GAS DAILY
                             ON-LINE EDITION
                             May 15, 2001
***FERC launches formal hearing in El Paso case
     A collection of high-powered attorneys crowded a FERC hearing
room yesterday for the launch of a formal hearing into
allegations of market power abuse by El Paso and its affiliates.
While a decision is still a way off, the presiding judge in the case
made it clear that FERC must find a precise way to measure market
share in California before ruling on the case.
     The hearing also marked the public release of a controversial
market power study by The Brattle Group, which was commissioned
by Southern California Edison to find evidence of market power
abuse by El Paso marketing affiliate El Paso Merchant Energy. The
Brattle Group said that it found substantial evidence that El Paso
manipulated California's gas market -- a claim that remains
strongly in dispute (see story, page 4).
     In an opening statement, FERC Chief Administrative Law Judge
Curtis Wagner laid down the parameters for the hearing. The
burden of proof, he said, is on the California Public Utilities
Commission, which filed the original Section 5 complaint against
El Paso. But once a case is made, Wagner added, "the burden of
going forward with evidence to rebut that case shifts to El Paso
Merchant and the parties on its side of the table."
     The case originated last year, when the CPUC asked FERC to
abrogate a series of transportation contracts between El Paso
Natural Gas and El Paso Merchant. The California regulators
claimed the capacity award was rigged, and further complained of
a conspiracy to drive up the delivered price of gas into California.
     In March, FERC dismissed the CPUC's claim that there was
favoritism in the bidding process for El Paso pipeline capacity (GD
3/29). But the commission also sent the case before an ALJ, saying
the case raised larger questions of market power. According to
FERC, certain disputed issues of fact need to be examined at a
hearing before a decision can be rendered.
     One of the biggest issues will be determining whether the
affected market is the entire state of California or whether it is
just Southern California. The CPUC and Southern California Edison
maintain that only the Southern California market is at issue,
while El Paso argues that the case applies to the entire state.
     The outcome of the case could hinge on that distinction. As
Wagner noted in his opening remarks, "The question of the
geographic market makes a tremendous difference in how El Paso
Merchant's market share will be measured and the results."
     If the entire state is considered as a single market, said
Wagner, then El Paso Merchant would have a market share that,
depending on methodology, would range between 17% and 26.8%.
But if the CPUC's contention that the market is Southern
California holds up, he added, then El Paso Merchant's market
share would be between 35% and 44.9%.
     Finding out whether market power exists also depends on how
many players are involved in a particular market. Wagner said
that the parties need to reach a stipulation among counsel on the
number of players. In addition, he said that he would need a better
geographic description of El Paso Merchant's capacity holdings
and information on the price differential of gas between Northern
and Southern California.
     Finally, Wagner directed a number of questions to El Paso. El
Paso Merchant, he said, "should answer the CPUC's question as to
why it subscribed for the involved [1.2 billion cfd] for 15 months
when it had no market for that amount." In addition, said Wagner,
El Paso should "show whether it sold in the secondary market
short-term releases of the excess [capacity] at a price higher than
it paid."
     Wagner also heard arguments over the admissibility of certain
evidence.
     Given the volume of testimony involved, the case will require
some legal heavy lifting before a preliminary decision is reached.
Noting that he received a nearly two-foot high stack of testimony
last week, Wagner said that reading prehearing briefs and
prepared testimony "consumed a very beautiful Sunday in
Washington." (RP00-241)     NH

***El Paso takes aim at Calif. Assembly, study
     In an effort to clear its name in the ongoing California market
power controversy, El Paso is going on the offensive. The company
yesterday issued a riposte to claims -- publicized by California
Assembly members and major newspapers -- that it manipulated
California gas prices. And it took close aim at The Brattle Group, a
consultancy that has figured prominently in various
investigations into the matter.
     According to El Paso, The Brattle Group worked "hand-in-hand"
with a California Assembly subcommittee to pin the blame on El
Paso and its subsidiaries for the run-up in gas prices in the
Golden State. El Paso furnished copies of internal Assembly e-mails
as proof that the subcommittee did not seek to conduct an
objective investigation.
     As reported in Gas Daily, The Brattle Group's study of alleged
market power abuse by El Paso marketing arm El Paso Merchant
Energy has been exhibit A in California pipeline litigation (GD
4/25). In a study commissioned by Southern California Edison, The
Brattle Group concluded that El Paso had deliberately manipulated
California-bound pipeline capacity in an effort to drive up the
price differential between production basins and the California
border.
     Drawing in large part on The Brattle Group's opinion, the
California Assembly Subcommittee on Energy Oversight recently
concluded that El Paso caused the price run-up (GD 4/20).
Representatives of the Assembly's Democratic majority said The
Brattle Group study proved conclusively that the rise in gas
prices at the California border was greater than could be
accounted for through normal market forces.
     But according to El Paso, the subcommittee majority was --
deliberately -- wrong. The inquiry conducted by the subcommittee,
said El Paso, was a "charade that was orchestrated from the
beginning" to shore up SoCalEd's case.
     "El Paso has recently obtained, through discovery in a
proceeding before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
correspondence between the staff for the subcommittee and the
paid litigation consultant [The Brattle Group] for Southern
California Edison," said El Paso in a statement. "This
communication reveals that the subcommittee majority's
conclusions were pre-determined to blame El Paso for California's
failed energy policies."
     The correspondence included apparent requests from
subcommittee staff members for help in "rebutting" El Paso's
testimony before the Assembly. El Paso interpreted those requests
as proof that the subcommittee majority "never intended" to write
an objective report on the matter.
     "We are shocked that the subcommittee delegated its
responsibilities to [SoCalEd's] consultants," said Norma Dunn, El
Paso senior vice president of communications and government
affairs. "We voluntarily met with subcommittee staff and testified
before the subcommittee in good faith, under the false premise
that the subcommittee was interested in seeking the truth. Now we
learn that the subcommittee was working at the direction of
[SoCalEd's] litigation consultants to support SCE's litigation
position."
     Litigation pitting SoCalEd and the California Public Utilities
Commission against El Paso is currently under way at FERC (see
story, page 1). Following yesterday's hearing, Dunn told Gas Daily
that SoCalEd and the CPUC were also waging their campaign against
El Paso in the   national press.
     The New York Times, for instance, has published articles that
relied on The Brattle Group study and other sealed documents.
Dunn said it was "clear" that SoCalEd and the CPUC were using the
selective leak of documents to take the case against El Paso to the
public.
     Prior to recess in yesterday's hearing, FERC Chief
Administrative Law Judge Curtis Wagner issued a reminder of the
need to restrict access to protected documents.     NH

