http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
Dear Subscriber,

We are delighted that thousands of you took the time last week to download
our free PDF sample of SourceBook Weekly.

We hope that you found our analyses helpful in making your critical business
decisions.

SourceBook Weekly is designed to give you the tools you need to identify
competitive threats as well as business opportunities.

Our readership is growing exponentially so we know that we are succeeding
in bringing incisive analytical and competitive intelligence to you, our
reader.

Please browse the hotlinked descriptions of the new SourceBook Weekly articles
below and click through to our site to take advantage of our special December
offer.

Sincerely,
Jane Pelz
Director of Marketing Communications

PS: Today's IssueAlert follows these SourceBook Weekly links.
************************************************************************
WIRES COMPANIES: RISKY BUSINESS?
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************
FUROR OVER FUEL CELLS
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************
PG&E'S HYDROELECTRIC ASSETS: PLAYING BOTH SIDES OF THE GAME
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************
SOUTHERN COMPANY: SPINOFF OF SOUTHERN ENERGY PLANNED FOR APRIL
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************
BEYOND PANTELLOS AND ENPORION: NICHE SUPPLY CHAIN EXCHANGES ATTEMPT TO
FIND SEAT AT THE TABLE
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************
SIERRA PACIFIC AND PORTLAND GENERAL: MOVING FORWARD ON MERGER
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, December 13, 2000
Constellation to Buy Nine Mile Point Nuclear Plants; Match for Entergy
in New York
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================

Constellation Nuclear, a wholly owned subsidiary of Constellation Energy,
and the owners of the two Nine Mile Point nuclear power plants announced
that Constellation Nuclear will buy 100 percent of Unit 1 and 82 percent
of Unit 2. Constellation will own a total of 1,550 MW of Nine Mile Point's
1,757 MW of total generating capacity. The total purchase price, including
fuel, is $815 million. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the New York Public Utilities Commission
still need to give regulatory approval to the purchase, but Constellation
Nuclear has said it expects the deal to be completed by mid-2001.

ANALYSIS: This is a very strategic move for Constellation Nuclear for several
reasons. First, the purchase of the plants expands Constellation's generation
assets, which has been one of the key strategies of the company over the
last year. Secondly, the location of the plants is a critical factor.
Constellation
has narrowed its competitive strategy to the Northeast region, and New
York in particular is shaping up to be arguably the most important playing
field for nuclear assets. Third, owning the Nine Mile Point plants will
elevate Constellation's stature, moving it ever close to become on par
with its nearest competitor in the New York market, Entergy Corp.

Before I expand on the reasons why I think this is a such a pivotal move
for Constellation Nuclear, let me establish some of the important factors
of the deal. Nine Mile Point is a two-unit boiling water reactor site.
Nine Mile 1 began producing electricity in 1969; Nine Mile 2 began producing
electricity in 1988. The two units are both located in Scriba, N.Y., which
is about 40 miles north of Syracuse. The Nine Mile Point units have had
rather spotty histories, but over the last two years have shown signs of
becoming strong performers. Niagara Mohawk operates both units.

Constellation Nuclear is purchasing the plants from a group of several
different utility owners. Niagara Mohawk happens to be the sole owner of
Unit 1. Unit 2 is owned by a group of co-owners: Niagara Mohawk (41 percent),
New York State Electric & Gas (18 percent), Rochester Gas & Electric
Corporation
(14 percent), and Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation (9 percent).
It is important to note that Constellation Nuclear is only able to purchase
82 percent of Unit 2 because the Long Island Power Authority, an additional
co-owner that controls 18 percent of Unit 2, has opted not to sell its
share of the plant at this time.

The sale came about in part as a result of the New York Public Service
Commission urging nuclear plant owners in the state to determine the market
value of their plants through an open, competitive process. This is part
of an overall effort to separate generation, transmission and distribution
activities within the state.

With that established, I will continue to support my case that the acquisition
of the Nine Mile Point plants effectively supports Constellation Energy's
growth strategy. In early 2000, Constellation began a restructuring of
its corporate identity, dividing its operations into two separate segments:
one focused on its merchant energy business (including Constellation Nuclear)
and the other focused on regional retail energy services. The merchant
energy business was ranked fifth in the nation for sales of electric power
in the third quarter of 2000, and the company is committed to expanding
this growth. The goal for the merchant energy business, according to
Constellation
Energy CEO Christian Poindexter, is to establish a portfolio of over 30,000
MW of electric generation facilities by 2005. Toward that end, Constellation
Energy acknowledged earlier this year that it would be taking advantage
of "bargain prices for nuclear plants," which resulted in large part from
other utilities focusing on transmission operations and thus choosing,
or being mandated, to divest their generation plants.

Another important point is that the Constellation Nuclear Services group,
a unit within Constellation Nuclear, was established when Baltimore Gas
& Electric, another Constellation Energy subsidiary, created a new area
for its life-cycle license renewal activities. Thus, most likely Constellation
will be applying to renew the licenses for the two Nine Mile Point units,
and has a core group of people with expertise in this area. License renewals
in general have been moving rather smoothly through the NRC, so there should
not be any difficulty for Constellation with regard to this process. The
only challenge might be that the two Nine Mile Point units are very different
in age and could be viewed as two separate plants by the NRC.

Presently, Constellation's generation assets are based in a mixture of
coal and nuclear. The nuclear plant purchases that Constellation is making
expand upon its Calvert Cliffs asset, an 850-MW two-unit nuclear plant
in Southern Maryland. As natural gas prices are projected to rise for the
foreseeable future, buyers on the wholesale market may turn to coal and
nuclear as substitutes for their power purchases. Thus, Constellation could
be in a prime position if the desire for nuclear-generated power continues
to rise, as the company anticipates. While Constellation will most likely
retain its coal-fired generation assets, the company is clearly moving
closer toward a nuclear-based portfolio. Constellation has justified its
move in this direction by saying that its experience has found that nuclear
fuel is cheaper than coal and gas generators and that "the economics [of
nuclear] are quite robust, once they are calculated out."

A key element of the acquisition that may get overlooked in the press releases
is that Constellation Nuclear has secured a 10-year contract to provide
electricity to the sellers at negotiated competitive prices. Specific terms
of the deal are that Constellation has agreed to sell 90 percent of its
share of the Nine Mile Point plants' output back to the sellers at an average
price of nearly $35/MWh until 2010. This alone should provide a solid rate
of return for Constellation's merchant energy business.

In addition, as I indicated, the New York location is key factor in this
deal. Aside from its large population, the state of New York is home to
a number of nuclear plants that have come up for sale recently. For these
two reasons alone, New York stands out as the center within Constellation's
focus on the Northeastern United States. Yet, Constellation's competitors
also have the same plan, and have all fought to gain assets in the region.

Just within the last few months, Entergy Corp.*which also has based its
strategy to a large extent on nuclear*has been aggressively making its
own acquisitions of nuclear plants in New York State. In fact, Entergy
was competing against Constellation Nuclear as one of the other bidders
for the Nine Mile Point plants. I know this because I spoke to Carl Crawford,
an Entergy spokesperson, back in August and he confirmed that Entergy was
actively attempting to purchase the two plants. However, despite the loss
of the two Nine Mile Point plants, Entergy retains a very strong nuclear
presence in New York. In late November, Entergy closed the sale on the
New York Power Authority's two nuclear power plants, Indian Point Unit
3 in Westchester County and the James A. Fitzpatrick plant in Oswego County.
In fact, the purchase of the two plants from NYPA marked the largest
acquisition
to date in Entergy's nuclear strategy, and also represented the highest
purchase price ($967 million) ever of a nuclear asset. Earlier in the same
month, Entergy completed a purchase of the Indian Point 2 plant from Con
Edison. Altogether, Entergy now controls over 3,000 MW of nuclear generation
in the state of New York.

Consequently, since clearly Constellation Nuclear wants to become one of
the top nuclear power producers in the industry, it will need to match
Entergy (along with other competitors such as Exelon and Duke) with regard
to its nuclear portfolio. There is only a limited number of nuclear plants
that will become available for purchase, and thus any acquisition of an
operational nuclear plant is a significant accomplishment for those in
this particular market.

As a sidenote, I established that Niagara Mohawk was one of the primary
sellers of the Nine Mile Point plants (100 percent of Unit 1 and 41 percent
of Unit 2). It is important to remember that Niagara Mohawk is being acquired
by National Grid, a U.K. company that is considered one of the world's
largest independent transmission companies. The acquisition of Niagara
Mohawk is supporting National Grid's strategy of becoming a major presence
in the transmission and distribution sectors of the U.S. energy industry.
Generation is not a high priority for National Grid, and the sale of Niagara
Mohawk's nuclear assets resulted from this strategy.

Moreover, once again we see a case that represents the divergent approaches
that different companies have toward deregulation in the United States.
Whereas generation does not factor in to Niagara Mohawk's current strategy,
it is a key component for Constellation Energy. There are certainly risks
associated with both approaches, but the bottom line on this deal, from
my perspective, is that Constellation has acquired some valuable assets
in a strong market. It's pretty obvious that Constellation intends to be
a contender in the nuclear arena, especially in New York, and owning the
two Nine Mile Point units should effectuate that goal.
===============================================================
SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert and SourceBook Weekly should
be sent to wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

*********************************************************************
Reach thousands of utility analysts and decision makers every day. Your
company can schedule a sponsorship of IssueAlert by contacting Nancy Spring
at nspring@scientech.com or (505)244-7613. Advertising opportunities are
also available on our website.
*********************************************************************

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and type "delete" in the subject line.


