Steve:  FYI.  Don't worry about the conference call, but thought it might be
useful to review the proposals prior to Monday's meeting.

See you Monday.

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

Best,
Jeff

******************************************************************************
**************************************

Several IEP companies have been invited to a meeting with the Governor,s
staff next Monday, November 27th.
The following are some options, which the Governor,s office is considering.
IEP is doing some preliminary research on some of these topics.  IEP would
like to arrange a teleconference call around noon on Monday, November 27th to
discuss the Governor,s meeting.  Please advise us as to whether your have
been invited, and who you are sending.
California,s electricity supply situation has two inter-related problems )
(1) high wholesale electricity costs, and (2) marginally adequate supply of
generation ) both have combined to create a dysfunctional wholesale
electricity market.  The goals should be:
 To assure reliable electricity to California consumers for the lowest
reasonable cost.
o Consider requiring that all in-state generation be sold in state.
o Consider re-asserting state authority over the operation, maintenance and
safety practices of all in-state generating facilities, for public health and
safety purposes.
o Consider developing a state power authority to build generation and
own/operate transmission.
o Consider requiring utilities both to retain existing and to build new
generation.
o Consider providing utilities with authority to stabilize retail prices to
be paid by consumers through development of an energy portfolio that reduces
exposure to spot markets, including contracting forward for much more of
their unmet power needs.
o Consider extending consumer rate freeze.
o Consider centralizing power plant dispatch like the other ISOs in the rest
of the country.
o Consider eliminating the ISO and assigning its functions to either a state
or private entity that can acquire the transmission facilities, and control
the electricity transmission grid (MUNIs have proposed this).
o Consider sponsoring/supporting legislation to change the ISO and PX boards
to increase accountability.
o Expand energy conservation programs focused both on immediate peak demand
reduction and on longer term, broader-based programs.
o Aggressively work to site new generation and transmission facilities, to
streamline permitting, and to develop renewable resources.
o Call for/sponsor federal FERC reform legislation that would:
o Impose a regional price cap that varies by time of day and year;
o Set requirements for FERC to use its retroactive refund authority;
o Improve FERC enforcement over price gouging practices;
o Affirm the role of states to protect their customers from unjust prices.
o Pressure the FERC to do its job to (1) bring about responsible seller
behavior in wholesale electric markets through price controls and other
market interventions as necessary, and (2) provide refunds to affected
consumers.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 03:44 PM -----

	Susan J Mara
	11/22/2000 03:05 PM

		 To: "CHUDSON" <carol@iepa.com>
		 cc: "Andy Brown \(E-mail\)" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, chudson@iepa.com, "Curtis
Kebler \(E-mail\)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Delaney Hunter
\(E-mail\)" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jeff
Dasovich \(E-mail\)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)"
<joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout \(E-mail\)" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>,
jparker@HMOT.com, "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
kelly@hnks.com, "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "Lynn
Lednicky \(E-mail\)" <lale@dynegy.com>, marie_moretti@msn.com,
mrmonagan@aol.com, "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)" <rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Bob
Escalante \(E-mail\)" <rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)" <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)"
<Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com
		 Subject: Re:

Jeff Dasovich and Steve Kean are attending.  Someone can be on a call -- me
if no one else -- if Jeff and Steve are travelling at the time. Hey, does the
Governor have to fly coach?

	"CHUDSON" <carol@iepa.com>
	11/22/2000 12:47 PM

		 To: "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Jeff Dasovich \(E-mail\)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <knorton@mcnallytemple.com>,
"John Stout \(E-mail\)" <John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Curtis Kebler
\(E-mail\)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, "Andy
Brown \(E-mail\)" <abb@eslawfirm.com>, "Bob Escalante \(E-mail\)"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott \(E-mail\)" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)" <joer@calpine.com>, "Lynn Lednicky
\(E-mail\)" <lale@dynegy.com>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com, "Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Susan J
Mara \(E-mail\)" <Susan_J_Mara@enron.com>, <mrmonagan@aol.com>,
<marie_moretti@msn.com>, "Delaney Hunter \(E-mail\)"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, <kelly@hnks.com>, <jparker@HMOT.com>,
<chudson@iepa.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Jan Smutny-Jones, Exec Dir
Independent Energy Producers Assn.
1112 I Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, CA 95814
PH: 916-448-9499
FX: 916-448-0182
iepa@iepa.com

 - Govs meeting Conf Call.doc


When I asked you to adjust the Gas Logistic's PAA's to $100, I forgot to ask you to do the same on the separate PAA for gift checks for EOTT pipeline control.  Please give me a call if you need any supplemental paperwork from me.

