i am all hot and bothered.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:46 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

ok, but i have to approve them first.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:46 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

oh my god!  i am all worked up here at work.  i am going to find you a
hottie right now.

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:38 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   absolutely.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:39 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   does that mean you would do it even if i didn't win $80million

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:24 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      disgusting, i wouldn't do it.  you'd have to pick someone really
      attractive
      and then i would do it.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:24 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      i thought it was.  i think that girl is hot.  if i won $80million
   that
      is
      the girl i want you to hook up with.

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:18 PM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         that's not nice.  you should compliment me.  that was not a
      compliment
         though.  nice try.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 4:08 PM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         whatever.  i try to be nice and pay you a compliment and you turn
   it
      on
         me.
         i guess i will just never compliment you again.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:48 PM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            whatever, you're mean

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:46 PM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            those photos are all stretched out.  i can't believe you don't
      think
         she
            is
            pretty

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:33 PM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

                i'm not kidding, i honestly, 100%, do not think she is
   pretty
      and
         am
               insulted by the comparison.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:33 PM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               whatever.  i think you are messing around and you probably
   love
         the
               comparisson.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
                  Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:05 PM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  she does look like a man, she's hideous.  you are ruining
   my
         day.

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 3:05 PM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  http://www.bonniebernstein.freeservers.com/

                  this is the site and she doesn't look like a man.  danm
   it.

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON
                     Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:55 PM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     yes, you have to type in her name where it says search
      and
         then
               her
                  site
                     will come up.  it is definitely her b/c that picture
   you
         sent
            me
               is
                  on
                     it.
                     she looks like a man.

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                     Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:54 PM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject: RE:

                     are you sure you are looking at the correct one b/c i
      don't
         see
               her
                  on
                     yahoo.  i think you are lying b/c she is not gross.

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
      @ENRON
                        Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:46 PM
                        To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                        Subject:  RE:

                        i just searched for her on yahoo.com and a site
   came
      up
         with
            a
                  bunch
                     of
                        pictures of her.  gross, gross, gross.

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
               [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                        Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:44 PM
                        To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                        Subject: RE:

                        where did you look her up?  i dont know what you
   are
         talking
               about
                     b/c
                        she
                        is skinny and pretty.

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Erin Richardson
   <erichardson@sarofim.com>
         @ENRON
                           Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:38 PM
                           To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                           Subject:  RE:

                           that may not be a good picture but i just looked
      her
         up
            and
               saw
                  a
                        bunch
                           of
                           pictures and she is gross in all of them.  she's
      big
         too.

                           -----Original Message-----
                           From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                           Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:39 PM
                           To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                           Subject: RE:

                           she isn't gross .  she is hot.  you need to see
   her
      on
            tv.
                  like i
                        said,
                           that is not a great pic.

                               -----Original Message-----
                              From:   Erin Richardson
      <erichardson@sarofim.com>
            @ENRON
                              Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:33 PM
                              To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                              Subject:  RE:

                              she's gross, thanks a lot.  i look better
   than
      her.

                              -----Original Message-----
                              From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                     [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                              Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:27 PM
                              To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                              Subject: RE:

      http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/chat/2000/cbs/bernstein112000.htm

                              this is a photo of the girl i think you look
      like
         but
            it
                  isn't
                        really
                           a
                              good pic.

                                  -----Original Message-----
                                 From:   Erin Richardson
         <erichardson@sarofim.com>
               @ENRON
                                 Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:12 PM
                                 To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                 Subject:  RE:

                                 what are you talking about??

                                 -----Original Message-----
                                 From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                        [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                 Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:06 PM
                                 To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                 Subject: RE:

                                 if you act enthusiastic(sp?) then you'll
   be
                     enthusiastic(sp?)!

                                     -----Original Message-----
                                    From:   Erin Richardson
            <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                  @ENRON
                                    Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:02
   PM
                                    To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                    Subject:  RE:

                                     now you're supposed to tell me how
      excited
         you
               are.

                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                           [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                    Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:57 PM
                                    To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                    Subject: RE:

                                    good.  that is what i like to hear.

                                        -----Original Message-----
                                       From:   Erin Richardson
               <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                     @ENRON
                                       Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001
   1:36
      PM
                                       To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                       Subject:  RE:

                                       i mean, that sounds great, i can't
      wait!

                                       -----Original Message-----
                                       From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                              [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                       Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:34
   PM
                                       To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                       Subject: RE:

                                       what do you mean you guess?

                                           -----Original Message-----
                                          From:   Erin Richardson
                  <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                        @ENRON
                                          Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001
      1:31
         PM
                                          To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                          Subject:  RE:

                                          fine i guess

                                          -----Original Message-----
                                          From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                                 [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                          Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001
      12:33
         PM
                                          To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                          Subject: RE:

                                          7:30-8.  how does that sound?

                                              -----Original Message-----
                                             From:   Erin Richardson
                     <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                           @ENRON
                                             Sent:   Tuesday, October 09,
   2001
         12:08
            PM
                                             To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                             Subject:  RE:

                                             i don't know, you tell me.

                                             -----Original Message-----
                                             From:
   Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                                    [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                             Sent: Tuesday, October 09,
   2001
         12:06
            PM
                                             To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                             Subject: RE:

                                             what time you coming over

                                                 -----Original Message-----
                                                From:   Erin Richardson
                        <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                              @ENRON
                                                Sent:   Monday, October 08,
      2001
            10:58
               AM
                                                To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                                Subject:  RE:

                                                i don't think so.

                                                -----Original Message-----
                                                From:
      Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                                       [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                Sent: Monday, October 08,
   2001
         10:53
            AM
                                                To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                Subject: RE:

                                                if you win lets go to
   applebys
         and
            if i
                  win
                     lets
                        go
                           to
                                    redwood
                                          grill.

                                                    -----Original
   Message-----
                                                   From:   Erin Richardson
                           <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                 @ENRON
                                                   Sent:   Monday, October
   08,
         2001
               10:49
                  AM
                                                   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                                   Subject:  RE:

                                                   nice analogy but i will
   win
         this
            bet
               so
                     start
                              thinking
                                    about
                                          where
                                                   you're
                                                   taking me.

                                                   -----Original
   Message-----
                                                   From:
         Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                   Sent: Monday, October
   08,
      2001
            10:31
               AM
                                                   To:
   erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                   Subject: RE:

                                                   i don't think so.
      sometimes
         the
            sun
                     shines
                        on a
                              dogs
                                 ass
                                       but i
                                             don't
                                                   see
                                                   that happening again.

                                                       -----Original
      Message-----
                                                      From:   Erin
   Richardson
                              <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                    @ENRON
                                                      Sent:   Monday,
   October
      08,
            2001
                  10:17
                     AM
                                                      To:     Lenhart,
   Matthew
                                                      Subject:  RE:

                                                      alright, i hope
   you're
         ready
            to
               buy
                  me
                        dinner
                                 again.

                                                      -----Original
      Message-----
                                                      From:
            Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                      Sent: Monday, October
      08,
         2001
               10:07
                  AM
                                                      To:
      erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                      Subject: RE:

                                                      here is our bet on
      cu/a&m
         game
               this
                        summer.
                           i
                              have
                                 cu
                                       -8.
                                          we
                                             can
                                                   think
                                                      of
                                                      a dinner later.

                                                          -----Original
         Message-----
                                                         From:   Erin
      Richardson
                                 <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                       @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                                      NRON@ENRON.com]

                                                         Sent:   Friday,
      October
         05,
               2001
                     11:12
                        AM
                                                         To:     Lenhart,
      Matthew
                                                         Subject:  RE:

                                                         sounds exciting.
      want
         to
            go
               to
                     dinner
                           with
                              me
                                    before
                                       you
                                             have
                                                   your
                                                         'matt
                                                         time'?

