Have you guys met/discussed this with Michele?  Please get me up to speed.
Thanks DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 08/24/2000
09:54 AM ---------------------------
   Michele Winckowski                08/17/2000 01:39 PM

To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Maria
Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Glen
Hass/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Caithness Big Sandy, LLC. Project

As you are aware, Transwestern is working with a shipper to potentially
provide service to a new power plant located approximately 40 miles off the
mainline in Arizona.  Although, the final negotiation are not complete
certain options are being evaluated, I need some assistance in interpreting
the regulations regarding the authority we should use for approval of this
project.

The facilities that would be constructed include a delivery point and
approximately 40 miles of pipe.  As these facilities are non-mainline, it may
be possible to construct the proposed facilities under the prior notice
provisions of TW's blanket certificate, provided the project satisfies the
blanket criteria (generally costs and environmental).

With this in mind, I have the following issues and questions:

Preliminarily, marketing is thinking that we may want to develop an
incremental rate  to recover the cost of the project.

Would a new incremental rate for this service impact our ability to file for
approval under the prior notice provisions?  Note: Generally, Subpart F of
Part 157 (blanket regulations) does not address service issues as
transportation service is provided under Part 284 of the Commission's
regulations.  However, the regulations (o157.204)  set forth Who may apply
for a blanket certificate.   The criteria includes, among other things, any
interstate pipeline that has rates accepted by the Commission.  Therefore,
would an incremental rate have to be approved by the Commission before the
proposed facilities would be blanket eligible?

Can a new incremental rate be established through a limit-section 4 rate
filing or is a case-specific certificate required?

As the facilities will not include any mainline expansion - Is an open season
required for the project?  My opinion is "NO".  Do you agree?

Your thoughts and assistance in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks MW


You have been identified to participate in the Business Objects training/knowledge sharing.  Don Powell and Ken Powers have agreed to train and to share their knowledge regarding Business Objects.

The session will cover the following:
	1.  Inventory of commonly used Universes and their data structure (4 hours)
	2.  Description of the canned reports that currently exist and how they are being used.  (2 hours)
	3.  Q&A and assistance in developing reports (2 hours).

Please bring a list of needed reports from your respective areas to develop in the days (or weeks) immediately following the class.  The expectation on the session timing is within the next six weeks.  Don and Ken will work with Mike Bodnar to set up the session.

Gas Logistics goal is to develop individuals that can create complex reports using Business Objects and reduce its reliance on IT and Don in developing such reports.

If you have any questions, please contact me or your Director.


After using a vacation day yesterday with my car trouble, I have 11 days
left.  I plan to roll over 5 days, but I have to take 6 days before the end
of the year.  I would like to take the following days off:

 Friday, December 8th

 Tuesday, December 12th

 Monday, December 18th

 Wednesday, December 27th
 Thursday, December 28th
 Friday, December 29

Please let me know if these dates are acceptable to you.  Thanks.


Hi Tana-as discussed, here are the names of folks who need access to the swap
agreements database (please forgive me if some included already have access.)
 Janet Wood, Michael Slade , Ian Brungs, Robert Quick, Justin Boyd, Michael
Schuh, Martin Rosell, Yumi Takei, Mark Elliot,   Rahaul Saxena, Adam Duguid,
Paul Simons, Marcus Von Bock

Read only access- Debbie Nicolls, William Morely , Chris Sloan, Diana
Higgins, Hamish Skutt, Lindsay Edmunds, Rod Nelson, Anna Reich, Paul Maley,
Minna Tapponen, Oliver Harrison.

Thanks for arranging and if you need any more info please let me know.

Ed- Is there anyone else who you think we should include?


Denise -- can you order this for me?
Let me know if you need any info.
I'll need the laptop plus 2 docking stations, one upstairs and one down.
And a normal monitor & keyboard.
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 11/02/2000
09:56 AM ---------------------------

Jeff Nguyen
10/30/2000 01:49 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Karon O'Gorman/OTS/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Armada M700 - Laptop Purchase

Susan,

I've spoke to our purchasing person, Karon O'gorman, about an order status in
Omaha.  According to Karon, all purchasing from Omaha and Houston goes
through her.  Therefore, if you need to order a new laptop, Karon can handle
all of the arrangements for you.

Thanks,
Jeff Nguyen


Enron announced today that its common stock will now be traded as an Over-the-Counter (OTC) equity security under the symbol "ENRNQ."  This follows a decision by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to file an application to delist Enron's common stock, which means that Enron's common stock and related securities are suspended from trading on the NYSE.  Enron is considering whether to appeal the NYSE's decision.

The NYSE has standard criteria for listing stocks, which can be found on their website at www.nyse.com.  Enron recently fell below the following listing criteria: average closing price of a security less than $1.00 over a consecutive 30 trading-day period.  Quotation service for Enron's stock will now be provided by the National Quotation Bureau, LLC "Pink Sheets."


Return Receipt

 Your
 document:

 was received Liane Kucher/ST/FIS
 by:

 at:          03:36:15 PM Today


Go vote for the Cats!!!!!?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/college/index.html


Dutch:

We have Dave Wei (x5-3853) working on the PortCalc change and Margie Nguyen
(x5-3706) working on the Excel to fetch/save the vol. skew matrix.
We should have the Excel ready for testing by Friday, and the PortCalc by
early next week.

Jeremy
x3-0573

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Quigley, Dutch
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Jeremy Wong/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc: Maggi, Mike; Griffith, John
Subject: Skew Project

Jeremy,

Can you give me a status report on the skew project along with the contact
inf. for
the person that is working on the project.

Dutch
3-9257


Hi Janette,

If the tickets are still available, I would love to have them.  I realize I
was a little slow on the draw this time!

Thanks,

Kay

Janette Elbertson@ECT
03/16/2001 02:36 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Banczak/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandi M
Braband/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Bruce/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa G
Bushman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Carter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Barton Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nancy
Corbet/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Ned E
Crady/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Eddy Daniels/NA/Enron@Enron,
Angela Davis/NA/Enron@Enron, Peter del Vecchio/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E
Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert H George/NA/Enron@Enron, Barbara N Gray/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Grace/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Greenberg/NA/Enron@ENRON, Wayne
Gresham/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne C Koehler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Lyons/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Travis McCullough/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janet H Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Janice R
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julia Murray/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron,
Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Francisco Pinto
Leite/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Coralina
Rivera/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Michael A Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth
Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Lance Schuler-Legal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lou Stoler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Van Hooser/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart
Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Rockets Vs. San Antonio Spurs

Mark Haedicke has four tickets to the game on Saturday, March 17.  The
tickets will be given away on a first-come, first-served basis.  Please reply
by e-mail.

Janette Elbertson
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com


No, contact Rosalee Fleming (ken's assistant).  I let her know that you would
be preparing the briefing.

Ricardo Charvel@ENRON
08/03/2000 08:30 PM
To: Steve Kean, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Lay-Fox meeting

Do we have an estimated deadline for presenting the info to Ken Lay?

Please let me know.

Ricardo


Please see attached

Regards,
Tom Moran
3-3017


I'll update the March storage ticket for 36,300/day.

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron on 02/23/2000
03:26 PM ---------------------------

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/23/2000 02:24:22 PM
To: " - *Joan.Veselack@enron.com" <Joan.Veselack@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: COH Storage Withdrawals

Joan--Thanks.   Our target daily storage withdrawal for TCO storage in March
is
36,300 dth/day.   Given the warm weather, that may prove to be a problem going
forward.   We'll just have to monitor the situation as it unfolds.

Joan.Veselack@enron.com on 02/23/2000 03:17:59 PM
Please respond to Joan.Veselack@enron.com

To: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc: Katherine.L.Kelly@enron.com, Victor.Lamadrid@enron.com,
Colleen.Sullivan@enron.com, Robert.Allwein@enron.com, Joann.Collins@enron.com,
Kate.Fraser@enron.com, Dick.Jenkins@enron.com, Chris.Germany@enron.com, Kara
Destephanis/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, Jeffrey
Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS, joan.veselack@enron.com

Subject: Re: COH Storage Withdrawals

Okay.... to ensure we are all on the same page. We will try to hit your
48,000/day for the last 6 days. The nom's were redone for 2/24.

Because choice burns are so low... I'll nominate about 33,000/day of the
choice burn directly from storage. Joann Collins will use about 15,000/day
to other CES Enduser Market. Just remember, we are at the mercy of mother
nature. When the actuals arrive.... we balance off storage. So if it gets
colder than the forecast, the storage withdrawal will increase. If it gets
warmer, the storage withdrawal will decrease.

If for some reason you want to change this 48,000/day target... just let me
know by 10 EST. This will allow enough time to switch the nom's.

Dick Jenkins and Chris Germany will review if they want "CES to sell back
flowing gas to Enron in order to maintain the storage withdrawal at this
level." (quoted from your other e-mail).

Do you know your March target number for storage withdrawal??? I can
provide your storage balance if needed. Remember, that operationally.... I
use the storage to keep your choice burn balanced with choice actuals.

Thank you!!!!

dkinney@columbiaenergygroup.com on 02/23/2000 12:13:49 PM

To:   " - *joan.veselack@enron.com" <joan.veselack@enron.com>
cc:   " - *Porter, Jeffrey" <jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
      *Destephanis, Kara" <kdestep@columbiaenergygroup.com>

Subject:  COH Storage Withdrawals

Joan--I got your voicemail regarding the current daily requirement for COH
Choice.   I understand that you won't be able to pull the 48,000 dth/day
from
storage if the load requirement is below that level.   I anticipate that we
may
be in that situation for at least the next few days, and I will check with
Kara
regarding the burn levels in the future.   We'll figure out day by day how
much
we want to pull and we'll get that to you prior to your 10am EST nom
deadline.     Don't redo your nom for 2/24; just leave it as is.