NGI's Daily Gas Price Index
published : May 15, 2001
El Paso Calls California Subcommittee Hearing a 'Sham'
El Paso Corp. claims it was set up by California Assembly members to take the
blame for high gas prices in the state. It said recent hearings before a
subcommittee were a "sham," and that it was "predetermined" that El Paso
would be accused on wrongdoing in a report approved by the subcommittee
majority yesterday.
While El Paso battled similar accusations at the opening of hearings
yesterday before a FERC administrative law judge, the company publicly
contested the results of the majority report (approved 3-2) of the California
Assembly Subcommittee on Energy Oversight, which placed the blame on the
energy company for skyrocketing gas prices in the state. The majority report
says El Paso drove up gas prices by withholding pipeline capacity from the
market, focusing on the same year-old capacity contract between El Paso's
pipeline and marketing affiliate that is the subject of FERC's investigation.
Contrary to the majority report, however, are the conclusions of a report
prepared for the two Republican members of the five-member subcommittee. That
document said the hearings "produced no conclusive evidence" of price
manipulation.
Although the majority report has not been made public, "it is clear, based on
accounts of the report and recently uncovered documents, that the
subcommittee hearing was a sham," El Paso said in a statement.
El Paso released to the public yesterday documents containing e-mail
correspondence between staff members of the subcommittee and members of the
Brattle Group, a paid consulting firm for Southern California Edison. The
Brattle Group is one of El Paso's main opponents at the hearings this week
before FERC's Chief Administrative Law Judge Curtis Wagner Jr. Brattle
accuses the company of costing Californians an additional $3.7 billion in gas
costs over the past year.
The correspondence El Paso released reveals a close relationship between the
consulting firm and the subcommittee staff. For example, a staff member said
to Brattle Group's Matthew O'Loughlin, "I can't thank you and Paul enough for
your testimony. It was beyond expectations, the members were highly
impressed. The chairman asked me if you guys could stay and help us with a
second day. We could have used it."
El Paso said the communication reveals that the subcommittee majority's
conclusions were "pre-determined to blame El Paso for California's failed
energy policies." The subcommittee majority was working "hand-in-hand with,
and relying on, SCE's consultant, the Brattle Group, in their so-called
analysis," El Paso said. "In communications between the subcommittee staff
and SCE's consultant, it is clear that SCE's consultant assisted in preparing
questions for the hearing and that the subcommittee staff requested
assistance from SCE's consultant in preparing the final report.
"That the subcommittee majority never intended to conduct an objective
investigation is clear... [R]ather than write an objective report based on
the testimony, the staff went on to ask SCE's consultant for help in
'rebutting' El Paso's testimony."
"We are shocked that the subcommittee delegated its responsibilities to SCE's
consultants," said Norma Dunn, senior vice president of Communications and
Government Affairs for El Paso. "We voluntarily met with subcommittee staff
and testified before the subcommittee in good faith, under the false premise
that the subcommittee was interested in seeking the truth. Now we learn that
the subcommittee was working at the direction of SCE's litigation consultants
to support SCE's litigation position. We are particularly concerned that
after coordinating the questions to be asked, the Brattle Group testified
before the subcommittee as if it were an independent group. It is obvious
that the subcommittee hearings were a charade that was orchestrated from the
beginning. Final conclusions were drawn before we had an opportunity to
testify and then the final report was leaked to the press instead of provided
to us, so that we would not have an opportunity to react."
Dunn said El Paso is confident that once the facts are presented to FERC in
hearings this week, it will be "vindicated."
However, El Paso also faces an uphill battle in Washington. The FERC hearings
pit El Paso and its subsidiaries against the California Public Utilities
Commission and the state's two largest investor-owned utilities, Pacific Gas
& Electric and Southern California Edison.
The regulators and the utilities also allege El Paso withheld capacity on its
pipelines into the state, which in turn pushed prices up. If the charges are
substantiated, FERC Judge Wagner could order the company to refund any money
it earned due to price or supply manipulation. Such a ruling could have even
broader implications because skyrocketing prices for natural gas, the single
biggest source of fuel for power plants in California, obviously contributed
to the financial calamity that brought Southern California Edison to its
knees and sent Pacific Gas & Electric into bankruptcy.
The details of the charges are well known at this point. Critics alleged that
El Paso Merchant Energy Gas LP and El Paso Merchant Energy Co. received
inside information on a discount transportation rate that enabled them to end
up the big winners in an open season in February of last year. The open
season involved 1.22 Bcf/d of firm capacity on El Paso to the California
border.
But in an order on complaint, FERC found "no merit in the allegations." It
cleared El Paso of charges that it rigged the bidding for capacity to favor
its affiliates. Moreover, it said there was no evidence that El Paso violated
its standards of conduct. However, the Commission did not dismiss the
allegations that El Paso engaged in market and price manipulation. It set the
market power issue for hearing in March before Judge Wagner and ordered him
to provide an initial decision within 60 days (see Daily GPI, March 29).
FERC staff also appears to be hot on El Paso's tracks. In testimony submitted
last week before Judge Wagner, FERC staff's expert witness concluded that El
Paso probably exercised market power in the Southern California gas market
and drove up gas prices over the past year when pipeline capacity constraints
existed. FERC Economist Dr. Jonathan D. Ogur concluded that under certain
circumstances El Paso was able to wield market power in the Southern
California gas market (see Daily GPI, May 14).
The rise in California natural gas prices is not attributable to El Paso, the
company said in its statement yesterday, but is attributable to the fact that
demand for gas has far outstripped supply. Evidence presented at the
California subcommittee hearings shows that El Paso has consistently utilized
its pipeline capacity to ship natural gas to California and has never
restricted supply. Constraints on gas infrastructure in the state have
limited the supply of gas during a time in which demand has risen
dramatically, the company said.


Yes, because they are deducting pretax dollars for parking.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 05/31/2001 09:14 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Yes, they are deducting for parking

But, did you sign up for the transportation spending account.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/31/2001 09:03 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Yes, they are deducting for parking

How do I get on the list for the form?  Could you pretty please check for me?

Thanks,

Kay


Dear Dr. Kaminski:
Thank-you once again for inviting me to  interview for a position in your
Corporate Research group. I very much enjoyed  meeting you and your
colleagues. I was quite? impressed by the excellent  quality of the people
and the entrepreneurial spirit at Enron. The ongoing  projects in support of
energy and broadband? marketing as well as  insurance? are very interesting
to me. I definitely would like to be a part  of these efforts. Thank-you
again for the opportunity to interview with your  group.
?
Sincerely,
Rodney Greene


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
W E E K E N D   S Y S T E M S   A V A I L A B I L I T Y

F O R

March 30, 2001 5:00pm through April 2, 2001 12:00am
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

SCHEDULED SYSTEM OUTAGES:

ARDMORE DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

AZURIX: No Scheduled Outages.

EB34 DATA CENTER - FACILITY OPERATIONS: No Scheduled Outages.

EDI SERVER: No Scheduled Outages.

ENRON NORTH AMERICAN LANS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/31/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  1:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  11:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  4:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Network Change on EB4
Environments Impacted:  Personel on EBB1-EB4
Purpose: Network 172.16.231.0 is deleted from the network
Backout:
Contact(s):  Mark Trevino    713-345-9954

FIELD SERVICES:  No Scheduled Outages.

INTERNET: No Scheduled Outages.

MESSAGING: No Scheduled Outages.

MARKET DATA: No Scheduled Outages.

NT: No Scheduled Outages.

OS/2:  No Scheduled Outages.

OTHER SYSTEMS:
Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sun 4/1/2001 at  9:00:00 AM CT thru Sun 4/1/2001 at  9:00:00 PM CT
 Sun 4/1/2001 at  7:00:00 AM PT thru Sun 4/1/2001 at  7:00:00 PM PT
 Sun 4/1/2001 at  3:00:00 PM London thru Mon 4/2/2001 at  3:00:00 AM London
Outage:  OS upgrade, data migration to new T-3 disk, migration off fddi.  New
IP address will be 172.16.63.63
Environments Impacted:  astral Development database users
Purpose: Need for addition storage, corporate direction to migrate off fddi,
general maintenance.
Backout: change the primary interface back to fddi
change the DNS entry back to the original
shutdown the server and restart using the original disks only.
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/31/2001 at  11:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at   1:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at    9:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at 6:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Migration off fddi for server limbo.  New IP Address is 172.16.2.157
Environments Impacted:  Lim database users
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi.
Backout: Change the primary interface back to fddi
Change DNS to original setting
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/31/2001 at   2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Migration off fddi and dual boot update for server ocs-m.  New IP
address to be 172.16.2.158
Environments Impacted:  SysAdmiral
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: change primary network interface back to fddi
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/31/2001 at  2:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at 12:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  11:00:00 PM
London
Outage:  Migration off fddi for server ossprod.  New IP address will be
172.16.2.159
Environments Impacted:  SUN OS application users
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi.
Backout: change primary interface back to the fddi
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/31/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  5:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  3:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at 10:00:00 PM London thru Sun 4/1/2001 at  12:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Migration off fddi for server utopia. New IP address will be
172.16.2.163.
Environments Impacted:  RMS
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi.
Backout: change primary interface back to fddi
change DNS entry back to original
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  CORP
Time:  Sat 3/31/2001 at  4:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  6:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  2:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  4:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  11:00:00 PM London thru Sun 4/1/2001 at  1:00:00 AM London
Outage:  Migration of server zodiac off fddi and dual boot addition.  New IP
address to be 172.16.2.160
Environments Impacted:  zodiac application users
Purpose: corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: change the primary interface back to the fddi
change DNS entry to old entry
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

Impact:  UNIX
Time:  Sat 3/31/2001 at   1:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  3:00:00 PM CT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at 11:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  1:00:00 PM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  8:00:00 PM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  10:00:00 PM London
Outage:  Migration off fddi and patch updates for server gemini. New IP
address to be 172.16.2.162
Environments Impacted:  UNIX sysamins
Purpose: Corporate direction to move off fddi and general maintenance.
Backout: change primary interface back to fddi.
Change DNS entry back to old entry
Contact(s):  Malcolm Wells    713-345-3716

SITARA:  No Scheduled Outages.

SUN/OSS SYSTEM: No Scheduled Outages.

TELEPHONY:
Impact:  All
Time:  Fri 3/30/2001 at  7:00:00 PM CT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  7:00:00 AM CT
 Fri 3/30/2001 at  5:00:00 PM PT thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  5:00:00 AM PT
 Sat 3/31/2001 at  2:00:00 AM London thru Sat 3/31/2001 at  2:00:00 PM london
Outage:  Lucent Switch ATM Conversion - UPDATE!!
Environments Impacted:  All telephone systems including voicemail will be
out. 3AC & 2AC switch will be taken down at 7 PM and EB at 10:30 PM
Purpose: Upgrade will allow for more bandwidth between switches (EB, 3AC,
ECS, 500 Jefferson, etc.) and to prepare for the Enron Center South system.
Backout: Revert back to fiber network.
Contact(s):  Cynthia Siniard    713-853-0558

TERMINAL SERVER:  No Scheduled Outages.

UNIFY:  No Scheduled Outages.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
FOR ASSISTANCE

(713) 853-1411   Enron Resolution Center

Specific Help:
Information Risk Management                                     (713) 853-5536
Unify On-Call      (713) 284-3757  [Pager]
Sitara On-Call     (713) 288-0101  [Pager]
RUS/GOPS/GeoTools/APRS   (713) 639-9726  [Pager]
OSS/UA4/TARP    (713) 285-3165  [Pager]
CPR      (713) 284-4175  [Pager]
EDI Support      (713) 327-3893  [Pager]
EES Help Desk     (713)853-9797 OR (888)853-9797


All,

You are invited to attend an ENA Trading Track Dinner, Tuesday, October 16th ( location details to be confirmed ).

