Daren - Deal # 97929, meter 1450 expired Nov. '99.  Is there a way for you to
extend the deal or create a new one since there seems to be a little bit of
flow each month?

- Aimee

---------------------- Forwarded by Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT on 02/03/2000 03:06
PM ---------------------------

Fred Boas
02/03/2000 02:02 PM
To: Aimee Lannou/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bridgeback Error at Meter 1450 for 11/99

Aimee:

There is a bridgeback error at the above referenced meter and month.  The
reason for the error is that the deal, # 97929 has expired.  Please determine
if the deal was to be extended or is there another deal to replace it?

To fix this I will set up an accounting arrangement but what I need from you
is a valid deal number and the transportation contract that you want me to
put the deal on.

Thanks in advance for your help,

Fred


Ditto on this deal!

---------------------- Forwarded by Sharen Cason/HOU/ECT on 04/02/2001 02:50
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sharen Cason                           04/02/2001 02:47 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: #567423

This deal has an NP delivery point with firm energy.

Thanks!


I may just ask him if anyone else  has had problems with the quality of their
work,  and leave out the billing stuff.  If I say anything I won't mention
you,although I think you did what you could to control these cowboys.

Kay

From: Stuart Zisman@ECT on 10/11/2000 05:26 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Ledford and Fehr Option Agreements

I haven't said anything to Mark and don't plan to.  I don't want Piper
Rudnick's inadequacies to be seen as a reflection of poor management (by
me).  I just plan to make sure that they don't work with me ever again.

Stuart


you're not billing by the word now are you?  :)

-----Original Message-----
From: MDay [mailto:MDay@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 12:24 PM
To: Dasovich, Jeff; Smith, Mike; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.; MDay;
Williams, Robert C.
Cc: Sharp, Vicki; Higgason, Kelly; Maynard, Michelle
Subject: RE: Extensions of CA Deals

I also agree.  Until we see how the direct access suspension implementation
issues are resolved, there is a signficant probability that the utilities
will insist on seeing all documents related to an ESP agreement, and will go
screaming to the commission to turn off your DA service if it appears any
portion of the agreement was executed after Sept. 20.  As indicated in
previous calls, that does not mean an ESP agreement executed prior to Sept
20 cannot be amended as to price and other such terms, but it cannot be
extended or renewed so as to give the customer longer access to direct
access without raising the risk that the CPUC will invalidate the extension
IF it chooses to forbid extensions and renewals after Sept. 20.  At this
time we do not know when or if the CPUC will address these issues, although
as Sue Mara has reported, there will be a Rule 22 meeting in a week which
will likely result in utility filings to get clarification from the
commission on these issues.  Beyond that we have no idea of the procedural
schedule the Commission will follow in addressing these issues.

Bottom line:  The existing commercial deals should not be put at risk by
means of amendments as to term of the agreement which were executed after
Sept. 20.  Follow on extensions or renewals to take effect at the end of the
existing agreements can be signed, but will remain at risk untilthe renewal
or extension issue is addressed by the Commission.  Post Sept. 20 amendments
to the price term of existing agreements are very likely safe so long as the
pre-Sept 20 term and quantity of the contracts are not altered.

Let me know if you have any other questions.

Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Smith, Mike; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.; mday@gmssr.com;
Williams, Robert C.
Cc: Sharp, Vicki; Higgason, Kelly; Maynard, Michelle
Subject: RE: Extensions of CA Deals

For what it's worth, I concur with Mike.  Option 3 is the most prudent,
and preferable, path.

Best,
Jeff

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Smith, Mike
> Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:50 AM
> To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Mara, Susan; Steffes, James D.; mday@gmssr.com;
> Williams, Robert C.
> Cc:	Sharp, Vicki; Higgason, Kelly; Maynard, Michelle
> Subject:	Extensions of CA Deals
>
> CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION
>
> I'd like to get some thoughts on this issue and hopefully build a
> consensus pretty quickly.
>
> We are in the process of extending the term of some of our existing CA
> deals that we executed on the Master in June.  Understanding that
> "new" deals struck after 9/20 are, and extensions of existing deals
> may be, at risk, it seems to me we have three basic options in order
> to effect this extension, and I want to make sure we evaluate and
> choose the one that minimizes the risk that the extension is
> invalidated.  Note that DASR's have been submitted for the subject
> accounts under the original Transactions.
>
> The 3 choices I see are:
>
> 1.  .Amend and Restate the existing Transaction Confirmation to add
> the extension and new price for the extension.  In this case, the
> extension would be wrapped up on one document that is signed after
> 9/20 but effective in June.
> 2.  Simply amend the existing Transaction to add extended term and
> price.  This would be a separate document.
> 3.  Execute a whole new Transaction for the extended term, which would
> be effective when signed but the services and price under which would
> not start until after the expiration of the existing Transaction.  The
> existing Transaction would stay in tact as written.
>
> It seems to me that choice number 3 is the safest overall.  The
> amended and restated route has appeal because the whole transaction is
> dated back to June.  However, if a regulator were to peel it back, the
> conclusion could be that the deal was struck after Sept 20 and
> therefore the whole transaction was invalid, including the original
> structure.  I think that choice 2, though creating a separate document
> for the extension, could fall into the same trap.  In that sense,
> choice 3 seems safest because arguably the original transaction is not
> at risk.  If the extension is invalidated, that determination would
> likely not claw back to the original deal.
>
> The commercial teams want to close these extensions in Q3 so they are
> moving fast.  Please let me know your thoughts asap.  If we need to
> have a quick call, I can set something up.  Thanks.  MDS

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Zufferli, John
Sent:	Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:44 AM
To:	Rogers, Glenn
Subject:	RE: P&L for Oct 9

Also, instead of sending me the P&L via e-mail, arrange to have someone here to put the P&L and new deal reports on my desk as usual.

Thanks
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rogers, Glenn
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 8:10 PM
To:	Zufferli, John; Richey, Cooper; Greenizan, Bill
Cc:	Reeves, Kathy
Subject:	P&L for Oct 9

Please find attached the file containing the P&L for Oct 9.

 << File: pwrdpr.xls >>


thanks for calling sir


Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <Aa8588@aol.com>
From: Aa8588@aol.com
Full-name: Aa8588
Message-ID: <b4.49dbd57.296cc05f@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:36:31 EST
Subject: Re: Hello
To: VKaminski@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118

Vince:

I can't thank you enough for your help.  I supported your group as an HR
generalist from February 1998 through year end 1999 when I transitioned it to
Sheila Walton and her team.  As you may recall, I also served as Sheila's
backup (until December 2001) for more senior level work in your group, i.e.,
conducting your PRC meeting.

Thanks again.  Hope you are doing well in spite of the turmoil.

Best regards,

Cindy Skinner


No one going. Sorry.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keeler, Jeff
Sent:	Friday, October 19, 2001 3:18 PM
To:	Shapiro, Richard
Cc:	Robertson, Linda; Yoho, Lisa
Subject:	World Energy Congress
Importance:	High

Rick:

Is anyone from government affairs attending the World Energy Congress next week in Buenos Aires (Oct 21-25)?  I have been working with the EGM Clean Energy Solutions group on DOE funding initiatives for various pollution control technologies, and they were told that the conference would be a good opportunity to informally mention these efforts to incoming Asst. Sec for Fossil Energy (Mike Smith?)

If someone from your team is going, I'd like to put them in touch with the folks at EGM.

Thanks,

Jeff

Jeff Keeler
Director, Environmental Strategies
Enron Corp
(203) 245-0828 office
(203) 464-1541 cell


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2001 10:50 AM ---------------------------

Darla Saucier@ENRON
05/07/2001 04:15 PM
To:	Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	4/2001 New Power

For your review, sir.  Please let me know if this is good to go!

Thanks!


Barbara,

 The information requested in Specification 13 is readily ascertainable from
the Transaction Agreements for the Entex contracts supplied pursuant to
Specification 3.

      Dan


These deals have been changed - just thought I'd let you guys know, for
future reference, that deals scheduled to flow during on peak hours only
should not be booked through Sunday. Even though the system won't recognize
any Sunday hours, apparently it messes with Houston's reports.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 02/16/2001 09:34 AM
---------------------------

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/16/2001 09:36 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Melissa Ann Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: 2/15 Bloomberg Checkout

Kate,

I understand that the deals are not actually flowing on Sunday but for
auditing/reporting purposes per Melissa Murphy, these deals need to display
the correct term of 2/17 only instead of 2/17-2/18.

The deals are:  523881, 523882, 523877, 523875, 523876, 523879, 523880,
523883, and 523884

Thanks!!

   Kate Symes @ ECT                02/15/2001 05:54 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: 2/15 Bloomberg Checkout

1. Because 2/18 is a Sunday and this is an off-peak deal, no hours will be
counted for 2/18. If you need me to change the term anyway, I can. Let me
know.
2. The rest of these deals traded on Bloomberg after Jeff Richter and Chris
Mallory left for a power marketing conference. This caused many problems, as
you can see. Following are the added or corrected deals:

  1) 523831 - changed from Dynegy to Reliant - corrected
  2) 524481 - buy Duke/March-01/NP/265.00] - added
  3) 524482 - same terms - added

Let me know if you have any further discrepancies with these deals.

