---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------

"Tom Lenhart" <tlenhart@corealty.com> on 11/14/2000 01:46:02 PM
To: <jshana12@hotmail.com>
cc: <matthew.lenhart@enron.com>, <debbielatham@realtor.com>,
<tclupinski@dpdenver.com>, <llschultz3@aol.com>

Subject: Sorry, I keep getting these things.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brenda Mosley [mailto:bmosley@corealty.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:13 PM
To: Tambra Lupinski; Tom Lenhart; J'Shana Farley; Annette Williams;
Monica Rene Quinn
Subject: FW: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Franklin, Niecie [mailto:Niecie.Franklin@marriott.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:18 AM
To: bmosley@corealty.com; mreneq456@aol.com; Brandy Sawyer; Carla
Coleman; Chris Maston; Jennifer Kadel; Kevin Duncan; Lila MacKinney;
Peter Gerling; Shauna Betschart; Tricia Fox; Virginia Glavan
Subject: FW: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn_Grandberry@r1.fws.gov [mailto:Shawn_Grandberry@r1.fws.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:35 AM
To: ddarmstrong16@hotmail.com; Boyd.Nyle@broadband.att.com;
QXIO@AOL.COM; zoltan_chancy@hotmail.com; jaymeson@blackplanet.com;
Zanetha.Evans@Notes.airtouch.com; nannysasa@aol.com;
Niecie.Franklin@marriott.com; lhibbert@usa.net; phadrea_ponds@usgs.gov
Subject: Fwd: FW: THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

Why Not receive Junk Mail

Subject:    THIS IS SCARY!!! DO IT!!

    > >
    > The Phone Will  Ring Right After You Do This. . .
    > Just read the  little stories and make a wish.
    > Scroll all the  way to the bottom and there is
    > alittle
    > message
    > there -then
    > do  it. No attachment on this one.
    >
    >
    > I'm 13 years  old, and I wished that my dad would
    > come
    > home from  the army,
    > because he'd  been having problems with his heart
    > and
    > right leg. It  was
    > 2:53 p.m.
    > that  I'd made the wish. At 3:07 p.m. (14
    > minutes
    > later),  the
    > doorbell rang,  and there he was,
    > luggage and all!!
    > Katie
    >
    >
    > I'm 20 and I've  been having trouble in my job and
    > on
    > the verge of quitting.
    > I made
    > a simple  wish that my boss would get a new job.
    > That was a  1:35
    > and at
    > 2:55  there was
    > an announcement that he was
    > promoted.
    > Lisa
    >
    >
    > Believe me...  this really works!! Just scroll down
    > to
    > the end,  but while you do,  make a wish.
    > Whatever age you are, is
    > the number of  minutes it
    > will take for  your wish to come true (ex.
    > you are
    > 15 years old, it  will take 15 minutes for  your wish to come
    > true). If you don't send this to people in 5  minutes, you
    > will have
    > bad luck for years!!
    > Go!!!!!!
    > *
    > **
    > ***
    > ****
    > *****
    > ******
    > *******
    > ********
    > *********
    > **********
    > ***********
    >
    > ************
    > *************
    > **************
    > ***************
    > ****************
    >
    > *****************
    > ******************
    > *******************
    > ********************
    > *********************
    > **********************
    > ***********************
    > ************************
    >
    > *************************
    > **************************
    >
    > ***************************
    > ****************************
    >
    > *****************************
    > ******************************
    >
    > *******************************
    > ********************************
    >
    > *********************************
    > **********************************
    >
    > ***********************************
    > **********************************
    >
    > *********************************
    > ********************************
    >
    > *******************************
    > ******************************
    >
    > *****************************
    > ****************************
    >
    > ***************************
    > **************************
    >
    > *************************
    > ************************
    > ***********************
    >
    > **********************
    > *********************
    > ********************
    > *******************
    > ******************
    > *****************
    > ****************
    > ***************
    > **************
    > *************
    > ************
    > ***********
    > **********
    > *********
    > ********
    > *******
    > ******
    > *****
    > ****
    > ***
    > **
    > *
    > **
    > ***
    > ****
    > *****
    > ******
    > *******
    > ********
    > *********
    > **********
    > ***********
    > ************
    > *************
    >
    > **************
    > ***************
    > ****************
    > *****************
    >
    > ******************
    > *******************
    > ********************
    > *********************
    > **********************
    > ***********************
    > ************************
    >
    > *************************
    > **************************
    >
    > ***************************
    > ****************************
    >
    > *****************************
    > ******************************
    >
    > *******************************
    > ********************************
    >
    > *********************************
    > **********************************
    >
    > ***********************************
    > **********************************
    >
    > *********************************
    > ********************************
    >
    > *******************************
    > ******************************
    >
    > *****************************
    > ****************************
    >
    > ***************************
    > **************************
    >
    > *************************
    > ************************
    > ***********************
    >
    > **********************
    > *********************
    > ********************
    > *******************
    > ******************
    > *****************
    > ****************
    > ***************
    > **************
    > *************
    > ************
    > ***********
    > **********
    > *********
    > ********
    > *******
    > ******
    > *****
    > ****
    > ***
    > **
    > *
    > **
    > ***
    > ****
    > *****
    > ******
    > *******
    > ********
    > *********
    > **********
    > ***********
    > ************
    > *************
    >
    > **************
    > ***************
    > ****************
    > *****************
    >
    > ******************
    > *******************
    > ********************
    > *********************
    > **********************
    > ***********************
    > ************************
    >
    > *************************
    > **************************
    >
    > ***************************
    > ****************************
    >
    > *****************************
    > ******************************
    >
    > *******************************
    > ********************************
    >
    > *********************************
    > **********************************
    >
    > ***********************************
    > **********************************
    >
    > *********************************
    > ********************************
    >
    > *******************************
    > ******************************
    >
    > *****************************
    > ****************************
    >
    > ***************************
    > **************************
    >
    > *************************
    > ************************
    > ***********************
    >
    > **********************
    > *********************
    > ********************
    > *******************
    > ******************
    > *****************
    > ****************
    > ***************
    > **************
    > *************
    > ************
    > ***********
    > **********
    > *********
    > ********
    > *******
    > ******
    > *****
    > ****
    > ***
    > **
    > *
    >
    >
    >
    > STOP!!!!!!!!
    > Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    > Your wish
    > will  now come true in your age minutes!!
    > Now
    > follow this  carefully.... it can be very
    > rewarding!!!! If  you send this
    > to 10 more people, other
    > than the 5
    > that youalready  have to send to,
    > something major that you*ve been
    > wanting will
    > happpen
    >
    >
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Thousands of
    > Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
    > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ <http://shopping.yahoo.com/>
<<http://shopping.yahoo.com/ <http://shopping.yahoo.com/> >>
    >


Sorry, I didn't.  I left a message with him the day you nd I  spoke a couple
of weeks ago.  I will try again today.

From: Sara Shackleton on 08/09/2000 10:13 AM
To: John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Forest Oil Corporation

John:  Did you speak with John Nicholson?  I need his phone number please.
Call me.  Sara


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 04/11/2001 01:33 PM -----

	exchangeinfo@nymex.com
	04/11/2001 02:21 PM

		 To: tana.jones@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: (01-129) END OF MIDDLE EAST SOUR CRUDE OIL FUTURES CONTRACT

Notice No. 01-129
April 11, 2001

TO:
ALL NYMEX DIVISION MEMBERS
ALL NYMEX DIVISION CLEARING MEMBERS
ALL MEMBER FIRMS

FROM:
Neal Wolkoff
Executive Vice President

SUBJECT:
END OF MIDDLE EAST SOUR CRUDE OIL FUTURES CONTRACT

The NYMEX Board of Directors decided today, Wednesday, April 11, 2001, to
cease trading of the Middle East Sour Crude oil futures contract effective
immediately.  The contract was available only on the NYMEX ACCESSc system.

The Middle East Sour Crude oil futures settlement index will no longer be
published as a result of this action by the Board of Directors.

If you have any questions, please contact Jeffrey Kerr at (212) 299-2615.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"
http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdoc
=(01-129)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


Company: 002909     Arng: 37556-00412     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                     2,290                 2,277
Working                       2,290                 2,277
Capacity Allocation           2,290                 2,277
Confirmed                     2,289                 2,276  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10138     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 5,000
Working                           0                 5,000
Capacity Allocation               0                 5,000
Confirmed                         0                 2,500  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10147     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 5,000
Working                           0                 5,000
Capacity Allocation               0                 5,000
Confirmed                         0                 2,500  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10473     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       800                     0
Working                         800                     0
Capacity Allocation             800                     0
Confirmed                       273  CBL                0

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10474     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       800                     0
Working                         800                     0
Capacity Allocation             800                     0
Confirmed                       273  CBL                0

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10475     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       800                     0
Working                         800                     0
Capacity Allocation             800                     0
Confirmed                       274  CBL                0

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10476     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       800                     0
Working                         800                     0
Capacity Allocation             800                     0
Confirmed                       274  CBL                0

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10477     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       400                     0
Working                         400                     0
Capacity Allocation             400                     0
Confirmed                       137  CBL                0

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10478     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       800                     0
Working                         800                     0
Capacity Allocation             800                     0
Confirmed                       274  CBL                0

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10479     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                       800                     0
Working                         800                     0
Capacity Allocation             800                     0
Confirmed                       274  CBL                0

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10513     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 5,000
Working                           0                 5,000
Capacity Allocation               0                 5,000
Confirmed                         0                 2,500  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10573     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 2,260
Working                           0                 2,260
Capacity Allocation               0                 2,260
Confirmed                         0                 1,960  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10574     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 3,000
Working                           0                 3,000
Capacity Allocation               0                 3,000
Confirmed                         0                 2,602  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10575     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 5,000
Working                           0                 5,000
Capacity Allocation               0                 5,000
Confirmed                         0                 4,337  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10576     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 5,000
Working                           0                 5,000
Capacity Allocation               0                 5,000
Confirmed                         0                 4,338  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10577     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                10,000
Working                           0                10,000
Capacity Allocation               0                10,000
Confirmed                         0                 8,676  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10578     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                10,000
Working                           0                10,000
Capacity Allocation               0                10,000
Confirmed                         0                 8,676  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10579     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                10,000
Working                           0                10,000
Capacity Allocation               0                10,000
Confirmed                         0                 8,676  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10580     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                10,000
Working                           0                10,000
Capacity Allocation               0                10,000
Confirmed                         0                 8,676  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10582     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 5,000
Working                           0                 5,000
Capacity Allocation               0                 5,000
Confirmed                         0                 2,500  CBL

Company: 002909     Arng: 39229-10621     Eff Date: 2001-06-09

                        ----- Receipt -----   ----- Delivery -----
                           Quantity  Cut CD      Quantity  Cut CD

Nominated                         0                 5,900
Working                           0                 5,900
Capacity Allocation               0                 5,900
Confirmed                         0                 5,119  CBL


Attached is the Enron Americas Gas Trading violation memo for VaR, Maturity
Gap Risk, and Net Open Position for May 10, 2001.  The Office of the Chairman
for Enron Americas is responsible for printing out a hard copy of this memo,
signing it and returning the hard copy to Chris Abel who will forward it to
RAC to obtain their signature.