Happy Holidays


Thanks for the idea.  I'll pass it on to Mark Metts

	Mark Schroeder@ECT
	12/18/2000 05:10 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: water opportunity

I meant to send you an article some time ago on the UK water business (now
cannot find it).  I do not make it my habit to follow this sector, and we
have never discussed my following this here in the UK.  However, I just
wanted you to be aware, and you can pass along as you see fit, that recent
developments in the UK water sector should create new business opportunities
for Wessex (and, indeed, trade press here reports as much).  I am also not
trying to "end run" either Colin Skellett (CEO) or Keith Harris (reg. affaris
at Wessex), both of whom I have a high regad for.  just wanted to get this
into the right circles.  The development is the "mutualisation" of water
distribution companies.  This was proposed last year by Kelda, in England,
and turned down by the water regulator.  It is essentially securitising the
future income streams of the pipes business, servicing bonds, and making the
customers the owners (there is essentially no equity stake).  Thus, the
license obligation to invest in infrastructure is on the customers themselves
(raises interesting enforcement problems).  The "services" part of the
business is "outsourced" on a competitive basis (this is where Wessex would
come in).  As I noted, such a proposal has previously been rejected.  Now,
though, it is proposed to "mutualise" the Welsh water company.  Normally the
regulator would reject this, for being unsound along the same lines as the
earlier proposal.  However, the leaders of this "mutualisation" effort in
Wales are 200 of the "great and the good" leaders of the Welsh business
community, and it is seen as a source of Welsh "national" pride to take back
ownership of their water industry, i.e., meaning it is going to happen.  We
now have a new water regulator who is smart enough not to stand in the way of
Welsh politics, and has said he thinks the proposal has some merit and he
will look not reject it out of hand.  Wessex could bid on the "services"
agreement for this company, and if approved, this "mutualisation" will open
the door for others to follow, and and hence more opportunities for Wessex.
Hope this is of some interest and use to you.   mcs


Mark:

Pursuant to our conversation today, we would appreciate your thoughts on the
attached advice and whether it is too "risky" for us to proceed using Enron
Japan as the counterparty for weather derivatives in light of how we have
assessed the risk in other jurisdictions regarding weather derivatives. I
will also being forwarding to you the June 13 e-mail advice mentioned in the
attached memo. The referenced January 14, 2000 memorandum is quite lengthy,
but I can forward to you by e-mail if you would like. Let me know what you
think as soon as you can; sometime this week would be very helpful. Thanks a
lot.

Alan
----- Forwarded by Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 04:36 PM -----

	John Viverito@ENRON
	07/10/2000 03:01 AM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Weather and Oil Derivatives

Hi Alan-

I will give you a ring your Monday morning to discuss B&M's attached advice
and other issues.  Based on the advice, I think we are in pretty good shape
with the contemplated activities, not totally risk-free, but with "relatively
low" risk so long as we institute certain procedures and ensure that the
GTC's reflect their comments.  It has been pretty busy here, primarily
operational/administrative work and all, thus far, is proceeding smoothly.

Cheers,

John

----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 07/10/2000 02:42 AM -----

	Jeremy.Pitts@BAKERNET.com
	07/07/2000 05:49 AM

		 To: John.Viverito@enron.com
		 cc: scott.gilchrist@enron.com, Paul.TYO.Davis@BakerNet.com,
Naoaki.Eguchi@BAKERNET.com, Shinji.Toyohara@BAKERNET.com,
alan.aronowitz@enron.com, nicholas.o'day@enron.com, michael.grimes@enron.com,
jonathan.whitehead@enron.com
		 Subject: Weather and Oil Derivatives

John  - the memo is attached.  I am copying this to Scott in the event that we
have transmission problems getting to you.

Scott - could you make sure that John receives this message.

Thanks and best regards

Jeremy Pitts

 <<Gamble 06.07.00.doc>>

 - Gamble 06.07.00.doc


A succinct and strong analysis


It would be total exposure, physical and financial, for gas, and then power separately, if you have access to that.  If not, forget power.  The date would be as of our bankruptcy, (Dec. 2nd?).  What did we owe them that we are not going to pay them?  What is our future exposure (MTM) as of now? (For a summer 2002 swap, for example.)  and what do they owe us if we haven't been paid?  We just need to be aware of how things ended with Enron so we can discuss it when we knock on their door as UBS.

Let me know what else you need and thanks for your help.

Kim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:20 PM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	RE: West Gas Roll Out Plan

Kim,

Are these physical or financial, or a combination.  Do you know the termination dates?  If not, I will try to get them from the confirmations group.

