thx.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 12:46 PM
To:	Ngo, Tracy
Subject:	RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Tracy:  Just spoke with Michelle Sternberg.  Allegheny does not want to carve out setoff benefit for ENA because it cannot take advantage of the setoff benefit.  I told her that we still wanted the provision for ENA and could continue business under the old Merrill "deemed arrangement" which has whatever setoff provision we negotiated.  She'll speak with Yair.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ngo, Tracy
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:29 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

please let me know what the physical power attorney advises...this is news to me.  yes, we need to at minimum setoff our affiliates with the cp.  -Tracy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Shackleton, Sara
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:23 PM
To:	Ngo, Tracy
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	FW: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Tracy:

Let me know what you think.  I'll check with a lawyer from the physical power group.  Also, we should at a minimum, preserve setoff with respect to ENA's affiliates.  Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 2:18 PM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Cc:	Yaish, Yair
Subject:	RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Sara -

I have spoken with our in-house regulatory specialist and she has informed
me that we cannot agree to include our regulated or non-regulated Affiliates
in Set Off under the Public Utility Holding Company Act without getting
approval from the SEC.

Please advise if we can proceed on the ISDA with carving out Affiliates in
Set Off, as per our original request.

Regards,
Michelle

Allegheny Energy Global Markets
Office of General Counsel
909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10022
(T) 212-224-8718
(F) 212-224-8446/8711

-----Original Message-----
From: Sternberg, Michelle
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:35 PM
To: 'Sara.Shackleton@enron.com'
Cc: Yaish, Yair
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Sara -

I am checking internally if we can agree to the below.  I will get back to
you in the beginning of next week.

Regards,
Michelle

Allegheny Energy Global Markets
Office of General Counsel
909 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10022
(T) 212-224-8718
(F) 212-224-8446/8711

-----Original Message-----
From: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com [mailto:Sara.Shackleton@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 7:38 PM
To: MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com
Cc: Marie.Heard@enron.com
Subject: RE: ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

Michelle:

With respect to your setoff request, we cannot agree to eliminate setoff
for your non-regulated affiliates.  Perhaps you could provide us with the
regulated affiliate(s) for a carve out.  I look forward to hearing from
you.  Regards.

Sara Shackleton
Enron Wholesale Services
1400 Smith Street, EB3801a
Houston, TX  77002
Ph:  (713) 853-5620
Fax: (713) 646-3490

    -----Original Message-----
   From:   "Sternberg, Michelle" <MSternberg@aeglobalmarkets.com>@ENRON

[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Sternberg+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMSternberg+40aeglobalm
arkets+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]

   Sent:   Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:14 AM
   To:     Shackleton, Sara
   Cc:     Heard, Marie
   Subject:  ENRON/ALLEGHENY ISDA

   Sara -

   As per Marie's instructions, please find attached a blackline
   incorporating
   the changes that will be required to be made in the final form of ISDA
   (modifications to the Notice and Set-Off provisions).  The attached is
   the
   last version that I have but if the changes are acceptable, I would
   suggest
   that you take the changes and incorporate it into your form of agreement
   since it is the final version.

    <<ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc>>

   Once reviewed, please let me know if the changes are acceptable - at
   which
   point you can forward to me a revised Schedule (without the signature
   page)
   via e-mail and I can have the agreement countersigned and replace the
   Schedule with your revised Schedule.

   Thank you for your patience.

   Regards,
   Michelle

    - ENRON ISDA.REVISED 9.26.01.doc << File: ENRON ISDA.REVISED
   9.26.01.doc >>

**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************


Has the CPUC put forward and timetable to act?  I would assume that this
Commission would be ready to cut off DA as soon as possible.

Jim

	Harry Kingerski
	02/09/2001 05:31 PM

		 To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: your opinion

when will the PUC make effective the restriction on Direct Access called for
in AB1x?

expected date (50/50)
early date (25/75)
late date (75/25)

EES is using this informed opinion to value risk exposure to new deals in San
Diego being rescinded.

My answers:
April 15
Mar 1
May 30


adesell@nyiso.com writes to the NYISO_TECH_EXCHANGE Discussion List:

The email sent earlier today (shown below) incorrectly
stated that the bid and offer period for the January 2000
TCC Reconfiguration Auction is January 11, 2000.  The
date for this activity is December 11, 2000.

_____________________________________________________

Bids and Offers for the January 2001 TCC Reconfiguration
Auction will be accepted on January 11, 2000 from 8:00 AM
to 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.

The bid and offer forms for this auction are being posted
to the NYISO web-site.  These forms will appear under
the TCC Market, Winter 2000/2001 with a revised date of
12/8/00.

From the NYISO Home Page:

1)   Over the Markets, click on TCC Market

2)   Next click on Winter 2000/2001

3)   The Bid & Offer Forms will appear in
Microsoft Excel and Lotus 123 Formats


To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT, Jose Marquez/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tony
Hamilton/EU/Enron@Enron
cc: Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Leaving London

Hi guys...

Tony and I wanted to summarize "where we go from here" - here is how we see
it.  I left the string attached - just read below....
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron on 04/26/2001
10:44 AM ---------------------------

Tony Hamilton
04/26/2001 10:46 AM
To: Stephen Bennett/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Leaving London

My comments in blue...

Tony

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Stephen Bennett                           26/04/2001 16:36

To: Tony Hamilton/EU/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Leaving London

Hi guys...

Before leaving here I wanted to quickly summarize the projects that have been
left open:

1) Tony shifts his focus slightly toward more development - a little less day
to day forecasting
   Development
    - Building and developing a transatlantic heating demand model -
including shipment
    - Building an NAO model and index for wx deriv
    - Developing a model for the API number
    - Examine UK Met data and potential for getting Ensemble forecasts from
the ECMWF
   - Keep up with non-Enron Global Markets' future needs without commiting
current resources

  Operational
   - Begin daily briefings for Agriculture - examine data sources and
forecast products
   - Continue to produce Global Summary - with help from Steve/Jose in Houston
   - Continue to produce 1-5 and 6-10 day forecasts for Europe coordinating
with Houston
   - Continue to coordinate on US 6-10 day forecasts with Houston
   - Continue Monday/Wednesday briefings for Crude meetings
   - Provide met comment and support toward weekly/monthly/seasonal official
outlooks from the UK Met for WxDeriv  (team support from houston)
    - Design and Develop forecast of Met forecast (try to beat their release
by at least 1 hour) prior to each daily update (like our Bloomberg Forecaster)
    - Identify any additional "market-movers", anticipate and add value to
same

  "Back-Burner"
   - Develop a method for providing probability distribution/confidence
graphics based on numerical forecast guidance and ensemble    data

   "On the Shelf"
    - Daily briefings and products for UK Gas
    - Daily briefings and products for Continental Power
    - Daily briefings and products for Dutch Power
    - weather support for Coal Trading?
    - Daily forecasts of and comment on UK Met official 3-5 and 6-10
forecasts
    - Automation of temperature history/forecast plots from model ensemble
data

2) Steve continues to work on a few ongoing projects and ties up "loose ends"
   On-Going
     - Automate a process for getting forecast temps (Model/Other) from
EarthSat data
     - Continue to produce the US part of the Global Exec Summary
     - Consult with Tony on 1-5 day Europe Forecast
     - Continue to produce Port Status Report - work on expanding this report
     - European forecast verification (like Houston)

   "Loose-Ends"
     - Contract with WSI for met data
     - Talk to EarthSat about a daily conference call for Tony
     - Talk to UK Met office about a daily conference call for Tony
     - Refine list of Europe forecast cities and get them from EarthSat
     - Make sure Jose didn't destroy my house!!

3) Jose
     - Continues to investigate data for Global Ag and works with Tony on
getting Ag products up and running
     - Makes sure Steve's dog is in perfect shape to return home this weekend
(i.e. find one with identical markings before Steve gets back!)
 - Order Mofongo for London Research luncheons!

That's it - see you Tuesday....
Steve


Thanks very much.  Very interesting.  We'll be a lot more aligned once
they've paid us...

Best,
Jeff


To view this e-mail online click here .
Celebrate in Style
All you'll need for the holiday season ahead, our collection includes
a look that's just right for the occasion.
 Shop Festive Attire
Show Stoppers - The Drape-Neck Red Satin Dress by Tahari
Make an entrance in this head-turning satin dress and rich T-strap
sandals by Stuart Weitzman. A luxurious pashmina adds the finishing
touch to a look that will have everyone rolling out the red carpet
for you.
Polished Perfection - The Illusion Beaded Top with Pants
A sleek and elegant silhouette is created with beading highlights on
the neckline, cuffs and hem of this sophisticated top. The high
Hollywood waist of the flattering pants makes for a comfortable fit
that will keep you looking and feeling your best all night long. A
sparkling clutch and open-toe sandal add the finishing touches.
Dazzle & Drama - The Dramatic Duster & Palazzo Pants Ensemble
This alluring sheer gossamer silk duster with beading on the hem makes
a striking entrance at any affair, while the double georgette shell
and pants are the perfect foundation for your holiday looks. Top it
off with Harten CZ earrings for that special event.
Easy Elegance - The Sparkling Cardigan Set & Ball Skirt
Have a ball this holiday season in this classic, always-elegant
combination. The kate spade handbag and Dyeables sandals give this
ensemble its finishing, feminine touches.
From formal events to the office bash,
styles that fit the occasion
 Shop Dress Attire for Men
Hurry, Ends October 31st!
Give Shipping the Boot!
Get Free Standard Shipping* on your Entire Online Order
 *Click for Details
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail was sent to you because you are a valued Nordstrom
customer. If you would no longer like to receive our E-mail Updates,
please click here . http://nordstrom.m0.net/m/u/nrs/n.asp?e=KWARD%40enron.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Set up 8:59 am - 9/25 - Jessica Ramirez
Andrew Miles x-30314


Thank you!  We've received your registration for the 75th Anniversary Dinner.
 Mark your calendar and plan to have an enjoyable evening.

