[IMAGE]

 	 [IMAGE]  The Sporting News -  just 99? an issue, plus  a FREE Gift!       [IMAGE]    CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP NOW

 	 	  Hey REAL sports fan,   Had enough of EXTREME sports and wrestlers prancing in leotards? Then you're ready for real sports coverage from the real sports magazine - The Sporting News.   Subscribe now for The Sporting News' detailed stats, informative team-by-team updates, and no-nonsense coverage of all major sports: including pro and college football, baseball and basketball, plus hockey and NASCAR. You'll save 75% off the cover price, PLUS get an awesome stainless steel Thermo-Bottle, FREE!    If you're searching for synchronized swimming scores, leave now. If it's real, hard-core sports coverage that you crave, we've got a weekly subscription with your name on it.   Go for it... Click here to subscribe now!     You received this e-mail because you registered on CBS SportsLine.com. If you do not want to receive these special e-mail offers you can  unsubscribe by clicking this link:  http://www.sportsline.com/u/newsletters/newsletter.cgi?email=dutch.quigley@enron.com  or by replying to this message with "unsubscribe" in the subject line. You are subscribed as dutch.quigley@enron.com. Although we are sending this e-mail to you, SportsLine.com is not responsible for the advertisers' content and makes no warranties or guarantees about the products or services advertised. SportsLine.com takes your privacy  seriously. To learn more about SportsLine.com's use of personal information, please read our  Privacy Statement at  http://cbs.sportsline.com/u/userservices/privacy.htm

[IMAGE]


Likewise.  Hope I'm not being to much of a pain on the calls.   Just that
Enron---I'm quite certain---won't lend it's name to anything that's less than
stellar.  And I'm sure GSPP would like for the conference to be all that it
can be, too.  How'd things go in Portland?

Best,
Jeff

gramlr@pjm.com on 08/29/2000 07:12:41 AM
To: jdasovic@enron.com
cc:
Subject: RE: Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm

I got the message but not til today because our e-mail was down.  It was good
to
talk to you last night.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdasovic@enron.com [SMTP:jdasovic@enron.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 3:02 PM
> To: gramlr@pjm.com
> Subject: Re: Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm
>
>
> I can be on the call.  Please let me know if you get this, since I've been
> having severe email problems.  Thanks.
>
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> gramlr@pjm.com on 08/25/2000 07:04:27 AM
>
> To:   MichaelBerg@ICFConsulting.com, whederman@columbiaenergygroup.com,
>       doornbos@socrates.berkeley.edu, amosher@appanet.org,
>       hcameron@uclink.berkeley.edu, lfried@uclink.berkeley.edu,
>       jeff.dasovich@enron.com
> cc:   jalamo@enron.com
> Subject:  Tentative meeting Monday 8/28 at 5 pm/2 pm
>
>
>           Please confirm that this schedule works.  It is the only day
> that worked for everyone.  Jeff Dasovich is still in the Sierras so I can
> check
> in with him Monday.
>
>           The agenda sounds simple but don't be deceived, there are many
> many options.  Please be prepared with a list of 3 top speaker choices.
>
>           1.  Topics of panels.
>
>           2.  Speaker list.  Try to agree on an 'A' list who we can start
> calling and a 'B' list of alternates.
>
>
>


Just send cookies then and we will be happy.

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 11/01/2000 12:01:04 PM
To: "'mfleming@enron.com'" <mfleming@enron.com>, "'chris.germany@enron.com'"
<chris.germany@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Mtg Tomorrow

Tomorrow looks like it's shaping up to be a busy day; so Keith and I need to
take a rain check for lunch.? Let's do lunch maybe later in the month when
things settle down a little.

Thank you.??? ii


Max:

I will get the amendment to you today.

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sonnonstine, Max
Sent:	Thursday, July 19, 2001 9:30 AM
To:	Heard, Marie; Panus, Stephanie; Bailey, Susan
Subject:	FW: ConAgra Energy Services amendments

Good Morning,
	For the below request, I have just received the amended guarantee from Cindy Richardson.  If you have the amended ISDA, I'd like to forward this to Russell Martinson.
	Also, for Kona oil and gas properties draft ISDA, they want a draft ASAP for their legal to review.  If you can send the draft to me today I'll forward to the apporpriate party.

Thanks,
Max

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Sonnonstine, Max
Sent:	Tuesday, July 10, 2001 2:38 PM
To:	Abrams, Clement; Panus, Stephanie; Heard, Marie; Bailey, Susan
Cc:	Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject:	ConAgra Energy Services amendments
Importance:	High

All,
	Per Jay Williams approval, Russell Martinson of ConAgra Energy Services has requested an increase in Enron's outgoing guarantee of ENA to $30million from $20million.  In return, Enron has requested amendment to the ISDA giving ENA a credit threshold of $25million, up from $12.5million.  There will be no change in ConAgra credit.  Please prepare the appropriate amendments of the guarantee and ISDA to forward to Russell.  I am working on getting the mailing address to forward these documents, and will send it to you all once I receive it.  Please coordinate so both amendments can be sent at the same time.
	If you have any questions, don't hesitate to call either Jay or myself.

Thanks,

Max Sonnonstine
x 58261


Please place on your calendars.  I will be taking names....:)

adr
Audrey D. Robertson
Transwestern Pipeline Company
email address:  audrey.robertson@enron.com
(713) 853-5849
(713) 646-2551 Fax

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Armstrong, Julie
Sent:	Monday, November 05, 2001 11:19 AM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Harris, Steven; Dowd, Stephen; Hayes, Robert; Kilmer III, Robert; Gadd, Eric
Cc:	McCarty, Danny; Winters, Ricki; Robertson, Audrey; Kovalcik, Tammy; Paschal, Zelda; Wadle, Susan
Subject:	FW: Floor meeting with Stan Horton

Please note the floor meeting with Stan on Wednesday.  Please forward this message to your respective groups.  Thanks.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Stan Horton.@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 5:05 PM
To:	Danny McCarty - Houston@ENRON
Subject:	Floor meeting with Stan Horton

Please join me for an open discussion floor meeting on Wednesday, November 7, at 2:30 pm on the 39th floor near EB3922.

This will be an opportunity for me to update you on what is currently happening within Enron, EGS and ETS, as well as an opportunity for me to answer any questions you have.

I look forward to seeing you there, and thank you for your continued hard work and support of our company.

Stan


Boy, was she quick.  We appear to have only one trade to assign, so Credit, I
guess you are OK with this, and Bob, you don't show any other crude trades do
you?
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 07/05/2000 06:08 PM -----

	"Anita Herrera" <aherrera@statoilenergy.com>
	07/05/2000 06:06 PM

		 To: "Tana Jones" <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Crude trades

Attached is the one crude trade between the 2 companies:
(See attached file: Enron crude trades.xls)

 - Enron crude trades.xls


Very good cross over of ideas - I will push Andy to see the communication
expand - there must be substantive correlation between these physical
businesses at the operational level !!

Mike
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Jordan/LON/ECT on 24/01/2001 13:53
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Brenda F Herod                           23/01/2001 23:40

To: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jill
Lafave/ENRON@enronXgate, Delmar Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel
Hamilton/ENRON@enronXgate

Subject: Re: Metals

Andy,

Thanks so much for your message.  I had you on my "To Do" list today to
follow-up from our conversation last week.  I appreciate your responses, and
will follow-up as needed.

Just to recap EIM's current inititives.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) was engaged in 10/00 to develop a business plan
for tactical and strategic solutions for the projected growth in the physical
business.  In 11/00, AA was engaged to develop a "Blueprint" of EIM major
processes (Deal Execution, Deal Capture, Risk Management, Logistics,
Settlements and Financial Reporting), down to level 2 processes.  The
initiatives have been combined into one team focused on delivering the
"Blueprint", a gap analysis of Enron systems to business needs and
recommended systems.  A complete "roadmap" should be laid out with a
0-3months, 4-6months, 7-9 months and 10-12months timeline.  The plan
addresses tactical also.

Our overall objective:  Build an infrastructure (people, processes and
systems) that is scalable and supports the trading business of EIM.  The
current industries are Forest Products and Steel.  However, additional
industries may be added.  The targeted infrastructure would require little
change to support new industries.

The delieverable is expected by the end of 2/01.  We'd be happy to visit with
you all (video conference or Houston,....) to give you more information.  Let
me know how to proceed.

Thanks again for your time.  Since I wasn't able to attend the Controllers'
Conference last 10/00, I'm glad I got to meet you last week.  Stay in touch.

Brenda

To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Metals

Brenda

As discussed at our meeting last week there are a few areas of commonality
between Enron Metals and EIM that should allow leverage off common goals.

In particular I promised info on a few areas:

Project Q assessment

A lot of the issues raised in the report are particular to Enron Metals
(being to do with interfaces with our AS400 ysstem) however high level issues
which formed part of the decision to not develop this for Enron metals were:
Q is over specified for metals. Traffic / logistics for metals is less
complex than oil & coal.
Metals process tends towards Buy>Store>Sell whereas for liquids the storage
is not as prevelant
Metals logistics typically involves trucks whereas liquids is ship/barge

2.    Inventory Controls

Again the reports produced here have been very specific to Enron Metals. Paul
Wallace a manager in the co-ordination function is working extensively on
developing the controls in this area. I would suggest that you contact Paul
directly if you wish to discuss specific areas or inventory controls in
general.

3.    Funding of inventory

We have a structured finance facility here in London. The deal is specific to
Enron Metals markets in that it works by reference to LME prices as these are
the base index for all the positions placed in the facility. If structured
financing is sort for EIM then it would be appropriate to talk to either
David Tregar (Metals Commercial) or Bill Appleby (Global Finance) as an intro
to the issues faced.

4.    Curve Management Process

The markets in which our merchanting division trades are based on the LME
curves but are linked to a large number of basis curves for quality and
location. Given the vast number we have opted to break down the markets by
brand group and port location. E.G. for Copper this means we have a grid with
5 brand groups and 3 sets of port groups (13 for europe, 7 for the US and 6
for the Far East). The maintaince & price testing of the grids is made
manageable by the fact the premiums only need be entered for brand and port
groups by the traders yet prices can be tested by reference to node points
i.e. price of  specific brand at a given location which can be checked to a
market quote.

5.    Re recruitment of paper traders

I haven't been able to contact him but I recall that the brother of David
Rosenblum, one of the metals traders in Chicago, is a trader of recylced
paper.

I'll keep you posted on long term system development plans here in London.
I'd appreciate same for EIM.

Regards
Andy


Louise,

Sorry to bother you with this request, but I'm not sure who else to ask:

A number of people have expressed an interest in the details of the auction process and any insight it might provide as to what a final deal might look like.

