Elizabeth:  here is one of the old e-mails.  I'll see if I can find the one
regarding the PECO/Great Bay marketing dispute.  John

"This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is
confidential and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges.  This e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public
information intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If
you are not an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including
attachments and notify me by return mail, e-mail or by phone at 212
424-8125.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
of the e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
jklauber@llgm.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 14:31:51 -0500
From: "JOHN G KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>
To: esager2@ect.enron.com
cc: stweed@ect.enron.com, MOLEARY@LLGM.COM
Subject: Power Marketing Alliances
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Elizabeth:

Following up on our conversations late last week, I reviewed the initial
research undertaken by one of our junior associates dealing with the
fiduciary duty issues in the context of a power marketing arrangement entered
into by ECT to market the output of another party's ("Counterparty's)
merchant power plants.  My general thoughts are as follows:

1.  Significance of Parties' Business and Economic Arrangements.  As you
know, the precise nature of the business and economic relationship between
ECT and Counterparty likely will affect the legal analysis; thus, it will be
necessary to keep a close on that issue as the negotiations proceed.  It
would appear that ECT generally would press for an agency relationship since
the law is somewhat more favorable with respect to the ability to carve out
areas where the agent does not owe a fiduciary duty to its principal.
However, depending on the business and economic negotiations, there may
ultimately be some risk that ECT could be deemed to be in a "partner" role
vis-a-vis the Counterparty.  We assume, for example, that ECT would possess
the power to bind the Counterparty to power sales contracts with third
parties (subject, most likely, to specified parameters), at least with
respect to spot market type deals.  (This likely will be the case even if the
Counterparty has the right to terminate the agreement at anytime -- which
termination effectively would be prospective in nature since any existing
deals would continue to binding on Counterparty).  The risk of deemed partner
status probably will exist regardless of whether the governing agreement
specifically provides that the arrangement is not intended to create a
partnership.

A further indicia of partner status would be if ECT's compensation is tied to
net profits, particularly if ECT also shared in losses to some extent (e.g.,
perhaps in the nature of an overall "netting" or "tracking" account pursuant
to which, for example, profits previously paid out to ECT would be recaptured
with future losses (but never go below zero)).  Another factor running in
favor of partner status will be the length of the agreement; a longer
agreement often suggests more of a partnership arrangement.

2.    The Choice of Governing Law may be Significant.  For example, in states
that have adopted the Uniform Partnership Act ("UPA") (e.g., New York,
Delaware, Pennsylvania), there is more of a concern that a court would impose
a higher fiduciary duty standard on ECT.  This result is less likely in
states that have adopted the Revised Uniform Partnership Act ("RUPA") (20
states, including Texas, California and Montana), pursuant to which the
parties can exclude specific categories of activities that are not subject to
the partner's fiduciary duty obligation (if the carve outs are not manifestly
unreasonable).  Although ECT presumably will always take the position that it
is not a partner of Counterparty, in analyzing these issues, ECT should try
to apply those tougher standards to its relationship in the event a court
ever determined that those standards should apply.  The bottom line may be
that the definitive agreements will need to specifically state that the
parties recognize that ECT is in the business of buying and selling power and
that it will be in competition with Counterparty, ECT is not obligated to
bring Counterparty the best deals, Counterparty can terminate if it is
dissatisfied, etc.  It will be advisable to list specific activities where it
is clear ECT and Counterparty may be in competition, rather than rely on a
general waiver of fiduciary duties; the courts clearly do not like advance
disclaimers of all fiduciary duties (particularly where, like here, the
arrangement is likely to be an exclusive one). Where ECT will need to be
particularly careful will be with respect to ensuring against the use of
confidential information from the Counterparty and its facilities in its
stand alone power trading operations.

3.  Other Considerations.  One additional consideration to keep in mind.  The
potential Counterparty you mentioned on the phone intends to project finance,
on a nonrecourse or limited recourse basis, many of the plants it proposes to
acquire.  Like any merchant plant financing arrangement that is being put in
place in today's "deregulating" power markets, the project lender will be
very involved in any arrangement dealing with the marketing of the power from
those plants since, obviously, that is the source of repayment for their
loan.  The lender(s) could drive, for example, such items as the governing
law for the definitive agreements, the term of the agreement, etc.  In
addition, the lender will be very interested in any economic arrangement that
could result in "performance" or similar types of bonuses being payable by
the Counterparty to the agent, as well as any "clawback" of previously paid
amounts in the event of subsequently incurred negative results.  In one
similar arrangement with which have been involved, the lender has been very
active in the negotiations of a similar type of agreement.  My guess is that
undoubtedly will be the case in the situation you raised.  Thus, ECT's
commercial negotiators likely will be encountering multiple parties "on the
other side."

4.  PECO/Great Bay Dispute.  I put on the fax to you again another copy of
the previous summary I had put together on the PECO/Great Bay contract
dispute for your quick reference.  As we discussed, there are a number of
provisions in that contract that ECT's originators would find of interest
from a commercial perspective  -- with the clear caveat that some of them
obviously are what lead to the litigation.  The allegations in the complaint
clearly are, to some extent, of the fiduciary duty type (implied covenant of
good faith and fair dealing).  Interestingly, there is a lack of language in
that agreement trying to carve out PECO's obligations to Great Bay with
respect to PECO's own trading operations.

I hope the foregoing is at least somewhat useful to you, although the "rules"
in this area are fairly blurry.  Please call me if you have any questions.

John


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/12/2000
05:06 PM ---------------------------

Ashley Baxter@ENRON on 10/12/2000 10:08:05 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com, John Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Diana Ovalle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, shirley.crenshaw@enron.com
Subject: Presentation for Cal Berkeley

Hello Vince and John,

I wanted to forward to you both the current presentations for campus.  We can
tweak these however we feel appropriate to match Cal Berkeley on Monday.  I
believe that we can probably expect about 30 - 50 students (based on interest
shown at the Career Fair).  These tend to be fairly informal.  I was thinking
that we could present in this order:

Vince  Gives the Enron overview presentation  (30 minutes)
John  Gives the Global Technology specific presentation (20 minutes)
 Ashley  Goes over recruiting information at the end (10 minutes)

Please take a look at each presentation and speaker notes to ensure that you
feel comfortable with the layout and content.  I am meeting with John today
at 1:30 - Vince if you would like to get together and discuss as well that
would be great.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. 3-3589
Thanks,
Ashley
Vince, here is a copy of the current Enron overview presentation.  There are
also speaker notes that go into great detail.

John, here is a copy of the current technology presentation for Carnegie
Mellon.  The only changes will be to the recruiting dates at the end.  There
are also speaker notes that go into greater detail.  --->


Group,
We have some changes regarding Enron Canada.

One...they have hired their own staff to handle the dispatching of the
Transalta units into and out of the pool.  We will still serve as a back-up
resource for questions from their new staff.  And some of their new hires
will be rotating down here to get a better understanding of what we do.

Two...as a result of having staff, they will be having more of an opportunity
to purchase transmission across BC to the US.  When this happens we typically
will have very little time to sell this power (mostly we get called on the
status of the power at the bottom).  However, please keep in mind that this
power is typically priced between $10 and $65 a mw.  If you have questions
regarding purchasing from Enron Canada please ask me.  We have told Canada
that there is no bid in the Northwest two different times now.  If there is
no bid for $65 power, lets communicate that to Canada before they spend money
on transmission.    If you have questions regarding purchasing from Enron
Canada please ask me.  Please do your best to improve communication and to
prevent these situations from happening again.
Thank you.
Bill


Hey Hunter, how's it going? Got a favor. I am sponsoring a "Summer Series" of presentations to select individuals in EES to get them more acquainted with the wholesale marketplace and other areas of Enron. I will be having these each Wednesday beginning June 13th. We're starting with US Power which Rogers Herndon is going to present. On June 20th, I'd like to have someone present US Gas. I'd really like to have you present if at all possible. We're doing these in 5C2 which holds about 100 folks. The EES groups will really benefit in gaining more insight into the wholesale markets. I'm basically wanting to give them an overview of the current fundamentals in the US Gas market, the influence from Canada/Mexico, an update of storage and transportation balances/concerns, our view of the forward market and the things that are influencing it, etc. We probably just need a 30-45 presentation with about 30 minutes for Q & A.

We're trying to establish a much closer link between the wholesale and retail groups, and things like this will really help. You could always bring someone else to tag team with if you like.  I will introduce you and be there the entire time, and Dave Delainey will more than likely be there as well. By the way, we will be taping these so folks can watch it on their PC's afterwards.

If you can do it, I owe you one! Let me know. Thanks!


FYI, not the markets I was hoping to see.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/22/2000 07:13
AM ---------------------------

mflewellyn@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/21/2000 04:21:43 PM
To: " - *chris.germany@enron.com" <chris.germany@enron.com>
cc: " - *dick.jenkins@enron.com" <dick.jenkins@enron.com>
Subject: market exits

Chris,

As I indicated on our call about a week ago, CES Retail is attempting to exit
a
number of current markets for Major Accounts business only.  The list that
we're contemplating includes CKY, CG&E, DP&L, East Ohio, Indiana Gas, Western
Kentucky, CVA, COH, and BGE.  Again, for those LDCs where we participate in
Choice programs, we will continue to serve those customers.

We are trying to have this accomplished prior to March flow so that we can
take
March 2000 forward out of our physical requirements from Enron.

I'll keep you apprised as additional information becomes available.

Thanks,

Melissa


About Members Events News Contact Jobs                                                            December 19, 2001                          APLF.org                                     Festo - Virtual Roundtable                                                   On January 8th Oral arguments will be made before the Supreme  Court on the Festo appeal. A number of our members will be in  attendance, and on January 10 we will hold a panel discussion  to report back and discuss the issues and provide some insight.    Time: 1.00pm Eastern  Duration: 1 hour  Call in telephone number: If you wish to join us, please  RSVP for the dial in toll free number to info@aplf.org .    The format will provide an opportunity to pose questions to the  panel and to other experienced patent law attorneys.   For a full briefing on the Festo case, please see the presentation  on www.aplf.org/events/festo .                      About Members Events News Contact Jobs

To Unsubscribe from this newsletter, please reply to this email
with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.


