Remedy Ticket ETS200000034963 has been entered for this issue
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wilkens, Jerry
Sent:	Friday, November 23, 2001 12:12 PM
To:	Hottap HelpDesk (E-mail); John Buchanan (E-mail); Lynn Blair (E-mail); Sheila Nacey (E-mail); Terry Kowalke (E-mail)
Subject:	TMS CONFIRMATION SCREEN

FYI,
Can a fix be made to get the whole scheduled number to appear on the confirmation maintenance screen?  These seems to happen on any point that is retrieved.
Thanks

Jerry  @ ext. 3-6167

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>


Monday is better
--------------------------
Jim Steffes
Enron


Per your request.


EOL Deals	 From: 9/1/2001   To: 9/27/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 9/1/2001   To: 9/27/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals
Total MWH

 	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	 [1]
 	 EPMI Long Term California	 527	 10,535,725	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 102	 4,273,805
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 384	 6,015,000	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 454	 15,115,061
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 439	 7,036,730	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 293	 22,328,990
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 2,361	 2,129,781	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 692	 1,837,214
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 1,290	 923,600	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 623	 762,604
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 1,791	 1,658,650	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 884	 2,451,283
 	 Real Time	 1,266	 31,750	  	 Real Time	 665	 72,783

 	 Grand Total	 8,058	 28,331,236	  	 Grand Total	 3,713	 see comments

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 9/27/2001   To: 9/27/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 9/27/2001   To: 9/27/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 43	 903,200	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 4	 2,683,905 [2]
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 26	 442,000	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 41	 6,813,946 [3]
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 12	 218,350	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 16	 6,597,135 [4]
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 124	 150,622	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 53	 177,089
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 88	 94,800	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 51	 139,195
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 81	 238,600	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 41	 50,635
 	 Real Time	 154	 3,850	  	 Real Time	 23	 1,901

 	 Grand Total	 528	 2,051,422	  	 Grand Total	 229	 see comments

 	 ICE Volumes	 From: 9/27/2001   To: 9/27/2001
 	 Delivery Point	 Total MWH	 EPMI MWH	  Price

 	 Cob (P, Next Day)	 400	 0	  $       20.50
 	 Cob (OP, Next Day)	 800	 0	  $       20.25
 	 Mid C (OP, Next Day)	 4,000	 0	  $       18.50
 	 Mid C (P, Next Day)	 1,200	 0	  $       18.92
 	 Mid C (P, Oct-01)	 21,600	 10,800	  $       22.90
 	 Mid C (P, Nov-01)	 40,000	 0	  $       28.01
 	 Mid C (P, Dec-01)	 50,000	 0	  $       35.20
 	 Mid C (OP, Dec-01)	 8,600	 0	  $       27.00
 	 Mid C (P, Jan-02)	 31,200	 0	  $       34.50
 	 NP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 800	 0	  $       21.50
 	 NP-15 (P, Next Day)	 800	 0	  $       21.63
 	 NP-15 (P, Oct-01)	 10,800	 0	  $       25.50
 	 NP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 90,000	 0	  $       28.08
 	 NP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 20,000	 0	  $       35.50
 	 Palo (P, Next Day)	 4,400	 0	  $       25.40
 	 Palo (OP, Next Day)	 1,600	 0	  $       21.08
 	 Palo (P, Next Week)	 2,400	 0	  $       27.25
 	 Palo (OP, Oct-01)	 39,125	 0	  $       17.25
 	 Palo (P, Oct-01)	 162,000	 0	  $       26.30
 	 Palo (P, Nov-01)	 60,000	 0	  $       25.53
 	 Palo (P, Jan-02)	 10,400	 0	  $       30.10
 	 Palo (P, Q1 03)	 30,400	 0	  $       33.00
 	 SP-15 (OP, Next Day)	 3,200	 800	  $       19.69
 	 SP-15 (P, Next Day)	 3,600	 800	  $       22.52
 	 SP-15 (P, Oct-01)	 21,600	 0	  $       25.18
 	 SP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 20,000	 0	  $       26.88
 	 SP-15 (P, Dec-01)	 30,000	 20,000	  $       32.17
 	 SP-15 (P, Jan-02)	 10,400	 0	  $       32.00
 	 SP-15 (P, Cal 03)	 122,800	 0	  $       39.75

 	 Grand Total	 802,125	 32,400	  $     762.09

  _____

[1]
kalport:
MW for 9/27/01 trades have not been added to Month-to-date.  MWH's will be corrected Friday for Monday reporting.
[2]
kalport:
MW are not correct b/c of 76 EES trades entered.  Number of Enpower trades are correct.  MWH's will be corrected Friday for Monday reporting.
[3]
kalport:
MW are not correct b/c of 152 EES trades entered.  Number of Enpower trades are correct.  MWH's will be corrected Friday for Monday reporting.
[4]
kalport:
MW are not correct b/c of 144 EES trades entered.  Number of Enpower trades are correct.  MWH's will corrected Friday for Monday reporting.


I will be offsite with Jake, Dave and Mike today.  Cellphone will be on (503-789-4248) or Mollie can get a message to me.

Chris Calger
503-464-3735


Please note that this test has been postponed for 30 minutes.

Logistics will now log into the system at 1:30 p.m.; Volume Management will
log into the system at 2:00 p.m.; and, Settlements will log into the system
at 2:30 p.m.

Thanks for your understanding and cooperation.

Ken Harmon
(713) 853-5633 work
(281) 850-7548 cell


Attached is an Excel spreadsheet comparing fuel used between Red Rock and propose Sun Devil projects.  The Phoenix delivery of 500 MMcf/d is locked and the Cal. border deliveries decrease in 10% increments down to 60%.  If you look at the mainline fuel use only, there is a decrease in fuel used per flowing volume.  If you have any questions, please call.

Ron Matthews


good.  that is what i like to hear.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:36 PM
To:	Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:	RE:

i mean, that sounds great, i can't wait!

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:34 PM
To: erichardson@sarofim.com
Subject: RE:

what do you mean you guess?

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
   Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 1:31 PM
   To:     Lenhart, Matthew
   Subject:  RE:

   fine i guess

   -----Original Message-----
   From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:33 PM
   To: erichardson@sarofim.com
   Subject: RE:

   7:30-8.  how does that sound?

       -----Original Message-----
      From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
      Sent:   Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:08 PM
      To:     Lenhart, Matthew
      Subject:  RE:

      i don't know, you tell me.

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
      Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:06 PM
      To: erichardson@sarofim.com
      Subject: RE:

      what time you coming over

          -----Original Message-----
         From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
         Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 10:58 AM
         To:     Lenhart, Matthew
         Subject:  RE:

         i don't think so.

         -----Original Message-----
         From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
         Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:53 AM
         To: erichardson@sarofim.com
         Subject: RE:

         if you win lets go to applebys and if i win lets go to redwood
   grill.

             -----Original Message-----
            From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
            Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 10:49 AM
            To:     Lenhart, Matthew
            Subject:  RE:

            nice analogy but i will win this bet so start thinking about
   where
            you're
            taking me.

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
   [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
            Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:31 AM
            To: erichardson@sarofim.com
            Subject: RE:

            i don't think so.  sometimes the sun shines on a dogs ass but i
      don't
            see
            that happening again.

                -----Original Message-----
               From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON
               Sent:   Monday, October 08, 2001 10:17 AM
               To:     Lenhart, Matthew
               Subject:  RE:

               alright, i hope you're ready to buy me dinner again.

               -----Original Message-----
               From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
      [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
               Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 10:07 AM
               To: erichardson@sarofim.com
               Subject: RE:

               here is our bet on cu/a&m game this summer.  i have cu -8.
   we
      can
            think
               of
               a dinner later.

                   -----Original Message-----
                  From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
               NRON@ENRON.com]

                  Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 11:12 AM
                  To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                  Subject:  RE:

                  sounds exciting.  want to go to dinner with me before you
      have
            your
                  'matt
                  time'?

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
         [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                  Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:45 AM
                  To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                  Subject: RE:

                  probablyl gonna just kick it

                      -----Original Message-----
                     From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
   @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                  NRON@ENRON.com]

                     Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 10:41 AM
                     To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                     Subject:  RE:

                     i haven't thought about it yet.  what are you doing

                     -----Original Message-----
                     From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
            [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                     Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:30 AM
                     To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                     Subject: RE:

                     you know, whatever.  i will let you know later.  what
   are
         you
               doing
                     tonight.

                         -----Original Message-----
                        From:   Erin Richardson <erichardson@sarofim.com>
      @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                     NRON@ENRON.com]

                        Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:57 AM
                        To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                        Subject:  RE:

                        like what?

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
               [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                        Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:51 AM
                        To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                        Subject: RE:

                        i can think of a few things

                            -----Original Message-----
                           From:   Erin Richardson
   <erichardson@sarofim.com>
         @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                        NRON@ENRON.com]

                           Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:47 AM
                           To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                           Subject:  RE:

                           i was just kidding.  i am very sweet.  i feel
      terrible
            that
               you
                        didn't
                           sleep
                           well. if there was anything i could do to make
   you
         feel
               better
                  i
                        would.

