Where did we get the readings for Thursday?  I can't seem to find them
anywhere.
Can someone please fax me a copy?  My fax number is (415) 733-4190.

Thanks

**********************************************
Mark D. Guinney, CFA
Consultant
Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting
345 California Street, Ste. 1400
San Francisco, CA  94104
(415) 733-4487 ph.
(415) 733-4190 fax

____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject:    More Nagging About the Project
Author: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com
Date:       03/13/2001 8:18 PM

Greetings:

Sounds like I'm glad that I missed the quiz last week.

Hate to be a nag, but we've got to turn in what we're doing for our project
on Thursday.  I propose doing a nice, clean merger, which would allow us to
do both comparative analysis (who are these companies?) and
merger/valuation analysis.  Mark and I talked last night and I pleaded
again not to do strict accounting stuff, but if that's what folks would
like to do, I can certainly suck it up.  Any thoughts?

Best,
Jeff


Sandy, need to discuss this w/ you ASAP.  No answer on your cell phone.  Can
you please page me at 888-766-4103 or call at 713-853-5676.  Thanx.
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Letke/DUB/EES on 03/20/2001 02:46 PM
---------------------------

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Marty Sunde                           03/20/2001 09:25 AM
	Phone No: 713 853-7797 Phone
  888-953-9478 SkyTel Pager
  EB 889

To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Jeff and Eric,
I have NO problem trying to get letters for support of Direct Access.  Eric,
if we can get those to support Jeff and Sandi, this is wonderful.

Also, I had asked Eric to check with Alpert's office to register our follow
on phone number and offer to try to correct the aggravated customers.  Eric,
if you can provide a status on all of these as you make progress, that's
appreciated.
---------------------- Forwarded by Marty Sunde/HOU/EES on 03/20/2001 09:13
AM ---------------------------
From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 07:57 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Marty Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Marty:  Thanks for the information.

Getting Eric's contact information to Alpert's office is in motion.
Regarding attempt to follow-up with those who called Alpert's office to
complain, I wasn't clear on that action.  Likely makes sense for Eric to
coordinate with Sandi to make the contact with Alpert's office.
Letters are an attempt to influence Alpert to 1) fix the Direct Access
prohibition and 2) ensure that DA customers don't get saddled with the DWR
costs.

Let me know if this approach works.

Best,
Jeff

	Marty Sunde@EES
	03/19/2001 07:02 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/Na/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Heidi Messick/EFS/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: Follow up with Alpert's Office

All I asked Eric to do was:
ensure that there was an Enron contact if another complaint came in.
find out from Alpert's office if we could call back a few of those who called
to complain to find out what they perceived, correct the misperception,
apologize.

From: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON on 03/19/2001 04:20 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich@ENRON
To: Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>, Eric Letke/DUB/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, hgovenar@govadv.com, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON,
mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, MDay@GMSSR.com, ken@kdscommunications.com, Marty
Sunde/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Follow up with Alpert's Office

Thanks, Scott.

Scott/Hedy/Sandi/Bev:  Erik Letke heads up the retail marketing effort
underway in San Diego.  Marty Sunde wants Alpert to have an EES commercial
contact that she can talk to in the event she has further questions, etc.,
He'd like Erki to be the contact person.  Erik could you copy your vitals
(title, contact info) to Scott and Hedy Govenar and Sandi McCubbin so they
can forward along to Alpert?

Erik, seems that it would be useful if the customer letters to Alpert could
make the following points (folks please weigh in and add/subtract/modify if
needed):

The customer's glad to have had the option to take Direct Access service from
Enron because having the opportunity to take advantage of the offer has made
the customer better off.
Direct Access is an extremely important option that customers need, want and
should have going forward.
Any "solution" that the Legislature comes up with must therefore include the
continuation of Direct Access for all customers.
As such, the Legislature should immediately fix AB 1X to make sure that
Direct Access remains a permanent fixture of California's energy strategy.
Direct Access customers should not be forced to pay for DWR's power purchase
costs, since Direct Access customers aren't benefitting from those purchases.

Best,
Jeff

	Scott Govenar <sgovenar@govadv.com>
	03/19/2001 04:01 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich <jdasovic@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Dede

As discussed, customers should send letters to Dede as follows:

The Honrable Dede Alpert
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 5050
Sacramento, CA 95814

Interested companies should copy:  "Honorable Members of the California
State Legislature" and fax or mail me a copy for further distribution.
My fax is (916) 448-0816 and my address is 1127 11th Street, Suite #400,
Sacramento, CA 95814.

Scott


EFF_DT PORTFOLIO_ID DOWN95
2/28/01  MANAGEMENT-COAL 0
2/28/01  MANAGEMENT-CRD 0
2/28/01  MANAGEMENT-GAS 854,693
2/28/01  MANAGEMENT-PWR 164,563
2/28/01  AGG-MANAGEMENT 964,254


Please attend a very important meeting to discuss/ review the mock test tomorrow, with regards to data setup, and user tests for the afternoon.

Agenda:
* We need to ensure ETX can create a data subset based on what is setup in global counterparty & contracts.
	- counterparties - U.S. and Canada
	- pipelines - U.S. and Canada
	- contracts
* Test schedule for Thursday
* Any other issues.

Location:  ECS 05990.
Please forward to others that need to be in attendance.

See attached for proposed list..

Thanks,

Regan Smith
Testing Integration coordinator of UBS downstream systems


fyi.  df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 01/29/2001
04:09 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dan Fancler                           01/26/2001 10:34 AM

To: David Port/Market Risk/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vernon Mercaldo/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Bob
Chandler/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Drew Fossum@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON,
Lisa Sutton/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Debbie Moseley/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lee
Ferrell/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: Risk Management Caminus

David Port, ETS is purchasing a trading system from Caminus to track their
transactions.  Included in this system are position reports which the
Accounting Department will be using to report and determine compliance with
the attached policy and procedures, including open positions, VAR, MTM,
approval limits, Greeks, credit risk, stress testing, basis positions,
confirmations and invoicing.  The ETS Risk Management policy requires that
our reporting conform to the corporate standards, accordingly your name was
given to me as the person who could help direct some of the more technical
reporting standards.

Caminus is doing an introduction to their system today from 12:00 am to 3 pm
in 49c2, however I know you will not be back in town until next week.  Vernon
Mercaldo is coordinating the installation of the system and will be needing
your input relating to Corporate reporting standards.  As the project
progresses he will be contacting you.

Attached are drafts of the ETS Policy and Procedures.


Chris:
A little background (recaps briefly what we discussed on the phone on Monday):
A few weeks ago, we (government affairs) approached John Fielder of Edison to see if there was any chance that Edison might be willing to reach a deal on our Negative CTC/PX credit claim.
After discussions with RAC, we offered to take 90 cents on the dollar for amounts owed through March 1. (There's general agreement with Edison on what the number is up to January 17, which would only leave 1.17--3.1 in dispute.  But recall there's still the FERC refund issue which complicates the issue.)
We asked for 10% down immediately and a binding agreement that Edison would pay us by a date certain sometime in the next quarter.
In exchange, we said we'd drop our law suits at the PUC. In one suit, we're asking the PUC to have Edison pay us. In the other, we've stopped paying Edison for transportation costs until the PUC gets Edison to pay us.  We're depositing what we owe Edison in an escrow account pending resolution.
We also agreed to work with Edison to get the PUC to end the whole residual CTC/PX credit framework retroactive to March 1, 2001.  (That would reduce Edison's exposure to negative CTC and our exposure to positive CTC.)
For his part, Fielder was looking (in addition) for 1) an agreement on our part to forebear, and 2) an agreement that everyone, including DA customers, should pay what they rightly owe for a) Edison's undercollection, b) the bonds, and c) DWR's stranded contract costs.
We never resumed the talks in earnest because soon after our talk, Edison struck its bailout deal with the PUC.

With respect to what else we could offer them:
From a commercial standpoint, I'm sure you're scouring that front, and I may not have much to add.  But given the credit risk associated with the utility and Edison's other subs, devising a commercial option to help settle the negative CTC claim seems like a challenge.
One possible avenue might be the $250 MM in hedging activity the PUC agreed to in its bailout settlement with Edison.  Edison is authorized to hedge its generation and QF fuel costs for up to $250 MM under the settlement. (But this would expose us to PUC regulatory risk, in addition to Edison's credit risk.)
Another commercial angle might be Mission Energy, but again, not sure how much better Mission fares from a credit perspective.
One idea that we've bounced around that might appeal to Edison--but may or may not be appealing to us--us is to agree to take a note from Edison.  That is, in return for 100 cents on the dollar, we'd agree to take, for example, a 3-year note at some agreed to coupon.
This should appeal to Edison since 1) it takes us off the list of folks who might take them in, 2) it might provide a useful template that Edison could use with other creditors, and 3) it lessens the overall financing Edison needs to arrange (bridge loan, etc.) in the near-term to pay its creditors.
The "note" angle could be packaged up with the other regulatory issues explored in the first call with Fielder.

Hope this helps.

Best,
Jeff


Let's do a cake so long as there is no mention of "retirement".

	Suzanne Adams
	06/19/2000 05:00 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rod Nelson Lunch

I see on the party information that they will do personalized cakes requested
in advance.  Do you want to do that or just go with their dessert selection?
Haven't heard from MT re champagne.