Sincerely,
Meetingstop@aol.com


i think jv strip prices to where we price out enough demand to get to 2.8.
whther that price level is 425 or 725 is arguable.  i think it's close to
here.  but when we get to november and we have 2.8 and don;'t repeat the
weather of this past winter and we have 2.5 bcf more supply and people
realize that we have 2.3 bcf to withdraw before there are any
problems...bombs away.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/07/2001 01:00 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE:

Why do you think nov mar is worth $3.75?
Also whats your schedule looking like next week----care to meet for a
beverage?

Jen Fraser
Enron Global Markets Fundamentals
713-853-4759

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Arnold, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:03 PM
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Subject: Re:

  What it's trading  what I think it's really worth
apr oct   540    500
nov mar 547    375
cal 2  491    400
cal 3   460    325

Obviously most bearish the further out you go.  However, the game right now
is not sell and hold...although it will be soon.  The game is where will it
be tomorrow and next week and next month.  The market is structurally short
term gas thanks to our friends from california.  where ca is buying power,
williams and calpine and dynegy dont care of the gas costs 450 or 475 or 500
or 525.  irrelevant.  so term is not going down in the short term unless the
front comes into the 400's and scares some producers to start hedging or we
or el paso can find fixed price lng to the tune of 250,000 a day for 10 years.

From: Jennifer Fraser/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/06/2001 10:37 AM
To: John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:

what are your thoughts on

ap-oct
nov-mar
02
03

price levels and outlooks
 thanks
Jen Fraser
713-853-4759


The Gas Spec (Oil NG Hedge) book will show a MTD variance of $819,000 today.
When the Power p&l was added to this book last week the formulas did not
divide by 1,000.  Therefore the incorrect p&l was reported.  However, John
Lavorato was given a corrected report, so this variance will not be included
in today's daily p&l on the NGP&L.

If you have any questions feel free to give me a call.

Thanks,
Robin


November 8, 2000
Notice No. 00-385

TO: All New York Mercantile Exchange Members

FROM: Daniel Rappaport, Chairman of the Board

RE: Exchange Sets Target Date for Demutualization

The Exchange today set a target date of November 15 for its demutualization,
which will make it the first exchange in New York to convert from
not-for-profit membership structure to a for-profit structure.

On October 24, the Exchange received a favorable private letter ruling from
the Internal Revenue Service notifying the Exchange that there would be no
tax consequences to it or any of its members as a result of its
demutualization. This ruling was the final approval required for the
demutualization of the Exchange to take effect.  The plan was previously
approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, and a 97.5% majority of the Exchange members.

The Exchange has moved decisively and rapidly in its pursuit of this
demutualization and the various requisite regulatory approvals.  This
approach is indicative of the progressive and innovative manner in which we
will proceed as a for-profit corporation to reposition the Exchange as a 21st
century business enterprise that will create and pursue profitable new
opportunities, react rapidly and decisively in an increasingly competitive
marketplace, and explore interest by outside investors.

Pending certain legal notifications by November 15, the Exchange, a
not-for-profit membership corporation under New York law, will be reorganized
on that date as a for-profit membership corporation under Delaware law and
will be renamed New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc.  A new stock-holding
company named NYMEX Holdings, Inc., will be formed to own all of the economic
interests and most of the voting control in the for-profit membership
corporation.  Each existing NYMEX Division membership will be converted into
one share of common stock in NYMEX Holdings, representing equity in the
overall organization, and one membership in the Exchange representing trading
privileges.

The common stock and trading privileges will not be separable until a
majority of stockholders vote to permit separate trading of the common stock
and trading rights.

__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.

"http://208.206.41.61/email/email_log.cfm?useremail=tana.jones@enron.com&refdo
c=(00-385)"

Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.


I haven't talked to anyone.  I've got 10 docs going out this am, but I'm
almost finished.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:46 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

Sheila can't go today because of work.  Carlos called, is he still going?
It's your birthday lunch, what do you want to do.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	01/10/2001 10:42 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: How about Vincent's for lunch?

Sounds good, but if today isn't a good day, it is not a problem.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 01/10/2001 10:35 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: How about Vincent's for lunch?


Hello, John.  I am forwarding this to you at the request of Rob Walls.  Let me know if you also would like to have the litigation summary for employment matters.  Michelle

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Johnson, Rick
Sent:	Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:40 PM
To:	Cash, Michelle
Subject:	Labor Agreements

Michelle, per your request, below are the current and/or active labor union agreements specific to Enron and / or its direct affiliate entities:

Direct Hire -  Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA)
PGE/IBEW
PGE's coyote springs project - recently re-nogitiatied to 5 year term.
PGE's generation, distribution, and transmission  workforce. - 3 year term through Mar. 2004

Eko-Electrica - JV with Mission Energy - / USWA
Eco-Electrica project - Puerto Rico -  3 year term - through June 2004

San Juan Gas
Teamsters  - O&M employees - Do not know the term of this agreement.
Progasco
UTI (local independent union) - Do not know the term of this agreement.

EIM - entities not listed -
EES/EFS - entities not listed -

Pre-Hire - Project Labor Agreements (PLA)
EWS
Roseville Energy Development, L.L.C.  - California State Building & Construction Trade Council - Negotiations underway.  Contract(s) to include Project Labor Agreement; expires on commercial operation,  Major maintance Agrement,  term to be determined (15 - 30 years); Line and Distribution construction - project specific; Access & referral neutrality agreement - Term 1 year from commercial operation date.
LODI L.L.C. - California State Building & Construuction Trades Council - Negotiations pending - peaker facility development with commitment to negotiate PLA.
Enron Power & Industrial Construction Co. (EPICc)
Coyote Springs II Project - Active agreement(s) governing the construction of the facility - Third party ownership is established. Agreements expire at commercial operation.
Longview Energy Development L.L.C. - Kelso Longview/Washington State Building & Construction Trades Council - negotiations dates pending Dec. 2001 anticipate a mirror of the Coyote Springs Agreement(s).

Please call if additional information is needed
Regards, Rj.


per our conversation
---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2000
04:02 PM ---------------------------

Lynn Aven@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
03/03/2000 07:11 AM
To: Sara Shackleton@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:
Subject: A new form of Bingo.

Here it is.

Lynn
---------------------- Forwarded by Lynn Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 03/03/2000
07:16 AM ---------------------------

"Hoffman, Catherine" <HoffmanC@EpEnergy.com> on 09/14/99 02:36:58 PM
To: "'Franck, Vic       tbs via internet'" <vic_franck@tennecotbs.com>,
"'Cleaver, Mark'" <mark.cleaver@trw.com>, Lynn
Aven/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: A new form of Bingo.

>      This is very appropriate game for playing while bored off your nut at
>
>      meetings.
>
>     <<bingo.doc>>

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please forward
the message to EMAdmin@epenergy.com
**********************************************************************
 - bingo.doc


The above referenced call has been scheduled as follows, please mark your
calendars:

Date:  Thursday, March 22

Time:  11:00am - 12:30pm (CST)

Number: 1-800-283-1805

Location: The War Room (EB4701)

The agenda for the call will be as follows:

                                                       1) The Strategy of the
campaign ...so far
                                                        2)Where we're
winning??
                                                        3) Where we're losing
                                                         4) What we're doing
right
                                                          5) What we're
doing  wrong
                                                          6) What we're not
doing
                                                           7) Where we go
from here

Lora - Please have Tom Briggs participate on behalf of Linda.  Thanks

gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 03/21/2001 11:14 AM -----

	Ginger Dernehl
	03/20/2001 03:01 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Linda Robertson/NA/Enron@ENRON, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Janel Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Joseph Alamo/NA/Enron@Enron, Cindy Derecskey/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lora
Sullivan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lysa Akin/PDX/ECT@ECT, Maureen
McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcia A Linton/NA/Enron@Enron, Linda J
Noske/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Conf. Call re: California

Rick would like to schedule a 90 minute conference call regarding
"California: A midcourse assessment of the campaign".  Please respond "ASAP"
which dates/times listed below will work best with your schedules.

Thursday, March 22  11:00am-12:30pm (CST)

Friday, March 23  10:30am - 12:00pm (CST)
    12:00pm - 1:30pm (CST)
    3:30pm - 5:00pm (CST)

gngr
713-853-7751


Thanks for your nice note.  Did you get the job?  I certainly hope so.

I appreciate your thoughts and prayers - both are very much needed!  We are all still somewhat in a state of shock over the state of the company.  I find myself working lots of hours on things that several months ago we wouldn't have thought about.  Life is always interesting - it may take a while to see where this twist is leading us, but I do know that it will be interesting!

--Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lynn Tippery" <ltippery@houston.rr.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, November 25, 2001 11:34 PM
To:	Beck, Sally; Friddle, Kimberly; Todd@Work
Subject:	Thank you

I wanted to thank you for the referral,it was nice of you to take the time.  Ireally appreciate it.
Ialso wanted to let you know that you are in my thoughts and prayers.  Iam so sorry things have gone the way they have.  I will be thinking of you and praying all week ,and the week after!
Please let meknow if there is anything at all that I can do.  Lord knows you've all taken care of me!
Iwish you nothing but the best!

LynnTippery
281 807-5966

mslegal searchltippery@mslegalsearch.com << File: mailto:ltippery@mslegalsearch.com >>
713 807-8500


EMAZING Home[IMAGE]Edit Your ProfilePrivacy

		Advice and Living - Brain Candy - Business and Money - Comics - Daybreakers -
Entertainment
		Espaol - Games - Good Thoughts - Grapevine - Greetings - Health - Hobbies -
Horoscopes
		Household Hints- Kitchen - Music - Sports - Style - Technology - Travel -
Wireless

		[IMAGE]

		  NO TIME TO READ?  NO PROBLEM!
		Join Audio Book Club and you can enjoy John Grisham's latest on the way to
work, get some good advice from John Gray or Suze Orman, or have Stephen King
read you a bedtime story. Whatever you're looking for, you are sure to find
it at Audio Book Club...and you'll also find one great deal! Join Audio Book
Club today and get 4 audiobooks for only 1 Penny. Click  here for more
details.

