Cheryl Johnson
08/31/2000 11:14 AM
To: Camille Gerard/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeremy Wong/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom E
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, John D Powell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Marilyn Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Laurel
Adams/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Alix/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amelia Alland/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lauri A
Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bridgette Anderson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Beth
Apollo/LON/ECT@ECT, Arfan Aziz/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyndie
Balfour-Flanagan/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Stacey Richardson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward D
Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kimberlee A Bennick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Berg
Carver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anne Bike/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jennifer Blay/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Fred Boas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anthony
Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia A Campos/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nella
Cappelletto/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cary M Carrabine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Clem
Cernosek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Pat Clynes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Marilyn
Colbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Coleman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Donna Consemiu/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Robert Cotten/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Croucher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Romeo
D'Souza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shonnie Daniel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cheryl Dawes/CAL/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rhonda L
Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Bradley Diebner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Eiben/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan
Elledge/NA/Enron@Enron, Faye Ellis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Diane Ellstrom/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Veronica Espinoza/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Enron Europe Global Contracts and
Facilities, Enron Europe Global CounterParty, Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Jacquelyn Farriel/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Genia FitzGerald/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irene
Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shawna Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hoong P
Foon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Imelda Frayre/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scotty Gilbert/TOR/ECT@ECT, Lisa
Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carolyn Gilley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Winston
Goodbody/HOU/ECT@ECT, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT, Mary G Gosnell/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Melissa Graves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrea R Guillen/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Bill D Hare/HOU/ECT@ect, Kenneth M Harmon/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tony Harris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Hedstrom/CAL/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth L
Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marlene
Hilliard/HOU/ECT@ect, Liz Hillman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Nathan L
Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Corey Hobbs/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jim Homco/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Cindy Horn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Larry Joe Hunter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rahil
Jafry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Nanette Kettler/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cheryl Dudley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Klein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Troy Klussmann/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary W Lamphier/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kristian J
Lande/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elsie Lew/HOU/ECT@ECT, Andrew H Lewis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim
Little/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kori Loibl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott F
Lytle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Hillary Mack/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard C
McKeel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Carey M Metz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard A
Miley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bruce Mills/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott Mills/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Glenda D Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Patrice L Mims/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jason
Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, Torrey Moorer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jackie Morgan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Michael W Morris/HOU/ECT@ECT, Matt Motsinger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gary
Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tracy Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
Nicholls/LON/ECT@ECT, John L Nowlan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank
Ortiz/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, B Scott Palmer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita K
Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Regina Perkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debra
Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Pinion/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sylvia S
Pollan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cyril Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dutch Quigley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Donald P Reinhardt/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Suzy
Robey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carlos J
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sam Round/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marilyn M Schoppe/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brad Schneider/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dianne
Seib/CAL/ECT@ECT, Cris Sherman/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, James
Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Lynn E Shivers/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michele Small/LON/ECT@ECT,
Mary M Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Solmonson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jefferson D Sorenson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carrie
Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie
Stewart/HOU/ECT@ECT, Geoff Storey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT,
John Suttle/HOU/ECT@ECT, Connie Sutton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tara
Sweitzer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dianne J Swiber/HOU/ECT@ECT, Neal Symms/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Vance L Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kim S
Theriot/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Veronica
Thompson/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON, Mark D Thorne/HOU/ECT@ECT, Philippe
Travis/LON/ECT@ECT, Susan D Trevino/HOU/ECT@ECT, Laura
Vargas/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Claire Viejou/LON/ECT@ECT, Elsa
Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Robert Walker/HOU/ECT@ECT, George
Weissman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Wiebe/CAL/ECT@ECT, Sony Wilson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
O'Neal D Winfree/HOU/ECT@ECT, Christa Winfrey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rita
Wynne/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Inactivations

REMINDER:

Records on the August 2000 name change/merger notification report will be
inactivated tomorrow afternoon 9/01.


Hello All,

Please add Stephanie Sever to all EOL emails that you currently send to Frank
Davis and myself.  I am leaving the group as of June 1st and she will be
taking over my responsibilities.  However, please continue to send them to me
until then.

