Thanks Bob.  I think you deserve all the credit fot ICI.  I don't know how
or why, but I will dutifully think of a way. Thanksalso for suggesting Baker
& McKenzie in Singapore.  That might be quite helpful.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Williams, Robert C.
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 8:38 AM
To: Brownfeld, Gail; Sanders, Richard
Cc: Walls, Rob
Subject: RE: India matters

Is that all?  Seems very quiet compared to California.  I do not know of any
international environmental lawyers.  Is Gordon Grimes involved?  He could be
a big help.  BTW, Matthew Scrimshaw came by yesterday to tell me that you
were the best lawyer, British included, that worked on the ICI case and that
we wouldn't have gotten the settlement we did without you.  Apparently he
also told Vicki the same thing because she left me a voice message relating
this to me.  I have not figured out how I can take the credit for the job you
did, but, don't worry, I am still working on it and am sure that I'll come up
with something.  Give my best to the bartender at the Oberoi.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Brownfeld, Gail
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 9:12 PM
To: Williams, Robert C.; Sanders, Richard
Subject: India matters

 Things are really heating up in India.  DPC is considering filing several
arbitrations against the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, the Government
of Maharashtra and the Government of India concerning the failure of
Maharashtra to pay for the electricity provided by DPC. These claims also
involve the Government's claim that DPC failed to properly declare its base
load availability and, therefore, owes it more than DPC is claiming in
payment.  DPC has also filed 12 new writ petitions seeking to enjoin a
government office from exceeding the scope of his authority by striking a
number of quarry operation leases from the public record.  Several new Public
Interest Lawsuits have been filed seeking to shut the project down as well.
These have been filed in courts other than the Bombay high court so the first
order of business is to get them transferred.
 On the environmental side, the Pollution Control Board has ordered that
testing on Phase II be stopped claiming that DPC did not have the appropriate
clearance (permit) to test. DPC is considering filing a writ petition to
enjoin this action.  Moreover, there was  Naphtha spill last week. The spill
has been reported and, under separate cover, I will forward to you some of
the information I have received on it.  DPC is considering
litigation/arbitration against Bechtel (who DPC believes to be responsible
for the spill) and wranglings with the government are also expected since
DPC's permit to operate Phase I comes up for renewal on April 1. If the
permit isn't renewed, DPC will have to shut down operations.  In addition,
there was an environmental lawsuit in 1999 (which I'm trying to figure out)
which may come up again in connection with the current situation.
 Chris Walker is working on the claims against the government for
non-payment.  Atul Rajadhyaksha and Atul Setalvad are working on the PIL
suits and suits against the governmental officer, with some help from Chris.
They are also working on the environmental claims.
 I think it would be helpful to have an international environmental litigator
on board to help out with some of the environmental claims. I don't think
this is Chris' area of expertise and I don't believe that he has the time, in
light of everything else, to address these new claims in any event.  Do you
guys have any ideas?  I think the back-up would be useful.  Thanks.


I have attached two documents below --

Letter directed to SW to address their claim that title had passed --

Updated version of project chronology --

The Project Chronology document indicates letters or correspondence I am
trying to track down from EECC.  I would appreciate your comments on the
letter I plan to send to SW in repsonse to the December 8th fax and any
updates to the chronolgy that appear to be incorrect or lacking.

Please call me if you have any questions.  Thanks, Ron.


thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Rabon, Chance
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:30 PM
To: Love, Phillip M.
Subject: my books post id's for 11/30


Louise and Geoff,

Please find the attached file for the latest Statement Of Work for the Consolidated Gas System project. I have only revised the Estimated Costs section to match the final budget for the project next year. The preliminary work done this year will be charged to some existing projects. This is the Statement Of Work for the phase 1 (physical) of the project. The Statement Of Work of the phase 2 (financial) will be delivered in a few weeks. Please review the document. I would like to request your signature some time next week.

Thanks

Zhiyong


Please put this on my calendar, thanks

fletch

---------------------- Forwarded by Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001
05:05 PM ---------------------------
From: John J Lavorato/ENRON@enronXgate@enronXgate on 03/15/2001 05:41 PM
Sent by: Kimberly Hillis/ENRON@enronXgate
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Karen
Buckley/ENRON@enronXgate, Chuck Ames/NA/Enron@Enron, Bilal
Bajwa/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell Ballato/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve
Gim/NA/Enron@Enron, Mog Heu/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Vladi
Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Denver Plachy/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Schiavone/ENRON@enronXgate, Elizabeth Shim/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Matt
Smith/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Virawan Yawapongsiri/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Ted C Bland/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Dinner Invitation - April 10, 2001 (For Trading Track)

You are cordially invited to attend cocktails and dinner on April 10, 2001 at
La Colombe d'Or restaurant located at 3410 Montrose Blvd (a map can be found
at www.lacolombedor.com).  Cocktail hour will start at 7:00 pm with dinner to
follow.

Please note:  this dinner is for the Trading Track Program.

Please RSVP to Ted Bland at extension 3-5275 before April 6, 2001.


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You sold 213 shares of CIEN (Ciena Corp Com) at 80.250000.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-300-AAZM-2558
Order entered at:                      11:20:15 on 12/01/00
Order processing began at:             11:20:21
Order executed at:                     11:20:21 on 12/01/00

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 11:20:21 on 12/01/00
Your position in CIEN is 37 shares
Your real cash total is $-1,205.92

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


You Wanna Piece of My Heart....
You better start from the start


Great.  Thanks.   Jeff

	From:  Douglas S Friedman                           10/23/2000 04:25 PM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: NEW EOL PRODUCTS

Jeff:

About a month ago, we asked EOL to create three new products for the
financial petrochemical and plastics desk.  They are:

1.  propylene (polymer grade),
2.  a polypropylene to propylene spread, and
3.  a polyethylene to ethylene spread.

We expect to have these rolled out this week.

Doug


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007591&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007591
Request Create Date : 11/16/00 11:20:13 AM
Requested For       : dan.harrell@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Stack Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


You & Your Spouse are cordially invited
to join me at the
2001 Houston Livestock & Rodeo
on
Monday, 26th February

with performances by
Brooks & Dunn
Event start time:  7:00 p.m.

Please RSVP to Liz Taylor (x31935)


Thanks Dr.Kaminski,
I forgot that :-)
I'll understand it as
I may identify work that I think will be
beneficial to both of us.
Actually,
I have more ideas on the work, beyond the suggestion.
I'll work on it and send it in more formal way again.
(I mean, work list, schedule, deliverables etc)

I'll take steps to get work permit for those two months.
And please tell me know what you can support
and what I should start to do to find a place to stay,
rent a car etc.

Warm regards,
Jinbaek

ps. and thanks for forwarding the message.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek

Go Bears!

      :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
     :      a   a      :                 __....._
     :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
      :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
       `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
        : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
        `.   '"'                                   ;
         `.               '                        ;
          `.     `        :           `            ;
           .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
         .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
     __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
   .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
   `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
         `.......-'                 `........'

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:

>
> Jinbaek,
>
> The answer to the 1st question is yes.
> The project list is fine with me and is still valid. We are an organization
> driven by the needs of our internal customers.
>
> I shall froward your message to the  person in EBS.
> Hopefully, we shall get a positive response.
>
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
> Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/15/2001 01:12:32 AM
>
> To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  Summer internship
>
>
> Dr. Kaminski,
>
> Sorry for the late response,
> it took me some time to coordinate things.
> Finally, it's almost dont :-)
> It turned out that from June to August
> will be best for me for work at ENRON
> (Say June.4 to August.4)
>
> But I still need to know several things from your side.
> Could you answer following questions?
>
> First:
> Is my suggested working period is OK with you?
> If so, let me know what to do for settlement
> during the period.
>
> Second:
> I got a list of work, I might be able to do for
> DealBench team from Ross and Suresh.
> I'd like to know it is still a valid work list:
> The list he sent is as following:
>
> > 1.  Write a paper in layman's terms that answers
> > questions like the following:
> > Benefits of auctioning online for both buyers and
> > sellers, particularly in reverse auctions
> > Explanation how multi-variable auctions are not
> > as efficient as price-only auctions (is this true?)
> > How many participants are recommended for a
> > successful live auction
> > What types of goods and services are best suited
> > for live auctions versus sealed bid quotes
> > Opinions on lotting strategies
> > Trends in online private auctions
>
> > 2.  Identify appropriate recent auction research (3
> > or 4 papers out of the 90+ you provided)and obtain approvals from the
> > authors to post on our site
>
> > 3. Create a list/bibiliography of relevant auction
> > literature (with hyperlinks?)
>
> > 4.  Would you be willing to offer auction consulting
> > services to our customers (if they are interested)
>
> Third:
> There is an e-procurement forum at Haas School of business,
> in May 22. The chair of the forum is my advisor Prof. Arie Segev.
> A person from Wells Fargo Bank will talk about Wells Fargo's role
> in e-marketplace payment initiative,
> where ENRON broadband services is also one of key players
> along with Citibank.
> He asked me whether you can contact a person at
> ENRON broadband services, who's related to the initiative.
> He wants to know whether we will have a speaker from ENRON
> to see ENRON's perspective, in the Forum.
>
> Here is a link to news related to the initiative,
>
> http://www.internetweek.com/story/INW20000808S0001
>
> Fourth:
> My advisor wants to know whether
> there could be any opportunity to do a case study,
> regarding ENRON's business.
> He is interested in e-procurement and e-marketplaces.
> Business model and System architecture...
>
> Thanks for reading this long email.
> I'll look forward to your answer..
> I am sorry for giving you so much burden
> to answer those questions possibly not easy to answer.
>
> Warm regards,
> Jinbaek
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jinbaek Kim
> Ph.D Candidate
> Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> U.C.Berkeley
> http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
>
> Go Bears!
>
>       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
>      :      a   a      :                 __....._
>      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
>       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
>        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
>         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
>         `.   '"'                                   ;
>          `.               '                        ;
>           `.     `        :           `            ;
>            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
>          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
>      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
>    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
>    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
>          `.......-'                 `........'
>
>
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
>
> >
> > Jinbaek,
> >
> > This is fine though you are welcome to spend more
> > time with us this summer.
> >
> > Vince
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/04/2001 03:45:40 PM
> >
> > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  Re: Summer internship
> >
> >
> > Dr. Kaminski,
> >
> > Thanks for your answer.
> > Before I tell you the time frame,
> > I'll need to talk with my advisor, first.
> > Because here is an on-going-project.
> > I need to coordinate the schedule.
> >
> > I'll appreciate it if you understand my situation,
> > and give me some time (less than a week, of course).
> >
> > For your reference,
> > probably
> > the dates I'd like to ask you will be
> > from mid-May to mid-July (2 months)
> >
> > Warm regards,
> > Jinbaek
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jinbaek Kim
> > Ph.D Candidate
> > Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> > U.C.Berkeley
> > http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
> >
> > Go Bears!
> >
> >       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
> >      :      a   a      :                 __....._
> >      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
> >       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
> >        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
> >         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
> >         `.   '"'                                   ;
> >          `.               '                        ;
> >           `.     `        :           `            ;
> >            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
> >          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
> >      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
> >    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
> >    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
> >          `.......-'                 `........'
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Jinbaek,
> > >
> > > You can coordinate the details with me.
> > > Let me know what the time frame is for you
> > > and we shall send you an appropriate offer.
> > >
> > > Vince
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Jinbaek Kim <jinbaek@ieor.berkeley.edu> on 03/02/2001 04:43:06 PM
> > >
> > > To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
> > > cc:
> > > Subject:  Re: Summer internship
> > >
> > >
> > > Dr. Kaminski,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much.
> > > Of course, I'll be happy to have an opportunity
> > > to work at such a wonderful company.
> > > I was contacting with Surech Raghavan at Deal Bench team,
> > > and was going to express my appreciation to you again
> > > after settling down process with them.
> > >
> > > For the period of working,
> > > I still need to coordinate with my advisor and
> > > may need to adjust according to that.
> > > but anyway, I'll try to coordinate smoothly.
> > >
> > > Please let me know whether I should keep contacting
> > > with Deal Bench team,
> > > for working period and
> > > for misc. living support such as finding a place, rent a car, etc.
> > >
> > > I appreciate you so much again,
> > > for arranging such meetings and giving me an opportunity.
> > > All this opportunity will not be available to me,
> > > without your kind help.
> > >
> > > Warm Regards,
> > > Jinbaek
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Jinbaek Kim
> > > Ph.D Candidate
> > > Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
> > > U.C.Berkeley
> > > http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
> > >
> > > Go Bears!
> > >
> > >       :"'._..---.._.'";       `.             .'       .'           `.
> > >      :      a   a      :                 __....._
> > >      :     _.-0-._     :---'""'"-....--'"        '.
> > >       :  .'   :   `.  :                          `,`.
> > >        `.: '--'--' :.'                             ; ;
> > >         : `._`-'_.'                                ;.'
> > >         `.   '"'                                   ;
> > >          `.               '                        ;
> > >           `.     `        :           `            ;
> > >            .`.    ;       ;           :           ;
> > >          .'    `-.'      ;            :          ;`.
> > >      __.'      .'      .'              :        ;   `.
> > >    .'      __.'      .'`--..__      _._.'      ;      ;
> > >    `......'        .'         `'""'`.'        ;......-'
> > >          `.......-'                 `........'
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for a delay in getting back to you.
> > > > We would like very much to offer you a summer internship.
> > > >
> > > > Please, let me know if you are interested.
> > > >
> > > > Vince Kaminski
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>


Our usual place is just fine--unless there is a new place your interested in trying????

I am flexible too.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dona.Carmony@ourclub.com [mailto:Dona.Carmony@ourclub.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 1:47 PM
To: Bailey, Susan
Subject: RE: Weekend

Saturday lunch it is then! I look forward to seeing you at 1pm at our usual
place right?  Do you want to go somewhere different. It doesn't matter to
me.  I am flexible.


FYI.  I talked with Don and sounds like this report will give us what we
	need to determine which charts are actually late.  This is good news
	and a big step in helping the field identify the problem areas.
	Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hawkins, Don
Sent:	Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:35 PM
To:	January, Steve; Blair, Lynn
Subject:	Charts

Effective January 31, GMS has the ability to scan charts independently of the PGAS system so they can generate reports that identify which charts are received after monthly closing deadlines.  The first report will be provided to us after close on February 3.

Don


We intend to execute agreements with Trading Edge for ENA and ECT
Investments.  Therefore, the prime broker letter Trading Edge requested
should address both entities.

Thanks.

Mike
713-853-9990

Samantha Boyd
10/05/2000 11:49 AM
To: a.capolongo@msdw.com, jgreenberg@tradingedge.com
cc: Mike Fowler/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
jpeters@andrews-kurth.com, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Trading Edge

Anthony:

In connection with preparing the Prime Broker Letter for Trading Edge, Inc. I
wanted to provide you with information for our contact person at Trading
Edge, Inc.:

Mr. Joe Greenberg
Trading Edge, Inc.
Clearing/Credit Department
(212) 813-6043
jgreenberg@tradingedge.com

Mr. Greenberg will be expecting your call.  I have also provide him with your
contact information.  Please remember to forward a copy of all correspondence
with Mr. Greenberg to my attention for our files.

________________________________

Joe:

Mike Fowler will be calling you to verify which Enron entity this transaction
is for.  Please provide that information to Anthony for the Prime Broker
Letter.

Thanks for your assistance with this matter.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


Attached is an amendment to open Block Lumber Company, Inc. to trade both
financial and physical.  The original had them trading only within physical.
Please call if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Walter


Robin,

If you were to accept a rotation in Chicago your cost-of-living adjustment
would be 20%.  In addition, we would also facilitate your relocation from
Houston to Chicago.  You would be eligible to receive $1,500 relocation
allowance to cover expenses outside of the household move.  (i.e. house
hunting trip, meals, etc...)  You also have the option to have the company
move your household goods.  (We will provide a professional carrier to pack
and move your goods) or you can opt to do a self move and receive another
$1,500.  (This amount is before tax.)  Please let me know if you have any
questions.

Ivonne Brown
ext. 57106


attached is the latest draft of the 3rd Qtr 10-Q.

Rick/Louise/Bill - please read footnote 2 in the draft (beginning on page 9 of the clean draft) and provide any comments.  If you have any questions, please call me on my cell at 713-303-6032.