The attached file contains updated August FOM volumes for CES.  This file is
an
update to the one sent on 7/26/00.   The changes are listed on the 'Comment'
worksheet.   Please call me if you have questions, problems, etc.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - Aug00_FOM_Req03.xls


[IMAGE] Forums Discuss these points in the Forums:  Forexnews Forum       Technicals Live Charts Analysis available from: Cornelius Luca   J.P. Chorek   Technical Research Ltd.   Charts & News featuring Standard & Poor's       Interest Rates   US: Japan: Eurozone: UK: Switzerland:   2.0%  0.15%  3.25%  4.0%  1.75-2.75%       [IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]  Euro Slips on Ifo Dip, USD Outlook Steady  November 21, 7:00 AM: EUR/$..0.8796 $/JPY..122.85 GBP/$..1.4196 $/CHF..1.6559  Euro Slips on Ifo Dip, USD Outlook Steady by Jes Black  At 8:30:00 AM US Nov 17 Jobless Claims (exp 450 k, prev 444k) At 10:00:00 AM US Nov final U. of Michigan index (exp 83, prev 83.5) At 2:00:00 PM US Oct Fed. Budget  (exp -11 bln, prev  35.4 bln)  The euro came under pressure today following another fall in the key business sentiment survey for Germany. The Ifo business survey fell to an 8-year low of 84.7 in October after plunging in September to 85.0 from 89.5. Since the headline index did not stabilize, it implies that September's steep decline was not just an overreaction to the terrorist attacks on the US and that the economic environment in the Eurozone is actually worse than previously thought. More trouble lies ahead for the Eurozone considering the expectations index fell to 89.6 from a downwardly revised 90.5, meaning that we still have not seen a bottom in the Ifo or the euro.   EUR/USD fell to a session low of 87.81 after the release but held above a 3-month low of 87.67 reached on Monday. The euro has still to test key resistance around 87.45, but with the Eurozone's number one economy now teetering on the edge of a recession, markets are likely to punish the euro again. On Tuesday, the Bundesbank's monthly report for November indicated that Q3 growth was likely to be zero to negative after posting slightly negative growth in Q2 of -0.003%. The Ifo report suggests that Q4 growth will also be negative and that could push Germany into a technical recession. Today's release by the European Union forecasted growth in Germany to stagnate at 0.7% in both 2001 and 2002.  USD/JPY fell to a session low of 122.57 after failing to break key resistance around 123.40 earlier in the day. JPY came under renewed pressure this morning after S?Tokyo Head Chang Yu-Tsung was quoted as saying Japan's sovereign rating could be downgraded again after the S?revised its outlook on Japan's AA rating to "negative" in September. However, offers reported around 123.50 kept a cap on the dollar's gains. A fall in EUR/JPY from highs around 108.81 to a session low of 107.74 also gave JPY some strength.   USD/JPY rose to a 3-month high of 123.49 on Monday and has since eased off its highs. But any selling coming ahead of the long holiday weekend should not be enough to offset the overall bullish trend. Sentiment continues to underpin USD because of the renewed momentum in US equities as investors show an increasing appetite for risk. The yen will also stay under pressure from mounting worries about the Japanese banking sector ahead of a slew of earnings reports by major Japanese banks on Thursday. Moreover, with little room for improvement in the Japanese economy until late next year, most market watchers see the yen heading for 125 now that it has successfully breached the 123 mark. Resistance is seen around 123.35/45. But USD/JPY support is expected to hold at 121.95/122.00 followed by 121.40/50, with any pullback towards the latter level seen as a buying opportunity, dealers said.  GBP/USD remained in a tight range of 1.4150 to 1.42. The dollar held sterling's recovery to the 1.42 mark after cable plunged to a 3-month low of 1.4080 on Tuesday morning. Cable was little moved by the fall in EUR/USD as it was offset by a simultaneous fall in EUR/USD. Meanwhile, GBP/USD is still in a bearish trend given its inability to maintain gains above the key technical level of 1.4195.  US Q3 GDP due next Friday is expected to show a decline of 0.9%, but St. Louis Fed President Poole on Tuesday affirmed US economic growth would revive in a matter of months and not years because of low inflation, competitive markets and the combination of Fed and fiscal policy that are supporting the economy. However, Poole cautioned that an exact recovery was uncertain, but that the Fed still has more room to cut US interest rates if needed.  Given the high degree of uncertainty surrounding the US, the Fed's commitment to growth is one of the reason's the dollar has performed well despite the near certainty of a recession. It is also explains why the Morgan Stanley Capital International index is expected to be reweighed in favor of US equities. On the basis of the adjustments MSCI is making, Japan, France and Germany are likely to see the most money leaving their markets, while the UK and US will be the largest beneficiaries.  Today's data from the US is expected to show jobless claims have edged off the 500k pace in October. However, the continuing layoffs is expected to push the final reading of the Univ. of Mich consumer sentiment survey down to 83.0 from 83.5 previously.   	[IMAGE] Audio Mkt. Analysis USD Pairs Gain Across the Board       Articles & Ideas  USD/JPY: The Next Level   OPEC: The beginning of a price war?       Articles & Ideas Forex Glossary   Economic Indicators   Forex Guides   Link Library      [IMAGE]
		[IMAGE][IMAGE] [IMAGE][IMAGE]
		  This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you wish to unsubscribe from this or any other Forexnews.com newsletters, please click here .


WOW!  This is really a surprise. Does this mean the current surcharge of 3 cent and 1 cent will NOT apply to direct access loads?  You would really make our day if your answer is yes.

Wanda

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October  2, 2001 4:42 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa; Comnes, Alan
Subject:	California Update--10.02.01:Part 2:  PUC Approves Edison Bailout

In another surprise move, the PUC approved an Edison bailout today on a 5-0 vote.  This item was not on the Commission's agenda other than as a placeholder regarding "litigation."  We do not have copies of the agreement but we just talked to Edison's SVP of Regulatory Affairs and here's a summary:

The Commission will keep current rates in place through 2003
Any "overcollection" resulting from keeping current rates in place will go to paying off $3.3 B in Edison's past due accounts (the so-called "undercollection")
If Edison collects the $3.3B prior to 2003, then rates can change
If Edison has not collected the $3.3 B by the end of 2003, the PUC will create a dedicated rate component on all bills to collect the remainder.  Half the remainder will be collected in 2004 and the other half in 2005.
Any refunds received from litigation against suppliers will go to reducing the $3.3 B undercollection.
Edison can keep 10% of any refunds received after the $3.3B is paid off.
Edison cannot pay any dividends during the time that it is using rates to pay off the $3.3B.
Edison can apply to the PUC for approval to hedge gas price risk.
Edison will be protected from any increases in DWR contract costs (i.e., if DWR's costs go up, the PUC will raise rates rather than take it out of Edison's rates)
The PUC will not fine Edison during this period if Edison's capital structure varies from the PUC-approved capital structure
Edison must drop its lawsuits against the PUC regarding 1) the "filed rate doctrine" and 2) the so-called "TURN" accounting method, which effectively kept the rate freeze in place.
Edison agrees to "cooperate" with the Attorney General and the PUC in all litigation against suppliers.
The PUC decision could likely nullify the need for the "special" session that the Governor recently announced

We will report back with additional details as soon as we get them.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 2:45 PM
To:	Kean, Steven J.; Belden, Tim; Sharp, Vicki; Blachman, Jeremy; Comnes, Alan; Tribolet, Michael; Walsh, Kristin; Delainey, David; Leff, Dan; Frazier, Lamar; Keeney, Kevin; Gahn, Scott; Swain, Steve; Lavorato, John; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Calger, Christopher F.; Mara, Susan; Black, Don; Richter, Jeff; Kitchen, Louise; Dietrich, Janet; Mara, Susan; Robertson, Linda; Kingerski, Harry; Denne, Karen; Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Shapiro, Richard; Curry, Wanda; Mellencamp, Lisa; Higgason, Kelly; Whalley, Greg; Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:	California Update--10.02.01:  PUC Turns Down Davis' Proposed Rate Agreement with DWR

In what will likely be viewed as a fairly shocking event, the California PUC today voted down Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC.
The vote was 4-1, with the two Republicans voting with Davis' hand-picked appointees Lynch and Wood.
Davis' proposal was introduced at the meeting by another Davis appointee--Geoff Brown--who made a lengthy speech about why California would experience economic and political destruction if the PUC did not approve Davis' proposed rate agreement.

What is Davis' proposed rate agreement between DWR and the CPUC?
It would remove all PUC authority to review any contracts between DWR with suppliers.
It would require the PUC to pass through to utility rates all DWR power contract costs, no questions asked.

What are the implications of the move by the PUC to reject Davis' proposal?
With the vote, it remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the DWR power contracts.
The political pressure to re-negotiate--or break--the DWR power contracts is likely to intensify considerably.
It remains unclear how California/DWR will pay for the $12.5 B in bonds the Treasurer has unsuccessfully attempted to issue for past several months.
Under the structure devised by Davis, the revenues flowing from the CPUC/DWR rate agreement would be used to both 1) pay for the DWR power contracts and 2) service the bonds the Treasurer is trying to issue to repay California's General Fund for spot and other short term power purchased by DWR since January.
In short, there is no clear indication of how California will pay for DWR contracts or issue the bonds.
Safe to say that today's PUC vote has seriously embarrassed Davis, and left his approach to "solving" California electricity crisis in shambles.

What Next?
A broad left-right coalition of energy interests supported a bill (18XX) that passed the Legislature with broad bi-partisan support.
The bill would create a "dedicated rate component" on every customers bill to service the $12.5 B in bonds that the Treasurer wants to issue.
Proponents of the bill--and just about everyone else--argue that the "dedicated rate component" is a signficantly more efficient way to raise the debt California needs to plug the hole in its budget.
The bill is silent, however, on how California would pay for the DWR contracts, and the bill's opponents claim that the power suppliers will sue as a result.
All four PUC commissioners who voted against the Davis rate agreement today urged Davis to sign the bill.  The left-right coalition (from Nader types to oil companies) is also working hard to get Davis to sign it.
Davis has said that he will veto the bill on the advice of the Treasurer and bond counsel.
Given today's vote, however, Davis may have no alternative than to sign the bill if he wants to get the bonds issued and the state budget repaid.

Update on Edison Bailout
Still appears that chances are very small that Edison and Davis will succeed in getting the Legislature to vote for an Edison bailout when it returns for another "special" session next Tuesday.

If you have any questions, just let us know.