[IMAGE]	 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]

             [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Upgrades  [IMAGE] DownGrades  [IMAGE] Coverage Initiated  [IMAGE] Coverage Reiterated  [IMAGE] Stock Splits  [IMAGE] Buybacks  [IMAGE] Dividends  [IMAGE] Pos Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Neg Pre-Announce  [IMAGE] Pos Surprises  [IMAGE] Neg Surprises  [IMAGE] Earnings Revisions  [IMAGE] IPO - Lockup Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Pricing  [IMAGE] IPO - Quite Periods  [IMAGE] IPO - Postponements  [IMAGE] IPO - Withdrawals  [IMAGE] IPO - Latest Filings     [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Unsubscribe  [IMAGE] Update  my Membership / Profile  [IMAGE] Forgot  Username / Password  [IMAGE] Add  / Edit Alerts  [IMAGE] View  My Alerts   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE]  [IMAGE]    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] 	  As requested, your News Alert for BRCM  follows from EquityAlert.com.     WIDCOMM Announces Demo and Distribution Agreement with Broadcom; Broadcom to Team its Blutonium Chip with WIDCOMM's Bluetooth Software for Windows   SAN DIEGO, Oct 29, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- WIDCOMM(R) Inc., a leader in short-range wireless communications and Bluetooth networking, today announced an agreement with Broadcom Corporation (Nasdaq:BRCM), the leading provider of integrated circuits enabling broadband communications. The agreement allows Broadcom(R) to demonstrate and distribute WIDCOMM's BTW Bluetooth Communications Software for Windows(R) with Broadcom's Blutonium(TM) chipsets.   Broadcom's Bluetooth customers will be able to evaluate WIDCOMM's BTW protocol stack and the Broadcom BCM2033 single-chip solution for Bluetooth wireless applications together. Broadcom will distribute an evaluation copy of WIDCOMM's BTW for customers interested in the combined solution.   Broadcom's BCM2033 single chip solution consists of a Bluetooth v1.1 qualified radio and baseband integrated together to provide a high performance, low power single chip solution. WIDCOMM's BTW provides an upper layer protocol stack, an extensive array of Bluetooth profiles, an integrated user interface, and localization support for multiple languages. Currently BTW supports the Windows(R) 98SE, Windows(R) Me and Windows(R) 2000 platforms; soon it will also support Windows(R) XP. The combined offering is a turnkey Bluetooth solution for PC OEMs and is fully compliant with v.1.1 of the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) standard.   "We chose to distribute WIDCOMM's software because its BTW application works seamlessly with Broadcom's Blutonium products to provide reliable, feature-rich Bluetooth applications for the Windows environment," commented Scott Bibaud, Director of Marketing for Broadcom's Bluetooth products. "Now customers will be able to evaluate both premier products at the same time and be assured of strict compliance with Bluetooth's interoperability standards."   "WIDCOMM's BTW running on Broadcom's chipset gives Broadcom customers a complete solution that enables them to produce prototypes earlier and bring products to market faster," said Ron Wong, WIDCOMM's Director of Marketing.   WIDCOMM's core Bluetooth protocol software is the world's first Bluetooth Qualification Body (BQB)-certified product. Similarly, Broadcom's BCM2001, another product in the Blutonium family, was the world's first radio transceiver developed in a standard digital CMOS process to achieve BQB certification.   About WIDCOMM  WIDCOMM, Inc. ("Wireless Internet and Data/Voice Communications"), is a leading provider of wireless connectivity solutions based on Bluetooth technology. WIDCOMM is the first company to take Bluetooth from a cable replacement technology to the next level -- networking -- and the first to bring certified Bluetooth software to the world. Developers can build their own Bluetooth applications and products with WIDCOMM's broad line of development kits. The company's mission is to create core technologies that enable leading consumer electronics, networking, telecommunication and semiconductor companies to bring complete, interoperable Bluetooth networking solutions to market quickly and easily. For more information, please visit www.WIDCOMM.com.   Note to Editors: Broadcom(R) and Blutonium(TM) are trademarks of Broadcom Corporation and/or its affiliates in the United States and certain other countries. Bluetooth is a trademark owned by Bluetooth SIG, Inc., U.S.A. and licensed to WIDCOMM. Windows is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.   CONTACT:          WIDCOMM                   Tamara Williams, 858/453-8400 Ext. 465                   twilliams@widcomm.com                   or                   for WIDCOMM                   Judy Curtis, 415/865-2204                   judy@thebinghamgroup.com URL:              http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page.  Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire.  All rights reserved.  -0-   KEYWORD:          CALIFORNIA  INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS                   HARDWARE                   TELECOMMUNICATIONS                   PRODUCT                   SOURCE:                   WIDCOMM    [IMAGE]    ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL***   At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell.   In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Cybertrader, distribution of this advertisement forms a component of a content exchange agreement with RealTimeTraders.com, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period.   In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement.   Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports.   Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites.   All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer.   [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp  FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER]        	  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stock  Quote [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Stock  Chart [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Covered  Calls  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Company  Profile [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Option  Details  [IMAGE]   [IMAGE] Black  - Scholes [IMAGE]     [IMAGE]  Power Option PLUS Logo    [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]    [IMAGE]


what about hull?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bass, Eric
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:41 PM
To:	Blanchard, Timothy
Subject:	BBALL

we need a fourth again


Hello Kenny,

Just a couple of things.  One our stock is up again today  now it is up 2 at 62$  I was wondering if we should sell some?  What is your opinion.
Also I have some reading for you tonight - The Skiliing Story is all over the Gas Market.  (I told Ya).  I know that Clayton has soccer tonight - dont worry about dinner , I would actually prefer some of that Turkey tonight.

I love you


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 01/25/2001
10:02 AM ---------------------------

From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON
               01/25/2001 09:49 AM

To: Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melinda Whalen/CAL/ECT@ECT, Dianne Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT,
Janie Aguayo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Meredith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ellen Wallumrod/NA/Enron@ENRON, Celeste
Cisneros/NA/Enron@Enron, Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron, Tiffany
Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Feldman/CAL/ECT@ECT, Patricia
Boulanger/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon
Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Walter Guidroz/NA/Enron@Enron, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Gonzalez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Credit Report--1/25/01


SICK LEAVE POLICY

Policy

To keep the business and each department running smoothly and efficiently, it is important that every employee be on the job on time regularly.  For this reason, careful attention is given to promptness, absence record and overall dependability.

Enron recognizes, however, that an employee may occasionally be unable to come to work due to injury or illness.  As a result, the Sick Leave policy is designed to provide protection to employees against loss of income during pregnancy, illness or injury.

Eligible employees who are unable to perform their jobs due to pregnancy, illness or injury are eligible to receive sick leave pay for up to 1,040 hours (6 months) in a twelve month period, assuming certain procedures are followed.    Effective January 1, 2002, the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) runs concurrently with Enron's Sick Leave policy.  An employee who is still disabled after using the 1,040 hours of sick leave pay ends may qualify for long term disability insurance.  Sick days cannot be carried over from one calendar year to the next and employees are not paid for sick days either at the end of the calendar year or upon termination.

Proposed Policy Link

Procedures -

To be eligible for sick leave pay, employees unable to report to work must telephone their supervisor directly, each day of their absence, as far in advance as possible.  If their supervisor is not available, the employee's human resources representative should be contacted.  If an employee is unable to make the call personally, a family member or a friend should contact the supervisor.  The supervisor or human resources representative must be contacted each day of absence.  An employee who fails to contact his/her immediate supervisor or human resources representative may forfeit the sick leave pay and may be considered as having voluntarily resigned.  This policy must be followed unless an exception has been made for a particular absence, and a written memo to this effect has been sent to the employees' human resources representative.

On the fifth day of continued absence due to injury or illness, in addition to notifying the employee's supervisor or human resources representative, the employee must also attain a doctor's certification indicating the estimated date in which the employee will be able to return to work.  Any absences exceeding 2 weeks will require a doctor's certification indicating that the employee is able to return to work.


The following items were discussed in this weeks corporate change control...

Feb 27
From 5:00 - 6:00 p.m., Enron Network Services will block all ICMP messages from all Internet routers.  These changes will be made on the Houston, Ardmore EIN, and Omaha Internet routers.  No impact is expected.

Feb. 27
From 9:00 - 10:00 p.m., the Messaging team will upgrade Nahou-MSBES01P, Nahou-MSBES02P and Nahou-MSBES03P to SP2 and apply a hotfix.  This change will result in a five minute delay sending and receiving Blackberry messages.

Feb 28
From 7:00 p.m. through 3/1 at 1:00 a.m., the Unix team will upgrade the ftp.enron.com server from existing Ultar2 to E450 as well as upgrade ftp to Proftp ver. 1.2. This maintenance will result in a total outage of the ftp.enron.com site.  The old sites moby.enron.com and sparky.enron.com will no longer exist after this change.  Support staff should ensure jobs going to the enron ftp server use ftp.enron.com.  Any questions about this maintenance, contact me at 713-853-3381 or 713-859-6676.

Mar. 6
At 12:00 p.m., the Gas Measurement team will decommission the MIPS server (IP address 192.168.175.62).  All users and processing should be pointing to PGAS as the MIPS system is not longer being updated. The MIPS server will be powered off at this time but the equipment will not be moved until later.

ETS Solution Center - Houston, at 713-345-4745
ETS Solution Center - Omaha, at 402-398-7454


You have signed the last beam....
 Now  watch it rise.