Thanks
Kam

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 4:03 PM
To:	Keiser, Kam
Subject:	FW: West Gas Roll Out Plan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:03 AM
To:	Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	West Gas Roll Out Plan

Kim, as part of the roll out plans we will need a summary report of the close out values for these customers.  Can you coordinate with credit, including the utilization of an analyst ( if you can find one). to complete this list.

Cash means ( receivables, payables positions outstanding).
MTM ( the last MTM that we had with a company as we closed out).

The intent of compiling this information is to be able to position ourself for the appropriate conversation with this customer.... (if Enron owes them money, we should know that before we walk in the door).

Pls review and let's discuss....

BT  << File: westgascustlistrolloutplan.xls >>


Located at:

M:\Electric\Miller\P&L\Historical Analysis - Nepool.xls

You may need some "add-ins" to use this model, as it queries the database.

Good Luck,

Jeff


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	 Staff Mtg. Conference room EB4102

Date:		1/29/2001
Time:		11:00 AM - 1:00 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


No, I can go to Best Buy and get it.  I just wanted to make sure you were
still in.  If you want to just order it, you can, but I was just making sure
it was what you wanted to do.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Jason Bass
Subject: RE: DVD player for Mom and Dad

are you telling me that you want me to buy and you will pay me back?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:08 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: RE: DVD player for Mom and Dad
Well the bottom one I think would be best.  Amazon has free shipping now.
But I just Saw that Best Buy has it for 188 instead of 199.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bass, Eric [mailto:Eric.Bass@ENRON.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:54 PM
To: Jason Bass
Subject: RE: DVD player for Mom and Dad

whatever you think - just let me know
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Bass [mailto:JBass@stdauto.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Bass, Eric
Subject: DVD player for Mom and Dad
http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11064102
<http://www.bestbuy.com/detail.asp?e=11064102&m=1&cat=32&scat=244>
&m=1&cat=32&scat=244

or this is the best one for the money.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005AK8U/104-2782814-1135955
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00005AK8U/104-2782814-1135955>

What do you think?

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Attached is the Management Report for Feb. 29, 2000

External Trading

 Total  29-Feb-00  To Date

 Number of Transactions   1,155   39,504
 Gross Notional Value $   463,655,144   13,348,236,465

 Revenue from Physical flows to date ($)    389,590,286

 Number of New Counterparties transacting today    4
 Number of Counterparties having transacted to date    236

 N.A. Gas

 Number of Transactions   893   32,560
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   176,724,389   6,578,821,519
 Gross Notional Value $   369,245,902   10,725,358,246

 UK Gas

 Number of Transactions   118   2,192
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   23,947,500   290,654,000
 Gross Notional Value $   49,068,042   588,977,144

 Belgium Gas

 Number of Transactions   1   82
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   750,000   17,455,000
 Gross Notional Value $   95,813   33,077,248

 U.S. Power

 Number of Transactions   96   3,358
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   723,029   27,453,027
 Gross Notional Value $   28,797,941   1,012,870,946

 UK Power

 Number of Transactions   3   206
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   50,400   9,760,421
 Gross Notional Value $   1,621,319   366,340,778

 Swiss Power

 Number of Transactions   3   34
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   4,452   58,155
 Gross Notional Value $   92,703   1,291,297

 German Power

 Number of Transactions   25   241
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   95,357   1,981,993
 Gross Notional Value $   1,645,518   37,252,632

 Spanish Power

 Number of Transactions   -     6
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   -     17,713,650
 Gross Notional Value $   -     631,836

 Norwegian Power

 Number of Transactions   1   104
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   11,160   1,938,264
 Gross Notional Value $   179,786   28,427,265

 Crude & Products

 Number of Transactions   4   250
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   600,000   27,460,184
 Gross Notional Value $   9,861,600   369,447,080

 Petchems

 Number of Transactions   -     42
 Volume of Transactions    -     360,000
 Gross Notional Value $   -     59,888,900

 LPG

 Number of Transactions   7   190
 Volume of Transactions (BBl's)   56,000   2,184,000
 Gross Notional Value $   2,045,000   74,362,500

 U.S. Coal

 Number of Transactions   3   85
 Volume of Transactions (st)   18   2,033,424
 Gross Notional Value $   1,001,250   29,767,433

 U.S. Pulp & Paper

 Number of Transactions   -     4
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     2,550
 Gross Notional Value $   -     1,500,750

 Plastics

 Number of Transactions   -     1
 Volume of Transactions   -     1,500,000
 Gross Notional Value $   -     427,500

 Emmissions

 Number of Transactions   -     58
 Volume of Transactions   -     145,000
 Gross Notional Value $   -     18,982,650

