Hi.

We can get a computer hook up through Time Warner for $15 month.  Could you
ask John if he likes it?  Can it be installed anywhere in the house?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/22/2001 10:54
AM ---------------------------

	From:  The ClickAtHome Project Team                           01/10/2001
03:19 PM

Sent by: Enron Announcements
To: ClickAtHome Pilot 1 Confirmed Participants, ClickAtHome Pilot 2 Confirmed
Participants
cc: Suzanne Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Wise/NA/Enron@Enron, Kevin
Whitehurst/NA/Enron@ENRON, Elizabeth Boudreaux/NA/Enron@Enron, Stacey
Dempsey/HR/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marie Newhouse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marsha
Francis/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: ClickAtHome ISP Ordering is Here!

Thank you for your participation in our first two pilots.  Your effort, time
spent, feedback, and interest in the program has been very helpful in
improving it.  Thank you, too, for your patience through this new process.

We are excited to announce the beginning of Internet Service Ordering today,
Wednesday, January 10.  Many of our vendors are ready to begin providing
service to you today, while all vendors will be ready by late February.   The
ClickAtHome Internet Service Providers whom are currently available for
internet service are
Time-Warner in Houston, (cable modem)
Kingwood Cable, (cable modem)
AT&T in Portland.  (cable modem)

MSN will be available in late February, providing both dial-up and DSL
service.  We will provide further communication as soon as MSN orders can be
placed. We appreciate your patience in advance.

To pre-qualify and sign up for service in your area today with Time Warner,
Kingwood or AT&T- Portland, refer to http://clickathomepilot.enron.com for
specific provider information and instructions on how to place your order.
If you have problems launching the site, please copy and paste
http://clickathomepilot.enron.com directly into Internet Explorer.

The ClickAtHome Team is excited to bring you the final stage of the program.
Again, we thank you for your patience.  We encourage you and your family to
use and personalize your new portal, which can be found at
www.clickathome.net.  And we encourage you to get connected, and Get
Innovative at Home!

ClickAtHome Team


Carey,
Per Scott's request below the following business unit (aka: desk id,
portfolio) was added to Global production and Unify development, test,
production and stage.   Please copy to the other Global environments.
Thanks,
Dick, x3-1489

Updated in Global production environment GCC Code Desc:

P ENT SUBENTI DATA_CD    AP DATA_DESC               CODE_ID
- --- ------- ---------- -- -------------------- ----------
A SIT DESKID  IMCL       A  ENA - IM Cleburne          9273

	From:  Scott Mills                           08/30/2000 08:27 AM

To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Elwood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Rose/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa
Schulte/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J
Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Nommensen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Shawna Johnson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: New Sitara Desk Request

This needs to be available in production by early afternoon.  Sorry for the
short notice.

SRM (x33548)


<<December 17, 2001 Notification.doc>>

Thank you,

Bobbi J. Kilburn
Treasury & Risk Administrator
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
(802) 258-4120
(802) 258-2101
Bobbi.Kilburn@vynpc.com

 - December 17, 2001 Notification.doc


The state of transmission/transportation regulation here is continually evolving and a full treatment would qualify for an economics doctorate.  You should also be aware that not everything out of Ofgem (the UK regulator) makes sense.   Hence, while I've provided some answers to your specific questions below, I would see these only as broad guides to the issues you are facing in the US and would retain a healthy degree of scepticism about the lessons to be drawn from UK schemes.  In particular, I would caution against relying solely on the NGC incentives document, since this is only a small part of a much large jigsaw of price controls etc.

1) Do you think that the UK  for-profit Transco model has been working satisfactorily? We know it is still early for you to make a final judgement, but have the incentives and penalties shaped the way NG behaves (in terms of costs and elimination of T contraints)?

The for-profit model has worked reasonably well so far.  Both RPI-X regulation and NGC/Transco's incentive schemes have driven out many operating costs.  However, the link into ensuring long-term investment is not clear.  RPI-X in it's purest form has poor investment incentives.  Ofgem are seeking to remedy this by introducing longer-term contracts for transmission capacity, together with upside rates of return if the companies improve on some key output measures (they are leading the way on this in gas).  Nevertheless, I think they're still some way short of solving the problem.

In my view, this is because the problem borders on the insoluble.  Ofgem are obsessed with introducing "market based" signals for new investment.  I'm deeply sceptical about this - while you can auction fixed amounts of capacity and thereby get a "market price", the capacity made available at one location depends on the amount made available at all other locations.  In short, there are major network externalities which are the source of the natural monopoly in transmission.  As a result, the regulator and/or the Transco will always need to define how much capacity should be built and made available at particular locations.  In turn, this means that while contracts can play some role, we can't leave regulation behind in ensuring that sufficient network capacity is made availalble.

As far as the for-profit and non-profit debate goes, I'm an agnostic.  The former can undoubtedly focus the mind (NGC have virtually removed voltage constraint from the system, due to installation of reactive compensation equipment), but serious doubts still remain about the ability of the UK system to implement major new investment.  On the flip side, I would be concerned about how to ensure appropriate performance incentives for non-proift transmission organisation.

2) We took a good look a the NGC system operator price control and incentive schemes under NETA - Final Proposal - Dated December 2000 (attached) . Which of the alternative proposals on page 21 has been adopted?

The final proposals are here.

http://www.ofgas.gov.uk/docs2001/ngcmod_22march.pdf

These might be useful if you're having trouble sleeping, but I suspect that the finer details of NGC's scheme are too case-specific to be of any use elsewhere.  The key element, I think, is the fact that Ofgem gave NGC a choice from several different incentive schemes.  This mirrors some economic theory developed by Laffont and Tirole on the design of optimal incentive sctructures.  The idea is to overcome the information assymmetry between the regulator and company, because the company "reveals" the optimal structure in choosing between the alternatives.

3) Have the incentives/penalties system been working or have them been subject to reviews in terms of targes, upsides, collars, and other parameters due to external factors beyond Transco control?

The incentive schemes are subject to regular review, but for the reasons above, I'm not sure you can draw any lessons beyond the general lesson that incentive schemes can be useful ways of making efficiency gains.  I'm not aware of any scheme being reopened because of external factors.

4) Could you send us (or help us find) the "official"  Transmission Licence Agreement, where all incentives and penalties are clearly spelled out?

As above - but again, how relevant are these specifics for your purposes?

5) Question related to NETA rules:  As I understood, there is not a central pool, and market participants (generators and suppliers) have to submit a balanced schedule in the forward market. NG is responsible for [small] imbalances or residual purchasing. If that is true, how can NG be made accountable for energy deviations in the real time that it has no control whatsoever? (It seems that the incentive mechamism takes this metrics into account)

NGC accepts offers (for more generation or less demand) and bids (for less generation and more demand) which it calls off to balance the system in real time.  It doesn't need "control" because people are free to price these offers and bids as they see fit.  NGC can also enter balancing services contracts for particular ancillary services (reserve, reactive support etc).  NGC is subject to a balancing services incentive scheme which ensures that they balance the system economically.

6) Do you think the profit-RTO as proposed by NETA could live with a completely different congestion management system, such as central dispatch/LMP/financial rights (as current in used in the PJM pools in the US)?We have the impression that NG advocates a profit RTO and a self-dispatch, physical rights congestion system. We have been advocating the former.

I'm yet to be convinced that there are huge differences between physical/financial transmission schemes - despite noodling on the problem continuously for the last 7 years (it all started in CA in 1994 . . . . ).  At the end of the day, someone (the system operator) must decide what is required where to keep the system stable, ie, to make "spot" decisions on transmission availability.  If the capacity is fungible, you would also expect a secondary market to emerge in physical rights.  It would, however, be practically quite difficult to introduce an LMP scheme under NETA.  This is why we're moving down the entry-exit physical capacity route.

7) We prepared a list of questions to be sent to NG. Could you please take a look. Do they make sense? Are they based on correct assumptions regarding the UK system? Any other aspects to be investigated?

Question 3 is the main problem to resolve both within an RTO's region and between RTO's.  You might want to expand this further to include efficient investment, maintenance and operation in the light of the comments above about the deficiencies of the UK system.

LM

-----------------------------QUESTIONS TO ASHLEY BROWN - ALLIANCE/NG  RTO PROPOSAL ----------------------------

1) Profit-RTO - Where does your proposed organization fit  in the attached graph in terms of end state ? Stage III? Stage IV?

 << OLE Object: Microsoft PowerPoint Slide >>

2) Regarding document "Response of National Grid USA to questions posed by the Commission": Does it imply that core, for profit functions should not be subject to a stakeholder process? Wasn't the NETA design subject to an extensive
consultation, even for profit, NG core functions?

3) If each Transco manages it own OASIS, how can we avoid fragmentation (balkanization), pancaking and many other
negative aspects and seams that the RTO process is trying to eliminate? How can you achieve one-stop shopping? By outsourcing those functions to one singole  third party?

4) What kind of PBR mechanism are you envisioning for the Transco-RTO? Are you thinking about including "external" measures such as cost to provide ancillary services, congestion costs or costs incurred in energy balancing?

5) Are you envisioning an RTO-Transco model which will assume that all transmission assets in the region will be divested? Or can the model live with a "light" RTO where part of the assets are divested but others are not (and sign an operating agreement with the RTO. Would your proposed Matrix of RTO Functions (page 9) still be robust under this scenario?

6) Can your proposed RTO model dovetail with an LMP/Congestion Management system based on financial rights? [Our understanding is that NETA completely reorganized the UK pool. The UK system now looks like a "self-dispatch", physical rights model]

7) As a follow up of the previous question: Assuming Alliance adopts a self-dispatch, physical rights approach similar to the one NG operates in the UK today. Don't you think that this will create significant barriers/seams with other neighboring RTOs, considering that there seems to be a general trend towards security constrained dispatch, LMP and financial rights for most RTOs in the US?

8) If your proposed system can be dovetailed to a central dispatch, LMP/financial rights, shouldn't some functions in your "Martix of RTO Functions" be collapsed? For example: management of congestion prices, calculation of congestion, operations of energy markets and generation redispatch?