                           -----Original Message-----
                           From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                           Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:47 AM
                           To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                           Subject: RE:

                           real sweet.  you have a stone heart.

                               -----Original Message-----
                              From:   Erin Richardson
      <erichardson@sarofim.com>
            @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                           NRON@ENRON.com]

                              Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:38 AM
                              To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                              Subject:  RE:

                              of course you don't.  you just dream up these
         things
            so i
                  will
                        feel
                              sorry
                              for you, i don't.  you slept fine.

                              -----Original Message-----
                              From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                     [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                              Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 9:10 AM
                              To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                              Subject: RE:

                              um, i don't remember that.

                                  -----Original Message-----
                                 From:   Erin Richardson
         <erichardson@sarofim.com>
               @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                              NRON@ENRON.com]

                                 Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 9:00 AM
                                 To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                 Subject:  RE:

                                 that's your fault.  you were taking up
   over
      half
         of
               the
                  bed,
                     i
                        had
                           to
                                 ask
                                 you to move over.  and then you kept
   coughing
      in
            the
                  middle
                     of
                        the
                              night
                                 and
                                 waking me up. so, i did not sleep well.
   you
            probably
                  slept
                        better
                              than
                                 me, i
                                 don't know what you're complaining about.

                                 -----Original Message-----
                                 From: Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com
                        [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@enron.com]
                                 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:53 AM
                                 To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                 Subject: RE:

                                 i am tired b/c i kept waking up with no
      covers
         and
            my
                  butt
                     was
                              hanging
                                 off
                                 the bed. i looked at you and you were
   covered
      up
         to
               your
                     neck
                        with
                              the
                                 covers in the middle of the bed.  you look
      like
         you
               slept
                     well.

                                     -----Original Message-----
                                    From:   Erin Richardson
            <erichardson@sarofim.com>
                  @ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-Erin+20Richardson+20+3Cerichardson+40sarofim+2Ecom+3E+40E
                                 NRON@ENRON.com]

                                    Sent:   Friday, October 05, 2001 8:45
   AM
                                    To:     Lenhart, Matthew
                                    Subject:  RE:

                                    i know, me too.  but isn't she so cute?
   i
         love
               her,
                     she's
                        the
                              best.

                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: Lenhart, Matthew
                  [mailto:Matthew.Lenhart@ENRON.com]
                                    Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 8:12 AM
                                    To: erichardson@sarofim.com
                                    Subject:

                                    i am tired.  your dog kept me up all
      night.

   **********************************************************************
                                    This e-mail is the property of Enron
   Corp.
            and/or
               its
                        relevant
                                 affiliate
                                    and
                                    may contain confidential and privileged
         material
               for
                  the
                        sole
                           use
                              of
                                 the
                                    intended recipient (s). Any review,
   use,
               distribution
                  or
                              disclosure
                                 by
                                    others is strictly prohibited. If you
   are
      not
            the
                     intended
                              recipient
                                 (or
                                    authorized to receive for the
   recipient),
         please
                  contact
                     the
                              sender
                                 or
                                    reply
                                    to Enron Corp. at
                     enron.messaging.administration@enron.com
                        and
                              delete
                                    all
                                    copies of the message. This e-mail (and
      any
                  attachments
                        hereto)
                              are
                                 not
                                    intended to be an offer (or an
   acceptance)
         and
            do
               not
                     create
                        or
                                 evidence
                                    a
                                    binding and enforceable contract
   between
         Enron
               Corp.
                  (or
                     any
                        of
                              its
                                    affiliates) and the intended recipient
   or
      any
            other
                     party,
                        and
                           may
                                 not
                                    be
                                    relied on by anyone as the basis of a
         contract
            by
                     estoppel
                        or
                                 otherwise.
                                    Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


Attached are the money market rates as of yesterday, January 22, 2002.

Please feel free to call us with any questions.

Thanks, Julie


Folks:

Attached is an updated testing script for your benefit.  Please feel free to
add additional steps if I have missed anything to this list.  Thanks.  SR:-)


everyone up here loved that


nope.  maybe ask greg or sebastien.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Poon Tip, Colin
Sent:	Thursday, November 22, 2001 8:49 AM
To:	Richey, Cooper
Subject:	log file

Hey coop...........what is this? WS_FTP.LOG
I found it in the XNAX/Security folder, and noticed that it was screwing things up..............did you drop it there?

ciao


I think you can see the card if you click on view card.  If not, come down to
my office and I'll "play" it for you.
Regards,
Janice

EB3861
Assistant General Counsel, Enron North America Corp.
713-853-1794 (Fax:  713-646-4842)
----- Forwarded by Janice R Moore/HOU/ECT on 03/21/2001 03:05 PM -----

	postoffice@bluemountain.com
	03/21/2001 02:55 PM

		 To: Janice.r.moore@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: Copy - Lauren

Hello! Here's a copy of the Blue Mountain greeting card you sent to:

Lauren at teiglandl@sullcrom.com   View Card

Thank you for visiting Bluemountain.com!

The following links do not appear on your recipient's notification.

******************************************************************************
**
What's new on Blue Mountain this week? See our latest cards!
******************************************************************************
**
Send a gift or gift certificate with your Blue Mountain eCard:
Pick a birthday card to check it out!
******************************************************************************
**

If you are unable to see the greeting you sent by clicking on the View Card
link,
then copy and paste the full URL below into your browser:

Lauren at teiglandl@sullcrom.com
http://www5.bluemountain.com/cards/boxe224579x6/hvwdbnt32vb5pns.html


I am glad that everything worked out.  Good luck in your new job!


The Payment status has changed on the following report:

Status last changed by:  System
Expense Report Name: MW112801
Report Total: $127.42
Amount Due Employee: $127.42
Amount Approved: $127.42
Amount Paid: $0.00
Approval Status: Approved
Payment Status: Processed

To review this expense report, click on the following link for Concur Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


Ben

Roughly speaking if you use absorption chilling, you would save (at max
summer conditions) maybe 1.2 MW per LM or about 2.5% on capacity which would
be nominally a 2.5% improvement in heat rate. To get this you need a source
of steam. For Lowell, we possibly could get steam from UAE (I don't know how
the transaction would work). We would need about 180,000 lb/hr of steam at
least at 15 psig. The chillers would cost about $400,000 total more than the
mechanicals we have discussed.

If UAE can't supply the steam, then we would need small HRSG's behind each
CTG and would most likely also try and steam injection for NOx control. Heat
rate would improve by maybe 6-7%, plant net output would increase by maybe 2
MW per LM. Capital cost would grow by maybe $8,000,000 (this is wild guess,
we did get HRSG quotes for this steam injection/absorption version but have
not done a detailed capex).

Bruce


Below is the description of the new bandwidth product type that is rolling
out shortly.  My initial thoughts are to copy the profiles from the existing
physical bandwidth product types.  Please send me any comments as soon as
possible.

Thanks!!!!

Frank

Commercial is rolling out the following new product for Bandwidth.  It is the
same set-up as the products for Bandwidth currently set-up.

Commodity:  DW-48
Currency:  USD
Default UOM:  DSO Miles
Country:  USA

Description:

A US Bandwidth Transaction with Enron Broadband Services, L.P. ("EBS")
pursuant to which the Seller shall sell and the Buyer shall buy the quantity
of Bandwidth Units submitted by Counterparty via the Website. The number of
DSO's per DW-48 is 32,256.  The price shall be as submitted by the
Counterparty via the Website. Any party entering into a Transaction to buy or
sell Bandwidth Units from or to EBS shall be responsible for connecting to
the Demarcation Point located at each Market Pooling Point in order to take
physical delivery of such Bandwidth.  In order to achieve such connectivity,
a party may incur costs and expenses and may additionally be required to
execute certain documentation.


sorry, yes it is the same.

You're killing me. We have no definition for first contingency must run. Is
this the same as First Contingency Emergency Dispatch?

HELPPPPPP.

ckm

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 11:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Fairley/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Please fill in the blank:
&First Contingency Transmission Outage8 means [Rorschach, Reagan]  an Entergy
transmission constraint that from time to time results in a transmission cut
and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their generation assets to serve
Clarksdale Native Load.
Our obligation during such an event:  During first contingency must run
conditions, EPMI will document the production costs, megawatts generated,
duration of the event, and lost opportunity costs.

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 10:37 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: RE: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

I'm still waiting on David Hunt to send me some stuff, which would really
help move the document along.  I'll ask again if i can get it from him. There
are still internal questions in it, which I have annotated. I'm happy for you
to look at it fairly shortly, especially if you can give definitive
commercial direction.

Do you feel that the commercial team is  finished with the exhibits?  I
haven't worked on them, but I suspect the exhibits need work.  I know the
bogey calc doc is a bit rough. [Rorschach, Reagan]  Exhibits are rough.  I
need to make a list of Exhibits called out in the current doc version, pull
them all together, and clean them up.