Thanks.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317


Summary

-Yesterday's hearing confirmed imminent death of SoCal MOU
-Plan(s) B also drew little support; state "trust" for generators unlikely
-QF/SoCal negotiations are "treading water" as SoCal runs out the clock;
tries to postpone involuntary filing
-BK court unlikely to view SoCal payments to QFs as preferential because of
state order

Report

1. Few Signs of Legislative Support for SoCal MOU

Sources report that Bryson is in regular contact with many legislators,
but especially with Hertzberg and Keeley on the Assembly side (from which
the Plan B is being directed) and Bowen (Senate Energy Chairperson) on the
Assembly side.  Sources believe that Bryson's comment may about the
legislature 'warming up to the MOU' may be a smokescreen; Democratic Senator
Alarcon said in the MOU hearing yesterday that the MOU is dead and is not
going to pass.  Reportedly no one attempted to contradict him.

Members of the Chamber of Commerce, large energy users,  TURN, the California
Manufacturers' and Technology Association (CMTA) and  others also spoke out
against the MOU.  (Sources found it remarkable that  TURN and the CMTA, who
have been rivals in Plan B negotiations, agreed with each  other in strongly
attacking the MOU.

2. Plan(s) B Are Still Foundering

 The Plan(s) B were not discussed at the hearing, though some of the same
issues came up.  For instance, it was discussed whether it was possible to
transfer all of Edison's obligations to a trust that pays out after the
conclusion of litigation.  In the opinion of the governor's counsel and
other lawyers present, this is "shaky," especially without the consent of
creditors.  In their opinion, there would have to be an agreement that would
pay off everything.

The governor's counsel stated there were constitutional problems with setting
up a trust for what the generators are owed, then letting them litigate over
the trust.  Also, he stated that it was not feasible for the state to be
offering generators cash on the one hand while the FERC negotiated with them
to refund the state for power
purchases (as ordered in the FERC decision Monday).  The governor's counsel
stated that the only reasonable thing for the state to do was to give the
generators their cash, then sue them for it.

3. QF/SoCal Negotiations Are "Treading Water"

 QF sources suggest that the debate between SoCal and the PUC as to whether
the QFs should be paid 10% or 15% of what they are owed is "not a real
question," but rather a stalling measure allowing SoCal to hold on to cash
in advance of a filing or a global solution.  "SoCal is just treading water,"
said a source.

4. SoCal Payments to QFs Unlikely to be Viewed As Preference  Payments

Sources also comment that SoCal payments to the QFs likely would not be
seen as a preference payment in bankruptcy court because they were ordered
by a state agency, the PUC.  However, comments made in the SoCal conference
call yesterday seem to indicate that Solomon Smith and perhaps other
creditors may see the payments this way and may be willing to sign a
bankruptcy petition.


Print on my business letterhead.

Naomi Leff
Naomi Leff & Associates
12 West 27th Street
New York, NY  10001
212 686 6300

Dear Naomi,

Thanks for the opportunity to work with you on my new home.  I've enclosed a
virtual tour disk (just follow the prompts), and some floor plans from my
architect.  If there is anything else you need, please call anytime.  I'm
excited for you to see the house in person, and have the chance to discover
my passion for 20th century design.  Dennis and Daniel have been a great
source of the best objects and knowledge.  Of course it is a primary concern
to make sure the home, the objects, the furnishings, and the space work
together.

Dennis and Daniel speak very highly of you and it is important to me that I
have the help to complete this project with great attention, and all that
results from that attention.

Best Regards,

Jeff


Mike, I want to see the final costs before determining.  My understanding is
that there is still significant expenses outstanding.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000
07:41 PM ---------------------------

Mike J Miller
07/06/2000 04:29 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Peaker Fee

EE&CC has forwarded the peaker fee ($9.1 MM) invoice to ENA (see at bottom).
I have sent a return e-mail to Gavin Gaul and John Normand explaining that
final approval of this invoice will be from you.  Amy and I are waiting for a
better breakdown of overhead charges on acceleration change orders.  Once we
have the overhead issue framed out, I would then battle the fee, especially
on Wilton Center, on a packaged basis with the overhead charges.

As per the Wilton Center fee, I reviewed all of the e-mail rhetoric regarding
who is to blame for the massive construction cost overruns.  EECC/NEPCO's
cupbability lies in their insistance from day one that Wilton Center could
and would be built non-union.  It was only after ENA forced the decision in
late June 1999 to build the job union (to avoid air permit intervention) that
EECC/NEPCO even began to deal with how to build the job in a union
environment.  Even at that point, EECC/NEPCO would not move off of building
the job on a cost reimbursable basis and did not properly consider other
alternatives such as fixed unit pricing (fixed price per unit quantity
installed).  EECC/NEPCO claimed that they did not have enough time to
negotiate with the unionsor pursue other options.  However, because of their
insistance to go non-union, they precluded the ability to negotiate until the
decision to go union was made.  According to our labor experts, breaking off
union site negotiations and building non-union is worse than just going
non-union from the start.  In any event, if you need more detail on this
subject prior to discussing the fee with Larry Izzo, please let me know and I
will summarize the key points.

I will continue to work with Amy Spoede to tie down the remaining cost and
overhead issues.  If you need me to do anything else, please let me know.

Regards,

Mike Miller
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT on 07/06/2000 11:11
AM ---------------------------

Gavin Gaul@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
07/05/2000 05:34 PM
To: Amy Copeland@ECT
cc: Robert Miesen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Normand/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, nickv@nepco.com,
DavidG@nepco.com, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Peaker Fee

Amy,

Attached is the invoice for the 2000 Peaker fee.  All punchlist items should
be completed next week, weather permitting.

Gavin
---------------------- Forwarded by Gavin Gaul/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
07/05/2000 05:35 PM ---------------------------

Robert Miesen
06/30/2000 11:59 AM
To: Gavin Gaul
cc: Cameron Best/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Peaker Fee

Gavin,
Attached below is Nepco's invoice for the 2000 Peakers fee.  If you approve,
please forward to Amy Spoede (formerly Copeland).

Thanks,
Rob

---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Miesen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
06/30/2000 11:59 AM ---------------------------

Rickg@nepco.com on 06/30/2000 10:29:38 AM
To: Robert.Miesen@enron.com
cc: NICKV@nepco.com, DavidG@nepco.com, Gavin.Gaul@enron.com

Subject: Peaker Fee

 <<Peakers-Fee.PDF>>
Rob
Attached is the invoice for the Fee for the Peakers.

 - Peakers-Fee.PDF


he probably doesn't want to redraw because he knows he can't possibly rip you
off any more than he already has!

Phillip M Love
08/14/2000 08:46 AM
To: Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com, Bryan Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, lqcolombo@aol.com, Michael Walters/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Harry Bucalo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve Venturatos/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Redraw?

I wonder why Lenhart doesn't want to redraw?  Are you afraid you will not be
able to score the #1 pick again?
PL


Attached is a summary of FERC Staff,s November 1, 2000 report on its
investigation of the Northeast region.  The report is very encouraging
because it is comprehensive and recommends many of the changes and solutions
that Enron has been advocating for years.  The report is also encouraging
because it indicates a significant level of understanding of the northeast
markets (and the problems in these markets) by the FERC people who worked on
this report.  Because this is only a brief summary, the entire report
(particularly sections 4 and 5) should be read in detail.  A copy of the
report is attached.

Please let us know if you have any questions or comments.

Sarah


I spoke to Aquila again today.  They are planning to submit bids on Friday
for Gleason, Wheatland and Pastoria.  They already have a tolling agreement
in the Lincoln area and don't want more capacity there.

Aquila's question:

They questioned the development costs for Pastoria - look very high.  I
noted that it includes the ERC's.  They would like a breakout of the
development costs

PG&E's question is below.  Are you comfortable disclosing this at this stage
or is this a phase II due diligence item?

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas [mailto:thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 5:17 PM
To: 'Iaconetti, Louis'
Subject: RE: Responses to PG&E Questions on Pastoria

Since we do not have to accept the NEPCO contract, can you break out the
cost and scope of equipment (Enron uses the term "power islands")?  Can we
get this information tomorrow?  Both cost and scope of this is important to
be able to assess the "EPC" price and determine bid price.


----- Forwarded by Rob Walls/NA/Enron on 01/12/2001 04:09 PM -----

	Allen W Ueckert
	01/02/2001 02:11 PM

		 To: Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Kent Castleman
		 Subject: ECI Payment Summary

Rob - attached is a summary of the payments we have paid to ECI, per our
accounting records.  If you need the back-up for these numbers, let me know
and I can forward this to you.

Let us know if you have any questions.

Allen

---------------------- Forwarded by Allen W Ueckert/NA/Enron on 01/02/2001
02:03 PM ---------------------------

Thach C Phan
01/02/2001 01:46 PM
To: Allen W Ueckert/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: ECI Payment Summary

Allen,
Attached is the ECI Payment Summary file.
Thach


The recipient of the 2000 Chairman's Award has been selected.  Read all about
it!

Also in this issue:
German gas monopolies
Emissions trading
Enron's status as market maker with NordPool
Trading satellite capacity

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 17, 2000."


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000
03:29 PM ---------------------------

Maureen Raymond@ENRON
10/25/2000 02:58 PM
Sent by: Gwyn Koepke@ENRON
To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Larry Lawyer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike
McCullough/ET&S/Enron@Enron
cc: Bob Schorr/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: E-strategy for metals trading

Attached is an article from yesterday's FT regarding the efforts by a
consortia of four major international metals and mining producers to develop
an internet marketplace for producers and consumers.  As we come across this
type of information to keep you abreast of developments in the commodity
markets, we will pass it along.

Maureen Raymond-Castaneda


Just a quick note to give you as much warning as possible.  The next phase of
the office construction process will begin in just over a week.  That means
it is finally time to move into your new offices.  Taffy Milligan will be
submitting the move request (for next Friday - Jan. 12) and will have details
directly.  Your assistants can help you order boxes and arrange your move.


Make sure you get our trades updated into Fred's midmarket results for
August. Thanks. Per


These are not spot deals.  PanEnergy did not receive gas on the exchange.
However, they did deliver gas to us at Cotton Valley.  According to the
contract, when volumes are overdelivered, HPL buys the gas at GD-.10.  So, in
order to correctly estimate our economics, I changed the price on the
delivery to reflect how the deal will settle.  This occurred in August and
September.  Any spot deals will be on seperate tickets.

