---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey Keeler/Corp/Enron on 09/06/2000
06:39 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Jeffrey Keeler                           09/06/2000 06:28 PM

To: James Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ted Robinson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael A
Robison/HOU/ECT@ECT, J Mark Metts/NA/Enron@Enron, Dwight
Larson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Marc
Phillips/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Jim Peterson/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Susan
Worthen/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe
Kolb/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stacey Bolton/HOU/EES@EES, Sandra
McCubbin/SFO/EES@EES, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES, James D
Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Rob Bradley/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Allen/HOU/EES@EES, Joe
Hillings/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Wodraska/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Diane Bazelides/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Jonalan
Page/PDX/ECT@ECT, Thomas Krueger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clayton Seigle/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Chris Long/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Senate Environment Committee Markup Tomorrow (9/7)

On Thursday 9/7 (tomorrow, 9 a.m.), the Senate Environment and Public Works
Committee plans to mark up S. 2962, Chairman Bob Smith's legislation that
would remove the oxygenate mandate and phase out MTBE.    It is expected to
be a very contested markup, with several Republicans and (hopefully) some
Democrats opposing the legislation on various grounds.

The basic provisions of the "Manager's Amendment" (the latest bill version
that will be the operative vehicle at the markup) include:

1)  Removal of the federal mandate that 2% of RFG contain oxygenates --
states apply for a waiver

Comment:  a state would need to do nothing but apply to have a waiver
approved.   Ethanol does not like this provision, because it harms them too,
but the new "clean fuel" mandate (below) makes up for that.

2)  A phase out of MTBE by 2004.

Comment:  rather than setting year-by-year goals, it sets a date certain for
phase out in 2004  -- this is probably preferable for producers to transition
to making other additives, giving them 4 years to make the necessary
arrangements.

3)  Environmental "Anti backsliding" language
 -- air toxics must be 27.5% better than a baseline
 -- criteria pollutants (this is still in development, drafted by NRDC) -
sets a 5 year baseline period and then looks at   that baseline and
determines whether further action is warranted.

Comment:  this is a weak anti-backsliding provision, that will weaken MTBE's
ability to hold on to market share on the basis that other additives are not
meeting environmental criteria.

4)  Clean Alternative Fuels Program:  a mandate for clean, renewable fuels
(mainly ethanol), ramps up over 10 years.  It is estimated that the current
1.2 billion gallon market for ethanol would expand to 4.5 billion gallons in
that 10 year period.

Comment:  This provision is the one that is causing most of the problems --
refiners, Highway Funding advocates (road builders, etc.) do not want to see
ethanol get such a boost.  Senator Jim Inhofe (the Clean Air subcommittee
chairman) will vigorously try to remove this provision.   In addition, ADM,
Cargil and the other big ethanol producers don't really prefer this approach
to an ethanol mandate.  This may seem strange, but if there is simply an MTBE
ban with no ethanol mandate, the market for ethanol production would increase
quickly to 2.8 billion gallons,  While this is smaller than the 10 year
number of 4.5 billion gallons envisioned by the bill's mandate, the larger
producers would be able to get a greater share and more money up front if
there is no mandate.   If the mandate stays in place, there will be more
opportunity for smaller companies to build additional ethanol capacity to
meet the eventual 4.5 bg market.

5)   LUST funding:  releases more LUST money and allows it to be used for
remediation of MTBE spills.

There are numerous amendments planned on various issues, many of which deal
with the ethanol mandate.   At this point, refiners (API, NPRA) are opposing
the bill over ethanol issues.   MTBE producers (thorough the OFA) are
opposing the bill on a number of grounds and working with certain Republican
Senators (Kay Bailey Hutchison, Bob Bennett) to develop amendments that would
make the bill less acceptable.

Enron has not directly opposed the legislation, but is relying on OFA to do
most of that work.   We have focused on issues related to "transition."
Stranded cost amendments may be offered, but are not expected to have much
traction.   We were successful in getting Chairman Bob Smith to agree that if
this bill is passed by the Committee, they will address issues of transition
for MTBE producers before the bill goes to the Senate floor.   He will engage
in a "colloquy" with Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison at the end of the markup in
which he will commit to work on these issues with Hutchison and other MTBE
supporters.   A transition package could include tax relief or other
incentives for the production of other additives.   In another recent
positive development, we have received signals that Democrats Tom Daschle and
Max Baucus will also support efforts to develop a MTBE transition package
before a bill reaches the floor.   This is largely in an effort to neutralize
some of the MTBE industry opposition to a bill on the Senate floor.

I will keep you posted as developments occur, and likely send a report later
in the afternoon tomorrow.   Please let me know if you have questions.

Jeff Keeler


Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 7:22 PM
To: pgroetzinger@brentbroker.com
Subject: RE: BrentBroker Full Style

Thanks!.  I'll fax it back to you after it's signed.

                    "Pete Groetzinger"
                    <pgroetzinger@brentb        To:
<Tana.Jones@enron.com>
                    roker.com>                  cc:     "David Salomon"
<dsalomon@lab9.com>, <John.Pavetto@enron.com>,
                                                <Louise.Kitchen@enron.com>
                    07/13/2000 07:08 PM         Subject:     RE: BrentBroker
Full Style

Tana - I just sent the executed CA to your fax machine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 6:00 PM
To: pgroetzinger@brentbroker.com
Cc: Louise.Kitchen@enron.com; John.Pavetto@enron.com
Subject: Re: BrentBroker Full Style

Please find attached a copy of our proposed form of Confidentiality
Agreement.  Please call me if you have any comments or questions.  If the
agreement meets with your approval, please have an authorizied officer of
the company execute it and return the signed document to me at the fax
number below.  Thanks for your attention herewith.

I passed on your "regards" to Robbi Rossi.

(See attached file: brentbroker.doc)

Tana Jones
Paralegal
Ph:  (713) 853-3399
Fax:  (713) 646-3490

                    "Pete Groetzinger"
                    <pgroetzinger@brentb        To:
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    roker.com>                  cc:
                                                Subject:     BrentBroker
Full Style
                    07/12/2000 05:01 PM

Tana -

The legal name is: Brent Broker.com LLC

I look forward to receiving your Confidentiality Agreement.

Regards,

Peter V. Groetzinger, COO
BrentBroker.com
One Riverway, Suite 2500
Houston, Texas 77056
USA
713.888.0500
www.brentbroker.com


would anybody be interested in playing beach volleyball? there are really nice courts at the monkey club 15 min away from post midtown properties. we will need at least 10 people (5-5) to play. it is open til late so playing outside is not that bad. reply if interested.

sona


Done.  Are you dry?

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/07/2001 09:29 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Westinghouse - Gleason

please calendar.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2001 09:29
AM ---------------------------
From: Stuart Zisman/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/07/2001 08:47 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Westinghouse - Gleason

I received a letter from Westinghouse in response to our threat to draw on
the letter of credit.  A copy is being delivered to you today.  I have spoken
to Patty Clark (Asst. General Counsel for Allegheny) about what we are doing
and she didn,t seem overly concerned but asked to be kept in the loop.  I
told her that Enron was very sensitive about the potential impact that our
threats against Westinghouse might have on Allegheny,s contractual
relationship with them.  Personally, I don,t think that we should draw on the
letter of credit (even though I believe that we are entirely in the right on
this one) because it might somehow hurt Allegheny.  I don,t, however, want to
take the heat off of Westinghouse so I have not said anything.

We had a call with Westinghouse yesterday to discuss the facts surrounding
our claim and have a follow up call scheduled for Wednesday (6/13) at 3:00
pm.  You are welcome to participate if you would like.  To date, lawyers from
either side have not participated in discussions as they have been primarily
fact-finding in nature.  I am happy to give you an update as to what has
happened and what I expect to occur on Wednesday at your convenience.

Take care,

Stuart


I certainly will, I know you can't wait to go home and begin your life!!!!


The following is the Board approved statement in response to Walter
Hewlett's letter to the Board.

We plan to distribute on the newswires momentarily.

Grace

> December 13, 2001
>
> TO: 		Mr. Walter Hewlett
>
> FROM: 	Compaq Board of Directors
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> __
>
> This is a response to your letter of December 12, 2001.
>
> We and the Compaq management team strongly disagree with your
> conclusions.
>
> The Board of Directors of Compaq has carefully analyzed the short-term
> and long-term impact as well as the strategic implications of the
> proposed HP-Compaq merger.  We are disappointed that both the Hewlett
> Foundation and the Packard Foundation have decided to oppose the
> transaction. We continue to believe that the combination of HP and
> Compaq will provide better market coverage, significant synergies and
> higher profits than either company would achieve on its own.  These
> benefits will lead to the creation of long-term value for both Compaq
> and HP shareholders.
>
> On that basis, we believe that this merger is well worth the effort
> and that our employees, shareholders and customers will be better
> served in the long term. Therefore we will continue to vigorously
> encourage shareholders to vote in favor of the transaction.
>
> In addition, we are confident that over the coming months, the
> shareholders of both companies will recognize the value of the merger
> and give their approval.
>
> The Board of Directors of Compaq is pleased with the execution of the
> company's present strategy and with its market momentum.  We intend to
> maintain this positive momentum and bring an even stronger Compaq to
> the merger.
>
>
> Grace Chen Trent - Executive Director
> Office of the Chairman & CEO
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> 20555 SH 249 - MS110802
> Houston, Texas 77070-2698
> 281-518-9460  work
> 281-518-9882 fax
>
>
>


The DPR for today is final and posted to the Executive Reports website.


OOPS!  Here's the attachment.

---------------------- Forwarded by Dana Davis/HOU/ECT on 10/10/2000 02:02 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Dana Davis                           10/10/2000 01:56 PM

To: abraham5@flash.net>
cc:
Subject: Hey Bonnie SUE!

: )  I couldn't resist.  Attached to this email is a Word document that lists
all the MOP members names, addresses and phone #'s.  I plan to revise it more
with email addresses and alternate/emergency phone #'s but for now will you
help me fill in the blanks where possible?  Later, if every one approves, we
can distribute this.  Let me know what you think.

Lots of Love for my sister in Christ.

Dana


he's a trip


Donna --

I'd say that it is a commercial matter.  Try and push the bill back.  I know that Paul says his RC is closed but someone above him has to have some $$.

Jim


Greetings from Citibank Bill Manager,

We recently emailed you regarding new service levels that would be available
for your selection on June 1, 2001 for Citibank Bill Manager. However, due
to additional improvements we are making to the Citibank Bill Manager site,
these new service levels will now be available beginning June 7, 2001.
We apologize for this delay.

