Pacific  Rim Club General Meeting
&
Pac Rim  Trip Information Session
Wednesday, October 4
12:30 Room  C330
Non-Pizza Food  Provided
?
?
12:30 - 13:00 General Meeting
- Meet the officers
- Learn about upcoming  events
- Join the Consumption Function (10/20)  organizing team
- Join the Pac Rim Trip organizing  team
- Sign up for other activities
- Throw in ideas!
- Become a member!  (PLEASE BRING YOUR  CHECKBOOK)
?
?
13:00 - 14:00 Pac Rim Trip  Information Session
(1/3 - 1/16 Seoul => Beijing => Bali)
- Meet Richard, the professional travel  organizer!
- Learn more about the itinerary and  registration process
- Ask ALL the questions you might have re  this year's trip
- Look around for cool roommates for the  trip!
?
?
?
Hope to see you all  there!
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?


Start Date: 4/22/01; HourAhead hour: 4;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042204.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  TIE_POINT: SLVRPK_7_SPP
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 4 / Preferred:   1.91 / Final:   1.88)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/22/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Nothing fatal. Here are some thoughts/comments on the AMA for your general
consideration:

2.2 (d) Bank accounts/bookkeeping.  I've previously been advised that Corp
performs this function.    Issues which arise: will the money be invested
overnight, who has signature authority, etc.  We have a draft services
agreement prepared for Peoples which can serve as a "go by" if you decide you
need a separate doc.

2.2 (b)Billing/collection.  Responsibility generally should stop at sending
nastygrams.  No duty to hire lawyers, etc.

2.2 (f) Insurance.  In Texas, you have to have licenses to buy/sell insurance
and adjust claims.  Current language may be soft enough to not violate
licensing laws.

2.2 (g) cost of filing for licenses and permits not included in defn of
Marketing Expenses, but there's some catch all language that might help.

2.3  Accountants may like it to be clear that we can't hire/fire O & M
contractor, set O & M policies, or dispatch plant.

3.2   If there are multiple transactions in a short period, these may be
captured in one document, not one document for each transaction.

 It would be helpful if the EEIM for use with others explains our agency
role. (may be in there - didn't review a copy) Is the Owner a power marketer
yet?  Are we helping them get EEIM's with the Approved Counterparties, or are
they on their own?

 Will Enron sign on behalf of Owner for Contractor (Enron) transactions
(sounds silly)?  Is there an EEIM in the works between EPMI and Owner?

3.3 (f) I suspect by now you've figured out profits, etc, relating to "day
of" transactions.

3.4  last line - should it be interruptible instead of contingent?  Assume
Owner has transmission risk?

Is there a "no third party beneficiary" clause?  I might have missed it.  Not
life or death.

Interesting structure.  Could I get a copy of the final document?

Thanks,

Kay


I agree.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Palmer, B. Scott
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:35 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Cc:	Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; Love, Phillip M.; McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	RE: TRV

If we can set up new ones for NETCO, I do not see why we need the old ones.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:33 PM
To:	Winfree, O'Neal D.; Giron, Darron C.; Love, Phillip M.; Palmer, B. Scott; McLaughlin Jr., Errol
Subject:	TRV

Do you want to keep any of the old TRV files for Netco for any reason.  We can create new ones once it is set up.

KK


CERA

VKaminski

italia
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000
02:50 PM ---------------------------

David Callanan <dcallanan@CERA.com> on 06/27/2000 10:16:06 AM
To: "'vince.j.kaminski@enron.com'" <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: European Power Web Call Replay

Mr. Vincent J. Kaminski
Managing Director
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

Dear Mr. Kaminski:

On June 8 last, we held a special web-based conference call pertaining to a
new CERA multiclient study, "The Future of European Power: Electricity
without Borders".? Participants in this complimentary call learned first-hand
some of the initial results of the study, and how the study provides a
framework for evaluating current and future company strategies.

We are pleased to announce the availability of the recorded presentation on
our website.? To view the presentation, please visit our website at:?
http://www.cera.com/cfm/track/mc.cfm?p=662&c=2804?

The presentation focused on the study scope and approach, and its underlying
analysis.? In addition, the link above will also provide access to the
prospectus for the study, including the deliverables and enrollment
information.? If your organization has not yet enrolled in the study, we urge
you to consider doing so at this time.

Should you have any questions either about this study, or about any aspect of
CERA's European Power services then please contact me by reply email or
directly by phone in Paris at + 33 1 42 44 10 18.

Sincerely,

David Callanan
dcallanan@cera.com

Should you have trouble reaching the website using the link above, please go
to? http://www.cera.com/offerings/mcs/eurpow99/?

************************************************************
Our relationship with you is very important to us.? If you wish not to
receive e-mail notifications from CERA, please send a reply to this message
with "DoNotEmail" as the subject of your message. (
mailto:info@cera.com?subject=DoNotEmail )

************************************************************


o eSpeed Fulfillment Taps Lawyer, Consultant for Board

DALLAS -- eSpeed Fulfillment, which provides services
and technology to business-to-business and business-to-consumer
Internet companies, said it has appointed David
Bryant, partner of Hughes & Luce, a Texas technology
law firm, and Robert J. Potter, president and CEO
of R. J. Potter, a Dallas-based consulting firm,
as the second and third members of its board. eSpeed
Fulfillment closed its first round of funding in
September at just under $1 million from undisclosed
individual investors. eSpeed said that it will use
the funds to develop logistics and order management
technology.
http://www.espeedfulfillment.com/

______________________________________________________

Internet Exchange Reports Success

More than 40 million barrels of crude and refined oil derivatives have been
traded online on the IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) since its launch of
energy trading two weeks ago, a spokeswoman said Thursday.

The internet platform, located at www.intercontinentalexchange.com, has been
trading in precious metals since August and began live trading of energy
products Oct. 12.

By the close of trade Wednesday, ICE had traded more than 40 million bbl of
crude and refined derivatives, 240 million Btu of natural gas and natural gas
derivatives, and 6 million megawatt hours of power, a spokeswoman said.

The trades bring the total notional value for all over-the- counter products
traded to date on the ICE to more than $6 billion, said Chief Executive
Jeffrey Sprecher.

Oil swaps traded on ICE include crude oil, fuel oil, gas oil/heating oil, jet
fuel, gasoline, and naphtha.

Natural gas and power products include physically delivered gas at fixed and
indexed prices, natural gas basis and swing swaps, and firm power.

_____________________________________________

o Software Firm CES Lands $12 Million in Second Round

ATLANTA -- CES International, which makes operations
management software for utility companies, received
$10 million in its second round of financing from
Cinergy Ventures, the venture division of utility
company Cinergy, and $2 million from previous investor
Wexford Capital Management. Larry Thomas, group
president of new technology and energy delivery
for Cinergy, will join CES's board as its sixth
member. CES said it plans to use the funds to expand
the company in the U.S. and abroad and for research
and development.
http://www.ces.com/

__________________________________________________

o eVentures India Gets $150 Million from Softbank, Epartners

MUMBAI, India -- eVentures India, an investment
and operating company, said it received $150 million
from previous investors Softbank and epartners.
eVentures India focuses on investing in and developing
Internet and new media related ventures with a significant
Indian component. The company said it will use the
new capital to invest in four areas: Internet-based
software and IT-enabled services, infrastructure,
new technologies in areas like wireless and broadband,
and B2B enabling services. P.K. Mittal, an Indian
industrialist, is also an investor. eVentures India
has committed $65 million to 14 partner companies,
including NetAcross Online Solutions, Netpilgrim,
and Customerasset.com. The company has offices in
Mumbai and New York.
http://www.eventures.co.in/
_____________________________________________

o E-commerce Firm RedSpark Gets $14 Million in First Round

SAN FRANCISCO -- RedSpark, which provides applications
and e-commerce services for the manufacturing industry,
said it has raised $14 million in its first round
of funding led by Crosspoint Venture Partners that
included Impact Venture Partners. RedSpark, which
was spun out of Autodesk, said it will use the funds
for deployment of its services. Bob Lisbonne, general
partner of Crosspoint, will join Carol Bartz, the
chief executive officer of Autodesk, and RedSpark
president and chief executive officer Dominic Gallello,
on the company's board of directors.
http://www.redspark.com/
_____________________________________________

o Logistics Technology Firm Velant Raises $7 Million Round One

ATLANTA -- Velant, which develops Web-based decision
making software for automating and speeding up transportation
planning, said it closed its first round with $7
million from Matrix Partners and other individual
investors. The company will use the funds to expand
its staff and offices.
http://www.velant.com/
_____________________________________________

o Network App Firm XDegrees Raises $8 Million First Round

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. -- XDegrees, a provider of
infrastructure for network applications, announced
it has launched and raised $8 million in its first
round of funding from Redpoint Ventures and Cambrian
Ventures. The company was founded by Michael Tanne,
the chief executive officer, and Dan Teodosiu, the
chief technology officer. XDegrees has built a secure
scalable infrastructure services that enables enterprise
and consumer application developers to build and
deploy network applications.
http://www.xdegrees.com/
_____________________________________________