Are there publically available documents covering the auctions process and descriptions of compliant bids?

Dave


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 02/26/2001 05:44 PM -----

	Walter Guidroz@ENRON
	02/26/2001 04:56 PM

		 To: Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cynthia Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Enron Europe Global Contracts and Facilities,
Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT, Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Claudia Clark/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Lees/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Jana Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT,
Sonya Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT,
Karen O'Day/NA/Enron@Enron, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kelly
Lombardi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brian Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, EOL Call Center, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D
Hare/HOU/ECT@ect
		 cc:
		 Subject: EOL approvals, 2-26-01

Please see attached.


Here it is.  Please let me know your comments today.  Thanks.


I will not be attending.

---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 09:29
AM ---------------------------

jgerth@columbiaenergygroup.com on 03/13/2000 09:17:49 AM
To: " - *Christian, William" <wchristian@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " -
*Watkins, Julie" <jwatkins@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Fenwick, Debbie"
<dfenwick@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *Lang, Marshall"
<BLOCK@columbiaenergygroup.com>, " - *chris.germany@enron.com"
<chris.germany@enron.com>, " - *john.hodge@enron.com" <john.hodge@enron.com>
cc: " - *Adams, Brian" <bkadams@columbiaenergygroup.com>
Subject: ENRON Agenda

Attached please find the agenda for Wednesday's meeting.

Thanks,

Jill

 - ENRON Meeting.doc


fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 05/24/2001
07:48 AM ---------------------------
From: Sandra McCubbin on 05/23/2001 02:57 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

a number of legislators have told us that they were going to call or send Ken
a note of apology for Lockyer's quote...would be interested in anyone
actually did it...thanks


Please print and file tx rick
---------------------- Forwarded by Rick Buy/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 09:45 AM
---------------------------

	From:  Sheila Walton                           01/30/2001 09:05 AM

To: Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Investigation Research

For your peace of mind.

sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT on 01/30/2001 09:03
AM ---------------------------
From: Robert Howes/ENRON@enronXgate on 01/30/2001 08:27 AM
To: Sheila Walton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Roberto Deleon/ENRON@enronXgate, Matthew Ahern/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: RE: Investigation Research

We will save this for our records.
Thanks,
Robert Howes
Sr. Security Specialist
IT Security and Controls
Work 713-345-3423
Fax     713-646-3010
Email             mailto:Robert.Howes@Enron.com
2Way Pager mailto:roberthowes@pagenetips.com

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Walton, Sheila
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:31 AM
To: Howes, Robert; Ahern, Matthew
Cc: Deleon, Roberto; Buy, Rick
Subject: Investigation Research
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential

Rick Buy, the Business Unit Head for the RAC group, and I logged onto his
computer on Friday, January 26, 2001 to review information for an
investigation on one of his employees.  We logged on at 3:01 PM and logged
off at 3:15 PM.  Please make certain that the records reflect this
investigative effort so Mr. Buy's name does not come up in a random search
for accessing inappropriate websites.  If you have any questions, please call
me at Ext 30649. Thank you.

Sheila Walton
HR Director


We have reservations at Lalime,s in Berkeley on the 23rd of January (at
8:15pm) to celebrate the 32nd birthday of Lizzie Sellers!!!!  Yippeeeeee!!!!

The restaurant is located at 1329 Gilman St. (bet. Neilson St. & Peralta
Ave.)  and the telephone number is:  (510) 527-9838

Please let me know if you can,t make it(

See you soon Lizzie!

Love,

Cameron

Cameron Sellers
Vice President, Business Development
PERFECT
1860 Embarcadero Road - Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94303
cameron@perfect.com
650.798.3366 (direct dial)
650.269.3366 (cell)
650.858.1095 (fax)


Anytime you like.  Typically 7 or 7:30 ish


Attached are the final blacklines for the seasonal and daily FX products.
Also, we can discuss Justin's latest description.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


It's just you and me tomorrow.  Soma is having furniture delivered from Star
and they said they could only come between 8-12.  So shall we drive
together?  Do you want to come to my house?  At what time?

	"Patti Young" <pyoung@pdq.net>
	11/09/2000 04:53 PM

		 To: <Tana.Jones@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

Of course.  Do you two want to be there for the early show or I could just
meet you there later?

Also, you can sign up on the internet for the early bird show.  I don't
think you can pay when you get there, except if you go at 10 a.m.

www.houstonballet.org  Look it up here.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tana.Jones@enron.com [mailto:Tana.Jones@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:27 PM
To: pyoung@pdq.net
Subject: Re: Nutcracker Market/Saturday

I'm interested!  Would it be OK to invite one of my new business people
from London, she doesn't know anyone in Houston yet?

                    "Patti Young"
                    <pyoung@pdq.n        To:     "Tana Jones"
<tana.jones@enron.com>
                    et>                  cc:
                                         Subject:     Nutcracker
Market/Saturday
                    11/09/2000
                    04:01 PM

Miss Tana,

Are you interested in going to the Nutcracker Market this Saturday morning
and being there for the early bird special (8 a.m.)??  It costs $25 to get
in early, but that covers $10 admission, $5 parking, coffee and
refreshments.  Otherwise, you can go at 10 a.m., pay $10 to get in with the
rest of the crowd and $5 for parking.  I think I am going to plan to be
there around 7:40-7:45.  Let me know if you are interested.

Patti


_______________________________________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the
sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________________________

David: Here are comments on the draft you sent yesterday. Good job as
always. (1) Page 1-should have new date; (2) Sect. 1.17-change spelling of
"interruptible" before parking and loaning; (3) Sect. 2.2-Note the sentence
toward the bottom of p. 4 indicating that neither MEH nor Peoples is liable
... in performing its duties, absent willful misconduct or gross
negligence." Does this (or something similar) sufficiently protect MEH from
liability so as to permit adjustment of 2.9 (ii) to delete the commercial
reasonableness qualification for MEH's responsibilities? From a regulatory
perspective, I would like to avoid qualifying the obligation to follow the
GTC, if we can address the liability concern in another way. (4) Sect.
2.10. There should be something before "(ii)", maybe "and";  Sect. 2.4.
There is a sentence missing between before the new sentence which Peoples
was in Peoples' draft and is important to include: "Peoples may only revise
information regarding firm Hub Capacity that is provided to MEH pursuant to
Section 2.4(a) if MEH consents to such revision." This should be the second
sentence of the text following the listed items (before the strikoeover
which starts "Peoples shall inform...").


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/20/2000 12:42
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Kay Mann                           10/19/2000 03:47 PM

To: ppipitone@andrews-kurth.com
cc:

Subject: LM 6000 Transformer Assignments

Hi Paul,

Any luck with the draft of the ABB facility agreement form?  Looks like we
might have some business.

I have forwarded your draft of the turbine document to GE, but have not had
any comments.  I would like to set up a conference call with GE to discuss
it.  How is your schedule tomorrow or Monday?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/19/2000 03:45
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Chris Booth                           10/19/2000 03:22 PM

To: michael.o.sandridge@us.abb.com
cc: Ed Dannhaus/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kathleen
Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Harry
Okabayashi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Bruce
Golden/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT

Subject: LM 6000 Transformer Assignments

Mike,

Per our conversation today, please note the assignment of transformers to the
PSCO / Fountain Valley Station project in El Paso county Colorado.

Unit / ABB Item # Guaranteed Delivery Date Site Designation

LNL 9517-1   11/17/00  El Paso County, Colorado

LNL 9517-2   11/17/00  El Paso County, Colorado

LNL 9517-3   12/01/00  El Paso County, Colorado

Please feel free to call if you have any questions or concerns.

Chris


FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000
09:30 AM ---------------------------

Rosalee Fleming on 08/14/2000 10:47:18 AM
To: Meredith Philipp/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000
10:46 AM ---------------------------

DJS400@cs.com on 08/14/2000 09:35:46 AM
To: VIEWPOINTS@chron.com
cc: PAUL_BETTENCOURT@co.harris.tx.us, JUDGE_ECKELS@co.harris.tx.us,
HCRPGOP@AOL.COM, KENNETH.LAY@enron.com, STEVE_LETBETTER@reliantenergy.com
Subject: THE ARENA DEAL IS A RIPOFF TO TAXPAYERS

 - ARENA.doc


pls print off.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nemec, Gerald
Sent:	Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry
Cc:	Hodge, Jeffrey T.
Subject:	Huber Docs

Barry,  Attached are the drafts we discussed yesterday.  Please give me a call to discuss.


We have received an executed Master Agreement:

Type of Contract:  ISDA Master Agreement (Multicurrency-Cross Border)

Effective Date:   January 23, 2001

Enron Entity:   Enron North America Corp.

Counterparty:   Carolina Holdings, Inc.

Transactions Covered:  Approved for all products with the exception of:
Foreign Exchange

Confirming Entity:  Enron North America Corp.

Governing Law:   Texas

Copies will be distributed.

Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX  77002
Phone:  (713) 853-9188
Fax:  (713) 646-3490
email:  samantha.boyd@enron.com


This may take a few seconds to load depending on your connection speed...please wait.
If you do not see the animation please click  here .
You are receiving an animated email message from ELECTRIC POWER 2002 (March19-22 in St Louis) to remind you of the February 7 early bird registration deadline.  If the message cannot be accessed, please call 713-463-9595 for information or email info@electricpowerexpo.com.

If you would like to be removed from this list click HERE  to unsubscribe.


