Rod,

Here are few questions that I would like to run by you:

I got your message at Noon today, you indicated that you had been able to
contact the following:

David Clements
Barney Brasher
George Quittner
Larry Fenstad ----not yet notified
Elaine Conklin----not yet notified

I plan on starting on Monday November 6th attending Phil's Monday morning
staff meetings.   I also plan on attending Phil's staff meeting on November
13th - half day - afternoon.

Are there any key points that you want covered in a weekly report?   When do
you want the report in hand?

I plan to start meeting with Phil and all his direct reports (one on one) to
determine their needs from our organization, as soon as the announcement
comes out.  I will work with our organization to develop objectives for 2001
based off these interviews.

Do you have any concerns if I go ahead and get with Human Resources and get a
posting for an Administrative Assistant for myself?

John Keller had a three day meeting offsite scheduled for next week in the
Woodlands, that George Quittner and I are scheduled to be a part of.   I plan
on missing the second day due to the meeting with CES on Thursday.

Are there any other pressing issues that I need to be involved with next
week?   I understand that the EOTT budgets are due to the Administrative
Directors on November 7th and to Tracey on the 10th.   When will the budgets
be presented to EOTT?

I met with Jerry Martin several times this week.   We also meet with George
Wasaff and Derryl Cleaveland in the GSS organization a couple of times.   We
decided it would be best for all of Enron, as well as for ETS to have Four
(4) of the recommended six (6) EE&CC Procurement personnel to go into the GSS
organization rather than the ETS procurement department.    We have moved
Jerry Thomas, Dwain Moody, Rick Perkins and Sue Perkins to the GSS
organization.  George Wasaff and Jerry Martin have agreed that Jerry Thomas
will continue to manage the procurement of materials for Florida's Phase IV
and Phase V projects, while lending his knowledge of compression to all of
Enron.   We will use our procurement personnel to execute the material
requirements.

Therefore we are only bringing two (2) people into the ETS organization -
Mary Lynne Dix and Josh Mayes.    Jim Davis and Jerry Thomas have expressed
real concerns to Jerry, George and myself about these decisions.   If we
continue to manage projects in the traditional EE&CC manner, their concerns
are valid.   But we feel if we partner with the GSS organization and properly
use third parties for the peaks, we can manage these projects efficiently.
We will continue to monitor the Phase IV, Phase V and NBPL expansion project
closely to assure no loss of productivity during this transition.

John Keller, yourself and I met with George Quittner this week.   George and
I are reviewing our organization and working on how to manage the
organization most effectively for ETS Operations.    We discussed
possibilities this week and it is quite obvious that we have different
opinions on where we should be going with this.
We will meet next week to finalize a proposal.   More to come.

Do you have a good feel for what my job title should reflect on my business
cards?    Should I just hold off?

Thanks again for your vote of confidence and the job offer.   I look forward
to serving this organization in this capacity.   I look forward to our new
working relationship.   I feel like I have a great staff, very capable of
addressing the challenges ahead and turning the opportunities into real
advantages for ETS.

Morris


George,

Would you like to take a like at the service (see below).
The meeting is on July 12 at 2:30 (19th floor).

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 06/29/2000
04:08 PM ---------------------------

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/29/2000 03:53:40 PM
Please respond to <ekrapels@esaibos.com>
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc: "Jeffrey Shorter \(E-mail\)" <jshorter@wsicorp.com>
Subject: RE: Next visit to Houston

Vince,

Good to hear from you and I'm glad you're available. How is Wednesday at
2:30?

I did look at EOL and am not surprised to see its quality. I was unable to
say much about it in my Risk Electricity Hedging and Trading report because
of deadline pressures. How is the site doing? I am intrigued by the
competition for trading platforms and was astonished to hear that Goldman,
Morgan, BP and Shell were going to launch a site to compete with yours. Talk
about a shotgun marriage!

If we have time next week, I could step you through our website --
www.weathereffects.com. I'm very proud of what we've done. I can't give out
a password yet but would be happy to walk through the site with you over the
phone using my password. It's a very ambitious site -- with state-of-the-art
WSI weather (seasonal, 6-10, and day to day) driving a good load model for
PJM and NEPOOL. ESAI contributes oil and gas input price forecasts, capacity
judgments, and "herding" ideas to develop power price forecasts for same
time periods. After one month's full-bore effort, I'm pleased with the
results (e.g., we forecast Nepool onpeak to be $43 and it turned out $46).

Have a great weekend.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 5:29 PM
To: ekrapels@esaibos.com
Cc: Vince J Kaminski; Shirley Crenshaw
Subject: Re: Next visit to Houston

Ed,

I shall be available on both days. What about Wednesday,
July 12, between 1:30 and 4:00. Please, let me know
what time would work for you.

It will be nice to see you again.

Vince

P.S. By the way, did you have a chance to take a look at the EOL?

"Edward Krapels" <ekrapels@esaibos.com> on 06/28/2000 02:49:41 PM

Please respond to ekrapels@esaibos.com

To:   Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:  Next visit to Houston

Dear Vince,

I will be returning to Houston during the  week of July 10.

ESAI and Weather Services International have launched -- after more than 18
months of R&D --  our service, called Energycast Power Trader and Energycast
Gas Trader, for power traders in Nepool and PJM. I would be happy to review
the service with you as well as take you on a tour of our web site. Are you
available on July 12 - 13?

Sincerely,

Ed Krapels


what went on this weekend?  i am still tired from this weekend.


I made some changes to New Power.  Would you please send me a new purchase
and sales worksheet for Jan?

thanks


Hi, Lauren:

I cannot find the new email address for the Allegheny lawyer for delivery of
a revised ISDA Schedule.  I left a voice mail for Yair Yaish and for Laurie
Peddicord
but have not heard back.  Can you provide me with the latest information?
Are you the lawyer who should receive this Schedule?  Please let me hear from
you.  Thanks.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


Latest on plans for Nailia and for David FYI. Look forward to seeing you in
London on Thursday.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 07/10/2001 09:15
PM ---------------------------

Peter Styles
07/10/2001 08:05 PM
To: Sophie KingsleyLON/Enron@EUEnronXGate @ ENRON
cc: Paul Dawson/Enron@EUEnronXGate@ENRON, Alfredo
Huertas-rubio/Enron@EUEnronXGate@ENRON, Doug Wood/Enron@EUEnronXGate@ENRON,
Paul Hennemeyer/Enron@EUEnronXGate@ENRON

Subject: RE: As per our discussion

I should add to Paul D's explanation a footnote re help for Alfredo on Italy.
I have agreed with Alfredo, Paul D, Paul Mead and Eric Shaw that Nailia
Dindarova will spend approx. 30% of her time between now and the end of this
year supporting Alfredo on Italian electricity market regulatory work. For
this purpose Paul Mead will find a desk next to the Italian market traders
for Nailia, and she will spend up to three days each week in London rather
than Brussels over the six month period.

From: Sophie KingsleyLON/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 07/10/2001 01:09 PM GDT
To: Paul Dawson/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT, Alfredo
Huertas-rubio/Enron@EUEnronXGate
cc: Doug Wood/Enron@EUEnronXGate, Paul Hennemeyer/Enron@EUEnronXGate

Subject: RE: As per our discussion

Thanks Paul for the feedback, Let's keep looking in the market.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dawson, Paul
Sent: 09 July 2001 14:54
To: Kingsley, Sophie; Styles, Peter; Huertas, Alfredo
Cc: Wood, Doug; Hennemeyer, Paul
Subject: RE: As per our discussion

Sounds fine to me.  I've followed up with Alfredo, Peter and Doug, re, David
Gonzalez.  I think our preference would still be to keep David for another
six months, while accepting that this does carry some risk in terms of
employment rights issues.  David fills a valuable hole currently that it
would be very difficult to plug in the short term.  That said, it will be
made clear to David that this is a final renewal and that he may want to
explore opportunities elsewhere within or outside of Enron.  Meanwhile,
Alfredo is committed to using the six month period to recruiting someone
permanent to help him out on Spanish and Italian issues.

Regards,

Paul

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Kingsley, Sophie
Sent: 09 July 2001 15:20
To: Styles, Peter; Huertas, Alfredo
Cc: Dawson, Paul
Subject: RE: As per our discussion

All,

I have interviewed Esther, twice, and on both occasions reccomended that we
did not hire, so would not be supportive of moving her into the group as I do
not believe she has either the capaiblity to communicate effectively in
English or the business knowledge to make her useful to you.

Regards

Sophie

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Styles, Peter
Sent: 09 July 2001 05:29
To: Huertas, Alfredo
Cc: Kingsley, Sophie; Dawson, Paul
Subject: As per our discussion

... I'm pretty clear that you will not have any vacancy suitable for Esther.


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 09/29/2000
04:58 PM ---------------------------
From: Karla Feldman on 09/27/2000 04:24 PM
To: GemanIX@aol.com@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re : Re: Software license

Ms. Geman,

I apologize for the delay, but I finally have drafted an Escrow Agreement for
placing the software in escrow with your attorneys.  Please review and have
your attorneys review and let me know if it is acceptable.

I will be leaving the department I have been working in and moving to a
different Enron subsidiary on October 13.  If at all possible, could we try
to get the Software License Agreement and the Escrow Agreement wrapped up
before I leave so that someone else does not have to try to pick up where I
left off?

I think we are just about in agreement on the Software License portion.
Seems like the only outstanding question had to do with your concern
regarding providing a response time of 2 business days.  I do not have any
answers regarding that - maybe Vince Kaminski or Stinson Gibner can respond
on this issue.

I look forward to hearing from you and trying to get this finalized within
the next 2 weeks if possible.

Thank you,

Karla Feldman
Enron Corp.
(713) 646-7554


i'll give you a call.  i'm in new york today.

best,
jeff

	Harry Kingerski
	01/29/2001 08:23 AM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Rate Surcharge Proceedings Move Forward

Jeff - we'll have to make it a priority today to come to a conclusion on the
scope of our testimony.  Let me know your schedule.  thanks.

