Thanks for email.  will listen to the whole of it later today.  running
between meetings.  sorry!  mckinsey to be calling you.

attached is bio.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com [mailto:Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 4:07 PM
To: kari.dohn@gov.ca.gov
Subject: Thanks

Thanks again for taking the time to meet.  We're very interested in
following up on the demand buy-down/energy efficiency issues and are glad
to assist if we can--and we think we can.

As I mentioned, I've attached the final version of the document we've been
distributing in Sacramento describing our proposed solution to California's
energy crisis. If you have any questions about it, or want to discuss it
further, just let me know.

Also attached is the letter we sent to the PUC supporting Comm'r Bilas'
alternative decision designed to 1) make CDWR a creditworthy entity and 2)
permit the Legislature to continue its work on a "Direct Access" fix
without interference from the PUC. It's critical that the PUC adopt the
Bilas decision as soon as possible.

In addition, I'm including a story regarding the EOB/ISO filing at FERC
alleging price gouging and demanding refunds.  As we discussed, it's
creating a good deal of consternation in the market.

Finally, we'd be very interested meeting with you and the folks from
McKinsey on our reverse-auction for demand reductions.

Have a nice weekend.  Look forward to talking again very soon.

Best,
Jeff

(See attached file: Hertzberg final.doc) (See attached file: Comments on
Bilas Alternate.DOC)

POWER POINTS: How To Raise Electricity Prices, ISO-Style
   By Mark Golden
   A Dow Jones Newswires Column

  NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--There they go again. The California Independent
System Operator has initiated another attempt to suppress wholesale
electricity
prices rather than deal with the fundamental reasons of why prices are
high.
  Like past anti-market moves, Thursday's request that the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission slash suppliers' unpaid invoices for December and
January power will fail in its stated aim. Also as with past attempts, the
ISO's
action this week will likely result in higher costs for Edison
International (EIX)
unit Southern California Edison, PG&E Corp. (PCG) unit Pacific Gas &
Electric,
Sempra Energy (SRE) unit San Diego Gas & Electric Co. and the state's
Department of
Water Resources.
  The ISO, which is responsible for maintaining the balance of power supply
and demand on most of the state's power grid, has suffered the unintended
consequences of its actions many times before. When the ISO passed a
$250/MWh price cap in the summer, the cap became a target and caused prices
to rise,
just as the ISO had been warned it would. When the ISO exercised its
ability to
buy power above its cap only from out-of-state utilities, California
generators
sold power to the out-of-state utilities, which in turn sold the power back
to
California at a markup.
  The latest attempt to suppress the market is mind-numbingly stupid. The
ISO wants the FERC to order retroactive discounts for power it says was
sold at
unreasonably high prices. Merchant generators, other western utilities and
power marketers sold about $3 billion worth of bulk power to the ISO in
December
and January. The ISO says overcharging accounts for $560 million of that
total.
Suppliers' prices, which the ISO agreed to pay at the time, exceeded
hypothetical generating costs by more than 10% and are therefore
unreasonable,the grid manager says.
  Actual refunds might greatly exceed $560 million, according to the ISO,
once the FERC looks at the suppliers' actual costs. Power from a generating
company that bought natural gas before the spot market ran up, for example,
should
be discounted the most. Generators that waited and paid the most for gas
would
make the bigger profit per megawatt hour. What a great idea: punish the
smart and
reward the stupid.
  Staffers lead by Anjali Sheffrin, the ISO's director of market analysis,
and Eric Hildebrandt, manager of market monitoring, spent a fair amount of
time
and money to establish this shocker: In a supply-short commodity market,
prices
exceed producers' costs.
  Where they vary from well-established economic principles is that they
find this "unreasonable."
  Sheffrin and Hildebrandt want the FERC to obtain extensive cost data from
all suppliers - including government-owned utilities Los Angeles Department
of
Water & Power and Canada's BC Hydro - and begin hearings on refunds. This
would
cover the vast majority of sales to the ISO during December and January
because
almost every seller to the ISO exceeded the $150 per megawatt-hour "soft"
price
cap, above which transactions must be reported to the FERC for possible
review.
  There is no question the ISO has been paying prices that exceed even the
already high market prices. On Tuesday, for example, the ISO paid an
average
price of $337/MWh for power that other western utilities had bought and
sold
for $175-$200/MWh. On that one day, the ISO paid almost $25 million for
power
that was worth about $14 million.
  The reason: The ISO has had to pay a premium to the rest of the market
since the middle of December, when suppliers correctly figured out that the
utilities were running out of cash and wouldn't be able to pay their ISO
bills. Once
northwestern utilities stopped selling to the ISO at any price, the ISO
asked some of the in-state generating companies like Williams Cos. (WMB) to
step
into the middle on its behalf. Williams did so for what it has called a
reasonable profit.
  Let's say that Williams bought from some other generator at $450/MWh and
sold to the ISO at $500/MWh. That would be reasonable based on Williams'
costs,
according to the ISO's view.
  But if the generator sold directly to the ISO in the first place at
$450/MWh,it would be ordered to provide a refund, because its generating
costs are
assuredly nowhere near $450/MWh.
  So, according to the ISO, $500/MWh is reasonable, but $450/MWh is too
high.
  If the FERC were to order refunds as the ISO has requested, no company
that generates power would ever again sell to the ISO. It would always sell
to
some third party, which in turn would sell the electricity to the ISO at a
markup.
  Does the ISO ever stop and think through the impact of what it tries to
do?
  "We certainly recognize that's a problem, and it's something FERC needs
to
grapple with," Hildebrandt said in an interview.
  What the FERC will do is save the ISO from itself. "We reject proposals
to
return to cost-based regulation," the FERC said in its Dec. 15 California
ruling.
  The FERC will review some of the high prices, as required. But refunds
will be ordered only if the FERC finds that a particular seller to
California - or a
colluding group of sellers - withheld supplies in order to increase prices,
according to the FERC ruling.
  But collusion won't likely be found. There have been many investigations
into whether sellers have created a "false scarcity." None have found it.
  In December, Republican FERC Commissioner Curt Hebert, now chairman,
applauded the commission's decision to "reserve 'price mitigation' for real
exercises
of market power rather than focusing on the price level itself."
  The issue of the ISO and utilities having to pay a credit-risk premium
arose after the FERC had decided what it would do about California. But,
according
to a source knowledgeable about FERC operations under Hebert's leadership,
the
commission will recognize the credit-risk premium as reasonable.
  In the meantime, however, the specter of retroactive price controls and
the increased hassle of dealing with the ISO makes suppliers even more
reluctant
to sell to the ISO. The ISO will have to overcome that reluctance by
offering
to pay an even higher premium.
  Good move.
  -By Mark Golden, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-4604;
mark.golden@dowjones.com

  (END) Dow Jones Newswires 02-03-01
  1844GMT(AP-DJ-03-02-01 1844GMT)

 - Kari's bio.doc


Plan of Reorganization.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Miller, Stephanie
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 4:21 PM
To:	Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	RE: Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

By the way, what is POR?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Dasovich, Jeff
Sent:	Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:55 PM
To:	Tycholiz, Barry; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Hass, Glen; Miller, Stephanie; Tholt, Jane M.; Lawner, Leslie; Cantrell, Rebecca W.; Steffes, James D.; Novosel, Sarah; Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew
Subject:	Conference Call with PG&E to Discuss the Gas Portion of Its Proposed Plan of Reorganization that It Will File w/FERC Toward End of November

PG&E called.  They want to set up a conference call to brief us on the gas piece of their POR that they'll be filing with FERC around November 30th.  They want to try to do it in the next couple of weeks. Please let me know if you're interested and please pass this along to anyone else who might be interested.  Thanks.

Best,
Jeff


Rick and Steve:

Per Rick's request, attached is the memorandum prepared by V&E last summer
regarding possible emergency action DOE could take on open access issues.

As Rick and I discussed this morning, we are trying to assess what authority
DOE has, and what authority it would need, to enable it to take emergency
action this summer if things start to go badly.  I will be working with Linda
and John Shelk here in Washington on this issue.  We will let you know what
we come up with.

Sarah

----- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 04/30/2001 10:28 AM -----

	"Bobbish, Donna J." <dbobbish@velaw.com>
	04/30/2001 09:43 AM

		 To: "'snovose@enron.com'" <snovose@enron.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: Requested Memorandum

Sarah: Adam indicated that you wanted this memo sent again.  Please let me
know if you need anything more.  Donna

Donna J. Bobbish
Of Counsel
Vinson & Elkins
1455 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20004-1008
(202) 639-6618

          ++++++CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE+++++
The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged.  This
email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
or the information contained herein is prohibited.  If you have received
this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email
and delete this email from your system.  Thank You
 <<interim emergency approaches.DOC>>

 - interim emergency approaches.DOC


Sara:

I typed these transactions and stored them in Kaye's "C" drive for future use
or to be transfered to your own data files.
It was great seeing you again and I wish you the best.

Have a great weekend!

Gaby


I spoke to Christian on Friday.  He was not able to reach agreement on a power agreement so EPMI did not sign one with DWR.  He gave me the name and number of the outside counsel that he used.  I will call him this afternoon.

Stacy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Tycholiz, Barry
Sent:	Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:49 PM
To:	Dickson, Stacy E.; Williams, Jason R (Credit); Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject:	DWR Updates

What is status of our DWR discussions.  I am hearing conflicting stories as to whether or not ENA power has executed a Enabling agreement with DWR.  Stacey, any luck with Christian?

I will get an update with Louise on ENA's interests with DWR and advise.

BT


I will be in California beginning this Friday through next week . . . so
I won't be at work to check e-mails.
If something changes with the planned conference call you'll have to
send e-mail to home ---   cattlepig@earthlink.net
or leave a message on my home voicemail for me to retrieve.  Otherwise,
I'll just plan on speaking with you all on Saturday morning, August 12th
@ 11:00 a.m.

Matthew Gillaspie
NASD Registered Series 7, 63, 53, 55
Fixed Income Trading - Ingersoll
Brenton Investments Inc.
515/237-5379
2840 Ingersoll Avenue
Des Moines   IA  50312
matt.gillaspie@brentonbank.com
Tax Equivalent Yields that may be noted above are ESTIMATES ONLY and may
not take into consideration unique qualities of the bonds or your
clients tax situation.  Your client should CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX
PREPARER OR ATTORNEY TO DETERMINE THEIR TAX EQUIVALENT FOR THEIR
SPECIFIC INCOME SITUATION.
Brenton Investments, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brenton Bank.
Investment and insurance products offered through Brenton Investments,
Inc. are not FDIC insured, are not deposits nor obligations of any bank,
are not guaranteed by any bank and involve investment risk, including
the possible loss of principal.


I will be out of the office beginning on Friday, March 8 and returning on Monday, March 18.  I will be checking voicemail daily (713-853-6027).  If you need immediate assistance, please contact Dina Snow at 713-345-7099.