Days 5 & 6, as well as 9-31 should be settled as if the exchange was in
place.  (PanEnergy overdelivered about 7,800 per day, which we buy at Gas
Daily -.10)

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           10/03/2000 02:29 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Duke Energy Field Deal 157288 8/00

Daren:
I am taking over the Duke account from Katherine and am having trouble with
8/00 production.  It looks like we have some spot deals included in the
exchange deal 157288.  I think days 9 - 31, which are priced at GD - 0.10,
need to be moved to a new ticket if they are spot.   Let me know if you
agree.  Also, can you confirm for me that days 8/5 and 8/6 are suppose to be
exchange?  The sale volume for those two days was zero, so there was no
exchange.  We have not received any statements from Duke yet, so there is
nothing to verify our volumes.

You may also want to look at Sept. 2000 for deal 157288.  It looks like spot
deals are being included in the exchange deal.  Those will need to be moved
to a new ticket if they are spot.

Thanks,
Megan


See attached - I put Karl's few nit comments in - I left a v-mail about the
4th and 5th recitals - timing of the assignment of option agreement and the
exercise of the option don't seem to work(?)


Enron's trading policy prohibits employees from trading any products the
company trades.  If you have any questions about any specific products please
feel free to contact me or any of the London legal team.

	Mark Schroeder
	06/26/2000 04:46 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

I currently do not have any such account.  Would this prohibit me from
opening one in the future?  thanks  mcs
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT on 26/06/2000
10:48 ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Mark Taylor @ ENRON                           22/06/2000 01:39

Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: Everyone_in_ECT_Calgary, Everyone_in_ECT_London, Everyone_in_ECT_Denver,
Everyone_in_ECT_Singapore
cc:

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any other
related commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with
another person pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business Friday, June 30,
2000 if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest
in any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading
affiliate account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


Joe;
Per our conversation, here is the scoop on Oneok.  By the way, Sara resolved
the IPE Brent issues so we don't need to talk.
Carol

----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/19/2000 11:23 AM -----

	Carol St Clair
	06/16/2000 11:39 AM

		 To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Name Chnages

Susan and Susan:
Could one of you send out a notice concerning the following and update lotus
notes:

1. Oneok Gas Marketing Company has changed its name to Oneok Energy Marketing
and Trading Company, II ("Oneok II").

2. K N Marketing, L.P. is now known as Oneok Energy Marketing and Trading
Company, L.P. ("Oneok LP")

We have Masters with both of these entities.

I have sent to Oneok a Transfer and Termination Agreement where the following
will occur once it becomes effective:

1. Onoek II will assign all of its trades and its rights under its Master to
Oneok LP.

2. The Oneok LP Master will be terminated and all trades will be under the
Oneok II Master.

In summary, once this becomes effective, all trades will be done with Oneok
LP under the Oneok II Master that was assigned to it.  Credit Support comes
from the parent Onoek Inc.

Enclosed is a draft of the Agreement.

Carol


Once again, it's time to find out what you think about your work experience
at Enron and what we can do to help make it better.  That's why we want to
check your pulse.  In fact, we've changed the name of last year's "Excellence
Through Communication" employee survey to The Pulse.  We believe The Pulse
more accurately captures the purpose of the survey.  Your diagnosis will help
us correct problem areas so we can continue to make Enron a great place to
work.

Is available:  Monday, October 16 ) Friday, Oct. 27
Is located at: survey.enron.com

There are a few things we want you to remember about The Pulse:

1. Your survey responses will be confidential.  You can complete your survey
at your desktop or at special computer kiosks that are set up in some of our
larger offices.  Several group computer terminals also will be available in
smaller field offices.  We want to provide you with the most comfortable
environment possible, as your participation is of vital importance to us.
2. We will respond actively to your comments.  We are going to do our best to
cure some of the current problems that exist and put into action preventative
processes that will help identify smaller problems before they become major
ones.  We may ask for your help in resolving some of the issues that are
collected in the survey ) your active role will help us identify the best
solutions.
In last year's survey, you identified several problem areas regarding
internal communications and we've already acted on many of your
recommendations.  These are a few of the things we've accomplished or are
working on in direct response to your input:
1. Require all executives (VP and above) to attend the Executive Impact &
Influence course, which is a 360-degree program designed to improve
leadership and communication skills.  By year-end, more than 90 percent will
have attended this course, with the remaining 10 percent to be trained in the
first quarter of 2001.
2. Offer all employees online communication courses.  These courses will be
available in the first quarter of 2001.
3. Improve our online communication tools, beginning in the fourth quarter,
2000:
   w Simplify and standardize Enron directories
   w Educate all employees about the availability and usage of IT tools.
   w Promote intelligent/responsible use of email.
4. Introduce Participation & Dissent (P&D) sessions to provide a vehicle for
solving problems, addressing issues and developing new opportunities.  This
application will launch in the first quarter of 2001 in the ThinkBank on
eThink.

So take a few minutes to check your pulse and tell us what you think and how
you feel about your job and about Enron.


----- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 03:38 PM -----

	"Crawford, Ann" <AnnCrawford@aec.ca>
	02/23/2001 03:16 PM

		 To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc: "Day, Brian (Denver)" <BrianDay@aec.ca>
		 Subject: AMUS / ENRON Transaction Agreement

Gerald,

Attached is the blackline confirmation showing the changes we would like
made.  Please advise if this wording is acceptable.  Thank you.

Ann Crawford
Gas Marketing
Sr. Contract Administrator

Phone: 403-266-8425
Fax: 403-290-8479

 <<ENRON OPAL 5YR B.doc>>

 - ENRON OPAL 5YR B.doc


Can you spot what's wrong with this picture? Look closely. It may take you a minute.
http://secure.falcon-networks.com/~culprit/whatswrong.html


BR-

Are you still in H-town?  Give me a holler.  I'm working with Chase Asset
Management down town and housesitting in River Oaks.

I'll be down here until Aug. 24- we'll have to grab some drinks, etc....

Derek


Please email me a brief overview of what these documents are, how they fit
into the overall picture, and the issues which need the most scrutiny.
Additionally, have these been evaluated in light of Enron's balance sheet and
financing issues?

Thanks,

Kay


Start Date: 1/10/02; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011012.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Tori Kuykendall/HOU/ECT on 04/27/2001
01:40 PM ---------------------------

Tori Kuykendall
04/20/2001 08:19 AM
To: Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT
cc:
Subject: ep blanco avg

hey melba -- guess what -- we have come to the point where we no longer need
to make blanco a restricted product.  can we go ahead and change these ep
blanco avg products - both the fixed and index - back to normal unrestricted
products?  let me know...


Everyone in the following gorups, now have access to the West Desk Support
Web Site at http://westdesksupport. The UserName is the same as your NT / W2K
Login UserName. And the password is the same as the username. Please use this
site to log problems with CAPS, Excel, Enpower / FSP, network problems, or
anything else that IT Needs to get involved in. Those of you that have logged
in under the old username / Password system have also been changed to the new
system.

The Groups are:

Real Time
Pre Sched
Volume Management
Risk
Middle Marketing
Power Traders

Thank you for your time.

Michael Tully
Application Support


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
06:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Keith Holst                           03/14/2001 04:30 PM

To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:


Susan will be in around 9:30 - 10:00 today.


Confidential Settlement Document Under CPUC Rule 51

PARTIES:

This is a reminder that PG&E will host a Gas Accord II Settlement Workshop
next week, on Tuesday and Wednesday, November 7th and 8th.  Please note, the
workshops will start promptly at 9:00 a.m. each day, and end around 4:00
p.m.  Among other things, these slightly longer sessions allow time for
feedback from the parties.  With this earlier start, we will provide a
continental breakfast as well as lunch on both days.  The Workshop will be
held at PG&E's headquarters, 77 Beale Street, San Francisco.  We will be in
Conference Room 308 on Tuesday, and Conference Room 300 on Wednesday.

Please RSVP to Darcy Morrison, at e-mail D2Mr@pge.com, or by telephone at
(415) 973-6644, so that we can get a head-count for the meals.

Attached below is our proposed agenda for the November 7-8 Workshop.  The
topics include:  demand-supply forecast, supply reliability, capital cost
forecast, and backbone direct connection and local transmission rate design
options.  Although these subjects have been discussed at prior workshops,
our objective is to present additional detail and analysis so we can all
wrestle with some key issues and begin to formulate possible solutions.

Also, as we discussed at the last Workshop, we have set aside two hours at
the end of each day for observations and feedback from the parties.  Along
with the issues list, this will help PG&E to put together a proposal that
seeks to balance the many competing interests.

This is our last scheduled Workshop before we send out our first version of
a settlement proposal.  Our target date for this proposal remains December
8.

We look forward to seeing you next week.  Please call or E-mail us if you
have any questions or suggestions.

Frank Lindh    Ray Williams
Attorney    Director
415-973-2776   415-973-3634
frl3@pge.com   rdw0@pge.com

 <<Agenda 11-7&8-00 Workshop.doc>>

 - Agenda 11-7&8-00 Workshop.doc


This may have some impact on discussions with Questar....
CPUC ALJ Calls for Cost-Based Peaking Charge on SoCalGas
A recommended decision by a California Public Utilities Commission administrative law judge would replace the controversial Residual Load Service (RLS) tariff on Southern California Gas mainlines with a cost-based peaking service (D.00-04-060).
SoCalGas had proposed either a market-based or cost-based peaking rate in place of the RLS. ALJ Carol A. Brown rejected the market-based rates, saying the cost-based system "is consistent with our policy of promoting economic bypass." Opponents of SoCal's RLS rate have called it an "anti-bypass" tariff, saying it effectively kept new interstates out of SoCalGas territory since customers would have to pay the interstate's rates as well as SoCal's RLS charge (See Daily GPI, April 23 <http://intelligencepress.com/subscribers/daily/news/d20010423g.html>).
The judge said "the cost-based peaking tariff should include a customer charge computed monthly, based on the higher of either the current monthly usage or the highest monthly usage over the prior 12-month period; a Public Purpose Program (PPP) charge based on the PPP rates adopted by the Commission in Resolution G-3303; a reservation charge for transportation using noncore coincident peak demand for the calculation of the demand charge; and an Interstate Transition Cost Surcharge, collected as a separate volumetric rate, to be applied to the actual recorded, monthly, throughput."
Also the peaking tariff "shall: (a) be a system-wide rate; (b) customers shall balance their nominations and burns daily; (c) partial bypass customers shall not be eligible for SIC credit; and (d) the tariff shall apply on a facility-by-facility basis." It also will be subject to review in the SoCalGas Biannual Cost Allocation Proceeding.
The judge recommended that SoCalGas file for a conforming peaking tariff within 10 days of approval of the decision. The decision must be reviewed by the full CPUC.


