding the 2000 Peakers as well as the development
sites.  Please let me or Don Miller know if you have any comments.  Thanks!
Ben


Hi Jeff -- The West gas desk (Janie Tholt and Mike Grisby) have asked to receive more information about what is going on in the California gas side (for example, updates on the intrastate infrastructure issues, etc.).  Do you mind sending them some periodic updates and ccing our gas group (Leslie Lawner, Becky Cantrell, Melinda Pharms, Jim Steffes, and me)?  Thanks!  Christi


i would categorize things in the following manner:

day ahead markets we want bid information (e.g., ancillary service markets,
transmission markets, generation adjustment bids, load adjustment bids,
import adjustment bids, export adjustment bids), initial preferred schedules,
final schedules.
hour ahead markets we want the same thing.
real time market we want bid information, beep dispatch instructions.
after the fact we want actual meter information to get actual unit by unit
production and load zone consumption.
per bob badeer, we want to see transmission information broken down between
new firm use and existing transmission contracts.  we need adjustment bids,
day ahead schedules, hour ahead schedules, real time adjustments, actual
flows, and transmission availability by category of ownership (etcs, nfu).
we want this for all transmission lines.
unit outage information.  planned outages and forced outages.
rmr calls.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tim Belden/HOU/ECT on 08/01/2000 06:14 AM
---------------------------
From: Robert Badeer on 07/31/2000 04:05 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: information from iso

Jeff,
 Tim told me to put together a list of inormation we would want from the ISO.
As a general rule, we want all information released. Here are some of the
highlights:

1.  ETC schedules on each transmission line (both DA and HA). We want to see
the ETC schedules at the same time they are submitted to the ISO on the
following paths:
 a. path 15
 b. path 26
 c. nw1
 d. nw3
 e. az2
 f. az3
 g. lc1

2. Actual flows on each path. (real time flows)

3. How many mw's get cut on each path DA? i.e. how many mw's are adjustment
bid out of the stack

4. Intrazonal Cong
 a. What paths have intra-zonal cong
 b. How many mw's flow, how many get cut on a DA/HA basis

5. BEEP stack

6. All load and generation bids DA by SC

7. Real time production from each plant


Hi Jim
Per our telecon. Pls call me upon reading and we'll discuss the fwd path
Regards
sunil
---------------------- Forwarded by Sunil Deshmukh/AIGTC/US on 05/24/2001
01:51 PM ---------------------------

Sunil Deshmukh on 05/21/2001 03:07:54 PM

To:   wade_doshier@enron.net
cc:
Subject:  Solution to the Enron's dabhol Power Plant Situation

Hi Wade
It was nice catching up on the old stuff.
Attached, pls find the summary of my thoughts on the subject. As time is of
the essence, I am confident, I can structure a solution that will be
satisfactory to all parties and fulfils your objective.
Pls run this by Jeff and other key people . I wud like to present my
solution to them.
As I mentioned, Ambassador Wisner is fully supportive of my efforts and we
can find a way that works

Regards
sunil

Sunil Deshmukh
MD, Structured Transactions
AIG Energy Trqding
203-861-3804 W
203-322-0546 H

---------------------- Forwarded by Sunil Deshmukh/AIGTC/US on 05/21/2001
02:52 PM ---------------------------

Sunil Deshmukh on 05/11/2001 12:23:08 PM

To:   jserra@attglobal.net
cc:
Subject:  Solution to the Enron's dabhol Power Plant Situation

Hi Jeff

I have the following thoughts for a clean solution to the Dabhol Power
Plant situation

Background

Locals:

Local govt in the State of Maharashtra wants to squeeze them by  forcing
them to keep the plant operating but refusing to pay  [ standard Chinese
torture in the 3rd world when the real pain starts after you part with the
money and stuck in the tar pit]

The Central govt characters were previously involved with the "fast track"
approval ,  are now hesitant to help out for the fear of political damage .

The elctricity is now too expensive for the locals due to $/Rupee and Oil
Price hit per the original contract that locals signed and did not hedge!

This has become an unpopular political football with prior champions
running for cover, so only bad things will come out of it if the agony
prolongs

Enron:

Enron has made a paradygm shift from physical to intellectual assets, so
the  India Powe Plant  does not fit the forward path

This is an example of "how not to do things" as it was done with highest
profile and  with open involvement of political Mafia, involving  broad
allegations of corruption and highly unusual approval and guarantee
process. Enron does not need this "Tar Baby" any more

If they get rid of this problem, the stock is likely to go up 10 % , a
better arbitrage for getting rid of this liability

AIG:

Ambassador Wisner, Vice Chairman of AIG was the US Ambassador to India
during this period and knows all the cast of characters  and the situation
well. He is also the President of the Indo-American Chamber of Commerce and
is trying to reconcile the situation. Since he is wearing 2 hats, he does
not want to approach Enron for a role in getting rid of this liability. I
have discussed this issue with him at length

I am the only person who knows ALL the cast of characters involved in this
drama very well. I have met Ken as we were keynote speakers at a conference
and later met in NY for personal chat. Jeff  gave me a personal tour of the
trading floor when he was the head of trading at Enron and I was head of
trading at Citibank.. Sanjay Bhatnagar, their previous  India man whio
worked closely with Rebecca is also known to me .
 Additionally, I personally know the current Chief Minister of the State of
maharashtra, Vilasrao Deshmukh, all the Left Front partners, Mr Pawar who
initially approved the deal as the previous Chief Minister. I also know  Mr
Munde and Mr Thakare, the two politicians who approved the expansion of
this project when they were in power. Current minister in charge of the
Power Portfolio is also a friend of mine. My contacts with all of these
people were developed over the past 10-20 years and  are on a close
personal basis; hence, I have a neutral, trusted position with all
concerned

I have close contact with Reliance  and  Tatas and personally  discussed
this situaton with the owners during my trip to Bombay last week. As you
know, nothing gets done there without Reliance's blessings

Solution;

If Enron empoweres me, I  can negotiate a clean break in this situation
that will be mutually beneficial and free up the management's energies to
focus on the main business. Ambassador Wisner is  fully supportive of this,
as he just does not want to take personal  initiative for the reasons of
apparent confliict of interest .