When you visit Citibank Bill Manager for the first time on or after June 7,
2001, you will be asked to select one of the three available service levels.
***** If you do not select a service level by June 30, 2001, you will
automatically be placed in the Premium Plan. *****

Please keep in mind that the service level you select is effective for your
billing activity in the month of June and billing for your new service level
will begin with your July statement.

If you select the Premium or Standard Plan, your account will reflect the
features of the new service level the next time you visit Citibank Bill Manager.
You may change your service level at any time by going to the Profile section
within Citibank Bill Manager. Changing your service level to the Free Plan
within the Profile Section will be available later this month.  If you choose
to change your service level within the Profile section, billing for the new
service level will be effective immediately.*

If you select the Free Plan, you must remove all non-AT&T Universal Card and
Citi Card billers and bills from your account before you can complete the
change in your service level. Your account will reflect the features of the
Free Plan later this month.

If you have any questions about the new service levels, please do not hesitate
to contact us at support@billmanager.accountonline.com or call 1-888-489-8653
between 8am and midnight ET, 7 days a week.

Sincerely,

Citibank Bill Manager Subscriber Services

* Customers who change their service level within the Profile section during
the month of June may see the new service level reflected on their June bill.


I would add to what Teun says below a good lesson from California for the
Dutch: Disconnect the functioning of the retail and wholesale markets at your
peril. If bad regulatory/ political  intervention gets in the way of
participation by new and old players in both on a level playing field,
fingers will get burnt. In the Netherlands the incumbent generators and
vertically integrated distributors have been given unfair advantages in a
non-transparent manner in the wholesale market, whilst enjoying more or less
guaranteed prices in the retail market. New entrants/ importers got squeezed
and most consumers have not yet enjoyed the full benefits of liberalisation.
Incidentally, in both California and the Netherlands there was excessive
political trumpeting of the benefits and of the enlightenment of policymakers
in advance, followed by a mess in practice.

---------------------- Forwarded by Peter Styles/LON/ECT on 08/06/2001 18:50
---------------------------
From: Teun van Biert/Enron@EUEnronXGate on 06/06/2001 10:05
To: Nailia Dindarova/LON/ECT@ECT, Peter Styles/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: Bullets re California in the NL?

Email below was sent to both of you on Monday evening.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Van Biert, Teun
Sent: maandag 4 juni 2001 21:08
To: peter.styles@enron.com; nailia.dindarova@enron.com
Subject: Bullets re California in the NL?

Peter, Nailia,

Today Dutch bank holiday, heard nevertheless your voicemail, please find
below initial thoughts in bullet format:

Why California cannot happen in the Dutch market:

? Plenty installed capacity available
Available import capacity about 30% of total demand
Price cap for distco's based on real quarterly purchase portfolio and
industry average index

Why California nevertheless -in the longer run- can happen:

? CHP plants are closed down and large generators are shutting down plants
Lack of grid system transparency with regards to importcapacity, operational
aspects of the grid, balancing market etc. Biased signals to the market.
Market structure with limited number of players therefore lack of
competition. Prices do not reflect underlying market supply and demand ratio.
Therefore new entrants are hesitating to add new assets to the market.
Environmental and spatial permits are time consuming processes. (e.g.
National Government faces large resistance of local authorities against the
siting of windmills). Governmental Policy aims at state of the art technology
of new additions to the powerplantmix. Environmental Impact Report often
necessary.

Teun


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Driscoll, Michael M.
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:03 PM
To:	Benson, Robert
Subject:	FW: West power

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Driscoll, Michael M.
Sent:	Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:05 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	West power

Presto,

In the west,

Peak and Off Peak swaps for Mid Columbia, California-Oregon Boarder (COB), NP-15, SP15, and Palo Verde.
We had already built some of these products for EOL earlier this year, but it was only for Palo Verde Delivery point (PEAK).

The other regions would need to be built.

here are the most recent definitions Dow Jones has published for their index.

And here are the indices that we receive on a daily basis.


<TITLE>Gas Indices - IntercontentalExchange</TITLE>

IntercontinentalExchange

Firm Physical Natural Gas Price Bulletin

For Natural Gas Delivered on Saturday, December  22, 2001 thru Wednesday, December  26, 2001

(Trade Date of Friday, December  21, 2001)

Click here to access index history.

* volume represents sell-side only *

 Region
    Hub	High
Low
Wtd Avg Index
Change ($)
Vol (mmBtu)

Hub Name

LOUISIANA

    <NOBR>ANR SE	          $2.6700	          $2.4750	          $2.5388	+    .0141	       1,445,000	American Natural Resources Pipleline Co. - SE  Transmission Pool

    <NOBR>Columbia Onshore	          $2.6400	          $2.5350	          $2.5698	+    .0127	         749,500	Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. - Onshore Pool

    <NOBR>Henry Hub	          $2.7900	          $2.5600	          $2.6271	+    .0308	       4,128,000	Henry Hub - Tailgate, Louisiana

    <NOBR>NGPL LA	          $2.6100	          $2.4650	          $2.5323	+    .0311	       1,215,500	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 500L	          $2.5600	          $2.5100	          $2.5341	+    .0034	         622,500	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone L, 500 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>Tenn 800L	          $2.5650	          $2.5000	          $2.5449	+    .0215	         499,000	Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. - Zone L, 800 Leg Pool

    <NOBR>TETCO ELA	          $2.5950	          $2.5200	          $2.5412	+    .0004	       1,013,500	Texas Eastern - East LA

    <NOBR>TETCO WLA	          $2.5500	          $2.4800	          $2.4980	-    .0194	         296,500	Texas Eastern - West LA

    <NOBR>Transco 65	          $2.7500	          $2.5800	          $2.6414	+    .0169	         853,500	Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. - Station 65

    <NOBR>Trunkline ELA	          $2.5600	          $2.4650	          $2.5072	+    .0057	         267,000	Trunkline Gas Company - East Louisiana Pool

    <NOBR>TxGas SL	          $2.6700	          $2.5300	          $2.5855	+    .0079	       1,578,500	Texas Gas Transmission Corp. - Zone SL FT Pool

MIDCONTINENT

    <NOBR>MichCon, citygate	          $2.7300	          $2.6050	          $2.6475	+    .0341	         622,500	Michigan Consolidated Citygate

    <NOBR>NGPL Midcont	          $2.5800	          $2.3500	          $2.4614	+    .0837	         608,000	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Mid-Continent Pool

    <NOBR>NGPL Nicor, citygate	          $2.6400	          $2.3350	          $2.4366	+    .0540	       3,441,000	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Nicor Citygate

    <NOBR>NGPL NIPSCO, citygate	          $2.6500	          $2.4000	          $2.5365	+    .0755	         713,500	Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America - Nipsco Citygate

    <NOBR>NNG Demarcation	          $2.7500	          $2.4350	          $2.5112	+    .0862	         760,500	Northern Natural Gas - Demarcation Pool

NORTHEAST

    <NOBR>Columbia TCO	          $2.8100	          $2.6800	          $2.7113	+    .0179	       1,717,500	Columbia Gas Co. - TCO Pool (Appalachia)

    <NOBR>Dominion So.Point	          $2.7400	          $2.6650	          $2.6965	-    .0143	       1,122,500	Dominion - South Point

    <NOBR>TETCO M3	          $3.0300	          $2.9000	          $2.9841	-    .0136	       1,663,000	Texas Eastern - M3 Zone

    <NOBR>Transco Z-6 (NY)	          $3.1000	          $2.9800	          $3.0265	+    .0258	         290,000	Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. - Zone 6 (NY)

WEST

    <NOBR>El Paso non-Bondad	          $2.5000	          $2.3600	          $2.3989	+    .0136	         645,000	El Paso - San Juan Basin, Blanco Pool (non-Bondad)

    Huntingdon/Sumas	          $2.4600	          $2.4600	          $2.4600	-    .0156	          50,000	Westcoast Energy & Northwest Pipeline Corp.

    <NOBR>Opal	          $2.4200	          $2.2650	          $2.3117	+    .0134	         856,000	Opal Plant Tailgate

    <NOBR>PG&E Citygate	          $2.7600	          $2.7100	          $2.7351	-    .0366	         730,500	PG&E - Citygate

    SoCal Border	          $2.6000	          $2.5200	          $2.5398	-    .0047	         357,000	Southern California Border Points (Ehrenberg,Topock,Needles)

WEST TEXAS

    <NOBR>El Paso - Keystone	          $2.5300	          $2.3650	          $2.4371	+    .0440	       1,532,500	El Paso - Keystone Pool

    <NOBR>Waha	          $2.5400	          $2.4300	          $2.4889	+    .0339	         775,000	Waha Hub - West Texas

Includes all firm physical fixed price trades done from 7 AM to 11:30 AM Central Prevailing Time on the trade date specified for natural gas delivered on the specified date(s).

IntercontinentalExchange is the world's most liquid trading platform for over-the-counter energy and metals.  Active markets include North American power and natural gas, global crude and refined oil products, and precious metals.  Traded instruments include forwards, swaps, and options.

In order to receive the proprietary information contained in this email, you acknowledge and agree that you shall not further disseminate the IntercontinentalExchange Market Data contained herein to any person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.    Furthermore, you acknowledge that (1) IntercontinentalExchange has exclusive and valuable property rights in this data; (2) IntercontinentalExchange's data is being made available to you only for your own business or personal activities; and (3) you cannot communicate the data, in any form, to any other person or entity without the express written consent of IntercontinentalExchange.

This data is provided to you free of charge.  IntercontinentalExchange reserves the right to cancel this service at any time for any reason or no reason at all.

You agree that IntercontinentalExchange does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the data.

To become an Exchange Participant or inquire about the indices, please contact sales@intcx.com.

To unsubscribe from this service, click here unsubscribe.

©Copyright IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2001, All Rights Reserved.


THE RICE ALLIANCE FOR TECHNOLOGY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP
A Strategic Alliance among the Schools of Engineering, Management,
and Natural Sciences at Rice University

==========================================================================================================

DIGEST ISSUE No. 30 -- November 27, 2001
Alliance web site:  http://www.alliance.rice.edu

WELCOME to the Rice Alliance Digest, an e-newsletter which notifies
you of upcoming events and items of interest to subscribers.