Thanks,
Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
02/15/2001 02:56 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 2/15 Bloomberg Checkout

Jeff Richter:

deal 523877
Bloomberg shows term as 2/17 only not 2/17-2/18

I am missing the following deals:

1)  Enron sells to  Reliant Energy 25 mw of 2/17-2/18 off-peak NP-15 at $295
2)  Enron buys from Duke 25 mw of March'01 NP-15 at $265
3)  Enron buys from Duke 25 mw of March'01 NP-15 at $265


I confirmed commuting w/ your bike on MAX counts.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shields, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, August 20, 2001 7:59 AM
To:	Dunton, Heather
Subject:	RE: OREGON BIKE COMMUTE CHALLENGE

Heather,

I participate in this every year with my previous employer. Since moving from Eugene I now commute on the MAX. I would like to commute with my bike on MAX and perhaps the think to do is ride to the MAX and get off the train a few miles outside town and ride in. Do you know if the  Bicycle Transportation Alliance has coordinated with TriMet on this event?

In any case, count me in. I'll be riding every day.

Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dunton, Heather
Sent:	Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:48 PM
To:	DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject:	OREGON BIKE COMMUTE CHALLENGE

Enron IS TAKING THE 2001 OREGON BIKE COMMUTE CHALLENGE

Each year the Bicycle Transportation Alliance has a bike commute challenge
-a program to encourage bicycle commuting during September.
We need to:
o Report your percentage of bike trips and
the total number of bike trips to Heather.

o Ride at least 7 days (14 trips) and take this tally
to a participating bike shop for special discounts.

o Come to the Bicycle Hubbub where winners
will be announced on Oct. 11, 6:00 - 8:00 PM,
BridgePort Brew Pub, 1313 NW Marshall, Portland.

3 Prizes will be awarded on the floor
o  Greatest % commuting on your bike
o  Most mileage ridden
o  Most trips ridden

Below is the current list of participants
Tim Belden, Chris Calger, Heather Dunton, Mike Etringer, Kysa Alport, Jesse Bryson, Paul Choi, Alan Comnes, Sean Crandall, Dave Fuller, Steve Hall, Leif Harasin,
Eric Linder, Mike Mier, Kourtney Nelson, Dale Rasmussen, Jeff Richter, Stewart Rosman, Holden Salisbury, Serena Bishop
I will be coming around to get the rest of you involved!!!


In an October 3 update meeting with Rick Buy and Rick Causey on Doorstep reviews, both were very supportive of the efforts to date this year.  Since we were in the midst of the budgeting process, we wanted their view on the continuation of Doorstep Reviews, and they resoundingly agreed that the effort is valuable to Enron and that they wanted to be certain that the effort continues.

In reviewing the plans for 4th quarter, one of our issues was the willingness of key staff members to travel long distances in light of the September 11th terrorists attacks.  We were in agreement on postponing some of the planned 4th quarter reviews until early 2002.  Planned reviews for the Metals business and certain other EEL lines of business were reaffirmed by Buy and Causey for completion in the 4th quarter.

Certainly life on October 26 feels different today at Enron than it did on October 3.  I understand multiple demands on staff members currently and the additional demands of the budgeting process, and in your case, the voluntary redundancy program.  In the next few days I will again review the 4th quarter plans for Doorstep reviews with Buy and Causey, sharing with them your concerns.  I will let you know the outcome of those conversations.  If there is still a strong desire to complete these reviews this year, we will work creatively to leverage work that is being done through the EAS process and minimize both travel and time involved.  -Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dyson, Fernley
Sent:	Friday, October  26, 2001 2:24 AM
To:	New, James; Jordan, Mike
Cc:	Beck, Sally; Apollo, Beth; Brown, Michael - COO London
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

The EAS work takes priority over Doorstep - we need the AA opinion.

I'm afraid that Doorstep is way down my list of priorities at this time - I certainly do not want other things to suffer.

Thanks

Fernley

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	25 October 2001 20:38
To:	Dyson, Fernley; Evans, Coralie; D'arcy, Paul; Jordan, Mike
Cc:	Yeo, Robert
Subject:	FW: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

It's official, we are being door stepped. The Houston plan is to do all of Power and all of the Structures (although when I spoke to Stacey she seemed a little unsure of her plan for structures). Also from what Stacey said the Gas door step will be following shortly.

Stacey and Kristin Albrecht aim to be here for the whole week starting first thing on Monday the 5th. EAS here are already in the loop as they have been various conversations. Obviously with all the additional work we are being asked to do at the moment something will have to give. I aim to speak to Paul Bromley to agree whether the EAS or doorstep work takes priority and to get him to clearly explain which areas will be covered by the doorstep and which by the EAS process since I will be very unhappy if we fail to avoid duplication. In addition, we will also need to make commercial aware of a reduced capacity to perform analytical tasks as well as model review and gap analysis work etc.

James

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	25 October 2001 19:59
To:	New, James
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

We will not be there next week so that should be fine.  Are the complex derivatives group and 'structured book' run by Paul Darcy the same thing?  If yes, then we are planning on reviewing that area.  Should I contact Paul Darcy directly?  If no, what is the complex derivatives group?

Thanks,
Stacey

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:45 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

Also in addition can you please confirm that you are not doing the complex derivatives group which is run totally separately in both personnel and risk terms ?

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	New, James
Sent:	25 October 2001 18:03
To:	White, Stacey W.
Subject:	RE: UK & Continental Power Doorstep

Are you here next week then because I am due to be away for some of that time ?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	White, Stacey W.
Sent:	25 October 2001 17:47
To:	New, James
Subject:	UK & Continental Power Doorstep

James,

Just a quick note and request regarding our UK & Continental Power Doorstep review we will be performing.  Please provide a list of books, curves and deal types used for UK & Continental Power.  In addition, please send information on any large, structured, out of the norm transactions and any transactions that are calculated outside of the core trading system.

Please provide this information early next week.  Look forward to seeing you.

Stacey


My knee is killing me.  I am going to sue Dr. Frost!!  I just decided to go
pretty easy on it for the next couple of weeks and see if it gets any
better.  Talk with you tonight.  Bye the way Jessica is not doing well. DK is
taking her to the doctor today.  I will let you know how she is tonight.

Dad


Brent;

I discussed with local outside counsel some additional issues regarding the
implementation of EOL in Brazil.  Please review the attached memo carefully
(I think it is self-explanantory) and let me know if you need any further
clarification.

Best regards,

Sami

 - consumer.doc


Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 03/29/2001 03:54 PM -----

	"Beiser, Megan" <Megan.Beiser@edelman.com>
	03/29/2001 01:49 PM

		 To: "Allen, Stevan" <stevan.allen@edelman.com>, arm@phaser.com,
"brbarkovich@earthlink.net" <bbarkovich@earthlink.net'>,
cra@calretailers.com, dennis.flatt@kp.org, dhunter@smithandkempton.com,
djsmith@smithandkempton.com, Dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com,
drothrock@cmta.net, "Fairchild, Tracy" <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
gdoar@newpower.com, gharrison@calstate.edu, hgovenar@govadv.com,
jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com, "jerryl@abag.ca.gov" <jerryl@abag.ca>,
.gov@mailman.enron.com, johnlatimer@capitoladvocacy.com,
ken_pietrelli@ocli.com, kgough@calpine.com, kmccrea@sablaw.com,
kmills@cfbf.com, lhastings@cagrocers.com, "Manuel, Erica"
<Erica.Manuel@edelman.com>, mday@gmssr.com, mmoretti@calhealth.org,
nplotkin@tfglobby.com, randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com, richard.seguin@kp.org,
RochmanM@spurr.org, rrichter@calhealth.org, sgovenar@govadv.com,
smccubbi@enron.com, spahnn@hnks.com, sschleimer@calpine.com, theo@ppallc.com,
vincent.stewart@ucop.edu, vjw@ceert.org, "Warner, Jami"
<jami.warner@edelman.com>, wbooth@booth-law.com, wbrown@lhom.com,
wlarson@calstate.edu, "Aaron Thomas (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<athomas@newenergy.com>, "Andrea Weller (E-mail) (E-mail)" <aweller@sel.com>,
"andrew Chau (E-mail) (E-mail)" <anchau@shellus.com>, "Bill Chen (E-mail)
(E-mail)" <bchen@newenergy.com>, "Douglas Oglesby (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<doao@chevron.com>, "Jeffrey Hanson (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jeff.hanson@phaser.com>, "jennifer Chamberlin (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jnnc@chevron.com>, "john Barthrop (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, "John Leslie (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jleslie@luce.com>,
"Joseph Alamo (E-mail) (E-mail)" <jalamo@enron.com>, "'Michael Nelson'
(E-mail)" <mnelson@electric.com>, "Peter Bray (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<pbray@newpower.com>, "Rebecca Schlanert (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<rschlanert@electric.com>, "Richard Counihan (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "'Robert Morgan' (E-mail)"
<rmorgan@newenergy.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail) (E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Energy Crisis Press Conferences at the Capitol: CAUSE and Assem.
Republicans file suit against Gov. Davis et al