Attached is the final report requirements and reporting template to be used for the draft report to the PUCT on October 31st and the November 15h report to be filed with the PUCT.  I had provided due dates in the previous email, but please have the October 31st information to me so I can send to the PUCT by 2:00 p.m., October 30th.  I would like to have the November 15th report by COB November 12th so we can properly prepare the filing.  Thanks.

Nancy A. Hetrick
Enron Corp.
Director, Government Affairs
Phone:  712-366-3399
Pager:   888-912-1426


---------------------- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 07/20/99 09:14
AM ---------------------------

Sara Shackleton
07/16/99 09:36 AM
To: Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Merita

Please review and let's talk.  Thanks.  SS


The following represents a sampling of my accomplishments for 2000.

1. The creation of the Hawaii 125-0 concept - the creation of a revolver for
FASB 125 transactions.  The deal will ultimately be fully utilized and has
saved significant fees for Enron as well as eased execution of those deals
(single source of equity, etc)

2. The concept of an internet-distributed $3 Bln Revolver - Initiated the
concept of the distribution of the revolver over the internet which led to
the launch of Dealbench.

3. The initiation and execution of project Grayhawk - Initiated the idea to
take a large ENE stock position in January prior to the ENE equity analyst
conference and led the deal team which executed the trade.  The transaction
generated $85MM in profits for EGF.  In addition, identified tax leakage in
the existing structure which was remedied.  Sure it looks like a no-brainer
now, but it wasn't at the time.

4. Enron NetWorks, Enron Industrial Markets - Regional CFO - Financed MG
acquisition,  created financing strategy for group and specific transactions.

5. Enron NetWorks Partners, L.P. - Structured and executed private equity
fund which will raise
$900MM of outside equity dollars.  Fund will close by year-end.

6. Created structure to monetize existing Pulp & Paper business through FASB
125 or alternate structure to capture $75MM - $100MM in earnings and
approximately $200MM in funds flow.


---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/09/2000 11:13
AM ---------------------------

"Stan Jensen" <sjensen@bracepatt.com> on 06/09/2000 10:57:21 AM
To: <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Re: Assignment of GE Contract regarding Vitro Project

Attached are the EPC contract with Mitsui that was executed and the Exhibits
to same.

The split EPC contracts and Exhibits are in draft form and have not been
executed.  I will have my secretary send you a copy of the latest drafts
later today if you have any specific question please feel free to call or
drop me an email.

>>> <Kay.Mann@enron.com> 06/08 6:15 PM >>>

Stan,

Could you please me send me the electronic file of the executed EPC
contracts, including the consolidation agreement?

Thanks,

Kay

"Stan Jensen" <sjensen@bracepatt.com> on 06/08/2000 02:57:57 PM

To:   <Jeff.Blumenthal@enron.com>, <kay.mann@enron.com>,
      <Peggy.Banczak@enron.com>, <Steve.Irvin@enron.com>
cc:

Subject:  Assignment of GE Contract regarding Vitro Project

Following discusions with Kay Mann and Robert Stephens we revised the
Assignment Agreement to have the payment terms for the GE Turbine
incorporated in the Assignment Agreement and to provide Enron North America
the option to have the GE Turbine either returned to it or returned to EEIM
upon  termination of the EPC Contract.

Attached is a revised clean version of the Assignment Agreement and a
redline showing how the revised version is different from the original.

Please feel free to call me at (713) 221-1524 with any questions.

Stan Jensen

(See attached file: ASSIGN.doc)
(See attached file: ASSIGNre.doc)

 - EPCMITS.doc
 - EXHIMITS.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 08/04/2000
04:52 PM ---------------------------

"Paul Bristow" <pbristow@risk.co.uk> on 08/03/2000 05:14:43 AM
Please respond to "Paul Bristow" <pbristow@risk.co.uk>
To: <vkamins@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Enterprise risk management

Dear Vince,
?
Thanks for your call the other day regarding  EPRM's upcoming enterprise risk
management conference. We seem to be making  progress and are pulling
together some interesting subjects for inclusion this  year. I am currently
at a stage where there are plenty of possible sessions and  over the next
week I will be able to decide of which will stay and which will  go.
?
I have attached a file that gives an indication  of the topics that have been
identified so far. Although I have bullet points  for the sessions I would
first like to identify interested parties and then work  with them to develop
a session that reflects their particular expertise and  experience. I also
think that by continuously developing the points we can make  greater
allowances for continuity between each participant.
?
Based on our discussion I would be extremely  interested in inviting you to
lead a session on the main conference. You seemed  to have an interesting
view on operational risk and the particular challenges  that are presented
within the energy industry. This session will run on  Thursday, November
16th. The title is reasonably broad at this stage and any  suggestions are
welcome.
?
Your overall views on the current conference content is also  welcome and if
you feel that another session is more suited to your work do not  hesitate to
contact me. I look forward to speaking with you soon.
?
Yours sincerely,
?
Paul Bristow
Senior Course and Conference Producer, Energy & Power Risk  Management
+44 (0) 20 7484 9883
 - maildoc.doc


You're the best!

	Michael Slade
	10/25/2000 11:27 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re: EnronCredit.com Houston signatory

Hi Tana - got your message - should be possible to get EnronCredit.com
director to sign here tomorrow morning and faxed to you in time for meeting.

Best wishes

Mike


I heard about this.  Griswold was a weener.

-----Original Message-----
From: Cherry, Diane - PSP [mailto:dcherry@bpa.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:56 AM
To: 'Sean Crandall'
Subject:

Don't know if you saw this:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced August 21 that it
filed and simultaneously settled administrative proceedings against Avista
Energy, of Spokane, Washington, former Avista Energy Vice President of
Trading Thomas Johns of Spokane, Washington, and former Avista Energy trader
Michael T. Griswold of Seattle, Washington. In the Order issued today, the
CFTC finds that on four days between April 1998 and August 1998, Avista
Energy manipulated the settlement prices of the Palo Verde and
California-Oregon-Border electricity futures contracts traded on the New
York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), in order to increase the company's net
gain on certain over-the-counter option positions, whose value was based on
the settlement prices at issue.

The CFTC imposed cease and desist orders against Avista Energy, Griswold,
and Johns, and required them to pay civil monetary penalties of $2.1
million, $110,000, and $50,000, respectively. The CFTC also imposed an
18-month trading ban on Griswold and a 12-month trading ban on Johns. The
settlements require Avista Energy, Griswold, and Johns to cooperate in any
further investigations and proceedings related to the conduct at issue.
Avista Energy, Griswold, and Johns consented to the entry of the orders
without admitting or denying the findings made in the orders.

The CFTC also filed a ten-count complaint against former Avista Energy Vice
President of Trading Strategies William H. Taylor of Houston, Texas, former
Avista Energy trader Robert S. Kristufek of Chicago, Illinois, and NYMEX
floor broker Anthony J. DiPlacido of Bellmore, New York, charging them with
participating in the manipulative scheme.

Copies of the CFTC complaint and orders may be found at http://www.cftc.gov/
<http://www.cftc.gov/cftc/cftchome.htm>

Diane Cherry
503.230.5648


Gotta check out the link below.

EM
---------------------- Forwarded by Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron on 05/04/2001
09:36 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Joey Taylor                           05/04/2001 09:28 AM

To: Derek Bailey/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: FW: Stick fighting

---------------------- Forwarded by Joey Taylor/NA/Enron on 05/04/2001 09:27
AM ---------------------------

"Bluhm, Jerry" <JBluhm@tractebelusa.com> on 05/04/2001 09:18:13 AM
To: "'Alter, Jeffrey'" <jalter@fulbright.com>, "'Joey Bluhm'"
<jmb0202@hotmail.com>, "'Joey.Taylor@enron.com'" <Joey.Taylor@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: FW: Stick fighting

>
>
>  http://members.brabant.chello.nl/~a.mert/fight.swf


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Terry K. - Oncall

Date:		5/6/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Thanks.  When you have Annex A ready, we'll have to tweak Annex B.  For
example, I think we eliminated the term "Derivative Transactions" in Annex A
(but it shows up in the Catalytica Annex B).  Bart Clark is the lawyer who is
asking to receive the two annexes.

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tana Jones                           09/01/99 03:49 PM

To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Catalytica confirm

Attached is the Annex B for Catalytica.


June 16, 2000

Don Nicolson
Forest Oil Corporation

Dear Mr. Nicolson:

Attached for your review is a draft of a Master Firm Purchase/Sale Agreement
between Enron North America Corp. and Forest Oil Corporation.

Please do not hesitate to contact me  with your questions and or comments
regarding the Agreement.
Best  Regards,

Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
dperlin@enron.com
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax  713-646-3490


---------------------- Forwarded by Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT on 02/28/2001 12:56
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Karen D McIlvoy                           02/27/2001 10:55 AM

To: ragan.bond@bhlp.com
cc:  (bcc: Andrea Ring/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Fwd: CLINTONS LEAVING

---------------------- Forwarded by Karen D McIlvoy/HOU/ECT on 02/27/2001
10:51 AM ---------------------------

HGHanley@aol.com on 02/22/2001 10:42:47 AM
To: lantee@lsuhsc.edu, barry.j.belcher@boeing.com, HardyCole@cs.com,
blyzese@heart.org, LCPFlyer72@aol.com, kalo@prodigy.net,
karen.d.mcilvoy@enron.com, mcilvoy@pendulumenergy.com, dmmiller@wkhs.com,
Jadd202@aol.com
cc:
Subject: Fwd: CLINTONS LEAVING

Return-path: <LHT@aol.com>
From: LHT@aol.com
Full-name: LHT
Message-ID: <31.10cd93ea.27c69829@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:28:25 EST
Subject: CLINTONS LEAVING
To: LHT@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part2_71.af596aa.27c69829_boundary"
X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 10502

THE CLINTONS LEAVING THE WHITEHOUSE. PLEASE DOWNLOAD.


-----Original Message-----
From: JOHN HEILI
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 5:58 PM
To: EVERYONE AT TVA
Subject: Earthquakes

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/earthquakes/archive/read
y.dtl

The above web site offers some good advice in the form of a list of items
to have ready in the event of a major earthquake here in Portland.
 Drinking water, flashlights, and first aid kits are some of the bare
necessities.
I can tell you from experience that if or when an earthquake hits you will
be glad you took the time to  prepare some of these items.

rock on.


Parties to the Gas Strategy OII, I.99-07-003

PG&E is providing the attached "Real-Time Access Methodology Survey - Status
Report" pursuant to the CPUC Decision Approving the Comprehensive Settlement
As To PG&E In The Gas Strategy OII, Decision 00-05-049.  PG&E will send the
final report on or before January 12, 2001.

Randy Litteneker
PG&E Law Department
(415)973-2179

 <<Gas OII Survey Letter.doc>>   <<Gas OII Report on Access Survey.doc>>

 - Gas OII Survey Letter.doc
 - Gas OII Report on Access Survey.doc


Of course your Dad would be invited to anything we do, but if you'd rather
spend the
time alone with him that weekend we could always make it another weekend.
The only
problem with the 12th is that we'll be consumed with the move the entire
weekend.  Let
me know what works for you.  We're flexible after the 12th.