Best,
Jeff


Per our discussions, I would like to move forward with the adjustments below for Casey Evans and Donnie Vinson who have assumed the lead positions for Power East Risk Management.

Per our discussions, I would like to move forward with the adjustments below for Fran Chang and Jon Paul Lewis.  These adjustments put the power risk management specialist salaries in line with each other with certain qualifications for certifications and experience with the group.

Please let me know what else I can do to move this along.  Thank you for all your help.

Stacey


whenever

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyer, Chris
Sent:	Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:33 AM
To:	Parks, Joe
Subject:	Centana

Joe - I'm back in the saddle....Spain was great.  Hope things went well for your mom.

Lets get together asap to wrap up the Centana deal.

cmm
x31666


Tana:  I don't know who Brad Diebner is.  However, Greg called me.  What Greg
really needs is the ENA "form" of ISDA Schedule (with the utility election).
He will also need a "generic" Paragraph 13.  The boilerplate can be mailed.
Before you send, I need to chat with Mark and I'll let you know more later
today.  Thanks.  Sara

	Tana Jones
	08/21/2000 09:14 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

I left a message for both Molly and Brad Diebner and neither has returned my
calls.

	Sara Shackleton
	08/21/2000 08:24 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

Tana:  Have you responded to either Greg or Molly?  Please call.  Sara
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 08:23 AM -----

	Molly Harris
	08/18/2000 02:12 PM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

I understand Greg Penman has inquired for the same.  I would be happy to
coordinate amongst us and informed Greg accordingly.

Thank you
Molly

Molly Harris
08/18/2000 01:58 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA ISDA with PEC

Tana

Is it possible to get electronic file for the Enron North America and Peoples
Energy Corporation ISDA?  Is it in Word?  I am trying to get our new JV,
Midwest Energy Hub, to utilize our format for the template for MEH.

Thanks
Molly

a.huprikar@pecorp.com on 08/17/2000 03:48:36 PM
To: molly.harris@enron.com
cc:
Subject: ENA ISDA with PEC

Molly,

Could you send me an electronic version of the ISDA that was signed between
ENA and PEC. I understand from our attorney that we did not work with an
electronic version, only a hard copy. In order to create an ISDA template
for MEH, I need the electronic version.

Thanks

Aparna

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.


The report named: Power West Price Peak <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=30&report_name=Power+West+Price+Peak&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/26/2001>, published as of 10/26/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


We have had many requests for a copy of the roster from the class you
recently attended.  Clearly, that is a positive sign that the networking
part of our objectives in holding these sessions is working.   Attached is
the roster from your group.  We encourage you to contact these individuals
as you move forward in your careers at Enron.  You have a significant
"shared experience" and I am sure they would be willing to be of assistance
to you in any way they can.

Thanks again for your active participation in the program.  You had a major
part in making it the success that it was.   I will be contacting you in
the next few months to follow up and get some feedback from you about the
program.  In the interim, let me know if there is anything else I can do to
be of help in furthering your executive development.
(See attached file: EII Roster 050400.xls)
                                                             Dick Amabile
 - EII Roster 050400.xls


Ditto Credit.

	Tana Jones@ECT
	03/21/2001 05:18 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-21-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 05:18 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/21/2001 05:15 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-21-01

Please see attached.


I've run across what seems to be a glitch in Deal Blotter; although it may be
caused by the default settings in a specific trader's blotter. A few times
over the last several weeks, our traders at the Short Term Southwest desk
have entered off peak deals by choosing the "off" selection under the "Hours"
heading. But the mask doesn't change to include Sundays and Holidays, and the
traders then enter another deal to compensate for this. What we've found then
is that the original deal did in fact include a strip for Sundays and
Holidays, round-the-clock hours.

My question is - when you enter an off-peak deal in Deal Blotter, does it
automatically read that as Mon. through Sat. off-peak hours AND Sundays and
Holidays round-the-clock? Even though the mask does not change to show
Sundays and Holidays? I'm just wondering if there is an easier way to assure
that we've entered off-peak deals correctly other than double-checking them
in Deal Entry.

Please call or e-mail when you get a chance. Again, this could be just a
matter of incorrect settings in someone's blotter; but I'd like to make sure
either way.

Thanks for your time,
Kate


I have no interest in these two employees.


no attachment


A very senior attorney in Delhi (perhaps a retired Supreme Court justice?)
has advised Enron that MERC has no jurisdiction over the PPA and cannot
establish regulations on things like merit order dispatch, much less set the
merit order dispatch.  A written legal opinion has been requested.  The
thought of the Linklaters attorneys (both Sandeep Katwala and Chris Walker)
and tentatively Wade is that the MERC may be DPC's worst enemy if it has
jurisdiction over the renegotiated PPA (which it will) and must approve it;
thus, it may be better to take the offensive and challenge its jurisdiction
over merit order dispatch.    The strategy isn't fully formed yet, but I
wonder about the wisdom of (i) taking on a regulator that could be in a
position to approve a renegotiated PPA; and (ii) how a jurisdictional
challenge to a regulator attempting to restructure squares with Enron's
positions/reputation worldwide.  I'll be discussing this with all parties
when I get back to work after New Year's and will let you know as this issue
progresses.

Enron is as I speak seriously contemplating pulling the letters of credit.
We've been told by the Chairman of MSEB that he has some money but he is not
going to pay October's bill for DPC.  According to him, DPC was forced on
MSEB by the Gov't of Maharashtra, so we should pursue our financial and legal
remedies.  The Government of course will want to renegotiate in exchange for
payment.  Here we go.

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/27/2000 07:54 PM ---------------------------

Mark Schroeder@ECT
12/27/2000 04:25 PM
To: Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Merit order dispatch: what is the real problem

Jane - thanks, good note.  mcs

Steve - FYI, just an overview of issues affecting Dabhol, and payment
capability.   mcs

Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
27/12/2000 03:52
To: Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mohan
Gurunath/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Akshay
Singh/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul
Kraske/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sisir K
Podder/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rajesh
Sivaraman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mark Schroeder@ECT, Ashok
Mehta/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, K
Seethayya/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mukesh
Tyagi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Amr
Ibrahim/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Merit order dispatch: what is the real problem

While I am in touch over the rest of the week, I remain more or less on
vacation with my family.  Upon return after New Year's, Akshay and I will
look at the items in italics below.  Of course, we cannot do analysis out of
the context of the model.  Perhaps if you sent Akshay and me the model that
is being used to work the answers to Jim's questions (one model or two?), we
can see what we're working with currently.

Please note the following:

1. Merit Order Dispatch in the Next Rate Case.Attached below is what my team
(Robert Neustaedter) has drafted for the rate case filing on merit order
dispatch.  There is a mistake on page 5 regarding the percentage TOP that
needs to pass outside merit order dispatch (it's 75% rather than 78%).
Further, we've asked Ramu to "Indianize" the text before we pass it back to
Mr Palumvar.  Merit order dispatch has not been clearly treated by the MERC
(or any other Commission other than the Gujarat ERC), and this filing should
serve as a foundation for this rate case (and others).

2. Merit Order Dispatch "Cap".  The May 5, 2000, order treats two concepts as
one: the least cost purchase policy that determines what power purchase costs
are included in the rates for the rate case period is equated with merit
order dispatch, which is  a day-to-day operational tool that determines
actual purchases.  The rate case order of May 5, 2000, as written, did not
"cap" the quantities.  What the rate case stated (and I am not quoting) was
that quantities in addition to those authorized could be dispatched so long
as the average realisation exceeded the cost.  I would also argue that the
India obligation to serve customers provides additional grounds for further
dispatch quantities.  The "catch" is in two places:  first, whether dispatch
of DPC power meets the test (Shubh told me recently it did -- does this
continue to hold true, Mohan?), and second, the recovery of the power
purchase costs due to the variance (the difference between what is authorized
in the order and what is actually dispatched.)
3. Recovery of Variance. According to Mr Podder, the Electricity Supply Act,
1948, does not allow a carryover of these volumes from one rate case to the
next.  (Typically, the variance is just included in the next rate case.  This
practice actually provides a utility with an opportunity to overrecover costs
for a period of time, which is why the goal of a rate case is normally to
understate demand.  We have approached the MSEB  rate case, however, with a
different perspective in an attempt to get the revenues up to allow more
funds for MSEB to pay its bills.)  As provided in the Act, the variance must
either be subsidised by the State or absorbed by the SEB.  This is a major
financial problem for the SEBs and should be rectified by GOI.  Mr. Podder is
writing down the accounting legal basis in Act, and I will forward that memo
to you.
4. MSEB Representation regarding dispatch.MSEB clearly discusses its failure
to dispatch more than 3044 MU with us in the rate case process.  Mr. Palumvar
and Mr. Bakshi state that failure to dispatch additional quantities is simply
a matter of budget.  The cost of 3044 MU is incuded in the rates, and the
cost of additional volumes isn't.  Since there is no way for MSEB to collect
the cost for additional volumes other than from the State, it is logically
not dispatching additional volumes.
5. MERC Jurisdiction. Thus, I have a query: let's assume that the MERC does
not have jurisdiction to determine least cost purchases or merit order
dispatch or to determine a blend of the two.  I'm not sure how that will help
MSEB to recover the full costs of its power purchases.
6. Logical Area of Focus. In my opinion, once Sandeep Katwala and team
confirms our interpretation of the Act, the most beneficial course of action
would be to work with the regulators/Government/anyone else to repair the
cost recovery mechanism of the Act.  This helps DPC, this helps MSEB and
will, in the end, help the country.

Might be worth considering.
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/27/2000 08:23 AM ---------------------------

Sandeep Kohli
12/21/2000 01:41 AM
To: Mohan Gurunath/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: Re: Dabhol question

Mohan,

I have gone through your note, and agree with the concept.