Thanks
Kent

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gray, Dortha
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 7:25 PM
To:	Koenig, Mark; Causey, Richard; Rogers, Rex; Bowen Jr., Raymond; McMahon, Jeffrey; Schnapper, Barry; 'david.b.duncan@us.arthurandersen.com'; 'christopher.j.herbold@us.arthurandersen.com'; 'd.stephen.goddard.jr@us.arthurandersen.com'; 'charrington@velaw.com'; 'greg.danilow@weil.com'; 'cathy.dixon@weil.com'
Cc:	Westbrook, Sharron; Johnson, Jan; Peng, Gary; Castleman, Kent; Butts, Bob
Subject:	Enron Corp 2001 Third Quarter Form 10-Q Draft

Attached is a marked and unmarked draft of the Enron 2001 Third Quarter Form 10-Q.  Please review this draft and fax your comments to Kent Castleman at 713-646-8409 by 2:00 pm Saturday, November 17.


Here is another hefty ISO  filing that came in this week.  Please let Sue or
I know if you believe we should intervene/protest.

Alan Comnes

Summary of ISO Amendment 34:

Filed: December 28

Effective Date: 1/1/01 (expedited treatment requested)

Protests Due: January 17? (need to confirm this)

Filing in a Nutshell: The ISO states that the purpose of the amendment is to
clarify certain issues associated with implementation of the new transmission
Access Charge methodology it orginally proposed in Amendment No. 27.
(According to the ISO, Amendment 27 has been accepted for filing, suspended,
and set for hearing.  Settlement negotiations are ongoing.  (Is Enron a party
to these settlements?)) In addition, the ISO provides new transmission Access
Charge (TAC) rates that will be in effect if the Commission approves the City
of Vernon joining the ISO effective January 1, 2001 and the amount of Firm
Transmission Rights that will be given to Vernon in accordance with the ISO
Tariff.

Specific Proposed Changes

Clarification of Wheeling Access Charge Quantity

The ISO proposes that these provisions be clarified to specify that in the
determination of the Wheeling Access Charge, the proper calculation is to use
transmission facility ownership and Entitlements less all Encumbrances.
Encumbrances include transmission used to meet demands of existing
contracts.  This is how the ISO is currently calculating this charge and the
ISO appears to be using this filing to codify this method.

New HV TAC Rates Using Year-1 of the ISO,s Proposed Transmission Methodology

The current Access Charge methodology consists of three separate zone rates
based on the Transmission Revenue Requirement of the Original Participating
TO.  Because each zone corresponds to the service territory of the TO, they
are known as &license plate8 rates.  Under Amendment No. 27, this methodology
continues in effect until a New Participating TO joins the ISO.  Once that
occurs, the Access Charge for High Voltage Transmission Facilities will be
assessed based on the combined High Voltage Transmission Revenue Requirements
of all the Participating TOs in each TAC Area.

The filing claims to implement an already-approved transition formula wherein
new members of the ISO will pay a rate that is a mix license place and system
average embedded costs.  The goal is that after 10 years there will be only 1
high voltage access charge. The following table shows that under the current
method, which would be a 90/10 split of license-plate/system-average charges,
PG&E and SCE TO access charges would rise approximately $3.2 million and
Vernon would be subsidized approximately $7 million.

Calculation of the net (benefits)/burdens from Access Charge and GMC Impact.
 PG&E and SCE have a $32 Million cap annually and
SDG&E has a $8 Million cap annually; Vernon is held harmless; I
OUs pay muni cost increases in proportion to their cap relative to the total
cap.	Adjusted
	Net
	(Benefit)/
	Burden
	($1000)
	[37]
PG&E	$3,283
SCE	$3,283
SDG&E	$821
Vernon	($7,051)
  Total	$336

	Note: a positive number means the TAC is going up.  A negative number means
the TAC is going down (or will be lower than would be the case under 100%
license plate ratemaking)

Vernon,s Existing Transmission Rights Converted to FTRs

Veron, by joining the ISO effective 1/1/01, agrees to convert existing
transmission rights to FTRs of presumably an equivalent amount.  The proposed
FTRs to allocate to Vernon are in the filing.  These FTRs will expire when
the underlying contract right expires or 10 years, whichever is sooner.

Susan J Mara@ENRON
12/28/2000 03:57 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Christopher F
Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, gfergus@brobeck.com, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Jubran
Whalan/HOU/EES@EES, Neil Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES
cc: rcarroll@bracepatt.com

Subject: There is No Christmas for CA -- NEW FERC Filings

Here we go:

12/20/00 - PG&E files emergency request for rehearing of 12/15 order.  It
seeks refunds, cost of service rates, elimination of market-based rate
authority and more.

12/20/00 - CA Bureau of Audit opposes the emergency motion of the generators
to require FERC-like confidentiality provisions to apply to data requested
from the ISO.

12/22/00 -  Dynegy files complaint - EL01-23-000 - alleging discriminatory
use of OOM by the ISO against in-state generators.  Seeks pricing above
short-run marginal costs plus 15% on a temporary basis and to prohibit the
ISO from using OOM for non-emergency conditions (I thought we won that one a
while ago).  And more ...

12/22/00 - Dynegy seeks clarification on FERC's 12/15 order -- wants FERC to
clarify that standard commercial practices will be used to deal with the
utilties' creditworthiness problems, wants to avoid the IOUs somehow claiming
the FERC order obviates their need to be credit worthy. (huh?)

12/26/00 - CalPX files to request for rehearing of FERC's 12/15 order to save
itself.  It asks to stay the prohibition for the IOUs to sell to the PX, stay
the termination of the CTS rate schedule, and stay the $150 "breakpoint"
applied to the PX day-ahead market.

12/?/00 - Cal PX also institutes new pricing method (plus and minus $125 for
constrained areas), but claims it's only a software change and does not
require a Board vote or a FERC filing

Note:  There were no filings made on Christmas Day, as far as we can tell.

regards,
Sue


My apoligies for the confusion.  Please call me right back if this does not agree with what you were thinking.

Thanks,
Todd


Dave,
 I have attached the above sample form for your review.  I have been unable
to find any documentation where we act as an agent for the shipper and
contractually agree to remarket their unused capacity.  As soon as I find
some language, I will forward same to you.  As we discussed, the major
concerns that I have concerning the Energy Marketing Services Agreement form
that Kaiser provided relates to the duties of the Marketer thereunder.  ENA
is in the business of buying and selling natural gas for its own account and
as such any services it agreed to provide relating to most of the items under
Articles III and IV would be subject to claims of abuse or violation of
fiduciary duties.  Specifically, ENA should not agree to perform the items
under  Article IV, Section A. Parts 1-8, 11; Article IV, Section B.
Parts1-2, 4, 6; Article IV, Sections C, E, and F.  Otherwise, ENA sales
obligations should be patterned in the manner set forth in the Enfolio
Contract which provides safeguards for both parties in the event of a default
by either.
 Therefore, we need to work from our Enfolio contract and I will get you some
agency language for the confirm to address how we would share any
transportation savings that we were able to obtain for them during the term
of our sales transaction with them.
 Please call me after you have had a chance to review the contract.


Nice job.  In line with your letter, and in response to Wood's questionnaire about rolling the suspension date back to July 1, don't you think it is absolutely necessary to have hearings in order to establish a record prior to any decision? Wood throws around the $10 billion number in his questionnaire (ruling, whatever), without any substantiation whatsoever.  Shouldn't DWR and its rev. req. be thoroughly scrutinized in the hearing room before making a decision.  Seems logical though 1) logic has prevailed much lately and 2) I'm not a lawyer, so I could be missing the boat completely.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: William Booth [mailto:wbooth@booth-law.COM]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:37 PM
To: 'Dorothy Rothrock'; William Booth; cra@calretailers.com;
ek@a-klaw.com; mikahl@ka-pow.com; djsmith@s-k-w.com; dhunter@s-k-w.com;
Derek Naten; 'Dominic DiMare'; Barbara R. Barkovich (E-mail); Keith
McCrea (E-mail); Dan L Carroll (E-mail)
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Evelyn Elsesser; Loren Kaye
Subject: RE: Reponse to Angelides

Dorothy -- Attached is a another version of the letter that takes a little
different approach.  What do you think?  I worried that your first letter
looks a little like an invitation to pile on the exit fees, of all types and
in any magnitude.  I think we need to attack the premise that any DA causes
an increase in DWR costs for other customers.  Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Dorothy Rothrock [mailto:drothrock@cmta.net]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 1:35 PM
To: wbooth@booth-law.com; cra@calretailers.com; ek@a-klaw.com;
mikahl@ka-pow.com; djsmith@s-k-w.com; dhunter@s-k-w.com; Derek Naten;
'Dominic DiMare'
Cc: Dasovich, Jeff; Evelyn Elsesser; Loren Kaye
Subject: Reponse to Angelides

Wanna sign onto this letter to Loretta? Any suggestions? We could make it a
CEA thing.