Please print checklist, Trust and the email itself.  2d message to follow
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 09/07/2000 11:48 AM -----

	"CHRIS KRECEK" <KRECC@andrews-kurth.com>
	09/06/2000 05:04 PM

		 To: "David Barbour" <BARBD@andrews-kurth.com>, "DEBORAH LOWE"
<LOWED@andrews-kurth.com>, "MURIEL McFARLING" <MCFAM@andrews-kurth.com>,
"SCOTT OLSON" <OLSOS@andrews-kurth.com>, <alan.quaintance@enron.com>,
<brenda.l.funk@enron.com>, <charles.delacey@enron.com>,
<Clement.abrams@enron.com>, <David.roland@enron.com>,
<Joel.Ephross@enron.com>, <LOri.pinder@enron.com>,
<sara.shackleton@enron.com>, <tina.livingston@enron.com>,
<Trevor.Randolph@enron.com>, <trushar.patel@enron.com>,
<mniebruegge@mayerbrown.com>, <tellwood@mayerbrown.com>,
<eawilburn@prickett.com>, <Tamullen@prickett.com>, <kenton@rlf.com>,
<mark.wolf@us.cibc.com>, <Mercedes.arango@us.cibc.com>,
<schottla@us.cibc.com>, <ARoberts@WilmingtonTrust.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Enron/Tahiti

Attached are the transaction documents for Project Tahiti.  Each of the
documents is marked to show revisions against the version circulated last
Wednesday, August 30.  As we discussed on the phone, we have incorporated the
business agreement reached between CIBC and Enron, as follows:

The Tahiti Series Trust Agreement has been revised to require the consent of
all certificateholders (which includes Fiji Z LLC, which can only consent
with the consent of its Class B Member - CIBC) prior to (i) the creation of
any series after December 31, 2000 (see definition of Series Supplement) and
(ii) making any amendments to the purpose provision (which specifically
limits the purposes of the Trust to holding Trust Property - defined as the
warrants) or the definition of Series Supplement.

The Subscription Agreement has been revised to provide that CIBC's commitment
to fund on December 31, 2000 will be terminated if the Bali Trust receives
any funds except in connection with the issuance of debt of the Bali Trust
(which would require the consent of CIBC as the beneficial owner) or funds
received from CIBC.

Please be aware that because of the revisions described above, it was not
necessary to incorporate  all of Tim Elwood's comments received September 3,
2000.

The documents in WordPerfect format are identified as follows:

Closing Checklist (255001)
Trust Agreement of Tahiti (254424)
Beneficial Interest Certificate (254806)
Series Supplement Creating Series Z (254816)
Tahiti Series Z Certificate issued to Fiji Z (254975)
Warrant Assignemtn (254974)
Promissory Note from Tahiti (254802)
Direction Letter to Owner Trustee of Tahiti (254976)
Amended and Restated LLC Agreement of Fiji Z, L.L.C. (254423)
Promissory Note from Fiji to Tahiti (254977)
Amended and Restated LLC Agreement of Bora Bora (254978)
Promissory Note from Bora Bora to Fiji (254979)
Sale and Auction Agreement (255084)
Independent Auctioneer Letter Agmt (254097)
B Interest Assignment AGmt (254982)
Assignment of Bali Promissory Note to Fiji (255717)
Trust Agreement of Bali (255146)
Reimbursement and Disclosure Agreement (255563)
Promissory Note from Bali to Bora Bora (254981)
Certificate Distribution Agreement (255568)
Subscription Documents (255729);
Certificate Interest Certificate to CIBC (254983); and
Direction Letter to Owner Trustee of Bali (254980)

If you have any questions, please call Muriel McFarling at (214) 659-4461.

Chris Krecek, Secretary/Legal Assistant
Andrews & Kurth L.L.P.
1717 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, Texas 75201
Phone: (214) 659-4481
Fax: (214) 659-4401
Email: ckrecek@andrews-kurth.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  The information in this e-mail (including any
attachments) is confidential, legally privileged and intended only for the
use of each recipient named above.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, use or disseminate this information.  If you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this e-mail from your computer.
VIRUS WARNING:  Although this e-mail (including any attachments) is not
intended to contain any virus or defect that may affect your computer, you
are responsible for ensuring that no virus or defect exists.  The sender
disclaims any responsibility for any loss or damages arising from any virus
or defect associated with this e-mail.

 - 255729.wpd
 - 254424.wpd
 - 254802.wpd
 - 254806.wpd
 - 254816.wpd
 - 254974.wpd
 - 254975.wpd
 - 254976.wpd
 - 254977.wpd
 - 254978.wpd
 - 254979.wpd
 - 254980.wpd
 - 254981.wpd
 - 254982.wpd
 - 254983.wpd
 - 255084.wpd
 - 255097.wpd
 - 255146.wpd
 - 255563.wpd
 - 255568.wpd
 - 255717.wpd
 - 254423.wpd
 - 255001.wpd


CGoering@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The NYISO is reserving hour beginning 05:00 in the April 28, 2001 Real-Time
Market as well as the following hours per ECA20001006B to verify prices:

PJM: 01:00, 03:00, 04:00, 06:00 and 21:00
HQ:  06:00 and 21:00
OH:  06:00 and 21:00
NE:  06:00 and 21:00

Prices in the April 29, 2001 Day-Ahead Market are correct.

This e-mail information is a copy of the official posting which can be found
at
the following address on our website:
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/htm/OperMessages/CurrentOperMessages.htm#mm


Drive to Succeed: Enron Prefers Toyota to GM

To prosper in the new energy economy, Enron COO Jeffrey K. Skilling says oil
and gas companies need to trash their traditional business models and instead
reshape themselves to resemble Toyota when it captured the imagination and
pocketbook of U.S. consumers 30 years ago.

In a somewhat back-to-the-future treatise on how Enron expects to continue
its monumental success, Skilling told Arthur Andersen Energy Conference
attendees to define themselves not by their industry, but rather by their
skills base. Toyota changed the U.S. auto industry by outsourcing its
production, offering customers exactly what they wanted cheaper and faster.
The energy industry has to do the same thing into the future, he told the
Houston audience.

"In 1982, the energy industry was a very rigid industry," he said, pointing
to a similar business model that had been used by General Motors and Ford
Motor Co. Those companies did every bit of the manufacturing process, keeping
all of its pieces within the corporate structure. Then Toyota turned things
upside down.

When a customer wanted a different radio, Toyota relied on outside producers.
It didn't stop the production line to please the customer. And it was able to
do it faster. Enron has used the same model to shape its achievements,
packaging components for customers to save time and money. Other energy
companies are now adopting that method.

In many ways, Skilling said Enron views itself as the Toyota of the energy
industry. "We don't feel we have to provide all components, but package them
the way the customer wants them. This is a pervasive trend we are seeing all
over the industry."

Enron, which has had a shareholder return of 1,333% in 10 years (January 1990
to November 2000), saw the changes required by new technology and
deregulation and redefined its core competencies, which grew from its
pipeline business. Skilling said to remain successful, the Houston-based
corporation plans to continue to morph.

"It all hinges on one good idea Enron had in the 1980s, that vertically
integrated structures had dominated our industry and the structures were
starting to break up. In the energy industry, the reason was deregulation.
Fundamentally, this is a better business structure for two reasons: you can
be supplied with cheaper cost components and it allows you to change much
more quickly."

Instead of bigger energy companies, Skilling said he expects to see many
smaller companies, "maybe thousands tied together electronically and
vertically." The transformation and interaction costs are "collapsing across
the economy." As an example of interaction costs, Skilling used bank tellers.
In 1985, it cost a bank $1.50 a transaction. To bank on the Internet today,
it costs a bank less than a penny.

This drop in interaction costs is a major reason Enron finds the bandwidth
market so attractive. In 1995, the length of time to provision bandwidth was
six to eight months. Today, it's two to three months. And next year, Skilling
predicts it will take one second.

"We will have bandwidth on demand by next year," he said, and added that
Enron plans to be the leader in the field.

Similarly, long-term gas contracts in 1982 took two to three years to
execute. In 1989, they took nine months. Three years ago, they took two weeks
to execute. Today, using EnronOnline and other similar Internet trading
systems, it takes less than one second.

"All of the sudden the world has changed. We have the same manufacture cost,
but interactive costs collapse. I think that because of this, we'll see the
collapse and demise of integrated energy companies around the world,"
Skilling said.

To survive, Skilling advised companies to "virtually reintegrate" what they
need. "If you have an old vertically integrated mind set, it's tough. Give it
up. I know there are still power producers who are buying gas reserves. I
don't get it. It makes no sense whatsoever. You can get it online at the
lowest cost. If your business strategy is dependent on this, it will be a
very hard row to hoe."

Each stage of production will become increasingly competitive in the next 10
years, predicted the Enron president. "You're not just competing against
three people in West Texas, but thousands around the world."

Opportunities exist, he said, for those companies that "go with the flow and
find ways to compete. Create low cost, dependable market interfaces...provide
packaged turnkey solutions for customers through complex structures,
differentiation and customization."

The only threat is from the old way of doing business, he said. "But there is
tremendous opportunity to do things for customer you've never been able to
do." He suggested a "new" energy model based on brainpower, networking,
offering real options to customers, moving quickly and being entrepreneurial.

"At Enron, this has been the whole premise: to be able to change by
responding and reacting to the environment. By getting components together
and packaging them for the customer."


Are we going to inspect tomorrow?


Thanks for your nice note.  I am pleased for all of us at the increased
recognition of the roles that we play within the organizaiton.  My ability to
do my job well is very dependent on those of you who play key roles in
operations.  Thanks for your part in that and for your continued support.
--Sally

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           01/15/2001 04:25 AM

To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Promotion

Sally,

I am so excited for you and your promotion.  I have had the privilege to see
the impact you have made on this organization, and I am very glad to see you
get the rewards you well deserve.  You simply amaze me, and I have such a
tremendous amount of respect for you and your contributions and values.

CONGRATULATIONS!!!

