Great--the front running ideas now are (1) an operational sale in the San
Juan of the 20,000 we recieve there and an offsetting operational purchase
(less basis differential) at some other location (i.e., the permian) thus
freeing up 20,000/d of physical space on the lateral; or (2) an exchange
agreement under which a party takes our 20,000 in the SJ and gives us back
the same amount, less basis differential, in the permian.  The SJ 20,000
would still physically flow down the lateral, but it would have to move under
someone's transport agreement--in other words it wouldn't be incremental to
our 850,000/d of firm transport obligations.  I don't know if this will work
yet, but it was a creative idea by Keith and Donna.  I'm eager to talk to
Steve Harris and Susan about this because it sounds similar to a scenario
that Susan researched  a while ago and that Lindy explained to me--maybe
there are problems or solutions yet to be considered.  DF

Keith Petersen
12/14/2000 04:07 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Donna Martens/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Gallup Expansion

Today we had meeting to discuss the filing for the 10 MMcf/d expansion.
Donna covered her needs so that a filing draft can be sent out on 12/15/00.
There was discussion on the possibility of having an Open Season.  Drew
covered his thoughts of not having an Open Season and building the project At
Risk.  Once we are ready to put the changes into service we would post the
capacity.  At this time Donna has received all of her information is putting
into a draft.

After our meeting this morning, we discussed the possibility of moving only
the 850 MMcf/d on the San Juan lateral and not include the 20 MMcf/d of
fuel.  If we are to only move the 850 MMcf/d, the changing of horsepower may
not be needed (I have a call into Ron Matthews for the answer).  The reason
we are asking this question is save capital dollars and speed up the in
service date.  Planning has said that any change we make at the Gallup
station will not work for the main expansion.  Drew and Maria are looking for
a way to bring the fuel or a portion of the 850 MMcf/d in at another point
(Drew to explain in more detail).  The reason we are asking these questions
is that engineering says the project will not be ready for service until the
third quarter of 2001.  We may miss an opportunity.

I will be in early tomorrow or you can reach me at home tonight after 9:00 PM
(896-1025), if have any questions.

Keith


----- Forwarded by Brent Hendry/NA/Enron on 11/29/2000 04:46 PM -----

	Brent Hendry
	11/29/2000 04:45 PM

		 To: D'Arcy Carroll/SA/Enron@Enron, trandyyoung/sa/enron@ECT, Sara
Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Lynn Aven/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Radous/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Re: Financial Swap - Aracruz

We had concluded early on in our due diligence in Brazil that financial
transactions should be conducted offshore by both the Brazilian entity and
Enron.  However, we have not conducted any due diligence on Panama to
determine if Panamanian counterparties can enter into derivative transactions
with ENA.  Are there any other offshore subsidiaries in any other
jurisdictions that could be used for this trade?

Is this due diligence something that you want to move forward on or is the
deal still in the early stages?  I would guess that the due diligence could
cost around $15,000 to $25,000 and could take from one to two weeks to
complete and there would be no guarantee that financial transactions would be
allowed.

Randy, do you know of any counsel in Panama that Enron has worked with in the
past?

Regards,
Brent

	Sara Shackleton@ECT
	11/29/2000 03:53 PM

		 To: Brent Hendry/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: D'Arcy Carroll/SA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Financial Swap - Aracruz

per my voice mail
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 11/29/2000 03:52 PM -----

	D'Arcy Carroll@ENRON
	11/29/2000 04:32 PM

		 To: Randy Young/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ECT
		 cc: Sara Shackleton@ECT
		 Subject: Financial Swap - Aracruz

Randy/Sara,

Please confirm if Enron can or cannot execute a financial swap with Aracruz
Brazil.

Alternatively, we need input on Enron's ability to execute a financial swap
for pulp with Aracruz's off-shore, Panamanian  subsidiary.

We are trying to prep for a discussion scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday
afternoon, Sao Paulo time (4 hours ahead of Houston).

Thanks your help.


Charlotte,

This is a desk-to-desk deal.  You need to get with the scheduler on the East
Desk who handles Transco.  Both desks will need to tie in MOPS.  In this
case, POPS most  likely tried to update the HPL side, but the East Desk has
not adjusted their side in MOPS.

D

	From:  Charlotte Hawkins                           12/29/99 11:26 AM

To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Meter 74, December BRIDGEBACK ERROR

Daren:

I have an error for Transco Bammel for that 20.0/day on days 23 through 27 -
do you change the volumes as they are sent back?

The volumes are:

23     133
24     20783
25     20738
26     20787
27     20123

Thanks!

Charlotte

PS    I have to be clear by noon tomorrow.........................


----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 11/09/2000 09:42 PM -----

	US Publishing <daily@restructuringtoday.com>
	11/09/2000 11:35 AM
	Please respond to daily

		 To: "RT Reader" <daily@restructuringtoday.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Restructuring Today, Thursday November 9, 2000

(see attached file:  rt001109.pdf)

Thank you,

Season Hawksley
US Publishing
1-800-486-8201
www.restructuringtoday.com
season@restructuringtoday.com

 - rt001109.pdf


I know that each of you has just said,  "FINALLY",  and I do apologize for the delay.   As I explained to you earlier this week, Ken, we wouldn't want to have you actually sign the papers until very close to your last day at Enron, because the interest will run from the date of your signature.

Please take a look at the document and call me with any questions.  I will need to know the exact loan amount to complete the loan document, and will have to ask Legal to sign off before it's executed.

Thanks,
Molly
x34804


There are four deals on the no report that look like they sould be
confirmed.  Can you take a look at them and check to see why they are coded
not to be confirmed?