Enron employees are invited to celebrate the
 Topping-Out of Enron Center South
 this afternoon at Antioch Park
3:45 pm - 4:30 pm.

In celebration of Arbor Day, tree saplings will be
handed out to all participants.

In the event of rain, the Topping-Out Celebration will air on IPTV Wednesday
and
the tree saplings will be distributed in the plaza today at 4:00 pm


A helpful hint of the day.
---------------------- Forwarded by Cynthia Morrow/Corp/Enron on 06/23/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------

	From:  SAP Security                           06/23/2000 04:14 PM

Sent by: Danette Campbell
To: Enron Apollo & Beyond X Key Site Contacts, ENRON APOLLO AND BEYOND ALL
PROJECT TEAM, Enron SAP COE Team - Houston Only
cc: Betsey Tufano/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Support Tips Emails

And you thought that it couldn't get any better.....but it does!!  Keep
looking for the Support Tipemails coming soon to LotusNotes everywhere.

So I got my eHROnline ID.....but what's my SAP GUI id???
The SAP ID that should have been received by users this week was for BOTH eHR
Online AND the SAP GUI.
Also remember that although several people may have been working with alpha
IDs (rsmith) for the past several months, these IDs WILL BE TURNED OFF by
JULY 15, 2000.  Users are STRONGLY encouraged to begin using their Pid for
their GUI transactions, and MUST use their Pid for any time entry on eHR
Online.

What about the passwords?
The passwords are synchronized, so this means that when a user logs on online
and changes their initial password from their birthday to one of their
choosing it is changed in ALL INSTANCES OF SAP; PR1, PR2 and all online
sessions (the online sessions are just an extension of PR1 and PR2).  This
new password is now good IN ALL PRODUCTION BOXES, ie. PR1 and PR2.  The users
should NOT try and log on to the GUI with their birthday if they have already
changed their password online or viceversa.

If you have questions, please contact Betsey Tufano, SAP Security support at
X57488.


Please see the attached draft.


Will you two please get this info to Dutch.  Thanks.

DG
---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 11/02/2000
10:01 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dutch Quigley                           11/02/2000 01:40 AM

To: William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Regional Origination

Can each person supply me with the originators for their  region.

Thank you

Dutch


Scott,

I shall attend.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Scott Tholan                           08/01/2000 04:49 PM

Sent by: Sharon Purswell
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J
Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES,
Jim Fallon/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Russell Woody/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, John Brindle, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Economic Espionage Act Presentation - August 15th

You are cordially invited to attend a presentation entitled:  "Acquiring
Information: Trade Secrets and the Economic Espionage Act (EEA)".   Daniel
Waltz, of the law firm Patton Boggs LLP, is a leading expert on the EEA and
will deliver what promises to be an interesting and informative segment.
Congress passed the EEA in 1996, and it will increasingly shape how corporate
America collects, uses, and protects valued information.  In addition to
explaining some of the intricacies of the EEA, Dan Waltz will include
"hypothetical" corporate case studies (some actually torn from the headlines)
to illustrate his points.

This event is sponsored by ENA's Competitive Analysis and Business Controls
(CABC) group and is supported by ENA legal.   This event kicks-off CABC's
Competitive Intelligence Standards Program, which seeks to raise awareness of
issues relevant both to Enron's practitioners and senior consumers of
competitive intelligence.  This particular speaking engagement is designed to
raise awareness of the EEA's legal guidelines, as well as to stimulate
thought both on the collection opportunities against our competitors as well
as how we might better protect Enron's own proprietary information.   I
believe the topic of the EEA is especially relevant, given that we find
ourselves amidst the big bang of this new information age.

All CABC staff is being asked to attend this presentation, and we are
inviting a small number of other Enron employees who are engaged in aspects
of serious competitive intelligence.  Select executives like yourselves are
being invited to attend, and I would welcome any suggestions of others that
you think might benefit from attending this event.

The EEA presentation is set for August 15, 1:30-3:00 PM, in the 50th floor
Conference room.  Please RSVP to either myself or Sharon Purswell.  Hope to
see you there.

P.S.  By the way, our next speaker segment in the CI Standards Program will
concentrate on the guidelines and implications of the "Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA)," and will likely be scheduled for the fall.


k,

thanks, i could use all of the luck that i can get right now trading this
market.  i have heard so many rumors about what's going on over there that
my head is spinning.  i won't bombard you with questions though.  how's
everything going other than work?  any opinions on this gas market?  you are
supposed to be my gas guru, i thought i would have heard from you a week ago
telling me to buy it, that it was going to make this huge move.  maybe the
email got lost.  went to florida this weekend for the ga/fla game and once
again left disappointed.  anyway, hope all is well, let me know if you're
going to be out this way anytime soon, my nov trip might be cancelled now,
i'll tell you more about all the crap going on over here next time i see
you....

E


Hi John -

I thought I would let you know that Mike McConnell will be in London on
business on Friday and therefore will be unable to attend.

Thank you.

Cathy Phillips
X-36898

John Ambler@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
02/12/2001 08:05 PM
To: Rebecca McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paula
Rieker/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Richard
Shapiro@Enron, Jeffrey Sherrick@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bruce
Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Habiba Bayi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Katrin
Haux/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith Miceli/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Johan Zaayman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Senator Gramm at Houston World Affairs Council

Senator Phil Gramm will be speaking at a meeting of the Houston World Affairs
Council on Friday, February 16.  We have secured a table for the event and
would be honored if you would join us.  The meeting will be held in the
Ballroom of the Four Seasons Hotel.  Registration begins at 7:00 a.m. and
breakfast will be served at 7:15 a.m.  The speech and meeting should conclude
by 8:30 a.m.  Please let me know by Wednesday whether you are able to join us.

Thanks,

John


Sandi asked me to forward the attached cost benefit analysis from
Governor Davis regarding the Edison MOU.

http://www.governor.ca.gov/govsite/pdf/issues/benefit-cost_final.pdf


Regarding proposed rate freeze for large SDG&E customers at 6.5 cents:

Adds to DWR's burden of covering the net short positions without any further
clarification of how shortfall will be funded.  The incentive these customers
now have to participate in DA and thereby remove burden from DWR is removed.

Creates incentives to increase usage and decrease conservation, exactly at
the time that just the opposite effect is desired.  Rate at frozen level
removes all price signal effect in unregulated market.

These are customers who under existing law already have had choice, as an
alternative to paying market price,  of 1) voluntarily opting in to a one
year 6.5 cent rate freeze, with a true-up, or 2) buying commodity and risk
management products in the competitive market, as many of them have already
done, and 3) reducing usage to save money.  This bill takes takes away the
last two choices/incentives.

Adopting "rates by proxy" (in a sense, indexed to PG&E and SCE rates) creates
the potential for a regulatory nightmare.

As an alternative, the Legislature should consider extending the voluntary
opt-in program under existing law.  This would preserve existing protection,
keep choices available to customers, and not unduly add to DWR's burden.

As another alternative, we could be a lot more willing to accept this IF the
"end of the rate freeze" date in (f) were specified to occur no earlier than
the date new rates are put in place (the proposed language from 18X,
remember?) and it were clear that existing DA contracts were not overturned
by this Act.


Pre-FOMC and the market is, to quote Joe Cocker, "Feelin' Alright". The Dow
Industrials shot up over100 points in the morning and hovered there to close
up over 135. The Nasdaq followed suit in the morning, came in in the
afternoon, and rose again in the last hour to close up over 65. The street
liked the MO NA deal - MO (Philip Morris) up over 15%; NA (Nabisco Holdings)
also in the green - lots of the food stocks joined the party - HNZ (HJ
Heinz), DOL (Dole Food), DLM (Del Monte Foods), KBL (Keebler Foods) and RAL
(Ralston Purina) all closed in the green. President Clinton mid-day
celebration of the  completion of the Human Genome mapping had mixed results
for the space - CRA (PE CP Celera) down over 12, BGEN (Biogen Inc) down over
4, PDLI (Protein Design) down over 14 while GENE (Genome Therapy), AMGN
(Amgen Corp),  DNA (Genentech) and IMNX (Immunex) all closed up...Things
weren't very chipper with INTC (Intel), MOT (Motorola) and AMD (Advanced
Micro Devices) all closing in the red - guess that Celeron news was abit of
a yawn. But it wasn't all grim in tech with ORCL (Oracle), SUNW (Sun
Microsystems), CA (Computer Associates), AAPL (Apple Computer) all up over
4% and MSFT (Microsoft), DELL (Dell) and IBM up over 2%. There were a couple
of tech blow ups with INKT (Inktomi) down over 25 on news that YHOO (Yahoo)
isn't using there search engine for the main site anymore - in addition HLIT
(Harmonic Inc) pre-announced negatively after the close and is trading down
25% in after hours. In the CEUT Universe - CTAC* (1800 Contacts) continues
the climb - up over 2.... BWAY* (Breakaway Solutions) down over  3 1/2...
PSEM* (Pericom Semiconductors) down over 3, ZRAN* (Zoran Corp) up 5... CATT
(Catapult Communications) up over 10%... JDSU* (JDS Uniphase) up over 2, NT*
(Nortel Networks) up over 3... ANCR* (Ancor Communications) up over 3, NTAP*
(Network Appliance) up over 5, PRCM* (Procom Tech Inc) up over  3... PROX*
(Proxim) up over 2 and GOAM* (Goamerica) up over 2 (over 16%) on the day and
continuing to rise in after hours after announcing a deal with HWP
(Hewlett-Packard) to use  their tech. - Jason Tsai was very bullish on both
these names in the  morning meeting.... MERQ* (Mercury Interactive) down
almost 3, MUSE* (Micromuse) up over 9, VRTS (Veritas Software) up
3...GILTF* (Gilat Satellite) up over 2, GMH* (General Motors H) down over 4,
LLL* (3-L Communications) down over 1 1/2, PGTV+ (Pegasus) up over 2... SIMG
(Silicon Image) up over 3.... WCII (Winstar Communications) down over
2......... In IPOland - lots coming Tues. - Click Commerce (CKCM) b 2 b e-
commerce for manufacturing co. - priced mid-range; Marvell Tech (MRVL) -
circuits for comm. markets - priced mid-range; Stratos Lightwave (STLW)
broadband optical components - priced above range; eFunds Corp. (EFDS)
-electronic debit payment - priced below range/ General feeling is no hike
now but who knows come August.