Brenda


***REMINDER***

We have not yet received your feedback.  Your input is
very valuable and to be included in the participant's
summary report, it must be received NO LATER THAN CLOSE
OF BUSINESS on Friday, October 6.  Without your
feedback, the participant may not receive a summary
report or be eligible to attend the program.

___________________________________________
* IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED - Do Not Delete *
Executive Impact & Influence Program

Dear Kenneth L. Lay,

As part of the Executive Impact and Influence Program,
each participant is asked to gather input on the
participant's own management styles and practices as
experienced by their immediate manager, each direct
report, and up to eight colleagues/peers.

You have been requested to provide feedback for a
participant attending the next program.  Your input
(i.e., a Self assessment, if you are a participant in
this program, Manager assessment, Direct Report
assessment, or Colleague/Peer assessment) will be
combined with the input of others and used by the
program participant to develop an action plan to
improve his/her management styles and practices.  If
you are providing feedback as a Manager of the
participant, please note that your feedback will be
identified in the summary report.

It is important that you complete this assessment NO
LATER THAN CLOSE OF BUSINESS on Friday, October 6.

To begin the online administration process, you will
need the following Internet address and Password(s).
NOTE:  If you are providing feedback for more than one
person, each password and participant name is
individually listed below.

Open your Internet browser e.g., Internet Explorer or
Netscape Navigator, and please type or copy the URL
address below into your Internet browser (please DO NOT
go through Lotus Notes):

www.fsddatasvc.com/enron

ARRCUP    (James V. Derrick jr.)

If you experience technical problems, please call
Dennis Ward at FSD Data Services, 713-942-8436.  If you
have any questions about this process, you may contact
Debbie Nowak at Enron, 713-853-3304, or Christi Smith
at Keilty, Goldsmith & Company, 858-450-2554.

Thank you for your participation.


This request has been pending your approval for  5 days.  Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000035276&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000035276
Request Create Date : 5/16/01 2:37:38 PM
Requested For       : lance.schuler-legal@enron.com
Resource Name       : Cynet Desktop Faxing
Resource Type       : Applications


Attached for your review is an Amendment to the GISB concerning Section 2.5 Confirming Party.  Please have two originals executed and forward same to my attention for final signature.   I will return an original for your records.  Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to give me a call.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/22/2000 02:32
PM ---------------------------

Brenda H Fletcher
01/21/2000 12:07 PM
To: Sherry Anastas/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cove Point - Prepay

The following Deal #'s have been created  with Demand fees for the 3 Cove
Point contracts:

Deal #   Contract #
153770   96032397
153775   96032399
153786   96032402

Let me know if there are in problems.
BF


Ask him if Scherer 1,2,3 and/or 4 would work?   Let him know that an odd lot would command a $2.50-3.00/Mwh premium on top   In addition, even if we used Scherer, it would be from any one of the facilities therefore the transmission would need to be able to use any of the Scherer units as a source.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Braddock, Billy
Sent:	Monday, October 08, 2001 10:21 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	TEA - into MEAG

TEA is looking to buy 20MW, 5x16, June-Sep'02, into MEAG.  Also looking to buy 20MW, 5x16, Cal'02, into MEAG.  I told them we may be more willing to offer into GTC.  His response was he would need to know which facility or interface would be the source (I suspect this is so he can reserve ahead to use his network transmission).

Any interest?

Billy Braddock
Manager - Enron Power Marketing Inc.
713-345-7877 (work)
713-646-4940 (fax)
713-503-2166 (cell)


Please see the attached redline and forward your comments/questions/approval
to Sara Shackelton at 3.5620

---------------------- Forwarded by Diane Anderson/NA/Enron on 05/29/2001
04:45 PM ---------------------------
From: Sara Shackleton@ECT on 05/29/2001 04:43 PM
To: Diane Anderson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: KCS Energy Marketing Inc.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/21/2000
02:36 PM ---------------------------

Sevil Yaman@ENRON
11/21/2000 02:21 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mccullough's speech

vince,
here is the speech and the update.
sevil,


Attached are the commercial terms of the ILA.  Please review and comment.
The balance of the document will follow end of today.


Any GCP adjustments will be highlighted in red.

Rgds.

Samuel x3-9890
(GCP_Enron Networks)

From: Walter Guidroz/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/08/2001 05:24 PM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/ENRON@enronXgate,
Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli
Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana
Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center@ENRON, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny Clark/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 3-8-01

Please see attached.


see attached


GE has been negotiating with Freshfields (just like you will be soon) so I
don't know what the current version looks like.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/11/2001 01:59
PM ---------------------------

"Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE)" <kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com> on 04/09/2001 11:14:00 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Salmon:  LEGAL OPINION

Kay:

Here are my comments to the Opinion of Counsel for Salmon Energy.

Kent

 <<Opinion of Counsel.doc>>

 - Opinion of Counsel.doc


Here is the draft of the Master Agreement for Frontera.  Please let me know
if you have any questions.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hi Cath

Can you do me a favour?  Sally is proposing Eugenio for the Risk Manager role
in the Japan office.  Joe Hirl has asked me to track down his most recent
performance reviews.  Can you get hold of copies asap and fax them to me (63
2 9229 2352)?

Thanks and regards

Phil


-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:06 AM
To: 'daf@ball-weed.com'
Subject: FW: Flood Pictures - Downtown Houston Tunnels

-----Original Message-----
From: Donna Wilkerson
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Marc Stewart; Marc Kutner; Kathy Wilson; Elsa Cavazos; Monica
Rodriguez; Robert Aviles; Dawn Cagle; Sandi Sauers (E-mail); Beverly
Upham Cox (E-mail); Shelley Rehm (E-mail); Bridgett Overlease (E-mail);
Jeanne Frazier (E-mail); Dorothy Hope (E-mail); Barbara Oberholtzer
(E-mail)
Subject: Flood Pictures - Downtown Houston Tunnels

 - MVC00046.JPG
 - MVC00050.JPG
 - MVC00064.JPG


?
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]	[IMAGE]
																					[IMAGE]

																Enerfax Daily

														[IMAGE]
																								[IMAGE]
																				[IMAGE]
																											[IMAGE]

																												[IMAGE]

																																[IMAGE]

																								Looking  for a past article or issue. Click here to use Sagewave's  Search.

																							Enerfax  Daily? -? Page  ? -? November 21,  2000

																															[IMAGE]

																													[IMAGE]

																														Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 4? -?  November 21, 2000 -? ?  Past  Issues
Available on Sagewave

																																[IMAGE]
																											[IMAGE]

																																				[IMAGE]
																														[IMAGE]
																																	[IMAGE]
																																	[IMAGE]

																									Governments Negotiate Differences in The  Hague

																									? ?
																									After a week  of preliminary talks that failed to resolve differences over
how  best to protect the planet, government leaders have arrived to  bargain
over the toughest aspects of curbing emissions. About 2,000  lower level
officials did what they could to prepare for the final  week of negotiations
among environment ministers or cabinet-rank  officers from at least 150
countries. The US feels its effort to  find common ground and be flexible has
not been returned by?  European counterparts. The US has been singled out for
criticism for  its effort to reduce its commitments. The government
essentially  agreed to Kyoto because they agreed to the flexibility
mechanisms  such as emissions trading, now the US is running into trouble
with  that. If the conference ends in agreement, any treaty enforcing a  new
global code of behavior on emissions will require ratification  by most of
the industrial countries. Without a US endorsement, it  would be difficult
for such a treaty to come into force. The US  Senate already has passed a
resolution making its ratification  conditional on assurances that the
nation's competitiveness on world  markets will not be harmed. A select group
of leading policy makers  held informal closed-door talks in The Hague ahead
of a ceremony  Monday marking the start of the critical second phase of the
conference. The politicians are working toward a comprehensive plan  to
reduce the Earth's output of heat-trapping gasses from  businesses, farms and
automobiles, without bloating national budgets  or hampering the global
economy. A board of 2,000 leading  scientists, the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, projects  that in the coming 100 years there will be more
rainfall, a  temperature increase of up to 11 degrees Fahrenheit and a
sea-level  rise of up to 30 inches. An agreement reached in 1997 in Kyoto,
Japan, called for a worldwide reduction of carbon-based gas  emissions by an
average 5.2% below 1990 levels. The target date for  the reductions was 2012.
Europe is committed to cutting emissions  8%, Japan 6% and the US 7%.

																																		[IMAGE]

																																			Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 7? -?  November 21, 2000

																																	[IMAGE]

																																		Enerfax  Daily? -?  Page 8? -?  November 21, 2000

																																[IMAGE]

																										(Continued from Page 6)

																										and could put  the future of the Midwest ISO in peril. However, FERC has
never  articulated clearly a requirement that a party exercising a
contractual termination right must demonstrate that termination is
consistent with the public interest, according to Dynegy. It also  argued
that it has not refused to participate in an RTO; it merely  seeks to join
one that adequately protects its legitimate financial  interests and also
represents a significant improvement to the  status quo for other market
participants. Dynegy urged FERC to limit  its decision on whether or not the
company can leave the ISO to the  facts, not on the uproar Dynegy's actions
have caused in the  Midwest. Regulators in Illinois and Michigan have
protested Illinois  Power's

																																[IMAGE]

																													Financial Summary

																																			[IMAGE]

																						")} TC
																		[IMAGE]

 - blnk.gif
 - img17.gif
 - img18.gif
 - img19.gif
 - img20.gif
 - img21.gif
 - img22.gif
 - img23.gif
 - img24.gif
 - img25.gif
 - img26.gif
 - img27.gif
 - img28.gif
 - img29.gif
 - img30.gif
 - img31.gif
 - img32.gif
 - img33.gif
 - img34.gif
 - img10.gif
 - img35.gif
 - id=1381847
 - img36.gif


Christie,

Thanks for taking initiative on the trip so quickly. Let's meet with Jeff
Shankman
to discuss the agenda. I shall try to organize a meeting next week after PRCs
are over.