Thank you,

Lisa Gillette
x31827


Gentlemen:
The following champagne is available at 70% of approximate retail price. Also
have interest in trading for red wine.  Retail prices derived from Spec's
website or Winesearcer.com.  Wine has been stored at temperature controlled
private wine storage facility.

Quan      Vintage  Wine         Retail
3  1990  Perrier Jouet Brut Fleur de Champagne  110
1  1988  Piper Heidsek Reserve    65
2  1990  Dom Perignon     125
1  1990  Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin La Grande Dame 100
1  1988  Taittenger Millesine Brut    85
1  1992  Jacquart Millesine    29
3  1990  Roederer Cristal     200

Any interest??


Please note the changes  in the GCP record as follows in the attachment:


CALENDAR ENTRY:	APPOINTMENT

Description:
	Terry K. - Oncall Thanksgiving

Date:		11/22/2001
Time:		7:00 AM - 8:00 AM (Central Standard Time)

Chairperson:	Outlook Migration Team

Detailed Description:


Pursuant to my voice mail message, attached please find a clean
copy of the current GE Form Agreement (second document below), as well
as a blackline (first document below) showing changes made to the
version circulated on March 19.  this version does not contain the
"Robust Scope" language in Section 7, nor does it make any significant
changes to Change orders (other than move what had been in Section 5.3
into that Article pursuant to one of our earlier conference calls.  I
have also not touched the takeover provision.  Chris can be reached at
(202) 662-2016.
 <<Comparison of GE Turbine Agreement, Versions 4 to 5.DOC>>  <<GE
Agreement - Version 5.DOC>>
 - Comparison of GE Turbine Agreement, Versions 4 to 5.DOC
 - GE Agreement - Version 5.DOC


I will work with her and Dan to try and figure out a better solution in the short term.     Now that some space is available from the moves to the new building, it is possible that there is a better place to move to for a period of time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Horton, Stanley
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Corman, Shelley; Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	McCarty, Danny
Subject:	RE: Floor Space Announcement

Calm down.  The operative word is it has been put on hold.  These are not normal times.  No one saw this coming or we could have planned better.  Give us a few days to figure everything out.  We just made the decision today to preserve cash while we were waiting to see what was going to happen.  Thanks for your cooperation which I desperately need right now.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Corman, Shelley
Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 4:07 PM
To:	Hayslett, Rod
Cc:	Horton, Stanley; McCarty, Danny
Subject:	Floor Space Announcement

I was very disappointed to not have any advance warning about the announcement that construction on 41 has been put on hold for financial reasons.

The Gas Logistics team was "relocated" off the 41st floor on October 5.  Prior to the move, we had a very efficient, open configuration that let us work together as a unified team.

After the move, we are located on 3 different floors.   Besides the general impact on team unity, this move also means that our evening staff work alone on separate floors, rather than in a group.  It means fewer individuals to cover customer calls.  It means having more equipment to cover the day to day business.   I have worked hard to calm the team that this arrangement is just temporary and that we will eventually be put back together as a team.

Prior to our move I constantly questioned whether our move was necessary.  I asked about smaller, more practical changes to fit more people on the floor.  And, I specifically asked about whether Enron issues might impact the groups desire to continue to spend $7-$10 million -- even as I reluctantly packed up my boxes.

I hope you can appreciate that the current seating arrangement is a serious issue for my team and one that generates constant questions as my staff meetings.  Finding out  that we moved off of 41 for no reason at an all-employee floor meeting undermines my team's faith in my leadership.


Rick -- here is the offer letter for Paul.  I believe it has everything noted except if we are going to allow for a house hunting trip prior to his moving.  I'm told this is usually done in conjunction with a business trip, so I'm not sure if that could be worked in for Paul.

In addition, to get any questions answered he may have about the benefits in Mexico, I would suggest that he call
Melizza Evanson, the HR Rep that is the liaison for our employees in Mexico.  She works very closely with the HR/Payroll people in Mexico and is the most knowledgeable.  Tim Callahan did say that the Benefits in the UK are greater than they are even in the US, and the benefits in the US are even greater than those in Mexico.  However, he didn't elaborate on the specifics of any particular benefits.  Melizza did say that the cost of living in Mexico is extremely low, so the employees there are provided with a driver, maids, etc.

