1.  I haven't seen the paperwork on the name change.  I asked around
yesterday, and I have someone checking it out.  Initially going through Corp
(vs. ENA) made it a bit more complicated to track down.

2.  I believe I sent you a form services agreement to review.  I think that
the parameters for performing certain services can be captured by way of
reference to a named guideline or procedure, or by attachment as an exhibit.
I will resend the email for your easy reference.

Hope this helps.

Kay

	From:  Gregg Penman                           09/27/2000 02:28 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: More stuff

1-Is there anything left to do to change the name under the LLC agreement to
enovate?
   2-I am attaching the overview cash protocol that was discussed during our
meeting with Treasury, Accounting and Finance.  Who can begin crafting a
services agreement around this template?

That's it for this moment.

Thanks,

Gregg


______________________________________

jcrew.com
______________________________________

get up to 70% off at our clearance sale!
over 275 great spring & summer styles(including kids)
...but only while they last
men
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eG7r0Sgo10Ciy0Oon0A5
women
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eG7r0Sgo10Ciy0Ooo0A6
kid
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eG7r0Sgo10Ciy0Oop0A7

Unsubscribe:  To be removed from the jcrew.com
mailing list, please go to
http://click.jcrew.com/cgi-bin8/flo?y=eG7r0Sgo10Ciy0Oox0AG&email=lcampbel@enron.com


Outlook Migration Team@ENRON
05/14/2001 01:26 PM
To: V Charles Weldon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geraldine Irvine/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jin Guo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louis Dicarlo/NA/Enron@ENRON, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandy Olitsky/HOU/ECT@ECT, Santiago
Garcia/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven Curlee/Corp/Enron@Enron, Alexandra
Villarreal/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jennifer Walker/NA/Enron@Enron, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathie Grabstald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Bates/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean
Boyle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria
Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vladi Pimenov/NA/Enron@Enron, Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Frank W Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Gil
Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Phil
DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tammi DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daniel Lisk/NA/Enron@Enron, Hillary
Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jan Sutherland/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jason
Wolfe/NA/Enron@ENRON, Shannon Groenewold/ENRON@enronXgate, Shelly
Mendel/NA/Enron@ENRON, Stacey J Brewer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzanne
Christiansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Evans/NA/Enron@ENRON, Dina
Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lance
Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vineet Arora/NA/Enron@ENRON, Beth A
Ryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Berkeland/Corp/Enron@Enron, David A
Terlip/Corp/Enron@Enron, Doug Leach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marc De La
Roche/HOU/ECT@ECT, Randal Maffett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tushar Dhruv/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Yolanda Cordova-Gilbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amy Villasenor/OTS/Enron@Enron, Debra
Young/OTS/Enron@Enron, Jeff Arnold/OTS/Enron@ENRON, John
Reese/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Josh Mayes/OTS/Enron@Enron, Larry
Fenstad/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mark Adleman/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Ann
Johnson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mary Lynne Dix/OTS/Enron@Enron, Mike
Thomas/OTS/Enron@Enron, Morris Brassfield/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Rinetia
Turner/OTS/Enron@Enron, Robert Geheb/OTS/Enron@Enron, Ruthann
Frausto/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Tyrone Brown/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: 2- SURVEY/INFORMATION EMAIL 5-17-01

Current Notes User:

To ensure that you experience a successful migration from Notes to Outlook,
it is necessary to gather individual user information prior to your date of
migration.  Please take a few minutes to completely fill out the following
survey. Double Click on document to put it in "Edit" mode. When you finish,
simply click on the 'Reply With History' button then hit 'Send'  Your survey
will automatically be sent to the Outlook 2000 Migration Mailbox.

Thank you.

Outlook 2000 Migration Team

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full Name:        Susan W. Pereira

Login ID:  spereir

Extension:  33229

Office Location:  EB3223F

What type of computer do you have?  (Desktop

Do you have a PDA?  If yes, what type do you have:   (None

Do you have permission to access anyone's Email/Calendar?  no
    If yes, who?

Does anyone have permission to access your Email/Calendar?  no
    If yes, who?

Are you responsible for updating anyone else's address book?  no
    If yes, who?

Is anyone else responsible for updating your address book?  no
    If yes, who?

Do you have access to a shared calendar?  no
    If yes, which shared calendar?

Do you have any Distribution Groups that Messaging maintains for you (for
mass mailings)?  no
    If yes, please list here:

Please list all Notes databases applications that you currently use:  mailbox

In our efforts to plan the exact date/time of your migration, we also will
need to know:

What are your normal work hours?  From:  7    To:      5

Will you be out of the office in the near future for vacation, leave, etc? no
       If so, when?        From (MM/DD/YY):      To (MM/DD/YY):


-----Original Message-----
From: David_Lachance@amat.com [mailto:David_Lachance@amat.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 3:07 PM
To: Shelli_Wood@amat.com; Mary_Malatesta@amat.com;
Scott_H_Fuller@amat.com; Jayla_B_Fuller@amat.com; Megan_Lowe@amat.com;
Mauricio_A_Suescun@amat.com; James_Dohrman@amat.com;
Nicole_Wayman@amat.com; Bert_Leonard@amat.com; Steve_Hurt@amat.com;
Tammy_Schmidt@amat.com; Kevin_Crawford@amat.com; Jerry_Kulm@amat.com;
Ginger_Bryan@amat.com; Amy_Braga@amat.com; Matt_Stamm@amat.com;
Sam_Jones@amat.com; Reyna_Enoch@amat.com; Ash_Lenn@amat.com;
Katy_Rudd@amat.com; Jim_Young@amat.com; Alton_Brown@amat.com;
Jill_Green@amat.com; Joan_Garcia@amat.com; lgregg@austin.rr.com;
Darin_Hawley@amat.com; Orlando_Zapata@amat.com; John_Ditmore@amat.com;
Melonie_Poole@amat.com; Elizabeth_Ramirez@amat.com;
Kevin_Honnoll@amat.com; Jack_Franks@amat.com; Danny_Elkaim@amat.com;
Eric_Johnson@amat.com; errobinson@academicplanet.com;
readingbuddy@yahoo.com; sandyteb@aol.com; smartinez@auschron.com;
lachance.2@osu.edu
Subject: First military move

A platoon of crack Special Forces soldiers have taken the first steps of
reprisal after the incidents in America.

The heroic force, composed of A&M corps graduates, have broken into the dog
kennel area of the A&M Veterinary Science Building and captured all the
Afghans.

They reported light casualties.


Thanks.  I appreciate that.  It is a bit gloomy and MOODY over here.  I don't think too many people are excited about Dynegy but its better than bankruptcy.

And I do appreciate the job offer, its just hard to do with a family.  But I will chat with my significant other and see what she says.  I've asked her about moving before and I thought she was going to hit me.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mark Gazzilli <Markg@cook-inlet.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Chris Germany (E-mail)
Subject:	I hope you're coping ok

Hey Chris,

I hope the madness that's been occurring over there isn't weighing you down
too much.

I just wanted you to know my offer stands if you'd be interested in looking
at moving to LA to manage our T&E.  Our asset base has been growing and we
are looking to expand some more. Your expertise would be tremendous.  Let me
know.

Mark L. Gazzilli
Cook Inlet Energy Supply
Director-East/Gulf Coast Trading and Marketing
310-789-2333


Hey Delene,

Everytime I try this number, I get a busy signal.  Interesting....

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Travella, Delene M." <delene.travella@funb.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Travella+2C+20Delene+20M+2E+22+20+3Cdelene+2Etravella+40
funb+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Reves, Brant
Subject: RE: conference call

Hi Brant,
I am hoping to tell you that we're done as soon as Sara gets back to me.  We
have 1 remaining issue.......  Will keep you posted.  Sorry you had trouble
trying to reach me, I'm not aware of any messages.
Dee

Delene M. Travella
Vice President
Capital Markets, Derivatives
Telephone: (704) 383-8778
Facsimile: (704) 383-0575
email: delene.travella@funb.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reves, Brant [SMTP:Brant.Reves@enron.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 11:27 AM
> To: delene.travella@funb.com
> Cc: Shackleton, Sara
> Subject: conference call
>
> Delene,
>
> We continue to hold the confirmation of the executed trade?  I believe
> it was agreed that, if we could not immediately agree on the final terms
> of the ISDA, we would agree to confirm the trades under a Deemed ISDA.
> We are bumping up against 5 working days and intend to confirm the trade
> today.  Please give me a call (713) 853-9897 as I have found it
> difficult to reach you by phone.
>
> thanks
> brant
>


FYI
 Jim Derrick

-----Original Message-----
From: Beth Moore <bethm@ahlr.com>@ENRON [NOTES:Beth Moore <bethm@ahlr.com>@ENRON]
To: Cheek, Charles <Charles.Cheek@ENRON.com>
CC: Derrick Jr., James <James.Derrick@ENRON.com>; Davis, Britt <Britt.Davis@ENRON.com>; 'bdavis@enron.com' <bdavis@enron.com>; Siess, Kathy <Kathy.Siess@ENRON.com>
Sent: Wed Nov 14 13:28:31 2001
Subject: Temporary Staffing for Shareholder Litigation Suits

November 14, 2001

Chuck:

Wanted to pass along my appreciation to you for considering Ad Hoc Legal
Resources in filling Britt Davis' recent need for a temporary paralegal.
 As you probably know, our employee, Barbara O'Banion, started in the
position earlier this week.  I will be calling Britt soon to check on
Barbara's progress.

On a separate note, I want to offer you our services as you and your legal
team strategize your defense of the recent shareholder suits.  Ad Hoc has
been an integral component in staffing complex, multi-party litigation for
companies of your size -- we have supplied as many as 90 temps on a single
piece of litigation.  We have considerable experience designing and
recruiting flexible, cost-efficient teams of knowledgeable legal
professionals who can handle the routine aspects of a document review,
while your permanent staff works on more sophisticated matters.  Likewise,
as your transactional counterparts at Enron begin working on the merger's
due diligence review, I hope Ad Hoc can offer its experience.  We supplied
the largest number of temporary lawyers and paralegals to conduct document
reviews in both the El Paso/Coastal and Exxon/Mobil mergers.  We were also
involved in the Chevron/Texaco merger and the Waste Management buyout.