#533919
#533931
#533932
#533934

I guess you have seen the email that shows what your computer looks like when
you work in (or apparently near) California?  You open it and the screen
starts moving around.

Stay well!


*******************************************************

This exclusive offer has been sent to you by TheStreet.com as a
result of a partnership between TheStreet.com and Interactive Week
because you are currently or within the last year have been a
subscriber (either free-trial or paid) to one of our web sites,
www.thestreet.com or www.realmoney.com. If you are not a current
or former subscriber, and you believe you received this message
in error, please forward this message to members@thestreet.com,
or call our customer service department at 1-800-562-9571.

Please be assured that we respect the privacy of you, our subscribers,
and that we have not disclosed your name or any other information
about you to Interactive Week or any other third party.
This email was sent to you by TheStreet.com.

*******************************************************

Interactive Week, the Internet's newspaper, has
a special offer for TheStreet.com subscribers.
A FREE 1-year subscription! That's right, you get
52-issues of the publication that brings the business
and technology worlds together, and it's absolutely FREE.
(Let me be clear, you will not be billed- EVER!)

Interactive Week delivers in-depth news and insight on the
rapidly changing worlds of digital communications and
interactive media.

To apply for your complimentary subscription, simply
go on-line to:

http://www.omeda.com/ziff/iaw/iaw.cgi?&p=ts1

AOL Users Click
Here

We must ask that you confirm before March 12, 2001.
Thank you and welcome.

Sincerely,
James Scottsdale
Director of Professional Relations

P.S.  Should you miss the deadline, you may request a
paid subscription to Interactive Week for $120 per year.
Just call our Customer Service Department at: 1-847-564-9002

*******************************************************

If you would prefer not to receive these types of offers from us
in the future, please click here
http://www.thestreet.com/z/unsubscribe.jhtml?Type=A

To view our privacy policy,
please click here:  http://www.thestreet.com/tsc/about/privacy.html

*******************************************************


Version 2.0 of the ClickAtHome Portal is now available!
 Log into www.clickathome.net now, from work or home!

Access the PEP System through the portal!
 Choose your reviewers and fill out your evaluations in the comfort and
privacy of your home!

Outlook Web Access and eHRonline will be available SOON!

The ClickAtHome portal is fully customizable for you!
 YOU choose the content on each page, as well as the look and feel!

Note: the ClickAtHome portal must be launched through an Internet Explorer
browser, 5.0 or higher.


brenda was a test.  stratego failed.  this email is yet more evidence.

the fact that stratego was not aggressively machinating does not impress me in the least.

the fact that you are still representing makes me sad.

asking for props?  please, dude, the depths of your selfishness have yet to be established.

don't treat me like a fool or one of your bitches.  take a moment and peer inside - that tinge of guilt?  that's what i'm talking about.

in any case, i don't plan on claiming anyone again.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:43 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	RE:

Dude,

Do you know how hard it was for Stratego to lay off this email and not start
machinating on it.  A few props every now and then would be appreciated.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:40 AM
To: JHawker@petersco.com
Subject: RE:

that's even worse, stratego

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:40 AM
   To:     Richey, Cooper
   Subject:  RE:

   I didn't get her email address, fag.

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Cooper.Richey@enron.com [mailto:Cooper.Richey@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:34 AM
   To: JHawker@petersco.com
   Subject: RE:

   nice work getting her email address, bitch

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Jai Hawker <JHawker@petersco.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:24 AM
      To:     Richey, Cooper
      Subject:  FW:

      I was cleaning out my inbox and forgot that Brenda had sent me these.
      She's
      hot.  The game she's talking about here was the game that I was at in
      the
      box.  Didn't see here there.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: brenda smith [mailto:brenda_smith@hotmail.com]
      Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 7:26 PM
      To: jhawker@petersco.com
      Subject: Fwd:

      Hey Jai,
      Now that I look back at these pictures I kind of look like a loser.
      But, oh

      well.  I'm going to the game on Sat.  I won tickets through Molson
      Canadian!!  I'm pretty pumped!  It's the game against Anaheim.  Isn't
      that
      the one that you were talking about?
      Well, have a great day!
      Brenda

      >From: "Jordan Drobot" <jordandrobot@hotmail.com>
      >To: brenda_smith@hotmail.com
      >Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 23:01:18 -0700
      >

      _________________________________________________________________
      Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
      http://www.hotmail.com

       - ATT04510.htm << File: ATT04510.htm >>
       - P1010128.jpg << File: P1010128.jpg >>
       - P1010131.jpg << File: P1010131.jpg >>
       - P1010132.jpg << File: P1010132.jpg >>
       - P1010134.jpg << File: P1010134.jpg >>
       - P1010136.jpg << File: P1010136.jpg >>

   **********************************************************************
   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
   and
   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
   reply
   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
   all
   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
   a
   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not
   be
   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
   Thank you.
   **********************************************************************


Suzanne:
FYI.  Can you and the clerks handle packing up my office?  I may be able to
help but I don't want to make any commitment  that I can make it up there.
Hopefully, it won't take that long and the only files that need to be marked
or perhaps put in the legal assistant area are the files near my window.  If
the move-out timing slips and happens while you are on vacation, I would
prefer that it be handled before hand so that the floater doesn't have to
worry about it.  Let me know what you think.  Sorry to impose but I tried to
do as much as I could before I left.

Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 08/09/00 10:52 AM -----

	Mark Taylor
	08/08/00 09:08 AM

		 To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Office Build-out

It looks like Phase II of our construction project (over where Julia's office
used to be) will be finished on the 18th so she will be moving into her new
office that weekend.  I now have the plans for Phase III and it turns out
your office will be included in the construction area.  Phase III will
probably start on the 25th.  That could always slip but I wanted to give you
as much notice as possible.