Do you still owe me the emergency transmission cut stuff? [Rorschach, Reagan]
  Yes.  I am not exactly sure of the context....but try this on for size:
Clarksdale is subject to an Entergy transmission constraint that from time to
time results in a transmission cut and mandates Clarksdale dispatching their
generation assets to serve Clarksdale Native Load.  Dispatching Clarksdale
assets under these circumstances is known as the first contingency must run
condition.  During first contingency must run conditions, EPMI will document
the production costs, megawatts generated, duration of the event, and lost
opportunity cost of buying from the market.  Clarksdale is due reimbursement
from Entergy for extra costs incurred during such events.

Early next week is better than later, and Thursday and Friday are huge
problem days for me.  When are you thinking of meeting with Beck?  Anyway to
combine the two at once, given the short timeframe? [Rorschach, Reagan]  I
think we could get everyone together at the same time as soon as Monday.  I
want them to have the time to study the document so we can get it all done at
once.

Has Dave signed the extension, by the way? [Rorschach, Reagan]   done,
fedex'ing to MDEA.  Will have faxed copy today.

Kay

From: Reagan Rorschach/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/31/2001 09:59 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: MDEA Agreement Scheduling

Kay,

We are starting to run into some scheduling constraints for next week, at
least with Bob Priest.  I'd like to get together with Bob and Marvin early
next week to discuss the agreement--moving toward finalizing before June 12.
Bob is only available Monday.  Bob and Marvin think it is a good ideal to
then meet with RW Beck.

I'd like to email Marvin and Bob the next version sometime today?

Reagan C. Rorschach
Enron North America
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002
713.345.3363


Start Date: 2/2/02; HourAhead hour: 10;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002020210.txt


This is for energy only, i.e, its an into product, but we may source it from anywhere in the market.

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: Mack, Iris
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:32 AM
To: Arora, Harry; Blair, Greg
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

Greg,

    Attached is a term sheet for the TVA tolling deal.

    Please call us on the options desk to discuss after you've taken a look at it.

Thanks,
Iris Mack
x3-6711

-----Original Message-----
From: Arora, Harry
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:37 AM
To: Mack, Iris
Subject: FW: Synthetic Peaker

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 3:45 PM
To: Blair, Greg; Arora, Harry
Cc: Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

P.S.  I'm in NY, at home, if either of you need to speak with me.  516 746-1751.

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 3:43 PM
To: Arora, Harry
Cc: Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

Harry and Brandon:

Just got off the phone with the customer.  Seems we were sufficiently off the market that they didn't see any upside in stringing us along.  I told them that the indicative price came from our structuring group and that we would now try to tighten things up directly with the desk.  Ergo, we get another shot.  Let's make it a good one.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arora, Harry
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 12:38 PM
To: Blair, Greg
Cc:
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

Greg

1. Who made these prices ?

2. Is this a into TVA product

3. Is this a 3 yr starting 2003 they are asking for ?

4. How much size are they interested in ?

5. Is this a day ahead 5x16 (16 hour minimum) product or is there a 4hr/8hr min ?

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: Blair, Greg
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Arora, Harry; Cavazos, Brandon
Subject: FW: Synthetic Peaker

Harry and Brandon:

Apparently, we are not as competitive as we need to be here.  Let me know if there's anything we can do here to make this more attractive.  My quote to them is at the bottom of the thread.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Hilson, D. Wayne" <dwhilson@tva.gov>@ENRON
Sent: Fri 11/2/2001 11:07 AM
To: Blair, Greg
Cc: Goza, Stuart L.
Subject: RE: Synthetic Peaker

Greg:

We have completed our evaluation of the two proposed structures (1) May

through September and (2) June through August for a three year duration

beginning in 2003.  Unfortunately, based on the prices quoted below, neither

evaluates well enough that we would want to pursue any further.  We

appreciate your interest and remain interested in any future proposals you

may want to offer.

Regards,

Wayne Hilson

(4230 751-2916

 -----Original Message-----

From:   Greg.Blair@enron.com [ <mailto:Greg.Blair@enron.com>]

Sent:   Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:33 PM

To:     dwhilson@tva.gov

Subject:        RE: Synthetic Peaker

Any idea on timing of a response?  Just curious.

    -----Original Message-----

   From:   "Hilson, D. Wayne" <dwhilson@tva.gov>@ENRON

   Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 4:06 PM

   To:     Blair, Greg

   Subject:  RE: Synthetic Peaker

   Thanks.

   We'll be in touch.

    -----Original Message-----

   From:   Blair, Greg [ <mailto:Greg.Blair@enron.com>]

   Sent:   Monday, October 15, 2001 3:32 PM

   To:     dwhilson@tva.gov

   Subject:     Synthetic Peaker

   Wayne:

   May 1 through Sep 30:  $5.83/kw-mo

   Jun 1 through Aug 31:  $8.78/kw/mo

   Heat Rate:   10,900

   VOM:         $1.63/MWh

   Term:        3 years

   Start:       2003

   Availability:     5x16

   Delivery:    Into TVA

   Regards, Greg

   **********************************************************************

   This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate

   and

   may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the

   intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by

   others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or

   authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or

   reply

   to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete

   all

   copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not

   intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence

   a

   binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its

   affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not

   be

   relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.

   Thank you.

   **********************************************************************


I do not see any problems with the assignment however,  I want to look over the contract and the transactions before I give the ok  because I do not see the contract in our system.  Do you have a copy?

 dp
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mims, Patrice L.
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 8:43 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	FW: Assignment Agreement Kaztex, Nicor, Enron
Importance:	High

Hey Debra,

Here is the assigment letter that we talked about--the deals that they want to assign from Kaztex to Nicor Energy are the following:
V17258.1
V17337.1
V17515.1

They want these contracts assigned to Nicor effective October 1st.  From my perspective, is there anything else I need to do, other than change the name on our documents,once you have approved the assigment agreement.

Thanks
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pam Kirchhoff <PamKirchhoff@NicorEnergy.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Pam+20Kirchhoff+20+3CPamKirchhoff+40NicorEnergy+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Friday, September 28, 2001 8:18 AM
To:	Mims, Patrice L.
Subject:	Assignment Agreement Kaztex, Nicor, Enron
Importance:	High

Patrice,

Please call me asap if there are any concerns or questions regarding the
agreement.  If not, please sign and fax to 630-435-6400.

Thanks,
Pam

 <<Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc>>

 - Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc << File: Kaztek Assignment (Enron)  9.27.01.doc >>


Andy-- send those materials I gave you to Lisa. Jeff-please send all future
pleading to her as well.
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 01/02/2001 09:25 AM -----

	Lisa Mellencamp
	01/02/2001 09:11 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

yes
Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp. - Legal
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com

	Richard B Sanders
	12/29/2000 11:05 AM

		 To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

Are you handling this?
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 12/29/2000 11:08 AM -----

	William S Bradford
	12/29/2000 09:41 AM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew Edison/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

---------------------- Forwarded by William S Bradford/HOU/ECT on 12/29/2000
08:43 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Veronica Espinoza @ ENRON                           04/19/2000 10:15 AM

To: William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya
Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

Spoke to Alicia Jones in Settlements and she forwarded me the following.
Please note that Jan and Feb business was paid on time. The March invoice was
sent out for $101,370 and she will continue to keep me informed of any
developments on her end as she is in communication with the counterparty.

---------------------- Forwarded by Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron on
04/19/2000 10:09 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Alicia Jones @ ECT                           04/19/2000 09:35 AM

To: Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bryce Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Pittsburgh Corning Corporation

Veronica,

I spoke with Pittsburgh Corning about our current month natural gas
receivables. Per Harry Fleming, they have filed Chapter 11 and are in court.
He transferred me to Jill Kio who informed me that they submitted Enron's
invoice for payment before they filed so they do not expect to delay payment.
However, as they do not know what the outcome of court will be, they can not
promise the payment will NOT be delayed.

Jill is faxing me some paperwork on their filings and I will forward that to
you upon receipt. If you have any questions, please do not hestitate to call.


---------------------- Forwarded by Joe A Casas/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000 08:24
AM ---------------------------

knovsek@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/08/2000 08:21:22 AM
To: " - *jcasas2@enron.com" <jcasas2@enron.com>, " -
*Steve.Gillespie@enron.com" <Steve.Gillespie@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: CGE for Tomorrow the 9th

Hi.  Please take the volume at CGE off TGT K#6057 from 1186 to 386 dth for
March 9th only.  Effective March 10-31, please leave the nomination at 1186
dth
per day.


I was going to send you a photo of your woman from the baby shower but I
can't load it from work.  I'll send it to you next week.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 09/08/2000 07:55
AM ---------------------------

Trogg522@aol.com on 09/07/2000 09:10:37 PM
To: chris.germany@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Photo


Start Date: 4/9/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in SC Trades schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040909.txt

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_OZZY
  ENGY_TYPE: FIRM

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblInt_Interchange.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred: -950.00 / Final: -949.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/9/01
  TRADING_SC: DETM
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 1
  DEAL_NO: 1


Wilson, Sorry for the delay in responding to this e-mail - yesterday was
Jeff's first day back in the since December 14, so we are catching up!

