i am going to stay home tonight.  i need my beauty sleep. it is also nice
being at home alone b/c chad is out of town.  i probably won't go out until
sat.


Can you reply to Justin & let him know where we stand?
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/20/2000 09:26 AM -----

	Justin Rostant
	10/20/2000 08:20 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: New Markets for EnronOnline

Mark,

 Sorry about the late request. Can I please get an update on the following
countries for EnronOnline

Argentina
Brazil
Colombia

This information is required for a report to Louis Kitchen by Friday.

Thank you very much for your assistance.
Justin Rostant
3-6460


Maria and Michael:

The form of confirmation of fine.  How would you like to handle execution of this transaction?  of remaining transactions?  Scheduling the VE discussion for later this week is also acceptable.  We look forward to hearing from you.  Regards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Chiodi, Maria" <maria.chiodi@csfb.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Chiodi+2C+20Maria+22+20+3Cmaria+2Echiodi+40csfb+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Armogida, Jim; Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Emerson, Michael; Haratunian, Stephen
Subject:	Revised Total Retun Confirmation

Jim and Sara:

As we discussed, I attach a revised copy of the confirmation that is marked
to show changes made to our June 27th draft.

Regards,

> 	Maria Chiodi
> 	Legal and Compliance Department
> 	CREDIT | FIRST
> 	SUISSE | BOSTON
> 	Phone: 212-325-6724
> 	Fax: 917-326-7763
>
>
 <<TRS Oct 4 2001 CSFB Draft.doc>>

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - TRS Oct 4 2001 CSFB Draft.doc << File: TRS Oct 4 2001 CSFB Draft.doc >>


I just called my other friend, her name is Renee Lewis and her home number is
281-484-2380.  She has sang the I Believe in You and Me song mnay times
before at weddings and she is familar with Kissing You, but said its a really
sexy song,  Have Barbara call her because she has alot of ideas.  She's a
professional now and she can suggest all kinds of songs.  Take care!


I want to add Trent Green for $50
I want to add D. Mason for $25


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 01/07/2000
09:33 AM ---------------------------

Corrinne Greasley <CGREASLEY@isda.org> on 01/06/2000 02:17:07 PM
To: ISDA BOARD <BOARD@isda.org>
cc: Nick Collier <ncollier@isda-eur.org>, Robert Pickel <RPICKEL@isda.org>
(bcc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Board Dinner

Dear Members of the Board:

The dinner for the Board of Directors will take place on January 26, 2000,
at 6:45pm (following the Board Meeting) at the restaurant listed below:

Quaglino's
16 Bury Street
London SW1Y 6AL
Phone: 171 930 6767

Quaglino's comes highly recommended by our resident restaurant critics so
the evening promises to be an enjoyable one.  Please confirm your attendance
by return e-mail if you have not already done so.

Thanks
Corrinne


Hi Rev. Jackson

How's it going?  I'm sure I'll be seeing you tonight at choir rehearsal, but
I was curious if anything new happened on the choir director front?

Let me know if you get this e-mail in time to respond.  I'll be leaving at
5:00 directly.

See you tonight!


Gerald,

Let's meet tomorrow to discuss these contracts.  We need to put this issue to
bed fairly soon.  Are you available at 1:00?

Regards,

Heather

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather,  I did receive the Ash Handling Agreement from Bill White and I am
reviewing and should have comments shortly.  I  have not received the Coal
Handling Agreement yet from Kris' attorney.

	Heather Kroll
	02/27/2001 03:26 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Gerald,

Please give me an update on the redrafting of the ReUse agreements.  I
thought you told me that their attorneys were drafting, but from this e-mail
I don't think Kris Johnson is aware of that.  Please follow up with their
attorneys and let me know when to expect a new draft.

Regards,

Heather Kroll
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 04:24
PM ---------------------------

"Johnson, Kris" <KrisJohnson@Cogentrix.com> on 02/27/2001 02:51:36 PM
To: "'Heather.Kroll@enron.com'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather:

Please give me a quick update on the status of the Lumberton and
Elizabethtown coal and ash contracts from Enron's perspective.  Are we still
shooting for a March 15th closing date.  As of now I will out of town on the
15th, but reachable.

Thanks, hope all is going well.

Kris Johnson
1-800-827-3873, ext. 105


fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Fabiano Robalinho [mailto:frobalinho@sbadv.com.br]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Blaine, Michelle
Subject: Fees Summary

Dear Michelle,

Please find attached the Fee Letters Summary.

Regarding the proposal for other LDCs', we sent a letter to Sergio Assad on
09.25.01, in which we propose a 30% reduction in the fees we had proposed to
Elektro and CPFL, if another LDC decides to join Elektro and CPFL in the law
suits mentioned in the Fee Letters Summary. FYI, our proposed fees to CPFL
are on the same basis of the fees proposed to Elektro.

Please feel free to call me, should you need any clarification.

Regards,

Fabiano Robalinho


Tana,
Please add Noel Petterson and Frank Davis to the distribution list for Legal
approvals. We can take Jarrod Cyprow off of the list now.
Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron on 11/02/2000
11:04 AM ---------------------------
From: Tana Jones@ECT on 11/02/2000 09:21 AM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jarrod Cyprow/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: ClickPaper Approval List for 11/01/00


Here is another opinion to support my earlier thoughts.  Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/28/2000 09:03 AM -----

	Sharon Butcher@ENRON
	06/27/2000 08:23 PM

		 To: Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: CALME JV & Consultants

Dear Michelle:  I agree with you and Kriste.  I thought we put this issue to
bed several years ago.  Consultants and Contractors are to be reviewed, if at
all, by their respective employers.  If the Consultant and/or Contractor is
not an employee of a third party employer, then Enron has the right to
determine if they are meeting the terms and provisions of their contract.
However, this does not mean they are to be included in the PEP and PRC
process.

To include them opens too many doors with respect to the proper
classification of these individuals.  If we treat them like employees, we may
find that a court determines they should be employees and thus eligible for
all employee benefits, a la MicroSoft.

Thanks.  Sharon

06/27/2000 02:33 PM
Kriste Sullivan
Kriste Sullivan
Kriste Sullivan
06/27/2000 02:33 PM
06/27/2000 02:33 PM
To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathryn
McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sharon Butcher/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: CALME JV & Consultants

I agree with your recommendation Michelle that consultants and contractors
should not participate in the PRC or the PEP process.  If  you treat
consultants and contractors like "employees", they will soon become them in
the eyes of the law, along with all of the costs, bonuses, and benefits.

Kriste K. Sullivan
Enron Corp. Legal
1400 Smith, EB 4861
Houston, TX  77002
(713) 853-7557
(713) 646-5847 Fax
KSulliv@Enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	Michelle Cash@ECT
	06/27/2000 01:03 PM

		 To: Kathryn McLean/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sharon
Butcher/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kriste Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: CALME JV & Consultants

Privileged and Confidential -- Advice Covered by the Attorney-Client Privilege

K2:

I have copied this email to Sharon & Kriste, who are supporting the CALME
region.  My recommendation is to exclude contractors/consultants because
their inclusion would increase the risk that they would be deemed to be
employees, and that a court could determine that they are owed employee
compensation and benefits (a la Microsoft).  This exposure could be high.
Depending on the other indicators of independent contractor status, rating
them along side our employees could be a factor to tilt the balance.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Michelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------

Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas  77002
(713) 853-6401
michelle.cash@enron.com

This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.

	Kathryn McLean
	06/27/2000 10:01 AM

		 To: Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: CALME JV & Consultants

Hi Michelle,

Please see my note below regarding including JV employees and Consultants in
our PEP system and the PRC. Could you please give us more expert legal advice
(from my own : - )!!) in relation to this? We want to ensure that we cover
ourselves.

Thanks, K2.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathryn McLean/HOU/ECT on 06/27/2000
09:51 AM ---------------------------

	Kathryn McLean
	06/26/2000 09:12 AM

To: David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gina Corteselli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Janie
Bonnard/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Chris
Cockrell/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Monica Cale/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CALME JV & Consultants

David,

I've been forwarded a voicemail on Friday from David Haug where he has
requested that we include CALME's JV employees and Consultants who are at the
VP level. (He knows that they should not be pulled into the VP meeting).
Monica and I initially pushed back on this due to the requirement that only
AIP employees are involved in our mid year process, however, due to David's
instance I'm reverting to you for a decision.

Although I do not have a strong opinion on including the JV's - my concern is
primarily with the Consultants.

Below are my concerns in accommodating this request:-

- The PEP system has officially told employees that the feedback stage has
finished. Although the system is still open we are going to turn off the
system message requesting reviewers to access PEP to review employee.  In
this instance, there would need to be an effort within Janie's team to
communicate to all reviewers of the JV's that they are required to give
feedback.

- The way PEP is set up, we would need to load the consultants as employees
in order to generate the 360 feedback functionality. Due to US law on how to
describe employees/non employees in a database, this comes with legality
issues and I want us to be aware of what we're doing regarding this.

Call me to discuss or if you wish for me to forward the voicemail,

K2


This may be pertinent.
----- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:46 PM -----

	Justin Boyd
	08/09/2000 12:54 PM

		 To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
		 cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: FX Transactions

Jon,

I had a glance over the written paper from Sullivan & Cromwell as to FX
Transactions, and it seems to me that there would be fewer US regulatory
issues (should there be any), if we were to use MG Brokers Inc, the FCM
entity.  Are there any other reasons why we would not want to use this entity?

[Mark/Alan/Marcus - I have separately sent you by email the Sullivan &
Cromwell paper]

Thanks.
Justin

---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Boyd/LON/ECT on 09/08/2000 18:49
---------------------------

Jon Barrett@MGLTD
09/08/2000 16:37
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT, Janine Juggins/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Trena McFarland/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin Rhodes/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Sid
Tipples/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD, Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: FX Transactions

---------------------- Forwarded by Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD on
09/08/2000 16:36 ---------------------------
From: Alfred Pennisi@MGUSA on 09/08/2000 06:50 EDT
To: Jon Barrett/MGLTD_London/MGLTD@MGLTD
cc:

Subject: Re: FX Transactions

Jon,

My suggestion would be for the FX business be run out of a NON FCM firm in
the states (NY) since it is a non-regulated product.