I agree with your assessment of the group. I was greatly impressed with the
caliber of the students.

Vince

Christie Patrick@ECT
12/07/2000 06:33 PM
To: FAP <FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Clay DeGiacinto <clayton.degiacinto.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Deepa
Mallik <mallikd@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Dennis Feerick
<Dennis.Feerick.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Edson Otani
<edsono@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Gustavo Palazzi
<gustavop@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, "Heather N. Thorne (E-mail)"
<hethorne@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Jack Rejtman
<Jack.Rejtman.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Jaideep Singh
<singhjai@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Jason Cummins
<Marc.Cummins.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Joshua Leventhal
<levent86@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Kim Whitsel
<whitselk@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, "LOUIS A THOMAS (E-mail)"
<thomas@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Murat Camoglu
<camoglum@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Nick Levitt
<Nicholas.Levitt.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Omar Bassel
<bassalo@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Pat Henahan
<mhenahan@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Ram Vittal
<mvittal@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Steve Lessar
<Stephen.Lessar.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Tulika Bhalla
<bhallat@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Vincent Chen
<Vincent.Chen.wg02@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, Weigelt
<Weigelt@wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, FAP
<FAP@management.wharton.upenn.edu>@ENRON, "'christie.patrick@enron.com'"
<christie.patrick@enron.com>@ENRON, "'vkamins@enron.com'"
<vkamins@enron.com>@ENRON, Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Enron Contact info

Hi evryone!

Vince, Vasant and I are very excited about the Tiger Project!  We all
thoroughly enjoyed the opportunity to meet with such an incredibly
interesting, enthusiastic and intelligent group.  Thank you for your time!

For those interested in the Houston trip on January 18-19th, please let me
know by the 15th of December so that I can get the best deal on air fare
(one-month in advance).

Also, I'll be forwarding the Enron information packages to Donna Piazze for
your receipt next week.  I am including Jeff Shankman in this reply, as Jeff
is a Wharton grad, leader of one of our Enron business units, and one of the
most enthusiastic Enron/Wharton cheerleaders.

Please feel free to individually contact me if there is anything I can do for
any of you.

Thanks again for your enthusiastic interest in Enron!

--Christie.


I have an 8:40 am eye doctor appointment tomorrow morning.  SS


You need to speak with Reps from Exxon and Highland.  Ask them about their
Lone Star transport allocation.  They had to transport the gas on Lone Star
to sell to us.  So, Lone Star should have given them an allocation on their
transport deliveries at that point (or their supplier's contracts) to match
the sale volume.  Adjust our purchase amount from each party based on the
transport allocation.

D

Rebecca Griffin@ENRON
12/07/2000 02:47 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: TXU Lone Star

I am working on clearing an old TXU Lone Star/Gas Distribution balance from
8/99 and 9/99.  We originally billed TXU on nominated quantities and they
have shortpaid us due to meter adjustments.  These are brokered deals where
we sold to TXU and purchased from ExxonMobil and Highland.  TXU has provided
meter support since the deals were on Lone Star pipeline, however, I am
unsure how to have Volume Management reallocate.

For example, we originally sold 10,000 mmbtu on 8/3/99 to TXU and purchased
1,200 mmbtu from Highland Energy and 8,800 mmbtu from ExxonMobil.  TXU shows
the total amount of gas on 8/3/99 was 9,240 mmbtu.  How should the purchase
piece be allocated between ExxonMobil and Highland since this was a brokered
deal?

August 1999:

Sale
TXU Electric & Gas  deals# 104975, 104256, 104738
Lone Star Gas Co. deal# 101985
Purchase
ExxonMobil Corp. deal#101522
Highland Energy Co. deal#101530

September 1999:

Sale
TXU Electric & Gas deal#109046
Purchase
ExxonMobil Corp. deals#101522, 108564
Highland Energy Co. deals#101530, 108146

Please let me know if I need to speak with someone else about this.  Thanks
for your help.

Thanks,
Rebecca


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 02/06/2001
02:56 PM ---------------------------

Vince J Kaminski
02/06/2001 02:50 PM
To: David Ikenberry <daveike@rice.edu> @ ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re:

Dave,

Both days.

Vince

David Ikenberry <daveike@rice.edu> on 02/06/2001 01:39:58 PM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc: ostdiek@rice.edu
Subject:

Hi Vince,

I just now heard back from Andrew Karolyi.  He will be here on Monday March
12.  Would you be available for dinner either on Sunday March 11 or Monday
March 12?
Thanks, Dave

***********************************
Prof. David Ikenberry
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University
713-348-5385


See my changes on the attached.

Jeffery Fawcett
03/02/2000 12:45 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Calpine Operating Agreement


Please find attached the PIP master list and the first set of PIP documents
for your review prior to the RUG meeting. As requested, the PIP master list
identifies items which are believe to require input and/or vote from RUG.

The PIP items that I currently have as requiring as RUG vote (based on the
notes) are as follows:

108 --sub QSE (payment process, invoicing, and liability) --proposal by C.
Moseley
200 and 104 --LSE/QSE Load Ration (at the QSE or LSE level) --proposal by B.
Jones
146 --Notifications vs. posting of Loss Factors
187 --TX SET Concurrent Processing approach --proposal by B. White
204 --EPS Meter Data Transmittal --proposal by J. Cohea

PIP item 112 (BUL) will be delivered tomorrow, as there is still some
follow-up regarding the formula.  When it is completed, it will be sent out
to this exploder.

If there is a PIP item missing from this grouping, please check the master
list, as it may have been resolved or merged with another item during the
PIP process.

Best regards,
Vikki Gates
Structure Consulting Group
vikki.gates@scgo.com
cell: 512.350.4020
@ERCOT: 512.248.3884

 - PIP100_130.zip
 - PIP_Master_List.xls


Start Date: 4/6/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040611.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.65)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 11 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_SCOUT
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/6/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: ZP26
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


Pat,  Could you print all these out for me.  I need two copies.  Thanks.

---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 11/16/99 08:28 AM
---------------------------

Ken Choyce@ENRON
11/15/99 03:24 PM
To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Mountain West Scope of Work

Gerald,

Sorry this took so long.  Please let me know if you need anything else from
me.  I believe this goes to the attention of Sunny Gagler at Mountain West.
Their number is 970 858-3900.   Thanks


gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 07/16/2001 01:23 PM -----

	Ginger Dernehl
	06/18/2001 02:11 PM

		 To: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/Enron@EnronXGate, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Howard Fromer/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda
Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Susan M Landwehr/NA/Enron@Enron, Daniel
Allegretti/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Jody Underwood/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lysa
Tracy/ENRON@enronXgate, Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Terri Miller/NA/Enron@Enron, Ginger
Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Campaign Leadership Conf. Call (Change)

Please mark your schedules to note the change in the dial-in information for
the call mentioned above.  This change will take place immediately.

Date:  Thursday (weekly call)

Time:  4:30 pm (CDT)

Number: 1-800-998-2462 (domestic)
  703-736-7230 (international)
  passcode 5316376

Thanks and please don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions.

gngr
713-853-7751


Matt Motley
deal 468359
error:  Amerex shows Enron as seller not buyer

Bob Badeer
deal 468404
error:  Amerex shows price as $134.50 not $134.45

Bob Badeer
deal 468405
error:  Amerex shows price as $134.55 not $135.00

Mike Swerzbin
deal 468302
error:   Prebon shows December only

Jeff Richter
deal 468427
Prebon shows price as $177 not $197

Jeff Richter
I am missing the following deals per Prebon:
Enron sells to Tractebal Q3 PV at $175
Enron buys from Tractebal Q3 SP-15 at $145

Thanks!!


Hi Cindy

I will be out of town all of next week (sorry I will not be able to play) but will try to mail you the results and league fee early next week on the one day I am back.  Tonight, all of the lines except line 4 won.  Thanks and talk to you soon.

-----Original Message-----
From: CKMADI@aol.com@ENRON
Sent: Mon 10/1/2001 3:22 PM
To: ABlumrosen@aol.com; Sager, Elizabeth; MegToups@aol.com; linmagid@yahoo.com
Cc:
Subject: League Fee

This is a reminder that you still owe me the league fee of $18.  You can

either pay me cash or check.  If you want...you can mail it to me at:

Cindy Madi

Ellis Mgmt

2825 Wilcrest, Suite 300

Houston, TX  77042

Thank you!


When: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:00 PM-4:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: EB3269

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


One of Market Risk's primary responsibilities is to review Enron's trading
activities and provide feedback to management, and management's expectation
is that this is feedback and analysis is provided at the beginning of the
Houston trading day.  Global Risk Management Operations in Houston is now
providing Market Risk with a Enron Consolidated Preliminary DPR prior to 8
a.m. Houston time, for use in Market Risk's morning meeting where we review
all of Enron's trading activities from the prior day.  The only information
missing from this is the UK, and I understand we do not receive the London
DPR until 10:30a.m, 4:30pm your time.
I'm sure you're working toward obtaining a final DPR earlier in the day, but
meanwhile, we'd like to obtain a preliminary DPR that Global Ops can
consolidate for Houston management's use first thing in the morning, as
decisions need to be made each day based on Enron's consolidated exposure,
etc..   We understand they're preliminary, but we work off preliminary #s
from Houston, and I expect with the 6 hour time difference, your preliminary
#s will be much firmer than ours.  We can start with just P/L and VaR, so
it's not that many #s we need.  I'm hoping when we get the RisktRAC feeds
complete we'll be able to see positions earlier as well.

Please let us know when we can begin receiving this information.

Thank you,

Cassandra Schultz
VP, Market Risk Management
work 713 853 0429
cell 713 858 2618
home 936 321 2185


Dear All,

Please find attached our Weekly Report (16th November 2000) for your
information and perusal.

Regards,

Beverley


Tanya,

I could not locate the file.