Hope you are all doing well.  Getting any sleep yet?


Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
01/20/2000 02:49 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vacation

Vince:

I would like to take Tuesday, January 25 as a vacation day if possible.

Thanks!


played paintball with people in risk.  it was a blast.  did you go out?  i
had a date on fri but i didn't do shit on sat.


Hi Sara:  Michelle asked that I forward a copy of her consulting agreement
form.  Here it is.

K


http://www.2000Greetings.com
                     Free Newsletter #31
                   -- October 9th 2001 --

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If Links are not clickable please go to our home page
and look under NEW Cards http://www.2000greetings.com

Get $5.00 and 12 CDs FREE! Check out our selection
of 16,000 releases, with none of those annoying cards
to return, and only pay $.99 shipping each!
http://www.netflip.com/nf/FastCash/Click/?hid=7520283&pa=7520283&pr=1156&v=1&pb=5200518
______________________________
When I think of you...I smile!
http://www.2000greetings.com/flash8.htm
________________________
You are my guiding star
http://www.2000greetings.com/flash4.htm
_________________________
How do you see yourself?
http://www.2000greetings.com/funstuff8.htm
_________________________________
Just 3 little words...I Miss You!
http://www.2000greetings.com/flash5.htm
__________________________
The Blonde Miss America :)
http://www.2000greetings.com/funstuff9.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CHOOSE ANY 5 CHILDREN'S BOOKS FOR ONLY $2.00
http://www.netflip.com/nf/FastCash/Click/?hid=7520283&pa=7520283&pr=2277&v=1&pb=5200524
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you feel someone has added you to our newsletter
without you knowing please click the link below
http://www.2000greetings.com/abuse.htm

Thanks for Joining Us.
2000Greetings Staff
The most unique Greeting Card Site on the net!
http://www.2000Greetings.com
http://www.2000greetings.com/questions.com

If you can't open a card please try again later,We have
thousands of members that open these cards at the same time.

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?2000greetings
* Enter your email address (tlokey@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "2000greetings".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address tlokey@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: tlokey@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>

pmguid:du.j1g.7r6v


I do not need to see London's lists.  Please take me off this distribution.

	Adnan Patel@ENRON
	01/26/2001 12:33 PM

		 To: Stuart Sheldrick/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R
Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia
Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang
Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian
Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 1/25/01 _ GCP (London) Response--------GCP
(Houston) Update

Attached is the list of GCP Signoffs with a revised and completed Signoffs on
EOL approvals for 01-25-01

Attn: CP 62659 "SG Australia Ltd." is set up in GCP as SG Australia Limited

Stuart Sheldrick@ECT
01/26/2001 12:19 PM
To: Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Brian
Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 1/25/01 _ GCP (London) Response

	From:  Samuel Schott                           26/01/2001 17:51

To: Stuart Sheldrick/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 1/25/01 _ GCP (US) Response

---------------------- Forwarded by Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001 11:51
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Samuel Schott                           01/25/2001 12:58 PM

To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cynthia
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe Global
Contracts and Facilities@ENRON, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan
Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: EOL approvals, 1/25/01 _ GCP (US) Response

GCP adjustments highlighted in red.

Best Rgds.

Samuel xe-9890
(GCP_ENA)

Walter Guidroz@ENRON
01/25/2001 09:29 AM
To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Enron Europe
Global Contracts and Facilities, Enron Europe Global
CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bradley
Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Adnan Patel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: EOL approvals, 1/25/01

Attached are EOL approvals/amendments/declines for January 25, 2001.


I would like to exchange ideas on topics for the upcoming Enron Advisory
Council meeting.  The discussion you led last time was particularly thought
provoking and I'd like to extend an open-ended invitation for you to take the
floor again on a topic of your choice.

We will have presentations from Gavyn Davies and Larry Lindsay on
macroeconomic trends as well as the customary domestic political update from
Bill Kristol.  The balance of the meeting will focus on markets which are, or
could be, commoditized.  We will update the Council on new markets we've
added to the Enron portfolio through Enron Networks, (most recently metals
and paper).  A presentation by you on this, or another trend, would be most
welcome.

Let me know what you think.


**********************************************************************
The following message was sent to you as an opt-in subscriber to The
eDirect Network. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the
products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe
please copy and paste the following link into your web browser or
click here. http://www.optin-offers.net/ednu/?e=pmims@enron.com
**********************************************************************

Everyone has an opinion...
..Share yours with us and we'll give you chances to WIN CASH!

Dear PATRICE,

If you are interested in completing surveys for the chance to win cash and
prizes - become an NPD Online Research Member! Click below to get started:
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=1729756161&m=2111010&c=811

Have some fun! Take a Chance! Make a Difference!

The ONE step process:
Simply complete the form on the website to become an NPD Online Research
Member and automatically you are registered for cash prizes! The Goal???
If you join NPD's Online Research Team, you could win $1,000!

The NPD Group is a top ten marketing research company and we are looking
for people just like YOU.

A VERY IMPORTANT NOTE
Your privacy is of great concern to you and to NPD.  Any information you
provide will be kept strictly CONFIDENTIAL. We will never try to sell you
anything, and we will never sell your personal information. Participation
is free and confidentiality is guaranteed. You can count on that.

HOW DO I GET STARTED?
Please visit us at:
http://www.optin-offers.net/edn/?i=1729756161&m=2111010&c=811

See our site for Official Sweepstakes rules.