Anyway, take a look at the letter and let me know if you need any revisions.  And please have Paul call Melizza directly at
(713) 345-7855
with any questions.

Thanks.
Jo Ann


Hi Jeff
?
try vjw@cleanpower.org
?
or jackstraw29@hotmail.com
?
Thanks, vjw


It's pretty sappy.......but I think you will enjoy it.

DG

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Darnell" <dmoore21@charter.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, January 21, 2002 2:34 PM
To:	Kristi Giron; Jessie Mayers; Sally Cravey; Linda Newsome; Gretchen Elson; Roxie Wilcox; Celia Olson; Kenny Templet; Ray Martin; Becky Kelley; Lois Shumate; Giron, Darron C.; luvNLIFpt@aol.com
Subject:	Fw: The cost of kids...

The Cost of  Children
I have seen repeatedly the breakdown of the cost of
raising  a child, but this is the first time I have seen the
rewards listed this way.  It's nice, really nice!
The government recently calculated the cost
of raising a child from birth to 18 and came up with
$160,140! That  doesn't even touch college tuition.
For those with kids, that figure  leads to wild fantasies about
all the money we could have banked if not for  (insert your child's name
here).
For others, that number might confirm  the decision to remain childless.
But $160,140 isn't so bad if you break  it down. It translates
into $8,896.66 a year, $741.38 a month, or $171.08 a  week.
That's a
 mere $24.44 a day! Just over a dollar an hour.
 Still, you might think the best financial advice says don't
 have children if you want to be "rich". It is just the opposite.
 What do you get for your $160,140?
Naming rights.  First, middle, and last!
 Glimpses of God every day.
 Giggles under the covers every night.
 More love than  your heart can hold.
  Butterfly kisses and Velcro hugs.
 Endless wonder over rocks, ants, clouds, and warm cookies.
 A hand to hold, usually covered with jam.
 A partner  for blowing bubbles, flying kites, building
 sandcastles, and skipping  down the sidewalk in the pouring rain.
 Someone to laugh yourself  silly with no matter what
 the boss said or how your stocks performed  that day.
 For $160,140, you never have to grow up.
 You get to finger-paint, carve pumpkins, play hide-and-seek,
 catch lightning bugs, and never stop believing in Santa Claus.
 You have an excuse to keep: reading The Adventures of Piglet
 and Pooh, watching Saturday morning cartoons, going to Disney
 movies, and wishing on stars.
 You get to frame rainbows,  hearts, and flowers under
 refrigerator magnets and collect spray  painted noodle
 wreaths for Christmas, hand prints set in clay for
 Mother's Day, and cards with backward letters for
 Father's  Day.
 For $160,140, there is no greater bang for your buck.
 You get to be a hero just for retrieving a Frisbee off the
 garage roof, taking the training wheels off the bike, removing a
 splinter, filling the wading pool, coaxing a wad of gum out of
 bangs, and coaching a baseball team that never wins but always
 gets treated to ice cream regardless.
 You get a front  row seat to history; to witness the first step,
 first word, first bra,  first date, and first time behind the wheel.
 You get to be  immortal.
 You get another branch added to your family tree, and
 if you're lucky, a long list of limbs in your obituary called
 grandchildren.
 You get an education in psychology,  nursing, criminal
 justice, communications, and human sexuality that no
 college can match.
 In the eyes of a child, you rank  right up there with God.
 You have all the power to heal a boo-boo,  scare away
 the monsters under the bed, patch a broken heart,
 police a slumber party, ground them forever, and love
 them  without limits, so one day they will, like you,
 love without counting  the cost.
 ENJOY YOUR KIDS (and grandkids) !!!!!!


The End Date on the following Park & Loan contracts has been extended from 9/30/01 to 10/31/01.

Contract	Deal
37874		1075382
37875		1075388
37876		1075391
37877		1075393
37878		1075407
37879		1075408

I had to create new sitara numbers because the old deal numbers were "Baseload" instead of "Term".


---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001
10:57 AM ---------------------------

Miyung Buster@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
04/20/2001 10:54 AM
To: Ann M Schmidt/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Janel
Guerrero/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Gov. Davis' California Song (Sung to Rawhide)

this is funny...