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	01/28/2001 09:01 PM

		 To: Harry Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Gordon
Savage/HOU/EES@EES, Wanda Curry/HOU/EES@EES, Mike D Smith/HOU/EES@EES, Vicki
Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Donald M- ECT Origination
Black/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Robert C Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rate Surcharge Proceedings Move Forward

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 01/28/2001 08:59 PM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	01/28/2001 01:23 PM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>,
<billr@calpine.com>, <jackp@calpine.com>, <glwaas@calpx.com>,
<Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>,
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Rate Surcharge Proceedings Move Forward

On Friday, the Commission issued the attached Assigned Commissioner's  Ruling
in the rate surcharge proceedings which does the following:
?
1.? It identifies the issues for Phase 1 as being:
?
(a) Reviewing the independent audit results of PG&E and SCE, ordered in
D.00-12-067 and, as part of that analysis, determining whether or not there
is a  financial necessity for other or additional relief for the utilities.?
Included here is a recognition that the utilities may make other interim
proposals and this would be included within the scope of the first phase;  and
?
(b) TURN,s accounting proposal for the proper reconciliation of the
Transition Revenue Account (TRA) and Transition Cost Balancing Account
(TCBA)  accounts and the Generation Memorandum Accounts (GMA).
?
2.? The retention of utility generating assets and the interim  ratemaking
treatment for these assets is being separately handled and hearings  will not
occur on this issue in Phase 1.? Parties may file testimony on  interim
valuation in addressing whether the rate freeze has ended on a  prospective
basis.

3.?? The Commission will consider whether the rate freeze has  ended only on
a prospective basis in Phase I.

4.?? The Commission will address the reasonable and prudent  cost issue in a
later phase of this proceeding.

5.?? The  Commission will also consider parties, proposals for tiered rates
similar to  those discussed by Senator Bowen in the December public hearings.
?
6.?? PG&E and?Edison are required to?notify the  Commission and all parties
by January 30, 2001 of the specific portions of their  testimony that are
within the scope of this phase.
7. The hearing schedule adopted is:?

February 5,  2001?????????????  Intervenor testimony served
February 9,  2001?????????????  Rebuttal testimony served
February 15 )21, 2001?????  Hearings
February 23,  2001??????????? Closing  Argument
February 27,  2001??????????? Briefs,  not to exceed 15 pages
March 23,  2001????????????????Proposed  Decision
March 26,  2001????????????????Final  Oral Argument
March 27,  2001????????????????Anticipated  Final Commission Decision
?
Please let me know if anyone feels WPTF should be involved in this phase of
the proceeding.
?
Dan

?
 - CPUC01-#88123-v1-A0011038_ET_AL_Lynch_Walwyn_Ruling__.doc


For those of you interested in Entrepreneurship or Biotech/Healthcare,
they're doing some cool stuff at UCSF.

There's an e-mail list, plus several speaker/networking events. Sam
Collela of Versant Vertures spoke at their first event two weeks ago.
Our very own Peter Fiske will speak at an event on Dec 5th.

The organizers specifically asked that Evening MBA students were invited
to participate (our fame precedes us). Great opportunity to meet up with
clinicians/scientists with new ideas who need help with commercialization.

See below for details.

Tom McVey
-----

Hello ,

We have an exciting new program here at UCSF called the UCSF Innovation Accelerator
(UCSF-IA), whose mission is to engage and educate the UCSF community in
entrepreneurial ventures.  This year UCSF-IA is hosting a number of
activities including:
an Entrepreneur's Discussion Group, three workshops: Opportunity
Recognition in Life
Sciences, Writing a Winning Executive Summary, and Intellectual Property
in Life
Sciences (two will be mixers with the Biotech Club of Berkeley's Haas
School of
Business), and an Executive Summary Competition with an Awards Ceremony.

These activities aim to provide a forum for UCSF
students/postdocs/clinicians/scientists to
learn about the biotech business and writing business plans, to
encourage interest in
entrepreneurship, and to network with Bay Area scientists and business
professionals and MBAs.

We encourage you to sign-up on our listserv: ucsf-ia to receive
up-to-date information and
e-mail announcements about these and related activities hosted
throughout the year by
UCSF-IA.

To subscribe to the list send a one line email message to:
listserv@listserv.ucsf.edu -the
one line of the message is:
subscribe   ucsf-ia   your_first_name your_last_name

If you have any questions or comments please contact:

Rebecca Seal    sealr@itsa.ucsf.edu
Katherine Woo   kwoo@itsa.ucsf.edu

http://oird.ucsf.edu/ia/index.html


Please do not remove the lucent phone for John Griffith at location EB3155D
until notified.  Even when the move is complete, please leave the lucent
phone there because he will be working in both places for now.

Thank You,
Ina Rangel
X 3-7257
---------------------- Forwarded by Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2001 11:00 AM
---------------------------

Ina Rangel
01/12/2001 09:56 AM
To: Move-Team/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, David A Cummings/HOU/ECT, Ben Hill/HOU/ECT,
Leslie Peebles/Corp/Enron
cc: Sunny Rodgers/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Urgent - Move Request

David, Ben & Leslie -

Is there anyway to go ahead and set him up on a turret today?  He is going to
be working up here on Tuesday.

Sunny -
 Please notate new mail stop

Thanks,
Ina


Thank you for an overwhelming response to participate in ClickAtHome's Second
Pilot.    For those of you who have signed up, we are excited to have you in
this pilot.  We look forward to you testing our process and services and
giving us feedback!

In order to be eligible for Pilot 2, please read and agree to the Pilot
Participant Agreement and then respond to the ClickAtHomePilot2@enron.com
email box with the following statement:    "I accept the terms and conditions
of this Pilot Participant Agreement." with the Pilot agreement attached.

Once we have received your acceptance,  you will be eligible and confirmed
for Pilot 2.

Those who are confirmed for Pilot 2 will receive an email the week of
November 13th on how and when they can access the ordering website.  Until
that point,  the website will not be accessible.

Employees will have great options under this program for computers,
peripherals, and Internet connectivity.   Your personal selections will
determine your out-of-pocket expense, if any.

We know you are interested in more details.  However, one of our primary
Pilot objectives is to test the communication on the website.  We would like
you to review more details about program offerings and related out-of-pocket
costs, if any, once the pilot website is available.  After agreeing to the
Pilot Participants Agreement and reviewing these materials on the website,
you may choose to defer ordering until the All Employee roll-out in early
2001 if you wish.

Please send any questions to the clickathomepilot2@enron.com mailbox.

Thanks!


pls print with cover memo--for me and maria.  thanks. DF
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 05/04/2000
01:56 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Ricki Winters                           05/03/2000 07:22 PM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janet
Cones/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Steven January/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rick Dietz, Sheila
Nacey/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White

Subject: EnronOnline

Attached is a brief overview of the proposed TW Pilot Program for 20/d of
firm capacity using EnronOnline as the Internet Tool.  This is the
information that Steve Harris has been working on.  Unfortunately, Steve
Hotte and I have a conflict with the meeting you scheduled on Thursday May 4
at 1:00.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,
Ricki Winters for Julia White


Can whoever is working on the revised confirms for the referenced
counterparty let Doug know the status?  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 01/20/2000 12:43 PM
---------------------------
From: Doug Paterson on 01/20/2000 11:40 AM MST
To: Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: BC Gas Utility

My friends at BC Gas now have the ISDA amendment.  Thanks.  What about the
revised confirms?


Mike,

We are short manpower in London. We shall try to
evaluate the software in Houston.

Vince

"Mike Curran" <mcurran@quantinleap.com> on 04/24/2001 10:03:24 AM
Please respond to "Mike Curran" <mcurran@quantinleap.com>
To:	<vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	Willow and Pathstar evaluations

Hi Vince -

Hope all is well with you.

Sharad hasn't had time to evaluate our Willow Tree or Monte Carlo software
since the middle of last year.  Is there somebody else that could do it?

Please let me know who I should send the evaluation to.

Best Regards,

Michael Curran
CEO
Quantin' Leap Limited
Piercy House
7 Copthall Avenue
London EC2R 7NJ

Tel: +44 (0)20 7562 3450
Fax: +44 (0)20 7562 3411

mailto:mcurran@quantinleap.com

http://www.quantinleap.com


How's this look?

Steve Kean
Rick Shapiro (GA)
Paul Kaufman (GA)
Vicki Sharpe (EES)
Mike D. Smith (EES)
Chris Calger (ENA)
Karen Denne (PA)


Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 01:10 PM -----

	"BENNETT YOUNG" <BYOUNG@LLGM.COM>
	05/17/2001 12:49 PM

		 To: Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com, Michael.Tribolet@enron.com
		 cc: "CARL EKLUND" <CEKLUND@LLGM.COM>, "JOHN KLAUBERG" <JKLAUBER@LLGM.COM>,
"JAMES HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>
		 Subject: 4799756092ca99bf88256a4a00045971OpenDocument

Judge Montali has issued a tentative ruling on the MidSet QF's motion to
suspend performance under their PPA's.  Click on the link below to view a pdf
file containing the 27 page decision.

In summary, the Court's tentative ruling is to deny the QF's request to
suspend the PPA's, to decline to set a deadline for PG&E to assume or reject
the contract and to find that the reasonable rate that PG&E must pay the QF
for energy delivered post petition pending assumption or rejection is the
rate determined by the CPUC in the Wood decision.

The Court then goes on to note that this case is an extraordinary one
requiring extraordinary relief.  The Court therefore tentatively ruled that
PG&E should pay some undetermined portion of the pre-petition arrearages to
the QF's in order to ameliorate the burden on the QF's and help get them back
(or keep them) online.

The Court therefore ordered PG&E, MidSet and the Committee to meet and confer
and attempt to reach a resolution of the amount of the arrearage to be paid.
Judge Montali states that "he has it in mind" that the amount perhaps should
be equal to the difference between the Wood rates and the market price.

Call me if you have any questions or have an trouble with the link.

Ben Young

http://www.canb.uscourts.gov/canb/Documents.nsf/bf0c3519af9731c88825671d006664
79/4799756092ca99bf88256a4a00045971?OpenDocument

Bennett G. Young
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 400
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 951-1167
byoung@llgm.com

==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges.  This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================
 - 47997560.url


Vince,

I'll see you around 8:45 in the morning.  Meanwhile, the attached file
contains the latest draft of our questions.  Please run us a copy.

Thanks,

John
 - EnronInterview.doc


I will try calling you in a little while.  I had asked Joe Henry to give you a call; and thought you were already talking with him about these types of matters.  Peter del Vecchio is also available.  Thanks.  Lance.

-----Original Message-----
From: Von Bock Und Polach, Marcus
Sent: Fri 11/16/2001 4:00 AM
To: Haedicke, Mark E.
Cc: Schuler, Lance (Legal)
Subject: negative covenants in merger agreement

Mark,
re. the above, we are working on a significant number of divestments (very important transactions for cashflow reasons totalling potentially over 500MM US) in Europe that are likely triggers; I urgently need to address this with you guys - Michael Brown wants me to sort out a waiver letter / procedure before the weekend. Can't get a hold of Lance. Could you or Lance give me a shout this morning.

