Telecommunications Reports presents . . . . . TR's State NewsWire
January 23, 2001 2 P.M. Edition

STATES
PENNSYLVANIA -- Appellate court upholds Nextel wireless tower permit
MICHIGAN -- PSC approves Ameritech identity theft protection procedures
MICHIGAN -- PSC OKs revised Ameritech 'recip comp' rates
HAWAII -- Legislators to examine telemarketing fraud
MICHIGAN -- PSC fines companies for 'slamming'
UTAH -- Bill would increase telecom access in rural schools
FLORIDA -- Consumer group says local competition in Florida has failed
MISSOURI -- Bill would let colleges establish 'telecommunity centers'
VIRGINIA -- Legislator proposes license plate commemorating state's tech
heritage
IDAHO -- PUC sets new hearing on high-cost fund
TEXAS -- ALJ sets hearing on 'slamming' complaint

WIRELESS
PENNSYLVANIA
Appellate court upholds Nextel wireless tower permit

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has upheld a decision by the
Newlin Township Zoning Board to allow Nextel Communications, Inc., to
build a telecommunications tower in Newlin.

The opinion, written by President Judge Joseph T. Doyle, upheld a trial
court decision to defer to the town's zoning board.  The citizens
opposing the tower said the board erred when it defined Nextel's
proposed tower as a "radio transmitter."

The Newlin Township zoning ordinance limits the types of buildings that
can be constructed but allows the board to grant a "special exemption"
to authorize the construction of a "radio or television transmitter."
The ordinance, however, doesn't define "radio transmitter."

The citizens asserted that the "radio transmitter component of the
facility is but a minor element" and said the 150-foot tower "falls far
outside any commonly understood definition of 'radio transmitter.'"
They argued that because the tower doesn't fit into any other category,
the zoning ordinance doesn't permit it to be constructed within the
township.

Judge Doyle ruled that the record supported the board's decision.  The
judge noted that testimony by a Nextel engineer demonstrated that the
tower was an integral part of the facility.  He concluded that the
"entire system operates together in order to transmit the necessary
information for the cellular network to function."

Senior Judge William J. Lederer and Judge Bonnie B. Leadbeter joined
Judge Doyle's opinion.  (Case no. 3182 C.D. 1999 Robert and Loren
Pearson v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newlin Township and Nextel
Communications of the Mid Atlantic, Inc.)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MICHIGAN
PSC approves Ameritech identity theft protection procedures

The Public Service Commission today approved procedures proposed by
Ameritech-Michigan to protect customers from identity theft.  The
commission had ordered Ameritech to file the proposed procedures when it
fined the company $1.5 million for identity theft-related violations of
the Michigan Telecommunications Act.  (9/25/00 p.m.)  The PSC's decision
responded to a complaint filed by customer Patricia Nelski.

In July 1996 Nelski discovered that a fraudulent Ameritech telephone
account had been opened in her name.  She contacted Ameritech and was
told she wouldn't be held responsible for charges to the account.  She
subsequently learned that she had been denied credit and employment
because Ameritech failed to clear her credit record as promised.

Under the procedures approved today, Ameritech must (1) accurately
verify the identity of persons ordering service, (2) ensure that
accounts referred to collection agencies and credit reporting bureaus
are attributed to the responsible parties, and (3) keep records on
accounts referred to collection agencies and credit bureaus for the
duration of any adverse credit reports that result.  The company also
must ensure that all negative credit information is removed from credit
reports when an account has been deemed fraudulent, and it must respond
in a timely manner to customer complaints about fraudulent accounts or
identity theft.  (Case no. U-12700)

SECTION 251/252
MICHIGAN
PSC OKs revised Ameritech 'recip comp' rates

The Public Service Commission today approved Ameritech-Michigan's
proposed revisions to its reciprocal compensation rate structure.
Ameritech had proposed a bifurcated rate structure that reduces the
current charges applied to minutes of use and shifts recovery to a setup
charge applied to each call, without regard to duration.

The commission noted that Ameritech's showing that a rate structure
predicated on separate per-call setup and per-minute usage charges
better reflects cost causation wasn't rebutted by any of the other
carriers participating in the case.  Moreover, the PSC said, the revenue
effects of the Ameritech plan are largely neutral to the extent that the
traffic being exchanged reflects the average holding time used to set
the charges.
The PSC rejected Ameritech's request to exempt foreign exchange service
from payment of reciprocal compensation.  The commission said Ameritech
failed to explain whether, or how, the means of routing a call placed by
one local exchange carrier's (LEC's) customer to another LEC's point of
interconnection affects the costs that the second LEC necessarily incurs
to terminate the call.  Historically, the PSC said, the routing of a
call hasn't depended on whether it's a local call or a toll call.

Moreover, the commission said, the discretion that competitive local
exchange carriers exercise in designing their local calling areas is a
competitive innovation that enables them to provide valuable
alternatives to an ILEC's traditional service.  The PSC saw no reason to
change these standards, particularly when the result would be an
unnecessary restriction on the services the customers want and need.
(Case no. U-12696 - In the matter of the application of Ameritech
Michigan to revise its reciprocal compensation rates and rate structure
and to exempt foreign exchange service from payment of reciprocal
compensation)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
HAWAII
Legislators to examine telemarketing fraud

Sen. Brian Kanno (D., District 20) has introduced SB 97 to make
telemarketing fraud a criminal offense.  An individual would be
committing telemarketing fraud if the person--with the intent to defraud
or misrepresent--obtained, or attempted to obtain, the transfer of
possession, control, or ownership of property from another person
through communications conducted at least in part by telephone.

SB 97 would make telemarketing fraud a "class B" felony.  The measure
awaits consideration by the Senate Economic Development and Technology
Committee; the Senate Commerce and Consumer Protection, and Housing
Committee; and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
MICHIGAN
PSC fines companies for 'slamming'

The Public Service Commission today fined Accutel Communications, Inc.,
and Advantage Plus $43,600 and $105,000, respectively, for "slamming."
The commission's order adopts an administrative law judge's
recommendations.  (11/7/00 p.m.)

The ALJ found that Advantage Plus had performed an unauthorized switch
of a residential customer's telecom service provider and billed
unauthorized charges to that same customer's business.  Advantage Plus
is a reseller of Qwest Corp.'s services.

The ALJ also found that Accutel had charged the same business for a
service for which the telecom service provider hadn't received an
initial affirmative order.  (Case no. U-12545)

ADVANCED SERVICES
UTAH
Bill would increase telecom access in rural schools

Sen. Beverly Ann Evans (R., District 26) has sponsored a bill to require
the Utah Education Network (UEN) to work with rural county governments
to establish education resource centers in their counties.  The UEN
maintains an education microwave distribution system, data network, and
other telecom service distribution systems appropriate for providing
video, audio, and data services for public schools and colleges.

SB 124 would require the UEN to set up such centers in at least Beaver,
Daggett, Garfield, Juab, Kane, Morgan, Piute, Rich, and Wayne counties.
The centers would consist of four classroom facilities provided by the
counties, with equipment funded by the state.  The equipment would be
capable of bringing the full benefits of the UEN satellite system to
community residents.  It also would offer residents access to worldwide
databases through multimedia computers and advising services through
online technologies.

The bill would allocate $743,000 to the UEN to fund the centers.  Of
that appropriation, $441,000 would go toward one-time costs for
electronic equipment, and $302,000 would be allocated for ongoing costs.

SB 124 awaits committee referral.

COMPETITIVE LOCAL ENTRY
FLORIDA
Consumer group says local competition in Florida has failed

Florida has seen little improvement in local phone competition since the
U.S. Congress passed the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 nearly
five years ago, according to a new report from the Consumer Federation
of America (CFA).  CFA Director-Research Mark Cooper, who wrote the
study, says, "97% of Florida's local residential market is still under
the control of the incumbents--BellSouth [Telecommunications, Inc.],
Sprint [Corp.], and Verizon [Communications, Inc.]."

The study recommends several steps the Public Service Commission should
take to foster local competition.  It says the PSC should (1) guarantee
that new competitors can readily access the existing telephone network,
(2) ensure that competitors are charged reasonable prices for network
access and (3) ensure that operation support systems can accommodate the
demands of new competitors.

Local competition can begin to thrive in Florida, as it has in New York
and Texas, only if the PSC requires "the local monopolies to open their
markets on fair and reasonable terms," says Cooper.

The study, titled Florida Consumers Need Real Local Phone Competition:
Fair Access to Monopoly Wires Is the Key, is available at
http://www.consumerfed.org/fl.telecom.0101.pdf.

INTERNET
MISSOURI
Bill would let colleges establish 'telecommunity centers'

Sen. Mary Groves Bland (D., District 9) has introduced SB 154 to allow
all colleges, universities, and community colleges in Missouri to create
"telecommunity centers" for teaching local residents computer skills.

The telecommunity centers would use the schools' existing information
technology resources to provide the technical staff and technology
necessary to teach local residents how to use current hardware and
software.  Technical staff members could be volunteers or students who
were at least senior-level undergraduates.  Schools could allow students
to earn course credits for working at the centers.

SB 154 also would require each higher-level institution to create a
policy ensuring that "students of the institution are afforded necessary
access to all available information technology resources."

SB 154 has been referred to the Senate Committee on Education.  Its text
is available at
http://www.senate.state.mo.us/01info/billtext/intro/SB154.htm.

INTERNET
VIRGINIA
Legislator proposes license plate commemorating state's tech heritage

Del. James K. O'Brien (R., District 40) has introduced HB 2560 to
authorize the issuance of "special license plates bearing the legend,
Home of the Internet."

The bill has been referred to the Committee on Transportation.  Its text
is available at
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?011+ful+HB2560.

UNIVERSAL SERVICE
IDAHO
PUC sets new hearing on high-cost fund

The Public Utilities Commission has rescheduled a Jan 29 hearing on its
high-cost fund for March 20-21.  (11/2/00 a.m.)  The commission
rescheduled the hearing after Qwest Corp. filed a notice stating its
intent to withdraw from a stipulation it had reached with the PUC staff
regarding the fund.  The company said it was withdrawing because "it
realized that it might not have reached a 'meeting of the minds' with
the staff regarding a critical issue:  specific IHCF [high-cost fund]
per-line support for wire centers serviced by Qwest and Verizon"
Northwest, Inc.