o Broadband Developer Malibu Networks Raises $30 Million

SEATTLE -- Malibu Networks, which is developing
wireless broadband technologies, raised $30 million
in its second round of funding, according to investors
CVC Capital Partners and Second Avenue Partners.
The two firms jointly contributed $10 million to
the round which also included investments from ARCH
Venture Partners, Polaris Venture Partners, and
a consortium of existing investors. Calabasas-based
Malibu Networks is developing wirelss broadband
modem chips.
http://www.malibunetworks.com/
_____________________________________________

o XML App Firm Bowstreet Raises $50 Million Round Four

PORTSMOUTH, N.H. -- Bowstreet, an e-commerce XML
infrastructure firm, said it closed its fourth round
of financing with $50 million from new investors
Amerindo Investment Advisors, Azure Capital, Essex
Partners, and Putnam Investors and from previous
investors Charles River Ventures, Matrix Partners,
Integral Capital Partners, and Kleiner Perkins Caufield
& Byers, among others. Bowstreet said it will use
the funds to develop and research its products.
There will be no board changes as a result of the
round.
http://www.bowstreet.com/
_____________________________________________

o Spike Broadband Systems Raises $47 Million

NASHUA, N.H. -- Spike Broadband Systems, a provider
of carrier-class, fixed wireless broadband access
products, said it has raised $47 million from Canada-based
CDP Sofinov, a subsidiary of the Caisse de depot
et placement du Quebec, an investment fund manager.
Other investors include CDP Capital Communications,
Sandler Capital Management, Cabletron Systems, Ironside
Ventures, HLM Management, US Bancorp Piper Jaffray,
Dain Rauscher Venture Partners, Wheatley Partners,
Rosewood Corp., Agilent Technologies, Signal Equity
Partners and Commonwealth Capital Ventures. Spike
said it will use the funding to meet product demand,
increase its sales activities, and scale its production
and distribution capacity.
http://www.spikebroadband.net/
_____________________________________________

o Embedded  Wireless Devices Raises $20 Million Third Round

PLEASANTON, Calif. -- Embedded Wireless Devices
(EWD), a developer and marketer of silicon services
for wireless, audio, and Internet applications,
said it received more than $20 million in third
round financing from new investors H&Q/GAI and Anadigics
and previous investors Trieste Investment Groups,
Good Honor Holdings, Apodaca, Maton Fund II L.P.,
and Hotung Investment Holdings Limited. The company
plans to use the capital to strengthen its engineering
and marketing teams, develop new semiconductor and
software products, and bring wireless multi-point
services to market. The company has raised $30 million
to date.
http://www.embeddedwireless.net/


Attached is a FERC order accepting our rate schedule, allowing us to sell
power to PDE without prior FERC approval.  Note well, this tariff will not
become effective until the Sierra Pacific/PGE merger is consummated.

---------------------- Forwarded by Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT on 02/12/2001 08:02 AM
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Wenner, Adam" <awenner@velaw.com>
02/12/2001 07:00 AM

To: "'Hain, Mary'" <mhain@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Enron Power Marketing

 Mary --

  Attached is a link to the Commission's letter order accepting the EPMI et
al. rate schedule filings (to exclude PGE Codes of Conduct.)

 http://cips.ferc.fed.us/Q/CIPS/WP/ELECTRIC/ER/ER01-753.00A.WPD

>

>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this
email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and
delete this email from your system. Thank You
>
          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You


?

Hi Folks,

A couple of quick notes before we get to  this week,s Upgrades and Downgrades.

?

Replacing Ricky  Williams:?? Contrary to published reports,  Ricky Williams
bypassed surgery today to seek another opinion according to  ESPN.? The word
is that Jim Haslett  will likely not go outside the team for a back.? Chad
Morton and Jerald Moore will likely  be the choices with Morton getting first
shot.? Morton,s a little undersized at 5, 88  and 186 but so is San
Francisco's Charlie Garner and he manages pretty  well.??Morton came from a
big  time program at USC and averaged 20+ carries a game last year so it,s
not like  he isn,t used to carrying the load.?  We,ll see.

Don,t Count Out Brett  Favre:? According to ESPN, Brett Favre,s foot is  much
better and he may practice this week.?  Even if he doesn't practice, he
thinks he may be able to play and keep his  record streak of consecutive
starts intact.

Akili Smith Benched.? Not  just benched.? Benched for Scott  Mitchell.? That,
s gotta  hurt.

Marshall Faulk Raring to  Go?? With Trung Canidate out for the  year with a
broken wrist, Marshall Faulk has reportedly told the coaches he may  be able
to play this week.? Most  think that,s too optimistic but it,s nice to see
the desire there.?

Jeff George to  Start??According to the Redskins, Jeff George will start
again this week at QB.? Coach Norv Turner has stated the starting QB job is
Brad?Johnson's when he's?healthy, possibly in?week 13.  ?

?

Let's jump right into our Upgraded and  Downgraded Players.? As we head down
the home stretch, identifying  those players moving up or down can be the
difference between making the  playoffs or watching from the sidelines.?  As
we head into our 12th week of listing these players, it,s  inevitable that
some players will have made both the upgrade or downgrade  list.? Make sure
you understand,  what we,re talking about is players that are moving.? In
other words, a player like TE Chad  Lewis could appear on the downgrade list
and still be good enough to be a  starter in your league.? It just  means I,m
concerned about the way he seems to be heading.? Likewise, a player like WR
Laveranues  Coles may make the upgrade list even though he,s still fairly far
down the list  of WRs.? It,s all about which  direction players are moving.?
Keeping an eye on these trends can very often make all the  difference.

Joe

?

Upgrades and  Downgrades.? Some of these  players are obvious moves up or
down and some aren't as clear.? Here's my  list of guys I see moving this
week.

QBs Moving Up

QB Mark  Brunell (Jac)?? I,m one of those guys who quickly  points out
Brunell has never put together fantasy numbers to warrant the hype he
receives but you can,t deny what Brunell has done lately.? Behind a beat up
line, he,s standing in  there (while taking a beating) and delivering the
ball.? Jimmy Smith made a roaring comeback and  paired with Keenan McCardell,
they,re one of the better WR tandems in the  league.?

QB Kerry  Collins (NYG)? A few weeks ago, I took some (deserved)  lumps for
my early praise of Collins but he,s kicking his game up a notch of  late.? He
looks more comfortable in  the pocket, especially in his footwork and drop
backs.? Watch to see how Amani Toomer is doing  but when he,s healthy, Toomer
and Ike Hilliard make a great WR corps.? A?solid ground game in Ron Dayne and
Tiki  Barber continue to help the passing game.

QB? Donovan McNabb (Phi)? With  Deuce Staley gone, McNabb,s had to shoulder
the offense and this week he came  through with flying colors.? The bad  news
is he only completed 47% of his passes Sunday.? The good news is he threw the
ball 55  times.? When a QB airs it out 55  times in one game, it doesn,t
usually bode well for the team,s chances of  winning but it,s certainly a
plus for your FF team to see that many  attempts.? With that many chances,
it,s like allowing yourself to double the stats a Jeff Blake (23 attempts
this  week) or Jeff Garcia (25 attempts) puts up.? Unless you have a really
good feeling  about Stanley Pritchett or Darnell Autry, I,d think you,ll see
him continue to  throw often.

QB Trent  Dilfer (Bal)?? Remember, this list is  relative.? While he may not
be a  starter, Dilfer is definitely moving up the charts and that,s what this
list is  all about.? He actually looked very  good at times in the huge
victory over Tennessee Sunday.? He showed nice poise coming back after
basically throwing the game away a few plays earlier.? Brian Billick did
wonders with a  marginally talented Tony Banks in 1999 and it,s conceivable
he might do it here  again with Dilfer.? They play Dallas  and Cleveland next
but keep in mind Baltimore has a bye on December  3.

QB Troy  Aikman (Dal)? When I,m bashing Mark Brunell as a  Fantasy QB, I
usually compare him to Troy Aikman ) Great real NFL QB but not a  much for
Fantasy GMs.? Notice a  pattern here?? After being named the  starter Sunday,
Aikman went out and lit up the Bengal Defense which was ranked #  20 over the
last 4 weeks.? It,s hard  to put too much faith in him but if you,re
desperate for a QB, he could be worth  a gamble.? Tough matchup this week  vs
Baltimore but he gets the Vikings in week 13.

QB Jeff  Blake? (NO)? You of course know by now that RB Ricky Williams is
gone for 6-8 weeks.? I hate it for  Williams owners (I,m one) but what,s done
is done.? All we can do now is look forward.? And looking forward, I see
Blake being  forced to carry an increased load.?  QB Donovan McNabb threw the
ball 55 times Sunday in the wake of losing RB  Deuce Staley and I could
easily see a similar type situation in New Orleans with  Blake throwing a lot
more passes.