European Regulators nix WCOM, FON deal.

Webvan buys Homegrocer.

Ariba buys SupplierMarket.com

Liberty Media joins MSFT to offer high speed access in Japan.

Loudcloud - Marc Andreessen's new venture to aid co.s going to net - gets
$120 million in new funding.

Dow Jones - following NY Times in holding off on net tracking stock (market
conditions).

Lycos - buys MetroSplash owner of Matchmaker.com.

COM21 - broadband access systems - buys BitCom Inc. engineering firm.

ATHM (Excite@Home) - new click video service - broadband app to show video
content (Atom Films, Mondo Media, Bloomberg, iFilm.....) has animated host
"Baily" - girl next door.

DCLK - more privacy concerns - collected data on people going to government
anti - drug site.

MobileLogic (mobile data producer) - buys Katahdin consulting - strategic
tech services provider.

page 1 WSJ - post mortum on Boo.com

VSAT+ - addition to army contract.

WSJ Heard - AMZN* - how much is it really worth?

AETH - wireless data service deal with MSFT.

NPIX - revenue shortfall.

Q replaces US West in S&P 500.

Scient down 20% as customer goes bankrupt.

Freeserve - down over 15% on Deut T news.

Consumer Union - doesn't like T purchase of MediaOne.

Palm - expansion slot on new models - gadgets coming soon (like
Handspring?).

INTC - worldwide e-commerce testing labs/ expansion in Israel.

Dell - online service to small and med. business - do your e-mail and
purchasing services with us.

Mattel - selling Cyber Patrol (net filtering).

eMotion - $34 million round (dig. media management).

Italy's Bipop buying Germany's Entruim - formation of Pan-European online
bank.

YHOO - over 4% stake in ChinaTimes.com

NNDS (soft for pay tv) - software for settop box which monitors your viewing
habits - could customize programming for viewer.

VC Fund Emicom Group - $57 million VC fund for Israeli telecom and net co.
(main US Investor is Divine Inter Ventures also Charles Wang of CA).

First Union - dumping Money Store.

US Judge to hacker Mitnick - no lecture tour - column must be surpervised.

E*Trade - deal with Cahoot (IM software).

C. E. Unterberg Towbin: Bill Dering marketing in Boston/ Futurelink Roadshow
in San Diego-LA/ Infovista NY-Lunch.

There is talk: GTW for MUEI?/ MAIL - good news coming?/

The information contained herein is obtained from sources we believe to be
reliable but its accuracy and completeness, and that of the opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. C.E. Unterberg Towbin, or one or more of its
partners, may have a position in any of the securities discussed herein. All
rights reserved by C.E. Unterberg Towbin. May not be reproduced in whole or
in part without prior written authorization. This report is not an offer to
sell or solicitation of an offer to buy the securities mentioned herein.
*C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and/or has analyst
coverage.
+C.E. Unterberg Towbin makes a market in this security and has been involved
in a recent financing.
_____________________________
Bram Towbin
C.E. Unterberg Towbin
10 East 50th Street
New York NY 10022

Telephone: 212 572 8163
Fax: 212 759 4032
Btowbin@unterberg.com
www.unterberg.com

----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to SEC and NASD requirements, all incoming and outgoing e-mail of
C.E. Unterberg, Towbin is subject to review by the Compliance Department.

Please note that C.E. Unterberg, Towbin does not allow the use of e-mail to
request, authorize or  effect the purchase or sale of any security, to send
fund transfer instructions, or to effect any other transactions.  Any such
request, orders or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will
not be processed.

================================================================


In times of war,  get long the the Cope.

http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/011026/business_tobacco_ust_earns_dc_1.html
Larry Jester
Enron Power Marketing Inc.
Phone:  713-853-5266
Fax:      713-646-8272


Rachael,

Could you also send me yours and Drew's information?

Thanks

Kim

   Rachael Adams @ ECT                07/31/2000 04:00 AM

To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Contact Details

John -

I am Drew Lynch's assistant in the London office and I'd be grateful if you
could provide me with the following contact details:

Telephone Number;
Fax Number;
Work Postal Address;
E:mail Address.

Regards,

Rachael


A redraft of Change Order #5 to the LM 6000 contract to provide for the
purchase of a GE transformer for the Pleasanton project is attached.

Please note that I have added some guaranty/LD provisions in Exhibit A, and
confirm whether these are appropriate in scope and amount.

We will attach the documents included here as separate files as Exhibits B
and C.  I understand that GE is to provide a more current copy of their
standard specifications for the transformer to be included in the Exhibits.

Kathleen:  Kay tells me that you are the keeper of change orders.
Congratulations!!  The discussion of current amount balances, etc. in the
attached are clearly wrong if we are up to CO#5--it was all based on this
being the third CO.  Can you please let me know what the right numbers should
be?

Thanks in advance for your input.  I understand there is some urgency with
getting this out.


Maureen,

No problem.

Vince
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Raymond, Maureen
Sent:	Friday, June 29, 2001 12:44 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Cc:	Crenshaw, Shirley
Subject:	Vacation Time

Vince,

I would like to take vacation the week of July 23, 2001 to July 27, 2001.

Thank you,
Maureen


where are you at???


Please send reply  to ME,  ASAP.  We need info by Thursday a.m.
---------------------- Forwarded by Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT on 04/19/2000
07:04 PM ---------------------------

Sheri L Cromwell
04/18/2000 03:28 PM
To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya
Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carolyn George/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy
Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Radford/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda J Simmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dina Snow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Twanda
Sweet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda Whitehead/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chaundra Woods/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Nony Flores/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Windows 2000 Roll Out

Hi Ladies!

As you know, we are planning to roll out Windows 2000 in early May.  This
will require upgrading our computer equipment with what is "necessary" to run
Windows 2000, including new CPUs for most of us.  Although I haven't seen
Windows 2000 yet, I am told that there are very few changes, the most
significant one being that we will be using Lotus Notes for calendar
purposes.  (Organizer goes away.)  We are told that with 1 hour of training
everyone should be up to speed!

Could you please take a moment to answer the following questions?

Do you or your assignments have a Palm Pilot?

Do you or your assignments have an "Enron" purchased computer at home?

Do you or your assignments have any personal software you have loaded?

Do you or your assignments save any files to your C: drive?

Do you or your assignments save any files to your H: drive?

I need this information as quickly as possible.  Also, please let me know if
you are planning any vaction time during the month of May so we can start
scheduling training.

THANKS FOR YOUR HELP!

sc


I think this might have been intended for you.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 05:35 PM -----

	Linda Robertson
	01/16/2001 05:30 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Request for Economist

Steve Kean asked that I respond to your voice mail message to him regarding
your solicitation of government economists for your proposed May customer
conference.  Let me suggest the following, each of whom has different
attributes:

1.  David Wilcox, Asst. Sec of Economic Policy of Treasury, soon to rejoin
the Federal Reserve.   David is an excellent macro economist but is not a
"big name."
2.  Ted Truman, Asst. Sec of International Affairs, Treasury.  Ted is about
join a think tank.  Before his stint at Treasury, Ted served 26 years at the
Federal Reserve, many of which he served as Greenspan's right hand on
international currency issues.  Ted has quarterbacked about every
international currency intervention conducted by the United States over the
last three decades.
3.  Larry Summers, Secretary.   Larry will be joining a think tank for a few
weeks.  He may or may not be available.  If the topic is of interest to him,
he is agreeable to travel and speaking engagements.

This is just my initial cut at some suggestions.  Once we know the Bush team,
we may want to explore possible candidates from their ranks, although
government ethics rules may prohibit us from paying for their travel to a
"customer conference."  Government officials can accept travel from
50l(c)(3)s, as a general rule.


Effective Monday, November 19, Mark Haedicke will office in the new building.  His location will be:  ECS 06788 (sixth floor, office number 788).

My new location will be ECS 06785 (just outside Mark's office).

Our telephone numbers and fax number will remain the same.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
e-mail:  janette.elbertson@enron.com


Daren:
Please extend Equistar deal 759684 for the entire month of May.  We have 111 MMBtu that we need to allocate to the buyback on 5/15.  The deal only goes to the 11th.

Thanks,
Megan


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
03/12/99 09:29 AM ---------------------------

Paul Simons
03/12/99 08:53 AM
To: ECT London European Trading
cc:
Subject: Weather Derivatives: European Legal Due Diligence

FYI - bon weekend!
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Simons/LON/ECT on 03/12/99 02:54 PM
---------------------------

Paul Simons
03/12/99 12:08 PM
To: Nick Mooney/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Weather Derivatives: European Legal Due Diligence

As requested, a thumb-nail sketch of the above. As you will see, the sky is
generally blue , but follow up work will be required in one or two countries
before we can give the all-clear.

Executive Summary

Generally, only the Czech Republic, Poland, the Netherlands (options and
swaptions only) and Spain (options only) are countries/transaction types in
respect of which we cannot begin marketing and trading now.

In Germany, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Sweden and the UK, the marketing and
trading of ALL weather derivatives products can commence immediately.

In France, the marketing and trading of ALL weather products can begin when
we receive acceptance from SFA of our French passport application (in the
next few weeks).