Can we contact them to find out about how they plan to get their gas supply? I know Stan will ask me about this one.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brennan, Lorna
Sent:	Monday, August 13, 2001 10:58 AM
To:	Chavez, Gabriel; Dowd, Stephen; Gadd, Eric; Hyatt, Kevin; Millar, John; Ratner, Michael; Taylor, Gina; Hass, Glen; Loeffler, Michael; Stanton, Lon; Wilson, Rob; Harris, Steven; Donoho, Lindy; Goradia, Pallavi; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK; Lokay, Michelle; Moore, Jan; Watson, Kimberly
Subject:	New Mexico Power Plant Project

Regent Energy in Pact to Develop 500 MW Plant
Regent Energy recently executed a contract with Millennium Energy Ventures, a private Houston-based venture capital and project development company, to develop an electric plant with 500 MW generating capacity on Regent's Horseshoe Gallup lease in San Juan County, NM.
Regent will own 75% of the project, while MEVCO will own the remaining 25%. The estimated cost of the project comes in at $250 million.
Under the agreement, MEVCO will manage the permitting, estimated at 6 to 9 months, and construction process, arranging the equity as needed for same. Regent will be prepared to give up 50% (total) of its 75% net for the financing, netting a 25% interest following the equity/debt financing.
Further terms of the agreement provide that MEVCO will assist Regent in the acquisition of several gas fields in the Four Corners area, San Juan and Rio Ariba Counties of New Mexico, totaling an estimated 90+ Bcf and 20 MMcf/d current production. This production will be sufficient to power 100 MW of the power plant, with the remaining supply to be aggregated from other San Juan producers.
MEVCO Managing Director Phillip Gennarelli noted, "We are pleased to be involved in this project with Regent. The addition of more producing properties in the area that we bring Regent, coupled with Regent's Horseshoe Gallup holdings, which are in direct proximity with the existing Four Corners Power Plant and the route of the recently announced Sonoran Pipeline venture of Calpine and Kinder Morgan, will provide an unequaled opportunity for both companies."
Regent President John Ehrman said, "The additional production from producing properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in purchasing, currently producing some $1.5 million per month in net operating income, coupled with the additional income through power generation helps Regent to maximize the location of our holdings in relation to the proximity of the existing power plant and transmission lines to key electricity markets in Los Angeles and other western markets. It is a good use of our surface lease, not related to the current proved mineral reserves of the lease."
The producing oil and properties which MEVCO is assisting Regent in purchasing are in Regent's core area of the Four Corners region near Farmington, NM. Regent will be required to finance the acquisition of the oil and gas proven producing properties under consideration.
Recently, Regent announced that it was in the process of purchasing the interests of all remaining working interest owners in the field, a transaction that is expected to be consummated by the end of the third quarter 2001, giving Regent 100% ownership of the current minerals on the lease.


schedule 30 min to sit down with me either mon or tues after 430.  if you
want to get info, sending out an email survey is not the right way.  much
easier to respond to a question in voice rather than typing it out.

<cwomack@rice.edu> on 04/09/2001 04:17:59 PM
To: jarnold@enron.com
cc: cwomack@rice.edu
Subject: EnronOnline competitor questionnaire

Hello Mr. Arnold,

Thank you for speaking with me today with Kenneth Parkhill.  Unfortunately,
none of my teammates are available to meet with you today.  Would you please
review our questionnaire and reply back to me with your comments about the
questionnaire and answers to any questions that apply to your work.

We will follow up with you later this week if we have questions.  Thank you
for your help.

Charles Womack
2002 Rice MBA Candidate
281-413-8147
cwomack@rice.edu

 - Questionnaire.doc


Jennifer,

NGI-PGE/TOPOCK is an internal curve used to value transport and is equal to
NGI-SOCAL.  This curve will probably show up every month because the West
Coast is very volitile.  The change is due to a change in the market.

IF-TW/PERMIAN is a production area curve.  The change is also due to  market
changes that drove up the curve.

Call me if you have any questions.  Thanks.

DG    3-9573

	From:  Jennifer Nguyen @ ENRON                           03/21/2001 10:19 AM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: February Curve Validation

Darron --

Can you or anyone in your group follow up on the curves below?

NGI-PGE TOPOCK
IF-VALERO TX
IF-TW PERMIAN

Thanks,
Jennifer
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Nguyen/Corp/Enron on 03/21/2001
10:16 AM ---------------------------

	From:  Jennifer Nguyen                           03/13/2001 05:21 PM

To: Darron C Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kam
Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cassi Wallace/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: February Curve Validation

Hi guys --

Hopefully these curves are covered between the three of you!  Attached are
the 10 curves reviewed for the month of February.  Of these 10, the curves in
question are:

NGI-PGE TOPOCK
IF-HEHUB
IF-VALERO TX
IF-NNG TOK
IF-TW PERMIAN
IF-TRANSCO Z1
IF-TENN Z5

If you could, please identify the factors that are driving their drastic
changes in shape and seasonality as compared to the prior month.  Please do
not hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Thanks,
Jennifer
x5-7590


Dear Student,

What classes are you registered for?

NOTE: The classrooms are now open for Summer Session A.  If you are having
difficulty entering a class you are registered for make sure you have turned
in all of your tuition assistance forms. For further information on tuition
assistance contact finaid@amunet.edu.

Thanks
TechSupport


Sara -

Jay Williams has been discussing the new Merrill Lynch guaranty (for FX
trading) with Merrill Lynch.  They originally requested an unlimited
guaranty.  Per Jay, our current exposure is $500 million, and they are asking
for a guaranty of $400 million notional amount.  I don't know if this is
something you need to get involved in to resolve the guaranty issues.

Thanks.


---------------------- Forwarded by Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT on 08/22/2000
02:51 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Sherlyn Schumack                           08/22/2000 02:07 PM

To: Jackie Young/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lindley/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Meter 984132 for 1/16/99

Here is the issue for 1/16/99 at meter 984132.

20,000 mmbtu were confirmed for Adonis in POPS.   10,000 mmbtu on day 5 and
day 16.   Day 16 is not valid for deal 51862 (track id 6155), which is where
10,000 was confirmed.   The  actual sale to Adonis was 10,000 which was
invoiced and paid by Adonis.  We are trying to clear the feedback error
report.   My question is why was 10,000 confirmed on 1/16/99 if the date is
not valid for the deal?

When Karen allocates the actual 10,000 it is prorating 5,000 for each day
that is confirmed (the 5th and 16th).

Should the whole 10,000 be allocated to the 5th or should 5,000 be allocated
to each day?   If 5,000 should be allocated to each day, the 16th needs to be
added to the deal.


Please see the following important stories.  It appears to be quickly
slipping through Davis' fingers.  May be useful to re-group a bit in light of
the following events.  In sum:

Most importantly, in today's Chronicle, it's reported that Davis' staff met
with key Democrats yesterday and lowered the boom.
DWR purchases likely to be about $25 billion and rates may have to go up by
100%.  (See attached story.)
Apparently, one of the big reasons that 8X got held up yesterday is because
Davis' own staff went to D leadership and said, "don't move 8X (a bill that
Davis was said to support) because the $10 billion cap on bonds won't work;
they need much more."
It appears that rate increases will now become part of the mix, whether Davis
likes it or not.
The staff alleged that they were conveying the information before Davis had
been informed of the "bombshell."
Davis was criticized for being at yet another fund-raiser yesterday while the
situation significantly deteroriated in Sacramento.  (See attached story.)
Meanwhile, PG&E has sued--or may be about to sue--the State, saying they
won't pay the QFs according to Davis' plan (which the PUC is supposed to
implement on Tuesday).  (See attached PG&E press release.)
Finally, Mike Kahn has issued an opinion piece in yesterday's Chronicle, in
which he attempts to lump together into one pile Republicans, market
proponents, price gougers and Texans, and defending Davis and Lynch.

******************************************************************************
***********************************************************************
Davis' Measured Plan To Fight the Darkness
Michael Kahn
Friday, March 23, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/23/E
D103778.DTL
COMMENTS on Gov. Gray Davis' energy programs by apologists for former Gov.
Pete Wilson bring to mind Robert Kennedy's admonition that it is better to
light a candle than curse the darkness.
Let's examine the darkness created by Wilson's energy deregulation scheme.
The 1996 law he signed could not have been more wrong headed.
-- Why did it hand energy price control over to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission?
-- Why did it free wholesale prices, while capping the price utilities could
charge customers?
-- Why did the former state Public Utilities Commission force utilities to
sell off their fossil fuel power plants, leaving them vulnerable to predatory
pricing by out-of-state merchant generators?
-- Why did the Wilson-era PUC bar utilities from entering into contracts to
ensure a long-term supply of cheap electricity?
-- Most pointedly, why did California enter into deregulation without enough
available generation to ensure a fair market based on balanced supply and
demand?
These are tough questions. It is not hard to understand why former proponents
of the 1996 deregulation scheme would rather not answer them, preferring to
bemoan the darkness and curse Davis' actions.
The Wilson apologists jeer at plans for the state to purchase the power grid,
though they surely know the value of a well-maintained, fully functioning
electric transmission network. Bottlenecks in the grid impede the sharing of
power between Northern and Southern California. This was a main reason
Northern California experienced rolling blackouts in January while Southern
California had plenty of power.
The state's purchase of the grid will infuse new cash into the utilities,
pulling them back from the brink of bankruptcy, while giving the state a
tangible and valuable asset in exchange.
And ownership of the grid will allow the state to modernize it, removing
bottlenecks and upgrading technology - something the utilities have long
failed at doing.
The apologists ignore the state's strong record on energy conservation and
Davis' actions to enhance these efforts.
California now has the nation's second-best energy conservation record. The
governor has budgeted $404 million in new conservation measures and added an
executive order offering 20 percent rebates to those who reduce their
consumption 20 percent over last year. These measures will reduce commercial
lighting, encourage residential and industrial efficiency and make state and
commercial buildings more energy efficient.
The apologists disregard the fact that the governor has also reversed a trend
that had seen power plant construction in California drop to insignificance
in the '80s and '90s. Since April 1999, the California Energy Commission has
licensed nine major new power plants. Six are under construction. This is
part of a streamlined, fast-track plant licensing process that aims to put an
additional 20,000 megawatts on line by the summer of 2004, a nearly 50
percent increase in generation.
And the apologists refuse to recognize that California is building the right
sort of power plants - efficient, clean and environmentally friendly, with a
strong bent toward renewable power sources.
In fact, while some would go Texas' route and build plants that meet only the
bare minimum of environmental requirements, California is continuing the
effort that has made it the nation's leader in the use of clean, renewable
power sources.
Instead, the apologists engage in name calling, such as the charge leveled by
former Wilson communications director Dan Schnur on this page that Loretta
Lynch, the Davis appointee as PUC chair, is inexperienced and has failed to
deal effectively with the energy emergency.
Forget for a moment that of the 22 people who have served as PUC
commissioners since 1980, only six had any energy expertise before their
appointments.
Forget for a moment that one of the principal architects of deregulation was
Daniel Fessler, the UC Davis contract law professor with no special expertise
in energy issues whom Gov. Wilson appointed as PUC president.
Just consider this: It was the PUC under Lynch that freed the utilities to
buy electricity on cheaper, forward contracts outside the Power Exchange.
This corrected a huge Wilson-era PUC blunder that put utilities in an energy
price straitjacket. The Lynch-led PUC also prohibited utilities from selling
additional power plants, and it began the successful effort to make
California's ISO (the Independent System Operator that runs the state's power
grid) independent of the industry-connected officials who controlled it.
Meanwhile, what sort of grand solutions have the apologists presented? Drill
for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, build nuclear
plants on closed military bases and encourage the construction of dirty
Texas- style power plants in California.
Drilling in the Arctic will not produce a watt of new power for California.
Californians have long said they do not want the risks presented by new
nuclear plants.
And lax Texas pollution rules prompted the Dallas Morning News to charge in a
Dec. 17 editorial that Texans are choking on the exhaust from power plants.
Most disingenuously, the apologists would "let the market work," claiming
that unfettered market forces will soon bring fair and balanced prices. But
the market doesn't work now, as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has
repeatedly admitted, most recently with its finding that generators
overcharged the state in January.
Unfortunately, for the most part the same commission had refused to clamp
down on sky-high prices charged by generating companies. Look at New York's
deregulated market, where there are no caps on retail electric prices. Market
forces have done consumers there little good. New Yorkers pay the highest
prices for electricity in the country. And the New York Times has reported
that rates paid by consumers have increased a whopping 40 percent just since
1999.
Those who would allow the market to work (let the darkness reign) know well
that if the market "works" to produce New York-style rate increases in
California, the consequences to the public would be dire.
Compare this to Gov. Davis' well-structured plan for effective energy
conservation and stabilization of the state's electricity market and his
expedited program to bring clean, efficient new power plants on line quickly.
Robert Kennedy would understand Gov. Davis' approach and his critics'
perspective.
Michael Kahn is a member of the state Independent System Operator's board of
governors.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 25