9) Procurement and deployment of ancillary services is listed as non-core. However, in the UK system, this represents a significant role of the Transco, with incentives and penalties attached to its achievement. Is there a different vision or do you assume that those functions will end up being developed by the RTO and consequently will be part of the PBR formula?

10) Generation interconnection. Obviously, your proposal did not go that far. Conceptually, do you favor a system whereby T fixed costs are recovered via a postage stamp rate across an entire region or do you favor the UK model whereby fixed costs (use of the system) are calculated based on incremental cost and have a strong locational component (and connection costs are treates separately, according to a shallow method?

11) Establishment of transmission rates. How to reconcile the fact that those should be regulated and you propose that the Transco itself will establish its T rates? Are you thinking about some possible non-regulated activities?

12) You stated that separation and control of T assets persists, to a large extent, in the Collaborative Model proposed as part of the Southeast Mediation. Do you think that the Independent System Administration model is superior in this regard? What are the key important differences in your view in the conceptual design of those models


-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Wallace Corigliano [ <mailto:robinwc@charter.net>]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 10:24 PM
To: allison; ami leatham; amonra@hia.net <mailto:amonra@hia.net>; annmarie_hfsm@hotmail.com <mailto:annmarie_hfsm@hotmail.com>;
arozzell@rimicenters.com <mailto:arozzell@rimicenters.com>; barbara; bdragoo@earthlink.net <mailto:bdragoo@earthlink.net>; Becky (instr)
Moores; bev; bismark95@hotmail.com <mailto:bismark95@hotmail.com>; bob Gonzalez; brobinso@bayou.uh.edu <mailto:brobinso@bayou.uh.edu>;
c_luber@msn.com <mailto:c_luber@msn.com>; Christa; christie.cottington@halliburton.com <mailto:christie.cottington@halliburton.com>;
CPCaudle@aol.com <mailto:CPCaudle@aol.com>; Cynthia; david barrone; dcardone@fitmac.com <mailto:dcardone@fitmac.com>;
dcardone@neosoft.com <mailto:dcardone@neosoft.com>; dcorigli@twcny.rr.com <mailto:dcorigli@twcny.rr.com>; Debra; debroll@aol.com <mailto:debroll@aol.com>;
DHebert@24hourfit.com <mailto:DHebert@24hourfit.com>; diane bagby; Donna.Young@jacobs.com <mailto:Donna.Young@jacobs.com>;
EsREDHEAD@aol.com <mailto:EsREDHEAD@aol.com>; fernanda; Fernanda (instr) Kannady;
garyg1@hotmail.com <mailto:garyg1@hotmail.com>; jay guillory; hayleyelise@hotmail.com <mailto:hayleyelise@hotmail.com>;
heyoscarg@aol.com <mailto:heyoscarg@aol.com>; higonzales@altavista.com <mailto:higonzales@altavista.com>; HIMaldonad@aol.com <mailto:HIMaldonad@aol.com>; Laura
Moffit; Patricia; natasha; tnasha@mailexcite.com <mailto:tnasha@mailexcite.com>; Stefani;
Stefani.Tjelmeland@heart.org <mailto:Stefani.Tjelmeland@heart.org>; nathan&michelle; nanci schwind; Mel
Trevino-Taylor; melody (instr) jackson; Marlene; Lydia; kris;
Kimfoley@aol.com <mailto:Kimfoley@aol.com>; kimramey; kelly.chadwell@gulfcoastseal.com <mailto:kelly.chadwell@gulfcoastseal.com>; Kathleen
(instr) Naff; joywink@hotmail.com <mailto:joywink@hotmail.com>; joeellison; jimmy; dee; veronica;
Russ; Maida; Janie; lisa beaton; liz pieratt; Susy (Sandra) Collins;
jam2172@yahoo.com <mailto:jam2172@yahoo.com>; jandmd1@prodigy.net <mailto:jandmd1@prodigy.net>; JDAntoni@24HourFit.com <mailto:JDAntoni@24HourFit.com>;
jdgoosey@aol.com <mailto:jdgoosey@aol.com>; jessica@understandinc.com <mailto:jessica@understandinc.com>; jljordan@txucom.net <mailto:jljordan@txucom.net>;
jmd2g@hotmail.com <mailto:jmd2g@hotmail.com>; joecorig@ev1.net <mailto:joecorig@ev1.net>; johnlagroue@hotmail.com <mailto:johnlagroue@hotmail.com>;
Joseph.cORIGLIANO@HCAhealthcare.com <mailto:Joseph.cORIGLIANO@HCAhealthcare.com>; khalidt@swbell.net <mailto:khalidt@swbell.net>;
laburke@hotmail.com <mailto:laburke@hotmail.com>; lesley; leslie; lilwebb@ev1.net <mailto:lilwebb@ev1.net>; waterlindateacher;
lindy1013@earthlink.net <mailto:lindy1013@earthlink.net>; maggieaw@aol.com <mailto:maggieaw@aol.com>; MelanieV@CapitalStream.com <mailto:MelanieV@CapitalStream.com>;
melaniev@system1.com <mailto:melaniev@system1.com>; mikloony@yahoo.com <mailto:mikloony@yahoo.com>; mollieholt@excite.com <mailto:mollieholt@excite.com>;
nswallace1@excite.com <mailto:nswallace1@excite.com>; patriley2000@yahoo.com <mailto:patriley2000@yahoo.com>; rgwells@flash.net <mailto:rgwells@flash.net>;
robinwallace@ev1.net <mailto:robinwallace@ev1.net>; robinwallace@mail.ev1.net <mailto:robinwallace@mail.ev1.net>; robinwc@charter.net <mailto:robinwc@charter.net>;
rodevans@pdq.net <mailto:rodevans@pdq.net>; Rtrottrot@aol.com <mailto:Rtrottrot@aol.com>; SAP20001@cs.com <mailto:SAP20001@cs.com>; schuyler8@ev1.net <mailto:schuyler8@ev1.net>;
sharonhodgson; Shelley.Zaiser@EXULT.net <mailto:Shelley.Zaiser@EXULT.net>; Smoores123@aol.com <mailto:Smoores123@aol.com>; soraya;
ssapio@opicoil.com <mailto:ssapio@opicoil.com>; stetz@ev1.net <mailto:stetz@ev1.net>; swhite@woundcarehbo.com <mailto:swhite@woundcarehbo.com>;
tandma@lcc.net <mailto:tandma@lcc.net>; tim@discountnaturalvitamins.com <mailto:tim@discountnaturalvitamins.com>; tpoupore@bellsouth.net <mailto:tpoupore@bellsouth.net>;
trudywuensch@yahoo.com <mailto:trudywuensch@yahoo.com>; twalsh@24hourfit.com <mailto:twalsh@24hourfit.com>; vitamike@piasanet.com <mailto:vitamike@piasanet.com>;
voss; wemarch@aol.com <mailto:wemarch@aol.com>; wendy@healthandfitnessmag.com <mailto:wendy@healthandfitnessmag.com>;
wendy_hfsm@hotmail.com <mailto:wendy_hfsm@hotmail.com>; wfzman@libertybay.com <mailto:wfzman@libertybay.com>; whit511@yahoo.com <mailto:whit511@yahoo.com>;
yecart98@aol.com <mailto:yecart98@aol.com>; yevans@ev1.net <mailto:yevans@ev1.net>; yevans@opicoil.com <mailto:yevans@opicoil.com>; zaisercrew@ev1.net <mailto:zaisercrew@ev1.net>

Subject: Fw: (fwd) FW: Warning from HFD...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Corigliano Joseph" < Joseph.Corigliano@HCAhealthcare.com <mailto:Joseph.Corigliano@HCAhealthcare.com>>
To: < robinwc@charter.net <mailto:robinwc@charter.net>>

Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:55 AM
Subject: FW: (fwd) FW: Warning from HFD...

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: terry gonzalez [ SMTP:neva@ev1.net <mailto:SMTP:neva@ev1.net>]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 9:42 PM
> > To: Brandy Freed; carey_chenevert@cisgi.co <mailto:carey_chenevert@cisgi.co>; claverie3@msn.com <mailto:claverie3@msn.com>;
> > doktavec@prodigy.net <mailto:doktavec@prodigy.net>; Drchoicembs@aol.com <mailto:Drchoicembs@aol.com>; emmitejp@bp.com <mailto:emmitejp@bp.com>;
> > eula.bell@libertymutual.com <mailto:eula.bell@libertymutual.com>; Harris, James M; ksbradly@aol.com <mailto:ksbradly@aol.com>;
> > nrevilla@CI.Galveston.TX.U <mailto:nrevilla@CI.Galveston.TX.U>; prodriguez@frostbank.com <mailto:prodriguez@frostbank.com>;
racarroll@yahoo.com <mailto:racarroll@yahoo.com>;
> > smithjjh@bp.com <mailto:smithjjh@bp.com>; Gillingham, Sonya; teasmith@utmb.edu <mailto:teasmith@utmb.edu>;
volhocmom@aol.com <mailto:volhocmom@aol.com>;
> > todd walker
> > Subject: Fw: (fwd) FW:  Warning from HFD...
> >
> > > >
> > > > I always check this stuff out when I get it.  I called HFD just
now,
> > > > and they confirmed that this is in fact true.
> > > > Thanks for the warning.
> > > > jef
> > > >
> > > > Greetings to all!
> > > > Gene has just called from downtown and asked that I forward this
> > > > info to as many of you as possible.  The Houston Fire Department
has
> > > > received info over their wires from the federal government
warning
> > > > about some mailings that have been received by others.
> > > >
> > > > Do not open a LARGE BLUE ENVELOPE with black lettering on the
front
> > > > saying "A GIFT FOR YOU FROM THE KINDERMAN FOUNDATION".  They say
28
> > > > people have already died from some type of chemical or something
on a
> > > > sponge inside.
> > > >
> > > > They are taking this seriously at this point.  I would hope that
> > > > this would hit the news later, but they say there are so many
things
> > > > going on it's impossible to cover them all.  If you do get an
envelope > > > > like this call the police department or take it to your
nearest fire
> > > > station or back to the post office.
> > > >
> > > > Just do not open it.
> > > >
> > > > How sad this all is.  I guess the best thing is to stick
together
> > > > protecting, caring and sharing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >


Is this correct? Rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000 03:25 PM
---------------------------

James New
12/21/2000 01:23 AM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shane Dallmann/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: UK Submission of Positions

Shane and I spoke yesterday regarding the USD curve. Whilst taking a curve
other than the day end curve is relatively easy to do (once we have agreed a
formal procedure and changed the IT feeds) and would give us only minor P&L
concerns on a daily basis there is an impact on determining and hedging our
USD cashflows. This would undoubtedly be a cost to the UK business. Shane is
going to put a note together to outline the issues and have a stab at
attaching a monetary cost (although I expect he will have to guesstimate the
amounts). Depending on the size this will need to be communicated to the
business heads here in London.