		Positive Living Tip of the Day
		Wednesday December 13, 2000

		Assert Yourself At Work

		Do you feel taken advantaged at your job? Are you being handed other people's
work? If so, it's time for you assert yourself and set boundaries to keep
your sanity.

		People who are considered the "saviors" on the job often have a fear of
rejection or are "people pleasers." To keep your sanity in check, you must be
willing to "rock the boat." Quitting is not the answer, because this scenario
will probably occur again in your next job. It is you who is creating
problems for you--not other people.

		Assert yourself by talking to your supervisor about how you feel about the
situation and how you wish to resolve it. (Have a solution in mind BEFORE you
approach your boss.) You'll feel better once you take some control over a
situation. Do not let your emotions keep you from gaining some control in
your work. This is where stress comes from: "The lack of control."

		- CG, Licensed Clinical Professional Counselor

		Email  this tip to a friend - Browse  the Archives

		Have a question for the writer of this tip? Please send it to us by clicking
on the feedback button! This tip is in no way a substitute for professional
advice. If you are dealing with a serious issue, please consult your
physician or other health professional.

		[IMAGE]

		The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
Greeting Cards! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions.

		Get satellite television in only one step.
		Click here for more information on FREE satellite TV!

		Want Coupons, FREESTUFF, & More? Click Into CoolSavings
		Visit CoolSavings and get coupons and great deals on the latest electronic
gadgets, clothes, toys, jewelry, and more!

		Don't spend Christmas without the Grinch...
		Save up to 40% at Amazon's Dr. Seuss Shop!

		End those last minute gift hassles forever!
		Try Flooz!  The online gift currency you send by email!

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		Tip Gift
		POSITIVE LIVING BOOK OF THE DAY
		Gary Arnold: Positive Thoughts for Successful Living

		Tip Gift
		MOVIE OF THE DAY
		Joseph - King of Dreams

		Book
		BOOK  OF THE DAY
		Martin Goldsmith: The Inextinguishable Symphony

		CD
		CD  OF THE DAY
		Creed: Human Clay

		Gift
		 GIFT  OF THE DAY
		RIM 950 Blackberry Internet Edition Wireless Handheld

		DVD
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (DVD)
		The Cars - Live at Musikladen

		VHS
		MOVIE  OF THE DAY (VHS)
		James Stewart: It's a Wonderful Life

		Quote
		QUOTE  OF THE DAY
		To climb steep hills requires slow pace at first.
		- William Shakespeare

		[IMAGE]
		[IMAGE]

		  The holidays are here!
		So get your warm wishes and season's greetings out to all with EMAZING's
Greeting Cards! They're fun, FREE, and cover all those merry, bright, and
seasonal occasions. Click  here for more details.

		[IMAGE]
		?
		Advertise - Company Info - Feedback - Help - Jobs - Privacy Policy - Terms &
Conditions
		Archives - Edit Your Profile -?Unsubscribe

		EMAZING.com is a service of EMAZING, INC. Copyright 2000. All Rights Reserved.
		EMAZING.com - Whatever you're into, we email it to you. FREE!
[IMAGE]


We have received the following notices:

1. On April 13, 2000, a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of
Limited Partnership of KN Marketing, L.P.  was filed with the Texas Secretary
of State, changing the name of the limited partnership to "ONEOK Texas Gas
Marketing, L.P.".    On May 4, 2000, a Certificate of Amendment to the
Certificate of Limited Partnership of ONEOK Texas Gas Marketing Company,
L.P.   was filed with the Texas Secretary of State, changing the name of the
limited partnership to "ONEOK Energy Marketing and Trading Company, L.P."
("ONEOK LP").

2. On April 27, 2000, a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of ONEOK Gas Marketing Company was filed with the Delaware
Secretary of State,  changing the name of the corporation to "ONEOK Energy
Marketing and Trading Company, II"  ("ONEOK II").

NOT YET EFFECTIVE   ---- BUT FYI

 We have Master Agreements in place with each of these entities.   We have
sent to ONEOK a Transfer and Termination Agreement under which  the following
will occur once it becomes effective.

1. Oneok II will assign all of its trades and its rights under its Master
Agreement to Oneok L.P.

2. The ONEOK LP Master Agreement will be terminated and all trades will be
done under the ONEOK II Master Agreement.

In summary, once the Transfer and Termination Agreement becomes effective,
all trades will be done with ONEOK LP under the ONEOK II Master Agreement
that was assigned to it.  Credit Support comes from the parent ONEOK Inc.
We will let you know when this becomes effective.

Susan D. Flynn
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB3806
Houston, Texas  77002
Phone:  713-853-0975
Fax:  713-646-3490


Over the past ninety-three years Delta Sigma Phi at the University of Texas
has continued to evolve and change.  We all have experiences and memories
within the fraternity that will last a lifetime.  Today Delta Sigma Phi is at
a crucial point in establishing itself as an organizational leader on
campuses both nationwide and at the University of Texas.

The key to the success of Delta Sigma Phi is recruiting high quality men.
Steps have already been taken by the Alumni Control Board and the
undergraduate chapter to recruit a better man.  Recently, the ACB has raised
semester scholarships for the highest GPA for an active and pledge to $250.
Also with the mortgage on the house paid for, the ACB now also provides free
semester rent in the house for double occupancy to any member that made a 3.5
GPA or better the previous semester.   This next fall we will have a full
house with four inhouse brothers qualifying for free rent.

During our time as undergraduates we lived the Eta Experience.  Our
friendships and memories were fueled by the statement "You join Delta Sigma
Phi for life."  All of us can reflect, as I have in my chapter advisor report
in the soon to be released newsletter, about the importance that the
fraternity has had on our lives.  However, the extending network of
brotherhood should not end when we graduate from school.  In an effort to
recruit the highest quality men it is necessary to provide an established
alumni base that is willing to work with members not only while they are in
school but also once they become alumni themselves.

I along with many of you have in the past become disenchanted with the
undergraduates for one reason or another.  I certainly do not approve of the
undergraduate actions of old.  However, today a good quality group of men
exist.  Grades are at the highest they've been since I've become involved
almost 3 years ago.  Long gone are the days of active members enrolled at
ACC, St Eds, or not even enrolled at all.  Times are definitely changing.

Part of that change includes the current undergraduate chapter and the ACB
proactively contacting Eta alumni to grow this network.  With the summer upon
us, the undergraduate members are asking for alumni to help in the recruiting
process.  A few of us in Austin, Houston, and Dallas have volunteered to take
undergraduates and rushees to small events: lunch, dinner, sporting events,
etc.  I invite all alumni to help the undergraduate chapter this summer as
well as in the future.  Please contact me by e-mail (MeliaTim@aol.com) or by
phone (512 707-0813), and I will put you and the undergraduates in your area
in touch.

YITBOS
Tim Lesko


I'm trying to meet a deadline at the moment, but are you free this
afternoon?  I have some information that can help a lot in that analysis.

Best,
Jeff

	Christopher F Calger/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/16/2001 12:19 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc: Tracy Ngo/ENRON@enronXgate
		 Subject: RE: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding
Creditworthiness

Thanks Jeff.  On a related note, we are trying to put together a financial
"headroom" forecast for DWR/State of California that goes out a few years and
shows:

Rate Revenues
less:  Utility gen costs
 QF costs
 DWR PPA's
 DWR spot purchases
Margin
Total Deficit

Bond Issue
Bond Principal & Interest

Would you know how to get something like that?

Regards,

Chris

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:12 AM
To: Calger, Christopher F.; Comnes, Alan; Shapiro, Richard; skean@enron.com;
Steffes, James; Yoder, Christian; Kaufman, Paul
Subject: Rate Agreement between DWR and the PUC Regarding Creditworthiness
Sensitivity: Confidential

FYI:  Just got off the phone with Michael Hoffman, who's one of two key
outside financial advisors to Davis on the electricity crisis. The
administration is trying to get a legally binding agreement between the PUC
and DWR to ensure that the PUC doesn't muck around with the money (via
utility rates) DWR requires to be creditworthy.  They were shooting for this
Friday to have a draft of the document read for folks to review, but it now
looks like it won't get resolved until (at the earliest) next week----seems
that the one PUC lawyer who can actually do the work is on vacation.  Go
figure.

Best,
Jeff


Mr. Carlson,

Upon further review,  I have made some additional corrections,  these are
minor however I would like to point these out to you prior to sending
documents for signature.   Please give me a call at your convenience to
discuss same.

Regards,
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


Hi there.

This is the letter Hancock is willing to give us in exchange for Hancock
getting a security interest in the escrow account. Any comments?

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/24/2001 07:00
AM ---------------------------

"PARKER, Isabel" <isabel.parker@freshfields.com> on 04/24/2001 01:47:09 AM
To: "Carolyn Campbell (E-mail)" <CCampbell@KSLAW.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)"
<kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Gregory F. Lang (E-mail)" <gregorylang@paulhastings.com>, "Jack Wallace
(E-mail)" <jwallace@jhancock.com>, "Amy Weed (E-mail)" <aweed@jhancock.com>,
"John Anderson (E-mail)" <jcsanderson@jhancock.com>, "BURKE, Ted (TDB)"
<ted.burke@freshfields.com>

Subject: Pegasus - ENA Entitlement Letter

This e-mail is confidential and may well also be legally privileged. If you
have received it in error, you are on notice of its status.  Please notify us
immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.
Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to
any other person:  to do so could be a breach of confidence.  Thank you for
your co-operation.  Please contact our
IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 20 7936 4000 Ext.2000 or email ITHelp@freshfields.com
if you need assistance.

Further to our email earlier today, please find attached a revised draft of
the entitlement letter, reflecting the comments of the noteholders.