Bombshell Warning on Power Cost
Spending may double and rates skyrocket, governor's office tells Legislature
Greg Lucas, Lynda Gledhill, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N176940.DTL
Top Davis administration officials told lawmakers yesterday that the state
may have to spend twice as much as expected on electricity purchases over the
next two years - requiring rate increases of as much as 100 percent.
The stunning admission by the Davis administration contradicts his repeated
promises that his plan to ease California's energy woes could be done without
a rate increase.
California will probably need to issue $23 billion in bonds for electricity
buys, more than double the amount Davis said would be needed by the state to
keep electricity flowing until California's cash-poor utilities can get back
on their feet.
Administration officials told lawmakers to stop action on a bill that would
have capped the state's energy purchases at $10 billion.
But a Davis spokesman said the numbers were far from firm.
"There are a lot of scenarios being run . . . and until we complete the
negotiations, this can be added up any way you want," said Steve Maviglio,
press secretary to Davis.
"Those numbers are not based on any reality right now," he said. "There are
too many things up in the air."
Assembly Democrats told a different story.
They said Tim Gage, director of Davis' Department of Finance, Cabinet
Secretary Susan Kennedy and John Stevens, Davis' top energy aide, met with
Assembly Democratic leaders and dropped the bombshell.
And they did so just as those same leaders were trying to convince fellow
lawmakers how important the bill was to the Davis administration.
They also said that Davis, who was in the Palm Springs area for most of the
day and briefly attended a fund-raiser at a golf club, was unaware of the
figures.
PURCHASES IN BILLIONS
The three top aides said that electricity purchases for this year by the
state would be $16 billion, not the $10 billion initially predicted. An
additional $7 billion in state power purchases would be needed next year,
they said.
The state has been buying power at a clip of $45 million a day since Jan. 17
because the troubled utilities could no longer afford to make the purchases.
From the start of the energy crisis, the state has planned to repay its power
purchases through bond sales. The bonds would be paid off by a portion of the
amount ratepayers are charged on their monthly bills.
Davis has so far insisted that enough money could be found to cover the $10
billion without raising rates.
But his aides said if the size of the bonds ballooned to $23 billion, a hefty
rate increase would be necessary.
INCREASE UPON INCREASE
The Public Utilities Commission is already planning to make permanent a
temporary 9 percent increase. An additional automatic 10 percent is scheduled
for no later than March 2002.
But the aides said, on top of that, an additional 60 percent to 80 percent
increase would be required to cover the debt service.
"For some time, I have believed a fundamental part of solving this problem is
admitting there needs to be a rate increase, and the numbers that have been
shared today make that inevitable, and we should start dealing with the
reality as soon as possible," said Assemblyman Fred Keeley, D-Boulder Creek
(Santa Cruz County).
One consumer advocate said the revelation means the utilities are closer to
bankruptcy because the state and ratepayers won't have the cash to bail them
out.
And it could mean political trouble for Davis.
"Unless the governor issues an ultimatum to lower the prices, everybody's
bill will double, and he will not be able to run for re-election in 2002,"
said Harvey Rosenfield, head of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer
Rights.
PG&E THREATENS SUIT
The news came as Pacific Gas and Electric Co. threatened to take the state to
court over Davis' plan to force the company to pay back certain creditors.
Davis' proposal would require the utilities to pay alternative power
generators for all the power that they supply, something PG&E said it cannot
afford to do. Several of the generators shut down earlier this week as
rolling blackouts spread across the state.
The bill stalled yesterday in the Assembly as Republicans objected. Lawmakers
will resume debate Monday.
Earlier in the week, Davis announced that action would be taken by the
Legislature and the Public Utilities Commission that would guarantee payment
to the alternative energy providers. He also said the state -- which has
spent $3.7 billion to purchase power -- should be paid back first.
Without that promise, several of the small biomass, solar and wind producing
plants -- called qualified facilities -- said they would have taken Southern
California Edison Co. into bankruptcy court. The alternative generators
provide enough electricity to power roughly 6 million homes.
PG&E said it cannot afford to pay the alternative producers and reimburse the
state for the billions it has spent purchasing power.
"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," Gordon Smith, PG&E's
president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.
DIFFERING VIEWS ON COSTS
According to PG&E's numbers, the company collects $400 million a month in
rates. It says the average price to pay all the generation sources exceeds
$1. 4 billion a month.
But consumer advocate Nettie Hoge said the utilities are exaggerating their
own costs in order to try to keep as much money as possible.
"It's just absurd," said Hoge, the head of The Utility Reform Network. "They
have a temper tantrum every time something doesn't go their way."
The bill PG&E objected to is necessary to allow the PUC to order utilities to
pay small power generators who agree to sign lower-priced contracts to
provide energy.
The proposal offers generators a choice of agreeing to a five-year contract
at $79 per megawatt or a 10-year deal at $69 per megawatt, Davis said. The
going rate now is about $150 a megawatt. The PUC wants to act as early as
Tuesday to bring some financial relief to the generators, who have been paid
pennies on the dollar.
Assembly Republicans objected to the bill in part because it would allow the
PUC to change the formula for setting the price paid alternative producers so
that it no longer considered the price of natural gas.
Co-generators -- some of the largest of which are operated by oil refineries
-- say without the price of natural gas as a consideration, it would cost
them more to produce energy than what they would be paid for it.
E-mail Lynda Gledhill at lgledhill@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 1

Davis at Fund-Raiser as His Bill Languishes
Critics say he should have been at Capitol
Greg Lucas, Robert Salladay, Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Saturday, March 24, 2001
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle
URL:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/03/24/M
N171337.DTL
While the Assembly struggled -- and failed -- to pass a bill aimed at keeping
hundreds of small energy generators from bankruptcy, Gov. Gray Davis attended
a $10,000-a-head golf fund-raiser yesterday in Palm Desert.
Organized by Duane Dauner, president of the California Healthcare
Association, the event was held at Bighorn Golf Club, a luxurious private
country club of which Dauner is a member.
Davis' top political adviser said the governor didn't play golf, just stopped
by a luncheon before the round began so he could return to Sacramento.
But during Davis' absence, a bill he backed -- critical to bailing out small
power generators -- languished in the Assembly.
On Thursday, lawmakers canceled next week's long-planned annual trip to
Washington, D.C., to focus on energy issues.
"There is not a lot of electricity to be found on the golf course," said
Harvey Rosenfield of the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, a chief
critic of Davis and the state's utilities. "He ought to be in Sacramento to
try and solve the crisis and not prospecting for contributions in the grass
in Palm Springs."
The Democratic governor has been frequently criticized for the time he spends
raising money for his campaign fund, money that comes from well-heeled
interests with dozens of issues pending before his administration.
Since becoming governor, Davis amassed $25 million by the end of 2000 --
averaging more than $1 million a month in contributions, often from fund-
raisers directed at specific industries.
Garry South, Davis' political adviser, said Davis was in Palm Springs to
dedicate a University of California building and "dropped by a lunch"
preceding the golf.
South said the fund-raiser "was a diverse group of people that paid varying
amounts of money."
Lawmakers canceled their yearly visit to federal officials on issues
important to the Golden State because they didn't want to give the impression
that "there was somewhere else more important than California," said state
Sen.
Don Perata, D-Oakland.
Raising money at a tony golf resort during the crisis simply looks bad,
Perata said.
"We have to be really careful because the public's patience and their
confidence in what we're asking them to do depends on how they see us
reacting to the problem," he said. "This will be negatively interpreted."
Other lawmakers said the governor's top-level staff was working on the
problem but acknowledged the golfing fund-raiser looked bad.
"It's not the best symbolic message, but I feel we have to give him the
benefit of the doubt," said Assemblywoman Carole Migden, D-San Francisco.
Davis did appear briefly yesterday on nationally broadcast CNBC to talk about
the energy crisis and blast power generators for allegedly overcharging the
state. He appeared live from Palm Springs.
The California Healthcare Association represents nearly 500 hospitals and
boasts on its Web site that it "influences public policy development through
both legislative and regulatory advocacy efforts."
Last month, the group introduced a legislative package to expand nursing
education and streamline college requirements for nurses.
One of the bills calls for spending $120 million a year on nursing classes.
The group also is lobbying the new Department of Managed Health Care, which
is staffed by Davis appointees, to speed up payment of $1 billion in late
bills owed to hospitals.
Davis signed a bill last year that gave the HMO czar the power to sanction
health care plans for failing to pay Dauner's clients, the hospitals, on
time.
In his first six months in office, Davis attended a fund-raising dinner at
Dauner's house that brought in an estimated $100,000. It was part of a spree
that netted the governor a record-breaking $6.1 million in half a year.
At the time, Dauner told the Los Angeles Times: "We don't talk policy at
those kinds of things, or legislation. This was really more of a social
event. He talked about his goals and probably spent more time discussing
education than anything else."
Dauner could not be reached for comment yesterday.
E-mail the reporters at glucas@sfchronicle.com and bsalladay@sfchronicle.com.
,2001 San Francisco Chronicle ? Page?A - 13

	FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 23, 2001
CONTACT: PG&E News Department (415) 973-5930

PG&E Responds to Energy Proposals in Sacramento
	San Francisco -- Pacific Gas and Electric Company today announced that it
will be forced to challenge actions now being contemplated by the State of
California to impose new demands on its frozen rate structure. The proposed
actions will destabilize its current situation with creditors and put the
entire possibility of reaching a balanced solution to California's energy
crisis at risk.
	This week, the State has made clear its intention to use Pacific Gas and
Electric Company's existing rate structure to begin fully paying Qualifying
Facilities (QFs) in advance, for future power purchases, starting April 1,
and to reimburse the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in advance of any
other generating source, including utility-retained generation, bilateral
contracts, QFs or the Independent System Operator (ISO).
	"These actions approach the problem in a piecemeal and uncoordinated fashion
and would force us to pay out far more than we collect in rates, further
exacerbating an already precarious financial situation," said Gordon R.
Smith, president and chief executive officer of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company. "The numbers just don't work."
	Currently, under frozen rates, Pacific Gas and Electric Company has been
collecting approximately $400 million per month for the purchase of electric
power. This revenue has been used in payments to power suppliers, including
power purchases from irrigation districts and bilaterals, to cover costs of
operating our retained generation, and is insufficient to cover payments to
the ISO and QFs. The average combined energy bill from all of these sources
exceeds $1.4 billion a month, and may go even higher in the coming months.
Moreover, the utility's financial condition has been further jeopardized by
the failure of the DWR to acknowledge responsibility for the full "net open
position," i.e. the power that must be purchased on the spot market. This
dispute over the net open position is threatening to accrue additional
liabilities for Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
	"We continue to work with State officials to develop a constructive,
comprehensive solution that assures that California has a reliable and fairly
priced supply of power. Nevertheless, we have a duty to our suppliers,
lenders and shareholders to protect the assets of the utility, and we must
challenge any action by the State to force us to pay out more than is
collected in rates," Mr. Smith concluded.
	?