Thanks, Marcus


New Corporate Public Affairs Directory 2002-Available in December 2001

Columbia Books is pleased to announce that the 2002 edition of the National Directory of Corporate Public Affairs will be available in a few short weeks. This new edition is fully updated with over 1700 companies and contains contact information (including address, phone and fax numbers, and email addresses) for over 15,000 corporate public affairs executives.  This directory is a must-have for those interested in networking, fact-finding and coalition building within the public affairs community.

To order, go to www.columbiabooks.com or call 1-888-265-0600.

National Directory of Corporate Public Affairs 2002
Provides contact information for 15,000 corporate public affairs executives, as well as information on corporate giving programs, foundations, investor relations and PACs.

ISBN:   1-880873-48-6
Publication Date: December, 2001
Price: $149 (includes shipping for U.S. orders)

Public Affairs Council members are eligible for a 20% discount on the National Directory of Corporate Public Affairs.  Call 1-888-265-0600 for details.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/17/2001 10:05
AM ---------------------------
From: Ann Ballard/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/17/2001 09:22 AM
To: Kate Cole/ENRON@enronXgate, Teresa Callahan/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Carlos Sole/NA/Enron@Enron, Matt
Maxwell/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FPA Designations

Please change the FPA designations of the following entities to add the
designation of ELEQ.

CA Energy Development I, L.L.C.
CA Energy Development II, L.L.C.
Salmon Energy LLC
Merchant Energy Ventures LLC

I noticed that CA Energy Development I and II have a list of Enron employees
as officers.  I believe that when ENA sold part of its ownership in these
entities that the co-owner may have appointed a new slate of officers. Could
Matt please verify that the Corporate Secretary has been given current
information for the data sheets.  I understand that one Enron employee is a
director of each of these entities.  I believe that it will be important for
FPA Interlocking Position Reporting for the Corporate Secretary to reflect in
the Data Sheets the name of any Enron employee who holds an officer or
director position.


FYI

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Mary Cook/HOU/ECT on 02/23/2001 08:24 AM -----

	Jaimie Jessop
	02/22/2001 05:59 PM

		 To: Mary Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron Canada Corp's Wiring instructions

Mary,

Please find attached a copy of Enron Canada Corp.'s wiring instructions for
both Canadian and US dollar amounts.  If you have any questions, please feel
free to give me a call at 403-974-6788.

Thanks
Jaimie


EDF is concerned because they are worried about the number of positions they are taking on for Enron.  They want to make an additional margin call of $45 million which ENE is not willing to post (true reason: corporate liquidity issues.) According to our broker agreement with EDF, EDF is not allowed to request more margin than the NYMEX requires so we refused on that basis.  EDF may want to reduce the positions they are holding based on their perceived risk of ENE.  Ira Polk, the CFO of EDF Man said the best person to talk to is Marty Timmonds.  I would not call him up and volunteer to move positions but if he calls you and wants to do so, the moving of positions was agreed to as one way to reduce EDF Man's risk without ENE posting additional cash margin.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:51 AM
To:	Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Subject:	RE: EDF Man

Sarah ,

What I was remembering was the front months exposures we had at EDF MAN.
	Prior to moves                After
DEC	-2,003			 1,967
JAN	10,502			-1,588
FEB	 1,338			   552
MAR	-7,013			   188
APR	 5,831			     33

the over all position before the move was 1,240 and as of yesterday it is 4,205.

Let me know what the concerns are at EDF MAN and the request that they are making.
We can shift some positions around if the have levels by months that they want us to stay under.

Dutch

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wesner-Soong, Sarah
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:41 AM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	EDF Man

Dutch - please send me the numbers.  Sarah


Sheila would like to meet with you at 11:00 a.m. today in EB3872.

The dial-in information follows:

1-888-830-6260

Code:  565558


Russell,
 Can you please attach the gty2846.doc so that I can draft the necessary
language for the new gty doc.

	Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/05/2001 09:38 AM

		 To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Clement Abrams/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: Aquila  outgoing guaranty (ref: gty2846.doc)

Dan,

Per our conversation on Friday regarding HPL, please coordinate with Clement
to issue a new guaranty.  As you recall, Aquila Energy Marketing Corporation
has $50MM of exposure from HPL and they have requested additional security
above the amount in the current guaranty listing HPL (gty2846.doc).  Please
issue a new guaranty for HPL covering Aquila Energy Marketing Corporation for
physical natural gas in the amount of $50MM.  In addition, please put
language in this guaranty which would amend the existing guaranty
(gty2846.doc) that would remove HPL.

Thank you,

Russell


Good morning everyone.

Please let me know which date you would prefer.  December 4 or December 8th.

Thanks!

Shirley

---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 10/30/2000
07:26 AM ---------------------------

Norma Villarreal
10/28/2000 10:47 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike A
Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pinnamaneni
Krishnarao/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Osman Sezgen/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ramona Perkins/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Performance

The Research group will be conducting a Performance Review Committee (PRC)
meeting in early December.  All Vice Presidents, Sr. Directors and Directors
should attend.  Shirley Crenshaw will be contacting you to schedule the PRC
meeting date and time. These are the current available dates:
December 4, 8.

In preparation for the meeting please submit recommended rankings and
promotions to me based on employee feedback by November 29, 2000. Please
included analyst/associates,

If you have any questions please feel free to call me or Ramona Perkins at
X58165.

Here is some helpful information for you as we proceed throughout he
Performance Evaluation Process
October 25, 2000 - November 17, 2000 (3 1/2 weeks):
Employees will provide a list of accomplishments occurring after June 1, 2000
to their supervisors
Employees will receive an email advising of access and passwords to PEP
System (10/25)
Employees identify selected reviewers on line and will submit to Supervisor
Supervisor will add and/or delete reviewers in order to capture a full 360
degree feedback
Supervisor will submit and Reviewers will receive an e:mail advising them of
their reviewer role
Reviewers can decline or complete the review

Once System Closes on November 17, 2000,
Prepare for Research PRC meeting (print consolidate review, pre rank
employees, identify candidates for promotion and submit to HR)

Important Dates(I will notify you of any changes):
September 30, 2000 Only employees before 10/1/00 will be included for PEP and
bonuses
October 15, 2000 Whomever is the supervisor for employees on 10/15/00 will be
responsible for their reviews
October 25, 2000 PEP system opens (http:/pep.corp.enron.com)
October 30-31, 2000 PEP Overview session at Doubletree
November 17, 2000 Pep System closes for Feedback
November 23-24 Thanksgiving Holiday
November 29, 2000 Provide HR with pre-rankings and Promotions
December TBD, 2000 Research PRC
January 31, 2001 All reviews must be complete, signed and submitted to HR

Norma
Sr. HR Representative
X31545


We are up this week due to a couple of reasons.  The Index Price increased to
$5.37 and T.K. negotiated an IT deal for 11/30 for 10,000 @ $14.00.

Please call if you have any questions (53858).


FYI - to keep you informed of the ongoing changes with the physical gas monetization issues.  Botttom line - I believe that the remaining amount will be very small if not zero. The atttorney's are sending me names but the ones Barbara mentioned on the phone are the large ones; Aquila, Sempra, Duke, etc.  I wil keep you updated.  Thanks, Leslie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Farrell, Keegan   On Behalf Of Gray, Barbara N.
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 12:36 PM
To:	Hansen, Leslie; Murphy, Harlan; Van Hooser, Steve; Sayre, Frank; Hendry, Brent; Davis, Angela; Portz, David; Viverito, John; Leite, Francisco Pinto; St. Clair, Carol; Del vecchio, Peter
Cc:	Reeves, Leslie; Herron, Chris; Cook, Mary; Ephross, Joel
Subject:	Master Netting Agreement Assignments...Identification of legal entities comprising your assigned "houses"

Based on the latest Master Netting Agreement Assignment List, you are assigned to one or more "houses" to prepare a Master Netting Agreement.  I am currently working on excising natural gas receivables from an existing gas receivable facility known as the Swee'P Receivables Facility.  This "excisement" is a prerequisite to our actual execution of the various Master Netting Agreements on which you are working.  In order for me to accomplish the excisement, I need to create a list of each of the non-Enron legal entities, which will be parties to the Master Netting Agreement you have been assigned.  The legal entities are needed so that we may assure that none of these legal entities will have its payables to ENA transferred to Swee'P.  The final submission of receivables is due on Monday, November 5th.  The list I am requesting from you will allow Leslie Reeves to excise your complete "house" from the submission of receivables.

I know that each of you are swamped, but this excisement is a prerequisite to the execution of the Master Netting Agreements.  Even if you have only a rough list of the entities in your house, please provide your best available information to me via email, copying the CCs listed on this email.  Thank you for your assistance.

Best Regards,
BNG


Please see attached:


SCE quizzing DWR on its proposed revenue req.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 07/30/2001 11:17 AM -----

	"Dan Douglass" <douglass@energyattorney.com>
	07/27/2001 08:22 AM

		 To: "Vicki Sandler" <vicki_sandler@apses.com>, "Sue Mara"
<susan.j.mara@enron.com>, "Steve Huhman" <steve.huhman@mirant.com>, "Roger
Pelote" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "Rob Nichol"
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, "Randy Hickok" <rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Nam
Nguyen" <nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "Joe Paul" <jmpa@dynegy.com>, "Jeff
Dasovich" <jeff.dasovich@enron.com>, "Janie Mollon"
<jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>, "Jack Pigott" <jackp@calpine.com>, "Greg Blue"
<gtbl@dynegy.com>, "George Vaughn" <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>, "Gary
Ackerman" <foothillservices@mindspring.com>, "Curtis Kebler"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Curt Hatton" <curt.hatton@neg.pge.com>,
"Corby Gardiner" <jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, "Charles Miessner"
<camiessn@newwestenergy.com>, "Carolyn Baker" <cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "Bob
Anderson" <Bob_Anderson@apses.com>, "Bill Ross" <billr@calpine.com>, "Ed
Cazalet" <ed@cazalet.com>, "Denice Cazalet Purdum" <dpurdum@apx.com>, "Robert
Berry" <berry@apx.com>, "Tamara Johnson" <tjohnso8@enron.com>, "Max Bulk"
<mbulk@apx.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Edison Letter to DWR

Attached is an interesting letter from Edison to DWR asking a number of
questions concerning the relationship bvetween the utilities and the  agency.
?
Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.?  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:?? (818)  596-2201
Fax:? (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
 - 7-26-01 Ltr to T Hannigan.doc


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/10/2001 12:09 PM -----

	Jennifer Rudolph@EES
	03/08/2001 03:31 PM

		 To: CA Team
		 cc:
		 Subject: NEWS: 6.5 cent bill passes Senate

* CA Senate passed SBX1 43 today
* Now, the bill goes to the Assembly
* Looking for article...
* More to come


---------------------- Forwarded by Maureen Raymond/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000
02:57 PM ---------------------------

Leandro Ibasco@ENRON
05/31/2000 09:59 AM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vanessa Carranza/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Vasant Shanbhogue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Harry Arora/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suresh
Raghavan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jeff Bartlett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Maureen
Raymond/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Friday off

Hi,

Please note that I will be taking a vacation day on Friday, June 2 to study
for the CFA exams.