 U.S. Weather

 Number of Transactions   1   92
 Volume of Transactions    1   97
 Gross Notional Value $   270   59,760

 UK Weather

 Number of Transactions   -     22
 Volume of Transactions    -     22
 Gross Notional Value $   -     6,438

 Number of Users Logging onto EnronOnline:
 External Users with Execution rights    812
 External Users with No Execution Rights    62

 Internal Trading
 29-Feb-00  To Date
 Gas

 Number of Transactions   118   2,915
 Volume of Transactions (mmbtu's)   46,696,943   1,192,523,602
 Gross Notional Value $   115,033,723   2,111,296,314

 Power

 Number of Transactions   2   75
 Volume of Transactions (MWh's)   56,913   1,023,527
 Gross Notional Value $   1,623,870   30,817,983

 Coal

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Emmissions

 Number of Transactions   -     -
 Volume of Transactions (st)   -     -
 Gross Notional Value $   -     -

 Total

 Number of Transactions   120   2,990
 Gross Notional Value $   116,657,593   2,142,114,297

Regards

Louise


Kevin,

Please, talk to Jeff Shankman's secretary about including all the Research
Group members on
the 31st floor  in the company provided lunches (when they are available).

If an additional  lunch is needed from time to time, it's fine, but it should
be seen as a something done
under exceptional circumstances.

Vince

Kevin G Moore
12/20/99 12:10 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shirley
Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Daily Lunches

Hi Vince ,
It has been brought to my attention that several
members of the Weather Team may require a
lunch from time to time.
The person right now is Trisha Tlapek she
has to be at her desk .
Please , could  I provide  daily lunches for her.

                                             Thanks
                                         Kevin Moore


FYI

Beverly
---------------------- Forwarded by Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT on 12/28/2000 10:27
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Victor Haley" <Victor.Haley@dvn.com>
12/28/2000 11:24 AM

To: <beverly.beaty@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: ENRON AVAILS- JAN, 2001 REVISED

ENRON AVAILS-  JAN, 2001  REVISED

 - EnronAvails0101.xls


Mr. Dasovich,

It turns out that this is the same meeting that Jim Steffes has set up for 2:00 p.m. CST today.  Thanks for your help.

Best regards,

Jan

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Cooley, Jan
Subject:	RE: November 7 Prehearing Conference

Actually, I'm travelling tomorrow.  If we could do it between 8 and 9:30 AM (PST), that would work.  Otherwise, I'll need to do Wednesday if possible.

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooley, Jan
Sent:	Monday, October 29, 2001 7:29 AM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	November 7 Prehearing Conference

Mr. Dasovich,

Bob Williams has asked me to schedule a conf. call regarding the November 7 Prehearing Conference.  Are you available tomorrow from 1:00 - 2:00 p.m. CST?  Thanks.

Jan


Helen-

I was just checking to see if Sunday, Feb. 18 at 3 pm would work for Kali's
last private lesson.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira


T:  Would you please print this and attached and file in BP amoco file?
Thanks.  MHC

---------------------- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 11:06
PM ---------------------------
From: Rick Johnson@ENRON on 05/02/2000 12:03 PM
To: Glenn Wright/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle
Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Labor Specific Response - BP Amoco's RFP

Bob, Glenn;  attached word doc provides our recommended responses to BP
Amoco.
Michelle indicates that we are requesting copies of collective bargaining /
union agreements.  Please let me know if I can be of further assistance.

                 Regards,  Rj


TO:         Interested Industry Participants
FROM:   Rae McQuade, Executive Director
RE:     Meeting Agenda for Industry Meeting to be held April 17, 2000
DATE:       April 7, 2000

To follow up on the meeting held on February 14 regarding the industry
support for an organization whose role would be to develop wholesale and
retail energy standards, two additional public meetings will be held.  These
meetings are public and any interested industry participant is invited to
attend.  This meeting agenda is attached in .pdf format.  You may already
have received the meeting announcement from our office.

Scope is the topic of this meeting.  Once again, the Department of Energy has
graciously offered its facilities for the meeting site.  The meeting
specifics are below:

WHERE:  Department of Energy
            Forrestal Building
            1000 Independence Avenue, SW
            Washington, DC 20585

WHEN:       Monday, April 17
            1:00 p.m.  to  6:00 p.m.

Work papers for this meeting can be forwarded to the GISB office by April 12
in electronic format (gisb@aol.com).  The work papers should address items
that should or should not be included within the scope of an organization
whose role would be to develop wholesale and retail energy standards.  The
work papers will be posted on the home page (www.gisb.org) and emailed to all
participants on April 13.