I can broker political and business peace with a clean sale of assets to
the locals or their nominees at a fair market value. Enron , being a
"merchant-operator', understands the concept of "mark-to-market" valuation
better than anyone else

This is more of a negotiated solution, brokered by a skillful negotiator
with "East-West" skills and connections rather than an M&A transaction

The lenders' interests are not aligned with those of Enron and a separate
peace needs to be brokered  with the locals, if they so desire

Dealing with the burocrats with politicians playing " puppeteers" in the
background will cause further "quicksand" effect

Time is of the essence as this is akin to the "perishable goods" problem

I wud like to get together with the key  decision makers on the Enron side
to present this view

You know my professional background and qualification and I feel very
confident that I am the only person in the unique position to extricate all
concerned with  the ability to forge a fair solution

Sunil Deshmukh:

Education- MS Chem Engg, MBA, JD, Licences to practice law in the US

Experience-- MD Structured Transactions, AIG Energy, Greenwich, CT

                           Previously, MD and Head, Global Commodity
Derivatives  Business , Citibank, NY
                                                  Head,  Crude Oil Trading,
Louis Dreyfus, Wilton, CT
                                                  Sr Trader, J. Aron, NY
                                                  Worked for BP and Exxon

Regards
sunil

***************************************************************************
Important:

This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information
intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged,
confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication may be subject
to legal restriction or sanction.  Please notify us immediately of any
unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any
copies.
***************************************************************************


Daren,

FYI.  Per our discussion, the following nominations were revised on EOG
Resources:

Meter #  Orig Nom Rev Nom Deal #

5263  4,755  5,820  126355
6067  3,726  4,600  126281
6748  2,005  3,300  126360
6742  4,743  10,120  126365
6296  5,733  2,300  126281

Bob

Daren J Farmer
05/31/2000 05:51 PM
To: Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Revised Nomination - June, 2000

Bob,

Go ahead and accept the nom revision.  I believe that this is with PGE, not
El Paso.  How do the rest of our noms compare with EOG?  I f they have a
higher volume at another meter than we do, I would like to increase our nom
there.  In effect, I want to keep our physical index position as close as
possible to what we have in the system now.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Cotten                           05/31/2000 04:04 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised Nomination - June, 2000

Daren,

Charlotte Hawkins is having trouble confirming the volume of 5,733 with El
Paso.  El Paso will not confirm the volume that high.  EOG revised their
nomination as follows:

C/P Name Meter #  Orig Nom Rev Nom

EOG Res. 6296  5,733  2,300

Will you approve revising the volume in Unify down to 2,300?  Please advise.
Thanks.

Bob


Vince:

Attached please find my resume.

Thanks,

Ding
6-7072


Charlotte,
I forgot to call you this past weekend regarding Michael. He has an
appointment with Sharon Tuesday and Paige is taking him for me. I'm taking
my mom to the doctor Tuesday morning so I will be out of the office in the
am. If you are open Saturday I may try to take Kay out Saturday night. NM


The language that I sent in yesterday's draft is what we agreed.  I made the
same point you raised - that consent wasn't relevant.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           12/11/2000 08:09 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ross Newlin/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas
on, et.al.

Kay -

No way.  My reading of the contract indicates that they can't withhold
approval anyway.  Did they bring this up in Friday's conference call?

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000
08:07 AM ---------------------------

DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKrey@swpc.siemens.com> on 12/08/2000 12:07:47 PM
To: "Mitch Robinson (E-mail)" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>
cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com>, Saugstad Kathryn
<Kathryn.Saugstad@swpc.siemens.com>

Subject: FW: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re Gleas
on, et.al.

Mitch
SWPC requests that revision below be incorporated

Lynn DeKrey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saugstad Kathryn
> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 11:47 AM
> To: DeKrey Lynn
> Cc: Monahan Bill
> Subject: The proposed letter agreement between SWPC and Enron re
> Gleason, et.al.
>
>
> Lynn:
>
> I have compared the latest version of the settlement agreement provided by
> Enron  . . . . . . . . .  We do want to have approval on the assignments.
> Granted, SWPC will not unreasonably withhold the approval but, we need to
> keep this ability.
>
> Thus, Paragraph 5 should read:
>
> SWPC agrees that the Gleason and Wheatland contracts and associated
> warranties may be assigned to limited liability companies owned in whole
> or in part by an Enron entity pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
> Gleason and Wheatland contracts, and that SWPC's consent to such
> assignments will not be unreasonably withheld.  SWPC will honor warranty
> claims currently outstanding or asserted in the future by the contract
> assignee, assuming such assignment is in accordance with the terms and
> conditions of the Gleason and Wheatland contracts.
>
>
>


Hi Sara, attached, as per your request, is a copy of the most updated list.

Reminder that if you do not receive a copy, you can always go into the legal directory and get it.  Look in o:\legal\CNelson\brokerage agreements -status reports.  Then, note that the name of each document reflects the date it was created.  So, the doc below was done last week on May 23rd.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693
http://gss.enron.com/


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/31/2001
11:46 AM ---------------------------

Vincent Tang <tang_vincent@yahoo.com> on 03/30/2001 08:22:11 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Recommendation letter

Hi, Dear Vince,

How is everything going?

I wonder if you have had a chance to write me the
recommendation letter yet.  The application deadline
is coming up.  If you need any more information for
writing the letter, please let me know.  Thanks for
the help.

Best Regards,

Vincent

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text


Steve,

Thank you for the diagram and sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
We are evaluating how Merchants Exchange and Enron could work together
and will contact you when we are ready to move the dialogue forward.

Thanks,
Andy Zipper


Hi All,

Just wanted to take a minute to thank each of you for celebrating my birthday with me. I was in a bit of a mood yesterday, but dinner with all of you last night really helped me to enjoy the day.