Regards,

Roy


ta!
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:44
PM ---------------------------

Yumi Takei
04/30/2001 04:34 AM
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Didrik Thrane-Nielsen/OSL/ECT@ECT

Subject: CTD Weather Confirmation

Justin,

We have a norwegian municipality that is interested in trading a CTD option.
We have the older version of confirmation that we used for the CTD with Rock
Garden, which is attached below.  We would like to send the CP a copy of our
template during this week, however was wondering if this is something we
should revise to match our HDD and AVT 2 page confirm + GTC or update in any
way.

Please advise.

Thank you
Yumi
x34708


We currently have an opening(s) in the Utility Risk Management (URM) group reporting to Steve Swain.  Based upon the candidate skill level, the opening(s) will be at the Specialist, Sr. Specialist or Analyst level.

Responsibilities will include:
Building and maintaining forward price curves for a number of utility tariff rates across the WSCC.
Tracking and analyzing URM's portfolio of retail positions.
Preparing daily reports for management that analyze various factors contributing to changes in positions, P/L, hedges, etc.
Performing research and analysis on legislative and regulatory changes that could impact our price cuves and/or positions.
Working closely with the Retail Gen desk to coordinate activities involved in managing EWS's overall retail position.
Research to support the development of effective hedging strategies for the various risk exposures inherent to the URM book.

The ideal candidate(s) will possess sound Excel modeling skills (including at least superficial knowledge of Visual Basic), some familiarity with database systems and/or experience collecting and analyzing large amounts of data, excellent organizational skills, and a solid understanding of financial statements.  While some experience with regulated tariffs and utility cost of service modeling would be helpful, it is not necessary.

For those interested in learning more about the position, or about URM in general, Steve Swain and Gordon Savage will be hosting a Brown Bag Info  Session on Friday, 10/5 from 12-1 PM in Mt. Hood.

If you are interested in this opportunity, please let Julie Kearney know by close of business on Friday 10/5.


Interesting slide presentation on the state of powerplants, siting and
natural gas in CA

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 05/17/2001 01:44 PM -----

	"Julia Wright" <jwright@s-k-w.com>
	05/17/2001 12:51 PM

		 To: "Marilyn Hawes" <marilyn@ceert.org>, "Kelly Boyd"
<kelly.boyd@asm.ca.gov>, "Karen Edson (E-mail)" <kedson@ns.net>, "Julee
Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)" <jmball@ns.net>, "Joseph Alamo" <jalamo@enron.com>,
"John White (E-mail)" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, "John Rozsa (E-mail)"
<john.rozsa@sen.ca.gov>, "John Redding" <john.redding@gene.ge.com>, "John
Larrea (E-mail)" <john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "John Fistolera"
<johnf@ncpa.com>, "John Fielder (E-mail)" <moravekj@sce.com>, "John Fielder
(E-mail 2)" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "John Bridges (E-mail)"
<bridgesj@epenergy.com>, "Joe Ronan" <joer@calpine.com>, "Joe Lyons (E-mail)"
<joseph.lyons@asm.ca.gov>, "Jim Groninger (E-mail)" <gronijn@texaco.com>,
"Jerry Jordan (E-mail)" <jordan@cmua.org>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)"
<jdasovic@enron.com>, "Jeannie Cain (E-mail)" <jeanne.cain@calchamber.com>,
"Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)" <smutny@iepa.com>, "James D. Boyd (E-mail)"
<jim@resources.ca.gov>, "Jack Stewart (E-mail)" <jstewart@cmta.net>, "Jack
Gualco" <jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com>, "Jack Flanigan (E-mail)"
<jackflanigan@flaniganlaw.com>, "Greg Hardy (E-mail)" <hardygl@texaco.com>,
"Grace Davis" <grace.i.davis@intel.com>, "Gordon McDonald"
<gordon.mcdonald@pacificorp.com>, "Gary Schoonyan" <schoongl@sce.com>, "Gary
Heath (E-mail)" <gheath@eob.ca.gov>, "Evelyn Elsesser (E-mail)"
<eke@aelaw.com>, "Eloy Garcia (E-mail)" <egarcia@ka-pow.com>, "Ed Yates
(E-mail)" <ed@clfp.com>, "Doug Fernley" <fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "Dorothy
Rothrock (E-mail)" <drothrock@cmta.net>, "Dominic DiMare"
<dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>, "Derek Naten" <derek.naten@roche.com>,
"Denny Samuel (E-mail)" <dsam@chevron.com>, "Dennis Price (E-mail)"
<priced@epenergy.com>, "Denice Cazalet" <dcazalet@apx.com>, "Delbert Fore
(E-mail)" <fore.delbert@epenergy.com>, "Delaney Hunter (E-mail)"
<dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, "Dan Carroll (E-mail)" <dcarroll@dbsr.com>,
"Craig Brown (E-mail)" <brownc2@epenergy.com>, "Cindy Howell"
<chowell@sempra.com>, "Charles Bacchi" <charles.bacchi@asm.ca.gov>,
"Catherine Hackney (E-mail)" <hacknece@sce.com>, "Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail)"
<cmcintyre@sempra.com>, "Brian Kelly (E-mail)" <brian.kelly@sen.ca.gov>, "Bob
Houston (E-mail)" <houstgrp@pacbell.net>, "Bob Foster (E-mail)"
<fosterrg@sce.com>, "Bill Keese (E-mail)" <wkeese@energy.state.ca.us>, "Bill
Dombrowski (E-mail)" <cra@calretailers.com>, "Bill Booth (E-mail)"
<wbooth@booth-law.com>, "Becky Kilbourne (E-mail)" <bakilbourne@calpx.com>,
"Barbara Barkovich (E-mail)" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "Audra Hartmann
(E-mail)" <ath@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Art Carter (E-mail)" <debinorton@aol.com>,
"Anna Ferrera (E-mail)" <anna.ferrera@sen.ca.gov>, "Ann Cohn (E-mail)"
<cohnap@sce.com>, "Allan Lippincott (E-mail)" <alippin@mail.arco.com>, "Aaron
Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>
		 cc: "Karen Jarrell (E-mail)" <kjarrell@smurfit.com>, "Karen Koyano"
<kykoyano@calpx.com>, "Karen Lindh" <karen@klindh.com>, "Karen Mills
(E-mail)" <kmills@cfbf.com>, "Kari Harteloo" <klc@aelaw.com>, "Kassandra
Gough (E-mail)" <kgough@calpine.com>, "Kathy Brandenburg"
<katherinebrandenburg@flaniganlaw.com>, "Katie Kaplan" <kaplan@iepa.com>,
"Kay Grosulak" <kgrosulak@sppc.com>, "Keith McCrea (E-mail)"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "Kent G. Smith (E-mail)" <ksmith@energy.state.ca.us>,
"Kent Palmerton" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "Kevin Lynch (E-mail 2)"
<diane.glenn@pacificorp.com>, "Kevin Lynch (E-mail)"
<kevin.lynch@pacificorp.com>, "Kevin Smith (E-mail)" <kevins@ncpa.com>, "Kip
Lipper (E-mail)" <kip.lipper@sen.ca.gov>, "Lawrence Lingbloom (E-mail)"
<lawrence.lingbloom@sen.ca.gov>, "Lenny Goldberg (E-mail)" <lga@mother.com>,
"Louis Szablya (E-mail)" <szablyal@epenergy.com>, "Marc Joseph (E-mail)"
<mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>, "Mark Smith" <mark_j_smith@fpl.com>, "Marwan
Masri (E-mail)" <mmasri@energy.state.ca.us>, "Michael Alcantar (E-mail)"
<mpa@aelaw.com>, "Michael Florio (E-mail)" <mflorio@turn.org>, "Mike Kahl
(E-mail)" <mikahl@ka-pow.com>, "Mona Petrochko" <mpetroch@enron.com>, "Pete
Conaty (E-mail)" <pcaceo@pacbell.net>, "Peter Bray (E-mail)"
<pbray@newpower.com>, "Phil Nails (E-mail)" <phil.nails@asm.ca.gov>, "Phil
Stohr (E-mail)" <pstohr@dbsr.com>, "Ralph Cavanagh (E-mail)"
<rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, "Randy Chinn" <randy.chinn@sen.ca.gov>, "Ray Thompson
(E-mail)" <ray.thompson@sen.ca.gov>, "Richard Costigan III ESQ. (E-mail)"
<richard.costigan@asm.ca.gov>, "Richard Counihan (E-mail)"
<counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Richard Mesereau (E-mail)"
<Richard.mesereau@imc.asm.ca.gov>, "Robert Berry" <berry@apx.com>, "Robin
Larson (E-mail)" <rlarson@calso.com>, "Scott Tomashefsky (E-mail)"
<stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>, "Sheryl Carter (E-mail)" <scarter@nrdc.org>,
"Steve Ponder (E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Steven M. Pike (E-mail)"
<pikes@epenergy.com>, "Stu Wilson (E-mail)" <swilson@cmua.org>, "Sue Mara
(E-mail)" <smara@enron.com>, "Susan Reeder" <sreeder@sppc.com>, "Terry Winter
(E-mail)" <twinter@calso.com>, "Tim Schmelzer" <tschmelz@energy.state.ca.us>,
"Tommy Ross (E-mail)" <rosst@sce.com>, "Tony Braun" <braun@cmua.org>,
"Victoria Schaefer" <schaefvl@sce.com>
		 Subject: FW: Chairman Keese's presentation

The attached presentation is for today's CESG meeting.