Jeff asked me to let you know that he is very supportive of this opportunity,
and has conveyed that to Mr. Lay.  I'm not sure what next steps would be, but
please feel free to call on us should you need our assistance further.

Regards, SRS

Wilson Kriegel@EES
12/15/2000 04:10 PM
To: Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron
cc:

Subject: NewPower & Enron

Mr. Skilling,
First, let me congratulate you on being appointed to CEO of Enron. Very
exciting news!

Mr. Lay may have spoken to you about NewPowers' desire to be the premier
energy provider to Enron employees.
- If you had a moment, please take the time to read and reflect on the
opportunity of this project.
- As you will notice, I was assigned to lead the project and am looking
forward to working with Enron (again).

I look forward to  the opportunity of seeing you again, while I am in Texas;
and I hope that you will find it worth your while to provide input to this
project.
Having a good understanding of Enron and it's culture, I strongly believe
that your direct support will have a huge effect on the success of the
project.

Below is the Email that Mr. Lockhart sent to Mr. Lay:

As part of NewPower's plan to enter Texas, we would appreciate your support
to implement a plan to offer Enron Employees the opportunity to sign up to
NewPower when deregulation opens on February 15th.  We believe that an Enron
Employee Exclusive offer for NewPower electricity and customized offers to
employees at Enron's partners could be a cost effective way for NewPower to
help achieve our goal to be the branded choice of electricity in Texas

We have developed some compelling "Consumer Driven" sign up incentives for
Enron Employees such as "Guaranteed Savings - Free December" electricity, a
aligned to a $20.00 NewPower ATM card and free companion airline ticket
coupons.

We would appreciate your help and support on the following:

Obtaining Enron Executive support/guidance for our proposed Enron Employee
Exclusive offer for NewPower electricity.
 - It would be helpful to have your personal endorsement linked to
implementation assistance through Cindy Olson's HR group.
Guidance and support for a similar "Customized" offer to Enron's partners
employees that might include Vincent & Elkins, Compaq, Arthur Andersen,
Continental, University of Houston, University of Houston American Airlines.
   - We would appreciate any thoughts on other companies we should approach.
          - It would be helpful if you would consider sending  a letter or
email of introduction to the companies CEO and head of Human Resources in the
near future.

To help you understand more about the proposed plan, attached, please find a
copy of the plan highlights and draft creative that was sent by Nick Utton
(Chief Marketing Officer) to Cindy Olson.  Nick is currently in discussions
with Cindy on how to best implement this plan and has assigned Wilson Kriegel
as the NewPower manager responsible for working through the details.

I look forward to your input and help.
This could go a long way in Texas towards our goal of NewPower being the
national brand of "Energy Solutions".

Wilson Kriegel


anything for you mainline

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 4:09 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	RE:

the most up-to-date, informative site available ;)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 4:09 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	RE:

you are right you got www.nymexinfo.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 4:07 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	RE:

ha...why not

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 4:07 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:	RE:

should i put the word in for you to trade the futs for ene estate ......

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Scott, Susan M.
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 4:00 PM
To:	Quigley, Dutch
Subject:	RE:

ha...this bites

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Quigley, Dutch
Sent:	Monday, March 25, 2002 4:00 PM
To:	Scott, Susan M.
Subject:

i hate UBS systems , im down again


John,

Here's ABB's wiring instructions:

The  wire transfer has to be sent to ABB Trafo, S.A.  Our bank  coordenates
and account number are:

  Bank : Deutsche Bank
  Address : Calle Concepci?n 4
             14008 Cordoba-Spain
  Swift Code  : DEUTESBB
  Account no. : 0019 0481 18 4010007594

Notice should be sentto:

ABB Trafo
Michael Sandridge
P. O. Box 42802
Houston, Tx 77242-2802

facsimile: (713) 821-3527

Comments to the assignment will come separately.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kay


Sorry, I read the other email first--you guys have me covered quite well.  I
think the staff meeting formerly known as Mikes is on Tuesday Mar. 3, right
Emily??  I didn't have anything on my calendar on the 12th.  Emily, you might
want to send an email around reminding everyone of the Mar. 3 all-lawyers
meeting and the secretary meeting just in case some people are assuming I'll
schedule mine at different times.  Thanks all.

From: Louis Soldano/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/30/2001 10:01 AM
To: Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings

Drew - I have you covered for the 12th.

Em - you might cancel the Mike Moran staff meeting for 11:00 on the 12th.
I'd cover for Drew but, if I were him, I would not let me conduct his first
official staff mtg with the lawyers....especially if Dot is anot availble to
keep me in line..

 -----Original Message-----
From:  McCoppin, Dorothy
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 10:36 AM
To: Fossum, Drew; Soldano, Louis
Cc: Sellers, Emily
Subject: RE: Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings
Importance: High

 Drew-

 Staff meeting on Monday the 9th -- no problem.  I would be glad to cover the
Derrick meeting on April 12; however,
 I have jury duty that day (yuck)!

 --Dot

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Fossum, Drew
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 8:40 AM
To: McCoppin, Dorothy; Soldano, Louis
Cc: Sellers, Emily
Subject: Re: Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings

Yes, lets continue to have the pre-meetings formerly known as Mike's every
Mon. at 8:30 (pls put on my calendar Emily).
I'll be in Houston this Monday so just come to my office at 8:30 if you are
both here.  Dot, pls cover the staff meeting on
Monday, April 9 as I'll be on vacation.  Also, pls cover the Derrick large GC
meeting at 9:00 am on April 12 as I'll be at NN's Keyex meeting in Cal.  (I
may be able to call in to this but would like you to cover anyway in case
something goes haywire). Thanks df

From: Dorothy McCoppin/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/29/2001 04:39 PM
To: Emily Sellers/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Mon morning pre-ETS staff meetings

 If Mike has "checked out", will he then not be here on Monday at 8:30 for
pre-Stan meeting, or what?  Should I just
 call Drew?   When?


I did not come out for nothing,  I got to see the cattle, and you know I love being out there. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help Garry or Gail.

  Dp

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Jeff D. Worman" <jworman@academyofhealth.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Jeff+20D+2E+20Worman+22+20+3Cjworman+40academyofhealth+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 10:09 AM
To:	Perlingiere, Debra
Subject:	RE:

OK.  They had to take her off solid foods.  I am taking Garry to dinner tonight.  Sorry you came out there for nothing Sat.

-----Original Message-----
From:	Perlingiere, Debra [SMTP:Debra.Perlingiere@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, July 16, 2001 9:58 AM
To:	jworman@academyofhealth.com
Subject:

 How is Gail?

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Legal
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron
713-853-7658
713-646-3490 Fax


Steve,

Attached is my listing of 2000 accomplishments and goals achieved.  Please
let me know if you need additional information or explanation.

John


I have penciled you guys in for Tuesday, March 27, 2001 @ 9:30 - 10:00 a.m.
in Mary's office.

Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Jones, Tana
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 4:47 PM
To: Gonzalez, Esmeralda
Cc: Panus, Stephanie
Subject: Re: Meeting with Mary Cook

I spoke to Stephanie and anytime between 9-11 am or after 3:30 pm would be
fine for us.  Just let us know.

	Esmeralda Gonzalez/ENRON@enronXgate 03/23/2001 04:36 PM 	   To: Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT  cc:   Subject: Meeting with
Mary Cook

Mary Cook asked that I schedule a meeting the week of the 27th for
approximately 30 minutes to meet with you.  Please let me know what day and
time would best work for you.

Thanks.

Esmeralda Gonzalez
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3815
Houston, Texas 77002
e-mail: esmeralda.gonzalez@enron.com
Phone: 713-345-7621
Fax: 713-646-3393


Did you watch Michael Jackson yesterday?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:41 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

um yeh - - me too,  can i fit in your suitcase??

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:43 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

My resume is finished and the job offers are pooring in

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:26 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

no overlap in EES - have you written yours, or are you just going to retire...

ha ha

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:18 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

you should be working on your resume

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

actually forced myself to read last night - trying to get smart

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

They have some cute guy lawyers this year-but I bet you probably watch that manly Monday night Football.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:55 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

bits and pieces - never really got into Ally

i assume you did..

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:53 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

Did you watch Ally last night?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:50 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

such a tough life

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:49 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

I saw the tv advertisement last night for Temptation Island for Thursday.  I think it may conflict with Will and Grace.  Could be a tough night.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 4:00 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

it looks to be on Thursdays at 8

http://www.fox.com/temptation2/home.htm

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 3:45 PM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

I was looking in the TV guide and did not see where it is on this week let me know if they changed the date and time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 11:49 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

um.....no....sorry - i guess he is why you are watching?

aren't there good looking boys on the island?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 11:20 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

Have you seen Ben on Felicity?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

i don't understand how you put Felicity on the same level at TI2...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:45 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

I am a desperate person for entertainment-what can I say.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:35 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

that is horrible - i am embarrassed for you...

