To All Employees:

This morning Enron took a series of actions designed to stabilize our situation and preserve the value in our businesses:

-- We filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Contrary to popular belief, this does not mean we are out of business. What it does mean is that we have entered into a court-supervised process by which we can continue to operate most of our businesses, reorganize our finances, and explore various strategic, operational and financial alternatives, including the sale of non-core assets, in an orderly manner.

-- In connection with our filing for Chapter 11 reorganization, Enron is in active discussions with leading financial institutions for debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing and expects to complete these discussions shortly. Upon the completion and court approval of these arrangements, the new funding will be available immediately on an interim basis to supplement Enron's existing capital and help the Company fulfill obligations associated with operating its business, including its employee payroll and payments to vendors for goods and services provided on or after today's filing.

-- We filed a lawsuit against Dynegy, alleging breach of contract and other causes of action for Dynegy's wrongful termination of our proposed merger. We are asking the court for damages of not less than $10 billion.

-- We also announced this morning that we are in active discussions with various leading financial institutions about providing financial support to recapitalize and revitalize the company's wholesale energy trading operations under a new ownership structure. As contemplated, this recapitalized entity will be staffed with people from Enron's current wholesale energy trading team, and will conduct counterparty transactions through EnronOnline.

These are the first steps in a strategic restructuring process that will allow Enron to meet its obligations to its creditors and preserve the value in our core wholesale energy trading business. From an operational standpoint, our energy businesses - including our pipelines, utilities and other energy assets - are conducting safe and normal operations around the world, and will continue to do so.

As you know, the second and unavoidable part of our restructuring is to improve our financial position by implementing a comprehensive cost-savings program. This will entail a significant reduction in our work force. This is painful for all of us and our goal is for as many of you as is possible to know where you stand by the end of the day Tuesday, though in some cases notification will take longer.

For our friends and colleagues who will lose their jobs as part of this process, you will remain on the company payroll for now. In addition, we will submit a severance pay plan to the Bankruptcy Court for approval. This approval must be received before we can begin paying severance benefits. We will be providing more information about this plan as soon as the Court has made its determination.

I know these actions raise new questions about our company's future and what this means for each of us. Your business unit leader will be holding floor meetings on Monday to discuss these events with you. In addition, you can access a copy of the press release on  <http://home.enron.com/>. We will also have a Q&A and other materials for you on Monday. While there is a great deal we simply don't know yet, we hope these materials will help answer at least some of your questions.

When decisions are made affecting our company, people, and operations, we will let you know as quickly as possible. There is still considerable value and opportunity in our business. The strategic restructuring process that we are beginning will allow us to preserve that value and those opportunities.

On behalf of the Board and entire management team, we greatly appreciate your patience, your professionalism and whatever support you can offer each other as we navigate through these tough times to a better future.

Ken


I had arranged for this process to move along in Europe in parallel with
Joel's instruction of AA in Houston. Do you foresee any issues here ?

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 03/10/2000 17:13
---------------------------

Doug Imrie
03/10/2000 15:22
To: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Oliver Gaylard/LON/ECT@ECT, Hugo Moreira/LON/ECT@ECT, Simon
Sear/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: Risk TRAC Clarification

Just to clarify, I believed you would like me to document the process of the
feeds from the deal capture and valuation systems (Power 99 etc.) into the
Risk TRAC database which flows through to CAS.

David Hardy was not in the meeting today, but Oliver Gaylard made a good
point that Simon Sear (ie the Strategic Initiatives) Group may be doing this,
do you want me to continue with this?

Kind regards

D


Pretty damn funny.
PL


Paul & Raymond,

It took more than a few days to catch up after I came back from Australia.
There  are few things I would like to bring up to your attention.

First of all, I would like to thank you for your hospitality. I learned a lot
about Australian markets and was greatly impressed with the
quality of the people at the Sydney office.

1. The resume you sent to me and Grant looks quite good.
I think it makes sense to interview this person and we can help
you with a phone interview.