Thank You


The following servers will be off line on: 10/18/2001 5:00 to 6:00 AM for the SP2 upgrade, IIS hot fix, and WINS update.
Change Control #CH2241-E has been submitted.
nahou-wwmkm01t
nahou-wwhrs01d
nahou-wwhrs01t
nahou-wwrem01d
nahou-wwrem01t
nahou-wwrem02d
nahou-wwrem03d
nahou-wwgen01d
nahou-wwgen01t
nahou-wwgen02d
nahou-wwgen03d
nahou-wwgen04d

Thank you
Web Operations
(Please do not reply to this message.  If you have any concerns please address them @ http://webops.corp.enron.com)


Thanks Jeff!  One big benefit is that I'll be down here so I can keep a
closer eye on you guys!  df

From: Jeffery Fawcett/ENRON@enronxgate on 03/09/2001 08:07 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Organization Announcement

Drew,
Congratulations!  Well deserved, I might add.  I hope that in your new lofty
position, you don't forget the "little people."

 -----Original Message-----
From:  ETS General Announcement/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-ETS+20General+20Announcement_ET+26S_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com
]  On Behalf Of Stan Horton, Chairman & CEO@ENRON
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:58 PM
To: Enron Transportation Services Operations@ENRON
Subject: Organization Announcement

Michael Moran, currently Managing Director and General Counsel for ETS, has
decided to retire after a distinguished 27-year career with Enron.   Mike has
been a conscience and a statesman of our organization and it is hard for me
to imagine the ETS organization without Mike.

Fortunately, Drew Fossum, currently Vice President and General Counsel for
Northern Natural Gas and Transwestern, has accepted my offer to become Vice
President and General Counsel of ETS effective April 1, 2001.  Drew will
relocate to Houston and report to me in his new role.

To assist with transition issues and special projects, Mike has agreed to
stay on board for several months as Managing Director and Special Counsel to
the Chairman and will continue to report to me.

Please join me in congratulating Drew on his new assignment and thanking Mike
for his many contributions to ETS and Enron.


Kevin
I am scrambling to get the correct quad maps so I can find the locations and route from the cavern to the El Paso MP 619. Without them, it will be very difficult from the air to figure out where we are and what we're looking for/at.
No luck yet, but will try to get before I depart Monday noon.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyatt, Kevin
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:40 PM
To: Cebryk, Doug
Subject: Panda Energy lateral

Doug--
	The Panda Energy Plant is to be located 3 miles NE of the Town of Gila Bend, AZ.  Panda proposes to lay approx. 18 miles of line to reach the El Paso southern system.  The Panda lateral to El Paso would parallel Hwy 85 and interconnect with El Paso at mile post 619.  The El Paso southern system lies approx. 15 miles south of Interstate 10.  You can click on the map below (look for the green dot) to locate the plant.

My question is what does the ROW look like from the proposed salt storage south and west to where Panda will interconnect with El Paso?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sarakaitis, Seth
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:09 AM
To: Hyatt, Kevin
Subject: RE: map coordinates

The coordinate is a green circle in Section 20.

Let us know if this is OK, or if you'd like us to plot more points.

Seth

-----Original Message-----
From: Hyatt, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:03 AM
To: Sarakaitis, Seth
Subject: map coordinates

-----Original Message-----
From: Beth Conrad [mailto:BethC@pandaenergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:18 AM
To: Lindberg, Lorraine
Cc: Hyatt, Kevin; Jim Adams
Subject: Transwestern

UTM coordinates:

N: 11972906.7696
E:  1124025.6171

Thanks,

Beth


I was planning on going down relatively early on Saturday morning with Sul
and Sheffler.  I would like to leave around 9:00 and go down and have
breakfast and a few beers at the peacock as a good friend of mine owns it now
and I would like to see him and what he has done to the place.  You are more
than welcome to come with us if you like.


ST-CALI is short 50 mws in NP-15 on Monday on peak.  Please buy for ST-CALI
(under their book) and sell to the California Imbalance for them.  They are
short at $340.
Thanks,
Bill


Are you on the internet?  Email me.


Attached is a short memo and summary outlining changes to the Business School Loan Program for the Western Hemisphere. As many of you know, over the past couple of months we have taken a hard look at our approach to business school loans. The updated guidelines better serve Enron's business interests, eliminate credit exposure for the company, and potentially broaden the reach of the Loan Program. If you have any questions, please contact Ted Bland (x35275) who leads Career Development for the Program.
Billy


That works for me.

	Kal Shah
	08/11/2000 01:03 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Re: ads approval

How about if we get permission from the newspapers that they are ok with
running these ads in their newspaper?  Would that be sufficient back up to
protect us?

Kal

From: Mark Taylor on 08/11/2000 12:27 PM
To: Kal Shah/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: ads approval

My only concern is the 8 hours out of date reference.  As of when?  It might
not be 8 hours old when they go to press so do we mean when it is being
read?  Would it hurt to say something to the effect of "By the time you read
this" as a lead in?  Are we sure that even this is accurate?  How long from
press run til the first copy hits the street?

	Kal Shah
	08/07/2000 06:50 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer
		 cc:
		 Subject: ads approval

Please provide approval of the following ads for Global editions of the Wall
Street Journal and Financial Times.  We are going to remove mention of
EnronOnline being the only website in the world to reach $100 billion in
eight months from the ad text.  The rest of the ad copy will stay as is.  We
plan to run sometime beginning in September.

Thanks


The only one I am aware of is Kimball,which Lisa is handling.

	William S Bradford
	11/20/2000 08:34 PM

		 To: Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: (bcc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT)
		 Subject: Re: Status of bankrupt companies

Still no response from legal.   Will follow up when I get a response.

Bill

Rebecca Ford
11/13/2000 11:15 AM
To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status of bankrupt companies

I have not heard the status on these counterparties.  Do you have any updates?

Thanks,
Becky

To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bonnie
White/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Georgeanne Hodges/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Status of bankrupt companies

Lisa/Richard/Bonnie,

Please give me an update of the following bankruptcy claims.  We need to make
a determination if we should write off these receivables but would like to
get input from you on any potential recovery before we move forward.  On a
broader issue, do you have any report outlining outstanding bankruptcy
preceedings or litigation that I may get a copy of on a regular basis so we
can more effectively manage the credit and workout related issues on the
trading portfolio?

Please advise.

Bill

From:  Tanya Rohauer
   10/31/2000 08:54 AM

To: Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Status of bankrupt companies

---------------------- Forwarded by Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 08:49
AM ---------------------------

Rebecca Ford
10/31/2000 08:11 AM
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Status of bankrupt companies

Hi Tanya and Debbie,

I was wondering if I could get an update as to the status of the following
bankrupt companies:

Alma Energy Corp.
Kimball Trading Company
Southern Mineral Corp.

For each company, we have an outstanding receivable on our A/R.  I was
wondering if, in each case, we expected to see some money to offset the
receivable, or if there was a slim chance that we would receive anything in
bankruptcy proceedings.

Please advise.

Thank you,
Becky


Ben,

Thanks for the briefing.  We have your file here and I will add this
information so we have a complete "story".  Good luck with the GMAT and
keep in contact.

Jennifer
-----------------------------------------------------

Jennifer Miller
Interim Director of Admissions, MBA program
McCombs School of Business
University of Texas at Austin

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com [mailto:Benjamin.Rogers@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:49 PM
To: Jennifer Miller
Subject: Re: FW:

Jennifer:
     Thank you for the response and the update.  The news that Dr,
Harris
had left was news to me, since I had not received an auto-reply message.
Just to let you know, Dr Harris and I had talked quite a bit last year
about my application status.  I had also talked to many of the Finance
Professors, particularly Professor Sheridan Titman about the program and
my
application status.  Both Professor Titman and Dr Harris suggested that
I
take a finance class as well as retake the GMAT.  Due to my documented
learning disability, I am trying to receive a "special testing status"
from
GMAC and then re-take the GMAT.
     I hope this brief "download" of my previous conversations with Dr.
Harris and others at the Business School has helped.   I hope all is
going
well with the new school year and I look forward to hearing from you in
the
near future.

Regards,

Ben Rogers


Dana,

     I don't get off until 5:00, so it will be about 5:30 or 5:45 before I
can get there.  Thank-you.

Denise

-----Original Message-----
From: Dana.Davis@enron.com [mailto:Dana.Davis@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 4:46 PM
To: denise.moore@dhs.state.tx.us
Subject: Re: Can you come early?

YES!  I WILL BE THERE.  I DON'T HAVE THE KEY BUT I THINK I CAN GET IT.  OK?