Vince

Tanya Tamarchenko
12/07/2000 01:17 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rabi De/NA/Enron@ENRON, Jaesoo
Lew/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Suggestion: implementing VAR based on non-normal log-returns
simulations

Everybody,
we were talking for a while about using non-normal distributions in the
Monte-Carlo simulations in our VAR model.
I put together some suggestion regarding this. The text is under
O:\_Dropbox\Tanya\non_normal_logs.doc

Look through this 3 page document, and let me know what you think, please.

Tanya


Let's meet at Sullivan's just inside the 610 West loop on Westheimer at 7 PM
because
a) It's central to the 3 Enron parties going on that night.
b) Matt and I haven't been kicked out of that place yet.
c) I can make fun of the people that are older than even me..
See you Saturday


Dear Alumni,

Community Vocational Enterprises(CVE)in San Francisco, CA
has two opportunities available. Please respond to Michele
Tatos, Executive Director if interested either the Program
Director or the Farber Enterprise Project Manager position.
Contact information follows each opportunity description.

Thank you,
Lorie

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Industry: 	Nonprofit/Social Enterprise
Function: 	General Management

Employer: 	Community Vocational Enterprises (CVE)
Job Title: 	Program Director
Job Location:	San Francisco, CA

Organization Description
Community Vocational Enterprises (CVE), established in 1986, creates opportunities for individuals with psychiatric disabilities and other disenfranchised populations to successfully integrate into the community. We currently own and operate six business enterprises, which combined employ 150 people, and we offer an array of employment training, placement and support services.  CVE has grown from a budget of $150,000 to over $3 million in a relatively short time frame. CVE website: www.cve.org.

Job Description
In conjunction with the Executive Director, the Program Director creates and implements the vision for the CVE agency, sets and monitors standards and goals for client programs, and is responsible for fiscal oversight of client programs. Other responsibilities:
- Train, supervise and evaluate staff reporting to this position
- Design and implement strategies for the improvement and growth of client programs
- Work closely with Business Director for continuity between the client service needs and the CVE business needs
- Collaborate with the Department of Rehabilitation for case service contract and fee-for-service contracts
- Collaborate with CVE's new partner, the San Francisco Sheriff's Department
- Oversee the launching and general operations of the client data tracking system
- Integrate social entrepreneurship practices into organizational operations
- Lead and motivate a diverse staff  toward targeted goals and objectives
- Maintain cooperative working relationships with co-workers, supervisors and the public

Qualifications
MBA, MA or at least five years related work experience. Excellent organization, communication, supervisory, and budgeting skills.  Experience in strategic planning and implementation.  Ability to lead and motivate staff. Ability to work with a diverse staff and clientele, including people of various ethnic backgrounds, mental health consumers and persons of diverse sexual orientation. Direct experience in supervising and growing programs with over 25 employees desirable.  Preferred: broad understanding and experience working with persons with psychiatric disabilities, the mental health community, funders and other community stakeholders in San Francisco. Bilingual abilities preferred.

Compensation
Salary: $60K, plus up to $5K bonus.

To Apply
Send resume and cover letter (preferably by e-mail) to:

Michele Tatos
Executive Director
(MNC-657)
CVE
1425 Folsom St.
San Francisco, CA  94103
E-mail: mtatos@cve.org

This job listing was forwarded under the auspices of The MBA-Nonprofit Connection
==============================

Industry: 	Nonprofit/Social Enterprise
Function: 	General Management

Employer: 	Community Vocational Enterprises (CVE)
Job Title: 	Farber Enterprise Project Manager
Job Location:	San Francisco, CA

Organization Description
Community Vocational Enterprises (CVE), established in 1986, creates opportunities for individuals with psychiatric disabilities and other disenfranchised populations to successfully integrate into the community. We currently own and operate six business enterprises, which combined employ 150 people, and we offer an array of employment training, placement and support services.  CVE has grown from a budget of $150,000 to over $3 million in a relatively short time frame. CVE website: www.cve.org

Job Description
In collaboration with the Director of Business Enterprises, continue the transition of business enterprises Nu2U, Nu2U2 and Recycled Merchandise into CVE's portfolio; review and update the venture business plans, including timelines for marketing, hiring of employees, and business operations; and oversee fiscal and strategic planning of Nu2U, Nu2U2 and RM business operations. Other responsibilities:
- With the CVE support team, coordinate a smooth flow for clients moving into and out of training positions
- Train, supervise and evaluate staff reporting to this position, and oversee these functions for indirect reports
- Integrate social entrepreneurship practices into organizational operations
- In collaboration with the Director of Business Enterprises and store Managers, develop an extensive classroom training program for employees
- Meet target guidelines including outcomes, client percentages and revenue expenses, reporting budget findings to the Executive Director on a regular basis, and to external organizations as appropriate
- Ensure proper licensing and ongoing compliance with legal and insurance requirements
- Lead and motivate a diverse staff toward targeted goals and objectives
- Maintain cooperative working relationships with co-workers, supervisors and the public

Qualifications
MBA.  Excellent communication, fiscal and organization skills.  Strong supervisory experience. Ability to work with a diverse staff and clientele, including people of various ethnic backgrounds, mental health consumers and persons of diverse sexual orientation. Preferred: experience in oversight of multiple businesses or departments, retail experience, experience in working with psychiatrically disabled community and/or other underemployed populations in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Compensation
Salary: $60K, plus up to $10K bonus.

To Apply
Send resume and cover letter (preferably by e-mail) to:

Michele Tatos
Executive Director
(MNC-656)
CVE
1425 Folsom St.
San Francisco, CA  94103

_________________________________________________
MBA Career Management Center
The Anderson School at UCLA
Entrepreneurs Hall, C201
Phone: (310) 825-3325
Email: career.management.center@anderson.ucla.edu
Web: http://www.anderson.ucla.edu


This is one for you.
----- Forwarded by Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron on 06/07/2001 04:42 PM -----

	Melba Lozano/ENRON@enronXgate
	06/07/2001 02:49 PM

		 To: Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: FW: NY ZONE A

Example:
US Pwr Fin Swap  ISO NY Z-A HE14-23 EPT  07Jun01         USD/MWh

A US Power financial Swap Transaction with Enron North America Corp. under
which the Seller pays a Floating Price and the Buyer pays the price submitted
by Counterparty on the Website (the Fixed Price) in respect of the Notional
Quantity per Determination Period. The Notional Quantity per Determination
Period shall be the volume submitted by Counterparty on the Website,
multiplied by the number of applicable hours in such Determination Period.
Each calendar month during the term of the Transaction will be a
Determination Period; provided that, if the term of the Transaction is less
than one calendar month the Determination Period shall be the term of the
Transaction. The Payment Date(s) for Transactions which are less than one
month will be the fifth (5th) Business Day following the last day of the
month that includes the Determination Period. The Payment Date(s) for
Transactions which are one month or longer will be the fifth (5th) Business
Day following the date on which the Floating Price is determinable.
The term of the Transaction shall correspond to the date(s) set forth in the
Product description on the Website.

The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the
hourly day-ahead prices listed in the Index for electricity delivered during
Peak hours on each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.
The Floating Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated
utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by the New York Independent
System Operator on its official web site currently located at
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/P-4Alist.htm, or any successor thereto, under the
headings "Time Weighted/Integrated Real Time LBMP"  (the "Index").

The price is quoted in US Dollars per unit of volume, which will be the
Contractual Currency.
The unit of measure against which the price is quoted shall be megawatt-hours
(MWh) and the quantity shown shall be in MW's delivered in each applicable
hour for the duration of the Transaction (the "Hourly Quantity').
The transaction is for on-peak ("Peak") hours on each Delivery Day beginning
with the hour ending 1400 (1:00 pm) and concluding with the hour ending 2300
(11:00 pm) Eastern Prevailing Time.  'Delivery Day' means a day during the
term of the transaction that is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or
Friday, excluding any day that is a NERC holiday.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Nettelton, Marcus
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 2:47 PM
To: Lozano, Melba
Subject: Re: FW: NY ZONE A

Melba

Please send me the complete product description.

Thank you.

Marcus

	Melba Lozano/ENRON@enronXgate 06/06/2001 02:06 PM 	   To: Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON  cc: Joe Stepenovitch/ENRON@enronXgate, Chris
Walker/ENRON@enronXgate  Subject: FW: NY ZONE A

Marcus,

Can you review the attached index for Joe Stepenovitch.  He trades Balance of
the Day products.  Let me know if you need additional information.

Thanks,

Melba
ISO NY ZA (BOD) Peak
ISO NY Z-A
The Floating Price during a Determination Period shall be the average of the
hourly day-ahead prices listed in the Index for electricity delivered during
Peak hours on each Delivery Day during the applicable Determination Period.
The Floating Price for each Determination Period shall be calculated
utilizing the hourly clearing prices published by the New York Independent
System Operator on its official web site currently located at
http://mis.nyiso.com/public/P-4Alist.htm, or any successor thereto, under the
headings "Time Weighted/Integrated Real Time LBMP"  (the "Index").

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Stepenovitch, Joe
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:20 AM
To: Lozano, Melba
Subject: NY ZONE A

Time Weighted/Integrated Real Time LBMP  << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>
Zonal <http://mis.nyiso.com/public/P-4Alist.htm>


Caithness - Confidentiality agreements were sent this week to the project
developers of the 550Mw Big Sandy project in northwest Arizona.  Work
continues on developing pipe lateral costs and environmental impact
statements.

KN Energy - Their current transport contract to the West has a ROFR that
expires 7/31.  The 20,000 MMBtu/d capacity is split evenly between Topock and
Needles (KN is not currently flowing anything to Topock) at a rate of
$.13/MMBtu.  Even with the Topock space, the total capacity could be worth
something in the low to mid $.20's.  KN would also like to keep the ROFR
language but this could only occur with a max rate deal for a term of one
year or longer.  We should have any offer from KN by Monday 7/31.