2. I have received another resume that looks very promising. I am
very interested in this guy and would be ready to bring him over
to the States  where we lack desperately technical talent.
Can you help us by interviewing him in Sydney?
The main determination I need from you is whether he can
function in a company like Enron. As any good academic
he sent his resume in a ps format and I shall fax you a copy in case
you don't have a PostScript reader on your system.

3. Christian Werner does some really neat things on
the weather front. I would like to determine if he can help
us to upgrade our systems. Can we bring him to Houston
for a week to discuss the weather forecasting  technology with  Mike
Roberts and Joe Hrgovcic. I think that he could learn a lot
from Mike and other weather guys here how we translate
weather info into business related information. I shall be glad to
underwrite the cost of this trip.

Vince


Francisco:

Here is the CA for Procter & Gamble Manufactura.

Marie


Gerald:

This meeting is intended for you as well.

Thanks
Lisa Lunz
3-5634
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Lunz, Lisa
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:56 PM
To: Sherman, Cris; Lofton, Gerald; Coffey, Jim; Gruesen, Karen
Cc: Guerrero, Alisha; Jackson, Monica
Subject: 20/20
Importance: High

There will be a meeting Tuesday, April 3rd @ 9:00 am in EB2324.

Subject is 20/20.  If you are unable to attend please contact Lisa @ 3-5634.

Thanks!


Start Date: 4/5/01; HourAhead hour: 3;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040503.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  21.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  76.00 / Final:  75.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  TRADING_SC: SETC
  PNT_OF_INTRC: SP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   0.42 / Final:   0.39)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE1
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   4.62 / Final:   3.85)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE2
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:  42.26 / Final:  35.28)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE3
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  SC_ID: EPMI
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
     Details: (Hour: 3 / Preferred:   1.91 / Final:   1.71)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  LOAD_ID: PGE4
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/5/01
  SC_ID: EPMI


It looks fine.  Mark

	Michelle Cash
	Sent by: Twanda Sweet
	11/08/2000 02:58 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: PEP Feedback

Below is an email to be sent to all attorneys/paralegals within ENA Legal.
Please review and provide me with any comments.

Thanks.

Many of you have received requests for feedback through the Performance
Evaluation Program ("PEP") system.  This feedback is used by the Performance
Review Committee in conducting its evaluations and also is used in preparing
the written performance reviews.

Please take the time to complete the forms and provide candid, accurate
feedback when it is requested.

The deadline for completing evaluation forms is November 17th.


Jeff, my team believes that there should be a premium to book in the range we
quoted to you; however, I appreciate your interest.  I would agree that we
have spent enough time on this and it is time to move on.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/19/2000
09:27 PM ---------------------------

Jeffrey Sherrick@ENRON
07/19/2000 02:03 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: C-Gas

Dave,  I met with my team today and based on the data and information
supplied by Steve, it is doubtful that the assets and on-going organization
would command a current market value equivalent to book.  I am still willing
to move the assets onto our balance sheet at book for the benefit of Enron,
although if this was a third party bid, I would be surprised if we could pay
this price.  Furthermore, due to your desire to maintain this discussion
among the Houston teams only, I am assuming the PDP reserves are solid, no
major enviornmental issues exit, legal problems are minimal and contracts are
standard.  Let me know what you want to do. I think we have all spent enough
time on this effort.

On a side issue, are you aware that this is a JEDI I property?  My
understanding is that Jedi I owns 100% of C-GAS and the Jedi I fund WILL be
liquidated before the end of the year.  At what price will your unit pay to
liquidate the fund?

jeff

David W Delainey@ECT
07/13/2000 08:12 PM
To: Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve Pruett/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: C-Gas

Steve, please call Jeff and go through in detail how we got to our valuation
of approximately $39 M.  Please ensure that this is a reasonable facsimile of
value that ENA would accreate over the short to medium term assuming your
continued management.

Let me know where you end up.

Regards
Delainey


We regret the recent response to the subject email "Password Security Notice"
that you may have received.  The particular email was inappropriate and the
ISC has therefore taken immediate disciplinary action against the individual
responsible.

Allan Sommer
Integrated Solutions Center (ISC)


I've found a great website to check on utilities (trying to figure out if a
counterparty is one, or whether its a governmental one).  It's at
www.utilityconnection.com.  It even has non-U.S. utilities.  When you have a
minute, give it a look.