Thanks so much,
Lisa


Great Southern Energy is approved but as a Statutory Entity there are legal
restrictions on it trading other than Australian power or weather

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 19/04/2001 07:43 AM CST
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: EOL approvals, 04-18-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2001 08:43 AM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	04/18/2001 05:27 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'day/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa
Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 04-18-01

Please see attached.


i nailed this mother. unfort reduced my short on the f#$% aga and didnt
replace enuf shorts. more lost opportunity than anything. but gamma long and
vol length worked well. i called the break out  luckily but conservatively.
   not much hope i dont think-need hurricane shutins to avoid phys problems.
i think the phys problem come a bit earlier. last half sep when we get over
2.8 tcf. ratchets shud come in to impact by then. i hope we get to 2.50 or
less on spot-then have a n unbeleivably cold winter so next summer has a
chance. cuz man if its warm nov and dec-natgas gonna suck for alonfg time.
but then thatll help my petro positions at least.
  i think the downside put shorts shud be gettiung very very nervous. and
ther eshud be alot of them

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 10:38 PM
To: LaFontaine, Steve
Subject: RE: rumours

wow, i missed this move.  didnt realize one number meant a 30%+ swing in
the price of natty.  then again, i don't know why i'm surpirsed.  this is
one market that can overreact.  trade extremely bearish here. have a hard
time seeing a strong bidweek.  i'm looking for a bull case and having a
hard time finding one.  think we have physical problems in oct?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


A pipeline meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, March 27, 2002 from
9:00am-3:00pm at CMS Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line to discuss FERC Order
RM96-1-019 that was issued on 3/11/2002.

Date:          3/27/2002
Time:          9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Location: CMS Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
          5444 Westheimer, Houston, 77056
          Please check in with the 7th floor receptionist.

Conference calling will be available.  Please send me an email letting me
know if you will attend in person or via conference call.

Also, attached is a document that I sent out internally after the NOPR was
issued late last year.  It was intended as a status report on where we left
off in GISB on the issue of partial day / intraday recalls.  I am attaching
this document as it may be a helpful reminder of where we left off.  The
document also contains links to the GISB EC 12/2000 recommendation form,
the 12/8/2000 pipeline comments, the 12/14/2000 EC minutes, and AGA Reply
to the 2/1/2001 GISB Report to FERC.  Please let me know if you have any
questions about the document or links.

I will be attending NAESB WGQ meetings at CIG next week.  I can be reach at
713-598-2946.  I will also check my email frequently.  Thanks...k

(See attached file: INGAA Status of NOPR RM96-1-019 and History of Recall
Issue.doc)

Kim Van Pelt
GISB Coordinator
CMS Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
(713)989-7354
kvanpelt@cmsenergy.com


This request has been pending approval for  12 days and you are the alternate.  Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000037058&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000037058
Approver            : stinson.gibner@enron.com
Request Create Date : 5/24/01 1:27:34 PM
Requested For       : schiavone.paul@enron.com
Resource Name       : \\enehou\houston\common\Research - [Read/Write]
Resource Type       : Directory


Ingrid's Dr.


Kevin,

FYI-Rogers and I are meeting with Janet this afternoon regarding the LSE situation.  This is the presentation I put together for the meeting.  Just wanted to give you a heads up in case it filters back to you.

-Joe


has a 4yr TB Gelding $3500
@ Harmon Stables --- 249 to Phillips 66 station and turn left


Hi there,

I suggest a brief status call tomorrow at 100 central to assess where we are
and what we need to finish.  How does this time work for everyone?

Thanks,

Kay


Dynegydirect will be unavailable beginning at 3:00pm today for system
maintenance.  The system will not be taken down until 3:30pm to allow for
completion of daily reports, etc. We request that you please log out of the
system while we are performing maintenance.  Dynegydirect will be available
tomorrow, January 16, during normal business hours starting at 2:00am until
6:30pm. Should you have questions, please contact eCare at 713.767.5000 or
1.877.396.3493.

Dynegydirect  e-Care
Dynegy Inc.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800
Houston, Texas 77002

E-mail:
e-care@dynegydirect.com

Phone:
North America 877.396.3493
United Kingdom 0800.169.6591
International  +1.713.767.5000

Fax:
North America 877.396.3492
United Kingdom 0800.169.6615
International  +1.713.388.6002


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Ted C Bland                           08/31/2000 01:29 PM

To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Billy Lemmons/Corp/Enron@ENRON, George
McCormick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daniel Reck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stacey Dempsey/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: ENA Analyst and Associate "Brownbag" Presentations

Thanks for helping out.  Below is Dave's memo explaining the purpose of the
program and abrief outline for the presentations.  If you have any questions
please call me at 3-5275.  Also, attached is the tentative schedule with each
presenter.  We will fill in any  blanks.  Ted

---------------------- Forwarded by Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT on 08/31/2000 01:20
PM ---------------------------

	From:  David W Delainey                           08/29/2000 02:09 PM

Sent by: Kay Chapman
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Raymond Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, C John
Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON, Beth
Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wes Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rodney
Malcolm/HOU/ECT@ECT, George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jere C
Overdyke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean
Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mollie Gustafson/PDX/ECT@ECT, Felicia Doan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ina
Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christy Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tina Rode/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marsha
Schiller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lillian Carroll/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tonai
Lehr/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicole Mayer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darlene C
Forsyth/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela
McCulloch/CAL/ECT@ECT, Pilar Cerezo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Cherylene R
Westbrook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Tijerina/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nicki
Daw/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stella L Ely/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ana
Alcantara/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angie Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Baker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted C Bland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim O'Rourke/Corp/Enron@Enron,
David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonna Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: ENA Analyst and Associate "Brownbag" Presentations

It is the intent of the Office of the Chairman to maintain a high quality
flow of Analysts and Associates rotating through Enron North America as well
as provide them with up to date information on all the potential rotations in
ENA.  Additionally, we would like to provide the ENA AA's a forum for your
respective groups to promote your business unit as a viable alternative in
the rotation process.  I need your assistance for this endeavor and want your
respective business unit to participate in the process by delivering an
informal presentation to the AA group which should include the following:

Your business unit's current activities, purpose and interfaces with other
departments
Recent successes and current projects
Ideas on the horizon
Opportunities in your business unit for AA's
The benifits of rotation in your business unit
An open Q&A session

These presentations should be informal and it is not necessary to have
handouts.  The goal is to provide an open forum for the AA's and to have them
ask questions about each business unit.  Also, bringing one of your current
AA's with you to provide their insight might help stimulate discussion.  Ted
Bland will be contacting you to schedule your business unit for a
presentation.  The first "brownbag" will take place September 8 between
12:00pm and 1:00pm in Room 30 C1.