Julia B. Wright
Executive Assistant
Smith, Kempton & Watts
980 Ninth Street, Suite 1560
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916)446-5508
(916)446-1499 Fax
jwright@s-k-w.com

 - CEC Presentation without NOTES.ppt


SBX2 78 (Polanco), the MOU opposed by SCE, failed passage in the Senate
Energy Committee.  The bill will be voted on again in committee tomorrow
morning at 9:00 a.m.  If the bill succeeds, it will immediately go to
Appropriations and then the Senate floor.

ABX2 82 (Keeley/Hertzberg), the MOU supported by the Administration, passed
out of the Assembly Energy Committee and the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, largely on a party-line vote.  The first time the bill was voted
on by the Energy Committee it failed passage.  On reconsideration Rod Wright
and Dead Florez switched their votes and the bill passed.  The bill will be
heard on the Assembly floor tomorrow at 9:30 a.m.

ABX2 50 (Wright, Campbell, etc.), the MOU minus transmission, passed out of
the Assembly Energy Committee, largely on a party-line vote.  The bill will
be heard by the Appropriations Committee tomorrow upon call of the chair.

SBX2 18 (Burton), DRC, will be heard by the Senate Energy Committee tomorrow
at 9:00 a.m.  It is my understanding that the Republicans may be supportive
of this measure which requires a 2/3 vote.


Beginning in 2001, Enron will include Martin Luther King, Jr. Day as one of
our 11 official holidays for U.S. employees.  Martin Luther King, Jr. is one
of our nation's most remarkable heroes, and we want to honor his tremendous
contributions to our history by observing his holiday.

Next year, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day falls on Monday, January 15.  See the
holiday schedule below for a list of other holidays that Enron will observe
in 2001.

2001 Holiday Schedule

Monday	January 1	New Year,s Day
Monday	January 15	Martin Luther King Day
Monday	February 19	President,s Day
Monday	May 28	Memorial Day
Wednesday	July 4	Independence Day
Monday	September 3	Labor Day
Thursday	November 22	Thanksgiving Day
Friday	November 23	Thanksgiving Observance
Monday	December 24	Christmas Observance
Tuesday	December 25	Christmas Day
Discretionary Day

Days designated Observance are floating holidays set by Enron for the year.
A Discretionary Day may be taken as a holiday on any work day with the
supervisor,s prior approval.  When used, it must be designated on payroll
records for that pay period; depending on the State where employed, an unused
discretionary holiday may be forfeited at year end.  For more information*
especially concerning holiday pay for employees who work other than the
standard, 8-hour, 5-day work week*please refer to HR policy #12 (Work Hours,
Holidays, Vacation) or contact your HR representative.


p.s.  we are not selling a pipeline at all.  just the fee property on which
no pipelines exist.  tell me where I lost you and I'll be happy to clarify
further.

thanks, Dan.

Candy

Dan.J.Hyvl@enron.com on 06/06/2001 02:04:34 PM

To:   clbywaters1@aep.com
cc:

Subject:  Re: Crane County 640 Acre Sale

Where is your earnest money contract?  Isn't the information therein.  I
was not aware that we were selling a pipeline to anyone.  Please advise?

                    clbywaters1@a

                    ep.com               To:     dan.j.hyvl@enron.com

                                         cc:

                    06/06/2001           Subject:     Crane County 640 Acre
Sale
                    07:25 AM

---------------------- Forwarded by Candace L Bywaters/HO1/AEPIN on
06/06/2001 07:25 AM ---------------------------

Candace L Bywaters
06/06/2001 07:19 AM

To:   dan hyvl@enron.com
cc:

Subject:  Crane County 640 Acre Sale

While I'm in the process of getting the appropriate information for Mr.
Earp, one question.  Shouldn't we also have a bill of sale to accompany
this document, registering the value to be paid for this property?

Pls advise.

Candy


I understand you plan to attend the meeting on May 11th at Brennans.  I
would like to put you down for another update on the energy industry
situation....nothing of more interest to our group and of great
importance to Houston and all of us.  Thank you in advance!!  (if
something comes up at the last minute and you can't make it...I'll just
fill in with something else.)  Regards, R


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	EB 3143c - Interview Warrick Dwayne Franklin

Date:		6/19/2001
Time:		1:00 PM - 1:30 PM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Stacey W White

Detailed Description:

(per April Weatherford) - Conf Rm per Lisa Zarsky - 3-4321


Dave,  Attached is a rough draft of the letter we discussed.  The right to
match option is a little less drastic than the "saving sharing" we
discussed.  The savings sharing is a little more problematic to enforce.  We
can discuss though, if that is really the way you want to go.  Please review
and lets discuss.


-a reminder,
NEIL HARSHFIELD'S work will be leaving the gallery after this Saturday.
We are letting you know because of your past expressed interest in his work.
In the region, Neil will continue to show with Arthur Roger Gallery in New Orleans.
james gallery
307 sul ross | houston | tx 77006
713.942.7035 tel | 713.942.7038 fax
contactus@jamesgalleryhouston.com
wed-sat 10-5:30
N
http://www.jamesgalleryhouston.com


Kay, I take no exception to the changes.  I see where we have included a down
payment requirement.  From EECC's perspective this is a good point.  I assume
that Mark is ok with it.

Will you or Mark forward the document to the customer or do you want EECC to
do it.

	Kay Mann
	02/07/2001 05:33 PM

		 To: Robert Sevitz/NA/Enron@Enron, Randy Pais/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Co Op City EPC contract

Here 'tis:


I am forwarding a resume from an Enron Argentina legal candidate who is
perhaps interested in ENA.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2000
11:44 AM ---------------------------

Sami Arap@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/21/2000 11:34 AM
To: Sara Shackleton@ECT
cc: SJRoss@BarristerReferrals.com
Subject: Buljevich, de Rosso, Saborit, Esq.

Sara;

I am forwarding to you a copy of Esteban Buljevich's resume for your review.
We have interviewed Mr. Buljevich for our BA Office, but we would think that
he would rather pursue an opportunity with Enron North America.  I would
greatly appreciate it if you could forward Esteban's cv to the appropriate
people within ECT and ENA.

Thanks,

Sami

---------------------- Forwarded by Sami Arap/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/21/2000
02:39 PM ---------------------------

"Stanley J. Ross" <SJRoss@BarristerReferrals.com> on 03/21/2000 01:51:32 PM
To: "Sami Arap-Sobrinho, Esq." <Sami.Arap@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Buljevich, de Rosso, Saborit, Esq.

Sami:

Thank you for your emails this morning.  Attached is a copy of Esteban
Buljevich's c.v. as you requested as well as a copy of his list of selected
transactions.

I am very pleased that you will be speaking to Randy about Pablo de Rosso.

Please let me know if John Novak requires my assistance in arranging to
speak with Joaquin Sales Saborit.

Regards,
Stanley Ross
 - BULJEVICH Esteban 2/00


Presentations That Work
June 11 & 12  8:00 am - 5:00 pm
in EB560    Cost:  $900
Limited seats available

This intensive 16-hours workshop includes nine presentations and provides
practice and feedback from peers, instructors, and videotape.  The training
focuses on instruction and practice in organization, delivery skills, visual
design and use, and question-and-answer models.  Participants will receive
personalized, confidential feedback from the instructor and will develop a
self-improvement action plan.  Customized exercises give participants
first-hand experience in one-on-one, small group, impromptu, and sit-down
settings.

As a result of this course, you will be able to:

? Reduce preparation time
? Increase rapport and persuasions
? Organize your ideas for impact
? Select appropriate details
? Plan the presentation
? Design and use visuals effectively
? Use a dynamic delivery style
? Handle questions and answers appropriately

Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website,
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any
questions, please call 713 853-0357.


I talked to Rick but he is on his way to SP to try and resolve the Petrobras
consent.  I will try and put together a meeting for us to resol the issues.
Thanks for your patience.


Carolyn,

Please use NewCo instead of Spawn.  Also, please give them only one business
day to review the final facility agreement.  Also, we need the duplicate
forms for Sunlaw Energy Corporation.

Will we be getting the drafts tonight?

Please call me if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Kay


Vince:

According to Alex,  Li Xiao gave your email address to Alex.  Did Li Xiao
talk to you first about Alex? I don't know for certain.  Alex contacted you
in March, interviewed once, but nothing came of it.  After Gary left, Li Xiao
suggested to Alex that he try again, and the rest is history.

Grant.

Vince J Kaminski
02/15/2000 08:58 AM
To: Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Referral

Grant,

Did Li Xiao refer Alex  to us?

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/15/2000
08:57 AM ---------------------------

Linda Vargo
02/14/2000 02:39 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Referral

Can you advise as to whether or not Li Xiao referred Alex to you last
summer.  I need to know this in order to process
an employee referral (under old plan) for her.
---------------------- Forwarded by Linda Vargo/HOU/ECT on 02/14/2000 02:39
PM ---------------------------

Li Xiao@ENRON
02/14/2000 11:19 AM
To: Linda Vargo/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Referral

Hi, Linda,

I wonder if you heard from Vince Kaminski regarding my referral for Alex
Huang.

Thanks,

Li x39635

---------------------- Forwarded by Li Xiao/Corp/Enron on 02/14/2000 11:12 AM
---------------------------

Linda Vargo@ECT
01/17/2000 04:29 PM
To: Li Xiao/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Re: Referral

I am waiting for feedback from Vince Kaminsky.  As soon as I know something,
I will advise.


no problem. they seem okay so far.


Per our conversation, please find attached below a copy of the PSA with
Mustang (PSA 19-96) as well as our Affiliate Tasking Letter form that we use.

The PSA expires shortly, but I am working with Sue Perkins at Mustang to
update the rate schedule and extend the term for an additional two years, so
there will not be a problem with issuing a Tasking Letter under this
Agreement.

If you have any questions or if I may be of further assistance, please feel
free to contact me.  Please send me a copy of the Tasking Letter once it is
fully executed so that I may put a copy in our contract file.

Thanks
Renee Alfaro
Phone: 713-646-7281
Fax: 713-646-6158
Email: ralfaro@enron.com


Enron opens an office in Japan.  Get the details in eBiz.

Also in this issue:
FERC suggests overhaul for California
ENA's focus on upstream services
Cyber Cafe in Dabhol

It's all in the latest eBiz.  Go to home.enron.com, click Publications, then
click eBiz, and "eBiz November 3, 2000."


One Enron(.  To support this corporate goal, Enron Net Works (both European
and Houston Information Technology) is standardizing technology across the
Enron Business Units outlined below.   Project plans for EBS, GPG, and Azurix
are still being finalized and will be communicated separately.  Our goal is
to create a computing environment with the same look and feel across all of
Enron.  Oh, and did we mention that this will make traveling to another Enron
site feel almost like you,ve never left home?   (At least when it comes to
your ability to access Enron information.) Well, we plan to accomplish this
with Project GEM!