Qwest also asked the commission to vacate the current schedule and give
the company an additional 30 days to "either attempt to meet a mutually
acceptable agreement with staff or offer another independent alternative
for the parties' consideration."  After Qwest asked the commission to
vacate the schedule, Verizon and AT&T Communications of the Mountain
States, Inc., made schedule requests of their own.  Verizon and AT&T,
however, wanted the PUC to suspend the schedule indefinitely.

The commission granted Qwest's request and said the company should file
its revised direct testimony by Feb. 5.  Rebuttal testimony will be due
Feb. 28.  (Case nos. GNR-T-97-22 and GNR-T-00-2)

CUSTOMER-AFFECTING
TEXAS
ALJ sets hearing on 'slamming' complaint

A Public Utility Commission administrative law judge has scheduled an
April 24 hearing to consider a "slamming" complaint filed against Axces,
Inc.  Slamming is the unauthorized switch of a customer's telecom
carrier.  Earlier this month, the PUC staff asked the commission to fine
Axces up to $930,000 for "slamming" 186 customers.

The staff said the proposed fine amounted to $5,000 per violation.  It
said the penalty was "appropriate" because the PUC views slamming as one
of the "most serious" violations that a telecom provider can commit.
The staff also said stiff fines were warranted to deter Axces from
committing future violations.  The staff pointed out that Axces'
"pattern of slamming" has continued despite the fact that the company
paid a $100,000 penalty to the PUC in 1998 for alleged slamming
activities.  (01/9/01 a.m.)

The ALJ determined that prehearing conferences should be held every
three weeks to resolve any outstanding discovery issues and preliminary
matters.  The conferences are scheduled for Jan. 26, Feb. 16, March 9,
March 30, and April 20.

Staff's prefiled direct testimony is due March 9, and objections to the
staff's testimony are due March 16.  Responses to those objections are
due March 23.  Axces' prefiled direct testimony also is due March 23,
and objections to Axces' testimony are due March 30.  Responses to those
objections are due April 6.

The staff's rebuttal testimony is due April 11, and objections to the
staff's rebuttal testimony are due April 16.  (SOAH Docket no.
473-00-0731 and PUC Docket no. 20934)

Federal law prohibits duplication in any form, including electronic,
without permission of the publisher.

TR's State NewsWire Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000 Telecommunications
Reports International, Inc. (ISSN 1082-9350) is transmitted each
business day at 8 a.m. and 2 p.m., except holidays.
Telecommunications Reports International, Inc.
1333 H St. NW, Suite 100-E
Washington, DC 20005-4707

Associate Editor for Online Publications: Jennifer Erschen, E-mail:
jerschen@tr.com
Senior Legislative & Regulatory Analyst: Gayle Kansagor, E-mail:
gkansagor@tr.com
Senior Research Analyst: Steve Arlowe, E-mail: sarlowe@tr.com
Senior Analyst: Barney McManigal, E-mail: bmcmanigal@tr.com
Account Services: Eileen Callahan (202) 312-6116, (202) 842-3023 (fax)
E-mail: ecallahan@tr.com


I've added the fee - these are supposed to default when traders enter the
deals in Enpower, but for some reason Bloomberg fees aren't coming through
lately. I'm checking with IT on this.

Thanks,
Kate

PS - I'll add you to the Deal Correction Report mail list starting today.

Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
04/09/2001 12:59 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: deal 574356

deal 574356
Jeff Richter
Kate Bloomberg shows a fee of .005 on this deal and we show no fee.

Thanks


---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/24/2000 10:53 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Jim Homco                           10/23/2000 01:46 PM

To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: Pipeline Capacity

Andy Johnson (Mgr Business Development)with El Paso is double/triple checking
the max flow rate,
but it  is believed to be 190,000 mmbtu/day or 7,900 mmbtu/hr.
Currently at 500 Mw and 11.5 heat rate, our  flow rate is approx 5,750
mmbtu/hr

---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Homco/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 01:39 PM
---------------------------
From: Jim Homco on 10/23/2000 10:28 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Pipeline Capacity

I have calls into El Paso again today...Also John Hodge (from Stephanie
Miller's group) has
replaced the calls he made on Friday, at my request.  The only reference any
documents that I have make is to the
current max flow rate of the plant.  However I am sure the interconnect was
built larger than required.
I will for ward the respones ASAP.


The information contained in the Weekly Public Report can be communicated to audiences outside the company and should be used to ensure that we present a consistent message to the public. Please ensure that this email is distributed to anyone in your group who needs to discuss EnronOnline with individuals outside the company.

This report is not intended to be used as a stand-alone presentation, nor that all the information be used in a single presentation or customer communication.

Total Life to Date Transactions >1,650,000
Average Daily Transactions > 5,500

Life to Date Notional Value of Transactions > $900 billion
Daily Notional Value Approximately $2.6 billion

Number of Products Offered: Approximately 1,900
Number of Currencies Traded in = 15

EnronOnline Version 1.0 Launch Date: November 29, 1999
EnronOnline Version 2.0 Launch Date: September 18, 2000

Due to size constraints on the Outlook System, the Public Report will no longer be distributed.
A complete copy of the report can now be accessed directly through the EnronOnline Intranet Site at http://eolinfo.enron.com.

In order to access this report,  click on the link above. Once there, follow the link entitled "Reports" and then select the "Public Reports" tab. A dropdown menu will appear with a list of the various public reports available for viewing. .

We look forward to your feedback and comments. If you have any questions or experience any difficulties accessing your reports through the Intranet Site, please feel free to contact either Bryan Deluca at x54943 or Fraisy George at x35424.


Many of you have inquired about January reimbursements to 2002 flexible spending accounts.  Aon Consulting, Enron's flexible spending account administrator, has experienced some processing delays.  Aon has encountered difficulty in retrieving spending account deduction information, and some deductions are not appearing in Aon's records.  Enron Benefits is working with our IT group to help Aon resolve this issue.  Also, unprecedented activity at the end of 2001 flooded Aon with year-end claims.  Aon has assured us that 2001 reimbursements are now up-to-date, and that they began processing 2002 reimbursements on Monday, February 4.

Questions regarding flexible spending accounts can be directed to georgia.fogo@enron.com.


As a reminder...there are several pieces of equipment that are set up on the 30th Floor, as well as on our floor, for the Disaster Recovery Team.  PLEASE DO NOT TAKE, BORROW OR USE this equipment.  Should you need to use another computer system, other than yours, or make conference calls please work with your Assistant to help find or set up equipment for you to use.

Thanks for your understanding in this matter.

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX  77002
Tel:  (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
E-mail:  Lisa.Mellencamp@enron.com


Jeff, I wouldn't be too concerned about calling you-know-who an asshole.  I don't think it hurt "W" too much, and it gave us all something to talk and/or chuckle about.  I am very fond of using it myself, but my favorites are "dickhead" and "dickbrain."  In fact, I used them so frequently that my husband urged me to use a Spanish translation, which turned out to be Ricardo Cabeza and Ricardo Sesos (pronounced "say-sos").  Please feel free to use those anytime you feel the urge.

Seriously, thanks for the good things that are happening at our company.  The stock is looking better, and us old folks appreciate that.  Hope you are taking time to enjoy life as well.  Are you doing the MS150 this year?  Good luck in all your endeavors.  Fondly, Peggy


Who can I call to get access to NYMEX when I'm there next week? I'll want to take photos!!!

How was your weekend? MSA


As promised.  Jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 10/02/2000
02:10 PM ---------------------------

James M Bannantine@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
09/26/2000 11:17 AM
To: Bruce Lundstrom/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Kristina Mordaunt@Enron Communications, Scott Sefton@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp@EES, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen Wallace@ENRON,
Mark E Haedicke@ECT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michael Moran@ENRON, Randy Young@ECT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth Labanowski@ECT, Eric
Newell@ENRON, Janet Place@ENRON, Mark A Evans/HOU/EES@EES, Al
Alexanderson@Enron, Stephanie Harris@ENRON, Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron, Rex
Rogers@ENRON, Greg Whalley@ECT, Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Andrew S
Fastow@ECT, Lou L Pai@EES, Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David W Delainey@ECT, Stanley
Horton@ENRON, Bill Donovan@ECT, Diomedes Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, James
L Noles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill Cordes@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin@ENRON, Peggy Fowler@ENRON, Lance Schuler@ECT, Mark Frevert@Enron, Mike
McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shawn
Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon@ECT, Jeffrey
Sherrick@ENRON, J Mark Metts@Enron, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
Subject: Re: FOR IMMEDIATE REVIEW: Agreement Restricting Power Generation
Competition in Asia Pacific Region

I have not followed this closely  but question why we would give a noncompete
for this much of Asia in exchange for what I gather is an increased
expectation in the valuation of Newco in the future if we want to sell.  This
was the one question I have asked about Dragon all along.  It is a big piece
of the world to do everything as a minority with these two other partners
going forward (or have them have a right of first refusal over whatever we
do).  It is difficult to predict the future and this seems restricitive.
Maybe I don't understand it all.