"Moore,Denise I" <denise.moore@dhs.state.tx.us> on 10/11/2000 04:34:41 PM

To:   ddavis@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Can you come early?

Dana,

     Are you coming to power time?  If so, can you come early?  I just need
someone to pray with me and for me.  Satan is on my trail fast and furious.

Let me know.

Denise


We have scheduled the above mentioned meeting for:

		Tuesday, October 9th, 9:00a - 10:00a, EB-1336

We will have a small breakfast for you, so bring your appetites.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:31 AM
To:	Robertson, Audrey; Harris, Steven; Lokey, Teb; Pryor, Tony; Kilmer III, Robert; Donoho, Lindy; Harris, Steven; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Watson, Kimberly; Y'Barbo, Paul
Cc:	Paschal, Zelda
Subject:	RE: SoCal Needles - Marketing Strategy  for Incremental Delivery Capacity

Due to scheduling conflicts, we will have to re-schedule this strategy meeting.

I will notify everyone later this morning as to what our new date and time will be.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:37 AM
To:	Harris, Steven; Lokey, Teb; Pryor, Tony; Kilmer III, Robert; Donoho, Lindy; Harris, Steven; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; McConnell, Mark; Robertson, Audrey; Watson, Kimberly; Y'Barbo, Paul
Cc:	Paschal, Zelda; Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	SoCal Needles - Marketing Strategy  for Incremental Delivery Capacity

Please be informed, we have scheduled a meeting to discuss the above mentioned topic.  Please mark your calendars to reflect the date and time:

			Today, Thursday, October 4, 3:30p - 4:30p, EB - 1336

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Tana,

The distinction is that Carol and Aparna work for Ken supporting credit for
Enron Industrial Markets, which where the pulp and paper world resides.
Walter and I support Enron Global Markets where EOL lives and breathes.

tm

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Guidroz, Walter
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:07 AM
To: Jones, Tana
Cc: Moran, Tom
Subject: RE: Click Paper Approvals

Yes Tana, Carol North works in the Credit Group.  She will be working with
Aparna Rajaram and Ken Curry.  Please add her to any ClickPaper distribution
lists that you currently send out; thanks.

WG

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:00 AM
To: Moran, Tom; Guidroz, Walter
Subject: Click Paper Approvals

Does Carol North work in Credit?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/05/2001 10:04 AM -----

	Carol North/ENRON@enronXgate 03/05/2001 09:37 AM 	   To: Karen
Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Steve
Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G
Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Paul Radous/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole Hunter/NA/Enron@Enron, Aparna
Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate  cc:   Subject: Click Paper Approvals

Please see attached.

 << File: CP 03-05a-01.xls >>


Gosh , Kimat, this is so unfair... I get penalized for exceeding VAR by 1,000, and Derren by 1,000,000 and it's both 10,000!!!!

:) Biliana

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Singla, Kimat
Sent:	Friday, November 16, 2001 9:47 AM
To:	Pehlivanova, Biliana; Espey, Darren
Cc:	Love, Phillip M.
Subject:	VAR Violation

FYI, penalty of $10,000 each has been posted to your P&L for VAR violation.

Kimat


i think this is a call for help.  maybe you should provide with some service
tonight?
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 06/30/2000 11:43 AM
---------------------------

Christa Winfrey
06/30/2000 11:40 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hector Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher
Coffman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kyle Etter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chad Landry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reagan
Mathews/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Brad
Mauritzen/HOU/EES@EES, Kent McNellie/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stephen
Plauche/Corp/Enron@Enron, Travis Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John A Cote/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Volunteers needed - Houston Boys Club Weekend

John Cote asked me to forward this information on to any guys that I thought
might be interested.  Apparently, he thinks I know a lot of noble men here at
Enron.  All kidding aside, this sounds like a worthwhile thing, if you have
the time.  If any of you are interested, contact John Cote at ext. 3-3830.

Hope everyone has a great 4th of July!
Thanks,
Christa

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  John A Cote                           06/30/2000 10:28 AM

To: Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Boys Club Weekend

I'm looking for commitment from a few NOBLE MEN:

What: Houston Boys Club Summer Camp Weekend [Enron-sponsored volunteer
project]
When: Friday, July 21 @ 1pm through Sunday, July 24 @ 2pm [2 nights]
Where: Willis, TX (just north of Conroe)
Who: 8 counselors to chaperone 60 children (7-12 years old)
How: coordinate the following 5 activities, (1) Kitchen, (2) Canoeing, (3)
Fishing, (4) Baseball/Basketball, (5) One-on-One Mentoring
Contact: John Cote, x3-3830

Enron is supporting this activity; funds for supplies/equipment will be
provided.
Spread the word to your colleagues.

Interested counselors, please RSVP ASAP.
We have an organizational meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 13th @ 5pm in
the lobby (Starbucks).


===================== FOOLWATCH - THE MOTLEY FOOL ===============
                       Monday, November 19, 2001
rshapiro@enron.com
=================================================================
Editor's Picks:
---------------------
- Straight Talk on Penny Stocks
- Qualcomm's Margin of Safety
- Social Security Benefits and Income Taxes
- Bioinformatics Takeover Candidates
-----------------------------------------------------------------

                    Close    Change  %Change

        FOOL 50   1,442.34   +16.19   +1.14%
        DJIA      9,976.46  +109.47   +1.11%
        S&P 500   1,151.06   +12.41   +1.09%
        NASDAQ    1,934.42   +35.84   +1.89%

              (Numbers as of 4:00 p.m. ET)
               THE LATEST MARKET NUMBERS
           http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541013

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: ShareBuilder
Buy stocks for just $4!
Make dollar-based investments in the stocks and index
shares you choose for just $4 per transaction.
Or, pay $12 per month for unlimited stock buys.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=541014

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL CAP: STRAIGHT TALK ON PENNY STOCKS
  When, if ever, is it worth the risk to consider a penny stock?
  Zeke Ashton has the answer.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541015

IN MY OPINION: QUALCOMM'S MARGIN OF SAFETY
  When you take a close look at this quarter's numbers, margins
  rule the day.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541016

RETIREMENT: SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS AND INCOME TAXES
  Did you know that Social Security benefits can be considered
  taxable income? It pays to prepare.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541017

FOOL ON THE HILL: BIOINFORMATICS TAKEOVER CANDIDATES
  The up-and-coming bioinformatics industry is full of players.
  Tom Jacobs surveys the consolidation situation.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541018

NEWS: NEW HIGHS FOR LOWE'S
  The number-two home-improvement chain continues to show
  strength, keeping the pressure on Home Depot.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541019

60-SECOND GUIDE: OPEN AN IRA
  Want a cozier retirement and some tax savings, too? Then open
  an Individual Retirement Account (IRA). Here's how.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541020

FOOL PLATE SPECIAL: MERGER WOULDN'T SAVE PALM, HANDSPRING
  Some investors want Palm and Handspring to merge. It's not
  much, but it's something.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541021

FOR A COMPLETE LIST OF TODAY'S STORIES, CLICK THE LINK BELOW.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541022

-----------------------------------------------------------------

SPONSORED BY: ShareBuilder
Buy stocks for just $4!
Make dollar-based investments in the stocks and index
shares you choose for just $4 per transaction.
Or, pay $12 per month for unlimited stock buys.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=541023

-----------------------------------------------------------------

My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541024
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541025

WANNA TAKE THE SHORTCUT?
Check out our new Crash Courses, the fastest way to get
your finances in order. Get results in less than an hour, for
just $10. Try one today!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541026

PERKS FOR FOOLS ONLY
Get free stuff and special offers, just for you!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541027

CUSTOMER SERVICE
Ask our staff for help with email delivery problems.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541028

UNSUBSCRIBE
Here's how to unsubscribe or change your settings.
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=rshapiro@enron.com

_________________________________________________________________
Copyright (c) 1995-2001 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved.
Legal Information: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=541029

MsgId: msg-4471-2001-11-19_17-57-57-6467737_1_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-18:00:20(11-19-2001)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: rshapiro@enron.com


Let's talk.  While there is always some value in these things it is ususally
quite small and consumes more valuable resources in trying to capture the
benefit than the benefit itself.

From: Michael B Rosen@ECT on 07/13/2001 08:44 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron

cc:

Subject: A&M - Bush Library Foundation & School of Public Policy

Steve-

We have been approached by the Texas A&M/George Bush Presidential Library
Foundation and School of Public Policy to endow additional funds.

Enron had made an original contribution to the library foundation back in
1998 totaling $250K over five years.

I am working with Community Relations and A/A Recruiting to evaluate the
latest request and to discuss where Enron may have interest or find leverage
for our Government Affairs, Recruiting, or PR efforts.

The Foundation is willing to work with us to establish whatever type of
program(s) and/or participatory involvement we would like.  We have discussed
an Enron speaker series, classroom lectures, advisory committee seats and the
likes.

I have already had a chance to run this by Rick Shapiro and Rob Bradley.
Although Rick was noncommittal regarding his team's time for speaking or
lecturing, he seemed supportive of the effort.  Rob has already been
participating in some speaking opportunities there, and supported expanded
efforts.

What are your thoughts on contribution levels (another $250K was suggested by
CR) and any specific program or relationship opportunities regarding the
Library Center or School of Public Policy.

Please grab me for quick conversation when you have time.

Thanks.

Mike


Wednesday, April 25 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Sherri Sera, executive
assistant to Jeff Skilling, on eSpeak.  Sherri will answer questions about
how her job has changed since Jeff became CEO.

If you can't make the live event, post your questions on eSpeak now.  Sherri
will answer them during her eSpeak, and you can find the answers in the
transcript later.

Have you been wondering what happened to the information about Enron's
severance pay policy?   Would you like to see an innovation suggestion for
the Saturn's ring that will connect the two Enron buildings?  Read the new
postings in the "Office of the Chairman" category in eMeet.