Kind regards
Isabel

 - COMPARE001.DOC
 - NY003701393.DOC


Title: Mexico and Multiservice Contracts: What's the Deal?
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2812;

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2813;

***********************************************************************

Dear Mexico Gas and Power Client,

As you might be aware, Pemex is proposing a new type of service contract as a
way to increase E&P investment in nonassociated gas in the Burgos basin.
Originally, CERA was planning to have a luncheon in December to discuss the
current status of these integrated contracts. Our intention was to invite key
individuals from Pemex to discuss the proposed contracts with our clients.
Pemex has informed us, however, that they are unable to discuss the service
contracts with the private sector prior to their formal announcement of the
service contract structure. Until this constraint has been resolved, CERA has
decided to have a conference call detailed below. We look forward to your
participation.

Regards,

Mexico Gas and Power

**************************************************************************

TOPICS

*  Overview of proposed service contract structure

*  Assessing the attractiveness of the contracts

*  Expectations of future investment under proposed structure

FORMAT

Our speakers will address this topic for 30 minutes, with accompanying graphics
presented on the Internet, followed by an open question and answer period.

Speakers
*  Sondra Scott, CERA Director, Latin America

*  Alejandro Gonzalez, CERA Associate, Latin America

Time:

3:00 P.M. Eastern Time, Wednesday, December 5, 2001.

Eligibility:

Clients eligible to participate in this conference call are those who subscribe
to the CERA Mexico Gas and Power and Latin America Upstream Retainer Advisory
Services.

TO ENROLL

To enroll, please send a fax to Mary Rice at 617 576 8763 or send an e-mail to
mrice@cera.com before 5:00 P.M.EST, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2001. Please include
your name, company, and telephone number with your correspondence.

Enrollment is not mandatory but assists us in optimizing the conference
experience. If you are unable to pre-register, please follow the above URL,
click through to the Full Report, and follow the directions to participate on
the day of the call.

TO PARTICIPATE

Follow above URL and click through to the Full Report for instructions on how
to participate in the call (audio and internet information).

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Notification
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Mexico Gas & Power, Latin America Upstream

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


jeff-

could you get me access to a foward curve for pv, np, & sp? thanks for your
help.

matt


That's right.  Feed him milk -not beer
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Larry Orsi <Orsi@tconl.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Larry+20Orsi+20+3COrsi+40tconl+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:33 PM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	baby

Your suppose to feed a baby milk not  beer


The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days.  Please review.

Owner: Beth W Apollo
Report Name: General Expenses - Sept & Oct
Days In Mgr. Queue: 6

Owner: Kevin G Sweeney
Report Name: 11/09/2001
Days In Mgr. Queue: 6


Russell & Brad, Have you been able to get with United regarding Credit
approval for a Master SWAP Agreement ?  We have given them several quotes on
a collar this past week, but can't transact until we get the contracts in
place. (We need financial and physical contracts).  If you haven't reached
them, please let me know. The contact for credit issues is Leigh Prieto, CFO
and his number is 512-328-8184. The trading contact is Doyle Valdez. Thanks.


Mark-

Today, we received IBJ's responsive comments to the points that have been
raised, which are set forth below for your review.

IBJ has stated "In terms of CSA, as we are not ready for running collateral
operations, we still do not prefer to use the CSA."  During our recent
meeting they did not deny that IBJ had entered into CSAs with financial
institutions.  I note that IBJ also raised the point that Enron had a loan
from IBJ of roughly US$ 100,000,000.
Jonathan Whitehead has raised this issue with John Suttle to receive his
input.

IBJ's specific responses are quoted below as follows:-

"Part 1

(a)  Agreed not include Affiliates of PartyA.

(g)  We prefer to terminate the Transactions when as a result of merger as
for a party, a surviving party of such becomes materially weaker than before.

Part 3

We usually accept to deliver a copy the list of authorized signatures only.

Part 4

(f)Even though deleting the word "not" in this provision, we can net the
payments with respect to the same Transaction.   Due to our system
incapability, we are not able to net the payments with respect to two or more
Transactions in the same currency.

(h) Agreed.

Part 5

(a)  If your suggested language is included, a Non-defaulting Party has to
continue to make payment to a Defaulting Party with no payment obligation,
which does not seem realistic.  We prefer to terminate Transactions when an
Event of Default occurs.  We do not like to include the provision which
releases a technical error.

(c)  Agreed.

(e)  We propose 5 business days instead.

(g)  We do not think the definition of the Affiliate includes a party's
branch offices. If our branch have a deal with Enron Japan, we will amend
this Master Agreement to include such branch as Multibranch Office.  We heard
that in most jurisdictions of the world,  it is not effective to set-off the
obligations between a party and the other party's Affiliate.

(i)  Agreed to include this provision.

(j)  We do not prefer that a party could transfer its rights and obligations
without the other party's consent to even its Affiliates. We might not get
approval of the transfer from our Credit Department or such transfer might
cause an additional payment of tax or other cost.

(k)  We will revert to you later.

(m)  Agreed.

(n)  Agreed to include this provision.

Part 6

We still prefer to include the provisions relating to the Commodity
Transactions in the respective Confirmations."

I look forward to receiving your input.  I note that Jane McBride has started
here at Enron Japan, therefore I have copied her on this correspondence.
Looking forward to seeing you in Houston soon.

Best regards,

John
----- Forwarded by John Viverito/Corp/Enron on 09/19/2000 04:15 AM -----

	John Viverito
	09/07/2000 04:54 AM

		 To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Mark-

Thanks for your input.  I agree with all of the comments you have raised.  As
to Part 5 (n), the use of the English language is not uncommon in Japan with
regard to these types of arrangements and should be insisted upon for
transactions under the ISDA documentation.

I think that it will be useful to better understand Japanese market practice
relating to the use of the Credit Support Annex. Therefore, I have asked
Baker & McKenzie to provide a clear picture as to the situation in Japan and
will provide this information upon receipt.

Following receipt of John Suttle's comments, I will prepare the response to
IBJ based on the points that have been raised by both you and John.

Thanks,

John

	Mark Taylor@ECT
	09/06/2000 09:00 PM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

 I had a brief conversation this morning with John Suttle (Credit) and it
looks like he's going to insist on the CSA.  We are going to talk tomorrow
and go through the whole agreement to get the rest of his comments.  While we
have documentation for transactions entered into prior to execution of a
master agreement, the extent of their revisions makes me very uneasy.  Many
of these points are very serious and if they can not agree we will have
trouble coming to agreement even on the short form documents.  It would be
helpful if they could explain the changes rather than just sending us a
mark-up.

Following are my points responsive to their revisions:

Part 1 (a)  The addition of our affiliates has the affect of expanding the
possible defaults too broadly and we cannot agree to these changes (for
example, this would mean that if any Enron affiliate went into bankruptcy
this agreement would be in default).

(g)  This provision provides additional flexibility without any credit risk
to the other party.  It should remain in place unless IBJ can articulate a
reason to remove it.

Part 3 The language inserted is much to vague.  Our original version spells
out exactly what is expected of the parties.  If the documents we listed are
not acceptable, IBJ should tell us now what would be acceptable and if we
agree we will put it in the agreement.

Part 4 (f)  By deleting the word "not" in this provision, IBJ is saying that
payments due to each other with respect to the same transaction will not net
(i.e. if we are paying fixed and they are paying floating, we each have to
make the full payment to the other rather than netting the two amounts to one
payment).  This is not acceptable.

(h) If IBJ will use their NY branch as agent, we should use Enron Corp or ENA.

Part 5 (a) Our suggested language allows the purchaser of an option to
receive payments due even though technically in default under another
provision of the agreement.  Our position is that if there are no other
possible payment requirements due from the purchaser, the option should be
honored.

(c)  The section we delete requires that the market makers be in the same
city.  For many markets in which we participate, it is very difficult, if not
impossible, to find multiple market makers in the same city.

(e)  The change to 10 business days is much too long.  This means we can not
have certainty as to the terms of the transaction for two weeks!  We can go
as high as three days if necessary but even that is beyond common market
practice.

(g)  Their changes remove the ability to set off against obligations owed to
multiple Enron companies if they default and only allows set-off with each
IBJ branch as a separate entity.  This may not be an issue if we will never
trade or otherwise transact with them in any other Enron company and if we
will never do business with any other branch of IBJ.  We usually don't like
to restrict ourselves that way.

(i)  We absolutely insist on the confidentiality of our transactions.  If
there is some revision to this section they would like we can discuss it but
wholesale deletion is out of the question.

(j)  As with Part 1 (g) this section adds flexibility to both parties while
maintaining flexibility within the corporate family.  Given the frequency
with which Enron moves businesses around within the family, this section is
important to us.

(k)  This section results from an experience we had with a counterparty that
went into bankruptcy (and therefore default) while they were in the money.
We disputed the amount owed and under the terms of the agreement (without our
revision) we would have owed them interest at their cost of funds - a rather
high rate given their status as a bankrupt.  We feel the non-default rate is
more appropriate.

(m)  I can't imagine why they wouldn't want this section included - it
protects us both.

(n)  You know more about this than I.

Part 6  These are all important issues for us and we can discuss them
individually if they object for some articulated reason.  If these provisions
are not included here they will need to be included in each confirmation (a
significant burden for our back office systems which are not set up for it)
and we need to know now if they object to any of them.

Other revisions that they have made are acceptable unless Credit objects.  I
hope this is helpful and sorry to have run on so long.  I'm happy to discuss
any of these issues at greater length if you want.  It sounds to me like
IBJ's expectations regarding execution of documents are a bit high given the
volume and nature of their comments.

	John Viverito@ENRON
	09/05/2000 09:06 PM

		 To: Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com@ECT, Kevin Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steven
Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Tom-

As far as the progress on the ISDA documentation, I am awaiting feedback from
both legal and credit in Houston.

Could you provide me with the details of the proposed transaction(s).  I note
that I have copied Mark Taylor on this correspondence, as I will need to get
his input regarding our most efficient going forward strategy.

Thanks,

John

	Tom Bruce-Jones@ECT
	09/05/2000 09:36 AM

		 To: John Viverito/Corp/Enron@ENRON
		 cc: Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com, Steven Kleege/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin
Cordesman/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

John
I have just had IBJ on the phone again asking for a progress report on the
ISDA docs.  Have we managed to move this forward, bearing in mind Labour Day,
since he is very keen to commence trading on Monday next.  He suggested that
he would be comfortable in trading prior to the implementation of the docs
for these initial trades as per Jonathon's previous comments in past mails.
Are we comfortable doing this if we cannot resolve the issues on the docs?