James

	From:  Sheila Glover                           19/12/2000 17:45

To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shane Dallmann/LON/ECT@ECT, James
New/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: UK Submission of Positions

Rick,
Shane Dallman and I are trying to speak with James to discuss the Libor Curve
and its impact on London's reporting.  The Libor curve is published daily in
Houston at 3:00 pm (CST) at the close of US Trading.

The Global Products books are now final closed from Houston so their areas
should not be impacted.

We will update you when we have spoken to James regarding his areas and
possible ways Rate & Currency can assist.

Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 12/19/2000 11:35
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Gary Hickerson                           12/18/2000 09:40 AM

To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: UK Submission of Positions

---------------------- Forwarded by Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT on 12/18/2000
09:43 AM ---------------------------

James New
12/18/2000 03:10 AM
To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Fernley
Dyson/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UK Submission of Positions

Rick,

Thanks you for your note below. We are today implementing a flash P&L
process. We aim to report daily numbers at 7am Houston time and will start
today with the P&L. We will build on this and hope to have draft positions
and VAR for most books within a week or so. There will be a reconciliation of
flash to final numbers which will be included in our return to Houston.

I will put together a note on the London DPR production process which goes
into the process we currently have, the process we actually need to have, and
the obstacles that are in the way. I would expect this to be finalised
tomorrow. Obtaining the USD interest rate curve on a more timely basis is
just one of our problems but it is unfortunately by no means our only or most
serious problem.

James

From:  Rick Buy
15/12/2000 21:59

To: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Michael R Brown/LON/ECT@ECT, Mike
Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: UK Submission of Positions

Need your help on the following: Each day we are delayed in finalising var,
p&L and positions because the UK must wait for a USD  interest rate curves
before submitting their data to Houston. I am also told that it is really not
necessary to wait for this curve and the data could be submitted close of
business London. Even if there was some minor inaccuracy from this method it
would be better than what we have now. This would greatly improve the
efficiency (by 4 to 6 hours) in reporting to senior management. Can you guys
initiate this change or get me to the right person there. Thanks, Rick


I think that you should make her something. Perhaps you could draw a picture or make something out of paper mache. I'll stop by Tiffany's and see if they have anything to go with her bracelet and earings (from x-mas).

Later skater...

cd


Looks like you got this earlier.  I think it has new relevance in light of
FERC's announced investigation.

----------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 08/24/2000 08:40 AM
---------------------------

Tim Belden@ECT
08/17/2000 09:34 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan J
Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES,
Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard
Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES

Subject: Re: FERC INVESTIGATION IN CA - What should they be looking for?

Here are some more thoughts:
FERC should take a hard look at why the ISO is almost always in an "inc"
situation in real time.  Without structural incentives to go short into real
time, I would expect the CAISO to "inc" in some hours and "dec" in others --
with no consistent patterns.
The IOU's have four choices for purchasing power:  PX Block Forward, PX Day
Ahead, PX Day Of, and CAISO Ex Post.  They had ample opportunity to purchase
lower cost power in the PX Block Forward but didn't buy enough.  That left
them short in the Day Ahead.  They can reduce Day Ahead prices by moving some
of their load to the Ex Post market.  Dave Parquet did an Econ 101
presentation on this incentive at the CAISO board meeting in June.
The ISO remains primarily in "inc" mode even during the shoulder months when
prices are lower, another indicator that the real time "inc" problem is
driven by the load side rather than the supply side.  The IOU's continue to
go short into the ISO Ex Post market even when the CAISO Ex Post price is
consistently above the PX Day Ahead price.
There is evidence that the IOU's are not willing to pay above the CAISO price
cap for energy from the PX in the Day Ahead market.  Does it matter that the
price cap for the ISO also acts as a PX price cap?
The NOx market in California is very tight.  How has this contributed to
higher costs and has the complete lack of available NOx credits prevented any
generators from running?
How large was the impact of the below normal water year on the supply side?
The attached presentation quantifies this effect in the Northwest.  (I have a
theory on how hydro capacity completely overstates reserve margins in the
west from an economic perspective.  I can go into more detail if you wish.)
Friction between California PX and ISO markets and other western markets.
For example, why are actual flows going into the state yet prices out side of
the state are higher?  Another example of anomylous behavior is at COB on
8/11 and 8/12.  There was congestion from California TO the northwest those
days in the Day Ahead market.  In real time the NW ended up being a net
seller of about 3,000 MW from the NW TO California.
Demand Side - we really need to press on this issue because all of the
proponents of price caps claim that as soon as the demand side is "workably
competitive" then there is no need for price caps.  Is large-scale economic
demand response required for a competitive market?  What if demand response
is there, but at very high prices?  The demand response in California is a
joke.  With 2700 MW of interuptible, why did the utilities and the CAISO only
get around 600 MW of economic demand response.  Much of this response comes
at $1500/MWh.  The assymetric treatment of supply side resources and demand
side resources can be justified on environmental grounds, but not economic
grounds.  So why this assymetric treatment?  This gets to the question of the
fine line between "scarcity rents" which are ok, and market power which is
not.  If power is scarce, and demand truly values it at $1500/MWh then
shouldn't that be the price.  At what price would the rest of the
interuptible load economically curtail?  Bottom line -- there are about 2,000
MW of load that should be able to respond to price signals that chooses not
to or values power at more than $1500/MWh.
Burden of proof -- what empirical measures should be used to assess market
power?  The reports published to date have been unimpressive.  The Market
Analysis Unit report, for example, does a bunch of handwaving and then
concludes that there is market power.  But they never explain why.  I would
think that proof might be something like this:  Generator X sets price y% of
the time when loads exceed Z MWs.  Or, four generators set price 80% of the
time when prices exceed $200/MWh.  They have all the data to be able to tell,
yet they don't provide any empirical measures.  The only test I've heard of
so far is the UC Energy Institute report that demonstrates that generators
are submitting bids above their marginal cost.  The PX report states that
supply bids are fewer and at higher prices than last year.  They fail to
mention the fact that there are 5,000 fewer MW of hydro this year relative to
last.

James D Steffes@EES
08/17/2000 06:18 AM
To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Bruno
Gaillard/SFO/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: FERC INVESTIGATION IN CA - What should they be looking for?

As we begin to meet with FERC Staff on the Wholesale market issues related to
CA problems, I think that we need to put together a list of questions that
FERC needs to be asking Western power market participants.

The following are some questions that I think are important to have FERC ask;
I'm sure there are more.

1. Were California utilities underscheduling load into the PX day ahead
market?
2. How many MWs did the CA ISO procure during each hour during the Summer
2000?  How does this compare with CA ISO procurement during 1999?
3. Has PG&E changed its bidding behavior associated with its Hydro facilities
in 2000?
3. Are there baseload facilities that were operated differently in 2000 than
in 1999?
4. Were any generation plants off-line due to unplanned maintenance during
Summer 2000?
5. How did the CA ISO demand side program work?  Why didn't more load
participate?
6. What options did SDG&E have to "hedge" its retail rates?  What were prices
in the CAL PX block forward market on Jan 15, 2000 and May 15, 2000?
7. How high did natural gas prices go in California for generation during
Summer 2000?
8. Were other Western power markets prices higher (year-on-year)?
9. Did the CA ISO Board face political pressure to reduce bid caps?  Is this
appropriate for a FERC jurisdictional entity?
10. What specific details is SDG&E referring to in its Complaint on
"unworkably competitive" CA ISO markets?  Can these be fixed "quickly"?

Please add other questions.

Jim


No that is the DJ that will be at the bar. Check out his website attached.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Young, Becky
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:46 PM
To:	Griffith, John
Cc:	Abramo, Caroline; Zivic, Robyn
Subject:	FW: DJKREEMY ON THE WHEELS OF PLASTIC

is that a young John G in the pic attached?!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zivic, Robyn
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:43 PM
To:	Young, Becky
Subject:	FW: DJKREEMY ON THE WHEELS OF PLASTIC

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Griffith, John
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:02 AM
To:	Zivic, Robyn; Abramo, Caroline
Subject:	FW: DJKREEMY ON THE WHEELS OF PLASTIC

you guys should check this out, use my name, I should be on the guest list.  He is the one you bought the book about Carolyn.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	karimrashid <karim@karimrashid.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 7:59 AM
To:	everybody
Subject:	FW: DJKREEMY ON THE WHEELS OF PLASTIC

Please come Thursday night to Joes Pub. I'll spin starting at 11pm. You are all on the guest list.
Love, K
Karim Rashid Inc.
357 W 17th Street
p 212 929 8657
New York NY 10011
f 212 929 0247
www.karimrashid.com
Confidentiality Note: The information in this electronic mail message may be
confidential and for use of only the named recipient. The information may be
protected by privilege, work product immunity or other applicable law.  If
you are not the intended recipient the retention, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail
message in error please notify us immediately by telephone on +212 929 8657
or by e-mail at office@karimrashid.com -Thank you.

 - DJKREEMY on wheels of Plastic << File: DJKREEMY on wheels of Plastic >>


Christi - here is the plaintiff malpractice reference from Cyndi.  Rick used to work with Cindy at Full bright and recently formed his own firm.  I know him and he's a great guy.