The Department of Energy has security procedures for visitors, so those
intending to attend the meeting should notify the GISB office (gisb@aol.com)
by Wednesday, April 12 and provide the following information:
? Name of Attendee
? Company Represented
? Phone Number
? Email Address
? Fax Number
? Country of Citizenship
An attendance list will be provided to the Department of Energy to facilitate
the sign in procedures.

Governance including industry segments and voting is the topic of a
subsequent meeting, scheduled for April 26 from 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Building, 888 1st Street NE,
Washington, D.C.  The meeting announcement and agenda for April 26 will be
made available shortly.

Please feel free to call the GISB office should you have any questions or
comments.  We look forward to seeing you at this industry meeting.

Best Regards,
Rae McQuade

 - agenda.pdf


In order to better align our engineering and operations capabilities with the
commercial businesses they support, we are pleased to announce the following
organizational change will be effective immediately.  A new business unit,
Enron Engineering and Operational Services (EEOS), is being formed which will
include our existing operations in Enron Engineering and Construction Company
(EE&CC), Operational Energy Corporation (OEC), and National Energy Production
Corporation (NEPCO).

Brian Stanley, as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Keith Dodson, as
Chief Operating Officer will provide the leadership for this new
organization, reporting to the Office of the Chairman of Enron Wholesale
Services.  NEPCO will continue to operate as a stand-alone business under
John Gillis, President.

With the majority of EE&CC and OEC,s activities focused on assets and
projects which are in Wholesale Services, this will better align the efforts
of EEOS with the commercial businesses it supports.  While EEOS will be a
stand-alone unit within Enron Wholesale Services it will work very closely
with and have direct accountability to the business units it supports.

This realignment also centralizes our engineering and operations capabilities
in a single business segment and should ensure that innovation and best
practices are shared and implemented across our many operations and will also
allow for better identification of priorities and more effective allocation
of resources to these projects.  Consistent with this approach, Development
Engineering will have dual reporting to both EEOS and the business units
which they support.

With an extensive and varied portfolio of assets around the world and a wide
variety of new development opportunities available to Enron, it is critical
that we continue to maintain the best in class capability to design,
construct, commission, and effectively manage and operate Enron,s assets on a
global basis.

This new global business unit should insure that we will continue to enhance
these demonstrated capabilities and provide us with a sustainable advantage
as we advance our business strategy around the world.

Please join us in congratulating Brian and Keith on their new assignments.

Mark Frevert & Dave Delainey


I made the decision last week to disband the Strategic Initiatives team which
reported to Mary Solmonson within my organization.  The group was led by a
director, and consisted of 2 managers, 1 senior specialist and 4
specialists.  The employees were made aware of this decision last Friday
afternoon.  My HR rep was on hand to explain the help that all will receive
in finding new assignments within Enron through the Enron Corp. Re-deployment
Team.  Mary Solmonson continues as one of my direct reports, focused on
CommodityLogic and our business development efforts regarding the
commercialization of mid and back office services.

As part of my on-going effort to deliver both the best value and quality of
service within Energy Operations, I reviewed core versus non-core activities
within my team.  I am committed to investing appropriately in people
resources to support core activities.  And I believe that we can become even
more effective if investments in non-core activities are eliminated.    The
role played by the Strategic Intiatives team in coordinating systems projects
will be more appropriately shouldered by the IT project leads and the
respective business sponsors/end users.  The "middle-man" role played by the
Strategic Initiatives team had ceased to deliver appropriate value.

I wanted you to be aware of my decision in case you hear anything about the
re-deployment effort.


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/03/99
09:40 AM ---------------------------

SHoward@milbank.com on 11/02/99 11:42:30 PM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: NSM cases in California

The Milbank attorney working with me on the Farallon and Legg Mason cases is
Roland Tellis  phone 213-892-4573; e-mail  rtellis@milbank.com

Steve Howard
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
showard@milbank.com
213-892-4478; 213-892-4748 (fax)

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

 - att1.htm


I think I received this e-mail in error.  I am in the Legal-financial trading group.

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Danilov, Viacheslav
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 9:41 AM
To:	Williams, Matthew D; Hewitt, Kirstee; Heard, Marie
Cc:	Karabatsos, Anastasia
Subject:	FW: Power transmission curves

guys,

I know that Nick is working on something like this.

Please, could you provide your view on whether we are expected to provide sign offs for the methodology.

many thanks,

Slava

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Karabatsos, Anastasia
Sent:	01 October 2001 15:37
To:	Evans, Coralie; Danilov, Viacheslav
Cc:	Nath, Tani
Subject:	Power transmission curves

Coralie/Slava

We had a meeting with Matt Kernot on Friday, about SMBP, SMSP, RCRC curves for UK power.
These are due to go live in the near term (if they haven't already)

The team is using various scalars to create HH curve if needed.