----- Forwarded by Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 04/20/2001 10:53 AM
-----

	Rob Bradley@ENRON
	04/19/2001 12:28 PM

		 To: Miyung Buster/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Gov. Davis' California Song (Sung to Rawhide)

> > Rollin', rollin', rollin',
> > Though the state is golden,
> > Keep them blackouts rollin', statewide.
> > A little colder weather,
> > And we all freeze together,
> > Wishin' more plants were on the line.
> > All the things I'm missin',
> > Like lights and television,
> > Are waiting 'til we can pay the price.
> >
> > Turn 'em on, turn 'em off,
> > Shut 'em down, block 'em out,
> > Turn 'em on, turn 'em off, statewide!
> > Brown 'em out, black 'em out,
> > Charge 'em more, give 'em less,
> > Let the pols fix the mess, statewide!
> >
> > Keep movin', movin', movin',
> > Though they're disapprovin',
> > Keep them rates a-movin', statewide.
> > Don't try to understand 'em,
> > Just raise, charge, and collect 'em.
> > Soon we'll be livin' high and wide.
> > My heart's calculatin',
> > Nuclear plants will be waitin',
> > Be waitin' at the end of my ride.
> >
> > Turn 'em on, turn 'em off,
> > Shut 'em down, block 'em out,
> > Turn 'em on, turn 'em off, statewide!
> > Brown 'em out, black 'em out,
> > Charge 'em more, give 'em less,
> > Let the pols fix the mess, statewide!
> > STATEWIDE!!!


This testimony was provided by PG&E in response to TURN's motion to roll TRA
balances into the TCBA.  While useful for internal purposes, the testimony
was struck from the proceeding.  PG&E has said they will be filing a
subsequent application to the Commission on their rate stabilization plan
within the next week.  I would expect to see this, or similar information, in
that filing.

From: Jeff Dasovich on 11/16/2000 06:34 PM
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
To: Roger Yang/SFO/EES@EES, Dennis Benevides/HOU/EES@EES, Neil
Bresnan/HOU/EES@EES, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: FW: PG&E's Testimony on Financial Issues Associated with TRA
Undercollection

----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/16/2000 06:21 PM -----

	"Delaney Hunter" <dhunter@smithandkempton.com>
	11/16/2000 05:30 PM
	Please respond to dhunter