(I am copying Jeff D. as a courtesy...I think we need this to be just a
customer deal).

Dot
498-3319

This e-mail is intended solely for use of the individual to whom it is
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If the reader of
this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the
original sender of this note.  Thank You.


No Burrito next two weeks.  Read a book.

gba

 - Sushiroll.pdf


Urgent !!

 Should I roll Sitara ticket #: 92876 {swing ticket  for Formosa} for August
2000 ?

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000
10:10 AM ---------------------------
From: Robert E Lloyd on 08/07/2000 09:39 AM
To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Formosa Meter #: 1000

 Gary :   I will roll deal #: 92881 for Formosa Buyback.    Thanks !

                              Please  verify the "commodity fee" as being
what you want.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Gary W Lamphier                           08/07/2000 09:21 AM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Formosa Meter #: 1000

The deal will continue as in months past, however the sales price is I (.035).
You may roll old deals for another month or give me the ticket numbers and I
will do so.

Thanks,

Gary

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           08/07/2000 08:46 AM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert E
Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Formosa Meter #: 1000

Urgent Request !

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000
08:44 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           08/03/2000 04:48 PM

To: Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Formosa Meter #: 1000

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
04:47 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Robert E Lloyd                           08/02/2000 03:48 PM

To: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Howard B Camp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Formosa Meter #: 1000

 Will there be a Buyback ticket for Formosa during August 2000 activity.
  Deal #:  92881 expired July 31,2000.


pls print--I'll look at it in the am (maybe!) DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/01/2000
04:13 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Susan Scott                           08/01/2000 01:53 PM

To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com
cc:

Subject: TW Options

Here is the latest draft of the filing for transport options.  Significant
changes include:

- added definition of Counterparty
- added captions and reorganized the filing to more clearly reflect
compliance with 154.202
- included an explanation of how the option fee will be part of a negotiated
rate
- added an example of how options will work

I think we need to decide whether we are better off with the type of option
fee explanation I have in this draft, or whether we should instead state the
fee will be market based, and include an explanation that, pursuant to the
Commission's discussion in Order 637, market based rates are appropriate
because we are going to commit to an open season process that will be
nondiscriminatory and that will ensure we aren't withholding capacity from
the market.

Can we have a conference call to discuss your comments this week?  I will
have Janet call to determine your availability.


Suzanne:
David DuPre and I are going to meet every Tuesday at 4:30 to discuss confirms
issues.  Could you please make my calendar do this?
Tahnks.

carol


We have received an executed financial Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   September 13, 2000

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Compania Minera Autlan, S.A. de C.V.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exeception of:
Foreign Exchange
          Pulp, Lumber & Paper

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   Texas

Copies will be distributed.

Stephanie Panus


Shelley Norman
62 Ivy Lane
South Windsor, CT 06074
snorman@ccc.gerbertechnology.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Shelley Norman


How difficult issues are resolved in Illinois..........
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/30/2000
08:06 AM ---------------------------
From: Susan M Landwehr on 11/29/2000 10:08 PM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Rick/Harry/Jim--- it's a tie this year for who is the worst player in the
energy business---I can't decide which is more appalling---  Commissioner
Ruth Kretschmer's blatant grab for her legacy or Commonwealth Edison's sleazy
tactics.

You'll recall that Com Ed has been trying to get accelerated collection of
the decommissioning costs ($120 mil per year for 6 years) despite the fact
tht they're planning on transferring their nuclear plants to an unregulated
Genco.  The battle has been ongoing at the ICC, and the customers and CUB and
other intervenors have been successful in getting the hearing examiner to
state that Com Ed should not be able to collect any dollars if they transfer
the assets.  Our hope was that the ICC would actually agree with the hearing
examiner and deny the request, and that Com Ed would have to go to the
legislature to get language that would allow them to collect.  The ICC has
not ruled yet.  Anticipating that COm Ed would simultaneously work the
legislative side,we have been working at the statehouse for about a month to
sow the seeds to make sure that we could block them enough to get a trade
such as a year or two of CTC early roll off.  The legislature is in veto
session right now, and Com Ed has not been able to get enough backing to move
a bill.

So....low and behold, a fax comes across this evening and it's a letter to
the ICC from Com Ed offering to donate 2 of it's nuclear station sites to the
citizens of Illinois to use as public parks after the sites are
decommissioned if they are given the full $120 mil/6 year collection. And
gee, do you think that maybe one of the parks would be named after the woman
who brought it to the people!!??

There has been a rumor for about a year that Ruth had been angling with John
Rowe to have one of the nuclear sites donated in her name, and she started
ruminating in public and in semi public meetings about 6 weeks ago about the
general concept.

Part of me wishes that we didn't have any business interests that need
protecting in Illinois, as I  really would like to give a quote to Crains or
the Tribune tomorrow slamming Kretschmer and Com Ed. Isn't this just the
height of arrongance and corruption??!!

I'll be sending out a general info e mail tomorrow on this development to the
Project Lincoln team and of course Roy that is a bit more sanitized, but
wanted you guys to know the real scoop (plus I think I just wanted to vent!)


Attached are  EES's Volumetric NYMEX and Basis positions for 7/11/2000.    If
you have any questions, you may contact me at X3-5070.

Thanks,

Monica for Kyle


I'm flying Continental and I will check my mailbox for the card...I haven't checked it in a while.  I'm going to bring my pictures from the last two weekends ( very fun activities...I tell you all about them this weekend).

Love ya,
Susan

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.  From:  Julie Gibson <julieg@qualcomm.com>                           04/09/2001 11:10 AM

To:	Susan.M.Scott@enron.com
cc:
Subject:	Re: Hello!

great- sounds perfect!  have you seen any movies lately?  i haven't seen a movie in forever and there are several girl movies out that i would love to see....chocolat among them.- i've heard the scenery is amazing.  what airline are you flying?  i'll be there thursday at 7, and will check the arrival time before leaving work.  i will be picking you up directly from work, but always have my cell phone on me, should you need to get in touch:  619-890-7565.

yeah!!! thursday will be here before we know it!!

have a great week.....oh- i have several rainy day activities, should the weather be less than stellar. did you ever get the card i mailed you at work?

can't wait to see you!
love,
julie

At 10:49 AM 4/9/2001 -0500, you wrote:

Hi yourself,

I swear you read my mind sometimes...I was just about to email you.
Anyway, things here are good and I am equally (if not more) excited about
my visit.  I know the weather's been kind of funky the last week or so but
I've been hearing the same rumours as you regarding a weekend warm-up.
Therefore, I'm still bringing my suit/beach clothes and will just make sure
I've got some stuff in case it stays on the chilly side.  I'll also make
sure to include some work-out clothes and Sunday attire ( I'm assuming
skirt or dress will work okay? ).

No worries about the need to study.  I've been go-go-go the last couple of
weekends and would not mind at all having some down-time during the day for
naps, lounging, walking, etc. while you study to your hearts content.
Honestly, we've got plenty of time to do things so it's no big  deal.

My flight is supposed to arrive Thursday night at 7:00 and I leave at 3:40
Sunday afternoon ( I got direct flights this time so I won't be nearly as
tired).

Hope this week isn't too crazy for you...of course, if it is you'll be more
than ready for a little R&R.

Love,
Susan

 (Embedded     Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
 image moved
 to file:      From:  Julie Gibson
 pic18662.pcx) <julieg@qualcomm.com>
               04/09/2001 10:26 AM

To:   Susan M Scott <Susan.M.Scott@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  Hello!

hi susan-

how are you??  things are super crazy here, so wanted to drop you a note
before it's suddenly thursday!  i am SO excited for your visit and a day
off- i do have to warn you that my statistics mid-term got postponed
(horrible and a relief at the same time) until the monday after easter, so
i may have to study a bit over the weekend....i'll of course try to get it
all done before you get in on thursday, though!  don't want to intrude on
our beach time!

the weather is odd right now- raining and chilly, but they're claiming it
will warm up to 68 by friday- hopefully warmer.....so still definitely
bring your suit, running shoes, and church clothes for Easter.....

what are your flight times?

can't wait to see you!
love,
julie


Larry,

Jacques has been working with Claudia.  I will check his progress this
morning and let you know.