Dave


Vicky,

Sounds like they've been working you to hard.  You certainly deserve a
vacation.  I would like to hear about your adventures overseas.  My address
is as follows:

   Andy Lewis
   3131 Timmons Ln
   Apt. 1010
   Houston, TX  77027

I got a letter from Diem with their new London address.  I figure I'll give
them a month or so to move in  before I look into visiting.  Of course,
getting time off in this job is easier said than done.  Anyway, enjoy your
trip, and I look forward to hearing from you.

-Andy


I have made reservations for Jason's Bachelor Party.  You are the chosen few.  The cruise is set for Sat. Jan 19 at 7 pm out of Freeport.  Transportation will be arranged for you.  We need to leave at about 5 pm on the 19th.  I will arrange a meeting place and relay it to you in a future e-mail.  The final tally will be $32 a person. I have paid for this already so you can reimburse me on the 19th and I can promptly blow all of that money on gambling.  Sadly, the gourmet dinner was not available on the Freeport cruise so we will have to suffer through a buffet dinner.

Let me know if you have any questions.

-Eric


new article from Fishkin.

I have now moved to KPMG LLP, where I am working in the firm's capital
markets, risk management and treasury practice.

cfishkin@kpmg.com
212.954.6211
______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

 - SILENT RISK.pdf


----- Forwarded by Julie Austin/DEC/Dynegy on 10/04/01 03:19 PM -----

                    Mike Carter
                                         To:     Julie Austin/DEC/Dynegy@Dynegy
                    10/04/01             cc:
                    03:07 PM             Subject:     Additional Winter Supply RFP

Illinois Power is requesting proposals for firm gas supply into Natural Gas
Pipeline in the MidContinent Zone and Louisiana Zone.

Term:          Five months (November 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002).

Quantity: Approximately 25,000 MMBtu/day in either zone (minimum 5,000
          MMBtu/d packages)
          Quote pricing on 0 - 100 percent swing rights.

Price:         Index plus or minus any reservation.

Illinois Power is also requesting proposals for firm gas supply into
Trunkline West Louisiana.

Term:          Five months (November 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002).

Quantity: Approximately 25,000 MMBtu/day (minimum 5,000 MMBtu/d packages)
          Quote pricing on 0 - 100 percent swing rights.

Price:         Index plus or minus any reservation.

Please submit your complete proposal by 5:00 p.m., Central Standard Time,
on Monday, October 8, 2001.  Proposals may be submitted by fax to
217-424-8304 or e-mail to mike_carter@illinoispower.com and
julie_austin@illinoispower.com, and follow up with a hard copy by mail.  If
you have any questions, please feel free to call Mike Carter at
217-424-8128 or Julie Austin at 217-424-8366.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Beck, Sally
Sent:	Wednesday, September  5, 2001 9:04 PM
To:	Port, David
Subject:	RE: Reconciliation Across Risk Applications

The project that Wanda mentioned in her original note is not meant to include every operational measurement.  Frankly, an initiative that broad would be bogged down and simply wouldn't work.  Look for a separate e-mail response from me that adds some additional clarification to Wanda's good summary of the project at hand.

So that efforts are not unnecessarily duplicated, I would suggest that you and I get together so that I can share with you the processes and the reporting that we do on a continuing basis relative to operational analysis (the term that we have used for several years for the old flash to actual moniker) , cash collection, A/R collection, and confirmation creation and execution.  I know that Leslie Reeves reviewed our cash collections memos and operating reports with Wanda and Rick Carson.  Rick called me afterwards and liked what he saw.  We have some more established reporting tools in the US, and Mike Jordan has been providing me with operating reports recently from London as well.  These types of reports are on the radar screen for EES, but we have had bigger fish to fry than creating the reports  -- such as simply getting some info!    Through the internal audit process conducted by Arthur Andersen, all of the aforementioned processes are audited annually.  The A/R review is complete and has been issued for 2001.  Other reviews are planned or in progress.

I would hate to see separate initiatives kicked off around these operational processes without your having the benefit of a detailed understanding of what already exists.  Call me if you want to follow up on this.  Thanks.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Port, David
Sent:	Wednesday, September  5, 2001 8:59 AM
To:	Curry, Wanda; Buy, Rick; Piper, Greg
Cc:	Beck, Sally; Apollo, Beth; Wilson, Shona; Victorio, Tom; Murphy, Ted; Bradford, William S.
Subject:	RE: Reconciliation Across Risk Applications

Wanda

I believe this will give us a good sense of the validity of the information we rely on to make the assessments about risk that we are expected to make. I have mentioned this concept before - I envisioned an application (possibly using our 3d tools) that would allow an interested user to assess data flow visually, similar to the way we control our physical assets and commodity flow at ETS, for example.

The other key techniques whose results I believe we need comfort on are the "flash-to-actual" reconciliations, the process of tracking and chasing confirmations and perhaps cash collection/payment analyses. I think you may have included these in your point "4", these all point in some way to the efficacy of the mark-to-market results (which underpin most of the risk metrics we utilize), and trends in them, (or an absence of the analysis altogether), can indicate impending "controls" issues of the type we have witnessed here - so I'm a big fan.

Let me know if you need anything further from me.