                                                         -----Original
         Message-----
                                                         From:
               Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                         Sent: Friday,
   October
         05,
            2001
                  10:45
                     AM
                                                         To:
         erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                         Subject: RE:

                                                         probablyl gonna
   just
         kick
            it

                                                             -----Original
            Message-----
                                                            From:   Erin
         Richardson
                                    <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                          @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                                         NRON@ENRON.com]

                                                            Sent:   Friday,
         October
            05,
                  2001
                        10:41
                           AM
                                                            To:
   Lenhart,
         Matthew
                                                            Subject:  RE:

                                                            i haven't
   thought
         about
            it
                  yet.
                        what
                           are
                              you
                                    doing

                                                            -----Original
            Message-----
                                                            From:
                  Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                            Sent: Friday,
      October
            05,
               2001
                     10:30
                        AM
                                                            To:
            erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                            Subject: RE:

                                                            you know,
      whatever.
         i
            will
                  let
                     you
                           know
                                 later.
                                       what
                                          are
                                                you
                                                      doing
                                                            tonight.

   -----Original
               Message-----
                                                               From:   Erin
            Richardson
                                       <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                             @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                                            NRON@ENRON.com]

                                                               Sent:
   Friday,
            October
               05,
                     2001
                           9:57
                              AM
                                                               To:
      Lenhart,
            Matthew
                                                               Subject:
   RE:

                                                               like what?

   -----Original
               Message-----
                                                               From:
                     Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

               [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                               Sent:
   Friday,
         October
               05,
                  2001
                        9:51
                           AM
                                                               To:
               erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                               Subject: RE:

                                                               i can think
   of
      a
         few
               things

      -----Original
                  Message-----
                                                                  From:
   Erin
               Richardson
                                          <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                                @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E

   NRON@ENRON.com]

                                                                  Sent:
      Friday,
               October
                  05,
                        2001
                              9:47
                                 AM
                                                                  To:
         Lenhart,
               Matthew
                                                                  Subject:
      RE:

                                                                  i was
   just
            kidding.
               i
                  am
                     very
                              sweet.
                                 i
                                    feel
                                             terrible
                                                   that
                                                      you
                                                               didn't
                                                                  sleep
                                                                  well. if
      there
         was
                  anything
                     i
                           could
                              do
                                 to
                                       make
                                          you
                                                feel
                                                      better
                                                         i
                                                               would.

      -----Original
                  Message-----
                                                                  From:
                        Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                                  Sent:
      Friday,
            October
                  05,
                     2001
                           9:47
                              AM
                                                                  To:
                  erichardson@sarofim.com
                                                                  Subject:
   RE:

                                                                  real
   sweet.
         you
            have
               a
                     stone
                           heart.

         -----Original
                     Message-----
                                                                     From:
      Erin
                  Richardson
                                             <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                                   @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E

      NRON@ENRON.com]

                                                                     Sent:
         Friday,
                  October
                     05,
                           2001
                                 9:38
                                    AM
                                                                     To:
            Lenhart,
                  Matthew

   Subject:
         RE:

                                                                     of
   course
         you
               don't.
                     you
                        just
                              dream
                                 up
                                       these
                                                things
                                                   so i
                                                         will
                                                               feel
                                                                     sorry
                                                                     for
   you,
      i
            don't.
                  you
                        slept
                              fine.

         -----Original
                     Message-----
                                                                     From:
                           Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

                     [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                                                     Sent:
         Friday,
               October
                     05,
                        2001
                              9:10
                                 AM
                                                                     To:
                     erichardson@sarofim.com

   Subject:
      RE:

                                                                     um, i
      don't
               remember
                     that.

            -----Original
                        Message-----

   From:
         Erin
                     Richardson
                                                <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                                      @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E

         NRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:
            Friday,
                     October
                        05,
                              2001
                                    9:00
                                       AM
                                                                        To:
               Lenhart,
                     Matthew

      Subject:
            RE:

   that's
         your
               fault.
                     you
                           were
                                 taking
                                    up
                                          over
                                             half
                                                of
                                                      the
                                                         bed,
                                                            i
                                                               had
                                                                  to
                                                                        ask
                                                                        you
   to
         move
               over.
                     and
                        then
                              you
                                 kept
                                          coughing
                                             in
                                                   the
                                                         middle
                                                            of
                                                               the
                                                                     night
                                                                        and

   waking
      me
            up.
               so,
                  i
                     did
                        not
                              sleep
                                    well.
                                          you
                                                   probably
                                                         slept
                                                               better
                                                                     than
                                                                        me,
   i

   don't
         know
            what
                     you're
                                 complaining
                                       about.

            -----Original
                        Message-----

   From:
                              Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com

                        [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]

   Sent:
            Friday,
                  October
                        05,
                           2001
                                 8:53
                                    AM
                                                                        To:
                        erichardson@sarofim.com

      Subject:
         RE:

                                                                        i
   am
         tired
            b/c
               i
                  kept
                           waking
                              up
                                 with
                                    no
                                             covers
                                                and
                                                   my
                                                         butt
                                                            was

   hanging
                                                                        off
                                                                        the
      bed.
         i
               looked
                  at
                     you
                           and
                              you
                                    were
                                          covered
                                             up
                                                to
                                                      your
                                                            neck
                                                               with
                                                                     the

   covers
      in
            the
                  middle
                     of
                        the
                              bed.
                                    you
                                       look
                                             like
                                                you
                                                      slept
                                                            well.

               -----Original
                           Message-----

      From:
            Erin
                        Richardson

   <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                                                         @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E

            NRON@ENRON.com]

      Sent:
               Friday,
                        October
                           05,
                                 2001
                                       8:45
                                          AM

   To:
                  Lenhart,
                        Matthew

         Subject:
               RE:

   i
         know,
            me
               too.
                     but
                           isn't
                              she
                                 so
                                       cute?
                                          i
                                                love
                                                      her,
                                                            she's
                                                               the
                                                                     best.

               -----Original
                           Message-----

      From:
               Lenhart,
                        Matthew

                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]

      Sent:
               Friday,
                     October
                           05,
                              2001
                                    8:12
                                       AM

   To:
                           erichardson@sarofim.com

         Subject:

   i
      am
            tired.
                  your
                     dog
                           kept
                              me
                                 up
                                    all
                                             night.

   **********************************************************************

      This
            e-mail
               is
                  the
                           property
                              of
                                    Enron
                                          Corp.
                                                   and/or
                                                      its
                                                               relevant

      affiliate

   and

   may
            contain
                        confidential
                              and
                                       privileged
                                                material
                                                      for
                                                         the
                                                               sole
                                                                  use
                                                                     of
                                                                        the

         intended
                  recipient
                        (s).
                           Any
                                    review,
                                          use,
                                                      distribution
                                                         or

      disclosure
                                                                        by

      others
         is
                  strictly
                              prohibited.
                                 If
                                       you
                                          are
                                             not
                                                   the
                                                            intended

   recipient
                                                                        (or

            authorized
               to
                     receive
                           for
                              the
                                          recipient),
                                                please
                                                         contact
                                                            the
                                                                     sender
                                                                        or

      reply

   to
         Enron
               Corp.
                  at

                           enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                                                               and
                                                                     delete

   all

      copies
         of
               the
                        message.
                           This
                                    e-mail
                                       (and
                                             any
                                                         attachments
                                                               hereto)
                                                                     are
                                                                        not

         intended
            to
               be
                  an
                        offer
                           (or
                              an
                                          acceptance)
                                                and
                                                   do
                                                      not
                                                            create
                                                               or

      evidence

   a

         binding
            and
                        enforceable
                                 contract
                                          between
                                                Enron
                                                      Corp.
                                                         (or
                                                            any
                                                               of
                                                                     its

            affiliates)
               and
                     the
                              intended
                                       recipient
                                          or
                                             any
                                                   other
                                                            party,
                                                               and
                                                                  may
                                                                        not

   be

      relied
         on
            by
                     anyone
                        as
                           the
                                 basis
                                    of
                                       a
                                                contract
                                                   by
                                                            estoppel
                                                               or

         otherwise.