The report named: West VaR and Off-Peak Position Report By Trader <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=27&report_name=West+VaR+and+Off-Peak+Position+Report+By+Trader&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/22/2001>, published as of 10/22/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.

(Revision: 2)


---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT on 09/27/2000 01:45
PM ---------------------------

"George, Mike (CA - Calgary)" <migeorge@deloitte.ca> on 09/25/2000 05:53:40 PM
To: Chris Dorland/CAL/ECT@ECT, "'dan'" <ddorland@smednet.com>, "'jenny'"
<jgeorge74@hotmail.com>, "'K-Dog'" <StephanieKreuz@aec.ca>, "'Steel's lil
buddy'" <msawyer999@hotmail.com>, "'Zing Dong'" <zinger01@hotmail.com>
cc:
Subject: turn sound on

-----Original Message-----
From: Ganden, Garrett (CA - Calgary)
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 4:04 PM
To: George, Mike (CA - Calgary)
Subject: per your request

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Balija [mailto:RBalija@smednet.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 3:00 PM
To: Brian Kapusta; 'Damon Reidel (E-mail)'; 'Everett Willier (E-mail)';
Garrett Ganden (E-mail); Juan Carlos Dubon; Kevin Soloski (E-mail);
'Lisa Thody'; Perry Zich (E-mail); Rudy Zich (E-mail); Shane Turriff
(E-mail); Stan 'Yumbo' Matotek (E-mail); Tammy Farion & Dan Pintaric
(E-mail); Trevor Pohl (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Airport announcements

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary James
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 2:45 PM
To: Anna Rybak; Ryan Jorgensen; Adam Carroll; Richard Balija; Derrick
Hauser; Rob Webb; Trevor Didluck; Richard Marsters; Craig Robinson;
Rennie Hamilton; Tina Mitchell; Jaime Ong
Subject: FW: Airport announcements

-----Original Message-----
From: RYAN SMITH [mailto:c.bonky@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 2:44 PM
To: Bruce/Debbie; Steve Zschockelt; Colin Lemecha; Gary James; Kathy
Carey; keith thompson; Leo Paquin; PETER MACK
Subject: Airport announcements

Turn your sound on......

 - Airport Announcements.doc


You might mark your calendar for a lunch (12-1:30) at the Hyatt downtown on
Wednesday December 13 where Barton Smith of UH and George Tolley of the U. of
Chicago will present the findings of their economic study.  The Houston Forum
event will be part of the Kenneth L. Lay Lecture Series in Global Economics
at the University of Houston.  (I will have a table for Enron.)

The authors presented their preliminary results to us this week, and the
total benefits of the planned ozone reduction (all SIP measures as currently
proposed) are below $100 million (we are indoors most of the time that bad
air days are occurring since it is typically very hot), and the costs are
around $5 billion out to 2010.   Lots of caveats to this conclusion including
the assumption of today's best technology but no more.  The high costs
include a "last mile" problem that the proposal of the Partnership's Business
Coalition for Clean Air (BCCA) avoids (such as no noon-to-midnight
construction, a 75% average point source reduction to allow for trading and
future permits instead of a 90% reduction, etc.).

The effect on Houston is to reduce our forecast economic growth but not
eliminate it.  Real wages are forecast to fall by some 5% or more under the
current SIP versus without it.  Total job loss will be over 100,000--about a
1 and a half years of growth out to 2010.   This "shock" will be around
one-half of what Houston went through after the oil price crash in 1986
according to Dr. Smith.  One might say that slower growth and spreading the
pollution around (some of our refinery/petrochemical growth going elsewhere)
is not the end of the world, however, if a more cost-effective SIP is chosen.

It will be several weeks before the results are final (and the election
over), at which time an executive summary will be released.  The Mayor's
office and TNRCC will be briefed first.  The luncheon will be the formal
unveiling of the study with explanation, but I expect press coverage of the
study next month.