Bruce Lundstrom
09/25/2000 03:54 PM
Sent by: Liz N Martinez
To: Kristina Mordaunt@Enron Communications, Scott Sefton@ECT, Frank
Sayre/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Vicki Sharp@EES, John
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephen Wallace@ENRON,
Mark E Haedicke@ECT, Daniel R Rogers/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Michael Moran@ENRON, Randy Young@ECT, Sandeep
Katwala/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Elizabeth Labanowski@ECT, Eric
Newell@ENRON, Janet Place@ENRON, Mark A Evans/HOU/EES@EES, Al
Alexanderson@Enron
cc: Stephanie Harris@ENRON, Rob Walls/NA/Enron@Enron, Rex Rogers@ENRON, Greg
Whalley@ECT, Ken Rice@ENRON COMMUNICATIONS, Andrew S Fastow@ECT, Lou L
Pai@EES, Larry L Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sanjay
Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rick
Bergsieker/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, David W Delainey@ECT, Stanley
Horton@ENRON, Bill Donovan@ECT, James M
Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Diomedes
Christodoulou/SA/Enron@Enron, James L
Noles/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bill Cordes@ENRON, Larry
DeRoin@ENRON, Peggy Fowler@ENRON, Lance Schuler@ECT, Mark Frevert@Enron, Mark
A Evans/HOU/EES@EES, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey A Shankman@ECT, Wade
Cline/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Shawn
Cumberland/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon@ECT, Jeffrey
Sherrick@ENRON, J Mark Metts@Enron, James A
Hughes/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: FOR IMMEDIATE REVIEW: Agreement Restricting Power Generation
Competition in Asia Pacific Region

General Counsels -

At the direction of the Enron APACHI Office of the Chairman, I am sending
this e-mail to you pursuant to the Enron Corp. Policy on Noncompetition.  I
would appreciate if you would check with your CEO/COO regarding this e-mail
and respond to me by Friday, September 29 if you have questions or concerns.
Enron APACHI may need to commit to the following provisions (that bind Enron
affiliates) by Monday, October 2.

Given the consolidating power generation market in Asia Pacific, Enron Asia
Pacific/Africa/China (Enron APACHI) is proposing to enter into a transaction
with Marubeni and Sithe Asia to combine the respective power generation
portfolios into a single company (Newco).  Newco would be charged with making
the shareholders' investments as liquid as possible to allow for sale of the
shareholders' respective stakes in Newco.

The shareholders believe that Newco must not be seen by the market as a
"dumping ground" for existing power projects but rather as the vehicle
through which the investors will continue to pursue power generation
opportunities in Asia.  As a result, Enron APACHI proposes to include
competition restrictions in the Marubeni/Enron Shareholder Agreement that
would bind their respective affiliates.

The following is a summary of these competition provisions:

Enron affiliates (with the exceptions stated below) could only develop or own
power projects in the Asia Pacific Region (as defined below) after first
offering the opportunity to Newco.  If Newco declines the opportunity, Enron
would be free to own the project itself or offer the project to third parties
provided that the terms do not materially improve.  Development or ownership
does not include the provision of construction, O&M, offtaker or risk
management services.

There are a number of exceptions to this rule:  (a) small projects involving
20 MW or less; (b) projects in which Enron owns less than a 1/3 interest; (c)
projects initiated by our SK joint venture; (d) Korean projects using natural
gas produced by Enron; (e) projects obtained in a corporate acquisition in
which Asia generation is less than 20% of the value of the acquisition; and
(f) situations in which any Enron company would be exposed to fiduciary
liability to another shareholder in complying with the competition
restriction.

"Affiliates" will be defined to exclude Enron affiliates which are
publicly-owned (e.g., Azurix).

"Asia Pacific Region" will be defined to include Brunei, China (including
Hong Kong and Macau), South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Laos,
Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar, the Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, East
Timor, Singapore, Papua New Guinea and the Pacific Islands (including Guam,
Saipan, the Federated States of Micronesia, and Fiji, but excluding Hawaii).
It does not include Japan and Australia.

The competition clause would survive until the earlier of (a) Enron selling
its interest in Newco or (b) December 31, 2003.

Thank you,
Bruce Lundstrom, General Counsel, Enron APACHI


[IMAGE]

[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE] 	[IMAGE]

  Go  to  Amazon.com  Travel  or Search Amazon.com

 Expedia  Special Rate (ESR) hotel room or vacation rental purchases can be made  only through the Expedia.com U.S. Web site. Qualifying stays include a  minimum purchase of one (1) night at any ESR hotel or vacation rental.  If a customer finds a lower rate on another Web site within 24 hours of  purchase, Expedia will refund the difference. The customer should call  Customer Support at 1 (800) EXPEDIA to request a refund. Sample vacation  packages are based on per person, double occupancy. Prices vary based  on dates, availability, and departure city. Sample Las Vegas hotel rates  are based on weekday prices for select hotels on sale from November 18  through December 20, 2001. Unless otherwise noted, all prices quoted are  in U.S. dollars. Prices and dates subject to change.  We  hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not  receive future e-mails of this sort from Amazon.com, please visit your  Amazon.com account  page . In the Personal Information box under the Account Settings  heading,  click the "Update your communication preferences"  link.

Please  note that this message was sent to the following e-mail  address:lavorato@enron.com


Myself,  being of Mexican descent there is no need for this snake oil.
Please double check with the Russell Belato's of the world.


i was planning on watching at home.  are you going to watch it somewhere?

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 01/05/2001 11:26:35 AM
To: "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: New Years

Where are you going to do this?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:25 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: New Years

yeah why

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 01/05/2001 11:10:28 AM

To:   "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: New Years

Are you watching football tomorrow?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 11:10 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Subject: RE: New Years

not yet but i will let you know

"Bass, Jason" <Jason.Bass2@COMPAQ.com> on 01/05/2001 11:08:23 AM

To:   "'Eric.Bass@enron.com'" <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: New Years

Eric,

Did you ever hear anything back from America West?

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric.Bass@enron.com [mailto:Eric.Bass@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 9:49 AM
To: Bass, Jason
Cc: shusser@enron.com
Subject: New Years

Jason,

Shanna and I were wondering what you and Donnita were doing for New Years?

-Eric


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/02/2000 01:25
PM ---------------------------

"Way, Karen S. - CHI" <karen.way@piperrudnick.com> on 10/02/2000 12:22:33 PM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "'fred.mitro@enron.com'" <fred.mitro@enron.com>,
"'rusty.stevens@enron.com'" <rusty.stevens@enron.com>, "Shindler, Donald A. -
CHI" <Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>, "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI"
<chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: Ledford-Titan Option to Purchase

Kay:
   Per my voicemail, at the request of the Ledfords, Fred and Rusty
have agreed to limit the easement area in the Option for Purchase and Grant
of Easement between the Ledfords and Titan Development to a 100' area
adjacent to the railroad right-of-way.  The following reflects that
modification to the third "whereas" in the Ledford-Titan Option incorporated
this morning following my conversations with Fred and Rusty.
   WHEREAS, Optionors desire to grant to Optionee, and Optionee desires
to obtain from Optionors, an option for the grant of an easement in, over
and within the strip of land 100' wide in Parcel 2 (defined below) which is
immediately adjacent to and east of the railroad right-of-way for the
installation of drain tiles, pipelines, and other utility uses across other
property owned by Optionors ("Parcel 2"), as more particularly described in
Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the
"Easement");

Additionally, I have received a fax copy of the executed Fehr agreement. I
am stopping by their attorney's office today to pick up the originals and to
put together the joint counterpart signatures.  I am also meeting with the
Ledford's attorney this afternoon and hope to finalize the execution of that
Option as well.  I will fax you the fully executed copies tomorrow morning
when I return to the office and the original versions will follow by fed ex.
Please call either Mark Gershon or me on Mark's cell phone 847-869-2015 with
any questions or comments. Thank you.

Karen S. Way
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
203 N. LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60601
email:  karen.way@piperrudnick.com
(ph) 312-368-2152
(fax) 312-630-6347

____________________________________________________________________________
The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


Please put the 17th meeting on my calendar.  I may or may not attend, but
want to have that on the calendar just in case.  Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 04/09/2001 10:29 AM
---------------------------
   Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC

From: Office of the Chairman - Enron Net Works LLC@ENRON on 04/09/2001 10:13
AM
Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
To: ENW-Employees_Houston
cc:
Subject: Net Works Floor Meetings - DATES AND LOCATIONS HAVE CHANGED PLEASE
READ

We will be holding floor meetings on the following dates.  Please join us for
a general overview and Q&A session on one of the following floors:

Tuesday, 4/17/01 - 2:00 - 3:00 p.m.  Location:  In front of EB2711

Wednesday, 4/25/01 - 2:00 - 3:00 p.m. Location:  In front of EB2265

Thursday, 4/26/01 - 2:00 - 3:00 p.m.  Location:  In front of EB2556

Philippe & Greg

Please disregard the email sent on 4/6/01.  We apologize for any
inconvenience.


FYI.  Please check into this....
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
12:51 PM ---------------------------

Phil Clifford
11/08/2000 12:32 PM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: David J Botchlett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: marketing quote

i wanted to follow up on our earlier phone conversation regarding a marketing
quote. i spoke with troy about the product he was looking for, a strip of
flat price quotes for 7 months, and the reason for the time delay. in order
to give an accurate fixed priced quote on a month by month basis i needed to
update the merc quotes on each front to back for the 7 months. this was going
to take approx 5 minutes, the time needed to get spreads from the floor, and
this was the amt of time i told troy i needed. i also explained i could quote
it as a strip package vs settle live.( i believe this all took place Friday.)

if memory serves me, early Monday the customer asked for the quote as a strip
package. we quoted it live, but i don't believe they liked the offer.
considering that i quoted the mkt on both the bid and ask, which was a good
25-30pts tighter than the floor i am not sure what the problem was. as i see
it, if they did not like the offer i provided they were free to take me out
of the bid i showed them on the two way.

kind regards,

Phil Clifford


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/07/2000 01:25 PM -----

	Jane Wilson@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	11/06/2000 02:38 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: More

Sorry to bring more to you but perhaps this is something that Rob Walls could
easily look through.  Global has a contract that is ready for signing.
Global is involved as an investor in Razorfinish.com.  The person who is
supposed to sign the contract is procrastinating as long as possible bec ause
the contract is not in the interest of Enron.  I told the person not to sign
it regardless of the pressure from Sanjay.  Hopefully, Rob could get to it.


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT on 12/14/2000
10:06 AM ---------------------------
From: Sarah Novosel@ENRON on 12/13/2000 04:39 PM CST
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Fulton/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Final FIled Version

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000 05:35 PM -----

	"Randall Rich" <rrich@bracepatt.com>
	12/13/2000 05:13 PM

		 To: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com>, <jhartso@enron.com>,
<jsteffe@enron.com>, <llawner@enron.com>, <rebecca.w.cantrell@enron.com>,
<Richard.b.sanders@enron.com>, <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Final FIled Version

The filed version of the comments in the San Diego Gas & Electric matter at
FERC is attached.