The marketing of, and trading in, Dutch weather swaps and Spanish swaps and
swaptions can commence immediately.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
The following questions are addressed in the case of each country

1. are weather derivatives regulated ( eg marketing restrictions/
licence/capital requirements etc)?
2.  could they be construed to be unauthorised insurance contracts?
3.  could they be construed to be gaming contracts?

Czech Republic  ---  1.  Totally unregulated
                                               2.  Possibly, yes (especially
options) with criminal consequences if unauthorised
                                               3.  Unlikely if transacted for
commercial purpose

France  ---  1.  Regulated in the same way as commodity derivatives (ISD
passport available to EEFT)
                        2.  Unlikely
                        3.  No

Germany ---  1. Totally unregulated
                            2.  Not insurance contracts
                            3.  Carve out from gaming law possibly not
available, but no problem if in good faith believe c'party is hedging
(English law may improve analysis)

Hungary  ---  1.  Totally unregulated
                         2.  Highly unlikely (if individually negotiated)
                         3.  Highly unlikely

Italy  ---  1.  Totally unregulated
                  2.  No
                  3.  Probably not if transacted for commercial reason

Netherlands  ---  1.  Same as commodity derivatives, but capital requirements
may apply to options and swaptions (we are checking this)
                                       2.  Unlikely
                                       3.  Unlikely if transacted for a valid
commercial purpose (but we will clarify in light of possible criminal
sanctions)

Norway  ---  1. Totally unregulated
                          2.  Probably not insurance contracts, but may be
prudent to check with Banking Securities and Insurance Commission
                          3.  No problem if in good faith believe c'party is
transacting for sound financial/commercial reason

Poland  ---   1.  No specific requirements now (eg under the Energy law)
                          2.  Unlikely, but unclear: need to check with
Minister of Finance (English law would not help) -  up to 2 yrs' imprisonment
for breaches
                          3.  Unlikely if transacted for commercial reasons,
but need to check with  Minister of Finance (risk of 3 yrs' imprisonment and
loss of power licence)

Spain  ---  1.  Totally unregulated if OTC
                      2.  Swaps and swaptions, no. Options, unclear (risk
higher if a premium is payable and contract a hedge). Result: options may be
void
                      3.  No problem if one party transacts for valid
commercial purpose

Sweden  ---  1.  Regulated in the same way as commodity derivatives
                            2.  No
                            3.  No

United Kingdom  ---  1. Regulated by SFA (must be transacted through EEFT etc)
                                             2.  No
                                             3.  No, provided one part
transacts by way of business (Enron will).

Let's discuss this note before we distribute it more widely (including any
comments you may have).

Paul


Wouldn't it be nice to not have a fire drill at the end? At least we will be
ready.

I'm can't wait to see what their lenders will come up with.  Ben's hoping it
will fall through and he can sell these again, I think.

Kay

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 05/25/2001 08:12:49 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: NorthWestern

Great.  I will focus on the closing checklist to ensure that all of ENA's
closing deliveries are in order well before closing.

MIR

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:24 PM
To: Reuter, Marisa
Cc: Keffer, John
Subject: RE: NorthWestern

Thanks.

Did I tell you that I spoke with GE about the assignment, and their initial
response was very positive.

NorthWestern is predicting closing in July.

Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <gerard.a.sanfilippo@citigroup.com>
Date: Thursday, June 6, 2002 3:13:38 GMT
Subject:

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Davis, Jon B [FI]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:10 AM
> Subject:	WEEKLY ENERGY WIRE
>
>  <<CDD060602.pdf>>


Do you know Brian's email?  I have it as: brianp@aiglincoln.com.po

But mail comes back  undeliverable.


On 12/21 Colleen sent out an email with a file showing $ changes to each
transport leg (and possibly changes to delta, gamma, vega and rho).  This
change is due to an error in the formula for blending volatilities and
correlation.  Please plan to attend a meeting on 1/4/01 at 12:00 to discuss
these changes.  I will have an updated version of the impact of these changes
based on tonites close.   Please call at x.36247 if you cannot attend.
Thanks.

John


I went by some houses last night . . .

This house was by far the nicest and best bang for your buck, but in a
suspect neighborhood - it looks like they are building a lot of townhouses
close though
check it out . . .
http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=203161

These were nice too - more contemporary though . . .
http://www.har.com/search/condo/indexdetail.cfm?mlnum=389305

We should probably go look at these on Sunday.

Love,
e


May be of interest from a licensing perspective.
---------------------- Forwarded by Philip Davies/LON/ECT on 04/01/2001 18:47
---------------------------

Katy Lomax
04/01/2001 09:15
To: Thor Lien/OSL/ECT@ECT, Philip Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Ot@geelmuyden-kiese.no,
John Oliver/LON/ECT@ECT, Julie Green/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Press Clipping - Nordic

Please find attached the following article/s:

"Nord Pool to Update Its Rules To Attract Big-Bank Investors" - Wall Street
Journal

Kind Regards,
Katy Lomax


Richard, here's the latest thinking on the FGPC/ECT liquid fuel agreement
conflict. In brief, it looks like we have an argument, but it is too early to
tell whether we have the better argument.

     B.K.D.
----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/02/2000 03:31 PM -----

	Helen.Godel@clyde.co.uk
	08/02/2000 12:53 PM

		 To: Matthias.lee@enron.com
		 cc: britt.davis@enron.com, ngregson@wfw.com
		 Subject: m/v PACIFIC VIRGO

From David Best.

You  asked  for  a  preliminary  opinion following our telephone conference
this
morning on Enron?s contractual remedies and exposures on the FGPC contract.

I am afraid the matter is complex and there is no straightforward answer.

First,  we  should start with the contract which I have now read.  I am
assuming
the  NDC  date  has  passed,  but  not  the  conversion date.  Article 4.3 is
an
acknowledgment  by  the  seller  that  the  buyer?s preference is for
condensate
because of favourable tax considerations.  There is however an unfettered
option
given by Article 4.4. to Enron to deliver alternative liquid fuel in the form
of
gasoil or naphtha meeting the quality specifications.

The quality specifications for liquid fuel are set out in Appendix A.

Article 8.1 under the abbreviation T provides for a liquid fuel tax
differential
which  is  a  price  burden  falling  on Enron as part of the price
formulation.
However,  ?in  the event seller is unable to deliver condensate using
reasonable
commercial efforts, but supplies another type of liquid fuel instead, T shall
be
deemed to be zero for the first 600,000 barrels (in the aggregate) of such
other
types of liquid fuel delivered in a contract year.?

Other relevant Articles are 10.2 (buyer?s right to secure alternative
supplies),
the   whole   of  Article  10  (seller?s  default),  the  whole  of  Article
13
(determination  of  quantity  and  quality),  12.4  (mitigation  of losses),
and
13.3(a)  (?buyer shall be under no obligation to accept delivery of any
quantity
of liquid fuel which fails to meet the quality specifications ??).

No  doubt  there  are  other relevant Articles, but the above seem the
important
ones to me.

The  facts  have  been summarised already in numerous e-mails and
correspondence
and  I  certainly will not repeat them, except to say that I think it is
correct
that:

(1)   It is simply not possible to buy condensate applying test method D3605
for
condensate.   For this reason, for example, your contract with Phillips
Brothers
for the ?PACIFIC VIRGO? did not include this test method.

(2)   SGS  consider  D3605  is wholly inappropriate for condensate and have
said
that  modifying  D3605  with  ?ashing? is the preferred method to achieve
higher
reproduceability.   Indeed,  the  previous two cargoes of condensate supplied
to
FGPC have been tested using ?ashing?.

(3)   The gasoil has been nominated for August to replace the contaminated
Elang
arguably  because of the lack of lead time to find suitable cargo of
condensate,
but  more  probably  because  the trader in question understandably is
concerned
that  a  substitute  condensate cargo may fail if the plain D3605 test method
is
used.

(4)   FGCP  have  said  in  a  recent e-mail dated 27th July that ?FGCP will
not
hesitate  to  reject  any cargo which fails to meet the guaranteed
specification
and  which  offers  any possibility of invalidating any guarantees or
warranties
given  by  Siemens?.  They are therefore not prepared to entertain any
amendment
to the contract.

Following our telephone conference, and having read the contract, I saw
problems
for  Enron  and  decided  to  share  my thoughts with John Lockey of Essex
Court
Chambers.   He  is the barrister specialising in such problems, often used by
me
and  the firm for second opinions, and obviously helpful on a case such as
this.
We debated the subject at length and came to the following tentative
conclusions
which  I  shall  put  in  bullet form.  He and I are available for discussion
at
08.30  a.m. tomorrow at my office and I propose to call you at that time to
hear
your comments and to deal with any questions you may have on the following:

1.   We  think  that  it  is  not possible for Enron to argue with any
realistic
prospect  of  success that the apparent impossibility of finding a seller who
is
willing  to  sell  condensate  applying  test method D3605 satisfies the test
of
using  reasonable  commercial  efforts to justify zero tax for the first
600,000
barrels of other types of liquid fuel in any contract year.  It seems to us
that
this provision is designed to deal with problems of obtaining condensate
cargoes
due  to  force  majeure related reasons after the contract has been entered
into
and is not designed to provide effectively a let-out because the contract
simply
cannot be complied with at all from its start.  FGPC will simply argue with
some
prospect  of  success,  that they entered into the contract and agreed its
terms
regarding  pricing,  etc.  on the basis that Enron was able to supply
condensate
applying  D3605.   This  squares with what they have said in their recent
e-mail
which I have quoted above.  The same e-mail goes on to say:

?The  allowance  for 600,000 barrels was built into the LFPC to act as a
?safety
valve? only to be used should circumstances demand it.?

2.   If  we  are right about what we say above, this means that Enron are in
the
invidious  position  of  having  to  source  condensate  (to avoid the tax),
not
knowing whether it is going to meet D3605.  If SGS test using D3605 and fail
the
cargo, the contract supposedly gives FGPC an entitlement to reject.  Their
cover
costs could include gasoil with its additional tax as a ?cost? since there is
no
available  condensate  for  sale  on  the market applying D3605, assuming we
are
right about this assumption in (1) above.