REMINDER -- Tomorrow evening:

NOVEMBER 28, 2001
Wednesday, 6 PM to 9 PM
Business Thought Leader Speaker Series & Networking Event

Featuring Dr. Arati Prabhakar, who will speak on
"New Technological Trends and the Investment Climate for
Commercialization:  A View from Silicon Valley's Sand Hill Road"

5:15 PM - Registration
6:00 PM - Presentation
7:00 PM - Q&A / Buffet Dinner & Reception

Herring Hall
Rice University Campus
RSVP:  http://www.alliance.rice.edu/users/
Cost:  Free admission for Rice Alliance members / $35 for non-members

ALSO NOTE:

The Rice Alliance is proud to be a Supporting Organization for the
second annual Southwest Biotech Venture Conference and Symposium,
which will be held at the Houston Hyatt Regency Hotel in downtown
Houston on December 4-5.  The event combines a venture educational
symposium with an opportunity for linking investors and related
financial organizations with select ventures in biotechnology,
healthcare services, medical devices, and life sciences.

December 4th is a full-day educational program with presentations by
leaders in the Texas biotech and life science industry.  December 5th
will feature presentations from select ventures to an audience
including venture capitalists, corporate investors, angel investors,
and related service providers.  December 5th will also feature a
keynote address by Governor Rick Perry.

To sign up for the event, go to http://www.biosouthwest.com/biosw_reg.asp

The Rice Alliance has arranged for a unique opportunity for our
members to attend the kick-off reception only (if you wish) for a
special admission price of $75.  To sign up only for the kick-off
reception, send your registration information (from the above page,
which should include:  your name, company, mailing address, phone,
fax, and e-mail) to Virginia Rothenflue at virginia@thbi.com -- then
you may pay your $75 via check or credit card (no cash, please) at
the door.

We look forward to hosting you!

==========================================================================================================

Remember -- if you have a new business idea which you would like to
present, please e-mail us at alliance@rice.edu, or write to us at:

Rice Alliance for Technology and Entrepreneurship
Jones Graduate School of Management
Rice University - MS 531, 6100 S. Main Street
Houston, Texas  77005-1892  USA
713.348.3443 (voice) 713.348.5251 (fax)

________________________________________________________

TO UNSUBSCRIBE TO THE RICE ALLIANCE DIGEST, send your request to
alliance@rice.edu.
--
Trish Leggett, Program Coordinator
Rice Alliance for Technology & Entrepreneurship
Rice University, MS - 531
6100 South Main Street
Houston, TX  77005-1892 USA
(713) 348-3443 (voice); (713) 348-5251 (fax)
Web Site:  http://www.alliance.rice.edu


missing 2 deals

buys ees
164.95
25 mw
Q1
np15

sell duke
jan
25 mw
np-15
165.00

these 2 deals kind of recognize 478198, and 478199.


I am available at 1 pm.  Let me know if that still works for you.

	Heather Kroll
	03/04/2001 03:01 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Gerald,

Let's meet tomorrow to discuss these contracts.  We need to put this issue to
bed fairly soon.  Are you available at 1:00?

Regards,

Heather

To: Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather,  I did receive the Ash Handling Agreement from Bill White and I am
reviewing and should have comments shortly.  I  have not received the Coal
Handling Agreement yet from Kris' attorney.

	Heather Kroll
	02/27/2001 03:26 PM

		 To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Gerald,

Please give me an update on the redrafting of the ReUse agreements.  I
thought you told me that their attorneys were drafting, but from this e-mail
I don't think Kris Johnson is aware of that.  Please follow up with their
attorneys and let me know when to expect a new draft.

Regards,

Heather Kroll
---------------------- Forwarded by Heather Kroll/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001 04:24
PM ---------------------------

"Johnson, Kris" <KrisJohnson@Cogentrix.com> on 02/27/2001 02:51:36 PM
To: "'Heather.Kroll@enron.com'" <Heather.Kroll@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Status Check of the Coal and Ash contracts

Heather:

Please give me a quick update on the status of the Lumberton and
Elizabethtown coal and ash contracts from Enron's perspective.  Are we still
shooting for a March 15th closing date.  As of now I will out of town on the
15th, but reachable.

Thanks, hope all is going well.

Kris Johnson
1-800-827-3873, ext. 105


Here's as good a treatise on the subject as I've seen.  I think this article
does an excellent job of trying to explain the recent California market
phenomenon...

Tuesday, November 28, 2000
Gas Daily

No quick fix for soaring California gas prices
In the past year, gas prices in most regions have doubled and in some cases
tripled.  But no
region has seen the breadth of the price blowout now under way in the West.
While Henry Hub futures on the NYMEX appear to be leading the way for higher
winter
prices nationally, most industry professionals are watching in amazement at
the fundamentals-driven
price surge centered in the Pacific Northwest and California.

The cost of gas in Southern California has been skyrocketing.  Prices last
week started
trading in the $7-$7.50 range and by Wednesday were trading $14-$18.
The cost of gas entering into the Northwest region of California via the N.W.
Sumas,
PG&E Citygate, and Malin interconnections also soared to incredible heights,
some pricing
nearing $20/mmBtu.

The most obvious cause of the dramatic escalation is scarcity of gas.  The
bullish fundamentals
in California include heavier-than-normal heating loads due to uncommonly
cold temperatures,
planned and unplanned nuclear plant outages that substantially increased
demand
for gas-generated power, depletion of storage in Southern California and
transmission constraints on regional pipelines.

Improving deliverability into Southern California is key to bringing the
market back into
balance, said one trader, noting constraint-causing problems that have
plagued pipelines serving
the region, including Kern River Gas Transmission, El Paso Natural Gas and
Transwestern
Pipeline.

Those problems had come to a head in part because of high summer prices that
helped
drain storage in Southern California and discouraged refill before the
winter, he said.  Now,
unseasonably cold weather has hit the region, amplifying market needs to meet
heating loads
and produce power. Add growing and competing markets in the desert Southwest
and Northern
California and you have a crisis.

&It shows that when you get all the stars aligned, there is not enough gas to
meet demand,8
he said.  At most, only 15%-20% of California,s supply of gas comes from
in-state producers, with
the other 80%-85% coming from out-of-state, said Bill Woods with the
California Energy
Commission.  Roughly 60% comes from the Southwest, 15%-20% comes from Canada,
and the rest is
Rocky Mountain supply.

&At the moment, there is a lot of gas being purchased out of Canada.  But
because of
imposed restrictions and other flow transmission problems, prices are
soaring,8 he said.
At the moment, a lot of the new gas production in the Southern California
area is mainly a
byproduct of oil exploration and production * so any new natural gas
production will be
associated with what the demand for oil is, he said.
A majority of the &dry gas8 producers are located in the northern part of the
state, which
until recently, was primarily a captive market of Pacific Gas & Electric.
But new production
efforts are under way, he said.

&I definitely think that there needs to be some additional action taken to
enhance our own
in-state production efforts, but there are a lot of bureaucratic hurdles to
contend with before a
company can just go in and start drilling,8 he said.
&Hopefully, once the cold weather comes off, and our electricity loads start
moderating,
I think pricing will adjust respectively. But until then, I guess we have no
choice but to
deal with it.8


-----Original Message-----
From: Ginny Torstrick [mailto:ginny.torstrick@travelpark.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Hennessy, Sonia
Subject: NEW DATES FOR LONDON HOTEL//3-10NOV///GINNY 713 860 1115

                                          AGENT TK/GT BOOKING REF YRPMWJ

                                          WHITE/STACEY
                                          EB 3102G

  ENRON CORP

  DATE:  OCT 19 2001

HOTEL                 03NOV INTERCONTINENTAL
                      10NOV 1 HAMILTON PLACE-HYDE PARK
                            LONDON ENGLAND, W1V OQY
                            UNITED KINGDOM
                            TELEPHONE: 442074093131
                            FAX: 442074097460
                            TELEX: NONE
                            CONFIRMATION: 2622328
                            REFERENCE: SRDLSP2
                            SINGLE ROOM L
                            RATE: SP2 GBP 165.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            REQST EARLY CKIN ENRON NOSMKG
                    ::CANCEL BY 6PM HOTEL LOCAL TIME

MISCELLANEOUS         10MAR HOUSTON TX
                      SUN   ** THANK YOU FOR USING THE TAP **

WHITE/STACEY  S5C083ER1038

ASSISTANT: SONIA HENNESSY 713 345-4858
*******************************************
INTL TVLRS: CARRY SOS WALLET CARD W/ENRON ASSISTANCE INFO
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:IN U.S 800 523-6586
CALL SOS MEDICAL EMERGENCY:INTL 215 245-4707 (COLLECT)
*********************************************
***********************************************
U.S.CITIZEN REQUIREMENTS: PASSPORT
PASSPORT MUST BE VALID 6 MONTHS BEYOND DATE OF RETURN
ERIFY VISA REQUIREMENTS.
TRAVEL AGENCY IN THE PARK VISA DEPT:SAM 345-5166
*******************************************
3 HR CHECK-IN REQUIRED ON INTERNATIONAL FLIGHTS
RECONFIRM ALL FLIGHTS LOCALLY WITH EACH CARRIER
AIRLINE 72 HOURS PRIOR TO DEPARTURE.
FAILURE TO RECONFIRM MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION.
YOUR HOTEL CONCIERGE/FRONT DESK CAN ASSIST YOU.
*******************************************
YOUR HOTEL IS GUARANTEED FOR LATE ARRIVAL.
TO AVOID BILLING CANCEL 7 DAYS PRIOR TO ARRIVAL.
PREREGISTERED PER SONIA REQUEST W/CHARGE FOR 02NOV
ALL FARES ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UNTIL TICKETED/PURCHASED


Steve, we're providing this information to you for the upcoming Board meeting
per Mark's request.  Let me know if you need anything else.

Internal Communications Metrics:
eSpeak
Average live event participation ranges from 30 participants to more than
1,200
Transcript readership after the live event can reach more than 1,000

eMeet
Average daily visits have increased 138% since stats were first captured in
April 2000
More than 7,321 employees have visited the site

ThinkBank
More than 3,500 employees have visited the site since the launch in November
2000
92 business ideas are currently in the Idea Vault

eThink Merchandise
Before we even announced the online store in December 2000, we sold 90 screen
sweeps, 49 badges and 16 apparel items and recouped $122.13 (only apparel is
marked up -- 20%)

eBiz
Our average employee readership for 2000 was 1,529 users and our average for
2001 so far is 4,343 users
On our last issue of eBiz, we had 27,187 hits and 5,297 unique users

ETV
On average, we are running 50 segments of Enron content per week airing twice
a day
In January, there were 20 new segments created of Enron content and, so far
in February, there have already been 19 requests submitted

Enron Business
The average weekly readership of the online version has increased by 73%
since 1999
We continue to receive many requests for additional copies of the print
version for marketing purposes, etc.