Thanks for the great response to the new "Cost Reduction" category in the
Idea Vault!  Visit the ThinkBank today and read the suggestions for cutting
costs; and, while you're there, add your own.


Jeffrey,

Wow.  What can I say.  Will it help?  It covers about thirty months of
rent here (and I have a nice place), and makes it nearly certain that I
have the wherewithall to hang in there long enough to give this writing
thing an umitigated shot.  Thanks so very much.

Thanks also for for the kind words in your letter about appreciating
getting my little blurbs.  That means a lot to me.

Your letter capped what was one of my best days here (and I have had a
lot of great days here).  Have met a "harika [wonderful]" Turkish woman,
and had just spent a fine evening with her when I came home and found
your letter.  Her name is Sukran (pronounced "Shoo-kron").  More about
her later.  I have to admit that I cried a bit after I opened your
letter; the culmination of a lot of fantasitic feelings.

It would be great if you got over here.  It's really an endlessly
facinating place, and I think I'm becoming a prtty good guide.  (Also,
Sukran should be helping my Turkish a lot.)  Let me know as far ahead of
time as possible so I can sure you have the best choices of hotels.

I know my blurbs suggest greyness, but that's the most interesting color
for me.  As I mentioned in my last e-mail to you, I'm having the time of
my life.  Indeed, today is the first real day of spring here (though it
may be a false one [ it snowed pretty hard just two weekends ago]) and I
actually sat out in the sun on the porch next to my place and studied
Turkish and prepared my next English lessons.

I recently sent Kristin an "introduction to Istanbul" e-mail (we just
got in touch by e-mail after the holidays); you may want to ask her to
run off a copy for you (assuming she saved it).

Hope you're enjoying your work.  Let me know what else is happening in
your life.  Thanks again for everything.

Love,

Mark

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


FYI.  Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Lynn
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:36 PM
To: Stevens, Bob
Cc: January, Steve; Zadow, Raetta; Blair, Lynn
Subject: RE: Receipt Points

	Bob, you are correct in your statement.  But I want to be sure Koch understand
	when they nominate their receipt at Carlton of 2828 the delivery on that
	path will be 2828 less fuel.  Otherwise I agree with you statements.  I will
	be out next week, but Raetta is up to speed on this issue if you have any
	questions.  Thanks. Lynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Stevens, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:10 AM
To: Blair, Lynn
Subject: FW: Receipt Points

Lynn:  Please verify that if Koch realigns their 35,000/d contract (K# 20510)such that their MDQ at Carlton matches their Carlton flow obligation of 2,828 and has the rest of their 32,172/d at Marshall (They would need to realign 30 mcf from Carlton to Marshall to effectuate the above, and I've checked with Doug Aschwege to make sure he would approve it.) that Steve's and my interpretation as described below is correct.  Basically the question is whether the Carlton flow obligation is only the Tariff stated volume (ie., no fuel imputed) and that the remainder of the MDQ plus fuel on the whole 35,000/d will flow as primary firm receipts at Marshall.  Thanks for your help!

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillips, Steve (EKT) [mailto:Steve.Phillips@entergykoch.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Stevens, Bob
Subject: Receipt Points

Bob,

Per our conversations earlier this month,  My contract 20510 needs to have
only 2828 mmbtu at Carlton and 32172 at Marshall.  All of the fuel for the
transport needs to be taken from Marshall.  Currently, this contract has
2858 at Carlton.  This is 30 above my obligation.  After this change is
made, it is my expectation that under no circumstances will my volume at
Carlton be curtailed below a receipt volume of 32568 at Marshall.   A
combination of 2828 plus 32568 gives me a delivered volume of 35000.  That
is my firm entitlement and curtailments below that are unacceptable as long
as my nominations are primary FT.

Please contact me at 713-544-4017 if more clarification is needed.

Thank you.

Steve Phillips


Sorry you can't make it.  We'll miss ya!

What have you been up to lately?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruscitti, Kevin [mailto:Kevin.Ruscitti@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:02 AM
To: smitter@smitter.com
Subject: RE: Anderson '96 Reunion - 4 weeks away!

Steve,

Hope everything is going well.  Unfortunately I won't be able to attend
the reunion.  Hope you have a great time.  Talk to you soon.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Smith [mailto:smitter@smitter.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Steve Smith (E-mail); Pete Rose (E-mail); Lynne Bartron (E-mail);
'Melissa Salazar (E-mail)'
Subject: Anderson '96 Reunion - 4 weeks away!

Dear Class of 1996,

**Note:  Response to this email requested, thanks!

Well, our much anticipated 5-year Reunion is less than a month away!
The
planning committe is working hard on the events, and we are trying to
firm
up the list of attendees.  We got a GREAT response to the last email,
thanks
for taking the time to let us know your status.  If you haven't
responded
yet, please do so just so we can adequately reserve space.

Just to remind some of you, the event will take place on: *** November
2-4th
*** in Los Angeles, CA!   The rough schedule of events is shown below.
In a
subsequent email today or tomorrow we will provide some details about
hotel
accommodations.  You will also be receiving an information packet from
the
Alumni Office in a mailing that should be out next week.

If you are planning to fly I've heard there are some great deals on
Southwest and United among others (<$100 from SF).  Anderson Alums also
get
a 10% on Southwest (see below)

If you would like to respond to this email regarding your status, please
use
this form:

1) Status of your email account
	A)  Got this info - email address is correct
	B)  Got this info - but would prefer to use another address next
time
	C)  I did not get this info (not sure how you would answer this,
but...)

Note:  You may have received this note twice - it was sent to all
members of
the Class of 1996 currently registered in the Alumni Database, as well
as to
the Class of 1996 Email List (which is opt-in).

2) Plans for attending the Reunion Weekend
	A)  Will definitely be Attending
	B)  Will make a brief appearance (1 or 2 events)
	C)  Still Deciding
	D)  Will not be Attending (but wish I could)

3) Comments/Suggestions - Any thoughts on how to make this a GREAT
reunion?

As mentioned previously, its been a rough year for many of us and it
would
be great to end the year with some fun and good times!  I can tell you
from
what we've been hearing, and from the number of responses received, that
we
are going to have an awesome turnout for the events, so you don't want
to
miss out!!!   So get your tickets, review your facebook (so who was that
Doug Dahl character anyways), dust off the old Anderson attire and let's
party!!

Sincerely,
Steve Smith
On behalf of Pete, Lynne, Melissa and many, many Reunion Organizers

Southwest Airlines Partners with Anderson Alums!
-------------------------------------------------

- Save 10% off lowest priced fares all Anderson Alumni returning to
campus
for Alumni Weekend.
- Flights must be booked into LAX, Burbank, Ontario or John Wayne
airports.
- Call 800/433-5368 and reference Anderson's Group ID #R9216
- For flight schedules, visit http://www.southwest.com

OVERVIEW of CLASS OF 1996 EVENTS
--------------------------------------

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2

 **	5:30 p.m.	Reunion Beer Bust: Wine and Beer Tasting
			- Location: Anderson Courtyard
	   		- All reunion classes will be there
			- A fun first chance to catch up!  Just like old
times!
			- Contact: Pete Rose; rosep@towers.com
				or Steve Smith; smitter@smitter.com for
details

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 3

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:30 p.m.	Class of 1996 Barbecue / Picnic
			- Location: Will Rogers State Park
			- BBQ / Party / Volleyball
			- The Grass, the Food/Drinks, the Sun & Fun
			- Contact: Danielle (Romano) Schreiber;
schreiberd@earthlink.net

	Note:  This event was moved from the Beach to reduce the driving
distances,
and provide 	better logistics, as well as tables, BBQ pits, even
playgrounds
for some of you w/ kids

	EVENING
 **	7:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Reunion Dinner
			- Location:  The Gate (tentative)
			- Dinner and Dancing in Hollywood (remember
O-Week?)!
			- This events is Adults only (sorry, no kids)
			- Contact:  Gina (Wilson) Calderon;
Gina_Calderon@citysearch.com
				or Kim Moore; kmoore@k-swiss.com for
details

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 4

	MORNING
 **	10:00 a.m.	Class of 1996 Golf Tourney
			- Location:  Camarillo Springs Golf Course
			- Currently 20 "big hitters" signed up, room for
a few more
			- Event with competition and prizes
			- Contact:  Mike Solomon; mcsolomon@hotmail.com
for details

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Getty Museum Tour
			- Location:  The Getty Museum
			- If you haven't marveled at the wonder, its
time
			- Contact:  Rumor has it Jean Miao will give us
a tour!!

FULL REUNION WEEKEND SCHEDULE
-----------------------------

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2

	MORNING
	7:30 a.m.	Continental Breakfast
	8:15 a.m.	Plenary Session: "Leadership"
	10:00 a.m.	Break
	10:30 a.m.	Session I
	12:00 noon	Luncheon and Keynote Address:
				"Leadership in Action: Charting a new
Course"

	AFTERNOON
	1:30 p.m.	Session II
	3:00 p.m.	Break
	3:30 p.m.	The Exchange
	4:30 p.m.	Guided Tours of The Anderson School

	EVENING
 **	5:30 p.m.	Reunion Beer Bust: Wine and Beer Tasting
			- Location: Anderson Courtyard
	   		- All reunion classes will be there
			- A fun first chance to catch up!  Just like old
times!
			- Contact: Pete Rose; rosep@towers.com
				or Steve Smith; smitter@smitter.com for
details

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 3

	MORNING
	8:30 a.m.	Networking Breakfast
	9:15 a.m.	Welcoming Remarks
	9:30 a.m.	Plenary Session I - "Best Practices and Board
Governance"
	11:00 a.m.	Plenary Session II - "The National Business
Forecast"

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:30 p.m.	Class of 1996 Barbecue / Picnic
			- Location: Will Rogers State Park
			- BBQ / Party / Volleyball
			- The Grass, the Food/Drinks, the Sun & Fun
			- Contact: Danielle (Romano) Schreiber;
schreiberd@earthlink.net
	2:30 p.m.	Program concludes
	5:00 p.m.	Dean's Thank You Reception to Reunion Committee
Leaders

	EVENING
 **	7:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Reunion Dinner
			- Location:  The Gate (tentative)
			- Dinner and Dancing in Hollywood (remember
O-Week?)!
			- This events is Adults only (sorry, no kids)
			- Contact:  Gina (Wilson) Calderon;
Gina_Calderon@citysearch.com
				or Kim Moore; kmoore@k-swiss.com for
details

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 4

	MORNING
 **	10:00 a.m.	Class of 1996 Golf Tourney
			- Location:  Camarillo Springs Golf Course
			- Currently 20 "big hitters" signed up, room for
a few more
			- Event with competition and prizes
			- Contact:  Mike Solomon; mcsolomon@hotmail.com
for details

	AFTERNOON
 **	12:00 p.m.	Class of 1996 Getty Museum Tour
			- Location:  The Getty Museum
			- If you haven't marveled at the wonder, its
time
			- Contact:  Rumor has it Jean Miao will give us
a tour!!
	Various 	Reunion Activities / Free Time !!