Please do not hesitate to call on me at any time if I can be of assistance.
 Again, thank you for confidence in our services.

Best regards,

Beth Moore
President
E-mail: bmoore@ahlr.com


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Thursday, October   25, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Wednesday, October   24, 2001)
Click here to access index history.
                                                                                * volume represents sell-side only *

Hub	High	Low	Wtd Avg Index	Change ($)	Vol (Mwh)
Cinergy	         $28.00	         $25.00	         $27.23	+    .33	         103,200
Comed	         $26.50	         $24.75	         $25.58	+   1.33	           4,800
Entergy	         $23.85	         $23.10	         $23.47	-   1.25	          13,600
Nepool	         $40.00	         $39.75	         $39.85	+   1.29	           4,000
PJM-West	         $27.10	         $26.25	         $26.79	+    .44	          79,200
TVA	         $26.50	         $25.25	         $26.13	-   1.25	          12,800

                                                                                Includes all trades done from 6 AM to 11 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for financially firm power delivered during the on-peak hours (6 AM - 10 PM CPT for Eastern hubs / 6 AM - 10 PM Pacific Prevailing Time for Western hubs) on the delivery date(s) specified.
                                                                                IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.
In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.
This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.
You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.
To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com.
To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe.
                                                                                ?Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


Mark -

Your current agreements has now expired (dated 6/21 and not signed until 7/9 - only good for 14 days).  In addition, you did not sign all the necessary places - each document requires 2 signatures (pg 6 and pg 7) - you only signed page 7 on both.

I have re-printed 2 executable copies and have left them in your mailbox.  Please sign both on pg 6 and 7 and return both to me ASAP.  I would like to have this finalized by the end of the week.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks -
Amy


To:

Andres Almazan
Don Chew
John Freeman
Geoge Gau
Vince Kaminski
Bob Marchesi
John Martin
Vojislav Maksimovic
Laura Starks
Art Warga
Michael Weisbach

Dear Friends

Attached is some registration and logistical information relating to the
upcoming corporate finance conference on May 4-5 in Houston.  If you have
any questions, please don't hesitate to contact Sheridan, Bob or myself.

The program is shaping up nicely, however one of us may draft to serve in
some small, but helpful capacity.

Sheridan Titman, 512.232.2787, titman@mail.utexas.edu ,
Bob Parrino at parrino@mail.utexas.edu
Dave Ikenberry, 713.348.5385 , daveike@rice.edu

As of today, the list of firms sending a representative include:
Pfizer
Pacificare
Cooper Industries
RadioShack
Pepsi
Delphi Automotive
Microsoft
Whirlpool
Enron
Johnson Controls
Airgas
Sara Lee
Dell
Conoco

 - particpate registation details.doc

***********************************
Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385


can we chat about this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Diomedes Christodoulou" <diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:40 PM
To:	Walls Jr., Rob
Cc:	jim.derrick@enron.com
Subject:	RE: Enron payments

Rob,

Thanks. I am copying Jim on the entire exchange.

I realize things are hectic at Enron but they have been for some time
now and my payments can no longer be delayed. I think no one wants to
assume responsibility for this and that's why I am writing to you and
Jim because the delay is really reaching break point from my standpoint.
These are contractually agreed upon payments and they are not days or
weeks late but MANY MONTHS late. I really need to receive the payments
in a matter of days.

All the best and look forward to hearing from you.

Diomedes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob.Walls@enron.com [mailto:Rob.Walls@enron.com]
Sent: 25 October 2001 17:05
To: diomedes@cumulouscapital.com
Subject: RE: Enron payments

Dio -

I think Jim's email address is jim.derrick@enron.com.  I haven't heard
back
from Mary Joyce on any of this.  In fairness to her, things are a little
hectic over here right now.  Thanks.

Rob

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Diomedes Christodoulou" <diomedes@cumulouscapital.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Wednesday, October 24, 2001 9:00 PM
   To:     Walls Jr., Rob
   Subject:  FW: Enron payments

   Rob,

   I've not been able to follow this to Jim ?I must be misspelling his
   name. Can you please do so and also send me his email address?

   Thanks,

   Diomedes.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
   Sent: 24 October 200118:21
   To: 'jim.dereck@enron.com'; 'rob.walls@enron.com'
   Subject: FW: Enron payments

   Jim and Rob,

   I hope you are both doing well. I realize that you must both be
   extremely busy with other more important issues but I find myself in
a
   position that I HAVE to raise the issue described in the email below
to
   your direct attention. The email is self explanatory but the bottom
line
   is that not only has Enron failed to make payments that are due to me
   and to one of my companies for MONTHS now but  the company is not
even
   responding to my requests for information.

   I would highly appreciate it if you advised me on the best way to
handle
   this, i.e WHO do I need to talk to who has the decision authority to
   make the payments and give me answers. I stress once more that the
   unjustified delays by Enron in making these payments is already
causing
   me serious  problems and potential losses.

   I look forward to your response.

   Thanks and hope to see you soon.

   Diomedes.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Diomedes Christodoulou [mailto:diomedes@cumulouscapital.com]
   Sent: 20 October 200118:03
   To: 'mary.joyce@enron.com'
   Cc: 'John.Novak@enron.com'
   Subject: Enron payments

   Mary Joyce,

   I hope all is well with you.

   I am contacting you regarding a number of late payments by Enron
which
   have now become urgent from my standpoint. These payments refer to
   contractual obligations between ECI (one of my affiliate companies)
and
   Enron and to the Employment Contract between Enron and myself. The
   payments have been invoiced and they are months late now.

   After questioning John Novak about the status of these payments
(after
   leaving Enron I was told by Rob Walls to send all invoices related to
   the ECI and to my agreement with Enron to John Novak in Enron South
   America) I received a voice mail from Pam Buttler, who I believe
works
   with you, informing me that I would have to wait until early
November,
   maybe even until late November as the "changes in management at Enron
   require that all contracts be reviewed by the Compensation Committee
   which would convene in early or late November".

   As soon as I received this message last Wednesday I left a message
with
   Pam and also a voice mail with you and I subsequently left two
messages
   with your assistant asking you to contact me urgently regarding this
   very serious matter but as I have not heard from you I am writing
this
   email to make sure that my position is clear.

   These payments are due by Enron based on existing contracts and I see
no
   reason why I have to wait for a review by an internal Compensation
   Committee. These payments are already significantly late and I have
been
   extremely patient with continuous delays in payments due to me by
Enron
   up to now. Moreover I have repeatedly let Enron know that I am in the
   process of closing a transaction which depends on receiving these
   payments, otherwise I would incur costs by unwinding other positions
   that I have. I need these payments to be made no later than
Wednesday,
   October 24.

   Please inform me of Enron's intents so that I can take all the
   appropriate steps to enforce my contractual rights.

   I look forward to hearing from you,

   Regards,

   Diomedes Christodoulou.

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient
(or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender
or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments
hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not
create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron
Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other
party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Please find attached the Central & Eastern Europe overview completed by myself
and Aiaz.

Thanks,
Marty

(See attached file: CE_Europe.doc)

 - CE_Europe.doc


I wanted IR and PR to be aware that within the next few days  the PG&E Bankruptcy team will file with the Judge Enron's current claim.  We intend to ask the Judge to Lift the Stay so that we can file at the CPUC a complaint to recoup our current receivable.  I'm not sure what our public statements have been and as soon as we prepare the filing, I'll let you know.

If anyone has any questions, please give me a call.

Thanks,

Jim


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 01:45 PM -----

	"Susan Hopkinson" <susan.hopkinson@lovells.com>
	09/12/2000 04:31 AM

		 To: <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ISDA Master Agreement between Enron North America Corp. and
SociieteIndustrielle de Transports Automobile S.A.

CONFIDENTIALITY This e-mail and any attachments are confidential
and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient,
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
contents to another person, use it for any purpose, or store
or copy the information in any medium.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Sharon Lewis asked me to contact you about this.  Our client has instructed
us that it is SITA which will enter into the ISDA master agreement.  SITA as
the main company must have a better credit than the company that you
identified.

We cannot agree to a credit support document.

We suggest that you evaluate the credit of SITA and then get back to us.

Kind regards
Susan

>>> <Sara.Shackleton@enron.com> 9/11/2000 20:28:17 >>>
Sharon:  Thanks for your fax and markup of the Schedule dated Sept. 6.
There is a major issue which we need to discuss and that is the
counterparty identity itself.  It appears that you have identified a
DIFFERENT party to the agreement, namely, a limited liability company named
"SITA", which is not the entity which we originally proposed,.  This does
not appear to be the credit which we evaluated.

Also, we insist upon a Credit Support Annex.  As you know, the agreement
contemplates multiple transactions and the posting of collateral is a major
issue, particularly for long-dated pulp deals.

Can you call me tomorrow?  We need to address the major issues upfront.
You can reach me at 713-853-5620.  Thank you.  Sara

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lovells (the merged firm of Lovell White Durrant and
Boesebeck Droste, practising as Lovells Boesebeck Droste in
some jurisdictions) is an international law firm.

In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact
the sender or the London Technology Department on +44 (0) 20 7296 2000.


Stewart called last Friday and said there would be some deals for the City of
Roseville to be confirmed.  He did not have deal numbers for these deals, and
so far, I have not seen any deals for this counterparty.  Do you know
anything about these deals?  Can check around and see if anyone else knows
about them?

Thanks!


As you have probably observed, power markets have been severely tested this
summer.  There are many underlying causes (demand growth driven by a strong
economy, failure of regulators to quickly grant applications for new
generation, inadequate access to the grid, rate regulation which continues to
insulate end users from real time price signals, etc.).  But, the soundbite
on these troubles has been that deregulation has led to problems on the
grid.  The knee jerk policy response has been price caps and other threats of
re-regulation.

At the upcoming advisory council meeting, Ken and I were hoping that the two
of you could discuss the issue and help put it in perspective:

How great of a threat is re-regulation.
How might we respond.
How likely is this issue to play a significant role in election politics?