If you have an questions please call me at x5845.

regards,

Alfred Pennisi
MG London Inc.
520 Madison Avenue
28th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212.715.5845
E-mail: alfred.pennisi@mglondon.com


My understanding is that we want to take forward our cooperative effort with
PNG insofar as it involves education and information sharing, but that
capital investment is probably not in the cards.  As you probably know,
Christopher Hunt is coming back to Singapore to meet with the commercial
teams next week to outline Enron's commercial strategy in the region, and I
suggest that you and I get together by phone soon thereafter.  Chris tells me
you two have already spoken today.  Feel free to call me sooner if you wish,
but I think Chris can paint a more complete picture than me, and then we can
talk.   mcs

David Merrill@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/02/2000 16:40
To: Mark Schroeder@ECT, Terence H Thorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: Draft PGN/Pertamina Singapore Gas Transportation Agreement

FYI.  The PGN Indonesia partnership is letting us give drafting advice on
PGN's Gas
Transportation Agreement to Singapore.  The Indonesia to Singapore
project is on track and PGN would like us to apply to be the strategic
investor required by the Asian Development Bank.   ADB requirements
would favor us because ADB is looking for transmission competency in
the investor, not only price.  The partnership lets us demonstrate the
competency.   See e-mail yesterday on the other three areas PGN
encouraged Enron to invest in with them, including a marketing company.

---------------------- Forwarded by David Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/11/2000 12:32 AM ---------------------------

David Merrill
02/10/2000 05:45 AM
To: Robert Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Christopher B
Hunt/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Repit Suliyono/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jane
Wilson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Paul Adair@ECT

Subject: Draft PGN/Pertamina Singapore Gas Transportation Agreement

Chris:  This is concrete confirmation of one of the items we discussed this
morning:
that we are advising PGN on the language of their draft Gas Transportation
Agreement
for gas to Singapore - an agreement between Pertamina, PGN, and Santa
Fe/Gulf.
So Enron are advising on this agreement.   Re your question about guaranteed
volume,
it appears there are to be capacity entitlements for the shipper though these
are
blank in this draft.

Robert:  this is for your review and suggestions for PGN.   Please check
whether
I am right that there will be a minimum guaranteed quantity for the
shipper.   PGN
said it would probably be 350mmcf/day, if I understood them correctly.

Let me know if I can help.   They need our comments asap -- before the
workshop.

David
---------------------- Forwarded by David Merrill/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
02/10/2000 07:27 PM ---------------------------

Heri Yusup <yusuph@yahoo.com> on 02/10/2000 01:24:20 AM
To: david.merrill@enron.com
cc: repit.suliyono@enron.com

Subject: Draft Gas Transportation Agreement

Dear David,

As per discussed with Pak Widyatmiko at PGN yesterday,
I enclosed the draft of Gas transportation document
for your perusal.
If you have problen in receiving this document please
let me know by email.

Regards,

Heri
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
 - GTSA.doc


I tried to submit my question via eSpeak however I received the following message "The system was unable to process your request.  The information you submitted may be in error."  Since I was unable to submit my question via eSpeak I thought I'd send my question to you directly.

I'd like to begin by welcoming you back.  Although Enron has some experienced difficult times during the past year I know that you will help lead us and obtain our goal of being the world's leading company.

Secondly, I wanted to bring to your attention a matter that concerns me a great deal.  A close personal friend of mine who works at Enron and lives in an outlying area of Houston has been commuting to work in what I would consider a risky manner.  What she does and from what I understand its a common practice among Enron employees as well as others who work downtown is pick up riders from the park & ride lots so that she can get on the HOV lane.  People from what I understand literally line up and cars drive up and pick up passengers.  It goes without saying that the majority of the time the drivers do not know who they are picking up or vice-versa.  This is the part that concerns me.  I'm sure that most of the people that do this are good people and have no bad intentions and are simply trying to save time and maybe even get a little extra sleep.   However, what concerns me is eventually I think someone who has bad intentions will come along and I don't want anything to happen to my friend or anyone else for that matter.  I'd like to see if there is something that Enron can do so that our co-workers, friends, and loved ones can commute to downtown in a manner that isn't so risky.  I have told my friend that this isn't a safe practice but unfortunately it has fallen on deaf ears and would at least like to try an come up with an alternative for her.

The only alternative I could come up with is if Enron formed a voluntary list of Enron employees who live in the same area and commute to downtown in this manner so that they can car-pool in together.  I know some people might say that this isn't an Enron issue but I think it is because several Enron employees commute to downtown in this manner.

This months tragic events made me realize that sometimes we place too much of an emphasis on things that really don't matter and to focus on the things that do.  I just want to try and make sure that nothing happens to my friend.  Thank you for your time and once again welcome back.

Thanks.
Richard


Dear Power Outage Database Customer,

Attached you will find an excel document. The outages contained within are forced or rescheduled outages. Your daily delivery will still contain
these outages.

In addition to the two excel documents, there is a dbf file that is formatted like your daily deliveries you receive nightly. This will enable
you to load the data into your regular database. Any questions please let me know. Thanks.

Greg Elliott
IIR, Inc.
713-783-5147 x 3481
outages@industrialinfo.com

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS LEGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR
ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPY OF THIS E-MAIL TO UNAUTHORIZED ENTITIES IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE DELETE IT.

 - OUTAGE.dbf
 - 092501R.xls
 - 092501.xls


A treat for you...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 03/06/2001 12:20
PM ---------------------------

Dale Rasmussen@ECT
03/06/2001 12:05 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: LV Cogen/GE Agreement

---------------------- Forwarded by Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT on 03/06/2001
10:02 AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  "Thompson, Peter J." <pthompson@akllp.com>
02/28/2001 09:11 AM

To: "Dale Rasmussen (E-mail)" <Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Pipitone, Paul" <paulpipitone@akllp.com>, "Cobb, Chris"
<chriscobb@akllp.com>
Subject: LV Cogen/GE Agreement

 Attached please find the execution copy of the LV Cogen/GE
Agreement (the second document below), which incorporates the revised
Retention Letter amounts.  I have also included a blackline (first
document below) so that you can demonstrate to GE that no other changes
have been made.  To complete the Agreement, the date of execution must
be added to the first page and Exhibit H-2 must be inserted manually.  I
believe that you already have a copy of Exhibit H-2 provided by Lee
Johnson, but I will forward a copy momentarily.
 <<Comparison of LV Cogen/GE Agreement Versions 4 to 5.DOC>>  <<LV Cogen
Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC>>
 - GE Agreement Versions 4 to 5.DOC
 - LV Cogen Gas Turbine Purchase Agreement - Version 5.DOC


Mark,

It looks like we will probably take over the Cornhusker deal in October.  So,
I need you to get the following information for Lone Star, Williams, and
Apache:

Contact Name
Phone #
Fax #
Mailing address

We will be sending notices to these parties indicating our agency agreement
with the plant (Tenaska IV Texas Partners Ltd.)

Additionally, we will need this information from the plant manager.

Please gather this information as soon as you can from Nancy Stivers.

Thanks.

D


Lee johnson just called to see when he can sign the agreement.  I told him I
would ask you guys.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/27/2001 03:13
PM ---------------------------

lee.johnson@ps.ge.com on 04/26/2001 04:09:13 PM
To: kay.mann@enron.com, dale.rasmussen@enron.com
cc: kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, bill.williams@enron.com

Subject: FW: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract w /
GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.

Kay/Bill,

Bill says he agrees and accepts our comments to the A&A.

One change required to the Rev 5 document.  In Exhibit B, Add item "27)One
additional Human Machine Interface (HMI) per Unit (desktop PC type)"

Include these changes and we can get this done tomorrow.

Thanks,

Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:06 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP); 'bill.williams@enron.com'
Cc: 'dale.rasmussen@enron.com'
Subject: RE: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract
w/ GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.

Here are my comments.

Kent

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:15 AM
To: Shoemaker, Kent
Subject: FW: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract
w/ GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.
Importance: High

Kent,

Please review and note that this needs to be completed by week's end.
Closing date is 5/1 and I'm out rest of week 5/2-6.  We may need some of
Kay's help if we don't like what we see.  But let's try to work it out with
Dale Rasmussen first (Enron Portland office).

Lee

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill.Williams@enron.com [mailto:Bill.Williams@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 3:58 PM
To: Johnson, Lee L (PS, GE AEP)
Cc: THOMAS CONSTANTINE; Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com;
Jody.Blackburn@enron.com
Subject: Assignment and Assumption Agreement re: E-Next B/O Contract w/
GE for MCS as EPC for LVCII.

Hello Lee.  (I know your thinking - What now!)

As I'm sure you know, we are fast approaching a full notice to proceed on
the LVCII project.  One item that we have as part of our EPC contract with
Modern Continental South, is an Assignment and Assumption Agreement whereby
MCS will assume certain responsibilities for (owner), and abide by the
conditions set forth in that agreement.  We will ask GE to participate in
that Agreement.  I have attached that agreement to this e mail for your
review.  Current plans are for a full NTP (Notice To Proceed) to begin
construction on May 1, and we are working hard to be ready for that key
milestone to occur. Your review and concurrence on the draft document
attached below is appreciated.