------------------>
Steve Smith
mailto:smitter@smitter.com

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Do you want to go over to the game in two weeks?  I got four tickets - 2 for
your brother and 1 for me.  Ashley is staying home.  Let me know.
PL


Hi Vince,

 I have communicated the following requirements to Clayton.  Please give me
your thoughts on  additions/modifications.

For EOL Model,

1.  Working program, with easily usable interface

2.  User docs, for new user to easily start using system
      plus includes details about program structure and modules

3.  Reports for tabulation of data by commodity, counterparty, period, etc.
Should be easy to run daily.

4.  Time series description, including graphs, plus some time series analysis
(say, relationship of volume to time of day, day of week)

5.  Cross commodity trading relationships (identify potential arbitrage)

For Gas Model,

1.  Calibrate model

2.  User docs, with complete description of data


She's out no bitch

"Andrew Thomas" <athomas1@dellnet.com> on 08/28/2000 01:42:25 PM
To: <John.Arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re:

you know i have a picture of you blown up on my wall, don't you?  So when
does the fortune story come out?  (lemme guess, sep 11?)

----- Original Message -----
From: <John.Arnold@enron.com>
To: <athomas1@dellnet.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 12:49 PM
Subject: Re:

You didnt realize I was such a fucking bigshot did ya?  Check out the Sep
11 Fortune page 182 for more of the mojo.

"Andrew Thomas" <athomas1@dellnet.com> on 08/25/2000 02:02:59 PM

To:   <Matthew.Arnold@enron.com>, <john.arnold@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

"You can't turn away for a minute or you get picked  off." Damn!! I'm
minding my own business sitting on the dooker  reading Time, and sure
enough i get picked off! Sheeeeeeeeeet.   Friggin celebrities. Can I have
your autograph? :)

Nice work, dood.

Fellas, I believe the new job is almost here--i was  told yesterday that I
got the job and am just waiting for the phone offer  (supposed to happen
this afternoon). If it comes through, I'll be covering  the
internet--should be pretty solid. Who knows, if EnronOnline gets spun  off
(obv, not gonna happen) I might even get to cover it... what a  mock!
Anyway, thought I'd drop you two a line. Hope things are going  well...

can't wait for football... lemme know when  you boys come back out here...

Andy


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT on 06/12/2000 02:17
PM ---------------------------

From:  Matt Motsinger
    06/12/2000 02:14 PM

To: Kimberly Hillis/HOU/ECT@ect, David Forster/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sheri
Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Lavorato Report 06-09-00

Here are the average EOL and NON-EOL transactions for North American Gas by
Region as of June 9, 2000 .

Matt
EnronOnline


Jeff,

Sorry, I didn't realize we were attacking this one early over the holiday,
and I was out of town
until this afternoon. My conclusions differed from the attached write up on a
few points, but I am
not certain my thinking is the correct way. Here goes:

On the expropriation:

In the write up we say "We agree with the executive that Global should report
the expropriation
contingency in its 1994 report since both conditions included in FASB #5 were
met:  1) sufficient
information to assess that a loss is probable and 2) the loss could be
reasonably estimated.
Matuto took power in 1994 and it was known that he would nationalize major
industries.  "

The book says "The imminence of an expropriation may be indicated by a public
or private
declaration of intent by a government to expropriate assess of the enterprise
or actual
expropriation of assets of other enterpises." I would argue that Matuto was
not the government and
therefore unable to enforce these assertions when he was running for office.
It also says FASB 5
requires the two accrual criteria to be met.

As I understand it, the government took over sometime last year and
nationalization of resources
was part of their platform. However, the announcement occured in mid-Feb 1995
that the government
intends to nationalize the mining industry. Also, the taking over of the
telephone company took
place in January. Since both of these events happened in 1995, I would think
they should not accrue
in 1994 because the asset was not actually impaired in 1994, in fact the
asset was fully functional
and operational for the entire financial reporting period. I believe they
should disclose that the
possibility of expropriation exists in 1994, but I think they should not
accrue..

I disagree that the company should cease use of the patent infringing
technology, I believe that
companies frequently make conscious business decisions to infringe upon
patents. Since I agree that
an accrual is not in order, perhaps a general disclosure regarding patent
litigation should be
made.

The book states that "If there are several aspects of litigation, each of
which gives rise to a
possible claim, then the accrual criteria should be applied to each possible
claim...."

Thus I think we should break up the product liability suit into pieces.
They've agreed to pay 1M
for lost rentals. This should clearly be accrued, assuming it hasn't been
paid yet. The tenants
claims are expected to be settled for 1M, this too should be accrued. The
surrounding property
claims are not estimable, and therefore should be handled with a disclosure.

Christine

Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com wrote:

> OK folks, here it is.  Sorry for the delay, but those pesky questions ended
> up being more detailed than I anticipated.  Please take a quick look and
> let me know if there are any comments---more ambiguities than usual in this
> one.  I'll await comments and finalize this evening.
>
> Jimmie/Dylan--my apologies, but last Wednesday evening, I found out that I
> have to be in LA for a meeting tomorrow.  If I make it to class at all
> tomorrow, I won't get there until after the break.  Could one of you print
> out the case and bring it to class?  If not, don' t sweat it, I'll email
> him an electronic and turn in a hard copy to him on Tuesday. Sorry for any
> hassle.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> (See attached file: Case 26-1 Global Industries.doc)
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                              Name: Case 26-1 Global
Industries.doc
>    Case 26-1 Global Industries.doc           Type: Microsoft Word Document
(application/msword)
>                                          Encoding: base64
>                                   Download Status: Not downloaded with
message

 - christine.piesco.vcf


what is your address??


The only agreement I have right now for RBC protects us and is transaction
specific.

Kay C. Young
Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
713-853-6794 Phone
713-646-3393 Fax
kay.young@enron.com

	Tana Jones
	05/07/2001 11:28 AM

		 To: Kay Young/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDA for RBC

Any conflicts?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/07/2001 11:28 AM -----

	David Forster/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/07/2001 11:18 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: NDA for RBC

Tana,

As discussed, I would appreciate it if you could send a bilateral NDA out for
RBC later today. We will be discussing the possibility of Royal Bank posting
FX products on EnronOnline.

Recipient:

Simon Carling
email: simon.carling@rbcds.com
fax: 416 842 4327

Royal Bank of Canada
P.O. Box 50
Royal Bank Plaza
South Tower
2nd Floor, 200 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
M5J 2W7

Thanks,

Dave


Actually, the money that is in Clarica is part pension and part rrsp,
     however the pension money, (that should cause it to be locked in) is
     actually not locked in. I guess that it was not vested. As a result of
     this, I am looking to transfer it all the one rrsp.
     Let me know if you or Jacy have questions.
     Rob

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Re[4]: Pension Rollover
Author:  "Tycholiz  Barry" <Barry.Tycholiz@ENRON.com> at Internet-Mail
Date:    8/23/2001 10:07 AM

Jacy called me last night and I think will get in touch with you
today... Is the money that I have with you locked in or part of a RRSP
or is this just going to be self directed income.

BT

PS more e-mails in 1 day than in a lifetime.... wow !!

-----Original Message-----
From: rob_mcdill_at_love-&-persson@ricemail.ricefinancial.com
[mailto:rob_mcdill_at_love-&-persson@ricemail.ricefinancial.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Re[4]: Pension Rollover

     OK, got it.
     Rob

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Pension Rollover
Author:  "Tycholiz  Barry" <Barry.Tycholiz@ENRON.com> at Internet-Mail
Date:    8/22/2001 1:52 PM

I want to leave those funds with Jacy....

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: rob_mcdill_at_love-&-persson@ricemail.ricefinancial.com
[mailto:rob_mcdill_at_love-&-persson@ricemail.ricefinancial.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Re[2]: Pension Rollover

     Barry: I will send a note to Jacy. Also the funds I think we will
go
     into are going to be more heavily weighted towards stocks, but will

     have some bonds as well, that what makes them a balanced fund.
Also,
     do want us to manage the money Jacy has, or do you want to leave it

     with him? No problem either way, just let me know.
     Rob

______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: RE: Pension Rollover
Author:  "Tycholiz  Barry" <Barry.Tycholiz@ENRON.com> at Internet-Mail
Date:    8/22/2001 10:27 AM

I wasn't worried for a second.

I would like to have these funds in a portfolio that has a better
performance than money markets. I already have a decent amount of money
( 60K) in the Rice portfolio thru andrew agencies in Virden. You may
want to look at exactly what that is, contact Jacy Whyte at Andrew
Agencies... he will get you the details for Kim and I.

Was there a particular index fund you had in mind? What do you mean by
balanced ? Once we put it there I don't plan on touching or managing
this until I return to Canada.