Please RSVP your attendance.

Regards,

Karen Buckley
x54667


you guys want to do this?  i will play.


Dave

It sounds like the urgency on the Wind Power decision wasn't a reality.
Kevin says that they are working on it.  If you need me to do anything let me
know.

Lavo


hey mara,

i tried to call your phone number, but just got voicemail.  here are my numbers:  (w) 403 974 6946 (h) 403 262 0205 (c) 403 512 3312 - it would be good to chat, but i'll respond here in case you get this and not your voicemail.  also, a better email is "trycooper@hotmail.com" i've been meaning to write you (it's on my list) but haven't probly because i'm not sure what to say ... i'm glad you got in touch.  i hope you had fun in belize with your family.  i checked and i don't have brinda's email - sorry about that.  i might have her phone number athome, but that won't do you much good i don't think.  also if you are checking out SFSU, you may want to look up someone named Ingrid Binswanger - i went to college with her and she is ultra-cool and might be able to give you the lowdown.  i think she is doing some sort of joint degree and is probly still there - not sure though.

um, yeah, i was a bit surprised when you mentioned the 8 year statistic! but i'm not sure what relevance that really has.  it's too bad things are rocky between you and steve, it seems like you've been together forever.  it was a crazy night and i don't know what else to say, hopefully we will stay in touch better as a result?  it's funny to think that i've known you half of my life at this point.  of course, however you want to handle it is fine by me.  well, if you get this while you are in portland or sf, give me a buzz and i'll tell you what i can, otherwise, call or write and let's stay in touch.  good luck shopping for programs.

cooper

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mgiattina@aol.com@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:40 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	portland...

Hey Cooper,
  Well, I don't know if you remember, but I'm heading out to Portland for an interview.  Prob little to no chance I'll end up there, but what the hell, I've never been and it can't hurt to visit.  I remember you saying that you knew Brinda's email.  Do you think you could send it to me?  I'll be there the 14th.

Otherwise, don't really know what to say.  I'm pretty much still reeling from what happened.  I meant it when I said that nothing like this has happened in the last 8 years.  Unfortunately, my future with Steve is looking a little rocky right now, but I still don't know what my motivation was (drunkenness never an excuse...) and I've been pretty upset.  I haven't seen Steve yet, and to be honest I don't think now is the time to bring this sort of thing up to him.  I decide where I will move in feb, and I think it's best if steve and I go our own ways amicably, without this mess (yes, feeble excuse).

Anyway, don't mean to bring up all this crap, b/c it's not yours, but we've been friends for a long time and I respect you and like you, and I really don't want you to think that this is a frequent occurence.  I do wish I was a little more sober, not b/c it would've changed much, but I think it might've been better all around.

So, any advice on Portland or SF would be appreciated (one night in each).  Call 646 342 3507 or email.

Later,
Mara


Well, I didn't get this out to you before I left the office last night.  I
was still pouring over bonus info until 9:30, and decided to call it quits at
that point.  Here are some of the things that I would like to do next week:

 review your action plan to move the close and officialization of London
books to same day,

 to replicate, if appropriate,  an Operational Risk information session for
London counterparts (you and I can  review early in the week what we are
doing here in Houston today and modify the info for Europe)

 discuss the Doorstep process with you and, if you deem appropriate, your
business controllers in the   London office who will participate in Doorstep
reviews this year (clear up and questions and get your input  on how to
continually improve the process),

 discuss with Mark Pickering the technology dependencies of the London office
related to speeding up   London's information for the corporate DPR

 do some planning with you for the February 12 & 13 ASE

 discuss the feasibility of utilizing our operational pricing model in London

 discuss your ideas and thoughts on CommodityLogic and other ideas around
potential commercialization of  mid and back office services

In addition, I would like to meet with anyone in the London office that you
think would be beneficial.  Through Nicki Scott, I understand that Michael
Brown would like to meet with me so we are setting that up.  I will also
spend some time with Beth Apollo and Ted Murphy while I am there.  And I plan
to meet with Fernley as well.

Any other suggestions on topics or people to see?

I think that we have lunch already on the calendar for Wednesday.


Ammendments are highlighted in red.

Please see attached.

Regards,

Aparna Rajaram
ext. 5-4563


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 11:01 PM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/04/2001 09:39 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: May California Journal Ad

Below is copy for May's California Journal Ad.  We are currently working on
graphics.

Please respond with comments and suggested changes no later than 10am Friday
morning to ensure that we meet our deadline.

Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

You Have the Power

   California is facing a serious shortage of electricity this summer.

   No major power plants have been built in California for ten years. This
year?s below-normal rainfall threatens hydroelectric supplies. And as
temperatures climb, so does demand.

   We?re doing all we can to help. We?re working 24/7 to keep our power
plants running and speed construction of new facilities.

   You can help by conserving electricity at home and work, and by urging
your neighbors to do the same. You have the power to make a difference . just
by flipping a switch.

   We?re all in this together. We?re all part of the solution.

[Graphic:  a finger flipping the switch off]

To learn more about ending California?s energy crisis, call 916-448-9499
and ask for a free copy of our report "Powerful Ideas." Or visit our web site
at www.turnonthetruth.com.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000
05:16 PM ---------------------------

"Dalecka, Patrycja ." <Patrycja.Dalecka@destia.com> on 03/10/2000 02:40:19 PM
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Hello

Vince,
Dziekuje bardzo za artykul.
Troche sie go wystraszylam dzis rano, gdyz nie slyszalam, zeby Aiesec mial
jakis back up plan...
Przepraszam za moja gwaltowna reakcje.

Tymczasem zycie toczy sie dalej.
Zalaczam moje resume, postaram sie poprawic jego forme na poniedzialek...
niestety tresci juz nie poprawie, wiec mozesz poczytac... ha, ha
Rozumiem, ze czas najwyzszy poszukac "rozsadnej" posady...

pozdrawiam,

Patrycja

 - resume.doc


Melba,

Here is the sentence that we discussed.  "Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary in the General Terms and Conditions, if applicable, this Transaction
is between Counterparty and Enron North America Corp."  Please call me if you
have any questions.

Stacy

	Melba Lozano/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/11/2001 09:56 AM

		 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert B Cass/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: EOL GTCs

Stacy,

Attached are the descriptions for the  products affected by the HPL revision
to the GTC.  Please let me know if you need additional information.

Thanks,

Melba
58986

Examples:
Product #1
US Gas Phy Carthage 12Jun01 USD/MM
A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a firm basis. The Contract Price
shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The Period of Delivery
shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery at the tailgate of the Carthage Hub.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be millions of British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in
millions of BTUs per day.

Product #2
US Gas Phy ExxonKaty 12Jun01 USD/MM
A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a firm basis. The Contract Price
shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The Period of Delivery
shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for delivery at the tailgate of the Exxon Katy Plant.
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency. The unit of measure against which the price is quoted
shall be millions of British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in
millions of BTUs per day.
Product #3
US Gas Phy       Waha                    12Jun01         USD/MM
A US Gas Transaction with Enron North America Corp., under which Seller shall
sell and Buyer shall purchase a quantity of natural gas equal to the Daily
Contract Quantity at the Contract Price on a firm basis. The Contract Price
shall be as submitted by Counterparty via the Website.  The Period of
Delivery shall be from the Effective Date through the Termination Date.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.
The transaction is for the Buyer's receipt of gas at the PG&E Texas Pipeline
Waha header, as scheduled by the Buyer from any one of the following points:
Lone Star (Meter # 504-720); Oasis (Meter # 504-383); Transwestern Pipeline
(Meter # 531-350); Koch Midstream (Meter # 504-259); PGET Accounting (Meter #
504-481).
The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be millions of
British thermal units and the quantity shown shall be in millions of BTUs per
day.


Attached is the Powerpoint with updated data.  Please review and make any
final changes.

Thanks,

Eric


lunch is never good for me...I could do an early dinner if you want

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brad Gabrielson <bgabrielson@cdnam.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 06, 2001 1:04 PM
To:	Dorland, Chris
Subject:	re[2]: Meet for lunch

okay


I think we could wind this up with a quick conference call tomorrow a.m.  Greg and I had some additional thoughts on how to handle the issue that this contract is not for 40% of primary capacity - it is not like an El Paso/Dynegy, Enron or El Paso deal without necessarily getting into the alternate issue of sham transactions.  Also, Kathy R. checked and as of today, IS have not filed a protest.  Maria

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Pavlou, Maria; Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven; Kirk, Steve
Subject:	RE: answer to cpuc protest

 Attached are some addtional comments and questions in regard to this answer.  MK

 << File: RP97-288cpucmk.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pavlou, Maria
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 11:18 AM
To:	Rapp, Bill
Cc:	Kilmer III, Robert; Porter, Gregory J.; Miller, Mary Kay; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; McConnell, Mark; Harris, Steven
Subject:	answer to cpuc protest

Bill, attached are a few comments/questions on your proposed draft answer, which I thought was excellent.  We might want to discuss some of these questions with the ccs.  Thanks, Maria

 << File: RP97-288cpuc.doc >>


I figured it would.  The master is now in the hands (or on the email) of
Stacy Dickson, one of the gas lawyers.  Let's see if we hear anything by noon.