QB Rob  Johnson (Buf)? I make it a point to hold my tongue on  coaching
issues but I,ve gotta say I think Mr. Charisma with the Spiffy  Sweaters,
Wade Phillips, is 100% wrong in going to Johnson.? In terms of roster
management, he,s  hands down the worst in the NFL in my opinion.? But none of
that really matters as Rob  Johnson has to make the upgrade list since he,s
been named the starter for this  week.? Don,t get too excited,  though.?
Johnson finishes roughly  half the games he starts and the next three weeks
vs Kansas City, Tampa Bay and  Miami could be brutal.?

QB Matt  Hasselbeck (GB)? Hasselbeck played nicely replacing Favre  this
week.? Remember there was even  some talk about trading Favre and starting
Hasselbeck this summer when Favre,s  elbow was a big concern.? Before you
give up the farm to snare Hasselbeck, you should know Brett Favre is
reportedly  feeling better and hoping to play this week.? We,ll keep you
posted.

QB Shane  Matthews / Cade McNown (Chi)? Again, I,m highlighting guys moving
up.? With the injury to Jim Miller,  Shane Matthews will be thrust into the
starting role.? The injury will also likely add a little  fire under Cade
McNown who may be rushed back a little sooner than he would have  been if
Miller was performing well.?  Matthews looked very rusty but it,s tough to
judge a QB when he,s thrust  into the game like that.? I,d look  for Matthews
at least for this week against a tough Tampa Bay defense and then  we,ll
see.?

?

RBs Moving Up

RB Lamar  Smith (Mia)? You have to keep giving this guy his  props after
another great game.?  Although, if you,ve got an owner salivating over Smith
and you can get a  lot in return, it might be a great time to trade him.? I
can,t imagine his value being any  higher.? His yard per carry number  dipped
to 2.6 in Sunday,s game and he faces the Jets this week plus a brutal
matchup against Tampa Bay in week 15.?

RB Edgerrin  James (Ind)? It,s tough to upgrade a guy already near  the top
but he put in another great game Sunday with 155 total yards and shows
little sign of slowing down.? He  averaged 4.2? yards per carry Sunday  and
the Colts are leaning heavily on him.?  Watch out for a tough November 26
matchup vs Miami  though.

RB Robert  Smith (Min)? Smith quietly is having an incredible  year.? He,s
put those hang nail  injury jokes way behind him as he,s become one of the
best RBs in the  league.? He,s running between the  tackles for the tough
yards and catching the ball exceptionally well.? Keep an eye on that tasty
week 13  matchup against the Cowboys.?

RB Fred  Taylor (Jac)? Jaguar Fans may be distraught, but Fred  Taylor owners
have to be happy, at least lately.? Taylor,s running as well as he has in
his career, even if his team is struggling.? One can only wonder what he,d be
doing  with a healthy supporting cast.?  He,s got two tough weeks coming
against Pittsburgh and Tennessee.? But as everyone knows, Taylor has a  great
stretch run of opponents in weeks 14-16 when he faces Cleveland, Arizona  and
Cincinnati.?

RB Jamal  Anderson (Atl)? If you didn,t know better, you might  have thought
you were watching tape from 1998 if you saw Anderson Sunday.? He ran hard and
with the power and  quickness that pushed him to stardom.?? Hopefully, he,ll
be able to  maintain that form.

RB Michael  Pittman (Ari)? Pittman,s nursing a chest / rib injury  so keep an
eye on that but assuming he,s ok, he has to make the upgrade  list.? He
scored a TD Sunday and  averaged 4.2 yards per carry on 12 carries.? He also
added 8 receptions.? His main competition for carries, Thomas  Jones, had a
yard per carry average that equaled his fumbles Sunday:? 1.00???

RB Justin  Watson (StL)? Watson held his own Sunday as he rushed  for 62
yards on 17 carries.??  He likely won,t be a factor long as Marshall Faulk is
already itching to  get back on the field but he might be worth a shot for
one more  week.?

RB Ahman  Green (GB)? With Dorsey Levens, troubles, Green  clearly shoots up
the charts.? He,s  an enormously talented RB, but he,s got to learn how to
turn that talent into on  the field production.? After a tough  Tampa Bay
game last Sunday, he faces a soft schedule with the Colts, Panthers,  Bears,
Lions and Minnesota coming up.

RB Chad  Morton (NO)? With Ricky Williams out for the next 6-8  weeks, the
logical guy to attempt to fill his shoes is the rookie from USC,  Morton.?
He,s Detroit WR Johnnie  Morton,s little brother and was reportedly extremely
close to Ricky Williams and  shaken with his injury.? He,s small  but very
quick.? He,s not as big as  you,d probably like but neither is Charlie
Garner.? Last year at USC, he carried a full load  as the featured rusher so
he,s capable.?  The team hasn,t announced their plans yet and bringing in a
free agent is  a possibility but I,d expect Morton to get a shot first.? New
Orleans has a fairly favorable  rushing schedule ahead with Oakland, Denver,
San Francisco and Atlanta all  ahead.

??

WRs Moving Up

WR James  McKnight (Dal)? Wow.? What else can you say but give the man
credit.? 8 catches for 164 yards  with a TD is a pretty good day.?  Whether
he and Troy Aikman can keep it rolling is the question but you  have to like
what he,s done thus far.?  He,s got a brutal matchup next week in Baltimore
but he might be worth  grabbing to play against the Vikings in week 13.?

WR Sean  Dawkins? (Sea)? Excuse  us for not getting excited about a guy who
was buried on the Seahawks a few  weeks ago and had Jon Kitna throwing to
him.? But Kitna,s looking better and Dawkins  responded with a great game.?
Like  McKnight, the question is whether he can keep it up but he,s worth a
roll of the  dice.?

WR Torry  Holt (StL)? I drew a few snickers a month ago when I  said I
thought Derrick Mason was the best WR on the Titans.? I,m just about ready to
call Torry Holt  the best WR in St. Louis.? And  that,s no knock on Isaac
Bruce.?  Holt,s really coming into his own and to be honest, benefits greatly
from  the attention Isaac Bruce draws.? He  does face a couple of strong
defenses in Washington and New Orleans but I,m  betting he manages to produce
against tough competition.?

WR Derrick  Mason (Ten)? Mason is clearly the best WR on the  team. Partly by
default as Kevin Dyson,s gone and Carl Pickens is injured.? But partly
because he,s just that  good.? The Titans had their running  game shut down
by Baltimore Sunday and they were forced to the air.? And much to the
surprise of many, QB  Steve McNair fared pretty well and Mason was a big part
of that  success.?

WR Ricky  Proehl (StL)? Great, just what Fantasy GMs need )  Another Ram WR
to worry about.?  Proehl caught 6 passes for 53 yards and a TD Sunday.? In an
offense missing RB Marshall Faulk  as high powered as the Rams, there,s
probably room for another WR at the  trough.???

WR Patrick  Johnson (Bal)? Johnson replaced Travis Taylor in the  lineup and
came up big with the game winning TD.? He only caught 3 passes but
understand  that he,s the 3rd receiver behind TE Shannon Sharpe and WR Qadry
Ismail.? Still though, it,s a Brian  Billick team and Trent Dilfer is playing
better with each series it  seems.?

WR Jimmy  Smith? (Jac)???  With 10 catches for 117 yards, I guess you can say
he,s back.? The Jags may be struggling but Smith and  QB Mark Brunell are
back in synch.?  Ride it while the combo is hot.?

WR Jerome  Pathon (Ind)? Terrence Wilkins had a firm grasp on the  #2 WR spot
early in the season but Pathon seems to be taking over there.? Pathon is
playing with more confidence  and more importantly, seems to have the
confidence of QB Peyton Manning.? He had 3 catches for 42 yards  Sunday.?

?

TEs Moving Up?

TE Bubba  Franks (GB)? For a long while Franks and TE Tyrone  Davis had
battled for time.? It,s  now looking like Franks has prevailed as Davis is
seeing very little time.? Franks made a great catch of the fake  kick TD and
is showing some of the athleticism that caught the Packers, eye in  the draft.

TE Rod  Rutledge (NE)? So much for Eric Bjornson.? Rutledge seems to be the
new TE threat  for the Patriots and you know Drew Bledsoe likes to throw to
the TE.? If he can just get that thumb  healthy(?

TE Shannon  Sharpe (Bal)?? After some quiet weeks, Sharpe has  returned to
his place of one of the premier TEs in the game.? He,s clearly the best
receiver on the  team and has the confidence of QB Trent Dilfer.? Just as
importantly, he seems to have  confidence in Dilfer.

???

QBs Moving  Down?

QB Trent  Green (StL)? Mike Martz said a couple of weeks ago he  felt that
having Green behind center was &just like having Kurt in there8.? We believe
him.? If you,re going to deal him, now,s the  time.? Even as well as he,s
been  playing, the league MVP Warner does not lose his job to a broken hand.?
The team is talking about December 3 as  a possible date he,ll be back but I,
ve heard even sooner.? Regardless, you have to figure his days  are
numbered.? Plus, upcoming games  against Washington and New Orleans in the
next two weeks could pose a  threat.?