Thanks, talk to you soon.

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: rob_mcdill_at_love-&-persson@ricemail.ricefinancial.com
[mailto:rob_mcdill_at_love-&-persson@ricemail.ricefinancial.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:45 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: Pension Rollover

     Barry:

     You probably thought I had forgotten about you! I had not. I wanted
to
     iron out some areas of concern from my end here. As you know, I am
not
     supposed to do an investment for you while you are a resident of
the
     US. I have discovered that if we put the money into an account and
not
     make moves on it until you move back to Canada, then we can do it
if I
     use a Canadian address. I was advised to put the money into a
balanced
     fund and leave it there for now. My thoughts are to move it to a
     couple of funds in a self administered account and NOT make any
moves
     with it.

     Please review this note, and let me know what you think. If all is
ok
     I will mail you the forms to sign (which you signed here), and we
will
     get this moving.

     Hope all is well with you down there.

     Regards
     Rob

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate

and may
contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended
recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is
strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive for
the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at
enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the
message.
This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer

(or an
acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable
contract
between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended
recipient or any
other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a
contract by
estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Attached in Word format are the draft IEP comments, due to be filed on the
22nd, regarding the FERC Staff Report on market monitoring and market power
mitigation.  This is my suggested approach, which is obviously subject to
change per our discussion during the call tomorrow.

I would like to highlight that the draft characterizes the approach as a
"circuit breaker" during periods of highest demand and suggests that this is
distinct from notions of market power abuse.  Other entities are arguing that
during the highest demand, when it exceeds available supplies, all suppliers
have and are "exercising" (as distinct from abusing?) market power.  The
draft attempts to highlight the current regional supply context characterized
by the drought as a rationale for the "emergency circuit breaker."

As mentioned in Katie Kaplan's email this morning, if your company has a
draft of comments, we would appreciate an opportunity to look at them to
avoid substantive conflicts.

I trust this is the right distribution list but I was not able to use the
list from this morning's email because of computer problems at my end.  ABB

--
Andrew Brown
Sacramento, CA
abb@eslawfirm.com

 - DRAFT_010318_el00-95-012_IEP_Cmts_Staff_Rpt.doc


Click on the Weekly Report for week ending December 8, 2000.

Weekly Report


Here is the revised chart.  Gracias

 <<302P01!.DOC>>

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 302P01!.DOC


Kay--Would you like us to get you signature pages (for the GE and ABB
breakout contracts) on behalf of ENA from here, or is it more efficient or
uniform if you get a signature there before getting them to GE and ABB?
Sheila needs the fully executed agreements for TurboPark, so let me know.

Kay Mann@ENRON
01/11/2001 06:15 PM
To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan Larsen/PDX/ECT@ECT, Dale
Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: pthompson@akllp.com

Subject: GE override letter

Attached is the GE override letter to accompany the facility agreements.

I'm trying to figure out the ABB form.

Kay


Your message

  Subject:

was not delivered to:

  frmen1@epelectric.com

because:

  User frmen1 (frmen1@epelectric.com) not listed in public Name & Address Book

 - C.DTF
Received: from postmaster.enron.com ([192.152.140.9])          by
mail.epelectric.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.5)          with SMTP id
2001022720405190:17037 ;          Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:40:51 -0700
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id DAA17412 for
<frmen1@epelectric.com>; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 03:40:50 GMT
From: Mark.Guzman@enron.com
Received: from nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.38]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/corp-1.05) with ESMTP id f1S3ena26581 for
<frmen1@epelectric.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:40:50 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tac1c0a2651fe415270@nahou-msmsw02px.corp.enron.com> for
<frmen1@epelectric.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 21:40:44 -0600
To: frmen1@epelectric.com
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:32:45 -0800
Message-ID: <OF751687EE.756F0753-ON88256A01.00135721@enron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.6 |December
14, 2000) at 02/27/2001 09:38:07 PM, Itemize by SMTP Server on
MAIL/EPEC(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 02/27/2001 08:41:01 PM,
Serialize by Router on MAIL/EPEC(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
02/27/2001 08:41:04 PM, Itemize by SMTP Server on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release
5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 02/27/2001 09:38:43 PM, Serialize by Router on
ECTHOU-LNHUB1/ECT(Release 5.0.1 (Intl)|16 July 1999) at 02/27/2001 09:41:22 PM
X-Notes-Item: , CN=ENE-MTA01/O=Enron, CN=ENE-NS03/O=Enron; type=501;
flags=44; name=$UpdatedBy
X-Notes-Item: CN=ENE-MTA01/O=Enron, CN=ENE-MTA01/O=Enron,
CN=ENE-NS03/O=Enron; type=501; flags=0; name=RouteServers
X-Notes-Item: 27-Feb-2001 21:38:43 CST/27-Feb-2001 21:38:43 CST
=?us-ascii?q?=2C_?= =?us-ascii?q?27-Feb-2001?= 21:38:43 CST/27-Feb-2001
21:38:43 CST =?us-ascii?q?=2C_?= =?us-ascii?q?27-Feb-2001?= 21:41:22
CST/27-Feb-2001 21:41:23 CST; type=401; flags=0; name=RouteTimes
X-Notes-Item: AD171936:F381F81C-86256A01:001405E9; type=4; name=$Orig
X-Notes-Item: 0; name=$MsgTrackFlags
X-Notes-Item: 44; type=300; name=$Hops
X-Notes-Item: ENRON; name=FromDomain
X-Notes-Item: Memo; name=Form
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=88256A01001357218f9e8a93df938690918c88256A0100135721"
Content-Disposition: inline

(See attached file: EPE_FEB_2001.xls)

Click on the tab for the 28th
 - EPE_FEB_2001.xls


ps.   your stock is getting WHACKED again today!!!!!!!

******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************


Steve:

Here is Part II of the Staff report (covering the rest of the country).  We
are downloading part I of the report (on California) and will send it to you
in a couple of minutes.

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 10:30 AM -----

	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
	11/08/2000 09:13 AM

		 To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<Mary.Hain@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Part II of FERC Staff Report

Attached is the second part of the FERC staff report.  It can also be found
on the FERC web site, www.ferc.fed.us.

Jacqueline Gallagher
Research/Policy Assistant
Electric Power Supply Association
1401 H Street, NW
Suite 760
Washington, DC  20005
202.789.7200
202.789.7201
jgallagher@epsa.org

 - ercot.PDF
----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 11/08/2000 10:31 AM -----

	"Jackie Gallagher" <JGallagher@epsa.org>
	11/08/2000 09:20 AM

		 To: <bhawkin@enron.com>, <bmerola@enron.com>, <christi.l.nicolay@enron.com>,
<janelle.scheuer@enron.com>, <jeff_brown@enron.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<Mary.Hain@enron.com>, <sarah.novosel@enron.com>, <tom.hoatson@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Part II of FERC Staff Report

Attached is the entire Part II of the FERC staff report on bulk power
markets.  The report can also be found on the FERC web site, at
www.ferc.fed.us.

Jacqueline Gallagher
Research/Policy Assistant
Electric Power Supply Association
1401 H Street, NW
Suite 760
Washington, DC  20005
202.789.7200
202.789.7201
jgallagher@epsa.org

 - southeast.pdf
 - midwest.pdf
 - northeast.pdf
 - reportcover.pdf
 - ercot.PDF


Enron gave $50k to the Rep party at Brulte and Cox's request.  If Enron
is participating, please let us know.  Also, this is a reminder that
Scott will be back in early Nov. and I will return Nov. 12th.  Behave
yourselves.  Fondly,  Hedy

--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <Scott.Sadler@reliant.com>
To: theo.pahos@mirant.com, kelly@hnks.com, greg.blue@dynegy.com, rachel.king@elpaso.com, john.g.larrea@williams.com, hgovenar@govadv.com, Mark Nobili <mnobili@cal-lobby.com>, clondon@rosekindel.com
Date: Tuesday, October 9, 2001 6:49:42 GMT
Subject:

This time with the attachment.

SS

(See attached file: letbetterinvite.doc)

----- Forwarded by Scott A Sadler/ADM/HouInd on 10/08/2001 11:40 PM -----

                    Scott A
                    Sadler               To:     theo.pahos@mirant.com, kelly@hnks.com, greg.blue@dynegy.com,
                                         rachel.king@elpaso.com, john.g.larrea@williams.com, hgovenar@govadv.com,
                    10/09/2001           Mark Nobili <mnobili@cal-lobby.com>, clondon@rosekindel.com
                    01:42 PM             cc:
                                         Subject:     Oct. 29 Lunch

Theo, Hedy, Anne, Greg, John, Rachel, Mark, Carl

Attached is an invitation letter from Reliant's CEO Steve Letbetter to the
CEO and President's of your company/energy client.

Jim Brulte and Dave Cox asked Reliant to host a lunch for them with energy
industry executives in Houston and we will be doing do on October 29th.
Jim and Dave will be making follow up calls to the principals.  I wanted
you each to know this was happening and see the invitation.  The financial
commitment is attached to attending the lunch but the pitch will be made to
support the Senate/Assembly Leadership account at the CA Republican Party.

This invitation is only going to energy industry executives, although there
is a possibility a few other Texas companies might be included.

Expect a call from Jeff Miller encouraging you to support attending when
asked by your client/company.

Hope to see you in Houston on the 29th.

Sadler


Thanks.  I downloaded a lot of stuff from the HBS site including cases,
etc.  Looking forward to working with you.