They are also very keen to see the draft confirms for the proposed trade
(Steve, I have just heard from Rob in the vid conf that the proposed volumes
may prove difficult to take on the books??).  Please advise as to our
capability so that I can convey this to him in the morning.

Best regards
Tom

From: John Viverito@ENRON on 01/09/2000 02:48 CDT
To: "Yamato Konishi" <yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp>
cc: hirohide.yabuki@ibjbank.co.jp, Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com,
kazunobu.maeda@ibjbank.co.jp, teruyo.suzuki@ibjbank.co.jp,
Tom.Bruce-Jones@enron.com

Subject: Re: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Dear Mr. Konishi-

Thank you for your comments.  We will attempt to respond to you prior to the
holiday in the US, but if we are unable to do so, we will respond shortly
thereafter.

Best regards,

John Viverito

	"Yamato Konishi" <yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp>
	09/01/2000 02:31 AM

		 To: <John.Viverito@enron.com>
		 cc: <Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com>, "Tom Bruce-Jones"
<Tom.Bruce-Jones@enron.com>, "teruyo.suzuki" <teruyo.suzuki@ibjbank.co.jp>,
"Maeda san" <kazunobu.maeda@ibjbank.co.jp>, "hirohide.yabuki"
<hirohide.yabuki@ibjbank.co.jp>
		 Subject: Fw: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

Dear Mr.Viverito

Attached Word file is ISDA draft amended by our legal desk.
(please take the amended points as our comment on your draft)
Please check it all and kindly reply ASAP.
(CSA is not acceptable as I mentioned you before, and we'll check your
LETTER OF CREDIT after
the schedule is almost agreed)

In your draft, we cannot understand the meaning of "EDGAR" on page4,
so please show us what it is.

We are very hoping to conclude this process rapidly.
So, I very much appreciate it if you could send back your comment before
Holiday in U.S.(4th Sep)
(it's ok if only the rough prospects of concluding ISDA)

Best regards,
Konishi IBJ Tokyo
81-3-3214-1008
----- Original Message -----
From: "Teruyo Suzuki" <teruyo.suzuki@ibjbank.co.jp>
To: "Yamato Konishi" <yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT

> ISDA DraftI_X"?,d`-t,?,?,?,?,?_B-?-O
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yamato Konishi" <yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp>
> To: <John.Viverito@enron.com>
> Cc: <Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com>; "Tom Bruce-Jones"
> <Tom.Bruce-Jones@enron.com>; "teruyo.suzuki"
<teruyo.suzuki@ibjbank.co.jp>;
> "Maeda san" <kazunobu.maeda@ibjbank.co.jp>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:59 PM
> Subject: Re: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT
>
>
> > Dear Mr.Viverito
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Now we start checking your draft and maybe we can return comment on this
> > Friday.
> >
> > Please be advised following points at this time.
> > 1)Part 6 on the schedule is needed to be deleted.
> >   We think that it's enough if the terms in Part 6 are referred in the
> > individual confirmation.
> > 2)ISDA Credit support annex is not acceptable
> >   Unfortunately, we don't have internal system for concluding CSA with
> > non-financial entity.
> >
> > Please keep support us for concluding ISDA ASAP for our business in near
> > future.
> > If any question, please feel free to contact me.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Konishi /IBJ Tokyo 81-3-3214-1008
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <John.Viverito@enron.com>
> > To: <yamato.konishi@ibjbank.co.jp>
> > Cc: <Jonathan.Whitehead@enron.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 5:31 PM
> > Subject: IBJ ISDA MASTER AGREEMENT
> >
> >
> > > Dear Mr. Konishi,
> > >
> > > Attached hereto, is the draft ISDA documentation, for your review.
> > > Included are the Schedule, the Credit Support Annex and the Enron
Corp.
> > > Guaranty.
> > >
> > > I apologize for the delay in the preparation and distribution of these
> > > documents.
> > >
> > > We look forward to receiving your comments.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > John Viverito
> > >
> > >
> > > (See attached file: IBJ Schedule 30.08.00.doc)(See attached file: IBJ
> CSA
> > > 30.08.00.doc)(See attached file: IBJ EC guarantee 30.08.00.doc)
> >
> >
>

 - IBJ Schedule 31.08.00.doc


We are moving forward to transfer the positions from the emissions books (SO2
and NOx) to the coal group at close of business 5/23/00.  The SO2 marks for
both the underlying and volatility positions currently in the 2007 through
2010 timeframe create a value differential of $2.6 million between our
evaluation and their marks.  For the sake of not continuing the unproductive
task of negotiating this value, we will move forward to transfer despite our
differences.

I strongly recommend continuing to use and pay for all personnel in risk,
documentation and settlement that currently perform these duties for
emissions.
I would like to utilize these resources until further notice.  I am not
comfortable committing to any transfer of risk, documentation and settlement
duties until we have the time to evaluate this further.  I would appreciate
if you could help on this matter to ensure a smooth transition.

KJM


Title: Conference Call with OPEC'S President--Chakib Khelil, Minister of Energy and Mines of Algeria
URL(s):

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2786;

http://www.cera.com/eprofile?u=35&m=2787;

***********************************************************************

In a November 15, 2001 CERA Global Energy conference call, OPEC President
Chakib Khelil commented on recent discussions and decisions by OPEC, and their
implications for world crude oil prices and the global economy.

Follow above URL and click on the Related Research for access to the Internet
playback of this conference call.

A telephone recording of this call is also available until December 15, 2001.
To access this recording, please call +1-888-203-1112 (within the US) or
+1 719 457-0820 (outside the US). Please use confirmation number 680310
to access the recording.

**end**

E-mail Category: Conference Call Notification
CERA Knowledge Area(s): Global Energy, Global Oil

***********************************************************************
**************************************************************************************
CERAWeek February 11-15, 2002 - http://www.cera.com/ceraweek

SPECIAL OFFER: Register on-line before November 30th, and a 2-Day Pass
will be upgraded to a 4-Day Pass (maximum $1,800 value).
Day 1: Global Oil/Refined Products;
Day 2: Natural Gas/Global Energy;
Day 3 & 4: Electric Power
**************************************************************************************

To make changes to your cera.com profile go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/updateaccount

Forgot your username and password? Go to:
http://www.cera.com/client/forgot

This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2001. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


REMINDER ! ! ! ! !

You are enrolled in the following.

What: Wellhead to BurnerTip

When: May 3 & 4

Where: EB52

Time:  8:00 am - 5:00 pm  (1st day)
  8:00 am - 12 Noon (2nd day)

Please be on time.

Gracie
3-3985


i hope it becomes a hurricane too.  huricanne = $$$$ for me.  call me when
you get back from your 3 week vacation.  it must be really hard over there at
deloit.


As per the most recent list in compliance please set up the list as:
Jeff Kinneman
Paul Pizzolato
Chris Helfrich

The Anker bonds and pref. stock will be going into this account.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:43 PM
To:	Doukas, Tom; Kinneman, Jeff
Cc:	Lowry, Donna
Subject:	ECT Europe/Bear Stearns Account

We have been advised by Mary Kay Lemont that Bear Stearns will not open this new account until they have all corporate documentation in place.  ECT Europe Finance, Inc. does not have resolutions authorizing the opening of brokerage accounts, so we are currently preparing corporate resolutions to circulate for signature.

Will the authorized traders in this account be those authorized to trade on Enron Credit's behalf?  If so, will you provide me with a current list?

Additionally, is this the only position that will be in this account?

Thanks!

Marie


If made to choose, I'm for Option a) below.

Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:40 PM
To:	Rodriquez, Andy; Steffes, James D.; Bestard, Jose
Subject:	RE: Enron Response to Dave Nevius

Good mark ups.  Thanks.
Originally, I purposely excluded acknowledging the need for a forum to develop non-physical/pure financial standards.  I was not sure if this was an issue we could win buy-in from other marketers that NERC establish business practices.

However, on the EPSA-NAERO Working Group conference call today, one member suggested we alert NERC and FERC to the fact that "business practices" have the hardest impact on the marketers and IPPs.  And if NERC is going there - then the likes of EPSA and ELCON become the major staekholders in that forum.  I think this is a great twist to the old "reliablity first approach" of NERC  and can give us major leverage.  I will bolster this point in the write-up.

EPSA will draft a letter to be sent to Mike Gent explaining what EPSA members support.  It will be based upon a "checklist" of issues similar to this write-up.  I would like to get this write-up into Mark Bennett's hands to incorporate into the letter and see if other EPSA members can support it.  We may still want to send this write-up directly to Dave Nevius and Mike Gent since, they approached us directly.

Additionally, EPSA members agreed that we should continue the parallel development of EISB and NERC.  But - take an active role in the formation of the 4th quadrant of EISB.  DOE has offered to host a forum for an industry effort to kick-start the 4th quadrant.  Mark Bennett has been talking with Rae McQuade at GISB and she told him that NERC, as an organization, cannot be folded under the EISB umbrella.  FERC would have liked such a simple solution, they want the expertise/experience of NERC - and the fair process of GISB.  So, the challenge is
a) migrate the NERC expertise into the EISB, or
b) transform the NERC structure into an EISB like structure

NERC is proceeding at Warp Factor 10 in making a transition into the new One-Stop Shop. EPSA members believe that NERC leading this charge will certainly result in the marketers geting the short endf as we did with the Blue Ribbon Panel of a few years ago.  EPSA members want an open and inclusive forum for shaping the new organization.  That is the justification for participating in the DOE sponsored forum - to challenge NERC leading this charge.  This concern will also be expressed in the EPSA letter.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rodriquez, Andy
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 2:52 PM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Yeung, Charles; Bestard, Jose
Subject:	RE: Enron Response to Dave Nevius

Some additional comments to Jim's.