In a survey ,the Enron Internal Communications team conducted in 1999:

How do you generally read Enron Business (EB)?
67% print
8% online
25% both

Do you ever share EB with your spouse or family?
70% yes
30% no

In a survey we conducted in 2000:

How do you generally read EB?
67% read print
69% read online
36% read both

The number of respondents in the 1999 readership survey was 115.  The number
of respondents in 2000 was 6,035.

Recent Enron Accolades:
Fortune's America's Most Admired Companies:
Most Innovative for sixth consecutive year (Published)
Ranked No. 18 overall among 535 companies, up from No. 36 last year (Popular
Vote - Not published)
Ranked No. 4 overall among 535 companies, down from No. 1 last year (Total
rating of 8.29 in all eight attributes - Not published.  No. 1 Citigroup; No.
2 Omnicom; No. 3 UPS)
Ranking in seven other attributes:
 - Quality of Management No. 2 (We were No. 1 last year; Omnicom No. 1 this
year)
 - Quality of Products/Services No. 5
 - Long-term investment value No. 13
 - Financial soundness  No. 70
 - Employee talent  No. 4
 - Social responsibility  No. 12
` - Use of corporate assets No. 15
Overall industry results   No. 1
 (This year we're in the pipeline/energy industry, expanded from just
pipelines last year)

Fortune's 100 Best Companies to Work for in America:
Enron ranked No. 22, up from No. 24 last year


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 11/15/2000
07:53 AM ---------------------------

Shirley_Keeney@eogresources.com on 11/15/2000 07:40:26 AM
To: Paula_Corey@enron.net, vfromm7768@aol.com, "Charles Renner"
<crenner@excalibar.com>, vkamins@enron.com
cc:
Subject: The GORE Solution

This isn't the one I was thinking of, but it's cute, too!

The Dems want a new election in Palm Beach County - they've already
submitted the new ballot and gotten approval form those Dems who approved
the original confusing ballot. Here it its:
(See attached file: NewBallot.gif)(See attached file: NewBallot.gif)

 - NewBallot.gif


There is one completed unit going into TurboPark.  The address is listed
below.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 12/11/2000 10:55
AM ---------------------------

	From:  Rebecca Walker                           12/11/2000 10:42 AM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: ABB Address/Equipment Status

Kay

Karla Hesketh at ABB gave me the following information about transformer
status and location:

LNL 9521-1 and LNL 9521-2 (Austin) are at the Austin job site.
LNL 9517-5 and LNL 9517-6 (ESA) have been cancelled.
LNL 9518-1 and LNL 9518-2 (LV Cogen) are not scheduled to ship until 7/31/0.
LNL 9517-1 (PSCO) went into storage on 11/30/00.
LNL 9517-2 (PSCO) is scheduled to go into storage on 12/20/00.
LNL 9517-3 (PSCO) is scheduled to go into storage on 12/21/00.
LNL 9517-4 (Coral) is scheduled to go into storage on 12/31/00.

The storage facilities are located on-site at the ABB factory at the
following address:

4350 Semple Ave.
St. Louis, Missouri  63120

Please let me know if you need any other information.

Thanks,
Rebecca
x57968


I need to pull my tapes for Jan 21st.  Would you take care of that please?


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000
12:13 PM ---------------------------

Sharon Crawford
12/21/2000 12:15 PM
To: IT Calgary
cc: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rob
Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT
Subject: Industry Canada - Competition Investigation

To Everyone in the Calgary and Toronto offices (from Peter Keohane):

As you know from the numerous press stories and my earlier e-mail messages,
the Competition Bureau conducted an investigation into the activities of
Enron Canada Corp. and British Columbia Power Exchange Corporation regarding
transactions in the Alberta Power Pool.  As you know, we were co-operating to
the fullest extent possible with the investigating authorities, and we were
confident that there was no substance to the allegations.  Accordingly, it is
with great pleasure that I inform all of you that the Competition Bureau has
announced in a press release, that the alleged offences under the Competition
Act were unsubstantiated and that the Competition Bureau has closed the
inquiry.  To quote the Competition Bureau, "The evidence suggests that the
companies were employing independent business strategies and were not
colluding on bids."  I want to thank everyone for their co-operation in
dealing with this disruptive matter.

Regards,
Peter


Jim,

We need to advise the Executive Committee members that the November 2
meeting is canceled so they can free next Friday up on their calendars.

Shall I send the memo below (after you've added the dates you propose
and made any other modifications you wish), or would you rather I
contact them myself and simply tell them to stand by for more
information?

Thanks.

David

  _____

TO: The Executive Committee of the Institute for Law and Technology

FROM: James V. Derrick, Jr., Chair

RE: Our Inaugural Meeting

Due to conflicts in several of our members' schedules, I have determined
to re-schedule our inaugural meeting from November 2 to a later date. I
hope this does not greatly inconvenience those of you who have already
made your plans to attend on the 2nd.

Rather than simply announcing the new date, I'd like to try to find a
date suitable for all members. Please advise David Winn (
<mailto:(dwinn@swlegal.org> dwinn@swlegal.org or 972-664-3488) of your
availability on the following dates for our meeting in Dallas - as we
originally planned, we will begin with a working lunch at 12:00 p.m.
followed by drinks and an early dinner afterwards:

a) ____________

b) ____________

c) ____________

d) ____________

After reviewing your responses, we'll promptly schedule our meeting for
the date most convenient to the greatest number of committee members and
notify you of the new date.

Please pardon this change in plans. I do think it is important that we
have a full attendance as we chart our course for our first year, and
I'm looking forward to getting on with our work.


FYI
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 10/11/2000 12:28 PM -----

	David W Delainey
	10/10/2000 10:12 AM

		 To: Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, W David Duran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Donahue/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rob Milnthorp/CAL/ECT@ECT, Max Yzaguirre/NA/Enron@ENRON,
C John Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Josey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Brian
Redmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/NA/Enron@Enron, David Oxley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Beth Perlman/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Wes
Colwell/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Mark Frevert/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron@Enron
		 Subject: 2000 ENA Offsite

Guys, please mark your calendars for the 2000 ENA Management Offsite
scheduled for December 14th and 15th at the Venetian in Las Vegas.  We
envision people flying in the afternoon/evening of December 13th with the
offsite being held on December 14th and 15th.  Departure would occur the
morning of December 16th.  It is important that everyone stays for the entire
period including Friday night.  Jeff Skilling and Greg Whalley have taken
time out their schedule to speak to us on Thursday and Friday night about
Enron Corps strategy and our eCommerce/Networks strategy respectively.

A complete agenda will follow shortly.

Dorie Hitchcock will manage all the logistics.

Regards
Delainey


Rebecca,

As we had spoken on the phone, I met with Mr. KK Sud, a retired Secretary in
the govt. of India yesterday.  This meeting was arranged at Vince's request,
since Vince had been approached by Mr. Sud's son who is a student at Rice
(where Vince teaches a course).  The younger Mr. Sud had wanted someone at
Enron to meet with his father who was visiting Houston, and is currently an
advisor (post retirement from the government) to the Prime Minister's office.

This was my first meeting, and I have no background check on the person.
However, the meeting was interesting, and Mr. Sud conveyed to me in
confidence that the Indian govt. is very interested in solving the Dabhol
issue.  He also conveyed that a decision is being made in the direction of
NTPC buying all the power from Dabhol, but that this was still under wraps.

I have no way of judging the genuineness of this person, but he claimed to
have been Secretary in the Ministry of Defence for some 16 years, which is a
very important post in India.  The information he was conveying seemed so
important that Vince and I decided to update you on the same by phone this
morning.

Mr. Sud is leaving Houston on Monday so, as discussed, I will see if he can
meet with you on Saturday morning.

Regards,
Sandeep.


Hi Mom -
I got your e-mail yesterday.  Shanna wasn't offended by your poignant
political comments, she just knows, in no uncerain terms, that your are
Republican and are going to vote for Bush.

Disregard the bills that your recieve from Blockbuster.  I will pay the late
fee the next time I rent a movie.

How are things otherwise?

-E

"K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com> on 10/03/2000 10:15:01 AM
Please respond to "K. Bass" <daphneco64@bigplanet.com>
To: Eric Bass <Eric.Bass@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:

Good Morning, Eric-
?
I assume you received my message yesterday but were  too busy to respond.?
That's o.k.? As a postscript though, I bought  your Dad a new Marine
sweatshirt so you can keep the other one.? And, I got  another bill from
Blockbuster for late fees.? Perhaps it would be best if  you get your own
account.? Have a wonderful day.   LU-M


Note:  See gas quality section at the bottom that they propose adding on
their other pipelines, like they have
on NGPL.

Shippers Protest KMI's Order 637 Tariff Changes

Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission (KMI) has attempted an end run
around FERC's Order 637,
filing wide-ranging operational and rate changes early under expedited tariff
procedures to avoid the
more rigorous review in store for compliance filings, according to customer
protests.

Items in KMI's tariff filing fall into no less than 13 general categories,
Indicated Shippers said. They include
imbalance provisions, storage balances, small customer service, gas quality,
point allocations, curtailment
priorities, right of first refusal, scheduling priorities, incidental
purchase and sale, capacity release,
unauthorized gas, capacity rights overrun charge, and miscellaneous.

Indicated Shippers called for summary rejection or maximum suspension of
KMI's June 5 tariff filing (RP00-316),
saying "most of the changes proposed in this case represent an effort by KMI
to implement elements of
Order 637 selectively and in a manner designed to minimize the opportunity
for meaningful review and
comment by KMI's customers." Only 12 days are allowed for intervention and
comment on usually routine
tariff filings, while the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has allotted
30 days for comments on
Order 637 compliance filings. KMI was among the group of pipelines slated to
make compliance filings June 15.

KMI said its filing did not constitute its compliance filing, but was aimed
at changing its tariff to reflect "the
current natural gas business climate and evolving business practices.." It
did acknowledge, "A number of the
changes proposed herein are consistent with and advance the Commission's
goals in Order No. 637."

Indicated Shippers also protested changes that would make decisions regarding
negative storage imbalances
and end of season inventory swaps a matter of KMI's discretion without any
standards on how those decisions
would be made. The shippers also protested changes to the default methodology
for point allocations for billing
purposes, and the injection of KMI discretion into the formula for accepting
or rejecting predetermined allocation
agreements with upstream or downstream parties. In addition curtailment
provisions filed by KMI appear to be
contrary to Order 637-A's mandate that shippers moving gas within the primary
path should have primary rights.

The filing also would give the pipeline the opportunity to bottle up
significant quantities of coal bed methane gas
in Wyoming's Powder River Basin by imposing more rigorous standards on
nitrogen content, according to
Western Gas Resources. A key change would impose a nitrogen gas quality
specification of 3% by volume.
While KMI states the change is necessary to accommodate transfers with
interconnecting pipelines, six of the
seven connecting pipelines identified have no nitrogen specifications. Only
KMI's affiliate, Natural Gas
Pipeline Co. of America, has similar rules, Western Gas said.