At 03:15 PM 7/31/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>John,
>
>My new E-mail address is   vkamins@enron.com.
>
>I am compiling the  information for you. I should be able to send it in a few
>days.
>
>Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu> on 07/28/2000 02:41:42 PM
>
>To:   Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
>cc:
>Subject:  Reminder
>
>
>
>Stinson (and Vince--don't think your e-mail address is correct)
>
>This is just a reminder about the "care package" of Enron cases and
>materials that you guys were going to send to me.
>
>Stinson, please convey this request on to Vince because I think the e-mail
>address I have is an old one.
>
>Thanks and have a great weekend.
>
>john
>John D. Martin
>Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
>Finance Department
>Baylor University
>PO Box 98004
>Waco, TX 76798
>254-710-4473 (Office)
>254-710-1092 (Fax)
>J_Martin@Baylor.edu
>web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html
>
>
>
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


IntercontinentalExchange
                                                                                Firm Power Price Bulletin
                                                                                For Power Delivered on Wednesday, December  12, 2001
                                                                                (Trade Date of Tuesday, December  11, 2001)
Click here to access index history


To whom it may concern: I need the Microsoft outlook web access icon downloaded to my computer

	thanks michael.yowman@enron.com


Attached is the form of brief for PGT.

----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 03:32 PM -----

	Shari Stack
	01/10/2001 11:46 AM

		 To: Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan
J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PGE due diligence effort (2)

In case it is helpful as a go-by, attached is the memo I wrote regarding the
master agreements for physical power.

Kind regards,

Shari


Becky-  If Burlington and Amoco have the right to turn back east end
transport-ENA would like to be included in that group regarding turning back
our Havasou transport.


that's why we play the game


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=12/14/2001>, published as of 12/14/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Jeff & Alice:
I do not think I forwarded this to you earlier. I hope all is well. I'm
still leasing Bentley but, the Saturday AM classes have been completely
cancelled. I haven't yet determined another option.

I hope to see you at Kari's.
Madeleine

-----Original Message-----
From: Madeleine Todd
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:16 PM
To: Jeff Walker (E-mail); Jeff Walker (E-mail 2); Pippa Murray (E-mail);
Pippa Murray (E-mail 2); Aimee Ransel (E-mail); Nancy Duval (E-mail);
Edith & Helmut Marsiske (E-mail); Patrice C Scatena (E-mail); Kari Ontko
(E-mail); Lori Hom (E-mail); Nora McGee (E-mail); Michael Spear
(E-mail); Michael Spear (E-mail 2); Laura Newman-Sciarrino (E-mail);
Elise Geske (E-mail); 'chedleston@home.com'; Lari Shea (E-mail); Toria
Morrison (E-mail); Amy Gustafson (E-mail); Rob Levy (E-mail)
Subject: Save the Golden Gate Park Stables.html

I thought you might like to know about this web site (below) built to
help save the stables in Golden Gate Park. Please visit the site and do
what you can to help. The site enables easy access to the mayor and the
supervisors.

It would be great if stables received an infusion of capital and became
a first class facility, baring this it would be great to at least keep
horses in the park to keep riding accessible for children in the city.

Please also spread the word that there are many older/beginning horses
looking for peaceful homes. Please let me know if I should contact any
stables directly to determine their interest in adopting these horses.
Thank you,
Madeleine
PS Lori and Kari the barn is eternally grateful for you taking Hobbs,
Yorkie and Oscar.

http://www.savethestables.com/
 <<Save the Golden Gate Park Stables.html>>
 - Save the Golden Gate Park Stables.html


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT

Matt,

Subject to the views of Jim Studdert and David Best, given that we already
put underwriters on notice that there was contamination, and given that we
have worked closely with Minton's, underwriters' representatives, I would
assume that we are under no time pressure to give underwriters a  total
quantum before the joint survey  takes place; in fact, it looks like the
final determination of ECT's total quantum of damages may be impacted by the
results of the joint survey (although I would not necessarily want to say
that to underwriters at this point).

My preliminary review of the policy reflects no language in the policy which
would require ECT to immediately provide a total quantum. The policy
specifically requires, under "INSTRUCTIONS IN CASE OF LOSS", that ECT file a
claim in writing against the "delivering carrier holding him responsible as
soon as loss or damage is discovered even though the full exent thereof is
not apparent; details can be furnished later.  Such action will not prejudice
your insurance claim."  Let me know if you would like a copy of the pertinent
policy; I have already sent a copy to David.

I do have some strategy questions for David about the disposition of the
cargo currently in Thailand and will give him a call tomorrow morning at 9:00
a.m. Houston time to discuss.  Although I know that is quite late for you,
you are more than welcome to participate (just e-mail me a telephone number
at which you can be reached, or give me a call at that time).

   Regards,
   Britt

	Matthias Lee@ECT
	08/08/2000 06:52 AM

		 To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M
Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

Britt

With reference to Cliff Bennett's note, do you know whether our cargo
underwriters require notice of the amount of our potential claim? As you
know, previous figures were very rough estimates and only considered the
rejected cargo and associated freight and demurrage. We have not computed the
costs of the Thai cargo loss (if any) and the various testing and analyses
costs.

Regards
Matt

Matthias Lee
08/08/2000 06:41 PM
To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Angeline
Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT, david.best@clyde.co.uk,
ngregson@wfw.com

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

PRIVILEGED; CONFIDENTIAL; ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT

FYI - Please see below Cliff Bennett's recommendations for joint testing.

I spoke briefly with Rich Slovenski regarding the Elang presently stored in
Thailand. He confirms that the intention was to deliver it to First Gas some
time end August/early September premised on delivery and acceptance of the
first Elang cargo and subject to First Gas's consumption.

Cargo still not sold. Rich is not immediately able to calculate loss on the
cargo basis First Gas Price vs resale price, but will be giving it
somethought to arrive at an estimate.

The test results we have to date of the Thai cargo are somewhat inconclusive,
but indicate Lead and Vanadium may be off spec, but principal reason for not
delivering to First Gas is uncertainty of D3605 as a test method.

Summary of Thailand samples test results:

6 July 2000 - Ship Composite sample taken before discharge in Thailand was
tested by SGS Thailand for Carbon Residue 10% and Filterable Dirt. Filterable
Dirt was off spec at 6.3; Carbon Residue 10% was off spec at 1.5. SGS
Thailand suggested that the  Carbon Residue 10% result was questionable and
recommended retesting. There were however, no other ship composite samples
taken before discharge in Thailand. Shoretank samples tested by SGS Thailand
for Carbon Residue 10% and Filterable Dirt on the same date were on spec.

12 July 2000 -  Thailand shoretank samples brought to SGS Singapore tested on
spec except for Lead which tested off spec at 0.3 (T-961) and 0.2 (T-964).
"Ashing" test used for metals.

13 July  2000 - Thailnd shoretank samples brought to Caleb Brett Singapore
tested on spec, but note different test method used (D5184/5185).

14 July 2000 - Thailand shoretank samples re-tested for metals by SGS
Singapore:

Direct D3605
Vanadium off spec at 0.9 (T-964)
Lead off spec at 0.8 (T-961); 1 (T-964)
Vanadium + Lead off spec at 1.2 (T-961); 1.9 (T-964)

"Ashing"
Lead off spec at 0.3 (T-964)

Regards
Matt

---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 08/08/2000 06:01
PM ---------------------------

"clifford bennett" <minton@singnet.com.sg> on 08/08/2000 05:40:08 PM
To: "Matthias Lee" <Matthias.Lee@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

Matthias,

As per my e-mail dd. 3rd August to Eric, from cargo Interests viewpoint it
is usually best in these circumstances to keep as many analytical options
open as possible. Certainly sufficient to enable the best chance of
establishing the cause. To that end, I would recommend that you provide the
other Parties with the test methods (ASTM D-numbers) and state that these
tests will be applied to retain samples from each of:

1. Pacific Virgo before & after loading, Australia (all cargo)
2. Pacific Virgo before discharge, Thailand (Batangas-nominated tanks, if
samples available)
3. Pacific Virgo before discharge, Thailand (Thai-nominated tanks)
4. Pacific Virgo on arrival Batangas (the samples upon which First Gas based
their rejection)
5. Pacific Virgo prior departure from Batangas (including bottom samples)
6. Pacific Virgo prior discharge Korea (including bottom samples)
7. Pacific Virgo, any other samples that are available and that might
progress the investigation

Some testing may involve composites, some individual samples. This will to a
degree depend on the lab's ability to get any particulates into homogeneous
suspension and keep them there long enough to make a composite. If that
can't be done, it will have to be individuals.

Insofar as identifying the particulates, should this prove necessary, I
think we need to keep all options open. While it is always possible to
perform unilateral analysis should disagreements arise, better to keep the
Parties together if possible. But not at the expense of limiting the
analysis' ability to determine cause.

I apologise if this all seems a bit woolly. But if you limit at the
beginning the potential extent of testing that might be necessary, it can
all prove meaningless.

I appreciate that testing cost plays a role in all of this. It is in
no-one's interest to do testing just for the sake of it and, as far as I am
concerned, that is not on my agenda nor, I am sure, is it on Enron's. But we
must be realistic. Depending upon the size of your potential claim (have
Underwriters been put on notice yet, by the way?), it might be worth
spending several $K to get to the root of the matter, rather than less to
learn nothing.

Best regards.