> Assembly Republicans, led by Assemblymember Tony Strickland, held a press
> conference this morning to announce the filing of a lawsuit against
> Governor Davis, State Controller Kathleen Connell, the Department of Water
> Resources (DWR), and DWR Director Thomas Hannigan.
>
> This event was heavily attended by local media: mainly television and
> radio, with some print reporters.
>
> Assembly Republicans present were:
> Assem. Phil Wyman
> Assem. Dennis Mountjoy
> Assem. Dave Cogdill
> Assem. Keith Richman
> Assem. John Campbell.
>
> Also present was:
> Chuck Bell, attorney at law, representing Assembly Republicans in the suit
> to obtain the state's energy purchase information.
>
> Strickland distributed copies of letters sent to the Department of General
> Services, DWR, State Controller Kathleen Connell and the Department of
> Finance in the last month.  These letters were signed by several Assembly
> Republicans, including the newly chosen minority leader Dave Cox, and
> requested the immediate release of all invoices and purchase records on
> energy purchases made by DWR.   These letters also requested full
> disclosure of details of the long-term energy contracts signed by the
> Governor.  Also included in this packet were documents filed on behalf of
> Assembly Republicans in the Superior Court of San Diego in their suit.
>
> Strickland began his press conference by saying there was a "new band:
> Governor Davis and the merchant generators."  He added, "on February 16,
> the Governor said he could solve this problem in 20 minutes by raising
> rates; rates have risen and the problem is not solved."
>
> Referring to a similar suit by members of the media also filed in San
> Diego Superior Court, Strickland said, "the Republicans and the press are
> demanding this information to protect them from the merchant generators."
> He added, "we had no choice but to legally compel [the Governor] to
> release this vital information."
>
> Assem. Phil Wyman said, "it is not a happy occasion when members of the
> Legislature have to join with the Association of Broadcasters to get basic
> information."  Wyman added that he doesn't have enough information to
> support certain bills because he doesn't know if there is money available.
>
> On the subject of Tuesday's decision by the PUC to allow a rate increase,
> Assem. Mountjoy said he believes the Governor and the PUC are completely
> connected adding, "this is the Governor's PUC; he pulls the strings
> there."
>
> "This rate increase will impact all Californians," said Assem. Keith
> Richman. "We will all have to pay for the Governor and the Governor's
> PUC's lack of action last fall," when, Richman said, the Republicans
> requested a special session to deal with the energy issue.
>
> Assem. John Campbell said he was concerned about "making votes in a
> vacuum," adding that it was like "asking [members of the Legislature] to
> drive down a dark tunnel with the lights off--you're gonna crash."
>
> When asked who is paying for this lawsuit, Assem. Strickland said,
> "constituents in [his] district" were paying the legal bills.
>
> Attorney Chuck Bell said members of the media filed their suit last week
> and were given a May 18 hearing date.  Bell said, "we feel that is too far
> away," and that they were seeking a hearing early next week
>
> When asked if the plaintiffs would be satisfied with a redacted version of
> the information being requested, Bell responded that "AB 1X states...that
> full disclosure is required within 7 days."  However, Bell added that they
> were "waiting for the judge's decision as to what the appropriate amount
> of redaction would be."  Bell said that the group was confident that case
> law was in their favor.
>
> Bell said that Connell was named in the suit because "she is in possession
> of the records we are requesting."  He also added that the reason for
> filing the suit in San Diego Superior Court was because he believed it
> would be "expeditious and useful to file in the same court" as the lawsuit
> filed by members of the media.
>
> ********************************************
> The CAUSE (Campaign Against Utility Service Exploitation) rally was not
> well attended by local media or the public. However, the Associated Press
> did send both a reporter and photographer.
>
> CAUSE is being coordinated by Burt Wilson, a veteran of several consumer
> activist coalitions.  Wilson was the only CAUSE member to attended the
> rally.  CAUSE is encouraging customers of the three investor-owned
> utilities to dispute the accuracy of their electricity bills by sending
> the bills to the PUC with a request for a hearing.  Wilson said the
> utilities cannot disconnect service if the correct procedure is followed
> for filing this request.
>
> CAUSE's campaign is internet based.  Wilson said "we had 150 members when
> I checked at 8 a.m. today."  The website, www.utilityratefighters.com,
> contains forms people can use to request a hearing to dispute the accuracy
> of their bills from PG&E, Southern California Edison, and San Diego Gas
> and Electric.
>
> Megan Beiser
> Assistant Account Executive
> Edelman Public Relations Worldwide, Sacramento
> Phone: (916) 442-2331
> Fax: (916) 447-8509
>


Please plan to attend a meeting tomorrow(2/1) at 11:30 a.m. in Greg's office.  This meeting is requested by David Oxley and it will be regarding Netco employment agreements.

Tim-You can just call Greg's polycom number-853-5202.

Thank you!

Tammie Schoppe
Enron Americas-Office of the Chair
Assistant to Louise Kitchen
713.853.4220 office
713.646.8562 fax
713.253.2131 mobile


Sounds fine to me. Does it make sense to run resume past Brown and Sherriff prior to bringing him over? Also, is the idea he would be a director, sr director or vp? Each of these paths has consequences as you know. Rick


I have a question on the generation number we are pulling from your
database.  The hydro numbers are coming in positive and negative.  Could you
please explain the difference there when you get a chance.  Thanks for your
help.

Matt Lenhart


You boys done with the bplan?
 Trevor Woods


I am pleased to announce the following organizational changes within EGM Operations & Accounting effective immediately:

Todd Hall will be relocating to London and will assume responsibility for all EGM operational activities in London including Risk Management, Confirmations, Coordination & Settlements and Trade Accounting.  Todd will be working closely with the EGM business unit heads in London to ensure their businesses are being supported in an effective and efficient manner.

Cindy Horn will assume the role of EGM IT & Remote Office Controller.  She will be responsible for the oversight and coordination of all IT projects affecting the Operations group.  Her duties will include monitoring and reporting project timelines and expenses and ensuring IT is being utilized in the most cost-effective manner within Operations.  Cindy will also manage the operational activities of the Singapore and Tokyo offices and coordinate with the Sydney office in regards to EGM operations.

Michelle Bruce will assume responsibility for Risk Management in the Houston office for Crude & Products, Coal and Weather.  She will also continue to manage the Confirmation, Coordination & Settlements and Trade Accounting functions in Houston.

Please join me in congratulating these individuals on their new assignments.


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 06/11/2001 11:23 AM -----

	"Fergus, Gary S." <GFergus@brobeck.com>
	05/23/2001 07:11 PM

		 To: "Richard B. Sanders Esq. (E-mail)" <richard.b.sanders@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Here is the CPUC Subpoena

 <<scanned_.pdf>>

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com

 - scanned_.pdf


------------------------------------------------------------

NEWS RELEASE
FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

------------------------------------------------------------

For Immediate Release: November 20, 2001
News Media Contact: Claudia Chandler - 916-654-4989

Summer 2002 Electricity Forecast Calls Upon
Continued Conservation and New Power Plants
To Get California through Next Summer

The California Energy Commission forecasts that the State
would have adequate supplies of electricity to meet next
summer's electricity demand as long as planned power plants
are built and current levels of conservation continue. The
2002 Monthly Electricity Forecast projected electricity
supplies and demand over the next nine months. While the
report assumes that the market will function normally, price
spikes continue to be a concern if electricity supplies are
tight.

Energy conservation efforts by consumers and businesses
played a critical role in helping the State avoid blackouts
this past summer. Clearly the State's $800 million
investment in energy efficiency including the voluntary
conservation efforts achieved through the Governor's Flex
Your Power public awareness campaign and 20/20 utility
rebate program were key contributors to reducing electricity
demand last summer. An important question in forecasting
electricity demand is how much of last summer's conservation
efforts will continue next summer? If summer 2002
conservation efforts stay the same or decline only
moderately, the State should have adequate electricity
supplies to meet demand.

July may present the most challenging month for the State's
supply and demand balance next summer. The Energy Commission
projects a supply surplus of approximately 340 megawatts
including new generation of 4,000 megawatts expected on line
by July 2002. In an emergency declared by the Independent
System Operator, there are also an additional 1,700
megawatts of electricity that could be available from large
users participating in interruptible/emergency demand
responsive programs.

A key concern continues to be whether there are adequate
electricity supplies for all regions of the State. This
overall statewide supply and demand electricity balance does
not, however, focus on the problem of local area reliability
issues. Problems with transmission line congestion and
generation in a specific region could result in constrained
supplies and local distribution problems.