		 To: "Aaron Thomas (E-mail)" <athomas@newenergy.com>, "'Allan Lippincott'"
<alippin@mail.arco.com>, "Ann Cohn (E-mail)" <cohnap@sce.com>, "'Ann Watson'"
<anw@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Anna Ferrera (E-mail)" <Anna.Ferrera@SEN.CA.GOV>, "'Art
Carter'" <debinorton@aol.com>, "'assistant for John Fielder'"
<moravekj@sce.com>, "Audra Hartmann (E-mail)" <ath@cpuc.ca.gov>, "Barbara
Barkovich (E-mail)" <brbarkovich@earthlink.net>, "'Becky Kilbourne'"
<bakilbourne@calpx.com>, "Bill Booth (E-mail)" <wbooth@booth-law.com>, "'Bill
Dombrowski'" <cra@calretailers.com>, "Bill Keese (E-mail)"
<wkeese@energy.state.ca.us>, "Bill Zobel (E-mail)" <bzobel@mail.arco.com>,
"'Bob Foster'" <fosterrg@sce.com>, "'Bob Houston'" <houstgrp@pacbell.net>,
"Carolyn McIntyre (E-mail)" <cmcintyre@sempra.com>, "Carolyn Veal-Hunter
(E-mail)" <carolyn.veal-hunter@asm.ca.gov>, "Catherine Hackney (E-mail)"
<hacknece@sce.com>, "Charles Bacchi (E-mail)" <charles.bacchi@asm.ca.gov>,
"'Craig Brown'" <brownc@epenergy.com>, "Dan Carroll (E-mail)"
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>, "'Denice Cazalet'" <dcazalet@apx.com>, "Dennis Price
(E-mail)" <priced@epenergy.com>, "'Denny Samuel'" <dsam@chevron.com>,
"'Dominic DiMare'" <dominic.DiMare@calchamber.com>, "Dorothy Rothrock
(E-mail)" <drothrock@cmta.net>, "'Ed Yates'" <ed@clfp.com>, "Eloy Garcia
(E-mail)" <egarcia@ka-pow.com>, "Evelyn Elsesser (E-mail)" <eke@aelaw.com>,
"Gary Heath (E-mail)" <gheath@eob.ca.gov>, "'Gordon McDonald'"
<gordon.mcdonald@pacificorp.com>, "'Jack Flanigan'"
<jackflanigan@flaniganlaw.com>, "Jack Gualco (E-mail)"
<Jackson_Gualco@gualcogroup.com>, "'Jack Stewart'" <jstewart@cmta.net>,
"'James Boyd'" <jim@resources.ca.gov>, "Jan Smutny-Jones (E-mail)"
<smutny@iepa.com>, "Jeff Dasovich (E-mail)" <jdasovic@enron.com>, "'Jerry
Jordan'" <jordan@cmua.org>, "Jim Cassie (E-mail)" <jcassie@sempra.com>, "Jim
Groniger (E-mail)" <gronijn@texaco.com>, "Joe Lyons (E-mail)"
<joseph.lyons@asm.ca.gov>, "'Joe Ronan'" <joer@calpine.com>, "John Bridges
(E-mail)" <bridgesj@epenergy.com>, "'John Fielder'" <fieldejr@sce.com>, "John
Fistolera (E-mail)" <johnf@ncpa.com>, "'John Larrea (E-mail)'"
<jgl@cpuc.ca.gov>, "John Rozsa (E-mail)" <John.Rozsa@sen.ca.gov>, "John White
(E-mail)" <vjw@cleanpower.org>, "'Joseph Alamo'" <jalamo@enron.com>, "Julee
Malinowski-Ball (E-mail)" <jmball@ns.net>, "'Julia Wright'"
<jwright@smithandkempton.com>, "Karen Edson (E-mail)" <kedson@ns.net>, "Karen
Jarrell (E-mail)" <kjarrell@smurfit.com>, "Karen Koyano (E-mail)"
<kykoyano@calpx.com>, "'Karen Lindh'" <karen@klindh.com>, "Karen Mills
(E-mail)" <kmills@cfbf.com>, "'Kari Harteloo'" <klc@aelaw.com>, "Kassandra
Gough (E-mail)" <kgough@calpine.com>, "'Kathy Brandenburg'"
<katherinebrandenburg@flaniganlaw.com>, "Kay Grosulak (E-mail)"
<kgrosulak@sppc.com>, "Keith McCrea (E-mail)" <kmccrea@sablaw.com>, "Kevin
Lynch (E-mail)" <Kevin.Lynch@pacifiCorp.com>, "Kevin Smith (E-mail)"
<kevins@ncpa.com>, "Kip Lipper (E-mail)" <kip.lipper@sen.ca.gov>, "Lawrence
Lingbloom (E-mail)" <lawrence.lingbloom@sen.ca.gov>, "Lenny Goldberg
(E-mail)" <lga@mother.com>, "Louis Szablya (E-mail)" <szablyal@epenergy.com>,
"Marc Joseph (E-mail)" <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>, "Marwan Masri (E-mail)"
<mmasri@energy.state.ca.us>, "Mary McDonald (E-mail)" <memcdonald@calpx.com>,
"Michael Alcantar (E-mail)" <mpa@aelaw.com>, "Mike Florio (E-mail)"
<mflorio@turn.org>, "'Mike Kahl'" <mikahl@ka-pow.com>, "Mona Petrochko
(E-mail)" <mpetroch@enron.com>, "Pete Conaty (E-mail)" <pcaceo@pacbell.net>,
"'Phil Nails'" <phil.nails@asm.ca.gov>, "Phil Stohr (E-mail)"
<pstohr@dbsr.com>, "Ralph Cavanagh (E-mail)" <rcavanagh@nrdc.org>, "Randy
Chinn (E-mail)" <randy.chinn@sen.ca.gov>, "Ray Thompson (E-mail)"
<ray.thompson@sen.ca.gov>, "'Rick Counihan'"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>, "Robert Berry (E-mail)" <berry@apx.com>,
"Robin Larson (E-mail)" <rlarson@caiso.com>, "Sheryl Carter (E-mail)"
<scarter@nrdc.org>, "Steve Pike (E-mail)" <pikes@epenergy.com>, "Steve Ponder
(E-mail)" <steve_ponder@fpl.com>, "Stu Wilson (E-mail)" <swilson@cmua.org>,
"'Sue Mara'" <smara@enron.com>, "Susan Reeder (E-mail)" <sreeder@sppc.com>,
"Terry Winter (E-mail)" <twinter@caiso.com>, "Thomas Dinkel (E-mail)"
<tdinkel@retx.com>, "Tim Schmelzer (E-mail)" <Tschmelz@energy.state.ca.us>,
"'Tommy Ross'" <rosst@sce.com>, "'Tony Braun'" <braun@cmua.org>, "Victoria
Schaefer (E-mail)" <schaefvl@sce.com>
		 cc: <CJW5@pge.com>
		 Subject: FW: PG&E's Testimony on Financial Issues Associated with TRA
Undercollection