Project GEM (Global Enron Migration) is a collaborative project team
comprised of IT employees from London and Houston that have focused on
delivering a standardized rollout of Windows 2000.  We want to thank our
customers who have already been contacted by Project GEM for their
participation and feedback.  Currently we have approximately 600 employees
using Windows 2000 and we are ready to begin an Enron-wide roll out.

We are finalizing our Business Unit rollout schedule.  Additional information
will be provided as it becomes available.  In the meantime, please contact
your Business Unit representative listed below if you have any questions.

Business Unit / Date	Contact Name	Contact Information
Enron Corp
Enron North America (ENA)
Enron Property & Services Company
Enron Net Works
Enron Global Finance	Denise Rancour	 713-345-8069
ENA Remote Offices	 Fred Philipson	 713-345-9323
Enron Global Exploration & Pipeline	 Denise Rancour	713-345-8069
Enron Engineering & Construction Co.	 Burt Wilson	 713-345-5974
Enron Europe	 Chris Farrell	 +44(0)20 7783 4537
Enron India	 Burt Wilson	 713-345-5974
Enron South America    	 Burt Wilson	 713-345-5974
CALME Region
 - Enron Caribbean Basin
 - Enron Global LNG
   - Enron Middle East	  Burt Wilson	 713-345-5974
 APACHI Region
   - Enron Asia/Pacific
   - Enron Africa
   - Enron China	 Fred Philipson	 713-345-9323
Enron Energy Services	Rob Collier	713-853-7826

In addition to these contacts, you also may send questions to "Project GEM"
or project.gem@enron.com, and a member of the project team will be happy to
address these individually.  The latest project updates and news will also be
posted on the Project section of the IT Central Web site at
http://itcentral.enron.com.

We are very excited about the roll out of Windows 2000.  It is the foundation
for the delivery of future applications.  So, stay tuned for more details!!!


Can one of you write us a brief article for Deal Central on the California
order that came out the other day.  This is an article that needs an EES
spin.  A couple of paragraphs is all we need.  Thanks.


I haven't heard from any of the additional names submitted on last week.
Will any of the following attend our meeting.  I am submitting my final room
count to the resort today.

  David Kirkland w/PNM
  Steve Irizarry w/TransColorado
  Mike Larsen w/Duke

Let me hear from you today, please.

adr


If we did not send the link to Toronto office (Gaffney) a couple of weeks
ago, can you do so this week?  Thanks.

Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas   77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
mary.cook@enron.com


Mike has suggested that we cut back  board meetings to fewer than the eight
(8) we currently hold.? In order to  give you some background, Linda checked
other peer companies and the meetings  range from 6 to 8 a year.?
?
I think that we can cut back to 6,  however it may be more prudent to drop to
7 this year and first see how it goes  .? The two meetings that can be
dropped most easily are June or  September.?
?
June,  because we have the two day strat  plan meeting in July, and Sept.
because we don't yet have 4th quarter results  and not a lot of new
information is available.
?
I think that the board meetings take up   an incredible amount of Compaq
executive time and energy. I would rather have  them concentrate on getting 6
or 7 meetings right, getting the company back on  track and? increasing
earnings.? So, my vote is to?recommend to the board that we  eliminate the
September '01 meeting.? That is a particularly busy month for  many people as
exhibited by the lack of attendance we had at this past September  meeting (5
members).? In looking back, we seem to be able to "fill the  house" in June.
?
On the other hand, you all may want to  continue with the number of meetings
we currently have.? I will await your  reply.
?
Regards,
?
?


Hi Joy

We are not going to be able to make the event this year but thanks.

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Joy and Jeff Lee" <jeffjoylee@earthlink.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:01 PM
To:	Cara Cancelmo; Alexandra Cokinos; Claire Cooper; Sager, Elizabeth; Mary Elizabeth Davis; Frankie Demeris; Erin Granberry; Paige Matson; Emma Morgan; Leslie Moseley; Carly Rapp; Francesca Sartori; Anastasia Zavitsanos
Subject:	STRIDERS

As of today, I have not received paperwork to  register your daughter for Girl Scout STRIDERS, a track and field  event on December 1st.  If you want her to participate,  please deliver the event sign-up sheet and permission slip to Joy Lee by  Thursday, November 15th.  The troop's registration goes in Friday and girls  will not be able to register late.

If you need a copy of the forms, please call Joy  713-660-8764.

If you are not participating this year, please  reply to let me know.

Thanks,  Joy Lee


Start Date: 10/25/01; HourAhead hour: 1;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Fischer/HOU/EES on 08/29/2001 05:24 PM ---------------------------

Kim Harris
08/09/2001 01:07 PM
To:	Mary Fischer/HOU/EES@EES, Robert Guthrie/Enron@EnronXGate
cc:
Subject:	New Le Hesten FS

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Harris/HOU/EES on 08/09/2001 01:03 PM ---------------------------

Kim Harris
08/03/2001 04:11 PM
To:	Patricia A Lee/HOU/EES@EES, Mary Fischer/HOU/EES@EES, Jennifer Myers/HOU/EES@EES, Trisha Hughes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Ronald Adzgery/HOU/EES@EES
Subject:	New Le Hesten FS

Latest and greatest.........we'll discuss next week.  Only change I made was to the Preferred Distribution accrual on the detailed RE Statement.

Have a good weekend!

Kim
5-3474


Hi Pete,

I'm attaching parts of an email I received from one of our technical folks
regarding the C of Austin turbine contract.  I have to send it in pieces
because it is so large.

Thanks,

Kay


Tana:

None of the following CPs are authorized to trade US power:

Wisconsin Central System, a div of Wisconsin Central Transportation
Corporation - not a current trading partner/not FERC approved
AIG International Inc. -- not a current trading partner/not FERC approved
Buena Vista Hills, LLC - restricted by credit
United Parcel Service Inc. - not a current trading partner/not FERC approved

Leslie


According to legal, we have no jurisdiction over the domain name or its use.

Therefore we have no reason to become involved ( notify either party etc).

Obviously we would not pursue any activity similar to this.

Louise

ps funny though

Louise Kitchen
27/06/2000 09:35
To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: spectrononline.com domain name redirecting to enrononline

The spectrononline problem.

From initial IT investigation, it appears the domain name is owned by a
trader at Alliance Gas.  We have had no knowledge of this until one of our
power traders
found out yesterday.
Please could you advise if we need to do anything (eg notify Spectron ,
contact the IT resource we located on the web.

Thanks

Louise

Details from web research:

"Ahmed Hammodan Ahmed Hammodan (template COCO-265458) CORE-11
   .
   5 York MansionsChiltern Street
   Marylebone
   London, .   W1M 1PT   England

   Domain Name: spectrononline.com
   Status:      production

   Admin Contact, Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
      Steve Procter (COCO-21639) sales@easily.co.uk
      +441727874464 (FAX) +441727874464"

---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 27/06/2000
09:15 ---------------------------

Louis Redshaw
27/06/2000 05:57
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Derek Edmiston/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon Hastings/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: spectrononline.com redirecting to enrononline

excellent ruse!  We heard about this through other brokers who heard it from
a counterparty.  However I tried the same for ICAPonline and
intercapitalonline after Derek joked with them that we'd done it for all the
other brokers, and they had no sites.  I wonder if they'll reserve the sites
for themselves now that their minds have been focused, if you were thinking
of doing the same for other brokers names, we should get moving.

Hope Houston's treating you well,

Louis


There were some schedule changes to april and may due to some training
classes on the last weeekend in April.  If anyone has conflicts let me know
or trade where possible.

ryan


Dear David,

I'm so glad you asked for an update!

We have indeed had an interesting development regarding the Electricity Bill
since your visit.  You will recall that in AMCHAM's briefing, it was
positively noted that the drafting process of the Electricity Bill had been
transparent and that a draft that would provide a blueprint for the
restructuring of the electricity sector to move toward competitive markets
was attained.  Noone was 100 percent satisfied (probably the mark of a good,
passable bill) but many  agreed to the draft and felt, while not perfect, it
would achieve the desired reform.

We have learned that there are actually two drafts of the Electricity Bill
sponsored by the Ministry of Power.  The first has been developed by NCAER
(NCAER draft) in a very transparent process with seven iterations and
comments from 190 parties.  NCAER was hired as a consultant for this purpose
by the Ministry of Power.  At the time of Draft III, a second draft (MoP
draft) was developed in the Ministry which subsequently incorporated some but
not all of the NCAER draft provisions negotiated in the transparent process.
It was the MoP draft that was sent to the Group of Ministers and has been
worked on by the Ministry of Law.

The draft, however, was never introduced in Parliament.  The industry
discovered the existence of the second MoP draft immediately prior to
Minister Kumaramangalam's hospitalization and lobbied him and Secretary Basu
heavily to introduce the NCAER draft in Parliament or, at a minimum, allow a
transparent commenting process on the MoP draft.

Several parties in the industry have now been given the MoP draft, and
Secretary Basu has said he would entertain comments.  (How widely it has been
distributed is unknown.)  In addition, the death of the Minister, who was a
staunch advocate of reform, and the lack of a named successor, has now left
things somewhat uncertain.

The issues as they now stand are:

The existence of two separate Ministry-sponsored drafts, only one of which
was subjected to a wide sector review process.
The need to use the product of a transparent, commenting process once it has
been formulated.
The fact that the fine-tuned balance of interests and clear blueprint for a
transition to competitive markets achieved by the NCAER draft has been lost
in the MoP draft.  For example, the clear deregulation of price provisions in
the tariff section have been removed so that there is, in the MoP draft, full
regulation of price by the state commissions; however, in the state
commission section, there is a provision that allows the State Commission to
permit access to a consumer class and only determine the wheeling charge
(rather than the wheeling and supply price) for that class when it has so
determined.   Thus, there is  an apparent conflict within the statute
regarding the regulation of commodity priceand uncertainty regarding access
to end users.  (There are many such examples.)

Action Item:  Either support the NCAER draft and send it to the Ministry of
Law for legal fine tuning (Basu mentioned that the "form" of the NCAER draft
was not right), or repeat the iterative, transparent commenting process with
regard to the MoP draft.  hWe recommend supporting the NCAER draft because it
reflects a balance of the multiple sector interests.  It is the first such
document produced through an open process in India and was a process
sponsored by the Ministry -- for that reason alone, the Ministry should
promote and support the NCAER version.