Kay


I'm very flexible on who comes along - no views at all on that score.  It
would help to know the number and cabin sharing arrangement ahead of time so
we can book the correct size boat.  You can always change the amount of
groceries but at some point all the boats will be reserved.

I called Keswick last week and gave them my credit card number for the extra
room - it looks great from the website.  Will you be golfing or should we
make massage appointments?  Now that I think about it, I'm not sure which
days we have reserved - another alternative might be to stay near DC on the
day we get back from sailing (Inn at Little Washington?).  My guess is it's
an all day affair getting from a little island to DC so we may get in pretty
late.

Tell Amanda I said Hi!


All,

before we take precipitate action, can we all speak to ensure we are all on
the same page about this.

Firstly - the decision to add a Hong Kong password application on the
registration screen was taken in full knowledge of the relevant law and
everyone should be aware of the process that was gone through

Secondly - if I understand David's note, the conclusion is "we believe there
is no problem but we may attract some attention". We need to determine how
concerned we are about that and whether our concern merits the inconvenience
(is that all it is?) of removing the password application;

Thirdly - we are already pregnant. The application is already there. If
removing it solves the problem, why not wait until we know we have the
problem and then remove it?

Fourthly - all David's questions are valid and should be answered.

When we have discussed it, the right decision may well be to remove the
password application.

Mark, David F.  - could you make 4pm today London time (10am yours). Justin
and I will call you Mark at 4pm.  If not, I'll ask Tracy to fix something up.
Obviously David Minns can't make that, but I have a call with David on
Thursday and can update him then.

Jonathan Marsh@ENRON
14/11/2000 07:50
To: Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron on 14/11/2000
07:50 ---------------------------

David Forster
13/11/2000 21:31
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT,
Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT,
Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

I have asked that Hong Kong be removed from the list of online PA's,
effective for tonight.

This does not prohibit us from distributing PA's directly, if it is decided
that direct distribution is OK.

However, I am keen to answer the following questions as soon as possible, so
we can establish whether or not the PA can be put back on:

1) Does listing a PA for Hong Kong constitute "targetting" Hong Kong
residents?
3) Does the Protection of Investors Ordinance apply to EnronOnline or the
products contained on EnronOnline?
2) What are the HK Securities regulations and what is requried for
compliance? Is this painful, or do we qualify with little effort?
4) What happens if we come to the attention of the HK regulator? Does it just
mean some "getting to know you" meetings, or something more serious?
5) Is the Protection of Investors Ordinance aimed at individuals, or is it
intended to cover companies as well?

Dave

From: Mark Taylor@ECT on 11/13/2000 03:05 PM EST
To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster@ECT,
Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron@ECT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT,
Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

I concur in David's analysis.  Any idea who the target market is in HK?  If
we have specific customers in mind, would it be possible to approach them
directly rather than making the password application generally available?
It's not clear to me that even that would solve the problem since there would
still be some targeted HK residents, just not the public.

	David Minns@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/12/2000 08:14 PM

		 To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster@ECT
		 cc: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT, Dale
Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT,
Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Jonathan
Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

There is one issue outstanding concerning our due diligence for Hong Kong. It
does not relate specifically to Hong Kong weather but rather whether we
should revisit  the decision to last month list a Hong Kong Password
Application on the EOL registration screen. As I raised in my email last week
the Hong Kong regulator (SFC) has issued internet trading guidelines that
state that internet sites that "target" Hong Kong residents will be expected
to comply with HK securities legislation.

Under the HK Protection of Investors Ordinance there are restrictions on
making public offers regarding (i) securities; and (ii) "investment
arrangements relating to property other than securities".  Whilst it is
difficult to see how a HK weather swap (or any other product listed on EOL )
would fall with in these definitions it is not beyond doubt that the SFC may
want to investigate EOL if they believe it is targeting offers to Hong Kong
residents. My concern is that if the SFC logged onto EOL following the
publicity surrounding the HK weather launch they will find a password
application for Hong Kong residents. The SFC could well take the view that a
HK password application is evidence that EOL is targeting Hong Kong. Again it
is the act of making the offer, not entering into the transaction that is the
subject of the Ordinance. Hence arrangements to restrict with whom we
ultimately enter into password agreements or conduct trades  may not be
viewed as conclusive in determining to whom offers are being made.

l  have had an opportunity to review a 27 September 2000 advice that Jonathan
Marsh obtained from Allen Overy (HK). In Section 2 they raise similar
concerns with regard to the Protection of Investors Ordinance.

Way Forward

I would recommend that the Password Application for Hong Kong immediately be
removed from the list on the EOL registration screen, at least for the
present. The chance that this HK PA may invite the attention of the HK SFC
needs to be recognised. (This possibility exists irrespective  of the
decision to list HK weather products. Clearly on a practical level a greater
awareness in HK of EOL  generated by the launch of HK weather may be the
catalyst that attracts  SFC interest.)  Whilst our legal analysis has not
identified any  breach of HK legislation by EOL I would prefer if we
mitigated the risk of an  SFC instigated dialogue on this point.

This would mean a Hong Kong resident would need to call up to get a password
application.

If we wish to include on the parts of the EOL site that are available to the
public (ie where no password is needed) provisions that are unambiguously
directed to HK residents then it would be prudent for us to talk to the SFC
first. I note Allen & Overy also raised this as a possibility.

I recognise this is a judgment call on what is one of those grey areas. But
the prospect of publicity in HK for EOL was the determining factor in
concluding that this more conservative approach is warranted at present.

Amita Gosalia@ECT
13/11/2000 07:04 AM
To: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Jonathan Marsh/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

Hi Guys

Have checked the outstanding item with Jonathan Marsh.  Jonathan's view was
that the legal due diligence conducted by Mallesons provided the relevant
information.  Media coverage of launch of weather products based in HK may
lead to review by the HK regulator.

OK to proceed.

Regards
Amita

From: Paul Smith@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/11/2000 08:05 ZE10
To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Forster@ECT, Amita Gosalia@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Taylor@ECT

Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

Dale,

What is the legality issue that needs to be addressed by Amita regarding
offerring HK Weather products. David Minns and Mark Taylor have completed all
the legal checking and sign-off required for this product launch.

Regards,
Paul

	Dale Neuner@ECT
	11/11/2000 08:58 AM

		 To: Paul Smith/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Justin
Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert B Cass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer
deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Hong Kong Weather Products

I have created some Hong Kong weather Products in Production for your review.
You will find them in the Product Manager; 34991 and 34992.

Since we are still waiting on a response from Amita regarding the 'legality'
issue of offering Hong Kong Products, I have not made the necessary changes
to the Australia static data components nor have I 'squirrelled' the AUS
products. Once the go ahead has been given, we will release the ticker item,
update the AUS Static Data components, secret squirrel the AUD Products, and
move the Hong Kong Products into Active in the Product Manager.

In the interim, please feel free to amend the Hong Kong Products that I added
and add the additional Products that you may need.

Dale
3-9746

From: Paul Smith@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/10/2000 01:05 PM ZE10
To: Dale Neuner@ECT
cc: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Hong Kong Weather Products

Dale,

I can't see the HK Weather Products in Stack, Product or Data Manager. This
may be to do with my permissioning. In the absense of Justin, can you pls
check.

Regards,
Paul


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 09:46 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Shanna Husser @ EES                           09/28/2000 09:24 AM

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, ccampbel@tosco.com, jkcarruth@fedex.com, Misti
Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, daphneco64@bigplanet.com, lhusser@aol.com,
DTraylor@columbiaenergygroup.com, mshuggies@aol.com, jennifer@chescom.net,
scrilla364@aol.com, jennmmyers@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: FW: TeasingCat.MPG 2.mpeg

---------------------- Forwarded by Shanna Husser/HOU/EES on 09/28/2000 09:22
AM ---------------------------

Kim Chick
09/28/2000 09:13 AM
To: Shanna Husser/HOU/EES@EES, Emily Allwardt/LON/ECT@ECT, Angie
Ramirez/HOU/EES@EES, jenn_stew@hotmail.com
cc:
Subject: FW: TeasingCat.MPG 2.mpeg

 - TeasingCat.MPG 2.mpeg


Sue Nord, Sr. Director
Government Affairs
713 345-4196

----- Forwarded by Sue Nord/NA/Enron on 04/27/2001 02:53 PM -----

	Rita Hartfield@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS
	04/24/2001 12:53 PM

		 To: Anthony Gilmore/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Anthony
Mends/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Bob Felix/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Bob Hennig/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Bobby Robertson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Brad Nebergall/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brad Richter/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Brandon Luna/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Brian Spector/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Bryan Burnett/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Carin Andre/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Dale Surbey/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, David Cox/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Diane
Hetzel/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Donald Lassere/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ed Smida/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Edward Hlopak Jr/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Elizabeth Linnell/NA/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Fowler/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Everett Plante/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Frank Bay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Frank McGuinness/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Donahue/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jesse Morris/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Jim Crowder/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jim
Lowe/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, John Echols/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John
Neslage/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jon Thomsen/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kellie Metcalf/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Kelly Kimberly/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ken Rice/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Kevin Garland/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Kevin Hannon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Kim Godfrey/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Lara Leibman/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Lou Casari/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Margo
Reyna/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark Dypiangco/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Mark Gandy/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mark
Russ/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mark Solana/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Mark Wadlington/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Matt Harris/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Merat Bagha/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Michele Nezi Marvin/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Mike
Golden/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Norman Levine/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Patrick Hickey/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Paul Racicot/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Phil Markwart/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Raj
Thapar/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Randall Hicks/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard DiMichele/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@ENRON, Rob
Bradley/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob Callihan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Rockey Storie/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Russell Woody/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Scott Bolton/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Scott Manuel/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Scott Yeager/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Sheila Kahanek/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Shelly
Mansfield/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sherron Watkins/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Steve Iyer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Steve Pearlman/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Steven Sheldon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stewart
Seeligson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron,
Ted Seitz/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Terrie James/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Tom Wei/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: IntelliBytes - April Issue

Each issue of IntelliBytes is a concise summary of a broadband industry
topic.  April's issue is titled "Broadband 2001 according to JP Morgan and
McKinsey".  It contains information on operating and capital expenditures
involved in deploying xDSL and cable modems, the changing mix of Internet
traffic, and projection of U.S. CDN revenues to the consumer and business
market.