3.   It  occurs  to  us  that  it  may be possible to argue with some merit
that
Appendix  B  has  to  be  construed  to  imply a term that D3605 only applies
to
condensate if it is truly applicable to that grade.  You will note that
Appendix
B  sets  out  a  test  method in one column and three grades gasoil, naphtha
and
condensate  in  other  columns.   If  SGS  are  right  that  the  test method
is
inappropriate, they should not be testing against D3605 for condensate.
Putting
it  another  way,  the  condensate  could  be  on  spec applying the
appropriate
?ashing?  method, and the test method set out in Appendix B will not
necessarily
determine  this.  As you say, it is hit and miss.  Objectively, the intention
of
the parties must be to apply the appropriate test method, or not to apply a
test
method  if  it  is  not  capable  of  determining the contractual
specification.
Applying  this  reasoning,  it means that Enron are not in breach by
supplying a
cargo  of condensate in circumstances where the D3605 test is simply not
carried
out because contractually it cannot apply.

4.  As we say above, we think SGS should not be carrying out this test at all
if
it is entirely inappropriate.  Indeed, SGS, who are jointly appointed, should
be
instructed  by Enron not to carry out the test.  There is some force for this
in
Article  13.1(a) which says that measurement of quantities and taking of
samples
for  the  purposes  of  determining  the quality of liquid fuel in each
shipment
should be carried out ?in accordance with international standard practice at
the
time  of  the  shipment  in question?.   It is not completely on point since
the
clause  does  not deal specifically with testing.  In the event that SGS
confirm
it is inappropriate to carry out the test and they simply do not test, the
buyer
will  be  left  without  any test certificate that shows the cargo has failed
to
meet  the quality specifications.  Should subsequently the buyer test on his
own
under D3605 and it fails, whilst SGS independently apply the ?ashing? method
and
it passes, we believe the buyers will be in difficulties in maintaining a
lawful
rejection.

5.   Before  this  angle is pursued, we think SGS should be contacted to
confirm
the test method is inappropriate.  We also think it is important that you and
we
have sight of the exact wording of the test method to see whether on its face
it
is  inappropriate  for  condensate.  This would help to reinforce the
contention
that it is inapplicable to condensate in Appendix B.

6.   Finally,  I should like to have sight of the Appendix 1 ?Typical
laboratory
condensate  analyses?  that  is  attached to the fuel supply plan that you
faxed
yesterday.

We look forward to speaking to you at 08.30 a.m. tomorrow.

Regards,

David Best.

(Please reply to david.best@clyde.co.uk)

__________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Any views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of Clyde & Co.  If you have
received this e-mail in error, please contact Clyde & Co.

Clyde & Co.
51 Eastcheap, London, EC3M 1JP
Tel: +44 (020) 7623 1244, Fax: +44 (020) 7623 5427

Clyde & Co. Guildford
Beaufort House, Chertsey Street, Guildford GU1 4HA
Tel: +44 1483 555 555, Fax: +44 1483 567 330

E-Mail: postmaster@clyde.co.uk, Internet: http://www.clydeco.com


> DELL & ENRON ClickAtHome ORDER CONFIRMATION
>
> Thank you for your Enron ClickAtHome order!  Please read and retain this
> e-mail for your records.  It contains important information relating to
> your order that should be used in any future communications with Dell.
>
> Your Dell customer number is:  12213206
>
> Your order number is:  486116486
>
> Your total "Out of Pocket" amount:  $366.79
> The total "Out of Pocket" amount includes upgrade costs, shipping and
> taxes.
>
>
> Your Online Sales Point of Contact:
> We are here to assist you with your order if needed. Our office hours are
> Monday- Friday, 8am-7pm Central Standard Time.  You can reach our office
> by calling 1-866-220-3355 or through e-mail at:
> US_EPP_Clickathome@dell.com <mailto:US_EPP_Clickathome@dell.com> .
>
> Estimated Ship Date:
> We estimate that your order should be shipped on or before 12/29/00.
> Although we do not anticipate a delay in your order, we cannot guarantee
> the shipping date as we occasionally run into unexpected delays in
> manufacturing.  Your order is being shipped to you under Dell's terms and
> conditions of sale found at: www.dell.com <http://www.dell.com>.
>
> Total Satisfaction Policy:
> If you wish to cancel your order for any reason within 30 days, we'll
> refund amounts paid by you, minus shipping costs, no questions asked.  You
> are responsible for the cost of shipping your system back to us.
>
> How to Check Order Status:
> If you would like to check the status of your order, please call Dell's
> automated order status inquiry system at:  1-800-433-9014, or visit Dell's
> Order Status Page at: <http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/index.asp>.
>
>
> You can also register to have Dell e-mail you when your order is shipped,
> by going to:
> <http://wwwapp.us.dell.com/us/en/ordstat/watchreg.asp?ordnum>.
>
> How to reach a Technical Support Representative:
> Once you have received your equipment, if you need to contact a Dell
> technical support representative, please call 1-866-220-3355, option 3.
> You will be asked to give your "Service Tag Number".  The "Service Tag
> Number" is a five digit alphanumeric number written on the white bar code
> label on the back of the system.  Please have this number ready before you
> contact the technical support representative.
>
>
> Thank you for participating in the Dell/ Enron ClickAtHome program.  It is
> my pleasure to work with you.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Jerome Alder
> Dell Sales Rep.
> EPP
> 1-695-8133
> Ext. 49761
> Email:Jerome_Alder@Dell.com
>
>


I'm old now, but i can always find solace in the fact that you are older!  I
don't know yet if I am going to go out tonight, but if I do we'll probably go
to Woody's on Richmond - it used to be the velvet Elvis
-e

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@compaq.com> on 01/20/2000 08:43:40 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HAPPY BIRTHDAY

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!!!

How does it feel to be 23 fuck face?  I hope your day goes well!!!  What do
you want to do tonight?
JASON BASS
Technical Support Engineer

Compa Q


[IMAGE] 	A Free Win-Win Version of the Real Thing!    At Virtual Vegas , you can play all your favorite casino games -- blackjack , poker , slots , and more -- for free!  You couldn't lose money if you tried.   In fact, Virtual Vegas will give you 100 iCoins just for signing up, not to mention  great prizes  and incredible offers. Big time fun... for free !  Click Here  to register!   http://web1.customoffers.com/click.asp?lnk=104&email=PMIMS@ENRON.COM

Your privacy is extremely important to us. You requested to receive this mailing, by registering at  CustomOffers.com or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, we are committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience, with offers that include bargains, entertainment, and  money-making ideas. However, if you wish to unsubscribe, click here  or link to http://web1.customoffers.com/unsubscribe.asp?emid=75  Third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator.
[IMAGE]


On Monday Oct. 22nd we will be scheduling for Tuesday Oct. 23, Wednesday Oct. 24, & Thursday Oct. 25.  The WSCC has designated this schedule to accommodate the Bi-Annual schedulers conference that will be held on the 23rd & 24th.  Diane, Donald, & Stacy will be out of the office on those days attending the meeting but will be available by cell phone.

Thanks,

Stacy Runswick
Enron North America
stacy.runswick@enron.com
(877) 464-7779 ph
(503) 464-3740 fx


what did you get

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Huble, Amanda
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

I just got back from shopping.  I bought a new outfit for tomorrow!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:30 PM
To:	Huble, Amanda
Subject:

ready?


Attached is an update of my 2000 Objectives and the accomplishments
outside of the objectives.


We have two positions open for Trading Assistants with UBSW Energy.  One will work for Jeff Richter and Chris Mallory on the Cash Trading desk and one will work for me and Mike Swerzbin on the Term Trading desk.

In short, the Trading Assistant helps the traders run EOL markets, provides analytical support, prepares daily market summaries, reviews trade press for pertinent information, performs checkouts with brokers and counterparties, assists in pricing new deals.

Please send an e-mail to Amy Fitzpatrick by noon on Tuesday expressing your interest.  This position is open to both Enron and UBSW employees.

Tim Belden


We (Mike Gough, plant manager, Mike Mazowita and various Westinghouse "SWPC"
commercial folks) have had a few lengthy discussions concerning the February,
April and August outages.  The current issues and their status is as follows:

Outstanding Invoices:  The Feb and April invoices total to $1,627,541.81.
The breakdown is 2 times $420,388.06 Labor and $786,765.69 Parts.  We have
analysed the Parts invoices and have determined that the calculation
correctly (or favourably in some cases) determines the correct useful life
charge.

Tenaska Invoice Dispute:  Tenaska asserted that they should not be required
to pay either the parts or the labor for these outages (and would have held
similar for the August outage).  The parts which were the source of the
failure, the transition pieces and seals (including allocable labor), were
noted on the invoices as "Warranty."  The invoices were for the "actually
used life" for the repaired/replaced components as well as the incremental
labor associated with replacing these components.  Tenaska believes the
incremental should be covered under consequential damages under either the
warranty provisions of the maintenance agreement or the individually signed
labor agreements.  SWPC contends that there is no consequential damage
concept in either agreement.

Temporary resolution as of today:  We have agreed with SWPC to pay all parts
life charges and hold aside the labor charge in escrow pending legal review.
The review and either concurrence with SWPC or Tenaska needs to be reached
immediately.  I would like Richard Sanders of legal to spearhead this review
and deliver a preliminary view by cob tomorrow.  We will execute some form of
escrow and or payment depending upon Richard's determination.

Power Systems root cause analysis:  We will have PS at the site during next
weeks outage and will be required to pay for 1 full 8 hours of shift
downtime.  Once we know the legal review from 3 above, I will inform SWPC of
this issue.  The plant personnel already know and will fully cooperate.