Per the discussion at the Retreat, please see attached for information on
PG&E's financial situation.

Thanks to Chris Warner for providing this information.

Delaney

-----Original Message-----
From: Warner, Christopher (Law) [mailto:CJW5@pge.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 1:39 PM
To: 'dhunter@smithandkempton.com'
Cc: Kauss, Kent; Timmerman, Mark
Subject: PG&E's Testimony on Financial Issues Associated with TRA
Undercollection

 <<02_Response.doc>>  <<03_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch01_McManus.doc>>
<<05_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch02_Campbell.doc>>
<<07_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch03_Asselstine.doc>>
<<09_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch04_StandardPoors.doc>>
<<CPUC01-#83739-v1-A9901016_et_al_Minkin_Ruling_.doc>>

Delaney, attached fyi is the testimony PG&E submitted to the CPUC last week
on financial issues associated with our TRA undercollection and TURN's
petition for modification.  Also attached is a copy of yesterday's ruling of
the administrative law judge rejecting this testimony for consideration as
part of the evidentiary record of this phase of the proceeding. Needless to
say, we believe our testimony is informative and helpful and should be
considered as part of the overall policy debate on this vital issue.

Please feel free to pass this testimony along to others who might be
interested, and feel free to give me a call if you have any questions.

Chris Warner
PG&E Law Dept.
415-973-6695

 - 02_Response.doc
 - 03_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch01_McManus.doc
 - 05_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch02_Campbell.doc
 - 07_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch03_Asselstine.doc
 - 09_PTER_PhaseIII_Ch04_StandardPoors.doc
 - CPUC01-#83739-v1-A9901016_et_al_Minkin_Ruling_.doc


Start Date: 2/23/01; HourAhead hour: 14;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001022314.txt


That's it! I've also got a call into Ozzie.

Kay Mann@ENRON
05/16/2001 12:13 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FPL PPA

I'm remembering now.  It was a term sheet which was never executed, as far as
I know.  I believe FPL prepared it, and we may have commented on it. Let me
see what I can find.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/16/2001 12:09 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Re: FPL PPA

It was a deal Ozzie was working on with FPL.

Kay Mann@ENRON
05/16/2001 12:04 PM
To: Ben F Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: FPL PPA

I don't remember a PPA for Homestead.  I'll check, though.

Kay

	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           05/16/2001 12:03 PM

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: FPL PPA

Kay:

A while ago, you sent me a copy of an FPL PPA for Homestead. Could you please
resend me the document?

Thanks,

Ben


Start Date: 1/12/02; HourAhead hour: 16;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011216.txt


December 27, 2001

Dear Flycheap.com Member:

You are receiving this email because you are a registered user
of Flycheap.com and have indicated that you would like to
receive travel specials from us.

Here's what you'll find in today's Flycheap newsletter . . .

*   Visit the USA's Sun Destinations from $130
*   Caribbean All-Inclusive Vacations from $399
*   Top 3 Cruise Deals
*   Steamboat Springs, Colorado - 7 Nights from $256 per person
*   Reserve your Hotel Room online and Save!

For more information, please visit http://www.flycheap.com
AOL Users - Click here

*****************************************************************

VISIT THE USA'S SUN DESTINATIONS FROM $130

Warm up with these cool rates to some of the Great Sun Destinations.