Please review the attached request for quote.  I look forward to receiving
your offer tomorrow.

(See attached file: 1001RFQ1.xls)
 - 1001RFQ1.xls


----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 08/08/2000 08:44 AM -----

	Mike Curry
	08/07/2000 11:13 AM

		 To: Doug Gilbert-Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Zachary
Sampson/NA/Enron@ENRON, David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph
Piotrowski/NA/Enron@Enron, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Wind Section 5.04

FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Curry/HOU/ECT on 08/07/2000 10:55 AM
---------------------------

KWong@milbank.com on 08/04/2000 06:24:09 PM
To: mcurry@enron.com, dportz@enron.com, dsmith3@enron.com
cc: Michael.Payne@enron.com, Jeff.Maurer@enron.com,
Stephen.H.Friedlander@enron.com, John.Lamb@enron.com, Adam.Umanoff@enron.com
Subject: RE: Wind Agreements

Dear Gentlemen:

At the request of John Lamb, I am forwarding a revised version of Section
5.04 which has been marked to show changes against the clean version of the
file named WIND PPA 8-1-00.doc forwarded to me by Michael Payne.? Please note
that this revised version is being sent concurrently to you and our clients
and, as such remains subject to their comments.?

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call.

Best regards,
Karen?

__________________________________________________
Karen B. Wong
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
601 South Figueroa Street, 30th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
USA
kwong@milbank.com (email)
(213) 892-4419 (office telephone)
(213) 892-4719 (office fax)
(213) 479-3129 (cellular telephone)

This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee
or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.

?

?
 - Section 5.04 0804bk.doc


interesting company.  If you know anything about them
or their technology, please let me know.

thanks
Jon

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Fwd: OPtimal Technologies Materials]
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:28:53 -0800
From: BRBarkovich <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>
To: Jonathan Koomey <JGKoomey@lbl.gov>,Jonathan Koomey <numbers@numbersintoknowledge.com>

I got a quick response. Here is the info on Optimal. Happy reading.
Return-Path: <reh@richardhammond.com>
Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122])	by emu (EarthLink SMTP Server) with ESMTP id u27dim.1ai.37tiu8v	for <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:23:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from user-2ivfk3c.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.208.108] helo=wahoo)	by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)	id 16HXxM-0006N2-00	for brbarkovich@earthlink.net; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:15:57 -0800
From: "Richard E. Hammond" <reh@richardhammond.com>
To: "Barbara R. Barkovich Ph. D" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>
Subject: OPtimal Technologies Materials
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:14:47 -0800
Message-ID: <LPBBJICEPCHGDLGMFPELIEANCGAA.reh@richardhammond.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C18A29.D8740960"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

Barbara,

Attached for your convenience in forwarding material to Jon Koomey at LBNL
are two summary documents describing Optimal and its electric power
solutions, the Final Report on CEC-LBNL-Cal ISO Aempfast Technology
Evaluation Project, and two press releases.

I recommend you also encourage Jon to visit the Optimal web site at
www.otii.com, and to look at materials posted there (e.g., the speech to the
Commonwealth Club.

Thanks!

Cheers,

Rich

Richard E. Hammond
VP,  Projects, and Asst. Gen. Counsel
Optimal Technologies (USA) Inc.
Tel: 415-567-1429
Fax: 415-353-0990
E-mail: richardh@otii.com

The information contained in or attached to this e-mail message may be
privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure.  If you are not the
intended recipient, your dissemination, distribution, copying, or use of the
message in any way is strictly prohibited.  If you think you have received
this message in error, please e-mail the sender at richardh@otii.com.

 - Optimal_Facts_20011005.pdf
 - Optimal_Power_Solutions_20011002.pdf
 - CEC-CalISO_Task1-010610-Public.pdf
 - OTII_PressRelease-200110301.pdf
 - OTII_PressRelease-20011217.pdf


I did prepare these.


INDIVIDUAL.COM

Here's an article recommended by: Karen Denne
and it comes to you via Individual.com, Inc.

The following message was attached:

HERE IS THE STORY WE WERE REQUESTED TO SEND YOU

This story appeared on http://www.individual.com November 15, 2000
_________________________________________________________

Cal-ISO Declares Stage 2 Emergency; Directs SCE to Begin 'Load' Curtailment
Program for Certain Customers

ROSEMEAD, Calif., Nov. 13 /PRNewswire/  via NewsEdge Corporation  -
With the state's power reserves
at less than 5%, the California Independent System Operator (Cal-ISO) has
declared a "Stage 2 Emergency" and called upon Southern California Edison and
other investor-owned utilities to begin voluntary "load" curtailment programs
for certain customers within their service areas.

Cal-ISO attributed the Stage 2 emergency to a generation shortfall
partially attributable to several power plants in the California market being
down for scheduled maintenance.

At the same time, Cal-ISO and SCE are making urgent appeals for all
customers to immediately reduce their electricity consumption.

Cal-ISO, the nonprofit agency that manages 75% of California's
transmission power grid and secures power supplies for most of the state's
consumers, said the Stage 2 status would be in effect from 5:30 p.m. to 8 p.m.
The agency directed SCE to reduce its electrical load by 1,000 megawatts --
enough power to serve approximately a million homes.

To achieve this load reduction during Stage 2, SCE is required to activate
its voluntary load curtailment program, under which large industrial,
commercial, and agricultural customers who have agreed to have their power
temporarily interrupted in exchange for reduced rates.

Should the situation worsen for any reason, and power reserves drop below
1.5%, Cal-ISO will declare a Stage 3 Emergency, the most critical status.
Cal-ISO would direct utilities to "drop load," necessitating involuntary
rotating outages for blocks of customers across their service areas until
sufficient reserve levels are achieved.

Large energy users, such as industrial and commercial customers, can help
the power-supply situation by turning off unneeded lights and auxiliary or
redundant machinery where ever possible.  The best ways to reduce power
consumption at home are to turn off any unneeded electrical appliances and
lights.

An Edison International company, Southern California Edison is one of the
nation's largest electric utilities, serving a population of more than
11 million via 4.3 million customer accounts in a 50,000-square-mile service
area within central, coastal and Southern California.

SOURCE  Southern California Edison

CONTACT:  Corporate Communications of Southern California Edison,
626-302-2255
Web site:  http://www.sce.com
Web site:  http://www.edisonnews.com
(EIX)

_________________________________________________________

Individual.com is the #1 provider of free, individualized news
and information to business people over the Internet.  Visit us at
http://www.individual.com to browse the largest free collection of business,
financial, industry, trade, and company-specific news and information
on the web.

This news story was sent by Karen Denne through Individual.com.
You will not receive email messages directly from Individual.com
unless you register at http://www.individual.com.

Get more headlines and stories like this delivered FREE to your
desktop every business morning! Register at
http://www.individual.com/welcome.shtml.

Individual.com also brings you FREE news on your investments!
Sign up at http://www.individual.com/welcome.shtml.
___________________________________________________________

Entire contents Copyright , 1999-2000, Individual.comv, Inc.,
8 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA


is it really opening

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

at the met?  yes until the body shop opens

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:06 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

are you working out accross the street

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

k bye!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:05 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

my country club,

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

where?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no im not, i am going to work out now

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:04 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

and mean....i forgot that one!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

um, i dont know

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

so why are you now?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:03 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

i wasnt

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

everyone.  i thought that you weren't talking to me for a while?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

everyone,  who is down there

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:02 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

he he i am so funny!  and you are still a big jerk!  who all is up there?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:01 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:01 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

don't want to

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:00 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

why

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:58 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

um no

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:58 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no i did so come up and visit

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:54 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:

did you not think that was funny?


---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Breese/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2001 11:22
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Capital Management

	From:  Mark Breese                           04/24/2001 10:54 AM

To: Bryant Frihart/ENRON@enronXgate, Sylvia S Pollan/Enron@EnronXGate, Laura
Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron, Russell E Murrell/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Di Mu/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Cary
M Carrabine/Corp/Enron@Enron@ECT, Robin Barbe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ruth
Concannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Tammi
DePaolis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Nelson Ferries/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John
Hodge/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David Jones/NA/Enron@ENRON, Gil
Muhl/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Maureen
Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Craig Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank W
Vickers/NA/Enron@Enron, Stephanie Miller/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Philip
Polsky/NA/Enron@Enron, Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT, Barry Tycholiz/NA/Enron@ENRON,
Thomas A Martin/Enron@EnronXGate, Janet H Wallis/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Joseph Deffner/Enron@EnronXGate, Tanya Rohauer/Enron@EnronXGate, Louise
Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ed McMichael/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Structure for Storage Loans / Deferred Payment Deals

The memo attached summarizes a structured deal that the market has shown some
interest.

Essentially, this deal allows an LDC to defer payment for gas and avoid
carrying costs (which may result in a dollar for dollar benefit to your
customer's bottom line).

We have done two of these deals to date.  ENA has interest in additional
deals (albeit not an infinite appetite) if the structure allows us to move
them off the balance sheet.

Please review the memo and target any of your customers that may have an
interest.

Each deal will require a new quote from credit and from the cost of funds
group.  Gas structuring is set up to structure these deals and develop them
through to execution.

Please call me with any questions at x36751


no-they did not and Tori will be on vaction next Friday and Monday-would like
it done by Wed.-Nov 29-Thanks


Please note, I do not have a contact list for European End-User/Risk-Takers
per se.  Therefore, please contact me if you wish to participate in our
sub-group.