 << File: Enron Principles on New SSO1 - AJR.doc >>
Andy Rodriquez
Regulatory Affairs - Enron Corp.
andy.rodriquez@enron.com
713-345-3771

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 1:59 PM
To:	Yeung, Charles; Bestard, Jose; Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	RE: Enron Response to Dave Nevius

Here are my thoughts.  Use as you see fit.

Jim

 << File: Enron Principles on New SSO.doc >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Yeung, Charles
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:36 AM
To:	Steffes, James D.; Bestard, Jose
Cc:	Rodriquez, Andy
Subject:	Enron Response to Dave Nevius

A working draft for your comments.  Please do not distribute.

 << File: ENRONprinciples10-01.doc >>


Greetings:

My apologies for the delay in sending out this message.

We will be holding a PR call tomorrow at 11:00 a.m. to discuss this week's
session as well as ongoing PR efforts responsive to recent announcements and
what we are doing to move forward.

Agenda Includes:

o McNally/Temple Update/Upcoming issues

o Edson/Modisette Update/upcoming issues

o Upcoming Meetings
o Coalition Building

The call in number is 888-232-0365
Pass code: 111756

Let me know if you want to add anything to the rough agenda.
Thanks!

Katie Kaplan
Manager of State Policy Affairs
Independent Energy Producers Association
(916) 448-9499


Michelle,
Helen, Cecil, David (just joined the effort) and I had a meeting this
morning. A lot of things regarding
the coding has been discussed. We all felt good about the progress that has
been made
and have clear idea of how to proceed.  The project is speeding up nicely.

Best,
Alex


We may be overdrawling our storage MDWQ by 800dth. Hope it goes on a retro.


non-smoking


I use Lexis and am interested in learning how to do legal research better,
faster and simpler, but can that be set up at our individual work stations
rather than downstairs??  Maria

	From:  Dari Dornan                           12/06/2000 01:03 PM

To: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann
Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON

Subject: Re: Lexis Nexis/Legal and Windows 2000

i use Lexis but not Lexis Nexis.  Dari

MARTHA
BENNER
12/06/2000 07:36 AM

To: Maria Pavlou/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jim Talcott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dari Dornan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kathy
Ringblom/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ann Smith/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Lexis Nexis/Legal and Windows 2000

Who uses this application in our department?   Others?

Thanks.....Martha
---------------------- Forwarded by Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron on 12/06/2000
07:32 AM ---------------------------
From: Jean Mcfarland/ENRON@enronxgate on 12/05/2000 04:43 PM
To: Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Lexis Nexis/Legal and Windows 2000

Martha -- do you use Lexis Nexis?  Can you come down into my area and test
Lexis Nexis and other apps Legal may use?

Thanks.  Jean


Elizabeth and Mark,  it may also be useful to look at this suggested alternative.  Again, we do not have any agenda in terms of which is the "right" method, but we are just trying to figure out what works in the bandwidth context.  All thoughts gratefully received.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Traung, Peter
Sent:	12 July 2001 19:12
To:	Harkness, Cynthia
Cc:	Browning, Mary Nell
Subject:	Section 5.4 of the new draft MSA

Cynthia, subject to further amendment this is what we're planning to use instead of the structure in the June 22 draft:

(i)	If an Early Termination Date is designated, the Defaulting Party shall compensate the Non-Defaulting Party for the Loss, if any, caused the Non-Defaulting Party with respect to each Terminated Product.  The amount of a Loss shall be determined by reference to (i) the prices available within [thirty (30)] Business Days after the Early Termination Date in an arm's length transaction for a replacement product, or (ii) the price agreed in a cover transaction effected within [thirty (30)] Business Days after the Early Termination Date.  No actual purchase or sale shall be required in order to determine a Loss.  Any cover transaction shall be effected in a reasonable manner and on the best available terms.  In no event shall the Non-Defaulting Party be required to use its own market position in order to effect a cover transaction.
(ii)	If the Non-Defaulting Party has suffered Loss, the sum of such Loss shall be payable to the Non-Defaulting Party by the Defaulting Party on the date specified in Section 5.5.  The amount payable by a Party pursuant to this Section 5.4(ii) shall be the "Termination Payment".

"Loss" means an amount equal to the difference between the present value of the Contract Price for the remaining Term and the present value of the cost for a replacement product.  With respect to the Buyer, a Loss shall have occurred if such replacement cost is higher than the Contract Price for the remaining Term.  With respect to the Seller, a Loss shall have occurred if such replacement cost is lower than the Contract Price for the remaining Term.
This takes the place of the present 5.4(i)-(ii), and the definition of Gain is deleted.

Peter Traung
Senior Legal Counsel
Enron Europe Limited
DD +44-20-7783 2443
Fax +44-20-7783 1434


Julie:  the price should be $3.54.  Thanks.


Below I have attached the "Enfolio Master Sale/Purchase Agreement".  Please
note that Exhibit C (ENFOLIO MASTER FIRM PURCHASE/SALE AGREEMENT-GUARANTY
AGREEMENT) is no longer a required document to complete the transaction;
therefore, please discard.

Please print and execute two copies of the Enfolio Agreement along with the
two Transaction Agreements which should arrive via Federal Express later
today.

Please feel free to call with any questions.

Thanks,

Chris
713-853-1666


Since our meeting on Tuesday, we completed additional research on the invoices from the pipeline.  I have attached a spreadsheet that provides summaries of the invoiced amounts and details of the cash out charges for gas and penalties.  Also attached is a few pages of the pipeline tariff that addresses the required process for the pipeline to collect demand/reservation fees from the Releasing Shippers, Boston Gas and NYSEG, if the Replacement Shippers, ENA and EES, do not make on-time payments.

SUMMARY

For the capacity release contracts, it appears that Tennessee  is using the bankruptcy filing to satisfy their tariff requirements of issuing non-payment notice, and termination notice due to non-payment that are required before the pipeline can bill the Releasing Shippers, Boston Gas and NYSEG, for the reservation charges that were not paid by ENA and EES.  I have not been able to find any other letters sent to Enron from Tennessee regarding non-payment.  See attached Sheet No. 337A, 338, 355, 356 and 405.
The Boston Gas capacity release deal appears to be the largest $ amount of Tennessee's claim.  For November and December, $374,500.00 of the claim is associated with the reservation fees of Boston Gas' contract.  For January, $373,660.00 is the reservation fee.  The remaining portion of the bills are commodity and commodity surcharge expenses.  For the months of February and March, ENA posted a capacity release transaction on the pipeline EBB.  Each month, the deal was posted at 100% maximum rate transaction with Boston Gas as the pre-arranged party.  Therefore there should not be a continuing for those months.  At Boston Gas' request, both postings specified that the releases were subject to bid.
Tennessee's listing of contracts in the bankruptcy filing excludes the five contracts designated as "ENA Agent-Nomination and Billing".  This makes sense in that ENA was just a middle-man and transportation charges were being passed through to the customer.  Tennessee must be billing the customers directly!
For the Cash Out and Level Charges (i.e. penalties), there are two summaries that describe the information that you requested.  I believe that it is important to distinguish between current and prior month.  Current month imbalance numbers are usually tracked by the pipeline and are available to shippers with a couple of day lag time.  Prior month imbalances are made by the pipeline when accounting problems and issues result in reallocations of shipper volumes.  For example, in the Dec 2001 invoice dated 1/14/2002 for ENA's K# 80045, current month imbalance was 34,266 Dth due the pipeline or $92,323.29.  Since gas was due the pipeline, a Level Charge or $38,997.33 was also due the pipeline.  Prior month cash outs of 134,869 Dth or $887,821.20 due ENA also appeared in the same bill.  This adjustment covered the months of Oct 2000 through April 2001.  Another prior period adjustment will probably be made by the pipeline for May 2001 through December 2001 time period.  Please note that the Average $/Unit price is a simple average and not what is shown as the cash out gas price on the invoice.
For ENA, the storage agreement was used post-petition so that the storage inventory could be withdrawn.  It is my understanding that ENA has not paid the invoices yet.  There may be an issue whether or not the discounted rate was in effect for the last month that withdrawals took place.  ENA is waiting to see what the billed rate is before a payment is made to the pipeline.
EES's LMSMA balancing agreement is tied to serving one of EES's former customers.  The pipeline has expressed an interest in retroactively transferring this agreement and obligations over to the new supplier.  We are still trying to get additional information on the timing from EES.
As you can tell from the summary, there is some miscellaneous charges that have popped up.  One is clearly designated as a Late Payment Charge.  The others could probably fall into a similar category.

We have tried to summarize the facts.  I will leave it up to you to decide whether the amounts are prepetition or post petition.

Ruth
713-853-1667
ruth.concannon@enron.com


Chris what is the deal number to this  incremental tkt??????

---------------------- Forwarded by Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT on 02/01/2000
03:21 PM ---------------------------
From: Joan Veselack@ENRON on 01/31/2000 05:54 PM
To: Dick Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Hendrickson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Fixed price deal - PLEASE READ

Is this note to Brian below incremental gas????????

Meaning... Joann has a number about 250,000/day given to her by the LDC
Schedulers. This includes daily volume:

Who    Volume  Sitara Deal Ticket
CES Endusers    93689  143336
Choice    107489  148416
South Jersey   36900  142776
Penn Fuel   5000  151759
Hopewell   4500  139679
Texaco    255  136502
Engage   1966  142656
Florida Power and Light  152  151788

Total    249,951

Is there a way to put all incremental gas on one deal ticket??? It would make
our pathing life a lot easier too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Chris Germany@ECT
01/31/2000 03:41 PM
To: bperron@columbiaenergy.com
cc: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joan Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Fixed price deal

I believe you did a fixed priced deal with Craig Taylor.  The price is
$3.06.  Could you get me the meter numbers?  This is what I have so far

COH Mrkt Area Monthly Vol Meter
7 5  700
7 1  1141
7 1  682
7 5  1993
7 5  2881
8 5  5534
9 5  12309
5 2  1577


We are pleased to announce organizational changes to the Enron South America
legal department in response to the recent reorganization and realignment of
the principal Enron Wholesale Services business units operating in the
region, Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets.