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:31 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

it's on the sasme night as Felicity

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:30 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	RE: How good is Temptation Island 2

that's no fun

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tholt, Jane M.
Sent:	Monday, November 12, 2001 10:27 AM
To:	Evans, Ted
Subject:	FW: How good is Temptation Island 2

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Evans, Ted
Sent:	Friday, November 09, 2001 7:46 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	How good is Temptation Island 2

I'm not sure I'm going to watch it.  None of the people really interest me


<http://www.forestweb.com/digest/images/news/corps/199.gif>

NewsBeat:Daily News 10/23/2001

This email is a daily service of Forestweb <http://www.forestweb.com>'s NewsBeat.

All the stories from Tuesday, Oct. 23, are available under Tuesday's Headlines. <http://www.forestweb.com/taf/yesterday.taf?dt=10/23/01>

Newly posted on Forestweb: Wood Resources International. North America Wood Fiber Update -- September 2001. Click WRI  <http://www.forestweb.com/taf/commentary.taf?file=/editorial/analyst/wri/wri.10.12.01.html>to read.

If this NewsBeat. was forwarded to you by a colleague, please respect our copyright and order your own subscription. Corporate rates are available. For more information email NewsBeat <mailto:newsbeat@forestweb.com>

Contents

FOEX NBSK price slightly up; U.S. newsprint sinks again ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14605>...)
Newsprint output drops again in September, stocks also come down ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14606>...)
Finnish forest industry criticises Germany's pulp mill project ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14612>...)
Bowater selling total of 264,000 acres of timberland to Hancock and Wachovia ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14595>...)
D.R. Horton, Schuler Homes $1.2 billion merger to create No. 2 U.S. homebuilder ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14588>...)
Kimberly-Clark sees higher sales, lower income in third quarter ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14586>...)
Weyerhaeuser 3Q earnings cut in half on 'weak global economic conditions' ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14587>...)
Smurfit-Stone's 3Q earnings drop on lower packaging demand ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14582>...)
Georgia-Pacific settles Columbus, Ohio, 1997 explosion suit for $22 million ( More <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#story14619>...)

FOEX NBSK price slightly up; U.S. newsprint sinks again

10/23/2001 10:29:29, Forestweb

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 23, 2001 (Forestweb) --- The PIX price of northern bleached softwood kraft (NBSK) in Europe has increased to $464.96/tonne, up $1.02/tonne from a week ago, according to FOEX Indexes Ltd....
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14605&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

Newsprint output drops again in September, stocks also come down

10/23/2001 10:50:13, Forestweb

By James McLaren

SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 23, 2001 (Forestweb) -- North American newsprint production continues to lay low, down 15.6% in September compared with last year as the sector operated at ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14606&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

Finnish forest industry criticises Germany's pulp mill project

10/23/2001 14:04:58, Helsingin Sanomat

Planned subsidies would distort competition

Oct. 23, 2001 (Helsingin Sanomat) -- The Finnish forest industry has severely criticised the financing arrangements of the new pulp ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14612&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

Bowater selling total of 264,000 acres of timberland to Hancock and Wachovia

10/23/2001 09:06:31, Forestweb

Editor's note: Industry analyst Mark Wilde, Managing Director Deutsche Banc. Alex Brown says Bowater's total $230 million timber sale in southeastern U.S. is "good news." The price of $870/acre is lower than earlier sales, but in line with current market conditions, says Wilde....
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14595&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

D.R. Horton, Schuler Homes $1.2 billion merger to create No. 2 U.S. homebuilder

10/23/2001 06:26:57, PRNewswire

ARLINGTON, Texas and EL SEGUNDO, Calif., Oct. 23, 2001 (press release -- D.R. Horton, Inc. and Schuler Homes, Inc. today announced that they have signed a definitive agreement under which Schuler Homes will merge into D.R. Horton through a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $1.2 billion, including the assumption of debt....
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14588&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

Kimberly-Clark sees higher sales, lower income in third quarter

10/23/2001 06:11:10, PRNewswire

DALLAS, Oct. 23, 2001 (press release) -- Kimberly-Clark Corporation today announced its results for the third quarter of 2001. As previously reported, sales were more than $3.7 billion, an increase of 5.1 percent compared with 2000. Excluding currency effects, sales rose about 8 percent, benefiting from continued volume growth and higher selling prices....
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14586&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

Weyerhaeuser 3Q earnings cut in half on 'weak global economic conditions'

10/23/2001 06:19:24, BW

FEDERAL WAY, Wash., Oct. 23, 2001 (press release) -- Weyerhaeuser Company today reported third-quarter net earnings of $91 million, or 41 cents per share, that include nonrecurring after-tax items of $6 million. ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14587&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

Smurfit-Stone's 3Q earnings drop on lower packaging demand

10/23/2001 05:35:06, BW

CHICAGO, Oct. 23, 2001 (press release) -- Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation reported net income available to common shareholders of $28 million, or $0.11 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2001. This compares to net income of $79 million, or $0.32 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2000. Sales for the three- month period were $2,088 million, down 10.3 percent from third quarter year-ago levels. ...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14582&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

Georgia-Pacific settles Columbus, Ohio, 1997 explosion suit for $22 million

10/23/2001 15:02:22, The Columbus Dispatch

Company to compensate blast victims

Reins and formaldehyde plant rebuilt after accident; G-P paid more than $400,000 in fines for safety violations

...
( Story... <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=liststories&_function=detail&FORESTWEBNEWS_uid1=14619&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2>)

top of page <http://www.forestweb.com/digest/news.control.taf?_section=view&_function=detail&EDITION_ID=1996&_UserReference=9BACFC3BFDBDF3C13BD590B2#top>
  _____

To opt out of this newsletter or to make suggestions regarding NewsBeat, please email NewsBeat <mailto:pricebeat@forestweb.com>.

All news reports are copyrighted by the respective authors.
powered by Forestweb


Any word yet on this trade?

   Kate Symes @ ECT                11/30/2000 05:57 PM

To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Missing Trade for 11-30-00

Sean and Diana do not recognize this deal. They tried to check with the
brokers, but couldn't get a hold of anyone. I'll let you know first thing in
the morning whether or not this is good and what the deal number is.

Kate

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
11/30/2000 03:08 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Missing Trade for 11-30-00

Prebon sent over a confirmation for the following trade for Sean Crandall
Enron buys from Aquila January  Mid-C 25 mw at $300.00


Greg,
Here are the 3rd quarter stats for George.  These numbers go through the last day that George was active (Sept.10).

		Q2		Q3		% Change
Avg. Trades	208		281		+35%
Avg. Volume 	9,612,412	12,745,612	+33%
Avg. Cntprty	9		15		+67%
Total Cntprty	32		42		+31%

Obviously, the numbers dropped off after the events of Sept. 11 and after George was turned over to the desk.  Here are the stats for that period.

		Sept. 11-28
Avg. Trades	171
Avg. Volume 	6,390,714
Avg. Cntprty	17
Total Cntprty	48

I know this isn't exactly at the top of your list.  Let me know when you have some time.

-Dan


I have sent the guaranty to our Attorney for review of the requested
changes.  If acceptable, the guaranty will be issued shortly.  However,
please advise the amount to be covered by the guaranty.

Many thanks,
Roeline Hudson
Manager - Credit and Contract Administration
Torch Energy TM, Inc.
Phone: 713/ 756-1837
Fax   : 713/ 756-1842

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Damian, Wanda
> Sent:	Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:22 AM
> To:	Hudson, Roeline
> Subject:	FW: Comments to Guaranty
>
>
>
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From:	Nemec, Gerald [SMTP:Gerald.Nemec@ENRON.com]
> 	Sent:	Wednesday, June 27, 2001 6:13 PM
> 	To:	DamianW@teai.com
> 	Cc:	Johnson, Rudwell
> 	Subject:	Comments to Guaranty
>
> 	Attached are my comments to the Guaranty form for Torch Energy
> Advisors
> 	Incorporated you forwarded for Bridgeline Gas Marketing, LLC.
> Please
> 	review.  You can contact me at (713) 853-3512 with any questions.
> 	Thanks.
>
> 	 <<AAMASTER1(red).DOC>>   << File: AAMASTER1(red).DOC >>


Tom,

The GasPow position is correct.

Thanks,
Errol

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Victorio, Tom
Sent:	Saturday, October 27, 2001 1:13 PM
To:	White, Stacey W.; Evans, Casey; Postlethwaite, John; Vinson, Donald Wayne; Loibl, Kori; McLaughlin Jr., Errol; Reeves, Kathy
Subject:	EnPower positions

All, the numbers below are from EnPower Adhoc (commodity only and without ancillary curve positions) for EOD 10/26. Please confirm if these are consistent with your reports -- we want to be able to use these numbers for the DPR.

Also note, these do not include positions outside EnPower; I'll pull those spreadsheet positions from RiskTrac.

Thanks.
- Tom

 << OLE Object: Picture (Metafile) >>


Per Rose's instructions.