Phillip


Hello fellow equinephiles,

I received positive responses (Anything other than 'Yes' is bad, very, very
bad
- downright Negative) from Madeleine & Rob, Nora, and Pat. Carl sounds like he
is interested, but has other things on his mind at the moment. Alice has some
silly concern about a roof over her head, saying that she needs to take care
of
the house first. If anyone else is considering the trip, please let me know
soon.

The big question is about the timing. Rob and Nora have expressed a preference
for August. Pat is trying to get Intel to spring for her airfare by calling
it a
business trip (can you say, "Junket"). Because Pat has only the best interest
of
the company in mind, she feels April would be a good time to go. My preference
is to go just before or after the tourist season, which would be the beginning
of June or September.

The folks at Porlock advised me thus: Depending on the wetness of the winter
season, the outdoor jump arenas and x-country courses open in early May to
early
June. By mid June, the local tourist season is in full-swing. Bookings will be
more difficult, and we will have to compete with a good bit of traffic on the
roads and trails during hacks. Hikers use the same trails that we will canter.
The tourist season lasts through August, when much of Europe and the UK are
taking Summer holidays.

So, please help me find a time that is suitable for everyone. My vote is to go
at the end of August - Beginning of September. What do you think of that?

Jeff.

PS - Pat, I am only kidding. What's the point of working for a multi-national
if
you can't get some good trips out of it?

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent
to
Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.


Just a reminder.
---------------------- Forwarded by Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT on 02/17/2000
05:30 PM ---------------------------

Kimberly Perkins
02/16/2000 03:03 PM
To: Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen P Schwarz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lawrence R Daze/HOU/ECT@ECT, David R Cogbill/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn
Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark D Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Amber Limas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvonne
Acosta/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Neville/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pamela
Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Judith Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra R McNichols/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Shoemake/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meeting Scheduled for Friday, 2/18

Please plan to attend the following meeting requested by Judy Thorne:

Topic: Open Text Roundtable with Power
Date: Friday, February 18
Time: 8:30 - 10:00 a.m.
Location: Conference Room 47C2

Breakfast will be provided.

If you are unable to attend, please contact me at X3-5304.  Thank you.

Kim Perkins


If your do not see our email in 15 seconds, please go to http://www.enerfax.com to today's gas & power prices & news.
If your email does not support this web version, please subscribe to the free text version by writing subscribe@enerfax.com Please visit our website to view today's gas and power prices and news by clicking http://www.enerfax.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Heidi Black <mailto:heidiblack@houston.rr.com>
To: tgeaccone@houston.rr.com <mailto:tgeaccone@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:19 PM
Subject: update

Also, if you know someone at Harold Powell that would be a great one too!

Skip Mumsies - it is no longer in business, I believe, as the number has been disconnected and there is no other listing for it.
Heidi Black
heidiblack@houston.rr.com <mailto:heidiblack@houston.rr.com>


Is the City of Huntsville cleared to trade all products?

From: Tana Jones@ECT on 10-08-2000 08:55 CDT
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:

Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/09/00

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000 08:55 AM -----

	Bradley Diebner
	08/09/2000 05:14 PM

		 To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Stephanie
Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL Credit Responses 08/09/00

The EOL approvals for 08/09/00 are attached below.

Thanks,
Brad


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Omaha Luncheon w/Shelley Corman The Met

Date:		4/18/2001
Time:		11:30 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


***************************************************
You've received this message because while visiting
a 24/7 Media, Inc. partner website, you opted in to
receive special online offers and discounts.
***************************************************
html_email_tech
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
			[IMAGE]
	[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]		[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

To UNSUBSCRIBE from our list, simply click here,
http://www.enlist.com/cgi-bin/optout?c=tfsm&e=ebass@ect.enron.com
or reply back, using UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.


I thought you already had me at the dinner.  I think I'm available.  Check
with Jennifer

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kristin Gandy @ ENRON                           01/03/2001 10:17 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Keeney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Catherine
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rajesh Chettiar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Tom
Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jayshree Desai/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colin Jackson/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Laura Howenstine/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Michele Nezi Marvin/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Natalie
Halich/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Ranabir
Dutt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Teresa Dyar/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Golden/HOU/EES@EES,
Charles Ward/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron, Li
Sun/NA/Enron@Enron, Gillian Johnson/NA/Enron@Enron, Lisa
Connolly/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael J Popkin/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Evan Betzer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jebong Lee/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Chu Chu
Wang/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brad Hitch/EU/Enron@Enron, Betsy Bassis/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Matthew Goering/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claude
Tellis/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: Tiger Team - Wharton Participants

Attached below is a list of individuals that will be participating in the
tiger team event at Enron in Houston on the 18th of January.  Keep these
people in mind when it comes time to pick candidates to interview for the
Spring.  Call if you have any questions and I am still looking for Wharton
Alum who would like to attend the dinner at Churrasco's that same evening.
Thank you,

Kristin
---------------------- Forwarded by Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron on 01/03/2001
10:14 AM ---------------------------

Melinda McCarty
01/03/2001 09:43 AM
To: Kristin Gandy/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Tiger Team - Wharton Participants

Vincent Chen
Nicholas Levitt
Deepa Mallik
Jack Rejtman
Heather Thorne
Donna Piazze
Kim Whitsel
Tulika Bhalla
Jaideep Singh
Edson Otani
Joshua Leventhal
Pat Henahan
Gustavo Palazzi
Clay DeGiacinto
Steve Lessar
Ram Vittal
Omar Bassel
Jason Cummins
Dennis Feerick


Is "not going to AEP" considered an accomplishment?  By the way, most of the people who could give performance feedback on me are leaving or have left the company.  I'm sure they thought that I was superior though.

D

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Hall, Bob M
Sent:	Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:07 AM
To:	Superty, Robert; Farmer, Daren J.; Wynne, Rita; McClure, Mark; Bussell l, Kathryn
Subject:	Accomplishments for the first six months

It's that time again.

Please put together a list of accomplishments for the first six months.

I know you can use the system some how, just not sure how.

Let me know.

thanks

bob


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001
09:33 AM ---------------------------

Billy Lemmons@ENRON
03/21/2001 05:12 PM
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robina
Barker-Bennett/LON/ECT@ECT, Richard A Causey@Enron, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT,
Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT, Kevin Garland/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Eric
Shaw/LON/ECT@ECT, Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Analyst/Associate Committee Meeting

I just wanted to confirm the first meeting of the Analyst/Associate Committee
on Monday, March 26 from 8:00-10:00 am in the 50th Floor Dining Room
(eb50m).  You will find an agenda for the meeting below, as well as
attachments containing a recent overview of the program by business unit, and
the results of an October 2000 survey of program participants.  This
information should help you prepare for our meeting.

Feel free to contact me at x36671 if you would like to discuss anything prior
to the meeting.  I look forward to working with each of you.

Regards,
Billy

__________________________________________
Meeting Agenda
March 26, 2001

I. Welcome and Introductions (John Sherriff)

II. Program Overview (Billy Lemmons)
  a. Business Unit Summary
  b. Program Survey

III. Discussion Topics (Group)
  a. Program Leadership
  b. Business Plan (Focus, Metrics)
  c.. Focus Areas (what's working / what's not...)
    - Culture / Location
    - Recruiting
    - Rotations
    - Orientation
    -  Training
    - PRC

IV. Next Meeting / Next Steps (Billy Lemmons)

__________________________________________
Attachments


As many of you have already noticed, this year Enron will be closing its
offices on Monday, January 15 in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.  This
is the first time we have observed this national holiday, and I am certain
that many of you will be pleased to know that the executive committee has
decided that we will continue to do so in the future.

Enron continues to observe 10 holidays each year (including two floater
holidays) and provides one additional discretionary holiday for our
employees.   For a complete listing of Enron's holiday schedule, go to
http://hrweb.enron.com/holiday/body.asp.


Here is what I have so far, I apologize for not sending these yesterday.

1)  Definitions -

 Fuel Costs - Refers to ET Fuel costs.  I don't think this is defined
anywhere, and in the TECO transaction this refers to existing gas supply
contracts.  Reagan - Does MDEA   have any existing gas supply contracts?

 As a general comment, do we need to define the cost of serving their load
through third party purchases?

2)  Section 2 - Term

 Whose option is it to extend the term of this deal?  It sounds like both
parties have the right to extend, but then later in the paragraph it states
MDEA has the right to extend.  In the TECO agreement, TECO had a unilateral
right to extend the contract for the first year.