 - SANDIEGO.DOC


F.Y.I.

  E-Commerce; Section H
  BUSINESS TO BUSINESS
  Step Right Up and Buy a Megawatt!
  By MATTHEW L. WALD

  09/20/2000
  The New York Times
  Page 15, Column 1
  c. 2000 New York Times Company

  MANY Web sites scream about what they will sell you for next to nothing, or
less. But how
  about a site that pays you not to buy?

  A strange notion, but one that has more solid economic underpinnings than
many of those
  desperate give-it-away dot-coms. Then again, the commodity in question is
not the typical
  stuff of e-commerce transactions, like a plane ticket from Cincinnati to
Nashville next
  Thursday or a vintage Barbie doll or 20,000 widgets of a certain shape.
This promising new
  business is using e-commerce for a commodity that absolutely everybody
needs:
  electricity.

  As it turns out, one kilowatt may look like another, but its price may vary
by a factor of
  more than 100 in a single day. At night a kilowatt-hour -- the amount of
electricity needed to
  light 10 100-watt bulbs for an hour -- may sell for a penny or two, because
most of the
  generating capacity is unused. But on a hot afternoon, in places where the
market is
  deregulated, the same amount of power could cost $1 or $5, or even more.

  Traditionally, though, utilities charge most customers pretty much the same
price for the
  kilowatt-hour no matter what they pay to buy it or if they generate it
themselves. Even
  companies with time-of-day rates are charging a price that varies by only a
few pennies
  from peak to off-peak.

  But as California approached a summer of tight electricity supplies this
year, Pacific Gas
  and Electric started an e-commerce marketplace where customers could be
paid not to
  buy. In theory, the system would work with any customer, but it is only
practical with big
  consumers, mostly businesses, because otherwise the number of transactions
becomes
  hard to manage.

  As the state danced on the edge of rotating blackouts, the company quickly
applied to
  regulators for permission to expand its program, called E-Bid. The system
works like this:
  every afternoon, the utility gets an estimate of what power will cost on
the wholesale market
  the next day. When the price is high, the utility notifies big customers
that have signed up
  for its program, alerting them to log on to a secure Web site.

  There, according to Ronald K. Lowe, a company spokesman, the estimated
price is
  posted. If the customer, generally a factory, is willing to cut its
consumption 20 percent
  from its normal level, then it accepts the bid, and the utility pays the
customer the posted
  price, minus the normal retail cost per kilowatt-hour. If the bulk price is
$250 a
  megawatt-hour, for example, that makes electricity 25 cents a
kilowatt-hour, compared with
  a typical price to the factory of 5 cents or so. For every kilowatt-hour
that the factory does
  not use on the next day, the company pays 20 cents.

  The transaction has two functions. It cuts the risk of the grid running
short of power and
  causing a blackout. And by reducing the peak demand, it takes a few buyers
out of the
  market and makes the price lower for the remaining buyers. As the summer
ended,
  proponents of this kind of marketing said that the unanticipated price
swings, especially in
  places like San Diego, where some customers faced bills that had tripled,
showed the
  necessity for making hourly prices obvious to electricity users, so that
they would not
  blithely continue with normal consumption patterns at times of
extraordinary price spikes.

  But the California program is still small; on one tough day this summer,
July 31, 29
  customers participated, cutting demand by 40 megawatts, compared with a
peak demand
  of 21,000 megawatts.

  Pacific Gas and Electric charges customers $600 to enter the program and
requires that
  they be able to cut demand by at least 500 kilowatts, which is enough to
run about 100 big
  houses. But it has applied for permission to cut the entry fee to $100 and
take applicants
  who can cut demand by only 250 kilowatts.

  Such transactions are only possible through electronic commerce, but by
setting just one
  price in a 24-hour period, P.G.& E.'s system is hardly taking full
advantage. Wisconsin
  Electric Power began a more flexible system this summer in which it invites
big customers
  to log on to a site, where it offers a price per kilowatt-hour not used. If
it does not attract
  enough bidders to meet its needs, it can post a new bid price a few minutes
later.

  Such transactions could apply the market forces that already exist at the
wholesale level to
  the level of the electricity user, possibly even a homeowner.

  ''There's been a whole lot of debate over the years as to whether or not an
average
  consumer will ever shift consumption based on price principles,'' said
Scott A. Weiner, a
  senior vice president of Sithe Northeast, an independent power producer.
''On the other
  hand, people who run large office buildings or factories can get those
price signals in a very
  strong way,'' said Mr. Weiner, a former environmental commissioner for New
Jersey.

  BUT, he said, at the moment, there is a supply curve -- a changing level of
the amount
  available, depending on the price offered -- but no real demand curve,
because the buyers
  do not know what the price is and thus cannot respond. Demand is therefore
not affected
  by price.

  ''In the absence of a demand response, nobody can ever say, 'The price is
too high, I'm not
  going to pay that,' '' Mr. Weiner said. ''As load response programs come
into development,
  it's clear the Web will play a very vital part of making that real and
accessible.''

  A second form of e-commerce is emerging on a business-to-business model,
and it's one of
  the few forms that the government has required. It is called Oasis, for
Open Access
  Same-Time Information System, ordered by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
  Oasis gives companies that build free-standing power plants a way to market
their power
  and for companies that consume electricity a way to see the market. Oasis
systems are
  increasingly operated by new entities called Independent System Operators,
which have
  been formed on the East Coast and in California to run the transmission
grids that were
  formerly controlled by electric utilities.

  The systems vary from place to place, but are supposed to show the price of
electricity,
  sometimes broken down by location, to take account of transmission
bottlenecks.

  At the California Independent System Operator, William H. Simmons, the
manager of
  market applications, development and support, said that some aspects of
electricity trading
  existed years ago on electronic bulletin boards. But the ability of users
to identify available
  transmission links and schedule their use depended on the Web. ''It could
not have
  happened if it were not for the Internet,'' he said. The Independent System
Operator works
  with the California Power Exchange to arrange delivery of the power that
generators and
  customers contract for on the exchange.

  Both Oasis and programs like E-Bid have the potential to adjust electricity
use to reflect
  costs, experts say, and that would be one way to hold down peak demand and
thus make
  the system less prone to overload.

  Eric Hirst, an energy consultant in Oak Ridge, Tenn., and a former
scientist at the national
  laboratory there, speaking at a conference in Washington this spring on
reliability problems,
  said the result would contrast with the former pattern of electricity use.
When people know
  the price of a product they are consuming, they behave differently,
economists say; in the
  case of electricity, they will consume it in relation to its seasonal price
or even hourly price.

  As Mr. Hirst said, ''When people used to pay 5 cents a kilowatt-hour, it
didn't matter to
  them whether electricity was free or $2 a kilowatt-hour.''

  Graph: ''Lights Out'' Californians use so much electricity that the state
is flirting with
  blackouts. And because of deregulation , prices are sharply higher,
especially in peak
  periods. Now, utilities are paying some big customers to cut their
consumption during
  those periods. Below, the California Power Exchange's output and prices for
one day last
  June. Graph shows output compared to price. (Source: California Power
Exchange)

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Report: US Transition To Competitive Pwr Markets Muddled

09/20/2000
Dow Jones Energy Service
(Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

(This article was originally published Tuesday)

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The U.S. electricity sector is mired in a "prolonged
and muddled transition" from
regulated monopolies to competitive markets, and the political arena offers
little hope of fixing the problem,
according to the authors of a new report from Cambridge Energy Research
Associates and Arthur Andersen.

The report, "Electric Power Trends 2001," paints a picture of inefficiently
structured and balkanized power markets
hampered by inelastic demand and a gridlocked power grid.

With myriad special interests involved in framing the debate, politicians at
neither the state nor the federal level are
likely to resolve the problems anytime soon, said Cambridge Energy's Lawrence
Makovich and Arthur Andersen's
Jon Wierda.

"Unfortunately, the power industry right now is muddling through," Makovich
said. "There isn't an effective political
process to sort this out."

"We don't see this as something that's going to have a quick fix," agreed
Wierda.

The solution to the problem is "expert design," rather than the political
process, Makovich said.

The report assesses the status of electric industry competition two years
after California became the first state to
deregulate and open up its retail power market.

And with California's ill-designed and flawed market restructuring causing a
headline-grabbing power-supply crisis,
there is an increasing risk that a backlash will cause policymakers to
re-regulate the industry, Makovich said.

Already a half-dozen states have moved to slow down previously approved plans
to open up power markets to
competition, Makovich said, citing New Mexico, North Carolina and Oklahoma as
among those.

"There are right ways and wrong ways to put a competitive market together,"
he said, critical of the "serious flaws"
in California's approach, which contributed to a dearth in investment in
generation and transmission capacity.

The report identified a number of what it deemed surprises in the wake of
California's first-in-the-nation
deregulation experiment.

Among them, the report cited:

- A patchwork quilt of restructured markets has developed, the result of the
failure of Congress to issue a top-down
restructuring mandate providing "immediate and sweeping changes." As of 2003,
only half of U.S. electricity
consumers will have a choice among competitive power providers, the report
found.

- In states where customers do have a choice among competitive providers,
they are choosing not to choose. "Less
than 1% of electric customers switched from a traditional supplier in 1999,
even though more than 20% of retail
customers could choose among alternative power suppliers," the report found.

- The lack of investment in transmission interconnections has contributed to
balkanized power markets with "sharp
locational price differentials," the report said.

- Volatility in power markets once deemed abnormal is rapidly becoming the
norm, despite flourishing competitive
spot markets for wholesale power.

- This market volatility has prompted what could become "an electric supply
tsunami," as proposals have been
advanced to build 240,000 megawatts of generation capacity, an amount
equivalent to one-third of the existing
capacity in the U.S.

- Transmission capacity has declined and bottlenecks aren't being resolved,
contributing to increased threats of
blackouts and brownouts. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's order on
regional transmission
organizations puts the issue at "center stage," the report said. "However,
the order is not a bold move to confront
gridlock."