At this time, I would not expect that we have a potential disclosure issue on
the invoices (certainly open to change).

Chuck Ward


Sounds like I need to take gambling lessons from you.  I consistently lose money when I gamble.

 Do you have Tristan's email address?  Wanted to see if we could hook up in Austin for some Longhorn celebration.

-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Nemec, Gerald
Subject: RE: Austin

The weekend was a blast.  I won $116 at the craps table (I'm addicted now and my dad thinks I need to join gamblers anonymous).  We kayaked on the Colorado River - about 11 miles - on Saturday and the weather was spectacular.  And we hiked the Grand Canyon on Sunday - an amazing site!  It reminded me of a spontaneous college road trip.  We had a lot of fun.  Let's talk about another football game in the future or go get drinks sometime.

Have a good week!

-----Original Message-----
From: Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:27 AM
To: Guerrero, Janel
Subject: RE: Austin

I was in Austin for most of the weekend.  A friend of mine was supposed to have a boat party on Lake Travis Friday night, but that was cancelled due to the rain.  We just went out on 4th Street instead.  Went to the game Sat. night.  We won so that was good.  How was the girls road trip?

-----Original Message-----
From: Guerrero, Janel
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:10 PM
To: Nemec, Gerald
Subject: Austin

Hi.  I just wanted to let you know that the conference I was going to attend in Austin next week was cancelled and the organizers of the conference are now defunct.  Oh well.....I think I'll pass on going to Austin for the game.  I need a weekend at home to myself after SC and the Vegas/Grand Canyon adventure.

Did you enjoy the long weekend?


hrgis#: 90010251
pin#: 9257


That should be easy enough.   Paige needs some glasses, and that could run
$200-$300.
Dental is also covered, if we have any uncovered dental expenses.  I'm going
to guess we might have another $100 in prescriptions to fill this year as
well.  I could stand some new glasses also.

Your Eckerd's glasses can also be submitted.

We need to forecast for next year, as open enrollment starts soon.

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/16/2000 02:39:52 PM
Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: reimbursement

Election was $2400. Paid to date is $784 and I have an additional $712 to
submit. Hopefully they will pay even though the insurance declined to cover
it. So, that leaves a balance of $904 and we will owe Sharon $200 or so by
the end of this month. Depending on what happens after that we might have
another $250 or so from Sharon by the last of December. Best guess, $500 or
so we need to cover somewhere.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 1:49 PM
To: nmann@erac.com
Subject: Re: reimbursement

Does that take into account that more money may be going into the spending
account?  I think we have a total of $2500 allocated for the year.  My
records indicate that I've put in $1900 as of my last paycheck.

Love,

Kay

"Neil Mann" <nmann@erac.com> on 10/16/2000 01:08:08 PM

Please respond to <nmann@erac.com>

To:   "C. Kay Mann (E-mail)" <Kay.Mann@Enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  reimbursement

I just received the EOBs back on Sharon Seals. They will not pay. If the
reimbusement account pays it will leave about $900.00 in the account. I
will
try to get the form completed tonight and in the mail tomorrow.
NM


The video says www.bloomberg.com.  We get the video source through an application called IP TV viewer.  I am not sure how Enron provides this service to us.

Grigsby


We expect that the lawyer who will take Frevert's deposition will be Steven
Smith with O'Melveny & Myers out of San Francisco.  His biographical
information can be found at
http://www.omm.com/navigate.asp?nodeHandle=31&idContent=2024

I will bring you a hard copy when we meet at 1:30 p.m.

Andy


Cooper,

If you are interested....

Craig

 -----Original Appointment-----
From: 	Dupuy, Mark
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:52 AM
To:	Dupuy, Mark; Mclurg, Craig; Punja, Karim; Merchant, Brad; Wong, Michael F ; Garcia, Sebastien; Quon, Sandra; McKeel, Richard; Berry, Greg K.
Subject:	let's go for drinks after work
When:	Friday, October 19, 2001 5:00 PM-6:30 PM (GMT-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada).
Where:	Barley Mill


Martin,

I wanted to verify with you the transactions done to date.  Let me know if you agree

9/8	50,000		$0.10		$5,000
9/9	50,000		$0.10		$5,000
9/10	50,000		$0.10		$5,000
9/13	50,000		$0.10		$5,000

Total to date			           $20,000


(For e-mailing list removal information see bottom of email.)
[IMAGE]

[IMAGE] 	 [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Get RealArcade, the first easy, all-in-one  Internet game service, today! With RealArcade it's easy to discover great new  games, connect and play online with others, organize your games, and much more?and  did we mention it?s free? [IMAGE] [IMAGE]

										[IMAGE]
[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
										[IMAGE]
Big Bot Battles 	 	Kayak Extreme 	 	Super Bubble Pop 	 	Primal  Prey 	 	Arcade Classics 	 	Cue Club

 [IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]  [IMAGE] Try free demos of every downloadable game - over 50 titles  and growing  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Get great games in every genre, including action, puzzle,  casino and more  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Play over 50 different full-version Web games, absolutely  FREE  [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Chat with others, preview new games, and get hot tips and  tricks  [IMAGE] Download RealArcade for FREE today and put the fun back on your desktop! [IMAGE] Click here for RealArcade  [IMAGE]

[IMAGE]
You are receiving this e-mail because you downloaded  RealPlayer
 or RealJukebox
 and indicated a preference to receive product  news, updates, and special offers from RealNetworks
.
[IMAGE]
If you do not wish to receive e-mails from us in the future, click  on the Remove Me link below.
[IMAGE]
remove  me  |privacy  policy
[IMAGE]
RealNetworks
 and RealArcade? are trademarks or  registered trademarks of RealNetworks, Inc. All other companies or products listed  herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


I just finished having lunch with Tobin and he filled me in a bit about this
morning's meeting.  I don't know how you reacted, if you were upset, etc.
but I wanted to offer this up if you were struggling with the situation.
Whatever happens and whatever is said about your move don't ever lose sight
of the fact that in every aspect of this situation you conducted yourself in
the best and most open manner possible.  In no way can or should your conduct
be called into question.  Bearing that in mind any criticism that was
expressed within the meeting this morning was beyond inappropriate.  I am
sure it reflected much more poorly on the accuser than it did any of those
being criticized.  Furthermore, just keep focused on what an incredible
opportunity this move is going to be for you and all of the doors it will
inevitably open.  There isn't a doubt in my mind that you are bound for great
things, you just have to seize the opportunities that will lead to that when
they come along (which is exactly what you've done).

Keep your chin up and whatever you do don't doubt yourself or your actions.


Over the last few months, we have been discussing our standard E-mail
platform with you, our customer.  Your feedback from the various
demonstrations, surveys and Technology Showcases validated that E-mail is a
vital part of your ability to communicate effectively.  However, your
feedback also indicated that you need your E-mail client to have additional
functionality and increased integration with other applications you use.
Therefore, to meet the demands of our fast-paced business, Enron Net Works is
standardizing our E-mail platform by deploying Microsoft Outlook 2000 to all
the Business Units we currently support for messaging.  (Project plans for
EBS, EES and Azurix are still being finalized and will be communicated
separately.)

This conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000 will improve your ability to
communicate and provide a more consistent look and feel across the standard
office applications you use on a daily basis.  We are excited about this
opportunity to provide a more robust, full function solution for your
messaging needs.   To provide you with additional details about the
conversion from Lotus Notes to Outlook 2000, we are including a list of
frequently asked questions about this project.

How does this project affect me?
Your current Lotus Notes E-mail system will be converted to Microsoft Outlook
2000.

What is Microsoft Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 is the messaging client you will use to read your E-mail, update
your calendar and personal address book, record to do lists, etc.

Why are we switching to Outlook 2000?
Outlook 2000 integrates more effectively with our new operating system,
Windows 2000, and the Microsoft products that Enron currently uses. With
Outlook 2000, we can provide you with a more robust mail platform including
the following new features:

Instant Messaging ) Ability to send person-to-person, immediate, pop-up
messages.
Improved Palm/CE Synchronization ) Allows for simpler and quicker updates of
your hand held device from multiple places.
Conferencing Server ) Ability to conduct video conferences from your desktop.
Web Access ) Ability to retrieve your Enron E-mail via a browser.
Fax Integration ) Ability to send/receive faxes from your E-mail Inbox.
Voice Mail Integration ) Ability to have your voice mail delivered to your
E-mail Inbox for retrieval.

When will the Outlook 2000 rollout start and when will I get it?
The pilot will begin in late October with the production rollout beginning in
late November.  We are finalizing our Business Unit rollout schedule.
Additional information will be provided to all business units as it becomes
available.  Project updates will be posted on the Project section of the IT
Central web site at http://itcentral.enron.com.  Additionally, you may send
questions to Outlook.2000@enron.com, and a member of the project team will be
happy to address these individually.


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/02/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,077
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,013
Total Life to Date Transactions	403,039

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/02/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,516	75%
Enron Europe Limited	135	33%
Global Products	179	35%
Enron Metals	247	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	46%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,735,478,227
MTD	5,283,038,758
LTD	218,650,288,670
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,096,560,598

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	15,302,941,580

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	544
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,216
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,921
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,670


Start Date: 4/15/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041514.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_LUCKY
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  10.00 / Final:   9.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/15/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


ya don't say?


Daren,

The above meter flowed on the 215K for 3/2000.  I has flow for the first two
days of this month (Sitara deal #205569-deal ends 3/31/2000).

Can you please see if the deal can be extended or if the gas should be placed
on stranger's?

Thanks
-Jackie-
3-9497


Re: Note I left on your desk. Could you take a look at this deal when you get
a chance?