Just a reminder - please mark your calendars:

This memo will confirm our dinner meeting to be held June 21, 2000 at the
River Oaks Grill

     DATE    June 21, 2000
     PLACE   Wine Room
         River Oaks Grill
         2630 Westheimer
         713/520-1738
     TIME    6:30 PM

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Kay (3x0643) or
Beverly (5x7857)

I will look forward to seeing you there.


Mark,

Here are some photos of me.? Two are of me diving in.? In one photo I have a
white swim cap on and in another I have a blue swim cap on.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon & Debbie Sturgeon [mailto:sturgeon@ev1.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:08 PM
To: Cy-Clones
Subject: [cy-clones] Photos online

-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
At 200 mph, it's hard to catch Mark Martin. But you can meet
him on his own page at www.gatorade.com. Find out what
makes him one of NASCAR's hottest drivers!
http://click.egroups.com/1/7609/15/_/827594/_/968893688/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

Cy-Clones,

Some photos from the recent Woodlands and National meets are on our web site
at:

http://users.ev1.net/~sturgeon/swimming/swimming.htm

Note that some of the photos are quite large so they might take a couple of
minutes to download if you have a slow modem (like we do...).

Enjoy!
Jon Sturgeon

To unsubscribe from this list, send an email to:
cy-clones-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Mailing list website:
http://www.egroups.com/group/cy-clones


I left a voice mail for Paul but have not heard back yet.

From: Matt Motsinger on 12/10/99 07:53 AM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline Password Application

Mark could you follow up with this customer regarding the Password
Application.

Thanks,
Matt
---------------------- Forwarded by Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT on 12/10/99 07:52
AM ---------------------------
From: Matt Motsinger on 12/08/99 02:08 PM
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EnronOnline Password Application

I received a call from Paul Sauer (713-877-7028) with Engage Energy. He
stated that he would like to discuss legal aspects of the Password
Application and possible modifications of that form.  Could you please
contact this individual.

Thanks,

Matt Motsinger
713-853-5221
EnronOnline Call Center


Brent (and Neve and Bill),

I want to be perfectly clear in understanding this trade, and where/who is
managing the risks.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  White, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:53 PM
To: Murphy, Ted
Cc: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Subject: FW: New GFU oil volumes

Ted, looks like the deal may/will be hedged on Thursday.  They indicate that
part of the oil may be offset with an existing accrual position (can't
remember whether this magic was with train 1 or 2).  Two questions:  1) is
this being signed off on by accounting, and 2) I would like to make sure that
the offset position is being "put to bed", ie that we are not going to find
ourselves trading a long-term piece of crude against the UK gas group at some
point in the future.

Thanks for the help in advance.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Ferguson, Matthew
Sent: 06 June 2001 13:22
To: White, Bill; Clarke, Niamh
Cc: O'Brien, Tony; Peter, Stewart; Murray, Anita; Foster, Maria
Subject: FW: New oil volumes

Bill

Well, we are almost there, Statoil finally agreed our price today.  Also, it
looks like the oil volumes that we need to hedge will not be as large as
anticipated due to an existing long accrual position at the Teesside gas
plant.  We will get the final amount that Transaction Support will let us
apply to the Teesside position tomorrow morning and probably hedge the rest
of it.  The anticipation is that we will need to purchase between 30% and 50%
from you all.

Attached are the volumes for both scenarios (30% and 50%).  If you can send
over mid and offer prices for the two volumes, we will get a final number
from TS and let you know how much we need to hedge in the morning.

Thanks
Matt

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Murray, Anita
Sent: 06 June 2001 19:07
To: Ferguson, Matthew
Subject: New oil volumes

Matt,

Please find attached a spreadsheet approximating the oil volumes based on the
current forward USD/GBP FX rate & either a 33% or 50% hedge based on either
of the two Train 1 scenarios.

Regards

Anita


Rick  -- Attached is my list of rehearing issues for the Southern and
GridSouth RTO orders that you requested.

Also included are summaries of GridSouth and Southern Orders.

Jim, Tom and Christi -- Please send these to others that you think would like
to see them.  Also, call me if you would like to discuss.


David, I have a problem with the RAC comments made on page #2 of the DASH.
Specifically, the two paragraphs basically add no value and just confuse the
reader (ie) what is your opinion?  Is this a good sale or can significant
recovery (on a risk adjusted basis) occur if we convert the sub debt and
infuse more equity?  Are we not receiving enough value from the CFPC given
the possible recovery of this sector?

The DASH is deficient in its view of Basic's prospects given current energy
prices.

Jeff/Dick/Ray, what are your opinions?

Independent of the desire to move on - what is the right call - I do not want
to give value away in any divestiture or restructuring.

Regards
Delainey


---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
10:03 AM ---------------------------

John Perdew <jperdew@apbenergy.com> on 01/11/2001 10:02:21 AM
To: "'Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com'" <Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE:

THANKS A LOT

-----Original Message-----
From: Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com [SMTP:Tori.Kuykendall@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 10:47 AM
To: rhaygood@darbylaw.com; jperdew@apbenergy.com
Subject: FW:

---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 01/11/2001
09:45 AM ---------------------------

<Jennifer_Lamprecht@oxy.com> on 01/11/2001 08:34:43 AM

To:   CandMserv@aol.com, ELamprecht@encompserv.com, Chis.Gales@Compaq.com,
      mfinger458@aol.com, Pam_Macaul@bmc.com, rwalls@lgl.ci.houston.tx.us,
      sheri.thomas@enron.com, hadix@pdq.net, tkuyken@enron.com,
      Tracey.Tripp@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  FW:

-----Original Message-----
From: Lipka, Jim
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 8:29 AM
To: Carsten, Kim; Wilkinson, Gordon; Lamprecht, Jennifer
Subject: FW:

-----Original Message-----
From: DAN HARTWICK [mailto:dhartwick@mindspring.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 9:05 PM
To: Tim Shea Wadkins; SHAWN; Ruth D Motes; RICHARD KUJAY;
Ppmjgillis@aol.com; Patty Reilly; Jim Lipka
Subject: Fw:

----- Original Message -----
From: Russell  <mailto:rperrine@one-eleven.net> Perrine
To: Travis Wilson <mailto:twilson@arthur.k12.il.us>  ; TIM STEFANIAK
<mailto:timstef@netzero.com>  ; Ron  <mailto:rjmiller@advancenet.net>
Miller
; jon  <mailto:MOON9MOON@aol.com> mooney ; DAVE TIFFAN
<mailto:dtiffan@arthur.k12.il.us>  ; Brett Mulford
<mailto:Bsmulford@aol.com>  ; Ben Gordon <mailto:bengor@ccipost.net>  ; DAN
<mailto:dhartwick@mindspring.com> HARTWICK ; Jeff Mercer
<mailto:jmercer206@one-eleven.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:22 AM

>   Subject: Dr. Suess
> > >See if you can  do this.
> > >Read each line aloud
> > >Dr. Suess lost tongue twisters
> > >
> > >This is this cat
> > >This is is  cat
> > >This is how cat
> > >This is to cat
> > >This is Keep cat
> > >This is a  cat
> > >This is dumbass cat
> > >This is busy cat
> > >This is for cat
> > >This is  forty cat
> > >This is seconds cat
> > >   Now go back and read the THIRD word in each line  from the TOP!!!!!
> > >Betcha you can't resist passing it  on!!
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Enron Seminar Series in Finance
Jones Graduate School of Management, Rice University

Paul Schultz
University of Notre Dame

will give a seminar at the Jones School on Friday, March 30,?

?????????????????????????????????????? &Who Makes Markets8

The seminar will begin at 3:30 in Room 115.

The paper will be made available shortly.


I thought it might be a some help if I distributed a red-lined version of
this document prior to tomorrow's meeting.  I hope you find this of some use.

Jeff


I skimmed the attached NOPR looking for the approach FERC was proposing to take to the key issue we fought over here in CA a couple of years ago.  Although I did not see the word "congestion", the implication of what I read is that the generator would pay for his extension cord plus any congestion impacts that it makes on the grid.  The implication of the last statement is that the generator would put the grid back into the condition it was in "but for" the new generator.  That is great, assuming I did not skim from too high an altitude.  Did I?

I also read the thing from the point of view of an issue that I had forgotten about until recently.  That is, if the generator pays for all of this upgrade and "but for" stuff, and then "gives" it to the utility, are there taxes due on the "gift"?  When we developed our project in Pittsburg, CA, PG&E's initial position was that we owed them for the upgrades AND for the taxes on the upgrades (about 35 - 40% additional charge), which they turned over to the state and fed.  (This is potentially A LOT of money to "waste" on an interconnect, if it is an expensive one.)  Working with Enron's tax dept (I do not remember specifically with whom), we convinced PG&E that taxes were probably not due for various reasons, and we mutually agreed to get a private letter ruling from the IRS confirming.  (We also agreed that IF the taxes were ever due, that we would pay them.)  I understand that that IRS ruling was put in abeyance, pending some sort of law congress was considering.  (I may be making this up here as I go along because Calpine bought the project from us and I lost track of the various machinations.)  The point of all of this.  Is it reasonable in this NOPR process on interconnection to address the tax issue?  Is it too late?  Is it irrelevant to the FERC process?  Does anyone know the status of the law making process?

I am concerned about taxes for two reasons.  First, many of the opponents to the proposed NOPR approach thought that all grid upgrades should be paid for by the utility and  included in rate base.  (In other words, "all generators are good and benefit the ratepayers.")  On fundamental grounds they will resist paying for upgrades.  If they believe that they will get the insult after injury treatment (pay for upgrades AND for taxes on the upgrades), they will resist the NOPR more strenously.  (FYI to everyone, Calpine strongly resisted paying for upgrades at Pittsburg and somehow got out of it.  And guess what?  Now with all of the new plants - ~1200MW added by Calpine within a 5 mile area of 2500 MW of existing - there are congestion problems around all of the projects, just as we forecasted.  ISO is now considering adding a new zone and/or charging PG&E and/or the projects for congestion.  Because PG&E did not, and probably never will in our lifetime, add the grid upgrades so as to include in ratebase, the projects will be hurt.  Because all of this is not forecastable in the context of developing a project in a timely manner, this outcome, exactly as we had forecasted, is why we supported the approach in the proposed NOPR.)  Second, perhaps naively, I am assuming that the tax issue is no different for gas pipeline upgrades than for electric transmission system upgrades.  On a project we are now developing in Roseville, CA, we are faced with significant gas pipeline system upgrades in PG&E's system.  Significant grossups for tax impacts of the "gift" are are being discussed as I remember for Pittsburg's electric transmission system upgrades.  Since it sounds like the same issue, sure would be nice if we could get some appropriate precedence going.  Any possibliity of dealing with the tax issues in this NOPR?