Many of the surprises identified in the report are interwoven with one
another.

For instance, the potential for supply to overwhelm demand, represented by
the large number of new power plant
proposals, is exacerbated by the economics of the industry that provide an
incentive to keep older plants operating.

There are 40,000 megawatts of new power plant capacity now under
construction, and another 30,000 megawatts
for which developers are seeking permits to build, Makovich said. Even with a
50% failure rate, that represents two
to three times the amount needed, he said.

And the surprise doubling in natural gas prices over the past year
complicates those development plans, since 93%
of the planned projects involve gas-fired plants, the report said. The report
attributed the doubling in gas prices to a
lack of coordination between investments in natural gas supply and power
generation.

"High gas prices make old plants all the more valuable," said Makovich.

Further, the surprising value of divested power plants, many of which are
more than 30 years old, and which sold for
as much as four times book value, has resulted in utilities' stranded
investment being much less than anticipated.

The gridlocked transmission network complicates the "misalignment
geographically" of much of the planned power
plant development, Makovich said. He noted that California, where there is a
severe supply crisis, hasn't built a new
plant in a decade, while Texas is overbuilding.

Makovich credited ill-designed markets with the failure of retail customers
to switch power suppliers.

A key component of California's supply crisis was the "well-intentioned"
decision to impose a rate freeze for retail
customers until the state's three investor-owned utilities paid down their
stranded investment, Makovich said.

But without retail customers receiving a price signal allowing them to react
to growing market volatility, there was no
demand response, and the volatility was exacerbated.

The California market design left San Diego's consumers subject to
spot-market pricing just as the supply crisis
caused by the price freeze erupted, he said.

"The companies with active management able to react to surprises are the
companies that will survive" the
transition, said Wierda. The "tsunami" of power plant investment will require
a portfolio approach to asset
management, he said.

Successful companies will be headed by chief executive officers who act as
"chief risk officers," he said.

-By Bryan Lee, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-6647; bryan.lee@dowjones.com

Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  THE WALL STREET JOURNAL / CALIFORNIA

  What's News: California

  09/20/2000
  The Wall Street Journal
  Page CA1
  (Copyright (c) 2000, Dow Jones & Company, Inc.)

 Escaping Rate Freeze

  PG&E Corp. is banking on the proposed sale of its extensive Northern
California
  hydropower operations to help it get out from under a consumer-rate freeze
that the
  company says has cost it $2.2 billion this summer. The San Francisco-based
company's
  utility unit, Pacific Gas & Electric Co., wants to sell the 4,000-megawatt
hydroelectric
  system -- the largest network in North America -- to an unregulated fellow
affiliate. Such a
  move would generate upward of $2.8 billion in cash and allow the utility to
pay off its
  so-called stranded costs, principally expensive nuclear-power plants. Once
that happens,
  the utility said in filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, it intends to
  seek permission from state regulators to end the consumer-rate cap. Under
the state's
  1996 electric- deregulation law, PG&E would then be free to raise rates and
recoup
  losses caused by this summer's spike in the wholesale electricity price.

  Metro; Metro Desk
  COMMUNITY NEWS / COVERING ORANGE COUNTY'S 33 CITIES COSTA MESA
  Jennifer Kho, (949) 574-4275

  09/20/2000
  Los Angeles Times
  Orange County Edition
  Page B-5
  Copyright 2000 / The Times Mirror Company

  Representatives of Costa Mesa and Santa Ana businesses will meet for lunch
today to
  discuss electricity conservation and the possibility of power outages.

  The South Coast Metro Alliance will present a meeting titled "If the Power
Goes Out: A Hot
  Topic as Temperatures Increase," from 11:45 a.m. to 1:15 p.m. at the Westin
South Coast
  Plaza, 686 Anton Blvd., Costa Mesa.

  Presentations will include information about the availability of
electricity, rolling power
  outages, the impact of the electricity situation on businesses,
deregulation legislation and
  conservation efforts.

  Information: (714) 435-2109.

  Copyright , 2000 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


find out who they deal with and I'll try to find a counterparty that has the other side

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"CAROLINE ABRAMO, ENRON CORP." <CABRAMO@bloomberg.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 30, 2001 9:27 AM
To:	Arnold, John
Subject:	AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02 NG SW

AND ONE MORE....GLOBAL NEEDS TO SELL 50/MTH APR-OCT 02 NG SWAPS.

THEY ARE WONDERING IF:
A) IF WE KNOW WHO WE ORIGINALLY OFFSET THEIR TRADES WITH- COULD
THEY CALL THEM DIRECT AND WE WILL "REASSIGN" THE TRADE. SO NO NE
T CHANGE TO YOUR CURRENT POSTION.

B) IF WE ARE GOING TO IMMEDIATELY OFFSET TODAYS TRADES WITH SOME
ONE, COULD THEY CONFERENCE ALL OF US TO AGREE ON A PRICE FOR THE
M TO TRADE WITH BOTH CPTYS.

C) IF THEIR TRADES TODAY NATURALLY HELP OUR BOOK, THEY WILL TRY
TO CALL SOMEONE TO TAKE THE OTHER SIDE AND THEY EAT BID/OFFER.


Next week is already booked for PRS Priorty Meetings and RMS.   I think we
must meet this week.

                    "ROBESON,
                    DAVE"                To:     "'careed@aep.com'" <careed@aep.com>,
                    <DROBE90@ente        set@ercot.com
                    rgy.com>             cc:     "WALLACE, PAMELA H"
                                         <PWALLA3@entergy.com>, "BUCK, KENNETH W"
                    01/21/02             <KBUCK@entergy.com>, "BREAKFIELD, JAMES W"
                    10:18 AM             <JBREAKF@entergy.com>
                                         Subject:     RE: Texas Set Meeting Jan 22nd and
                                         23rd

It is hard to get travel and hotel reservations with a one day notice.

Want to attend and participate but am not sure I can get there.

There are a lot of issues on the agenda.  Many of these probably have some
material which could be provided up front so we can be prepared to
review/discuss.

Would it be possible to reschedule this for next week?

Dave
Entergy
504 576 2571

-----Original Message-----
From: careed@aep.com [mailto:careed@aep.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 9:21 AM
To: set@ercot.com
Subject: Texas Set Meeting Jan 22nd and 23rd

First of all sorry for the late notice, Heidi and I did not have our
signals
straight!

The next Texas Set meeting is scheduled for tomorrow Jan 22, and Wednesday
January 23rd in Austin at the ERCOT center room 206B.  The meeting is
scheduled from 10:00-5:00 on Tuesday and 8:30-2 on Wednesday.

The agenda items are as follows:

*          Nominations for Chair and Vice Chair

*          Proposed changes to Change Control process

*          824 point to point

*          867_03 contingency

*          Final review of 814_28/_29

*          Review 1.5 data gatherings findings

*          Revist ERCOT validation of "date in the past"

*          Change control 242 and 243

*          Tabled questions from Change control call.

*          CSA move in/out gaps

*          Texas Set rejection of response transactions at ERCOT

*          Muni Coop transactions 810 and 820

Cary Reed
Sr Business Standards Consultant
918 594 4026 audinet 700-4026


Sorry so late, but does 4 PM California time work for you?

Best,
Jeff


Larry,

Please, take a look at this candidate. I don't
think his profile matches my requirements, but he looks quite
interesting.

Vince

---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/14/2000
04:32 PM ---------------------------

"Paul Rowady" <epr@pipeline.com> on 11/14/2000 04:09:43 PM
To: "Vince Kaminski" <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Seeking opportunity in computational finance

Dear Vince:

In following up on my voicemail message today, I attach my resume below for
your review and consideration.

It's ironic that you called while I was putting the message together.  I
will keep it short and look forward to speaking to you at your convenience.

Best regards,

Paul

E. Paul Rowady, Jr.
2300 West Alabama, Suite 69
Houston, Texas  77098

713-807-8624   home / fax
713-539-4541   mobile
epr@pipeline.com

 - Paul Rowady2.doc


George,

Congratulations. Well deserved.

Vince


On Wall Street, people are talking about Enron.  At Enron, we're talking
about people...our people.  You are the driving force behind every success
that our company has experienced, including our high-performing stock price,
which surpassed the $50 mark only a few days ago. You made it happen!

To show our appreciation for your hard work and commitment to Enron,s
continued success, eligible regular full-time and regular part-time employees
who were on the payroll of a wholly-owned Enron company at Dec. 31, 1999 will
receive 50 Enron stock options.  A special stock option award certificate and
a copy of the stock plan will be sent to you in the next few weeks.

About the stock options grant:
? The grant was effective Jan. 18, 2000, therefore, the option grant price is
$55.50.
? Options will have a seven-year term, which means you must exercise these
options before seven years have passed.
? Options will vest 25 percent on Feb. 28, 2000 and 25 percent each
subsequent January 18th thereafter until fully vested, as long as you are an
employee of Enron.  This means you may exercise 25 percent of these options
as early as Feb. 28.
? This grant is made in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Enron
Corp. Stock Plans and the award documents, which you will receive in the
coming weeks.

Due to varying international restrictions and legalities, Enron employees in
certain international locations will receive some other form of recognition.
Your local management and human resources representative will communicate
further details.

Visit home.enron.com for additional information.  There you can access a list
of frequently asked questions regarding stock options.  And you can view a
special message from Ken Lay.  To access the special message, you must have
IP-TV and a sound card. If you are not able to view Ken,s message, a
transcript is available.  If you encounter any technical difficulties, please
contact your PC Help Desk.

Again, thank you for all you do to make Enron a successful global energy and
broadband services company and a great place to work.


[IMAGE]

?	?

		Dear Mike,

		Two large mergers are done deals.  Valero Energy is buying rival Ultramar
Diamond Shamrock for $4 billion in cash and the assumption of $2 billion in
debt today.  The acquisition creates the second-largest refiner of petroleum
products in the U.S. Williams Energy, parent company of ENL, also completed
a $2.8 billion deal to buy Denver-based Barrett Resources.  The deal more
than doubles Williams' natural gas reserves, and now makes Williams a
producer and distributor of natural gas.  Today ENL brought you interviews
with the CEOs from all four companies.  If you happened to miss it, log onto
the ENL website and click on "video library" to see the interviews in full.