You do have to compare end-user tariff with costs till end-user, which will
include T&D losses.
You have assumed 30% loss figures which is assuming little or no improvement
(since this is the worst case scenario)
Your assumptions on Rs. devaluation are also aggressive as they need to be
for a pessimistic scenario
You have assumed that MSEB's average realization per unit in $ terms actually
goes down due to Rs. devaluation

There are some areas where Jane can shed more light:
MSEB can increase its average realization, simply by limiting supply to agri.
customers, and by not giving any new unmetered connections
The latter is something that has been decreed by MERC (Jane please correct me
if I am wrong), while the former was the most likely cause for Bhave's exit
Jane - Can you (with Akshaya's help) take a crack at what the agricultural
load and unmetered customers are likely to be in the years 2002 through 2004
?  Similarly, what is the likely growth in the metered cutomer categories?
Also, if Dabhol were to be despatched to the load center at Mumbai (following
Mohan's conclusion of 75% PLF on  2400 MW), and the plants close to
Chandrapur were to despatch less, what would be the overall T&D loss picture
?
The question to answer here is what portion of the 30% is theft, and what is
actual T&D loss.  My understanding is that betwen 16-18% is actual T&D loss
due to the poor state of the network.  Further, we will have to ask the
question whether the actual T&D loss is more due to distribution or due to
transmission.  My gut feel is that it is due to distribution.
The next logical question to tackle then would be what you see as the
improvement in distibution between now and 2004.  Jane - Can you take a crack
at that ?

Mohan - My gut feel is that there will not be a 75% despatch on all three
blocks.  I can envisage that type of despatch in Block B, but that will be
the optimistic rather than the pessimistic scenario.  I do not see C being
used more than 6-8 hours daily, and that too only in the peak season.  I had
started the team working on a stack and peak and off-peak load curves.  We
need to do more on that.

Bottom line is that we need much more detailed information on the T&D sector,
on the pace of reform, and most importantly on merit order deptaching of the
plants (building the stack of plants).  This was Jim's concern too when we
met this morning, and we will need to develop a plan to move that forward
further.

Regards,
Sandeep.

Mohan Gurunath
12/20/2000 09:35 PM
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Sandeep Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: Dabhol question

Attached is an analysis of Jim's question for your review/comments.

Regards
Mohan

To: Mohan Gurunath/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sandeep
Kohli/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Dabhol question

Can you 3 Amigos look into this and come back to me with a joint response for
Jim? I would like an answer by Thursday's task force call, which is at 8:00
am Houston time on Thursday.

Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
12/20/2000 04:59 PM ---------------------------

James A Hughes
12/20/2000 04:00 AM
To: Wade Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Dabhol question

Wade:

I am sure you guys are getting tired of questions.  However, here is one more.

I was thinking about how to determine our worst case.  While considering
this, I came up with a question I couldn't answer:  What is our breakeven
power price at the overall PLF we think would be achieved if MSEB used
marginal economic cost dispatch.  If we determined that this price was at or
above the realised tariff of MSEB, then we know ultimatley we will survive,
the only question is how long it takes us to get our equity back.  If it is
below, then the situation may be dire indeed.

Jim


Thursday morning works for me.  I would also like to include Jan Moore and Lindy Donoho.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cobb Jr., John
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 6:54 PM
To:	Geaccone, Tracy
Cc:	Fancler, Dan
Subject:	FW: TW Daily Balance 09/27/01

Tracy, Dan and I visited briefly this morning and we are willing to meet with you next week
to further explain the inputs into the Gas Accounting process for TW.  If Thursday morning will
work for you we will see what we can pull together.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Geaccone, Tracy
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:01 PM
To:	Cobb Jr., John
Subject:	FW: TW Daily Balance 09/27/01

this is the report I was referring yesterday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Powers, Ken
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 2:50 PM
To:	Doll, Jeanette; Donoho, Lindy; Fancler, Dan; Geaccone, Tracy; Harris, Steven; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Moore, Jan; Moseley, Debbie; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Watson, Kimberly; Y'Barbo, Paul
Subject:	TW Daily Balance 09/27/01

Please see attached.

 << File: TW Daily Balance.pdf >>

Call me if you have any questions.

Ken Powers
(402) 398-7065


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 07/19/00 09:28 PM -----

	Renee Pena@ENRON
	07/19/00 02:12 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Form from my husband

Carol, I did receive the form and instructed the proper person to end your
parking spending account deduction due to your being on leave.

Thanks,
Renee

   Carol St Clair @ ECT                07/19/2000 01:12 PM

To: Renee Pena/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Form from my husband

Renee:
Just wanted to confirm that you received the parking form that you needed
from my husband by fax this morning and that you have everything that you
need.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Thanks Dana!  Maybe we'll be neighbors! df

From:	Dana Jones/Enron@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 07:28 AM
To:	Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject:	FW: Organization Announcement

Congratulations Drew!!   We look forward to seeing you in Houston.

Dana

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To:	Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject:	Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cherry, Paul
Sent:	Friday, December 07, 2001 12:06 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Dietz, Rick; Nacey, Sheila; Blair, Lynn
Cc:	Sheffield, Sandy; White, Angela
Subject:	Enron Affiliate Payments

	In reference to this weekend's activity, I contacted Bob Superty as to their plans for nominations and explained that payment must be received today to permit any transportation. My call was returned by Suzanne Calcagno who advised they were not in a position to make payment but hoped to know more next week. I advised that we would require the prepayment and she understood and appreciated our call.

	If any questions arise this weekend, please feel free to contact me.

	My phone numbers are Home - 281-320-2563
                                              Cellular - 281-731-0692

	Regards.


fyi, we have staff meetings on the first and third Wednesdays, at 130.  The
meetings usually last an hour or less.

ckm


Please find attached the current copy of the EnronOnline Weekly Public Report
and Key Messages, including slides and statistics for public consumption.
The information contained in the attachments can be communicated to audiences
outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent
message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone
in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the
company.

This report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone presentation, nor
that all the information be used in a single presentation or customer
communication.


Kay - I reviewed the captioned.  My only comments are -

p. 8  - The date in 3.1(a) is July 15, 2000 - should it be 2001?

Also, on p.8, I am not sure how the 3.3 damages calculation is supposed to
work with the LD calculation under Section 4.6.

Interesting "reinstatement" provisions - I'd love to talk to you sometime and
find out why!

I assume the structure will require "hell or high water" provisions and
"market LDs."  I saw that there are provisions "de-linking" the provision of
power from the building or commissioning of the project - I assume Herman
will be able to tell you if the de-linking and LDs pass muster with AA for
purposes of "marking" the contract and getting the cash flow and earnings pop.

Thanks,

Rose


Sara,

Our traders have been advised that the appropriate Enron entity is Enron North
America Corp, however if you advise that we should be negotiating the ISDA
with Enron Corp then we will pursue negotiations with them and our comments
may change. We are very close to finalising the ISDA Master with
EnronCredit.com and would ideally like to complete the other Enron ISDA as
well. Can you please advise which Enron enity we should be negotiating with
and revert with any comments that you may have so we can finalise this
negotiation as soon as possible.

Do not hesitate to contact me with any queries that you may have.

Regards,
Mat Flett

Sara.Shackleton@enron.com wrote:

> Matthew:  We have had some internal discussions regarding the appropriate
> Enron party to this master and have concluded that Enron Corp. (the parent
> of Enron North America Corp.) should be your counterparty.  Does this
> change warrent any changes with respect to your comments?  Sara


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Stevens-GL-1/PGI on 05/11/2001 08:25
AM
---------------------------

 Internet Mail Message
 Received from host:
 omahpop3.omah.uswest.net [204.26.64.3]

From: mkswanson <mkswanson@qwest.net> on 05/11/2001 01:44 AM GMT

             mkswanson           To:
 <mkswanson@qwest.net>           Cc:    (bcc: Gary Stevens-GL-1/PGI)
                         Subject:      Fw: Fw: FW: HR Survey

   05/10/2001 08:44 PM

----- Original Message -----

Subject: Fw: Fw: FW: HR Survey

>
>
> Subject: Fwd: Fw: FW: HR Survey
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Brian and Jo Dion" <banjo@osprey.net>
> > >To: "Keith Dreiling" <kdrling@valu-line.net>
> > >CC: "Ed Vohs" <evohs@hotmail.com>,        "The Niece and Linda"
> > ><GLittleLinda@aol.com>,        "Lesli Garver Tatman"
> <lesligt@swbell.net>,
> > >       "Stacey Poe" <stacey@valu-line.net>,        "Jeannine Neill"
> > ><jeannine@sktc.net>,        "Marie Miller" <jayandmarie45@hotmail.com>,
> > >    "Brenna and Tim Mercer" <bcrazy7@swbell.net>,        "Gary and
Cathy
> > >McCurdy" <hitchman@carrollsweb.com>,        "Janie and Bill Henderson"
> > ><janiesews@kscable.com>,        "Vicki Hay" <HAYVIC@aw437.k12.ks.us>,
> > >  "Dan and Kathy Hamman" <daffykathy@hotmail.com>,        "Sarah Haag"
> > ><staci1976@yahoo.com>
> > >Subject: Fw: FW: HR Survey
> > >Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 18:45:37 -0500
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
>
 - SURVEY.BAT


---------------------- Forwarded by John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron on 10/27/2000
11:32 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Tim Belden @ ECT                           10/26/2000 07:35 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron
cc:

Subject: eol

went down at about 5:06 AM this morning.  did not come up for 1/2 hour.  we
didn't receive a call from anyone and received little or no information when
we called the help desk.  we do 2/3 of our volume between 5am and 5:30 am.


John and Angie this was the best Christmas yet.  Thank you for the Very
Stylish Suitcase.  I think I will set the standard for travel these days.  It
took me 12 hrs to get home from Houston.  Icy roads, yuck,  my normally 2hr
30 min trip from San Angelo took 6 hrs.  Once again Thanks for making mine &
Kerans Christmas so Wonderful.
Mel


Yeah--EMC is the best investment I ever made--I only wish I had put in
100000k instead of 1k.  Check this email out--one of our guys got it from
someone at one of our competitors.  Enron is known as the "evil empire" in
the energy bidness.  DF
C---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 06/22/2000
01:43 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Dari Dornan                           06/22/2000 09:13 AM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Dave
Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FW: Latest Press Release

I got this from outside the company.  Thought you might be interested.