As head of the economics working group, I have tried to ensure that a
top-notch analysis was done without an industry bias.  The results are
considered conservative by the authors all things considered and in line with
the peer-reviewed literature on costs and benefits.  The study is not
intended to be a "whining" study but to give us realistic expectations and to
(naturally) bring into review some "last mile" problems where certain SIP
measures are the least cost effective.

These preliminary results are confidential given the political cycle we are
in and should not be shared externally.

- Rob


Stinson,

We are going to update you and Vince the progress of the EOL George project.
Friday, 9:30AM - 10:00AM in EB 1938.

Bob,

We may get some other ideas from the following book, take a look to see if it
is worth to buy one.

---------------------------------------

http://www.riskpublications.com/books/index.html

Risk Executive Reports	?	?
	?	High-Frequency Financial Market Data
Sources, Applications and Market Microstructure
		By Dr Owain ap Gwilym and Professor Charles Sutcliffe, School of Management,
University of Southampton, UK
		A high-quality, non-technical resource on an increasingly invaluable topic
for all users of high-frequency data.
		10 sections cover the many aspects of high-frequency data by covering a broad
set of information ranging from data suppliers to detailed research angles
		Topics covered include: managing HFD; arbitrage opportunities; intra-day
seasonalities; regulation; market efficiency and market making.

		Format
		Price
		Report
		o175/US$280
		A4, 162pp
		Published: August 1999

		Review | Table of Contents | Order Now in o | Order Now in $

For other titles of interest please click here:
		Risk Executive Reports

		Send this page to a colleague

		High-Frequency Financial Market Data

		CONTENTS
		1. Introduction and overview
Overview and background
The motivation and demand for high-frequency data
The uses of high-frequency data
Structure of this report
		2. Sources and Types of High-Frequency Data
Types of data
Data supplied by exchanges
Panel 2.1 (by Paul MacGregor, Liffe) - The sourcing and preparation of Liffe
tick data
Specialist data providers
Real-time data providers
Summary
		3. Managing and Exploiting High-Frequency Data
Panel 3.1 - Illustrative high-frequency data
Data storage, filtering and cleaning
The treatment of time
Panel 3.2 - Olsen filtering system
Constructing continuous series
Key considerations in manipulating high-frequency data
Modelling issues
Summary of chapter
		4. Arbitrage Opportunities in Equity Markets
What is arbitrage?
Empirical studies of arbitrage opportunities
Arbitrage in equity markets
Individual arbitrage trades
		5. Intra-Day Seasonalities
Intra-day patterns in returns
Intra-day patterns in volume
Intra-day patterns in volatility
Intra-day patterns in the bid-ask spread
Intra-day patterns in the autocorrelation of returns
Intra-day patterns in hedge ratios
Other intra-day patterns
Effects of news announcements on intra-day patterns
The turn-of-the-year effect and high-frequency data
Conclusions
		6. Links Between Markets
Leads and lags in prices between different types of market based on the same
asset
The 1987 stock market crash
Leads and lags in price volatility
Links between geographically separated markets
Rival markets
		7. Destabilisation of Markets
Relative volatility
Programme trading and volatility
Price movements at expiration
Conclusions
		8. Regulations Governing the Markets
Regulation of dual capacity
Circuit breakers
Restrictions on short selling
Taxes on transactions
Tick size and price clustering
Delayed publication of trades
Conclusions
		9. Market Efficiency
Weak-form efficiency
Semi-strong-form efficiency
Conclusions
		10. Market MakingRevision of prices
Other aspects of financial markets
Determinants of the bid-ask spread
Block trades
Conclusions
		11. Conclusion and Future Developments
References
?	?	?


taerystrystrystry


Here is the PG&E 10-K disclosure, which does not help much.