I was wondering if anyone in Risk or Research had looked at the validity of the curves and scalars and if Risk/Research is expected to sign off on these?


Greg Whalley and I have moved to the 33rd floor.

  Greg's new office location is EB3324 - Steno #549

I'm located at EB3322 - Steno #598

Many Thanks,

Liz Taylor


I am glad it made you happy.  That is very important to both Caron and me.
It is nice to see you excited.  It made our day too.

Stan


We're off the hook!  Tony, pls get this stuff to Dan and make sure he's available to talk tomorrow.  Steve, we'll talk tomorrow at 2:30 and get Dan on the line.  DF

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 4:53 PM
To:	Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven; Pryor, Tony; douglass@energyattorney.com
Cc:	Mara, Susan; Shapiro, Richard; Lawner, Leslie
Subject:	Legal Representation for Steve Harris

Drew/Steve/Tony:

I've talked to Dan and he's available to represent Steve during his testimony on Wednesday.  Few things:

Dan's an excellent regulatory lawyer.
Dan worked for many years at SoCalGas before going into private practice.
Drew, I'll leave to you and Dan to work out the details of any contract for Dan's services.
Dan will need immediately:
A copy of Steve's testimony.
A copy of the PUC Rulemaking, etc. calling for testimony.
Any information on the list of parties who have indicated that they will cross Steve and for how long, and any testimony filed by those parties.
In addition, I would recommend strongly that Dan and Steve (at a minimum) get on the phone and discuss Steve's testimony tomorrow, and plan to meet prior to the hearing on Wednesday.  If you'd like me to participate in a call tomorrow, just let me know.

If there's anything else I can do, just let me know.

Best,
Jeff


Updates
Jennifer Burns - new cell phone number
Kathy McMahon - new executive committee assistant


I will be out of the office until Monday the 7th of January.    If your request is urgent please send me an email and tell me so.


Joan,

Stan tells me that in 2002 I will have the privilege of representing the pipeline segment on the GISB Board.  Will you be letting Rae McQuade know the results of the pipeline segment board elections?


i will probably go to woody's thurs if i have a good week.


FYI.  Per my voice message to you yesterday.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/08/2000 11:51 AM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	12/08/2000 09:39 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <BillR@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <glwaas@calpx.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>,
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <KEWH@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>,
<foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>,
<Nam.Nguyen@powersrc.com>, <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>,
<Roger.Pelote@Williams.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Fwd: R0010002 Mattson Ruling