Subject:  Latest Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Today Enron and Hades announced a definitive energy services agreement
said to be worth an estimated $666 Trillion.  In the deal, Enron will
provide both gas and electric commodities to Hades' facilities throughout
and under North America.  John D. Rockefeller, former CEO of energy
monopolist
Standard Oil, is now head of Hades' energy management division.  Said
Rockefeller, "Obviously Hell has significant heating demands.  While eternal
flames are a great idea in concept, they require vast and reliable fuel
resources.  Enron was the only supplier willing to make a deal with my
boss, and, as a former monopolist, I just
like the way they do business."  A spokesperson for Enron said the two
cultures were able to work easily together during negotiations.  According
to the company, "The deal fits both companies exceptionally well.  With
Hades' ability to attract and retain new customers, we see this as a
fabulous
growth opportunity for millennia to come."  According to several energy
industry insiders, Hades' high heating demand with very little need for
summer air conditioning make it a very attractive energy portfolio addition.
Hades is a multinational corporation with millions of sites worldwide
and approximately 173 quintillion customers.  The entity boasts sustained
high growth rates over the last two thousand years.  Enron is one of the
world's leading energy and communications companies.  The company owns
approximately $37 billion in energy and communications assets.  Enron
ranks in the top quarter of Fortune's "Best 100 Companies to Work For
if You Can Keep A Job There and Don't Mind Working 80 Hours A Week," and
is among the most respected corporations in America, as ranked by customers
with respect-us-or-get-curtailed clauses in their energy supply contracts.

______________________________________
This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
message,or any attachment, is strictly prohibited.  If you have received
this message in error, please notify the original sender (or the WSPR
Help Desk) immediately by telephone (212-858-1000) or by return
E-mail and delete the message, along with any attachments, from
your computer.  Thank you.


We are pleased to announce that Dave Duran will replace Janet Dietrich to
co-lead the East Power Wholesale business at Enron.  Dave will continue to
run the highly successful Generation Investments business.

The East Power team will continue to have a single income statement and joint
accountability toward its financial goals as was set out in the
reorganization in late 2000.

Within Dave's Generation Investments group; Michael J. Miller will lead the
effort to acquire new QF projects, Chuck Ward will lead the restructuring
efforts on existing QF projects, and Carl Tricoli will lead the initiative to
develop and market capital products to IPP's.  In addition, Mitch Robinson
will lead a new initiative to evaluate opportunities with coal fired
generation.  Dave and Kevin Presto will attempt to leverage the Generation
Investments business and the Origination activities through a tighter
integration between the two groups.

Dave has over nine years of direct experience in gas and power origination at
Enron including an outstanding performance over the last couple of years
building the Generation Investments business.  He also spent two years
managing Enron's Retail Gas Marketing business in Dublin, Ohio.

The East Power group has had a great start to the year and we feel confident
that the leadership team of Kevin and Dave will lead to continued success.


Czesc Wicek,

Dzieki za notke.

Spotkalem sie z ta osoba w ubieglym tygodniu - niestety ale wczesniej bylem
na urlopie i nikt mi nie sygnalizowal nic na ten temat.

A.Wodnicki niestety pomieszal fakty i moj numer kontaktowy dostal od Ciebie a
nie Twoj ode mnie - tak jak pisze w swojej notatce.

Biorac pod uwage, ze pozostalo niecale 7 dni od dnia mojego z nim spotkania
do dnia rozpoczecia - nie bylo fizycznej mozliwosci wprowadzenia Enron
formalnie jako sponsora - zwlaszcza biorac pod uwage, ze caly PR Dept. jest
zaangazowany w otwarcie siedziby w Londynie jutro i pojutrze a AIESEC
potrzebowal ode mnie decyzje i pieniadze w piatek czyli dwa dni temu.

Jedyne co moglem zrobic (i zrobilem) to wprowadzilem ich do kilku innych
instytucji (czytaj kolegow z HZ) ktorzy mogli podjac decyzje szybciej.

Pan Andrzej Wodnicki niestety przyznal sie do organizacyjnego balaganu w
wyniku ktorego zagubiono moje namiary telefoniczne i faksowe, a nikt nie
pomyslal o zajzeniu do ksiazki telefonicznej po numer naszego biura w
Warszawie. Drugi problem to to ze zabral sie on za organizacje dodatkowych
srodkow na dwa tygodnie przed rozpoczeciem imprezy.

Niestety nic wiecej instytucjonalnie nie moglem dla nich zrobic.
Zasugerowalem tez, ze gdyby nie dopieli calego finansowania to jeszcze moge
sprobowac zebrac mala grupe ludzi, ktorzy mogliby ew. dofinansowac brakujaca
kwote jako darowizne indywidualna - ale biorac pod uwage kto jest w komitecie
honorowym i ze Kwasniewski jest glownym sponsorem - taka forma moze byc
politycznie niewlasciwa.

mam od nich dostac jakas informacje w przyszlym tygodniu czy dzieki moim
dzialaniom cos im sie uda czy tez beda nadal potrzebowac pomocy.

Pech - ale niestety zawiedli organizacyjnie.

Pozdrowienia - Jarek


Regardless of your "misc mind altering" habits, I think Will did say that they would only be able to have path modifications/cuts modified in the notes part initially.  Then (whenever the "next" modification was implemented), they would add the capability to interact with Enpower deals (ie write notes to the deal record and then, provide an entry point for deal entry for new deals done).

The East Group does not need to see POR/POD in the path for "transmission."  My intent was to put a counterparty name in the TRAN1 NAME column (example: TVA), and Enpower deal number in TRAN1 DEAL#	(example: 236891.1) if available, and Oasis number + level of reliability in TRAN1 OASIS
(example:  30912345 F-7).  I thought the logic for "Tag" and "Oasis" should be a combination of text and numbers. The reasoning for Border 2 was to have an additional border point to query for (in confirmation) when we move from one place to another. What if you put the borders in the Oasis column (ie: WW/MEAD 123456 F-7)? The path would be: Generation-marketer-E-TRANS(T) WW/MEAD 123456 F-7-E-marketer-Sink.

Gotta run,
CB

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Semperger, Cara
Sent:	Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:21 AM
To:	Bentley, Corry
Subject:	Transmission Stuff in the new system

Good Morning,

Did you read Will's last note?  Anyway, I am wanting to do one of two things and need to know which you like better.

The name and oasis number representation for tranny is not enough info for us.  We need POR and POD information as well. So,  I need the following capability

Either

Put the transmission path in the E cell like we do now,

or

Put more information in the Trans name  ( ie:  APS-(T)PV/WW)  and in the OASIS cell  (ie:  23055 HNF)

Do you have a preference?

We also need to be a united front about the design and intent of the Path Cut. They are not wanting to make it work all the way. I sure don't remember the conversations being that it should be just a replacement for the notes part, but because it's enpower everything should work together.  Am I on crack?

Thanks,

Cara


AWADnews
                                   August 2000

   CONTENTS:

   1. A.Word.A.Day in Media
   2. How Many People Receive A.Word.A.Day
   3. New Countries/Domains on the List
   4. Email Address of the Month AWArD
   5. Credits
   6. Administrivia

------------------------------

1. A.Word.A.Day in Media

   A.Word.A.Day has been featured in the following places since the last
   update. If you have noticed it somewhere not listed below, please drop
   me a line at anu@wordsmith.org.

   o The Daily Telegraph (UK), July 8, 2000
   o WBFO Radio, July 13, 2000
   o Clicks Today, July 14, 2000
   o Popular Computer Week (China), July 24, 2000
   o The Courier Mail (Australia), July 25, 2000
   o Speak Up, (Italy), July 2000

------------------------------

2. How Many People Receive A.Word.A.Day

   Over 300,000 people in more than 188 countries receive AWAD daily.
   The following table shows the distribution of addresses by domain name.

   This table, with the flags of these countries, can be seen at:
   http://wordsmith.org/awad/stats.html