QB Doug  Flutie? (Buf)? Right  or wrong, Flutie takes a seat as Rob Johnson,s
been named the starter this  week.? Hold onto him though as I,ve  got to
think the chances of Johnson staying healthy for long are  slim.

QB Drew  Bledsoe (NE)? So much for the Boston Globe,s Bill  Belichick
conspiracy that Bledsoe would miss several weeks.? Still though, you could
clearly see he  wasn,t 100% with the thumb.???

QB Brett  Favre (GB)? As you know, Favre suffered a sprained  foot against
Tampa.? While everyone  was shouting about how many weeks he,d miss, Favre
told anyone who,d listen  today that he looked to be ready for this week,s
game against Indianapolis.? Players are notoriously optimistic so  keep an
eye on it.?

QB Elvis  Grbac (KC)? Don,t get me wrong, Grbac is still a top  QB.? He just
showed Sunday he,s  human.? He really should have done  more against San
Francisco though.?  On a side note, didn,t he say he,d shave that goofy beard
when they  lost?(?

QB Brian  Griese (Den)? It,s the 3rd quarter of the  Monday Night game as I
type this and it,s pretty obvious Brian Griese is at less  than 100% arm
strength.? Keep an eye  on this.? He,s a gutsy kid and has  played through a
lot but it does seem to be affecting his  play.?

QB Charlie  Batch (Det)Another game, another  less than impressive
performance.?  Batch just seems to struggle to get anything done.???

QB Akili  Smith (Cin)? I,ve been ripping this guy for weeks and now I feel
sorta bad for him as he,s been benched(for Scott Mitchell. That,s gotta
hurt.?

QB Jim  Miller (Chi)? Talk about blowing an opportunity.? Miller had been
moving the Bears and  looked to be the spark Chicago was missing with Cade
McNown.? And then Mr. Achilles decided he didn,t  want to participate.? Nasty
injury  and too bad as he was showing promise.???

?

RBs Moving Down?

RB Charlie  Garner (SF)? Garner,s been a regular on the upgrade  list and he
had another huge game Sunday where he posted 141 total yards with a  TD
against the Chiefs.? Two big days  loom on the horizon though.? I  promise
you he,ll be shut out in week 13(he has a bye.? And then he faces San Diego
and New  Orleans in week 14 and 15.? He,s a  great player and one of the best
RBs in the game but he,ll be facing some tough  matchups coming up.?

RB Ricky  Williams (NO)? As I reported yesterday to our email  subscribers,
Ricky Williams suffered a broken ankle and will miss 6-8  weeks.? I had to
chuckle watching  Saints Head Coach Jim Haslett talk about how Ricky doesn,t
play defense and  didn,t make any of those sacks or force any fumbles and
about how Ricky,s just  one guy and they,ll be fine.? Yada yada  yada. ?That
sounds good Jim but you,re in for a rude awakening if  you really believe
that (I don,t think he does)? Chad Morton will be the likely  replacement.?
Jerald Moore will get  a shot too.???

RB Tshimanga  Biakabutuka (Car)? 1.7 yards per carry will not get it done for
a  featured RB in this league and that,s exactly what Biakabutuka posted
Sunday.? He,s got to get back on  track if the Panthers are to be effective
as a team.?

RB Mike  Alstott (TB)? It seems as if Alstott is less of a factor every
game.? He only had 9 rushing  attempts Sunday for 38 yards.? If I  were him,
I,d pay Keyshawn to tell the coaches I needed some  carries(?

RB Emmitt  Smith (Dal)? What a disappointing game vs the Bengals Sunday.?
Smith fumbled early on what should have  been a sure TD and never seemed to
recover.? I thought he,d carry the load for a  struggling Aikman.? Turned out
the  other way around.?

RB Shaun  Alexander (Sea)? So much for the idea of coach Mike  Holmgren
throwing in the towel for 2000 and starting the young players like
Alexander.? The rookie is a fine  player and will get his time but for now,
it doesn,t, seem to be happening  anytime soon.?

RB Trung  Canidate? (StL)?  Canidate broke his wrist Sunday and will miss the
rest of the  season.? I have no idea how the Rams  will function without
him.?

?

WRs Moving Down?

WR Marvin  Harrison (Ind)? Is it just me or is Marvin Harrison  getting more
and more quiet with each game?? He only had 4 catches for 34 yards  Sunday
and didn,t seem to be a big factor.?  He,s still one of the best WRs out
there but I,m worried about his  production.?

WR Terry  Glenn (NE)? Glenn,s faded down the stretch and the  Bledsoe thumb
injury won,t help his play one bit.? Don,t be too down on him as he does
have  some favorable matchups on the horizon.?  But if Bledsoe can,t go, it,s
trouble for Glenn.?

WR Marcus  Robinson (Chi)? The loss of QB Jim Miller is huge.? The Bears are
now with their #3 QB and  you can only expect so much.?  Robinson will make
any QB better but there,s only so much he can  do.?

WR Antonio  Freeman (GB)? Freeman appears to be headed toward the  path he
was on a few weeks ago ) mediocrity.? And that was with a healthy Favre.?
With a?less than  healthy?Favre, it could be worse.???

WR Jacquez  Green (TB)? Keyshawn Johnson,s gain is Green,s loss  as QB Shaun
King seems locked in on Johnson.? Green will still catch the occasional  long
ball but it appears for now, he,s the clear cut #2 WR.?

WR Terrence  Wilkins (Ind)? Suddenly, Terrence Wilkins is the  forgotten man
in the Colts passing game.?  For some reason, Peyton Manning just isn,t
giving him the looks.???

?

TEs Moving Down?

TE Kyle  Brady (Jac)? Brady,s still a solid TE but with the  return of Jimmy
Smith, it,s clear that he won,t be the big target he had  been.???

TE Jay  Reimersma (Buf)? Reimersma was a total non factor in  Sunday,s game
catching only 1 pass for 7 yards.? One has to think the QB shuffle could
have an effect.?

TE Itula  Mili (Sea)? Mili,s yielded his starting TE job to  Christian Fauria
and Fauria seems fairly intent on keeping it.? Mili may be a contributor but
it looks  like he wont, see enough action to make him a consistent  threat.

?

?

?

 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cheatsheets-unsubscribe@egroups.com


missing deals

buy idaho
19th
25 mw
415.00
np15

buy aep
19th
25 mw
400.00
cob
off peak


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL JOURNAL'S TECHNOLOGY DAILY AM EDITION
is now available at http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/techdaily/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

MORNING HIGHLIGHTS:

PRIVACY: Privacy legislation may stand a better chance in a
Democratic-controlled Senate.

ANTITRUST: Activists asked the Justice Department to stop the launch of the
airlines' Orbitz Web site.

ON THE HILL: The Senate confirmed President Bush's FTC and FCC chairmen and
new FCC members.

BUSINESS: President Bush and California Gov. Gray Davis will meet Tuesday
to discuss the energy crisis.

ALSO ON NATIONALJOURNAL.COM:
-- Daybook: Key Events On And Off The Hill
http://nationaljournal.com/members/calendar/

-- Ad Spotlight: Dems Hit Bush Energy Plan
http://nationaljournal.com/members/adspotlight/2001/05/0529dnc1.htm

******************************************************
GOT A JOB TO FILL? CAPITAL CAREER SOURCE CAN HELP

Capital Career Source puts your job listing in front
of thousands of top-notch job seekers -- many of them
regular readers of NationalJournal.com.

Find the right people, right now. Call us at
(202) 266-7259 for details, or go directly to
http://www.capitalcareersource.com.
******************************************************

----------------------------
To stop receiving these E-mail Alerts:

Reply to this message and include the word "unsubscribe" (without quotes)
in the BODY of the message.
----------------------------

National Journal's Technology Daily is published daily by National Journal
Group Inc. For more information about National Journal Group's
publications, go to http://www.nationaljournal.com.


d s
20924  NE Interlachen Lane
Fairview, OR 97024
davidshult@juno.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

d s


Rick,

Here's what I mentioned.  Thanks for the v-mail, let me know what I can do.

Regards,
Ozzie

---------------------- Forwarded by Ozzie Pagan/HOU/EES on 05/30/2001 07:18
PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth Howley

05/29/2001 12:45 PM
To: Ozzie Pagan/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Reliant Pushes for "Negawatt" Plan

Ozzie -
Here is an article talking about Reliant's effort to do what we were
discussing last week, regarding negawatts - getting wholesalers to pay for
them like they were actual generated power instead of the absence of.

---------------------- Forwarded by Elizabeth Howley/HOU/EES on 05/29/2001
12:37 PM ---------------------------

STACEY BOLTON@ENRON
05/29/2001 12:14 PM
To: Jeff A. Brown/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Heather Mitchell/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Howley/HOU/EES@EES, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Reliant Pushes for "Negawatt" Plan

This is the Reliant program I mentioned in our meeting.