Rick A. Eckerson
Sydow, Kormanik, Carrigan & Eckerson, L.L.P.
1111 Bagby Suite 4650
Houston, Texas 77002
713-654-8100
713-654-9353 (direct)
713-752-2199 (fax)
reckerson@skcelaw.com


What company are you with?

	Stephen Wallace/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/06/2001 12:37 PM

		 To: "Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON"
<IMCEANOTES-Mark+20Taylor+20+28Vice+20President+20and+20General+20Counsel+29+4
0ENRON@ENRON.com>@SMTP@enronXgate
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: PLEASE READ

Mark,

Here at Enron Global E&P I have polled my CEO, Jeff Sherrick, and my CFO/CAO,
Howard Selzer, and neither they nor I have anything to report.

Am I supposed to poll everyone in the business unit -- 50 people in Houston
and 250 overseas?

Stephen.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Enron+20Announcements_Corp_Enron+40ENRON@ENRON.com]  On
Behalf Of Mark Taylor (Vice President and General Counsel)@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 6:43 PM
To: NYMEX Hedge Exemption List@ENRON
Subject: PLEASE READ

To:        Department:   ENA Legal

From:  Mark Taylor     Date: May 11, 2001
  Vice President and General Counsel

Subject: Enron North America Corp. NYMEX Hedge Exemption Applications

We are in the process of preparing applications for position limit exemptions
for ENA,s NYMEX energy commodities futures trading.  These applications
require that ENA represent whether its officers, employees, owners, or agents
have a power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in any related
commodity future(s) account either individually or acting with another person
pursuant to express or implied agreement.

Please direct any responses to my paralegal, Tana Jones, via intercompany
email or call her at (713) 853-3399 by the end of business on June 15, 2001
if you have any power of attorney, control or have a financial interest in
any commodity futures account (other than an ENA or other trading affiliate
account).

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A COMMODITY FUTURES ACCOUNT, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESPOND TO
THIS REQUEST.


WILLIAMS, JASON C,

You have been selected to participate in the Mid Year 2001 Performance Management process.  Your feedback plays an important role in the process, and your participation is critical to the success of Enron's Performance Management goals.

To complete a request for feedback, access PEP at http://pep.enron.com and select Complete Feedback from the Main Menu.  You may begin providing feedback immediately and are requested to have all feedback forms completed by Friday, May 25, 2001.

If you have any questions regarding PEP or your responsibility in the process, please contact the PEP Help Desk at:
Houston:  1.713.853.4777, Option 4 or email: perfmgmt@enron.com
London:  44.207.783.4040, Option 4 or email: pep.enquiries@enron.com

Thank you for your participation in this important process.

The following is a CUMULATIVE list of employee feedback requests with a status of "OPEN."  Once you have submitted or declined an employee's request for feedback, their name will no longer appear on this list.  NOTE: YOU WILL RECEIVE THIS MESSAGE EACH TIME YOU ARE SELECTED AS A REVIEWER.

Employee Name:
RYDER, JAMES
STRAIGHT, MARGIE


577133 - I just added APB for the broker.

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
04/10/2001 02:28 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: apb

missing deal for chris
buy duke
11th
25 mw
325.00
np15
off peak


The following note is from Kim Watson:

Please review the attached proposal for Pemex (MGI) for firm transportation on Transwestern.

Please forward all comments back to Steve Harris.  We would like to send this out today, so your prompt attention would be appreciated.  I am on vacation until October 8 and Mark will not return to the office until October 1.

Steve, once all comments have been incorporated, please forward to Jorge at Pemex at his email address of jrojas@gas.pemex.com

Please feel free to call me on my cell phone to discuss (713-416-5059)

Thanks, Kim

Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax


Sure makes sense.  One concern.  If they buy up to 80% of load, do we run the
risk of "stranded cost" problem later down the road when we hit the
backwardated part of the curve.  Hinges on the term of the contract.  Sort of
chicken and egg problem.  If the buy for short terms, the prices will be
high, if they buy for longer terms, the prices will be lower, but the risk of
stranded cost rises.  Thoughts?

	Margaret Carson
	10/18/2000 08:33 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: IDEA RE ISSUE OF UTILS IN CALIF WANTING $100 PRICE CAP

Jeff   Is  there   merit  in  California's  regulators     requiring  that
utilities first  buy up blocks
of firm  power   to meet,  say, 80 percent of their load  before  they are
allowed a
price  cap (be  it   $100  or whatever)    on the  rest.  It certainly  makes
lously  economic  sense
to  price    cap ALL of it..    Even  pro-utility commissioners  can  see
through  that kind of  bail out  strategy  ..
your comments appreciated ...   Margaret...


Sell 'em all.  There's no turnaround in sight.

What's going on??

KR


My location is EB 3224C and ext 31755


If you're looking for a reasonable, reliable general contractor
with lots of experience in everything from carpentry, tile, fencing,
plumbing, electrical, painting, to additions or remodeling call Ray
Fedor 281-536-4552.  Old houses are his speciality.

He should be added to our list of recommended contractors.

Frank Williams
713-526-3518
6xx Willard

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iZp8OC/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/NoOolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
emca-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Return-Path: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
Received: from  rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (rly-ye02.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.199])
by air-ye02.mx.aol.com (v73.12) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 May 2000 18:05:21 -0400
Received: from  postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-ye02.mx.aol.com (v71.10) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 May 2000 18:05:02 -0400
Received: from mailman.enron.com (mailman.enron.com [192.168.189.66]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id RAA16047 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:05:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from dserv1.ect.enron.com (dserv1.ect.enron.com [172.16.1.37]) by
mailman.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/corp-1.03) with ESMTP id RAA03182 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from notes.ect.enron.com (ecthou_gt2.corp.enron.com [172.16.4.33])
by dserv1.ect.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA27377 for
<vkaminski@aol.com>; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:05:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by notes.ect.enron.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))
id 862568DD.00794B9A ; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:52 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ECT
From: "Vince J Kaminski" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
To: vkaminski@aol.com
Message-ID: <862568DD.00794A86.00@notes.ect.enron.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:04:47 -0500
Subject: Conference May 31 on Energy Derivatives in Toronto
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Unknown

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 05/12/2000
05:07
PM ---------------------------

Phelim Boyle <pboyle@uwaterloo.ca> on 05/12/2000 03:47:59 PM

To:   Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com, Amy Aldous <aaldous@watarts.uwaterloo.ca>,
      pconcessi@deloitte.com, ROSS Raymond -CMMRCL OPS
      <raymond.ross@ontariopowergeneration.com>
cc:
Subject:  Conference May 31 on Energy Derivatives in Toronto

 Vince
Thanks again for agreeing to speak at our conference.
It is attracting considerable interest. .

Is it possible for you to send us copies of your slides by May 18 to meet our
deadline for
preparing the material.? If you have? a related paper available that covers
some of the same material that would do instead but
naturally we would prefer the slides.

I would like to mention again the?? the pre-conference dinner at
7 pm on Sunday May 30 for the speakers
We hope very much you can be present

I was also hoping you would be available for the last? session of the day to
be
panel member
The provisional title? is
Managing Risk in Illiquid Markets
The chair is Pat Concessi of Deloitte and Touche
The panel last from 3.30 until 4.30 and we would like panel members should
speaker for
a few minutes and take questions from the floor.

In the meantime if you have any questions please let Amy or myself know

Sincerely
Phelim P Boyle

--
Phelim P Boyle
Director
Centre for Advanced Studies in Finance,
University of Waterloo,
Waterloo, Ontario
Canada N2L 3G1

Tel? 519 885 1211(6513)
Fax 519 888 7562


Jana,

We should have tomorrow the movie schedule for the weekend.
Saturday around 5:00 p.m. would work for me.

Vince

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 04/13/2000 09:49:11 AM
To: vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: movie

Vince
Let's talk tomorrow and see what time that movie starts and when we should
meet, ok?

jana


Could you please put together a combined presentation : Enron's strategy and
the need for open access on the transmission system?
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
09:18 AM ---------------------------

"Steve Reynolds" <SREYNO@state.wy.us> on 05/23/2001 09:40:11 AM
To: <skean@enron.com>
cc: <sland@enron.com>

Subject: Wyoming Energy Commission subject

Steve, it was great to meet you and hear your remarks yesterday.  For the
speaking engagement next Wednesday, I would like you to focus upon the Enron
strategic model of virtual integration of market forces in the evolution of
energy development.  Wyoming represents a huge material resource base and the
commission is charged with the development and promotion of such.  But the
Governor's message is that we cannot see ourselves as producers and exporters
in the traditional sense.  We will continue to have the status of a colony if
we do not recognize the new dynamics of how these market places are
evolving.  If you set the stage with a presentation of Enron strategy, then
we will discuss how a state, with its agencies and auathority can play a role
in this evolution.  I have set your time for 45 minutes, which can include a
short Qand A period.  But your message can be as succint as you can make it
and get the point across.  You may have to present the Enron case a number of
different ways, but the Governor will give you latitude to make the point.
You will be welcome to participate in a following panel which will address
role playing by the state and the commission.  Plan to join us for lunch.  If
you need more detail, let me know.  Thanks!  Stephen


---------------------- Forwarded by Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000
11:38 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Kevin Meredith                           11/17/2000 10:35 AM

To: Eve Puckett/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Confirms

Eve,

On these confirms, the counterparty is simply calculating what the premium is
on the option.  As long as they are not crossing anything out and writing in
the decimal amount, the confirms are okay to execute.

Thanks.
Kevin


Summary of what we discussed the other night:

Background:

power -- power prices have moved above $1000/mwh in the Northwest and are
showing $600-700 for the first quarter of 01; forward prices in California
have also moved well above the "soft cap" of $150.  Sellers are exporting
power from California to the Northwest.

gas -- balance of the month gas in California was trading at $26-27 with Jan
trading at $19, feb at $12-14 and Summer at $8.