To meet California's electricity crisis, the Governor
established Emergency Executive Orders that streamlined the
licensing of new power plants and encouraged new generation
from a variety of sources to meet Summer 2001 electricity
demand. Twelve Energy Commission licensed power plants,
including ten simple cycle units, added 2,100 megawatts of
new generation to the State's electricity system this year.
There also was an additional 1,400 megawatts of new
generation available from restarting and/or boosting
generation from existing power plants, adding new renewable
energy facilities, and new power plants that were licensed
by local jurisdictions.

The Joint Legislative Audit Committee requested the
Commission's electricity supply and demand analysis for the
summers of 2002 through 2004. The 2002 Monthly Electricity
Forecast: California Supply/Demand Capacity Balances for
January ? September 2002 and the California Summer
Electricity Outlook for 2002-2004 provide the analysis and
assumptions used in responding to the Committee's request.
The reports will be presented at the Joint Legislative Audit
Committee hearing at 9 a.m. on November 26, 2001.

Both reports are available at the Energy Commission's web
site:

www.energy.ca.gov/reports/

# # #

--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * *
Do your part to help during California's Electricity Crisis.
Set your computer and monitor to go to sleep or energy
saver  mode during the business day.  And turn your
computer and monitor off at the power strip or surge
protector when you leave at the end of  the day or over
the weekend.

To learn more about what you can do go to:

http://www.flexyourpower.ca.gov

Bob Aldrich
Web Development Team
California Energy Commission
916-654-4989

To unsubscribe from this list, please go to:

http://www.energy.ca.gov/listservers/

Or simply send an e-mail to majordomo@energy.ca.gov
and in the body of the e-mail, type in

unsubscribe (name of this list)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * *


Daily Blessing
Baseball Game
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless103.htm

check out Christmas greetings at
http://www.debsfunpages.com/christmas.htm

Do you need ink AGAIN?  There's so much great stuff out here on the web,
that you want to print and share, but you think of how much it's going
to cost you for those ink cartridges or refills and you hesitate...no
more reason to hesitate!!  You can get affordable ink cartridges and
refills on the internet for much lower than you pay in a retail office
supply store...just check out the folks at Mr Inkman!!

http://daily-blessings..com/inkman.htm

win a digital camera, $4500.00 or MORE
http://www.daily-blessings.com/4500.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


Further to our conversation,  please see attach resume.  Thanks!!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Rogelio,

Congratulations.  That is quite an honor.

Regards,

Kay Mann

"Rogelio Lopez Velarde" <rlopezv@lvha.com.mx> on 05/29/2001 10:29:01 AM
To: <Undisclosed-Recipient:@dns.vivesantafe.com.mx;>
cc:

Subject: Energy Law Committee

Dear all,

In light of the opening of the energy industry, the Mexican Bar Association
has been asked by different sectors to create the Energy Law Committee. I am
pleased to inform you that I have been asked to chair such committee.

As part of our endevors, we will be involved in the upcoming reforms to the
energy industry.

Very truly yours,

Rogelio Lopez-Velarde
Lopez Velarde, Heftye, Abogados
Guillermo Gonzalez Camarena No. 1600, Piso 6
Col. Santa Fe, Centro de Ciudad
01210 Mexico, D.F
Telephone: (52) 5081-14-24
Dir.: (52) 5081-14-23
Fax: (52) 5081-14-25
e-mail: rlopezv@lvha.com.mx
www.lopezvelardeheftyeabogados.com

The information contained herein may be confidential and/or privileged.
This information is intended to be reviewed only by the individual or the
entity to which is addressed.  If the reader of this e-mail message is not
the intended recipient or a representative of the intended recipient you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this e-mail
message or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have
received this e-mail message in error, please immediately notify the sender
and delete this communication from your system.


i dont suppose you are smoking are you


Start Date: 1/24/02; HourAhead hour: 4;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


Steve- In our various telephonic and email dealings regarding my representation of Enron with the California Senate hearings I never got to meet you personally and never realized you were a Hawkeye until recently seeing the Enron executive bios. I grew up there and went to both undergraduate and law school at Iowa. Hope things are going as well as can be expected under these dire circumstances for Enron. Have a good holiday. I truly enjoyed representing Enron over the past year. Best regards


Shirley,

Austin. Please, set up an interview with me, Stinson, Zimin, Vasant, Grant,
Paulo, Krishna. Sometimes next week.

Let's make it a formal interview (coordinated through Elizabeth Grant).

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
05/08/2000 09:27 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: real options openings?

Vince:

Is this gentleman in Houston?  When do you want to bring him over - next
week?

Thanks!

Vince J Kaminski
05/08/2000 09:25 AM
To: Christopher M Kenyon <cmkenyon@concentric.net> @ ENRON
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: real options openings?

Chris,

We shall make arrangements to bring you over for an interview.
Our HR Department will contact you later this week.

Vince

Christopher M Kenyon <cmkenyon@concentric.net> on 05/05/2000 07:56:11 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: real options openings?

Dear Vince Kaminski,
 I was auditing Prof Dyer's Real Options class on Thursday when you spoke
on Enron's activities in this area.  I would be interested in exploring the
possibility of joining the group that works on real options in response to
and in anticipation of Enron's business requirements.  I'm currently
working in the development and application of real options methodology at
Schlumberger.  In particular I'll be speaking at an industry Real Options
Valuation conference in London (http://www.iqpc.co.uk/finance/rov/) and I
just had the paper accepted for publication in Operations Research.  Could
you pass my resume on to the relevant people to have a look at?

Thanks in advance,

Chris Kenyon

 - cmkenyon_cv_may00.doc


Sally:

Below is the detail of what the "extra" housing cost was for Todd Hall that
is to be charged to whatever RC is provided.  If you need to discuss further,
please call me at 55064.  Otherwise, may we have a charge cdode for this
expense?

Thanks,

Jane

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000 08:40 AM
---------------------------

Tara Rozen
05/12/2000 04:31 AM
To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rachel Clifford/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Todd Hall

If Todd was unaccompanied, we would have paid o2167 p/m.  The flat he is
occupying is o2817 p/m, difference of o650 p/m. Not sure if this is going to
be relevant enough to the RC. We definitely could have rented the place so it
would not have been left empty.

Let me know if you need anything else.
Tara

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           11/05/2000 22:11

To: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Todd Hall

Before I speak with Sally, exactly what piece of the housing are we charging
to her RC since he took existing housing?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000 04:09 PM
---------------------------

Kim Melodick
05/11/2000 12:28 PM
To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Todd Hall

Jane, Norma has the group now, however, I do believe Sally wants to speak
with you on this issue.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           05/08/2000 04:15 PM

To: Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Todd Hall

I called and left you a message last week.  Do we still need to talk or has
it been resolved?  My new number is 55064.

Jane

Kim Melodick
05/03/2000 12:39 PM
To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Todd Hall

Sally would like to speak to you regarding the differential.  She knows that
Todd had taken residence in accommodations left vacant by Beth Perlman.  She
want ed more clarification on how that would be managed since it was
utilizing an existing space. The RC she provided was Todd Hall's RC#2182.
Please call me at your earliest convenience as I will explain the remaining
details.

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           05/02/2000 08:01 AM

To: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Todd Hall

Kim:

Can you get this for Tara, please?

Jane

Tara Rozen
05/02/2000 03:02 AM
To: Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Todd Hall

No, I did not, thanks

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           01/05/2000 14:11

To: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Todd Hall

Tara:

Did you ever get the coding for this expense?
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Allen/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2000 08:10 AM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           03/17/2000 08:31 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim Melodick/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Todd Hall

Can we please have the RC that should be charged for the upgrade for Todd's
housing from single to accompanied?

Thanks,

Jane

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/17/2000 08:31 AM
---------------------------

Tara Rozen
03/17/2000 02:58 AM
To: Matt Hatton/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa McRae/LON/ECT@ECT, Jane Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Todd Hall

Matt

Please can you arrange for Todd Hall, who is coming from Houston to work for
Barry Pearce, to stay at Dolphin Square apartments? Please liaise with him
directly on this.

We have a bit of a complicated costing situation. Barry Pearce will be taking
the cost of the normal one bedrooms at Dolphin Square and Sally is taking the
rest of the cost.

Jane - please provide the costs for Sally's RC.

Thanks
Tara
---------------------- Forwarded by Tara Rozen/LON/ECT on 17/03/2000 08:56
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Jane Allen                           15/03/2000 21:43

To: Tara Rozen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Todd Hall

Sally has decided to go with the 2 bedroom Dolphin Square accommodations for
Todd.  Please reserve them for March 25th through at least April 15.

Thanks.

Jane


Further to my email below,  I've just heard from Vasco and we are to receive the information for the rationing period from ASMAE on Oct. 31.

Rgds,
   Michelle
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Blaine, Michelle
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 8:56 AM
To:	Haedicke, Mark E.
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Williams, Robert C.; Novak, John
Subject:	Brazil Update

CUIABA
Furnas: Nothing particularly new to report since last week, other than it appears we are likely to get the consent documents signed Tuesday or Wednesday. These documents reflect a resolution to the consent issue and the Resolution 49 regulatory issues that changed some of the risks under the PPA.   As reported last week, one of the reasons Furnas/Electrobras have agreed to sign is because the two difficult issues regarding (i) the validity of the Electrobras guaranty following privatization; and (ii) political force majeure allowing a "put" option for Brazilian governmental acts, were deleted from the Furnas consent documents and will be negotiated separately with the Brazilian government over the next two weeks.  These issues must also be resolved for financing.