Kay


Dear Jeff,

I have not received any payment from the following Pledges to our annual
gala which took place on April 7, 2001:

Natsource        Contact:                 Address:
EDF Mann         Contact:                 Address:
Banque Paribas   Contact:                 Address:
Spectron         Contact:                 Address:

I have pledges of $5,000 from each company.  Marti told me that you did
write to the appropriate contacts.  Do we need to follow up again?

I do want to close out the gala pledges by June 30, 2001.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.  Please let me know what I can
do to help.  My direct line is 713-284-8262.

Grace Pierce
Assistant Director of Development


We will hold off transferring any physical positions desk to desk until the end of bidweek.  After NX1, we will transfer positions at a daily EOL Index mid price.  Please monitor my book and others to make certain DEC deals are not being transferred prior to NX1 at an IF monthly or GD daily mid price.

Thanks,

Mike


Sally

I feel I already know you having had the benefit of sitting next to Brent for
the last few months- but I realise I have been impolite in not organising a
call just to introduce myself and arrange dates for a visit to Houston.

Additionally Brent, Shona and I have spent some excellent time on the subject
of Internal Control Enivronment / Operational Risk / Doorstep and I wanted to
agree potential next steps with you.
Do you have anytime today / tomorrow ?

Regards

Mike


--------- Inline attachment follows ---------

From:  <hgovenar@govadv.com>
To: Enronshort@govadv.com
Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:18:11 GMT
Subject:

I just spoke to Richard Katz, who is coordinating Edison MOU efforts for
the Governor's office.  The Proclamation declaring the Special Session
is still on the Governor's desk although Richard expects him to issue it
shortly (against Richard's advice).  Richard has spoken to several key
Senators trying to convince them to pass the MOU with some form of
direct access and exit fees attached.  He said Enron should be thrilled
with the PUC action.  I responded that Enron believes continuing direct
access is necessary and wants comprehensive legislation to do it.  He
believes a bill without direct access can't pass the Assembly.  He says
staff is still meeting, but nothing conclusive has been achieved.
Although he's made his hotel reservations for next week, he suggested
that its still not 100% certain that the session will be called.


I will be in Houston Sat.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


We will not be settling the El Paso/Stingray imbalance.  El Paso insists on
being paid back in kind, as opposed to cashing out at prices when the
imbalance occurred.  We'll just carry the imbalance on our books.  Maybe
we'll pay it back next year.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira

P.S.-  Was new paperwork sent out to Cinergy??


Frank - I'm forwarding the email I received from Enserco regarding the
penalty for our failure to take the full volume on days 1 and 18 on deal
#423705.  As I explained to Suzanne, I would not have paid this had they
invoiced me for it but Enserco is a Netout customer and we were in a net
receivable position this month so they deducted this amount out of what they
paid me.  As the penalty seems to be legitimate, can I get you to set up a
new deal in Sitara to offset the receivable?  If you agree with their
calculations, can you set up a positive Demand charge of $2,405.03 with Enron
as the Purchaser and Enserco as the Seller?

Please reply to this email with your approval (or disapproval) of their
calculation and let me know when you have the demand charge set up (or not).

Call me if you have any questions.
...Chuck
x.36275
---------------------- Forwarded by Charles Jacobs/NA/Enron on 11/27/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

"Nancy Lissel" <nlissel@telusplanet.net> on 11/22/2000 04:24:51 PM
To: <charles.jacobs@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: October Malin Penalties

Charles
?
Please find attached the worksheet for the October  Daily Malin Penalty
calculation.
?
Please call with any questions or  concerns.
?
Darrell Danyluk
403-269-5522
 - oct enron penalties.xls


Mike:  the draft comments read very well, however I would echo Jeff's
comments on the price cap.  We should advise against, but still support the
RPD overall.  No other comments to add.

Paul Amirault
Vice-President, Marketing
Wild Goose Storage Inc.
403 266-8298

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:17 PM
To: MDay; Amirault, Paul; Jeff Dasovich Enron SF; Michael Alexander,
SCE; Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary; Porter, Douglas K; Hass, Glen; Steffes,
James D.; Mara, Susan
Subject: RE: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

Mike:  Comments looks good.  My only comment is that, in our view, the
price cap (which would cover ALL capacity in the secondary market) is
simply bad economic policy and won't address any problems--in fact it
will only create problems. (From a practical perspective, I'm not even
sure that the Commission can successfully "regulate" prices in the
secondary market.)

Will the commission change the price cap provisions of the decision
based comments advising against them?  Very unlikely.

But when the caps create problems (and they will), I want to have been
on record advising the Commission of why caps are bad economic policy
and pointing out the bad outcomes that caps will cause.  I think that
it's very important to point out the downside of caps and to be on
record against them.

That said, I don't want the comments to be so negative as to cloud
support for the decision; nor do I think the Commission will change the
cap based on our comments.  Other than that, EES and ENA can sign on.
Anyone have any objections to pointing out the fact that price caps are
ill-advised?

Best,
Jeff

	-----Original Message-----
	From: MDay
	Sent: Thu 10/18/2001 8:43 PM
	To: 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Jeff Dasovich Enron SF'; 'Michael
Alexander, SCE'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; 'Porter, Douglas K'
	Cc:
	Subject: I. 99-07-003 Draft Comments on the Revised Proposed
Decision

	 <<X28621.DOC>>

	Enclosed for your review are the draft comments on the Revised
Proposed
	Decision in the Gas Restructuring Investigation.  WGSI and Enron
have
	indicated a desire to file supportive comments.  Edison has
indicated an
	interest in reviewing our draft for the purpose of considering
joining in
	our comments.  Please send edited electronic versions with
underline and
	strikeout to MBD at this address no later than noon tomorrow.
These comments
	must be filed tomorrow before 5 pm.  I am sorry for the lateness
of the
	draft, but these are not extensive comments.  Except for the
little
	bombshell about extending commission jurisdiction over gas
marketers, I see
	little in the RPD to warrant our opposition.  Even if the
Commission
	proceeds with the jurisdictional grab, I believe it can be
overturned by the
	Court of Appeals.

	I look forward to your comments.

	Mike Day

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Well, Ben's POA is executed, it is just a matter of getting some of the poa's
for the subs worked out.  Come see me whenever you want.

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           03/28/2001 03:39 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Ben's Power of Attorney

Just wanted you to know that Ann Elizabeth is freaking out about Ben's POA
not being executed yet and I think she is going to talk to you about it.  I
told her that you and I were working on it but that it just kind of got
pushed down in the priority.  I personally do not think it is a big deal (but
she sure does).

Also, since Matt is taking Deb Korkmas' place I am going to give him a list
of companies and people we want to be listed as officers.  I'll send you,
Carlos and Ann Elizabeth a draft list soon so we can decide who we want (may
be like the officers listed on Merchant Ventures)

K-


Effective March 1, 2001 Enron North America (CO 0413) employees will begin
using XMS (Expense Management System) to process employee expense
reimbursements.

XMS is a web based employee expense reimbursement system which will provide
the following benefits;

? More timely reimbursements to employees
? User friendly Web access
? Ability for employee or designated administrative assistant to submit
expense reimbursement
? Greater efficiency and lower cost
? Efficiently integrated with the current SAP accounting system

This system will REPLACE our current manual expense reimbursement process.
All employee expense reimbursements for ENA employees submitted after March
1, 2001 should be done via XMS.

Following are details regarding system access, training and support.

To access the system go to the Enron Home Page and type http://xms.enron.com
in the address field.

LOGON ID
Enter your personnel number (P number).   HR information is loaded
automatically into XMS, but an incomplete load may mean that some people's
IDs are not updated.  If your P number doesn't work, try using your first
initial and last name (lower case).  If you can't log in to the system, go to
the IT Central web page from the Enron home page and select Services>Security
Requests>eRequest or call (713) 853-5536.

PASSWORD
The first time you log in, the password is upper case ENRON.  The system will
guide you through confirming your personal information and changing your
password.  The Enron Code of Ethics prohibits the sharing of passwords and
logging on as another person.  Please observe Enron,s policy.  If you have
forgotten your password, call the Resolution Center at (713) 853-1411.

TRAINING
Go to the IT Central web page.  Select Services>Training.  Click on
"Schedules" in the North America column, and go to the XMS Workshop schedule
to choose your class.  If no classes are listed, call the training department
and place your request at (713) 853-1816.  Those in outlying locations and
those who prefer on-line training can use LEAP by signing on to isc.enron.com
and clicking on "training and education," then LEAP (shown as a link).  Use
xms (lower case) as the User ID and Password.

DOCUMENTATION
Step by Step documentation is also available from IT Central web page.
Select Services>Training. Click on "Documentation" in the North America
column and choose XMS User's Guide from the list.

APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
Call the ISC help desk at (713) 345-4SAP (4727). Do not call Accounts Payable
with questions about how to use the system or with issues regarding
electronic pre-populated data.