The Cal gas and power utilities remain unhedged (price caps are in place for
retail power and utilities continue to buy power from the ISO and PX while
gas utilities, we believe, are primarily buying at spot prices even under
their long term deals).  The power utilities will continue to book large
deferrals and gas utilities will be passing costs through a month or two
after incurring them. The impact of the gas price increases will begin
showing up in Jan billings to consumers.

curtailment rules (gas):  More work to be done here, but it appears that gas
utilities will curtail deliveries in the following order:  interruptible
first (with some priority for cogens); firm service (with utilities
alternating or rolling between generation load and nongeneration load); and
core customers last.  Curtailment rules apparently allow the utilities to
confiscate gas sold to direct access customers


||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

C L I C K Z   T O D A Y
Monday, December 11 2000

The Internet's Leading Resource      http://www.clickz.com/
for Doing Business Online___________________________________

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This e-mail is optimized for mono-spaced typefaces.
For maximum legibility, specify Courier as your e-mail font.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
for subscription options, see the bottom of this mailing.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-------------------------- T A B L E   O F   C O N T E N T S

<> Calling All Dropouts
by Kim MacPherson
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2980

<> Slandering Online Advertising
by Jeffrey Graham
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2989

<> Will XML Standards Help Make the B2B Connection?
by Philip Say
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2992

<> Scattered Attention Loses Sales
by Nick Usborne
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2987

<> Lessons in Customer Service From the Web
by Kim Brooks
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2993

<> CD-R Makes MP3 A-OK
by  Studio One Networks
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2983

<> The Future of WAP and Mobile Devices
by Nick Mayhew and Mark Smith
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2995

<> Convergence: What Is It, Anyway?
by Tom Daly and William Smith
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2990

<> Protection for a Broadband Net
by Dana Blankenhorn
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2991

<> At Issue in the Forum Today
by  ClickZ Forum
http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2996

------------------------------------------------------ T O C

/\
//\\  You're not a member of The ClickZ Forum yet?
\\//              Well, you should be! Sign up now at:
\/                      http://clickz.com/sub/entry.html

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>advertisement<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Get consumer input at Web speed

Use InsightExpress to test your creative ideas and better
understand your target market. See results in hours,
all for as little as $450. Let your customers help you to
validate a concept, size a market, evaluate a promotion,
assess price points or test a new tag line. See us @
http://www.insightexpress.com/welcome.asp?s=14&a=224&r=11

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

_______________________________E M A I L   M A R K E T I N G
_____________________________________sponsored by flonetwork
_________________________________k i m   m a c p h e r s o n

Calling All Dropouts

The art of acquiring customers and leads through email is
not always the easiest thing to do. Acquisitions success
boils down to two key items: the offer and the lists. And
how you plan and/or manage each.

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2980

_______________________E M A R K E T I N G   S T R A T E G Y
________________________________________sponsored by Revenio
_________________________________j e f f r e y   g r a h a m

Slandering Online Advertising

It's become fashionable to talk about the demise of online
advertising and falsely link the current market correction
to the idea that online advertising isn't effective.
Nothing could be further from the truth.

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2989

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>advertisement<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Target IT Pros at TechRepublic

TechRepublic is fast becoming the premier web site for IT
gurus. We provide engaging technical content, community
interaction, and because we're partners with Gartner, we can
deliver an IT audience like no other site on the Internet.
Reach IT pros where IT pros go to connect. See our media kit
at http://www.techrepublic.com/mediakit/mediakit.jhtml.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

___________________________________B 2 B   M A R K E T I N G
_______________________________________sponsored by B2BWorks
_________________________________________p h i l i p   s a y

Will XML Standards Help Make the B2B Connection?

It's easy to see the benefits of B2B e-commerce:
accelerated time to market, lower production costs, better
inventory manaement. And that's just to start. What's hard,
though, is achieving supplier and market integration.
Here's where XML standards might help.

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2992

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>advertisement<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Maximize Ecommerce Profitability!

Your driving focus today right now should be preparing for
the hottest Internet retailing season yet. Are you ready? A
fraction of a percent increase in your conversion rate could
mean the difference between being in business at this time
next year, or not. Are you willing to risk it?
Maximize your online ROI today. http://www.angara.com

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

_____________________P E R M I S S I O N   M A R K E T I N G

______________________________________n i c k   u s b o r n
e

Scattered Attention Loses Sales

Sometimes words alone, one after the other, are your best
choice for getting the job done right.

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2987

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>advertisement<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

IF you want to reach B2B buyers THEN GOTO techies.com

Think tech professionals only go online to swap code? 76% of
our 650,000 members influence the purchase of their
companies' computer products and services -- ranging from
desktop PCs to servers If you'd like to get to know this
audience even better, place your ad at techies.com, their
favorite tech career site. For a media kit, go to
http://advertising.techies.com/clickz/index.html.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

_________________C R O S S -  M E D I A  S T R A T E G I E S
_________________________________________k i m   b r o o k s

Lessons in Customer Service From the Web

Although the web hasn't put stores out of business yet, it
does have a few lessons to teach offline retailers.

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2993

_________________________________D I G I T A L   L I V I N G
__________________(c)  s t u d i o   o n e   n e t w o r k s

CD-R Makes MP3 A-OK

This holiday season offers a new breed of MP3 players that
can hold more than ten hours of near-CD quality music with
a cost of about a dollar a disc.

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2983

___________________W I R E L E S S   A P P L I C A T I O N S
_____________n i c k   m a y h e w   &   m a r k   s m i t h

The Future of WAP and Mobile Devices

WAP technology may be over hyped these days, but here are
some very exciting, upcoming possibilities for application
developers and consumers alike.

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2995

_______________________________________C O N V E R G E N C E
_____________t o m   d a l y   &   w i l l i a m   s m i t h

Convergence: What Is It, Anyway?

Few buzzwords are more elusive than "convergence." People
use the term casually to refer to many of the stunning
developments reshaping the media and technology businesses.
But what does it really mean?

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2990

_____________________________e B U S I N E S S   R E P O R T
_____________________________d a n a   b l a n k e n h o r n

Protection for a Broadband Net

Sure, it's great to have broadband access. It's fast, it's
powerful. But power can make you vulnerable. How are we
going to protect a broadband Net?

http://clickz.com/cgi-bin/gt/article.html?article=2991

_____________________________________C L I C K Z   F O R U M
____________________________________sponsored by DoubleClick

At Issue in the Forum Today

Valuable information can be obtained from discussion groups.
Is the online grocer business model sound? Email marketing
can foster customer relationships. Next week's topic --
News Digests.

http://clickzforum.com/

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>advertisement<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Like many online Professionals in the Internet Business,
there's no doubt you're eager to find a website that
delivers the latest breaking news, business reports and
interviews with top Internet industry leaders.

Look no further than BizReport.

BizReport is recognized internationally as a leading online
source for Internet business and e-commerce news. BizReport
attracts a diverse and influential audience to online
professionals such as you.

BizReport is linked by a broad range of online finance and
investment portals, technology companies and e-commerce
sites. Industry CEO's and Internet Business Executives
around the world rely on BizReport.com for in-depth, up to
the minute coverage of the Internet industry. BizReport
reaches a committed group of successful e-commerce
professionals on a daily basis.

What's so great about BizReport is you can find it ALL in
one website - industry features, insightful research and
timely news articles.

BizReport Network also includes adsGuide.com, the most
comprehensive directory and search engine for Internet
advertising, marketing, and commerce services. The directory
provides exceptional coverage of the best marketing and
advertising resources worldwide.

Don't wait. Take a look at a BizReport newsletter today.
Free to subscribe. And, you'll see how easy it is to read.

The stories on the website are "encapsulated" for easy and
fast reading and/or scanning. A subscriber can learn a
week's worth of industry knowledge in just a few minutes.
Both, the newsletter and website, are easy to access and
navigate.

Choose the fresh, cutting edge intelligence of BizReport.com
to stay ahead of the game.
Check it out today - http://www.BizReport.com/clickz/
For text-only newsletters go to
http://www.bizreport.com/cc.pl?url=bizreport.com/clickz/

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

_______________________________________________________
/ ____________________________                          \
\  ____________________________  A b o u t  C l i c k Z  \
\_______________________________________________________/

Founded in 1997 and headquartered in Andover, MA, The
ClickZ Network (http://www.clickz.com/) is a compendium of
resources and advice for helping online marketers do their
jobs more effectively. The Network culls the experiences of
more than 70 contributors to deliver articles each week full
of practical information about online marketing and
e-commerce. ClickZ reaches more than 80,000 subscribers
each business day through e-mail and the Web.

Sponsorship opportunites at ClickZ? Contact:

Jim Kelly  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mailto:jim@clickz.com
National Account Manager

Editorial comments/questions?  Contact:

Ann Handley  . . . . . . . . . . . . . mailto:ann@clickz.com
Chief Content Officer / President

General comments? Contact:

Andrew Bourland . . . . . . . . . . . mailto:andy@clickz.com
CEO / Publisher

Copyright 2000 ClickZ, Inc.           http://www.ClickZ.com/

____________________________________________________________

To modify your subscription or unsubscribe,
login  to ClickZ subscription services
by visting http://clickz.com/sub/entry.html

To quickly unsubscribe, send a blank email to
leave-clickz.today.txt@my.clickz.com

.                                                          .


FYI--Midwest Generation is the renamed  So Cal  sub (started out as Edison
Mission Energy) that was formed to purchase the coal fired plants from Com
Ed,now Exelon.  They are obligated to provide power to Com Ed/Exelon through
power supply contracts into the year 2004.
----- Forwarded by Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron on 06/05/2001 04:24 AM -----

	"Freddi L. Greenberg" <flgreenberg@flglaw.com>
	06/04/2001 03:25 PM

		 To: Joe.Bizzano@nrgenergy.com, Jane Cahill <jane.cahill@neg.pge.com>, Jerry
Erjavec <gerjavec@indeck-energy.com>, Susan.M.Landwehr@enron.com, Melissa
Lavinson <Melissa.Lavinson@neg.pge.com>, "Jana M. Martin"
<jmartin@TENASKA.com>, John Stauffacher <JJST@dynegy.com>, Dick Suslick
<rjsuslick@wpspower.com>, Doug Oglesby <doao@chevron.com>, "Samantha Slater"
<SSLATER@epsa.org>, Greg Pakela <gapa@dynegy.com>, Jennifer Chamberlain
<jnnc@chevron.com>, Mike Malloy <mmalloy@utilicorp.com>, Priya Devaguptapu
<priyad@calpine.com>, Doug McFarlan <dmcfarlan@mwgen.com>, Steve Brick
<steve.brick@neg.pge.com>, Barbara Hueter <bhueter@enron.com>, Jim Orlando
<jorlando@coral-energy.com>, Janine.Migden@enron.com, Gary_Edwards@dom.com,
Bob.Lewis@mirant.com, Donald.Lassere@enron.com, D.Anderson@pecorp.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Crain's Article - California Utility's Revamp is no Threat to
Illinois

Letters to the Editor
June 04, 2001
CALIF. UTILITY'S REVAMP IS NO THREAT TO ILLINOIS

Crain's does readers a disservice in an editorial by stoking groundless fears
that electricity supplied by Midwest Generation is somehow threatened by a
debt refinancing of Edison International, our ultimate parent company ("Feds
must ensure Illinois isn't singed in Calif. crisis," May 28).