The report named: East P/L Totals <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=1&report_name=East+P/L+Totals&category_cd=1&category_name=EAST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=1&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=11/15/2001>, published as of 11/15/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


If you have any questions on comments, feel free to contact me.

Will Smith
EnPower IT
713-417-4679 (cell)


Based on our meeting this morning with Jeff and Ray, attached are my revised budget scenarios.   I have changed the way I would implement a 40% reduction.

Thanks,

Lisa


This is awesome!  Just left click and drag to skew the facial features.

http://www.colonize.com/warp/


The preliminary should be out by the end of the day on the 2nd of January, not the 1st as noted below.

Sorry for the confusion.

Regards

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilson, Shona
Sent:	Friday, December 28, 2001 9:14 AM
To:	Abel, Chris; Andrews, Naveen; Apollo, Beth; Beck, Sally; Belden, Tim; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Bradford, William S.; Brooks, Loretta; Buy, Rick; Castleman, Kent; Causey, Richard; Cockrell, Rainier; Colwell, Wes; Curry, Wanda; Day, Misti; Delainey, David W.; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Frevert, Mark; Gold, Joe; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; Haedicke, Mark E.; Hagelmann, Bjorn; Hall, D. Todd; Hanson, Kristen J.; Hardy, Trey; Hayden, Frank; Helton, Susan; Hickerson, Gary; Hillis, Kimberly; Hodges, Georgeanne; Kaminski, Vince J; Kass, Michael; Kathol, Sherri; Killen, Faith; Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John; Lay, Kenneth; McKinney, Hal; McMahon, Jeffrey; Mills, Scott; Moscoso, Michael E.; Murphy, Ted; New, James; Piper, Greg; Port, David; Presto, Kevin M.; Schmidt, Darin; Schoppe, Tammie; Shepperd, Tammy R.; Talley, Darin; Ueckert, Allen W.; Valdez, Veronica; Whalley, Greg; White, Stacey W.; Whiting, Greg; Albrecht, Kristin; Ayala, Susie; Best, John; Brackett, Debbie R.; Branem Hansen, Trond; Brown, Matt A.; Bruce, Michelle; Carrington, Clara; Chang, Fran; Chew, Carol; Evans, Casey; Fondren, Mark; Gillis, Brian; Keiser, Kam; Latham, Jenny; Leuschen, Sam; Lewis,  Jon Paul; Mason, Heidi; Miralles, Albert; Oliver, David; Powell, John D.; Prejean, Frank; Ramesh, Ganapathy; Reeves, Kathy; Swinney, John; Taylor, Dimitri; Thomas, Sheri; Thrane-Nielsen, Didrik; Trevino, Susan; Vinson, Donald Wayne
Subject:	DPR reporting

Plans for the reporting of the consolidated DPR are:

For trading date Friday, December 28th - No DPR
For trading date Monday, December 31st - Our goal is to publish this in preliminary form by the end of the day Monday, 1/1/02 Tuesday, 1/2/02 .

Please call me if you have questions or comments about this reporting schedule.

I wish you all a happy New Year.

Regards

Shona Wilson
Director, Global Risk Operations
X39123


SK - I printed this out for you & put in your mail folder.  mm

Stan and Steve,

Thanks again for serving as Chairs for the upcoming PRC meetings.  I've
talked with Terry and Ted, and we suggest that you use the following points
to open each of the meetings.  If you have questions please feel free to
contact any of us.  I've also attached an updated set of Ground Rules to
replace in your binder.

Thanks,
Billy

__________________

Analyst & Associate Mid Year 2000 PRC Meeting
Chairperson Introductory Comments

? Good Morning and Welcome
? Quick Introductions Around the Room
? Schedule for the Day
 -  3 Groups (First Year Analysts, All Other Analysts, Associates)
 -  Housekeeping (breaks, restroom locations, food, etc.)
 -  Scheduled to go from 8 am until finished - reach consensus on each of 3
groups
? Roles of the Participants
 -  Chairperson (Make Introductions, Enforce Ground Rules and Distribution)
 -  Facilitator (Terry Bosien - Manage and Facilitate the Meeting)
 -  PRC Reps (Provide representation of accomplishments and areas for
improvement)
 -  Analyst & Associate Committee Members (Program awareness,
cross-calibration)
 -  Analyst & Associate Program Management (Program awareness,
cross-calibration)
? Importance of the Process
 -  PRC is at the heart of the "meritocracy"
 -  Rewards and feedback impact our most important source of new talent
 -  What's at stake - depends on anniversary date, decisions on tenure /
promo based on
  first review after anniversary date, bonuses based on year-end
? Distribution of Ratings
? The Ground Rules
 -  Revision attached, please replace in your binder
 -  Read each point, ask the group to police itself
? Get Started


Read this . . . it's the "chain letter" we've all been waiting for:

> >
> >
> >
> >  The Best Chain Letter Ever!!
> >
> >  Hello, my name is Barbara and I suffer from the
> > guilt of
> >  not forwarding 50 billion fucking chain letters
> > sent
> >  to me by people who actually believe that if you
> > send
> >  them on, a poor 6-year-old girl in Arkansas with a
> >  breast on her forehead will be able to raise enough
> > money to
> >  have it removed before her redneck parents sell her
> > to
> >  a travelling freak show.
> >
> >  Do you honestly believe that Bill Gates is going to
> >  give you, and everyone to whom you send "his"
> > email,
> >  $1000? How stupid are we? "Ooooh, looky here! If I
> >  scroll down this page and make a wish, I'll get
> > laid
> >  by every good looking model in the magazine!" What
> > a
> >  bunch of bullshit.
> >
> >  Basically, this message is a big FUCK YOU to all
> > the
> >  people out there who have nothing better to do than
> > to
> >  send me stupid ch! ain mail forwards.
> >
> >  Maybe the evil chain letter leprechauns will come
> > into
> >  my house and sodomize me in my sleep for not
> >  continuing a chain that was started by Peter in 5
> > AD
> >  and brought to this country by midget pilgrims on
> > the
> >  Mayflower.  Fuck them.
> >
> >  If you're going to forward something, at least send
> > me
> >  something  mildly amusing. I've seen all the "send
> >  this to 10 of your closest friends, and this poor,
> >  wretched excuse for a human being will somehow
> > receive
> >  a nickel from some omniscient being forwards about
> > 90
> >  times. I don't fucking care.
> >
> >  Show a little intelligence and think about what
> > you're
> >  actually contributing to by sending out these
> >  forwards. Chances are, it's your own unpopularity.
> >
> >  The point being? If you get some chain letter
> > that's
> >  threatening to leave you shagless or luckless for
> > the
> >  rest of your life, delete it. If it's funny, send
> > it
> >  on. Don't piss people off by making them feel
> > guilty
> >  about a leper in Botswana with no teeth who has
> > been
> >  tied to a dead elephant for 27 years and whose only
> >  salvation is the 5 cents per letter he'll receive
> > if
> >  you forward this email.
> >
> >  Now forward this to everyone you know. Otherwise,
> >  tomorrow morning your underwear will turn
> > carnivorous
> >  and will consume your genitals.
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________________________

http://www.piperjaffray.com

Investment products purchased from or through U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray:

    ---------------------------------------------------------
    * Not FDIC-insured * No bank guarantee * May lose value *
    ---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.piperjaffray.com/disclosure.asp - See For Additional Disclosure
Information
______________________________________________________________________


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 04/02/2001 09:45 AM -----

	Katie Spencer
	Sent by: Brenda Sells
	04/02/2001 08:56 AM

		 To: skean@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: 2000 dividends

1099 information is only produced if an account earns more than $10 in
dividend/interest income.  Your savings for the year 2000 earned $3.96 and
you have the free checking account which is non-interest bearing so there
were no dividends earned on that account.  If you need additional
information, please contact the Financial Services Department at the credit
union at 713-853-6902.

Thank you.


Attached is a copy of the new floor plan for 47, as well as a list of the
seating assignments as approved by senior management.  The construction is
scheduled to be completed on February 9, and we'll be able to effect our
moves the following Monday, February 12.

The move paperwork will be handled as one complete request.  You may be
contacted for your social security number, current location, etc. if we don't
already have that information.

On another note, a couple of people have voiced complaints about the air
quality on the 47th floor.  The air filters have been replaced with high
density, thicker filters which should make a significant improvement.  The
Facilities group will also perform some additional testing to check our air
quality.

If you'll be out of the office on Monday and need help getting your desk
packed, please let Elizabeth know by Thursday, 2/8.

Please call her at x33896 if you have any questions.

Angela M. Wilson
Enron Corp.
Government Affairs-The Americas
713-853-1593
awilson3@enron.com


----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 01:28 PM -----

	Treasa Kirby
	11/28/2000 09:38 AM

		 To: Mark Evans/Legal/LON/ECT@ECT, Marcus Von Bock Und Polach/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Paul Chivers/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Corp Prepay

As you are aware TD were concerned about the basis risk embedded in the
prepaid swap structure . They plan to hedge their Enron exposure by buying
credit default swaps in the market. However under credit default swaps, only
a default on debt as defined by GAAP is  included as a credit event, and
swaps are excluded from this definition .  This basis risk  therefore occurs
where  Enron defaults on the oil swap but has not defaulted on any debt. This
does not trigger a payout to TD under their credit protection, their recourse
will then be through  the Corp guarantee with time delays.

To mitigate that risk it was proposed that  in the event of an Enron default
under the prepaid swap, the MTM termination value of the swap would be
converted into a loan and Enron would automatically default on that loan.
TD's counsel came back late on Friday to say that they could not give a clean
legal opinion on this  structure.

We therefore proposed an alternative structure which involves TD and Enron
entering into a loan of $10.1m at the same time as the swap is executed. This
loan will  be in the name of Enron Corp. In the event of an Enron default on
the prepaid swap, this will cross default into the $10.1m   loan and that
forms the required trigger for TD's  credit default swaps.   The lawyers
signed off on this last night and Norton Rose are now preparing the loan
documentation.
They are basing it on the May 2000, 364 day Enron Corp facility and we are
expecting first draft tomorrow. I will forward this to you when I receive it.

The deal itself is still undefined as TD have  credit approval subject to
presyndicating the loan to two other banks and putting a certain level of
credit protection in place prior to executing the trade.
The confirm/term sheet has not changed from two weeks ago and I have
forwarded Sara's  comments to TD but their focus has been on getting credit
approval rather than docs until today.  We have not sent a confirm to Morgan
Stanley yet as we plan to replicate  whatever  confirm we agree with TD.

I will keep you informed as to TD's progress.

Regards


Tanya,

Please, look into it.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 03/20/2001
08:30 AM ---------------------------

"Mark B. Garman" <mark@fea.com> on 03/19/2001 05:24:02 PM
Please respond to <mark@fea.com>
To: <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: VaRdelta and Watershed technologies

Vince,

FEA has arrived at a very simple, direct, and inexpensive approach to
licensing our two VaR-related patents as a package.  I hope that you will
agree that our proposed license fee of $2,500 plus $1 per employee, with
licenses to go to all of your affiliates, would be an attractive offer.  I
would love to sign up Enron for this package as an early customer.  Do you
think you could forward the attached pdf license agreement to the
appropriate people at Enron, together with your recommendation? I am highly
motivated to get Enron as a licensee, and I strongly believe that it will be
a worthwhile effort for both parties.