KR


John -- Sorry we did not catch up when I was in Houston in December.? At the
time, I was in the process of leaving the company I helped to start? and have
joined a sports marketing agency to build their international business.

At some point, I would be interested in speaking with you about some projects
(domestic and international) that we're working on.? One of our business
groups specialize in the stadium/properties naming rights field and there are
some great opportunities including the new Pittsburgh Steelers stadium.? I
thought one of your companies or possibly New Power might have an interest in
taking a look at it.? Let me know when you have a free moment.

Cheers, BA

Bruce Angus
Millsport International
750 Washington Blvd. 6/F
Stamford, CT 06901
P. 203-977-0504
F. 203-977-0555
Email. bruce.angus@millsport.com


Attached is a draft SP 15 on peak confirm which you may send to Delano.  SS


How funny!

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 09:12 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

No, he thinks he is God's gift to contracts.

From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 06/06/2001 09:08 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Is this his attempt at humor because he is on the email list.  I told them
you are on vacation, but they still want to have the call.

	Kay Mann@ENRON
	06/06/2001 07:36 AM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Sometimes John forgets that he is not a lawyer.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/06/2001 07:36
AM ---------------------------

Kay Mann
06/06/2001 07:31 AM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

 Next time you vote for me, please copy me on the email.

Kay

From: Scott Dieball@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 06/05/2001 05:44 PM
To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron

Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Vacation???  I've heard that tomorrow at the staff meeting Mark H. will be
rolling out the new policy of eliminating all vacation for ENA legal folks.

	John G Rigby
	06/05/2001 03:08 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Scott Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Lets continue without Kay.  I think this call will be focusing on the
documents sent out already.

	Suzanne Adams@ECT
	06/05/2001 02:42 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Kay will be on vacation Thursday and Friday.  Can the call go on without
her?  Same time, 1:30 p.m. CDT?  Let me know please.

	John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/05/2001 02:25 PM

		 To: Suzanne Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

lets make the change- GE cannot make it wednesday- plus the extra day gives
both GE and us time to review the exhibits and the new T&C draft.  given that
Sheila is in her "hostage situation", the other key person is Kay.   Thanks.

	Suzanne Adams@ECT
	06/05/2001 12:02 PM

		 To: John G Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

John, I'm not going to change the call to Thursday until I hear from you to
make sure you guys want it that way.  Thanks, Suzanne

	John G Rigby@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
	06/05/2001 11:17 AM

		 To: stephen.swift@ps.ge.com@ENRON
		 cc: Ben.Jacoby@enron.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com, Ed.B.Hearn.III@enron.com,
John.G.Rigby@enron.com, john.schroeder@ps.ge.com, kay.mann@enron.com,
kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, Lisa.Bills@enron.com, michael.barnas@ps.ge.com,
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com,
Suzanne.Adams@enron.com
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Changing to Thursday works better for Scott Dieball, John Rigby and Peter
Thompson.

	stephen.swift@ps.ge.com
	06/05/2001 08:49 AM

		 To: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com, Sheila.Tweed@enron.com, Ben.Jacoby@enron.com,
Lisa.Bills@enron.com, Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com, Scott.Dieball@enron.com,
michael.barnas@ps.ge.com, kent.shoemaker@ae.ge.com, kay.mann@enron.com,
john.schroeder@ps.ge.com, Bill.Williams@enron.com, Ed.B.Hearn.III@enron.com,
John.G.Rigby@enron.com
		 cc:
		 Subject: RE: Weekly GE Conference Call

Any chance of postponing until Thursday afternoon - same time?

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Suzanne.Adams@enron.com [mailto:Suzanne.Adams@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 7:09 PM
To: Sheila.Tweed@enron.com; Ben.Jacoby@enron.com; Lisa.Bills@enron.com;
Roseann.Engeldorf@enron.com; Scott.Dieball@enron.com; Swift, Stephen L
(PS, CommOps); Barnas, Michael C (PS, Legal); Shoemaker, Kent (GEAE);
kay.mann@enron.com; Schroeder, John H Jr (PS, Sales);
Bill.Williams@enron.com; Ed.B.Hearn.III@enron.com;
John.G.Rigby@enron.com
Subject: Weekly GE Conference Call
Importance: High

The weekly conference call will take place at 1:30 p.m. CDT on Wednesday,
June 6, 2001.  EB38C1 has been reserved for those of you in Houston.

Dial In:       1-888-285-4585

Participant:   536220

Host:          121970 (Sheila)


-----Original Message-----
From: 	"John D. Martin" <J_Martin@baylor.edu>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22John+20D+2E+20Martin+22+20+3CJ+5FMartin+40baylor+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:15 AM
To:	Kaminski, Vince J
Subject:	Second paper looks interesting