----- Forwarded by Stacey Bolton/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001 12:13 PM -----

	Lynnette Barnes
	05/29/2001 11:58 AM

		 To: Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marchris Robinson/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill
Moore/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Frank
Rishe/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Montovano/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES,
Pearce W Hammond/HOU/EES@EES, Brad J Snyder/HOU/EES@EES, Gloria
Ogenyi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert Frank/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary
Schoen/NA/Enron@Enron, Ron McNamara/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Bolton/NA/Enron@Enron, Patrick Keene/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie
Lawner/NA/Enron@Enron, Stella Chan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kevin
Kuykendall/Enron@EnronXGate, Roy Boston/HOU/EES@EES, Barbara A
Hueter/NA/Enron@Enron, Becky Merola/HOU/NewPower@NewPower, Susan M
Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Janine Migden/NA/Enron@Enron, Kerry
Stroup/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald Lassere/NA/Enron@Enron, bmerola@newpower.com,
Geoff Duda/HOU/NewPower@NewPower, kathleen.magruder@newpower.com,
pbray@newpower.com, sbertin@newpower.com, scovino@newpower.com,
treichel@newpower.com, cynthia.sandherr@newpower.com, Kathleen
Sullivan/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reliant Pushes for "Negawatt" Plan

FT Energy Article

By Rick Stouffer
rstouffer@ftenergy.com
The electricity supply-demand equation is simple: Match supply to demand and
things are dandy. Demand overwhelms supply: build more supply.

Throughout the country, but particularly in California, there is no question
more supply is mandated*NIMBY (not in my backyard) be hanged. But what about
the demand side of the issue? What about getting customers involved in the
solution by allowing them to sell their excess power back into the system?

'Negawatts' nothing new
Granted, the concept of negawatts is nothing new; it was coined roughly a
quarter-century ago by the founder of the Boulder-based consulting firm E
Source: Amory Lovins. Many utilities today use customer curtailment to get
them through wattage rough spots from time to time.

All the existing independent system operators have actively considered
demand-side bids at one time or another, according to Richard Rudden,
president of the consulting firm R.J. Rudden Associates in Hauppauge, N.Y.

But what about a negawatt program serving the entire Western Interconnection?
Rather than a supply exchange, aka an independent system operator, put in
place a "demand exchange" where customers could make a choice: Do I produce
widgets, run my milling machines, build product or take the power I would
have used, bid it out and see what happens?

Just such a demand exchange within the Western Interconnection is being
championed by an unlikely proponent: Reliant Energy Inc.

The Houston-based energy giant already has testified in Washington, D.C.,
concerning the proposal, has had meetings with key Western state government
leadership and pitched its idea to trade associations and environmental
groups.

The scorecard: Thus far, no one has laughed, no one has walked away from the
conversations*no one has said "no," according to Reliant's John H. Stout,
senior vice president of asset commercialization.

"You're taking forced, rotating outages and prioritizing the interruption,
with the customer (that) can take the outage doing so," said Stout.

Much of what Reliant proposes is included in Texas Republican Congressman Joe
Barton's Electricity Emergency Assistance bill, but no big generator is
pushing from the industry side like Reliant.

A demand exchange
Like generators, including Reliant, bidding load into the independent system
operator pool, a demand exchange allows retail customers to determine what
they could spare and bid in a specific load and acceptable price.

The negawatt dispatch clearinghouse would develop a bid stack and make it
available throughout the Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC). If a
particular system needed more power, it would contact the clearinghouse,
which would match the least cost set of bids that could be shipped, keeping
in mind additional transmission charges.

Once the bids were identified, the clearinghouse would contact the customer
and its local control area. The customer would interrupt and the host utility
would move the curtailed megawatts onto an export schedule.

One key to the program's success is that no one loses money. The customer
that gave up its designated electrons would continue to pay its retail
supplier for what it didn't actually use, and the customer would receive its
bid price, times the megawatts curtailed, minus its regular retail charges,
plus any payment to the transmission provider.

"The key is it gets the incentives right at the margin," said William Hogan,
a professor at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.

Another key to the Reliant-championed negawatt program is that it is not
seasonal; it doesn't lock a potential megawatt-shedder into a long-term
contract.

"You can bid into the market every day," said Stout.

"It offers a tremendous advantage in that it allows distributive decisions to
be made, how much a customer is willing to take for an energy entitlement,"
said Richard Tabors, president of the Cambridge, Mass.-based energy
consulting firm Tabors, Carmanis & Associates.
As Tabors points out, customers who sell back into the market obviously are
doing so to play the margin, to make money. But their efforts also will have
a serious impact on the spot market price.

"Every megawatt not consumed is a megawatt which doesn't have to be
produced," Tabors reasoned. "That lowers the marginal cost, the spot market
cost. It really comes down to what (specific megawatts) are worth to someone
and not worth to me."

Heavy users thrilled
Heavy industrial users already are thrilled with the regional negawatt
proposal. "We think it is a well thought-out program. We feel customers have
the right to buy power, they should have the right to sell power and ought to
be compensated like the generators," said John Anderson, executive director
of ELCON, the Electricity Consumers Resource Council, which represents large
industrial users from nearly every manufacturing sector.

Anderson favors this particular plan because it gives the customer choice*
sound familiar?*allowing it to determine when it shuts down or gives up its
power.

"This is voluntary. You know when you will be shut down and thus you won't
incur any damages," said Anderson. "Many proposals tell the customer to cut
usage, but it costs money for industrial users to just shut down. Command and
control proposals treat everyone alike*and they're not."

Stout said at least two vendors have expressed interest in taking part in the
Reliant proposal, with discussions already taking place with Automated Power
Exchange Inc. (APX).

"We have had discussions with Reliant; we're in the business of working with
generators," said John Melby, vice president for North American marketing for
Santa Clara, Calif.-based APX.

According to Melby, APX represents more than half the demand response in the
California ISO. He said the company could utilize key computer programs and
systems previously developed to get the region-wide negawatt program up and
running.

The down side
There could be a number of problems in moving forward with such a large plan.
Consultant Tabors, for example, pointed to the White House and the Bush
administration's seeming preoccupation with supply.

Harvard's Hogan said having the power available when needed was key, while
Reliant's Stout said the biggest hurdle was that many states prohibit retail
customers from selling load back into the wholesale market. An obvious
solution to that would be passage of the Barton bill; however, nothing is
certain in such a divided Congress.

Thus, Stout continues to travel the West pushing the negawatt program.
California Gov. Gray Davis was briefed on the plan some two weeks ago when he
called a meeting of all California's generators.

"We thought he (Davis) generally liked the idea," Stout said.

Next up on Reliant's hit list is S. David Freeman, former head of the Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power and now Davis' California energy
conservation "czar."

"We've already raised the issue with him (Freeman), but we're looking to plug
him in," Stout said.


Power Generation Investco, L.L.C.

We have been requested by EWS-ENA to file for withdrawal of Power Generation Investco, L.L.C.'s qualification to conduct business in the State of Louisiana.  If you are aware of any reason NOT to withdraw from this state, please advise me no later than Thursday, June 21, 2001.  If we receive no objections, we will proceed with withdrawal procedures.

Lillian R. Bailey
Administrator
Corporate Services
EB4804A
Phone 713/853-3577
Fax 713/646-8007
lillian.bailey@enron.com


Cathy please seperate two items from your original list.  TAGG#N50101.C for
$897,332 and TAGG#N70687.7 for $659,979.  These two liquidations relate to a
NGPL storage deal on the desk that should have variances for several months.
The net amount of these two liquidations is $237,353.  For now, please  put
this item on the backpage on it's own line.  We will reconcile the other
storage lines in the next few weeks and see what if anything needs to be
added to this line.  At that time we will work out the necessary steps to get
this item off of the backpage.  Scott is still looking at TAGG#N38268.L for
$1,443,519 for the remainder of the balance for May.  Shout with any
questions.
PL


Awais,

I deleted your most recent Management report, please send another one to Greg
Whalley.