Thanks,
Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 01/09/2001 04:53 PM
---------------------------

	From:  Kimberly Allen                           01/09/2001 01:48 PM

To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: #485446

Kate,
I received and index trade into NP15 that Chris Mallory did. For Price the
confirmations states:

The average day ahead, post congestion price for the Constrained Price as
published by the California Power Exchange for the on in the period of
delivery stated herein plus 3.00.

Is this language o.k. to accept on the confirmation.

Thanks,

Kimberly Indelicato
33031


Hey Paul - feel free to reply to this email...I will do what I can to help!

-T


To Market Participants:

At the Market Issues Forum yesterday, Jeanne Sole led the presentation on
Distributed Generation, presenting the initial ISO thinking based on recent
proceedings and feedback from participants.   In the context of the CPUC
proceeding on distributed generation, the ISO has identified ISO
requirements that should be clarified or revised to accommodate distributed
generation.    The ISO has scheduled a meeting on August 31 , in Folsom,
from 10:30 AM -3 PM  to discuss its initial ideas on
clarifications/revisions. The ISO invites entities interested in discussing
these ideas and other ideas related to distributed generation to attend.  It
is our schedule now to take this issue to the Governing Board in October.

The ISO will distribute information on its initial ideas along with more
information on the location of the meeting by Friday August 18.

Don Fuller

Director, Client Relations


I spoke with Larry Zamit this morning regarding the outage January 1 through
6.  He agreed to hold the gas for us and batch it throughout the rest of
January.  At this point we have 3,007 nominated for 1/1/00 and that is what
he has agreed to hold.

Questions??  Give me a call.

Charlotte/Aimee


Attached are two documents that outline day ahead scheduling procedures for the weekend.

The first walks you through copying schedules (if Saturday and Sunday are the same)

The second is the "normal" procedure used to submit schedules using QSE MOS

Questions should be directed to Smith or Bill Freije, b/c I am leaving for Austin tomorrow.  Good luck!
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Day, Smith L.
Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 8:10 AM
To:	Katz , Randy
Subject:

Smith L. Day
Enron Power Marketing, Inc.
Ph. 713-853-4201
Fax: 713-646-8272
Pager: 877-306-9429


Brad,

You're scheduled to meet  w/Greg on Wednesday at 3:30p.m. in EB2801b.  It was
great seeing you and welcome back!

Liz


564894 - changed to Bloomberg - but it's a buy, not a sale - is this the same
deal prebon is missing?

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/29/2001 02:25 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: 3/29 Checkout

AMEREX
All deals o.k.

PREBON

Mark Fischer
deal 564894
Prebon does not recognize

BLOOMBERG

Mark Fischer
I am missing the following deal:
Enron sells to El Paso 25 mw May PV  $304.00
I believe this deal is the deal prebon does not recognize--564894


Look at the cc.  I'm an idiot.
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2000
10:52 AM ---------------------------

Daren J Farmer
02/16/2000 10:14 AM
To: Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stacey Neuman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mtg: Customer Trip

Heather,

I will be at an offsite meeting today.  Stacey Neuweiller will attend in my
place.  Leave me a voicemail if you need me to do anything.  Thanks.

D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 02/16/2000
10:13 AM ---------------------------

Heather Choate
02/15/2000 04:20 PM
To: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maria Garza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charles T
Muzzy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark L Schrab/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
D Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Kinsey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Benjamin Markey/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Margie Straight/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Zhang/HOU/ECT@ECT, Reyna
Cabrera/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darren Espey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cora
Pendergrass/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Alex Saldana/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberly
Vaughn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chantelle Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Mtg: Customer Trip

  Please plan to attend a meeting to discuss the Customer Trip

 Wednesday, February 16, 2000
 at 3pm in EB3084

   Thanks! Heather, x33278


I've returned the Staff's phone call, but got voice mail.  It would be
helpful to discuss this before I talk to them.  Could we schedule something
around noon (or later)?

Thanks,

Kay


---------------------- Forwarded by Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000
12:24 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Enron Human Resources @ ENRON                           10/06/2000
05:27 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: All Enron Downtown
cc:
Subject: United HealthCare Contracting Update

TO: Houston Area Employees Participating in Domestic Medical Plan Benefits

FROM: Enron Human Resources

We are pleased to pass along to you the fact that United HealthCare (UHC) and
Memorial Herman Health Systems (MHHS) reached agreement on a long-term
contract.   There will be no disruption in terms of accessing network
services from the hospital system or those providers who were scheduled to be
terminated.  Employees currently electing UHC will receive a confirming
letter shortly from UHC.

As mentioned in our earlier memo, it is our understanding that Cigna has also
been contacted by MHHS and are now in contract negotiations.

Open Enrollment packages are in the mail and you should consider the above
facts when making your decision on your medical election.


Things are going well here.  I have been pretty busy losing lots of money at
work.
Brian and Hector are going to Europe at the end of the month, but I can't go
because of work.  It doesn't bother me that much though.   I will probably
try to take a trip over there in May.  On top of that I am thinking about a
cruise this summer some time.
Brian and I are actually moving this weekend to a new apartment within the
Park at Midtown.  Brian recently got his bike stolen from the balcony, so we
are going to move to an interior apartment.  Of course, I wouldn't expect you
to relate to any of this because you have never seen my apartment.  Oh well,
I guess you have your priorities.

Other than that, not a whole lot going on.  How are things with you and the
fam?

e

Danielle Samson <DanielleS@JonesGranger.com> on 03/15/2000 05:24:32 AM
To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hi there!

Hey Ner,
Just wanted to write you a quick note and say hi.  I hope everything is
going o.k.  I haven't heard from you in a while.  How's the fam?  Any trips
planned for you yet?  Have you found out anymore about the Europe trip?  How
is work going?  And the apartment?  Are you still getting along with Brian?
Hope all is going well.

-Dee


We have some serious issues.   Downgrade, collateral called, liquidity crisis, issue more equity.   I can see $12 pretty easy.

I think both Lay and Fastow are gone.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 11:03 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	RE: Energy Agenda

yeah, don't know if they will really want an ene rep on the panel.  i really expected a fastow resignation - maybe tomorrow.  looks to me like a merger is on the order.

rh

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Monday, October 22, 2001 10:57 AM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	RE: Energy Agenda

No problem.   The only problem right now is ENE's stock price.   Wow - you get em.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Herndon, Rogers
Sent:	Sunday, October 21, 2001 1:18 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	FW: Energy Agenda

Kevin -

I was requested by Prof Webb to participate in an Energy Panel Discussion at UVA and have agreed.  Some of our competitors will be there and this will hopefully further our recruiting efforts.  Please let me know if you have a problem with this.

Thanks,
Rogers
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Alderson, Kathy" <kja5y@forbes2.comm.virginia.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Alderson+2C+20Kathy+22+20+3Ckja5y+40forbes2+2Ecomm+2Evirginia+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, October 05, 2001 2:57 PM
To:	Herndon, Rogers
Cc:	Webb, Robert; Harvard, Elizabeth
Subject:	Energy Agenda

Mr. Herndon:

As promised earlier, here's a copy of the energy program.  We look forward
to having Enron participate in this program.  If you have any questions,
please contact Elizabeth Harvard at 434-924-4123 or Bob Webb at
434-924-7570.

Kathleen Alderson
Center Coordinator
McIntire School of Commerce
Phone: 434-924-7010
Fax:  434-982-3073
E-mail: kja5y@virginia.edu

 - Agenda-Panelists.doc << File: Agenda-Panelists.doc >>


Sally,

Just something from a recruiting prospective for us to think about,
remembering the situation from last fall of George making the mistake of
extending verbal offers, quoting incorrect salaries, and the difference being
recovered by your RC, I wanted to bring the potential of a residual OU salary
issue to your attention.

The salary being offered for another internship or full-time position, which
ever applies, may appear (to the OU candidates) to be wrong.  Interns will
enter the program at the same pay rate, $3,000 monthly and the full-time
analysts at 40k.  As you know, both salaries are non-negotiable for
consistency amongst the program participants.

I'm sure questions will come up regarding compensation and thought we could
discuss the inevitable.  I would really like your input on how to "soften the
blow".

I look forward to your response.
Thanks
Shelly


Sara,  Keegan and I do not know what you are saying you want to do finally.

You indicated yesterday that you did not have any meetings scheduled with me
today on brokerage accounts and immediately thereafter, Keegan and I adjusted
my schedule accordingly with other meetings.

Are you now saying that you want to still meet at these times referenced in
Kay's email below.

Or, are you saying, based on a more recent email, that you only want to meet
Monthly?

Let us know.

Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3816
(713) 345-4693

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	04/04/2001 08:43 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reminder of Brokerage Agreements Meeting Tomorrow at 1:30 pm in 38C1

FYI

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 08:42 AM -----

	Kaye Ellis
	04/04/2001 08:20 AM

		 To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reminder of Brokerage Agreements Meeting Tomorrow at 1:30 pm in 38C1

Here is the email I sent out listing when each Brokerage Agreement Meeting
would be held..
----- Forwarded by Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2001 08:18 AM -----

	Kaye Ellis
	03/13/2001 03:14 PM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Reminder of Brokerage Agreements Meeting Tomorrow at 1:30 pm in 38C1

----- Forwarded by Kaye Ellis/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2001 03:12 PM -----

	Kaye Ellis
	02/22/2001 11:15 AM

		 To: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Keegan Farrell/NA/Enron@Enron, Holly
Keiser/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: Brokerage Agreements Meetings

Please put the following dates on your calendar for the Brokerage Agreements
meetings.

Monday, February 26 at 2 pm in 38C1

The following meetings will all be held at 1:30 pm in 38C2:

March 14 March 28
April 11  April 25
May 9  May 23
June 13  June 27
July 11  July 25
August 8 August 22
Sept. 12 Sept. 26
Oct. 10  Oct. 24
Nov. 14  Nov. 28
Dec. 12  Dec. 26

Please let me know if you have any conflicts.

Thanks
Kaye