DP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Curry, Wanda
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Buy, Rick; Piper, Greg
Cc:	Beck, Sally; Apollo, Beth; Wilson, Shona; Victorio, Tom; Murphy, Ted; Bradford, William S.; Port, David
Subject:	Reconciliation Across Risk Applications

Rick and Greg,

I met with Sally and Beth on August 24th to discuss the operational risk management initiative requiring a reconciliation across all major risk applications.  This reconciliation is necessary to validate the transfer of all data from
source systems, i.e. risk books, into risk applications which calculate VAR, provide credit exposures,  feed Infinity with daily cash flows and ultimately the DPR.

Sally and Beth, along with IT, have initiated a project to improve and monitor the accuracy and efficiency of these daily interfaces.  The scope includes a review of the processes which  impact the accuracy of  information, timing of interfaces, production performance issues, inventory of books and improved controls over changes to book attributes, and the officialization process.  They have agreed to add a requirement to provide, on a daily basis, this reconciliation across all major risk applications.

The projected  timeline to complete this project, including the reconciliation initiative, is 60 to 90 days.  We will need to reassess the decision to combine these initiatives, if the GRMO timeline slips.

This daily risk applications reconciliation will provide four key metrics not currently available:

1) the ability to track data "accuracy" in terms of the percentage of information which transferred and processed correctly, vs. just unique "failures".  How complete is the data?

2) the ability to validate the accuracy of exception reporting (are all failures included on the exception reports?)

3) the ability to validate Infinity cash flows

4) Reconciliation of values (volumes, PRMA &PRML and cash flows), not # of books processed.

Please call me if you would like to discuss.

Wanda Curry


---------------------- Forwarded by V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT on 02/05/2001
08:53 AM ---------------------------

Margaret Jones <mjones@gc.edu> on 01/23/2001 11:07:08 AM
To: V.Charles.Weldon@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Misc

I figured you were exhausted so I didn't call - I hope Melissa and Hunter are
better.  I have updated your address and they made me update my pin number -
it
is 68966896 - they now have to be 6-8 digits.  I got my new subscription today
- it is really neat - thank you.  Also, for tax purposes am I right in
thinking
that I will only have to claim $2,000 as earned income since that is all we
moved - the year before it was much more and I had to pay taxes.  Let me know.
Love, Margaret

V.Charles.Weldon@enron.com wrote:

> Sorry I did not get to call last night.  I'll try tonight after 8:00.
>
> Can you please call Fidelity at 1-800-544-6666 and update my address?
> Your duplicate statements have been going to my old address in Austin.  My
> new address is 13006 Brayton Court, Houstno, TX 77065.
>
> You will also need to sell $2000 of stocks in your Bidwell account and make
> your 2001 IRA  contribution to this IRA account as we have done the last
> several years.  We'll talk about what to sell later.
>
> Love,
>
> Charlie


I was forced to allow my business judgment pre-empt my personal wishes....

	Susan Scott
	09/28/2000 10:52 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gas Accord

I'm disappointed in your conclusion that TW does not need to be extensively
represented, for long weeks at a time, in San Francisco for the early stages
of Gas Accord II.


Take a look and let me know if it serves your needs.

Eric Benson@ENRON on 03/14/2001 03:45:41 PM
To: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Monthly Report

Paul - I've saved the monthly report in a format you should be able to get
but if for any reason it doesn't work please give me a call; thanks; the
report is due by the 19th and needs to have the current projects and status;
let me know if you need anything else - Eric


Barry -

My name is Brian Wood and I am an Associate who is currently up for rotation. I spoke with Shelly Friesenhahn from the Associate/Analyst Program and she recommended that I contact you about openings within your group.  I would be very interested in talking to you in order to find out if I would be a good fit for your needs.

I have spoken with an Associate in your group, Phil Polsky, and am excited about the business and learning opportunities in West Coast Gas Origination.  In my previous rotations, I have participated in a broad base of structuring, modeling, and origination activities.  To provide further detail about my experiences and achievements, I have attached my resume for your review.

With everything going on in the company, I know it may be difficult to find time to meet with me.   Please let me know when it would be most convenient to stop by.  I look forward to having the chance to explain how I could provide value to your group.

Thank you for your consideration,

Brian Wood
Associate
Enron Broadband Services
(w) 713-345-3564


(See attached file: HPLN0504.xls)

 - HPLN0504.xls


All:

As you all know that the DRN within a pipeline should be unique, the DRN_description should be too. Otherwise
it will cause aggregation errors in our reports, values with the same DRN_description within a pipeline are all summed
together. I have created a query called qry_Mulri_DRN_Names in the Access database O:\Fundy_ops\ReportSetting.mdb (Access 2000),
You can run this query to find out how many duplicates there are, and which pipeline they are. If you entered those duplicates,
you can work with Hyde or Eddie to have them corrected. Please also pay special attention when you enter new DRN and their
descriptions. The rule is No Duplicate DRN or DRN descriptions are allowed within the same pipeline.
When in doubt, you can always run the query mentioned above to check duplicates.

Let me know if you have questions. Thanks.

Yan x33228


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Distillate and unleaded charts to follow.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude42.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas42.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG42.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG42.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL42.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                OCTOBER 11, 2001

Notice ID: 3176
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR OCTOBER 12, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPTS:

PAULDING:  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for
secondary firm customers.

LEBANON AGGREGATE:  New IPP customers received equal shares of available
capacity or their October 12, 2001 nominated quantities, whichever was less.

DELIVERIES:

ALGONQUIN:

HANOVER:  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for
secondary firm customers.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available
PAL Lends/Unparks         Available

Excess MDIQ               Not Available +
ISS Injections            Not Available
SIT Injections            Not Available
Imbalance Paybacks        Not Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   Not Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas day of October 12, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on October 12, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday,
October 11, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


HUNTER SHIVELY,

The PEP system closes on Friday, May 25, 2001.

Our records indicate that one or more of your direct reports has suggested reviewers that you have not yet approved.  Feedback cannot be provided on your employee until you approve the reviewers.

Please log into PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Supervisor Services from the Main Menu to approve your employees' reviewers.