GT11/12:  Repairs still on schedule to meet requirements under the PPA for the changeover to gas by year end.  Siemens and our engineers will meet with the underwriters in London tomorrow to discuss the root cause of the failures.  Still no written confirmation of coverage, but we currently do not anticipate a problem.

Shell:  Preparing for mediation to be held in Toronto November 5-7.

ANNEX V

After reporting last week that the cost pass through suits had been filed, I learned that Orlando Gonzales made the commercial decision to hold off on those suits because of significant progress he made in negotiations with the Brazilian government for resolution of these issues and Annex V.

Elektro received some of the information from ASMAE for calculating its numbers; however, as of Friday it had not received the information for the rationing period, the relevant period for calculating the set off.  I talked with Vasco this morning and he believed this information was received today and will confirm.  If the information is not forthcoming, we are prepared to file a suit to compel it.

I will stay in touch with Orlando this week to determine if and when we can file these suits without interfering with his negotiations.

Regards,
   Michelle


Gerald,

Here is their response to our comments.  Not much but take a look:

Under term7:  Notices - unless we include language similiar to...'Fax is
acceptable as long as the fax is followed by hardcopy documentation and
effective upon such hardcopy reciept.'  Back to square one.  They don't like
fax.
Under term 8:  they are objecting to affiliate assignment.  Successor is ok.
Affiliate assignment is no good.  They would like to take out the term
assigns.

that is it.

brant

To: Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bridgeline Guaranty

Brant,  The attached doc. contains Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC's
comments to our guaranty form with our responses.  Please forward as
appropriate.  I would be happy to discuss our comments with Hess if they so
desire.


[IMAGE]			[IMAGE][IMAGE]
[IMAGE]			250  premium color business cards![IMAGE]

[IMAGE]

 WE HAVE A WIDE SELECTION OF TEMPLATES TO  CHOOSE FROM: HIGH IMPACT MOST POPULAR PROFESSIONAL GEOMETRIC INFORMAL 			 VistaPrint.com is giving away a very  special FREE gift to visitors of its web site right  now!   Click the link below to claim your FREE* set of  250 business cards, custom printed for your business  or personal use. Since premium quality, full-color  business cards can cost as much as $100.00 to $150.00,  this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that is not  to be missed!   Design your business card online in five easy  steps. Choose from corporate, elegant, casual, funky  or even wild designs. VistaPrint.com will custom  print your design on attractive, top-quality paper  stock and ship your cards to your door. Claim this  rare and valuable free* gift now!    CLICK HERE   * Shipping & Handling not included. Click on offer for details.
		[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

 You  are subscribed to the RealBigWinners.com newsletter as: andrew.h.lewis@enron.com  If you wish to unsubscribe please click the link below:    Click Here to Unsubscribe

[IMAGE]


Dan, we have a right to deliver to a mainline carrier under another section
as well;please talk with Gerald about the specific language.   I think we
need to all focus on that language as well,since I am expecting Wild Horse to
respond that Section 3 was deleted in the amendment                Thanks for
the update                 bng

	Dan J Bump@ENRON
	Sent by: Dan J Bump@ENRON
	09/26/2000 06:06 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Arvel Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT,
kckrisa@apex2000.net
		 cc:
		 Subject: Crescendo / Wildhorse Issues

As you all know, on September 1st, Wildhorse indicated (verbally to me)  they
did not feel that contractually they had the obligation to deliver
Crescendo's San Arroyo (Dakota) production to "any pipeline we choose"; i.e.,
Northwest P/L.

Since this verbal conversation, we have sent a written clarification
reiterating our position (as well as had numerous verbal discussions) and
have now nominated Crescendo's October production to be delivered into
Northwest P/L.  Also since this above conversation, Wildhorse has said they
will clarify their legal/contractual position and respond back to us.

Numerous calls by Mark Whitt and myself have not been returned....until
today, during lunch.  Kent Harris of Wildhorse finally returned our calls
(... probably hoping to catch me at lunch), and he said the following:

"I'm still waiting on our legal review of the contract and hope to have it
this afternoon"  (its now 5pm; no call).  "While I agree with your 'first
queue' contractual rights and therefore we have to take all your gas up to 10
MM/d, I don't agree with your claim to have the right to take the gas to any
available delivery point".

My response: "Kent, that is the cleanest provision in this contract."  [Then
I read back Section 3 of the contract..."or any other connection with a
mainline carrier downstream of the tailgate of the Mesa (San Arroyo)
Plant..."].

He responded: "That's your opinion; we'll see what my legal counsel says."

I responded that nominations were due tomorrow, we sent our nomination to
Wildhorse today for delivery into NWPL, and for October and beyond our market
is on NWPL.  September 1st was when Wildhorse made the delivery point
location an issue; now its Sept. 26th (the day before nominations are due)
and we've gotten no other response from Wildhorse after we clarified our
position numerous times both verbally and in writing!

Again, he said he'd try to get back with me asap.

On the Entrada project, he did say that they have redesigned the proposed
route (based on our ideas and requests) and feel that the capital required
for the project will be significantly reduced.  They hope to have a revised
proposal to Crescendo soon.

[Gerald and I still are not clear where under the contract they are claiming
the right to send us a proposal/renegotiate, but that's for another meeting.]

Mark Whitt and/or I will follow-up upon any further developments.

Regards,

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: Velez, Luis
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Causholli, Monika
Subject: FW: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average;
Goldman Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

-----Original Message-----
From: Stivaletti, Joe [mailto:joe.stivaletti@gs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Stivaletti, Joe
Subject: Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average; Goldman
Sachs High Yield Research; 8/14/01

Pulp Update: Inventory Rise in July Well Below Average; Goldman Sachs High
Yield Research; 8/14/01

Norscan pulp inventories rose just 4,000 tonnes in July, which is well below
the typical seasonal increase of approximately 150,000 tonnes.  Amidst all
the bad news about the pulp environment, this is good news.  Producer
downtime is certainly helping.  However, pulp prices remain quite weak, and
inventories of 1.78 million tonnes are still too high to allow for any
tightening of supply and demand in the short term.

We will distribute details of the July pulp report once they are available.

Joe Stivaletti
Goldman, Sachs, & Co.
High Yield Research
85 Broad Street, 29th floor
New York, NY 10004
(212) 902-3299


Sure.

B

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:24 AM
To:	Tchernokojeva, Marina; Oh, Jeffrey; Mallory, Chris; Salisbury, Holden; Bland, Todd; Williams III, Bill; Morris, Jeremy; Hyde, Crystal; Solberg, Geir; Stokley, Chris; Driscoll, Michael M.
Subject:	Associate and Analyst Meeting - July 5, 2001 at 11:00 am in Mt Hood (Lunch will be provided!)

Grace is trying to finalize numbers for the above meeting on Thursday, July 5.  Can you please let me know as soon as possible if you will be able to attend?

Thanks!
Amy


Please revise the document as Aleck's changes indicate.  With respect to the
alternative responses shown near the end of the document, leave both
alternatives in.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 07/31/2000 08:58
AM ---------------------------

Richard Shapiro
07/31/2000 07:08 AM
To: Aleck Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Eric
Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT, Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Project Stanley

I am comfortable w/ the changes. On question of whether we colluded W/
Powerex, I would opt for simpler alternative and say we complied w/ all rules
of the pool. Thanks.

To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Hemstock/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc: Ginger Dernehl/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Project Stanley

Privileged and Confidential - For Instruction of
Counsel                                                 Attached is a revised
copy of the Background note discussed earlier this week.  The revisions are
based on comments  from Frontier Economics and GPC, and further reflection by
Rob Hemstock and myself. I have also attached the  raw calculations from
Frontier that underlie several of the revisions.  I have not  sent the
revised document to outside counsel for review.


Pat,

Hello!  I am sending to you a memo from Stuart Zisman here at Enron.  He has
a question that I am forwarding to you, since I don't know the answer.  Would
you please give him an answer today, if possible?

Thanks a lot!

Michelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000 01:46
PM ---------------------------

"Stuart Zisman" <zisman@hotmail.com> on 10/30/2000 12:21:31 AM
To: hhaltom@andrews-kurth.com, michelle.cash@enron.com,
matt.gockerman@enron.com, rhett.jackson@enron.com, patrick.maloy@enron.com,
pbohannon@andrews-kurth.com
cc:
Subject: stuart.zisman@enron.com, jinsung.myung@enron.com

Attached is a memo relating to the E2 transaction.  Please review the memo
and respond as soon as possible.  We need to receive all feedback promptly
as we expect to revise and post the revised Purchase & Sale Agreement by the
end of business today (Monday).  Thanks in advance.