Please review and contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely

W. J.  (Bill) Williams Jr
Director, Technical Services
Enron North America
(503) 464-8958

(See attached file: GE ASSIGNMENT 173951 CLEAN 0417.doc)

 - GE ASSIGNMENT 173951 CLEAN 04171.doc


[Neubauer, Dave]  Attached are the weekly financials if you did not receive them separately.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Hayden, Frank
Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:44 AM
To:	Allen, Phillip K.
Subject:


We are fine with these changes.   I will prepare execution docs and send same
to your attention.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Pablo and Jose:
Thanks for the update.  Based on the marketing information that you received
from us yesterday, are there any restrictions on our folks in Mexico going
forward with their marketing efforts?  If so, please advise.  Prior to
receiving you written advice, would it be possible to schedule a call maybe
on Wednesday of next week with myself and Jaime so that we can at least
outline any potential online issues, both in connection with our marketing
efforts and in connection with the online documents that you are reviewing? I
am available anytime after 2:30 (Houston time) on Wednesday and I am wide
open on Thursday.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crudespread33.pdf
Heat Spread     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatspread33.pdf
Unleaded Spread
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/unleadspread33.pdf

Heat Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/heatcrack33.pdf
Gas Crack     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/gascrack33.pdf

Carr Futures
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60606  USA
Tel:  312-368-6149
Fax:  312-368-2281
soblander@carrfut.com
http://www.carrfut.com


Please find attached the net daily cash position per business unit as of 10/25/01.

Thanks,
Rob

Rob Brown
Manager, Enron Corp.
Financial Accounting & Reporting
Off. 713.853.9702
Cell 713.303.4497
rob.brown@enron.com


Critical Migration Information:

1. Your scheduled Outlook Migration Date is THE EVENING OF : May 17th
2. You need to press the "Save My Data" button (only once) to send us your
pre-migration information.
3. You must be connected to the network before you press the button.
4. If a POP-UP BOX appears, prompting you to "ABORT, CANCEL OR TRUST SIGNER"
please  select TRUST SIGNER.
5. Any information you Add to your Personal Address Book, Journal or calendar
after you click on the button will need to be manually re-added into Outlook
after you have been migrated.
6. Clicking this button does not complete your migration to Outlook. Your
migration will be completed  the evening of your migration date.

    Failure to click on the button means you WILL NOT get your Calendar,
Contacts, Journal and ToDo information imported into Outlook the day of your
migration and could result in up to a 2 week delay to restore this
information.

If you encounter any errors please contact the resolution center @
713-853-1411


Please remove my name from your list.   Todd Maddock

-----Original Message-----
From: RTO West Regional Representatives Group
[mailto:RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG]On Behalf Of Dalia, Keith A - TOS-DITT1
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:40 PM
To: RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG
Subject:

You have been added to the RRGA-L mailing list (RTO West Congestion Model
Content Group) by Keith Dalia <kadalia@BPA.GOV>.

Please save this message for future  reference, especially if this is the
first time you subscribe to an  electronic mailing list. If you ever need
to  leave the  list,  you  will find  the  necessary instructions  below.
Perhaps  more importantly,  saving a  copy of  this message  (and of  all
future subscription notices  from other mailing lists) in  a special mail
folder will give you instant access to the list of mailing lists that you
are subscribed  to. This may  prove very useful the  next time you  go on
vacation and  need to leave  the lists temporarily so  as not to  fill up
your  mailbox while  you  are away!  You should  also  save the  "welcome
messages" from the  list owners that you will  occasionally receive after
subscribing to a new list.

To send  a message to  all the people  currently subscribed to  the list,
just send mail  to RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. This is  called "sending mail
to the  list", because  you send  mail to a  single address  and LISTSERV
makes  copies  for all  the  people  who  have subscribed.  This  address
(RRGA-L@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG)  is also  called the  "list address".  You must
never try to send any command to that address, as it would be distributed
to all the people  who have subscribed. All commands must  be sent to the
"LISTSERV  address",   LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.  It   is  very
important to understand  the difference between the  two, but fortunately
it is  not complicated. The  LISTSERV address is  like a FAX  number that
connects you  to a  machine, whereas  the list address  is like  a normal
voice line connecting you to a person. If you make a mistake and dial the
FAX number  when you  wanted to talk  to someone on  the phone,  you will
quickly realize  that you used the  wrong number and call  again. No harm
will have been done. If on the  other hand you accidentally make your FAX
call  someone's  voice  line,  the  person receiving  the  call  will  be
inconvenienced, especially if your FAX then re-dials every 5 minutes. The
fact that  most people  will eventually  connect the  FAX machine  to the
voice line to  allow the FAX to  go through and make the  calls stop does
not mean  that you  should continue  to send FAXes  to the  voice number.
People would just get mad at you.  It works pretty much the same way with
mailing  lists, with  the difference  that  you are  calling hundreds  or
thousands of people  at the same time, and consequently  you can expect a
lot of people to get upset if  you consistently send commands to the list
address.

You may leave the list at any  time by sending a "SIGNOFF RRGA-L" command
to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You can also tell LISTSERV how you
want it to confirm  the receipt of messages you send to  the list. If you
do not trust  the system, send a "SET RRGA-L  REPRO" command and LISTSERV
will send you a  copy of your own messages, so that you  can see that the
message was distributed and did not get damaged on the way. After a while
you  may find  that this  is getting  annoying, especially  if your  mail
program does not  tell you that the  message is from you  when it informs
you that new mail has arrived from  RRGA-L. If you send a "SET RRGA-L ACK
NOREPRO" command, LISTSERV will mail you a short acknowledgement instead,
which  will look  different in  your  mailbox directory.  With most  mail
programs you  will know immediately  that this is an  acknowledgement you
can read  later. Finally,  you can  turn off  acknowledgements completely
with "SET RRGA-L NOACK NOREPRO".

Following  instructions from  the list  owner, your  subscription options
have been set to "NOFILES REPRO" rather than the usual LISTSERV defaults.
For more  information about subscription  options, send a  "QUERY RRGA-L"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.

Contributions sent to this list are automatically archived. You can get a
list of the available archive files  by sending an "INDEX RRGA-L" command
to  LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG. You  can then  order these  files
with a "GET RRGA-L LOGxxxx"  command, or using LISTSERV's database search
facilities. Send an  "INFO DATABASE" command for more  information on the
latter.

This  list is  available  in digest  form.  If you  wish  to receive  the
digested version of the postings, just issue a SET RRGA-L DIGEST command.

Please note that  it is presently possible for other  people to determine
that  you are  signed up  to the  list through  the use  of the  "REVIEW"
command,  which  returns   the  e-mail  address  and  name   of  all  the
subscribers. If  you do not  want your name to  be visible, just  issue a
"SET RRGA-L CONCEAL" command.

More  information on  LISTSERV  commands  can be  found  in the  LISTSERV
reference  card, which  you can  retrieve  by sending  an "INFO  REFCARD"
command to LISTSERV@LIST.RTOWEST.ORG.


Attached is a draft of the Agreement for Recruiting or Contract Personnel
Services.  This draft combines the Master Services Agreement, the Agreement
for Project Services, and the Staffing Services Agreement into a single,
comprehensive document.

Attached to this, as applicable, will be a Project Work Description ("PWD")
and/or a Staffing Services Description ("SSD").  I understand that HR is
working on a revised PWD.

I will circulate the SSD in the near future.  It will contain a more specific
description of staffing services (e.g. retained/contingency) as well as pay
rates.

Please review this draft to determine if it fits your needs.  Feel free to
throw darts!  Let me know by return email if you have comments or questions.
I will resolve as many as possible based upon your comments as well as those
of others in Legal, and circulate a revised draft based upon those comments.

Thank you.


In office all week.


Yes. They are actually antique windows that I found at an antique store and
decided to feature in the cabinet.  It is really fun to visualize something
like that and then make it happen. It happens a whole lot faster than Int'l
Project Finance too!!


Can you forward this information along to Kimberly in the Confirms group?
Thanks so much.

Kate
---------------------- Forwarded by Kate Symes/PDX/ECT on 03/01/2001 03:03 PM
---------------------------

Kimberly Hundl@ENRON
03/01/2001 02:36 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Need Contact Info...

Hi Kate,
Can you please give me a contact info for Dennis St. Jean, or whoever I'm
supposed to contact, at Tosco Refining Company (Deal #533134)?
Thanks!
Kim


John,

Tim's view is the main reason I am trying to sell these tolls.  We sold our Las Vegas toll on-line (Dealbench) and I thought about putting these into EOL.  However, different companies want different delivery points, start dates and implied heat rates.  I think we have whet their appetite for the structure - if they don't transact, I think we should put a couple of structures online.  Sometimes the formality of a competitive auction makes people transact - and bid higher!

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Lavorato, John
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 6:54 PM
To: Calger, Christopher F.
Cc: Belden, Tim
Subject: RE: West Power Orig Update

Chris

Have we thought about auctioning off a synthetic toll.  It might fit Tim's view and we have seen some interest in the East on the synthetic or purely financial side.

Lavo

-----Original Message-----
From: Calger, Christopher F.
Sent: Sat 5/26/2001 1:33 PM
To: Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Schoppe, Tammie; Hillis, Kimberly
Cc:
Subject: West Power Orig Update

Change in Gross Margin:
Blue Dog moved to Q2 from Q3:                                           $3.5MM
PSCo: additional income taken due to construction completion :          $5MM
Las Vegas: additional income taken due to toll closure:                 $5.3MM
Pastoria: income reduced due to expenses and related writeoffs:         -$2MM
                                        Total Gross Margin Change:      $11.8MM

Gross Margin to Date:
Pastoria:                       $39MM
PSCo (Fountain Valley):         $10MM ($7MM more to be recognized in Q3)
Turbine Swap:                    $3.7MM (+ $2.1MM to Jacoby)
DWR:                            $7MM
Las Vegas:                      $5.3MM
Blue Dog:                       $3.5MM
Other:                          $1MM
        SubTotal:               $69.5MM
QI QF Valuation:                -$5MM
        Total:                  $64.5MM

Hotlist Summary:
PSCo, Q3                        $7MM
Las Vegas, Q3                   $20MM
Saguaro, Q3                     $5MM
Longview, Q4                    $15MM
Various Commodity               $20MM
        Total:                  $67MM

        Total Forecast:         $131.5MM

Deal Update:

Las Vegas:  Meetings and site visits scheduled with Northland, Black Hills and Allegheny.  All have registered a lot of time on Dealbench.  Northland brought there investment bankers (CIBC) to Portland and hired an independent engineering firm.  We will have the info memorandum prepared this week tosend out to other potential purchasers if necessary.  Still on track.