-----Original Message-----
From: Lindberg, Susan
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 7:29 AM
To: Parquet, David; Hueter, Barbara A.; Rasmussen, Dale; Dieball, Scott;
Tweed, Sheila; Booth, Chris; Carnahan, Kathleen; Churbock, Scott;
Comeaux, Keith; Gimble, Mathew; Grube, Raimund; Hausinger, Sharon;
Inman, Zachary; Jacoby, Ben; Keenan, Jeffrey; Kellermeyer, Dave; Krause,
Greg; Krimsky, Steven; Kroll, Heather; Mitro, Fred; Moore, John;
Tapscott, Ron; Whitaker, Rick; Baughman, Edward D.; Coulter, Kayne; Day,
Smith L.; Gilbert, Gerald; Kinser, John; May, Tom; Miller, Jeffrey;
Will, Lloyd
Cc: Comnes, Alan; Fulton, Donna; Nicolay, Christi L.; Novosel, Sarah;
Steffes, James D.
Subject: FW: FERC rulemaking on Generator Interconnection

Please see the attached.  FERC has asked for preliminary comments on its proposal to adopt a standard generator interconnection agreement and procedures; the deadline for comments is December 21.  After it has considered the comments, FERC will issue a NOPR.

EPMI will participate in the Nov. 1 meeting at FERC; an update will be sent to you.  I will be taking the lead on drafting our comments.

Please contact me if you need further information.

Susan Lindberg
713.853.0596

-----Original Message-----
From: Jackie Gallagher [mailto:JGallagher@epsa.org]
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 8:57 AM
To: acomnes@enron.com; Hawkins, Bernadette; Nersesian, Carin; Nicolay,
Christi L.; Fulton, Donna; Scheuer, Janelle; Hartsoe, Joe; Shelk, John;
jsteffe@enron.com; Noske, Linda J.; Robertson, Linda; Alvarez, Ray;
Shapiro, Richard; Novosel, Sarah; Mara, Susan; Lindberg, Susan; Hoatson,
Tom
Subject: FERC ANOPR on Generator Interconnection

Last night, FERC issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) on Standardizing Generator Interconnection Agreements and Procedures.  The ANOPR incorporates the ERCOT interconnection procedures, modified by various "best practices" identified by the Commission in an attachment.  A public meeting has been scheduled for November 1st in Washington, although the notice of the meeting is not yet available.  We will forward it when it becomes available.  The ANOPR is attached.


Attached please find an updated presentation.  Louise has expressed concern
about the slides containing spreads, # of products and # locations.  I know
this is the message you want to deliver.  I'm trying to touch base with
Louise on this.


That's strange - I entered these deals for Matt yesterday, and specifically
typed 2 p.m. into the expiry date. Somehow it changed over, but I've changed
it back and re-saved it - so it should read 2 PM.

Thanks for catching that,
Kate

Stephanie Piwetz   05/01/2001 07:48 AM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: expiry time on 597006.01, 596993.01

Kate, can you please ask Matt about expiry time, the deal strip says 2:00 AM
it should be 2:00 PM on both.  thanks


Update:

Preparations for the upcoming Texas Finance Festival III are about complete
and I just wanted to update you on the hotel reservations information.  You
will need to make your reservation before March 20 to be assured of getting
a room in our reserved block.  Also, for "counting" purposes I need
everyone's registration form completed.  Many of you (and a lot of new
faces) have already sent them in but some may not have, so . . .

Lots of fun stuff is planned so come prepared for a very relaxing and
productive weekend!

John

 - announcerev.doc

John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


NETWORK WORLD NEWSLETTER: JASON MESERVE on
SECURITY AND BUG PATCH ALERT
01/17/02
Today's focus: Panda: Non-tech security pays off

Dear Wincenty Kaminski,

In this issue:

* A non-technical virus warning system
* Patches and alerts for Linux sudo, Solaris, IRIX nsd, others
* Viruses, including one set for the 15th and 30th of every
  month
* Gates calls for 'trustworthy computing,' plus other
  interesting reading

_______________________________________________________________
This newsletter sponsored by
Akaba

NEW!  Network Security Validation System

Check your Firewalls, Servers and Applications. The people who
designed Firewalls and VPN devices for Novell, Avaya (VPNet)
and Alcatel (Internet Devices) have developed a powerful
network scanning system.  See how the next generation in
Security technology will ensure confidence in your network.

Get the "Network Security Validation:2002"  White Paper.
http://nww1.com/go/3820954a.html
_______________________________________________________________
PRODUCT INFO IN ONE CONVENIENT LOCATION!

Heard about a new product launch? Curious to find out if the
features and benefits of this new product will meet your
critical business needs? Network World Fusion's Product Central
section includes all the info you need to make informed
decision about new products and also includes a product finder
function. Check it out at http://nww1.com/go/ad216.html

_______________________________________________________________
Today's focus: Non-tech security pays off

By Jason Meserve

I had an interesting experience walking into Network World's
headquarters yesterday. There were signs posted all over the
place warning us that a virus could be in our e-mail inbox and
not to open any .vbs extensions. Why the signs?

When the Goner worm spread across our organization last month,
it moved quickly before IS could warn all of our users.
Yesterday's virus was old code but infiltrated a system with
old virus definition files. Instead of warning people via e-
mail, which people may read after opening the infected message,
the IS staff posted helpful signs that were hard to miss. It
worked.

Of course, if all users knew better than to open a .vbs file,
then there would be no need for the signs in the first place.

Today's bug patches and security alerts:

* Linux vendors patch sudo

A flaw in sudo, a program that gives limited root privileges to
users, could allow a malicious user to obtain full superuser
privileges on the local machine. Users can download updates
from:
FreeBSD:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-02:06.sudo.asc

Debian:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-101

Conectiva:
http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000451

Red Hat:
https://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-011.html

Linux-Mandrake:
http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/security/2002/MDKSA-2002-003.php

EnGarde:
http://ftp.engardelinux.org/pub/engarde/stable/updates/

* CERT: Exploit circulating for Solaris hole

Hackers are actively exploiting a known vulnerability in Sun's
Solaris version of the Unix operating system, security experts
said late Monday, urging administrators to check if their
system is vulnerable.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/0115solarishole.html
IDG News Service, 01/15/02

CERT advisory:
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-01.html

Cisco Media Control Gateway is also affected because it sits on
Solaris:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/Solaris-for-MGC-pub.shtml

* SGI warns of IRIX nsd vulnerability

A flaw in the way IRIX name server daemon uses its cache could
lead to the entire hard drive being filled. SGI "highly
recommends" users download the fix for this problem. For more
information, go to:
ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20020102-03-P

* Debian, SuSE patch at

A bug in the at package could lead to a heap corruption. A
malicious user could exploit this to gain the daemon's user
privileges. For more, go to:

Debian:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-102

SuSE:
http://lists2.suse.com/archive/suse-security-announce/2002-
Jan/0002.html

* XChat patch available

A flaw in the XChat IRC client can be exploited by a malicious
user to take over a chat session. A malicious user could
exploit this to launch social engineering attacks and other
mischief. For more, go to:

Debian:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-099

Red Hat:
https://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-005.html

* Debian patches CIPE

A problem with the CIPE VPN package could cause an affected
system to crash. The package does not check to see if an
incoming packet is too short. If it is, the system crashes. For
more, go to:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-104

* New version of gzip available

A potential flaw in gzip could be exploited to cause a buffer
overflow when files with long names are compressed. Debian
claims the chances of someone exploiting this are slim, but it
has released an update to be safe:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-100

* Updated glibc package available

A buffer overflow has been discovered in the glob function of
the glibc library. The flaw can be exploited via programs that
use the function, including shells and FTP applications. For
more, go to:
http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-100

* Red Hat patches groff

According to an alert from Red Hat, a vulnerability exists in
the groff document formatting system. The groff preprocessor
contains an exploitable buffer overflow. If groff can be
invoked within the LPRng printing system, an attacker can gain
rights as the "lp" user. For more, go to:
https://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-004.html

* EnGarde patches pine

A vulnerability in pine, a popular e-mail client for
Linux/Unix, contains a vulnerability that could allow a
malicious user to execute arbitrary commands on the affected
system. The flaw is in the way URLs are handled by the program.
EnGarde users can find the appropriate patch at:
http://ftp.engardelinux.org/pub/engarde/stable/updates/

* Flaw in EnGarde LIDS

A vulnerability in LIDS, an access control system, could allow
an attacker to gain root access to the affected system and
possibly disable LIDS completely. To download a fix, go to:
http://ftp.engardelinux.org/pub/engarde/stable/updates/

* ICQ has same security hole as AIM

Users of the instant messaging application ICQ are urged to
upgrade to the latest version of the software because of a
potentially damaging bug in older versions, according to a
notice on the ICQ Web site.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/0115icq.html
IDG News Service, 01/15/02

Today's roundup of virus alerts:

* WM97/Fifteen-A - On the 15th or 30th of any month, this Word
macro virus will password-protect an infected file with the
password ">>xvx<<". It also displays a message on the infected
system. (Sophos)

* W32/Maldal-F - This Windows worm spreads via Outlook and
comes in a message titled "Happy New Year" with an attachment
called "Christmas.exe." (Sophos)

>From the interesting reading department:

* Gates calls for 'trustworthy computing'

Bill Gates is getting serious about security. Microsoft's
chairman and chief software architect is calling on the
software giant's 49,000 employees worldwide to make
'trustworthy computing' the company's highest priority.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/0117gates.html
IDG News Service, 01/17/02