   Domain  Count        %  Domain Description

   com    185116  59.4489  Commercial
   net     42023  13.4954  Network
   edu     25067   8.0501  Educational
   org      7006   2.2499  Non-Profit Organizations
   us       5785   1.8578  United States
   ca       5266   1.6911  Canada
   kr       5231   1.6799  South Korea
   au       4120   1.3231  Australia
   uk       3539   1.1365  United Kingdom
   in       2698   0.8664  India
   gov      2609   0.8379  Government
   de       1496   0.4804  Germany
   jp       1423   0.4570  Japan
   mil      1381   0.4435  USA Military
   cn       1300   0.4175  China
   br       1150   0.3693  Brazil
   za       1141   0.3664  South Africa
   pl       1105   0.3549  Poland
   sg        977   0.3138  Singapore
   nz        972   0.3122  New Zealand
   tw        950   0.3051  Taiwan
   es        606   0.1946  Spain
   fr        578   0.1856  France
   it        575   0.1847  Italy
   il        574   0.1843  Israel
   se        544   0.1747  Sweden
   my        483   0.1551  Malaysia
   mx        439   0.1410  Mexico
   ru        409   0.1313  Russian Federation
   vn        342   0.1098  Vietnam
   ie        333   0.1069  Ireland
   nl        325   0.1044  Netherlands
   id        296   0.0951  Indonesia
   ch        291   0.0935  Switzerland
   ar        286   0.0918  Argentina
   tr        265   0.0851  Turkey
   hk        254   0.0816  Hong Kong
   no        252   0.0809  Norway
   be        249   0.0800  Belgium
   th        213   0.0684  Thailand
   fi        203   0.0652  Finland
   ae        199   0.0639  United Arab Emirates
   dk        183   0.0588  Denmark
   pk        161   0.0517  Pakistan
   ph        154   0.0495  Philippines
   hu        145   0.0466  Hungary
   co        126   0.0405  Colombia
   cz        114   0.0366  Czech Republic
   at        113   0.0363  Austria
   gr        109   0.0350  Greece
   ua         97   0.0312  Ukraine
   int        85   0.0273  International
   ro         79   0.0254  Romania
   pt         73   0.0234  Portugal
   pe         71   0.0228  Peru
   sk         69   0.0222  Slovak Republic
   sa         67   0.0215  Saudi Arabia
   fm         62   0.0199  Micronesia
   yu         62   0.0199  Yugoslavia
   om         60   0.0193  Oman
   cl         56   0.0180  Chile
   ve         53   0.0170  Venezuela
   tt         51   0.0164  Trinidad and Tobago
   lb         43   0.0138  Lebanon
   lt         43   0.0138  Lithuania
   bg         42   0.0135  Bulgaria
   ne         40   0.0128  Niger
   si         40   0.0128  Slovenia
   hr         39   0.0125  Croatia
   bh         39   0.0125  Bahrain
   bm         38   0.0122  Bermuda
   ir         35   0.0112  Iran
   lk         33   0.0106  Sri Lanka
   uy         31   0.0100  Uruguay
   np         29   0.0093  Nepal
   cu         29   0.0093  Cuba
   su         29   0.0093  Former USSR
   bw         28   0.0090  Botswana
   cr         27   0.0087  Costa Rica
   is         27   0.0087  Iceland
   ee         27   0.0087  Estonia
   nu         25   0.0080  Niue
   lv         24   0.0077  Latvia
   eg         23   0.0074  Egypt
   to         23   0.0074  Tonga
   mr         20   0.0064  Mauritania
   zw         20   0.0064  Zimbabwe
   am         19   0.0061  Armenia
   bf         17   0.0055  Burkina Faso
   mt         17   0.0055  Malta
   cy         16   0.0051  Cyprus
   na         15   0.0048  Namibia
   ec         15   0.0048  Ecuador
   lu         15   0.0048  Luxembourg
   jm         15   0.0048  Jamaica
   bs         15   0.0048  Bahamas
   do         14   0.0045  Dominican Republic
   cc         14   0.0045  Cocos (Keeling) Islands
   ke         13   0.0042  Kenya
   lc         13   0.0042  Saint Lucia
   jo         13   0.0042  Jordan
   fo         12   0.0039  Faroe Islands
   qa         12   0.0039  Qatar
   ma         12   0.0039  Morocco
   fj         12   0.0039  Fiji
   ba         12   0.0039  Bosnia-Herzegovina
   sn         11   0.0035  Senegal
   kh         11   0.0035  Cambodia
   cm         11   0.0035  Cameroon
   kw         10   0.0032  Kuwait
   bo          9   0.0029  Bolivia
   vi          9   0.0029  Virgin Islands (USA)
   ge          9   0.0029  Georgia
   gy          9   0.0029  Guyana
   mu          9   0.0029  Mauritius
   py          9   0.0029  Paraguay
   by          8   0.0026  Belarus
   mk          8   0.0026  Macedonia
   hn          7   0.0022  Honduras
   ag          7   0.0022  Antigua and Barbuda
   mo          6   0.0019  Macau
   ng          6   0.0019  Nigeria
   gn          6   0.0019  Guinea
   bj          6   0.0019  Benin
   zm          6   0.0019  Zambia
   ml          6   0.0019  Mali
   md          6   0.0019  Moldova
   mg          6   0.0019  Madagascar
   as          6   0.0019  American Samoa
   cx          5   0.0016  Christmas Island
   kz          5   0.0016  Kazakhstan
   cd          5   0.0016  Congo
   gt          5   0.0016  Guatemala
   gh          4   0.0013  Ghana
   pa          4   0.0013  Panama
   ad          4   0.0013  Andorra
   mz          4   0.0013  Mozambique
   uz          4   0.0013  Uzbekistan
   sz          4   0.0013  Swaziland
   ci          4   0.0013  Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)
   bn          4   0.0013  Brunei Darussalam
   az          4   0.0013  Azerbaijan
   ni          4   0.0013  Nicaragua
   ky          4   0.0013  Cayman Islands
   ug          4   0.0013  Uganda
   et          3   0.0010  Ethiopia
   an          3   0.0010  Netherlands Antilles
   nc          3   0.0010  New Caledonia (French)
   gi          3   0.0010  Gibraltar
   ye          3   0.0010  Yemen
   pg          3   0.0010  Papua New Guinea
   mn          2   0.0006  Mongolia
   ws          2   0.0006  Samoa
   pr          2   0.0006  Puerto Rico
   tc          2   0.0006  Turks and Caicos Islands
   tz          2   0.0006  Tanzania
   tg          2   0.0006  Togo
   li          2   0.0006  Liechtenstein
   bb          2   0.0006  Barbados
   kg          2   0.0006  Kyrgyzstan
   gm          2   0.0006  Gambia
   dm          1   0.0003  Dominica
   je          1   0.0003  Jersey
   ga          1   0.0003  Gabon
   td          1   0.0003  Chad
   mm          1   0.0003  Myanmar
   gs          1   0.0003  S. Georgia and S. Sandwich Islands
   tm          1   0.0003  Turkmenistan
   aw          1   0.0003  Aruba
   pf          1   0.0003  French Polynesia
   al          1   0.0003  Albania
   ms          1   0.0003  Montserrat
   sr          1   0.0003  Suriname
   mv          1   0.0003  Maldives
   bz          1   0.0003  Belize
   -------------
   Total  311387
   -------------

   In addition to the above list of countries, AWAD's readership includes:

   Angola (ao)
   Anguilla (ai)
   Bangladesh (bd)
   Belize (bz)
   Grenada (gd)
   British Virgin Islands (vg)
   British Indian Ocean Territory (io)
   Haiti (ht)
   Malawi (mw)
   Rwanda (rw)
   Comoros (km)
   Antarctica (aq)
   Saint Kitts and Nevis Anguilla (kn)
   Northern Mariana Islands (mp)
   Guam (gu)
   Marshall Islands (mh)
   French Guiana (gf)
   Saint-Pierre and Miquelon (pm)
   El Salvador (sv)

   These places do not appear in the above table because the subscribers
   use addresses with a different domain. If you are from a country not
   listed here, drop me a line at anu@wordsmith.org and I'll add your
   country to this list.

   Stats on Address Lengths:
   Mean               :  20.116
   Median             :  19
   Mode               :  18
   Standard Deviation :   4.544
   Longest address    : 117 characters,
I_cant_believe_people_make_up_such_long_addresses_just_to_get_honorably_mentio
ned_in_the_AWAD_monthly_email@phord.com (Phil Hord)
   Shortest address   :   6 characters, s@s.to (Stonewall Ballard)

------------------------------

3. New Countries/Domains on the List

   Isle of Man (im)

   Welcome aboard!

------------------------------

4. Email Address of the Month AWArD

   This month the AWArD goes to:

   size-13@bigfoot.com (Matt Kane)

   If you know of an unusual email address that is funny or clever, you are
   welcome to send your nomination to anu@wordsmith.org.

------------------------------

5. Credits

   o AWAD is created by Anu Garg (anu@wordsmith.org).
   o Tip o' the hat to Todd J. Derr (tjd@wordsmith.org) for care and feeding
     of the computer that houses the wordserver, and keeping it smoothly
     running (thus providing an exception to Murphy's Law).
   o Thanks to Stuti Garg (stuti@wordsmith.org) of Namix (http://namix.com)
     for recording word pronunciations in her melodic voice.
   o Thanks to Emery Reiff (emery@wordsmith.org) copy editor par excellence,
     for making sure all i's are dotted and t's crossed.
   o Thanks to Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products N.V. (http://www.lhsl.com)
     for permission to use the American Heritage Dictionary, 3e., in AWAD.
     Their lawyers have asked us to add this: The American Heritage(R)
     Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition Copyright 1992, 1996
     by Houghton Mifflin Company. Used with permission from Lernout & Hauspie
     Speech Products N.V. All rights reserved.
   o Thanks to Electric Library (http://www.elibrary.com) for help with
     citation sources.
   o Thanks to Northern Light Search (http://www.northernlight.com/)
     for assistance with citation research.
   o Special thanks to all the linguaphiles who have joined and made the
     list what it is.

------------------------------

6. Administrivia

   For press and other inquiries, please contact sureg@wordsmith.org.

   How to join A.Word.A.Day, sign-off, etc.:

   Subscribe:    http://wordsmith.org/awad/subscribe.html
   Unsubscribe:    http://wordsmith.org/awad/unsubscribe.html
   Address Change:   http://wordsmith.org/awad/address-change.html
   Gift subscription:  http://wordsmith.org/awad/gift.html

   AWADtalk Bulletin Board: http://wordsmith.org/board

   Word list:   http://wordsmith.org/awad/wordlist.html
   Archives:  http://wordsmith.org/awad/archives.html
   Search:  http://wordsmith.org/awad/search.html
   FAQ:   http://wordsmith.org/awad/faq.html

   If you don't have web access, send a blank message with the word "help"
   in the subject line to wsmith@wordsmith.org to get the email command list
   for the resources mentioned above.

   A.Word.A.Day ISSN: 1524-6884

--
Anu Garg   anu@wordsmith.org   anugarg@acm.org   http://wordsmith.org/anu
(AWAD.20000811.258950.001.966005474)


I understand you owe Jean 1.25 Million this week.  Please make sure it's paid.


The attached schedule contains a forecast reflecting the delay in meter installations -- which are currently on hold.  New schedules of priority meter installs are now being prepared by Murray ONeil's group and will be included in future forecasts.  The impact of meter delays lowers load totals by averages of approximately 30 mW. Please call if you have any questions regarding these changes.