Midwest Generation, based in Chicago, stands on its own financially and has
its own set of lenders and covenants that would prevent financial
consequences related to the California energy crisis. Our contracts to
provide electricity to ComEd give us the strongest possible financial
incentive to invest in our plants.

Under the refinancing approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
the stock of Edison Mission Energy would be used as collateral by its parent,
Edison International, to achieve favorable terms for the refinanced debt.
Edison International also owns the Southern California Edison utility, which
has been plunged into well-documented financial hardship.

Midwest Generation stock would not be used as collateral. In fact, the
refinancing actually provides yet another layer of insulation between Midwest
Generation and Edison International.

Georgia Nelson
President
Midwest Generation
Chicago

Thank you,

Jennie Peebles
Assistant to Freddi L. Greenberg
Office of Freddi L. Greenberg
1603 Orrington Avenue
Suite 1050
Evanston, Illinois 60201-5000
p. 847-864-4010
f. 847-864-4037
flgreenberg@flglaw.com


Guys, we appreciate your efforts on this project but we will not be needing
your services as owners engineer on the Vitro project.  I will honor our
agreement on the sell down; however, we have sufficient technical talent
internally and externally to manage this job.  I see very little effort in
continuing to waste internal time in ENA and EECC on this discussion.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000
01:26 PM ---------------------------

	Enron de Mexico

	From:  Max Yzaguirre @ ENRON                           08/18/2000 12:58 PM

To: Steve Irvin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert P Virgo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wayne Mays/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vitro Project

Steve and Bob:

I know that John Normand told you yesterday that he had sign-off up his chain
of command on the deal you negotiated with him.  However, Dick apparently
does not agree with John or has had second thoughts.  Please review the
attached memo and let's discuss next steps.  It would also be helpful if one
of you would get a download from John as to the reason behind this change in
position.

Best regards - Max

Note to Dave:  I suggest that Steve, Bob and I take this up with Dick before
involving you.  This is a 180 degree turn from what we had been discussing
with Dick, John Normand and the rest of their team.  Dick and I were supposed
to have a 1 pm video call today to confirm the deal that had been worked out,
but he cancelled the call when he sent his e-mail to me.  We'll figure out
what's up and keep you posted./ Max

---------------------- Forwarded by Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron on 08/18/2000
12:42 PM ---------------------------
From: Dick Westfahl@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 08/18/2000 12:27 PM
To: Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Vitro Project


Vince, both Matt and April think that this type of research would be
value-additive to EBS.  I will be out all next week in a meeting with John
Griebling and other on a deal that is being worked out.  I understand that
you are following up with HR on all of our summer intern offers. Please make
sure Palo is given an offer and that he will work with April and Matt (he did
talk to Matt) on the topics that April and I suggested.

Regards,

Ravi.
----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 02/20/00 12:41
AM -----

	Matt Harris
	02/17/00 08:08 PM

		 To: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc: April Hodgson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 Subject: Re: Summer Intern: Paulo Oliveira

Looks interesting.

I would guess that there is a TON of research available (from @Home, AOL,
Roadrunner, Real, Microsoft, etc.) on Broadband's impact on the strategic
value of web properties.  Compiling this would be very helpful.

MH

	Ravi Thuraisingham
	02/17/00 12:15 PM

		 To: April Hodgson/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Matt
Harris/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: Summer Intern: Paulo Oliveira

Hi April & Matt, here is additional information on the summer intern that
I've mentioned.

Matt, I know you know nothing about this! My discussion with April on the
possible research topic let me (& April) to believe that you would provide
great input on what the student can work on while he is here.

Regards,

Ravi.
EBS Research
----- Forwarded by Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications on 02/17/00 02:09
PM -----

	Stinson Gibner@ECT
	02/17/00 11:23 AM

		 To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Ravi Thuraisingham/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Thomas D
Gros/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Summer Intern: Paulo Oliveira

Vince:  Here is the information that I have on Paulo.    He would be slated
to work for the summer with April Hodgeson and Matt Harris on how streaming
media products may add value to advertising or some related area.
Actually, he would also be a good fit for helping to think ways to analyze
our Enron On-line data.    I have asked if he can send a resume.   In the
mean time, most of his relevant information is attached below.

--Stinson

---------------------- Forwarded by Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT on 02/17/2000
11:14 AM ---------------------------

Paulo Rocha e Oliveira <paulo@MIT.EDU> on 02/10/2000 12:04:56 PM
To: "Stinson Gibner" <Stinson.Gibner@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Trip to Houston

Stinson,

Thank you for your e-mail.  My phone number is (617) 492-9551.

I graduated from Princeton University in 1996 (mathematics), and came
straight to MIT for a
Ph.D. in Operations Management at the Sloan Schoolof Management.  In my first
three years I took all the required coursework in mathematics,
optimization, stochastic processes, etc., as well as a number of courses in
psychology (at MIT and Harvard).  I am working with Prof. Gabriel Bitran,
and I am interested in the mathematical modeling of service operations.  In
particular, I am interested in the interaction between customers and
companies (hence the interest in psychology).  The (tentative) title of my
PhD thesis is "Pricing Substitute Products on the Internet", and I am
sending you the summary which I sent to Tom Gros a few weeks ago that will
give you an idea of what this research is about.

Thanks again, and I'm looking forward to meeting you and your research
group next week.

Paulo

Pricing Substitute Products on the Internet

Objective:

To develop new tools to decide pricing policies for goods and services sold
on
the internet.

Motivation:

This research is motivated by the fact that traditional choice and
optimization
models are not appropriate for internet-related businesses.  The technological
innovations associated with the internet brought about an overload of
information
which inevitably affects the ways in which consumers make choices.
Furthermore,
companies have a great deal of influence on how much information consumers can
have access to.

The problem of pricing substitute products is an important strategic issue
faced
by internet companies.  Consumers usually search for generic products (e.g.
VCRs
or computers) without knowing exactly what they will buy.  Companies can show
different products and different prices to each consumer.  This type of
flexibility
was not available until the internet came about.

The problem of pricing substitute products is not unique to the internet.  The
methodology developed by this research should be transferable to a number of
other settings, such as pricing services.  Services are unique, and there are
many cases where customers will only buy one of many services offered by a
given company.  Our model will help companies decide which services to offer
to which customers and how much to charge for these services.

Research Strategy:

Our research strategy is to divide the pricing problem into two components
which can be combined to generate optimal pricing strategies.  These
components are choice models and optimization models.

Choice Models:

Choice models describe how customers make choices.  The management literature
draws on two main sources for these models: psychology and economics.  The
common approach in psychology models is to use what are called heuristic
elimination methods.  These methods consist of the elimination of options
based on the sequential elimination of features until only one choice
remains.
These methods tend to be very context-specific and do not lend themselves very
easily to mathematical analysis.  Economists focus on utility-maximing models
that are significantly more mathematically tractable than psychological
models.
The most common economic model of choice is the logit model.  The problem with
these types of models is that they are not very accurate reflections of how
consumer make choices on the internet.  The first step in our research will
be
to develop choice models that capture the interactions going on between
customers
and companies on the internet.

Optimization:

Traditionally, the optimization problem consists of maximizing revenue over a
certain planning horizon.  On the internet, the problem of maximizing revenue
still exists, but there is also a need to learn about customers.  Short term
profit is based on sales, but long term profit is based on how well you know
your customers and are able to retain them.  The optimization problem must
therefore include a short term component (sales) and a long term component
(learning).


Dear Errol,

	Please try the latest version of Power PortCalc :

	/prod/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr.new

	Thanks,

Norman.

********************
This is the last email for Power PortCalc release, you are on the distribution list for the next release.

Dear All,

	A PortCalc Production Fix ( v 4.1.9.1 ) executable (    /prod/egs-home/ermt/bin/pwrcalc_slr.new     ) has been released.

	This executable is based on the last Production PortCalc. ( pwrcalc_slr  :  v4.1.9  08/20/2001).

	Version 4.1.9.1 .

	Changes Affecting All:

Asian Options - Fixed the issue that single-average-period Asian option did not get correct the liquidation value.

Asian Options - Fixed VATR table issue for Risk Trac.

Volatility Smile - Fixed the issue in volatility smile calculation for previous day, so that the prior day MtM matches the results from the Prior Effective Date calc.

Deals with the same desk  ( in both Primary and Secondary counterparty)  will not be evaluated, and PortCalc reports are not generated for those deals.

	Changes Affecting East:

Added support for Simulation Trading Portfolio - this will evaluate deals like the East portfolio.

	Changes Affecting Emission:

Added support for COAL Portfolio - this will evaluate deals like the East portfolio. This is for handling Power deals, not coal deals as the name implies.

	Please test the executable, and let us know if you encounter any problems.

	Thanks,

Norman.
x36976


Attached please find a consolidated weekly report for EJOT. Please note that
not all individual reports were received. Thanks,

Eddie


I think Mary's idea is good - like with Calpine, we can just let them know that the draft is only for consideration.