Under AB 1890, when the Utility has recovered its eligible transition
costs, the conditions for terminating the rate freeze and ending the
transition period will have been satisfied. At August 31, 2000, consistent
with transition period accounting mechanisms adopted by the CPUC, the Utility
credited its TCBA by $2.1 billion, the amount by which a negotiated $2.8
billion hydroelectric generation asset valuation exceeded the aggregate book
value of such assets. Based on this credit, the Utility believes it recovered
its eligible transition costs during August 2000. At August 31, 2000, there
was a balance of approximately $2.2 billion of undercollected wholesale power
costs recorded in the TRA. If the final valuation for the hydroelectric assets
is greater than $2.8 billion, as the Utility expects, the Utility believes it
will have recovered its transition costs possibly as early as May 2000. The
undercollected TRA balance as of the end of the earlier determined transition
period will be less than the $2.2 billion August 31, 2000 balance and could be
zero depending on the ultimate valuation of the hydroelectric assets and when
the transition period actually ends. Under current CPUC decisions and AB 1890,
the Utility's customers are responsible for wholesale power purchase costs
after the Utility has recovered its transition costs.

   In one of its March 27, 2001 decisions, the CPUC adopted TURN's proposal to
transfer on a monthly basis the balance in each utility's TRA to the utility's
TCBA. The accounting changes are retroactive to January 1, 1998. The Utility
believes the CPUC is retroactively transforming the undercollected power
purchase costs in the TRA into transition costs in the TCBA. However, the CPUC
characterized the accounting changes as merely reducing the prior revenues
recorded in the TCBA, thereby affecting only the amount of transition cost
recovery achieved to date. The CPUC also ordered that the utilities restate
and record their generation memorandum accounts balances to the TRA on a
monthly basis before any transfer of generation revenues to the TCBA. The CPUC
found that based on the accounting changes, the conditions for meeting the end
of the rate freeze have not been met.

   The Utility believes the adoption of TURN's proposed accounting changes
results in illegal retroactive ratemaking and constitutes an unconstitutional
taking of the Utility's property, and violates the federal filed rate

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Thome, Jennifer
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:07 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry; Dasovich, Jeff; Neustaedter, Robert
Subject:	RE: California Rate Exposure

10 am CDT works for me.  I can find a room up here unless you would rather meet on your floor, Michael.

Jennifer

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:04 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Neustaedter, Robert
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	RE: California Rate Exposure

Can we do a 10am CDT, 8am PDT call?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:52 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael; Neustaedter, Robert
Cc:	Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	RE: California Rate Exposure

Michael:

Thanks very much for your help on this.  Can we discuss first thing in the AM after all have had a chance to review?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tribolet, Michael
Sent:	Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:20 PM
To:	Neustaedter, Robert
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer; Kingerski, Harry
Subject:	RE: California Rate Exposure

All:

I changed the following:

1. Reduced total load from 185,000 GWh to 178,000 GWh.
2. Allocated the "costs" by utility based on total demand
3. Changed the DWR negative MTM on contracts from $7.5B to $9.55B
4. Added an undercollection of $.932 Billion for SDG&E (more below)

I did not:

1. Add the Nuclear decommissioning as it is funded on balance sheet.

I added the following:

1. Allocated the Bonds and Contracts on DWR share of Revenue Requirement %.
2. The CTC is the softest assumption.   The utilities wrote off considerable Transition Revenue Account (undercollection) and Transition Cost Balancing Account Balance (primarily stranded cost) at year end.  The Regulatory Asset for PG&E and Edison is assumed to be primarily TCBA at 6-30-01, but there is no footnote to absolutely corroborate this.   The Undercollection for SDG&E is assumed at the Regulatory Asset balance at 6-30-01.   This is due to the rate freeze having ended for SDG&E and therefore their TCBA should be recovered (reduced to zero).

Results:

One of the key driver to the utility-by-utility allocation is the difference between total volume and share of DWR costs.   DWR allocated costs to have a uniform "rate" across the net short by utility.   Thus those with a larger portion of their total demand (SDG&E and to a lesser extent PG&E) which is covered by DWR, have a higher unit cost across all rates for the Bonds and Contracts.  Edison has the converse.

Any changes in assumptions are welcomed.

Regards,

Michael

 << File: m010822.xls >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Neustaedter, Robert
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 5:28 PM
To:	Tribolet, Michael
Cc:	Dasovich, Jeff; Steffes, James D.; Thome, Jennifer
Subject:	California Rate Exposure

Michael,

Jim has asked Jennifer and me to estimate the potential exposure (worst case) to the Company's book position for DA customers in California.  Starting from the  model you and Jeff developed we have added other possible categories of charges allowed by existing regulations.