Operations - we temporarily lost a compressor for approximately 1 hour at
Station 2 on Thursday.  There was minimal throughput impacted.  An unusual
"knock" sound has also been coming from one of the units at Station 4.  High
western flow is taking its toll on equipment.

August Capacity - West demand is expected to be robust for August (higher
than June) with high temperatures combined with lower hydro-generation
capacity available from the Northwest (per CERA).

El Paso / Blanco Mis-Measurement - A letter was drafted this week for Stan's
signature for delivery to El Paso's management.  The letter outlines the
circumstances and chronology of events leading up to our meeting with El Paso
in June.  The letter requests a payback of all the gas volume.  Stan has
opted not attach a copy of the lawsuit filing to the letter.

Reliant - Extended their Flex Firm (Primary Receipt and Primary Delivery at
the West Texas Pool) from July to August 2000 for $.03, but increased volumes
from 10,000 MMBtu/day to 20,000 MMBtu/day.

ENA / Citizens Utilities - The new Citizens interconnect for the Griffith
power plant was scheduled to be purged and filled with gas this week.  As
manager of Citizen's transport agreement, ENA has notified us verbally they
will request some or all of the 25,000 MMBtu/d of primary delivery capacity
for that point.  As soon as we receive their request in writing, we will
discuss strategy with legal and regulatory to evaluate all TW's options.

Duke Atoka-Crawford Proposal - For a $750,000 construction contribution from
TW, Duke is willing to build out part of their gathering system to unload
20,000 MMBtu/d off the Atoka lateral and re-deliver gas to TW's Crawford
lateral.  TW would receive a 5 year FT at a rate of $.05 plus actual fuel.
Oasis would be the primary delivery point.  This project has the added
benefit of allowing TW to sell incremental space on the Atoka lateral.

In addition, Duke is proposing to install additional compression to deliver
up to 40,000 MMBtu/d of incremental volume to TW off the Zia plant.  In
exchange, TW would provide a discounted $.035 IT transport rate for a two
year term.  The Zia gas would flow through a new tap into TW's high pressure
30" line.   This project has a fuel saving benefit to TW by eliminating one
stage of compression from the low pressure system.


Please prepare a deemed ISDA for this transaction.  No credit language wil be
required as ENA sold an option with the premium paid upfront.  Please let me
know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Tanya


Bill, I had some problems with the hourly sheet when i tried to update it this morning. It froze up and actually froze up my entire computer and I had to shut down.  Could you please take a look at it this morning.  I was scared to reopen the sheet with what happened initially.  thanks


Currently I have 2 machines (one on 41, one on 47) plus a laptop.
Jean McFarland contacted me a couple of months ago with this idea.  Basically
we would be replacing 3 computers with one laptop.  I will probably want to
get a regular sized monitor for my work station on 41 (I do not know if this
is included in the "docking station" entry).
If you like, I can get Jean to do the math on how much we would be saving, if
anything.  My machine on 47 is really out of date.  Someone else can use my
brand new computer on 41 though.

	From:  Drew Fossum                           11/08/2000 11:47 AM

To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Request for approval to purchase laptop, etc. for Susan Scott

What's the basis--do you currently use a laptop?

DENISE LAGESSE
11/07/2000 03:46 PM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Request for approval to purchase laptop, etc. for Susan Scott

Please approve the following purchase for Susan Scott: (and please don't take
it out of my huge raise come Feb!)

Compaq laptop (1 ea)  $2,745.00 2,745.00 total
Memory upgrade (1 ea)        575.00    575.00 total
Docking stations (2 ea)        587.00 ea 1,174.00 total

      4,494.00 grand total


excellent.  We need daily reports that represents the volume that we could loose.  The schedulers must know the proper rankings and cut procedures in a hurricane forms.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kinsey, Lisa
Sent:	Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:09 AM
To:	Shively, Hunter S.
Cc:	Superty, Robert
Subject:	Hurricane Preparedness

Hunter,
FYI - Next Tuesday we will be getting together with Tom to talk about what we will need to be prepared for in a hurricane.  We are planning to talk about the different interconnects within our region as well as the east desk, plans to replace gas, what legal considers force majeure and rankings.  I have invited the schedulers from the east and upstream desks hoping that this will help facilitate discussion and ideas on how to resolve problems should a hurricane happen.

Kirk Lenart is also in the process of working with Unify team to create reports out of Unify to enable us to track cuts in Unify rather than on a spreadsheet.  This will be more efficient and accurate.  The code freeze on Unify will soon be lifted since the migration to the new server will happen this weekend.

Let me know if you have any other suggestions or questions.

Lisa


---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 10/02/2000
04:14 PM ---------------------------
From: Lisa Koob@EES on 10/02/2000 02:34 PM
To: annamaria.bosley@compaq.com, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON,
nchancler@vedp.state.va.us
cc:

Subject: cat

 - TeasingCat.MPG


Here are my brief edits to the presentation--added a couple of bullets to the
Quaker slide and tightened up the deal summary slide.  Also attaching a word
doc of additional info for everyone for use during the presentation and Q&A.
Also attached is the deal comps table.

Best,
Jeff


Start Date: 2/1/02; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020123.txt


Here are you positions.


Updated by: CN=Mark McConnell/O=Enron Communications


1st Quarter 1999 WSPP Filing (created by Linda L Lawrence/HOU/EES on 4/26/99)


FYI - I have done the west and I have resaved this file out there.  I highlighted the rows to be changed in yellow.  If we all do this, we should be able to use the same list.  I added a column to the file and put IM S/B, LT S/B and Daily S/B.
PL

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Keiser, Kam
Sent:	Monday, January 07, 2002 11:00 AM
To:	Love, Phillip M.; Winfree, O'Neal D.; Palmer, B. Scott; Giron, Darron C.
Subject:	sitara mappings

The sitara mapping table is saved in the Netco file named CurveMappings.xls

Check your regions and if you see any locations mapped to curves we won't be setting anymore, make a list of those and what the new mappings should be.  Once the new database is set up we will get with Russ to have those changed over.

Thanks

KK


Hi Mike:

Thanks for responding so quickly.  I have scheduled the telephone interview
for Thursday, July 6 at 10:00 AM Houston time (8:00 AZ time)

They interviews usually last from 45 minutes to an hour.

We will call you at 520/325-9730.

Thanks and have a great 4th of July

Shirley Crenshaw
Administrative Coordinator
Enron Corp. Research
713/853-5290
email:  Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com


Should we respond to PNM's protest of the dollar valuation of imbalances
prior to netting and trading?  Did we already respond to this issue when they
filed their protest of the 637 filing?  DF


Please see note below from Lisa Costello:
*****************************

As many of you are aware, Genie Schafer passed away on Tuesday morning.  The
service will be held on Saturday, October 28, at 11:00 a.m. in Concordia,
Kansas.  Below are the arrangements that have been made:

 First United Methodist Church
 740 W. 11th Street
 Concordia, KS   66901
 785/243-4560

If you would like to make a donation in lieu of flowers, a scholarship fund
has been set-up:

    Omaha Artist Scholarship Fund
    c/o Marge Frost
    25834 Meadowlark Loop
    Crescent, IA   51526-4202
    712/545-3127

Dave's home address is: 2418 Riverway Oak Drive
    Kingwood, TX   77345-2125

If you have any questions, please contact me at x31819.

Lisa


Set up w/Sally on 6/14 jar


Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save(R) E-mail Update for
December 5, 2000

****************************************************************
Your Freedom to Travel This Week Includes

I. Click 'n Save Internet Specials
II. Announcing! Rental Car Availability
III. Southwest Airlines Vacations Las Vegas Special
IV. Click 'n Save Subscriber Information
V. SWABIZ - Company Online Booking and Tracking

********* SOUTHWEST.COM ONLY SPECIALS *********

I.  Check out our Weekly Click 'n Save Specials.

*21-day advance purchase with the first day of travel
 on December 27, 2000, since December 26, 2000, is
 a blackout date.  Additional blackout dates include
 December 29, 30, 2000 and January 1, 2001.
*Travel December 27, 2000  through March 30, 2001.
*Purchase beginning December 5 through
 December 7, 2000, midnight Pacific Time.
*Click 'n Save Internet Specials are available one-way or
 may be combined with all other fares.
 When combining with other fares, the
 most restrictive fare rules apply.
*Changes to any portion of the reservation
 (flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
 once purchased will result in the cancellation of
 the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
 fare available which could result in a fare increase.
*Scroll down for more details!

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials at
http://www.southwest.com/hotfares/?src=click

Fares do not include a federal excise tax of up to $2.75
that will be imposed on each flight segment of your
itinerary. A flight segment is defined as a takeoff and
a landing. The fares listed do not include airport-assessed
passenger facility charges (PFCs) of up to $12 roundtrip.
Fares shown are each way.