      Thank
            you.

   **********************************************************************


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 01:49 PM -----

	Trang Le
	10/25/2000 01:42 PM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
O'Donnell/NA/Enron@Enron, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gordon
Heaney/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacey
Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim Stanley/NA/Enron@Enron, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Steel Trading - General Contacts

FYI - Below is the list of the current contact names for the various
processes related to steel trading activities.  Please note that some of the
arrangements are only temporary. Let me know if you have any comments and/or
suggestions.

Thanks,
Trang x3-6996

  1. Legal:
       Financial:  Mark Taylor
       Physical:  Harry Collins
  2. Trader:
       Financial:  Kevin O'Donnell
       Physical  Kevin O'Donnell
  3. Deal Capture:
       Financial:  Trang Le
       Physical:  Trang Le
  4. Risk Management:
     Financial:  Martha Stevens
       Physical:  Martha Stevens
  5. Confirmation:
      Financial:    Bob Bowen
      Physical:  Trang Le
  6. Logistics:
    Financial:  N/A
     Physical:  TBD
  7. Global CP:
      Financial:  Mary Gosnell
      Physical:  Mary Gosnell
  8. Global Contract:
       Financial:  Anthony Campos
       Physical:  Linda Bryan
 9. Settlement
      Financial:  Gordon Heaney
      Physical:  Trang Le
10. Accounting
     Financial:  TBD
     Physical:  TBD


Re: Purchase Option Assignment and Assumption Agreement for Austin turbines
I've added the equipment description in Schedule 1 and changed the date of
the agreement to November 30, 2000 (see attached redlined version).
Ben/Eric - can you verify that my unit numbers in Schedule 1 match your list
of unit numbers?
David - can you sign off on this for accounting?
Once we have sign-off from accounting, we can circulate the document once
more with Winston & Strawn.  Hopefully it should be in pretty good shape by
tomorrow.  Thanks,
-Catherine
x3-9943


Attached is the latest weekly electric report

Also attached is the schedule for workshops for guidance in establishing
RTOs. (Note:  Atlanta workshop has changed from April 5-6 to April 6-7).


FYI

	I'm trying to sell 10,000/d off Blk Marlin into Carbide for Nov & Dec 01.
	Jody was a pass on HSC - $0.03 because of other gas he has flowing
	which he now indicates is showing up at HSC - $0.04 to $0.05.

	Nelson hasn't confirmed price to me but the best I've heard from him was
	a HSC - $0.04 and he wanted to better Spinniker's price.

	Our last shot for Nov & Dec is Monday.
	After that, we have a shot at gas that comes up Jan 01 at TX City.

	Jody still wants to see a delivered price off of MOPS and he seems to
	be expecting HSC - $0.10 to $0.12 based on gas he's buying at
	El Paso Blessing.

	mk


Joe and Bob:
Could someone bring to our luncheon tomorrow a copy of the "Special Handlings
List"?

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)


I'm out next week, but will be in touch with steve horn when i return.

Jeff

Massimo Marolo@ENRON
10/27/2000 03:17 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Rotation

The Center is run by Paul Frison who is the President / CEO and the Enron
liaison is Steve Horn of E-Commerce ventures. The center's website is
http:/www.houstontech.org

Thanks again
Massimo


I have a customer that has requested ACH rather than wire transfer for
payment.  Is this a problem?   Please advise.  I will be drafting physical
gas contracts for this company,

Thanks for your assistance.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Start Date: 4/14/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041414.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SPP
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: -125.00 / Final: -124.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred:  25.00 / Final:  24.92)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 14 / Preferred: -60.00 / Final: -59.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/14/01
  TRADING_SC: NCPA
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


hey bonnie!!!

how are you doing?  i just had dinner w/ lisa last night and some of the UT girls here in houston.  she's was so excited to hear that we hung out as much as we did last weekend.  I wanted to write and thank you again for being such a gracious host...i had the BEST time hanging out and fell in love with Seattle all over again.  it is truly a fantastic city.  hope all is well with you, and i'm continuing to explore the possibility of joining you and Holly in the Emerald City.

have a wonderful holiday season,
susan


Thanks. I'll give Leslie a call and explore this with her, Dave Samuels, and
likely Tom Gros.

Alan

	Mark Taylor
	07/10/2000 01:42 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: AlphaTrust: Providing a Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures

Thought you might be interested in this.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 01:42 PM -----

	Leslie Hansen
	07/10/2000 10:14 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: AlphaTrust: Providing a Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures

Mark:

What do you know about the issue of electronic signatures?  Is this service
or a similar service something we should further explore?

Leslie
----- Forwarded by Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 10:11 AM -----

	Dave Samuels
	07/10/2000 09:58 AM

		 To: Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: AlphaTrust: Providing a Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures

I received this solicitation from this company last week.  Do we have any
interest in discussing anything further with them?  (all of the attachments
appear to be messed up, but the website provides more detail)

thanks
Dave

---------------------- Forwarded by Dave Samuels/HOU/ECT on 07/10/2000 09:54
AM ---------------------------

Randall Whitfield <Randall.Whitfield@AlphaTrust.com> on 07/07/2000 04:51:30 PM
To: "'Dave Samuels'" <Dave.Samuels@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: AlphaTrust: Providing a Legal Framework for Electronic Signatures

Dave,
Thank you for the prompt reply.
There are many areas where electronic signatures can reduce business costs
and enable new applications.  But, most importantly Enron and Enron Online
needs to know they can trust an electronic signature.  AlphaTrust can
serve as the 3rd party managing your electronic signatures including risk
management.  There are many costs associated with implementing an
electronic signature service with the polices and legal requirements.  And
typically there can be a 12-18 month time frame to implement.

AlphaTrust provides the infrastructure,
AlphaTrust provides the legal framework and fraud protection across all
jurisdictions including internationally,
AlphaTrust can enable your business to get started quickly.

I will call you next week to follow-up.  If you like we can coordinate a
call with your legal counsel and my CEO who understands the laws to a
great extent.

Thank you,
Randall Whitfield
p. 214.290.1905
randall.whitfield@alphatrust.com
This e-mail is electronically signed. As a prudent business practice, we
electronically sign e-mail, and prefer that our customers and business
partners do as well. For information please visit:
http://alphatrust.com/e-signed-mail.asp

 - AlphaTrust ESIGN Sum.doc
 - AlphaTrust Service sum.doc
 - Policy Issues in E-commerce Applications - BBTEs.pdf


Here ya go!


Lisa:
I'll be interested in their response.  Stacy is still working on the form of
amendment and we had hoped to fax it to KCS sometime tomorrow.