3)  Section 8 - Accounting and Reports

 paragraph (c) refers to Existing Transactions - I thought we were taking
this out.

4)  Section 10 - Delivery Point and Title

 Do we need to state where EPMI delivers to MDEA?

5)  Section 11 - Fuel Management Services

  It is my understanding that at the beginning of this agreement, ENA will
'sleeve' the gas purchases, and the ultimate goal is to help MDEA set up
master agreements with multiple parties.  However, my interpretation of the
statement in para (a) "The parties recognize that without MDEA's full and
active participation....EPMI will not be able to procure fuel for the
facilities or seek to reduce Fuel Costs,"  is that we will not be sleeving
any gas purchases.  Is this the case?

6)  Section 13 - Payment and Fees

 It is my expectation that most months, we will be billing MDEA to pay our
costs of serving their load, not redeeming to MDEA the Market Proceeds.  I
think that para (a) is a little confusing because it mixes the two of these
together.  I think it may be easier to understand if these two are broken out.

 Also, there will be times that we may have to sell off energy that we have
overpurchased to serve their load.  We need to explicitly define how this
will be handled.

Reagan - Here are a few comments about the exhibits:

1)  Exhibit [] - Reports

 I think I said this in my last e-mail, but the P&L, Risk Statement will not
include 'various risk indicators for MDEA's power output for the term of this
agreement' We may need to talk about this further.

2)  Exhibit XX - MDEA EPMI Incentive Fee Calculation

 Let's talk about this.

I'll let ya'll know if there is anything else!

Thanks,

E


are you prepared to defend your answer?

"Eva Pao" <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu> on 05/13/2001 03:01:04 PM
Please respond to <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu>
To: <John.Arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: 2

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:54 PM
To: epao@mba2002.hbs.edu
Subject: RE: Extra credit

and your offer?

"Eva Pao" <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu> on 05/13/2001 02:58:28 PM

Please respond to <epao@mba2002.hbs.edu>

To:   <John.Arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Extra credit

1.99999999999999999999999999999999999

-----Original Message-----
From: John.Arnold@enron.com [mailto:John.Arnold@enron.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: epao@mba2002.hbs.edu
Subject: Re: Extra credit

rules to a game:
You flip a coin. If you get tails you win 0.  if you get heads, i give you
$1.  Keep flipping until you get a tails, at which point you walk away with
the money.  however, each heads you get after the first you double your
money.  So if you flip heads 3 times and then tails, you get $4.  What's
you bid/offer on playing this game?  (would you pay $.5 to play? $1? $2?
what you charge me play against you?)


FYI -

Scroll below for meeting conclusion and next steps.

Marie
----- Forwarded by Marie Hejka/Corp/Enron on 11/30/2000 06:27 PM -----

	Marie Hejka
	11/30/2000 05:34 PM

		 To: David Gossett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Anthony
Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brandon
Rigney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Allen Elliott/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Bryan Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Wasaff/NA/Enron@Enron, John
Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: KM Task Force Content Strategy Meeting

Thank you for your participation in yesterday's meeting.  Please review the
below meeting notes.

Sincerely,

Marie Hejka

  11/29/00
Content Strategy Meeting Notes

Attendees:
Allen Elliott - mynetwork.com
David Gossett - mywEBSource.com
Marie Hejka ) KM Task Force Chair
Anthony Mends - mywEBSource.com
Brandon Rigney ) my.home.enron.com

Meeting Details.

The above group met to discuss the content strategy for the KM Task Force
portal.  Our intention is to synergize the collective intelligence of these
teams to develop a best practices portal.  The task force is in a unique
position because the portal we will develop from is Bryan Powell,s
mynetwork.com which although it largely reflects Brandon Rigney,s
my.home.enron.com, it does not reflect the characteristics requested by the
KM pilot executive sponsors and task force members.  The question to ask is:
are the characteristics identified by the KM pilot executive sponsors and
task force members the characteristics we should include in a portal?
Further analysis is required to conclude what user needs are before we can
determine what to include in a portal.

The team agreed that a portal is relatively easy to develop.  What is more
important and challenging is the process, established perhaps by a
centralized KM effort, by which information or content is made available to
all given portals. It is the content accessible through a portal which
determines the success of the portal.  Yahoo.com users, through a minimal
number of starting points, may access some 6000 containers of information.
For our project, it has not been determined what information (what content)
needs to be accessed from a portal.  The answer to this question should
predict what front end buttons are most important to place on the initial
dashboard of the portal.

Does the task force want to enter in to the business of hashing out what
specific content to make available through the portal?  No, we have neither
the time nor the responsibility to undertake this.  But, how then, does the
task force determine what the initial dashboard will look like if we don,t
have an understanding of what content users actually need most to access?
The requirements phase should predict this.

What is most challenging about content?  The answer:  locking down the
containerable information (content) to bridge to portals.  Information needs
to be syndicated.  In order for it to be syndicated, it must be in an
appropriate container.  &Containerable8 information is information that can
be shown as a channel.  In other words, containerable information is
information that can be accessed from the portal.  Not all information on a
given website is containerable and available to be pulled by portals.
Editorial assistance is required to make certain information is contained.  A
KM strategy should propose a method to identify, develop and maintain
information a portal can capture.

Meeting Conclusion.

The development of any business structure should be driven by business
needs.  Given business needs vary from Business Unit to Business Unit and
person to person, the task of developing a portal as the single interface for
all Enron Business Units is large.

Consider the following diagram as a high level plan we may reference to
develop the content strategy for a best practices portal.

Requirements Phase	Design Phase	Build Phase	Test Phase 	Launch Phase

We are currently in the requirements phase of this project.  Although
multiple, personalized portals have been developed, unveiled and implemented,
we are still gathering requirements to create a best practices portal.  The
task force is chartered with the responsibility to develop a Knowledge
Management proposal.  In this proposal, we may consider the process through
which containerable information is identified, developed, and maintained.  In
the meantime, the content strategy team is available for the task force
members to consult.  The content strategy team will help Bryan Powell,s team
shape mynetwork.com.

With respect to content strategy, some of the responsibilities a KM proposal
should review include:
? A plan to develop a process to determine what information is important to
contain
? A plan to develop a process to identify owners of containers
? A plan to develop a process for teaching people how to build containers
? A plan to develop a process for cleaning up data
? A plan to develop a process for inventorying data on websites
? A plan to develop a process for inventorying data on the &O8 drive and
other assets
? A plan to develop a process for creating a consulting portal kit whereby
specific needs of communities are identified and reflected in a best
practices portal
? A plan to develop a process for shutting off old channels (i.e. email from
Office of the Chairman) and turning on new channels (i.e. portal delivery of
Office of the Chairman information)

Next Steps.

Identify content strategy &to do,s8 for the requirements phase.
Identify owners of content strategy &to do,s8 for the requirements phase.
Establish weekly meetings for content strategy team.
Content strategy team members gain authorization from management to support
task force.


I would like to discus this matter with you when you get a chance.

Alan
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 09/29/99 04:10
PM ---------------------------

Matthias Lee
09/29/99 05:02 AM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: MT " Pacific Valour"

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 09/29/99 06:01 PM
---------------------------

Matthias Lee
09/29/99 03:01 PM
To: sbainbridge@wfw.com
cc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: MT " Pacific Valour"

Suzanne

As just discussed, I attach a transcript of a taped conversation between
Russell and Joseph Tan of Hyundai Singapore Pte Ltd. The conversation took
place on 20 Sept 1999 at about 9.30am.

Please let me have your advice as to whether the conversation can amount to
an election on the part of Hyundai such that they cannot subsequently rely on
our breach of condition to rescind.

I think Yukong Line [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep 604 is a relevant case which you may
want to have a look at.

I look forward to hearing from you before the end of the day.

Thanks and regards

Matt


Good story on retail -- as a direct result of ARM's hiring of Edelman.  Some
good Lay and Robert Michaels' quotes.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001 10:42 PM -----

	"Counihan, Rick" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>
	02/07/2001 01:09 PM

		 To: "'Allen, Stevan'" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>, "Counihan, Rick"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "'ARM List Serve'" <Arm@phaser.com>
		 cc: "Warner, Jami" <jami.warner@edelman.com>, "Beiser, Megan"
<Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>, "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>
		 Subject: RE: LA Times story

This story is fantastic!!  It is the best single piece I have seen on the
retail market in California and it is in the newspaper of record.  I think
we should make copies and hand them out in our press packets and all
meetings we have.  I think this is a concrete example of a payoff from
working with Edelman.