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marra [mailto:SMARRA@isda.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 1:20 AM
To: 'bill.krameer@abnamro.com'; 'chris.leberne@ap.abnamro.com';
'debbiegdm@absa.co.za'; 'richard.williams@ants.co.uk';
'deborah.aschheim@ace-ina.com'; Norie Bregman; Bob Coors; Karen Garry;
Eric Rothman; David Benton; Daniel Cunningham;
'chin.chong.liew@allenovery.com'; 'david.wainer@allenovery.com';
'philippa.m.howley@aib.ie'; 'pmckee@ambac.com'; 'cparker@ambac-uk.com';
'mschozer@ambac.com'; 'heasleyt@anz.com'; 'porteoug@anz.com';
'Ernst.Decker@BHF-BANK.com'; 'Juergen.Ziebe@BHF-BANK.com';
'iona.levine@bakernet.com'; 'rdesantis@bci.it'; 'pgribaudi@bci.it';
'fcaputo@bci.it'; 'carla.wyckmans@bbl.be'; 'hweissler@hapoalimusa.com';
'rick.e.briggs@ncmi.com'; 'danc@ncmi.com';
'chris.flosi@bankofamerica.com'; 'douglas.kerridge@bankofamerica.com';
'robert.g.lendino@bankofamerica.com';
'scott.vanhatten@bankofamerica.com'; 'terry.watson@bankamerica.com';
'rickp@ncmi.com'; 'rbrady@bankofny.com'; 'azeem.kassam@scotiabank.com';
'rasheed_saleuddin@scotiacapital.com'; 'crietscha@btmna.com';
'mirko.berner@ib.bankgesellschaft.de';
'abradwell@ibuk.bankgesellschaft.de';
'rburley@ibuk.bankgesellschaft.de';
'Joseph.Carrico@ib.bankgesellschaft.de';
'henning.gravlev@ib.bankgesellschaft.de';
'james.lettiere@bnpparibas.com'; 'gaynor.wood@bnpgroup.com';
'guy.dempsey@barcap.com'; 'Christopher.Eddy@barclayscapital.com';
'melisa.macdonagh@barcap.com'; Jess Saypoff; David Wysoki;
'richard_cerick@hvbamericas.com'; 'ulrich.parche@hypovereinsbank.de';
'marshall_terry@hvbamericas.com'; 'ilse-karolina.binder@blb.de';
'eberhard.marsch@blb.de'; 'frommer@bear.com'; 'bfuqua@bear.com';
'aliberatore@bear.com'; 'edubois@cdcixis-cm.com';
'george.francois@us.cibc.com'; 'gina.ghent@us.cibc.com';
'john.pearson@cibc.ca'; 'wendy.rogers@cibc.co.uk';
'rozarioj@us.cibc.com'; 'nmathews@cwt.com'; 'rshirazi@cwt.com';
'lary.stromfeld@cwt.com'; 'marjorie.gross@chase.com';
'deborah.hooper@chase.com'; Frank Ronan; 'blake.titrud@chase.com';
'christina.villa@chase.com'; 'john.vollkommer@chase.com';
'pinar.yetgin@chase.com'; 'susan.furman@citadelgroup.com';
'andrew.w.alter@ssmb.com'; 'donald.bendernagel@ssmb.com';
'scott.l.flood@ssmb.com'; 'steven.j.keltz@ssmb.com';
'lisa.b.rothenberg@ssmb.com'; 'sumit.roy@ssmb.com';
'claude.brown@cliffordchance.com'; 'claire.exum@cliffordchance.com';
'nancy.jacklin@cliffordchance.com'; 'kimberly.loepp@cliffordchance.com';
'habib.motani@cliffordchance.com';
'michelle.pfeiffenberger@cliffordchance.c';
'tina.woo@cliffordchance.com'; 'david.yeres@cliffordchance.com';
'greg.haynes@commerzbankib.com'; 'jean-claude_zerey@commerzbank.com';
'cberkowi@us.ca-indosuez.com'; 'frederic.braun@indosuez.com';
'alec.cohen@creditlyonnais.co.uk'; 'paul.chu@csfb.com';
'simon.davidson@csfb.com'; 'andrew.downes@csfb.com';
'susanne.dunn@csfb.com'; 'john.gatsos@csfb.com'; 'stacy.gevas@csfb.com';
'allegra.kelly@csfb.com'; 'christine.knight@csfb.com';
'hc.lee@csfb.com'; 'barbara.nottebohm@csfb.com';
'helen.oldfield@csfb.com'; 'jeanette.whomersley@csfb.com';
'john@creditex.com'; 'heide_bachstaedter@dgbank.de';
'claudia.rosemann@dgzbank.de'; 'ruhe@danskebank.dk';
'blim@debevoise.com'; 'JEG@dentonwildesapte.com';
'katherine.andrews@db.com'; 'peter.beck@db.com';
'alessandro.cocco@db.com'; 'francis.dickinson@db.com';
'roger.ehrenberg@db.com'; 'jean.fudjinski@db.com';
'chip.goodrich@db.com'; 'angie.montalvo@db.com'; 'nathan.muller@db.com';
Dave Petersen; 'robert.m.spielman@db.com'; 'fabia.warlix@db.com';
'lklein@deweyballantine.com'; 'chandraleka.bhargavan@dresdner-bank.com';
Mark Haedicke; 'denis.o'connell@enron.com'; 'richard.gonseth@ey.com';
'susanne.boewing@erstebank.at'; 'n.barr@eib.org'; 'rmccaw@ecgd.gov.uk';
'dbegley@fhlbatl.com'; 'gu1@ffwlaw.com'; Mary Lou Guttmann;
'raross@bkb.com'; 'brance@freshfields.com'; 'rwhitacre@garban.com';
'alan.green@gecapital.com'; 'cgeorgi@genre.com'; 'rmurphy@genre.com';
'acf@gide.fr'; 'duhamel@gide.fr'; 'tricia.bowden@gs.com';
'john.cieslowski@gs.com'; 'david.geen@gs.com'; 'charlene.kuo@gs.com';
Bob Mancini; 'tom.riggs@gs.com'; 'chandra.sinnathuray@gs.com';
'derek.smith@gs.com'; 'tim.j.allen@hsbcgroup.com';
'nobby.clark@hsbcgroup.com'; 'cecile.hollevoet@us.hsbc.com';
'michael_boehm@trinkaus.de'; 'constantyn.nieuwenhuis@hamburglb.de';
'mpeeters@houthoff.nl'; 'levinec@hugheshubbard.com';
'jeff.kushner@ing-barings.com'; 'michael.srba@ing-barings.com'; John
Berry; Nellie Lim; Angela Papesch; 'seema_bal@ipicorp.com';
'ptrollip@investec.co.za'; 'adams_jon@jpmorgan.com'; Mark Brickell;
'lewis_david@jpmorgan.com'; 'masters_blythe@jpmorgan.com';
'nittenberg_ronald@jpmorgan.com'; 'schaffer_carl@jpmorgan.com';
'thompson_don@jpmorgan.com'; 'xistris_demetrios@jpmorgan.com';
'enalbantian@jonesday.com'; 'andrew.dominus@kbcfp.com';
'veerle.vercaigne@kbc.be'; 'tansinliang@khattarwong.com';
'thomas.bulgrin@kfw.de'; 'andreas.kinzelbach@lbbw.de';
'gernot.becker@helaba.de'; 'beatrix.goebel@helaba.de';
'paul.condon@lrp.de'; 'gkieslin@lehman.com'; 'bmcgowan@lehman.com';
'cmordas@lehman.com'; 'hpilley@linklaters.com';
'deepak.sitlani@linklaters.com'; 'jsummers@lsta.org';
'laurence.garside@lovells.com'; 'edward.kerr@msj.com.au';
'psadro@maplepartners.com'; 'judith.lawless@mccann-fitzgerald.ie';
'atkinric@filon.ml.com'; 'bbarrett@exchange.ml.com';
'larry_dobosh@ml.com'; 'bradl@ml.com'; 'srp@exchange.ml.com';
'sean_tiwari@ml.com'; 'hermann_watzinger@ml.com';
'robert_webster@ml.com'; 'jwalker@milbank.com'; 'jwarbey@milbank.com';
'ebo.coleman@moodys.com'; 'craig.abruzzo@msdw.com';
'gurjinder.bassi@msdw.com'; 'jonathan.dorfman@morganstanley.com';
'epstein@ms.com'; 'simon.freitag@msdw.com';
'chris.goodlad@morganstanley.com'; 'james.hill@msdw.com';
'aronj@ms.com'; 'Joan.Ma@msdw.com'; 'stephen.o'connor@msdw.com';
'julie.oneill@msdw.com'; 'philipsm@ms.com'; 'thomasa@ms.com';
'william.thum@morganstanley.com'; 'terrence.yang@msdw.com';
'ujahn@morganlewis.com'; 'mrodgon@morganlewis.com';
'cameron.munro@eu.nabgroup.com'; 'mark.stone@eu.nabgroup.com';
'francois.bourassa@bnc.ca'; 'robert.daniell@nomura.co.uk';
'tom.oriordan@nomura.co.uk'; Tom Salatte; 'maria.spinelli@nordlb.com';
'hendersonsk@nortonrose.com'; 'iversena@nortonrose.com';
'somerb@nortonrose.com'; 'g.neville@nyc.rabobank.com';
'pratleyz@rabo-bank.com'; 'ejung@refco.com'; 'susan.heard@rbcds.com';
'emily.jelich@royalbank.com'; 'peter.nowell@rbcds.com';
'Renuka.Abeysinghe@rbos.com'; 'alex.bouchier@rbos.com';
'liz.goodman@rbos.com'; 'mercerl@rbos.co.uk';
'alberto.ruano@sjberwin.com'; 'wplayle@sanwaint.com';
'dparisi@shearman.com'; 'hwest@shearman.com';
'jbauman@primusguaranty.com'; 'ccarlon@sidley.com';
'adalton@sidley.com'; 'aglass@sidley.com'; 'mgreenbe@sidley.com';
'whon@sidley.com'; 'tom.hunter@simmons-simmons.com';
'josborn@skadden.com'; 'olle.Westring@seb.se';
'anna.lawry@slaughterandmay.com';
'patrick.rosenvinge@slaughterandmay.com'; 'sanjevwks@slaughtermay.com';
'victoria.binavince@socgen.com'; 'tugdual.boisse@socgen.com';
'cecilia.poullain@socgen.com'; 'governor.tipton@us.socgen.com';
'jacqueline_tang@standardandpoors.com'; 'simmonsr@sullcrom.com';
'stephen_frank@smbcgroup.com'; 'pimbley@smbc-cm.com';
'james_baker@summithq.com'; 'carolyn_loverro@infinity.com';
'anfo@handelsbanken.com'; 'gordon_boozer@swissre.com';
'stephen_kruft@swissre.com'; 'todd_lurie@swissre.com';
'hilmar_schaumann@swissre.com'; 'cjameson@thacherproffitt.com';
'jstern@tpwlaw.com'; 'harvey@smbc-cm.com'; 'mvd@tbeuk.com';
'beckek3@tdsec.co.uk'; 'chiarp@tdusa.com'; 'hansec@tdusa.com';
'kerrl2@tdusa.com'; 'makarb2@tdusa.com'; 'rosenj2@tdusa.com';
'edward.kyritz@ubsw.com'; 'daniel.ladd@wdr.com';
'bryon.lancaster@ubsw.com'; Bryan Murtagh; 'alison.philpott@ubsw.com';
'william.sullivan@ubsw.com'; 'birgit_hoefer@westlb.de';
'matthias_kalthoff@westlb.de'; 'dr_klaus_poggemann@WestLB.de';
'dhoney@westpac.com.au'; 'ajohnson@westpac.com.au';
'llove@westpac.com.au'; 'tmcclarty@westpac.com.au';
'jmorgado@westpac.com.au'; 'price@westpac.com.au';
'istewart@westpac.com.au'; 'sross@ny.whitecase.com'
Subject: Credit Derivatives Market Practice Committee - New G6

ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
600 Fifth Avenue
Rockefeller Center - 27th floor
New York, NY 10020
Phone: (212) 332-1200
Facsimilie: (212) 332-1212

MEMO TO:  ISDA Credit Derivatives Market Practice Committee

FROM:   Louise Marshall, ISDA New York, Katia D'Hulster,
ISDA London

DATE:   May 21, 2001

RE:   New G6

At the May 8 meeting of the ISDA Credit Derivatives Market Practice
Committee, and subsequently at a May 15 meeting of the European Committee,
the following Group of Six (G6) members were elected to take forward the
Committee's work:

Dealers
NA - Mike Pohly, Morgan Stanley  michael.pohly@morganstanley.com
Eur - Pierre Mathieu, BNP Paribas
pierre.g.mathieu@bnpparibas.com

End-users/risk-takers
NA - Craig Welch, Ambac   cwelch@ambac.com
Eur - Eric Rothman, Ace Guaranty  erothman@aceguarantyre.com

Bank portfolio managers
NA - Hetty Harlan, BofA   hetty.harlan@bankofamerica.com
Eur - Cameron Munro, NAB
cameron.munro@eu.nabgroup.com

The new G6 will have its first call on Tuesday, May 22. Agenda items will be
prioritized and circulated to the whole committee. Please be sure to
identify your constituency representatives and to be aware of any resulting
communications from them. The efficiency of this process is dependent on the
input of all constituents. If you do not receive materials from your
representative, please contact him or her directly to ensure appropriate
representation.

NB: The Restructuring Supplement To the 1999 ISDA Credit Derivatives
Definitions, which is now in effect, is available on the ISDA Website
(www.isda.org).

Any questions or comments may be directed to Louise Marshall at ISDA New
York (lmarshall@isda.org) or Katia D'Hulster at ISDA London
(kdhulster@isda-eur.org).


In these troubled times, it's nice to get a blast of good news.  Check out Swerzbin's EOL from today.  He set a personal best of 130 transactions totalling 1.3 million MWhs.  I guess he can do it if he wants to.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alport, Kysa
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:31 PM
To: Coffing, Timothy; DL-Portland Real Time Shift; Alonso, Tom; Badeer, Robert; Belden, Tim; Crandall, Sean; Driscoll, Michael M.; Fischer, Mark; Mallory, Chris; Morris, Jeremy; Motley, Matt; Platter, Phillip; Richter, Jeff; Salisbury, Holden; Scholtes, Diana; Swerzbin, Mike; Williams III, Bill
Subject: Enpwer and EOL Data for 10/24/01

 	 Note:  No Day Ahead Cash Trading today due to Scheduling Meeting

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 10/1/2001   To: 10/24/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 10/1/2001   To: 10/24/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 340	 7,031,632	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 59	 3,173,455
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 648	 9,648,200	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 385	 20,828,366
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 634	 10,662,700	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 317	 14,903,675
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 2,534	 4,396,081	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 1,067	 2,733,875
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 1,311	 1,205,732	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 681	 927,584
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 1,884	 2,636,168	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 925	 3,928,514
 	 Real Time	 1,380	 35,150	  	 Real Time	 710	 60,088

 	 Grand Total	 8,731	 35,615,663	  	 Grand Total	 4,144	 46,555,557

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 10/24/2001   To: 10/24/2001	  	 EnPower	 From: 10/24/2001   To: 10/24/2001
 	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Desk	 Total Deals	 Total MWH

 	 EPMI Long Term California	 39	 959,232	  	 EPMI Long Term California	 4	 180,400
 	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 130	 1,310,400	  	 EPMI Long Term Northwest	 22	 379,200
 	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 45	 886,728	  	 EPMI Long Term Southwest	 24	 1,096,000
 	 EPMI Short Term California	 40	 270,475	  	 EPMI Short Term California	 13	 122,000
 	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 17	 28,000	  	 EPMI Short Term Northwest	 4	 18,000
 	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 44	 64,050	  	 EPMI Short Term Southwest	 30	 214,080
 	 Real Time	 77	 1,925	  	 Real Time	 53	 4,790

 	 Grand Total	 392	 3,520,810	  	 Grand Total	 150	 2,014,470

 	 EOL Deals	 From: 10/24/2001   To: 10/24/2001	  	 EOL Deals	 From: 10/24/2001   To: 10/24/2001
 	 EES	 Total Deals	 Total MWH	  	 Short Term West BOM	 Total Deals	 Total MWH
 	 Daily	 0	 0	  	 Daily	 0	 0
 	 Month-to-Date	 76	 17,000	  	 Month-to-Date	 0	 0

 	 ICE Volumes	 From: 10/24/2001   To: 10/24/2001
 	 Delivery Point	 Total MWH	 EPMI MWH	  Price

 	 Mid C (OP, Nov-01)	 8,000	 0	  $     25.75
 	 Mid C (P, Nov-01)	 70,000	 10,000	  $     29.69
 	 Mid C (P, Dec-01)	 50,000	 10,000	  $     39.58
 	 NP-15 (OP, Nov-01)	 8,000	 0	  $     26.50
 	 NP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 50,000	 10,000	  $     30.16
 	 NP-15 (P, Cal 03)	 122,800	 0	  $     43.75
 	 Palo (P, Bal Month)	 2,000	 2,000	  $     28.75
 	 Palo (OP, Nov-01)	 16,000	 8,000	  $     20.25
 	 Palo (P, Nov-01)	 120,000	 10,000	  $     27.90
 	 Palo (P, Dec-01)	 50,000	 20,000	  $     33.75
 	 Palo (P, Jan-02)	 10,400	 10,400	  $     32.50
 	 Palo (P, Jun-02)	 10,000	 0	  $     44.00
 	 Palo (P, Q2 03)	 30,800	 0	  $     37.75
 	 Palo (P, Q3 02)	 30,800	 0	  $     55.50
 	 Palo (P, Q4 02)	 30,800	 0	  $     35.25
 	 Palo (P, Cal 05)	 245,600	 0	  $     43.05
 	 SP-15 (P, Nov-01)	 70,000	 10,000	  $     29.64
 	 SP-15 (P, Q1 02)	 30,400	 30,400	  $     34.25
 	 SP-15 (P, Q3 02)	 30,800	 30,800	  $     51.00

 	 Grand Total	 986,400	 151,600	  $   669.02


John,

As discussed, we propose a 3% adjustment to the base salaries of the under $100k employees to be included in the NETCo offer letters we may produce next week (this is separate from any promotions we may want to make - we will give you a list by Friday pm). I have spoken with John and Louise and they are in agreement. Following our last conversation I believed you also were in agreement. Please confirm.

The salary increase will NOT be communicated as a subsidy for additional benefits costs, but as a modified/streamlined annual base salary review which we would do at this time of year, in the normal course of business.

David
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Jarrett,  Anthony
Sent:	Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:18 PM
To:	Oxley, David
Cc:	Davies, Neil; Rahaim, Christian; Slone, Jeanie; Oquinn, Kari
Subject:	Final Cost Estimates For SSMB Benefit Transition

Attached below is the final Estimates for SSMB:

Based on a worst case scenario if all AD&D, Employee Life and Spouse Life insurances were maxed out it will take $1.9 million additional dollars to make every employee whole (3% over our current annual payroll).

If we only look at employee's who make less than $100 K a year we would need $1.2 million additional dollars. (worst case scenario)

Included are all the estimates, rate charts, and salary adjustments.

Thanks, Tony


[IMAGE]   Dear MARK,   No need to fret about the gift-giving season ahead. Our Web site is filled with great ideas for anyone on your list. We'll deliver your gifts and greetings in tip-top condition in time for the holidays. If you visit our convenient Web site, you can also take advantage of seasonal specials  and exclusive varieties  available in only limited quantities.  [IMAGE] Save 25% on Simply Red , our exclusive Tulip Collection, with prepared bulbs in a basket shipped ready to start growing!  [IMAGE] African Mallow Standard - Save 25%!   Our talented greenhouse staff spend more than a year pinching and pruning our African Mallow standard s to perfection. For a limited time (and only on the Web), save 25% on this long-blooming, easy-to-grow plant, also known as Anisodontea x hypomandarum. Plants are 26 to 28 inches tall, growing in 7-in clay pots. (We also send the saucer.) The plants can spend next summer outdoors, and will bloom mightily.     [IMAGE] Our Trailing Abutilon    has bell-shaped flowers of red and gold that light up the sunny variegated foliage.  Abutilons (also called Flowering Maples) are among the easiest houseplants in the world, and bloom for an astonishingly long season. In fact, they'll bloom 12 months of the year, if given regular watering and a bit of fertilizer occasionally. We send complete care instructions with every order.      We recently updated our site to make gift-giving easier and faster. After you register as a member, you can create an address book that will store your addresses for future use. Click on "gift message" in your cart, and you can add your personal greetings to each recipient.  Thank you for your interest in White Flower Farm. If you choose to order, please reference Source Code 14854 when prompted during checkout.   To review our privacy statement click here.  Copyright 2001, White Flower Farm, Inc


Hi guys,

I want to make sure that you are comfortable with whatever services are being
provided by Piper Rudnick, so that there won't be any surprises when the bill
comes in.  Could you give me a brief outline of their scope?