You don't talk to me for months and you email just to give me crap!!  What's
up with that?!

   Shannon McPearson                01/12/2001 02:05 PM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: NG Gas Deferred

Great! I am glad to see that Robin is getting some work done!

Errol McLaughlin@ENRON
01/12/2001 01:47 PM
To: Shannon McPearson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: NG Gas Deferred

It's done.  Robin Rodrigue with the benchmark group has pulled this P/L in.

Thanks,

Errol


Miss Tana ---
Would you give me a heads up when this customer's profile has been changed?
Thanks,
Griff
x3-5753

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Guidroz, Walter
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Gray, Mary Griff
Cc: Moore, Kathy M.; Moran, Tom
Subject: RE: Sierra Pacific Power Company (adm71112) wanting tenure of 6
months

Griff, I've updated the profile for both Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power to
reflect a 24-month tenor.  Tana is out so I'm not sure exactly when this will
go through.

Thanks for your note; I've enjoyed working with you too!  Yes, I'll be
working as a geologist but also with an element of project management over
two large offshore field complexes as well as a pseudo-team leader over some
lesser experienced geologists and geophysicists.  It should be interesting!

Take care.

Walter

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Gray, Mary Griff
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:21 AM
To: Guidroz, Walter; Moran, Tom
Subject: FW: Sierra Pacific Power Company (adm71112) wanting tenure of 6
months

I talked to Stephanie Sever yesterday and she said that this was back in your
court.  When will the US gas and power products get revised from one month to
24?  I'll be out of the office tomorrow (Friday, the 4th), so let Kathy Moore
know the status and she'll update the ticket on this customer.

Walter, good luck to you.  Are you going back to the geology area?

Thanks for being such a great person to work with, Walter.
Griff

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Guidroz, Walter
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Gray, Mary Griff
Cc: Moran, Tom
Subject: RE: Sierra Pacific Power Company (adm71112) wanting tenure of 6
months

Griff, we'll go 24 months on both this counterparty as well as on Nevada
Power.  I'll include this in today's approval spreadsheet.  Thanks!

Walter

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Gray, Mary Griff
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Guidroz, Walter
Cc: Moran, Tom
Subject: Sierra Pacific Power Company (adm71112) wanting tenure of 6 months

Hey guys,

Want do you know about this request?

Thanks,
Griff


Hey guys-

  We will be having lunch this Friday April 12, 2002 at 11:30am at Rock Bottom to say goodbye to Donna Sheidun.  Her last day will be Monday April 15....then she is off to sunny California!!

  Please pass this note on to anyone I missed.
  Please shoot me an email if you are going to be there so I can make reservations....

  Thanks,

 Virginia


Hey, you know my email doesn't update automatically, I actually have to
refresh it manually.  It sucks....

So, yes changes were good....although......I don't exactly know which changes
you were referring to, but I'll pick which ones I would have liked you to be
thinking of.  Anyway, I think I'm heading out to happy hour soon with jeff,
so you'll have to call if you want to communicate.

Later.

Mat


---------------------- Forwarded by Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT on 05/10/2001
02:52 PM ---------------------------

"SoRelle, Andrea L" <ASoRelle@h-s.com> on 05/10/2001 02:39:15 PM
To: "'Amy Clemons'" <amy.clemons@enron.com>, "'Anne'" <anneyows@hotmail.com>,
"'Brad'" <bradf@inqueststaffing.com>, "'Caroline'"
<carolinehead@hotmail.com>, "'Karen'" <k1p1@aol.com>,
"'kriscameron@deloitte.com'" <kriscameron@deloitte.com>, "'Marcy'"
<marcyrinehart@hotmail.com>, "'Maggie work'" <mbeery@hillandknowlton.com>,
"'Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com'" <Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com>, "'Rachel'"
<rachelarriola@yahoo.com>, "'Ritter, Robert H.'" <rhritter@utmb.edu>, "'Tara
Levinthal'" <tlevinthal@aol.com>, "Pechersky, Svetlana" <SPechersky@h-s.com>,
"Cohlmeyer, Lisa M" <LCohlmeyer@h-s.com>, "'Shirley Elliott'"
<shirley.s.elliott@citicorp.com>, "'Holly Korman'" <holly@layfam.com>,
"'MATTOSO, ANGELA'" <Amattoso@mdck.com>, "'SAM'" <missshy@texas.net>
cc:

Subject: FW: slut......serves her right haha

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
[mailto:Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:12 PM
To: ellie.bullard@mail.house.gov; christina@gulfcoastentertainment.com;
lacyprice@henrysmiller.com; kawise@hotmail.com; kafriedman@hotmail.com;
courtneyb@johndaugherty.com; emily1009@yahoo.com;
elizabeth_bowen@aimfunds.com; abradford28@hotmail.com;
alexa_carter@aimfunds.com; abradford28@hotmail.com;
laurasperry@excelonline.com; asorelle@h-s.com; MBowen1025@aol.com;
mgockturtle@mail.utexas.edu; allison.f.blanton@vanderbilt.edu;
AMcGee@thealexandergroup.com; BWare@rnchq.org;
christine_lawhon@amsinc.com; caledere@TexasChildrensHospital.org;
c.domercq@worldnet.att.net; erin.e.fowler@us.arthurandersen.com;
hbuche@kingadvisors.com; jana.m.dupree@us.arthurandersen.com;
jennspinks@aol.com; jsiff@central.uh.edu; jwunz@ncta.com;
lara.wright@bakerhughes.com; laurasperry@excelonline.com;
mbeery@HillandKnowlton.com; mmalone@loomissayles.com;
ssemple@SicolaMartin.com
Subject: slut......serves her right haha

Stephanie E. Friedman
Corporate Tax Department
Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
(713) 207-3084
----- Forwarded by Stephanie E Friedman/ADM/HouInd on 05/10/01 02:08 PM
-----

                    gemma.moore@us.an

                    dersen.com               To:
Stephanie_E_Friedman@reliantenergy.com
                                             cc:
amanda.gaskin@us.andersen.com,
                    05/10/01 02:06 PM        carrie.a.henke@us.andersen.com,

                                             mgmateer@yahoo.com,

silvia.c.melendez@us.andersen.com,
                                             Rabitbear2@aol.com,
Bear4242@aol.com,
                                             ksm_00_99@yahoo.com,

leticia.ramirez@us.andersen.com,

meredith.riekert@us.pwcglobal.com,
                                             haley.c.smith@us.andersen.com,

                                             wallace_ashley@hotmail.com

                                             Subject:     slut......serves
her right haha

(See attached file: leopard.jpg)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If
you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender
by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and
other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of
my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

(See attached file: leopard.jpg)

 - leopard.jpg


SSSSSSHHHHH!!
IT'S A SURPRISE

Chris Hilgert
FRIDAY OCTOBER 5TH @ TRAVIS CAFE'
Please be there no later than 6:30 as he will be brought in at 7:00.
Come as you are, to surprise Chris for his birthday, thanks to his wife Nichole!
The Travis Cafe' is located at 208 Travis in between Congress and Franklin, phone 223-4073.
If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 713-853-4887 and I will be happy to help!!  Hope to see you there!
AND IF YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME AND DID NOT RECEIVE THIS, FEEL FREE TO PASS IT ON!!!!

<Embedded Microsoft Clip Gallery>


Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-za02.mx.aol.com (rly-za02.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.98]) by air-za03.mail.aol.com (v81.9) with ESMTP id MAILINZA36-1025181514; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:15:14 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by rly-za02.mx.aol.com (v80.21) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINZA24-1025181449; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 18:14:49 -0400
Received: from corp.enron.com (nahou-msmsw02p.corp.enron.com [192.168.110.109])	by postmaster.enron.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/external_corp-1.08) with ESMTP id f9PMEl301962	for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:14:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com (unverified) by corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T56d1440edac0a86e6d87c@corp.enron.com> for <vkaminski@aol.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:14:45 -0500
Received: from NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com ([192.168.110.41]) by nahou-mscnx04p.corp.enron.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);	 Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:14:45 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: FW: Real Options Research...
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:14:32 -0500
Message-ID: <31738B46B7BD864080808A19977D9F757ABDD3@NAHOU-MSMBX03V.corp.enron.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Real Options Research...
Thread-Index: AcFdeax9c3AwKMlsEdWxIgBQi+MJ2QAKLxZw
From: "Kaminski, Vince J" <Vince.J.Kaminski@ENRON.com>
To: <vkaminski@aol.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2001 22:14:45.0632 (UTC) FILETIME=[740F2800:01C15DA2]
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version)

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:     "Megan Bross" <mbross@riskwaters.com>@ENRON
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 12:26 PM
> To:   vkamins@enron.com
> Subject:  Real Options Research...
>
> Dear Mr. Kaminski,
>
> Hello, I am producing this year's 'Real Options Training Course' on
> behalf
> of the Risk Waters Group in NY.  I am very interested in hearing your
> comments and suggestions regarding the issues surrounding real
> options, in
> addition to hearing what type of research Enron has been doing with
> real
> options (as well as a possible speaker position).  Thanks again, I
> look
> forward to speaking with you.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Megan Bross
> Conference Producer
> Risk Waters Group, NY
> Phone (212)925-1864 ext# 193
> Fax (212)925-7585
> E-Mail: mbross@riskwaters.com
> Web Address:  www.riskwaters.com
>
>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


FROM Dr Arusi Agbara.
AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING UNIT.
FOREIGN REMITTANCE DEPT.
AFRICAN INTERNATIONAL BANK.
LOME-TOGO.
TEL:00228-911-40-37.
FAX:00228-222-45-84

DEAR,
                   (CONFIDETIAL PLEASE)

I am Dr Arusi Agbara, chief accountant for the bills
and credits in the foreign remittance dept. section of

African International Bank Lome-Togo in west Africa
with due respect and regard. I have decided to contact
you on a business transaction that will be very
beneficial to both of us at the end of the
transaction.