We would appreciate if you could please review the attached and provide us with any feedback.  If available we would like to call you Wednesday morning to discuss.

 << File: direct access.xls >>


Set against the backdrop of the Brixton's unique social blend, South
West Nine, directed by Richard Parry is a powerful and humorous
portrayal of six individuals who become entangled in a frenzied and soul
searching 24 hours that alter their lives forever. Produced by Fruit
Salad Films, makers of the award winning and critically acclaimed Human
Traffic.

The soundtrack mixed and compiled by Dave Pearce and released on Telstar
Records features exclusive tracks from Orbital and Alabama 3, Lol
Hammond feat Lindy Layton and an exclusive remix of The Clash's "Guns of
Brixton" by Roger Sanchez as well as recent and forthcoming hit singles
from the likes of Talisman P meets Barrington Levy "Here I Come (Sing
DJ)", Double Figures "Hey DJ", Sunscreem vs Push "Please Save Me" &
Roger Sanchez "Contact"

You will need Flash 5 plugin <http://www.macromedia.com/downloads/>  to
view this flyer.

 <http://www.telstar.co.uk/sw9/sw9.html>


More depressing news from CA, We should discuss at mroning call if we want to
take any action on this.

Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 02/13/2001 11:13 PM -----

	"Les Spahnn" <spahnn@hnks.com>
	02/13/2001 08:02 PM

		 To: "Dian M. Grueneich" <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>, "Aaron Thomas"
<athomas@newenergy.com>
		 cc: <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>, <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>,
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, <wbooth@booth-law.com>, <drothrock@cmta.net>,
<jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com>, <kmills@cfbf.com>, <kmccrea@sablaw.com>,
<mshames@ucan.org>, <mday@gmssr.com>, <lga@mother.com>, <mflorio@turn.org>,
<nplotkin@tfglobby.com>, <wlarson@calstate.edu>, <vincent.stewart@ucop.edu>,
<gharrison@calstate.edu>, <sgovenar@govadv.com>, <hgovenar@govadv.com>,
<smccubbi@enron.com>, <lhastings@cagrocers.com>, <theo@ppallc.com>,
<cra@calretailers.com>, <mmoretti@calhealth.org>, <wbrown@lhom.com>,
<randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com>, <dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>,
<vjw@ceert.org>, <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, <rochmanm@spurr-remac.org>,
<rrichter@calhealth.org>, <ken_pietrelli@ocli.com>, <dennis.flatt@kp.org>,
<richard.seguin@kp.org>, <arm@phaser.com>, <djsmith@smithandkempton.com>,
<john.redding@gene.GE.com>, <jbradley@svmg.org>, <wally@laedc.org>,
<jcondie@calrest.org>, <jmr@ka-pow.com>, <aprea.company@worldnet.att.net>,
"Jody London" <jlondon@gralegal.com>
		 Subject: Re: Rumour of CPUC Action on AB 1 Direct Access Suspension Language
This Week

All:
It is my understanding, from good sources in the Govs office that the Gov
will order Loretta Lynch to expeditiously implement the provision to suspend
all parties auhtority to enter into direct access contracts.  The premise
with which the administartion is acting is that if they expeditiously
suspend everyone's right to bilateral contracts quickly, it sets up a
barrier which the direct access coalition must break through.  In other
words the table is set.  Deal your meal from where the dishes are located.
I.E. the Davis Administration wants to place all direct access advocates in
the position of having to justify why each and every party should be the
exception to the suspension rather than have a general rule concerning how
direct access should work for all parties.  It clearly gives the Admin a
very strong upper hand to control who when and where direct access can occur
without having to say that they oppose direct access.  Power be where power
lies.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dian M. Grueneich <dgrueneich@gralegal.com>
To: Aaron Thomas <athomas@newenergy.com>
Cc: <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>; <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>;
<brbarkovich@earthlink.net>; <wbooth@booth-law.com>; <drothrock@cmta.net>;
<jackson_gualco@gualcogroup.com>; <kmills@cfbf.com>; <kmccrea@sablaw.com>;
<mshames@ucan.org>; <mday@gmssr.com>; <lga@mother.com>; <mflorio@turn.org>;
<nplotkin@tfglobby.com>; <spahnn@hnks.com>; <wlarson@calstate.edu>;
<vincent.stewart@ucop.edu>; <gharrison@calstate.edu>; <sgovenar@govadv.com>;
<hgovenar@govadv.com>; <smccubbi@enron.com>; <lhastings@cagrocers.com>;
<theo@ppallc.com>; <cra@calretailers.com>; <mmoretti@calhealth.org>;
<wbrown@lhom.com>; <randy_britt@robinsonsmay.com>;
<dominic.dimare@calchamber.com>; <vjw@ceert.org>; <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>;
<rochmanm@spurr-remac.org>; <rrichter@calhealth.org>;
<ken_pietrelli@ocli.com>; <dennis.flatt@kp.org>; <richar
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 6:45 PM
Subject: Rumour of CPUC Action on AB 1 Direct Access Suspension Language
This Week