For those WPTF members who are interested in following?the  interruptible OII
at the CPUC, ALJ Mattson issued a ruling yesterday concerning  future filings
and the scope of the matters to be covered in them.
?
This ruling clarifies that respondents and parties should not delay making
proposals on curtailment and other issues.? He directs that, "respondents
and parties should, within seven days of the date of this ruling, file and
serve  proposals that address each of the four items in Ordering Paragraph 1
of the  Rulemaking, including curtailment issues:
(a)? "the role of customers on  a utility,s interruptible tariffs to ensure
reliable and reasonably-priced  electric service in California, especially
for the Summer of 2001;
(b)?  coordinate the variety of interruptible, curtailable and demand
responsiveness  programs being offered and proposed in California;
(c)? identify  alternative means for customers to reduce their energy usage
during periods of  peak demand; and
(d)? "to revise and update the Commission,s priorities  for curtailing
customers during times of energy shortages."? (R.00-10-002,  Ordering
Paragraph 1, page 15.)?
Further, to the extent proposals filed  December 4, 2000 do not address
improved curtailment notification measures,  respondents and parties may file
and serve additional proposals.? For  example, respondents and parties may
address the feasibility, desirability and  cost of creating phone banks or
using electronic mail to notify customers before  curtailments (e.g., rolling
blackouts).? Comments on proposals filed and  served seven days from today
may be filed and served within seven days after  proposals are filed."
?
A copy of the ruling is attached for your information.
?
Dan
Received: from dymwsm08.mailwatch.com by ArterHadden.com; Thu, 07 Dec 2000
19:00:13 -0500
Received: from dymw0114.mailwatch.com (dymw0114.allegro.net [204.253.83.107])
by dymwsm08.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eB800I807848 for
<douglass@arterhadden.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:00:18 -0500
Received: from 204.253.83.34 by dymw0114.mailwatch.com with SMTP (
WorldSecure Server SMTP Relay(WSS) v4.3); Thu, 07 Dec 00 19:00:06 -0500
X-Server-Uuid: 17085090-7ecb-11d4-ba0b-00508bd371a2
Received: from [134.186.70.194] (nic.cpuc.ca.gov [162.15.7.1]) by
dymwsm12.mailwatch.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eB8004e29390 for
<douglass@arterhadden.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 19:00:04 -0500
Received: from nic.cpuc.ca.gov by [134.186.70.194] via smtpd (for
mail.mailwatch.com [204.253.83.157]) with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 23:58:47 UT
Received: from [162.15.7.254] (exchserver1 [162.15.5.63]) by nic.cpuc.ca.gov
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA16921; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:56:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from no.name.available by [162.15.7.254] via smtpd (for
nic.cpuc.ca.gov [162.15.7.1]) with SMTP; 7 Dec 2000 23:57:35 UT
Received: by EXCHSERVER1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<YNG1RV17>; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:58:53 -0800
Message-ID: <11E42F27414DD411B86300005A42A7B016888C@EXCHSERVER2>
From: "Mattson, Burton" <bwm@cpuc.ca.gov>
To: "'aweller@sel.com'" <aweller@sel.com>,   "'kmccrea@sablaw.com'"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>,   "'defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil'"
<defrawis@efaches.navfac.navy.mil>,   "'rcsstl@cdmnet.com'"
<rcsstl@cdmnet.com>,   "'jsmollon@newwestenergy.com'"
<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,   "'napedersen@jonesday.com'"
<napedersen@jonesday.com>,   "'athomas@newenergy.com'"
<athomas@newenergy.com>,   "'sschwartz@kelleydrye.com'"
<sschwartz@kelleydrye.com>,   "'lisa_g_urick@calpx.com'"
<lisa_g_urick@calpx.com>,   "'douglass@arterhadden.com'"
<douglass@arterhadden.com>,   "'bruce.reed@sce.com'" <bruce.reed@sce.com>,
"'jleslie@luce.com'" <jleslie@luce.com>,   "'pszymanski@sempra.com'"
<pszymanski@sempra.com>,   "'fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov'"
<fmo@sdcity.sannet.gov>,   "'reechpubpol@mail.com'" <reechpubpol@mail.com>,
"'furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil'" <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>,
"Scarff, James E." <jes@cpuc.ca.gov>, "'marcel@turn.org'"
<marcel@turn.org>,   "'joe_como@ci.sf.ca.us'" <joe_como@ci.sf.ca.us>,
"'cgilson@fbm.com'" <cgilson@fbm.com>,   "'jnnc@chevron.com'"
<jnnc@chevron.com>,   "'jlondon@gralegal.com'" <jlondon@gralegal.com>,
"'jlondon@gralegal.com'" <jlondon@gralegal.com>,   "'eke@aelaw.com'"
<eke@aelaw.com>,   "'jsqueri@gmssr.com'" <jsqueri@gmssr.com>,
"'jsqueri@gmssr.com'" <jsqueri@gmssr.com>,   "'jbennett@gmssr.com'"
<jbennett@gmssr.com>,   "'jkarp@whitecase.com'" <jkarp@whitecase.com>,
"'pbeter@newpower.com'" <pbeter@newpower.com>,   "'rgex@skjerven.com'"
<rgex@skjerven.com>,   "'edwardoneill@dwt.com'" <edwardoneill@dwt.com>,
"'anne@plurimi.com'" <anne@plurimi.com>, "'dfc2@pge.com'" <dfc2@pge.com>,
"'ssmyers@hooked.net'" <ssmyers@hooked.net>,   "'wbooth@booth-law.com'"
<wbooth@booth-law.com>,   "'mgomez1@bart.gov'" <mgomez1@bart.gov>,
"'pjpowerlaw@aol.com'" <pjpowerlaw@aol.com>,
"'nryan@environmentaldefense.org'" <nryan@environmentaldefense.org>,
"'apak@energyharbor.com'" <apak@energyharbor.com>,
"'brbarkovich@earthlink.net'" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>,
"'bill@jbsenergy.com'" <bill@jbsenergy.com>,   "'janders@caiso.com'"
<janders@caiso.com>,   "'abb@eslawfirm.com'" <abb@eslawfirm.com>,
"'dcarroll@dbsr.com'" <dcarroll@dbsr.com>, "'ed@clfp.com'" <ed@clfp.com>,
"'jdh@eslawfirm.com'" <jdh@eslawfirm.com>,   "'lmh@eslawfirm.com'"
<lmh@eslawfirm.com>,   "'jtachera@energy.state.ca.us'"
<jtachera@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'kmills@cfbf.com'" <kmills@cfbf.com>,
"'aorchar@smud.org'" <aorchar@smud.org>, "'mpa@aelaw.com'" <mpa@aelaw.com>,
"'dws@keywaycorp.com'" <dws@keywaycorp.com>,   "'vwatkins@pira.com'"
<vwatkins@pira.com>,   "'robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com'"
<robert.d.schasel@fritolay.com>,   "'dnorris@sppc.com'" <dnorris@sppc.com>,
"'mwynne@gridservices.com'" <mwynne@gridservices.com>,
"'Melanie_s_cibik@teledyne.com'" <Melanie_s_cibik@teledyne.com>,
"'bruce.reed@sce.com'" <bruce.reed@sce.com>,   "'mshames@ucan.org'"
<mshames@ucan.org>,   "'GJMF@PUCINC.COM'" <GJMF@PUCINC.COM>,
"'Dkolk@compenergy.com'" <Dkolk@compenergy.com>,
"'ewills@globalfrontiers.com'" <ewills@globalfrontiers.com>,
"'lhubbard@sempra.com'" <lhubbard@sempra.com>,   "'bfinkelstein@turn.org'"
<bfinkelstein@turn.org>,   "Cauchois, Scott" <wsc@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'phanschen@mofo.com'" <phanschen@mofo.com>,   "'rschmidt@bartlewells.com'"
<rschmidt@bartlewells.com>,   "'luluw@newsdata.com'" <luluw@newsdata.com>,
"'sdg6@pge.com'" <sdg6@pge.com>,   "'rochmanm@cubjpa.org'"
<rochmanm@cubjpa.org>,   "'bchen@newenergy.com'" <bchen@newenergy.com>,
"'difellman@energy-law-group.com'" <difellman@energy-law-group.com>,
"'mccann@cal.net'" <mccann@cal.net>,   "'crobinson@caiso.com'"
<crobinson@caiso.com>,   "'twetzel@thermoecotek.com'"
<twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,   "'pstohr@dbsr.com'" <pstohr@dbsr.com>,
"'karen@klindh.com'" <karen@klindh.com>,   "Stevens, Maria E."
<mer@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Schumacher, Brian D." <bds@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Mattson,
Burton" <bwm@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Danforth, Christopher" <ctd@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"Lafrenz, Donald J." <dlf@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Smith, Don" <dsh@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"Hendry, James" <jeh@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Morse, Jay" <jxm@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Fitch,
Julie" <jf2@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Martin, Laura A." <lra@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Ziering,
Mark" <maz@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Chavez, Moises" <mcv@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Kinosian,
Robert" <gig@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "Strauss, Robert L." <rls@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Casey,
Sean F." <sfc@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'dfukumot@energy.state.ca.us'"
<dfukumot@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'kgriffin@energy.state.ca.us'"
<kgriffin@energy.state.ca.us>,   "Schultz, Don" <dks@cpuc.ca.gov>,
"'mjaske@energy.state.ca.us'" <mjaske@energy.state.ca.us>,   "Greenspan,
Randi" <rsg@cpuc.ca.gov>,   "'mmesseng@energy.state.ca.us'"
<mmesseng@energy.state.ca.us>,   "'mrudman@energy.state.ca.us'"
<mrudman@energy.state.ca.us>
Subject: R0010002 Mattson Ruling
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:58:47 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-WSS-ID: 162EFB0C38333-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C060A9.A5562680"