Stuart

Jinsung, please forward this to Don Miller ASAP.

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

 - GENERAL COMMENTS TO REVISED PSA FOR E2.doc


Shares of Enron Corp. (NYSE: ENE - Quotes, News, Boards) were smacked around
again yesterday, following close on the heels of seven-session decline that
sent the stock down more than 13 points, or 16%, from its recent high of
$84.63 (December 28), all amid uncertainty and considerable volatility.
The pullback doesn't appear to be company-specific exactly, although the
rumblings in a certain geographic region, namely California, are triggering
aftershocks
 throughout the U.S. energy community.

As we outlined in a report on January 4, the energy situation in California
has rapidly reached crisis proportions. Strict environmental legislation and
the uncertain
profit potential post-deregulation has kept utilities from installing
sufficient generating capacity in the state over the last 10 years.

The state's two major utilities, PG&E Corp. (NYSE: PCG - Quotes, News,
Boards) and Edison International (NYSE: EIX - Quotes, News, Boards) , are
facing the
 prospect of eventual insolvency due to the spiraling costs of electricity
purchased on the open market. However, the rates the utilities can charge
their customers
 for power represent a fraction of the costs that prevailed during the
gradual rollout of full-scale deregulation.

The risks to Enron are two-fold.

For one, the crisis in California may result in a default of payments to the
state's major wholesale energy providers, including Enron. Although the
company does
 operate in California, the bottom-line impact would likely be shielded to a
considerable degree because of Enron's size, strength, and diversified global
revenue
 streams. In addition, Enron would likely be high on the list of default
payees given its importance to future wholesale energy supplies in the
region.

More significantly, investors are concerned that California legislators may
pull the plug on deregulation entirely, or at least until the current crisis
abates. Some also
 fear this mess might derail utility deregulation in other states as
regulators and politicians alike become fearful of adverse and unintended
economic consequences.

Neither scenario is probable. For one thing, the airline industry was
deregulated in fits and starts, with plenty of mistakes and recrimination
along the way. And a
strong argument can be made that the shortage of electric power would have
pressured rates sharply higher even in a fully regulated environment.

The California Public Utility Commission will attempt to decide the best
course of action this week. It appears inevitable that, regardless of PG&E
and Edison's
 ultimate fate, the state's energy consumers will likely absorb much of the
burden through an increase in the prevailing rate cap.

Enron has also fallen victim to the rotation out of strong defensive stocks
on the heels of the Federal Reserve's unexpected interest-rate cuts last
week. The initial
 euphoria has waned, however, upon the realization that the sharp rate cuts
will serve to offset what appears to be a rapid rate of erosion in domestic
economic
 growth, rather than generating a rebound in economic activity. As a result,
we expect investors once again to seek the shelter of well-capitalized
defensive plays
 like Enron.

We would emphasize that several factors that weigh in Enron's favor have been
overlooked amid the California crisis. The November-December period was
 18% colder than normal and the second-coldest start to the winter months in
the past 50 years. Coupled with an uncertain supply situation, particularly
in natural
gas, Enron stands to profit handsomely from energy volatility and pricing, an
environment that is likely to exist for at least the next 12 months.

In addition, Enron's diversification into still more new avenues of growth
help to insulate the company from additional challenges of this sort in the
future. The
markets for EnronOnline, a real-time commodities exchange vehicle, and
Enron's broadband services unit are expected to at least triple over the next
year.
An eventual inflection point in the groups' profitability would serve to send
profits measurably higher in the long term.

Despite the recent turmoil, Enron's consensus earnings estimate for 2001,
according to First Call, has come down a mere penny, to $1.65 a share.
Although the
stock's rich price/earnings multiple of 43 times may aggravate its near-term
volatility, the absence of a complete collapse of the stock indicates the
market
approves of Enron's maneuvers so far and is confident in its prospects going
forward


To give you a broad perspective on the issues I am dealing in our area, in
addition to the "regional integration/opening markets theme".

"High-noon" show-down over the gas issues. Enron needs to decide to veto the
gas contracts between Petrobras and the gas distribution companies in our
concessions.  We are been positioned as the stumbling block, preventing the
gas contracts for the emergency power plant program, eventually a national
security issue. If we agree with the contracts, we risk some value of the
distribution concessions.

Press articles about a deal with ABEGAS (Gas Distributors Association). The
ABEGAS representative has been negotiating on a number of limited issues. He
does not have the power to negotiate for the individual gas companies.

Project California.-  I have to give an optimistic  spin to the regulatory
situation.  I could be more forceful painting a "dark scenario" in front of
the investment community to pressure the reforms.  We will continue to press
with the regulators, but I will be hand-cuffed to take the debate forcefully
into the public arena.

Enron selling its assets/ getting out of the region.-  A communication
challenge because we can not comment on speculation but we need to tailor the
messages to our audiences. "We are here to stay".

Employees retention and recruiting
Customer/ Partnering relations
Government/ Institutions.

"A new beginning".- Petrobras has reorganized. They have a new Gas & Power
group. The new head has invited us to sit together to review our
relationships. Jim is optimistic about the results. I am not,  but we have to
do it anyway. We can not afford not to try.

Jose

See attachments about Thermoelctric program and Petrobras issues.


thanks vince...Jeff

Vince J Kaminski
09/01/2000 10:23 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re:

Jeff,

Christ, Mark and myself are planning to visit Tom Piazze in October. I talked
to Christy about Wharton
and she will be calling Tom to set it up.

Vince

	From:  Jeffrey A Shankman                           09/01/2000 09:25 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Celeste Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlene Jackson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject:

Hi Vince,

I just got off the phone with donna piazze at Wharton, (I don't know if there
is a relationship with Tom at Wharton), and we were discussing there Tiger
Teams.  It is a required research program, 2nd semester for MBAs, and Wharton
would love to have Enron participate.  I told her there is probably some real
life reasearch project we could have the students do.  She did  also mention
that it is one of the best recruiting tools under development at wharton..  I
gave her your number.

Her number is 215 573 8394.  Please call her when you get a chance within the
week.

Mark, can we get christy involved?  Thanks everyone.

Jeff


Thanks.  We have some relationship with Trans-elect - supported Trans-elect on the NG question of managing member of ARTO.  If you want to sit down with them, let me know.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Roan, Michael
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 1:01 PM
To:	Nicolay, Christi L.; Steffes, James D.; Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	Trans-Elect RTO participation

There are materials of the Trans-elect website that details the CMS purchase,  http://www.trans-elect.com/. Under a Q&A section is the following:

Q: Will Trans-Elect put the METC transmission system in an RTO?
A: Yes, in accordance with FERC requirements that all systems must join an RTO.
Q: Which RTO will Trans-Elect choose?
A: Either the Midwest Independent System Organization (MISO) or the Alliance will be selected. Trans-Elect has 40 days from the announcement to make a selection. Trans-Elect is assessing the two organizations to make a determination as to which one will best serve the interests of Michigan consumers.

Looks like there was substance to the Consumers energy rumour.  Consumers are currently part of Alliance, the fact that the new owner wanted to make a decision on RTOs suggests that they are moving to MISO (they would have looked at the ARTO structure as part of due diligence).  Will let you know when the decision is made.

regards
Mike


Please find attached the latest regulatory filing summary


Cameron and Scott -- that's great!!!
And Congratulations also to all you non-smokers!

Ken and I are looking forward to seeing all of you but we aren't sure
exactly when or how long we'll be dropping by. On a total whim, we bought a
cute (although a bit funky) little house up in Ft. Bragg last October. Our
main goal over Memorial Weekend is going to be to build a new staircase for
that house, but we're hoping to make it down to the dome Sunday early
evening. If not that, then we'll definitely show up for the softball game on
Monday. My Dad, the sweetheart, is coming out to help with this project on
his way up to the San Juan Islands and I know he's excited about getting to
experience a piece of 'The Dome' as well. Sarabeth is going to Greece for a
couple of weeks, so she's going to miss all the fun, poor thing. Anyway,
we'll be sure to bring champagne for all the celebratory causes and
See you all soon!
Celise