Carol


National Journal's CongressDaily
Issue date:  October 23, 2001
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

TRADE
Zoellick Seeks Specific Date For Vote On Trade Authority
   Trade Representative Zoellick today said the time has come for
the House to set a date for a vote on a bill to restore
presidential trade negotiating authority, stressing, "The eyes of
the world will be on Congress." Speaking to a National
Association of Manufacturers' breakfast, Zoellick said, "My own
sense is that we need a date." A CongressDaily survey of House
members released today showed 178 members publicly undeclared or
on the fence on the issue. Zoellick said setting a date is the
only way to compel members to focus on the issue and make a
decision.
   House Ways and Means Chairman Thomas said he "agrees
completely" with Zoellick and said he would have preferred to
hold a floor vote just after the farm bill was approved 10 days
ago. A vote on the trade negotiating authority measure is
expected within the next few weeks, but Thomas said he would need
to confer with House leaders on setting a date. Business
lobbyists said a vote would increase the need for direct
involvement by the president in securing votes. Thomas said that
would be more likely now that President Bush has returned from
his recent trip to Asia. Asked whether a wartime president will
have the time to devote to the trade issue, Thomas said, "A
wartime president does not have to," because many members are
prepared to help him win passage for his priorities.
   This afternoon, House Majority Leader Armey said the timing
for bringing trade negotiating authority legislation to the floor
was "up in the air indefinitely," saying there were "renewed or
new concerns" about the bill. Armey, who has long pushed for a
floor vote on the trade bill, referred questions about that issue
to the whip's office. Union officials have been expressing
confidence in recent days that they have the votes to defeat the
trade negotiating authority bill. "I think we have the votes,"
said one labor lobbyist. "We feel great on this one. I haven't
met with one member of Congress who's said they won't be with us.
A lot of those are probably in the [CongressDaily poll's]
undecided column."
   Zoellick acknowledged that some countries have sought changes
in trade arrangements with the United States in exchange for
their sustained support in the coalition effort against
terrorism, but he resisted characterizing them as "concessions."
Zoellick explained that expanded trade opportunities can play a
crucial role in the growth and stability of many countries - most
notably Pakistan - and the United States has a vital interest in
not repeating the isolation and retrenchment that accompanied
international crises in the past. - by Stephen Norton and Charlie
Mitchell
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

ECONOMY
Democrats Offer Stimulus Alternative Plan With Offsets
   House Ways and Means ranking member Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.,
will go to the House Rules Committee this afternoon seeking time
for debate on a bill Democrats contend is less skewed toward
corporate America and more fiscally responsible. Like the bill
the Ways and Means Committee approved recently, the Democratic
alternative would provide an additional tax rebate for income
taxpayers who did not qualify for the full rebate provided for in
the $1.35 trillion tax cut measure that became law this year. It
would extend a number of expiring provisions, but only for one
year. The bill favored by Republicans would go a bit further and
make permanent a provision known as Subpart F that aids financial
services firms operating overseas. Democrats contend the GOP
approach on this provision is part of a "payoff to big money
special interests." However, Democrats agree with Republicans on
the positive effect of extending the carryback period for net
operating losses over five years and doubling what some companies
can expense. It also provides relief for people who had massive
tax liability for exercising stock options that ended up being of
little value.
   The Democratic measure would focus much more on stimulating
the economy through spending. It would provide $11 billion for
interest-free financing for new school construction and repair.
It would also temporarily extend unemployment benefits for a full
year by providing 26 additional weeks' worth of payments, make
benefits available to certain workers now ineligible for them and
increase the payments by $65 a week. It would also allow a one-
year program that would provide a federal payment of 75 percent
of so-called COBRA healthcare costs. To pay for these proposals,
Democrats would freeze the income tax rate at 38.6 percent rather
than phasing in a reduction as provided for in the new tax bill.
Finally, the bill would create a trust fund for ideas that are
outside the committee's jurisdiction - such as additional
Medicaid benefits.
   House Majority Leader Armey this afternoon said the economic
stimulus bill would come to the floor Wednesday and predicted
passage by a sizable margin. He said he would fight to preserve
capital gains cuts during an eventual conference with the Senate,
although he acknowledged that he had hoped the House would be
able to provide more in capital gains relief than is included in
the Ways and Means bill. But he said the capital gains provision
was probably the only element of the House bill that would be "in
serious danger" of eventually being dropped from the package.
Armey said he believed an alternative minimum tax repeal -
although he did not mention retroactivity - and the acceleration
of rate reductions would survive.
   Meanwhile, several Senate Republicans issued warnings about
Democratic proposals in both chambers to include major spending
provisions in an economic stimulus package. "Unfortunately, a lot
of what the Democrats are advocating doesn't have much
stimulative effect," said Senate Minority Leader Lott. Added Sen.
Phil Gramm, R-Texas, "I just hope we don't end up with a package
that just squanders $75 billion." Gramm warned that if the
package is wasteful, "I won't vote for it." Sen. John Breaux, D-
La., said that a bipartisan group of moderates would meet
Wednesday with Treasury Secretary O'Neill to discuss the stimulus
package. - by Stephen Norton, Charlie Mitchell and Geoff Earle
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

CONGRESSIONAL OPERATIONS
Congress Returns To Work Under Makeshift Conditions
   Senators and staff took a makeshift approach today as the
Senate returned to session, while health and security officials
gathered more information about when to reopen congressional
office buildings. Minority Leader Lott said leaders would decide
later today about whether to "open up a couple of the Senate
office buildings." But there were indications that environmental
sweeps could take more time, and the process of eliminating
anthrax from the four sites within the Capitol complex where it
has been found has not begun. Aides said a toxic gas was one of
several options that could be used to eliminate the anthrax, and
that areas would have to be sealed off during the process. Asked
how many days the process might take to get the Hart Office
Building suitable for reopening, Rules Chairman Dodd said, "Try
weeks." In the interim, Dodd said he was working to assign space
to senators and staff. "I've got people bunked down here
together," he said. But he said the task would be considerably
easier once the Russell and Dirksen buildings reopen.
   Senators acknowledged the difficulties posed by their office
closings. "I don't see how you can function really effectively,"
said Commerce ranking member John McCain, R-Ariz. "So much of the
committee work is done in the Senate buildings." But McCain noted
the committees have already done much of their work. "We
certainly can conduct business here, and we will," said
Republican Policy Committee Chairman Larry Craig of Idaho. "It'll
be a little more complicated, there's no question about it." Dodd
said he was working to try to prioritize hearings to make
efficient use of space.
   Lott also expressed confidence in the safety of the Capitol
building. "We do have a regular monitoring system in the
Capitol," he said. In another show of confidence, Senate
Democrats met today in the Lyndon Johnson room off the Senate
floor, where staff for Daschle brought contaminated clothing last
week at the instruction of FBI officials. But a Capitol Police
spokesman said Monday that no new positive hits for anthrax have
occurred.
   House Majority Leader Armey today would not give any
indication when House offices may reopen, saying, "The speaker
and I had a very closely held discussion about that" earlier
today. He said it would be up to Speaker Hastert to make an
announcement. Following the weekly breakast meeting at the White
House today, House Minority Leader Gephardt told reporters that
the anthrax sent to Senate Majority Leader Daschle's office was
"weapons grade," implying other officials had not been
forthcoming enough in their descriptions of the substance. "I
think we've got to stop parsing words and trying to be anything
other than accurate about what this is - this is highly
sophisticated material it is small in size and it aerosolizes,"
Gephardt said.
   Officials confirmed anthrax today as the cause of death in two
local postal workers, the Associated Press reported. A mail
employee was hospitalized in New Jersey, also believed to be
suffering from the inhalation form of the disease. "We now know
the two deaths that were reported to you now are confirmed cases
of inhalational anthrax," District of Columbia Mayor Anthony
Williams said at a news conference. Amid suspicions that mail
with anthrax may have made its way to the Longworth House Office
Building, all the mail in that building - now closed - may be
burned as a precaution, said two congressional officials speaking
on condition of anonymity. Over the weekend, officials said a
machine in another House office building that bundles mail for
Longworth was found to contain anthrax. Officials have not found
the source of the contamination, but they are concerned that it
would take too many resources and be too time-consuming to go
through all the mail now in that building. - by Geoff Earle and
Charlie Mitchell
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