Randy Young, currently General Counsel of ESA, will be assuming new
responsibilities within Enron.  John Novak will become General Counsel of
ESA, reporting to Mark Haedicke.  The ESA legal department will be
responsible for supporting all Enron Americas and Enron Global Assets
businesses in the region.  Additional legal resources, coordinated by Lance
Schuler, will be provided from EWS Legal in Houston to support ESA's
wholesale activities.  John will also work closely with Bruce Lundstrom,
General Counsel of EGA, to coordinate legal support with respect to the EGA
businesses in the region.  An organizational chart describing the new
structure is attached.

This new structure will enable us to continue to provide quality legal
support across business lines within South America while improving
coordination and providing additional support from Houston for Enron's
existing operating businesses, as well as the new business development
initiatives under way in the region.


FYI.  Also, are you all on this SPP email list?  If so, I can get off it.
Let me know.  Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Christi L Nicolay/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001
04:33 AM ---------------------------

"Gibson, Barbara" <bgibson@SPP.ORG>@spplist.spp.org on 04/30/2001 10:38:48 AM
Please respond to "Gibson, Barbara" <bgibson@SPP.ORG>
Sent by: bounce-operations-1560@spplist.spp.org
To: "Operations Information" <operations@spplist.spp.org>
cc: "Taylor, John" <JTaylor@SPP.ORG>, "Perry, Kevin" <KPerry@SPP.ORG>,
"Kirby, Josh" <jkirby@SPP.ORG>, "Friddle, Jarrett" <jfriddle@SPP.ORG>,
"'sppteam@oatiinc.com'" <sppteam@oatiinc.com>

Subject: RTO_SS Parallel Test Sessions

The SPP members completed the first of several scheduled parallel test
sessions of the new electronic scheduling system, RTO_SS.  This first
session was held on Friday, April 27 from 9am CDT to 1pm CDT.  There
were a total of 9 SPP Control Areas that participated during this
session.  Those Control Areas included; WR, KCPL, CSWS, WPEK, GRDA, MPS,
SPS, SPA, and CLEC.  Many thanks to all those companies that
participated!  We are hoping for a higher turnout at the next session.
If you do not plan to participate during these parallel test sessions,
please contact Barbara Gibson so arrangements can be made for your
schedule approvals.

These parallel test sessions are excellent opportunities for training
and practice on the new system with live data being imported into
RTO_SS.  During the times that parallel testing is NOT in session, users
can test additional functionality by creating their own sample tags and
taking the various actions on those associated schedules, i.e.
approving, denying, adjusting, canceling, etc.  The system is available
to users 24 hours per day.

There will be 3 more parallel test sessions this week and finally 3
sessions the following week. The sessions this week are scheduled for:

Tuesday, May 1 - 9am CDT - 1pm CDT
Wednesday, May 2 - 9am CDT - 1pm CDT
Friday, May 4 - 12pm CDT - 4pm CDT

Please refer to the attached document for more details regarding logins,
test information, etc.

We still do not have many sources and sinks set up for the different
Generation Providers and Load Serving Entities that wish to have direct
approval rights on the schedules.  If you are a GP or LSE and need to
get this data set up, please call Barbara Gibson or Shari Brown at SPP.

If you have any trouble with RTO_SS please contact someone listed below:

Barbara Gibson, 501-664-0146 x245, bgibson@spp.org
Shari Brown, 501-664-0146 x23, sbrown@spp.org
Josh Kirby, 501-664-0146 x306, jkirby@spp.org

Regards,

Barbara Gibson
Supervisor, Applications Development
Southwest Power Pool
501-664-0146 x245
bgibson@spp.org

 - RTOSS_User_Testing.doc


Dear Vince,

Thank You!  I feel much better now.

Sam

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
11/15/2000 07:31 AM
To: William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: the next newsletter

Sam,

Good thinking. I shall also write an article over the weekend so we shall
have one in reserve.

Vince

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  William Smith @ ENRON                           11/15/2000 07:17 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Elena Chilkina/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: the next newsletter

Good Morning, Vince!

As I will be on vacation (tomorrow until Monday the 27th), I'm enlisting
Elena Chilkina's help in producing this Monday's (20 Nov.) newsletter.
Here's how I hope it will work:

I've asked Alex Huang to try to get his article to you by Friday for your
review.
I'm attempting to get with Sharad today to get his photo and remind him about
the bio piece for page one.  He should be the feature for Monday.
I will also schedule a person and an article (probably from Charlie Weldon)
for the 27th.  If Alex's article is a two-parter, we'll just do part 2 that
day instead.
For all submissions for this coming Monday's issue, I would ask that they be
e-mailed to Elena Chilkina

If you notice something I may have missed,  would you please let me know?

Thank You!

Sam


Apologies.  I need to get off and do this new assignement that Kean just gave
me.  Jeff


All, Please see attached Thanksgiving Holiday Coverage schedule for my team and have a Great Turkey Day!

Team:  If I have missed anyone, please forward.

Thanks!  Elaine

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Perales, Maria
Sent:	Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:57 PM
To:	Apodaca, Vera; Attasseril , Finney; Baker, Lee; Brasher, Barney; Brassfield, Morris; Carriere, Frank; Centilli, James; Chandler, Bob; Clements, David; Concklin, Elaine; Craig, Rick; Dickens-Wilson, Shirley Jo; Fancler, Dan; Hawkins, Don; Johnson, David L.; Keller, John R.; Kleb, Steve; Martin, Jerry D.; Patel, Sophie; Perales, Maria; Phan, Kim; Prendergast, Pat; Shafer, John; Smilenova, Rositza; Villasenor, Amy ; Vo, Hoang; Walters Jr., Harry; Young, Debra ; Zahn, Gary
Subject:	Financial Planning - Houston Operations Bullets for week ending 11/16/01

Elaine Concklin
Enron Transportation Services
Director Financial Planning
Operations Support Services
1400 Smith St.   Suite 3AC-3311
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 853-5521
Elaine.Concklin@Enron.com


The graph on page 6 of the following Power Point presentation should print
out more clearly than the original version.  In addition, a few minor
changes were incorporated on other slides in the presentation.
(See attached file: 5-11-01 Participants' Committee Financial Report.ppt)
----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.
 - 5-11-01 Participants' Committee Financial Report.ppt


This looks a lot better to me.  What do you guys think?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT on
07/21/99 01:33 PM ---------------------------

Justin Boyd
07/21/99 12:56 PM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Sefton/LON/ECT@ECT, Louise
Kitchen/LON/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT,
andrew.wilkinson@cliffordchance.com, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Proposed revised collateral clause for Online GTCs

Following my earlier conversation with Mark Taylor I have revised the text,
as attached.  This limits the form of collateral to letters of credit.

Comments/questions.........

Thanks

Justin


3461176

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Larry Orsi <Orsi@tconl.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Larry+20Orsi+20+3COrsi+40tconl+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:57 AM
To:	Tholt, Jane M.
Subject:	Phone #

Whats your dads phone number.  I want to see if he will golf with Stan
and I on Friday morning.


I would like to receive the alerts.

D

Brandee Jackson@ENRON
02/07/2001 10:50 AM
To: Suzanne Calcagno/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert Superty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob M
Hall/NA/Enron@Enron, Donna Greif/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane H Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor
Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, George F Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L
Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patti Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: E-mails

Are you interested in receiving these alerts?
   Please advise.

---------------------- Forwarded by Brandee Jackson/NA/Enron on 02/07/2001
10:50 AM ---------------------------

Lyelle Bellard
02/07/2001 10:28 AM
To: Laura Vuittonet/Corp/Enron@Enron, Ina Rangel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky
Young/NA/Enron@Enron, Kimberly Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT, Airam Arteaga/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jessica Presas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Heather Choate/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth
Soto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brandee Jackson/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Steve Bigalow/NA/Enron@Enron

Subject: E-mails

Please send the e-mail addresses of the traders in your group, to Steve
Bigalow, he will put them on an alert list for reversal signals on the gas
charts

           Thank You
           Lyelle J. Bellard


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 03/16/2001 12:16 PM -----

	"Daniel Douglass" <Douglass@ArterHadden.com>
	03/16/2001 11:56 AM

		 To: <Barbara_Klemstine@apsc.com>, <Vicki_Sandler@apses.com>,
<berry@apx.com>, <dcazalet@apx.com>, <billr@calpine.com>,
<jackp@calpine.com>, <Ken_Czarnecki@calpx.com>, <gavaughn@duke-energy.com>,
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, <gtbl@dynegy.com>, <jmpa@dynegy.com>,
<jbarthrop@electric.com>, <mnelson@electric.com>, <RSchlanert@electric.com>,
<jdasovic@enron.com>, <susan_j_mara@enron.com>, <Tamara_Johnson@enron.com>,
<curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, <counihan@greenmountain.com>, <foothill@lmi.net>,
<athomas@newenergy.com>, <bchen@newenergy.com>, <kmagruder@newpower.com>,
<pbray@newpower.com>, <camiessn@newwestenergy.com>,
<jcgardin@newwestenergy.com>, <jsmollon@newwestenergy.com>,
<rsnichol@newwestenergy.com>, <jeff.hanson@phaser.com>,
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, <Curtis_L_Kebler@reliantenergy.com>,
<AWeller@sel.com>, <anchau@shellus.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Lawsuit Against Edison

Looks like there may have just been a shareholder's derivative action filed
against Edison.  The following is a summary from lawsuits filed yesterday in
Los Angeles US District Court for the Central district of California:

Gerald King v. Edison Int,l, Southern California Edison Co., John Bryson,
Theodore Craver, Thomas Noonan, Kenneth Stewart

"Complaint for violation of the federal securities laws. Defendants failed to
adequately disclose material facts concerning the cash flow, liquidity and
financial condition of Edison and SCE, including material facts concerning
increased costs and known future costs for purchases of electricity,
"undercollections" in SCE,s Transition Revenue Account, adverse decisions of
the California Public Utilities Commission and the need to write off billions
of dollars as a result of CPUC,s decisions."