Albany, NY
 $34  each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $69  each way to/from West Palm Beach, FL
 Note: West Palm Beach service begins January 21, 2001

Albuquerque, NM
 $36  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $40  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $37  each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Amarillo, TX
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $99  each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Austin, TX
 $60  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $42  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $99  each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $34  each way to/from Albany, NY
 $34  each way to/from Cleveland, OH
 $99  each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Birmingham, AL
 $57  each way to/from Jacksonville, FL

Boise, ID
 $36  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Buffalo, NY
 $65  each way to/from Orlando, FL

Burbank, CA
 $34  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV

Chicago, IL (Midway)
 $64  each way to/from Jackson, MS
 $40  each way to/from Omaha, NE
 $66  each way to/from Providence, RI

Cleveland, OH
 $34  each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC

Columbus, OH
 $62  each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Corpus Christi, TX
 $48  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)

Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $36  each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $48  each way to/from Corpus Christi, TX
 $36  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $36  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $36  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX

Detroit, MI
 $55  each way to/from Nashville, TN
 $42  each way to/from St. Louis, MO

El Paso, TX
 $36  each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $60  each way to/from Austin, TX
 $40  each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $37  each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Ft. Lauderdale, FL
 $34  each way to/from Jacksonville, FL

Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX
 $99  each way to/from Amarillo, TX
 $99  each way to/from Little Rock, AR

Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $66  each way to/from Nashville, TN

Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $52  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $55  each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $56  each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $52  each way to/from Midland/Odessa, TX
 $55  each way to/from Oklahoma City, OK
 $69  each way to/from St. Louis, MO
 $56  each way to/from Tulsa, OK

Indianapolis, IN
 $45  each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $99  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $36  each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Jackson, MS
 $64  each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)

Jacksonville, FL
 $57  each way to/from Birmingham, AL
 $34  each way to/from Ft. Lauderdale, FL

Kansas City, MO
 $45  each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $99  each way to/from Orlando, FL

Las Vegas, NV
 $34  each way to/from Burbank, CA
 $99  each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $34  each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $99  each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $99  each way to/from Spokane, WA

Little Rock, AR
 $99  each way to/from Harlingen/Rio Grande Valley, TX

Long Island/Islip, NY
 $30  each way to/from Providence, RI
 $65  each way to/from Tampa Bay, FL

Los Angeles, CA
 $34  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $49  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT
 $99  each way to/from Seattle, WA

Louisville, KY
 $99  each way to/from Manchester, NH
 $62  each way to/from Orlando, FL
 $34  each way to/from St. Louis, MO

Lubbock, TX
 $40  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $99  each way to/from New Orleans, LA

Manchester, NH
 $99  each way to/from Louisville, KY

Midland/Odessa, TX
 $40  each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $42  each way to/from Austin, TX
 $36  each way to/from Dallas, TX (Love Field)
 $52  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $52  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)

Nashville, TN
 $55  each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $66  each way to/from Hartford, CT/Springfield, MA
 $41  each way to/from Raleigh-Durham, NC

New Orleans, LA
 $99  each way to/from Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC
 $99  each way to/from Lubbock, TX
 $99  each way to/from San Diego, CA

Oakland, CA
 $44  each way to/from Portland, OR
 $49  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Oklahoma City, OK
 $55  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $55  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)

Omaha, NE
 $40  each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)

Ontario, CA
 $45  each way to/from Reno/Tahoe, NV

Orlando, FL
 $65  each way to/from Buffalo, NY
 $99  each way to/from Kansas City, MO
 $99  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $62  each way to/from Louisville, KY

Phoenix, AZ
 $37  each way to/from Albuquerque, NM
 $37  each way to/from El Paso, TX
 $62  each way to/from Sacramento, CA

Portland, OR
 $44  each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $56  each way to/from Salt Lake City, UT

Providence, RI
 $66  each way to/from Chicago, IL (Midway)
 $30  each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Raleigh-Durham, NC
 $99  each way to/from Austin, TX
 $41  each way to/from Nashville, TN

Reno/Tahoe, NV
 $45  each way to/from Ontario, CA

Sacramento, CA
 $62  each way to/from Phoenix, AZ

Salt Lake City, UT
 $36  each way to/from Boise, ID
 $49  each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $49  each way to/from Oakland, CA
 $56  each way to/from Portland, OR

San Antonio, TX
 $99  each way to/from San Diego, CA
 $61  each way to/from Tulsa, OK

San Diego, CA
 $99  each way to/from New Orleans, LA
 $99  each way to/from San Antonio, TX
 $41  each way to/from San Francisco, CA
 $34  each way to/from Tucson, AZ

San Francisco, CA
 $41  each way to/from San Diego, CA

San Jose, CA
 $47  each way to/from Seattle, WA
 $68  each way to/from Tucson, AZ

Seattle, WA
 $99  each way to/from Los Angeles, CA
 $47  each way to/from San Jose, CA
 $34  each way to/from Spokane, WA

Spokane, WA
 $99  each way to/from Las Vegas, NV
 $34  each way to/from Seattle, WA

St. Louis, MO
 $42  each way to/from Detroit, MI
 $69  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $36  each way to/from Indianapolis, IN
 $34  each way to/from Louisville, KY

Tampa Bay, FL
 $62  each way to/from Columbus, OH
 $65  each way to/from Long Island/Islip, NY

Tucson, AZ
 $34  each way to/from San Diego, CA
 $68  each way to/from San Jose, CA

Tulsa, OK
 $56  each way to/from Houston, TX (Bush Intercontinental)
 $56  each way to/from Houston, TX (Hobby)
 $61  each way to/from San Antonio, TX

West Palm Beach, FL
 $69  each way to/from Albany, NY
 Note: West Palm Beach service begins January 21, 2001

Southwest Airlines Click 'n Save Internet Specials
Other Terms and Conditions:

Tickets must be purchased through the Southwest Airlines
web site at http://www.southwest.com/ The fares listed
above are per person for each way of travel.
Fares listed are for general information only and
are not a reflection of current seat availability. Travel
may originate in either direction.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials are nonchangeable and
nonrefundable. *Ticketless Travel Online may only be
purchased with a credit card. Customers holding funds from
a previously unused trip on Southwest Airlines or Customers
who have Southwest Airlines vouchers will not be able to use
those forms of payment for Ticketless Travel Online.
*Unused funds may be applied toward future travel on
Southwest Airlines within one year of the original purchase date.

Click 'n Save Internet Specials may be combined with
all other fares. When combining with other fares, the
most restrictive fare rules apply. Seats are limited
and won't be available on some flights that operate
during very busy travel times and holiday periods.

Changes to any portion of the reservation
(flight, dates, cities, and/or names of passengers)
once purchased will result in the cancellation of
the ENTIRE reservation and rebooking at the lowest
fare available which could result in a fare increase.
Standby travel requires an upgrade to the
full unrestricted fare.

Of course, if your favorite city is not listed, we have many
other incredible fares to all Southwest cities. To find more
great fares on Southwest Airlines, please visit Reservations
or check our Fares Information online at
http://www.southwest.com/

*****ANNOUNCING! RENTAL CAR AVAILABILITY*****
II.  Do the math!  Now reserving your flights and rental
cars on southwest.com adds up with a special double
credit offer.  Receiving a free award ticket just got easier.
Check out this special offer at :
http://www.southwest.com/rapid_rewards/rr_promotions.html

*********SOUTHWEST AIRLINES VACATIONS*********
III. Sensational Vegas Vacation for Two Adults from
Albuquerque, Burbank, Los Angeles, Ontario, Oakland,
Phoenix, Salt Lake City, San Diego, San Francisco,
San Jose, and Sacramento.
Packages include roundtrip air, two nights hotel, Rapid
Rewards credit, and 24-Hour traveler assistance.  Offer valid for
travel November 1, 2000 - March 15, 2001.  Purchase by
December 31, 2000. Certain blackout dates apply. To check out
our spectacular prices, please visit us at:
http://www.swavacations.com/landslide.htm

************ SUBSCRIBER INFORMATION **************
IV. Please pass this great news on to your friends!
To subscribe to Southwest Airlines
Click 'n Save E-mail Updates,
visit http://www.southwest.com/email/

Remember, if you change your Internet service provider,
you will need to unsubscribe and re-subscribe in order
to continue receiving Click 'n Save email updates.
Please visit our subscription page at:
http://www.southwest.com/email/

************************** SWABIZ *************************
V. Company Travel Managers can book and track
their company's business travel on SWABIZ. To find
out more about this FREE service, simply visit:
http://www.southwest.com/swabiz/?src=cnswabiz

***************************************************************

This is a post only mailing from Southwest Airlines.
Please do not attempt to respond to this message.

Copyright 2000 Southwest Airlines Co. All Rights Reserved.

---
You are currently subscribed to special-offers as: [mark.guzman@enron.com]
You can unsubscribe anytime at http://www.southwest.com/email


I'll be in Houston on the 17th so we can talk then. I'm based out of Sao
Paulo.  I'll get you Erwin Landivar's summary this week.

Nadia, would you please contact Patti and set up a time for me to talk to
Sally.

Sally Beck@ECT
07/07/2000 10:04 PM

To: Sherron Watkins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Berney C
Aucoin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Hardy/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Woulfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, James
Row/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Rafi
Khan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen Morse/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Carl Tricoli/Corp/Enron@Enron, Gustavo
Junqueira/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jean
Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, Timothy B Rebhorn/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Federico Cerisoli/SA/Enron@Enron
cc: Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Associate PRC - Input Needed

I will serve as a representative to the  Associates PRC meeting that will
take place on July 19.  As a PRC rep, I have been assigned the Associates to
represent in the meeting as indicated on the attachment.  The Associates
Program has provided me  with your name as the PRC supervisor of the
associate as listed.

Please provide me with the following by Friday, July 14:

Associate's accomplishments for the first half of 2000 (prepared by the
associate or summarized by you)

Description of associate's current responsibilities/assignment (and any
additional rotational assignments during this first six months of the year)

Pre-ranking of the associate from your business unit PRC , or your suggestion
on ranking if no business unit PRC process has been completed (Superior,
Excellent, Strong, Satisfactory, Needs Improvement or Issues)

Any other information that you believe will be helpful in accurately
representing the associate in the PRC process

Recommendation for promotion, if any

I will receive a copy of the Consolidated Supervisor Feedback from the PEP
system through the Associates Program.

I will be on vacation until Monday, July 17.  My assistant, Patti Thompson,
will be contacting you next week to ask if you would like to meet with me for
a few minutes on Monday or Tuesday, July 17 and 18 (or phone call) to discuss
your associate and his/her performance in more detail.

Thanks for your attention to this.  If you are not the appropriate PRC
supervisor for the associate listed on the attachment,  please reply by
e:mail as soon as possible and my assistant will research where I should go
next for this input.