CONGRESSIONAL OPERATIONS
House Prepares To Pass Anti-Terrorism Legislation
   Following a meeting with House Speaker Hastert, Majority
Leader Armey today said the House will take up the conference
report for the anti-terrorism bill tonight, and pass it either by
unanimous consent or as a suspension. He said the House would
move ahead with the legislation as "agreed to" in negotiations
with the Senate - even though some senators are seeking to add
anti-bioterrorism language. "We don't think that's within the
bounds of the agreement," Armey said, suggesting the senators
pursue that language separately. Armey also said the FY02 defense
authorization bill should be completed this week, and that the
FY02 Legislative Branch and Treasury Postal appropriations
conference reports will come to the floor as well.
   Meanwhile, there are increasing signs that the logistical
hurdles caused by the anthrax incident - plus a continuing logjam
on the Senate floor - could prolong the congressional session.
Lott said it could take three weeks to move several bills related
to terrorist attacks, plus more time to move the stalled FY02
appropriations bills. Senate Minority Leader Lott said that with
some immediate movement, "We could get it done before the
Thanksgiving recess," but said it might be necessary to bring
people back. "I'm concerned that every week we stay here there
seems to be another new idea of how we could spend billions of
dollars," he said. Commerce ranking member John McCain, R-Ariz.,
echoed that concern, even as he and other Republicans voted
against a cloture motion today that would have freed up the FY02
Foreign Operations spending bill, which Republicans are stalling
to protest what they consider slow movement of judicial nominees.
"I see us headed for one of those omnibus appropriations bills,"
he said. "It'll be a bonanza."
   Majority Whip Reid said leaders had made no decisions about
adjournment. "We're just feeling our way through this now," he
said. Added Rules Chairman Dodd: "I don't think we ought to get
out of here. There's a value to being here that I think is
reassuring to the American people. We may not need everybody
here, but I think we ought to be functioning." - by Charlie
Mitchell and Geoff Earle
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

HEALTH
Harkin Chastises CDC Chief For Poor Anthrax Reaction
   Senate Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Tom
Harkin, D-Iowa, sharply questioned Centers for Disease Control
Director Jeffrey Koplan today about why U.S. Postal Service
employees at a Washington-area mail sorting facility were not
tested for anthrax exposure after evidence of exposure was found
at Senate and New Jersey mail facilities. "Of course this has
never come up before, but we would hope CDC would have had some
plan," Harkin said. While acknowledging the loss of two workers
at the Brentwood facility who appear to have died in the last few
days from anthrax, Koplan said government officials were working
under the assumption then that the risk of contracting the more
deadly form of anthrax, inhalation anthrax, was only from opened
mail. Since the Brentwood facility does not open mail but
processes it, Koplan said, no immediate danger was seen.
"Sometimes the information can't be used on Day 10 when you don't
get it until Day 14," Koplan said.
   He assured senators that "no favoritism" was used in the
government's apparently quick response to test and provide
antibiotics to Senate aides, reporters and lobbyists who may have
been exposed to anthrax found in a letter sent to Majority Leader
Daschle and the rather slow reaction to rising concerns at the
Brentwood facility. Koplan promised to provide the committee with
a detailed list of CDC's actions to address the various areas of
potential exposure since anthrax was first reported in Florida on
Oct. 3.
   Koplan said the CDC, which is charged with responding to
potential biological threats, and the public health system "is
stressed through years of neglect and underinvestment." But, he
assured senators that CDC was working with federal and local
officials to respond quickly to emerging threats. Harkin and
Labor-HHS Appropriations Subcommittee ranking member Arlen
Specter, R-Pa., have proposed a $2.3 billion proposal that would
include funds to acquire and stockpile medicines and vaccines,
$700 million to beef up state and local public health services,
$140 million to expand CDC, funds for a tracking database and
funds to double the inspection of imported foods. - by April
Fulton
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

TRANSPORTATION
House Urged By Key Senators To Pass Aviation Proposal
   Senate Commerce Committee members asked President Bush today
to increase pressure on the House to pass an aviation security
bill while urging their House counterparts to move swiftly so a
bill could become law. "Safety delayed is safety denied," said
Senate Commerce Chairman Hollings, who along with ranking member
John McCain, R-Ariz., pushed a bill through the Senate earlier
this month on a 100-0 vote. Without a new law "the American
people do not have the confidence they need to have to fly on an
airplane," McCain said. "This is the cruelest kind of hoax on the
American people," Sen. John (Jay) Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said.
"Until we get an economic stimulus bill, this is the economic
stimulus bill," Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said. Hollings said
House Speaker Hastert had indicated to him that a bill could be
up in the House this week, but Hollings said he was unable to
speak with Majority Whip DeLay, who is a major opponent of the
Senate bill.
   House Majority Leader Armey said today there was some chance
airline security legislation would come to the floor this week,
but he said it was more likely to be on the agenda next week. He
said the bill would probably come to the floor under a rule and
that Democrats would be allowed to offer a substitute that calls
for fully federalizing airport "screeners." The House GOP
leadership supports language that would leave federalization to
the president's discretion, Armey said, noting that President
Bush has proposed a plan that would leave contract workers in
place, supervised by federal officers.
   The Senate bill would federalize most airport security
workers, would secure cockpit doors, would deploy more sky
marshals, among other measures to beef up air safety. Some House
GOP leaders so far have been resistant to bringing up a bill
because they are concerned they would not have the votes to
prevent security workers from becoming federal workers. Senators
also dismissed arguments House Republicans have been using
against federalization, such as calling for the United States to
follow the European model of aviation security in which there is
federal oversight but private workers. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison,
R-Texas, said while European airport security workers have
federal oversight and the European government pays for their
benefits, this would not happen in a U.S. system. McCain
dismissed the concerns that have been raised about workers
forming unions, saying the issue "should not in any way" be a
part of the debate. Hollings noted that a provision in the Senate
bill would keep workers from striking.
   President Bush continues to oppose full federalization of
airport screeners and baggage checkers, calling into question
whether a deal can struck on an airline security bill before the
busy Thanksgiving travel season. Bush raised the issue during his
weekly meeting at the White House with Hastert, Senate Majority
Leader Daschle, Senate Minority Leader Lott and House Minority
Leader Gephardt. White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer said
today Bush continues to support increasing standards for airport
workers, but questions the utility of putting them on the federal
payroll. Bush today urged the leaders to come together quickly on
the bill, but laid down no timetable. The possibility of Bush
issuing an executive order revamping airline security procedures
was raised at the meeting, but the president emphasized that
congressional action was preferable, Fleischer said. - by April
Fulton and Keith Koffler
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

HOUSE ADMINISTRATION
Baird Seeks Support For Emergency Replacement Plan
   Rep. Brian Baird, D-Wash., said Monday that about 40 House
Republicans and Democrats so far have cosponsored his
constitutional amendment setting forth procedures for appointing
House members in the event of a massive attack that kills or
incapacitates at least a quarter of House lawmakers. While his
efforts to gain more cosponsors are hampered by the closure of
congressional office buildings, Baird said "many more" than the
40 already committed are "contemplating" signing onto the bill.
"I hope we can get this done before we convene as a full body
next year," Baird said. Still, he acknowledged, "members find it
much more pleasant to talk about [presidential trade negotiating
authority] and other matters because they're much more pleasant
issues."
   His amendment - which must pass Congress by a two-thirds
majority and be approved by three-quarters of the states - would
give governors the authority to appoint successors for House
members who are killed or incapacitated during an attack that
left 25 percent of members dead or unable to serve. The temporary
appointees would serve no more than 90 days, at which point
special elections would be held to fill the vacancies for the
remainder of the term. Baird said that before introducing the
amendment, he decided to excise a provision that would have
directed governors to appoint temporary members of the same party
affiliation as the dead or incapacitated member. He made his
decision partly because he wanted to keep the Constitution free
of reference to parties, he said.
   But that decision did not sit well with National Republican
Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Davis of Virginia. While
Davis said he was not familiar with the details of the Baird
proposal, he said it would be "ridiculous" not to require a
governor to appoint a successor of the same political party. "You
should not have a partisan change . [you] subvert the will of the
people when you do it that way," Davis said, reasoning that a
partisan shift in the House majority would be too dramatic in
such a crisis.
   While Baird urged legislators to focus on his amendment first,
he also said "we ought to look at" other questions, including a
list of alternative locations for Congress to meet as well as an
expanded line of presidential succession, possibly including
governors who would be more likely to survive if a nuclear weapon
struck Washington, D.C., although those questions might addressed
through regular legislation rather than constitutional amendment.
- by Louis Jacobson
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