During our investigation and auditting in this bank,
my
department came across a very huge sum of money
belonging to a deceased person who died on november
1992 in a plane crash and the fund has been dormant in
his account with this Bank without any claim of the
fund in our custody either from his family or relation
before our discovery to this development.

Although personally, I keep this information secret
within myself and partner to enable the whole plans
and idea be Profitable and successful during the time
of execution. The said amount was $6,500,000.00usd(six
million five hundred thousand united states dollars).

As it may interest you to know, I got your impressive
information through my good friends who works with
chamber of commerce on foreign business relations here
in Lome-Togo. It is him who recommended your person
to me to be viable and capable to champion a business
of such magnitude without any problem .

Meanwhile all the whole arrangements to put claim over
this fund as the bonafide next of kin to the deceased,
get the required approval and transfer this money to a
foreign account has been put in place and directives
and needed information will be relayed to you as soon
as you indicate your interest and willingness to
assist us and also benefit your self to this great
business opportunity.

In fact I could have done this deal alone but because
of my position in this country as a civil servant, we
are not allowed to operate a foreign account and would
eventually raise an eye brow on my side during the
time
of transfer because I work in this bank.

This is the actual reason why it will require a second
party or fellow who will forward claims as the next of
kin with affidavit of trust of oath to the Bank and
also present a foreign account where he will need the
money to be re-transferred into, on his request as it
may be after due verification and clarification by the
correspondent branch of the bank where the whole money
will be remitted from to your own designation bank
account.

I will not fail to inform you that this transaction
is 100% risk free. On smooth conclusion of this
transaction, you will be entitled to 30% of the total
sum as gratification, while 10% will be set aside to
take care of expenses that may arise during the time
of transfer and also telephone and fax bills, while
60% will be for me and my partner.

Please, you have been adviced to keep top secret as
we are still in service and intend to retire from
service after we conclude this deal with you. I will
be monitoring the whole situation here in this bank
until you confirm the money in your account. and ask
us
to come down to your country for subsequent sharing
of the fund according to percentage.

previously indicated and further investment, either in
your country or any country you advice us to invest
in. All other necessary information will be sent to
you
when I hear from you. I suggest you get back to me as
soon as possible, stating your wish in this deal.

Yours faithfully,
Dr.Arusi Agbara.
TEL:00228-911-40-37.
FAX:00228-222-45-84.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions!
http://auctions.yahoo.com


email works just fine for the PUC, but it would be good if they followed up
with a phone call (no big deal if they don't, but would be helpful).

Best,
Jeff


As requested....

 Dipak


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/24/2000 08:51
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Colleen Sullivan                           01/24/2000 08:20 AM

To: Steve Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Booking of Transport--annuities to desk

I'd like to set up a meeting with the two of you (and whoever else you think
needs to be there) to go over the booking of various deals.  For example,
Dayton P&L--we pay out to them a big demand charge each month, but the desk
should be getting an annuity payment back.  Where will they see this in their
p&l?
CALP is another example.  Are you two available Tuesday around 12:00 to
discuss?

I will make sure someone from the East Desk is there as well.  If there are
any in the Central Region that are like this, let me know and I'll round up
someone from that desk, too (unless you think they already know how theirs is
working).

Thanks.


Denise,

A couple of questions about software.

I have used and would like to continue to use MiKTeX (A windows version of
TeX, the technical typesetting program). I find it is useful for
automatically formatting reports in fact I have designed the automated
summary report for the turbine SPC report using this program. This is
freeware. (The TeX users group http://www.tug.org/ has information of TeX
implementations. MiKTeX is probably the best, but PCTeX by Personal TeX is a
good non-free version). Please let me know what will need to be done so that
I can continue to use this software.

I was also planning to start Syncing my PDA with Outlook (as soon as Outlook
is configured for use). So can I install the "Palm" software for this purpose?

Mark Fisher

Denise Williams
07/04/2002 10:17 AM
To: GE_Benefits
cc:

Subject: Do Not Download or Install Software to your Machines

In accordance with the GE Power Systems Information Security Manual and
Security Procedure Guide (a copy can be found on the Transfer directory under
GEPS Information Security Manual), users are not allowed to download or
install software that is not authorized by GEPS management.  This includes,
but is not limited to, Web Shots, Real Player, Spinner, WinAmp, Games, Post
It Notes, Bonzi Buddy, Napster, Morpheus, or Limewire.  Additionally, users
are not allowed to bring in software from home and install it on their work
computers.

Please take a little time and read through the Guide.  GE has strict policies
and procedures regarding the use of GE owned equipment, and they monitor
every machine on the network.  If you have any questions about what can or
can not be loaded on your machine, please send me an e-mail.

Thanks.

--D


Can you supplement the answer to the visa question?  Thanks. Michelle
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Pieper, Kalen <Kalen.Pieper@ENRON.com>
To: Cash, Michelle <Michelle.Cash@ENRON.com>; Callahan, Timothy <Timothy.Callahan@ENRON.com>
Sent: Thu Dec 20 10:20:19 2001
Subject: additional Q&A's

Q:  I am on a H1-B Visa.  What assistance is the company providing me?
A:  Enron is required to pay for a one-way, coach ticket for the employee only.  Please contact ______ for necessary arrangements.
(Michelle, what else can we say about timing, when we submitted names to the INS, etc?

Q:  Will I be able to receive severance in the future if I file for unemployment?
A:  There is no company offset for State unemployment benefits against the $4,500.  You are able to file for unemployment immediately after your termination date.  If you receive additional severance in the future, it will be offset by any unemployment wages you have received.

Q:  Will I be paid for any unused vacation? (we've already answered this broadly, but are getting a ton of specific questions around vacation now b/c they are thinking that it is being treated as an expense)
A:  The $4,500 payment included payment for all pre-petition compensation including unused vacation time, WARN notification, and incentive and overtime pay.  Employees are entitled to pursue any claims for amounts in excess of $4,500 in the bankruptcy proceeding.  The link for the claim form is included below.


TradersNews Energy has begun beta testing for its  three new hourly indexes,
at TVA, ComEd and ERCOT. Attached are the first for  TVA and ComEd (ERCOT is
sent on a separate list), although we have been  collecting historical data
since Nov. 1, 2000.
?
We will distribute these two indexes to you at no  charge via e-mail during
the beta testing period, which?concludes March 19.  On that date,?we will
formally launch the indexes on our Web site,  at:? www.tradersnewsenergy.com.

Your participation is vital to produce the most comprehensive and  accurate
indexes. You may e-mail your prices and volumes to
tradersnewsindexes@ipgdirect.com,  or fax them to 713-647-7552. For your
convenience, attached is an Excel file  you
can use to report your prices and volumes.

These three new indexes  join TradersNews' Cinergy, AEP and SPP/Entergy
hourly indexes, launched in Fall  2000.
NOTE: If you are using our Excel Upload feature,  hourly indexes for Feb. 16
will be featured until 3:30?p.m. CST, today  only, because of yesterday's
federal holiday. After 3:30 p.m. today, we will  feature those for Feb. 19.

?
If you are interested in receiving the ERCOT hourly  index during this month
of testing,?e-mail Suzanna Strangmeier, at suzanna.strangmeier@ipgdirect.com,
 or call her at 713/647-7325.

Feel free to e-mail or call me with any  comments or questions. For
information about subscribing to TradersNews Energy,  contact Jeff Maack, at
713-647-8802.
?
?
Bobette  Riner???????????????????????????????
Senior Power Markets Analyst??????
TradersNews Energy
713/647-8690
FAX: 713/647-7552
cell:  832/428-7008
bobette.riner@ipgdirect.com
http://www.tradersnewspower.com
?
?
 - comedhrly021901.doc
 - tvahrly021901.doc
 - 6ndxtemplate.xls


Lucy,

Here is the rentroll from last friday.

The closing was to be this Thursday but it has been delayed until Friday
April 20th.  If you can stay on until April 20th that would be helpful.  If
you have made other commitments I understand.

Gary is planning to put an A/C in #35.

You can give out my work numer (713) 853-7041

Phillip


Fred, I will research our potential needs otherwise I agree with your
approach to keep the option open for as long as possible.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
01:09 PM ---------------------------

Fred L Kelly@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
08/03/2000 12:52 PM
To: Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dick
Westfahl/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Keith Dodson/NA/Enron@ENRON,
John Garrison/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Dan
Shultz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ken
Koye/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben F Jacoby@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brett R Wiggs/SA/Enron@Enron, David
Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John Chappell@ECT, Larry
Reynolds/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John M
Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mike
Coleman/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Peter Nassab/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Eddie Clay/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John G
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Brian D
Barto/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ed
Giblin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John M
Rose/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David W Delainey@ECT, Brian
Stanley@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Future GE forecast - John Schroeder

Need input if anyone thinks we need more turbines than John Schroeder/GE has
forecasted.  My gut feel is that John has forecasted more turbines than we
will need (which is OK).

The GE planning Boys called John and asked him to check with Enron....... and
determine if Enron wanted any turbines in the 2002/2003 timeframe (the
previous assumption being 7F's wouldn't be available till 4Q03, and 7EA's
wouldn't be available till 1Q03).  John stated that he didn't know what the
request from Schenectady meant....., but....., maybe a few production slots
were coming available as things shake out.....  John told them that he
thought Enron might be interested in:

qty 4 7EA's and qty 4 7F's for ESA
qty 2 7EA's and qty 2 7F's for Mexico
qty 6 7EA's and qty 6 7F's for NA

John is asking us........, "that would be enough...... right?".  We don't
need to change that input (from John Schroeder to Schenectady) if we want
less than he forecasted, but....., if someone knows something I don't,
and....., we would want more turbines than the above......., please let us
know.

On an immediate basis, John also stated that he had requests in for turbines
for Saudi, and....., "an island project".

Regards - F.Kelly


Chris and I would like to take this opportunity to update everyone on what has been happening on the floor(s) during the last couple of weeks and what is likely to transpire in the weeks to come.  I'd like to begin by apologizing for the lack of broad e-mail communications or floor meetings over the last couple of weeks.  These have been very hard times and I know that people have wanted information.  It has taken us nearly a week to sort through who will be part of the UBS Warburg team and who continue with Enron.