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen, Stevan [mailto:stevan.allen@edelman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 9:31 AM
To: 'Rick. Counihan (E-mail); Aaron Thomas (E-mail)
Cc: Warner, Jami; Beiser, Megan; Fairchild, Tracy
Subject: LA Times story

http://www.latimes.com/business/reports/power/lat_retail010207.htm

This piece ran front page of this morning's LA Times. It refers to provision
of AB1X we are concerned about. Also, Enron gets a lot of attention. I will
have this forwarded to the entire team later this morning. Thanks.

Stevan

PS - Bryson is having a news conference this morning in Sac. Will keep you
posted.

Deregulation Didn't Foster Competition

By NICHOLAS RICCARDI and STEVE BERRY, Times Staff Writers

The way people scrambled for a stake in California's power market three
years ago, you'd have thought it was the second coming of the Gold Rush.
Politicians and free marketers boasted that they were freeing millions of
customers from their monopolistic utilities so they could shop for cheaper
electricity. The state ordered an $87-million publicity campaign, promising
a brave new energy world bustling with competition.
But those dreams of capitalism unleashed never materialized, dashed by
provisions in the 1996 deregulation law that effectively undermined
competition and gave the utilities a substantial edge over newcomers. In the
end, only 1.7% of the utilities' residential users switched to other
providers, many opting to pay more for "green" energy.
Although the chaos swirling around California's electricity crisis has
chiefly focused on soaring wholesale prices, the virtual absence of
competition at the consumer level has played a key role in deregulation's
undoing.
Had competition among retailers flourished, garnering the millions of
customers deregulators expected, prices might never have reached today's
unprecedented peaks and the turmoil might have been tempered, economists and
retailers say.
Retail competition "would not have prevented a crisis, but it would have
toned it down," said Richard Counihan, spokesman for Green Mountain Energy,
which has returned most of its 50,000 customers to the utilities' ranks.
Now even the prospect of competition is gone. A measure enacted by the
Legislature last week, which made state government the biggest electricity
buyer in California, suspended further retail competition, preventing anyone
from underbidding the state.
"That buries us," said Tony Wayne, president of UtiliSource of Brea, which,
under the new law, can keep its relatively small number of customers but is
barred from entering into new contracts.
Few thought it would come to this.

High Hopes Collide With Reality
Almost 300 firms registered with the state to sell electricity to consumers.
Many of them, quick-buck hucksters or small-time operations, were scared off
by background checks, fingerprinting and the $25,000 deposit required to
enter the market.
But then there were the likes of giant Enron Corp., which predicted that the
new market would pull 700,000 customers from the utilities in the first few
weeks. Another firm deployed 400 salespeople, nabbing residential and
business prospects by the thousands.
They quickly discovered that the structure of California's landmark
deregulation effort erected protective barriers preventing most retailers
from beating the prices of the big three utilities--Southern California
Edison, Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric.
For example, deregulation law allowed the utilities to keep their 9 million
customers until each took the initiative to switch. Any ratepayer who used a
moderate amount of energy and wanted to change companies had to pay $600 for
a new meter--unless the retailer wanted to eat the cost itself.
In contrast, Pennsylvania, where deregulation has been more successful than
in California, requires most of its utilities to surrender some of their
customers. Last year, 300,000 customers of one utility were auctioned off to
the retailer who could promise them the most savings. All together, close to
1 million customers have switched from utilities to retailers, with savings
estimates ranging from a few dollars to $15 per month.
In California, the next barrier was expressly designed by deregulation
architects to keep new retailers at bay, at least temporarily.
Before throwing utilities into a free-for-all, lawmakers felt obligated to
give them time to pay off debts that would hurt their ability to offer
competitive prices. The Legislature froze customer prices at 1996 levels,
well above what the utilities were then paying for electricity. The
difference would be used to pay their debts.
The hitch for prospective retailers was that their customers--like those
remaining with utilities--would be charged the extra amount too. That
seriously hurt the retailers' ability to shave prices for their customers
without taking a hit themselves.
Utility executives say the so-called competition transition charge
accomplished its intent: providing some protection against new players until
the utilities could shed their debt and compete on an even field.
According to those executives, the plan went awry when wholesale electricity
prices soared before the special debt charge was lifted and competition had
a chance to flourish.
"We haven't had enough time for this market to work," said Denise Grant,
director of the Edison division that works with retailers. She said Edison
expected to lose 150,000 customers annually--a far cry from what has
happened.
Retailers say they faced other obstacles that seemed designed to help the
utilities keep as many of their customers as possible.
One of the biggest was a newly created energy marketplace called the Power
Exchange.
Under the exchange's rules, all buyers--little guys with a few hundred
customers and mammoth utilities with millions--paid the same price for
electricity. Once again, retailers were stymied in their search for ways to
cut their customers' bills.
Retailers had no place else to shop for energy because suppliers could make
more money selling in high volume to billion-dollar utilities on the Power
Exchange, rather than cutting small deals with upstart companies.
Wayne, the president of UtiliSource, learned the hard way. He was peddling
electricity in California in early 1997, before the state created the Power
Exchange. After arranging a good, but informal, deal with a Washington
generator, he sent out hundreds of salespeople, took to the road himself and
soon cornered 10,000 customers.
But the birth of the exchange caused the death of his deal, Wayne said. The
generators pulled out when they realized how much money they could make
selling on the open market.
"That was an oh-my-god. They said, 'Why should we give you a discount when
we can sell it to the Power Exchange ourselves?' " he said.
Retailers say the state protects the utilities in subtler but no less
damaging ways. That includes billing customers who switch companies for
certain overhead costs of their old utilities, such as weather forecasters
and accountants involved in procuring electricity.
In late 1999, a coalition of retailers filed a complaint with the Public
Utilities Commission arguing that their customers should not be forced to
pay costs for utilities they had decided to leave.
Earlier this month, the PUC finally reached a decision that favors the
retailers' argument but accepts the utilities' calculations of the expenses
borne by retailers, an amount critics say is far too low.
In dissenting, Commissioner Richard A. Bilas called the decision's paltry
award to retailers another strike against them.
"We cannot keep stymieing retail competition if we are seeking rational
markets," he said. "Energy service providers [retailers] have left the state
in droves. . . . They need all the encouragement we can give them."

Retailers Found Little Opportunity
Be they multinational giants or kitchen-table entrepreneurs, retailers are
dismayed by their experiences with deregulation.
Enron spent $5 million trying to sell electricity in 1997 and the spring of
1998. But, unable to offer enticing discounts, the firm picked up only
30,000 customers.
In a recent meeting with reporters and editors at The Times, Enron Chief
Executive Kenneth Lay suggested that the framers of deregulation kept market
forces pinned down in the retail sector. As a result, there was little money
to be made and little incentive to stick around.
"The more customers you signed up," Lay said, "the more [money] you lost."
Last week, Enron returned a number of its remaining electricity contracts to
PG&E. "In the end," Lay said, "we couldn't change the rules and we pulled
out."
On the other end of the spectrum, Paul Oshideri is now a one-man operation
since he laid off his seven employees during his unprofitable two years
trying to entice customers to Cucamonga Energy.
"You don't have that many options," said Oshideri, who is still holding on
to his 250 customers and vows not to quit. "What can you do? You can't do
anything right now."
Only when it came to businesses and big institutions such as universities
were retailers able to make a dent in the market. The small price reductions
they offered translated into huge savings for those large users of
electricity. The retailers also offered a variety of other services,
including aid to help businesses become more energy efficient.
Although fewer than 2% of all residential customers have switched to new
energy companies, 13% of industrial users have done so, according to the
Public Utilities Commission.
"If they'd structured this differently they would have had households able
to make big savings just like industrials," said Cal State Fullerton
economist Robert Michaels.
There is some dispute among deregulation critics over whether legislators
designed the law to protect the utilities from an onslaught of competition,
or it just turned out that way.
Jesse Knight, a former member of the Public Utilities Commission who
dissented on the panel's deregulation plan, said the law is biased against
retail competition.
"But I don't think it was the legislation's intent to protect the monopoly,"
Knight said.
There is general agreement, however, that not enough attention was paid to
the mechanics of the retail market.
Much of the deregulation legislation deals with generation, transmission and
wholesale prices of electricity. The only provisions on the retail end
simply allow consumers to shop for deals.
Lay, the Enron executive, recalled that the utilities fought hard to
maintain their customer base. The irony is that, with wholesale prices
skyrocketing over the last six months, buying electricity for all those
customers has driven the utilities to the brink of insolvency.
"With 20-20 hindsight, I expect they wish they'd agreed to more choice at
the customer level," Lay said. "Then maybe they wouldn't be in the
circumstances they're in."
   News </news> Politics </news/politics> Entertainment
<http://www.calendarlive.com> music <http://www.calendarlive.com/music>,
movies <http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/>, art
<http://www.calendarlive.com/art/>, TV <http://www.calendarlive.com/tvent/>,
restaurants
<http://www.calendarlive.com/top/1,1419,L-LATimes-Restaurants-X!Front,00.htm
l>    <<...OLE_Obj...>>    Business </business> Travel </travel>
Classifieds </class> jobs </class/employ>, homes </class/realestate>, cars
<http://www.cars.com/carsapp/latimes/?srv=parser&act=display&tf=/index-defau
lt.tmpl>, rentals </class/rentals>    <<...OLE_Obj...>>    Sports
<http://sports.latimes.com> Commentary </news/comment/> Shopping
<http://www.latimes.com/class/2shop/menus/>     <<...OLE_Obj...>>
 <<...OLE_Obj...>>
Copyright 2001 Los Angeles Times