		ENL's Washington Bureau Chief Jay Cranford leaves for California early
tomorrow.  Jay is scheduled to cover the meeting between California Gov.
Gray Davis and 12 energy companies.  The agenda of the meeting will include
discussion of unpaid debts, credit and the supply of power in California.
Log on for updates from California with ENL's Jay Cranford.

		Tomorrow, the Houston bureau will report on the Rig Insight Company.  Kim
Benestante tells us this company offers a web-based platform where other
companies can access rig data such as day-rates and availability.  Be sure
to catch this report from Houston tomorrow.  Later in the week, Kim will
take a trip to Texas Southern University for an interview with Dr. Joshua
Hill to talk about the University's solar technology department.  Kim says
TSU has the largest solar lab facility in the South, and produces solar
panels for use all over the world.  Log on Friday when ENL sheds some light
on the solar panel issue.

		Coming up tomorrow, Cook Inlet's Gregory Craig is scheduled to join us  from
our Houston bureau.  Craig will be in to discuss Cook Inlet's joint  venture
with Mirant.  We'll bring you all the details in the 10:00 a.m. EST
broadcast.

		This is a dynamic industry and things are subject to change at a moment's
notice.  Occasionally guests cancel or change time slots.  We'll continue to
do our best to keep you updated on future interviews and events.

		Keep it on energynewslive.com for all your energy news.  	?
?			[IMAGE]			?
	?	View today's Energy  Wrap  video: (Windows Media Player required)
		Broadband  (100k) ?| ?Dial-up  (56k)
		Get  Windows Media Player

		Experience all that Williams Energy  News Live has to offer!

		If you are receiving this letter for the first time and wish to continue,
Subscribe now

		To stop receiving this letter,   Unsubscribe now

		If you are having trouble receiving this e-mail, please let us know or  call
(800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426) weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.

		Comments? Suggestions? let us  know or  call (800) WILLIAMS (800-945-5426)
weekdays, 7am-7pm CST.

		Copyright 2001 Williams Energy News Live, LLC. All  Rights Reserved.


Hello all!

Just a little reminder that Todd Perry will be in the Mt. Hood conference room TODAY at 11:00am to discuss the Power Structuring position. If are interested in the position, or would just like more information, please stop by!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent:	Friday, May 11, 2001 3:06 PM
To:	Portland West Desk
Subject:	Available Opening - Power Structuring

The below position has recently become available in the Portland office.

Power Structuring

This position reports to Todd Perry.  Todd will be holding an information session on Tuesday, May 15, 2001 at 11:00 am in Mt Hood.

As a power structurer, you will be responsible for the following duties.

?	Perform pricing of power purchase/sale transactions, including swaps, options, swaptions and embedded loans.
?	Provide financial analysis of Origination transactions, including power plant development efforts, contract monetizations and long-dated commodity transactions.
?	Work with Enron's Credit, RAROC, and Risk groups to qualify and quantify risks inherent in transactions.
?	Maintain a weekly pricing sheet to monitor changes in forward curves.
?	Work with Trading to track changes in new-build economics and power price fundamentals.
?	Create Excel-based models of innovative transactions much as cross-commodity swaps, weather derivative products, and physical and virtual tolling options.
?	Provide transaction structure feedback to middle marketers and originators.
?	Various other duties as assigned.

Additionally, a strong background in Excel, basic financial statement analysis, and familiarity with option pricing theory are preferred.

If you have any questions about this role or would like more information, please see or call Todd Perry.  If you are interested in this position, please submit your name to Amy FitzPatrick no later than close of business on Friday, May 18, 2001.


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/18/2001 01:04 PM -----

	Leslie Lawner
	01/11/2001 10:15 AM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Rebecca W Cantrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelley
Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
		 Subject: Gas Issues Paper

Paul asked me to email this document to you.  It is the paper analyzing gas
delivery issues into the NY, California and Chicago markets, and an
attachment which summarized interstate transportation and penalty rules.  Let
us know if you have any questions.


A new or modified message is in the EOL Terminations mail file.

Click on the doc link below to view the message.

This service is supported by European Notes Administration
 Who Date Subject

 London Fax System 12/06/2000 New fax received (Likely sender: ).


Here's another roll . . I think there are several, but I'm not sure if they
are all attached here.  Some more will probably come in the next couple of
days.

http://photomail.filmworks.com/sharing/roll.asp?Key=4692072408060308

________________________________________________________________________
This email message has been sent to you from Matthew Gillaspie compliments of
the Seattle FilmWorks free photo e-mail sharing service. To view the photo,
please click on the link above.If your email program does not support
hyperlinks, simply copy and paste the link into your browser. If you have any
problems or questions please contact us at info@filmworks.com, or call us
toll free at 1-800-FILMWORKS.
Thank you for using Seattle FilmWorks.

 - Photo.url


Vince:  Mark had not received my email so simply assumed that I had a
business plan and he would help if he could.  I explained that I was at
the "pre" business plan stage.   Further, that I had hoped to discuss my
search for collaborators to become co-founders.  People with vision that
might help develop and refine the concept, identify model components,
isolate modules for the initial effort and build a business plan
suitable for angel investors not VCs.   I might need your help in
conveying this to him.  I have struggled to put on paper a very rough
draft of how it might be best describe as to the direction it might go
and what might conceptually be possible.  Please look at this and tell
me if I am going too far at this point.  I do not want to implant
insurmountable obstacle in anyone's mind.  I hope to hear from you.  Al
Arfsten 713 965 2158

 - LifeTrak Concept 012501.doc


Start Date: 10/25/01; HourAhead hour: 11;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001102511.txt

Error retrieving HourAhead price data - process continuing...
---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/25/01
  UNIT_ID: CALGEN_1_UNITS

---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/25/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_APS
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 10/25/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_EPE
  ENGY_TYPE: NFRM


That is amazing, we are the fila bj, east west, courreges hunters now.

Love you

The Pigs

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Angelica Marie Paez <jhgriff@earthlink.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 11:38 AM
To:	Griffith, John
Subject:	FW: Question for seller -- Item #1038949049

Hmmm, so damn tempting, eh?
--
Angelica Paez <jhgriff@earthlink.net>
ebay - vintagegarb
----------
From: "Todd Hoffman" <thoffman@rochelle.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:54:03 -0000
To: "Angelica Marie Paez" <jhgriff@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Question for seller -- Item #1038949049
Sure of course I understand Angelica.  I love your Lacoste vintage also!  As for the Fila warm-up, I've been looking long time for one and can never find right size/cond.  This one seems it.  So perhaps I will be lucky in the end.  My offer would be for $400 + if you're wondering........or change your mind this one little time.
Best,
Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: Angelica Marie Paez [mailto:jhgriff@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:46 PM
To: Todd Hoffman
Subject: Re: Question for seller -- Item #1038949049
Thanks Todd.  Appreciate your interest.  Once I pulled an auction and hurt a very good customer's feelings who wanted the item.  Don't want to do that again, thus my policy of never ending auctions early, even if the offers have been very tempting : )  Take care.
--
Angelica Paez <jhgriff@earthlink.net>
ebay - vintagegarb
From: "Todd Hoffman" <thoffman@rochelle.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:40:53 -0000
To: "Angelica Marie Paez" <jhgriff@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Question for seller -- Item #1038949049
OK as you wish Angelica.  Just save ebay fees and get a nice offer from Todd...............hahahaha.
If you change your mind, let me know.  I'll be the winner.  MY ID is:  Irvines
Best,
Todd
-----Original Message-----
From: Angelica Marie Paez [mailto:jhgriff@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:32 PM
To: thoffman@rochelle.net
Subject: Re: Question for seller -- Item #1038949049
Hi Todd.  I don't end auctions early.  I have received several offers, but prefer to let the auction run its course.  Good luck and I hope you win!
--
Angelica Paez <jhgriff@earthlink.net>
ebay - vintagegarb
From: thoffman@rochelle.net
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:24:35 PST
To: jhgriff@earthlink.net
Subject: Question for seller -- Item #1038949049
What price would you need from me to end this auction?
Todd
--------------------
Question from:           irvines
Title of item:           RARE Men's 70s FILA BJORN BORG Warm-Up JACKET
Seller:                  vintagegarb
Starts:                  Nov-25-01 16:46:14 PST
Ends:                    Nov-30-01 16:46:14 PST
Price:                   Currently $19.99
To view the item, go to: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1038949049
Visit eBay, the world's largest Personal Trading Community at http://www.ebay.com


I have read about the Super Maramu 2000 and note from your website that you
have a location on the Mediterranean in France.  I will be in Southern France
September 23 through 25.  Would it be possible to visit you in Hyeres during
that time?  Is an appointment necessary?

Mark Taylor
1322 Rutland Street
Houston, Texas  77008

(713)863-7190 (home)
(713)853-7459 (work)
(713)646-3490 (fax)


Personal & Confidential

Marc:

Given your message to me the other night, as well as recent communications between your commercial personnel and our credit group, I want to again review the NPW disclosure issues with you, Scott Freeman/Joe Armbrust and Joe Cialone.

I believe that it is essential that we discuss the disclosure issues today, and will be traveling tomorrow.  Please let me know this afternoon when we might be able to talk.

Thanks,
Robert


Hey, regarding deals 226462 and 258420, should we take the volumes to 0 on
deal 226462?
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 07:49
AM ---------------------------

Victor Lamadrid
05/03/2000 05:40 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Molly Johnson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Goodell/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Mulholland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: CES Deals

Look at the TCO deal below for accuracy....
---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 05/03/2000
05:36 PM ---------------------------

Elizabeth L Hernandez
05/03/2000 05:02 PM
To: David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna
Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: CES Deals

The following are deals that I have completed for the CES split.  Please pass
along information to Logistics person that nominates on particular pipe.  I
have also created the hedge for thos deals that are in red.  Any questions
please call me at X3-3048.