>Approved-By: approve@SSRN.COM
>Date:         Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:57:39 -0500
>Reply-To: admin@SSRN.COM
>Sender: "Capital Markets: Asset Pricing and Valuation Working Paper
      Abstracts" <CAPITAL-MARKETS-ASSETS-WPS@PUBLISHER.SSRN.COM>
>From: "G. William Schwert" <W_Schwert@SSRN.COM>
>Subject:      FEN CapMkts-Asset WPS Vol. 4, No. 36, 08/27/2001
>To: CAPITAL-MARKETS-ASSETS-WPS@PUBLISHER.SSRN.COM
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Aug 2001 00:33:49.0999 (UTC)
FILETIME=[1B5143F0:01C12F59]
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>        C A P I T A L   M A R K E T S   A B S T R A C T S:
>      A S S E T   P R I C I N G   A N D   V A L U A T I O N
>                      Working Paper Series
>                 Vol. 4,  No. 36: August 27, 2001
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>Publisher:     FEN Subject Matter Journals
>               a division of
>               Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. (SSEP)
>               and Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
>
>Editor:        G. WILLIAM SCHWERT
>               Distinguished University Professor of Finance and
>               Statistics, University of Rochester
>               National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
>               Mailto:schwert@ssb.rochester.edu
>
>Copyright:     SSEP, Inc. 2001. All rights reserved.
>
>Leading Social Science Research Delivered To Your Desktop
>               http://www.SSRN.Com/
>
>SEARCHING THE SSRN ELECTRONIC LIBRARY
> To search the entire SSRN Electronic Library by author, title,
> JEL code, or full text of the abstracts in our database, please
> visit http://papers.ssrn.com/
>
> To browse all abstracts published in this journal, please visit
> http://www.ssrn.com/link/asset-pricing-valuation.html
>
>REDISTRIBUTION
> Individual and professional subscriptions to the journal are for
> single users. It is a violation of copyright to redistribute
> this document electronically or otherwise without the explicit
> permission of Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc.
> Site licenses for organizations are available by contacting
> Mailto:Site@SSRN.Com
>
>SIGN OFF
> To stop delivery of one or more of the SSRN journals, write to
> Mailto:Remove@SSRN.Com Include the JOURNAL name or the NETWORK
> name or ALL in the subject line. If your address has changed, let
> us know by writing to Mailto:AddressChg@SSRN.Com
>
>ALIGNMENT
> If this document is misaligned, please set type face to a
> non-proportional font such as Courier 10.
>
>PAPER DOWNLOADS
> If you need assistance downloading papers from our web site,
> please contact Mailto:Support@SSRN.Com
>
>
>T A B L E   of   C O N T E N T S
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>
>"Trading Turkey's External and Internal Risks: A Value at Risk
> Analysis"
>     KURT DEW
>        Isik University
>
>
>"Regime Jumps in Electricity Prices"
>     RONALD HUISMAN
>        Erasmus University
>     RONALD MAHIEU
>        Erasmus University
>
>
>"Labor Income and Predictable Stock Returns"
>     TANO SANTOS
>        Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago
>     PIETRO VERONESI
>        University of Chicago
>        Graduate School of Business
>
>
>"Earnings Quality and Stock Returns"
>     KONAN CHAN
>        National Taiwan University
>     LOUIS K.C. CHAN
>        University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>     NARASIMHAN JEGADEESH
>        University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>     JOSEF LAKONISHOK
>        University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>        National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
>
>
>"Opinion-Producing Agents: Career Concerns and Exaggeration"
>     ERIC ZITZEWITZ
>        Stanford University
>
>
>"The Idiosyncratic Nature of Sibling ADRs Issued by Mexican
> Firms: A Clinical Study"
>     J. MICHAEL PINEGAR
>        Brigham Young University
>     RAVI RAVICHANDRAN
>        Northern Arizona University
>        College of Business Administration
>
>
>"Comparing the Quality of Three Earnings Measures"
>     LAWRENCE D. BROWN
>        Georgia State University
>     KUMAR N. SIVAKUMAR
>        Georgia State University
>
>
>"The Timing of Initial Public Offerings: A Real Option Approach"
>     JASON DRAHO
>        Yale University
>
>
>S S R N   I N F O R M A T I O N
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>          * Administrative Information
>             - Missing issues & change of address
>             - Solicitation of abstracts
>          * Directors
>          * Advisory Board
>          * Subscription to SSRN Journals
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>ACQUIRING PAPERS
> Download papers directly from the included web address or contact
> the author or other contact person directly. Provide an address
> to which the author or other contact person can send a paper
> copy and mention that you saw the abstract in SSRN. Some of
> SSRN's Partners in Publishing require a subscription or charge a
> fee for electronic downloads.
>
>
>
>EDITORIAL POLICIES
> To provide the broadest coverage of research in Capital Markets:
> Asset Pricing and Valuation we do not referee working papers. We
> accept abstracts of working papers in Capital Markets: Asset
> Pricing and Valuation whose topics suit the coverage of the
> journal and which are part of the worldwide scholarly discourse.
>
>W O R K I N G   P A P E R   A B S T R A C T S
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>"Trading Turkey's External and Internal Risks: A Value at Risk
> Analysis"
>
>      BY:  KURT DEW
>              Isik University
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=271891
>
>    Date:  June 1, 2001
>
> Contact:  KURT DEW
>   Email:  Mailto:kdew@isikun.edu.tr
>  Postal:  Isik University
>           Department of Administrative Sciences
>           Buyukdere Caddesi
>           Ayasaga
>           Maslak, Istanbul 80670   TURKEY
>   Phone:  +90 212 286-2960
>     Fax:  +90 212 286-7775
>
>ABSTRACT:
> In earlier work we showed we could not reject the hypothesis
> that returns to investments in Turkey's stock market were
> positive functions of risk generated by the World outside Turkey
> and by risks unique to Turkey. We found statistical evidence of
> Turkey's internal risks producing substantial returns and
> changes in returns over time. This article carries the analysis
> further by bringing our earlier results into a more concrete
> environment, asking whether these risks can be profitably
> managed as a practical matter. In particular we consider results
> of two strategies in trading cross-market portfolios. We examine
> a long position in the ISE Dollar Return Index, offset by a
> short position in the S&P 500 Composite Total Returns Index. In
> this analysis we verify profitability directly by computing
> actual profit produced by an implementable trading strategy. We
> identify our two portfolio management strategies using
> Value-at-Risk-inspired measures of risk and return. We also
> examine the importance of secondary issues in portfolio
> management, such as identification of buy and sell signals and
> selection of a trading position.
>
> We examine two issues determining the performance of a trading
> position in this cross-market portfolio. First, are there
> predictable and substantial periods of time when it is good to
> be long Turkey and short the Rest of the World and the reverse?
> Second, how important is it to monitor the time path of the
> risks unique to Turkey's Financial Markets in comparing returns
> in Turkish and World Markets? Our answers are first, Yes and
> second, Very.
>
> Keywords: Risk Targeting, Turkey, GARCH-M, heteroscedasticity,
> Historical simulation, Value at Risk, Portfolio Management, Risk
> Management
>
>
>JEL Classification: G11, G15
>______________________________
>
>"Regime Jumps in Electricity Prices"
>
>      BY:  RONALD HUISMAN
>              Erasmus University
>           RONALD MAHIEU
>              Erasmus University
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=271910
>
>    Date:  June 2001
>
> Contact:  RONALD HUISMAN
>   Email:  Mailto:r.huisman@fbk.eur.nl
>  Postal:  Erasmus University
>           Rotterdam School of Management
>           P.O. Box 1738
>           3000 DR Rotterdam,   THE NETHERLANDS
>   Phone:  +31 10 408 2790
>     Fax:  +31 10 408 9017
> Co-Auth:  RONALD MAHIEU
>   Email:  Mailto:r.mahieu@fbk.eur.nl
>  Postal:  Erasmus University
>           3000 DR Rotterdam,   THE NETHERLANDS
>
>ABSTRACT:
> Electricity prices are known to be very volatile and subject to
> frequent jumps due to system breakdown, demand shocks, and
> inelastic supply. As many international electricity markets are
> in some state of deregulation, more and more participants in
> these markets are exposed to these stylised facts. Appropriate
> pricing, portfolio, and risk management models should
> incorporate these facts. Authors have introduced stochastic jump
> processes to deal with the jumps, but we argue and show that
> this specification might lead to problems with identifying the
> true mean-reversion within the process. Instead, we propose
> using a regime jump model that disentangles mean-reversion from
> jump behaviour. This model resembles more closely the true price
> path of electricity prices.
>
> Keywords: Electricity prices, mean-reversion, jump modelling,
> energy finance
>
>______________________________
>
>"Labor Income and Predictable Stock Returns"
>
>      BY:  TANO SANTOS
>              Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago
>           PIETRO VERONESI
>              University of Chicago
>              Graduate School of Business
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=272118
>
>Paper ID:  NBER Working Paper W8309
>    Date:  June 2001
>
> Contact:  TANO SANTOS
>   Email:  Mailto:jesus.santos@gsb.uchicago.edu
>  Postal:  Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago
>           1101 East 58th Street
>           Chicago, IL 60637  USA
>   Phone:  773-834-0769
>     Fax:  773-702-0458
> Co-Auth:  PIETRO VERONESI
>   Email:  Mailto:pietro.veronesi@gsb.uchicago.edu
>  Postal:  University of Chicago
>           Graduate School of Business
>           1101 East 58th Street
>           Chicago, IL 60637  USA
>
>Paper Requests:
> Full-Text downloads are available from SSRN Online for $5.
>
>ABSTRACT:
> We propose and test a novel economic mechanism that generates
> stock return predictability on both the time series and the
> cross section. In our model, investors' income has two sources,
> wages and dividends, that grow stochastically over time. As a
> consequence, the fraction of total income produced by wages
> changes over time de-pending on economic conditions. We show
> that as this fraction fluctuates, the risk premium that
> investors require to hold stocks varies as well. We test the
> main implications of the model and find substantial support for
> it. A regression of stock returns on lagged values of the labor
> income to consumption ratio produces statistically significant
> coefficients and adjusted R2 's that are larger than those
> generated when using the dividend price ratio. Tests of the
> cross sectional implication find considerable improvements on
> the performance of both the conditional CAPM and CCAPM when
> compared to their unconditional counterparts.
>
>
>JEL Classification: G1
>______________________________
>
>"Earnings Quality and Stock Returns"
>
>      BY:  KONAN CHAN
>              National Taiwan University
>           LOUIS K.C. CHAN
>              University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>           NARASIMHAN JEGADEESH
>              University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>           JOSEF LAKONISHOK
>              University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>              National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=272119
>
>Paper ID:  NBER Working Paper W8308
>    Date:  June 2001
>
> Contact:  LOUIS K.C. CHAN
>   Email:  Mailto:l-chan2@ux6.cso.uiuc.edu
>  Postal:  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>           Department of Finance
>           113 Commerce West, MC 706
>           1206 South Sixth Street
>           Champaign, IL 61820  USA
>   Phone:  217-333-6391
>     Fax:  217-244-3102
> Co-Auth:  KONAN CHAN
>   Email:  Mailto:kchan@mba.ntu.edu.tw
>  Postal:  National Taiwan University
>           Department of Finance
>           6F, 50, Lane 144, Keelung Road
>           Section 4
>           Taipei, Taiwan 106   ROC
> Co-Auth:  NARASIMHAN JEGADEESH
>   Email:  Mailto:jegadees@cba.uiuc.edu
>  Postal:  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>           College of Business
>           Champaign, IL 61820  USA
> Co-Auth:  JOSEF LAKONISHOK
>   Email:  Mailto:lakonish@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu
>  Postal:  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>           Department of Finance
>           340 Commerce West, MC 706
>           1206 South Sixth Street
>           Champaign, IL 61820  USA
>
>Paper Requests:
> Full-Text downloads are available from SSRN Online for $5.
>
>ABSTRACT:
> An exclusive focus on bottom-line income misses important
> information about the quality of earnings. Accruals (the
> difference between accounting earnings and cash flow) are
> reliably, negatively associated with future stock returns.
> Earnings increases that are accompanied by high accruals,
> suggesting low-quality earnings, are associated with poor future
> returns. We explore various hypotheses - earnings manipulation,
> extrapolative biases about future growth, and under-reaction to
> business conditions - to explain accruals' predictive power.
> Distinctions between the hypotheses are based on evidence from
> operating performance, the behavior of individual accrual items,
> and discretionary versus nondiscretionary components of
> accruals.
>
>
>JEL Classification: G12, G14, M41, M43
>______________________________
>
>"Opinion-Producing Agents: Career Concerns and Exaggeration"
>
>      BY:  ERIC ZITZEWITZ
>              Stanford University
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=272172
>
>           Other Electronic Document Delivery:
>           http://web.mit.edu/ericz/Public/chapter2.pdf
>           SSRN only offers technical support for papers
>           downloaded from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection
>           location. When URLs wrap, you must copy and paste
>           them into your browser eliminating all spaces.
>
>    Date:  June 2001
>
> Contact:  ERIC ZITZEWITZ
>   Email:  Mailto:zitzewitz_eric@gsb.stanford.edu
>  Postal:  Stanford University
>           Stanford, CA 94305-5015  USA
>
>ABSTRACT:
> This paper models the incentives created by career concerns for
> opinion-producing agents. We find that career concerns can
> create an incentive for exaggeration or anti-herding, since
> high-ability agents will have opinions that are more different
> from the consensus on average and potential clients will learn
> more quickly about how different an agent's opinions are from
> the consensus on average that about whether or not they are
> exaggerating. The model predicts that agents should exaggerate
> more when they are under-rated by their clients, when the
> realizations of the variables they are forecasting are expected
> to be especially noisy, and when they expect to make fewer
> future forecasts. We find that these predictions are consistent
> with the empirical data on equity analyst's earnings forecasts.
>
> Keywords: Herding, Career Concerns, Reputation, Learning
>
>
>JEL Classification: D8, G0, M4
>______________________________
>
>"The Idiosyncratic Nature of Sibling ADRs Issued by Mexican