For those on the EBS LAN, you may view historic issues of IntelliBytes by
choosing "Browse the Spotlight" from wEBSource. The Spotlight symbol will
appear, from the circle titled "Business Development" choose "Market Research
& Intelligence", then choose "IntelliBytes".   A listing of the available
issues will appear.   To view February's issue on Interactive TV and/or
March's issue on Cable vs DBS in their proper format, select "Fetch" under
the Functions  tab.

Historic issues of IntelliBytes will soon be available via the Market
Intelligence community page of wEBSource.

For those on the Corp LAN, I have attached the February and March issues of
IntelliBytes.

Rita Hartfield
Phone:  713-853-5854
Cell:  713-304-5428
Fax:  713-646-8861
rita_hartfield@enron.net


I have in mind a contract that EECC and NEPCO will agree is the ENA form
contract, so that there isn't a need to come up with two different contract
forms.  Is that too high of a mountain to climb?

John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/25/2000 05:13 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Form contract

Of course, if you guys accept all our positions . . . Seriously, what do
youhave in mind.

To: John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Form contract

Hi John,

Question. Can we agree that a form contract will work for both EECC and
NEPCO? Sure would make life easier.

Kay


Brent,

Attached is my response to your RFP request.  Please let me know if you have any questions -

Thanks,
Kim Ward
Manager, West Gas Origination

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Brent Berneking" <bberneking@summitenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:18 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	Request For Proposal - URGENT

Please see the attached files, and submit a proposal in writing for service  to each of the seven (7) facilities shown.

Due date: Friday, November16th, 2001 3:00 PM EST

Please call with any questions.

Brent Berneking
Summit Energy Services, Inc.
502-429-3800

 - SSCC_SoCal_NG_RFP_1101.xls << File: SSCC_SoCal_NG_RFP_1101.xls >>


From: Mark Whitney
TheLaw.net Corporation
Homepage: http://www.thelaw.net
Remove: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm

  By late November folks aren't thinking about legal research, they're thinking about food. Our answer:

--discount subscriptions to TheLaw.net for the month of November by up to 20%
--send you something sharp and something sweet

  Subscribe to TheLaw.net before the end of November and we'll immediately direct the farm families of the Cabot Creamery in Cabot, Vermont, to ship you a pint of their pure Vermont Maple Syrup and a pound of their Vintage Vermont Cheddar. See, http://www.cabotcheese.com
see also http://www.thelaw.net/cabotoffer.htm

?AND SAVE 20% ON THELAW.NET CONVENIENCE EDITION!

  Just $395 (save $100!) on TheLaw.net Convenience Edition. TheLaw.net is a custom legal browser. It is very easy to use. $395 covers you for a year. You have unlimited access to everything. Install at work at home and on your laptop and feel-free to hand the software off to your trusted assistant at no extra charge. And did we mention there's a 30-day unconditional money back guarantee.

  Our Small Office Special is on sale, too, and the prices for multi-user Workgroups look even more attractive. See, http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

  Of course, our large competitors' databases have been a work in progress for generations. But, times have changed. A judicial opinion does not take on greater precedential value merely because it's fed to you via a WestLaw pipeline. It just costs more to read it. If you take a look at the searchable case law database you'll have UNLIMITED access to with TheLaw.net we stack up quite nicely, particularly when you consider the price.
See, http://www.thelaw.net/caselawgrid.htm

  By deploying TheLaw.net in your world you may discover that:

----your online productivity increases ten fold
----the list of expensive subscription items is much shorter
----it makes sense to turn to the big guns only when you cannot otherwise find the answer elsewhere, faster, cheaper.

?UNRESOLVED MANAGEMENT ISSUES

  Are you one of the select few who wants for little or nothing, or are you in a pick-and-choose mode with the overwhelming majority of your colleagues when it comes to choosing legal research resources?

     --What do you do when you have to research across state lines?

     --What do you do with a Federal question that properly demands a national look across all thirteen Federal circuits?

     --Our subscribers snicker to themselves, click a checkbox to search all states or all Federal and they pay not one thin additional dime for the privilege. (See covered jurisdictions listed below the signature line.)

"I AM IN MY SWEATS DOING BILLABLE RESEARCH. I LOVE IT!"

     And there you have our new favorite quote, from a new subscriber leaving a large firm to start her own thing. We have others; lots of them. See, http://www.thelaw.net/references.htm

     What's not to like?

--TheLaw.net is less than $1 a day for an individual annual subscription to our Solo Edition. Even less per day, per workgroup user. See, http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

--Enter a statutory cite into the search engine, and pop up cases construing that item, in one mouse click. See, http://www.thelaw.net/statutes.htm

--Have a case citation you need to know more about? Find cases construing that item in one mouse click. Simple.

--Easy to use? Do you know how to operate a browser, shuttle through little windows folders and do electronic case law research? If so, you're on your way to being a guru using TheLaw.net. If you don't know how to perform these tasks, we will teach at no cost.

--PERFORM UNKNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Use Boolean and, or, not, near, within, adjacent, nesting, truncation See, Sample Searches: http://www.thelaw.net/searchdemo/home.htm

--PERFORM KNOWN ITEM SEARCHES: Field search by cite, party, counsel, docket, author, date or panel.  See, http://www.thelaw.net/help/operators.htm

--CHOCK FULL. SEARCH TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT

--Millions of searchable cases - across nearly 200 Federal and state jurisdictions - updated four times daily - unlimited use - Federal and state statutes - State Administrative Codes - CFR - Federal Register - Public Laws - State and Federal Rules - State and Federal Executive Agency Databases - Bill Tracking Tools - Corporate Backgrounders - Thousands of Practice Area Helpers -  Reference Desk - People Finders - Every Major Metro Paper - Nearly 150 Major News Columnists - and much, much more. (Current case jurisdictions, statutes and regulations are listed below the signature line for your convenience.)

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICES

SOLO EDITION: $345 annually - you and one machine - less than $1 a day
http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

CONVENIENCE EDITION SALE PRICE: $395 annually - SAVE $100 when you sign up by November 30. Install at work, at home and on your laptop and your paralegal gets TheLaw.net, too - at no extra charge! http://www.thelaw.net/susbcribe.htm

SMALL OFFICE SPECIAL SALE PRICE: $575 annually - SAVE $120 when you sign up by November 30. This is for you, your partner and up to two paralegals http://www.thelaw.net/subscribe.htm

THREE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $795 annually
FOUR LAWYER WORKGROUP: $995 annually
FIVE LAWYER WORKGROUP: $1195 annually

ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS INCLUDE: unlimited access, a lack of meters, no surprises, a 30 day unconditional money back guarantee, unlimited, world class tech and reference support. What's stopping you?

SUBSCRIBE ONLINE - 30 DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE

     Sign up risk-free at: http://www.thelaw.net/fulfillment.htm or call in toll free 1.877.4.LAWNET with any questions or if you would like us to book your subscription for you.

     Join us today at TheLaw.net Corporation, where the availability of vast resources is not limited to those with vast resources. We'll do our level best to ensure your success - whatever it takes.

Regards,

Mark Whitney
President and CEO
TheLaw.net Corporation
San Diego - Chicago, USA
Toll Free 877.452.9638
Fax: 858.554.0968
whitney@thelaw.net
http://www.thelaw.net
"Information Retrieval Solutions for the Legal Profession"

****************************************************************
PRIVACY STATEMENT: TheLaw.net respects your time and we believe this is the fastest, least intrusive method of originating contact with busy professionals.  But we also provide several mechanisms allowing recipients to remove themselves  easily and at no cost. Simply go to: http://www.thelaw.net/remove.htm OR reply  to: remove@thelaw.net and enter the email address that you would like removed in the subject line or call toll free 1.877.452.9638. See also:  http://www.thelaw.net and click "Privacy Statement".
*****************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The proprietary searchable case law database included with your subscription is updated four times daily. However, on November 6, 2001, we did a count of entries by jurisdiction. What follows is a list of jurisdictions, the year coverage begins and the number of judicial opinions and orders in each library. A list of statutes and administrative codes is provided far below.