OLD DEAL #  NEW DEAL #  DESK  PIPE

134908   258411   Central  PEPL
226462   258420   East  CGAS
249183   249183   Central  ANR (Counterparty name change only)
140015   258735   Central  ANR
139451   258682   Central   ANR


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 02/28/2001 02:10 PM -----

	Michael Tribolet/ENRON@enronXgate
	02/26/2001 06:29 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/EES@EES, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: FW: Memo from LeBoef, Lamb, Greene & MacRae

 -----Original Message-----
From:  "JAMES L. HUEMOELLER" <JLHUEMOE@LLGM.COM>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22JAMES+20L+2E+20HUEMOELLER+22+20+3CJLHUEMOE+40LLGM+2ECOM+
3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 5:35 PM
To: Newell, Eric; msmith1@enron.com; McCullough, Travis
Cc: Tribolet, Michael; CARL A. EKLUND; JOHN G KLAUBERG; JOHN MAAS
Subject: Memo

 - 163194.doc


You have received this email because you are listed as a security approver.
Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000007589&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000007589
Request Create Date : 11/16/00 11:18:52 AM
Requested For       : victoria.storey@enron.com
Resource Name       : EOL US Backoffice  Data Manager
Resource Type       : Applications


Attached are clean copies of the following:

1.  Assignment of Interest in Haywood Power I, LLC;
2.  Amendment No. 3 to Securities Purchase Agreement;
3.  Amendment No. 4 to Project Development Agreement;
4.  Certificate of AES Greystone, LLC; and
5.  Certificate of Volunteer Land Development Company, LLC

Please call with any questions.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P.
711 Louisiana, Suite 2900
Houston, Texas 77002-2781
Phone: 713.221.1117
Fax:     713.221.2184
email: aroffwarg@bracepatt.com

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of
this information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
information in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at
713.221.1117 or by fax at 713.221.2184, and confirm that you have destroyed
this information and any copies.  Thank you.

>>> Aaron Roffwarg 05/10/01 05:09PM >>>
In connection with tomorrow's closing, attached for your review are revised
versions of the Amendments to the SPA and PDA, revisions to the Assignment of
Interests, and "Date Down" Certificates for the Purchaser and the Seller.
Please note that these comments are being distributed to the whole group
simultaneously and are subject to change.  Best regards.

Aaron P. Roffwarg
Bracewell & Patterson, LLP
South Tower Pennzoil Place
711 Louisiana St.
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-1117 (Ph)
(713) 221-2184 (Fax)

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT:
This information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination of this information is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this information in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone at (713) 221-1117 or by fax at (713) 221-2184,
and confirm that you have destroyed this information and any copies.
Thank you.

 - ASSIGNMENT OF INTERESTS.doc
 - AMENDMENT NO 3 TO SPA.doc
 - AMENDMENT NO 4 TO PDA.doc
 - BUYER REPRESENTATION CERTIFICATE.doc
 - SELLER REPRESENTATIONS CERTIFICATE.doc


I LOVE YOU TOO!!!!!!!!!!!

Kerry E. Carter
Analyst
Simmons & Company International
(713) 236-9999

                    "Taylor, Michael
                    E"                        To:     "Kerry Carter (E-mail)"
                    <Michael.E.Taylor@        <KCarter@simmonsco-intl.com>
                    ENRON.com>                cc:
                                              Subject:     happy anniversary
                    11/19/01 11:11 AM

I LOVE YOU!

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete
all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


PARTIES In The Gas Strategy OII, I.99-07-003

PG&E is holding the first Gas OFO Forum on Thursday, August 29, 2000.  The
Forum was established by PG&E's OFO Settlement that was approved by the CPUC
in Decision 00-02-050.  Below is the list of issues from the Settlement that
the Forum is to explore (Section B.3.a).  This Settlement also initiated a
quarterly OFO Report (Section C.f).  PG&E completed the first OFO Report on
July 31, 2000, and would like to review this report with the Forum.

In addition, the Comprehensive Gas OII Settlement approved by the CPUC in
Decision 00-05-049 made the issue of adding more storage to balancing a
first priority for the Forum (Section 2.1.3.7) and required PG&E to provide
a balancing study (Section 5.1.3).  The "Report on Adding Storage to PG&E's
Bundled Pipeline Balancing Service" was sent to parties on March 7, 2000.

The OFO Forum will be held in San Francisco at PG&E's Pacific Energy Center,
851 Howard Street (between 4th and 5th Streets).  The meeting will start at
9:30 a.m. and end around 4:00 p.m.  We will provide refreshments and lunch.
We will send our proposed detailed agenda to you next week.

Please RSVP to Belinda Bates at bdb9@pge.com or 415-973-6626, so we can get
an accurate count of attendees.  Please call or e-mail Geoff Bellenger at
gjb2@PGE.com or (415) 973-8415, if you have questions, or need copies of
either the March 7 Balancing Report or the July 31 OFO Report.

Ron Stoner    Randy Litteneker
(415) 973-3606   (415) 973-2179

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
 B.3.   The Gas OFO Forum will further explore the following issues:
  a. The effectiveness of customer-specific OFOs and
possible improvements to the procedure outlined in this Settlement,
including the need and methodology for changes to the Performance Factor set
forth in Section C.3.b.(7).
  b. Whether and how parties who significantly contribute
to system-wide OFOs on a repeated basis, e.g. to three (3) or more per
month, should be specifically identified.  A "significant contributor" is
defined as any balancing entity with total imbalances greater than 5,000 Dth
and 10 percent of its usage in the three days leading up to each system-wide
or customer-specific OFO.  For Core Procurement Groups, supply will be
compared to their Determined Usage, which is the Cumulative Imbalance
(except for OFO days when the 24-hour forecast will be used).
  c. Whether the exemption for OFO noncompliance charges
set forth in Section D.3.b should be increased.
  d. The need for the allocation of additional storage to
balancing (see Section C.6).
  e. Changing the Cash-out procedures.
  f. Other issues which relate to PG&E pipeline balancing
and OFOs.


Can we talk about this when you have a second?

	Bonnie White/ENRON@enronXgate
	03/22/2001 06:28 PM

		 To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: John Schultes v. McDonald Investments, et al.

I spoke with Jim Studdert re this matter, and he advised that he believes
that it may be covered at least in part by our insurance program.  He is
forwarding it to our insurers for their review.  (I understand that he's
never gotten a definitive answer re coverage in the other NSM matters, so
that may end up being the case here.)  I will let you know when I hear
anything further re a coverage determination.

Bonnie J. White
Enron Litigation Unit
1400 Smith Street, Suite 4824
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  713-853-7244
Fax: 713-853-6576
bonnie.white@enron.com


All:

Attached is a brief memo summarizing today's hearing.

Kim

Kimberly A. Curry
Bracewell & Patterson, L.L.P
2000 K Street, N.W.
Suite 500
(202) 828-7623 (phone)
(202) 857-2107 (fax)
kcurry@bracepatt.com

 - #142807 v1 - DAY 7 MEMO.doc


Hi Marilyn,
I am helping a friend plan an "away" wedding.  I was wondering if you knew of or would suggest any resorts that have full wedding services that we can start looking at.  They want simple wedding and are going to invite their close family and friends, but are not sure who will be able to come yet.  I am thinking it will probably be about 10 people.  They definitely want something tropical and probably all-inclusive would be best.  I had a friend who got married in Playa de Carmen, but I'm not sure which resort.  I was thinking somewhere in Mexico would be good but definitely not Cancun.  They are on a tight budget because they will be paying for it themselves.  So here are the details about what we are looking for:
Tropical All-Inclusive Resort
Round trip airfare
Travel date between November 2001 and January 2002 (what time is cheaper?)
Wedding Services including someone to perform the ceremony, flowers for the bride, photography, location for ceremony (possibly on the beach), location for reception for about 10 people (can be restaurant at the resort)

I couldn't discuss this on the phone because it is my coworkers boyfriend and I who are planning it and she sits right next to me.  If you could give me a list of resorts we will look over them, narrow it down, and then get back to you.  Thank you so much for your help!
Ashley Landry
EnFORM Technology, LLC
Office: (713) 350-1933
Fax: (713) 438-1933
Email: ashley.landry@enform.com


Effective 12/31/00, El Paso Merchant Energy-Gas, L.P., CP ID 72297 merged
with and into El Paso Merchant Energy, L.P., CP ID 53350.  I have received
copies of the Secretary of State certificate as well as the Certificate of
Merger.  Today, I suspended the old record, so that new business will not
attach to it.  Normally, notification would have been sent out on the 15th of
the month, but since I have received phone calls, e-mails expressing
concern,  and  copies of the documents from various groups (I appreciate
it!), we thought it best to send notification now.  It will also appear on
the next report.

Thanks,

Cheryl x3-3103


Start Date: 2/28/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022812.txt

---- Generation Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: Wheelabrat
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 2/28/01
  UNIT_ID: MARTEL_2_AMFOR


I made the changes, and I have one question in parentheses on the financial
piece.


Do you want to send the LOI to TECO, or should I?

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Mitro, Fred
Cc: Jacoby, Ben
Subject: RE: TECO

I don't believe we need Keffer's input to process the LOI.  I can have their
power guy look at the term sheet if we think we are done with it.

From: Fred Mitro/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/01/2001 12:42 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: RE: TECO

Kay:

I will review your comments on the LOI.  I wanted to check with make sure
that someone at King & Spalding is reviewing the Midway term sheet along with
the LOI, so that we can send the term sheet to TECO on Monday/Tuesday.

Let me know.

Fred

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Mann, Kay
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Jacoby, Ben; Mitro, Fred
Cc: jkeffer@kslaw.com
Subject: TECO

Ben,

I made a minor adjustment to the LOI re: exclusivity.