> Firms: A Clinical Study"
>
>      BY:  J. MICHAEL PINEGAR
>              Brigham Young University
>           RAVI RAVICHANDRAN
>              Northern Arizona University
>              College of Business Administration
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=272175
>
>    Date:  May 2001
>
> Contact:  J. MICHAEL PINEGAR
>   Email:  Mailto:jmp5@email.byu.edu
>  Postal:  Brigham Young University
>           Provo, UT 84602  USA
>   Phone:  801-378-3088
>     Fax:  801-378-5984
> Co-Auth:  RAVI RAVICHANDRAN
>   Email:  Mailto:Ravi.Ravichandran@nau.edu
>  Postal:  Northern Arizona University
>           College of Business Administration
>           PO Box 15066
>           Flagstaff, AZ 86011  USA
>
>ABSTRACT:
> We examine the relative prices of "sibling" American Depositary
> Receipts (ADRs). These ADRs are issued by the same foreign firms
> against shares with different voting rights. Though superior and
> inferior voting siblings begin their US trading experience at
> nearly equal values, relative prices of Mexican and non-Mexican
> sibling ADRs quickly move in opposite directions. Superior
> voting ADRs command a median premium for non-Mexican firms, but
> a median discount for Mexican issuers. The Mexican evidence
> represents an extreme exception to the inverse relation between
> the voting premium documented in other countries and the degree
> of legal protection enjoyed by outside shareholders. This
> apparent anomaly cannot be explained by differences in cash flow
> rights, total or systematic risk, liquidity, voting control of
> major blockholders, or ownership restrictions. Despite voting
> premiums and discounts, neither sibling in most pairs appears to
> have been an attractive investment for US investors.
>
>
>JEL Classification: G12, G15, G34
>______________________________
>
>"Comparing the Quality of Three Earnings Measures"
>
>      BY:  LAWRENCE D. BROWN
>              Georgia State University
>           KUMAR N. SIVAKUMAR
>              Georgia State University
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=272180
>
>    Date:  May 2001
>
> Contact:  KUMAR N. SIVAKUMAR
>   Email:  Mailto:ksivakumar@gsu.edu
>  Postal:  Georgia State University
>           Atlanta, GA 30302  USA
>   Phone:  404-651-4486
> Co-Auth:  LAWRENCE D. BROWN
>   Email:  Mailto:accldb@langate.gsu.edu
>  Postal:  Georgia State University
>           College of Business Administration
>           5th Floor
>           35 Broad Street
>           Atlanta, GA 30303  USA
>
>ABSTRACT:
> We use data during 1989-97 to compare the quality of three
> quarterly earnings measures: 'The Street', a pro-forma operating
> income proxy obtained from firms' earnings releases and two
> earnings measures obtained from 10-Q and 10-K reports: EPS from
> operations and EPS before extraordinary items and discontinued
> operations. Three techniques are used to assess quality:
> predictive ability, valuation relevance and information content.
> Predictive ability is examined by determining which measure is
> the most accurate predictor of future quarterly earnings four
> quarters hence. We assess valuation relevance by identifying
> which earnings measure has the most explanatory power and the
> highest earnings multiplier. We determine information content by
> finding which measure has the most explanatory power and
> generates the highest earnings response coefficient. Based on
> our three techniques to assess earnings quality, we find that a
> timely pro-forma operating income measure released by managers
> ('The Street') is of higher quality than either EPS from
> operations or EPS before extraordinary items and discontinued
> operations. Regulators are concerned that users of financial
> statements are misled by pro-forma earnings releases, and that
> they should rely instead on information in financial reports.
> Our findings suggest that users of financial information can
> obtain higher quality earnings measures using pro-forma
> operating income numbers released by managers than they can by
> perusing less timely 10-Q and 10-K filings with the Securities
> and Exchange Commission.
>
>
>JEL Classification: M41, G12
>______________________________
>
>"The Timing of Initial Public Offerings: A Real Option Approach"
>
>      BY:  JASON DRAHO
>              Yale University
>
>Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:
>           http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=271351
>
>    Date:  December 20, 2000
>
> Contact:  JASON DRAHO
>   Email:  Mailto:jason.draho@yale.edu
>  Postal:  Yale University
>           New Haven, CT 06520-8200  USA
>   Phone:  203-432-3595
>
>ABSTRACT:
> This paper analyzes the timing of IPOs by treating the
> going-public decision as a real option. Investors value the
> private firm using publicly observed market prices of firms from
> the same industry. With stochastically evolving market values
> firm insiders want to leave open the option of taking the firm
> public later, after a positive price shock. Going public
> exercises this option, which must be viewed as a cost of
> undertaking an IPO. Optimal exercising of the option dictates
> that IPOs should only occur after price run-ups. Firms never go
> public in a down market because the value of waiting is too
> great. These incentives can lead to clustering of IPOs near
> market peaks. The results generalize to seasoned issues. Each
> equity offering is for a unique fraction of the total ownership
> claim for the firm and is associated with its own timing option.
> Each equity issue is independent of all the others, and
> therefore the timing of an offering is unaffected by subsequent
> issues. Each equity issue is likely to follow an abnormal price
> increase.
>
> Keywords: IPO, real option, timing
>
>
>JEL Classification: G32, G12
>
>
>P A R T N E R S   in   P U B L I S H I N G
>_________________________________________________________________
>Editor and Subscription Information for Journals Carrying
>Accepted or Recently Published Papers Abstracted in this Issue
>
>Please mention SSRN when subscribing to these journals.
>
>
>NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH (NBER)
> Contact:  Jason Calieri
>   Email:  Mailto:orders@nber.org
>  Postal:  1050 Massachusetts Avenue
>           Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
>   Phone:  617-868-3900
>     Fax:  617-868-2742
>
>     URL:  http://www.nber.org
>
>For NBER subscriptions contact Mailto:subs@nber.org or write to
>Subscriptions at postal address above.
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>CLICKABLE EMAIL AND WEB ADDRESSES
> All email and web references in this journal are in a form that
> enables compliant email programs and web browsers to recognize
> them. This feature is supported by Claris Emailer 2.0, NetScape
> 2.0 or higher, and Eudora 3.0.  A reader with a compliant mailer
> can click on a web address to go directly to the paper's download
> web page or click on a Mailto address to obtain a pre-addressed
> email form. PLEASE IGNORE the "Mailto:" command preceding each
> email address when copying addresses directly into your mailer.
>
>
>A D M I N I S T R A T I V E    I N F O R M A T I O N
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>* Missing Issues and Change of Address
>
>    Contact Mailto:Missing@SSRN.Com for missing issues, or
>    Mailto:AddressChg@SSRN.Com for email address changes.  We may
>    not be aware of a problem unless you contact us.
>
>* Solicitation of Abstracts
>
>    This journal publishes working and accepted paper abstracts
>    covering a range of topics, including investments, investment
>    management, portfolio theory, the term structure of interest
>    rates, international markets, and asset pricing models.
>
>    To publish your abstract in SSRN's journals, and to deliver
>    your paper electronically (the latter at your option), we will
>    need:
>
>    * The abstract
>    * The Working Paper (either an electronic version, a URL from
>      which the paper is downloadable, a diskette, or a hard copy
>      of the manuscript)
>    * The email and postal addresses, phone and fax numbers, and
>      the affiliation of the contact author
>    * The email address and affiliation of all co-authors
>    * JEL Classification Code (optional but preferred for the
>      Legal Scholarship Network). For a list of JEL codes, see
>      http://www.econlit.org/elclasjn.htm
>    * Which journals you want your abstract to appear in. If you
>      leave this information out, our classifiers will use their
>      best judgment, but it is preferable for you to provide this
>      information.
>    * Paper Request Information: If you do not provide an
>      electronic version of the paper, and/or if the author is not
>      the person who fulfills paper requests, please provide
>      information on how readers may obtain copies of working
>      papers.
>
>
>
>    Let us know if a hard copy or electronic copy of your paper is
>    being sent under separate cover. When sending a diskette or a
>    hard copy manuscript by postal mail, please note if your
>    abstract was also submitted via our web site or email address.
>
>D I R E C T O R
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>FEN SUBJECT MATTER JOURNALS
>
>MICHAEL C. JENSEN
>  Managing Dir., Organizational Strategy Practice; Prof. of Org.
>  Strategy, Monitor University, The Monitor Company;
>  Jesse Isidor Straus Professor Emeritus, Harvard Business
>  School;
>Chairman, Social Science Electronic Publishing (SSEP),
>  Inc.
>  Mailto:mjensen@hbs.edu
>
>Please contact us at the above addresses with your comments,
>questions or suggestions for FEN-Sub.
>
>A D V I S O R Y   B O A R D
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>CAPITAL MARKETS: ASSET PRICING AND VALUATION
>
>EDWARD I. ALTMAN
>  Editor, Journal of Banking and Finance; Max L. Heine Professor
>  of Finance Vice Director, NYU Salomon Center
>
>MICHAEL J. BARCLAY
>  Professor of Finance, University of Rochester, William E. Simon
>  Graduate School of Business Administration
>
>GEERT BEKAERT
>  Professor of Finance and Economics, Columbia University; Assoc.
>  Prof. of Finance, Stanford University Graduate School of
>  Business (On Leave)
>
>DENNIS R. CAPOZZA
>  Editor, Real Estate Economics; Professor of Finance and Ross
>  Professor of Real Estate Finance at the University of Michigan
>  Business School
>
>DON CHEW
>  Editor-In-Chief, BankAmerica Journal of Applied Corporate
>  Finance; Executive Vice President of Stern Stewart Management
>  Services, Inc.
>
>J. DAVID CUMMINS
>  Editor, Journal of Risk and Insurance; Harry J. Loman Professor
>  of Insurance and Risk Management, Wharton School, University of
>  Pennsylvania
>
>DOUGLAS W. DIAMOND
>  Editor, Journal of Business; Theodore O. Yntema Professor of
>  Finance, University of Chicago, School of Business
>
>EUGENE F. FAMA
>  Advisory Editor, Journal of Financial Economics; Robert R.
>  McCormick Distinguished Service Professor of Finance,
>  University of Chicago, School of Business
>
>STEPHEN FIGLEWSKI
>  Editor, Journal of Derivatives; Professor of Finance, New York
>  University, School of Business
>
>KENNETH R. FRENCH
>  Advisory Editor, Journal of Financial Economics; NTU Professor
>  of Finance, Sloan School of Management, MIT
>
>STUART GREENBAUM
>  Founding Editor, Journal of Financial Intermediation; Dean,
>  Washington University, St. Louis
>
>CAMPBELL R. HARVEY
>  J. Paul Sticht Professor of International Business, Duke
>  University, Fuqua School of Business
>
>MICHAEL C. JENSEN
>  Managing Director, Organizational Strategy Practice; Monitor
>  Company; Professor of Organizational Strategy, Monitor
>  University; Jesse Isidor Straus Professor of Business
>  Administration Emeritus, Harvard Business School; Chairman,
>  SSEP, Inc.
>
>JONATHAN M. KARPOFF
>  Editor, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis;
>  Professor of Finance, University of Washington
>
>KENNETH LEHN
>  Editor, Journal of Corporate Finance; Professor of Business
>  Administration, University of Pittsburgh, Katz Graduate School
>  of Business
>
>STANLEY PLISKA
>  Editor, Mathematical Finance; CBA Distinguished Professor of
>  Finance, University of Illinois at Chicago
>
>CHARLES I. PLOSSER
>  Editor, Journal of Monetary Economics and Carnegie-Rochester
>  Conference Series on Public Policy; Dean and John M. Olin
>  Distinguished Professor of Economics and Public Policy,
>  University of Rochester, School of Business
>
>KATHERINE SCHIPPER
>  L. Palmer Fox Professor of Business Administration,
>  Fuqua School of Business, Duke University
>
>ALAN SCHWARTZ
>  Editor, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization; Sterling
>  Professor of Law, Yale Law School, Professor, Yale School of
>  Management
>
>G. WILLIAM SCHWERT
>  Managing Editor, Journal of Financial Economics; Distinguished
>  University Professor of Finance and Statistics, University of
>  Rochester, Simon School of Business
>
>WILLIAM F. SHARPE
>  The STANCO 25 Prof. of Finance, Graduate School of Business,
>  Stanford Business School; Past President, American Finance
>  Association; 1990 Nobel Laureate in Economic Sciences
>
>RENE M. STULZ
>  Everett D. Reese Chair of Banking and Monetary Economics, Ohio
>  State University College of Business
>
>ROSS L. WATTS
>  Editor, Journal of Accounting and Economics; William H. Meckling
>  Professor in Business Administration, University of Rochester,
>  School of Business
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>
>
>                 S U B S C R I P T I O N S
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>
>               HOW TO SUBSCRIBE TO SSRN JOURNALS
>
>1. Site license membership
>
>Many university departments and other institutions have
>purchased site licenses covering all of the journals in a
>particular network. If you want to subscribe to any of the
>SSRN journals, you may be able to do so without charge by first
>checking to see if your institution currently has a site
>license.
>
>To do this please click on any of the following URLs.
>Instructions for joining the site are included on these pages.
>
>    Accounting Research Network
>    http://www.ssrn.com/update/arn/arn_site-licenses.html
>
>    Economic Research Network
>    http://www.ssrn.com/update/ern/ern_site-licenses.html
>
>    Financial Economics Network
>    http://www.ssrn.com/update/fen/fen_site-licenses.html
>
>    Legal Scholarship Network
>    http://www.ssrn.com/update/lsn/lsn_site-licenses.html
>
>    Management Research Network (Forthcoming)
>
>If your institution or department is not listed as a site, we
>would be happy to work with you to set one up.  Please contact
>mailto:site@ssrn.com for more information.
>
>2. Individual membership (for those not covered by a site license)
>
>  * Send an email message to
>    Mailto:subscribe@publisher.ssrn.com?body=subscribe
>    which will return a subscription form
>OR
>  * Complete our web subscription form at our secure site:
>    https://hermes.ssrn.com/secure/subscribeform.cfm?function=main
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>
>
>FINANCIAL HARDSHIP:
>  SSRN understands there is financial hardship in certain
>  countries (for example the former Soviet Union and Eastern
>  Bloc). If you are undergoing financial hardship and believe you
>  cannot pay for a journal, please send a detailed explanation to
>  Mailto:Subscribe@SSRN.Com
>_________________________________________________________________
>
>                         Copyright 2001
>                SSEP, Inc., all rights reserved.
>_________________________________________________________________
>
John D. Martin
Carr P. Collins Chair in Finance
Finance Department
Baylor University
PO Box 98004
Waco, TX 76798
254-710-4473 (Office)
254-710-1092 (Fax)
J_Martin@Baylor.edu
web:    http://hsb.baylor.edu/html/martinj/home.html