POLITICS
Davis: 2002 Campaign Themes Uncertain After Attacks
   National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Davis
of Virginia said today that Sept. 11 terrorist attacks have
curtailed GOP fundraising and dampened political rhetoric, while
making it nearly impossible to predict what issues and dynamics
will dominate next year's mid-term elections. "Nobody knows. I
could sketch 15 different scenarios," Davis said in a briefing
with reporters. "Who knows? The answer is, 'Who knows?'" Davis
said the NRCC is focused on "the variables we can control," the
so-called "Five Rs:" retention, recruitment, redistricting,
resources and record. Davis, who recently had a long conversation
with Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairwoman Nita
Lowey of New York, said incumbents are still responsible for
their public statements and voting records, but said both
committees are presently reluctant to criticize their opponents.
"This is an environment where you want to be very careful in
comparison ads. You can give them a little elbow, but you have to
be careful," Davis said.
   Davis said both campaign committees have similarly refrained
from fundraising in the month following the terrorist attacks.
However, Davis said the terrorist threats have motivated some
reluctant potential House candidates to re-evaluate their
decisions. "People want to be relevant. They want to be
involved," he said. Davis said local off-year elections next
month - including gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey
where Democratic candidates have the advantage - would not be a
referendum on congressional performance. "I don't think what
happens Nov. 6 is going to have a thing to do with what happens
with the Congress and the president," Davis said. "There are no
national issues right now that will hurt Republicans."
   However, Democrats continue to emphasize their differences
with Republicans. In an e-mail sent to reporters today in advance
of the NRCC briefing, a DCCC spokesman suggested "four questions
for Tom Davis," including airport security and economic stimulus
questions. "Does he believe that Republican House candidates will
pay a price at the polls if [Majority Whip] Tom DeLay and
[Majority Leader] Dick Armey succeed in killing airport security
improvements?" the spokesman asked. Davis independently addressed
both topics. He said House Republicans simply would not rubber
stamp Senate airport security legislation and stressed the
importance of stimulus package. "It puts more pressure on a
stimulus package that actually works," Davis said. "The economy
might be an issue that is front and center. It might not." - by
Mark Wegner
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

POLITICS
Republicans To Drop Filibuster Against FY02 Foreign Operations
   Senate Minority Leader Lott this afternoon said Republicans
would drop their filibuster against the FY02 Foreign Operations
appropriations bill. "We're going to go forward with the
appropriations bills," Lott told reporters. Lott said Republicans
are still not happy with the pace of judicial nominations under
Senate Judiciary Chairman Leahy, but have decided that now is not
the time for them to push the issue. The Senate again had failed
to invoke cloture today on the motion to proceed to the Foreign
Operations spending bill, as senators voted 50-47 along party
lines. Awaiting floor consideration are the Agriculture, Labor-
HHS and District of Columbia spending bills, while the Defense
appropriations bill has yet to be marked up.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

POLITICS
Legislators Work Out Of Temporary Quarters
   House members and senators, along with a selected few staff
members, began working out of temporary quarters today. House
members are using GAO headquarters at 441 G St. N.W. A main
telephone number is not available for that location but House
officials are working to post a list of legislators' offices and
temporary telephone numbers on the official House Web site and
may send them out by e-mail. Senators and their staffs are
working out of the Postal Square building near Union Station and
can be reached through the main Capitol switchboard at 224-3121.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

TRADE
Zoellick Reiterates The Need For Steel Industry To Restructure
   In the wake of Monday's announcement that the International
Trade Commission had concluded that the U.S. steel industry has
suffered serious injury as a result of dumping of steel by
foreign competitors, Trade Representative Zoellick today
reiterated the need for the industry to restructure. He warned he
would not go through in pressing the issue and "perpetually"
coming to its assistance unless the industry is prepared to make
needed changes. Rep. Phil English, R-Pa., said Monday that the
ITC's ruling was no "panacea," but has "the potential to insulate
our domestic steel market from predatory dumping at a time when
our domestic industry has been facing it most severe crisis in
memory." Similarly, Rep. Benjamin Cardin, D-Md., said, "This
ruling means that foreign producers now will need to align their
capacity with domestic and global demand. The ultimate objective
must be to have the domestic price of steel reflect its true
competitive cost of production."
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

POLITICS
Largent Encouraged Not To Vacate His House Seat
   Rep. Steve Largent, R-Okla., who plans to resign Nov. 29 to
run for governor, is being encouraged not to vacate his House
seat until state legislative attempts to change current law have
been exhausted, the Daily Oklahoman reported. If Largent goes
ahead with his decision to resign on that date, Tulsa's 1st
District would be left without a voice in Congress during wartime
conditions, because under current state law, the governor cannot
call a special election until there is a vacancy, which would
trigger a process that could take as long as 90 days. Attempts to
resolve the issue intensified last week when House Speaker Larry
Adair gave state Reps. Russ Roach, a Democrat, and Mark Liotta, a
Republican, permission to work with the state Election Board on
wording for an amendment that would allow Largent's resignation
not to become effective immediately while an election is held to
replace him. Largent said he will go through with his plan to
resign Nov. 29, no matter what the state Legislature decides.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

ATTACK UPDATE
   Britain is sending about 1,000 troops to join the U.S.-led
ground war in Afghanistan, according to media reports today, but
the Defense Ministry said it had made no decisions, the
Associated Press reported. Citing senior defense officials, the
British Broadcasting Corp. said about 600 Royal Marine commandos
and several hundred special forces personnel - currently taking
part in a military exercise in Oman - would be deployed to join
the ground assault. Four British ships participating in the
exercise, which ends this weekend, also will stay behind to join
the Afghan campaign, the BBC said. Meanwhile, former Foreign
Secretary Robin Cook suggested that there was still time for the
Taliban regime in Afghanistan to hang onto power even if it
handed over Osama bin Laden. The government has not announced
whether British troops will join the ground campaign, but says it
remains an option. The chiefs of Britain's Royal Navy and Royal
Air Force were reported Monday to be drawing up plans for long-
term military involvement in the war against terrorism.
   In Afghanistan, U.S. jets swooped down to strike Taliban front
lines and a bin Laden stronghold north of Kabul today, watched by
opposition fighters hoping that the American bombardment will
open the way for their advance. Opposition officials also
reported U.S. attacks around the key northern city of Mazar-e-
Sharif, where an opposition offensive to recapture the stronghold
faltered last week. Missiles set fire to critical Taliban oil
supplies in the southern city of Kandahar. In recent days, the
United States has shifted strategy, drawing planes away from
urban areas to target the front-line positions of the Taliban and
their allies in bin Laden's al-Qaida network which face the
opposition Northern Alliance. The goal is to enable the alliance
to advance toward the capital, Kabul, and Mazar-e-Sharif to break
the back of Taliban resistance. From rooftops U.S. jets could be
seen as tiny white specks roaring far overhead, before they
swooped down to unleash their bombs. A series of nine blasts from
several miles away could be heard.
   Along the Kabul front, Taliban fighters were holding their
ground today, responding with rockets and mortars. One rocket
slammed into the bazaar at Charikar, 30 miles north of Kabul,
killing two people, including a 60-year-old vegetable vendor. In
Kandahar, the South Asian Dispatch Agency reported U.S. jets
struck an oil depot and a fuel convoy, sending a thick cloud of
black smoke rising into the clear blue sky. U.S. planes also
targeted an asphalt plant, setting back Taliban efforts to repair
the runway at Kandahar airport, which has been pounded repeatedly
during the air campaign, the agency said. The agency also
reported that U.S. jets late Monday bombed a mountain on the
western outskirts of Kandahar where Taliban troops were trying to
repair a radar station which had been heavily damaged earlier in
the air campaign.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

THE FINAL WORD
   "I need to sneak some food into my office, otherwise my
goldfish will be floating."
   - Sen. John Breaux, D-La., speaking to reporters today about
some of the liabilities of being locked out while all Senate
office buildings are screened for anthrax contamination.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
CongressDaily is published daily, Monday through Friday, by
National Journal Group Inc. Copyright 2001 by National Journal
Inc., 1501 M St., NW, #300, Washington, D.C. 20005.
Retransmission, redistribution or reproduction of CongressDaily
is prohibited without the express, written permission of National
Journal Group Inc.