"KMI's proposed nitrogen specification would enable KMI to refuse to accept
coal bed methane production for
transportation, thereby foreclosing the availability of one of the principal
means of downstream pipeline egress
out of Powder River production areas," Western Gas added. Producers would
have to shut in production while
they construct costly nitrogen facilities. This could "create at least a
temporary gap in the downstream
movement of coal bed supplies to mid-continent and eastern markets, thus
frustrating consumer access to
these significant supplies."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


HI my art  website  is   www.geocities.com/margaret_site  and  I have  some
magnolias and roses on there...we are going to the  Mediterranean  in May so
Giverny  is in the offing..I hope  I do justice  to the colors  and  the
gorgeous  light...regards  Margaret


Ben,

I spoke with Anjam and gave him the information about my trip.
Here is the short summary:

1. If you are free for dinner on  Sunday, I would be glad to meet with you
(as well
as Anjam and Steve). I would like to review what's going on in Houston and
London.

2. We can arrange the interviews for all  the candidates you lined up Monday
afternoon
(Tuesday  and Wednesday mornings are the alternative dates). We treat the
interviews as internal
to the Research Group  and we shall arrange full interview schedules at a
later day for those candidates
who pass our internal test.

3. Please, feel free to put on my agenda other meetings you think might be
useful.
Please, coordinate the meetings with Anjam and Steve. I am busy on Tuesday
afternoon
(I a speak at a conference).

Vince

Benjamin Parsons
02/14/2000 08:18 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Agenda for next week

Vince,

Could you give me an idea of your agenda for next week's London visit - in
particular which day(s) would be best to bring some candidates in for
interviews for my old role.

Thanks

Ben


Matt, Since so much of this related to tax, I thought you should have a look
at it.

Rusty/Fred, I'm not sure of the context of the presentation of the
information.  Is this something which is going to the public, or to the
governmental entity involved?  If there is something which will be
distributed to the public, then we should consider having Enron's PR group
bless it.

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 09/25/2000 06:19
PM ---------------------------

"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com> on 09/25/2000
04:07:00 PM
To: "Jeff Martin (E-mail)" <jmartin@teskaassociates.com>, "Brian P. O'Neil
(E-mail)" <boneil@ensr.com>, "Phil Houser (E-mail)" <phouser@f-w.com>, "Brian
Fisher (E-mail)" <bfisher@f-w.com>, "Ronald R. Pollina Ph. D. (E-mail)"
<rrp@pollina.com>, "Fred J. Mitro (E-mail)" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, "Rusty
Stevens (E-mail)" <rsteven@enron.com>, "Jennifer Walker (E-mail)"
<Jennifer.Walker@enron.com>, "Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>,
"Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>, "Elam,
Michael H. - CHI" <Michael.Elam@piperrudnick.com>, "Nooney, Kathleen L. -
CHI" <Kathleen.Nooney@piperrudnick.com>, "Way, Karen S. - CHI"
<karen.way@piperrudnick.com>
cc: "Farrell, Eileen - CHI" <eileen.farrell@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: Enron - Livingston County PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL

 As many of you know, we have received a number of written questions
from Livingston County which were presented to them by residents.  Enron and
our firm have  prepared and  attached an initial draft response to those
questions.  Copies are provided in Word Perfect and Word for your
convenience.  Certain of the responses deal with specific areas for which
each of you are responsible.  While we have attempted to utilize the
information that you have previously prepared, it is critical that you
approve the responses.  Please review the proposed responses and fax me any
changes or call me by noon tomorrow.  While I'm quite interested in any
comments you may have on any of the responses, please be prepare to
specifically approve or modify the following questions:

 1. Pollina - Questions 1 - 7;

 2. Farnsworth & Wylie - Questions A and B;

 3. ENSR - Questions 8, 9, A and B; and

 4. Everyone else - Everything.

 I hope to speak to each of you, but if you cannot reach me please
call Karen Way at 312-368-2152.

 <<Enron Livingston Draft Response to Questions.WPD>>          <<Enron
Livingston Draft Responses (WORD 97).DOC>>

Mark A. Gershon
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
Phone: (312) 368-2127
Fax: (312) 630-5338
Mark.Gershon@PiperRudnick.com

____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________

 - Enron Livingston Draft Response to Questions.WPD
 - Enron Livingston Draft Responses (WORD 97).DOC


This is a deal with Mieco and I thought they were cut off.

Thanks!


Can't make it, unfortunately.  The agenda sounds great--I believe you have
seen the latest draft of the proposed options filing for TW, so I have
nothing else to add on that.  Thanks. DF

Shelley Corman
07/13/2000 03:55 PM
To: Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, rkilmer@enron.com, Teb Lokey/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew
Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy McCoppin/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Julia
White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Hotte/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven
Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Please RSVP: Lunch with Dan Larcamp of FERC on July 18

Dan Larcamp, Director of the FERC Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates will
be visiting Enron on July 18.   I am planning for him to have lunch with a
group of staff from the GPG at 11:30 (catered lunch in 50M).  Please RSVP at
your earliest convenience whether you can participate in this lunch meeting
and/or the topics that you would like to see us discuss.

The lunch discussion will be informal, but I think we should have two or
three themes that we'd like to steer discussions towards.  Here are some
tentative ideas.

How to Bring New Ideas to FERC.  Get Dan's suggestions on how to best work
with FERC on new ideas.  Perhaps talk about capacity options as an example.
What were his Impressions about the Recent Outreach Meetings.  Did he hear
anything new from any trade groups.   Is there any general feedback he'd like
to give to pipelines as a group?
Get Dan to Talk about Expectations for the fall Order 637 Technical
Conferences.  The first conference has been scheduled for Sept. 19.  What are
the top issues on Staff's mind.
What Does he expect to see in the upcoming RTO filings.  Are there Staff
resources concerns that we should be aware of and/or any suggestions for gas
filings during this time period?

FYI - Here is an outline of what I tentatively has lined up for Dan's visit.
10:30-11:30 Trading Floor Visit  Christi Nicolay/Kevin Presto/Steve Kean
11:30-1  Lunch (50M)   GPG Staff
1-1:30  Gas Control Tour  Mike Bryant


No home yet. May have to take to Penn Fuel.  I left a message with Equitable
to see if they are interested in Peoples, EOG, Equitrans and Penn Fuel.
What are you going to do with the CPA.  Bary Vanderhorst w/EES might be
interested.  If not I wll contact Equitable.

I will contact Dominion to see if they are interested in any of this gas.
John

Chris Germany@ECT
05/22/2000 11:26 AM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Questa Petroleum.

Do you have a home for the T&F Explor behind Penn Fuel for June?

I left a message for Charlie at CES this morning about all the other citygate
production.  I'm also trying to get a bid from CNG for the month of June on
the EOG and
Peoples gas.  I'll keep you posted.

	From:  John M Singer @ ENRON                           05/09/2000 01:07 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Questa Petroleum.

Chris Germany@ECT
05/09/2000 12:33 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: Questa Petroleum.

Do you have a current Citygate production worksheet?


Attached is the latest version of the ABB Transformer Agreement along
with a marked version showing changes from the previously circulated
November draft.  Please feel free to contact Peter Thompson or Elaine
Farris should you have any questions.

Faye Stedman
Word Processor

<<ABB Power T&D Company Form Transformer Purchase Agt..DOC>>  <<ABB
Transformer Agreement Comparison of v. 3 to 5.DOC>>
 - ABB Power T&D Company Form Transformer Purchase Agt..DOC
 - ABB Transformer Agreement Comparison of v. 3 to 5.DOC


its all good


Please handle.  Thank you.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ackel, Dennis
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 4:58 PM
To:	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON; Jim Derrick@EES
Subject:	RE: Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

Does this mean that the email records that are old than the last 12 months will not be deleted on November 3?

Dennis Ackel
Project Manager Costa Mesa		(714) 429-8150 direct
Enron					dennis_ackel@enron.com
611 Anton Blvd., 7th Floor
Costa Mesa, CA  92626

-----Original Message-----
From:	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON@EES  On Behalf Of Jim Derrick@EES
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:55 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@EES
Subject:	Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

As you know, Enron, its directors, and certain current and former officers are defendants in litigation in Federal and State court involving the LJM partnerships.

Enron has employed counsel and they will represent Enron and its interests in the litigation.

Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, we are required to preserve documents that might be used in the litigation.

Accordingly, our normal document destruction policies are suspended immediately and shall remain suspended until further notice.

Please retain all documents (which include handwritten notes, recordings, e-mails, and any other method of information recording) that in any way relate to the Company's related party transactions with LJM 1 and LJM 2, including, but not limited to, the formation of these partnerships, any transactions or discussions with the partnerships or its agents, and Enron's accounting for these transactions.

You should know that this document preservation requirement is a requirement of Federal law and you could be individually liable for civil and criminal penalties if you fail to follow these instructions.

You should know that Enron will defend these lawsuits vigorously.  In the meantime, you should not discuss matters related to the lawsuits with anyone other than the appropriate persons at Enron and its counsel.

If you have any questions, please contact Jim Derrick at 713-853-5550.


---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 01/10/2001 12:20
PM ---------------------------

"Huzyk, Julian" <Julian_Huzyk@kindermorgan.com> on 01/10/2001 09:34:19 AM
To: "Bruce Sposi (E-mail)" <BSposi@WesternGas.com>, "'Buddy Farah (E-mail) '
(E-mail)" <buddy.farah@tombrown.com>, "Cervin Peter (E-mail)"
<pcervin@br-inc.com>, "David Kuhn (E-mail)" <david_kuhn@kmmktg.com>, "Davis
Rob (E-mail)" <redavis@sempra.com>, "Frank Tsuru (E-mail)"
<ftsuru@redcedargathering.com>, "'Hassler Bryan' (E-mail)"
<bhassler@brr.com>, "Ishikawa Richard (E-mail)" <rishikawa@pacent.com>, "Jane
M Tholt (E-mail)" <jane.m.tholt@enron.com>, "Jerry Bruner (E-mail) (E-mail)"
<jbruner@southern-ute.nsn.us>, "KIRK N BLACKIM (E-mail)"
<KNBlackim@MECA-Capital.Com>, "Lee McCravey (E-mail)" <gastrader@aol.com>,
"Marburger Pat (E-mail)" <pama@dynegy.com>, "McCotter Jim (E-mail)"
<mccotterj@epenergy.com>, "Murray Teresa (E-mail)" <murrata@texaco.com>, "Rob
Davis (E-mail)" <Rob_Davis@sempra.com>, "Robinson Tom (E-mail)"
<TomRobinson@ceracamb.com>, "Sanford, Dan (E-mail)" <dans627@aol.com>,
"Schnacke Greg (E-mail)" <kdrew98103@aol.com>, "Scott Dalene (E-mail)"
<scott.dalene@coastalcorp.com>, "Tom Price (E-mail)"
<Tom.Price@Coastalcorp.com>, "Wes Haun (E-mail)" <Wes_Haun@msn.com>
cc:
Subject: TransColorado Seeks 3rd Party Operator

TransColorado Seeks Independent 3rd Party Operator

TransColorado Gas Transmission Company ("TransColorado"), a general
partnership of Questar TransColorado, Inc. ("QTC"), and KN TransColorado,
Inc. ("KNTC"), is seeking potential candidates who have an interest in
serving as the independent operator of TransColorado and performing, or
engaging others as necessary and appropriate to perform, certain
administrative, legal, regulatory and marketing functions currently
performed by or at the direction of QTC and KNTC.