Best regards,

Mark B. Garman
President, Financial Engineering Associates, Inc.
2484 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 225
Berkeley CA 94704-2029
Tel    +1-510-548-6200
Fax    +1-510-548-0332
http://www.fea.com/

 - Microsoft Word - patent_lic.pdf


I want to make sure that we are adopting a policy whereby any material changes to employment agreements for individual employees are adopted across the board so we are creating consistency for all employees with respect to contract terms and conditions.

I think this is very important from an execution and timing standpoint.   I want to be able to represent to employees that "lawyering" the docs to death is not necessary, because we are going to maintain consistency for all employees.

I would like an affirmative yes on this question by Tuesday am.

Does everyone agree?


Peter, I have considered your issue in point three below and, further to our
discussion, I believe that the issue is addressed in Paragraph 8(d) of the
credit support annex.  That paragraph indicates that, upon termination, where
no amounts are payable by Pledgor (the party that has posted collateral) to
Secured Party (the party holding the posted collateral), the Secured Party
will transfer all posted collateral (plus interest if the posted collateral
is cash) to the Pledgor.  Therefore, although in your third example Bow
Valley would be required to post a letter of credit for the $15 million, upon
termination ECC would owe the $240 million to Bow Valley and Paragraph 8(d)
would kick in, such that ECC would be required to return the letter of credit
to Bow Valley and pay the $240 million.  The mechanism set forth in Paragraph
8(d) clearly makes sense in a multi-transaction situation but doesn't really
make sense in this situation, since, in your third example, ECC could call
for a letter of credit from Bow Valley knowing full well that it will never
be able to actually use it, thereby simply making Bow Valley incur the cost
of posting the letter of credit.  However, I think this is a point that we
should leave for the bank to raise, if they are concerned about it.
Practically speaking, I would think that, given these facts, ECC would simply
not call for the letter of credit from Bow Valley in your third example, as
it provides no real protection.

I guess the only other point to be made is that, if the index were to go to a
price of less than $0.25 per GJ, such that the amount owed to Bow Valley
under Swap 1 was reduced from $300 million to less than $15 million, ECC
holding the letter of credit would make sense.

Greg

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources
	Canada Corp.

	From:  Peter Keohane                           09/20/2000 10:42 AM

To: Greg Johnston/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Brian Kerrigan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Soma Ghosh/HOU/ECT@ECT, Derek
Davies/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sharon Crawford/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Alberta PPA Financing

I want to get a handle on how termination payments are handled vis a vis the
collateral obligations, particularly where the Index moves down relative to
the forward price and its effect on Swap 1.

@ $5.00 (assuming $5.00 example forward price) there is no issue.  There is
no collateral obligation and Swap #1 settles at $300MM and Swap #3 settles at
$0.

@ $6.00 (assuming $5.00 example forward price) there is $15MM collateral
obligation of ECC to Swapco on Swap #1 and $15MM collateral obligation of RBC
to ECC on Swap #3 each with $45MM collateral threshold, as Swap #1 settles at
$360MM due from ECC to Swapco and Swap #3 settles at $60MM due from RBC to
ECC.  This seems to make sense.  Swapco has a claim against ECC for $360MM
with Enron Corp. Guarantee and $15MM of collateral.  ECC has a claim against
RBC for $60MM with $15MM of collateral.

@ $4.00 (assuming $5.00 example forward price) there is $15MM collateral
obligation of Swapco to ECC on Swap #1 and $15MM collateral obligation of ECC
to RBC on Swap #3 each with $45MM collateral threshold, as Swap #1 settles at
$240MM due from ECC to Swapco and Swap #3 settles at $60MM due from ECC to
RBC.  This is where I get lost.  Swapco has a claim against ECC for $240MM
with Enron Corp. Guarantee but has given $15MM of collateral when it owes
nothing.  How is the collateral applied when it owes nothing.  RBC has a
claim against ECC for $60MM with Enron Corp. Guarantee and $15MM of
collateral.  This part seems to make sense.

Somebody smarter than me needs to explain.


Gerald,

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner on this.  I have sent an email to David Owen about the hazardous waste question.  I will let you know what he says.  However, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we want to make any warranties about potential hazardous waste sources on the property.  At the most, we could make a warranty about the fact, if true, that we have never used the property in such a manner.  David Owen should be able to tell us a little more about the uses of the property.

As far as Item #3 below is concerned, do you know if we have done a title search on the property?  If we need to do a title search, there is a guy in Louisiana that can do it for us.  If we know there is a discrepancy in the chain of title, is there a way to nullify the latest transfer between LRPC to LRCI.

Let me know what you think.  If you think it is necessary to meet to discuss these points, please let me know.

Thanks,

Rakhi
(x3-7871)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:17 PM
To:	Israni, Rakhi
Subject:	FW: Sale of Napoleonville, LA property,  Our file ENR-02

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"P. Keith Daigle" <pkdaigle@neosoft.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22P+2E+20Keith+20Daigle+22+20+3Cpkdaigle+40neosoft+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:13 PM
To:	Nemec, Gerald
Subject:	Sale of Napoleonville, LA property,  Our file ENR-02

Gerald:

    I have been contacted by Kim Torres of the Assumption Parish Police
Jury.  She has some questions and concerns about the Purchase & Sale
Agreement, to wit:

1).  They want to add warranty language to ? 4 as follows:

    Seller warrants that it is the record title owner to the property
being sold, and warrants it has good and merchantable title, free of any
and all liens or encumbrances, and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
buyer for the same.