To read CongressDaily on the Web, contact 1-800-207-8001 or
njcirc@njdc.com for your username and password.

President--John Fox Sullivan, 202-739-8468 (jsullivan@njdc.com)
Publisher--Steve Hull, 202-739-8475 (shull@njdc.com)
Editor--Louis Peck, 202-739-8481 (lpeck@njdc.com)

Executive Editor--Keith White
Senior Managing Editor/A.M. Edition--Robert Ourlian
Senior Editor--Charlie Mitchell
Associate Editor--Greta Wodele
Assistant Editor--Chuck Jordan
Reporters--Pamela Barnett, Lisa Caruso, Geoff Earle, Keith
Koffler, Brody Mullins, Stephen J. Norton, Mark Wegner
Special Correspondents--Jerry Hagstrom, Julie Rovner

Subscription price: $2,497 a year. Subscription and e-mail
transmission information: 202-266-7230 (cngdaily@njdc.com).
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

CDENDIT


Mary/Sara-

Looks like more counterparties are thinking about netting.  See below.   Under the current circumstances, is our procedure going to be sending out our newly developed master to all counterparties looking to enter into netting arrangements?

Thanks,

John

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mendoza, Nidia
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:40 AM
To:	Viverito, John
Cc:	Flores, Nony
Subject:	FW: Net-Out Agreement

John,

We need to have a netting agreement in place with Crown Central.  Please review the attached format and let me know if you are OK with it.

Thanks,

Nidia A. Mendoza
Credit Specialist
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith St.,  Suite 2808 D
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  713/853-4868
Fax:  713/853-9476
e-mail: nidia.mendoza@enron.com <mailto:nidia.mendoza@enron.com>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Wilhite, Thomas" <TWilhite@crowncentral.com <mailto:TWilhite@crowncentral.com>>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:28 AM
To:	Mendoza, Nidia
Subject:	Net-Out Agreement

 - Crown Enron Net Out Agreement.doc


As part of Enron Industrial Market's (EIM) move into the Pulp, Paper and
Steel markets, our European effort is well underway. Our markets are global
in nature and we believe we need a strong presence in Europe to penetrate
that market effectively. Accordingly, we are pleased to announce that Bruce
Garner has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Enron
Industrial Markets - Europe. In this role, Bruce will be responsible for all
activities for EIM in the European market.

Please join us in congratulating Bruce in his new position.


Jim, I have forwarded your binder to David Oxley to set up a meeting for the
wholesale group to discuss appropriate homes for your people.  It has taken a
little longer than expected to get people together but we are making
progress.  It may be helpful for you to identify, like Abe, where these folks
would like to go if they had their druthers.

It may be worthwhile for us to have a quick phone call to discuss.

Regards
Delainey


Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

       Midday Market View(TM) for Tuesday, August 7, 2001
                       as of 1:00PM EDT
           Information provided by Standard & Poor's

================================================================

U.S. INDICES
(1:00 p.m. EDT)

----------------------------------
Market            Value     Change

DJIA          10,418.20    + 16.90
Nasdaq Comp.   2,024.93     - 9.33
S&P 500        1,200.69    +  0.21
----------------------------------
NYSE Advancing Issues        1,529
NYSE Declining Issues        1,419
NYSE Trading Volume        524 mln
NASDAQ Advancing Issues      1,578
NASDAQ Declining Issues      1,848
NASDAQ Trading Volume      750 mln

==================================

U.S. TREASURIES
----------------------------------
Value            Yield      Change

1-year bill       n/a        n/a
5-year note       4.65%     - 1/32
10-year note      5.16%     - 2/32
30-year bond      5.60%     - 1/32

The tables above look best when viewed in a fixed-width font,
such as "Courier."

================================================================

U.S. TRADING SUMMARY

Stocks remain mired around unchanged levels at midday in
lackluster August trading. Stocks initially lost ground on
selling left over from yesterday's negative action, but
bargain-hunters quickly snapped up shares. This helped boost the
headline indexes back into positive territory ahead of Cisco
Systems' highly anticipated earnings report due after today's
session ends. However, with little conviction, the gains fizzled
and stocks were back to unchanged by midday. Sectorwise,
semiconductor manufacturers, networkers and personal computer
makers were all under-performing on the session as jitters over
Cisco's report kept traders on edge in the technology arena.
Outperforming industries on the day included the banks,
electrical equipment and retail stores.

----------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. TREASURY SUMMARY

Treasuries were unchanged to slightly lower in price by midday
with shorter-dated securities under-performing due to a major
amount of supply hitting the market. The Treasury kicks off its
quarterly refunding auction with the sale of $11 billion in
5-year notes, in addition to the $10 billion sale of 1-month
bills. While the auction is supposed to go well, the overall
level of supply has had a suppressive effect on the short end of
the yield curve, keeping prices close to yesterday's levels.
Elsewhere, the mild vacillations of stocks have mostly been
ignored by Treasuries as trading action remains thin and
relatively lackluster.

----------------------------------------------------------------

CURRENCY SUMMARY

The dollar has moved little versus the yen or the euro since
this morning, as it trades around 0.878 dollars per euro and
123.8 yen. The only event of note so far has been the
productivity data, which has given the dollar some support.

----------------------------------------------------------------

MAJOR COMPANY / INDUSTRY NEWS
(All prices as of 1:05 p.m. EDT)

** MetLife Inc. (MET: 29.22, - 0.10) reported fiscal
second-quarter profits that beat Wall Street estimates by $0.01
as operating profits rose about 12%. Profits came from its
institutional business, car and home insurance units. The No. 1
life insurer by premiums earned, before one-time items, $419
million, or $0.54 per share, versus $374 million, or $0.48 per
share, from the year-earlier period. Wall Street expected
MetLife to earn $0.53 per share on average.

** Procter & Gamble (PG: 70.41, - 0.34) reported fiscal
fourth-quarter earnings that beat Street projections. The
consumer products giant earned $837 million, or $0.60 per share,
before special items versus $777 million, or $0.55 per share a
year earlier. Analysts had expected a profit of $0.59 per share.
Procter makes such brands as Vidal Sassoon shampoo and Tide
detergent.

** Barr Laboratories (BRL: 82.05, + 3.10) reported fiscal
fourth-quarter earnings that more than doubled. The drug maker
just barely missed estimates, though, as costs related to legal
action weighed. Barr earned $18.5 million or $0.49 per share
versus $8.4 million or $0.23 per share in the year-ago quarter.
Analysts had expected Barr to earn $0.50 per share on average.
Barr recently began selling a generic version of the drug
Prozac.