Many Thanks,

Liz

Awais Omar
02/03/2000 10:53 AM
To: Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin P
Hannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Frevert/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay
Fitzgerald/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe A Bibi/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/CAL/ECT@ECT, Mark E
Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Corbally/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Louise Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcello Romano/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Forster/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil Jafry/LON/ECT@ECT, Tara
Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Management Report February 2, 2000

Please find the summary of today's activity on EnronOnline.  The full
Management Report is attached below this executive summary

  External Trading

 Total  2-Feb-00  To Date

 Number of Transactions   1,000   19,386
 Gross Notional Value $   337,792,245   5,959,638,012

 Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)    256,271,963

 Number of New Counterparties transacting today    2
 Number of Counterparties having transacted to date    188

 N.A. Gas

 Number of Transactions   882   16,330
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   153,789,969   3,055,719,339
 Gross Notional Value $   295,810,912   4,950,320,141

 UK Gas

 Number of Transactions   33   1,013
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   4,897,500   105,581,500
 Gross Notional Value $   9,851,869   204,387,494

 Belgium Gas

 Number of Transactions   -     52
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   -     11,452,500
 Gross Notional Value $   -     21,830,046

 U.S. Power

 Number of Transactions   67   1,483
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   507,428   10,526,741
 Gross Notional Value $   13,154,552   334,869,016

 UK Power

 Number of Transactions   3   83
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   132,639   3,229,535
 Gross Notional Value $   6,379,853   129,424,445

 Swiss Power

 Number of Transactions   1   10
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   1,109   18,917
 Gross Notional Value $   24,228   452,952

 German Power

 Number of Transactions   1   26
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   18,600   123,064
 Gross Notional Value $   337,378   2,478,884

 Spanish Power

 Number of Transactions   -     1
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   -     5,154
 Gross Notional Value $   -     115,457

 Norwegian Power

 Number of Transactions   4   45
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   51,960   760,776
 Gross Notional Value $   750,891   11,294,303

 Crude & Products

 Number of Transactions   3   151
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   450,000   17,147,562
 Gross Notional Value $   9,570,600   249,554,517

 Petchems

 Number of Transactions   -     17
 Volume of Transactions    -     144,000
 Gross Notional Value $   -     6,484,700

 LPG

 Number of Transactions   2   24
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   16,000   296,000
 Gross Notional Value $   528,500   9,590,000

U.S. Coal

 Number of Transactions   2   63
 Volume of Transactions (st)   60,750   1,972,506
 Gross Notional Value $   729,938   21,951,551

 U.S. Pulp & Paper

 Number of Transactions   -     4
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     2,550
 Gross Notional Value $   -     1,500,750

 Emmissions
 Number of Transactions   2   47
 Volume of Transactions   5,000   117,500
 Gross Notional Value $   653,525   15,354,925

 U.S. Weather

 Number of Transactions   -     37
 Volume of Transactions    -     42
 Gross Notional Value $   -     28,828

 Number of Users Logging onto EnronOnline:
 External Users with Execution rights    665
 External Users with No Execution Rights    107

 Internal Trading
 2-Feb-00  To Date
 Gas

 Number of Transactions   139   654
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   49,776,611   244,120,782
 Gross Notional Value $   71,566,859   398,817,628

 Power

 Number of Transactions   2   16
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   21,256   185,367
 Gross Notional Value $   656,281   5,006,250

 Coal

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Emmissions

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions    -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Total

 Number of Transactions   141   670
 Gross Notional Value $   72,223,140   403,823,878

Regards

Louise


Yet one more round.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 01:00
PM ---------------------------

"Konsky, Diane" <DianeKonsky@paulhastings.com> on 04/20/2001 12:14:57 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Attached email

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/20/01 01:15:09
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

==============================================================================
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

==============================================================================

?
-----Original Message-----
From: Konsky, Diane
Sent:  Friday, April 20, 2001 1:09 AM
To: 'ben.jacoby@enron.com';  'kay.mann@eron.com'; 'chris.booth@enron.com';
'michael.young@northwestern.com';  'jkeffer@kslaw.com'; 'mreuter@kslaw.com'
Cc: Kahn, Marguerite R.;  DeBerry, Jeremiah A.; Wright, Tremaine S.
Subject: Attached  email

At the request of M. Kahn and J. DeBerry, attached is a revised draft of the
Letter Agreement.?Please ignore the  draft of the Letter Agreement sent
earlier this evening.

?

?

 - Chess.gif
 - Letter Agreement(v4).DOC
 - Letter Agreement(vRED).DOC


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Office of the Chief Executive
Sent:	Friday, March 29, 2002 11:19 AM
To:	DL-GA-all_Enron_Domestic
Subject:	Retention & Severance Plan

To:  All US Domestic Employees
From:  Office of the Chief Executive

Earlier this week, we reached final resolution with the Creditors' Committee on a comprehensive retention and severance plan for employees of debtor companies, or those parts of Enron in bankruptcy.  Later this morning, we will file the plan with the bankruptcy court.  It will be public and posted on the court's website, but we have posted the plan on <http://home.enron.com>.  (See link below).  Other creditors and interested parties are allowed to review and comment on the plan.  After that, the court may approve or modify it.  We have asked the court to expedite a hearing date to consider the plan and we anticipate a hearing will be scheduled as early as the middle of April.

We want you to know that this plan is the result of much negotiation and compromise between Enron and our Creditors' Committee.  To be viable for approval by the bankruptcy court, a plan has to preserve or generate the greatest value for the estate and its creditors.  This plan meets that criterion.

We know all of you are interested in the plan's details so you can have some degree of financial certainty and make educated decisions for your future.  To help you fully understand how the retention and severance plan will work, we should first explain some near-term restructuring goals.

As we work to secure the most value for our creditors and other stakeholders, restructuring requires us to determine which assets or businesses provide greater value by being sold, as well as which assets or businesses provide greater value by generating ongoing cash flows.  We do have businesses and assets that are capable of emerging from bankruptcy.  We intend to separate those businesses from the liabilities and litigation facing the estate so they can succeed as part of a viable reorganized entity.

This will require us to identify employees best suited to liquidate non-core assets or wind down the estate, as well as employees best suited to support an emerging business.  Given the inherent uncertainty of restructuring, the retention and severance plan offers some measure of financial assurance to all employees of debtor companies regardless of their role within the organization.

The proposed plan is retroactive to March 1, 2002, and has a maximum value up to $130 million depending on the value of asset sales and other cash collections.  It includes the following components:
Severance benefits valued up to $7 million,
Retention payments valued at $40 million, and
Liquidation incentive pool, which is a variable pool tied to the amount of cash collected by the estate, with a minimum value of $7.4 million and a maximum value of up to $90 million, one percent of the estate's cash collection target of $9 billion.

SEVERANCE BENEFITS
A primary component of the proposed retention and severance plan is a new severance program for employees of debtor companies not currently participating in another plan.  Under the proposed plan, employees will be eligible for two weeks base pay for every full or partial year of service, with a maximum of eight weeks base pay and a minimum of $4,500.  If an employee resigns voluntarily or is terminated for cause, he or she is not eligible for severance benefits.

Some non-debtor companies were able to recently institute separate severance plans for their employees.  This was possible because their plans do not require the approval of the bankruptcy court.  The details of those plans have been shared with employees of non-debtor companies.

RETENTION
Under the proposed plan, retention payments will be made to many employees in debtor companies whose skills or knowledge are required indefinitely, or for a predetermined duration of the restructuring.  Regrettably, not all employees will receive retention.

An eligible employee's retention will be a percentage of his or her quarterly base salary.  At the beginning of each quarter, or three-month period, eligible employees will be informed of their projected range of retention compensation for the period by their supervisors.  The actual quarterly payout an employee earns will be decided at the end of the quarter based on performance and achievements during the period.

An employee participating in the retention program will receive 25 percent of the earned quarterly retention at the end of each period, with payouts as soon as practical after May 31, August 31, November 30, 2002, and February 28, 2003.  The remaining 75 percent of the earned retention for a period is non-vested, deferred, and will be paid to an employee after February 28, 2003.

If involuntarily terminated without cause prior to February 28, 2003, an employee will receive all deferred retention, plus retention based on the actual earned salary for the quarter in which he or she is terminated.  Employees' earned and deferred retention payments are considered post-petition administrative claims that take precedent over other obligations owed by the estate.

An employee involuntarily terminated without cause is eligible for the greater of severance benefits or earned retention, with the total amount of retention payments received offsetting the amount of severance received.  Depending on an employee's personal circumstances, a participant in the retention program may wish to consider setting aside some portion of retention as a financial safety net in the event he or she is involuntarily terminated.

If an employee receiving retention voluntarily resigns prior to February 28, 2003, or is terminated for cause, he or she does not earn a retention payment for that quarter and forfeits all deferred retention.  He or she would not be eligible for severance.

Any amounts not paid out are returned to the retention fund and could be reallocated to current or new participants of the program.

LIQUIDATION INCENTIVE POOL
Under the proposed plan, employees identified as critical to the sale of non-core assets and businesses will be eligible to participate in the liquidation incentive pool (LIP).  The amount of money in the pool will be directly tied to the amount of cash collected by the estate.

Enron's management committee will have discretion to assign incentive payments to participants in the liquidation pool after each $500 million dollars is collected, also called a "collection milestone".  Fifty percent of an employee's earned liquidation incentive for a collection period will be distributed at the time a milestone is reached.  The remaining 50 percent of the earned liquidation incentive is non-vested and deferred.

If a collection milestone is not reached in a given quarter, but progress has been made, a quarterly advance may be allocated among participants of the program based on a quarterly floor amount of $1.85 million.  Fifty percent of an employee's quarterly advance will be paid as soon as practical after May 31, August 31, November 30, 2002, and February 28, 2003.  The remaining 50 percent of an earned advance will be non-vested and deferred, and will offset against future incentive payments.