>From: Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>
>To: Nancy Sellers <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMondavi.com>, 'Lynne Robertson'
><Lynner@mcn.org>, 'Laura Whiting' <whiting@sonic.net>, 'John Whiting'
><johnw@fsgllc.com>, 'Lisanne and Ken Jensen'
><ljensen@westcoastweathervanes.com>, 'Celise'
><celise_clevenger@hotmail.com>, 'Eldon Sellers' <Eldon@direcpc.com>,
>'Cristina Greenway Shea' <cgreenway@brobeck.com>, 'Chris Shea'
><cshea@marin.org>, 'Carter' <carterhachman@worldnet.att.net>, 'Cameron'
><cameron@perfect.com>, 'Jeff Dasovich' <Jeff_Dasovich@enron.com>,
>"'Prentice @ Berkeley'" <PSellers@haas.berkeley.edu>, 'Prentice Sellers'
><PSellers@pacbell.net>, 'Scott Laughlin' <scottwl@hotmail.com>, 'Colleen
>Silva' <Csilva@jeiusa.com>
>Subject: RE: Memorial Day Update
>Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:27:02 -0700
>
>2 more celebratory items I forgot - well actually, I forgot one and did not
>know about the other...
>
>#1 - Jeff Dasovitch, Scott Laughlin, Cameron Sellers, Nancy Sellers, and
>Prentice Sellers - are all SMOKE FREE!!   Now that is something to
>celebrate!!
>
>and - - -#2 - drum roll  drum roll  drum roll  DRUM ROLL   DRUM ROLL
>
>On Saturday, May 12, Mr. Scott Warner Laughlin asked Ms. Cameron Smith
>Sellers to marry him.  And she
>said............................................YES!!!!!   Isn't that just
>the most wonderful news!!!!!!!  We are all so happy and excited!
>
>
>OK - now for a wine tasting update.  Every "unit" should bring 2 bottles of
>each wine (1 won't make it with this large a crowd).  It does not have to
>be
>from your designated local area ( LizAnne was making noises about the
>Sonoma/Napa/Santa Cruz disparity) - it can just be something you think is
>yummy.
>
>Saturday night let's make it Pinot Noir and Sunday Chardonnay, since no one
>had any burning favorites!
>
>Chris and Cristina have a family reunion that they have to attend  - but
>they promise that the THREE of them will be with us next year!  We will
>really miss you guys!
>
>Anything else?
>
>
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From:  Nancy Sellers
> > Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 10:00 AM
> > To: 'Lynne Robertson'; 'Laura Whiting'; 'John Whiting'; 'Lisanne and Ken
> > Jensen'; 'Celise'; 'Eldon Sellers'; 'Cristina Greenway Shea'; 'Chris
> > Shea'; 'Carter'; Cameron; Jeff Dasovich; Prentice @ Berkeley; Prentice
> > Sellers; Scott Laughlin
> > Subject: Memorial Day
> >
> > I hope you are all making plans to meet at the dome - we are so excited
>to
> > see you all and have some fun!
> >
> > Bring a bottle of bubbly (sparkling cider) because we have some special
> > things to celebrate:
> > * May 20 - Prentice graduates from Haas with her MBA
> > * May 26 - Laura's birthday
> > * John's new job
> > *  and...drum roll...
> > * Cristina is going to have a baby!!!  (November - good Scorpio
> > month!)
> >
> > Please feel free to submit other celebratory items!!
> >
> > There is one major problem.  Try as we might, we have not been able to
>get
> > the deck finished.  Everything is done (I think) except the railing.
>That
> > means there is a definite safety hazard.  Eldon is going to keep trying
>to
> > get someone to finish it up but I am not too hopeful.  That means that
>the
> > deck is fine for:
> >
> > * Sleeping
> > * Sitting
> > * Reading
> > * Chatting
> > * Eating/Cooking
> > * Moderate Alcohol consumption
> >
> > IT IS NOT FINE FOR:
> > * Dancing (Andrew)
> > * Running (Scotty)
> > * Manhattan Projects (Teddy)
> > * Heavy duty alcohol consumption (Chris)
> >
> > I have a couple of requests:
> >
> > #1 - I think we should start having an annual blind wine tasting.  A
>white
> > on Saturday and a red on Sunday - if anyone has a varietal that they
>want
> > to start with - let me know.  Each "family unit" should bring a bottle
>of
> > the white and red varietal and we will hold a blind tasting.  What do
>you
> > think?  It would be especially fun if the wines were typical of your
> > geographical area and we could have a really diverse sampling.  If you
> > want to use wine glasses you would have to bring your own.  I'll have
> > plastic ones available.
> >
> > #2 - I have a special request for the ab hunters.   It would be so great
> > if we could have the ab feast for dinner on Sunday night instead of as
> > appetizers on Saturday.  That would save one whole meal of cooking and
>we
> > could do a nice salad, garlic bread, etc.  I realize that we would have
>to
> > improvise if -- God forbid -- the ab was not to be found - but we could
> > chance it!
> >
> > Let me know about any other ideas you have out there...
> >
> > Don't forget your baseball mitts!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Nancy
> > (707) 251-4870 (phone)
> > (707) 265-5446 (fax)
> > "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
> >
> >
> >

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Good to go!

	Chris Walker/ENRON@enronXgate 05/25/2001 11:34 AM 	   To: Jeff Blumenthal/ENRON@enronXgate, Susan Musch/ENRON@enronXgate, Bjorn Hagelmann/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Shari Mao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlie Hoang/ENRON@enronXgate  cc: Lisa Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Tara Sweitzer/ENRON@enronXgate, Dawn C Kenne/ENRON@enronXgate, Torrey Moorer/ENRON@enronXgate, Robert B Cass/ENRON@enronXgate, Kevin Meredith/ENRON@enronXgate, Melba Lozano/ENRON@enronXgate, Carlos Alatorre/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: Approval needed for 2 product types (CAN Recycled OCC and ONP Phy)

Please approve the following 2 product types in Data Manager after 11:00 A.M.  Attached are the GTC and long descriptions.

CAN Recycled OCC Phy
CAN Recycled ONP Phy

STEPS FOR APPROVAL:

click the 	START button
select 	PROGRAMS
select 	TEST APPLICATIONS
select	ENRONONLINE CLUSTER(PROD)
	PROCEED WITH USUAL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click the	Enron Online Production Cluster "START" button
select	EnronOnLine (this is the EOL Datamanager)
	PROCEED WITH EOL LOGIN/PASSWORD
click on the "+" for EnronOnLine
click on the "+" for Product Types
click on the "+" for "Awaiting Approval" (OR  "Partially Approved")
select the product requiring review as stated in e-mail above
Right "mouse" click on "properties" to view product set-up
TO APPROVE:  Right mouse click on "Approved"


Please prepare a draft isda for this hedge fund ASAP.  Before actually
distributing this ISDA, please give me word that it is ready in the event
that Bill wants to tweak something.


What do you think?
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Purcell, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:43 PM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	RE: Cuts and Desks

In this case PPM, the purchase, was cut. The sale side, PNGC did not get any power and are sending us LD's. Both sides are affected and both sides need  an annuity put into the system.  Sale annuity to PPM and a purchase annuity for PNGC.  The sale is LT NW and the purchase is ST NW.

MP

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scholtes, Diana
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:02 PM
To:	Purcell, Mike
Subject:	RE: Cuts and Desks

Was the purchase cut or the sale cut?  Which ever it is, it should correspond to the book associated with it.

d

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Purcell, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:54 PM
To:	Scholtes, Diana
Subject:	Cuts and Desks

Diana,

Here is the same question I had the other day.  When we have a cut and  the purchase side of the deal  is ST NW and on the sale side the deal is LT NW how do you want us to enter the annuities.  If I put them on one book then we should be fine.