> Hello All:
>
> I have just heard that there is a rumor that the CPUC may act this week
under
> AB 1X to enact the Direct Access suspension.
>
> Has anyone else heard this rumor?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dian Grueneich
> Grueneich Resource Advocates
> tel: (415) 834-2300
> fax: (415) 834-2310
>
> Aaron Thomas wrote:
>
> > Hello All
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in getting the revisions we discussed on the call
> > earlier this week and the revisions that Karen and Dorthy worked out to
> > completely separate this issue from a customer's right to self generate
> > (disconnected or parallel).  I have also included the edit that Calpine
> > suggested via e-mail regarding the department's right to payment for
power
> > sold.
> >
> > We were told by Bowen's office that there will be no meeting on
Friday --
> > they did not say when they were planning to pull together the all party
> > meeting.
> >
> > A number of us have been approached by the Restaurant Association
> > regarding their problems with the 100 kW threshold.
> >
> > I think it would be a good idea for us together by conference call to
> > discuss the Restaurant Association's concerns.  Additionally, I would
like
> > to make sure we have gotten everyone's edits and discuss the questions
> > that came up at the CESG meeting or any last comments or suggestions.
> >
> > For example, I would like to raise a problem I see with section d and I
> > would like to discuss the concept of municipal aggregation for commodity
> > service in the context of Bowen's bill.
> >
> > I have set up a conference call for Friday at 3 PM.
> >
> > HOST/LEADER:                    Aaron Thomas
> > DATE:                                   February 9, 2001
> > TIME:                                   3:00PM (PST)
> > IN-DIAL NUMBER:                 415-217-0050
> > PASSCODE:                               NO PASSCODE NECESSARY
>


in case you didn't receive

---------------------- Forwarded by Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on
04/25/2001 02:24 PM ---------------------------
From: Gary Choquette/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/25/2001 12:28 PM
To: William Kendrick/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Bill Osborne/OTS/Enron@Enron, John
Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Asante/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Morgan Gottsponer/ENRON@enronXgate, Arnold L
Eisenstein/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ray Smith/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: FW: Updated Information Regarding EPA's Current Thinking on Draft
MACT Content