In this e-mail I will explain: (1) who will be going to UBS Warburg, (2) who do the people working for Enron work for and what are they expected to do, (3) how will the physical separation between Enron and UBS Warburg happen, and (4) when will the sale of Netco to UBS Warburg be completed.  In addition to Chris Calger and me, the following Portland-based employees have accepted positions with UBS Warburg:

Last Name	First Name	Last Name	First Name
Amador	Susan	Oh	John
Anderson	John	Platter	M
Bulbes	Victor	Postlethwaite	John
Chang	Fang-Tzu	Richter	Jeffrey
Chatterton	Jill	Robinson	Donald
Crandall	Sean	Salisbury	Holden
Cutsforth	Diane	Scholtes	Diana
Dasovich	Jeff	Semperger	Cara
Davidson	Debra	Sheidun	Donna
Dean	Craig	Shields	Jeffrey
Dunton	Heather	Slinger	Ryan
Etringer	Michael	Solberg	Geir
Gilbert	Michael "Scotty"	Steiner	David
Gustafson	Mollie	Stokley	Marlin "Chris"
Hall	Stephen	Swain	Stephen
Heizenrader	Timothy	Swerzbin	Michael
Kandaswamy	Balachandar	Thomas	Jacob
Lackey	Christopher	Thome	Stephen
Lee	Eugene	Van Houten	Maria
Mallory	Patrick "Chris"	Villeggiante	Theresa
McDonald	Michael	Wente	Laura
Meyer	James	Williams	William J
Meyers	Albert	Woodland	Andrea
Mier	Michael	Yoder	Christian
Nelson	Kourtney

While there are a few people who are still making up their minds, the rest of the people in our office will be working for the Enron estate.  It is not entirely clear to me right now what the management team for west power looks like for the Enron estate now.  As I understand it, there are two primary initiatives on the estate side that people in Portland may be a part of.  The first is the disposition of our development projects that are already well under way.  Dave Parquet in San Francisco has been leading this effort together with the Portland asset development team.  This effort has been ongoing since December.  The second is the disposition of our west power commodity positions.  Jim Fallon is in charge of this for the entire company.  People working on this for Jim include Don Miller, Paul Racicot, Brad Richter, Ed Baughman among others.  I have placed a call to Jim and to Paul to get advice on how people in Portland should proceed.  I would recommend talking to Ed, Brad, Paul, or Don to get direction.  I have placed a call to several of these people to get direction and am waiting for a response.  I am hopeful that they will designate a lead person in Portland to coordinate the power procurement and delivery efforts.

As most of you know, the physical separation between UBS Warburg and Enron has already begun.  People who will continue to work for Enron will be located on the 4th Floor, while UBS Warburg will occoupy the 3rd Floor.  We hope to make the moves to the 4th Floor by the end of this week.  Moves within the 3rd Floor will take place the following week.

The UBS Warburg transaction is subject to one last pro forma regulatory hurdle.  While I don't have an exact date, I am told that it will likely be on or about February 6th.

Finally, I want to once again thank everyone for their help and cooperation over the last few weeks.  These have been really horrible times as the Enron story continues to unfold in the news at the same time that people are finding out about their future with Enron and UBS.  I know that this hasn't been easy for anyone.  I am deeply saddened overseeing the breakup of the awesome team that we have put together.  Whether you are going to UBS, remaining with Enron, or leaving the company, I wish everyone who worked on this team the best in their future endeavors.  It has been a distinct honor to work with each and every one of you.

Regards,
Tim


Thanks for the input. We'll add.  Point of clarity: the employees who have
company-paid computers at home today typically have surplus older equipment
(except for executives) and have management approval to use for business
use.  The ENhome program is a different offering which does not require
business purpose and the equipment will be new.

Thanks again for the input.

Chris Holmes@EES
06/02/2000 09:39 PM
Sent by: Chris Holmes@EES
To: Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
cc: Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Drew C Lynch/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Stephen
Barth/Enron Communications@Enron Communications@ECT@ENRON, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Allen Hill/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ECT@ENRON, Todd Neugebauer/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications@ECT@ENRON, Randy Rice/NA/Enron@ENRON, John P
Tollefsen/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON, Tony Jarrett/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sharon
Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT@ENRON
Subject: Re: EnHome - Please review

Suzanne-- the presentation looks good-- I would add at the beginning two
other reasons to provide all employees with  Enhome :

1. A matter of equity-- we already have 2000 employees with computers at
home--- and it could be argued that if 2000 employees deserve computers at
home, the bulk if not all o/f the workforce also deserves  having that kind
of support.

2. Work at the office and at home is becoming increasingly indistinguishable;
while as a company we don't state that we expect employees to work at home,
the reality is that  few of us can get our work done unless we work at home--
and to be effective , we have to be connected. That simple.

Chris


Per the below request, please prepare Termination Letters for the following
contracts.
Reliant Energy-Entex  Global K# 96006420 (012-41991-05-001)  /  Previously
Entex 012-27105-501
Sempra Global K# 96008691 (012-79581-502)
Sempra Global K# 96018800 (012-79581-503)

All three contracts are available in LiveLink.  If you do not have access to
LiveLink, I can print them for you or we can get them from the File Room on
the 37th floor.

Energy Transfer 012-26878-501 was terminated 02/01/98.

Michael Eiben
01/19/2001 01:47 PM
To: Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPL INTRASTATE STORAGE CONTRACTS

see message below from Jim regarding terminated storage agreements.
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 01:44
PM ---------------------------

Irene Flynn
01/19/2001 01:02 PM
To: Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: HPL INTRASTATE STORAGE CONTRACTS

---------------------- Forwarded by Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 01:02
PM ---------------------------

Jim Schwieger
01/19/2001 11:35 AM
To: Irene Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kenny J Soignet/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL INTRASTATE STORAGE CONTRACTS

Irene / Tom:

All of the contracts below can be terminated except for:
 Texas General Land Office
 Cannon Interest - Houston
 Enron North America  (I assume this will terminate with the sale.
There has not been any activity on the rest for a couple of years.
Kenny would you please check to see if any of the contracts to be terminated
have any residual balances and get with the appropriate individuals to clear
up ASAP.

 Jim
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 01/19/2001 10:30
AM ---------------------------

Irene Flynn
01/19/2001 10:10 AM
To: Tom Shelton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kenny J Soignet/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: HPL INTRASTATE STORAGE CONTRACTS

In response to your phone call regarding Sempra Energy Trading Corp and
Trading & transportation Management.

Original original contract with AIG Trading Corp: 12-01599-504 dated 7/1/97 -
Tariff #101, Customer #070.  This contract was assigned to Sempra Energy
Trading Corp on 1/16/98 Contract #12-79581-502 - Tariff #101, Customer #072.

Original original contract with AIG Trading Corp: 12-01599-501 date 5/1/93.
On 10/28/93 this contract was assigned to Trading & Transportation Management
- Contract #12-89435-501; Tariff #072, Customer #146 which was terminated
6/9/97.

Following is a list of all the HPL Intrastate Contracts on file with the
Texas Railroad Commission:

12-14005-501 Cannon Interests, dated 4/1/94, Tariff #098, Customer #047
(Note:  12-83802-502 - Statoil Energy Services Inc. (was originally
12-25621-501Eastern Energy Marketing, Inc. before it became Statoil),
12-60740-501 - Mieco Inc. and Midcon 12-60272-501 all operate under Cannon's
contract, no tariffs for Statoil, Mieco or Midcon.)

12-26878-501 Energy Transfer Group L.L.C.,  dated 6/1/97 Tariff #100,
Customer #060.

12-27049-504 Enron North America, Oral Agreement dated 2/1/99 Tariff #105,
Customer #074.

12-27105-501 Entex, Inc. dated 1/1/91, Tariff #051, Customer #035.

12-79581-502 Sempra Energy Trading Corp., dated 7/1/97 Tariff #101, Customer
#072 (shown in paragraph 1).

12-79581-503 Sempra EnergyTrading Corp., dated 6/1/98 Tarrif #104, Customer
#072.

12-88494-501 Texas General Land Office, dated 10/27/88 Tariff #097, Customer
#061.

Jim and Kenny, review these contracts to see if any need to be terminated.
Please advise.


we are all good how bout you?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	8888915473@archwireless.net@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:55 PM
To:	bmckay@enron.com
Subject:	Wireless Message

just checking on u how is all the family love dad


www.thefistfuckdaxfrostedfruitflakesposse.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Dax Philbin [mailto:dax@cypressmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:29 PM
To: Cuilla, Martin
Subject: RE: New WTC

u and what Pusse?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cuilla, Martin [mailto:Martin.Cuilla@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:28 PM
To: Dax Philbin
Subject: RE: New WTC

don't fuck with me or my milita

-----Original Message-----
From: Dax Philbin [mailto:dax@cypressmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:25 PM
To: Cuilla, Martin
Subject: RE: New WTC

stick it! FROSTED FUCK!

-----Original Message-----
From: Cuilla, Martin [mailto:Martin.Cuilla@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:15 PM
To: Frank, Laura; Michael Wilkes; Christine Finch;
astephens@crushinteractive.com; dax@cypressmail.com;
austinassistant@clausman.com; isaac@prad.net; lydter@yahoo.com;
jmilbrandt@southwestart.com; muc@earthlink.net; mark.tasseel@netiq.com;
mcuilla@enron.com; tina.obanion@gte.net; toddgator@yahoo.com;
strangle_2000@yahoo.com; zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: RE: New WTC

There is a very good website for getting information regarding current
events - www.drudgereport.com  I highly recommend you read it if you
want to get the "real scoop" about what is going on in the World Trade
Center bombings.  As to who is responsible there is almost overwhelming
evidence that Osama Bin Laden was heavily involved if not the mastermind
and/or financier.  If you are interested -  read the article below that
gives a breakdown on who is believed to be responsible.
Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist that has targeted American people before
(embassy bombings in 1998 and attack on USS Cole in Yemen earlier this
year) and it would be in America's best interest to end his reign of
terror by ending his life!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

U.S. focuses on Bin Laden links with Hizbullah, Arafat's Fatah

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Friday, September 14, 2001
WASHINGTON - The United States is investigating whether a coalition of
Palestinian, Iranian and Lebanese groups joined to help launch the
suicide attacks in New York and Washington.