Thanks for the Book. I think I will enjoy it immensely in retirement. Merry
Christmas and best of luck to you in the new year and the new job.

Regards,

Rob


The report named: West Power Position <http://erv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=29&report_name=West+Power+Position&category_cd=6&category_name=WEST&toc_hide=1&sTV1=6&TV1Exp=Y&current_efct_date=10/17/2001>, published as of 10/17/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.


Daily Blessing
http://www.daily-blessings.com/bless139.htm

Easter Dress
http://www.daily-blessings.com/humor60.htm

please visit our sponsors..they keep this site going!

$10,000 no-cost-to you insurance...take advantage of this offer! I did!!

http://www.daily-blessings.com/insurance.htm

need ink for your printer...here are the best prices in town on ink
cartridges and refills.

http://www.mrinkman.com

want to know who's calling while you're online?  free download

http://www.daily-blessings.com/callwave.htm

do you check your email more often than your calendar?  free download

http://www.daily-blessings.com/reminder.htm

<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>
* To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to:
http://inbound.postmastergeneral.com/remove?dailyblessings:10
* Enter your email address (judy.hernandez@enron.com) in the field
provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "dailyblessings:10".

OR...

* Reply to this message with the word "remove" in the subject line.

This message was sent to address judy.hernandez@enron.com
X-PMG-Recipient: judy.hernandez@enron.com
<<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>>


---------------------- Forwarded by Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT on
07/05/2000 04:58 PM ---------------------------

Bob Klein
07/05/2000 04:57 PM
To: Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: UNIFY TO SAP INTERFACES

We interfaced UNIFY to SAP three times today. Interface number one (8:40 AM)
was error free. The second interface (Noon) created duplicate invoices for
those sent in our first interface. The problem that caused the duplication
was that the flag in UNIFY that prevents invoices from being sent to SAP
after they have already been interfaced did not work. The problem was
corrected before out third interface at 3:15 PM. In the 3:15 interface, one
error occurred --- a counterparty was set up in Global as intercompany that
should be third party. This error will be corrected before our next interface
on 7/6 AM.

Overall, I was pleased at how well the interfaces worked today and how fast
the SAP and UNIFY teams responded to our issues.

Bob


Nope.

	Earlene O'Connell
	11/07/2000 03:16 PM

		 To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: Re:

Just checking to see if your problem has been resolved.

Thanks.

_____________________________________
Earlene O'Connell
Public Affairs Specialist
713-853-7870

	Jeff Dasovich
	Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
	11/07/2000 11:28 AM

		 To: Earlene O'Connell/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject:

Hi.  My palm for some reason isn't syncing.  Could you have Chris give me a
call to try to get it to work?  Thanks a bunch.

Best,
Jeff

415.782.7822


I have not received a call back from Jeff Bartlett, but based on the brochure
I received from Louise, here is what I understand:

DealBench is a way to streamline processes to efficiently execute
transactions and distribute deal-related information.  There are 5 platform
tools - document sharing, multi-media, auctioning, secure communication, and
deal management.   There are five primary products offered which utilize the
tools provided...  Bank Products, Structured Products, Commercial Paper,
Procurement, and Legal Space.

1) Bank Products - deal management for issuance of debt offerings (credit
revolvers/secured term-notes)
2) Structured Products - deal management for initial issuance or re-sale of
bonds, leveraged leases and other financial transactions
3)  Commercial Paper - deal mgmt for issuance of CP
4)  Procurement - management of wholesale purchasing and selling of various
products
5)  Legal Space - designed to meet the needs of attorneys at law firms (doc
sharing, aggregation and organization in a secure environment)

I have a lot of questions for Jeff, so I will send you a quick note when I
speak to him.

Sheri


----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/04/2001 11:06 AM -----

	Jean Munoz <jmunoz@mcnallytemple.com>
	04/03/2001 07:22 PM

		 To: "'Andy Brown (E-mail)'" <ABB@eslawfirm.com>, "'B Brown Andy (E-mail)'"
<andybrwn@earthlink.net>, "'Baker Carolyn (E-mail)'"
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>, "'Bob Escalante (E-mail)'"
<rescalante@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Bob Weisenmiller (E-mail)'"
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>, "'Curtis Kebler (E-mail)'"
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, "Dean. Nistetter (E-mail)"
<Dean.Nistetter@dynegy.com>, "'Douglas Kerner (E-mail)'" <DKK@eslawfirm.com>,
"'Greg Blue (E-mail)'" <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "'Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)'"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "'Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)'" <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com>,
"'Joe Ronan (E-mail)'" <joer@calpine.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<john.g.larrea@williams.com>, "'John Stout (E-mail)'"
<John_H_Stout@reliantenergy.com>, "'Julee Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)'"
<jmball@ns.net>, "'Kassandra Gough (E-mail)'" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'kent
Palmerton (E-mail)'" <kent.palmerton@williams.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky
(E-mail)'" <lale@dynegy.com>, "Marie Moretti (E-mail 2)"
<mmoretti@mccabeandcompany.net>, "'Marty Wilson (E-mail)'"
<mwilson@pstrategies.com>, "'McNally Ray (E-mail)'"
<rmcnally@mcnallytemple.com>, "''Nam Nguyen' (E-mail)'"
<nam.nguyen@powersrc.com>, "'Norton Kelli (E-mail)'"
<knorton@mcnallytemple.com>, "'Paula Hall-Collins (E-mail)'"
<paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "'Pigott Jack (E-mail)'"
<jackp@calpine.com>, "'Richard Hyde (E-mail)'" <rwhyde@duke-energy.com>,
"'Roger Pelote (E-mail)'" <roger.pelote@williams.com>, "'Stephanie-Newell
(E-mail)'" <stephanie-newell@reliantenergy.com>, "'Sue Mara (E-mail)'"
<smara@enron.com>, "'Tom Ross (E-mail)'" <tross@mcnallytemple.com>, "Tom
Williams (E-mail)" <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>, "'Alex Sugaoka (E-mail)'"
<alex.sugaoka@uaecorp.com>, "'Bill Carlson (E-mail)'"
<william_carlson@wastemanagement.com>, "'Bill Woods (E-mail)'"
<billw@calpine.com>, "'Bob Ellery (E-mail)'" <bellery@spi-ind.com>, "'Bob
Gates (E-mail)'" <bob.gates@enron.com>, "'Cody Carter (E-mail)'"
<cody.carter@williams.com>, "'Curt Hatton (E-mail)'"
<Curt.Hatton@gen.pge.com>, "'David Parquet'" <david.parquet@enron.com>,
"'Dean Gosselin (E-mail)'" <dean_gosselin@fpl.com>, "'Doug Fernley (E-mail)'"
<fernley.doug@epenergy.com>, "'Duane Nelsen (E-mail)'"
<dnelsen@gwfpower.com>, "'Ed Tomeo (E-mail)'" <ed.tomeo@uaecorp.com>,
"'Eileen Koch (E-mail)'" <eileenk@calpine.com>, "'Eric Eisenman (E-mail)'"
<eric.eisenman@gen.pge.com>, "'Frank DeRosa (E-mail)'"
<frank.derosa@gen.pge.com>, "Frazier Blaylock (E-mail)"
<frazier_blaylock@ogden-energy.com>, "'Hap Boyd (E-mail)'"
<Hap_Boyd@enron.com>, "'Hawks Jack (E-mail)'" <jack.hawks@gen.pge.com>, "'Jim
Willey (E-mail)'" <elliottsa@earthlink.net>, "'Joe Greco (E-mail)'"
<jgreco@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Jonathan Weisgall (E-mail)'"
<jweisgall@aol.com>, "'Kate Castillo (E-mail)'" <CCastillo@riobravo-gm.com>,
"'Kelly Lloyd (E-mail)'" <kellyl@enxco.com>, "'Ken Hoffman (E-mail)'"
<khoffman@caithnessenergy.com>, "'Kent Fickett (E-mail)'"
<kfickett@usgen.com>, "'Lynn Lednicky (E-mail)'"
<lynn.a.lednicky@dynegy.com>, "'Marty McFadden (E-mail)'"
<marty_mcfadden@ogden-energy.com>, "'Paula Soos'"
<paula_soos@ogden-energy.com>, "'Randy Hickok (E-mail)'"
<rjhickok@duke-energy.com>, "Rick S. Koebbe (E-mail)"
<rskoebbe@powerworksinc.com>, "'Rob Lamkin (E-mail)'"
<rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, "'Ross Ain (E-mail)'" <ain@worldnet.att.net>,
"'Steve Iliff'" <siliff@riobravo-gm.com>, "'Steve Ponder (E-mail)'"
<steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "'Tony Wetzel (E-mail)'" <twetzel@thermoecotek.com>,
"'William Hall (E-mail)'" <wfhall2@duke-energy.com>,
<trusso@mcnallytemple.com>, <sadlersa@earthlink.net>, <mstultz@epsa.org>,
<rtemple@mcnallytemple.com>, <tracy.fairchild@edelman.com>,
<megan.beiser@edelman.com>, <deborah.fiorito@dynegy.com>, <lchurch@epsa.org>,
Katie Kaplan <kaplan@iepa.com>, <tcwillia@duke-energy.com>,
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>
		 cc:
		 Subject: IEP Key Messages

Below are key messages we recommend IEP begin using in light of recent
"price gouging/market manipulation" allegations - including the upcoming
State Senate hearings.
Thanks,
Jean

--
Jean Munoz
McNally Temple Associates, Inc.
916-447-8186
916-447-6326 (fx)

IEP KEY MESSAGES

Generators have been operating under the rules California established for its
electricity market.  We did not create the market, nor did we write the
rules.  In fact, the "big five" generators did not come to California until
AB 1890 invited them into the state, where they?ve since invested billions of
dollars buying, building and modernizing power plants.

. Energy companies, independent financial analysts and IEP warned that the
PUC was failing to implement AB 1890 properly, and that the market was being
set up to fail, especially the residential market.
. Last summer, generators were urging and offering long-term contacts. They
were flatly rejected.  Had they been adopted, the crisis could have been
prevented or its severity dramatically lessened.
. This crisis was caused by three things . the failure to enter into
long-term contracts, forcing an over-reliance on the spot market; a supply
shortage, and no retail market.  The market can be fixed.  It should not be
abandoned.