All accrued and deferred liquidation will be paid at the earlier of the following events:
1.		Enron's reorganization is complete; or
2.	the employee is involuntarily terminated without cause, or
3.	upon specified dates related to incremental cash collections.

Employees' earned and deferred liquidation incentives are considered post-petition administrative claims that take precedent over other obligations owed by the estate.

Employees participating in the liquidation incentive pool are not eligible for severance benefits.  If an employee receiving liquidation incentives voluntarily resigns prior to February 28, 2003, or is terminated for cause, he or she will forfeit any deferred liquidation incentive payment and any minimum liquidation payment for the quarter in which he or she resigns.

Any amounts not paid out are returned to the liquidation incentive pool and could be reallocated to current or new participants of the program.

OTHER ITEMS
Bankruptcy law allows creditors to claim as fraudulent any significant payments made by a company in the 90-day period prior to its bankruptcy's filing.  To that end, creditors may attempt to reclaim retention payments made prior to Enron's bankruptcy filing that they perceive were inappropriate or have not returned adequate value to the estate.  The Creditors' Committee has agreed to forego its right to pursue claims against any current employee who agrees to release claims against the company, and stays with the company through August 31, 2002, or until he or she is involuntarily terminated without cause, whichever comes first.

All debtor company employees will be required to sign a general release to receive their final severance benefits, deferred quarterly retention payments, or deferred liquidation payments.

We know how long you have waited for details about this plan.  We will instruct supervisors to begin communicating projected participation to each individual employee next week.  Although the Creditors' Committee has approved it, this proposed plan is not final until approved by the bankruptcy court.  Therefore, it is possible an employee's status could change depending on the final plan approved by the court.  Supervisors will hold follow up meetings with each employee to confirm his or her individual participation after the bankruptcy court rules on the plan.

To review the plan in its entirety, click on the following link:  <http://home.enron.com/updates/retsevplan.html>


Congratulations.  Even though it's the EEI agreement, getting Edison to agree
to sign something is an achievement.  Good luck landing deals.

Jeff

	Mary Hain@ECT
	11/17/2000 01:51 PM

		 To: Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Southern California Edison Company

FYI.  This is just a master under which we can do individual agreements.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/17/2000 11:55 AM
---------------------------

Rhonda L Denton
11/17/2000 08:13 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dana Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Genia
FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann
Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kyle Schultz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gretchen
Lotz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dean Laurent/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Suarez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cara
Semperger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jan M King/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mike Swerzbin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael
Etringer/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Malowney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Laura Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, James E
Terrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corry Bentley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Lorenz/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharen
Cason/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Piwetz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie
Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell T Kelley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stewart Rosman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Holli Krebs/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Choi/SF/ECT@ECT, Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Mead/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip Platter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Smith L
Day/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Brett Hunsucker/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, John M Forney/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kayne Coulter/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Kinser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Benson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul J
Broderick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janet H
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rogers Herndon/HOU/ECT@ect, Jesse Bryson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stanley Cocke/PDX/ECT@ECT, Michael M Driscoll/PDX/ECT@ECT, Doug
Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joy
Werner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Houston/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Amy Horton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kim Durham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda
Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rudy Acevedo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diana Allen/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Ted Ballinger/NA/Enron@Enron, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Burnett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carla Hoffman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Guzman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Larry F Campbell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike Carson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alan
Chen/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jason Choate/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lawrence
Clayton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kevin Cline/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terri
Clynes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keith Comeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karla
Compean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Crawford/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mike Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Oscar Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clint Dean/Corp/Enron@Enron, Todd
DeCook/Corp/Enron@Enron, George Diaz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Dutta/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Joe Errigo/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Fairley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Miguel L
Garcia/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gerald Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joe
Gordon/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brent Hebert/HOU/ECT@ect, Juan
Hernandez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wayne Herndon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim
Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Hopley/HOU/ECT@ect, Richard Hrabal/HOU/ECT@ect,
Rika Imai/NA/Enron@Enron, Alton Jackson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry
Jester/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Gary Justice/NA/Enron@Enron, MICHAEL
KELLY/ENRON@Gateway, Grace Kim/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff King/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Madhup Kumar/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Justin Laverell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Chris
Lenartowicz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter Makkai/NA/Enron@Enron, Dave
Mangskau/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Posey Martinez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
May/Corp/Enron@Enron, Keller Mayeaux/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug
Miller/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Narsimha
Misra/NA/Enron@Enron, Steve Olinde/Corp/Enron@Enron, Andy
Pace/NA/Enron@Enron, Juan Padron/NA/Enron@Enron, Ricardo
Perez/NA/Enron@Enron, Joseph Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Quenet/NA/Enron@Enron, Bill Rust/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Ryan/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Eric Saibi/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Zachary Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Anna
Santucci/NA/Enron@Enron, Janelle Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erik
Serio/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Sewell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Stalford/NA/Enron@Enron, Chad Starnes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joe
Stepenovitch/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Symms/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul D
Thomas/NA/Enron@Enron, Greg Trefz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Valdes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joseph Wagner/NA/Enron@Enron, Christopher
Watts/NA/Enron@Enron, Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jay Wills/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
George Wood/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alex Wong/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tracy
Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Valarie
Sabo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Fran Chang/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Southern California Edison Company

We have received the executed Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement dated
11/14/2000 from the referenced CP.  Copies will be given to Legal and Credit.

THIS IS AN EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE (EEI) AGREEMENT.


As you are probably aware, the Commission, at the pre-hearing conference on
October 26, rejected the utilities proposals to roll a bunch of related
issues into addressing their undercollection issue.  At this point, it
doesn't appear as though there will be hearings.  However, we do have to
file comments by November 9 on the utilities claims (taking, violation of
the filed rate doctrine, etc) and TURN's proposal.  TURN proposed to fold
the undercollected balance into the TCBA and let nature take its course
through the end of the transition period.

Our comments will go toward supporting TURN, in concept, refuting utility
claims of taking.  We may want to consider teeing up some of the ideas of
an equitable allocation of high costs to ratepayers.

Let me know your thoughts, who else will want to weigh in on this.


I am on the Board of BEAR and sponsoring this effort.  Please let Janette
Elbertson know by e-mail if you are interested in donating your time to help
staff the table in the lobby on Monday, December 18, from 10 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.

Thank you.

Help CPS Kids!
Enron, KRBE and Sun and Ski Sports are collecting donations for Children,s
Protective Services Be A Resource (BEAR) Program to purchase gifts this
holiday season. Make your donation and receive a $10-off coupon for Sun and
Ski Sports.

Donations will be accepted in the Enron Building Lobby - Tuesday, December
12, Thursday, December 14 and Monday, December 18 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. or
in EB407.

KRBE Morning Show LIVE in Antioch Park
Come out and show your support for the CPS BEAR collection Monday, December
18 when the 104 KRBE morning show,s Streets of America comes to Antioch Park.
See you there from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m.


Jeff--please put me on your list for any updates to the CA DA situation, including the proposed legislation.  Also, please send me any updates you have sent out since the meeting last Fri.  Thanks.  MDS


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: GRACO Contact Form
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 14:05:43 -0400
From: GRACO Customer Service <gracocsrep@gracocorp.com>
To: "'jimboman@bigfoot.com'" <jimboman@bigfoot.com>

James, Graco is sorry for the inconvenience. I ordered you a new diaper
bag,
the part you described is not replaceable so a new diaper bag is on
order
for you.
Please include all correspondence when responding.
Thank You,
Jody
Graco Customer Service

> ----------
> From:  jimboman@bigfoot.com[SMTP:jimboman@bigfoot.com]
> Sent:  Monday, May 03, 1999 12:08 AM
> To:  consumerservices@gracocorp.com
> Cc:  rubbercc@eisnet.com
> Subject:  GRACO Contact Form
>
> Submitted on Monday, May 3, 1999 at 04:08:22 GMT.
>
> Name:          James Lokay
> E-mail:        jimboman@bigfoot.com
> Phone:         281-927-9360
> Address 1:     1114 Augusta Dr., No. 25
> Address 2:
> City:          Houston
> State:         TX
> Zip:           77057-2227
> Country:       US
> Product Code:  603BW
>
> Feedback:
> I don't know if that is the correct product code.  The product I am
> writing about is a soft, backpack style diaper bag from the "Sarah"
> collection in a blackwatch plaid pattern.    We own many Graco product and
> have had trouble only with this one so far.  This is a fairly new product
> but the vinyl that the velcro patch on the top flap is attached to has
> torn away from the flap.  I am hoping that Graco supports this product and
> will be able to correct the problem.    Please let me know what I need to
> do to pursue a remedy for this.  I look forward to your reply.    Thank
> you,  Jim Lokay
>


Pat,

I think that we should probably send the newest people to the first
training.  What do you think?

Liz, Susan, Mary, Sabrae?

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000
03:31 PM ---------------------------

Russ Severson
09/12/2000 03:25 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: SITARA TRAINING

Daren

The number of interested people turned out to be larger than the room can
handle.  Can you just send 3 or 4 for this meeting and I will set up a
secondary date for the others.