Thanks,

Kay

---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/14/2000 06:31
PM ---------------------------

"Gershon, Mark A. - CHI" <Mark.Gershon@piperrudnick.com> on 08/09/2000
05:48:44 PM
To: "Fred J. Mitro (E-mail)" <fred.mitro@enron.com>, "Rusty Stevens (E-mail)"
<rsteven@enron.com>, "Susan M. Landwehr (E-mail)" <slandweh@ees.enron.com>,
"Kay Mann (E-mail)" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "Jim Murphy (E-mail)"
<jvmurf@mediaone.net>
cc: "Townsend, Christopher J. - CHI" <chris.townsend@piperrudnick.com>,
"Novak, Theodore J. - CHI" <Theodore.Novak@piperrudnick.com>, "Shindler,
Donald A. - CHI" <Donald.Shindler@piperrudnick.com>, "Way, Karen S. - CHI"
<karen.way@piperrudnick.com>

Subject: Livingston County Tour of Lincoln Energy Center

Mason Hall,  Livingston County Coordinator, has confirmed that the County
Agriculture and Zoning Committee, other key County officials and staff would
like to join us for a tour of the Lincoln Energy Center on August 22, 2000.
Current plan is for a bus to pick up participants in Pontiac at 10 a.m. and
to  return by approximately 2:30 to 3:00.  Lunch will be served at the site.
Mason anticipates approximately 15 to 20 participants.  We are also planning
to invite certain Township and City of Pontiac officials and should consider
other potential invitees including neighbors and other politicians.

Mark A. Gershon
Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe
Phone:   (312) 368-2127
Fax:   (312) 630-5338
Mark.Gershon@PiperRudnick.com
____________________________________________________________________________
The e-mail address and domain name of the sender changed on November 1,
1999.  Please update your records.

The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is
intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally
privileged.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to
the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your
computer system.
Thank you.

For more information about Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, please visit us at
http://www.piperrudnick.com/
____________________________________________________________________________


---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2000 02:17 PM
---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Eric Bass                           05/22/2000 09:04 AM

To: Brian Hoskins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Luis Mena/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Matthew Lenhart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Timothy Blanchard/HOU/EES@EES, Bryan
Hull/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, O'Neal D
Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kenneth
Shulklapper/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Hiemstra/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amir Ahanchian/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: GAME TONIGHT @ 9:45

 Let me know whether or not you will be there.  Please try to make it by 9:15.


Susan:

I'll continue to review the RMT masters and these should be included in the attorney rotation which Mark should mention at our swap meeting.
Let's discuss the recent changes to the form.

Sara

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Bailey, Susan
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:39 AM
To:	Shackleton, Sara
Subject:	RMT Masters

Sara,

Please advise if you are still the lawyer who reviews RMT masters, when requested for preparation.

If so, Legal has been requested to prepare an ISDA between RMT and Enron Japan Corp., which shall support their FX transactions.

Let me know, so I can pass this draft on to you for review.

Thanks.

Cordially,
Susan S. Bailey
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, Suite 3803A
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: (713) 853-4737
Fax: (713) 646-3490
Email: Susan.Bailey@enron.com


Dear Colleagues on the Energy Committee,

	Happy New Year, and best wishes for the coming year. The Bauer College is
extremely pleased to start the new year with a seminar visit by Professor
Darrell Duffie of Stanford University, one of the world's truly leading
financial economists. Darrell will be visiting us on Thursday, January 10.
I am attaching a seminar announcement that gives the precise title of the
talk and the location, and we would be delighted if you would disseminate
this announcement within your organizations to people you think may be
interested in the talk.

Best regards,

Praveen

Praveen Kumar
Chair and Professor of Finance
C.T. Bauer College of Business
334 Melcher Hall
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-6021
713-743-4770/713-743-4789 (fax)

 - BauerSeminar.doc


Elizabeth and I are coordinating on this matter. We commissioned the outside
counsel advice together. Now that I'm back I'll get with her and see if we
can reach some conclusions on these issues. Please feel free to call me if
you wish to discuss further.

Elizabeth: I received a call from Leslie Hansen on this yesterday. I'll call
her this week to discuss.

Alan

Tanya Rohauer
06/24/99 03:09 PM
To: Alan B Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Agency

Alan,

I am currently compiling a list of those utilities that to our knowledge have
agents. I am also trying to round up all of the agency agreements from our
files. In light of outside counsel's comments regarding the ability of an
agent to bind more than one principal, I am quite concerned over the amount
of business we do this way.  I would be interested in reading whatever you
received from outside counsel.  Also, are you coordinating this with
Elizabeth Sager?  Tracy Ngo , who works in our group, told me Elizabeth has
outside counsel looking at this too ( she is working here part time?) and
they are fairly comfortable with how these documents work for power. In
addition, where do the FERC and SEC fit into the picture?  Tracy mentioned
something about required approvals.  I am trying to determine our exposure to
these contracts, and whether they truly place our credit risk with the
utilities.

Thanks,
Tanya


i don't think i will play on sat


Kay,

I am not sure what we decided on Friday.  Are we going to send another (more
friendly) letter to the Westinghouse people evidencing a willingness to
discuss the draw issue?  Please let me know at your convenience.

Stuart


Hello-
Diana Scholtes  11/08
Enron Sells Idaho
99.50
Mid C

We have term 11/10-11/11/2000

Bloomberg has term 11/13-11/30-2000

please let me know
thanks


THIS IS SOME FUN STUFF
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Presto, Kevin M.
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:37 PM
To:	Lavorato, John
Subject:	FW: ERCOT LSE's

Ader has managed to get cross-wise with another good employee.

Ader's "supply group" has essentially stolen Roger's approved ERCOT LSE accounts.   Rogers needs these LSE accounts to serve load in ERCOT and now he has none.   This is BS and should not be tolerated.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Wagner, Joseph
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 1:09 PM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.; Herndon, Rogers
Subject:	FW: ERCOT LSE's

Kevin and Rogers,

After meeting with Ader yesterday to discuss some LSE topics and sending him a polite, to the point email, I received this email response from him.  This email completely misrepresents what was dicussed and makes me look bad to management.  I am about ready for war, so I think it is better that someone else look at this before I do something to get fired.  I have never been so completely disgusted with someone who is supposed to be a figure of respect and authority, and is a Vice President at a company like Enron.  My email was addressed to Ader and Bernstein and copied Rogers and Nancy Hetrick since these are the people who have knowledge of the subject matter.  For him to copy the people he did, and hide behind his contacts, while lying about our conversation, and skewing it in a manner in which I would never act, is inexcusable.  I would expect more from a 4th grader.  Sorry for the ranting and raving.  Kevin - Rogers is out today, so if you would like to discuss this further, please call me at 33143.  Thanks.

-Joe

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Ader, Jeff
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Wagner, Joseph
Cc:	Delainey, David; Dietrich, Janet; Blachman, Jeremy; Holmes, Sean; Bernstein, Mark; Hetrick, Nancy; Herndon, Rogers; Ochsner, Preston
Subject:	Re: ERCOT LSE's

Joe,

I requested a meeting with you yesterday to work with you and convey what we have learned over the last three months by working with regulatory and the ERCOT ISO to utilize and create additional LSE accounts.  As you were informed by Nancy Hetrick of regulatory all three currently available LSE account are committed by Structured Supply for use under currently negotiated masters.  We requested the meeting with you yesterday to explain what we were doing and why we needed the other three EES LSE accounts.  We also took the time to explain the process for establishing new LSE accounts, under a LLC structure which is not complicated, but the structure that the new LSE accounts would be created under (SPV) is inconsistent with the masters negotiated and EES would not be able to perform under these masters.

We have tried to work with you in cooperation to accomplish your goals consistent with the constraints of the ERCOT rules.  We have explained our needs and the reason for them. We conveyed our interest in working together to accomplish the greater good for the company and offered our help in any way we could.  You mark and I agreed that it would be easier to help each other and not duplicate efforts.  We were appreciative of your willingness to proceed consistent with this spirit of cooperation.  It disheartens and surprises me that you would leave the meeting with this understanding and in agreement of the business situation and send an e-mail the next morning, without picking up the phone or stopping by to discuss this and just attempt to dictatorially commandeer the LSE accounts that you knew were committed and why they were committed.

Moreover; you told us that you thought you might need one more and you have attempted to take three more.

Best regards,

Jeff

From:	Joseph Wagner/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/16/2001 09:14 AM
To:	Mark Bernstein/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Ader/HOU/EES@EES
cc:	Nancy Hetrick/ENRON@enronXgate, Rogers Herndon/ENRON@enronXgate, Preston Ochsner/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject:	ERCOT LSE's

Thank you for taking the time to discuss the LSE situation in ERCOT.  The present LSE was set up by EES and is being utilized by EWS Retail and EWS Services Group, for physical delivery in ERCOT for EES load.  In order to better manage EES volume and structure growth in ERCOT, billing issues, and optimization of the present and future portfolio, EES/EWS Retail will require the use of the sub LSE's available under EES's existing LSE arrangement.  Structured Supply will be responsible for the creation of any LLC's that need to be created to facilitate additional LSE availability.  If you have any questions or comments, please either email or call me (ext 33143).  Thanks.

-Joe


-----Original Message-----
From: Delainey, David
Sent: Fri 10/12/2001 2:52 PM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc:
Subject:

John, as a follow up to Greg's call, I would like to provide equity value, in recognition of the huge effort on the EES issues plus key player on the team going forward, to the following people from EES:

                                Options Equity          Total

        Rogers Herndon  $250K           $250K           $500K

        Don Black               $250K           $250K           $500K

        Jeff Richter            $100K           $100K           $200K

        Bernie Aucoin           $100K           $100K           $200K

I assume that you have Tim and Kevin managed.

Views?

When are we going to get back together to finalize our discussions?

Regards

Delainey


jen's dad better buy a bunch of booze.  and the schrutt's better take us
somewhere nice for the rehersal dinner.  and jen's friends better put out.


Presentations That Work
                      June 11 & 12  8:00 am - 5:00 pm
                          in EB560    Cost:  $900
                          Limited seats available

This intensive 16-hours workshop includes nine presentations and provides
practice and feedback from peers, instructors, and videotape.  The training
focuses on instruction and practice in organization, delivery skills,
visual design and use, and question-and-answer models.  Participants will
receive personalized, confidential feedback from the instructor and will
develop a self-improvement action plan.  Customized exercises give
participants first-hand experience in one-on-one, small group, impromptu,
and sit-down settings.

As a result of this course, you will be able to:

?    Reduce preparation time
     ?  Increase rapport and persuasions
     ?  Organize your ideas for impact
     ?  Select appropriate details
     ?  Plan the presentation
     ?  Design and use visuals effectively
     ?  Use a dynamic delivery style
     ?  Handle questions and answers appropriately

Please login and enroll through the InvestInMe website,
http://www.corptraining.com/index.cfm?company=enron.  If you have any
questions, please call 713 853-0357.