AMPS: We are negotiating with two industrials, each can take the first two units.  Oregon Steel in Portland and Geneva Steel in Utah.  Geneva is a better site (permitting and infrastructure).  High elevation in Utah will derate the output of the units, but will likely be able to run most hours.  Oregon interconnects with Portland General (good) but permit will restrict hours (3,500 hours estimate).  We need to talk this week to discuss the form of the contract and value/risk transfer between ENA and AMPS.

Wind:   We completed a term sale to Edwards Air Force Base consisting of shaped energy and green tags.  Tags came from our existing biomass tags and Texas wind.  We will purchase the balance from Pacificorp.  We expect more activity here with other feds, some of the munis and 6-7 developers that we are working with.

Generator Tolls: We are trading term sheets with Allegheny, Reliant, Idacorp, Dynegy, NRG and Constellation re our offer to sell at NP-15, Mid-C and Palo - I think we will get something done this quarter.

Longview: We met with the head of BPA this week and got confirmation that he supports our Longview process and that his agency will not slow us down with their proposed regional air study.  Finding EPC contractors has been difficult so we may start discussions with NEPCO.

DWR: Should execute the Master agreement this week which will allow short-term deals with 7 day payment.


Roger that--lid on.  I'm in KC today.  What a lovely city.  I can see why you
guys decided not to move.  DF

"Hooker, David" <DHooker@UtiliCorp.com> on 05/08/2000 03:03:36 PM
To: "'Drew.Fossum@enron.com'" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: RE: Siggy

Yes way.  Going after one final (big) - El Paso - type promote.  Its a good
story that should hang together.  Note however,  their departure has not
formally been announced internal or external yet.  Please keep a lid on for
a week or two.  Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drew.Fossum@enron.com [SMTP:Drew.Fossum@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 9:25 AM
> To: Hooker, David
> Subject: RE: Siggy
>
>
> No way!  Joining up with Russell???  That's interesting, I thought he had
> "hung 'em up" as they say.  I want the full scoop.  DF
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Hooker, David" <DHooker@UtiliCorp.com> on 05/08/2000 06:41:00 AM
>
> To:   "'Drew.Fossum@enron.com'" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>
> cc:
>
> Subject:  RE: Siggy
>
>
> Did you know XA and Clark are gone on Friday?  Going out with Russell and
> Gatewood to start a new development company.  Didn't need Cook and I. Pure
> devco-money promote.  More details when we visit in a few weeks.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:   Drew.Fossum@enron.com [SMTP:Drew.Fossum@enron.com]
> > Sent:   Sunday, May 07, 2000 8:36 PM
> > To:     Hooker, David
> > Cc:     'Drew.Fossum@enron.com'; Hooker, David; Peldner, Patrick;
> > tcook@utilicorp.com; dhill@wrf.com
> > Subject:     RE: Siggy
> >
> >
> > Outstanding.  I'll  bring em and I'll call you guys in a week or so to
> get
> > the details nailed down.  Did you know that Bienawski (sp?), the
> Sofregaz
> > guy, is at Enron?  He's got a storage development group or some damn
> > thing.
> > I'm going to look him up and see what the heck he thinks he's doing.  DF
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Hooker, David" <DHooker@UtiliCorp.com> on 05/07/2000 10:52:17 AM
> >
> > To:   "'Drew.Fossum@enron.com'" <Drew.Fossum@enron.com>, "Hooker, David"
> >       <DHooker@UtiliCorp.com>, "Peldner, Patrick"
> > <PPeldner@utilicorp.com>,
> >       tcook@utilicorp.com
> > cc:   dhill@wrf.com
> >
> > Subject:  RE: Siggy
> >
> >
> > Yea, but what are they going to do with all that salt!  Merrilee's
> > ditching
> > us that week, so I'll be in Houston.  Any day would work for me and yes
> -
> > bring the sticks.  We've got a new greg norman course out on Katy.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From:   Drew.Fossum@enron.com [SMTP:Drew.Fossum@enron.com]
> > > Sent:   Friday, May 05, 2000 12:11 PM
> > > To:     dhooker@utilicorp.com; ppeldner@utilicorp.com;
> > tcook@utilicorp.com
> > > Cc:     dhill@wrf.com
> > > Subject:     Siggy
> > >
> > > I heard that NE Hub made it through the Oriskany without blowing
> > anything
> > > up.  Siggy must have been so pleased, and Penn Fuel and CNG so
> > > disappointed!  Hey, I'm gonna be down the week of May 30-June 3 and
> > would
> > > like to get together with you guys.  What's going on that week?  Would
> > > there be any reason, say, to bring golf clubs?  I hear that my much
> > > ballyhooed former law partner David Hill might be down in Houston the
> > same
> > > time and I need to have a few beers on his expense account as well.
> > Pat,
> > > I
> > > don't think you've met this guy but you need to, if for no other
> reason
> > > because he buys beers.   DF
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 05/25/2000 04:15 PM -----

	Gaurav Babbar
	05/25/2000 04:13 PM

		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Hansen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol St
Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Windle/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: documents

Please find attached the documents that I have so far relating to this
project in electronic form.


PRELIMINARY EARTHQUAKE REPORT
Rapid Earthquake Location Service
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California
U.C. Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Version 2: Updates lower and earlier versions of this earthquake report

A MINOR EARTHQUAKE OCCURRED AT 04:38 PM PDT Thursday, Jun 07, 2001.
THE MAGNITUDE 3.6 (ML) EVENT IS LOCATED  20 MILES WNW OF FERNDALE, CA
THE HYPOCENTRAL DEPTH IS   7.8 MILES.

This event has been reviewed by Jim Luetgert-USGS.

PRINCIPAL EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
_______________________________

Magnitude              : 3.61  ML
Event Date & Time      : 06/07/2001   04:38:13 PM PDT
06/07/2001   23:38:13    UTC
Location               : 40.6573 N, 124.6368 W
            : (40 deg. 39.44 min. N, 124 deg. 38.21 min. W)
Depth                  :   12.6 km. deep (   7.8 miles)
Location Quality       : Fair

33 km ( 20 miles) WNW (286 degrees) of Ferndale, CA
41 km ( 26 miles) W   (279 degrees) of Fortuna, CA
43 km ( 27 miles) WSW (248 degrees) of Eureka, CA
47 km ( 29 miles) NW  (321 degrees) of Petrolia, CA
47 km ( 29 miles) WNW (285 degrees) of Hydesville, CA

ADDITIONAL EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS
________________________________

number of phases             :  64
rms misfit                   :   0.10 seconds
horizontal location error    :   0.7  km
vertical location error      :   1.2  km
maximum azimuthal gap        : 234    degrees
distance to nearest station  :  53.   km
event ID:   51108618

EDIS-06-07-01 1645 PDT

---------------------------------------------------------
To update or terminate your subscription to this email service
visit our webpage at http://www.incident.com/edismail.html.

EDIS is operated by the Governor's Office of Emergency Services,
State of California. This email relay is offered by incident.com
as a public service. Because of the complexity of this system and
its dependence on other systems, we cannot be responsible for
delays or failures in transmission.
---------------------------------------------------------


Just an update: Today I set up a front month fixed price gas daily product
priced at parity to NYMEX.  I thought the response was tremendous.  It really
shows that we might have an angle to put out more of the curve and become the
predominant benchmark for the industry rather than the exchange.

One problem I had was linking 2 syncopated basis products.  I set up a new
product for the prompt that was Nov GD/D Henry Hub that was a syncopated
basis of 0/0 to the Nov Nymex.  However, since Dec Nymex is a syncopated
basis to Nov Nymex, I could not set up a syncopated basis link around the Dec
Nymex.  Any ideas?


CBE, Inc is cancelling their contract with ENA for Meter 11480 Equitrans
production effective July 1, 2000.

The only production which we have for July forward should be:
 1.  Braxton Oil & Gas
 2.  Bill Kennedy
 3.  Aurora
I do not want to cancel their contracts untill we are sure that we do not owe
Equitrans for any past negative imbalances.

Cindi, when you nom for July, let me know the volume and I will try to sell
the gas to Dominion.

John


Just a note..................... I require animal crackers every day for
breakfast. Keep that in mind.................it is a must!!!! Ha Ha!


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

Special Announcement! This report can now be accessed directly through the EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access this report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Secured Reports" tab. A dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various secured reports available for viewing. After choosing the report you are interested in, a security window will appear requiring you to enter your Windows login ID and password. Simply enter your standard login and the report will load automatically.

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site, please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x36161 or Simone La Rose at x31670.

<Embedded Picture (Metafile)>


He asked me for the comments.

	From:  David Marshall @ ECT                           12/11/2000 08:51 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Fuel Cell

Kay,
unfortunately I deleted the comments.  You may want to check with Scott Healy
as I seem to recall that he may have been on the origination side.


Attached is a draft outline of Jan Smutny Jone's  Statement/Comments for the
FERC Hearing on Thursday, November 9 to address the  California
Report/Order.?
?
A conference call is scheduled for 9:30  a.m. (PST) on Wed., Nov 8 to discuss
the draft outline.
?
??? ???  Call-In Number??? ??? ???  888/476-6127
???????  Participant  #???????????????111756
?
?
Note, as the Hearing is Thursday, we are working in  real time to finalize
this Statement.? This is a work in progress.?  IEP will be translating the
draft outline into prose continually between now and  Wed noon, when we hope
to finalize the Statement.
?
As a point of reference, building off the IEP  Workshop we held last Friday,
IEP is moving forward to develop detailed comments  for the FERC proceeding
on California market structure matters? These  comments are due Nov. 22.? We
anticipate these Comments to be detailed  (e.g. 20-50 pages).
?
This Statement for the FERC Hearing on Thursday is  building off of the
discussion during the IEP workshop.? The Statement is  expected to be 5-10
pages, therefore by necessity it will be less substantive  and exhaustive as
the Nov 22 filing.? We are attempting to hit the 'high  points" and provide a
framework for FERC to (1) consider the specific details of  their proposal,
and (2) address certain FERC/state matters regarding roles and
responsibilities.
?
We will be developing "talking points" as well, but  these will be driven by
the overall Statement.
?
Talk to you tomorrow.
 - 001109_Statement of Jan Smutny.v3  SKK mark up.doc


Thanks, Tana.