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cook, Mary
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 11:11 AM
To:	St. Clair, Carol; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	RE: Master Netting, Setoff and Security Agreement
Importance:	High

I am overloaded on end of quarter deals and market disruption etc.  I suggest just sending out the current status of the form to begin negotiations, with the suggestion by comment that the parties may wish to develop a CSA type of attachment.  Then I can catch up to you on the flip side and Tanya will see that things are moving forward.  What do you think?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	St. Clair, Carol
Sent:	Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:56 AM
To:	Cook, Mary; Sager, Elizabeth
Subject:	FW: Master Netting, Setoff and Security Agreement

Mary and Elizabeth:
Tanya is desperate for me to send something to Williams and I keep putting her off.  I have run out of delay tactics.  Any suggestions on what I should send out?

Carol St. Clair
EB 4539
713-853-3989 (phone)
713-646-8537 (fax)
281-382-1943 (cell phone)
281-890-8862 (home fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keohane, Peter
Sent:	Tuesday, September  18, 2001 6:59 PM
To:	St. Clair, Carol
Cc:	Crawford, Sharon
Subject:	FW: Master Netting, Setoff and Security Agreement

It has taken some time, but attached is the for of Master Netting Agreement, blacklined and annotated to incorporate Robert Anderson's and my comments.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"ROBERT ANDERSON" <robert.anderson@blakes.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22ROBERT+20ANDERSON+22+20+3Crobert+2Eanderson+40blakes+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, September 18, 2001 5:50 PM
To:	Keohane, Peter
Subject:	Master Netting, Setoff and Security Agreement

Attached is a clean copy and a blacklined version

A. Robert Anderson
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
3500, 855 Second Street SW
Calgary, AB  T2P 4J8

Tel: 403.260-9624
Fax: 403.260.9700
E-mail: raa@blakes.com

This e-mail communication is confidential and legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown above or by return e-mail and delete this communication and any copy immediately. Thank you.

 - 30389944.DOC << File: 30389944.DOC >>
 - 30395543.DOC << File: 30395543.DOC >>


fyi.

Please follow up to make sure these $ are going to the correct p&l.

---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 05:02 PM
---------------------------
From: Molly Sumrow on 08/14/2000 04:35 PM
To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Update

The first invoice for $5.4 million went out a couple of weeks ago.  CES came
back to us and said they were not going to pay.  They claimed that the total
of all of the invoices to this date that they have already paid had covered
that amount.  I have researched all of their invoices, and it looks like
there was a demand invoice in the system for the month of June for
approximately $6 million to much.  CES incorporated a credit for that invoice
in with the charge for $5.4 million, netting out to approximately $600,000.
I am meeting with CES on Thursday to see if we are in agreement.  The other
invoice for $7.5 million was sent out last week, CES is in agreement and the
payment should be here shortly.
   If you have any questions don't hesitate to call me.

Molly
x34249

Robert Superty
08/14/2000 04:06 PM
To: Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Update

Molly, please see Scott's note below and give us an update.

Thanks - Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000
04:01 PM ---------------------------

Scott Neal
08/14/2000 03:18 PM
To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CES Update

What is the status of these invoices/payments?

Robert Superty
08/03/2000 04:02 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Molly Sumrow/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Update

FYI - ongoing CES reconciliation. At this point we will be receiving app.
$5.4M (invoice sent on 7/27) with another $7.5M to be billed to them next
week.

Still more to come, for details read the attached from Molly.

Bob
---------------------- Forwarded by Robert Superty/HOU/ECT on 08/03/2000
03:52 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Molly Sumrow                           08/03/2000 03:47 PM

To: Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CES Update

Attached is the current status of the CES reconciliation.  Please call me if
you have any questions.

Thank You,

Molly


This deal lis entered against the PX index.  We have been told by Chris
Foster that this index is going away.  Can you check and see if this is the
correct index?

Thanks!


----- Forwarded by Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000 01:01 PM -----

	Kal Shah@ECT
	10/12/2000 11:31 AM

		 To: Mark Palmer, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Meredith
Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: EnronOnline: ENRONONLINE-STYLE TRADING PLATFORMS COULD HARM MARKET,
ALTRA OFFICIAL SAYS

fyi.

Kal

ELECTRONIC TRADING
ENRONONLINE-STYLE TRADING PLATFORMS COULD HARM MARKET, ALTRA OFFICIAL
SAYS
Mark Davidson, Lincolnshire, Ill.

09/15/2000
Inside F.E.R.C.'s Gas Market Report
4
(Copyright 2000 McGraw-Hill, Inc.)

  Officials from the two predominant electronic gas trading systems squared
off this week after the head of gas trading for Altra Energy Technologies Inc.
accused proprietary systems such as EnronOnline of being ``potentially
dangerous to the long-term health of the industry.''

  Scott Coleman, Altra's director of natural-gas trading systems, told
Interchange Energy Group's LDC Forum in Lincolnshire, Ill., that proprietary
systems -- those run by market participants -- have the ``potential for
short-term price manipulation'' by the operators, which typically set the
bid/ask spreads and are on either the buy or sell side of every deal.
  And because those systems don't provide anonymity -- the operator knows the
counterparty's identity as soon as a deal is consummated -- they allow the
operator to gain market intelligence by monitoring the trading patterns and
market positions of its competitors, Coleman asserted.

  While acknowledging that he is ``slightly biased'' toward independent
systems such as his company's Altrade, Coleman said he fears that if one
proprietary system gains too big a share of the electronic trading market, ``I
think you can draw the conclusion that they will be able to control markets
short term.'' However, ``long term, the market always corrects itself.''

  Coleman did not assail EnronOnline specifically, although he did note that
Enron Corp.'s eight-month-old trading platform is by far the largest
proprietary system and is growing rapidly -- mainly because it's free of
charge and simple to use with its ``one-click'' approach to price discovery
and spot dealmaking.

  Coleman argued that independent electronic platforms such as Altrade -- most
of which charge a transaction fee -- are more reliable because they
essentially act as third-party brokers, matching up anonymous traders that set
the bid/ask spreads themselves. Altrade, unlike EnronOnline, does not take a
market position or assume title to gas traded on its system.

  EnronOnline Director Bob Shults rebutted Coleman's assertions regarding
proprietary systems. ``We provide liquidity in the marketplace. . . . I don't
think it's detrimental to the gas business at all,'' he insisted. ``I don't
think Enron has the ability to move markets; you don't have the market
manipulation that [Coleman] alludes to.''

  Shults maintained that if competitors thought price manipulation was
occurring, they would bail out immediately. Instead, competitors' use of
EnronOnline is soaring; the system now performs about $1 billion/day in
transactions, much of it in the gas and power sectors.

  ``We put the bid/ask spread out there and if you like it, you can use it. If
you don't like it, you don't,'' Shults added. Asked if EnronOnline tracks its
competitors' trading patterns in order to gain an upper hand in the market,
Shults simply answered, ``No.''

  Dennis Cornwell, senior vice president of risk management and trading for
Conoco Gas and Power Marketing, said his company -- which now does about 15%
of its gas deals electronically -- welcomes both proprietary and independent
systems and spreads out its trading activity among EnronOnline, Altrade and
other platforms.

  Cornwell, however, acknowledged that Conoco limits the number of deals it
does on any proprietary exchange in part because of the concerns Coleman
expressed.

  Meanwhile, Coleman asserted that a third type of e-commerce platform,
consortium exchanges, aren't likely to succeed in the gas and power industries
because of regulatory concerns about antitrust violations and because similar
multifirm exchanges in other industries have ``failed to materialize'' after
being announced. Also, Coleman cited the difficulty of several large companies
``agreeing on how to operate.''

  Several consortium systems have been proposed in North America, including
IntercontinentalExchange, an Internet trading platform founded by BP, Royal
Dutch/Shell Group, Totalfina Elf Group and four financial investment firms and
subsequently joined by six major gas and electricity marketers (IFGMR, 4 Aug,
20).

  As for electronic trading as a whole, Shults, Cornwell and Coleman all
agreed that while it won't entirely replace conventional methods, it will
become the dominant way of buying and selling gas and electricity within a few
years.

  Coleman said electronic trading ultimately results in saved time, lower
prices, better price discovery and ``just plain competition for the traders'
attention span. It's going to be tougher to get a trader on the phone. This
may depersonalize the business a little bit, but that is the way it's going to
go.''

  But Coleman added that the proliferation of electronic energy commerce will
create a whole new set of job opportunities. ``The human being will be what
holds all of this online trading together,'' he said.

  The speakers also agreed that most of the 20 or so electronic platforms
operating or in development aren't likely to survive the intense competition
and will either go out of business or be absorbed by another company within a
couple of years.

Folder Name: EnronOnline
Relevance Score on Scale of 100: 95

______________________________________________________________________

To review or revise your folder, visit http://www.djinteractive.com or
contact Dow Jones Customer Service by e-mail at custom.news@bis.dowjones.com
or by phone at 800-369-7466. (Outside the U.S. and Canada, call 609-452-1511
or contact your local sales representative.)
______________________________________________________________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved


yes we are going


been on vacation.  i'm back.  would you like me to call?

Tom Chapman@ECT
08/21/2000 07:19 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: California

Jeff-

This is a guy from South Carolina who works with a bunch of industrial
customers there.  At the last GridSouth meeting, he cornered Joe Connor and I
and asked us about California and the price spikes there.  I told him a bunch
of reasons why the price spikes happened, but it appears that he wants more
information.

I would appreciate it if you would call him or if you could find someone else
out there in CA to give him a call.  He is not super sophisticated, but he is
the representative of some big clients, so I try to keep him happy.  [I think
he represents Michelin and Nucor steel--two huge energy users in South
Carolina.]

Thank you very much.

Tom Chapman
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Chapman/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 07:16
PM ---------------------------

"Bob Knight" <bknight@brettpr.com> on 08/21/2000 12:54:30 PM
To: <tom.chapman@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: California

Tom

Do you have a contact in California that I can continue my questioning about
the situation out there?

Bob Knight
Brett Public Relations
864-239-0616 Greenville
803-765-1955 Columbia
803-608-4207 mobile

 - Bob Knight.vcf


I  may be on the road tomorrow (won't know until later), so something early
afternoon Friday would be best for me.