United States Supreme Court, 1900, 213,891

 Federal Circuit, 1982, 18350

 U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir., 1950, 14,345
  D.C. Court of Appeals, 1945, 11,546

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Cir., 1930, 18,350
  Maine Supreme Judicial Court, 1996, 1,558
  Mass. Supreme Judicial Court, 1930, 32,329
  Massachusetts Appeals Court
  New Hampshire Supreme Court, 1930, 9,026
  Rhode Island Supreme Court, 1950, 8,899

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 2nd Cir., 1930, 41,598
  Connecticut Supreme Court, 1950, 14,824
  Connecticut Appellate Court
  New York Court of Appeals, 1955, 425,966
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 2nd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 3rd
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Div. 4th
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 1st
  N.Y. Supreme Ct., App. Term 2nd
  Vermont Supreme Court, 1930, 7,903

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 3rd. Cir., 1930, 35,052
  U.S. District Court, New Jersey, 1999
  Supreme Court of Delaware, 1950, 24,859
  New Jersey Supreme Court, 1930, 44,830
  N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division
  U.S. District Court, E.D.Pa., 1997
  Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 1950, 146,850
  Pennsylvania Superior Court
  Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Cir., 1930, 62,794
  U.S. District Court, Maryland, 1999
  Maryland Court of Appeals, 1950, 20,269
  Maryland Special Court of Appeals
  North Carolina Supreme Court, 1945, 57,601
  North Carolina Court of Appeals, 1968
  U.S. District Court, South Carolina, 1999
  South Carolina Supreme Court, 1996, 1,944
  South Carolina Court of Appeals
  Virginia Supreme Court, 1930, 18,174
  Virginia Court of Appeals
  W. Va. Supreme Court. of Appeals, 1991, 7,130

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 5th Cir., 1930, 80,543
  Louisiana Supreme Court, 1980, 57,879
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
  Louisiana Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit
  U.S. District Court, N. Mississippi, 1997
  Mississippi Supreme Court, 1954, 17,890
  Mississippi Court of Appeals
  Texas Supreme Court, 1950, 109,548
  Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
  Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
  Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Cir., 1930, 56,247
  Kentucky Supreme Court, 1945, 22,235
  Kentucky Court of Appeals
  Michigan Supreme Court, 1930, 75,322
  Michigan Court of Appeals
  Ohio Supreme Court, 1950, 42,660
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 6th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 7th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 9th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 10th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
  Ohio Court of Appeals, 12th District
  Tennessee Supreme Court, 1950, 47,199
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Appeals, W. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App., M. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. E. Grand Div.
  Tennessee Ct. of Crim. App. W. Grand Div.

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Cir., 1930, 39,924
  Illinois Supreme Court, -1985, 31,813
  Illinois Appellate Court, 1st District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 2nd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 3rd District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 4th District
  Illinois Appellate Court, 5th District
  Indiana Supreme Court, 1940, 41,931
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 1st District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 2nd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 3rd District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 4th District
  Indiana Court of Appeals, 5th District
  Indiana Tax Court
  Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1945, 27,871
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District I
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District II
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District III
  Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IV

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 8th Cir., 1930, 47,131
  Arkansas Supreme Court, 1957, 23,949
  Arkansas Court of Appeals
  Iowa Supreme Court, 1995, 3,746
  Iowa Court of Appeals
  Minnesota Supreme Court, 1930, 42,152
  Minnesota Court of Appeals
  Missouri Supreme Court, 1960, 53,104
  Missouri Court of Appeals
  Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965, 13,926
  Nebraska Court of Appeals
  U.S. District Court, North Dakota, 1999
  North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930, 8,672
  North Dakota Court of Appeals
  South Dakota Supreme Court, 1965, 5,424

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Cir., 1941, 73,974
  Alaska Supreme Court, 1960, 8,009
  Alaska Court of Appeals
  Arizona Supreme Court, 1930, 21,928
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Arizona Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  U.S. District Court, Central, California, 1998
  California Supreme Court, 1930, 107,137
  California Court of Appeal, 1st Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 3rd Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 5th Appellate Dt.
  California Court of Appeal, 6th Appellate Dt.
  Hawaii Supreme Court, 1930, 7,116
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
  Idaho Supreme Court, 1965, 7,948
  Idaho Court of Appeals
  Montana Supreme Court, 1993, 2,724
  Nevada Supreme Court, 1950, 7,240
  Oregon Supreme Court, 1950, 71,910
  Oregon Court of Appeals
  Washington Supreme Court, 1935, 52,437
  Washington Court of Appeals, 1st Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 2nd Division
  Washington Court of Appeals, 3rd Division

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Cir., 1930, 33,347
  Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
  Colorado Supreme Court, 1930, 29,715
  Colorado Court of Appeals
  Kansas Supreme Court, 1982, 5,937
  Kansas Court of Appeals
  New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930, 17,135
  New Mexico Court of Appeals
  Oklahoma Supreme Court, 1954, 19,714
  Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
  Oklahoma Court of Appeals
  Utah Supreme Court, 1950, 10,905
  Utah Court of Appeals
  Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993, 1,527

 U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Cir., 1981, 36,724
  Alabama Supreme Court, 1955, 76,618
  Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
  Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
  Florida Supreme Court, 1950, 114,978
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 1st District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 2nd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 3rd District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 4th District
  Florida District Court of Appeal, 5th District
  Georgia Supreme Court, 1940, 83,838
  Georgia Court of Appeals

*******************************************
ADMINISTRATIVE CODES - ADMINISTRATIVE CODES

FEDERAL

Code of Federal Regulations
Federal Register
Executive Orders
OMB Circulars
Public Laws

STATE

Alabama Administrative Code
Alaska Administrative Code
Arizona Administrative Code
Arkansas Register
California Code of Regulations
Code of Colorado Regulations
Florida Administrative Code
Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia
Hawaii Administrative Rules
Idaho Administrative Code
Illinois Administrative Code
Indiana Administrative Code
Iowa Administrative Code
Code of Maine
Code of Maryland Regulations
Code of Massachusetts Regulations
Michigan Administrative Code
Minnesota Rules
Missouri Code of State Regulations
Nebraska Administrative Code
Nevada Administrative Code
New Hampshire Administrative Rules
New York Rules and Regulations
North Carolina Administrative Code and Rules
Ohio Administrative Code
Oregon Administrative Rules
The Pennsylvania Code
South Carolina Code of Regulations
South Dakota Register
Tennessee Rules and Regulations
Texas Administrative Code
Utah Administrative Code
Virginia Administrative Code
Washington Administrative Code
West Virginia Code of State Rules
Wisconsin Administrative Code and Register


im bored

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:27 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

so why are you talking to me now?


Vince -

Here's a summary of what's going to the BOD, along with updated policy.  Feel
free to call me if you have any questions.

Regards,
Cassandra.


Greg & Roger,

Per Mr. Nemec's request, I have attached the Firm, 311 & Interruptible
Intrastate Transportation Contracts (DRAFT) for your review and comment.

Thanks,

Eric Gillaspie
713-345-7667
Enron Building 3886


Does this include the suspension of the automatic email deletion policy?
Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jim Derrick@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:55 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

As you know, Enron, its directors, and certain current and former officers are defendants in litigation in Federal and State court involving the LJM partnerships.

Enron has employed counsel and they will represent Enron and its interests in the litigation.

Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, we are required to preserve documents that might be used in the litigation.

Accordingly, our normal document destruction policies are suspended immediately and shall remain suspended until further notice.

Please retain all documents (which include handwritten notes, recordings, e-mails, and any other method of information recording) that in any way relate to the Company's related party transactions with LJM 1 and LJM 2, including, but not limited to, the formation of these partnerships, any transactions or discussions with the partnerships or its agents, and Enron's accounting for these transactions.

You should know that this document preservation requirement is a requirement of Federal law and you could be individually liable for civil and criminal penalties if you fail to follow these instructions.

You should know that Enron will defend these lawsuits vigorously.  In the meantime, you should not discuss matters related to the lawsuits with anyone other than the appropriate persons at Enron and its counsel.

If you have any questions, please contact Jim Derrick at 713-853-5550.


I'm a little nervous actually commenting that we have Shipper imbalances.  Here are my comments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rapp, Bill
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:25 AM
To:	Donoho, Lindy; Hass, Glen; Blair, Lynn; Harris, Steven; Kowalke, Terry; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK
Subject:	SoCal Gas CPUC Proceeding

Attached is a draft of the letter that we propose to send to the CPUC regarding the AL2837 proceeding in which SoCal Gas is proposing changes to its "windowing" criteria. Your comments would be greatly appreciated. We need to file this tomorrow, so please communicate any comments to me by the close of business today, if possible. Thanks.

 << File: 11-21-01 Transwester Advice Comments 2837-A - DRAFTl1.doc >>


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 22;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041022.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 22 / Preferred:  24.00 / Final:  23.99)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Don,

Greg would love to see you.  What about lunch on the 13th?  (He's in PRC all
day on the 12th)  Lets say 11:30a.m.   We're located at EB2801.

Take Care,

Liz

Don Black@ENRON
09/01/2000 10:01 AM
To: Greg Whalley@ECT
cc:
Subject: Assist

Greg,

I will be in Houston for a few days the week of the 11th of September.  I
would appreciate your help as a career guidance counselor.  I would like
-+30mins of your time on the afternoon of the 12th or the morning of the 13th
of Sept.  If this works for you, have Liz contact me to set something up.
Thanks, Don


thanks tana!