 << File: Midway TECO LOI june 1.doc >>

Policy states that any time we sign up to exclusivity we are supposed to get
it approved by Mark Metts, Tim Detmering and the CEO of the affected business
unit.  Seems a little silly in this case, but it can't hurt. (yes, I know we
didn't do it with the turbine stuff)

Kay


Dear Sara,

Attached please find our response to the draft Amendment to the CSA
for the above-referenced Agreement.  You will note that I have added
some additional language which our Legal Dept. prefers to include in
Amendments, which I trust will be acceptable to you as well.  As
mentioned briefly over the telephone the other day, I have also
incorporated some changes with respect to Letter of Credit provisions.

The changes to the LC terms are those which our Credit Department is
requiring as a result of a review of Cargill's LC language.  The main
issue is that an LC issued as collateral can no longer be transferable.
I note from the file on our ISDA negotiations that Enron may have
preferred transferability in order to be able to transfer an LC to
its Affiliates.  If this is still the case, we can certainly discuss
options which may specify and limit transferability accordingly.

I look forward to your response at your earliest opportunity.

Regards,
Mara Alexander
Sr. Documentation Analyst
Cargill, Incorporated
Tel: 952.984.3417
Fax: 952.984.3872
e-mail: Mara_Alexander@Cargill.com

 - 31409_Amnd_CSA.doc


Dave,

Attached is the spreadsheet with the Abitibi paper mills and their pulp usage. Let me know when we can meet.

Monika


Steve --

Attached please find the Final DASH for Springs and Quebecor.

RAC has modified the Springs DASH to (a) raise the capital price and (b)
remove the direct NPV impact of Govt Affairs' rate forecasts but added
lanaguage showing economic impact if our forecast occurs.  Total NPV change =
$3 MM increase from earlier DASH.

During the Friday Underwriting meeting Rick Buy decided to hold off sending
these deals in the Board packet.  Looks like they will want our signature on
Monday.

My recommendation would be to sign-off on the DASH but to force the issue
over how RAC should price future deals.

JDS

---------------------- Forwarded by James D Steffes/HOU/EES on 04/21/2000
11:26 AM ---------------------------
From: Karen L Barbour@ECT on 04/21/2000 09:59 AM
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: EES DASHs - Springs & Quebecor

Please review the attached finalized Springs and Quebecor DASHs, which
reflect Dave's recommended treatment of the NPV related to the tariff
forecast.  The original hard copies will be routed through your department
for signature some time today.  Let me know if you have any
questions/concerns.  Thanks.


Please send me any dates you plan to be out of the office (either business or
vacation) during the month of March at your earliest convenience.  Calendars
will be distributed by the end of this week.  Thanks.


Deal NL3722 is a deal between ECC and another counterparty.  It is not a John
Arnold deal.  You will have to contact Ryan in Canada re: this deal.

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274


Kimberly Devlin
2006-B Sharon Lane
Austin, TX 78703
kjdevlin@austin.rr.com

To Mr. Ken Lay,

I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills.  Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.

Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out.  And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year.  As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.

The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it.  Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.

Sincerely,

Kimberly Devlin


OUTLOOK EMAIL NOTIFICATION

Your Date of Migration is: Monday, June 11th

YOU WILL BE UNABLE TO SEND E-MAIL unless you take the following action:
Please go through your Notes email and clean out as many old/un-needed email items as possible BEFORE your date of migration.  After you are migrated to Outlook you will only be allocated 100MB of total Mailbox space.   If more than this amount of data is migrated to Outlook YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEND E-MAIL until it is below the 100MB limit.  Cleaning up your Notes email now will prevent this from happening to YOU.

Enron's messaging platform is migrating from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Outlook 2000 worldwide.  You will be accessing Outlook for all of your email functions.

WHY IS ENRON MIGRATING TO OUTLOOK 2000?

Many factors contributed to the decision to migrate from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange/Outlook.  The most prominent factors were:

?	Significant advantages to moving to a product that is more integrated with current Enron apps (Windows 2000, Office and Internet Explorer)
?	More efficient Shared PC and Roaming User features
?	Improved support and integration for Palm/CE devices
?	Instant Messaging capabilities

WHAT IS BEING MIGRATED TO OUTLOOK 2000?

?	Email Messages.  From the date of your scheduled migration, the last (30) thirty days of your Email will be converted for use in Outlook.
?	All your folders in Notes you use to store email messages in.
?	To Do Items
?	Journal Items
?	Calendar Entries dating from (1) one year in the past to (10) ten years in the future will be converted.
?	Address Books, but NOT your Distribution Lists that you created.  You will need to re-create these in Outlook.

Thank you,

Outlook 2000 Migration Team


Jay,  My fax number is (618) 229-0229

Put a coversheet on it or something that has my name on it.
Thanks Dad

PS Think hard about anything you want us to bring since we will have the
truck.  We probably won't bring the truck very many times.


I'd like to get about 30 minutes with Mark, just to catch up.

Mark Schroeder@ECT
07/27/2000 07:47 AM
To: Elizabeth Linnell/HOU/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, Steven J
Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Maureen McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Beverley Ashcroft/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: trip to Houston

I expect to be in Houston next Monday from 1300, until Tuesday around 1500.
If any of you wish to meet, please have Maureen work with Beverley toput
something in the diary.

Elizabeth - if you do not mind, I think if we just sit down for a few hours,
this will be the best way to assure that Iget you timely and accurate budget
info, so can we book something?   thanks  mcs


If you are interested in attending this training I encourage you to do so.
Please let me know i fyou would like to attend before the training class is
held.

Thanks,
Hollis
---------------------- Forwarded by Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron on 04/23/2002
01:08 PM ---------------------------

Ronald Brzezinski on 04/23/2002 09:43:42 AM
To: Alaadin Suliman/EWC/Enron@Enron, Paul Landers/EWC/Enron@Enron, Orion
Sanders/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Stan Ballard/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Kim
Nguyen/EWC/Enron@Enron, Stanley Tehee/EWC/Enron@Enron, Norm
Phillips/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeff Marecic/EWC/Enron@Enron, Hollis Kimbrough/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Maurer/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Dave Schulgen/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Mike
Messier/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Joe Chapman/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Kevin
Cousineau/EWC/Enron@ENRON, Ed Agner/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: SCADA Network Training session April 30

The Training group and SCADA group have compiled a very thorough SCADA
Network training program.
Marc Adler and Ed Agner will be giving a "trial training" Tuesday, April 30,
South bldg main conference room 8am - 2pm PDT.
Please plan on attending.
This session will provide the attendee with useful SCADA Network information,
as well as refining the Training presentation for site presentation.

Note to cc: distribution.
Please send personnel you feel would benefit from this training.
Let Ed know so he can plan for the number of attendees.

Thank you.

Ron

---------------------- Forwarded by Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron on 04/23/2002
09:37 AM ---------------------------

Ed Agner
04/23/2002 08:53 AM
To: Ronald Brzezinski/EWC/Enron@ENRON
cc: Marc Adler/EWC/Enron@Enron, Kim Carter/EWC/Enron@Enron

Subject: SCADA Training

Ron,

The SCADA training practice session will be conducted next Tuesday morning in
the south building main conference room from 8:00 - 2:00. Please invite
anyone that can give constructive criticism.

Thanks,
Ed


---------------------- Forwarded by Claire Broido/HOU/ECT on 02/25/2000 01:10
PM ---------------------------

Amelia Alder@ENRON
02/15/2000 02:14 PM
To: Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON
cc:  (bcc: Claire Broido/HOU/ECT)
Subject: MS150 Registration

Just to clarify, if you are an Enron Cycling Club member, Enron will pay for
your registration.  Contact me or Stephanie Strong and we'll get you signed
up.  For non-Enron people who want to be on the MS150 Enron team, they can do
so by registering themselves and listing "Enron" as their team.  However,
they're not officially on the Enron team until we are notified, and we must
have their email address and phone number, also exact spelling of the name as
it appeared on the registration, or fax the registration form to 713-345-5755.

HERE'S A MESSAGE FROM THE MS SOCIETY:

Are you registered for the 2000 ISUZU MS 150 Bike Tour presented by The Home
Depot yet?

If not, then please join us for a registration Happy Hour this Thursday,
February 17 from 4:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the Hooters Restaurant located at 99
Woodlake Square Houston, TX 77063 . Click on the address for a map.

We're happy to announce that Hooters will again provide dinner at the new
finish line in Austin on Sunday, April 16. Applied Materials, located on
Highway 290 in Austin, will host the finish line this year. Look for their
team on the Tour led by Ken Haase. Maps of the route can be found online at
http://www.ms150.org/maps.htm and in the rider manual.

If you can't make it this Thursday, then join us at one of these other
Hooters locations:

Hooters Anderson Lane (Austin) - 5:30 to 8:00 on Tuesday, February 22
Hooters FM 1960 West - 4:00 to 8:00 on Thursday, February 24
Hooters Round Rock (Austin) - 5:30 to 8:00 on Tuesday, February 29
Hooters Riverside (Downtown Austin) - 5:30 to 8:00 on Tuesday, March 7
Hooters NASA - 4:00 to 8:00 on Thursday, March 9
Hooters Mangum - 4:00 to 8:00 on Thursday, March 16

For more information, please visit our official website: www.ms150.org where
you can register online, sign-up for online donations, and sign-up to
volunteer. It's fast, easy, and secure! If you're not planning to ride, then
join us as a volunteer. Check out the volunteer sign-up section on the
website where you can choose volunteer area(s) of your choice. As of
February 14, 492 people have registered online, 264 people have made online
donations in the amount of $9,886, 36 people have signed up to volunteer,
and 525 have signed up on our email subscription list. Click here to sign-up
for online donations: http://www.ms150.org/contribute.htm

Also, check out the Discussion Groups in the "Talk to" section of our
website. There are 3 different Discussion Groups where you can post
questions, suggestions, tips, advice, or comments about the bike tour.
Whether you're looking for tips on how to train for the ride or how to raise
money, you'll get your answers here. Click here to start talking:
http://www.ms150.org/talk2.htm

Thanks for supporting the National MS Society!

****************************************************************************
*************************************

The National Multiple Sclerosis Society supports more MS research and serves
more people with MS than any national voluntary MS organization in the
world.

The National Multiple Sclerosis Society ... one thing people with MS can
count on.