Note: All candidates will be required to provide a Statement of
Qualifications no later than 4:00 p.m. CST on January 24, 2001.

All those demonstrating satisfactory qualifications in their response to the
Request for Qualifications will receive a Request for Proposal on or before
January 31, 2001.

The TransColorado gas transmission system is regulated by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (the "FERC") and consists of 292 miles of  22" and 24"
diameter high pressure, interstate natural gas pipeline that extends from
the Piceance Basin near Meeker, Colorado to the San Juan Basin near Blanco,
New Mexico.  Interconnections exist with interstate and intrastate pipelines
and gathering systems and treatment plants.

All interested parties should contact either Ms. Dianne Barrett at (303)
763-3676 (email: Dianne_Barrett@KinderMorgan.com
<mailto:Dianne_Barrett@KinderMorgan.com> ) or Ms. Evelyn Zimmerman at (801)
324-5564 (email: EvelynZ@Questar.com <mailto:EvelynZ@questar.com>) to obtain
a copy of the Request for Qualifications.


Sir,
 For the month of August, 2000, we will take 50% of our open Block Forward
position financial instead of physical. We would like to make this change
because we think the elimination of physical risk will benefit us
commercially. Thus for bona fide commercial reasons, we will go financial
with 50% of our open Block Forward position.

Bob Badeer

Manager
West Power Trading
Enron North America


you had better not have another date.  you are a player though.  call me when
you get home so i know if you are going to the rodeo tonight.  hopefully you
can make it.  talk to you later.


Citizens Utilities is in the process of selling off all of its
non-telecommunications businesses throughout North America.  One of their
principal assets, Louisiana Gas Service (LGS) is one of those companies
recently sold by Citizens.  LGS provided gas control and operations services
to other non-LGS companies, including the Citizens Utilities LDC assets in
Arizona.  With the consummation of the sale of LGS, Citizens has told me
confidentially that they have no reasonable way of operating the
interconnect, metering and 1.5 mile lateral pipeline facilities that
interconnects TW and EPNG to the recently constructed Griffith Energy Power
Plant.   Therefore, Citizens is looking to possibly have a 3rd party provide
contract operations services under an operating agreement.  TW has been asked
in writing by Citizens to consider making a proposal to operate these
facilities.

Does TW have an interest in providing contract operations services for
Citizens?  In a related legal/regulatory question, does TW have the authority
to conduct contract services on behalf of others, or would we have to perform
these services as a separate legal entity?  If we do, does this present an
affiliate problem for us if we "share" operating employees?  If these
threshold questions can be accommodated, and TW is not only able to provide
contract operations services for Citizens, but has a commercial desire to do
so, what would we charge Citizens for this service?  Although it would appear
at first blush to be a relatively simple matter to operate these facilities,
remember that Citizens will be receiving gas (potentially) from both TW and
EPNG simultaneously, presenting not only a challenge to balance pressure
between the pipes, but to account for and reconcile deliveries and receipts
from both pipes as well as the plant site.

Although I'm the principal commercial representative for Citizens as regards
transportation matters, I'm certainly willing to step out of the middle of
this negotiation if Operations desires to handle it themselves.  I will be
happy to provide you a copy of the brief 1/2 page letter Citizens sent to me
on the 17th soliciting TW's interest.   Given the relatively short lead time
until LGS operations is sold, Citizens has requested expedited
consideration.  Please let me know how you want to proceed.  Call if you have
any questions.


********* Welcome to Bestfares.com's HOT DEALS BY EMAIL ************

BESTFARES.COM is your source for HOT TRAVEL DEALS. Visit our home
page at http://www.bestfares.com. Also, remember to visit our Newsdesk
daily at http://www.bestfares.com/travel_center/desks/newsdesk.asp
where we post hundreds of deals every day that could save you up
to 70% every time you travel! Subscribe and unsubscribe information
can be found at the bottom of this newsletter.

**************************** December 11, 2000  ************************

1-DAY BLOWOUT SALE: FLY COAST-TO-COAST FOR $148 RT JAN. 4-FEB. 15, 2001
Today, you,ll think the holidays have arrived early. Bestfares.com is
having a one-day blowout sale, and boy, do we have some good presents for
you. Can you believe that you can fly coast-to-coast from select U.S.
cities for only $148 roundtrip January 4 through February 15, 2001? For
example, how about flying to Las Vegas for just $148 roundtrip from
Chicago, Columbus (OH),
Indianapolis, Omaha, Kansas City, New Orleans, Austin, San Antonio,
Hartford, Baltimore, Orlando, Tampa, Fort Myers, Fort Lauderdale and many
other cities? You have to feel lucky that we can offer you Vegas fares
this cheap, but we also have a big variety of hot destinations such as Los
Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle and Portland (OR). If it,s
sunny Florida you,d like to try, head to cities including Orlando, Tampa,
Fort Myers and Fort Lauderdale for a low $148 roundtrip. Start the year
2001 off with a bang, with some of the cheapest fares of the New Year. For
more details, visit: http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10091582.

1-DAY FLORIDA SALE FROM $93 RT FOR JAN UARY & FEBUARY TRAVEL.
Seats to Florida during the December holidays are either completely sold
out or sky high. Your New Year,s Resolution should be that you never pay
full fare again. To help you keep this promise, Bestfares.com is offering
a one-day super sale to Orlando, Tampa, Fort Myers, Fort Lauderdale and
Miami on Monday, December 11, 2000. Just last week, temperature in Miami
and Fort
Lauderdale was a sunny 80 degrees. Believe it or not, we have airfares to
Florida almost as low as that temperature. For instance, Philadelphia to
Tampa is only $93 roundtrip, and New York City to Orlando is $94
roundtrip. You can fly from Chicago or Dayton to Orlando or Fort
Lauderdale for just $110 roundtrip. Milwaukee, Indianapolis, Oklahoma
City, Omaha, Austin, San Antonio, Louisville, Nashville and several other
cities to select Florida markets is $126 roundtrip. Plus,  Florida fares
from Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Diego, San
Francisco, Seattle or Portland (OR) begin at $148 roundtrip. With airfares
this low, you may want to fly for the frequent flier miles alone. For your
hot ticket to Florida for 2001, click to
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10091582.

FINAL DAY! FLY TO LONDON FOR $215 RT JANUARY 9 THRU APRIL 30, 2001.
The British are coming( the bargain British airfares are coming. With
travel as low as $215 roundtrip, and only $179 for children ages two
through 11, you can hop over to the U.K. for less than flying from
Dallas/Fort Worth to Memphis. Fly to London from Boston, Providence, or
New York City for only $215 roundtrip or $179 for children. How about
Washington (DC) to London at $242 roundtrip, children $202; Chicago to
London $239 roundtrip, children $179; Los Angeles, Orange County or
Ontario to London $287, children $215; San Francisco or San Jose to London
$303, children $227? Be sure to check out these special fares while they
last. Tickets must be purchased no later than 5:30 p.m. Central today.
For full details, visit http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10110593.

AUSTRALIA IS ON SALE FROM $899 RT FOR TRAVEL THROUGH MARCH 24.
Now that summertime is about to dawn Down Under, you can save up to $800
or more off the standard published rates. Now you can escape winter in the
States for some fun in the South Pacific without breaking the bank. Fares
to Sydney, Brisbane or Melbourne are now only $899 roundtrip (or $749 for
children ages two through 11) from Los Angeles or San Francisco.  Travel
is valid from December 30 through March 24, 2001.  Compare that to regular
peak season tickets at $1,638 and $1,708 roundtrip. New York City to
Sydney, Melbourne or Brisbane is only $1,179 roundtrip. That fare is far
below the usual price of $2,314 for weekend travel. Our fares are good
seven days a week with no weekend surcharge. Take advantage of some
Bestfares.com value savings at:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10110258.

CARIBBEAN SALE FROM $328 RT FOR WINTER/SPRING TRAVEL AT 50% OFF.
The Caribbean is just the place to relax and warm up this time of year,
when the average temperature is in the mid-80s Fahrenheit. The good news
is that we can bring you savings of up to half off on flights to over 15
Caribbean cities for travel through the middle of next June. You can
escape to the sunny islands of the Caribbean from over 40 U.S. cities
beginning at only $328 roundtrip. The average published roundtrip fares to
the eastern Caribbean are $658 to $798 from the East Coast, but our fares
can get you there for far less. For example, fly to the Caribbean from the
East Coast and the Southeast U.S. for only $328 roundtrip. From Chicago
and the Midwest, your cost is only $428 roundtrip. From the West,
including Denver, San Diego, Orange County, Los Angeles, San Francisco,
Seattle, Phoenix and Las Vegas, it's only $458 roundtrip. Travel on
weekends is just $20 more each way. Caribbean cities include Nassau, four
other locations in the Bahamas, Bermuda, San Juan, St. Thomas, St. Croix,
Aruba, Grand Cayman, Montego Bay, Cancun, St. Maarten and Santo Domingo.
For further information, click to
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10088489.