If you have any questions regarding the PRC process or the PEP system, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com


Shirley,

Please, arrange a phone interview next week. TT,  SG, ZL, VK.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
08:46 AM ---------------------------

nina knirel <knirel@yahoo.com> on 11/20/2000 05:13:47 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject:

708 Graham Place #207
Austin, TX 78705
November 20, 2000

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

I read with interest your company,s description on the
Web page. I was highly impressed by the work that
ENRON Corporation does and would like to inquire about
employment opportunities with your company.

Enclosed is a copy of my resume that details my
academic qualifications and practical experience. I am
excited about stepping into a position, which will
utilize my technical, analytical, and interpersonal
skills in a fast paced environment, and look forward
to expanding my horizons with new challenges and
opportunities that ENRON Corporation   will offer. I
know from customer and supervisor feedback that I have
the interpersonal skills imperative to building a
successful career at the ENRON Corporation and am
motivated to do so. Your firm has an excellent
reputation and I genuinely look forward to becoming a
part of the ENRON Corporation community.

I know you must be busy during this time of the year,
but I would sincerely appreciate a few minutes of your
time. I plan to call you within the next seven days to
discuss how my education, practical skills, and
background would qualify me as a member of your
company. In the meantime, if you need to contact me,
my daytime and nighttime number is (512) 474-6683 and
my e-mail address is knirel@mail.utexas.edu.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I
look forward to talking to you.

Sincerely,

Nina Knirel

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
http://calendar.yahoo.com/
 - knirel resume final[1].doc


Net Book Value shall be calculated based upon depreciation on a straight
line basis over a 20 year period beginning on the purchase date, as set forth
in Appendix C.  Under no circumstances shall Customer be obligated to
reimburse or otherwise keep ENA whole with respect to, or take assignment of,
any agreement or obligation entered into by ENA after the effective date of
this Agreement (or any amendment of any agreement existing prior to the
effective date of this Agreement) without Customer's prior written approval
of such agreement or obligation.


Jeff, you are killing me - we targeted that group specifically to build the
risk business in gas and east power in the short run.  This was well planned
effort.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000
03:00 PM ---------------------------

Gwendolyn Petteway@ENRON
08/10/2000 02:54 PM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jana Giovannini/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nedre Strambler/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New Associates

Dave and John, I spoke to Jeff Shenkman and he has indicated that the
following new associates are to support him in his role in Global Markets:

Dustin Collins
Vikas Dwivedi
Li Sun

Although Jeff mentioned a fourth associate, these are the only 3 that are
identified in our system.

John after speaking with you, it is clear that you have not been in contact
with Jeff regarding these associates supporting him.

Dave, can we discuss this matter?  I can be reached at 713/853-7351.  My
pager # is 1-800-980-1665.  Thanks.


Can you guys look into (quietly) the perspectives of the three utilities on
the FERC decision?  It would be interesting to know especially about the
question of refunds?

Other parties perspectives would also be helpful.

Jim


No Burrito next two weeks.  Read a book.

gba

 - Sushiroll.pdf


The attached report summarizes current significant legal activities of EWS
Legal as of March 15, 2001.  This report does not attempt to list all
transactions or include reference to on-going maintenance of completed
transactions.

Please let me know if you have questions.


Due to popular demand, an Excel worksheet has been created in the famous
Phonelist workbook (thanks Teri and Lisa!).  When you update the Cost Center
list, the numbers on the Cost Distribution tab will automatically update.
This further reinforces the importance of keeping that Cost Center list
current.

If you have any other ideas or suggestions to add, all the better!

Thanks for your patience,
Anna


https://www.columbianavigator.com/Ebb/Default.asp

http://www.wingsebb.twc.com/txg.htm

http://infopost.link.duke-energy.com/infopost/default.asp?pipe=TE

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Sally, here is a summary re Peggy Hedstrom.  Once you've communicated her
numbers, you can forward her this or email Janice Christianson and Janice
will get a copy to Peggy.

Thanks....


Start Date: 4/28/01; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042820.txt


Chris,

This is very well written and will serve the reader well. A few comments.

1. When I think about the taxonomy of the VaR models, I typically use the
classification based on 3 categories:

 a. variance/covariance  method
                b. historical simulation
                c. Monte Carlo simulation.

Delta approach is the way of representing a position in a nonlinear
instrument.

2. I would define Monte Carlo as an approach based on statistical simulation
of behavior of
all the market prices/rates, etc., and revaluation of the entire portfolio.
The revaluation may be based on an approximation (using Taylor's expansion)
that may
 involve delta, delta/gamma, delta/gamma/omega or may be exact (based on the
same
model that produces the mark-to-market portfolio valuations).

The main benefit of using the  MC simulation in the energy markets is the
ability to capture
the gapping behavior of the energy markets in a straightforward way. I would
emphasize that
there are attempts to incorporate jumps in the V/C model (I shall send you
the references
from home).

3. I would mention that historical simulation may break down in the markets
that are evolving
quickly (new instruments for which we have no comparable prices,
behavior of prices may change as markets mature or de-mature).

4. For bigger portfolios, virtually all methods require some level of
aggregation into
 atomic, elemental instruments to reduce the dimensionality of the problem.
This process may be a source of a big error.

5. The computational burden of MC can be reduced through clever preprocessing
of a portfolio that introduces no error. Many swaps with the same underlying
can be aggregated into one positions ( they are  portfolios of forwards and
they are linear
instruments).

Please, feel free to use any comment (or none).