Cliff Bennett
Minton, Treharne & Davies (S) Pte. Ltd.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Lee <Matthias.Lee@enron.com>
To: minton@singnet.com.sg <minton@singnet.com.sg>
Cc: Eric Tan <Eric.Tan@enron.com>; Angeline Poon <Angeline.Poon@enron.com>;
ngregson@wfw.com <ngregson@wfw.com>
Date: Monday, August 07, 2000 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing

>
>
>Dear Cliff
>
>Would you be able to draw up a test programme based on your recommendations
>below with the view to circulate it to all parties (including SGS) for
their
>agreement prior to joint testing? I think such a pre-agreed programme would
be
>most useful and would avoid any dispute on testing procedure subsequently.
>
>Eric expects all the samples to arrive in Singapore within the next couple
of
>days and send out the notice to all parties to attend joint testing
sometime
>between 16 - 18 August.
>
>Thanks and best regards
>Matt Lee
>
>
>---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Tan/SIN/ECT on 03/08/2000 16:49
>---------------------------
>
>
>"clifford bennett" <minton@singnet.com.sg> on 03/08/2000 12:22:21
>
>To:   "Eric Tan" <Eric.Tan@enron.com>
>cc:
>Subject:  Re: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing
>
>
>Eric,
>
>My recommendations concerning joint testing are as follows:
>
>1. Samples
>
>Ideally, at least one set of sealed (integrity) , traceable (chain of
>custody), samples from each stage of the shipment should be available at
the
>joint testing. The samples will be checked against the appropriate sampling
>records prior to testing.
>
>If possible, I think we should have samples from:
>
>    Loading Australia, one set Pacific Virgo's tanks after loading
>
>    Discharge Thailand, one set pre-discharge vessel's tanks - Thai parcel
>(if the other - Batangas - tanks were sampled at this time, these samples
>should be included)
>
>    Batangas, one set vessel's tanks on arrival, plus one set vessel's
tanks
>from the most recent sampling before the vessel departed Batangas (to
>include "dead" bottom samples)
>
>    Korea, one set pre-discharge vessel's tanks on arrival, including any
>"dead" bottom samples
>
>Depending on exactly what samples are available, testing may encompass both
>composites and, in some cases, individual tank samples (where particulates
>are involved, the composition of individual tank samples even in a
>laboratory can destroy the representivity of a sample. This, by the way, is
>the reason for my concerns over sample decanting in Philippines - evidence
>can be lost.).
>
>2. Testing
>
>I would suggest the laboratory of SGS Singapore because that is where the
>samples are being collated. Provided the testing can be done to the
>appropriate standard and the methods are available, any laboratory would
do.
>As advised previously, the laboratory tests and the witnesses are there to
>ensure, among other things, that all is above board.
>
>2.1 Test schedule
>
>As advised previously, the basic methods I would recommend are:
>
>Carbon residue, ASTM D524
>Carbon residue, 10 % bottoms, ASTM D524
>Ash, ASTM D482
>BS&W, ASTM D1796
>V, Na, K, Ca, Pb, ASTM D3605
>"Filterable dirt", ASTM D5452
>
>Please note that for "filterable dirt", ASTM D2276 is not applicable as it
>is designed for in-situ line samples. ASTM D5452 is a laboratory method
that
>is essentially equivalent. Both methods are intended for particulates in
>aviation fuels. Anyway, SGS Singapore can run ASTM D5452.
>
>
>The above suite of tests should be run on all selected samples (it will
>almost certainly not be necessary to test all available samples) in
>duplicate. Duplicates are necessary because "stand-alone" results are
always
>open to doubt. In any event, duplicates are often a requirement of the test
>method and any reputable laboratory will run duplicates as a matter of
>course. Duplicate samples should not mean twice the price!
>
>3. Investigative testing
>
>This is more difficult to predict in terms of exactly what will be
>necessary. To a degree, it will be guided by what is found in the above
>"spec." testing. My initial recommendation would be to check the solubility
>of the particulates, particularly in aromatic solvent (to check if organic)
>and possibly in acid (to check if inorganic).
>
>If, as has so far been reported, the particulates are not aromatic solvent
>soluble and because they do not appear to contribute to the ash content of
>the fuel, a "best guess" might be that they are carbon particles. However,
>we need to keep an open mind on this.
>
>We might need to think about microscopy - visible or electron - on the
>particles. Possibly also look at elemental analysis of the particles by
e.g.
>energy dispersive X-ray analysis.
>
>I will give some further thought to what might be required by way of
>investigative analysis and revert. At this stage, I suggest that all
options
>on the investigative side are kept open. Owners/P&I might not agree, but
>realistically we cannot predict what we will find or what might need to be
>done until we start getting some spec. test results and some simple
particle
>solubilities done.
>
>I trust this helps. Please keep me advised regarding samples/joint test
>matters.
>
>Best regards.
>
>Cliff Bennett
>Minton, Treharne & Davies (S) Pte. Ltd.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Tan <Eric.Tan@enron.com>
>To: Clifford Bennett <minton@singnet.com.sg>
>Cc: Richard Slovenski <Richard.Slovenski@enron.com>; Matthias Lee
><Matthias.Lee@enron.com>; Angeline Poon <Angeline.Poon@enron.com>; Victor
>Santos <Victor.Santos@enron.com>; John Chismar <John.Chismar@enron.com>;
>Carol Chew <Carol.Chew@enron.com>; ngregson@wfw.com <ngregson@wfw.com>;
>Michael J Gasper <Michael.J.Gasper@enron.com>; John H Harrison
><John.H.Harrison@enron.com>; James P Studdert <James.P.Studdert@enron.com>;
>Alan Aronowitz <Alan.Aronowitz@enron.com>; Michael Philips
><Michael.Philips@enron.com>; Michael A Robison
><Michael.A.Robison@enron.com>; Harry M Collins <Harry.M.Collins@enron.com>;
>Graham Cane <Graham.Cane@enron.com>; Wietze Dingeldein
><Wietze.Dingeldein@enron.com>; Britt Davis <Britt.Davis@enron.com>;
>David.best@clyde.co.uk <David.best@clyde.co.uk>; Paul Henking
><Paul.Henking@enron.com>
>Date: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 6:43 PM
>Subject: Pacific Virgo - Elang Crude - Samples for Testing
>
>
>>
>>
>>Cliff,
>>
>>Appreciate if you could provide a detail programme and methodology for the
>>testing of the samples so that we could take up with Owners and advise the
>>laboratory concerned.  (Appreciate you had given in your email of 25 July
>of
>>your suggested test methodology).
>>
>>Regards
>>Eric
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Thanks for following up on this, Melissa. I've forwarded your e-mail on to
Chris Foster and asked him to discuss the counterparty name with Bob Ellery,
his contact at Sierra Pacific Holding Co. I'll let you know which name we
need (or if we need one at all) as soon as I hear back from him.

Thanks again,
Kate
503-464-7486

Melissa Ann Murphy
04/11/2001 10:27 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New CTPY Request

Hello, Samuel Schott in Global Counterparty called this company and he was
told that they should be set up in our system as Sierra Pacific Industries,
Inc.  The contract has the long name on it so I am planning on asking Rhonda
Denton about this tomorrow when she comes in.  I am not sure if it will work
this way or not.  If you know anything else about this let me know.  Sierra
Pacific Industries, Inc. is in Enpower but I am not certain if we should use
that name.

I will let you know what Rhonda says tomorrow.
Thanks,
Melissa

   Kate Symes                04/09/2001 03:09 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: New CTPY Request

I just heard from Samuel (thanks for your message!) that I need to send
Rhonda new counterparty information in order to get their names added to the
system. I called Rhonda, but it turns out she's out of the office for the
first part of this week, and her voice mail referred me to Melissa. (That's a
short explanation of why I'm sending this info. to all of you.)

Anyway, following is the information connected with the new counterparty name
Chris Foster has requested:

Name: Sierra Pacific Holding Company, dba Sierra Pacific Industries
Address: PO Box 496028
    Redding, CA 96049
Or: 19759 Riverside Ave.
      Anderson, CA 96007
Phone: (530) 378-8179
Fax: (530) 378-8139
Contact: Director of Energy Resources - Robert Ellery

I also have a copy of the Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement if you'd
like me to fax that over. Just let me know how I can help. We've already
entered Chris's deal into the system with "New Counterparty," so the sooner
we can change that the better.

Thanks,
Kate


COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION
                        NOTICE TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
                                NOVEMBER 20, 2001

Notice ID: 3283
5 - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED

SUBJECT: CAPACITY ALLOCATION-TIMELY NOMINATION CYCLE FOR NOVEMBER 21, 2001

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ALLOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON THE RECEIPT OF
ANY NEW NOMINATIONS OR INTRADAY NOMINATIONS.

RECEIPTS:

ALLOCATIONS DUE TO LONG WALL MINING OF LINE SM-123:  For the following MLI
points: There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for ITS
customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm customers.  There is no
capacity for overruns.

        Equitable Hi Hat       MLI F3
        KYWV Beaver Creek      MLI H1
        CNR Boldman            MLI CNR02
        CNR Conoway            MLI CNR03
        CNR Johns Creek        MLI CNR08
        CNR Canada             MLI CNR09, CNR10
        CNR Stafford           MLI CNR11
        CNR Thacker/Majestic   MLI CNR12
        CNR Briar Mtn.         MLI CNR13
        CNR Huff Creek         MLI CNR14
        Conoco Grant           MLI P1

KA-1 LINE (819288 AND 827280):  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There
is no capacity for ITS customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm
customers.

INTERNAL CONSTRAINT:

LANHAM:  There is no capacity for IPP customers.  There is no capacity for ITS
customers.  There is no capacity for secondary firm customers.

Excess MDWQ               Available +
ISS Withdrawals           Available
SIT Withdrawals           Available
Imbalance Drawdowns       Available

Excess MDIQ               NOT Available +
ISS Injections            NOT Available
SIT Injections            NOT Available
Imbalance Paybacks        NOT Available

PAL Lends/Unparks         Available
PAL Parks/Loan Paybacks   NOT Available

+ Call Gas Control 24 hours in advance at (304) 357-2606 to request approval.

Columbia Gas Transmission has completed allocating all of its receipt and
delivery points for the gas day of November 21, 2001.  You may now view the
quantities you are authorized to flow on November 21, 2001.  On the Internet
NAVIGATOR, view Nominations, Scheduled Quantity, Scheduled Quantity for Service
Requestor-Summary, Nominations to be Viewed, and select Reduced Nominations.
The quantities confirmed to flow for your account are available on the Internet
NAVIGATOR after 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 20, 2001.

If you have any questions, please contact your Account Representative.


The gas prices assumed for the DWR analysis are much higher than our curves
from yesterday.  How old is the analysis?  Gas prices have come off at least
a buck or so in the past month.

Jeff