* Server glitch prevents users from updating XP

Microsoft is working on a technical problem with its Web server
that has prevented users of Windows XP from downloading
software updates - including a new security hole patch - since
last Thursday, the company confirmed on Tuesday.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/0115xpglitch.html
IDG News Service, 01/15/02

* NetIQ adds directory security tools to lineup

NetIQ on Monday released two security tools for Microsoft's
Active Directory to help administrators manage access controls
and group policy settings.
http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/0115netiq.html
Network World Fusion, 01/15/02

* Archives online

It's winter here in the U.S. Stay inside, stay warm and read
the Security and Bug Patch newsletter archives:
http://www.nwfusion.com/newsletters/bug/index.html

_______________________________________________________________
To contact Jason Meserve:

Jason Meserve is the Multimedia Editor of Network World
Fusion and writes about streaming media, search engines and
IP Multicast. Jason can be reached at mailto:jmeserve@nww.com.
_______________________________________________________________
Get your wireless service from the carrier ranked #1 by Forbes
magazine.  Now get Unlimited Night & Weekend Minutes, plus up
to $165 in savings when you activate on select calling plans
and purchase a Nokia 3360 or 8260 from AT&T Wireless. To learn
more go to http://nww1.com/go/ad207.html
_______________________________________________________________
FEATURED READER RESOURCE

Network World Fusion's Net.Worker site

Whether your company is growing larger or scaling back,
corporate managers are looking for ways to cut costs while
retaining and recruiting star employees. One smart solution -
at least on paper - is to let some employees work from home.
Network World's Net.Worker Web site bridges the gap between the
telework concept and the hardware, software and services needed
to make it happen. We bring you news and reviews, sound advice
and keen insight into the technologies and solutions you need
to manage a remote and mobile workforce.

Visit http://www.nwfusion.com/net.worker/index.html
_______________________________________________________________
May We Send You a Free Print Subscription?
You've got the technology snapshot of your choice delivered
at your fingertips each day. Now, extend your knowledge by
receiving 51 FREE issues to our print publication. Apply
today at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/nl
_______________________________________________________________
SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES

To subscribe or unsubscribe to any Network World e-mail
newsletters, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/notprinteditnews.asp

To unsubscribe from promotional e-mail go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/ep

To change your e-mail address, go to:
http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/news/scripts/changeemail.asp

Subscription questions? Contact Customer Service by replying to
this message.

Have editorial comments? Write Jeff Caruso, Newsletter Editor,
at: mailto:jcaruso@nww.com

For advertising information, write Jamie Kalbach, Director of
Online Sales, at: mailto:jkalbach@nww.com

Copyright Network World, Inc., 2002

------------------------
This message was sent to:  vkamins@enron.com


The only significant legislative development, in addition to the Senate vote
on AB 265, is that the leg. council draft of the Siting Bill, SB 2167 is
available.  We are getting our amendments out tonight.  Closed door
negotiations are supposed to start at 6 p.m. this evening.

Everything else (Assembly Bill on San Diego, SCE/PG&E bill) is still
churning.  No reportable events.


I will be able to attend.

Chris


-----Original Message-----
From:  Lundstrom, Bruce
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Derrick Jr., James; Haedicke, Mark E.; Walls Jr., Rob
Cc: Rogers, Rex
Subject: Dabhol -- A Brief Legal Update

Gentlemen -

A few updates:

The second Bombay High Court hearing was held today.  The court asked DPC to
go away for a week and try to continue discussions with MSEB.  The parties
are to return to the court in a week for another hearing.  We are not
entirely sure why the court made this request -- it has nothing to do with
the MERC jurisdiction issue before the court.  One possible positive
interpretation:  The court feels the need to generate some positive publicity
("I tried to encourage a positive outcome") before ruling in our favor on the
jurisdiction issue.  But, again, the court's motives are not clear.

We still don't know if some or all of the lenders will try to cure the
construction contract defaults this week.  I would expect that we would
receive formal termination letters over the weekend from the contractors if
the contractors are not paid in full this week.

Some of you are aware that DPC's relationship with its Indian outside counsel
has recently shown some strain.  That strain did not affect the quality of
DPC's representation at the Bombay High Court hearing.  However, I'm also
pretty sure that the strain has not been permanently "fixed" and that further
efforts will be required in this regard.  Gail Brownfeld and Jim McCartney
are helping DPC with these issues.

Bruce


Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.

We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.

It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:

-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;

-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;

-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;

-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and

-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.

We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.

Core Businesses

Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:

-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;

-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;

-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and

-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.

The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.

I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.

Non-Core Businesses

Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.

We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.

Businesses Under Review

These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.

Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.

Credit Rating/10-Q Filing

We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:

-- Moody's at Baa3       "Under Review for Further Downgrade"

-- Fitch at BBB-             "Evolving Status"

-- S&P at BBB-              "CreditWatch Negative"

We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.

We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."

In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.

In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.


When: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3270

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


The EHS annual report is now on the external site at
http://www4.enron.com/corp/pr/inthenews/ and at http://home.enron.com/
internally.

This is the first edition, with very few photos.  The second edition will go
up next week, subject to technical difficulties.

SW


In Follow-up to Mark Frevert's email to you  dated September 8, please call
me at your earliest convenience to reserve your seat in the MANDATORY
training session entitled Sales Practices/Anti-Manipulation Training .  The
training session will be conducted by Ken  Raisler from Sullivan and
Cromwell.   The program covers  the legal implications of various activities
of our commercial team -- particularly as they interact with customers in
marketing.  The program also covers laws prohibiting market manipulation that
might affect Enron's trading and marketing activities.

The two hour training sessions will be  held at the Doubletree, in the
DeZavala Room.  Since seating is limited to 50 people per session, please
call me at X57373 to reserve a seat.  If I am not available, please leave a
voice mail indicating your peferred session along with your extension
number.  I will call you back only if there is a need for reassignment.

  Session 1 Thursday, Sept. 14  2:00 p.m.
 Session 2 Thursday, Sept. 14  4:00 p.m.
 Session 3 Friday, Sept. 15  9:00 a.m.
 Session 4 Friday, Sept. 15  2:00 p.m.

Best regards,

Taffy Milligan
Asst. to Mark Taylor


Danny:
Please see Rob Kilmer's information.  I sent the list yesterday without his information as many people were off today and I wanted to get the list out to everyone.  I will update and send to all.
Thanks for communicating so effectively to me and the group.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kilmer III, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:25 AM
To:	Armstrong, Julie
Subject:	RE: McCarty Direct Report Holiday Contact List

Home on Wed. 713-466-1524
Cell phone Thurs-Sun.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:52 AM
To:	Kilmer III, Robert
Subject:	RE: McCarty Direct Report Holiday Contact List

Are you in the office tomorrow?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kilmer III, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, November 20, 2001 7:04 AM
To:	Armstrong, Julie
Subject:	RE: McCarty Direct Report Holiday Contact List

Julie, my cell # is 713-304-5350. Thanks
 Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 5:33 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Gadd, Eric; Dowd, Stephen; Harris, Steven; Hayes, Robert; Kilmer III, Robert; Miller, Mary Kay; Neubauer, Dave; Stark, Cindy
Cc:	Winters, Ricki; Wadle, Susan; Robertson, Audrey; Kovalcik, Tammy; Paschal, Zelda; Call, Josie; Cappiello, Deborah; Wehring, Linda
Subject:	McCarty Direct Report Holiday Contact List

Attached please find a contact numbers for Danny McCarty's group for the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday.

If you have any questions, please call Julie at x33597.  Thanks.

Have a safe and pleasant holiday.

 << File: McCartyholidaycontactnumbers.doc >>


April:  Could you please distribute this to the office?  Thanks a bunch.

Greetings Folks:

Tired of thinking about related-party transactions, SEC probes and re-stated earnings?

Well, here's a chance to take your mind off of things.  I've got a pair of exceptional 49er tickets--lowest section in 2nd tier, right on the 50 yardline. (My girlfriend's parents season tickets. I can't use them--in fact, ain't crazy about football)  They're playing the Saints, which will be a great game.

I'm selling them for face value, which is $50 each.  Like to be able to give them to someone in the office if possible.  If you're interested, please let me know ASAP.

Best,
Jeff


Becky,

Well, today things suck, but overall everything is great.  I lost about $100,000 this morning because I'm an idiot, but it's not completely my fault.  Anyway, you should definitely take an earlier flight so we could go to dinner or something.  Too bad it's not at the end of week so you could stay over, even though if you wanted to, you could.  I could leave work pretty much anytime on wednesday, so just let me know.  If you don't have my work number, its 713-853-0472.  Thanks.

Mat

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kostek, Becky/BHM" <bkostek@CH2M.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kostek+2C+20Becky_BHM+22+20+3Cbkostek+40CH2M+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Smith, Matt
Subject:	Hey there

Hey Mat - I haven't heard from you since we played phone tag about a month
ago.  Wanted to let you know that I have a trip coming up next week and I'll
be passing through IAH Wednesday night around 9:00.  Right now my layover is
for only 50 minutes but I may be able to catch an earlier connection out of
Denver if you're going to be around that night.  If you're around I'll call
your cell on Wednesday as I'm leaving Denver & let you know if I catch the
earlier connection and maybe you can meet me at the airport for a drink.
Anyway, let me know what your plans are.

Other than being totally swamped here at work things are good.  Matt & I see
each other about once a month and we're going to Alaska for two weeks at the
beginning of August.  Let me know how things are with you.

Becky Kostek
CH2M Hill
The Plaza Building, Suite 528
2112 Eleventh Avenue South
Birmingham, AL 35205
Phone: 205-326-8912 ext. 11
Fax: 205-326-8878


Done.

BMc

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:43 PM
To:	McIntyre, Burton
Subject:	FW: New trader in risktrac

The only FT-Central-Opt book that should move to her is the GDL.  The others should remain with Geoff Storey.  She also needs to have the INTRA-CNT-TRANS-PHY book.  Sorry for the mistake.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Love, Phillip M.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:00 PM
To:	Trevino, Susan
Subject:	New trader in risktrac

Please set up Souad Mahmassani in risktrac.  She is a new trader on the central desk.  She will be running the Aruba and central transport books.  The following books will be her responsibility:
ARUBA-SPLY-PRC
ARUBA-TP-PHY
FT-PEOPLES-BAS,PRC,IDX,GDL
FT-CENTRAL-OPT-BAS,GDL,IDX,PRC

Souad would need to roll up to the Central desk in natural gas, I would say she should be set up similar to Denver Plachy.