...i'm just about surviving......however dear old edmund suffering a bit -
he's out of action 'til October....it must be called "EOLitis"!

..we're off to florence for the weekend  for a wedding - which will be lovely
..will see "David" again...what a treat!

TooTOO

J

From: Tana Jones on 30/08/2000 15:32 CDT
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Online Letter Form

At Mark Taylor's request, I am attaching Leslie Hansen's form of override
letter when a GTC will "override" the master agreement for online
transactions.

How are you doing Justy?


The contract attached to that deal was a GTC Firm which ended 9/30/00.  I
created a new ticket for those two days (461059).

Julie

Daren J Farmer
10/30/2000 04:56 PM
To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Meter 6315

JM,
Can you extend the contrtact on deal 138605 thru 10/2/00 ?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
04:55 PM ---------------------------

Mary Poorman@ENRON
10/30/2000 03:55 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Meter 6315

Daren,

I have some flow at the above referenced meter without a deal.  Flow was for
the first 2 days only, and probably occured as the meter was in the process
of being shut in.  We purchased the gas from Torch-Rally Partnership in
Sept.  Can you extend the deal, or should I allocated off to strangers?

Please advise.

Mary


i ran on the field.  it looked awesome.  i had a blast.  it was one of the
top 3 games  i saw at tiger stadium.


Regional Office Summary

Summary of current regional office activities - please review and inform Lisa
Fair of any changes or developments.


I will be circulating the report below weekly.  Please let me know if you
would prefer not to be on the distribution list.

Information Management Weekly Milestones Report ) 1/26/01

Portal.
? Business Analyst presented IM Survey Results Report to technical team.
Report shows what Business Units/Functional Units need to access from a
portal.

? Based on BA report, technical team is developing a prototype portal to show
the User Experience team for &look and feel8 input.

? Monty Myers joined the task force to represent portal development efforts
for EES.  Challenges to access corp driven information from EES have been
identified.

? myhome.enron.com targeted as choice portal name.

? Kathy Schultea will handle Andrea Yowman,s responsibilities for portal
security development.

Unstructured Data Management/Enterprise Search Engine tool.
? The three competing products are Autonomy, Verity and Inktomi.  The
Software Selection Team met with Autonomy and Verity last week.  Inktomi is
being consulted via phone.

? The SST is currently reviewing and completing the evaluation criteria
matrix using input from the three vendors being considered.  The matrix
results indicate the vendors have similar offerings.  We may need to pilot
all three vendors.

? The SST plans to get quotes on software prices from all three vendors.  GSS
has been consulted.

? BP Amoco was contacted to gain their perspective on Autonomy.  BP,s
application of Autonomy appears to be similar to what Enron desires.  The
Autonomy project has been in progress at BP since March 2000.  The
implementation has not been smooth.  Three other BP contacts were suggested
for additional testimony.  BP concluded Autonomy was an immature product.
Every challenge encountered resulted in Autonomy bringing in consultants to
develop patch solutions to resolve.  On a side note, BP uses a product from
Addept Software (UK) that serves the same function as what is envisioned with
Expert Finder.  More details on how this product is used will follow.

? EES is looking to purchase Verity.  Azurix is already using Verity.  EBS
has agreed to purchase/pilot Autonomy.

? Enron London had a negative experience piloting Autonomy.

? The UDM/ESE tool of choice needs to respect existing authority for
confidentiality. Each vendor,s product is being tested for confidentiality
and  security.

IM Strategy Proposal.
? Steve Kean is scheduled to attend the February 7th IM Task Force Meeting.
The Task Force will present the IM Strategy proposal and the  recommendation
to appoint an executive coordinator for IM ASAP.  Similar to Rick Causey,s
sponsorship of SAP, we will request like sponsorship for IM.

? Task force members are collecting examples of duplicate efforts.


---------------------- Forwarded by David M Gagliardi/TTG/HouInd on
08/22/2000 08:15 AM ---------------------------

"Michael Gagliardi" <mggagliardi@duke-energy.com> on 08/22/2000 07:28:03 AM

To:   DGagliardi@reliantenergy.com, David_Ricks@GSDM.com
cc:

Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail #74

---------------------- Forwarded by Michael
Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC on 08/22/2000 07:37 AM
---------------------------

TruOrange@aol.com on 08/21/2000 05:08:30 PM

To:   TruOrange@aol.com
cc:    (bcc: Michael Gagliardi/Hou-ComOps/EnergyTrading/PEC)
Subject:  True Orange Fax/E-Mail #74

True Orange Fax/E-Mail Service
Volume 8, Fax/E-Mail #74, Monday, August 21, 2000
Jerry Scarbrough's True Orange, P. O. Box 26530, Austin, Texas 78755 -
Phone
512-795-8536

B. J. Johnson Has Big Day; Brown, Reese Like Backup Linebackers

B. J. Johnson joined Roy Williams as a freshman wide receiver sensation
Monday, making one truly sensational catch between veterans DBs Ervis Hill
and Joe Walker and making several other dazzling catches and moves.
Johnson and Williams were both ranked among the nation's top five wide
receiver recruits last year, and both have shown they certainly deserve all
the attention that came their way.
Johnson's great catch was on a long pass from QB Major Applewhite that he
managed to take away from the two defensive backs. He appears to be fully
recovered from a bad ankle sprain that hampered his summer workouts, and
he,
like Williams, looks ready to do some damage as early as the Sept. 9 opener
against Louisiana-Lafayette.
Freshman TE Brock Edwards also continues to improve on a daily basis and he
shows enough speed that the coaches hope he can fill the role they had
envisioned for sophomore Bo Scaife, who suffered a season-ending knee
injury
the first day of practice.
* * * *
Coach Mack Brown said he really likes the way backup linebackers Reed Boyd
and O. J. McClintock are playing this fall, and he said he thinks they will
be able to give starters De'Andre Lewis and Everick Rawls a rest during the
season. "We'd like to get about 20 plays a game from them, and that would
let
D. D. and Everick  rest."
Brown said he intends to play backups a lot more this season than he has in
the past. "We have more depth at more positions this year," he said. "You
need to rest your starters at times, and we think we have enough quality
depth to do that."
Defensive coordinator Carl Reese also said he likes the way Boyd and
McClintock are playing. He said they are particularly good as pass
defenders.
McClintock has had three interceptions during the first week of practice,
and
Boyd has knocked down several passes. He also praised the way Cole Pitttman
has played at DE since moving from DT. He said Pittman and Maurice Gordon
at
pushing starter Jermain Anderson.
* * * *
One-on-one blocking drills between the fullbacks and linebackers Monday
showed clearly why Matt Trissel is the starting fullback and Brett Robin is
running No. 2. They are head and shoulders above the other fullbacks at
stopping a hard-charging linebacker. Freshman Will Matthews also excels at
times, but he lacks consistency. He looks like a budding fullback star,
however.
* * * *
The Longhorns' practice schedule has changed slightly, so here is for the
remainder of the open practices (all practices are at Whitaker Field at
51st
and Guadalupe unless other noted):
Tuesday, Aug. 22, 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. (the 5 p.m. practice will be the first
one in full pads)
Wednesday, Aug. 23, 9 a.m. and a 5 p.m. scrimmage at Royal Memorial Stadium
Thursday, Aug. 24, 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Friday, Aug. 25, 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Saturday, Aug. 26, 9 a.m. scrimmage at Royal Memorial Stadium, 5 p.m.
practice at Whitaker
Sunday, Aug. 27, Fan Appreciation Day at 2 p.m. at Royal Memorial Stadium
Monday, Aug. 28, 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Tuesday, Aug. 29, 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Wednesday, Aug. 30, scrimmage at 6 p.m. at Royal Memorial Stadium (first
day
of classes)
* * * *
RECRUITING NOTES: College coaches can start calling players once per week
on
September 1, but they can't go to any games to scout players until October
1.
Look for one of their first stops in October to be at Shreveport Evangel,
where Bret Rawls, a transplanted wide receiver, gets his first start at
quarterback. Rawls was sensational at several summer camps, including the
one
at UT, but all the college coaches are going to want to see how he performs
in games. Rawls already is on several national 100 lists based on his
athletic ability and the way he performed in those summer camps. He likes
the
Longhorns.
* * * *
My next fax will be Tuesday, August 22.
* * * *
The True Orange Fax Service includes  at  least  99 faxes  a year and costs
$99 ($79 by E-Mail). The True Orange Newsletter includes  26 newsletters
and
is published weekly during football season and twice monthly during most of
the other months. It costs $45. Save by subscribing to both for $130 (or
$110
if you take the faxes via E-Mail  or $99 if you take the faxes and
newsletter
via E-Mail). Send check  to address at the top of page. I also  update my
900 number

- 1-900-288-8839
- frequently with recruiting news. My E-Mail
address is: truorange@aol.com


Can you print 10 color copies? Thanks


Yes, I think we should make a formal break.   We have separate accountability for retail gen (wholesale plus ancillaries), and I think reg gen plus T&D should have separate accountability as well.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Friday, June 15, 2001 11:14 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim; Richter, Jeff; Black, Don
Subject:	FW: URM Org Chart & Memo

Everyone -

Jay has prepared his organizational changes as they relate to East Tariffs.  He mentioned that he is allowing fopr ScottStoness to focus on the West with Steve Swain.