Just to let you know that I'm off next week, so I'm going to pass all this on
to Greg/Linda to deal with.

Sharon

From: Tana Jones on 03/23/2001 04:18 PM CST
To: Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Slater Steel

Sharon,

There are some hanky things going on in these confirms I don't like.  I've
just spoken to Russell and I'm going to talk to a swap attorney and then get
back to you.

	Sharon Crawford
	03/23/2001 03:48 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Slater Steel

Hey, Tana.  I just faxed you the new credit worksheet - it's totally
different.

From: Tana Jones on 03/23/2001 03:29 PM CST
To: Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT, Linda Sietzema/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: RE: Slater Steel

Sharon,

Per the email below, I looked in the financial trading agreement database and
saw that Stephanie Panus, a paralegal in our group prepared an Annex B for
this counterparty in January of this year.  I would just confirm that the
credit is the same and then use the same Annex B as before.  I am going to
fax the credit worksheet that Credit send Stephanie in January so you can
check the credit.  Below is the Annex B Stephanie prepared.

----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/23/2001 03:26 PM -----

	Russell Diamond/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/23/2001 03:15 PM

		 To: Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: RE: Slater Steel

Sharon,
As Canada is now executing these confirms, please get with Tana, or someone
in her group, for an explanation of your questions.  Your questions all apply
to standard procedures that the Legal group in Houston handles.  I did,
though, make a mistake on Cash Collateral, you are correct there is no cash
collateral in Canada. Please disregard that 'X' for both counterparty's.  In
regards to the complete name of Slater Steel, as I explain in the comments of
the worksheet, a previous transaction was executed with a credit annex
attached to the confirm.  Once again, Tana or someone in legal, can explain
to you the database they have that would give you all this information.

Thanks,
Russell

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Crawford, Sharon
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:12 PM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Slater Steel

Russell, sorry, I should have reviewed the entire credit sheet before
e-mailing you earlier, but I have a few more questions:

1. What is the complete name of Slater Steel?
2. Who is their guarantor?
3. What does "NW" before the C$188MM under "Guarantor") mean?
4. Cash Collateral??
5. What are the 3rd Party debt threshold amounts (Events of Default) for each
of Slater's Guarantor and Enron Corp.?
6. Is Enron Corp.'s MAC debt rating BBB-?
7. Why is the Counterparty "X'd" under the MAC if there is a guarantor?

I think that are all of the questions I have for now.  Please advise.

Please note, however, that I will be away from the office next week.  Please
forward your comments to Linda Sietzema if you don't get them to me by today.

Thanks,
Sharon


(1) The ENA Securities Loan Agreement/ENE Guaranty was received by Bear on
2/22.  Bear is preparing a form of assignment from ENA to Enron Credit Inc.

(2)  JP Morgan sending comments to Futures Agreement

(3)  I am reviewing Chase custody agreement.  I need info on a legal contact
at Chase.

(4)  ML Canada repo.  Waiting for response.

(4)  Enron Credit Inc. accounts.  Preparing form of assignment for all three
accounts.  Cheryl opening the accounts.  NOTE:  In general, Cheryl will be
responsible for opening accounts.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Zimmer, Michael J [mailto:Michael.J.Zimmer@BAKERNET.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:22 PM
Subject: E-Notes: Risk Considerations for Enron Counterparties: Failure
to Exercise Rights May Constitute Waiver

>  <<...OLE_Obj...>>
> E-Notes provides regular briefings on new developments in global energy
> and public utility law.
>
> October 31, 2001
>
> RISK CONSIDERATIONS FOR ENRON COUNTERPARTIES:
> FAILURE TO EXERCISE RIGHTS MAY CONSTITUTE WAIVER
>
>
> 	The reduction by Moody's Investor Service Inc. of Enron Corp.'s
> senior unsecured long-term debt to Baa2 from Baa1 this week may be an
> issue of concern for companies that are counterparts to Enron obligations.
> This downgrade may have immediate consequences under existing transactions
> with Enron given that its current credit rating is now two levels above
> non-investment grade.  Any further downgrade into non-investment grade
> levels could seriously affect relationships between counterparties and
> Enron, and possibly Enron counterparties and their counterparties.
>
> 	Enron is the principal in nearly one-quarter of all electricity and
> natural gas trades in the United States.  For Enron's power and gas
> trading counterparties, a credit event such as a downgrade by Moody's may
> precipitate certain obligations under the terms of their trading
> transactions.  For example, any downgrade, not just a downgrade resulting
> in a sub-investment grade rating, may entitle a counterparty to require
> Enron to provide additional credit in support of Enron's purchase
> obligations.  Counterparties should examine all power, gas or other
> commodity purchase and sale documentation to confirm whether they possess
> this right.  The failure to exercise this right may constitute a waiver
> and foreclose access to critical performance and payment assurance,
> threatening to alter the risk assessment and mitigation considerations
> upon which the transactions were originally based.  Furthermore, a failure
> to declare a credit event or default against Enron could cause a default
> on the part of the counterparty itself in collateral or ancillary
> arrangements, such as its financing.  The potential for a domino effect,
> causing defaults or credit events in a series of transactions, is
> considerable.
>
> 	It is uncertain whether Enron's efforts to obtain new lines of
> credit will be sufficient to overcome the current difficulties.
> Regardless, it is prudent to review the terms of existing transactions
> with Enron or its affiliates, including any guarantees or other forms of
> corporate credit support.  It is also advisable to examine the terms of
> transactions dependent on, or otherwise ancillary to, transactions with
> Enron or its affiliates to avoid any consequential effects of the Enron
> credit ratings downgrade.
>
> 	For further information on how Enron's current financial situation
> could impact your firm's transaction risk profile, please contact Michael
> Zimmer at 202.452.7055 or michael.j.zimmer@bakernet.com, Jonathan W.
> Gottlieb at 202.452.7084 or jonathan.w.gottlieb@bakernet.com or Samir
> Desai at 202.452.7057 or samir.s.desai@bakernet.com .
>
> Michael J. Zimmer
> Jonathan W. Gottlieb
> Samir S. Desai
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> __
> E-Notes is a publication of Baker & McKenzie.  It does not constitute
> legal advice or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances.
> The contents are intended as general information only.  You are urged to
> consult your attorney concerning your situation and specific legal
> questions you may have.  For further information on the subjects discussed
> in E-Notes, contact Michael J. Zimmer,
> mailto:michael.j.zimmer@bakernet.com or
> Jonathan W. Gottlieb, mailto:jonathan.w.gottlieb@bakernet.com.
>
> For more information about BAKER & McKENZIE and our global energy and
> utility practice, click on our electronic business card:
>  <<...OLE_Obj...>>
>
> or visit our website at <http://www.bakerinfo.com/Practice
> Areas/nabfmp/energy/!viewme.htm> .
>
>
>


As of yet, I have not yet received your completed lobbying questionnaire.  If
it is in the mail, please disregard this message.  If it is not in the mail,
please fill out the questionnaire as soon as possible and return to me via
email or interoffice mail so that we can be in compliance with Federal income
tax laws.  If you did not engage in lobbying activity in 2000, a short email
to that effect is sufficient.  Many thanks for your cooperation.

Tara Rafter
Director
Corporate Tax Planning

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Tara Rafter
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 12:08 AM
To: Daniel Allegretti; Joe Allen; Scott Bolton; Stacey Bolton; Roy Boston;
Hap Boyd; Rob Bradley; Jeff Brown; Margaret Carson; Wiley Cauthen; Tom
Chapman; Carolyn Cooney; Shelley Corman; Jeff Dasovich; Tom Delaney; Linda
Fitzgerrell; Howard Fromer; Janel Guerrero; Mary Hain; John Hardy; Joe
Hartsoe; Nancy Hetrick; Jean Ryall; Aleck Dadson; Robert Hemstock; Alberto
Levy; Ron McNamara; Mike Roan; Thane Twiggs; Steve Walton; Ricardo Charvel;
Kikumi Kishigami; Harry Kingerski; Stella Chan; Vinio Floris; Xi Xi; Tracy
Cooper; Dan Staines; Kathleen Sullivan; Kerry Stroup; Alan Comnes; Marcie
Milner; Donna Fulton; Allison Navin; Lora Sullivan; Stephen D Burns; Tom
Briggs; Linda Robertson; Robert Neustaedter; Gloria Ogenyi; Patrick Keene;
Robert Frank; Joe Hillings; Tom Hoatson; Stan Horton; Barbara A Hueter;
Richard Ingersoll; Paul Kaufman; Steven J Kean; Jeffrey Keeler; Robin Kittel;
Susan M Landwehr; Leslie Lawner; Donald Lassere; Lara Leibman; Rochelle
Lessner; Chris Long; Dave Mangskau; Kathleen E Magruder; Susan J Mara; Sandra
McCubbin; Becky L Merola; Janine Migden; FRED MILLER; Mary Kay Miller; Steve
Montovano; Bill Moore; Sue Nord; Christi L Nicolay; Lou L Pai; Sarah Novosel;
Christie Patrick; Mona L Petrochko; Scott Reblitz; Marchris Robinson; Thomas
S Reichelderfer; Fred Rimington; Frank Rishe; Cynthia Sandherr; Gavin Russo;
Dave Schafer; Richard Shapiro; Tom Shelton; Richard Shepherd; Jeff Skilling;
Lon Stanton; James D Steffes; Michael Terraso; Henry Van; Terence H Thorn;
Kathleen Wagner; Susan Worthen; Charles Yeung; Robert Wilson; Lisa Yoho
Cc: James Sandt
Subject: 2000 Lobbying Expenses

Please provide your assistance in completing the attached questionnaire
relating to 2000 lobbying activities.  I would like to receive all completed
questionnaires on or before March 9, 2001.  If you have any questions, please
feel free to contact me at 713-345-8362.  Thanks so much for your help.