Please shout with any questions or additional information that you may need.  Thanks.
PL


Attached is a draft of the Extension Agreement prepared by PG&E and revised by me.  Larry is fine with all changes.  Please review and let me know if you have any comments. Current standstill expired on the 20th and LCs expire on the 29th(Friday).

 Bill - LCs must be soon replaced ; Is someone working on this? Do you want me to look at draw conditions on revised LCs to make sure they track language in Standstill Letter (ie only draw on non-payment in accordance w master)?

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349


FYI.  Project's already done.
---------------------- Forwarded by Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT on 03/18/2001 07:25
AM ---------------------------

Alan Comnes
03/18/2001 07:21 AM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Benson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Project Requires RCR

The following project requires RCR:

Project Lead: Alan Comnes

Project Name: Cal PX Filing re: Implementation of $150/MWh Breakpoint

RCR Title: Comments on Cal PX Motion Seeking Guidance on Implementing
$150/MWh Breakpoint

Proposed Expenditure: $2,000.00

To see more detail on this project, click on the following link >>>


A hot dog at Enron Field cost. $3.00

-----Original Message-----
From: Whitt, James [mailto:jwhitt@hksinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Mark and Alicia Whitt (E-mail)
Subject: ENE

I know shares are going for 36 cents a piece, but if I buy in bulk, will
y'all give them to me at 3 for $1 ?


Robert,

Please be advised that Japan already has ETA's and PA's.

It costs approx. GBP 15,000 to add each new country. Please let us know which
ones you are happy to have charged to your RC and we'll commence legal due
diligence on any you specify.

Dave

Robert Quick@ECT
06/14/2000 01:36 PM
To: Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pierre
Aury/LON/ECT@ECT, Chris Connelly/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: freight derivatives - EOL

I have trawled through the list of jurisdictions of potential counterparties
to the freight swaps/options.

A list
Norway
Denmark
Germany
Switzerland
UK
Belgium
France
Netherlands
Singapore
Australia

We have already done full EOL due diligence on the above jurisdictions. The
only issue which we wd just need to cover is whether for regulatory purposes
freight is treated as a commodity. We shd be able to get answers on that
issue quickly.

B list
Turkey
Taiwan
Japan
Argentina
Israel
Gibraltar
S. Korea

We do not have much on the above jurisdictions here although Mark T may have
done some due diligence on the non- European, non-middle eastern countries.
Do you want us to undertake full due diligence on these?

C list
Liberia
Panama
Cayman Isl
BVI
Bermuda
Bahamas
BWI

I understand that decisions may have already been made not to include
entities incorporated into these jurisdictions, because of money laundering
issues, lack of corporate transparency etc. Cd this be confirmed.

Many thanks

Robert


From astrology.com (must I beware of overindulgence in such websites?)
I like the part about charm and charisma and think it is very true.

Sagittarius and Sagittarius
When two Sagittarians join together in a love match, the truth-loving natures
makes theirs a near perfect relationship. This couple views the world around
them with an educated eye and both share an intense hunger for more
knowledge. They will engage one another in pleasant conversation and
banter that challenges and tickles the mind.  An occasional hotheaded dispute
can erupt in the Sagittarius-Sagittarius relationship, when one fact-fanatic
Sag
partner carries things a little too far. Easygoing and independent, these two
are
compatible when it comes to balancing personal interests. They've never known
jealousy, and each partner keeps busy with personal projects when not with
their
lover. When they are together, however, they do all they can toward pleasing
their partner and satiating common interests.  Although they are adaptable
and
modern, they can, at times, fly off the handle. However, it is not in the
Archer's
nature to hold a grudge or let disagreements fester very long.

Sagittarius is ruled by the Planet Jupiter (Luck). Expansion is the key word
here;
as both partners enjoy the acquisition of knowledge, they will carry over
exciting
ideas into their relationship. They must be mindful of over-indulgences, as
such
gluttony will only distract them. Their charm and charisma make them a very
pleasant couple not only to one another, but the entire crowd.


Message-ID: <00c001c05063$dd0bdb20$1eccdacf@tinktink>
From: Mark <mark7@ev1.net>
To: Danel <danelrr@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fw: Fw: Ooooohhh, Aaahhhhhhh!!
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:52:08 -0600
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_A3F88E78.E889B725"

----- Original Message -----
From: phantomt38 <phantomt38@email.msn.com>
To: PAT H. <skikobe@aol.com>; ROY DEFRIEND <royd@glade.net>; RUSTY
<Roknr370@cs.com>; SUZANNE <RIBBITHEAD@AOL.COM>; STEVE@HOME
<Redtail57@aol.com>; PRISCILLA <pmartinez@ofmslaw.com>; PATTY
<plkchef@hotmail.com>; PAUL@WORK <PGASTON@EMS.JSC.NASA.GOV>; =ZIP=
<meichel@ameritech.net>; CHARLIE McCULLOCHS <McCULLOCHS@juno.com>; MARK
RAYBURN <mark7@ev1.net>; KEVIN <Kevin.Burttschell@delta-air.com>; =CGE=
<kc7djr@home.com>; =JIM= <JIM@rebelairforce.com>; KRIS & ROLAND
<jasrman@aol.com>; MARY BERGERON <Froggy@cfweb.net>; <DaLosiMon@aol.com>;
STEVE MALARCHICK <chevy69ssusa@netscape.net>; CHRIS&CINDY
<CCPOHLMEYER@AOL.COM>; ROBERT <bulldog86@msn.com>; brook928
<brook928@prodigy.net>; JENNIFER <Baybeestar@aol.com>; BOBBY A.
<BAllbritton@storagequip.com>; =INKY= <ANUBIS1942@aol.com>; AMANDA
<amandah@sprynet.com>; =ALW= <ALW@rebelairforce.com>; GEORGE MELD
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:18 PM
Subject: Fw: Fw: Ooooohhh, Aaahhhhhhh!!

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: gjoiner <gjoiner98@email.msn.com>
> To: fred berger <phantomt38@msn.com>; charles Holcombe <Lawdog@ev1.net>
> Cc: Little John <skilion@aol.com>; <Shotwho1@aol.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 7:38 PM
> Subject: FW: Fw: Ooooohhh, Aaahhhhhhh!!
>
>
> >
> >
>

 - Slide11.jpg
 - Slide12.jpg
 - Slide13.jpg
 - Slide16.jpg
 - Slide3.jpg
 - Slide5.jpg


I suspect that Enron India LLC would be the entity to use.  However, is
anyone from Tax involved in this?  If not, we need to get someone in the
loop.
____________________________
Lauren Hagerty
Enron India/EBS Asia
Three Allen Center, Room 2119
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone:  713-646-6529
Fax:  713-646-7549

	Bonnie Nelson
	01/19/2001 11:54 AM

		 To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lauren
Hagerty/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandeep
Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Re: CA for Henwood engagement

Stinson,

Please find attached a revised version of the draft Consulting Agreement with
Henwood.  FYI, I am attaching both a clean version and one marked toshow
changes from the last draft I sent you.  Please let me know if you have any
questions or comments on the agreement or the most recent changes.

WHat is the status of Henwood?  Do you still want to engage them and what is
the timeframe for their work (the dates in the draft may need to be
corrected).

Bruce and Lauren:  please advise on which Enron entity should be the party to
this Consulting Agreement.

Thanks, Bonnie


Diana: attached is the Term Sheet I spoke of, let me know if you have any questions.

Anna: Let Diana and I know ASAP if you receive the signed Cover Sheet from a Mr. Joel Cook of PP&L Montana.

Thanks,  John


He hadn't mentioned it, but I'd love to meet with him as well. Just let me
know when. And keep me up to date on the tomato happenings, will ya!

Kate

GRACE RODRIGUEZ
04/24/2001 08:44 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Kate Symes Interview

Kate:

FYI! Please note that Jesse will be meeting with you for an informal
interview either later this afternoon, or tomorrow morning. I'm not sure if
he had mentioned it to you...

-Grace
---------------------- Forwarded by Grace Rodriguez/PDX/ECT on 04/24/2001
08:52 AM ---------------------------

GRACE RODRIGUEZ
04/24/2001 08:38 AM
To: Bill Williams III/PDX/ECT@ECT, Geir Solberg/PDX/ECT@ECT, Chris H
Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Amy FitzPatrick/PDX/ECT@ECT, Kathryn Sheppard/PDX/ECT@ECT, Anna
Mehrer/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jessica Burry/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Kate Symes Interview

Hello all!

Sorry for the delayed schedule!

Today's interview with Kate Symes for a position in Real Time is as follows:

Kate Symes - Cascade conference room
9:30am - Bill Williams III
10:00am - Geir Solberg
10:30am - Chris Foster

Jesse Bryson will be interviewing Kate either later this afternoon or
Wednesday morning.

I will be distributing copies of this schedule, along with Kate's resume, to
the interviewers in just a few moments.

If you have any questions about this schedule, please let me know.

Thanks!
-Grace


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by: Marie Wallace
Expense Report Name: emclaughlin42401
Report Total: $78.00
Amount Due Employee: $78.00
Amount Approved: $78.00
Amount Paid: $78.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Paid

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


Ken and Dave,

You may have received a complaint letter with regards a gas supply contract with Enron Direct from one of our customers in the UK. The customer, Mr and Mrs Forrest wrote to me through Mr Kenneth Clarke who is a Member of the Parliament in the UK. Enron Direct has dealt with the complaint as soon as it was received and we sorted out the issue with the customer directly.  In addition we wrote a letter to Mr Kenneth Clarke explaining the actions taken by Enron.

The matter is resolved and all the different parties have been informed. If you have any questions please come back to me and I will give all the details you need.

Regards,

Enrique Gimenez
Enron Direct UK


Bob,

I wanted to continue the analysis on mark-to-market that I had spoken to you
about on the phone.