----------------------------------------------------------------

RESEARCH SPOTLIGHTS

** UBS Warburg upgraded shares of Healthextras Inc. (HLEX: 9.00,
+ 0.60) from a hold to a buy rating.

** Bear Stearns upgraded shares of Dendrite International (DRTE:
11.67, - 0.02) from an attractive to a buy rating.

################################################################

Log in using the links below to:

Access your account:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=CCBodyi&NeedCASelValue=Y

View your Email Alert customization options:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Perform research or request a market quote:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=Quotes

Place a trade order:
https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=TradeStock

To visit Schwab's home page, use this link:
http://www.schwab.com/

-----------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe or modify your Email Alert customization options,
log in using the link below or copy and paste it into your
browser's address window:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAMyAlerts

Now you can receive graphics Email Alerts in HTML format, using
helpful, full-color graphics and active Web links that connect
you directly to information you want. Use the link below to log
in and change your email format preference:

https://investing.schwab.com/trading/start?SANC=EAEditEmailAddr

----------------------------------------------------------------

Notice: All email sent to or from the Charles Schwab corporate
email system may be retained, monitored and/or reviewed by
Schwab personnel. (1000-8752)

Copyright 2001 Standard & Poor's MMS Inc.  All rights reserved.
Standard & Poor's MMS services are for personal use only.
Commercial use or redistribution in any form, print or
electronic, is prohibited.
Distribution by Quris, Inc.


Kim, it was around $5 or $6.  It was definitely a personal charge.

adr

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Watson, Kimberly
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:06 PM
To:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	RE: Charges on Steve's Met Account

Given that the first week of Dec was the bankruptcy filing, I don't show any lunches out during this week.  I don't believe it was me.  Can you tell by the price how many people may have been at lunch?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Robertson, Audrey
Sent:	Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:25 PM
To:	Watson, Kimberly; Wehring, Linda
Cc:	Robertson, Audrey
Subject:	Charges on Steve's Met Account

Kim and Linda, would either you know if someone charged a lunch meal on Steve's Account at the Met?  Linda, would you check with your guys?  The charge was made during the first week of December.

Thanks in advance,

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


I didn't havw any time off.


October is right around the corner, so please send me any dates you plan to
be out of the office during the month of October (other than October 5 and 6
for the Law Conference).  Thanks for your help.


Yesterday, the European Commission adopted a climate change package, which includes a draft directive on emissions trading, an instrument of EU ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and policies and measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.  Please the attached press release outlining the package.

Major provisions of the draft emissions trading directive include:

The emissions trading scheme has two phases -- first phase (2005 - 2007), second phase (2008 - 2012)

Penalties for non-compliance in first phase are 50 Euros per tonne or twice the average market price, whichever is higher; beyond 2008 the penalty would be 100 Euros per tonne or twice the average market price between 2008 and 2012 ,whichever is higher.

Permits are required in first phase for industrial and energy activities covered, chemicals and waste incinerators are not included in first phase (see Annex I of draft directive for the sectors covered)

Unrestricted access to the market by intermediaries

Banking allowed, but could be limited by individual Member States in first phase

National allocation (for free) in first phase, with provisions for new entrants (unspecificed); harmonized allocation rules by 2008

Possibilty to link with non-EU national emissions trading programs by MOU in first phase (aimed at accession states)

Only CO2 emissions are covered in the first phase, expanded to all GHG gases covered by 2008

Renewable energy certificates are not integrated with GHG allowances under the program

Emissions credits not incorporated into program, but desireable in future.  The EC will address this under a separate directive

I will work with Peter, Nailia, Diana and others to further analyse its implications for Enron.

Link to Draft Emissions Trading Directive:

<http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/com/01581_en.pdf>


Attached for your review and comment are the draft changes to the
Comprehensive Settlement due to the withdrawal of Altra.? Thanks.

 <<settlementrevTPSP.doc>>

Zenee G. Angeles
SEMPRA ENERGY
213 244-3831

 - settlementrevTPSP.doc


Sean:

Just in - I haven't read this yet, but it looks interesting.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Wendell Tangborn [mailto:wendell@hymet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:48 AM
To: wendell tangborn
Subject: Fw: Columbia River forecasting report on website

Dear Friend and/or Colleague,

A summary of the 2001 season, real-time forecasts of Columbia River runoff made weekly with the HyMet model can be viewed at the following website:

<http://www.hymet.com/colnex1.htm>

These results show the accuracy of each forecast made at the three main sites (Grand Coulee, The Dalles and Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River) from January 1 to June 30, 2001, and also demonstrate the influence of abnormal precipitation and temperature during the forecast season on the accuracy.

Precipitation in the Pacific Northwest during the 2001 forecast season was near the record historic low in this region, therefore a significant fraction of the forecast error can be explained by subsequent weather conditions.

Your comments are welcome.

Regards/Wendell

Wendell Tangborn
HyMet Inc
509 Olive Way
Suite 1658
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206 262 9697
Fax:      206 262 9698

email: wendell@hymet.com <mailto:wendell@hymet.com>
or:  wtangb@u.washington.edu <mailto:wtangb@u.washington.edu>
Web site: <http://www.hymet.com>


2
-----Original Message-----
From: "Palmer, James" <James.Palmer@morganstanley.com>
Sent: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:35:19 -0500
To: "'cdean12@earthlink.net'" <cdean12@earthlink.net>
Subject: Roth's comments & strategy

 <<mmst0107.pdf>>  <<roth0107.pdf>>  <<pk-0107.pdf>>

**** Important Notice to Recipients ****
It is important that you do not use e-mail to request, authorize or effect
the purchase or sale of any security or commodity, to send fund transfer
instructions, or to effect any other transactions.  Any such request,
orders, or instructions that you send will not be accepted and will not be
processed by Morgan Stanley.
****************************************

--


Rita Hennesey 33075
Acey (Rudi Zipter's office)


I do have a conflict with this meeting.  I will be in 2AC-1202 from 1:00 - 1:30.  If you need me, please call me in there.  If not, I'll be at my desk (x33841) after that in case you need to call me into your meeting.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Goode, Diane
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 4:32 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle; Yowman, Andrea; Schultea, Kathryn; Palmer, Lizzette; Donahue, Jeff
Cc:	'dick@jeanerret.com'; Matson, Jo ann; Sweet, Twanda
Subject:	Oct. 29 Meeting
Importance:	High

This e-mail confirms our meeting at 1 p.m. Monday, Oct. 29, 2001.  We will meet in Conference Room EB3824.

Mr. Jeanneret:  Please call me from the lobby and I will come down to meet you.  (New Security Requirement).

My direct number is 713-345-7103.

Thanks. Diane


Clem,

The total volume of 1,517 mmbtu that flowed during the period of 12/1/99
through 3/31/00 has been moved from the Strangers Gas Contract to
012-41500-02-004 for write-off purposes.

Bob

Clem Cernosek
01/08/2001 01:35 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL Meter #986563 Texaco Fee c/P

Daren:

During the period of 12/1/99 through 3/31/00 gas flowed into HPL's pipeline
at the above meter.  The gas volumes that flowed are as follows:

12/1/99 - 12/31/99                   1,457  Mmbtus
01/1/00 - 01/31/00                         49  Mmbtus
02/1/00 - 02/29/00               7  Mmbtus
03/1/00 - 03/31/00               4  Mmbtus

         1,517  Mmbtus

Prior to 12/1/99, the volumes were being purchased from High Sierra Operating
LLC under contract #96003435  Deal #26611 which have terminated.  Currently,
Logistics has these volumes recorded to HPL Stranger Gas Contract.  In order
to correct this, HPL Logistics needs either a new deal to record these
volumes which have flowed into HPL's pipeline, or Logistics needs approval to
write-off these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss.  (Please print, sign,
and return the original to Clem Cernosek).

 ________________________________________________________
 Deal/Deal Ticket#/ Customer (Buyer/Seller)

    OR

 _________________________________________________________
 APPROVAL to Write-off the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

Thanks, Clem