Any assistance you can render on this issue will be greatly appreciated by
many parties in the sector.  Let us know how it goes.

Sincerely,
Jane Wilson

---------------------- Forwarded by Jane Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
09/09/2000 07:51 PM ---------------------------

"Pumphrey, David" <David.Pumphrey@hq.doe.gov> on 09/09/2000 03:36:09 AM
To: "'sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com'" <sanjay.bhatnagar@enron.com>,
"'jane.wilson@enron.com'" <jane.wilson@enron.com>
cc: "Cutler, Thomas" <Thomas.Cutler@hq.doe.gov>

Subject: Electricity Bill Developments

Dear Sanjay and Jane,

I wanted to again thank you for the briefings you provided during my recent
visit to India.  Your analysis of developments in the electricity sector were
very helpful.

As you know we are getting ready for the visit of the Prime Minister next
week.  We have several energy events related to the visit and hope to be able
to complete some of the "homework" that you assigned.  It would be
particularly helpful if you could provide any updates on the status of the
Electricity bill.  I understand that the Council of Ministers had approved it
but I don't know if progress has been made in the Parliament.  Also there was
a report that some aspects of the bill had been changed in the approval
process.  Any updates would be useful for us in preparing for our meetings
with Secretary Basu and the Prime Minister.

Thanks for any help you can provide.

David Pumphrey
Department of Energy


ok


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hochschild, Lenny
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	FW: natural gas inquiry

Hey John -

You're the only guy I know in Nat Gas. Please forward this to the right person. Thanks.

Lenny

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brown, Ron X
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:22 AM
To:	Hochschild, Lenny
Subject:	natural gas inquiry

Hi Lenny,

Don't know if you are involved in this area or not. I think maybe. Anyway, we have a refined lead contract with Hammond. The local buyer for Pottstown, PA is interested in getting information about natural gas for possible future use from ENRON. If you could contact him or direct him to the person that is in a position to help it would be appreciated.  His name is, Joe Stewartz E-MAIL address is jstewartz@hmndgroup.com
telephone number (610) 327-1400 Fax number (610) 327-1255

Thanking you in advance and hope all is well with you.

Regards,
Ron Brown


-----Original Message-----
From: Richoux, Fred
Sent:  Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:33 PM
To: Heard, Anne
Subject:  FW: OZ (Truer Than We Know!!)

-----Original Message-----
From: Wagner, Bob
Sent:  Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:30 PM
To: Basanko, Olga; Connor, Larry;  Moredock, Sandy; Richoux, Fred; Zak, Mike
Subject: FW: OZ (Truer Than  We Know!!)
> > The last four U.S.  Presidents are caught in a tornado, and off they spin
to
> > OZ.  After threatening trials and tribulations, they finally make it tothe
>  > Emerald City and come before the Great Wizard.
> "WHAT BRINGS YOU  BEFORE THE GREAT WIZARD OF OZ? WHAT DO YOU WANT?"
> > Jimmy Carter  steps forward timidly: "I've come for some courage."
> >
> >  "NO PROBLEM!" says the Wizard. "WHO IS NEXT?"
> >
> > Ronald  Reagan steps forward, "Well, I think I need a brain."
> >
>  > "DONE," says the Wizard. "WHO COMES NEXT BEFORETHE GREAT AND POWERFUL OZ?"
> >
> > Up steps George H. W. Bush sadly, "I'm told by  the American people that I need a
> > heart."
> >
>  > "I'VE HEARD ITS TRUE," says the Wizard. "CONSIDER IT DONE."
> >
> > Then there is a great silence in the hall. Bill Clinton is just  standing
> > there, looking around, but doesn't say a word.
>  >
> > Irritated, the Wizard finally asks, "WHAT DO YOU WANT?"
> >
> > Clinton says "Is Dorothy here?"
> >


George,

 The San Marcos project is sounding very attractive.  I have one other
investor in addition to Keith that has interest.  Some additional background
information on Larry and yourself would be helpful.

 Background Questions:

 Please provide a brief personal history of the two principals involved in
Creekside.

 Please list projects completed during the last 5 years.  Include the project
description, investors, business entity,

 Please provide the names and numbers of prior investors.

 Please provide the names and numbers of several subcontractors used on
recent projects.

 With regard to the proposed investment structure, I would suggest a couple
of changes to better align the risk/reward profile between Creekside and the
investors.

 Preferable Investment Structure:

 Developers guarantee note, not investors.

 Preferred rate of return (10%) must be achieved before any profit sharing.

 Builder assumes some risk for cost overruns.

         Since this project appears so promising, it seems like we should
tackle these issues now.  These questions are not intended to be offensive in
any way.  It is my desire to build a successful project with Creekside that
leads to future opportunities.  I  am happy to provide you with any
information that you need to evaluate myself or Keith as a business partner.

Sincerely,

Phillip Allen


SK - Printed and put in your working group folder.  Also put as "FYI" next
scheduled meeting.  mm

Follow - up to our first meeting -

We had very good participation.  In the absence of some technical
difficulties, we would have had 100% participation.

As our discussion showed, people bring different issues and needs to the
group.  It seems that this group will function best if we serve as a source
of information and resources to each other.  Our collective knowledge is
capable of helping many different individual problems; we just need to figure
how to get the right information to the people who need it.  Our first task
should be to sort through this wide ranging topic and start to focus on some
specific deliverables.

Attached is an updated roster of the team, and a listing of the subgroups and
some ideas of what the subgroup should consider.  These ideas are not meant
to restrict but give some additional clarity.  Please note the subgroup
membership and the designated team leads, and begin your discussions.

Our next meeting will be Friday, February 4, 9:30 am - 11 am Central Standard
Time.  More details on phone/video conferencing and a full agenda will be
given later.  At the meeting, each subgroup should share with the larger
group their thoughts on the directions to be taken by the subgroup.  At that
time, we can all offer additional comments.

Thank you!


Carol:

I had Ellen Levinson make some changes to the bankruptcy derivatives
documents she produced, so that it reads a little better and is presented as
one complete package.  Could you review and approve (or edit) this document
ASAP?

As soon as I have your approval, I would like to:
1) get it to our industry colleagues at ISDA and Bond Market Association to
get them on board,
2) get it to Treasury/PWG for review
3) schedule a meeting/call with Treasury/PWG to get final sign-off
4) schedule Hill meetings to present language for inclusion in the conference
committee managers' package of amendments

Once we get through steps 1 and 2, I'll be able to better let you know if you
should bother coming to D.C. for steps 3 and/or 4.

THANKS!

Jeff


Sorry for the delay. I have been out of the office for few days.  Anyway
attached is the request for advice. Hope it is of some help.I also enclosed
the file note that I produced after our discussion last month. That proved
very useful in focusing counsel in on the relevant issues.

To: David Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: EnronOnline Legal Due Diligence

David -

I am putting together the request for assistance from local counsel in Japan
in preparation for opening up EnronOnline to Japanese counterparties.  If you
have a copy of the request you sent to MSJ when you started working on this
for Australia it would be very helpful to me.  I have what we've used in
Europe but would be grateful for your thoughts as well.

Thanks,

Mark


Next Steps

Resumes 1/10/01 in WDC.  Enron will continue to attend.

In the Room

Reliant submitted its proposal for blended rates and determining the real gap
between a blended wholesale price and potential retail rates. Reliant showed
that the gap is potentially quite small.
Reliant's effort was to move us away from the "Sharing the Pain" concept
offered by PG&E.
Enron again requested utility ideas for a quid pro quo, assuming any deal
could be struck.
Judge requested additional info from ISO and PX on market shares -- several
marketers explained their concern (e.g. Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch,
Avista) that this request gave credence to the "Pain" allocation proposal and
refused to give permission to release their data.  Enron said it was checking
on whether to release the data, but had the same concerns as the other
marketers on the principles.
Judge decided to use a joint statement for his report (see attached) to the
public. The statement was agreed to, in large part, by the participants.
Judge mentioned that 40% of the A/S market is apparently held by three
municipal/alien utilities.
Judges order urges participation by these parties.

Out of the Room

More bilateral discussions between utilities and gens.
Marketers discuss whether to continue to stay in the room and participate.


---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 08/18/2000
10:07 AM ---------------------------

	Invitation
Chairperson: Madhup Kumar

Start: 08/23/2000 03:00 PM
End: 08/23/2000 04:00 PM

Description: Select Web Scrapping tool, EB42C1

This meeting repeats   starting on    (if the date occurs on a weekend the
meeting ).
Meeting Dates:

john tollefsen
Lloyd Will/HOU/ECT@ECT
george Hopley
hunter shively
Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT
Nicole La/HOU/ECT@ECT
Clayton Vernon/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Colin Tonks/LON/ECT@ECT
Chris Hyde/Corp/Enron@Enron
Ted Biggs/Corp/Enron@Enron
Marc Bir/Corp/Enron
Yannis Tzamouranis/HOU/ECT

Detailed description:


Attached is the Transwestern Capacity Release Report that lists all capacity release transactions for the period effective 2/1/2002 forward.

A couple of things to note:
PG&E released two separate packages of gas for 25,000/day from Bloomfield to CA [one was at a fixed rate and the other is index based].
Socal indicated that the core customers they provided capacity via capacity release protested a ruling by the CPUC and won; therefore, these monthly prearranged releases are back on for now.  Because the decision came in late, Socal was not able to release for the full month of February.
ENA's capacity on K #24924 was again successfully released for February with TW collecting marketing revenues.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks,
Elizabeth


Hi, Roeline!

Just checking on the status of the original assignments I forwarded to you for execution.  Have you received them back from UOM, Dynegy and Sempra?  If so, will you send me an original of each for my files?

Hope all is going well and that you have a great weekend.

Marie


Please see the attached RFP's for June 2001 supply.

(See attached file: June2001.doc)

We look forward to receiving  your proposals on Wednesday, May 16, 2001
(2:00 p.m.).

Sevan
416 495-5357
 - June2001.doc


Rick:

Just want to let you know that I missed the boat a bit in coordinating my
reviewers with Paul.  In my first attempt to input them in the system, I
hesitated including you for the simple reason that I'm certain you have
countless other reviews to do already, and, frankly, I feel that you're an
integral part of my review whether you're formally on the list or not.  When
I went back to make my final additions to the list, the systerm was already
closed--Paul had approved the first round, which I guess shuts it down.