Should we go ahead and make a formal break between East (Jay reporting to me) and West (Swain reporting to Don) so that everyone is clear?  I think we could roll all of this out at once.

Thanks,
Rogers

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Lewis, James
Sent:	Thursday, June 14, 2001 6:25 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers; Black, Don
Subject:	URM Org Chart & Memo

Please review the following memo and org chart and provide feedback.

Thanks

Jay

---------------------- Forwarded by James W Lewis/HOU/EES on 06/14/2001 06:23 PM ---------------------------

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>
Rosalinda Tijerina
06/14/2001 05:06 PM
To:	James W Lewis/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject:	URM Org Chart & Memo

Here they are:

 << File: Utility Risk Management Org Chart - June 14 2001.ppt >>

 << File: URM Organization.doc >>


can you send this to all the staff member participants today?  Thanks.  Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000
02:55 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jana Giovannini                           10/23/2000 11:54 AM

To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc: Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Julie Braly/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Super Saturday Interviewers

Jeff/Larry,

To follow up on my voicemail, the Associate and Analyst Program is in great
need of interviewers for October 28th and November 4th Super Saturdays.
These weekends are the most critical at this time.  To date, we are in need
of an additional 38 interviewers for October 28th and 67 for November 4th.
In order to have a successful recruiting season, we would greatly appreciate
your assistance in getting more EGM executives to participate in this
effort.  Please contact me at x39233 with any questions.  Thanks for your
continued support.


Volumes for NNG:

2001 3CE - (1513.6 bcf total for year ) - Bcf / day = 4.147

2002 Plan - (1495.4 bcf total for year ) - Bcf / day = 4.097

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Sunday, November 04, 2001 2:07 PM
To:	Keiser, John; Gilbert, Steve; Moore, Jan
Cc:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	2001 3CE and 2002 Plan
Importance:	High

I need average throughput for the above as soon as possibe.

Jan, I need total not just west.

Please copy Rod on your reply to me.


Dear Mr. LARRY CAMPBELL:

Thank you for your order.

You bought 100 shares of JNPR (Juniper Networks Inc Com) at 181.500000.

ORDER DETAILS:
The tracking number for this order is: B-600-AASN-1666
Order entered at:                      10:47:53 on 11/10/00
Order processing began at:             10:47:53
Order executed at:                     10:47:54 on 11/10/00

ACCOUNT DETAILS:
Time and Date: 10:47:54 on 11/10/00
Your position in JNPR is 100 shares
Your real cash total is $-25,690.37

You will receive a printed Datek Online confirmation by postal mail, or by
electronic delivery if you are subscribed to that service.

Questions regarding this transaction? Contact our Customer Support department
by e-mailing support@datek.com. Please reference the order tracking number.


P. O. Box 2227
Livermore, California  94550
April 4, 2001

Dr. Vince J. Kaminski
Vice-President of Research
Enron Corporation
P. O. Box 1188
Huston, Texas  77251

Vince,

    I have cleared my calendar, and I am looking forward to meeting with you
in Houston on May 4th.

    Transmitted herewith is the agreement that you requested.

    Thanks.  Have a great weekend.

Larry Thorne

Attachments:  Non-Disclosure Agreement

 - Non-disclosure Agreement.pdf


Probably a smart decision. Rick


Nope, thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:05 PM
To:	Jones, Tana
Subject:	FW:

Did I send this to you already?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilhite, Jane
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:49 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:

Thanks for the cookies - I broke down and had a second!!

Jane Wilhite
ext. 35063


It is my understanding the outages Valero incurred at the above locations are
force majure situations during December and should not trigger the buyback
feature of the contract.

Gary, I have not seen any documentation of this from Valero. Please follow up
with your counterpart to secure the letter of notice or we will need to
process the deal as if the buyback is active.

Thanks

Ken


This request has been pending your approval for  2 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000014511&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000014511
Request Create Date : 1/19/01 10:21:25 AM
Requested For       : amelia.cavazos@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Stack Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


This date works for me so I will assume that Julie will be going.  I will
work on flight  arrangements for Julie and I unless you think you might be
going.  I need your help in determing what equipment needs we need.  Call me
at 35539 or respond to this memo.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 10/13/2000 07:54
AM ---------------------------

"Vera, Ed - TPEAV" <EVera@socalgas.com> on 10/12/2000 04:18:45 PM
To: "'jane.m.tholt@enron.com'" <jane.m.tholt@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Meeting in L.A.

Jane:

It looks like the Oct 31st works for most people here that would have a stake
in this proposal.? I have set-up a meeting starting at 8:30 to 11:30 am.? Let
me know if that works for you or if we need to adjust.? Also let's discuss
any equipment needs you might need such as a data line for access to Internet
and any audio video equipment so I can have it arranged.?? Hotels in the area
are: The Biltmore, The Westin Bonaventure and The Intercontinental Hotel all
within one block of our building.? I believe at the Biltmore we have a
special rate if you mention that its for SoCalGas.

I'll be telecommuting tomorrow so you can reach me at my cell phone at (213)
248-4053.

Thanks very much

Ed


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Daily Energy Letter
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/Energy-Letter1-8-02.pdf


I'd like to get about 30 minutes with Mark, just to catch up.

Mark Schroeder@ECT
07/27/2000 07:47 AM
To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: trip to Houston

I expect to be in Houston next Monday from 1300, until Tuesday around 1500.
If any of you wish to meet, please have Maureen work with Beverley toput
something in the diary.

Elizabeth - if you do not mind, I think if we just sit down for a few hours,
this will be the best way to assure that Iget you timely and accurate budget
info, so can we book something?   thanks  mcs


Sara,

Here is a credit worksheet detailing the changes we should include in the
ISDA amendment.

Dan,

I am forwarding by interoffice mail (i do not have an electronic copy) a
physical/financial guaranty for your review.  As of now, they do not transact
with Enron in the physical markets, but they may in the future.  Please
review...

thanks
brant

Sara Shackleton
02/23/2001 09:48 AM
To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Glencore

ENA will review CP's form of guaranty and comment; Brant will circulate
guaranty to a physical lawyer and advise him that financial is also
reviewing.  I spoke with David Porter and we have decided to amend the ISDA
to acknowledge that all three branches can transact under the existing
Glencore Ltd. master agreement.  The use of several different corporate
designations (Ltd., SA, AG) is confusing CP's trading partners in the U.S.

Click on this link to view the document in the Financial Trading Agreements
database-->


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 01/16/2001
01:01 PM ---------------------------

Dustin Collins
01/16/2001 10:17 AM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Fundamentals Group - Associate Rotation

Hunter - per our conversation the other day, I am finishing up my first
rotation with the LNG group and am very interested in rotating into your
Fundamentals group.  I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to
further discuss such opportunities.  Please let me know what time is good for
you.

Regards,

Dustin


Happy New Year.  We hope your holidays were enjoyable and restful.  For a pleasant start to 2002, please join your Enron colleagues for coffee and donuts this Friday, January 11, from 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. in the lobby of the Enron Building.  We look forward to seeing you there.


Thanks for the prompt info!!  I hope we can help this guy get his power plant
built.  DF

	From:  Jeff Nielsen                           10/02/2000 10:31 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jo Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Pale Verde 8 years out

I was not able to get the bid offer spread but I was able to get the mid
market for 8 years out:

2003           50.25
2004           43.5
2005            43.5
2006             43.50
2007             43.65
2008            44.25
2009             45
2010             45.75

I also checked with my buddy about why the value of Pale Verde value tails
off in the out years.   He says it is because a large part of there power
supply is generated by hydro plants and part of the spike this year was
created by the lack of moisture this past winter.


Ina,

Ya, the departure should now be Thursday Oct. 18th.  I think the 11:15 am flight will do.  Everything else remains the same.  Thanks.

Mat

PS.  My frequent flyer # is EG235566

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rangel, Ina
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 6:52 PM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	RE: Portland flight

Do you know what changes you are going to make yet?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Matt
Sent:	Sunday, October 07, 2001 6:35 PM
To:	Rangel, Ina
Cc:	Holst, Keith
Subject:	Portland flight

Ina,
Please book me on these flights to Portland.  Also, please arrange a reservation at the Vintage hotel for Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday nights (21st through 24th).  Thank you.
Mat << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
Fri 19-Oct-01 1833 mi (2950 km)
4hr 25mn Houston (IAH)
Depart 11:45 AM to Portland (PDX)
Arrive 2:10 PM  << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
Flight: 478
Economy/Coach Class, Lunch, Boeing 737-300
Total miles: 1833 mi (2950 km)
Total flight time: 4hr 25mn
Wed 24-Oct-01 1833 mi (2950 km)
4hr 5mn Portland (PDX)
Depart 3:00 PM to Houston (IAH)
Arrive 9:05 PM  << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
Flight: 128
Economy/Coach Class, Dinner, Boeing 737-300
Total miles: 1833 mi (2950 km)
Total flight time: 4hr 5mn