HOT DEAL! EUROPEAN CAR RENTALS FOR LESS THAN $14 A DAY!
EXTENDED DATES AND GUARANTEED LOWEST RATES(
Attention Bestfares.com members and guests(This Just In(Auto Europe has
extended savings of up to 20% off their already guaranteed lowest rental
cars rates for two more weeks. You now have 14 extra days to book your
European rental car for travel through the end of next year, December 30,
2001 when you book online. For example, a seven-day economy rental in
Amsterdam is only $100. That's only $14 a day! Or, three-day economy
rental in London is only $84. That's only $28 a day! Compared to other
rental car companies that charge $102 for this same rental, Auto Europe
can save you up to 20%. Folks, this truly is special offer ) guaranteed
lowest rental car rates in Europe, plus savings of up to an additional 20%
off when you book online. But hurry this offer has only been extended
through December 31, 2000. And if you thought this deal couldn,t get any
sweeter, Auto Europe is also throwing in a free one-week cellular phone
rental during this sale to make sure you are always connected during your
European travels. But don,t wait, come 2001, prices are sure to increase.
Check out the incredibly low rental cars rates below:

3-day rental in Amsterdam - $60 (That,s only $20 a day!)*
3-day rental in London - $84 (That,s only 28 a day!)*
3-day rental in Paris - $84 (That's only $28 a day!)*
3-day rental in Munich - $95 (That's only $32 a day!)*
3-day rental in Rome - $141 (That,s only $47 a day - all inclusive)*
7-day rental in Amsterdam - $100 (That,s only $14 a day!)*
7-day rental in London - $140 (That,s only $20 a day!)*
7-day rental in Munich - $159 (That's only $23 a day!)*
7-day rental in Rome - $235 (That,s only $34 a day ) all inclusive)*
*Take up to an additional 20% off these rates when you book online.

Hop into the driver seat and spend your next vacation seeing what you want
to see and doing what you,d like to do with great savings on rental cars
from Auto Europe. For complete details click to our feature story at:
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10111190.
Or, better yet book your European rental car now by visiting Auto Europe,s
web site at http://www.autoeurope.com/welcome.cfm?c=15.

SAVE UP TO 50% WITH RADISSON,S &HOT DEALS8
Radisson Hotels & Resorts is offering savings of up to 50% at over 300
worldwide destinations in the U.S.A., the Caribbean, Canada, Europe,
Australia, Mexico, the Orient and many more worldwide destinations. Unlike
others who only claim to offer big savings, Radisson delivers true
discounts of up to 50% with their &Hot Deals8 weekly Internet specials.
What,s more, Radisson,s &Hot Deals8 actually rewards travelers who do not
have advance reservations with unbeatable last-minute rates. For example,
the standard room-rate at the Radisson Resort Parkway in Orlando is
currently $149 but with Radisson,s &Hot Deals8 Internet rate you can spend
the weekend splish-splashing in the Orlando sun for only $59 a night. Or,
head west for a star-studded weekend getaway in the Radisson Westside
Hotel in Los Angeles and pay only $89 a night. Compare this to the
standard room-rate of $179 and Radisson,s &Hot Deals8 are saving you $90
or over 50% off the standard room rate.

So, forget the stress of a hectic week and take off on an affordable
getaway with Radisson,s &Hot Deals.8 These special rates are only
available at Radisson,s web site and they are updated every Wednesday. For
additional savings comparison and full program details you may want to
read our feature story at
http://www.bestfares.com/view.asp?id=10110291, or for those of you ready
to book right now and save up to 50% with Radisson,s &Hot Deals8 follow
this link:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2134924;4997587;z?http://www.radisson.com/hotdea
ls

********************************************************************

HOT DEALS BY EMAIL announcements feature special money-saving offers
available on Bestfares.com. This free, weekly newsletter is your
best bet to receive great, late-breaking travel deals.

Please feel free to send this newsletter to your colleagues, friends
and family and encourage them to sign up for a free subscription to
HOT DEALS BY EMAIL. Thanks to all of you who have already recommended
this newsletter to others. If this email has been forwarded to you,
you can get your own free subscription at:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

About your privacy: Our email list is used only for distribution of
our own materials. Our subscriber list will not be sold, rented, or
otherwise made available to third parties

********************************************************************

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION

To subscribe to the HOT DEALS BY EMAIL newsletter, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp.

To unsubscribe from HOT DEALS BY EMAIL, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp

To change your email address, please visit:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/unsubscribe.asp
and unsubscribe from Hot Deals. Then go to:
http://www.bestfares.com/e-deals/e-deal.asp
and register your new email address.

Although every effort is made to ensure accurate information,
Bestfares.com is not responsible for any errors in this newsletter.


Document attached; 5927mhc2.doc
Michelle, I have a suggested tweak to the document.
Pat

 - 5927mhc2.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000
11:36 AM ---------------------------

Shane.Dobbs@fctg.com on 11/28/2000 11:22:03 AM
To: tharpbl@eng.auburn.edu, dobbsmw@auburn.edu, domino@sonet.net,
hamptone@booksamillion.com, jmjaked@mindspring.com, jwood@regionsbank.com,
gwave85@hotmail.com, dobbswn@auburn.edu, phillip.m.love@enron.com,
poe77@earthlink.net, stephaniepool@huntersystems.com
cc:
Subject: FW: Proposed new seal for the DNC

-----Original Message-----
From: Hafley_Robert
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:21 AM
To: BIFP TRADERS
Subject: FW: Proposed new seal for the DNC

-----Original Message-----
From: Hoblitt, Allan [mailto:AHOBLITT@RILEYCREEK.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:32 AM
To: BILL MCGOVERN (E-mail); BILL SABUS (E-mail); BRIAN COOK (E-mail);
BURRLE ELMORE (E-mail); CARTER STINTON (E-mail); CRAIG SODERBERG
(E-mail); DAN SWEENEY (E-mail); DAVE BOURNE (E-mail); DAVE MCKINNEY
(E-mail); DEAN HAGUE (E-mail); KEN HESSING (E-mail); LARRY WARNER
(E-mail 2); LONNIE BASKETT (E-mail); MIKE GRAHAM (E-mail); MIKE SLATER
(E-mail); PAT GRANETO (E-mail); Stoyanov_Petar; Hafley_Robert; tom
warnock (E-mail); TROY NORKUS (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Proposed new seal for the DNC

-----Original Message-----
From: Boeh, Bob
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:26 AM
To: Hoblitt, Allan
Subject: FW: Proposed new seal for the DNC

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Riley [mailto:jim@intforest.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 9:02 AM
To: Jim English; Marc Brinkmeyer; Tony Colter; Brett Bennett; Bob Boeh;
Larry Isenberg; Mark Benson; Hugh Travaille; Guy Hurlbutt; Dick Bennett;
Bill Dryden
Subject: FW: Proposed new seal for the DNC

-

?
 - THE NEW OFFICIAL SEAL.doc
 - ATT00049.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
04:33 PM ---------------------------

Kristin Walsh
01/25/2001 11:23 AM
To: John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron
cc: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary Hickerson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard
Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Michelle D Cisneros/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff
Kinneman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Greene/LON/ECT@ECT, Jaime Gualy/NA/Enron@Enron,
Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Grigsby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Tholan/Corp/Enron@Enron, Robert Johnston/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: California Update 1/25/01

California Timeline:
February 2nd:
The state legislature has to pass the enabling laws to let the state pay for
the electricity from auction before the current emergency money runs out on
February 2.   Republican leaders have vowed to block any additional emergency
funds.
The California courts gave Edison a two-week grace period (until February 2)
on demands by the California Power Exchange that Edison forfeit $215 million
in long-term low cost power contracts to the CPX for repayment of its debt.
Governor Davis told the Court that he may absorb that contract in favor of
taxpayers using his emergency "taking" powers.
February 7th:
President Bush, who had to intervene personally against his energy secretary
to extend the Energy Department order mandating electricity sales to
California by power generators, made it abundantly clear to all sides that
the two week deadline was hard and would not be extended.
February 13th:
Edison worked out a three-week grace period -- through February 13 -- with
all of its 32 banks and QFS to prevent from asking for accelerated repayment
during that period, but if the state has not figured out a way to bridge that
debt by then, this deadline could be a real trigger for bankruptcy.

Legislation
As mentioned in Tuesday's update, legislators are close to a long-term power
buying deal with the so-called "green" producers (wind, solar, hydro, cows)
of energy, accounting for 30% of California's total energy production.   This
would allow the Department of Water Resources to buy power from them at 8
cents per kilowatt hour.

Bill AB1X--the key piece of legislation for setting long-term power
contracts--is still being mulled over in the Senate, but is expected to pass
this week.  The keys issues is still the price, which will probably be
revised in accordance to the results of the auction.  Other legislation has
been introduced, including three bills by Boxer that would increase federal
support and impose "windfall profits tax" for wholesalers that sell power at
"unfair and unreasonable" rates.  The hydro legislation is still being
bantered about, however with going opposition from both Democrats and
Republicans.

Bail out scenarios
A new scenario is a market-oriented solution that would give the state of
California "warrants" on the PG&E and Edison stock in return for lending them
the money to get out of this current mess (still the problem of financing the
$6B vs. $12B).   As the stock prices recovered, the state could cash in the
warrants and rebate to electricity users some of the emergency surcharge
needed to pay back the debt.  This is exactly the plan used to bail out
Chrysler in the late 1970s and it worked wonders for taxpayers then.  This
senario would also provide Davis with some political cover, as the idea of
rebates are far more appealing than price increases.  Lots of details remain
to be worked out, but even the consumer activist groups threatening to create
propositions on fall ballots appeared to like this deal.

Bankruptcy
Socal is close to an agreement with 32 bank creditors and QFs to allow a
forbearance on debt payments through February 13th.  However, it is not
expected that the bondholders would agree to this type of deal.  The
bondholders could try to force the utilities into involuntary bankruptcy, but
would probably be unsuccessful.  As long as Socal continues working with
their creditors and show "good faith" any bankruptcy at this time would have
to be voluntary.  As this date (Feb. 13th) fast approaches, the state will
have to take quick action and draft and approve legislation between the
governor, the generators and the utilities to prevent Socal and PG&E from
bankruptcy.    As part of the forbearance agreement, Edison has contracted
with around 400 QFs and negotiations have been directed toward separating the
rate schedules of generation facilities fuelled between renewables and gas
fired generation.  Socal is attempting to shift gas fired QFs to longer term
schedules in light of the recent higher gas prices.

Auction
After a nervous night when only one bid had come to the state's Internet site
by midnight on Tuesday, California officials were happy to announce that they
had almost 40 bids at an average of 6.9 cents per kilowatt-hour, below the
7.4 cent real cap state officials had set internally as the threshold between
doable and impossible.  This was well above the 5.5 cent ceiling the governor
had publicly stated as the preferred level.  Davis will now turn the
negotiating process over to David Freeman, who heads the Los Angeles electric
agency and is generally considered the dean of public-private utilities in
the west.   One thing to note, the State of California has no intention of
any credit guarantees for the bids with the Department of Water Resources.
Several California legislators have made it very clear that they do not want
the state to be ultimately responsible for these power purchases.