We?re an important part of the solution.

. We?ve made extraordinary efforts to keep our plants running during this
crisis to supply California homes and businesses with electricity.
. We?ve offered solutions and been cooperative partners in legislative and
regulatory efforts to end the crisis. . Rather than using tax money, we?re
investing billions of private-sector dollars to buy, modernize and build new
power plants in California . to generate electricity for California.
. Our new and upgraded power plants will help improve California?s air
quality and generate power more efficiently.

We?re hopeful that these hearing focus on facts, fairness and accountability.

. "Witch hunts," "scape-goating" and sensational headlines won?t solve the
problem or end the crisis.


Thanks for the explanation b/c I was completely clueless.  They are
definitely censoring.   She hasn't answered anything other than the program
requirements, etc.  What a waste of time.  But I guarantee you they'll bring
this up as something great they've done to improve communication.

R


Do you have any comments on this contract?  Please let me and Chris know.
Mark
----- Forwarded by Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT on 03/08/2001 11:03 AM -----

	Chris Gaffney
	03/07/2001 04:47 PM

		 To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
		 Subject: Long Term Power Transaction

Mark - Attached is a draft of a 3 year, 30 MW power transaction that Enron
Canada Corp. is contemplating entering into with Atlantic Packaging Products
Ltd.  The form of agreement is the one-off industrial form that is
back-to-backed  by the British Energy supply source.  We have used this form
for the Sunoco, TransCanada and Ivaco transactions.  As with the other
agreements, the transaction is conditional on, among other things, Ontario
Market opening occurring by November 30, 2001.

Regards
CJG


Shirley,

$1,861.32
$ 709.39

Vince


Cheryl will be leaving the office at 2:30 pm this afternoon and will return at 5:30 pm today.  She has personal appointments, pertaining to her upcoming wedding, that can only be taken care of during regular business hours.  If you should need any assistance, feel free to contact me directly at 713-345-3317.  Thank you,

Keegan


James:
I talked with Thomas Favinger and Tom Boren is the CEO of PG&E, which is not
the best guy to send the books to.  The better person is Thomas Favinger and
his address is:

Thomas Favinger
PG&E National Energy Group
7500 Old Georgetown Road
Bethesda, Maryland 20814

Phone: (301) 280-6231
Fax: (301) 280-6911

National Energy Group is the sub of PG&E.
So please send out 2 books to Thomas tonight.  Thanks!
Ben


These deals are Q94045.1@.2

Thanks,

Errol, X5-8274

	From:  Mechelle Stevens @ ECT                           03/26/2001 08:35 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Intercontinental Exchange

Errol,

Please advise as to the status of these trades.

Thanks,
Mechelle
---------------------- Forwarded by Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT on 03/26/2001
08:23 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Mechelle Stevens                           03/20/2001 11:03 AM

To: Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Intercontinental Exchange

Errol,

There are two trades that were done with Mirant Americas through
Intercontinental Exchange.  TAGG does not reflect these trades.  I faxed the
broker statements to Sherry D. and she stated that she forwarded them to
you.  Trade dates were on Nov. 13th and Nov. 14.  I also asked Joe Hunter to
check into this and he stated that he had spoken to you some time last week
or the week before and stated that you would be getting back with me on the
TAGG deal numbers.

When I querried TAGG this morning selecting Intercontinental Exchange as the
broker, no deals were found.

Can you please let me know the deal numbers as these trades need to be
settled as soon as possible.

Thanks,
Mechelle
x37278


As part of our monthly testing we review the monthly Natural Gas P & L
Statement
and identify specific regions for which we would like to review additional
documentation.  Please find below, the regions that we have identified.  We
are
requesting that you supply the P & L top pages for the last day of the month
for
those regions that are applicable to you.  Once we have reviewed these top
pages, we will be contacting you to discuss the drivers of these regions.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Also, please find below a list of those P&L Top pages requested for January
that
are still outstanding.  Please forward this correspondence to any responsible
parties not included in this e-mail.

Thank You,

Mark Austin
Arthur Andersen
ext. 68680

                  February NG P&L                            January
Outstanding
(Embedded image moved to file: pic19796.pcx)
(Embedded image moved to file: pic13200.pcx)

*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message.  If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of
the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to
anyone.
In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by
reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not
consent
to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my
firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

 - pic19796.pcx
 - pic13200.pcx


This request is in conjuction with BP Energy acquiring Vastar Resources.

Thanks

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Michelle.Lokay@enron.com [mailto:Michelle.Lokay@enron.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 4:42 PM
To: Wadle, Rick
Subject: Re: TW FT Assignments

Rick,
I have forwarded your request to our Contracts group for processing.
Please confirm that these contracts are associated with physical property
being assigned from Southern to BP Energy.  This is a required for
assignment under Transwestern's tariff.  Thanks.

"Wadle, Rick" <Rick.Wadle@SouthernEnergy.Com> on 10/11/2000 02:32:56 PM

To:   "'Michelle.Lokay@Enron.com'" <Michelle.Lokay@Enron.com>
cc:   "Hogan, John" <John.Hogan@SouthernEnergy.Com>

Subject:  TW FT Assignments

As per our conversation, please assign TW contracts 24926. 27201 and 27017
to BP Energy effective November 1, 2000.  You may contact Ms. Penny Barry
(281-366-4913)at BP Energy for confirmation.  If you have any additional
questions regarding this assignment, please call me at 678-579-3463.

Thanks for your help

Rick Wadle
Sr. Gas Control Coordinator
Southern Company Energy Marketing


Chris and Kevin--The attached file contains our latest daily volume
requirements for 3/10 thru Monday 3/13.  (The AGL numbers contained herein are
not current, but the values for all the other points are.)

Please call me if you have questions, etc.

Doug Kinney
Ph:  703-561-6339
Fax:  703-561-7317

 - 03-10-00Daily VolsAM.xls


Jim,

 Updated curves will be sent no later than 11 am on Monday 2/7.  I want Keith
to be involved in the process.  He was out today.

 Sorry for the slow turnaround.

Phillip


494842 should be peco

495168  should be 175.00


March 12, HE13, (2) 50 MW deals @ sell price $47, AEP showing purchased @
$42.


Andy:
I tried to open EOL at 4 on Sunday, but we had systems problems that delayed
the opening until 6:05.  This is the third time in four or five sessions when
EOL had problems on Sunday.  Anything you can do to improve reliability would
be appreciated.
John


That may work -  I don't want to end up with an equity position I just worked
hard to eliminate. Further, raptor may be a good accounting hedge but if we
took back JEDI's share at existing marks we would be destroying significant
real value. Will the buy back price of the equity/debt we get back from JEDI
incorporate the write downs we think should occur?

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2000
02:29 PM ---------------------------

	Enron Global Finance

	From:  Mike Jakubik                           05/11/2000 02:09 PM

To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Raptor

Dave, I assume you are asking how we hedge the portion of JEDI II investments
that will come back to us after the restructuring. As any buyout price for
CALPERS will reflect the state of the assets at closing, I think we are well
hedged until the closing of the restructuring. We can see if we can reserve
some Raptor capacity upfront to hege us moving forward from the restructuring
closin. If this does not answer your question, let me know.    Mike

David W Delainey
05/11/2000 01:37 PM
To: Mike Jakubik/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Raptor

How do we immunize ourselves from the workouts being shed into Raptor?

Regards
Delainey


----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 01/28/2001 08:55 PM -----

	Expense Server@Enron_Development
	01/22/2001 03:46 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
		 cc:
		 Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Miscellaneous

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Mark A. Palmer
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Miscellaneous
Report Total: $524.47
Amount Due Employee: $524.47

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://nahou-wwxms01p


Attached is a clean and redlined version of the Boeing Contract with my revisions.  Please review, specifically Section 4.2 and Article 7.  I want to make sure you are OK with those sections specifically.  Sorry for the delay on this.


-----Original Message-----
From: RVujtech@carrfut.com [mailto:RVujtech@carrfut.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:31 AM
To: RVujtech@carrfut.com
Subject: daily crude and ngas charts 4/11

The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete.  Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein.  Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author.  As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates.  ? 2001 Carr Futures

The charts are now available on the web by clicking on the hot link(s)
contained in this email. If for any reason you are unable to receive the
charts via the web, please contact me via email and I will email the charts
to you as attachments.

Crude     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/crude80.pdf
Natural Gas     http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/ngas80.pdf

Nat Gas Strip Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/StripmatrixNG80.pdf
Nat Gas Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixNG80.pdf

Crude and Products Spread Matrix
http://www.carrfut.com/research/Energy1/SpreadmatrixCL80.pdf


You are the Best!

	Dianne Seib
	04/11/2001 09:37 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: ECC Five Year Deals

Tana,

Further to the voicemail you left me yesterday, the two deals we discussed
when you were here were Lakeside (power) and IPSCO (gas).  Confirmations have
been sent to the counterparty on both of these transactions.

Dianne


Cast
John Arnold
Bill Perkins
Dean Theriot (trainer)

Dean: What's your favorite restaurant?
John: Why, are you trying to make Valentine's Day plans?
Dean : No.  I'm ready.  I've already bought a Valentine's card.
Bill : John's ready too.  He already has his Valentine's hickey.


Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/02/01.
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.


I cannot make it the 31st. All other days are good.

	Stephanie Harris@ENRON
	05/22/2000 09:40 AM

		 To: burdine@hagans-bobb.com, Robert C
Williams/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Hagans, Bobb & Burdine

Scott, Bob Williams has a conflict with June 7, 2000 for lunch with you and
Fred Hagans.  Could everyone please check your availability for one of the
following days instead of June 7.

Wednesday, May 31
Tuesday, June 13
Thursday, June 15
Wednesday, June 21
Thursday, June 22
Friday, June 23


Start Date: 12/21/01; HourAhead hour: 6;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2001122106.txt


I know you're busy and there is no urgency needed in your response; however, when you get a minute, please let me know what additional litigation/dispute matters, if any, NEPCO is involved in other than:

	FKPCL v. NEPCO,
	Payne Creek,
	Foster Wheeler, and
	Oklahoma EHS.

	To the extent that NEPCO has hired or is seriously considering hiring an outside litigator, I'd consider that to be disclosable.  Thanks in advance.


Jeannie drafted this op-ed in response to the situation in the California
market.  Please let me know if you'd like to proceed with placement in a CA
newspaper.  If so, we need to decide who should author and what is the ideal
placement.  thx. kd
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
07:17 PM ---------------------------

JMandelker@aol.com on 12/13/2000 05:56:44 PM
To: karen.denne@enron.com, Jeff.dasovich@enron.com
cc:

Subject: revised Electricity op-ed

Karen, I've incorporated your suggestions. Still need to know current state
mw capacity and no. of peaking mw approved for next summer. Hope Jeff can
help or direct me to someone who can.

Sorry for this AOL transmission -- the system is running really slow.

Take care,
Jeannie

 - Electricity Op Ed.doc


I guess I'll stop picking up random tennis balls off the street and carrying
them around in my mouth. Bummer!