Stan said last week that he would like to do a EGAS 2002 Capital Budget Review.  When do you think we can do this?


yes i will

From: Sarah Wesner/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/04/2001 09:50 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joseph Deffner/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Fimat (Soc Gen Line)

John - I got a call from Warren Tashnek today.  He is concerned about the
usage of the Fimat line because the trading volume is not covering its
costs.   He wanted to know how to increase business with Enron.  I referred
him to you.  As you know, he is so nice and not trying to start a fight with
us but needs more trades to justify the cost of the line.  Will you please
address this with him?

Thanks, Sarah


Thanks.  Suzanne just gave me the documents.  I like having the electronic
versions as well.

I can't believe it feels so good to be back.  I must be crazy.

Kay

"Campbell, Carolyn" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com> on 01/02/2001 09:07:05 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: RE: CA Energy Development LLC documents

 <<2R6L18!.DOC>>  <<2RM309!.DOC>>  <<2RLS10!.DOC>>  <<2R6K13!.DOC>>
<<2RSW04!.DOC>>

Kay:

Electronic copies of execution drafts of the following documents are
attached:

 1.  Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development I LLC;
 2.  Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development II LLC for the
turbine;
 3.  Letter Agreement for CA Energy Development II LLC for the
transformer;
 4.  First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
for CA Energy Development I LLC; and
 5.  First Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
for CA Energy Development II LLC.

The originals of these documents were forwarded by courier to your office on
Friday.  I will deliver the original Guaranty Agreements to you today.  Let
me know if you need anything else.  Thank you.

Carolyn M. Campbell
King & Spalding
713-276-7307 (phone)
713-751-3280 (fax)
ccampbell@kslaw.com <mailto:ccampbell@kslaw.com>

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 8:40 AM
  To: Campbell, Carolyn
  Subject: CA documents

  Hi Carolyn,

  Please email me the execution version of the documents
signed last week, as
  well as the current version of the other documents.  Were
the originals put
  in the mail?  My assistant isn't here, so I can't tell what
I have yet.

  Thanks,

  Kay

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - 2R6L18!.DOC
 - 2RM309!.DOC
 - 2RLS10!.DOC
 - 2R6K13!.DOC
 - 2RSW04!.DOC


Rod and I discussed this party (which always appears on the legal/credit
list!!!!  It seem that BP signed a Master Agreement (our OLD form) with
ECTRIC on 1/8/98 and agreed to sign THE IDENTICAL AGREEMENT with ENA.  Absent
an executed agreement, ENA and BP continue to use a form of "Swap Contract"
which had been agreed to many years ago (similar to our GTC's in the omnibus)
which also provides that the parties will negotiate a master agreement.   Rod
doesn't see much current trading activity so we didn't believe this to be a
high priority.

Having said all of this, the form is limited to swaps, doesn't provide for
setoff, arbitration, certain market disruption events and several other items
which we can review if necessary.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.  Thanks.  Sara


Kim,

Please disregard previous draft for C of Glendale,  this is a corrected draft.

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490

----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2001 04:42 PM -----

	Dan J Hyvl
	03/29/2001 08:14 AM

		 To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: City of Glendale

Debra,
 I had a type in the definition of Material Adverse Change.  Please resend if
necessary.


Jeff,
I will start copying you on the California updates.  The information comes
from a variety of sources and some of the information contained in these
emails are very sensitive and confidential and should not be disseminated to
anybody outside of Enron.  Please feel free to contact me should you have any
questions (713) 853-9510.

Thanks,
Kristin Walsh

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walsh, Kristin
Sent: Monday, March  26, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Cc: Allen, Phillip; Belden, Tim; Grigsby, Mike; Heizenrader, Tim; Kaminski,
Vince; Milnthorp, Rob; Presto, Kevin; Ribeiro, Claudio; Shapiro, Richard;
Steffes, James; Tawney, Mark; Tholan, Scott; Whitman, Britt
Subject: California Update 3/26/01
Importance: High

Executive Summary:

-CPUC likely to pass rate hikes tomorrow, politicians bowing to the inevitable
-Many questions still unanswered, most notably size/structure of rate
increase and past utility debts
-Past undercollect major sticking point, with little help available from
transmission deal or long-term contracts
-Reliant seeking relief in circuit court from emergency orders; large
generators increasingly angry with Davis' "blame game"
-QFs waiting for details of rate hike; new price formula crucial to SoCal's
ability to make payments
-Bankruptcy outlook increasingly complex, but debt rescheduling remains
subject to failure

In our late Friday report, we wrote "Davis could order rate hikes as a last
ditch effort, but this action would not address the undercollection  issue.
There is still a high chance of bankruptcy by either the larger generators,
commercial paper holders, and (less now but still very possible) the QFs as
time is running out."  Events are unfolding exactly along these lines.

1. Why Rate Hikes Now?
CPUC President Lorretta Lynch came out this weekend in favor of rate hikes.
Davis and many legislators recognize that rate hikes are the quickest
solution, but that there is a potentially painful political price attached.
Davis will probably come out in support of a structured rate system, passing
on most of the hikes to business and industrial users.

Other California politicians are starting to face reality of rate hikes.  The
CalEnergy ruling massively reduced their leverage over the creditors, who are
now able to sell outside the state, if they can get similar relief from the
courts.  And it's not just the QFs--the giant Reliant Energy is appealing to
the Ninth Circuit Court in San Francisco against Federal Judge Frank
Damrell's series of rulings forcing large generators to continue to sell to
California.

2. What Impact Will the Rate Hikes Have?
Rate rises will stabilize the situation going forward, but there will be a
messy scramble to assign blame and liability for past debts.  Some form of
rescheduling is a possibility, but there are any number of accidents that
could happen and yet result in bankruptcy for the utilities -- if they don't
seek protection from creditors themselves.

3. Undercollection/Net Short Still Unaddressed
All of these developments fail to address the past undercollection or the
bond revenue plan.  Still, the passage of rate hikes could speed up the
legislature on these fronts as well.  The bulk of the rate hikes will go
first to repay the DWR, then to the commercial creditors.  Absent the
transmission line deal, the bond revenue plan would have to be restructured
to repay the past undercollect.  Long-term power contracts are still
relatively meaningless until 2003, when the majority of the contracts kick
in.

4. Large Power Suppliers Losing Patience
Relations are also deteriorating between Davis and the large power
suppliers.  Davis for the most part has been very careful to cultivate them
during the drawn out negotiations, talking to several of the main CEOs almost
daily.  But state legislators and officials are rapidly trying to initiate
investigations of alleged market manipulation and overcharging to deflect the
growing political heat from themselves.  This is only agitating the larger
generators more as every day passes.  If Reliant loses their case, it may
also tempt some of the larger generators to force the issue to bankruptcy.
What's more, financial creditors are also waiting with growing impatience,
and the utilities themselves are contemplating voluntary bankruptcy.  PG&E in
particular simply will not agree to Davis' transmission lines deal as it
stands, and a bankruptcy workout may offer the best, albeit uncertain, chance
of a return to eventual health someday.

5. QFs Listening and Waiting
But the largest threat, as we have been saying, is not from the major energy
companies.  It is the small companies -- known as QFs -- that will be the
triggers if bankruptcy occurs.  Remember these two facts: (1) The QFs are a
diverse group of 600 companies, and it only takes three of them to force
bankruptcy; and (2) many of them have to move in court quickly or lose any
possible standing for future court action.  It is in the interests of a
number of creditors to wait and hope that a negotiated settlement can be
reached, but others have a large incentive to game the situation and threaten
to force bankruptcy.

Other bullish news: PG&E gets extended forbearance until April 13th from its
banks, and SoCal announces that it will pay some QFs.  The actual amount of
payments to the QFs is still subject to the CPUC  approving a revised pricing
formula that is satisfactory to the QFs.  That decision should come tomorrow.

6. Outlook
Last week we wrote that "the QFs felt there was no point in filing today
because they want to see what they can get from the legislature this week and
in all likelihood, what they can get from the CPUC hearing next week."  The
next 48 hours will be crucial.  Only massive rate hikes (40% or higher
roughly) would address the undercollect issue and Davis is unlikely to
authorize those.

As one source told us, "the age of denial is (mostly) coming to an end, and
that is the main source of hope that California can begin to move forward
from this."  But the situation is so complex, and there are so many players
and angles involved, that a negotiated solution to the past debt problem will
still be complicated and vulnerable to failure.


I am going to have Jim report to Haedicke with all of his people having a dotted line to the commercial desks - any issues let me know.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Tuesday, January 15, 2002 5:23 PM
To:	Kitchen, Louise; Lavorato, John
Subject:	Govt & Reg Affairs Update

Louise & John --

FYI.

1.	Charles Yeung has decided to leave the company.  He was in the ERCOT box support Doug Gilbert-Smith.

2.	I met with UBS counsel today to discuss FERC and other licensing issues.  I am scheduled to meet with Bob Dinerstein (sp?) sometime tomorrow to discuss the function and some other administrative issues.

3.	We continue to gather tariffs, etc. to process the forms as soon as possible.  Of course, the ability to sell physical power will be contingent upon FERC approval of Netco's MBR authority.