Tara Rafter
Director
Enron Corp. Tax Planning


Any idea what the going rate is for a limo on a Thursday?  Nothing
extraordinary needed, just your basic version.

Thanks,

Kay


Transwestern Pipeline Co. posted new notice(s) since our last check at
12/12/2000 12:18:01 PM, the newest notice looks like:

 Capacity Constraint, Dec 12 2000 12:25PM, Dec 13 2000  9:00AM, Dec 14 2000
8:59AM, 2231, Allocation - SOCAL NEEDLES

Please click the following to go to the web site for detail.

http://ios.ets.enron.com/infoPostings/shared/et_noncritical_notice.asp?company
=60


The attached chart summarizes the tax implications of the various options for
choice of legal entity for financial trading in Argentina.    The chart
addressed income taxes only.  Moving the operations to Brazil will result in
additional transactions taxes that are not addressed  in this analysis.  As
you can see, the tax impact of each option depends the specific set of facts
as to how Enron is operating its trading activity.  Of particular importance
is the concept  that the US will tax the earnings of foreign jurisdictions
even if there are no US employees involved in the transactions to the extent
a US affiliate of Enron is deemed to be providing substantial assistance to
the foreign entity that is involved in the financial trading activities.

The current structure for financial trading in Argentina is the most tax
efficient based upon the way Enron has chosen to conduct its business.  The
earnings are limited to a single layer of tax in the US.  To the extent that
the Sao Paulo office develops into an operation that can fully support all
trading activity so that there is no support from the US, we may be able to
restructure the operations to provide more flexibility to the traders in
South America.  Even if we shift the activity to a Brazilian entity,  the
traders will have to follow guidelines to avoid taxation in Argentina as well.

Lynn


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/09/2000 03:10 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/08/2000 07:12 PM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc: Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: ISO/PX Market Reports

Hi Mark:

Good to see you in Vancouver. Here are the reports that I referred to.

And here's the URL for the conference that Littlechild and I are
participating in.
http://gspp.berkeley.edu/events/electricity_summit_conference.htm.

Finally, do you have Littlechild's email address?

Best,
Jeff


Your phone is not going to voicemail so I can't leave a message.

DG    3-9573


Group,
We recently have had new counterparties express in interest in doing business
with us... The telephone numbers are as follows:

Enmax(City of Calgary)  1-403-268-2018
TransCanada       1-403-216-2905
Florida Power and Light 1-561-625-7100

The Canadian companies primarily deliver at the BC border(they are typically
sourcing from the Alberta Power Pool), please be sure to agree to terms for
this energy(firm, non-firm, trans-contingent, etc.), in the case of a cut.
TransAlta will also source from the Power Pool at times(otherwise they use
the Centrailia plant), please keep this in mind.
FPL has a geothermal plant in SP-15 and some wind generation(?) in NP-15.
Typically they have 12 mws in SP and 31 mws in NP.  Their SC is currently the
APX.

And finally as the credit situations change, or if you have any doubts be
sure to talk with Tracy or call the credit hotline (6-853-1803).  Remember
that you may be able to use other counterparties to buy or sell when needed
(ie.  SnoPUD will buy from POWX for us).

Good Luck.

Bill


Thanks for your message.  I thought that John did have responsibility for
risk, and I am glad to have that clarified.   Kristin worked for me for
several years as the risk lead for ENA power and joined Barry at EBS last
August, so I knew that you all had a great resource there!

I will look forward to a follow-up conversation to explore where we may have
potential solutions for EBS that can be borrowed or modified from EWS.  Just
give me a call when you are ready to get back together.  --Sally

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Thanks!

Thanks for taking the time to meet with me today.  You gave me some valuable
insights and suggestions.

I do want to correct one misstatement that I made.  John DOES have ownership
of the risk books.  This area of responsibility is being handle by a lady
named Kristen Albrecht who reports to Barry Pearce who is in charge of
trading operations.

I am looking forward to meeting with you again soon.

Gay Mayeux
Vice President, Enron Broadband Services
Physical Location:  1400 Smith Street EB4620
                                      Houston, TX 77002
Cyber Location:  gay_mayeux@enron.net
Office: (713) 853-9905
Cell:     (713) 416-8821
Fax:     (713) 646-9502


Kay/Ben,

The attached agreement was forwarded to me by Catherine Clark.  Do we have to
amend the attached Agreement to reflect the assignment of the Purchase Option
to the LLCs instead of Enron and, is this possible under the master
agreement?  Or, does this assign the Purchase Option to Enron who will then
assign it to the LLCs?  Please advise.

Also, as Kay Mann, Rose Engeldorf, and I agreed on Friday evening, we did not
send out the purchase option notice.  However, we still need to provide
formal notice in order to provide sufficient time for WLB to make the
appropriate arrangements.  The concern was whether Enron would trigger any
balance sheet issues by providing notice to West LB.

I will be in the office by 7:30 AM on Monday and would like to meet to
discuss any outstanding issues as soon as possible.

Raimund D. Grube


Mark

On the subject of the Customer Registration Form, the EOL group would like to
amend the form as follows:

? to ask the registrant to indicate which industry/business it is involved in;
? to ask the registant to indicate whether it is interested in view- and/or
trade- access.

This seems fine to me - but I wanted to hear from you...

Hope all's well with you...

Thanks

J


Hey Allison,

Not much is going on over here, just gutting it out until the weekend.  It
seems like the weeks get longer and longer, doesn't it?

How are things in your world?
You can come by whenever you want to get the check.  How much do I owe you
again?

Eric

To: Eric Bass/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JDF

Hey Eric,

What's going on?  I haven't seen you in a while...

I was wondering, when can I come by to pick up your check for JDF?  I need an
excuse to come visit anyway :)

Allison


<TITLE>Journey Pass</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1>
<META content="MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=GENERATOR>

 You
 are receiving this email from Blue Chip Brands. If you would prefer not
 to receive messages of this sort in the future, please see the unsubscribe
 instructions at the bottom of this email.

Now you can receive a Deluxe ToolTote Flashlight™ and
 $800 in Airline Savings Certificates, they're yours just for
 trying Journey Pass™ for 30 Days. Quantities are limited so Click Here and complete
 the form within the next 48 hours to take advantage of this
 offer.

All of these exclusive benefits and more are yours when
 you become a member of Journey Pass™:

Hotel Discounts

Cruise Discounts

Airline Discounts

Car Rental Discounts

Vacation Packages

Dining Discounts

Family Entertainment

Retail Stores

And So Much More!

With Journey Pass™, you can have the confidence of
 traveling with a leader in the
 industry!

Be Prepared! This multifunctional flashlight and
 toolkit is the perfect companion for the car, home, camping
 and any outdoor activity. Equipped with a high-powered
 flashlight and convenient carrying handle. Toolkit contains
 one ratcheting screwdriver with five bits, seven-piece
 standard socket set, seven-piece metric socket set and four
 precision screwdrivers.

This offer is risk-free and registration only takes a
 minute. Remember, the FREE Deluxe ToolTote Flashlight™ and
 $800 in Airline Savings Certificates are yours to keep, just
 for trying us out. Your satisfaction is guaranteed!

Get It
 Now!

(Offer open to credit card customers only. A shipping
 and handling charge applies)

 If
 you would prefer not to receive marketing messages from us, please click
 here to UNSUBSCRIBE.


_________________________________________________________________

WEEKEND SYSTEMS AVAILABILITY

FOR

2/1/2002 5:00:00 PM through 2/4/2002 12:00:00 AM
_________________________________________________________________

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:30:00 PM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 3:30:00 PM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:30:00 PM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 11:30:00 PM London thru Sun 2/3/2002 1:30:00 AM London
Outage:   Maintenance of NAHOU-SQUFY04S & 05S
Environments Impacted:   Estate Unify Production.
Purpose:   Preventive maintenance on two cluster member servers.
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Skinner, Tony  713-345-9334
	Jordan, Mark  713-286-5308
	Warner, John  713-345-1756

Impact:   EES
Time:   Fri 2/1/2002 3:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 11:00:00 PM CT
	Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM PT
	Fri 2/1/2002 9:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 5:00:00 AM London
Outage:   Upgrade EESHOU-DBRGS from NT 40 to W2K server
Environments Impacted:   SQL database
Purpose:   Server needs to be upgraded to windows 2000 and SQL 2000 to meet corp standards
Backout:   Restore original configuration from tape backup
Contact(s):   Nguyen, James  713-345-6137

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Thur 1/31/2002 5:00:00 PM CT thru Fri 2/1/2002 7:00:00 AM CT
	Thur 1/31/2002 3:00:00 PM PT thru Fri 2/1/2002 5:00:00 AM PT
	Thur 1/31/2002 11:00:00 PM London thru Fri 2/1/2002 1:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Replace disk on Envision
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance is needed to repair bad disk
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022

Impact:   Corp
Time:   Sat 2/2/2002 6:00:00 AM CT thru Sat 2/2/2002 9:00:00 AM CT
	Sat 2/2/2002 4:00:00 AM PT thru Sat 2/2/2002 7:00:00 AM PT
	Sat 2/2/2002 12:00:00 PM London thru Sat 2/2/2002 3:00:00 PM London
Outage:   Reindex Envision database
Environments Impacted:   Corporate-wide applications accessing the Envision web query, FileNet Panagon IDM Desktop, FileNet IDM for R3, Panagon Capture professional. Users will be able to access IBuyit and IPayit from SAP but will not be able to view invoices.
Purpose:   Maintenance needed to correct performance issues
Backout:   None
Contact(s):   Vollmer, Mary  713-853-3381
	Rye, Gregory  713-345-3022


Unbelievable ... 130K/month?

	Richard Shapiro
	11/06/2000 10:04 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Outside Counsel/Retainers

Here's the info on D.C. office.
---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/06/2000
10:03 AM ---------------------------

Carolyn Cooney
10/17/2000 06:40 AM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: Outside Counsel/Retainers

Rick,

As per your request.  If you have any questions please let me know.

Thank you,

Carolyn

---------------------- Forwarded by Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron on 11/06/2000
10:03 AM ---------------------------

Carolyn Cooney
10/27/2000 02:36 PM
To: Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Discretionary Budget

Rick,

As per your request.  If you have any questions please let us know.