Thanks
Russ
x37386
---------------------- Forwarded by Russ Severson/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 03:16
PM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
09/08/2000 02:14 PM
To: Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Liz Bellamy/NA/Enron@Enron, Sabrae
Zajac/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Poorman/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan Hadix/NA/Enron@Enron,
Tom Acton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark McCoy/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eddie
Janzen/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: SITARA TRAINING

Russ,

I would like for the following people from the Texas region to attend:

Liz Bellamy
Sabrae Zajak
Mary Poorman
Susan Hadix
Tom Acton
Mark McCoy
Eddie Janzen

Let me know if this group is too large and move some to a later date.  Thanks.

D

Russ Severson
09/08/2000 08:53 AM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: SITARA TRAINING

I will be giving a training session on Wed   9/13/00  in 21C2 from 3:00-4:30
pm.
I would like for you to send to the class any new logistics personnel that
you might think could use a Sitara overview.
If someone cannot make it at this time, let me know their names and I will
try to schedule something for them at a later time.

If possible, please send me a note on who might be attending, so I can get an
approximate head count.

Call me or e-mail me if you have any questions

Russ
x37386


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 07/26/2000
09:12 AM ---------------------------

Stinson Gibner
07/25/2000 05:38 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Offsite Agenda - Stinson


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001
01:59 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Phillip K Allen                           03/05/2001 10:37 AM

To: jim123@pdq.net
cc:
Subject:


I don't think I'm going to be able to go.  I am so busy at work....I'm going to be here late.
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com ]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Jilallen
Subject: RE:
you guys still going out tonight?
    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Allen, Jill (US - Houston)" <jilallen@deloitte.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:48 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:
   hey Matt!  what's going on?  got any big plans for this weekend besides
   watching the LSU game?
   This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
   information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
   protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should
   delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
   message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
   prohibited.
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
12:34 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Maria Sandoval                           01/07/2000 09:45 AM

To: Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Margo
Reyna/HOU/EES@EES, Cecilia Olvera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Elizabeth Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheetal Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lorraine Becker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angela Henn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristie Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hannah Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: WOW! Another New Years

ENJOY!!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Maria Sandoval/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
09:43 AM ---------------------------

Yolanda Sandoval <Yolanda.Sandoval@Halliburton.com> on 01/07/2000 09:39:51 AM
To: "'Castillo, Margaret'" <MCastillo@metromkt.com>, "'Beverly Taylor'"
<bevctaylor@aol.com>, "'Gilbert Hernandez'" <ghernandez@sbec.com>, Maria
Sandoval/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tammy Brzozowski <Tammy.Brzozowski@Halliburton.com>,
"'Tony Nunez'" <anthony.nunez@chase.com>, Ursula Tovar
<Ursula.Tovar@Halliburton.com>, Sylvia Balderas
<Sylvia.Balderas@Halliburton.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: WOW! Another New Years

Yolanda Sandoval
KBR Legal Dept.
713-753-5986
yolanda.sandoval@halliburton.com

 <<One World~Many Parties.pps>>

 - One World~Many Parties.pps


They are the same terms. Go with the one in the Definitions.

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:00 PM
To: Rorschach, Reagan; Fairley, David
Subject: Load forecasting model and load projection model

Both of these are capitalized terms in rev 23.  Is there a difference?  Load
Projection Model is in definitions, but Load Forecasting Model is used quite
a bit.

ckm


Changes to the Report Starting this Week:

-   The Financial Desk in North American Gas only shows values without
exchange traded future transactions.

Notes for this Week's Report:

*   North American Gas has already increased its overall average daily EOL
deal count by almost 1,000 trades a day since November.  There are now
approximately 4,040 trades a day in North American Gas alone which are being
traded on EOL.

*  The Financial Desk in North American Gas has increased its average daily
EOL deal count by about 45% since October, from 494 to 714 deals per day in
November.  In December, the average daily EOL deal count is up another 60%,
from 714 to 1,141 deals per day.  In addition, the average daily EOL volume
has increased significantly as well.

* US Power has increased its average daily EOL volume by 100% since
November.  The average daily EOL Deal Count has increased slightly as well.

*  Midwest, Southeast, and Northeast Power has increased its average daily
EOL volume by about 100% since November.  In addition, the average daily EOL
deal count for these Power regions has increased by about 50% since November.

*  Coal trades have decreased significantly from the levels seen in October.
The total monthly EOL deal count for November was only about 23% of the total
in October.  The total monthly EOL volume for November was only about 33% of
the total in October.

*   LPG's has steadily increased its total monthly EOL deal count from 281 in
September, 398 in October, 444 in November, to 181 deals already in
December.  The total monthly EOL volume has increased similarly as well.

*  Gasoil Financial has increased its total monthly EOL deal count from 11
trades in October to 26 in November.  The total monthly EOL volume has
increased by about 100% as well.

*  Brent Financial has decreased significantly from the levels seen in
October.  The total monthly EOL deal count for November was down to about 220
from a level of about 400 in October.  The total monthly EOL volume for
November has decreased similarly as well.

*  Heating Oil Financial has had few, if any, NYMEX look-a-like trades on EOL
over the past few months.  Out of a total of about 1,200 trades in November,
less than 40 have been done on EOL.  Heating Oil Physical has yet to do a
trade on EOL.

*  Kero US Financial has decreased significantly from the levels seen in
October.  The total monthly EOL deal count for November was only about 24% of
the total in October.  The total monthly EOL volume for November was only
about 25% of the total in October.  However, already in December there have
been about half as many trades as the entire month of November.

---------------
The following files contain a graphical view of the average deal count and
volumes per month by Commodity for EOL and OTC transactions since the launch
of EnronOnline. This information is for comparative analysis only.  Do not
update links when opening these files.

AVERAGE DEAL COUNTS FOR COMMODITIES (excluding Global Products, which
displays monthly totals)

NA GAS BREAKOUT BY REGION (Non-Averaged, including Volume and Notional Value)

If you have any questions regarding this breakout, please contact one of the
following:

Torrey Moorer x3-6218
Matt Motsinger x3-5221
Pete Berzins x5-7594

Pete
EnronOnline


CALENDAR ENTRY:	INVITATION

Description:
	EB3127 w/Jeff Gossett & Zhiyong Wei. Compare ways of managing gas and power books for future improvement.

Date:		2/14/2001
Time:		2:00 PM - 3:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:


Richard,
Attached, please find my analysis of the PX's position as stated in their
November 11 and December 21 letters.  Based on my discussions with Greg
Whalley last week, he was of the opinion that we should send a short letter
with only a few points refuting the PX's position.  The attached letter goes
into some detail refuting the PX's allegations.  We should talk on Monday or
Tuesday to discuss the content of the final letter.  Please note, I have not
included any of the recent FERC-related developments in my analysis.  Based
on discussions with Ron Carrol last week it appears that we have another
avenue to pursue.

Tim Belden


Tanya:  Just let us know the parties and guaranty cap.  I am not familiary with any Carr arrangements other than the ENA futures agreement.  Also, do you have a contact at Carr?

Thanks.  Sara

-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 2:42 PM
To: Rohauer, Tanya; Shackleton, Sara; Bradford, William S.
Subject: RE: Carr Futures

No objections

-----Original Message-----
From: Rohauer, Tanya
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:51 PM
To: Shackleton, Sara; Bradford, William S.; Kitchen, Louise
Subject: FW: Carr Futures
Importance: High

Are there any objections to issuing the gty? We just did the same thing last week for FIMAT Issuing seems the simplest rather than having to stop trading, although traditionally we have not issued corp gtys.  Please advise.

Tanya

-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 11:28 AM
To: Rohauer, Tanya
Cc: Su, Ellen
Subject: Carr Futures
Importance: High

Tanya,
I received a call from Carr Futures this morning.  Their parent, Cr?dit Agricole Indosuez, is requesting a parent guanantee to continue trading with Enron North America Corp. and Enron Capital and Trade Resources International.

I spoke with Gary this morning and he said that we could stop trading with them.  I said that others do trade with Carr.  He suggested then that the energy guys can proceed if they wish to continue trading with Carr.

Rick Farina, 312-441-4420, called me with Larry Anderson and Patty Chambers.

How do you want to proceed?

Sheila


---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 10/19/2000 09:32 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           10/19/2000 09:29 AM

To: Lisa King/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Best/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rosalyn
Lum/Corp/Enron@Enron, Brian Schwertner/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacy
Hardy/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan Rance/NA/Enron@Enron, Laynie East/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammy Barta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin Jolly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brad Carey/NA/Enron@Enron, Michael S Galvan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pam
Becton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hope Vargas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marnie Lamb/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Rufino

Rufino will be out sick today; however in his absence,  I will be here to
support your needs.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001
11:44 AM ---------------------------
From: Chip Schneider/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 11:37 AM
To: Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Gorte/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Allegheny B - Subject to further RAC Comment and Review