4.	I have postponed the FERC meeting scheduled for Thursday until sometime next week.  I still believe that it is appropriate to meet with FERC post-Bankruptcy Court approval (maybe HSR approval?).

Thanks,

Jim


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 23;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Generation schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042323.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:   0.00 / Final:   0.00)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EES
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: BADLND_7_PL1X2
$$$ Variance found in table tblGEN_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 23 / Preferred:  29.00 / Final:  28.89)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ARCO
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/23/01
  UNIT_ID: CARBGN_6_UNIT 1


I believe that this was authored by James Carville:

NEW YORK (AP) --The New York Mets announced today that they are going to
court to get an additional inning added to the end of Game 5 of the World
Series. The batting, pitching, and bench coaches for the Mets held a press
conference earlier today.  They were joined by members of the Major League
Players Union. "We meant to hit those pitches from the Yankee pitchers,"
said the Mets batting coach.  "We were confused by the irregularities of
the
pitches we received and believe we have been denied our right to hit."

One claim specifically noted that a small percentage of the Mets batters
had
intended to swing at fast balls, but actually swung at curve balls. It was
clear that these batters never intended to swing at curve balls, though a
much higher percentage were not confused by the pitches. Reporters at the
press conference pointed out that the Mets had extensively reviewed film of
the Yankees pitchers prior to the World Series and had in fact faced the
Yankees in inter-league play earlier in the year. "The fact remains that
some of the pitches confused us and denied us of our right to hit," said
the Mets
batting coach. "The World Series is not over yet and the Yankees are
celebrating prematurely."Major League Baseball has reviewed the telecast of
all the World Series games and recounted the balls and strikes called by
the
umpires of each game. "While some of the strikes called against the Mets
were, in fact, balls, there were not enough of them to change the outcome
of
the World Series," the commissioner said. Another portion of the Mets legal
claim stated that, based on on-base percentage, the Mets had actually won
the World Series, regardless of the final scores of the games.

"It's clear that we were slightly on-base more often than the Yankees,"
said

a Mets spokesman.  "The World Series crown is rightly ours."The manager of
the Mets has remained in relative seclusion, engaging in some light jogging
for exercise.  He has stated that he believes "we need to let the process
run its course without a rush to judgment."


As  I do not draft these,  please contact  Susan Bailey @ 34737 or Stephanie
Panus @53249

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


I think it would be very beneficial to pay McGrath to be present,  mainly to
keep Hellmold honest.

>>> <showard@agsk.com> 06/06/01 08:16PM >>>
Bruce MacLeod at Hennigan's firm has informed me that plaintiffs will NOT file
a summary judgment motion against ECT Securities.

Also, next week Ralph Hellmold will be deposed on 6/13 and 6/14, but we will
not be expected to produce McGrath until July.

Question:  Do we want to pay McGrath to attend Hellmold's deposition on 6/13
and 6/14 to help me out (and maybe keep Hellmold a little more honest by his
presence in the room)?

................................................

ALSCHULER GROSSMAN STEIN & KAHAN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
www.agsk.com

2049 Century Park East
Thirty-Ninth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3213
Tel 310-277-1226
Fax 310-552-6077

This transmission is intended only for the use
of the addressee and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately
via e-mail at postmaster@agsk.com or
by telephone at 310-277-1226. Thank you.

...............................................


Hola Susana:

Que tal?  Llegue tarde anoche de una linda visita a lo de mi hermana en
Boston.  Sin embargo, recibi muy malas noticias en cuanto a mi prima Lori.
El viernes pasado se encontraron 2 tumors en el cerebro.  Su hermano, Tommy,
ya estaba en St. Martin y volvio ayer a Florida.  Lori llega hoy.  Manana
tiene cita con el oncologo.  Como el proposito del viaje fue juntarme con
ella, no tengo ganas de irme solo.

Bueno, te llamo esta semana y puede ser que te vea mas tarde en el Met como
juego con Herve a las 6.  un beso, G.

>From: Susan.Scott@enron.com
>To: "william thursland" <wmthursland@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: livin' la semana loca
>Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:31:20 -0600
>
>
>Guilli, lo siento pero esta semana estoy muy ocupada.  La proxima semana
>seria mejor para almorzar -- el miercoles, jueves o viernes.  Yo pensaba de
>ir a Austin esta fin de semana, pero si no, te llamare para ver si estas
>disponible.  Un beso, S.
>
>
>
>
>"william thursland" <wmthursland@hotmail.com> on 11/07/2000 05:49:54 PM
>
>To:   Susan.Scott@enron.com
>cc:
>
>Subject:  almuerzo
>
>
>Hola Susan,
>
>Que tal?  Yo podria almorzar el viernes si te conviene.  Avisame.  Caio, B
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
>http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.


Let me know if you need any further information on NYISO's filing.

Susan Scott
713.853.0596

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"EMILY HARRIS" <eharris@bracepatt.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22EMILY+20HARRIS+22+20+3Ceharris+40bracepatt+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Monday, June 25, 2001 11:32 AM
To:	jlimone@aeglobalmarkets.com; Nicolay, Christi; Fulton, Donna; hfromer@enron.com; snovose@enron.com; sscott3@enron.com; Twiggs, Thane
Cc:	Andrea Settanni; Tracey Bradley
Subject:	New York ISO Notice of Filing

                          UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                    FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

     New York Independent System Operator, Inc.   Docket Nos.
                                                  ER00-1740-000 and

                                                  ER00-1740-001

                              NOTICE OF FILING

                              (June 21, 2001)

          Take notice that on June 18, 2001, the New York Independent
     System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) filed revisions to its Open Access
     Transmission Tariff in order to include a description of the cost
     allocation methodology for its Incentivized Day-Ahead Economic
     Load Curtailment Program, pursuant to the Commission s order
     issued on May 16, 2001 in the above-captioned proceeding.  The
     NYISO has requested an effective date of May 1, 2001.

          The NYISO has served a copy of this filing upon parties on
     the official service lists maintained by the Commission for the
     above-captioned dockets.

          Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing
     should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal
     Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington,
     D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
     Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
     385.214).  All such motions and protests should be filed on or
     before July 9, 2001.  Protests will be considered by the
     Commission to determine the appropriate action to be taken, but
     will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings.
     Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to
     intervene.  Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission
     and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be
     viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm
     (call 202-208-2222 for assistance).   Comments, protests and
     interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in
     lieu of paper.  See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
     instructions on the Commission's web site at
     http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm

                           Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
                              Acting Secretary

 - NYISONoticeofFilingER001740_TXT.txt


**********************************************************************
Transmission Plans Unveiled--Order 2000 RTO Filings
(CERA Web Call Replay November 17, 2000)
**********************************************************************

Author: N. American Power Team
E-Mail Category: Conference Call
Product Line: North American Power

URL: http://eprofile.cera.com/client/nap/media.cfm

In a November 17, 2000, CERA multimedia conference call and web presentation,
David Clement, CERA Associate Director,
Hope Robertson, CERA Senior Associate, and Larry Makovich, CERA Senior
Director, discuss:

TRANSMISSION PLANS UNVEILED - THE ORDER 2000 RTO FILINGS
* Is Consensus Building on RTO Structure?
* Will the Transmission Investment Logjam be Broken?
* Short Term Market Impacts of the Filings
* The Challenge for FERC

To view and listen to a replay of this presentation,
please click on the link above.

**end**
*******************************************
Profile Changes
To edit your profile information, including your e-mail
address, etc. go to: http://www.cera.com/cfm/edit/account.cfm

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html

Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research
Associates??? ??????? ??????? ??????? ???????


Chris,

We won't have any site specific technical info, so we will  have to fly
without it.  I know that seems strange, but there is no designated site for
this equipment as of now.

Here's co#1:

Each of these units has one dual fuel option.

The master list of serial numbers is in this document:

We use the unit serial numbers as opposed to turbine or generator serial
numbers.  I'm sending you the whole enchilada since this is a handy reference.

I agree with adding 25% of the cost of the dual fuel option to the January
payment.  Unit 17  to company 1 is fine.  The maximum liability price (or
whatever we call it) will be the base price allocation, plus the dual fuel
option amount.

Good question on the retention.  I guess we should set it up as if each is in
a stand alone project. As far as I know they may be intending to put these at
separate sites.

I'll get back to you on the fax and contract reference number.

Thanks,

Kay


Shirley,

Please, send a message to Norma to
finalize it.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
12/14/2000 10:32 AM
To: Norma Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: James "Brad" Aimone

Hi Norma:

FYI in case you do not know, today (12/14/00) is Brad Aimone's last day
with Enron.  I don't know what else I need to do as he was not a full time
employee.

Thanks!

Shirley


The buyback for Marthon-Ashland will be put in today.

Julie

Aimee Lannou   12/01/2000 08:16 AM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Swing and Buybacks

Julie - do you have the current swing ad buybacks list for December?   Please
let me know when you have it all together.

Thanks.

Aimee