U.S. defense sources said the Pentagon and CIA are quickly coming to the
conclusion that Saudi billionaire fugitive Osama Bin Laden was the
sponsor of the attack. But they said Bin Laden is believed to have used
a range of Islamic groups for logistics and support.

The groups being investigated include the Fatah movement headed by
Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat, the sources said. Another
group being examined for a link to the U.S. attacks is the
Iranian-backed Hizbullah, Middle East Newsline reports.

"Most of it today points to Osama Bin Laden," Sen. Charles Grassley, the
ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said. "But the
speculation at the end of the road is that he and his network were very
much involved with Hizbullah, Fatah and other."

Grassley was one of at least two dozen House and Senate members who were
briefed by U.S. intelligence agencies since the bombing.

A U.S. official confirmed that the administration has not ruled out that
Bin Laden was provided aid by a range of Arab and Islamic groups. But
the official said no determination has been made.

"We want to be sure we understand all the connections, not just one
connection," the official said. "As we find out who actually perpetrated
the crime, as we find out who they're connected with, as we find out who
could be considered harboring them, I think it'll come clear."

Analysts and some congressional sources said the Bush administration
appears unwilling to thoroughly investigate the involvement of Iraq in
the U.S. attacks. They said that the administration fears that targeting
Iraq would dash hopes for an Arab coalition against terrorism in the
Middle East.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the United States has not yet
determined who was behind the bombing. Rumsfeld said a determination
would have to be made soon.

The administration has requested $20 billion for a counterterrorism
campaign. Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said much of the requested
allocation would prepare the military for an expected counterattack.

"I don't think we know the breakdown yet, partly because the needs are
so enormous," Wolfowitz said. "A significant piece of this is going to
be to bring our armed forces to the highest level of preparedness."

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank, Laura [mailto:lfrank@vignette.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 10:02 AM
To: 'Michael Wilkes'; 'Christine Finch'; astephens@crushinteractive.com;
dax@cypressmail.com; austinassistant@clausman.com; isaac@prad.net;
Frank, Laura; lydter@yahoo.com; jmilbrandt@southwestart.com;
muc@earthlink.net; mark.tasseel@netiq.com; mcuilla@enron.com;
tina.obanion@gte.net; toddgator@yahoo.com; strangle_2000@yahoo.com;
zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: RE: New WTC

A more mature way to deal with the situation would be to wait until the
government proves he is responsible, rather than send hate mail & cause
added tension between the two countries!

Don't be so ignorant!  It's UN-American!

Whoever is responsible will be taken care of - we don't need to take it
upon
ourselves.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Wilkes [mailto:Michael.Wilkes@neonsys.com]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:40 AM
To: 'Christine Finch'; astephens@crushinteractive.com;
dax@cypressmail.com; austinassistant@clausman.com; isaac@prad.net;
lfrank@vignette.com; lydter@yahoo.com; jmilbrandt@southwestart.com;
muc@earthlink.net; mark.tasseel@netiq.com; mcuilla@enron.com; Michael
Wilkes; tina.obanion@gte.net; toddgator@yahoo.com;
strangle_2000@yahoo.com; zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: RE: New WTC

Nice...

Here is another good one.
http://www.thegunsearch.com/target.pdf

-----Original Message-----
From: Christine Finch [mailto:christine_v_finch@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: astephens@crushinteractive.com; dax@cypressmail.com;
austinassistant@clausman.com; isaac@prad.net; lfrank@vignette.com;
lydter@yahoo.com; jmilbrandt@southwestart.com; muc@earthlink.net;
mark.tasseel@netiq.com; mcuilla@enron.com; Michael.Wilkes@neonsys.com;
tina.obanion@gte.net; toddgator@yahoo.com; strangle_2000@yahoo.com;
zwharton@dawray.com
Subject: Fwd: New WTC

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
**********************************************************************


John --

I appreciate your allowing us to use your enclosed office for Ken Lay video applications.  In testing the equipment today, I realized for the first time that our fiber feed involved that big black box that you've undoubtedly noticed.  I was unaware that that would be necessary.  We really view this as temporary because we are planning to move all video activity to the new building before the end of the year.  However, if you would prefer, I can request to have the box moved out and a fixture put in your wall.

Thanks again, John.

Vance Meyer


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Walsh, Kristin
Sent:	Friday, June 01, 2001 4:44 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Tholan, Scott; Holman, Kelly
Subject:	FW: Labor Update

According to our source, the NRB ruling is expected sometime Monday.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Walsh, Kristin
Sent:	Friday, June  1, 2001 2:58 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Cc:	Will, Lloyd; Tholan, Scott
Subject:	Labor Update

Kevin,
	We will continue to monitor the situation and update you as information is received.

The Union is waiting on a NRB (National Labor Relations Board) ruling which should happen this afternoon or Monday.  This ruling could mandate Midwest to come to the negotiation table.
If the ruling says Midwest doesn't have to "go to the table" then the Union will strike.  It will take 1-2 weeks for the workers to organize a strike after the NRB ruling is made.  According to labor insiders, when the workers walk out they will either turn the machines over to non-union workers or turn them off.  The labor source believes that Midwest does not have the non-union workforce needed to take over for the union workers in the event of a strike.
If the ruling says Midwest has to "go to the table" then by law they will have to begin negotiations.


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/05/2000 06:47
AM ---------------------------

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/05/2000 06:31:50 AM
To: " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: TCO Capacity to COH

great thanks

Chris.Germany@enron.com on 04/04/2000 04:43:04 PM
Please respond to Chris.Germany@enron.com

To: Jeffrey Porter/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:
Subject: Re: TCO Capacity to COH

Secondary non-recallable, you can use $.14 year round

OR

$.05 for Apr-Oct which is probably a little high and $.15 for the winter.

The non-recallable factor is the hard thing to figure in.

jporte1@columbiaenergygroup.com on 04/04/2000 02:41:03 PM

To:   " - *Chris.Germany@enron.com" <Chris.Germany@enron.com>
cc:   " - *Perrone, Brian" <bperron@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject:  TCO Capacity to COH

Can you help me with capacity prices on TCO to put in our pricing models?
I
need Apr-Oct '00 and Nov-Mar for deliveries to COH. assume 10,000/d of
secondary for summer and 20,000/d for winter. Please call if you have
questions.


that's fine

	Heather Alon
	11/01/2000 12:59 PM

To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: video shoot

Hi John,
 John Lavorato needs to leave earlier tonight so we will need to start
shooting a little earlier today, around 5:00. Will this work for you?

Thanks,
Heather
3-1825


Daren,

Wanted to let you know that there are still two sitara deals that need to
have the expected volume brought down to "0" of the list that I previously
sent you.
They are 114099 and 92918.

I appreciate you revising the ones that you have and you probably were going
to handle the above two today.  In case you were please disregard this
notice.  If you had fogotten, this can serve as reminder.

As usual, thanks for your help.

-Jackie-
3-9497


Attached is clean and blacklined copies of the revised memorandum on the
Barton Bill.  Cynthia would like to schedule a conference call to discuss
this on Wednesday or Thursday.
 <<Blackline of Barton Bill (Word).DOC>>  <<Memo re Barton Bill (Word).DOC>>

 - Blackline of Barton Bill (Word).DOC
 - Memo re Barton Bill (Word).DOC


That's cheap


---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES on 08/10/2000
01:56 PM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich on 08/10/2000 10:12:20 AM
To: Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman@EES, Robert Badeer@ECT, Tim Belden@ECT,
Dave Parquet@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Mary Hain@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Cynthia Sandherr/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dennis
Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Douglas Condon/SFO/EES@EES,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re: Governor's Press Conference -- Shot Across the Bow

There appears to be a pattern forming.  The administration seems to make a
scene just prior to large events (e.g., Davis' letters calling for wholesale
caps just prior to the ISO Board vote, and now this on the eve of the joint
Assembly/Senate hearing scheduled for today).

In other late-breaking news.  On the heels of this press conference, I
received late last evening from Loretta Lynch's chief of staff a copy of a
proposed decision Lynch will release today reversing last Thursday's decision
rejecting (0-5) retail price caps in San Diego.  The draft decision she
proposes would establish an "interim" retail rate cap only for SDG&E
residential and small commercial customers.  She proposes to use a "balancing
account" to finance the cap.  Though it looks like the "interim" cap would
extend through December 2003, there is one place in the decision that states
the cap should only extend through December 2000.

"Karen Edson" <kedson@ns.net> on 08/09/2000 06:58:13 PM
To: "Baker Carolyn (E-mail)" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bill Carlson
(E-mail)" <william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "Bill Woods (E-mail)"
<billw@calpine.com>, "Curt Hatton (E-mail)" <curt.hatton@gen.pge.com>,
"Curtis Kebler (E-mail)" <curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "David Keane
(E-mail)" <dnke@dynegy.com>, "David Parquet (E-mail)"
<dparque@ect.enron.com>, "Duane Nelsen (E-mail)" <duanenelsen@msn.com>, "Ed
Tomeo (E-mail)" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>, "Edward Maddox (E-mail)"
<emaddox@seawestwindpower.com>, "Eileen Kock (E-mail)" <eileenk@calpine.com>,
"Ellery Bob (E-mail)" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "Escalante Bob (E-mail)"
<riobravogm@aol.com>, "Frank DeRosa (E-mail)"
<fderosa@sanfrancisco.usgen.com>, "Greg Blue (E-mail)" <gtbl@dynegy.com>,
"Hap Boyd (E-mail)" <rboyd@enron.com>, "Jack Pigott (E-mail)"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "Jan Smunty-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "Jim
Willey (E-mail)" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "Joe Greco (E-mail)"
<joe.greco@uaecorp.com>, "Joe Ronan (E-mail)" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Stout
(E-mail)" <john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "Katie Kaplan (E-mail)" <kaplan@iepa.com>, "Kent Fickett
(E-mail)" <kfickett@usgen.com>, "Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)" <lale@dynegy.com>,
"Marty McFadden (E-mail)" <marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "Paula Soos
(E-mail)" <paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "Robert Lamkin (E-mail)"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "Roger Pelote (E-mail)"
<rpelote@energy.twc.com>, "Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>,
"Steven Kelly (E-mail)" <steven@iepa.com>, "Sue Mara (E-mail)"
<smara@enron.com>, "Tony Wetzel (E-mail)" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>, "Trond
Aschehoug (E-mail)" <taschehoug@thermoecotek.com>, "William Hall (E-mail)"
<wfhall2@duke-energy.com>, "Richard Hyde (E-mail)" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"Sandi McCubbin (E-mail)" <smccubbi@ees.enron.com>, "Stephanie Newell
(E-mail)" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "Glenn R. Etienne (E-mail)"
<gret@dynegy.com>, "Nick Wallace (E-mail)" <njwa@dynegy.com>
cc: "Ann Kelly (E-mail)" <kelly@hnks.com>, "Bev Hansen (E-mail)"
<bhansen@lhom.com>, "Bob Judd (E-mail)" <caltech@ns.net>, "Govenar Scott
(E-mail)" <sgovenar@govadv.com>, "Hedy Govenar (E-mail)"
<hgovenar@govadv.com>, "Levake Barbara (E-mail)" <blevake@syix.com>, "Monagan
Mike (E-mail)" <mrmonagan@aol.com>, "Rob Ross (E-mail)" <robbiz@cwo.com>,
"Ron Tom (E-mail)" <rtom@govadv.com>, "Rudman Cary (E-mail)"
<cjrudman@softcom.net>, "Susan McCabe (E-mail)" <sfmccabe@mindspring.com>
Subject: Governor's Press Conference -- Shot Across the Bow