FYI.  Attached is a presentation on gas markets that I gave to an electricity
group yesterday.  The group was formed out of California's restructuring
legislation (AB 1980).  It's called the "AB 1980 Implementation Group" (I
heard that the group decided that its time to change its name.).  The group
includes just about all of the interest groups in California.

I focused on the fact that gas offers a model of a "real" market that
California should look to in order to fix the "artificial" and failed
electricity model created by AB 1980.

Best,
Jeff

---- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 10:14 AM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/13/2000 01:49 PM

		 To: April Hrach/SF/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject:


Steve,

Sign-off from the Research Group is something that requires defining formal
rules going forward.

My concern over the last few years was that we were asked on many occasions
to sign - off on partial results of valuation, without the benefits of a full
picture.
Sometimes, we were asked to sign-off on trade ideas, over which we have no
control long-term.

I shall talk to Rick Buy and David Port about setting up more formal rules
for the Research sign-off.

Vince

Steven Leppard
01/24/2001 03:42 AM
To: Sharad Agnihotri/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Tani Nath/LON/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/LON/ECT@ECT, James New/LON/ECT@ECT,
Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Research sign off

Hi Sharad

I note from our discussion earlier this morning that you've been asked to
sign off a calculation from another group, which is something we're asked to
do from time to time.

I take the view that we in Research can assess a computation in terms of what
it achieves with respect to its requirements, what its shortfalls are, and
therefore what the risks associated with using this method are.  We cannot
provide an opinion on whether these risks are acceptable to Enron, which I
feel falls firmly within RAC territory.

This then raises the question of can Research sign off anything for other
groups after all?  To "sign off" means to accept something, which our opinion
in itself cannot do.  It is most appropriate for us to provide a technical
note outlining the methodology, risks and shortcomings of a method, leaving
the formal "sign off" to those best placed to assess these risks for our
company.  The alternative is for multiple groups each to have their own view
on what is acceptable risk for the company.

Steve


I will be out on vacation all next week.  I will be local, except for Tues - Thurs.  Any FT problems or concerns call my cell phone at 713-304-2997.


Habiba,

Looks good to me. Pleasure to work with you.

Vince

Habiba Bayi@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/03/2000 06:23 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Contract Agreement

Hi,

Attached is the draft copy of the agreement for your review.  I will call
Lacima in London in the morning to fill in the gaps for the name of the book,
the date they intend to publish it and the name of the person who will sign
on their behalf.  As soon as I get your comments back, I will send the copy
to David, our attorney, and copy you as well.

Thank you.
Habiba


Brad,

What's up cuz?  Are the lights on in San Francisco?  I think it's only a
matter of time before the national guard comes in to prevent rioting in the
streets!

Anyway, I was just wondering what plans you have in the next month or so
because I want to go someplace and do something, but I'm just not sure what
yet.  I have a bunch of vacation I need to take and I'd rather not sit around
here and twidle my thumbs.  Let me know if you have any suggestions.

Mat


TODAY'S HEADLINES
The New York Times on the Web
Sunday, May 6, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------
For news updated throughout the day, visit www.nytimes.com

QUOTE OF THE DAY
=========================

"When people started saying personal things about me, about
what I was as a person, I decided it was time to get out."

- JOVAN LAZAREVIC, who quit after working for 18 years as a referee in
basketball, soccer and baseball.

Full Story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/sports/06SPOR.html

NATIONAL
=========================

U.S. Scientists See Big Power Savings From Conservation
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/national/06CONS.html

New Rules for Soccer Parents: 1) No Yelling. 2) No Hitting
Ref.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/sports/06SPOR.html

Segregation Growing Among U.S. Children
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/national/06DESE.html

Sugar Rules Defy Free-Trade Logic
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/business/06SUGA.html

/--------------------- ADVERTISEMENT ---------------------\

50% Off New York Times Home Delivery

Enjoy the award winning journalism of The New York Times
with the added benefit of convenient home delivery. Now you
have another chance to get 50% off for the first 8 weeks.
Pay by credit card and you'll also receive 4 additional
weeks at this low introductory rate. That's 12 weeks in all!
Subscribe today at:

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/email/nytcirc/indexmay.html
\---------------------------------------------------------/

POLITICS
=========================

Cameras Being Turned on Once-Shy C.I.A.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/politics/06CIA.html

News Analysis: Bush's Capitol Hill Two-Step
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/politics/06BUSH.html

In Spanish, Bush Focuses on Working With Mexico
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/politics/06RADI.html

Report Finds More Diversity at Top Levels in Government
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/politics/06GOVE.html

INTERNATIONAL
=========================

On a Diplomatic Mission, Pope Arrives in Syria
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/world/06POPE.html

At Home, Mexico Mistreats Its Migrant Farmhands
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/world/06MEXI.html

In Israel, Panel Urges Settlement Freeze and an End to
Terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/world/06MIDE.html

Poor Region's Governors in Colombia Unite to Oppose Drug
Plan
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/world/06COLO.html

BUSINESS
=========================

Sugar Rules Defy Free-Trade Logic
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/business/06SUGA.html

Questions of Style in Warnaco's Fall
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/business/06LIND.html

An Executive's Guide to Crystal Gazing in a Shaky Economy
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/business/06INDI.html

Penny-Pinching Wizardry for Leaner Companies
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/business/06OLIV.html

TECHNOLOGY
=========================

Reassessing Cisco as a Tech Stalwart
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/technology/06CISC.html

A Wing, a Prayer and Presto, It's Web TV
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/technology/06WEBTV.html

Discounts That Come to Travelers Who Wait
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/technology/06TRAV.html

Layoffs Are Becoming a Spring Break for the Dot-Com
Generation
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/05/technology/05DOTC.html

NEW YORK REGION
=========================

Angered by Shooting, 200 March in Irvington
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/nyregion/06RALL.html

Molecular Biologist Becomes First Woman to Lead Princeton
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/nyregion/06PRIN.html

For Chinese, Bliss Is Eternity in a Suburban Grave
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/nyregion/06GRAV.html

The Latino Candidate: Yours, Mine or Ours?
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/nyregion/06LATI.html

SPORTS
=========================

Monarchos Leaves Derby Field in the Dust
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/sports/06RACI.html

Once Again, Favorite Flunks the Derby
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/sports/06VECS-LATE.html

Collision in Crease Puts Devils on Brink
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/sports/06DEVI.html

A Policeman Who Turned Into a Hit Man
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/sports/06ANDE.html

ARTS
=========================

Jane Fonda: An Unscripted Life Starring Herself
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/arts/06KENN.html

Ravinia Festival: Where the Trains Have a Voice in the
Concerts
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/arts/06OEST.html

Orff's Musical and Moral Failings
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/arts/06TARU.html

Dancing Like a Bird, Like a Whale, Like the Wind
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/arts/06SCHE.html

OP-ED COLUMNISTS
=========================

By MAUREEN DOWD: Mexico Likes Us!

Why, only three months in, is America roiled by all these
bristly spats around the globe?

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/opinion/06DOWD.html

By PAUL KRUGMAN: More Missing Pages

How can Congress pass a budget resolution without factoring
in the cost of a missile defense system, military buildup
and expanded Medicare coverage?

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/06/opinion/06KRUG.html

HOW TO CHANGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------
You received these headlines because you requested The New
York Times Direct e-mail service. To cancel delivery, change
delivery options, change your e-mail address or sign up for
other newsletters, see http://www.nytimes.com/email

HOW TO ADVERTISE
------------------------------------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
other creative advertising opportunities with The New York
Times on the Web, please contact Alyson Racer at
alyson@nytimes.com or visit our online media kit at
http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo


Start Date: 4/24/01; HourAhead hour: 8;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042408.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 8 / Preferred:   2.22 / Final:   1.67)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/24/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


Either the location, or the number of locations has changed on revision number 2. The hedge associated with this deal needs to be re-evaluated.


John/Louise/Rob:

I thought I would fire off a quick note to inform you that Duke produced a non-binding bid for the entire Sundance B PPA.  Duke's bid is C$180,000,000.  This compares to an earlier bid of C$120,000,000 to C$140,000,000 for one unit on July 10, 2001.  Duke's bid combined with the cost structure of the PPA would have Duke buying the PPA for approximately C$35.50/MW or US$22.50/MW.

The mark-to-market value of both the Sundance units as of September 18th's curves was C$178,120,374.  Therefore, a sale to Duke at C$180 MM would not provide any significant increase to earnings.  Additionally, it must be noted that the curves have some very conservative heat rate assumptions built into to the latter years.

Based on a conversation with John last week,  he clearly indicated that selling the PPA for under US$25.00/MW is not acceptable.  I would agree with John that Enron would better be served by maintaining its current position than accept a bid reflecting a price less than US$25.00 .  It must be noted that Duke's bid expires at 5:00pm CDT, September 21.  Therefore, if anyone feels strongly that we should move forward with Duke we should address it immediately.  Otherwise, Don Miller and I continue to position Enron for the division of the PPA and subsequent auction.

Derek


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 21;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041721.txt


Time sheets for pay period October 16-31 will be due on Wednesday, October 31.  Please forward me your exception time.

Thanks!

Holly Keiser
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department
Phone: 713-345-7893
Fax: 713-646-3490
Location: EB 3887
Holly.Keiser@enron.com


i'm doing my best to get you over here, but there's politics involved.  not sure where you'll be if
you don't come over here, but Peggy wants your current seat.

Colin Poon Tip
05/25/2001 10:51 AM
To:	Cooper Richey/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:	move

Hey,
you know that I'm movin' eh??  I was informed that I'd be outta here shortly.......any word??


Michelle,

Please see the attached for changes approved by Tim.  Anything showing in
green should be included.

If you have any questions, please call us.  Paige will be here the rest of
the week.

Gracie
3-3985