Let me know if anyone would like a copy of this complaint.

Dan


Dana,

Here what I think will work for cash:

5/14/01-5/18/01
Monday   Susan
Tuesday   Susan
Wednesday  Both -- go over all instructions and inform Rufino, Brad and, Lisa Kang about you doing cash!!!
Thursday Dana
Friday Dana

5/21/01-5/25/01
Monday Dana
Tuesday Dana
Wednesday Dana
Thursday  (My birthday !!!!!)  Both -- I will be back in town -- we can go over stuff
Friday  Dana from here on out -- we should get the okay from managers etc in dept and see if this works out!

Let me know if you have any questions!
Hope you had a great weekend!

Susan Rance
Enron North America
susan.rance@enron.com
(713)345-3774


I am from the Associate/Analyst department and I am sending out this test email.  If you are no longer an associate or analyst, or would not like to receive future information please let me know, so that I can remove you from the distribution list.  If there is someone you know that did not receive this email please have them to email me.

thank you,

jc


Benjamin-

Attached is the latest version with revised numbers for Pepco.  Thanks.

Rishi

 <<enron comp.doc>>

[INFO] -- Content Manager:
This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain
confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information.  No
confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.
If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all
copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the
sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute,
print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. CREDIT SUISSE GROUP and each of its subsidiaries each reserve
the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks.  Any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except
where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state
them to be the views of any such entity.
Unless otherwise stated, any pricing information given in this message is
indicative only, is subject to change and does not constitute an offer to
deal at any price quoted.
Any reference to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as
preliminary only and subject to our formal written confirmation.

 - enron comp.doc


- Curr. Review Report 7.doc


Received doc....I will review but agree that we are almost there.  BT


Yes - I've been working with Samuel Schott in Global Counterparty and Melissa
Murphy. The new name has been entered into the system, and deal # 573679 has
been changed from New Counterparty to Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc. (That's
the name Sierra Pacific Holding Co. is doing business as.) Thanks for
checking in on this, though.

Kate

Rhonda L Denton
04/12/2001 07:08 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: New CTPY Name Request

I have been out of the office.  Has anyone responded to you on this?

   Kate Symes                04/09/2001 02:06 PM

To: Willie Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Johnson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: New CTPY Name Request

Because I'm not quite sure who to direct this request to, I'm e-mailing
everyone I think might be involved in entering new counterparty names. One of
our mid-marketers has executed a deal with Sierra Pacific Holding Company,
which is a new counterparty name and needs to be added as a choice in
Enpower. Please let me know if I've contacted the correct people, and if I've
contacted the incorrect people. (Sorry!)

Thanks,
Kate Symes
Trading Support
503-464-7486


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"BNA Highlights" <bhighlig@bna.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Sunday, December 23, 2001 11:22 PM
To:	BNA Highlights
Subject:	Dec. 24 -- BNA, Inc. Antitrust & Trade Regulation Daily

__________________________________

ANTITRUST & TRADE REGULATION DAILY
Highlights
Monday, December 24, 2001
__________________________________

ISSN 1526-520X

__________

HIGHLIGHTS
__________

No issue will be published for this service today.
___________________________________________________________
Antitrust & Trade Regulation Daily (ISSN 1526-520X)
Highlights are published daily by The Bureau of National
Affairs, Inc., 1231 25th St., NW, Washington, DC 20037.

Registered Web subscribers can access the full text of these
articles by using the URL link supplied.

To register for a FREE Web trial, go to http://web.bna.com.
For subscription information and other inquiries, call BNA
Customer Relations at 1-800-372-1033, Mon. - Fri. 8:30 am -
7:00 pm (ET), excluding most federal holidays.

To request retransmission or to order a copy of the
summarized article, contact 1-800-452-7773 or e-mail
bnaplus@bna.com.

For copyright guidelines, go to
http://www.bna.com/corp/copyright.

Copyright (c) 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
Washington, D.C.  20037.  Use of this service is subject to
the terms and conditions of the license agreement with BNA.
Unauthorized access or distribution is prohibited.


*************************************************************
HAVE YOU QUALIFIED FOR FREE ELECTRONICS?
*************************************************************

TABLE OF CONTENTS
etown.com Promotion Ends December 15th
How Does It Work / Bonus Miles
Earn Up to $1,500 in Free Electronics

___________________________________________________________________
ETOWN.COM PROMOTION ENDS DECEMBER 15th

Remember, you must sign up with a MyAlaskaAir account by December 15 to
qualify for the Alaska Airlines etown.com promotion.

If you have flown or are planning on flying Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air
between October 1, 2000 and December 15, 2000 you could earn up to $1,500
in free electronics from etown.com, the premier online consumer
electronics source.

___________________________________________________________________
HOW DOES IT WORK?  EASY.

1) Sign up with a new MyAlaskaAir account at www.alaskaair.com  before
December 15. A MyAlaskaAir account speeds you through alaskaair.com when
you want to book and purchase online. It allows you to securely and
conveniently store preference information such as favorite destinations,
seating choice, contact information, even your billing credit card if you
choose. It's free, takes only minutes, AND you'll earn 1,000 Mileage Plan
BONUS MILES just for signing up. Make sure you include your Alaska
Airlines Mileage Plan number to qualify for this promotion.

2) Fly Alaska Airlines or Horizon Air between October 1, 2000 and December
15, 2000 and earn miles on your Mileage Plan account as you would
normally. Qualifying flights made before you sign up with a MyAlaskaAir
account will count and it doesn't matter how you book or purchase your
tickets (you don't have to purchase online to qualify). Every segment you
earn will count toward your etown.com certificate award amount. The
etown.com certificates will be emailed to you in mid February.

Every round-trip you fly is at least two segments, so frequent flyers can
rack up free electronics fast. BUT REMEMBER, no matter how many Mileage
Plan flight miles you earn, you have to sign up with a new MyAlaskaAir
account (and include your Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan number) by December
15, 2000 to qualify!

___________________________________________________________________
EARN UP TO $1,500 IN FREE ELECTRONICS

This is how many dollars-off etown.com merchandise you can earn:

Alaska or Horizon Segments / etown.com credit

3-5 / $25
6-10 / $50
11-15 / $150
16-20 / $300
21-30 / $600
31+ / $1,500

So, get that MyAlaskaAir account, rack up Mileage Plan miles, and in
February you can shop for your dream electronics item. Go to
www.alaskaair.com for full details. Don't forget to visit www.etown.com to
start planning your purchase!

==============================================================
You are receiving this message today because you subscribed to our Email
Notification Service. While we'd be pleased to continue to tell you about
our great products and prices, you can unsubscribe by visiting our Web
site at http://www2.alaskaair.com/listserv/webmail.asp . Please do not
respond to this message. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered.


Mark:

The subject referenced data looks good. Please proceed.

-Tom-


Sounds great!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Staab, Theresa
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:01 AM
To:	Frank, Carole; Lucci, Paul T.
Subject:	RE: when you are ready

Carole,
We have a conference call at 11:10 your time (ten minutes).  As soon as we are done - we'll give you a call.

Thanks,
Theresa

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Frank, Carole
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:00 AM
To:	Lucci, Paul T.; Staab, Theresa
Subject:	when you are ready

Hey guys,

Call me when you are ready to talk about Red Rock Energy and Williams deals.

Carole C, Frank
Enron Net Works

713.345.3960 work
713.446.9307 cell


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/26/2000 08:10
AM ---------------------------

Ben F Jacoby@ECT
09/25/2000 07:37 PM
Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Janet R
Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill Williams/PDX/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project)

Lisa:

I don't have a problem with this to the extent Chris Calger has approved the
expenditure which I would guess would be approximately $500k. If these guys
are simply trying to execute a purchase option while they try to firm up
their deal, they should probably do it as a stand alone agreement (since we
don't need to involve WestLB in purchase options).

In any case, the key point here is Chris' approval of what is probably around
a $500k expenditure (of course, the option should only be for around 10% of
this amount). We don't need to worry about WestLB fees, etc., since this is
an ENA (West) Originations prospective deal.

Regards,

Ben

	From:  Lisa Bills @ ENRON                           09/25/2000 07:16 PM

To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project)

Ben, given that they want to use the existing LM6000 contract for the GSU
change order, I wanted to know if you were okay with this interaction with
GE.  Also, by using the existing LM6000 contract, they will be using up
capacity available for other LM6000 related equipment.  Are you okay with
this, i.e., you believe there is capacity available for them, and any
suggestions on how you would like to see them pay for the usage since the
LM600s have already paid the upfront structuring fee and ongoing commitment
fees.

Please call to discuss.
Lisa
---------------------- Forwarded by Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000 07:12
PM ---------------------------

Bill Williams@ECT
09/25/2000 06:22 PM
To: Lisa Bills/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Don Hammond/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mark Fillinger/SF/ECT@ECT, Dean
Russell/SF/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Pleasanton (ENA SFO project)

Hello Lisa
I wanted to contact you to let you know that we (ENA West) are attemtping to
help the ENA San Francisco guys locate a Generator Step Up Transformer for
the Pleasanton project.  ENA is responsible to bring an LM6000 and GSU to the
project.  We cannot use one of the ABB transformers (Don Hammond checked with
ABB, and the as built configuration simply cannot be used or changed to meet
the needs of ENA SFO's application.  As such, we have had to go out and find
a GSU.  The good news is we have found one through GE.  It will meet SFO's
delivery schedule.  We have not received a quote, nor have we signed anything
(but we want to ASAP).  In talking to Dale Rasmussen, I understand we would
need to purchase this major component through a West LB structure.  GE
prefers to sell us the GSU through ENA's existing contract with GE.  As such,
I am asking what steps you (or Kay) would like us to take in setting up a
purchase option (or whatever is the correct noun name for reserving, buying a
needed GSU in a timely manner).

This e mail is meant to be a starting point in dialog.  Please contact me on
Tuesday to discuss whatever is necessary.

Thanks.

Bill Williams
ENA Portland
503-464-8958