Governor Davis held a press conference today at which he accused
"out-of-state generators" of price gouging and market manipulation.  He
called on FERC to expedite their investigation of the market and to provide
for consumer rebates if FERC cannot conclude that California prices are
"just and reasonable."

Below are my notes from the press conference.  Attached is the Governor's
press release.

Karen Edson

Notes from Gov. Davis, Press Conference:

Opening Statement
Record hot temperatures; lack of supply; price manipulation have created the
crisis.
Electricity is the life blood of the State's economy.
He (the Governor) has responded with several recent steps.
Among them is his request that the AG & FERC examine price manipulation

1st Point
He is calling on the CPUC to establish a price stability rate for consumers
and business.
His intent is to reduce rates to $55-$65/mo. for next year or two.  (This
point was unclear.  Did he mean rates, bills, or what?)
Customers need predictable, reliable, affordable rates

2nd Point
The Governor called on President Clinton and Chairman Hoecker to expedite an
investigation of the unconscionable rates being charged by out-of-state
generators to California utilities
The Governor wants FERC to make evidentiary findings that rates are just and
reasonable.  If FERC can,t make such findings, he wants them to require
consumer rebates.  (This portion of his comments is not reflected in the
attached press release.  It is taken right from the script of Senator Steve
Peace.)

3rd Point
Believes deregulation will work. Generators must be held responsible.  When
gouging and extorting; you must pay the price.

Karen Edson
kedson@ns.net
916/552-7070
 - A. GOVERNOR Press Release 8-10.doc


I can be there, but I have to be home by 1:00, because the cable tv guy is
going to show up sometime between 1-5.

	Taffy Milligan
	06/15/2000 02:31 PM

		 To: Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Tudon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad
Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nidia
Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Sacks/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason Peters/Corp/Enron@Enron, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Tlucek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Legal Temp
2/HOU/ECT@ECT, Erica Braden/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Legal/Credit Meeting - June 16, 2000

Please be advised that the location of the meeting has been changed to
EB30C1.  See you at Noon-1:30 p.m.

In Suzanne's absence today, please RSVP to me at your earliest convenience.

Best regards,

Taffy Milligan
X57373


Attached is a new draft of the letter to John Pope with all comments
received.  Dick Ingersoll will send this out to TVA tomorrow.  If you have
any other additions, please get them to me today.


Start Date: 2/6/02; HourAhead hour: 20;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020620.txt
!!!General SQL error.
Couldn't update; currently locked by user 'Admin' on machine 'NAHOU-TRDTS5'.
Table

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstNW
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/6/02
  TIE_POINT: MALIN_5_RNDMTN
  INTERCHG_ID: ENRJ_CISO_3000
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/daily/detail/0,1136,33500000000108999,00.ht
ml?


Sara:
I have reviewed Tanya's list and of the ones that she told us to pursue, it
appears as if from our Lotus Notes entries that we are in fact  in the
process of getting ISDA's put in place.  That leaves us with Fred's customers
(other than Cross Timbers which we are getting an ISDA in place).  Any
thoughts on how we should proceed?  Should we focus on the remaining
counterparties on Joe's list or others?  Please advise.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Mark,
 Supper on Thursday sounds great.   We can plan to eat right after
your meetings end.  I will get tickets for the play Thursday night if you
are interested (I still go to all the plays - If you're not interested, I'll
just go on Sunday).  I'm looking forward to getting together again (I can
show you our new NMR).
 If I can do a little campaigning - don't repeat what I say here, I
don't want to get in any trouble.  I'm enclosing the brief notes from a
science building meeting last fall about the campaign.  We hope the campaign
isn't just about bricks and mortar.  It would be a great opportunity to
strengthen the sciences.  #'s 1, 2 and 3 below were particularly important
to many people.  #1 is getting scholarship money to attract good students
into the sciences.  #2 is endowment for equipment (we have a growing
endowment in chemistry and biology - I'll tell you about it when you are
here).  It is just that science has become very expensive and we would like
for this endowment to grow.  #3 is just to look at remodeling the science
building - chemistry doesn't need this as much as biology and psychology.  I
don't want you to push for these particular things - they would know you had
been lobbied!!  It is just that I hope there will be some attempt to
strengthen academics in the campaign - I'm also aware that some of our
requests may not be the most fundable items.  It is always easier to raise
big money on bricks and mortar.
 See you soon,  I'm off to class.
       Doc

------------------------------------------------------------
Science Building Meeting
August 27, 1999

Present: Biology,  Chemistry,  Computer,  Math,  Psych and  Physics  faculty

Ideas presented for funding possibilities in the upcoming campaign that
would benefit the academic programs offered in H-T Science Building:

 1. Presidential scholars
  To maintaining a steady stream of very good students in
            science and math classes.
  Many faculty thought this was very important!

 2. Endowment for equipment and computers
  Build the endowment for science equipment and computers to
            help maintain a
  constant and enhanced  supply of money to buy equipment and
            computers.

 3. Remodeling H-T science building
  Air condition some labs and lecture rooms.
  Remodel laboratory space for present needs of our programs.
            (look at whole building).

 4. Endowment for Faculty salaries

 5. Endowment for student research

 6. Endowment for summer programs

 7. Endowment for travel funds

 8. Endowment for named lecturers

 9. Staffing concerns
  Possibility of endowed chairs,  lab technician  and/or
            equipment repair technician.

  We know the lab and equipment repair people are on-going
            expenses, but maybe money
   could be raised to endow them.

These are the ideas that were suggested at our meeting.   Different faculty
would have different priorities within this list.   We all agreed it is
extremely important to raise some endowment funds in the next campaign for
the direct benefit of the programs offered in H-T.


Thanks again,  I explained to Dan the situation he sort of laughed after I
told him you would take lunch.   I always say in these cases quoting a famous
women,  "after all tomorrow is another day."

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I am attaching a preliminary Agenda for the meeting in Houston.  Please send
me suggested changes.

The intend is for Day 1 Jan 4 to get a business/commercial perspective, the
business unit leaders will be doing most of the talking, and at the end of
the day they may elect to leave. Day 2 the commercial support staff will
continue to work on specific issues and develop the assignement  list. Javier
Pantoja, and Guillermo Canovas need to stay.

Mike Smith.- Please coordinatte with Jane Wilson about the pre-identified
issue list  and the regulatory support staff (Southern Cone working Group)
we want to participate the following day. Please propose a  detailed agenda.

Jane Wilson. I need someone to take notes of the meeting and distribute them
to the participants.

Robert Neustaedter.- Please make the conference room reservation. I need an
overhead projector , easel paper and pens, masking tape.

Kelly and Jim Steffes. I need you to participate both days. I do not know
well enough the other members of the Sothern Cone working group. I do not
want to add others at this point in time because the obejective of these
sessions cannot be met with a large group. But review the agenda and suggest
if I need to add someone else.

Jose


?
----- Original Message -----
From: kamelang
To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 11:02 AM
Subject: Fw: Where Did We Go Wrong

?
----- Original Message -----
From: Lrmecmc@aol.com
To: LilTexGal@aol.com ; SAMNLISAVALMA@aol.com ; MFALLNUTT@aol.com ;
SDINBALI@aol.com ;  Anita Nazzaro
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:29 AM
Subject: Where Did We Go Wrong

...Hard to believe this was written by a high school  student...

A Columbine High School student wrote:

The paradox of  our time in history is that we have taller buildings,
but
shorter tempers;  wider freeways, but narrower viewpoints; we spend
more,
but have less; we  buy more, but enjoy it less.

We have bigger houses and smaller families;  more conveniences, but
less
time; we have more degrees, but less sense;  more knowledge, but less
judgment; more experts, but less solutions; more  medicine, but less
wellness.

We have multiplied our possessions, but  reduced our values.

We talk too much, love too seldom, and hate too  often.

We've learned how to make a living, but not a life; we've added  years
to
life, not life to years.

We've been all the way to the  moon and back, but have trouble crossing
the
street to meet the new  neighbor.

We've conquered outer space, but not inner space; we've cleaned  up the
air,
but polluted the soul; we've split the atom, but not our  prejudice.

We have higher incomes, but lower morals; we've become long  on
quantity,
but short on quality.

These are the times of tall men,  and short character; steep profits,
and
shallow  relationships.

These are the times of world peace, but domestic warfare;  more leisure,
but
less fun; more kinds of food, but less  nutrition.

These are days of two incomes, but more divorce; of fancier  houses,
but
broken homes.

It is a time when there is much in the  show window and nothing in the
stockroom; a time when technology can bring  this letter to you, and a
time
when you can choose either to forward this  message and make a difference
or just hit delete.


why?  doesn't soy clean the pipes?