Vince

"Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk> on 08/28/2000 02:58:56 PM
Please respond to "Chris Strickland" <chris@lacima.co.uk>
To: <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: EPRM article

Dear Vince,
?
D you think you might be able to look at this in  the next day or so? Robin
is after something by the end of this  week.
?
Best regards.
?
Chris.
?
 - EPRM_01_VaR.doc


EnronOnline
Trade Counts and Volume for April 20th, 2001

			EXTERNAL		INTERNAL		TOTAL
COUNTRY	COMMODITY	CATEGORY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	COUNT	QTY	UNIT OF MEASURE
Austria	Power	Physical	        11 	             2,865 	        -   	                   -   	        11 	             2,865 	MWh
Belgium	Natural Gas	Physical	          3 	         472,500 	        -   	                   -   	          3 	         472,500 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Financial	          4 	      1,067,000 	        -   	                   -   	          4 	      1,067,000 	MMBtu
Canada	Natural Gas	Physical	      278 	    15,941,559 	          5 	         736,250 	      283 	    16,677,809 	MMBtu
Canada	Power	Financial	        16 	             6,828 	        -   	                   -   	        16 	             6,828 	MWh (Canada)
France	Power	Physical	          4 	           73,800 	        -   	                   -   	          4 	           73,800 	MWh
Germany	Coal	Physical	          1 	                    9 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                    9 	SECA Contract - Metric Tonnes
Germany	Power	Physical	        53 	         579,693 	        -   	                   -   	        53 	         579,693 	MWh
Netherlands	Power	Physical	          2 	           45,024 	        -   	                   -   	          2 	           45,024 	MWh
Norway	Power	Financial	        33 	         924,000 	        -   	                   -   	        33 	         924,000 	MWh
Singapore	Crude	Financial	          2 	         125,000 	        -   	                   -   	          2 	         125,000 	Barrel
Singapore	Oil Products	Financial	          2 	           33,625 	        -   	                   -   	          2 	           33,625 	Barrel
Switzerland	Power	Physical	        11 	             2,456 	        -   	                   -   	        11 	             2,456 	MWh
United Kingdom	Crude	Financial	          7 	         695,000 	          3 	           75,000 	        10 	         770,000 	Barrel
United Kingdom	Metals	Financial	      652 	           35,775 	        50 	             3,225 	      702 	           39,000 	LME Registered mt Lot
United Kingdom	Natural Gas	Physical NBP	      102 	    13,286,050 	        -   	                   -   	      102 	    13,286,050 	MMBtu
United Kingdom	Oil Products	Financial	          3 	             7,500 	        -   	                   -   	          3 	             7,500 	IPE mt
United Kingdom	Petchems	Financial	          1 	             1,000 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	             1,000 	mt
United Kingdom	Power	Physical	        12 	         604,800 	        -   	                   -   	        12 	         604,800 	MWh
United Kingdom	Sea Freight	Financial	          1 	                  15 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                  15 	Sea Freight 9.1 Dys BPI Av 4 TC
United Kingdom	Sea Freight	Financial	          3 	                  45 	        -   	                   -   	          3 	                  45 	Sea Freight Lots
USA	Bandwidth	Physical	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                  12 	          1 	                  12 	Unit per PER
USA	Crude	Financial	      132 	      4,690,000 	        63 	      1,885,000 	      195 	      6,575,000 	Barrel
USA	Crude	Physical	          7 	         336,000 	        -   	                   -   	          7 	         336,000 	Barrel per day
USA	LPG	Financial	          3 	           80,000 	        -   	                   -   	          3 	           80,000 	Gallon
USA	LPG	Physical	          3 	           55,000 	        -   	                   -   	          3 	           55,000 	Gallon
USA	Natural Gas	Financial	      671 	  240,047,962 	      364 	  125,152,820 	   1,035 	  365,200,782 	MMBTU
USA	Natural Gas	Financial Option	        19 	    16,000,000 	          8 	      8,000,000 	        27 	    24,000,000 	MMBTU
USA	Natural Gas	Physical	   1,735 	    33,198,431 	        61 	      1,288,785 	   1,796 	    34,487,216 	MMBtu
USA	Oil Products	Financial	          9 	         377,024 	        -   	                   -   	          9 	         377,024 	Barrel
USA	Paper	Physical	          1 	                  40 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                  40 	Metric Tons (+/- 5%)
USA	Paper	Physical	          1 	                250 	        -   	                   -   	          1 	                250 	Short Tons (+/- 5%)
USA	Power	Financial	        52 	         241,041 	          7 	           14,192 	        59 	         255,233 	MWh
USA	Power	Physical	      419 	      4,332,932 	        84 	      1,924,101 	      503 	      6,257,033 	MWh
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          5 	    14,200,000 	          5 	    14,200,000 	EUR/1
USA	Rate and Currency	Financial	        -   	                   -   	          4 	         664,516 	          4 	         664,516 	USD/1
			   4,253 		      655 		   4,908


Maria:
Thanks.  I already did the Enron Guaranty yesterday and it is being signed
hopefully today.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

	"Salvatore, Maria" <Maria.Salvatore@pseg.com>
	05/18/2000 12:08 PM

		 To: "'Carol St Clair'" <Carol.St.Clair@enron.com>
		 cc: "Raspe, Adele M." <Adele.Raspe2@pseg.com>
		 Subject: RE: Enron Guaranty

Carol - Here are new Gtys showing the changes you suggested.

Maria

-----Original Message-----
From: Carol St Clair [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 3:44 PM
To: maria.salvatore@pseg.com
Cc: adele.raspe2@pseg.com; Susan Flynn
Subject: Enron Guaranty

Maria:
I think that 2 minor chnages need to be made to the Enron Guaranty and
probably
the PSE&G Guaranty:

1.   Change in the first paragraph "Enron North America Corp., a Delaware
corporation to Enron North America Corp., a Delaware corporation and its
successors and assigns

2.   In the definition of "Agreement" include language that would pick up
amendments, supplements, replacements and restatements thereof so its reads
:"such ISDA Master Agreement, together with each Confirmation exchanged
between
the parties thereto and together with any and all amendments, supplements,
replacements and restatements thereof, hereinafter the "Agreement")

Let me know if you have a problem with this.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)

 - enronga.doc
 - enrongb.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000
11:55 AM ---------------------------

"Shmuel Oren" <OREN@IEOR.Berkeley.edu> on 08/08/2000 08:14:59 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

Dear Vince
I will be happy to meet with you. Please let me know when you will be here.
I will check among our students who may be interested. I have a Ph.D.
student that is very good but he is still in the pipeline.
Shmuel.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Shmuel S. Oren, Professor
Dept. of Industrial Engineering
        and Operations Research
4117 Etcheverry Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1777
e-mail: oren@ieor.berkeley.edu
phone: (510) 642-1836 or 5484
Fax:      (510) 642-1403
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