It's likely not appropriate for reviews to happen outside the system, but I
wanted to let you know that, from my perspective, it would be great to
receive from you.  I'd value it a lot.  And I think we've worked closely
enough together over the last year for you to have a basis for reviewing me.
But again, I'm of the view that irrespective of the list, you partake in my
review of necessity, and I don't want to add any additional burdens to an
already loaded schedule.

No big deal, just wanted to let you know.

And I'm having a field day filling out your review. ("Rick discriminates
unfairly against neon-colored shirts.")   Seriously, I was quite pleasantly
surprised to have ended up as one of your reviewers.

Best,
Jeff


Background

The ISO presently uses the SLIC application in that Outage Coordination
operators manually enter outage information gathered from market
participants via fax, e-mail or phone call.  However, during the recent
power crisis, it was determined that several smaller units were actually out
of service simultaneously with other major outages and the lack of
coordination caused serious operational problems that could have been
avoided had the ISO had forehand knowledge of the market participant
requirements.  As a result, Executive Order D-23-01 was created by Governor
Gray Davis to enhance management of the ISO controlled grid by ordering the
ISO to request and coordinate the information of all generating facilities
within the state of California capable of providing 10MW of power or more.

In response to the critical problem at hand, the re-design and development
of a web-interface SLIC application was implemented to address the way the
outage information is collected and processed. This re-design proposes to
automate as much as possible the verification, management and processing of
outage requests and related information, with the objective of reducing
workload and eliminating the generation of errors.

How to Register as a SLIC user:

To connect to the ISO's SLIC system, all Outage Coordinators and Scheduling
Coordinators must first register their company information as well as
identify a person from within their company to act as a primary contact with
the ISO. The primary contact will be responsible for identifying personnel
from within their company who will be using SLIC and will require digital
certificates.

To register, please do the following:

* Complete and return the attached forms to the ISO (refer to return
address on page 2)

* Upon receipt and verification of this form, the ISO will forward a
Digital Certificate Request Form to the primary contact person identified
from within your company.

* The primary contact will then complete, and e-mail, the Digital
Certificate Request Form back to the ISO, identifying the personnel from
within their company requiring digital certificates.

* The ISO will process the requested Digital Certificates within 10
working days and Fed Ex them, along with the instructions for their use, to
the primary contact in your company.  Detailed instructions on using the
SLIC application will also be included in this mailing.

Full documentation for the program is being developed. The documentation
will include an implementation plan and user instructions. It is highly
important that we begin the security process as a soon as possible. Please
complete and return the forms by cob Friday, March 23,2001.

Contact Jblatchford@caiso.com (916)608-7051

 <<SLIC Cert Request Form.xls>>  <<OC Request to participate in SLIC3
MASTER.doc>>

 - SLIC Cert Request Form.xls
 - OC Request to participate in SLIC3 MASTER.doc


Brant:
Can you please e-mail me with the particulars on what should go into the El
Paso CSA so I can get that drafted and sent over to them?  Thanks.
Carol

----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 06/21/2000 09:55 AM -----

	<Mike_Pate@oxy.com>
	06/21/2000 07:28 AM

		 To: Carol.St.Clair@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: MAC Language

Carol:

Why don't you go ahead and send over your CSA form?  I think the idea here
is to have it fully negotiated in advance.  As to the idea of just using
S&P, I will pass that along to our Treasury Dept.

Mike

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Carol St Clair [mailto:Carol.St.Clair@enron.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 2:35 PM
  To: Mike_Pate@oxy.com
  Subject: MAC Language

  Mike:
  I have discussed your proposed language with Brant Reves,
our credit person, and
  we are okay with the concept except that we would like for
the ratings trigger
  to be based only on either a drop in the S&P rating or a
failure to have an S&P
  rating.  In addition, Brant has advised me that should we
put in place a CSA,
  that the following would be the credit matrix for collateral
threshold:

  BB to BB+  $2,500,000
  Below BB  Zero

  I look forward to hearing from you.  Should we send you our
form of Credit
  Support Annex?

  Carol St. Clair
  EB 3892
  713-853-3989 (Phone)
  713-646-3393 (Fax)
  carol.st.clair@enron.com


Hi Rebecca,

I'm trying to locate the sig pages for the NW guaranty.  These were the docs
that I approved after I had approved the letter agreement.  These signed
pages weren't with the letter agreements and change orders you brought me.
To you remember if you brought them to me before?  I haven't really searched
- I thought I would ask first.

Thanks,

Kay


Bert,
This is good to know. Thank you for the update.
Well done.
B

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyers, Albert
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 7:49 PM
To:	Williams III, Bill
Subject:	EPE Schedules for the past two days

Bill:

Please note the following due to the past two days schedules have been wrong in the EPE Schedules in Excel:

Tag number 6181 has been cancelled (50mw to the CISO).

Lending is wrong in the EPE schedules (it is 75mw from PSCO instead of 50mw).

SPS is wrong for HE 08 (it is 130mw instead of 100mw).

I thought you might like to since this is the only income we have currently for real-time and a major screw-up could hurt our relationship.

Regards,

Bert Meyers


The attached letter is being delivered this morning to the FERC
commissioners.  Since the letter concerns a matter currently pending before
the commission it will also be served on the parties.  We plan to talk to the
press about it as well.  A number of other companies and organizations are
also submitting letters and we have helped prepare an EPSA filing which
focusses specifically on California.  Our best information at this point is
that the FERC staff report regarding California is generally accurate, and
therefore, favorable.  While it will mention periodic exercises of market
power, it is expected to lay blame for California's woes at the feet of
California's own decisions about market structure.  It is further expected
that the report will not provide a basis for ordering refunds.  On the other
hand, the Commission's order (to be considered tomorrow along with the
staff's report) is expected to at least put refunds on the table for comment
and to discuss, and perhaps implement, further price caps.  This is just our
best guess at this point.  the Commission has put special emphasis on putting
the report and order under wraps until wednesday.
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 10/31/2000 07:24 AM -----

	Rosalee Fleming
	10/30/2000 06:00 PM

		 To: Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, dwatkiss@bracepatt.com
		 cc: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Hoecker letter


From my review of Eugenio's consolidated VAR spreadsheet, the following
listed items are those that are open that we           need information from
you on.  I will send a separate email that will address ECM,PGE and affiliate
information.  Corp. is looking to type the first draft of the Annual Report
(to be discussed with the Audit Committee) THIS FRIDAY, so we need your help
with this information as soon as possible.  If you will not be able to have
all of the information to Eugenio by Thursday night, please let me know.  We
may be able to give you some additional time to gather some of the smaller
pieces.   If you need to forward this on to others, please do so.

AA if you know of any other issues of completeness that I have not addressed,
please let Eugenio and I know!

*Why is Agg_ECT and Agg_ INDEX not available for January 1999?
*Is Cuiba in ESA's Nos.  Is it gas or power?  What month was it first
included? Is that the trade month?
*When did Australia first have substantial activity?  For some reason, the
spreadsheet has a June number, no July or August,      then September -
December.  If the first half of the year has material activity, we need to
get it from them.
*Has the Merrill peaker transaction been calculated yet (it was not
originally in theDPR)?  We definitely have to have that for the Dec. number.
*Where is EES gas?  Is it in the AGG_ECT?
*When did Kinneman's debt activity start?  The first VAR that we have is
September.  Did it start earlier?
*Did ET&S first have financial hedges in May, that is the first number that
we have?  Who should I talk to there?
*Is the June and September Rhythms number different that what we originally
calculated for the second and third quarter?  June must be as I recall it was
excluded at the time vs. the $24MM now showing.  Are the differences
primarily due to the 100%+ volatility versus the 60%+ number that Stinson
originally gave you? Have you asked him why he gave you what he did?  Please
get Jill Erwin to help you revise the December number for Ghost.
*There is lots of missing numbers for Total Return Swaps.  Eugenio and Gail
Tholen to determine which swaps were in place in which months of 1999 and run
the appropriate models.  If different models will need to be used in
different periods of the year for the same swap, lets get that information
out to AA and Jan.


i would like more detail if we have it tx rick

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crews, David
Sent:	Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:57 AM
To:	Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ENRON; David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject:	FYI - Project Raven

The proposed purchase of PSI Net by EBS was officially killed by Skilling this morning.

David


Bummer--it would have been a hoot.  Drinking and guns go together like ham
and eggs.  I'm in a meeting from 8:15 til 9 but then free for awhile--give me
a buzz whenever its convenient. DF

"Hooker, David" <DHooker@UtiliCorp.com> on 09/11/2000 06:45:55 AM
To: "'Drew.Fossum@enron.com'" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Oct. Hunt

Drewski:   I'm not going to be able to make it.  Bad timing unfortunately.
I call you this morning with the skinny.

-----Original Message-----
From: Drew.Fossum@enron.com [mailto:Drew.Fossum@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 5:20 PM
To: Tony@Digitrain.com; Frank.Bay@EnronCommunications.enron.net;
John.Dushinske@enron.com; dhooker@utilicorp.com; rlfossum@mato.com;
DLoon@USChamber.com
Subject: Oct. Hunt

Here's the deal--I just talked to my guy out in Kennebec S.D. and got a
glowing report on the situation.  His opening day group is down to 6 guys
so he is only giving them access to half of his fields--we get first shot
at the rest.  He's got so many pheasants he's worried about us limiting out
to fast and getting mad.    I assured him that the way we all shoot that
wouldn't be a problem.
When:  Friday-Sunday, Oct. 27-29.
Where:  Kenebec S.D.  (about 2 hours east of Rapid City, about 5 hours from
Omaha)
$$:       $75 per guy per day if we have at least 8 guys.   If we dwindle
to less than 8, its $100 per guy.  (he will cut us some slack on this if
some of you can only hunt 2 days.)
Fish:  Walleye fish fry on Sat. PM included
Lodging :  Super 8 in Chamberlain--about 30 miles away if the weather is
cold, possible camping in Kennebec if people are up for it.  Super 8 is a
lovely place:  motto is "Labs sleep free."  $100 per night, 4 guys per
room+ $25/head/night.

So far, I think we've got 5 or 6 guys locked in solid. Another 6 or 8 have
been invited but are obtaining spousal consent.   I'd like to get 10 locked
in solid by end of Sept.  More than that would make the hunting a little
clumsy.  Bay, my wife says you can't come because your new kid is due
around this time.  What a lame excuse!!  You were there for the first 4,
right?  Doesn't a guy deserve a bye eventually?  If you guys have anyone
else that's interested other than the folks that have already been invited,
let me know as we may want to invite a few more just to make sure we have
around 10.  Talk to you.  DF