I thought that it was getting very difficult explaining the whole transaction
by phone, so I am having Krishnarao who is in Vince's group explain the
transaction to you.

Krishna has been helping us structure the deal here in India, and he has just
returned to Houston from India after working with the team here.

He will seek an appointment with you to explain the transaction.  I would
like you to please spend some time with him, and then based on the discussion
please send us a note detailing how sucha a transaction would be marked to
market.

Please cosider the fact that currently there are no such transactions from
the Indian side.  This is a very important transaction for us, and we may
need to repeat this in coming months, hence setting up the system to account
for these maybe well worth it.  Also, what I am concerned about is that there
will be an Enron India (EIPL) account in India based on Indian GAAP, and upon
consolidation there will be a US GAAP accounting in the US.  It is here that
we would like to have mark-to-market accounting.  EIPL is structured through
Mauritius, and then Caymen Islands.

Another key question to consider is that when we m-t-m the transaction in the
US there will be a tax accruing in the year of m-t-m (say 2000).  However, in
India, as a result of the accrual accounting, there will not be any income
showing till the year 2002 or 2003.  We will need to know how that would get
treated, and whether there is a way to get credit for the tax payable in the
US.  I am also confused about whether US tax would be levied, since none of
the income is being brought back into the US (remains overseas - subpart-F
and other concerns).

Finally, we have been working hard in structuring a fixed price contract and
getting a fixed for floating swap in the US (this is still not allowed to
Indian Corporates).  I need you to think about this too, and see if some type
of accounting will solve this issue.  Krishna knows what I am talking about,
and will brief you on the same.

Krishna - Please walk Bob through the three structures we had worked here.

Look forward to your help and comments.  This is going to be an exciting
project for us all.

Regards,
Sandeep.


Are you aware of this?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	McCarty, Danny
Sent:	Monday, April 09, 2001 1:42 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Subject:	TW Capacity--drag reducer

Rod,
         It just keeps getting better and better.  I just found out that our TW drag reduceing project created 80,000 in new capacity, not 40,000.  But, as originally designed, the San Juan lateral could only transport 810,000/day rather than its certificated capacity of 850,000, and it was not designed to take into account fuel usage.  So, of the 80,000 of new capacity, 40,000 goes to bring it back to certificated levels  and 40,000 goes to compensate for fuel usage.
         Phil is of the opinion that Stan knows all about it, and was surprised that there was any confusion.

Dan


To: Sarah Novasel@sarah novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Steve Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Donna Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com, Joe Hartsoe@Enron,
James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, mhenry@bracepatt.com
cc:
From: Mary Hain/HOU/ECT
Date: 11/14/2000 01:46:23 PM
Subject: RTO West comments

I want these two issues raised in our protest of RTO West.  I don't care how
you make the arguments, just please make them.


Hi,

	 	The power options trading desk is beginning to structure deals and to make markets in spark spread options ( options on the spreads between power prices and natural gas prices).  Please refer to the attached file for further information.

 	   	It would be most helpful to meet with the relevant individuals  on the Gas desk  who would be interested in spark spread options.

	 	 Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Kind regards,
Iris Mack, MBA/PhD
Enron Power Options Trading Desk
x3-6711


What is the volume price?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


an extremely big one....

	Richard Shapiro/ENRON@enronXgate
	07/31/2001 08:49 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Davis spokesman under fire for stock

Maviglio is an ---hole.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:39 AM
To: skean@enron.com; Shapiro, Richard; Steffes, James D.; Denne, Karen;
mpalmer@enron.com; Mara, Susan; Kaufman, Paul; Kingerski, Harry; Robertson,
Linda; Landwehr, Susan M.; Guerrero, Janel
Subject: Davis spokesman under fire for stock

FYI.  This is THE story out here today.  Given the repugnant things that
Maviglio has said about Enron over the past several months, it will be very
interesting to see whether he'll be able to withstand the fact that all the
time that he was saying those things, he owned our stock.  Gee, couldn't
happen to a nicer guy.

Best,
Jeff

In addition, all this buzz about conflicts with traders and Calpine could put
in jeopardy the state's contracts with Calpine, which may, in the end, be a
very good thing for Direct Access.
Davis spokesman under fire for stock
By Amy Chance and Dale Kasler
Bee Staff Writers
(Published July 31, 2001)
Davis administration spokesman Steve Maviglio acknowledged Monday that he
bought stock in Calpine Corp. in June, at a time when the company was
announcing a breakthrough in its bid to build a controversial San Jose power
plant.
His disclosure came several days after Gov. Gray Davis dismissed five state
power purchasers for owning stock in the company and drew new complaints that
Davis administration officials may have improperly mixed their private
finances and their public roles.
Maviglio, now acting as interim communications director for the
administration, said he put in an "open" order for Calpine stock May 31,
agreeing to buy 300 shares once the stock hit a certain price.
He said that threshold was met June 20, the day after an action by the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission brought down "all energy stock prices
across the board."
Maviglio said he bought the stock for his individual retirement account, and
it has since declined in value. Under terms of the open order, he said, he
had no control over the exact date of purchase.
Maviglio touted the company in his role as spokesman to the governor in a
story published June 27 in The Bee. He said Monday that he was simply
responding to a reporter's question about the company's positive reputation.
"They have made a clear commitment to invest in California's future,"
Maviglio said at the time. "Their pricing has been far more reasonable than
any other generator."
In the interview, Maviglio also contrasted Calpine and Texas-based
generators. He said Calpine "took a different tack from the Joe Bobs of the
world," an apparent reference to Joe Bob Perkins, a senior executive with
Reliant Energy Inc. of Houston.
Maviglio acknowledged the stock ownership several days after the
administration ended its relationship with several energy consultants who
held stock in energy companies, including Calpine.
Under pressure from Secretary of State Bill Jones, a Republican who hopes to
challenge Davis for governor next year, the Davis administration has spent
several weeks scrambling to answer questions about the stock holdings and
potential conflicts of its consultants and energy traders.
Jones said Monday that Maviglio should be fired.
"These actions are unethical, unconscionable, unacceptable, and heads should
roll," he said in a statement. He said the Democratic governor should direct
all of his staff to immediately file updated conflict-of-interest statements
to reflect current holdings.
Jones, who last week asked the Securities and Exchange Commission to
investigate administration consultants for insider trading, also said the
probe should be expanded "to include all of the governor's staff."
Federal law and SEC regulations forbid anyone from trading stocks while
possessing "insider information" -- relevant facts not available to the
public, according to the SEC. Violations can bring lawsuits and criminal
prosecution.
Michael Prozan, a Menlo Park lawyer and expert on insider trading, said the
prohibition against it originally focused on halting company executives from
profiting from news before it was disclosed publicly.
But the laws have been broadened to include others besides company employees.
Investment bankers, lawyers and journalists have been snared by
insider-trading crackdowns.
Davis' office was instrumental earlier this year in paving the way for
removing barriers to construction of a Calpine plant in San Jose. On May 30,
after opposing the project for years, San Jose Mayor Ron Gonzales announced
he had negotiated an agreement addressing his concerns and agreed to support
construction.
His action came after Davis in April endorsed the plant's construction and as
the state Energy Commission threatened to approve it over local objections.
On June 20, the company announced it had won tentative state approval to
build the plant.
Maviglio said he buys many stocks and that Enron Corp. and Calpine are the
only energy generators among them. He owns 100 shares of Enron stock, which
he purchased in 1996.
"I deal with hundreds of California companies just about every day, and this
was one that I saw that looked like a good investment based on public
knowledge," he said. "I read six newspapers a day or more, and I know what's
going on in the world. If there's a standard that I can't invest in something
that I have general public knowledge of, then I wouldn't have any stocks at
all."
Maviglio said that the "open" order he placed meant that he could not have
used inside information to make his stock purchase.
"Had I had specific knowledge about a contract being signed or what actually
happened in the office of the mayor of San Jose ... that would have been
unrelated," Maviglio said. "There was no timing-based sequence to it."
Calpine stock, despite the company's considerable success, has slipped in
recent weeks because of general investor anxiety about the California energy
crisis.
The stock, which trades on the New York Stock Exchange, closed at $49.30 on
May 31, the day Maviglio says he placed the purchase order. The order was
executed as the stock dipped below $40 on June 20, closing that day at
$39.85.
The day before, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission announced a
price-control plan that investors believed was damaging to generators'
profits. On Monday, the stock closed at $37.13.
Last week, the Davis administration stopped doing business with five energy
traders under contract with the administration after Maviglio said
administration lawyers "came to the determination that there are possible
violations of the law or close to it."
"It's not a crime to own energy stock," Maviglio said Monday. "The difference
with these traders is they're making governmental decisions. They're
committing the state's resources by spending money to buy power."
Jim Knox, director of California Common Cause, said he believes the
Governor's Office made critical errors while hiring staff to purchase energy
for the state.
"Had the Governor's Office gone to the trouble to have these people fill
statements of economic interest, as they were required to do by law, they
should have known this before they were hired and they shouldn't have been
hired," Knox said.

The Bee's Amy Chance can be reached at (916) 326-5535 or achance@sacbee.com
<mailto:achance@sacbee.com>.
Emily Bazar of The Bee Capitol Bureau contributed to this report.


that was cute!? thank you! i especially loved the list....

At 08:28 AM 12/12/2000 -0600, you wrote:

---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 12/12/2000
08:23 AM ---------------------------

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?(Embedded???? Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.?
?image moved?????????????????????????????????????????
?to file:???? From:? "Emily Hillegeist"?????????????
?pic24766.pcx) <ehillegeist@hotmail.com>?????????????
?????????????? 12/12/2000 03:40 AM???????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

To:?? sonderfan@hotmail.com, katyhester@hotmail.com, sscott5@enron.com
cc:
Subject:? Fwd: hey, girlfriends!