Thanks

Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297


> >>
> >> > > > This, from a Canadian newspaper, is worth
>sharing.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > America: The Good Neighbor.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Widespread but only partial news coverage was
>given recently
>to a
> >> > remarkable
> >> > > > editorial broadcast from Toronto by Gordon
>Sinclair, a
>Canadian
> >> > television
> >> > > > commentator.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >   >>
> >> > > > What follows is
> >> > > > <<  the full text of his trenchant remarks as
>printed in the
> >> > Congressional
> >> > > > Record:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > "This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up
>for the Americans
>as
> >> > the
> >> > most
> >> > > > generous and possibly the least appreciated
>people on all the
> >> > earth.
> >> > > > Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent,
>Britain and Italy were
> >> > lifted
> >> > out of
> >> > > > the debris of war by the Americans who poured
>in billions of
> >> > dollars and
> >> > > > forgave other billions in debts.  None of
>these countries is
> >> > today
> >> > paying
> >> > > > even the interest on its remaining debts to
>the United States.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > When France was in danger of collapsing in
>1956, it was the
> >> > Americans
> >> > who
> >> > > > propped it up, and their reward was to be
>insulted and
>swindled
> >> > on the
> >> > > > streets of Paris.  I was there.  I saw it.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is
>the United States
>that
> >> > hurries in
> >> > > > to help.  This spring, 59 American
>communities were flattened
>by
> >> > tornadoes.
> >> > > > Nobody helped.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy
>pumped billions of
> >> > dollars into
> >> > > > discouraged countries.  Now newspapers in
>those countries are
> >> > writing
> >> > > > about the decadent, warmongering Americans.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'd like to see just one of those countries
>that is gloating
>over
> >> > the
> >> > erosion
> >> > > > of the United States dollar build its own
>airplane.  Does any
> >> > other
> >> > country
> >> > > > in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing
>Jumbo Jet, the
> >> > Lockheed
> >> > > > Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10?  If so, why
>don't they fly
>them?
> >> > Why do
> >> > all
> >> > > > the International lines except Russia fly
>American Planes?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Why does no other land on earth even consider
>putting a man or
> >> > woman on
> >> > the
> >> > > > moon?  You talk about Japanese technocracy,
>and you get
>radios.
> >> > You
> >> > talk
> >> > > > about German technocracy, and you get
>automobiles.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > You talk about American technocracy, and you
>find men on the
>moon
> >> > -- not
> >> > > > once, but several times--and safely home
>again.  You talk
>about
> >> > scandals, and
> >> > > > the Americans put theirs right in the store
>window for
>everybody
> >> > to look
> >> > at.
> >> > > > Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and
>hounded.  They
>are
> >> > here on
> >> > our
> >> > > > streets, and
> >> > > > most of them, unless they are breaking
>Canadian laws, are
>getting
> >> > American
> >> > > > dollars from ma and pa at home to spend here.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > When the railways of France, Germany and
>India were breaking
>down
> >> > through
> >> > > > age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them.
>When the
> >> > Pennsylvania
> >> > Railroad
> >> > > > and the New York Central went broke, nobody
>loaned them an old
> >> > caboose.
> >> > Both
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > still broke.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I can name you 5,000 times when the Americans
>raced to the
>help
> >> > of other
> >> > > > people in trouble.  Can you name me even one
>time when someone
> >> > else
> >> > raced to
> >> > > > the Americans in trouble?  I don't think
>there was outside
>help
> >> > even
> >> > during
> >> > > > the San Francisco earthquake.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I'm
>one Canadian who is
> >> > damned
> >> > tired
> >> > > > of hearing them get kicked around. They will
>come out of this
> >> > thing with
> >> > > > their flag high.  And when they do, they are
>entitled to thumb
> >> > their
> >> > nose at
> >> > > > the lands that
> >> > > > are gloating over their present troubles.  I
>hope Canada is
>not
> >> > one of
> >> > those."
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Stand proud, America!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This is one of the best editorials that I
>have ever read
> >> > regarding the
> >> > United
> >> > > > States.  It is nice that one man realizes it.
>  I only wish
>that
> >> > the rest
> >> > of
> >> > > > the world would realize it.  We are always
>blamed for
>everything,
> >> > and
> >> > never
> >> > > > even get a thank
> >> > > > you for the things we do.  I would hope that
>each of you would
> >> > send this
> >> > to
> >> > > > as many people as you can and emphasize that
>they should send
>it
> >> > to as
> >> > many
> >> > > > of their friends until this letter is sent to
>every person on
>the
> >> > web.
> >> > I am
> >> > > > just a single American that has read this, I
>SURE HOPE THAT A
>LOT
> >> > MORE
> >> > READ
> >> > > > IT SOON.  >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > <<  Makes you proud to live here doesn't it??
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
>http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>

______________________________________________________________________________
_______
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


FYI.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Mazowita/Corp/Enron on 10/05/2000
10:32 AM ---------------------------

"Mike Gough" <mike.gough@naes.com> on 10/05/2000 10:28:10 AM
Please respond to <mike.gough@naes.com>
To: "Mazowita, Mike" <MIKE.MAZOWITA@ENRON.COM>
cc: "Scarborough, Dan" <dan.scarborough@naes.com>, "Ward, Chuck"
<Charles.Ward@enron.com>

Subject: Tenaska IV outage update

We are finally beginning to put closure on our outage. It has been
frustrating to say the least. We are currently projecting a late Friday or
early Saturday morning startup barring any unseen problems.

MG


Les -
Here's the latest list of unit contingent deals in need of unit names. I've
tried referring to your unit name list and entering them myself, but it looks
like some delivery points correspond to more than one unit. I.E. Navajo can
originate from LV Cogen OR Saguaro Power. If you could add these unit names
into the deals, or let me know what they are so I can enter them, it would be
much appreciated.

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 05/01/2001 10:49 AM
---------------------------

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
05/01/2001 07:19 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Unit Contingent Deals

Mornin' Sunshine!!!
I need unit names for all of the following deals please:
593484
593486
594911
594915
595073
597061
597063
597065
598151
598153

Thanks!
Kim


FYI, Kim.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Harris, Steven
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 9:33 AM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Lohman, TK; Donoho, Lindy
Subject:	FW: TW ROFR

fyi

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Mary Kay
Sent:	Thursday, November 08, 2001 1:05 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Pryor, Tony; Hass, Glen; Darveaux, Mary; Lokey, Teb; Kirk, Steve; Pavlou, Maria; Rapp, Bill
Subject:	TW ROFR

  Upon receipt of a notice to exercise ROFR, you must determine the criteria of when the notice is required,  In the example provided I'm told it required a one year notice therefore if the contract terminated 10/31/02, notice was due 10/31/01.  Therefore 10 days after 10/31/01 the capacity must be posted for bidding.  In the interim, since it has not yet been posted a transaction could be negotiated and the shipper would then be required to provide notice of resinding the original election to participate in the Rofr process.  If this isn't clear, please call    MK


i tell him to bring some food


I need to review the outstanding omnibus confirm for this paper/pulp
counterparty.  I believe there is only one live trade.  Thanks.  SS


I'm going to be working late, and I have some errands I need to run, so I
don't really have plans, except that dinner will probably be around 8 pm or
so.

Mat


I don't see anything controversial in Leslie's outline.  We've done  a lot of
thinking about Dynegy's "funny money" argument and I volunteer Maria to work
with you and Leslie on making sure ENA's comments are consistent with ours on
this and all related issues.  DF

Shelley Corman
12/14/2000 04:17 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert Kilmer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Ray
Neppl/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Frazier King/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Place/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Marketing Affiliate Proceeding

FYI - Attached are ENA's preliminary thoughts on comments for the marketing
affiliate conference.  They are not certain yet whether they want to sponsor
a participant at the discussion table.
---------------------- Forwarded by Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron on 12/14/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------
From: Leslie Lawner on 12/13/2000 11:42 AM MST
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Marketing Affiliate Proceeding

Here is a memo on PL00-1.  Shelly, I am sure you will recognize the ideas.
Thanks.


I'm walking home for lunch and I'll call in 5 minutes.  or you can try me
there
at 610-676-0483 between then and 12:30 (9:30) or so.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 11:30 AM
> To: gramlr@pjm.com
> Subject: RE: GSPP on the forefront
>
>
> can you give me a call?  415.782.7822.  i'm freed up from a call i'm on in
> about 15 minutes.
>
>
>
>
> gramlr@pjm.com on 08/04/2000 08:26:16 AM
>
> To:   jdasovic@enron.com
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: GSPP on the forefront
>
>
> The threshold question is sponsorship, so if you have any ideas I'd
> appreciate
> it.  My contacts are all academics/policy people which is of no help at
> all.
>
> Do you work for Kaufman?  What's he like?  It sounds like you know about
> the
> position--would it be working with you?
> Rob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Friday, August 04, 2000 11:13 AM
> > To:     gramlr@pjm.com
> > Subject:     Re: GSPP on the forefront
> >
> >
> > Greetings.  Hold on, you mean someone's happy being involved with PJM?
> You
> > may be the only one (kidding).  Great to hear from.  Think it would be a
> > great idea to do a forum.  My preference would be to bring all of Enron's
> > resources (other than cash) to the effort.  But we can talk.  Be happy to
> > get involved.  Like to do it sooner rather than later given the atmo
> (Davis
> > has appointed Commissioners Lenin and Trotsky to the California PUC).
> >
> > You would be THE perfect person for that job, and think you should take
> it.
> > Let's talk more.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > gramlr@pjm.com on 08/04/2000 08:06:39 AM
> >
> > To:   jeff.dasovich@enron.com
> > cc:
> > Subject:  GSPP on the forefront
> >
> >
> > > Jeff,
> > > How are you?  Wild prices and politics out there I gather.  I have a
> > > question/proposal for you.  A major goal that is shared by the GSPP
> > alumni
> > > board
> > > and the school is to host policy forums that attract top academics,
> > policy
> > > makers, and public attention as not only a good public service, but at
> > good PR
> > > for the school and its mission.  Since electricity deregulation in CA
> is
> > on
> > > the
> > > front page of all major newspapers this summer, the Dean and I are
> > interested
> > > in
> > > putting together an electricity policy forum.  I would need your
> > contacts,
> > > political sense, and perhaps some financial support from Enron to make
> > this
> > > work.  Do you like the idea and would you be willing to help in some of
> > these
> > > ways?  I think it is in the interest of Enron to advance reasoned
> debate
> > with
> > > the backing of the independent/objective GSPP against what is already a
> > major
> > > emotional/political backlash.
> > >
> > > On a totally unrelated issue, I spoke with Tim Belden about a position
> in
> > the
> > > Enron govt affairs group working with the trading desk.  I guess the VP
> > for
> > > the
> > > West, Kaufman, is supposed to call me.  If the job is really to
> > understand and
> > > follow RTO developments and their interaction with energy prices it
> seems
> > a
> > > perfect fit with what I've been doing.  I told Tim I'm happy where I am
> > but
> > > the
> > > opportunity sounds interesting.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Rob
> > >
> > > Rob Gramlich
> > > PJM Market Monitoring Unit
> > > (610) 666-4291
> > > gramlr@pjm.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>