STEVAN ALLEN
Vice President
Edelman Public Relations Worldwide
1215 K Street - Suite 970
Sacramento, CA 95814

916/442-2331 - phone
916/447-8509 - fax
stevan.allen@edelman.com
 <<Allen, Stevan.vcf>>


---------------------- Forwarded by John Arnold/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2001 07:12
AM ---------------------------

SOblander@carrfut.com on 01/24/2001 06:25:43 AM
To: soblander@carrfut.com
cc:
Subject: daily charts and matrices as hot links 1/24

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  , 2000 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude13.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas13.pdf
Distillate     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/hoil13.pdf
Unleaded     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unlded13.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Stripmatrix13.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG13.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL13.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Vasant,

It seems we have to help them. Can Kate help
on this project?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
09:28 AM ---------------------------

Nelson Neale@ENRON
04/20/2001 10:29 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject: Petrochem Desk

I had a chance to speak with Christian LeBroc this morning with regard to
curve building for petrochemicals.  As it turns out, Christian left RAC in
April and joined the Petrochem Desk as a trader.  Previous efforts at
construction of a forward curve by the group have focused on intuition or
SWAGs.  Unfortunately, the group had a rough P&L year with at least some of
the blame directed toward the forward curve or lack thereof.  When asked
about the fundamentals group, Christian indicated that they'd only been
around about 3-4 months and are not yet well-suited to curve building.  John
Nowlan is indeed the head of the group.

From a timing perspective, I told Christian that it would probably take at
least 6-8 weeks to develop a curve, especially considering the need to
understand the key market drivers/fundamentals.  As was suggested yesterday
during our meeting, a strong relationship between petrochemicals and a NYMEX
component (e.g., crude oil) would provide a great beginning point--we could
then potentially strengthen/augment  this relationship with other key factors
(e.g., supply and demand terms) borne out of our market research.

Nelson


Hello,
I understand that some students in E203 have not received the emails I have
been sending out. I am not sure whether this is because they are not on the
email list or whether there is something the matter with the emails. I hope
that this one does get to you.

Here is a copy of the HW problem solutions. They should also be on the web.
You can get to them either through Pf. Berk's website, or by going to mine
at http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/duggar and then clicking on the B203 link.

Madhur
 - E203HW1.doc


The author was obviously not aware that the Enron pipelines pride themselves
in having standardized our "operational nuisances" !!  df

From: Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/22/2001 03:10 PM
To: Shelley Corman/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/ENRON@enronXgate, Janet Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan
Scott/ENRON@enronXgate, Frazier King/ENRON@enronXgate, Dari
Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lee Huber/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: RE: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief

 This brief is not very well written -- many legal mistakes and grammar is
also really poor.  Here are my questions and
 comments.  I did, however, enjoy reading about "the unique operational
nuisances of every interstate pipeline".

 --Dot

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Corman, Shelley
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 8:09 AM
To: Fossum, Drew; Miller, Mary Kay; Kilmer III, Robert; McCoppin, Dorothy;
Place, Janet; Neppl, Ray; Pavlou, Maria; Scott, Susan; King Jr., Frazier;
Dornan, Dari; Huber, Lee
Subject: FW: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief

Last brief draft for now!
 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Susan Moore" <SAM@vnf.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Susan+20Moore+22+20+3CSAM+40vnf+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.c
om]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Rnuschler@akingump.com; rmfmckinney@aol.com; mark.cook@coastalcorp.com;
Clevander@columbiaenergy.com; kkrieger@columbiaenergygroup.com;
Alexanderl@dsmo.com; Shelley_Corman@enron.com; hendricksond@epenergy.com;
Fkelly@gbmdc.com; cdavis@glgt.com; Mike.McMahon@gulfsouthpl.com;
JDRESKIN@INGAA.ORG; pludwig@INGAA.ORG; Kbdriver@jonesday.com;
Paul_Mallory@kindermorgan.com; Jblasiak@mcguirewoods.com;
carl.fink@neg.pge.com; marsha.palazzi@neg.pge.com; jschaefgen@reidpriest.com;
Coharra@velaw.com; Hmay@velaw.com; jjohnson@velaw.com; John Burnes; Paul
Korman; tiggka@wbip.com; Judy.neason@williams.com
Subject: Section 5 Argument of Segmentation Brief

Attached is the initial draft of the NGA Section 5 argument for the pipeline
petitioners' joint brief opposing segmentation.

I have attached the document in both Word and WordPerfect.  The document was
converted into WordPerfect from Word, which should explain any WordPerfect
formatting problems.

The Statement of the Case for the segmentation brief will be circulated on
Tuesday morning.

Susan A. Moore
Associate
Van Ness Feldman, P.C.
202-298-1896

 - VANDOC_98238_1.DOC << File: VANDOC_98238_1.DOC >>
 - VANDOC_98421_1.WPD << File: VANDOC_98421_1.WPD >>


For anyone that will be in Houston for Thanksgiving weekend, we will be
having our annual game-watching party at my (parent's) house Friday at 11am
to watch Texas kill A&M on the big screen.  We will even have our token
aggie (Sanay) there to heckle...  Come around 10am to pre-party for the
pre-game activities.  The address is 5230 Willowbend, if you need
directions call me on my cell at 512-789-4421.

Hook 'em!

Chris

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.


Hi John,

I'm the one who's working with eric on the spread option price. Jared indicated you'd get him something today....could you tell me what your using for you vols (FGT/MKTAREA and correlations (between Z2/Z3, and between (Z2/Z3) and FGT/MKTAREA)? Also, once I've plugged in the numbers if you'd like to see my results, let me know.

thanks,

cjc


Gary Porter of Sierra called.  He was very apologetic about not sending us an
interconnection agreement sooner.  Attached is a draft that has not been
reviewed by Sierra's executives yet, but I talked Gary into giving it to us
anyway.

Concerning our transmission request, Gary indicated that Sierra will have to
perform a study because some other parties are supposedly ahead of us in the
queue that would affect the available transmission capacity.  He referred me
to a table on the following OASIS cite showing the competing transmission
requests.  Stan or Don - please look at this table to see if you think
Sierra's position has any merits.  I'll give you more details in person.
Some tariff interpretation issues may also be involved depending upon whether
other parties are actually ahead of us in the queue.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 01:47 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Whalen, Brian" <BWhalen@SPPC.com>
02/28/2001 01:13 PM

To: "Mary Hain (E-mail)" <Mary.Hain@enron.com>
cc: "Porter, Gary" <GPorter@SPPC.com>
Subject: IOA and SWOASIS Link

Mary,

Here is the modified IOA.  We are nearly complete with our editing and are
waiting for Legal/Executive Review.  Please note, we reserve the right to
make additional changes and this version is preliminary.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks

 <<EnronIOADraft.doc>>

Transmission request link:
http://www.swoasis.com/nevp/NOTICES/TransmissionRequest.htm
Interconnection request link:
http://www.swoasis.com/nevp/NOTICES/InterConnectRequest.htm

I'll let you know the status of your study for your transmission request as
soon as our engineer returns from lunch.

Brian Whalen
Transmission Business Development
(775) 834-4185

 - EnronIOADraft.doc