Jeff,
Just wanted to let you know that David will be in Sacramento on Wednesday @ 1 p.m. to meet with John White.

Hi Kelly!

David wanted for you to be available to attend this meeting in Sacramento.  I am not sure how long you will be on vacation but, could you please let me know asap if you would be available to attend the meeting with Jeff Dasovich & David Parquet.

The meeting location address is:
1100 - 11th Street (cross streets: K & L)
Suite 311
Sacramento

Cristina

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 4:10 PM
To:	Zavala, Cristina
Subject:	RE: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29

thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Zavala, Cristina
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 3:27 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff; Etringer, Michael
Cc:	Parquet, David
Subject:	RE: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29

David is in NY and will not be back until Wed.

Jeff, I did leave David a voicemail with the information for the meeting in Sacramento and I told him to confirm with me if he would be able to attend.  I am still waiting for his confirmation.

CZ

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 10:52 AM
To:	Etringer, Michael; Zavala, Cristina
Cc:	Parquet, David
Subject:	RE: Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29

Dave and I are supposed to be in a meeting in Sacramento with John White at 1 PM in Sacramento.  So the timing may be tight.  Perhaps we could do 4 PM?

Best,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Etringer, Michael
Sent:	Monday, August 27, 2001 1:24 PM
To:	Zavala, Cristina
Cc:	Parquet, David; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	Meeting with Michael Tribolet for Wednesday, 8/29

Cristina, I am not sure what either Dave's or Jeff's schedule looks like but wanted to see if either would be available for a meeting  with Michael Tribolet and myself on Wednesday afternoon in SF.  Could you let me know.  It would likely be after 3:30 in the afternoon.

Michael Etringer
West Power Origination
Phone: 503-464-3836
Cellular: 503-701-4516


Could you find the deal ticket for Trco k#2.7055?

May
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 01/28/2000 01:08
PM ---------------------------
From: Beverly Beaty on 01/28/2000 01:05 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Do you see 2.7055 in Unify?

Nope.........


Attached are the changes we discussed today.


I'm working through the "agent for" issue, and thought I would share the
info.  I've asked our local counsel for  a bit more direct answer (ie, his
opinion).

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 03:42
PM ---------------------------

"Wilson Montjoy" <wmontjoy@brunini.com> on 06/06/2001 12:30:41 PM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Joint agency as reseller of power

I've recopied below Miss. Code Ann. Sec. 77-5-727. Subsection (u) appears to
answer your question, at least as to purchases of electric power. I'm not
aware of anything under the joint action agancy law that empowers the entity
to buy gas on behalf of its members.

Section 77-5-729 provides authority for the member utility to contract with
the joint agency to purchase power. It's recopied below as well.

o 77-5-725. Powers of joint agencies
Current through End of 2000 3rd Ex. Sess.
References     Annotations
Each joint agency shall have all of the rights and powers necessary or
convenient to carry out and effectuate the purposes and provisions of this
article, including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the
rights and powers:
(a) To adopt bylaws for the regulation of the affairs and the conduct of its
business, and to prescribe rules, regulations and policies in connection with
the performance of its functions and duties;
(b) To adopt an official seal and alter the same at pleasure;
(c) To maintain an office at such place or places as it may determine;
(d) To sue and be sued in its own name, and to plead and be impleaded;
(e) To receive, administer and comply with the conditions and requirements
respecting any gift, grant or donation of any property or money;
(f) To acquire by purchase, lease, gift or otherwise, or to obtain options
for the acquisition of, any property, real or personal, improved or
unimproved, including an interest in land less than the fee thereof;
(g) To sell, lease, exchange, transfer or otherwise dispose of, or to grant
options for any such purposes with respect to, any real or personal property
or interest therein;
(h) To pledge or assign any money, rents, charges or other revenues and any
proceeds derived by the joint agency from the sales of property, insurance or
condemnation awards;
(i) To issue bonds of the joint agency for the purpose of providing funds for
any of its corporate purposes;
(j) To study, plan, finance, construct, reconstruct, acquire, improve,
enlarge, extend, better, own, operate and maintain, one or more projects,
either individually or jointly, with one or more municipalities in this state
or any other state owning electric distribution facilities or with any
political subdivision, agencies or instrumentalities of any state, or with
any one or more joint agencies created pursuant to this article, or any
person, firm, association or corporation, public or private, engaged in the
generation, transmission or distribution of electric power and energy within
this state or any other state, and to pay all or any part of the costs
thereof from the proceeds of bonds of the joint agency or from any other
funds made available to the joint agency;
(k) To authorize the construction, operation or maintenance of any project or
projects by any person, firm or corporation, including political subdivisions
and agencies of any state, or of the United States;
(l) To acquire by lease, purchase or otherwise an existing project or a
project under construction, or any interest therein, or portion thereof;
(m) With the unanimous consent of the member municipalities, to sell or
otherwise dispose of any project or projects, or any interest therein or
portion thereof.  The member municipalities may enter into an agreement with
the joint agency whereby certain types of property may be traded or otherwise
disposed of without unanimous consent of the member municipalities;
(n) To fix, charge and collect rents, rates, fees and charges for electric
power or energy and other services, facilities and commodities sold,
furnished or supplied through any project;
(o) To generate, produce, transmit, deliver, exchange, purchase or sell for
resale only, electric power or energy, and to enter into contracts for any or
all such purposes;
(p) To negotiate and enter into contracts for the purchase, sale, exchange,
interchange, wheeling, pooling, transmission or use of electric power and
energy with any municipality in this state or any other state owning electric
distribution facilities, or with any political subdivisions, agencies or
instrumentalities of any other state or with other joint agencies created
pursuant to this article, any electric power association, any public or
private utility, and any state, federal or municipal agency which owns
electric generation, transmission or distribution facilities in this state or
any other state;
(q) To make and execute contracts and other instruments necessary or
convenient in the exercise of the powers and functions of the joint agency
under this article, including contracts with persons, firms, corporations and
others;
(r) To apply to the appropriate agencies of the state, the United States or
any state thereof, and to any other proper agency for such permits, licenses,
certificates or approvals as may be necessary, and to construct, maintain and
operate projects in accordance with, and to obtain, hold and use, such
licenses, permits, certificates or approvals in the same manner as any other
person or operating unit of any other person;  provided, however, nothing
herein contained shall be construed to require the joint agency to obtain any
permit, license, certificate or approval from the Public Service Commission
of Mississippi;
(s) To employ engineers, architects, attorneys, real estate counselors,
appraisers, financial advisors and such other consultants and employees as
may be required in the judgment of the joint agency and to fix and pay their
compensation from funds available to the joint agency therefor;
(t) To purchase all kinds of insurance including, but not limited to,
insurance against business interruption, and/or risks of damage to property;
(u) To purchase power and energy and related services from any source on
behalf of its members and other customers and to sell the same to its members
and other customers in such amounts, with such characteristics, for such
periods of time and under such terms and conditions as the board of
commissioners shall determine;  and
(v) To do all acts and things necessary, convenient or desirable to carry out
the purposes, and to exercise the powers granted to the joint agency herein.

o 77-5-729. Contracts by members to buy power from joint agencies
Current through End of 2000 3rd Ex. Sess.
References
Any municipality which is a member of the joint agency may contract to buy
from the joint agency power and energy required for its present or future
requirements, including the capacity and output of one or more specified
projects.  As the creation of a joint agency is an alternative method whereby
a municipality may obtain the benefits and assume the responsibilities of
ownership in a project, any such contract may provide that the municipality
so contracting shall be obligated to make the payments required by the
contract whether or not a project is completed, operable, operating, retired
or decommissioned and notwithstanding the suspension, interruption,
interference, reduction, curtailment or termination of the output of a
project or the power and energy contracted for, and that such payments under
the contract shall not be subject to any reduction whether by offset or
otherwise, and shall not be conditioned upon the performance or
nonperformance of the joint agency or any other member of the joint agency
under the contract or any other instrument.  Any contract with respect to the
sale or purchase of capacity or output of a project entered into between a
joint agency and its member municipalities may also provide that if one or
more of such municipalities shall default in the payment of its or their
obligations, with respect to the purchase of said capacity or output, then in
that event the remaining member municipalities which are purchasing capacity
and output under the contract shall be required to accept and pay for and
shall be entitled proportionately to and may use or otherwise dispose of the
capacity or output which was to be purchased by the defaulting municipality.
Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law to the contrary, any such
contracts with respect to the sale or purchase of capacity, output, power or
energy from a project may extend for a period not exceeding fifty (50) years
from the date a project is estimated to be placed in normal continuous
operation;  and the execution and effectiveness thereof shall not be subject
to any authorizations or approvals by the state or any agency, commission or
instrumentality or political subdivision thereof except as in this article
specifically required and provided.
Payments by a municipality under any contract for the purchase of capacity
and output from a joint agency shall be made solely from the revenues derived
from the ownership and operation of the electric system of said municipality
and any obligation under such contract shall not constitute a legal or
equitable pledge, charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the
municipality or upon any of its income, receipts or revenues, except the
revenues of its electric system, and neither the faith and credit nor the
taxing power of the municipality are, or may be, pledged for the payment of
any obligation under any such contract.  A municipality shall be obligated to
fix, charge and collect rents, rates, fees and charges for electric power and
energy and other services, facilities and commodities, sold, furnished or
supplied through its electric system sufficient to provide revenues adequate
to meet its obligations under any such contract and to pay any and all other
amounts payable from or constituting a charge and lien upon such revenues,
including amounts sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on bonds
heretofore or hereafter issued by the municipality for purposes related to
its electric system.
Any municipality which is a member of a joint agency may furnish the joint
agency with money derived solely from the ownership and operation of its
electric system or facilities and may make available for the use of the joint
agency any personnel, equipment and property, both real and personal, which
is a part of its electric system or facilities.
Any member of a joint agency may contract for, advance or contribute funds
derived solely from the ownership and operation of its electric system or
facilities to a joint agency as may be agreed upon by the joint agency and
the member, and the joint agency shall repay such advances or contributions
from proceeds of bonds, from operating revenues or from any other funds of
the joint agency, together with interest thereon as may be agreed upon by the
member and the joint agency.


Tom,

The conference in New York is held on  May 18 and May 19. I can visit Wharton
the day before.

Vince Kaminski

"Piazze, Thomas" <piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu> on 04/05/2000 08:40:55 AM
To: "'Vince J Kaminski'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Test

Vince:  I enjoyed talking with you yesterday and look forward to receiving
information relative to your visit to campus.

TOM PIAZZE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince J Kaminski [SMTP:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 4:52 PM
> To: piazzet@wharton.upenn.edu
> Subject: Test
>
>
>
> Test
>