Michael R. Frazier
Manager
Load Forecasting Desk
Enron Energy Services
Office: 713-345-3200
Pager: 877-926-0615
P-mail: 8779260615@skytel.com


(See attached file: PulpexWeekly_202.pdf)(See attached file: Pulpex_Broker_
List2.doc)

This file can be read using Adobe Acrobat Reader
It is also available in a *.rtf format. If you prefer to receive the bulletin in
this format, please advise me by return email.


A walk-thru/demo of this new functionality was held today with the Logistics
Managers and representative schedulers from each region except for Texas and
Calgary.  The changes were well received and no revisions were requested.
They would like to have the changes migrated to Production the evening of
Tuesday, January 18 for use the morning of Wednesday, January 19.

Paul, could you please insure that the network folks have the Tibco install
complete by Monday, including Terminal Server.
Scotty, Paul may need one of your folks to insure that the Tibco install
works OK on Terminal Server (none of us have access).
Scotty, can you follow up with Calgary and Texas since they missed the demo.
 Also, what level of security is desired for the rollout - selected
schedulers or all of Logistics?
Dave M, plan to have the last few related items in Stage by Monday to insure
all is clean by Tuesday night. (print, filter, closed Path List, & app close
error msg)

If you do not feel like this schedule can be met, please let me know as you
become aware.

Thanks, d.n.


J.B.  please print.  J.F.  are you on the distribution, and is this linked to
the fundy page?
----- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 09:46 AM -----

	Andy James@ENRON
	02/23/2001 10:27 AM

		 To: George McClellan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Staley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A
Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
McGowan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Mcquade/HOU/ECT@EC
		 cc: Peter Bradley/LON/ECT@ECT, Jez Peters/LON/ECT@ECT, Candace
Parker/LON/ECT@ECT, Kenny Nicoll/LON/ECT@ECT, Dimitri Taylor/LON/ECT@ECT,
Andy James/EU/Enron@Enron, Cornelia Luptowitsch/LON/ECT@ECT, Dorte
Kjaergaard/LON/ECT@ECT, Fiona Ryan/LON/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Burns/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jeff Andrews/NA/Enron@Enron, Carrie Southard/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Freight weekly report

Enron Shipping Services Weekly report 08/2001

Highlight
Despite sharp movement in spot rates for both sectors week in general has
been relatively quiet. Capes saw majority of strength in Pacific with Intra
Pacific rates rising around $1800 since last week. Late surge in Japanese
buying ahead of the close of their financial year is main reason attributed
to this rise. Atlantic Capesize been pretty flat to marginally better, no
exciting news. Outlook for coming week is that Far East strength will be
maintained although pace definitely slowing. No change sentiment in Pacific.

Panamax has seen opposite effect, grain stems finally rolling from S America
which has been the major driver of the Atlantic market, for March loaders.
market was under impression that Pacific likely to come under downward
pressure but once the demand has been strong enough epecially for modern
tonnage and outlook for coming week is that reates are likely to maintain
firmness. Atlantic expected continue run for next week.

Short term we have established small long for nearby Capes, but maintain
overall perspective to sell forward curve on appreciable rallies. Panamax
very similar approach.

Panamax we fixed timecharter tonnage to cover 14 / 26 Mch Dreyfus Ist
nomination USG / Far East grain cargo. Have also taken option to extend
period of vessel for short Trans-Pacific voyage if market maintains strength
longer than we think.

Capes nothing

Market
	Short term	Medium term	Long Term
Handy Max	Flat	Up	Down
Panamax	Up	Flat	Down
Cape Size	Up	Flat	Down

Cape
Average time charter rate: $ 18,315 ( +$1005 )
Spot RBCT/Rotterdam: $ 8.678 ( +$0.156)
Spot Tubaro/China: $10.285 (+$0.16)
Spot Bolivar/Rotterdam: $ 6.625 ( +$0.122)

Panamax

Average time charter rate: $ 11,654 ( + 544 )
Spot US Gulf/Japan: $21.994 ( + $0.513 )

Deals Done
Physical Freight
ECS freight

Third party freight deals
As above Panamax
OTC FFA s
Quieter week few swaps on both the Cape and Panamax routes.
EOL
Traded 150,000 tons BCI 4 with Bocimar
Travels
Pierre in Houston all week.

Andy


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 03/19/2001
08:40 AM ---------------------------
From: Jason R Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/13/2001 11:13 AM
To: Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Derek
Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Bell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Patricia Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Celeste Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Richard Deming/NA/Enron@Enron, Russell
Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate, Jeffrey C
Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate, Larry Joe
Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol
McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia Mendoza/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Leslie
Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ellen
Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Veronica Espinoza/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: Credit Report for 3/13/2001

Counterparty     TAGG#
Action
Amoco Oil Company    qW3725.1 Rebook to BP Amoco Corporation
      qW4703.1 Rebook to BP Amoco Corporation
      qW5571.1 Rebook to BP Amoco Corporation
      qW5749.1  Rebook to BP Amoco Corporation

BP Exploration & Oil Inc.   qW4759.1 Pending Russell Diamond
      qW4826.1 Pending Russell Diamond
      qW4826.2 Pending Russell Diamond

CNG Appalachian    qB8841.8 Pending Rudwell Johnson
      qB8841.9 Pending Rudwell Johnson
      qW5776.1 Pending Rudwell Johnson
      qW5776.2 Pending Rudwell Johnson
      qW5776.3 Pending Rudwell Johnson

Coral Energy Resources, L.P.   qW4526.1 Rebook to Coral Energy Holding, L.P.

Landmark Chemicals S.A.   qW4497.1 Pending Brant Reves
      qW4610.1 Pending Brant Reves

New Counterparty    qW5666.1 Pending Jay Williams

Virginia Electric and Power Co   qW4363.1 Rebook to Virginia Power Energy
Marketing, Inc.

WWF Paper National    qW5772.1 Rebook to WWF Paper Corporation

Williams Natural Gas Company   qW5417.1 Rebook to Williams Energy Marketing &
Trading Company


RBowers@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

In its Order on Rehearing issued by FERC in Docket ER00-1969-002 on
November 8, 2001, the Commission rejected the NYISO's request for rehearing
to continue to bill for operating reserves based on the $2.52 bid cap in
effect for the period March 1 through March 27, 2000.  FERC also directed
the NYISO to re-calculate operating reserve charges for that period without
the bid cap in place.

On Friday, November 16, 2001, the NYISO filed a stay/extension with FERC in
order  to postpone any re-billing pending an appeal of the FERC decision in
the  Federal Appeals Court. In the event that FERC does not act in a timely
manner   on  the  NYISO's  request,  the  upcoming  March  2000  settlement
adjustment,  expected  to  be  issued  on  or  about December 7, 2001, will
reflect  this  re-calculation in accordance with the FERC Order.  The total
amount  of  this  adjustment  is  approximately  $27 million, which will be
allocated  to the appropriate suppliers and LSE's for the period of March 1
through March 27, 2000.

Regards,
Randy A. Bowers
Manager - Customer Settlements


Please let me know if you have any revisions.


Alan and I spoke about point #2 on the comparison benchmark.  At this point,
we may be able to just say it is based on a comparison of the contracts with
today's forward market and gloss over the exact forward curve we used.  Of
course if there is a way to come up with a similar number using publicly
available data (or if we are willing to provide our numbers if pressed) then
all the better.  In the mean time, should I hold off on using the $13.8
billion number until I hear back from you about the conversation with Steve?

Also, do I understand correctly from Alan that the $13.8 billion figure is
NOT comparing the long term contracts California signed with recent spot
market prices, but rather is a comparison of the contracts to our present
forward pricing curves?  From you e-mail, it is the latter, I take it.

As to point #1, on the deal last year, we just need a similar "back of the
envelope" calculation on what California could have saved had California
taken us up on the offers we and others made.  Any guidance on where to get
that would be most helpful.


FYI

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
10:38 AM ---------------------------

EnergyWriter@aol.com on 11/08/2000 02:19:55 AM
Please respond to EnergyWriter@aol.com
To: EnergyWriter@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Natural Gas Storage research

I am working on a report aimed at Energy Marketers that will examine
Natural Gas Storage: Effects on Energy Trading. I am looking for people
who can talk about the importance of this subject to power marketers.
Please contact me if you can inform me on any of the following subjects.

I am interested in exploring the following issues:
1. Storage process: transportation, injection, withdrawal
2. Are all storage facilities connected to pipelines?
3. Description of types of storage facilities: salt caverns,
above-ground tanks, inactive underground volcano, others
4. Problems that limit underground reservoir effectiveness
5. Historical storage data
6. Contributing factors to storage levels: weather, generation demand,
reliability concerns
7. National map of storage facilities and capacities
8. Terms definitions: base gas, working gas, underground storage,
traditional storage, salt caverns, other relevant terms
9. Impact of storage fluctuations on prices and energy trading
10. Safety issues of natural gas storage
11. Seasonal storage trends
12. Total amount of national storage capacity
13.  Future storage capacity needs
14. LNG as storage alternative
15. Technology improvements
16. Who regulated natural gas storage?
17. List of storage facility owners

If you are involved with natural gas storage, or are an energy trader
who is affected by natural gas storage, please contact me by November
13th. Thank you in advance for your help!

Barbara Drazga
Independent Journalist
Denver, Colo.
Tel: 303-369-3533
Fax: 303-369-3510
EnergyWriter@aol.com


REMINDER:

    CAKE, ICE CREAM & PUNCH, 3:00 P.M., EB38C2


So are you Gold?  If not, go ahead and use the miles if you want.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/25/2000
11:15 AM ---------------------------

	Invitation
Chairperson: Chris Gaskill
Sent by: Amanda Huble

Start: 09/27/2000 04:00 PM
End: 09/27/2000 05:00 PM

Description: Meeting to discuss PGM and  Fundamentals in EB3084.