Here are the ratings per your request.  Let me know if you need anything
else.

NAME	MID-YEAR RATING
BORCYK, DAVID	EXCELLENT
BRASHER, BARNEY	EXCELLENT
BRASSFIELD, MORRIS	EXCELLENT
CENTILLI, JAMES	SATISFACTORY
CHANDLER, ROBERT	STRONG
CHERRY, PAUL	STRONG
CLEMENTS, DAVID	STRONG
COBB, JOHN	EXCELLENT
CONCKLIN, ELAINE	SATISFACTORY
FENSTAD, LARRY	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
GEACCONE, TRACY	STRONG
JESSE, JOHN	EXCELLENT
KEISER, JOHN	STRONG
KONSDORF, ELLEN	SATISFACTORY
PETERS, JERRY	STRONG
QUITTNER, GEORGE	NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
ROPER, KERWIN	EXCELLENT
SAUNDERS, JAMES	STRONG
STERN, ELLIS	STRONG
WIEDERHOLT, PATRICIA	STRONG

Rod Hayslett

11/13/2000 07:04 AM
To: Gretchen Jennings/OTS/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject:

Can you please provide me with a list of people for this purpose.    All
directors and above, with mid year rating.
---------------------- Forwarded by Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron on 11/13/2000
07:05 AM ---------------------------

Rod Hayslett

11/13/2000 07:02 AM
To: Kerry Roper/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, James Saunders/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Jerry
Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON
cc: Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON

Subject:

To ensure that all accounting employees (Directors and above) are ranked in
the Global Accounting PRC meeting on friday, December 1st, I am asking your
assistance in confirming the names and titles of these employees.  Please
send me a list of the names and job titles of your employees on the payroll
as of October 1, 2000.   An example is indicated below.  This information
should be in the following format and also include the cluster descriptor for
midyear as well as the recommendation for year end.   I have attached a copy
of the cluster descriptors for your reference and would like this information
by Wednesday, November 29th.  If you are unable to provide the information by
this date, please let me know as soon as possible.    If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 713-853-6178.  Your
cooperation is greatly appreciated.  Thank you.

EXAMPLE

NAME	JOB TITLE	CLUSTER DESCRIPTOR
Jane Dawson	Associate	Superior
July Summer	Finance Mgr	Needs Improvement
August Carson	Director, Finance	Excellent


Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 9;  No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041709.txt

Error retrieving price data (Record/Key deleted.
Record is deleted.
Table) - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
     Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred:  12.00 / Final:  11.98)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: ECTRT
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
  TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
  INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
  ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL


---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 01/26/2001
04:47 PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  V Charles Weldon                           01/22/2001 09:18 AM

To: Mike A Roberts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson
Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Turnover Document


Things are crazy. I still don't have a moving date or work visa but every one
assures me I have lots of time. I would go to a store like future shop or
look on the internet at chapters.ca. All electronics / stereo shops have them
now. Make sure you get one with lots of memory. Take it easy.

Chris


I have set up Grant Zimmerman to come in on Thursday, Nov. 8th to interview with you per Kevin Presto.  Please see your scheduled times below:

Don Baughman	2:30pm	3125

John Forney	3:00pm	3125

I will have his resume for you next week.

Thanks for your time,

T.Jae Black
East Power Trading
Assistant to Kevin Presto
off. 713-853-5800
fax 713-646-8272
cell 713-539-4760


Oops, another outstanding item...

Could you please provide me with the date of purchase of your Tibco and
Nasdaq 100 shares.  You gave me the cost per our phonecall, but I forgot to
get the acquisition dates from you.

Thanks,

Vicki

---------------------- Forwarded by Vicki L. Meszaros/CA/TLS/PwC on
05/22/2001 10:12 AM ---------------------------

Vicki L. Meszaros
05/22/2001 09:14 AM

To:   gstorey@enron.com
cc:
Subject:  Charitable donations

Hi, Geoff,

I have not received your list of charitable donations.  Please send (fax)
to me as soon as possible, so that I may finalize your U.S. return.

Thanks so much,

Vicki Meszaros

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Phone (403) 509-7469
Fax (403) 781-1825

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.


Attached is the updated list.


With regards to our conversation yesterday, I am loking for basic economics
regarding GE 7FA's.  Such as, 1. output per turbine; 2. output for 4 7FA and
2 steam turbines; 3.  Heat Rates; and 4. cost per turbine and steam turbine.
Total plant output will need to be 1000 MW's and will be run as a combined
cycle facility.  If you could get me these numbers by the end of the day or
call me to discuss what you currently have that would be great.  This project
is not due till Wednesday.  Thanks
Ben


The following documents, received today, have been forwarded for your
immediate attention:

Roger Atkinson v. Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, L.P., Cogen
Technologies, Tosco Corporation and Alplaus Power Engineering; No. L-1536-01,
In the Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County.  NOTICE OF MOTION TO
CONSOLIDATE AND TO COMPEL INSPECTION, AFFIDAVIT OF RONALD B. GRAYZE W/EXHIBIT
A and PROPOSED ORDER to CT Corp for Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, LP by
certified mail on 6/4/01.

PLEASE ADVISE IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.

Thank you !!

Becky A. Stephens
Support Services Coordinator
Enron Litigation Unit, EB4809
713/853-5025
713/853-6576 (fax)
Becky.Stephens@enron.com


I've got an opinion now...I think we should fly into Brescia (Italy).  We could fly in and cab it to Brenzone.  It's on one of those amazing lakes in northern Italy (Lago di Garda).  You can go to Gardaworld.com and then just click on photo gallery and Brenzone to see what it looks like...absolutely amazing.  It would be a fantastic trip in my opinion - Lots of great wine.  Plus, you can be the exchange rate from Pounds or Dollars to Lire.


James Flanigan LA Times Article on 8/27/2000.


Hi Vince,
I have sent a mail to Andreas with a full list of all the assumed units
within our model. He has sent some historical
data for cocoa beans and noticed that they were being quoted in GBP/mt so
even currency units seem to be important.
Thank you for pointing this out,
Kirstee

Vince J Kaminski
04/08/2000 15:45
To: Kirstee Hewitt/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cantekin Dincerler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant
Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: VaR for COB 2nd Aug 2000

Hi Kirstee,

Thanks again for all your work on MG. One think to double check is units.
Please, make sure that the prices are quoted in the same units our positions
come in.

One potential source of confusion arises from the fact that we are dealing
with different
cultures (metric system vs. English measures).

Vince

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. - Europe

	From:  Kirstee Hewitt                           08/03/2000 11:31 AM

To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: VaR for COB 2nd Aug 2000

Hi Vince,
I was waiting for a comment about the email below before sending it to the
full mailing list. Basically it suggests that the
copper option position may well have increased the VaR by more than $500,000.
However, given that the portfoilo has also
changed from the 1st of August it is difficult to asses the actual change due
to the option only.
Regards
Kirstee
---------------------- Forwarded by Kirstee Hewitt/LON/ECT on 03/08/2000
17:29 ---------------------------

	Enron Europe

	From:  Kirstee Hewitt                           03/08/2000 16:29

To: Cantekin Dincerler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Grant Masson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: VaR for COB 2nd Aug 2000

Hi all,
The CU option position has entered the MG books for the 2nd Aug. The delta is
35299$/mt for Dec 2000. The Cu VaR has gone up
from $2,245,000 to $3,306,000. I estimated that the portfolio for the 1st
would increase to approx $3,039,000 so this seems sensible.
The overall VaR change is from $4,780,796 to $5,991,569. Again, the estimate
for the 1st Aug was for an increase in VaR to ~ $5,476,000.
All estimates were based on a delta of 32,0004/dmt.
There has also been some increase in the VaR for Aluminium which will effect
the overall total.
A summary is as follows :

regards,
Kirstee


Bill,  I'm OK with the new draft.  In regard to cc's to Commissioners, we should send copies if that's the typical method for filing these types of comments.  Otherwise I don't want to overly offend SoCal by sending something direct if its not the usual filing process.  Thanks.  gh

-----Original Message-----
From: Rapp, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Donoho, Lindy; Kowalke, Terry; Hass, Glen; Watson, Kimberly; Lokey, Teb; Kilmer III, Robert; Lindberg, Lorraine; Lohman, TK
Subject: FW: Transwestern Advice Protest

Here's a revised draft of the letter to the CPUC re SoCal Gas' "windowing" proposal. This incorporates the comments of Lindy and Terry and also some editorial changes. We need to file this tomorrow, so I would appreciate receiving any comments by 10 a.m. tomorrow. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:48 PM
To: Rapp, Bill
Subject: Transwestern Advice Protest

Bill, attached is a third draft which contains the revisions we just discussed.  Let me know tomorrow if it is acceptable, as well as whether TW wants to cc the Commissioners.  Thanks!

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com <mailto:douglass@energyattorney.com>


---------------------- Forwarded by Sandra F Brawner/HOU/ECT on 05/11/2001 09:49 AM ---------------------------

"Jon Schnitzer" <jons@amerexenergy.com> on 05/11/2001 09:27:21 AM
To:	"Suzann Schnitzer" <sschnitz@jcpenney.com>, "susan schnitzer" <s.schnitzer@worldnet.att.net>, "skushnick" <skushnick@evomarkets.com>, "Sandra F Brawner" <Sandra.F.Brawner@enron.com>, "Schnitzer, Harry" <harrys@saaron.com>, <robert.k.rodriguez@db.com>, "Mike Bilotti" <michael.bilotti@capco.com>, "lance jordan" <lcjo@dynegy.com>, <JSEGAUL44@aol.com>, "john shaw" <john.shaw@glencore-us.com>, "jeremy davis" <jjda@dynegy.com>, "gerardo ruiz" <gee_ruiz@hotmail.com>, "david dunnavandt" <ddunnavant@reliantenergy.com>, "Chris Paul" <cpaul@dwintegrated.com>, "Brian York" <byork@dwintegrated.com>, "anrew o ertel" <aertel@evomarkets.com>
cc:
Subject:	Fw: : First Time Golfer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hollier, Diana" <DHollier@nisource.com>
To: <jons@amerexenergy.com>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: FW: : First Time Golfer

> ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grehlinger@altra.com [mailto:grehlinger@altra.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:51 AM
> To: Meyers, Tim; RickyA@calpine.com; michaels@amerexenergy.com;
Martin@Hou.MorrisArchitects.com; Hollier, Diana;
Chris.Hellman@axiaenergy.com
> Subject: : First Time Golfer
>
>
>

 - Inexperienced Golfer.jpg


---------------------- Forwarded by Ami Chokshi/Corp/Enron on 05/26/2000
05:05 PM ---------------------------

"Steve Holmes" <Steve.Holmes@dvn.com> on 05/26/2000 05:06:05 PM
To: <Ami.Chokshi@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: Revised June Avails.

The attached reflects changes to the Carthage (Exxon) piece and the HI 140.

Steve

 - EnronAvails0600revised3.xls