>From: Ukhawks@aol.com
>To: bandrowski@msn.com, aboguszewski@hotmail.com,
jclarke@chuck.stchas.edu, MMCronin00@aol.com, susiedrob@hotmail.com,
SewSewGolf@aol.com, nfelicito.travelnetwork@us.amadeusmail.com,
alana_glass@hotmail.com, Redfernran@aol.com, amanda_hawk@hotmail.com,
ehillegeist@hotmail.com, JUdyH314@aol.com, OscarWanda@aol.com,
SKnape@aol.com, Paulinelevin@aol.com, morein@worldnet.att.net,
Gtn126@aol.com, roberttprice@sprintmail.com, RDGJJR5@aol.com,
nshort@worldnet.att.net, Cinhundley@aol.com, paulrvirg@earthlink.net,
totonj@earthlink.net, JFLEWHITE@aol.com, EllenUK@aol.com,
swilliamson@edgellmail.com
>Subject: Fwd: hey, girlfriends!
>Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 04:30:16 EST
>
>

Get more from the Web.? FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-Path: <thesymingtons@email.msn.com>
Received: from? rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (rly-ye04.mail.aol.com
[172.18.151.201]) by air-ye04.mail.aol.com (v77.14) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec
2000 02:34:21 -0500
Received: from? secure.smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu07.email.msn.com
[207.46.181.28]) by rly-ye04.mx.aol.com (v77.27) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec
2000 02:34:14 -0500
Received: from oemcomputer - 62.7.137.35 by email.msn.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC;?? Mon, 11 Dec 2000 23:33:56 -0800
Message-ID: <000801c0640d$da9f4f80$2389073e@oemcomputer>
From: "thesymingtons" <thesymingtons@email.msn.com>
To: "Maggie Symington" <msymington@hotmail.com>
Subject: hey, girlfriends!
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:15:45 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;???? charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

Something fun to read!
>
>? I WANT WHAT SHE'S HAVING
>
> >>>> I have a new delightful friend,
> > >? > I am most in awe of her.
> > >? > When we first met I was impressed,
> > >? > By her bizarre behavior.
> > >? >
> > >? > That day I had a date with friends,
> > >? > We met to have some lunch.
> > >? > Mae had come along with them,
> > >? > All in all ... a pleasant bunch.
> > >? >
> > >? > When the menus were presented,
> > >? > We ordered salads, sandwiches, and soups.
> > >? > Except for Mae who circumvented,
> > >? > And said, Ice Cream, please: two scoops.
> > >? >
> > >? > I was not sure my ears heard right,
> > >? > And the others were aghast.
> > >? > Along with heated apple pie,
> > >? > Mae added, completely unabashed.
> > >? >
> > >? > We tried to act quite nonchalant,
> > >? > As if people did this all the time.
> > >? > But when our orders were brought out,
> > >? > I did not enjoy mine.
> > >? >
> > >? > I could not take my eyes off Mae,
> > >? > As her pie a-la-mode went down.
> > >? > The other ladies showed dismay,
> > >? > They ate their lunches silently, and frowned.
> > >? >
> > >? > Well, the next time I went out to eat,
> > >? > I called and invited Mae.
> > >? > My lunch contained white tuna meat,
> > >? > She ordered a parfait.
> > >? >
> > >? > I smiled when her dish I viewed,
> > >? > And she asked if she amused me.
> > >? > I answered, Yes, you do,
> > >? > But also you confuse me.
> > >? >
> > >? > How come you order rich desserts,
> > >? > When I feel I must be sensible?
> > >? > She laughed and said, with wanton mirth,
> > >? > I am tasting all that's possible.
> > >? >
> > >? > I try to eat the food I need,
> > >? > And do the things I should.
> > >? > But life's so short, my friend, indeed,
> > >? > I hate missing out on something good.
> > >? >
> > >? > This year I realized how old I was,
> > >? > She grinned, I've not been this old before.
> > >? > So, before I die, I've got to try,
> > >? > Those things for years I had ignored.
> > >? >
> > >? > I've not smelled all the flowers yet,
> > >? > There's too many books I have not read.
> > >? > There's more fudge sundaes to wolf down,
> > >? > And kites to be flown overhead.
> > >? >
> > >? > There are many malls I have not shopped,
> > >? > I've not laughed at all the jokes.
> > >? > I've missed a lot of Broadway Hits,
> > >? > And potato chips and cokes.
> > >? >
> > >? > I want to wade again in water,
> > >? > And feel ocean spray upon my face.
> > >? > Sit in a country church once more,
> > >? > And thank God for It's grace.
> > >? >
> > >? > I want peanut butter every day,
> > >? > Spread on my morning toast.
> > >? > I want un-timed long-distance calls,
> > >? > To the folks I love the most.
> > >? >
> > >? > I've not cried at all the movies yet,
> > >? > Nor walked in the morning rain.
> > >? > I need to feel wind in my hair,
> > >? > I want to fall in love again.
> > >? >
> > >? > So, if I choose to have dessert,
> > >? > Instead of having dinner.
> > >? > Then should I die before night fall,
> > >? > I'd say I died a winner.
> > >? >
> > >? > Because I missed out on nothing,
> > >? > I filled my heart's desire.
> > >? > I had that final chocolate mousse,
> > >? > Before my life expired.
> > >? >
> > >? > With that, I called the waitress over,
> > >? > I've changed my mind, it seems.
> > >? > I said, I want what she is having,
> > >? > Only add some more whipped-cream!
> > >? >
> > >? > Here is a little something for you all!
> > >? > We need an annual Girlfriends Day!
> > >? > If you get this twice,
> > >? > then you have more than one girlfriend.
> > >? > Be happy.
> > >? >
> > >? > ALL I NEED TO KNOW ABOUT LIFE I LEARNED FROM MY GIRLFRIENDS
> > >? >
> > >? >? * Good times are even better when they're shared.
> > >? >? * A good long talk can cure almost anything.
> > >? >? * Everyone needs someone with whom to share their secrets.
> > >? >? * Listening is just as important as talking.
> > >? >? * An understanding friend is better than a therapist...
> > >? >??? and cheaper too!
> > >? >? * Laughter makes the world a happier place.
> > >? >? * Friends are like wine; they get better with age.
> > >? >? * Sometimes you just need a shoulder to cry on.
> > >? >? * Great minds think alike, especially when they are female!
> > >? >? * When it comes to "bonding," females do it better.
> > >? >? * YOU ARE NEVER TOO OLD FOR SLUMBER PARTIES!!!!
> > >? >? * Girls just want to have fun.
> > >? >? * It's important to make time to do "girl things."
> > >? >? * Calories don't count when you are having lunch
> > >? >??? (or any other food) with your girlfriends.
> > >? >? * You can never have too many shoes.
> > >? >? * GEMS MAY BE PRECIOUS, BUT FRIENDSHIP IS PRICELESS!!!
> > >? >
> > >? >? PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO ALL OF YOUR GIRLFRIENDS


Given the importance of this document to the traders and given that the FERC
may be considering a number of these dockets at its December 13th meeting and
given that the agenda for that meeting has not yet been posted, I would wait
until the agenda is posted to update and forward to the traders.  The FERC's
agenda is posted at:
www.ferc.fec.us/public/isd/sunshine/htm

From: Marcie Milner@ENRON on 11/29/2000 03:15 PM CST
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weekly West Update 11/29/00


Jeff--I must not be on the e mail distribution list for the Monday California
call.  COuld you please send me info so that if I am not already on another
call (yes, I know, I am a pretty popular gal) I can jump on yours.  Thanks.


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Lebrocq, Wendi
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 9:18 AM
To:	Bradford, William S.; Lees, Lisa; Fayett, Juana; Le, Trang; Maley, Paul; O'day, Karen; Rohauer, Tanya; Lombardi, Kelly; Lindsay, Brian; EOL Call Center; Hare, Bill D.; Heffernan, Amy; Lafuze, Molly; Clark, Danny; Panus, Stephanie; Mandola, Teresa; Ebow, Amber; Coleman, Tandra; Campbell, Lesli; Lebrocq, Wendi; Taylor, Mark E (Legal); Lauer, Kara; Banner, Kimberly; Mcquade, Jennifer; George, Fraisy; Guillory, Michael; Rajaram, Aparna; Monterrey, Maribel; Lebeau, Maria; Escamilla, Albert; Lebrocq, Wendi; Global Emerging Businesses; Lambert, Karen; Jones, Tana; Schott, Samuel; Brackett, Debbie R.; Clark, Cynthia; Enron Europe Global CounterParty,; Sever, Stephanie; Moran, Tom; Clark, Claudia; Curry, Ken
Subject:	EOL and Clickpaper Approvals for 10-25-01

Please see attached.

Regards,

Wendi Lebrocq
3-3835


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Moon/HOU/ECT on 03/28/2001 11:43 AM
---------------------------

	From:  David Oliver                           03/28/2001 11:13 AM

To: Jennifer Oliver/EU/Enron@Enron, "Chris Dahl" <cdahl@incyte.com>,
"Ben_Richter" <Ben_Richter@email.msn.com>, "jerry oliver"
<jnmoliver@yahoo.com>, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Eric Moon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Harding/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Cross/NA/Enron,
Guy Freshwater/LON/ECT@ECT, Michelle C Waldhauser/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

---------------------- Forwarded by David Oliver/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001 18:12
---------------------------

Pasi Hamalainen
28/03/2001 17:07
To: David Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

---------------------- Forwarded by Pasi Hamalainen/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001
18:07 ---------------------------

	From:  Maarit Makinen                           28/03/2001 18:01

To: Pasi Hamalainen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

here is your first Albanian case
---------------------- Forwarded by Maarit Makinen/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001
18:01 ---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Sarah Knott                           28/03/2001 17:55

To: Maarit Makinen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Knott/LON/ECT on 28/03/2001 17:59
---------------------------

kmart@sintez.co.uk on 27/03/2001 15:27:23
To: mick.mart@rpgreaves.co.uk, eastlee@eclipse.co.uk, jk_bromley@hotmail.com,
Sarah.Knott@enron.com, DaveSpence999@aol.com, fathertimt@aol.com
cc:

Subject: FW: Foot and mouth crisis worsens

(See attached file: maul_und_klauenseuche.mpeg)

 - maul_und_klauenseuche.mpeg


This sheds some light on the subject, or did you already know it?

http://www.msnbc.com/news/495992.asp?cp1=1