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).
Meeting Dates:

Jennifer Fraser/HOU/ECT
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT

Detailed description:


as at 2:00 pm, May 8

Les


One of my GARP connections at El Paso has put forth a white paper for
discussion. He is hoping it will be adopted across the industry.  He will be
presenting it June 5th, at the next GARP meeting in Houston, to be hosted by
El Paso at El Paso.  He is collecting feedback before the upcoming meeting.
Please review, and comment to either myself of Lloyd at the address below.

Thanks,
Frank

His email address is:
Lloyd.Bloom@ElPaso.com


bobby shiring in the newest member of ees


How do you bait your hook?

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - penisfish.jpg


Amanda,

Can you put this file in the appropriate directory, and create the necessary
link under the "Testing" tab of the fundamentals website.  It should be
called Kern Expansion Economics".  I don't have a description yet (and I'm
still working on the other one I owe you).  Let me know if you have any
questions.  Thanks.

Mat


Jeff wants to know what you think about this.  SRS

 -----Original Message-----
From:  ""m y-" <enronsato@hotmail.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22+BFm+20+B2+A1+22+20+3Cenronsato+40hotmail+2Ecom+3E+40ENR
ON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 2:41 AM
To: Skilling, Jeff
Subject: Crisis in Enron Japan

Dear top management,

I know how dangerous if I use my real name so please forgive me to
use this free email.
I studied Enron for a long time before there is a branch in Tokyo.
How glad when I received the offer from Enron Japan! I believe my life must
have been changed to a new chapter.

But now... I'm so disppointed with enron Japan's poor management.
We local staff think Joe and other "experts" are too young to manage
this company. Forgive my impolite, EJ is really like a kindergarden!

In order not to waste your time,I conclude some points here:

1. Joe's poor management not only makes everything confused but also
makes local staff fears. He is so cold and imprudent that Japanese is
difficult to communicate with him. I know he is from Harvard,but that
doesn't
mean he is human,he is sensitive.

2. It's very obvious that Joe conflicted with Jonathan and now we don't
think he works well with Jeremy. We want to know why you top management
always make such kind of combination. Joe only trusts the people he worked
together in Norway and Australia. He has strong discrimination with Jonathan
and Jeremy's people,also has strong discimination with local staff.

3. Enron Metal is in the same office with us but like a completely different
company. No any communication between Enron Japan and Enron metal.The same
situation can be seen with E-power.Japanese mass media are suprised why
Enron
set up two companies in Japan. E-power is enough!!! Look at GE, why they
succeed
the business in Asia. They make joint venture company first. Until they are
convinced they can succeed, they open branch. Learn from GE!

4. The experts from overseas countries are really cheeky,they are not modest
to hear local staff's opinions but just push their methods to us. We can't
see any
democracy in this company!! If you want to succed your business,you should
also
hear some opposite ideas.You shouldn't alianate the people who say different
things! We don't need young associate! Let them go home!!

5. We don't need young experts because Japanese clients won't do business
if the counterparty is too young. All of the young experts should go home.
They are wasting enron's money!! To send young experts here doesn't match
Japanese culture.

All of these are true. I love Enron and want to see Enron Japan become a
comfortable and profitable place to work.

Thanks&regards
Sato

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


Hi Ken,

	I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for everything you're trying to do for us during this horrible situation.  It would have been easy to stay at home (many people would have) and watch events unfold but you had the guts and the heart to come back and take this thing head on. Being a 21+ year Enron/NNG employee, this situation has been heartbreaking... I know you're there too.  Many employees are sitting around in a daze over everything we've lost; I've lost everything too, BUT there are SO many things I have in my life that I would never have achieved had it not been for you and your leadership.  I am eternally grateful for everything you've done for Enron and for me personally. Hang in there, we still believe in you and this company.

God Bless You,

Craig Buehler


Gerald:  Nothing with La Western to the best of my knowledge.

Kay

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Gerald Nemec                           05/21/99 02:43 PM

To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CA Conflict Check - ASAP

Kay, Please review the attached data sheet and let me know if there are any
problems.  Thanks.


3:00 pm - Meeting w/Lani Upshaw and Patrice Thurston in EB3271.


Michelle,

Here are my comments:

Section 9b-  It is my understanding that the Utility lines are currently under construction and should be finished by late February 2002.  Can we reference the work that is being performed by the contractor, JC Evans.  I want to avoid any ambiguity regarding the "Utility Lines".  Also can we make the same distinction in the Utility Construction Escrow Agreement in Section C.

 Section 10-  Please change to Purchaser can extend closing for 3 successive periods of 30 days each for $10,000 per extension, not applicable to purchase price and non-refundable.

Also, I would prefer to sign the first amendment and the utility escrow documents at the same time since they reference each other.

I have sent Mike B. a copy of this email.

Thank you,

Phillip
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Simpkins, Michelle" <MSimpkins@winstead.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:28 PM
To:	'pallen@enron.com'; 'pallen70@hotmail.com'
Subject:	Blackline of First Amendment to Contract

 <<3MMPRED.DOC>>
Phillip,

Enclosed please find a blackline of the First Amendment to Contract showing
the revisions.  I have forwarded a clean version of the Amendment to you for
your signature.  If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at
(512) 370-2836.  Thanks.

Michelle L. Simpkins
Winstead Sechrest & Minick P.C.
100 Congress Avenue, Suite 800
Austin, Texas  78701
(512) 370-2836
(512) 370-2850 Fax
msimpkins@winstead.com

 - 3MMPRED.DOC << File: 3MMPRED.DOC >>


Lloyd,
George has departed for his planned vacation.   He will be back on the 30th, per his voice mail.
I bring him in at that time.

JMF


Frank -

Please see the attached article from Reuters below. I believe I'm listed as an officer on various Enron companies, including EPMI, for which I had to be fingerprinted for some type of California regulatory requirements.  Given the level of legal conflict etc. in California, and simply because it seems reasonable that I should understand if I have any exposure (financial or criminal as noted in the article) by being named an officer, I'd like to discuss it with one of our lawyers.  I've heard of D&O insurance, but really don't know what exactly that's for, whether I'm covered, and what it does cover, etc..

I've left messages over the past month for several people in Legal, but have received no response; hence this message to you in hopes you can direct me to whom I should be talking to.

I believe I'm listed as an officer on various Enron companies, including Enron Power Marketing Inc. (EPMI), for which I had to be fingerprinted for some type of California regulatory requirements.  Given the level of legal conflict etc. in California, and simply because it seems reasonable that I should understand if I have any exposure by being named an officer, I'd like to discuss it with one of our lawyers.  I've heard of D&O insurance, but really don't know what exactly that's for, whether I'm covered, and why I might even need it.

Another thing I'd like to know is who else at Enron is listed as an officer of EPMI.  And also, Sara Shackleton discovered last week that the Enron BOD did not actually approve me being designated as a RAC officer, so I'm wondering if the slate of officers for EPMI that was submitted to California for the regulatory requirements is invalid.  Evidently the change from Ted Murphy to me was overlooked in the paperwork approved by the BOD meeting, and the plan is to ratify it retrospectively in this next BOD meeting.

This isn't something that keeps me up at night, but it is of concern to my husband, especially since I am unable to explain the significance and potential exposure, if any, of being named an officer of these subsidiaries.

Thanks for your help,

Cassandra.
x30429

-----Original Message-----
From: BoSchultz@aol.com [mailto:BoSchultz@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:41 PM
To: Schultz, Cassandra
Subject: (no subject)

SACRAMENTO, Calif., July 18 (Reuters) - A California legislative panel voted
Wednesday to ask the state Senate to cite Reliant Energy Inc. < REI.N <aol://4785:REI>> for
contempt for failing to comply with a subpoena seeking confidential
documents.

The Senate Select Committee to Investigate Market Manipulation voted 6-0 to
move against Houston-based Reliant, which joins fellow Texas energy giant
Enron Corp. < ENE.N <aol://4785:ENE>> in facing what could be the first contempt citations
imposed by California's state senate since 1929.

Senate aides said the panel, which is investigating charges of market
manipulation and price gouging in California's energy crisis, would now begin
preparing a full report on Reliant's noncompliance for the full Senate.

The committee's report on Enron could be ready for submission to the full
Senate Thursday, they said, adding that continued efforts to negotiate an
agreement had proved fruitless.

According to state law, California's senators must use the reports to decide
whether to slap sanctions on the two companies. They also have the option of
fining or imprisoning company senior officers.

Enron, for its part, has filed a lawsuit in Sacramento Superior Court
challenging the investigative committee's authority to subpoena company
documents.

Senate aides said Reliant could follow the lead of another energy company,
Atlanta-based Mirant Corp. < MIR.N <aol://4785:MIR>>, which has avoided the contempt threat by
cooperating with legislators' demands to sign confidentiality agreements,
open a document depository close to Sacramento, and begin placing documents
there relating to the company's recent business in California.

The committee also voted on Wednesday to suspend for 30 days proceedings
against number of other energy firms, including Duke Energy Corp. < DUK.N <aol://4785:DUK>>,
Dynegy Inc. < DYN.N <aol://4785:DYN>>, Williams Cos. Inc. < WMB.N <aol://4785:WMB>>, AES Corp. < AES.N <aol://4785:AES>> and NRG
Energy Inc. < NRG.N <aol://4785:NRG>>, pending a review of their compliance efforts to date.

Enron has argued the committee has no legal jurisdiction over wholesale
electricity prices, which are regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Committee (FERC), and that the committee's proceedings violate the company's
legal rights.

State officials have accused the energy companies of overcharging California
power agencies and utilities some $8.9 billion for wholesale electricity over
the past 14 months, which saw power prices in the state soar tenfold.

Independent energy merchants have blamed the price spike on the state's
poorly designed electricity deregulation law and a failure to build enough
power plants to meet the growing needs of its 34 million residents and its
industries.

00:10 07-19-01

Copyright 2001 Reuters Limited.  All rights reserved.  Republication or
redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is
expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters.  Reuters
shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any
actions taken in reliance thereon.  All active hyperlinks have been inserted
by AOL.