DATE:?? December 7, 2000

TO:???? ??????? Service List in R.00-10-002

FROM:?? Burton W. Mattson
??????? ??????? Administrative Law Judge

Subject:??????? Ruling

Please find attached below a ruling in R.00-10-002.?

For clarification, the additional proposals and comments covered therein may
be as broad as any party wishes, but are intended to address Summer 2001.?

?
 - CPUC01-#85215-v1-R0010002_Mattson_Ruling.DOC


fyi, please add to my schedule.
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000 06:50 AM
---------------------------

Edward Terry
10/11/2000 08:25 AM
To: Christina Sanchez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Yvette Hales/NA/Enron@ENRON, Scott
Loving/NA/Enron@ENRON, Lia Halstead/NA/Enron@ENRON, Alvin
Thompson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve
Gillespie/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angie Zeman/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clarissa Garcia/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sabra L Dinari/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy
Vachuska/HOU/ECT@ECT, Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Franklin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert E Lloyd/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Bid Week

Please be prepared to meet with Commercial next week in preparation for
Bid-Week.  Tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, October 17th.

As in our last meeting, be prepared to discuss any issues regarding your
pipelines operations which may effect gas flow and trading decisions for the
month of November.  Also, relay any other "intelligence" gathered from
marketers, suppliers, or customers.

If you have any questions, please contact Victor or myself.