FYI, Please review and pass along to those you think would be interested.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Sam Clowney and Jim McCarthy <jim.mccarthy@gastechnology.org>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Sam+20Clowney+20and+20Jim+20McCarthy+20+3Cjim+2Emccarthy+40
gastechnology+2Eorg+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 10:41 AM
To: alex_wile@transcanada.com; ari.suomilammi@gasum.fi; akjauhar@glgt.com;
bschalke@wei.org; Raymond.Tan@gpugasnet.com.au; clanger@socalgas.com;
Dan.L.Goedde@Williams.com; donald_w_baumann@dom.com;
dhpendleton@cmsenergy.com; dboyko@transgas.sk.ca; ejamundsen@cmsenergy.com;
Choquette, Gary; Acker.George@epenergy.com; gpappas@uniongas.com;
jchini@socalgas.com; cordaroj@epenergy.com; plattjp2@bp.com;
John.P.Zygo@Williams.com; krshutter@duke-energy.com;
kevin.m.wilkerson@wgp.twc.com; k.hoving@gasunie.nl; loeide@ln.statoil.no.com;
paul_amato@iroquois.com; rsturgill@ceg.com; bob.cullen@foothillspipe.com;
ron.schafer@coastalcorp.com; pyeattr@epenergy.com; clowney.sam@epenergy.com;
alshaikh@aramco.com.sa; burgett.tom@epenergy.com; Couch.William@epenergy.com;
MJenkins@wei.org; Mike.whelan@gastechnology.org; Aburt@gpugasnet.com.au;
Tdtran@duke-energy.com; Pedersen.curt@epenergy.com;
tim.adamson@cgc.enbridge.com; thomas_bach@kne.com; lbeal@ingaa.org;
dboyle@txu.com; tboss@ingaa.org; tbell@bug.com; sdalton@keyspanenergy.com;
William_A._Danchuk@dom.com; edecardenas@duke-energy.com; kdenbow@aga.org;
akevans@cmsenergy.com; dfarrand@fin.twc.com; nwfe@ppco.com; LTGO@chevron.com;
dhaines@sempra.com; nhuston@nicorinc.com; Kendrick, William;
Werner.Max@pseg.com; Khalid.Muslih@coastalcorp.com; pmussio@uniongas.com;
rjredweik@shellus.com; rresch@ngsa.org; schievh@texaco.com;
schmitza@coned.com; joeshefchek@alliant-energy.com; ShermanM1@nimo.com;
sumnerr@epenergy.com; taggardl@bp.com; ltraweek@aga.org;
jcyang@marathonoil.com; ehy1@pge.com
Subject: Updated Information Regarding EPA's Current Thinking on Draft  MACT
Content

On April 4, 2001, we issued a memorandum which included information from
EPA regarding the Agency,s current thinking on the draft MACT standards for
IC engines and combustion turbines located at major sources of HAP
emissions (see Attachment A of attached file).  Since the distribution of
that memorandum, EPA has provided corrections regarding the compliance
monitoring requirements for the IC Engine MACTs.  The MACT information
provided by EPA, including the latest corrections regarding compliance
monitoring are included in this memorandum.  Clearly, this is preliminary
information and should not be construed as the content of the final rules.
This content could change before these rules are submitted to OMB,
subsequently issued as proposed standards, or promulgated as final rules.
 - Updated Draft MACT content.doc


Carlos, can you look through this for NEPCO and get comments back? David is
out all week, and he cannot get his e-mail at least as of an hour ago.Thanks
----- Forwarded by John Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 11/27/2000 12:13
PM -----

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	11/27/2000 10:14 AM

		 To: Roseann Engeldorf/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, davidlu@nepco.com
		 cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Hi there,

In resolving some issues with Westinghouse there was an agreement reached
concerning the disposition of the Blue Girl turbines, as well as certain
issues relating to the Gleason and Wheatland facilities.  In connection with
this agreement I am forwarding to you a draft letter agreement concerning
resolution of these matters.  As you can see, Westinghouse has requested that
NEPCO, EEPC and LJM2-Turbine, LLC sign the agreement.

Your comments would be appreciated.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000 10:08
AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mitch Robinson                           11/22/2000 09:09 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Some changes.  Can you review and advise?

Mitch
---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000
09:08 AM ---------------------------

DeKrey Lynn <Lynn.DeKray@swpc.siemens.com> on 11/21/2000 10:42:05 AM
To: "'Mitch.Robinson@enron.com'" <Mitch.Robinson@enron.com>
cc: Monahan Bill <Bill.Monahan@swpc.siemens.com>

Subject: Enron Issues Letter

Mitch
Attached are SWPC revisions to your proposed letter. Our contracts group
advised to add signatures for all affected parties to the agreement, in
addition to know parties for contracts on Gleason and Wheatland sites, we
have added parties identified in draft Blue Girl contract, Enron input as to
appropriate Enron signatures for the Blue Girl would be appreciated.  Please
call with any concerns.

Regards
Lynn DeKrey
407 736 2823
 <<Proposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Rev by SWPC.doc>>

 - Proposal to Resolve Issues on Enron - Rev by SWPC.doc