----- Original Message -----
From: <vkamins@ect.enron.com>
To: <OREN@queue.IEOR.Berkeley.EDU>; <vkamins@enron.com>;
<ashley.baxter@enron.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:59 AM
Subject: Hello from Vince Kaminski at Enron

> Shmuel,
>
> I hope you remember me. I visited you together with Aram Sogomonian, a
> good friend of mine, a few years ago. I am currently responsible, among
> other things, for recruiting graduates with finance and/or technical
> backgrounds at the University of Berkeley. I would be glad to give you a
> call and talk more about the details of our program. My colleague,
> AshleyBaxter, from the Analyst/Associate Program at Enron would join me
> as well.
>
> I am sending you a copy of the brochure about the Analyst / Associate
> Program.
>
> Vince Kaminski
>
>
> Vincent Kaminski
> Managing Director - Research
> Enron Corp.
> 1400 Smith Street
> Room EB1962
> Houston, TX 77002-7361
>
> Phone: (713) 853 3848
> Fax  :  (713) 646 2503
> E-mail: vkamins@enron.com
>


Is it me and not Lavo due to him maybe not attending

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	James, Terrie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:07 AM
To:	Horton, Stanley; Kitchen, Louise; Sherriff, John; Mcconnell, Mike; McMahon, Jeffrey; Dietrich, Janet
Cc:	Kean, Steven J.; Olson, Cindy; Clark, Morris; Lavorato, John; Delainey, David; Daw, Nicki
Subject:	Management Conference - Business Unit Panel

Hello All,

I'm planning the agenda for this year's Management Conference.  I've been working on the upcoming meeting since March, but as you can imagine, the direction has changed several times.

We are delighted to have General Norman Schwarzkopf delivering a keynote address on leadership, and Gary Hamel returning to help us process the past year.  While we have arranged an all-star line up of outside speakers, we also want to focus on what is happening inside Enron.  Rather than having only one or two business presentations, Mark Frevert has opted to moderate a panel to provide a high level overview of each of our primary operating units and has selected each of you to participate.

Currently, the panel is scheduled to take place 8:00-9:30am on Friday, November 16.  Please plan to present a very high level overview of your business.  You are welcome to use PowerPoint slides, but in the interest of time, presentations must be no more than 10 minutes.  Mark will introduce each of you, interject questions, encourage interaction, and ensure we stay on time.

Below is the proposed order for your presentations.  Regardless of your place in the rundown, you will need to be seated on stage by 7:50am and equipped with a microphone.  Because we have a full agenda that morning, we will try to begin the session promptly at 8:00am.

Stan Horton - Global Services
Louise Kitchen - Americas
John Sherriff - Europe
Mike McConnell - Global Markets
Jeff McMahon - Industrial Markets
Janet Dietrich - Retail

If you elect to use a PowerPoint presentation, please forward it to me electronically by Friday, November 9 or provide the presentation to me on CD at the Management Conference.  To ensure consistancy, I've attached a PowerPoint template that I would like you to use.

 << File: Sample Bullet Slide.ppt >>

Finally, Mark would like to meet with the six of you to finalize preparation for the panel at 4:00pm on Wednesday, November 14 following your arrival at the Management Conference.  The meeting will take place in the Library off the Main Lobby of the Westin La Cantera.  In the meantime, if you have any questions or need any assistance, please contact me.  I look forward to working with you.

Regards,
Terrie James
Senior Director, Corporate Communication
(ph) 713.853.7727
(fax) 713.646.3248
terrie.james@enron.com


Don't worry I won't.  I'll have kleenex in hand.

Kaye

	Sara Shackleton
	05/29/2001 04:21 PM

		 To: Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Kaye Ellis - 281-537-9334 (home)

DON'T YOU DARE LEAVE WITHOUT SAYING
GOOD-BYE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com

	Kaye Ellis
	05/29/2001 04:18 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Kaye Ellis - 281-537-9334 (home)

Sara,

I'll send you my work number and email address on June 4.

Kaye


---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 11/16/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 11/16/2000 08:30:26 AM
To:
cc:
Subject: FW: The Best FLORIDA BALLOT

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
*713-753-5986
 *713-753-7626
* yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

This email, including any attached files, may contain confidential and
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any
review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information
for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all
copies of this message.  Thank you.

>  Have you received this one yet?  I think you'll like it!
>
>
>  <<ballot_1.exe>>

 - ballot_1.exe


Ben:

Attached is FPL Energy's logo.

(See attached file: fple logo.ppt)

Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com on 06/29/2000 11:52:26 AM

To:   Randy_Hoyle@fpl.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: FPL Energy Logo

Randy:
I am putting some information together for you guys and wanted to know if
you could send me FPL Energy's logo by e-mail.  Thanks
Ben Rogers
3-7998

 - fple logo.ppt


Kevin:

I have a friend who is very interested in discussing opportunities as an
Enron power trader with you, and I offered to pass on her resume.  Pam is a
really neat person who has over nine years  experience and a proven track
record in the Natural Gas Industry.? Her  experience ranges from marketing,
origination,?running a desk and profit  center in trading, market making, and
management.? Most recently she ran a  regional trading desk and profit
center?at TXU Energy Trading.? Her  responsibilities included managing both a
financial and physical trading  book.? She made nine million dollars in
marked-to-market profits over the  last three years.?

Pam explained to me that with? electricity deregulation approaching,  TXU
made the decision to redefine their business plan which included shutting
down the proprietary trading side of the business.? This meant the shutting
down of the Houston Office, and Pam?made the decision not to move to
Dallas.   Due to changes in the Natural Gas industry, Pam is now ready for a
change and has been exploring career opportunities utilizing her marketing,
trading,?and  business-to-business expertise to a new commodity such as
power.?

Thank you for your consideration.  Please don't hesitate to give me a call if
you would like any further feedback.

Regards,

Leslie

?


Sarah Thomason
Chicago, IL
Sarah321@aol.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Sarah Thomason