Thanks,
Carolyn


I'd prefer that we give them a high level bullet point type summary rather
than a draft of the filing itself.  DF

	From:  Susan Scott                           07/18/2000 10:12 AM

To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Capacity Options

As I have mentioned already a couple of times, the Commercial Group feels it
is important to have something to present to customers.  My concern is that
if we just tell them about it over lunch or over the phone, something is
going to be ignored or lost in the translation, and then we'll have a dozen
protests to contend with.  Surely we've presented new services to customers
before in advance of filing...if so, how did we go about it?

Also, are you OK with filing July 31, or just as soon as we can get a
prefiling conference with FERC?

	From:  Mary Kay Miller                           07/18/2000 10:06 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Capacity Options

I'm going over it and hope to have comments to you shortly-  we don't usually
share the draft, just the concept which I don't see any hold up on that, but
since we're still working on it, I don't want to give them a hardcopy-  MK

	From:  Susan Scott                           07/18/2000 09:59 AM

To: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Capacity Options

I spoke with Steve Stojic about this and he had the same concern.  Even
though I was trying to keep this out of the new rate schedule requirements by
not making it a rate schedule, I believe I still managed to cover many
checklist items.  One that is not covered is testimony similar to what might
be filed in a rate case, in order to justify market based rates.  We are
planning to include a revenue estimate.  I'll go over these and make sure
everything is addressed before filing.

Are you OK with this filing from a general conceptual standpoint?  The
marketers want to start giving a draft to customers for them to review
beginning TODAY.

	From:  Glen Hass                           07/17/2000 05:35 PM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: TW Capacity Options

Susan,

 In reviewing the proposed filing I had some questions.  On page 2 in the
discussion of ensuring sufficient capacity we offer to establish position
guidelines, do we need to outline these and either include them as an exhibit
or have them ready for reply to either protesters or a staff data request?
Secondly, if we regard this as a new service does our filing comply with all
aspects of 154.202 (a) (ii), (iii), (iv) (A) & (B), (v), (vi), (viii) and
(ix)?  In recent filings the staff has challenged our filings in terms of
addressing each of these requirements.  I believe many our covered but
thought you might like to double check for compliance.  What about a revenue
estimate? Seems like we need one, even if its still very speculative.

Glen

	From:  Susan Scott                           07/12/2000 03:19 PM

To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK
Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine
Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, John
Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ramona Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Brian Hensley/ET&S/Enron@Enron

Subject: TW Capacity Options

Attached for your review is a draft of Transport Options filing that
incorporates the comments and suggestions I've received since last week.
Please provide any further suggestions/changes to me as soon as possible, but
in no case later than close of business, Friday, July 14.

The timeline I've discussed with TW Commercial for this project is as follows:

Final draft comments   Friday, July 14

Circulate draft to customers,
customer meetings, time for
customers to respond, informal
discussion with FERC   Mon. July 17 - Wed. July 26

Final internal review/edit of filing  Thursday, July 27

FERC filing    Monday, July 31

Please let me know your comments on this proposed timeline as well.  Thank
you.


Kay,

Ann Elizabeth did not provide a designated hitter for the South Dade Energy
Center (Dade Development Company LLC is Optionee, Certosa Holdings is
Optionor) nor did she provide one for tne Medley Dunn project.  I have been
told that the Dunns are considering backing off their ultimatums that they
gave Ann Elizabeth and I regarding taxes to the town and assumption of
enviromental liability.  Who do I talk to about the Dunn contract while Ann
Elizabeth is out?
 -----Original Message-----
From:  White, Ann Elizabeth
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 10:33 PM
To: gkrause@enron.com; Krimsky, Steven; Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Carnahan,
Kathleen
Cc: Milligan, Taffy
Subject: AEW's backup

Kay Mann is the designated hitter for the Pompano and Deerfied projects while
I'm on vacation.  I've given her a down load of the status of Greg and
Steve's projects.  Chris Boehler at A&K will be the designated hitter for
Midway.  I'm not going to check my voice mail while I'm gone but, if
necessary, here are the contact numbers while I'm gone.

Walter and Marlena Schilling  011-49-8218-89351 schilling.jun@freenet.de

Monika and Bernhard Steinacher 011-49-8232-8932 m.steinacher@schwabmuenchen.de

If you call, Walter and Bernhard and Bernhard's daughter, Susanne, speak very
good English.  Monika's isn't bad.  Marlena may get flustered and hang up on
you.

Best of luck at Deerfield and hope to see Pompano on track when I get back in
the office on June 11th.  Kay is planning on going to Florida on June 12 for
the moratorium hearing and the rezoning hearing.


The results are in and the Norsk Hydro visitors were very satisfied with their Enron experience overall.  Further results are enclosed.  Let me know if you would like any further detail.

Thank you again for your participation in this visit.

Carrie Robert
Manager, Enron Corp Marketing Services
713-853-3522


Jennifer,

NGI-PGE/TOPOCK is an internal curve used to value transport and is equal to
NGI-SOCAL.  This curve will probably show up every month because the West
Coast is very volitile.  The change is due to a change in the market.

IF-TW/PERMIAN is a production area curve.  The change is also due to  market
changes that drove up the curve.

Call me if you have any questions.  Thanks.

DG    3-9573

	From:  Jennifer Nguyen @ ENRON                           03/21/2001 10:19 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: February Curve Validation

Darron --

Can you or anyone in your group follow up on the curves below?

NGI-PGE TOPOCK
IF-VALERO TX
IF-TW PERMIAN

Thanks,
Jennifer
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron on 03/21/2001
10:16 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Nguyen                           03/13/2001 05:21 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassi Wallace/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: February Curve Validation

Hi guys --

Hopefully these curves are covered between the three of you!  Attached are
the 10 curves reviewed for the month of February.  Of these 10, the curves in
question are:

NGI-PGE TOPOCK
IF-HEHUB
IF-VALERO TX
IF-NNG TOK
IF-TW PERMIAN
IF-TRANSCO Z1
IF-TENN Z5

If you could, please identify the factors that are driving their drastic
changes in shape and seasonality as compared to the prior month.  Please do
not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Thanks,
Jennifer
x5-7590


Below you will find the list of employees that you have been slated to
represent at the Global Accounting PRC on Tuesday, June 27.  This list was
compiled based on information available.  If you have additions and delitions
please send them to me.

Also, please send me your -re-rating of these individuals.  We need this
information on Friday, June 23 if possible.  This should expedite the meeting.

The ratings are Superior, Execllent, Strong, Statisfactory, Needs Improvement
and Issues.


I just got a call from the online team, and there is a rush push on from
London to get this counterparty approved ASAP.  Since you are the key person,
I thought I'd pull you into the loop.  This counterparty should be coming
thru on tomorrow's approval list.  I know you've got to do your due
diligence, so if you could let me know how long it will take to get back to
me I can let the EOL and London people know.  Much thanks!

P.S.  I enjoyed chatting with you at the seminar!
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 05:49 PM -----

	Lisa Lees
	10/23/2000 05:27 PM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

As discussed, here is the name of the Japanese counterparty that will be on
credit's next approval matrix.

Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 05:21 PM
---------------------------

From:  John Suttle
 10/23/2000 04:38 PM

To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Lara Fields/LON/ECT@ECT, Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT@ECT, Neil R
Anderson/LON/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

Given the recent confusion on this counterparty and the push to have them
approved - I will review Idemitsu today and have recommendations by late this
afternoon.

Justin Timothy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/17/2000 11:40 PM
To: John Suttle@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

John

FYI

Justin
---------------------- Forwarded by Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
18/10/2000 03:40 PM ---------------------------

Justin Timothy
18/10/2000 03:36 PM
To: Anna Gardiner/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Frank L Davis@ECT

Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

Anna,

I just wanted to confirm with you that all fuel & liquids customers,
including those from Singapore, are being handled by credit in Houston now
that the responsibility for Global Products has moved from London to Houston.
I spoke with Sheri Thomas & Tom Moran (Houston credit) this morning & they
both agreed that these (Asia Pacific) counterparties should now be handled by
Houston. However there still appears to be some confusion over this issue so
I would appreciate it if you could send a reply confirming that this is the
understanding at your end so as to avoid any further confusion.

Many thanks

Justin

Anna Gardiner@ECT
10/10/2000 07:55 PM
To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product Control
Group/LON/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, Lara
Fields/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd

Justin

I spoke with Frank Davis in Houston yesterday about this PA and he agreed
that Houston PCG would ensure that this customer was reviewed in Houston and
set up as soon as possible.  I have also confirmed with Frank and Amita
Gosalia the situation with regards to responsibilities for Japan when
processing PAs.  Japan has always been the responsibility of the Houston PCG
except in the case of metals customers which are approved by credit and legal
in London.

It would seem that this is an issue that needs to be discussed further
between the London, Houston and Australia groups to establish responsibilites
further. Hopefully this will ensure that this type of confusion does not
occur again and delay the processing of a customer application.

Rgds

Anna

Justin Timothy@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/10/2000 07:27
To: Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Lara Fields@ECT

Subject: Re: Idemitsu Kosan Co, Ltd

Bo,

I put Idemitsu's PA into the database  for credit review on Sept 26 & it was
picked up by John Suttle in Houston. I haven't heard anything since & seeing
as they appear to be a fuel & oils customer I have today changed the RAC to
London so that the PA can be processed over there, which is probably where it
should have gone in the first place. I apologise for the delay and
inconvenience however there was initially some confusion between myself &
Houston as to where Asia Pacific fuel & oil customers should be processed.

Regards

Justin
PCG - Sydney

Sent by: Lara Fields@ECT
To: Justin Timothy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Bo Petersen/LON/ECT@ECT, Enron London - EOL Product Control
Group/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Idemitsu Kosan Co, Ltd

Justin,

Idemitsu Kosan in Japan sent in a PA on 29 Sept to your office.

Bo Petersen of our Global Products team has been getting calls from them
wanting to know the status of their PA as they are very anxious to get online.