    Seller warrants that it is a corporation in good standing and that
persons executing this sale on behalf of seller has valid and binding
authority to do so.

I believe this additional language is acceptable with some minor
revisions which I will do.

2).  They are concerned about the warranty language which covers
hazardous wastes in ? 4.  They tell me that they have not done an
environmental inspection of the property.  They want to know if there
have ever been any underground tanks or other hazardous waste sources on
the property.  They are looking for something in writing that no such
sources existed.

3).  Upon checking the conveyance records, they found that on March 31,
1993, Louisiana Resources Pipeline Co., L.P. sold the property to
Louisiana Resources Co., Inc.  Then, on February 28, 2000, Louisiana
Resources Pipeline Co., L.P. again sold the property to LRCI, Inc.  I
have not done a title exam so I cannot explain this discrepancy.

4).  She gave me the physical address of the property and the name of
the Police Jury President which I will insert in the documents.

Please contact me to discuss our response to these concerns.

Keith


missing deal for bob

buy edison mission
165.00
25 mw
feb
sp15

thanks


I have reviewed and it looks fine to me.
	mk

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 11:39 AM
To:	'bill@katzlaw.com'; Edison, Andrew; Hilgert, Chris; Knippa, Mark
Subject:	Revised Affidavit Form

Attached is a revised form of affidavit.  Please review and provide any comments asap.

 << File: WFEC Affidavit.doc >>


<<Agenda Board 6-05-01.doc>>  <<05-01 minutes.doc>>

Attached is the agenda for the board meeting next Tuesday, June 5.  Time
and location are on the agenda.  Please respond with your attendance
plans by hitting "reply" and placing your RSVP in the subject line.
Thank you so very much.
(Sorry if you received this more than once)

Arlene McCarty
Executive Assistant to the President and CEO
Greater Houston Partnership
(713)844-3602 Phone
(713)844-0202 Fax
amccarty@houston.org

www.houston.org

 - Agenda Board 6-05-01.doc
 - 05-01 minutes.doc


Here's an update to yesterday's meeting on this subject.

Product Development (Jim Wood, JD Burrows, JeVaughn Sterling, Gillian Johnson and myself) had a brief discussion with Jim Brown (Transaction Accounting) to review the applicability of MTM accounting for the Maryland index product.

With relatively minor contract changes (to ensure the product is an "Index Plus" structure) the conclusion of the discussion was that the product should qualify for MTM.  Market costs will not necessarily match revenues (for the reasons we discussed yesterday) which should make the product eligible for MTM.   The desk would have an index position.  The desk can then choose to manage the position or not.

Nina and I certainly want to make sure you agree with this reasoning.  Here's a 1st draft of a TC with marked revisions.  The "Management Fee" is eliminated and replaced with EESI Energy Index Price plus $__/kWh in this draft.

Please let me know if you think this is still workable from your perspective.  A follow-up meeting will be scheduled if needed.

Thanks,
Bob


EnronOptions Announcement

You can now access a web site that describes EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option
Program.  The web site contains some highlights of the EnronOptions Program
as well as some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).

Access EnronOptions ) Your Stock Option Program web site by clicking on
http://hrweb.enron.com or by typing the address into your web browser.

We hope you find the site helpful in addressing your questions about the
EnronOptions Program.  If you have any questions, please contact your H.R.
Representative.

There will be several EnronOptions - Your Stock Option Program presentations
throughout the month of January.  Stay tuned to a computer near you for
details.


Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Sean


Here tis.


Here's the next draft of the FERC presentation.  I know this looks long, but
if
you down load it and use the "Slide Show" mode, it will hide many of  slides
that will not be presented but will instead be provided, in hard copy, as
supporting information.  I realize there are formatting errors, but the basics
are now there.(See attached file: August 24 presentation to FERC1.ppt)

 - August 24 presentation to FERC1.ppt


However you would have to agree that we have some level of control over the GP.
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


Please find attached the requested chronological list of agreements.  Information regarding payments made under each agreement is being gathered by our accountants.  They say they will try to have it by tomorrow but don't think it can reasonably be found in the files until next week.  I will send you a draft of the response some time tomorrow morning.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Thanks.

Regards,

Andrea


Attached is the transcript of Tuesday's hearing before Judge Moreno, which we
received this morning.  The Court's comments deferring to the FERC proceeding
are at pages 4 and 34-35 of the transcript.

 - 02200102.txt


Would you fax me confirm #593548  re United Cities /  Woodward

Thanks!

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 10/15/2000 09:00 AM -----

	James D Steffes@ENRON
	10/12/2000 02:09 PM

		 To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vicki Sharp/HOU/EES@EES, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Peace Targetting Market Players

I wanted you to be aware that we may start to see some negative press from
Sen. Peace.  We be working up some potential responses, although we may end
up simply not responding publicly.

Jim

----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 10/12/2000 02:09 PM -----

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	10/12/2000 12:52 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, skean@enron.com, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, mpalmer@enron.com, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mona
L Petrochko/SFO/EES@EES, Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT,
Sandi Mccubbin, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Peace Targetting Market Players

FYI.  Just got a call from Jan Smutney-Jones.  Apparently, word is on the
street that Peace intends to begin targeting Enron as an example of the
"misconduct" that Peace alleges has occured in California's markets.  Smutney
thinks Peace may be keying off the comments of the "unnamed" trader in the
Dow article claiming that Enron's been buying power and holding on to it.
Apparently Peace's other angle is/will be:  "The same people who colluded in
the design of this market are now colluding to profit unfairly from it."  No
idea of when and how Peace might launch any attacks.  Two immediate thoughts:

Apart from the bad reporting in the Dow article, that article shows that
Enron got beat by, among others, two federal (Canada and the US), one state
(SRP) and one municipal (LADWP) government.
David Freeman, who now heads up LADWP, was appointed "Czar" by the State of
California and charged with the task of implementing Steve Peace's brain
child (AB 1890).  Freeman set up the ISO and PX market structures.  He also
set up the Governing Boards.


Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
03/10/2000 07:25 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Re: Vacation

Vince:

I just found out that it is Friday, April 7 and not Friday, March 31st
that I want to take for vacation.  Is this alright?

Thanks!

Shirley

Vince J Kaminski
03/08/2000 06:18 PM
To: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Vacation

Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
03/08/2000 03:56 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Vacation

Vince:

I would like to take the following days as vacation:

Wednesday, March 15th

Friday, March 31st.

Please let me know if this is ok with you.

Thanks!

Shirley


Start Date: 4/29/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042923.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTstCA
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/29/01
  TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_4C
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM


Done - take a look.

Gloria G Barkowsky
01/12/2000 07:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: CNG/Sabine 12/99

Deal #99663 - Thanks - gb

Chris Germany
01/12/2000 06:58 PM
To: Gloria G Barkowsky/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG/Sabine 12/99

Email works good.  Do you know which deal I should put that on?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/12/2000 06:57
PM ---------------------------

Gloria G Barkowsky
01/12/2000 04:27 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: CNG/Sabine 12/99

Hi!  Remember last month changing the rate in sitara so the
discounts could be taken....well, I need it done for 12/99 now.
The total volumes for CNG/Sabine for 12/99 are
7,676,198 and we should be paying $13,298.60 for at rate of .00172794.
Let me know if you need more information, or copies, or whatever.  And
does emailing this work ok, or what would work best to update this every
month?  Let me know.  Thanks, Gloria.  How are you?


<http://rs6.net/on.jsp?t=1010951578826.1010945481275&o=http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/images/p1x1.gif>
  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00004.jpg>
Project Finance Week
March 11-15, 2002 ? Metropolitan Hotel, New York City
Click Here To Download A Complete Conference Brochure <http://www.pmaconference.com/pfwbro_pma.pdf>
  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00007.gif>
Infocast's Project Finance Week continues to be rated the best introductory course on project finance available to developers, financiers, attorneys, utility representatives and vendors. Course #1, Project Finance The Tutorial, has been revamped for the new realities of 2002, offering in-depth sessions on today's hottest financing trends, including portfolio financing, synthetic leasing, and risk management strategies for merchant financing. These in-depth sessions will be enhanced by hearing the lessons learned by active participants in many of the top project financings of 2001.
  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00005.gif>	  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00006.gif>
? The Contractor's Perspective On Construction, Completion And Performance Risk
? The Role Of Credit Ratings In Project Financed Transactions
? Structuring The Project As A Synthetic Lease
? Structuring Your Project And Getting Financing In The Post Enron Collapse Environment
? Real-World Acquisitions And Divestitures Of Distressed Projects	 ? Moving From Commercial Agreements To Financeable Contract
? Translating And Negotiating The "Underwriting" Term Sheet
? Completion Issues
? Fuel & Tariffs
? The Loan Agreement - Locating And Delor=ng The Land Mines
? The Security Agreements
? Consents & Opinions
? Review Of Additional Issues Common To International Projects
  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00008.gif>
WORKSHOP #1: 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Negotiating and Documenting the Key Project Agreements

WORKSHOP #2: 1:30 PM - 5:00 PM
Predicting the Price of Power for Asset Valuation in Merchant Power Financings
  <http://www.pmaconference.com/imagesemail/id000040/id00007.gif>
Click Here To Download A Complete Conference Brochure <http://www.pmaconference.com/pfwbro_pma.pdf>
Visit our Subscription Center to edit <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=shelley.corman@enron.com> your interests or unsubscribe <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/d.jsp?p=oo&m=1000838503237&ea=shelley.corman@enron.com>.
View our privacy policy <http://ccprod.roving.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp>.


Yesterday, Aquilla sold March at 5.77 and 5.76 for HeHub.  Please change it
to Nymex


Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001 03:39 PM -----

	Judy Thorne/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/30/2001 08:52 AM

		 To: wkhu@dynegy.com@SMTP@enronXgate
		 cc: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Thorne/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: GISB

Kent,

Per our discussion,  I am forwarding for your review the attached sample of
Enron Upstream Company, LLC's GISB.   Please do not hesitate to give me a
call with any questions you may have regarding the enclosed.

Thanks,
Judy Thorne
ENA Upstream Company LLC


Attached is a clean and redlined version with my changes.   Please note the
following:

1.  I added back the limitation on damage provision I originally had.  We
need to be clear that the remedies specified in the amendment are the only
remedies.
2.  Changed both Seller and Buyer Minimum Volume Obligations to be consistent
with each other.

The amendment for the Powder River contract should reflect the same.  Please
contact me at (713) 853-3512 if you would like to discuss.


Glad to be of assistance.  Don't hesitate to call again.

Andrew Fairley
02/20/2001 11:15 AM
To: Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Keith Holst/HOU/ECT@ect
cc: David Gallagher/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Trip to Houston

Thank you so much for your time last week.

David and I found the time especially valuable. We have spotted several
issues helpful for our own market.
This should certainly help in the growth of our markets here in Europe. We
trust it won't be too long before we see similarly impressive results from
our side of the pond.

Best regards

Andy