Thanks,

Kay


I haven't heard back from you about my EOL database.  I will hope that your
lack of response means that you are busy, not in disapproval of my lovely
database...


The Strategy Meeting previously scheduled for tomorrow, November 14, 2000,
has been cancelled.  If you have any questions, please feel free to call Kay
@ 713-853-0643.

Thanks,

Dave


Dear Market Participant,

Technical Bulletin # 78 - Penalties for Persistent Undergeneration -
is being distributed for Market Participant  comment.  The
Technical Bulletin will be posted to the NYISO web site
following the comment period.  Please note that the penalties
described in this Technical Bulletin are effective as of
October 1, 2001.

The purpose of our Technical Bulletins is to facilitate participation
in the NYISO by communicating various NYISO concepts,
techniques, and processes to Market Participants before they
can be formally documented in a NYISO manual.

Please forward comments on this Technical Bulletin, via email,
by 5PM on Tuesday, October 2, 2001 to:

Peter Lemme
NYISO Customer Technical Services
plemme@nyiso.com

(See attached file: TB_78_draft.pdf)
 - TB_78_draft.pdf


Guys:
Here are some questions from PG&E via CSFB.  I will be sending another set of
questions shortly.  Please let me know how you would like to handle these
questions going forward.  Talk to you soon.
Ben
(713) 853-7998
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/22/2000
09:23 AM ---------------------------

"Heckler, James" <james.heckler@csfb.com> on 09/22/2000 07:46:26 AM
To: "'benjamin.rogers@enron.com'" <benjamin.rogers@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: FW: Pastoria

-----Original Message-----
From: Heckler, James
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:45 AM
To: 'ben.rogers@enron.com'; 'don.miller@enron.com'
Cc: Al-Farisi, Omar; Modi, Rishi
Subject: FW: Pastoria

Ben,

Can you get someone to give us an answer on this today, so we may get back
to Tom this afternoon.

Thanks,
James

-----Original Message-----
From: Iaconetti, Louis
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 8:38 AM
To: Modi, Rishi; Al-Farisi, Omar; Heckler, James
Subject: Fw: Pastoria

Please forward on to Enron.  Include Don Miller, but remember that he is out
of the ofice today and try to get it to somebody who can respond today.

 Thanks.

--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

-----Original Message-----
From: Favinger, Thomas <thomas.favinger@neg.pge.com>
To: 'louis.iaconetti@csfb.com' <louis.iaconetti@csfb.com>
Sent: Fri Sep 22 08:22:06 2000
Subject: Pastoria

Is the major maintenance reserve estimate based on a negotiated Long Term
Services Agreement (LTSA)?  If so, will it be in place and transfer with
PEF?

Are spare parts for the first major overhaul included anywhere in the
capital cost estimate or are they assumed to be purchased through the
maintenance reserve estimate (i.e. the LTSA) charge?

Thomas G. Favinger
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20814-6161
Ph 301-280-6231
Fx 301-280-6911

PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility.  Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission.  Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - wssinfo.txt


For those of you calling outside of the U.S., I have a new number for you to
use.  Please dial (805) 240-9673, passcode remains the same-666897.


not really and no

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fraser, Jennifer
Sent:	Tuesday, October 02, 2001 5:00 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	eol and you and limit orders

do you get many limit orders during the agas? does it help?


Ken Lay has approved the attached expense report for Rosalee Fleming.


I will be in early tomorrow because I have to leave at 4 p.m. for a 4:30 appointment.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Holly
Sent:	Monday, October 01, 2001 2:51 PM
To:	Bailey, Susan; Boyd, Samantha; Cook, Mary; Farrell, Keegan; George, Carolyn; Gonzalez, Esmeralda; Gray, Barbara N.; Greenberg, Mark; Griffin, Vanessa; Heard, Marie; Hendry, Brent; Jones, Tana; Keiser, Holly; Koehler, Anne C.; Leite, Francisco Pinto; Nelson, Cheryl; Panus, Stephanie; Sayre, Frank; Shackleton, Sara; Spencer, Becky; Taylor, Mark E (Legal)
Subject:	SWAP Calendar as of 10/01/01

 << File: SWAP_Calendar.pub >>

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


I am not aware of any other conflict with schedules.  I suggest we go ahead
with the meeting.

Molly_Sample@eott.com on 04/24/2001 04:22:57 PM
To: Stan_Horton@eott.com, Dana_Gibbs@eott.com
cc: Walt_Zimmerman@eott.com

Subject: Board Meeting on May 10

As you are both aware, we have a board meeting scheduled for Thursday, May
10 at 1:30.  The Audit Committee is scheduled to meet at 11:30 that day and
the Compensation Committee at 1:00.  All meetings are at the Enron
building.

Walt has just learned that John Duncan, Dee Osborne and Ken Lay are not
available to attend any of these meetings.  This leaves two out of three
for the Audit Committee and just enough for a quorum on the board meeting.
Walt is looking at possibly scheduling the Comp Committee for the day
before, but will confirm his plans on Thursday and will notify you if that
changes.

I am telling you all of this to advise you that if any of the remaining
board members, being the two of you, Dan Whitty and Ted Gaylord, are not
available, we will not be able to have the board meeting.   Walt recommends
we go forward with the date as scheduled, unless either of you is aware
that one of the four will not be available, or you would rather move the
date.

Please let me know your thoughts on this.  Thanks.

Molly Sample
VP & General Counsel
EOTT Energy Corp.
713-993-5027
fax 713-402-2806


Ditto Credit.

Thanks,

Shari

	Tana Jones
	03/14/2001 05:47 PM

		 To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shari
Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-14-01

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/14/01 05:45 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/14/01 05:33 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 03-14-01

Please see attached.


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041015.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 15 / Preferred:  24.00 / Final:  23.97)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_DESERT
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Rhino here.


Charlie,

Thanks a lot. It was a very quick response.
Steve Horn was greatly impressed.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  V Charles Weldon                           12/05/2000 11:07 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Bloomberg Request

Vince,

Mr. Horn's request has been taken care of.  He has the data he wanted and
knows how to call it up on his Bloomberg terminal in the future.

Charlie


eSource presents Free Global Energy Markets Presentation:

June. 5 	 9:00 -  9:30 AM	EB 5C2
June. 5 	 10:00 -  10:30 AM 	EB 5C2

Global Energy Markets
Global Energy Markets is an information service that gives you access to updated information and analysis whenever you need it.

Global Energy Markets provides many different news feeds and data sources in one service.  In addition, Global Energy Markets provides useful online databases for finding articles, projects and companies.

Each service is available by global region.  Services include the Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe/CIS and the Middle East.  Each service includes four key modules.

The first core module is the energy news.  The news comes from Reuters, Dow Jones, Energy24x, BBC, AP, AFP, and others.  This is an all-in-one regional news service.  The other three modules are useful databases for finding news articles, project information and companies.  The second module is the Global Energy Projects Database.  The third module is the Global Energy News Archive.  The fourth is the Energy Companies Directory.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/globalenergymarkets.pdf

Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at 5-7928
No Shows will be charged $50.00
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for additional training sessions and vendor presentations.

http://esource.enron.com

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


Monday the 11th is fantastic with me!!!?
>From: "Jennifer Bowles"
>To: merharp@hotmail.com, Sarahberry819@yahoo.com, Lisa.A.Meador@chase.com,
ashleastu@aol.com, julianna.grisham@halliburton.com, sscott5@enron.com,
sarah_c_buck@hotmail.com, rebeccacooke@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: A Christmas Tasters
>Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:31:39 -0600
>
>Hello everyone! I would love to have dinner and exchange gifts....
>I talked to Lisa last night and I am volunteering at the MFA on
>Tuesday, December the 12th... I was wondering if we could have it on
>Monday the 11th??? We could start our week fresh! :o)
>
>Let me know if this works for your schedules... I'm sorry for being
>THAT person...
>
>Hope everyone's doign well and.... Happy Thanksgiving!!!
>
>Love,
>
>Jen
>
>
>>From:
>>To: jkbowles@hotmail.com, ashleastu@aol.com,
>>julianna.grisham@halliburton.com, sscott5@enron.com,
>>sarah_c_buck@hotmail.com, rebeccacooke@hotmail.com
>>Subject: A Christmas Tasters
>>Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:55:23 -0600
>>
>>
>>
>>Hey guys!
>>
>>It is that time of year when everything gets SO crazy, so I am
>>thinking.........
>>we need to plan our Taster's Finale ahead of time so we can all
>>mark our
>>calendars and so we can find a place!
>>
>>Here are some thoughts: we could do a boy/girl Taster's where we
>>all invite
>>some of our friends, guys and girls to join us and we rent out a
>>room at a
>>restaurant. Or we could have just girls and have a really nice
>>Christmas
>>celebration at a cool restaurant and do "Secret Santa". Either
>>way, it would be
>>a blast.
>>
>>How does Thursday, Dec 14th sound?
>>
>>So, here is what I need: your vote on............... the type of
>>party, then
>>what restaurant that goes with that idea, then affirmation of the
>>date.
>>
>>Get excited girls! This is going to be fun!
>>
>>Love you guys,
>>Lisa
>>
>>
>

Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


I think we should also put the position report file in there that Jad/Couch created as a backup to the CEPos/East Positions.  Couch can you put the query file you set up for the price desk?
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:18 PM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Palmer, B. Scott; Couch, Greg; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Valdes, John
Subject:	NetCo.

Jeff was able to create a Netco file under O:\erms\erms_adm without an erequest.  There is a file for each region out there now.  I will save the new p&l to each region but could each of you please pick an p&l from your region as a back-up just in case.

these are the files I know of

Exotica
P&L
Hedgestrips
All excel queries
Weapon-X & new version
Access financial reports
Exotics file
Transport model
Curve files

Do you guys have anything else?

Kam


Attached is a current summary of the plans for each region as they stand right now.  Mr Presto had me add an extra manager to each group, so that should be the only change--unless one was submitted by you.  Please call if you have any questions.

Thanks

Trey Hardy


Re Alcoa,  currently in contract discussions.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490