The database says 'Credit Reviewing' - can you please feed back any comments
or updates to Bo and the London PCG directly?  I will be out of the office on
Monday and want to ensure that Bo knows what to tell the customer should they
call again.

Thank you,
Lara


Melissa,

It would help us considerably if Vance would include the prices for new deals
in the monthly nom.  In order to manage our postion and schedule the gas, we
need to put the deals into Sitara.  We will enter spot deals with the info
Vance gives us.  When the deals are ticketed, the risk group will adjust
Sitara with the finalized terms.

Thanks for your help.

D

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Melissa Graves                           09/28/2000 04:46 PM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donald P
Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Expected Volumes for October

Daren,

Per our phone conversation, please find the following information:

Camden Resources Inc., Driscoll Ranch #1, meter 9858, price:  HSC less $0.10
North Central Oil Corporation, McMurrey-Talbert #2, meter 5228, price:  HSC
less $0.14
KCS, Dickenson, meter 9797 - Susan Smith will be preparing a formal ticket
for the Buy and the Sell for the month of October.  We will be watching the
gas specs on this package, and if all goes well, we will book the rest of the
term at the end of October.

On a go forward basis, for gas that we provide in the monthly nomination that
we know is not ticketed, can Vance just include the price in the comments
field on each package to help you estimate for bid-week?  Let us know if this
information will be helpful in the future.

Thank you,
Melissa


Alan,

Further to our conversation, attached is the final version of the Spot
Purchase/Sale Agreement.  Please sign two agreements and return same to my
attention at the location listed below.  Upon final execution,  I will
forward an original for your records.

Should you have any questions and or comments, do not hesitate to give me a
call.

Best regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Jeff:? The FCC 214 number we discussed references a license as an Interstate
Carrier, which you should apparently not need at this junture.? However, can
you send the document itself regarding this issue to make sure?
???????? Texas requires an inital COA or SPCOA (certificate of operating
authority) depending on your business plan, and the CLEC application asks for
NECA
( National Exchange Carriers Association) i.d. number if you have one; it
also asks for a FCC CIC (Carrier Identification Code) "if available" -
perhaps this is what you were referring to; and that would probably not be an
impediment to filing.
??? Anita can check with Texas if you need more information - we do it all
the time and so it's no problem. Thanks.

Jeremy Meier
394-7500


carol:
I will call you later today.  Take a look at the Additional Termination Event
that I added.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com

	Carol North/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/04/2001 04:07 PM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: AK Steel

Can you give me a call.  I can't find where AK holdings states that AK Steel
is a wholly owned subsidiary, etc....

Thanks,

Carol

 -----Original Message-----
From:  St Clair, Carol
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:46 AM
To: North, Carol; Curry, Ken; Ernst, Nicholas
Cc: Stoler, Lou
Subject: AK Steel

Enclosed is a revised draft of the ISDA and CSA Schedules.

 << File: AK STEEL 2 RED.DOC >>

Carol St. Clair
EB 3889
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com


Looks good to me.

Mark

Marie Heard on 05/03/99 09:14:05 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Legal Temp 2/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Vacation Request

Mark,

I would like to schedule Monday, May 24 through Friday, May 28 as vacation.
Please let me know if there is a problem.

Thanks!

Marie


With regard to the Commission's limitations on the right of first refusal,
Order 637 provides for grandfathering of discounted long-term contracts that
are now subject to ROFR.  The Commission's rationale was that grandfathering
gives all shippers notice of the new limitation and the opportunity to
re-execute current contracts.  The TW Commercial Group has asked whether we
should challenge the grandfathering of existing contracts.  In limiting the
right of first refusal, the Commission has expressly acknowledged that if a
customer is truly captive and has no alternatives for service, it is likely
that its contract will be at the maximum rate.  Shippers that are not captive
and have alternatives in the marketplace do not need the protection of ROFR,
and the pipeline should be able to negotiate with other interested shippers
upon expiration of the contract.

In light of these conclusions, there should be no reason to grandfather the
ROFR rights of shippers under existing discounted contracts.  Such shippers
would not be harmed by removal of the right immediately upon the effective
date of a pipeline's tariff filing to limit the right of first refusal
(assuming the service contract incorporates tariff terms on an "as amended"
basis).  Consistent with the Commission's order, it would not be unfair to
make these shippers compete with others for the capacity upon expiration of
the contract.


Howard,

The conference call is confirmed. Friday, June 1, 9:00 a.m. Central Time.
Mark Tawney, the Head of our Weather Desk will participate.

The call will originate from my office, EB1962, 713 853 3848.
Shirley Crenshaw's number is 713 853 5290.

Vince

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Kunreuther, Howard" <kunreuth@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Kunreuther+2C+20Howard+22+20+3Ckunreuth+40wharton+2Eupenn+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:49 AM
To:	Kaminski (E-mail)
Cc:	Kleindorfer, Paul; Convery, Theresa; Fang, Fang
Subject:	Contact Info for Conference Call Tomorrow at 10 am EDT

Vince:

Paul and I are looking forward to our conference call tomorrow at 10 am EDT.

I can be reached at  610 664-8776
Paul can be reached at 412-268-5960

Please let Kate and Theresa (both copied on this message) know whether we are to call a number or whether someone will be calling us tomorrow. Thanks.

Howard

 Howard Kunreuther
Cecilia Yen Koo Professor of Decisions Sciences and Public Policy
Chairperson   Operations and Information Management Department
1326 Steinberg Hall-Dietrich Hall
Wharton School
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6366
Phone:215-898-4589
FAX:215-573-2130
Email:kunreuth@wharton.upenn.edu


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 04/20/2000 01:44
PM ---------------------------
From: Vladimir Gorny@ECT on 04/20/2000 01:27 PM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Karen L Barbour/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Gahn/HOU/EES@EES, Harry Kingerski/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Gorte/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Curve Validation

Outlined below are some details of the existing curve validation process and
its application to the proposed validation of tariff curves.

Wholesale Curve Validation

The existing process incorporates validation of all wholesale curves and
includes monthly validations and random curve reviews. Every month, results
of the validation are summarized in a memo and distributed to the Senior
Management. Results of the random curve reviews are brought up to the
attention of Desk Heads responsible for the respective curves and Senior
Management as necessary.

Curve Assessment
 Green:
  - curve is reasonable
  - small P&L impact from curve shift
 Yellow:
  - curve is illiquid
  - medium-to-large position and P&L impact from curve shift
  - some ability to validate prices from external sources
 Red:
   - curve mark is inaccurate (based on external data obtained)
  -  curve is illiquid: no ability to validate externally
  - significant positions and P&L impact from curve shift

Curves that are inaccurately marked based on data obtained from external
sources are urged by the Senior Management to be corrected. In the cases
where external data is not available or clear, the Senior Management urges
the respective Desk Head not to increase an already large illiquid position
or to built in a risk premium by widening the respective bid/offer spread and
not to take on positions inside of that spread.

Selection Criteria
The criteria for monthly curve selection are the following:
 P&L sensitivity
 Largest positions
 Staleness (curves have not been marked for a period of time)
 Completeness (curves that have not been validated in a long time)

The main criteria for random curve validation is new deals.

Curve Validation Tools
Broker Quotes/Other external data
Graph Analysis (curve slope vs. a peer group, curve humps/sculpting vs. a
peer group, curve shift vs. position shift, etc.)
New Deal Analysis (comparison of curve marks and executed/quoted prices)
Boundary Analysis/V@R Simulations (comparison of curve to simulated curve
boundaries using Enron's V@R Engine)
SAVA Model Comparison (comparison of curves to model generated results)

Tariff Curve Validation

Scope/Timing:
ASAP - 20 curves with the largest positions related to deals pending review:
(Frito-Lay, Quaker Oats, Starwood) - to ensure timely and smooth approval of
these deals.
Next 30-days - 20 curves with the largest positions/P&L impact
Monthly/Quarterly - 20 curves selected based on criteria described above
Randomly - curves with significant positions/P&L impact, resulting from new
deals

Data Gathering:

This Month:  Listing of 20 curves (related to deals in progress) and the
related support requested by EGA (to be provided by Scott Stoness)
On-going Basis:  The process of obtaining data should be streamlined and the
curve validation process should be relatively painless:
    - RAC should have access to the curve data (Minal Dalia is fully devoted
to EES and is currently residing on the EES floor)
    - Curve assumptions should be documented (to be provided by Scott Stoness)

Execution/Reporting:

RAC, EGA and EES Risk Management Group work together on curve validation
utilizing available tools and work on developing new tools
Utilize the Wholesale Curve Assessment methodology (Green, Yellow, Red)
Generate a curve validation report (see template attached)
Provide feedback to the Desk Heads and distribute the Curve Validation Report
to Enron and EES Senior Management

Other Curves

Other curves related to EES business should be gradually incorporated into
the aforesaid process (ancillary services, congestion, DSM and labor related
curves) - let us set a timetable.

In conclusion, curve validation results should be evaluated in conjunction
with other risk analytics: stress testing of prices, volatilities and
correlations, Value-at-Risk/Capital-at-Risk analysis, performance measures,
capital allocation framework, etc.

Vlady.


Sara,
I have spoken to Kim Theriot and she has said that that you are the person
who needs to sign off on the Master ISDA agreement which TD wish to use.
Could you let me me know if this is ok,  I need to get back to TD today. Kim
has confirmed that the ISDA has been fully executed.
Also could tell me which ISDA,  ENA have in place with Morgan Stanley Capital
Group Inc. Kim says its was executed on 2nd March '99 but I don't know if it
is the same ISDA as  the one TD want to use.

Regards

Treasa


Attached is my interpretation of what we should be providing in response to
Request No. 20 based on the series of e-mails that Mary sent earlier this
week.  There is a word doc and several associated excel spreadsheets.   Note
that at least one of the excel spreadsheets actually contains multiple sheets.

Mary--it would be helpful if you could review this data in this form and let
the team know if it is the right info to be providing the CPUC in response to
No. 20.  I don't think this info should be sent until Mary has had a chance
to review it and approve.

MDS