These fares are roundtrip and include all taxes and surcharges.

 Raleigh Durham - Phoenix     $175
 New York - Ft. Lauderdale    $130
 Chicago - Orlando            $130
 Philadelphia - Nassau        $265
 Detroit - San Diego          $284
 Washington - West Palm Beach	$178
 Seattle - Los Angeles        $193
 Minneapolis - San Diego      $271
 Hartford - Miami             $199
 New York - San Juan          $250
 Atlanta - Montego Bay        $325
 Boston - Ft. Lauderdale      $170
 Pittsburgh - Ft. Myers       $190

Fares available from where you live to everywhere you want to go.

Visit http://www.flycheap.com for even more great fares.
AOL Users - Click here

Remember, Fly Smart, Fly Cheap at FLYCHEAP.COM

*****************************************************************

CARIBBEAN ALL-INCLUSIVE VACATIONS FROM $399

CALL 1-800 FLY CHEAP or visit FLYCHEAP.COM

Caribbean Vacation Packages Include 3 Nights Accommodation at the
listed resort, airfare via American Airlines or US Airways.
Transfers included in Jamaica.

All Inclusive resort prices include all meals, beverages, taxes,
gratuities, water sports, activities and much, much more.

Package rates are available from over 200 cities to 220 Resorts
in the Caribbean.

                 Barcelo Club Las Perlas
New York                   $529
Boston                     $649
Chicago                    $559
Dallas                     $539
Denver                     $759
Los Angeles                $619
Miami                      $399

                  Sun Village Beach Resort
New York                   $639
Boston                     $689
Chicago                    $849
Dallas                     $849
Denver                     $959
Los Angeles                $979
Miami                      $539

                       Sandals Inn
New York                   $789
Boston                     $819
Chicago                    $789
Dallas                     $899
Denver                     $889
Los Angeles                $749
Miami                      $649

            Renaissance Jamaica Grande Resort
New York                   $839
Boston                     $869
Chicago                    $839
Dallas                     $969
Denver                     $949
Los Angeles                $799
Miami                      $699

We also have the following promotions in these great
destinations:

*  4th Night Free at the Condado Beach Resort in San Juan
      through 11/30/02

*  7th Night Free and room upgrade at the Wyndham El San Juan or
      El Conquistador in San Juan through 4/30/02

*  Reduced Rates at the Buena Vista Suites in Orlando
      through 2/15/02

*  7th night free at La Cabana All Suite Resort in Aruba
      through 3/31/02

*  Reduced Rates at the Ritz Carlton in Cancun through 4/30/02

*  Stay 7 nights, receive 2 free at Outrigger and Ohana resorts in
      Hawaii through 1/31/02

Visit http://www.flycheap.com for even more great fares.
AOL Users - Click here

Remember, Fly Smart, Fly Cheap at FLYCHEAP.COM

*****************************************************************

TOP 3 CRUISE DEALS

1.  Princess - 7 Nt Alaska Voyage of the Glaciers - from $599
    http://www.mytravelco.com/ss.asp?id=5347&type=15
    AOL Users - Click here

2.  Carnival - 11 Nt Western Caribbean Cruise - from only $649 pp
    http://www.mytravelco.com/ss.asp?id=5663&type=15
    AOL Users - Click here

3.  Celebrity Cruises - 16 Nt Transatlantic and Spain Cruisetour
      Includes 2 nights hotel and sightseeing in Barcelona - $1,399 pp
    http://www.mytravelco.com/ss.asp?id=5842&type=15
    AOL Users - Click here

For other hot cruise deals, visit

http://www.mytravelco.com/cruises/index.asp?type=15
AOL Users - Click here

*****************************************************************

RESORT CONDOMINIUM SPECIAL

Steamboat Springs, Colorado - 7 Nights from $256* per person

- Located high in the Rocky Mountains, The Village at Steamboat
     is the perfect ski destination for the entire group
- $1025 total price including tax
- *Per person price based upon quad occupancy

Click here for more details:

http://www.mytravelco.com/mr.asp?property=46&date=01/2002&subregion=26
AOL Users - Click here

This special resort offer is available through
ResortEscapes.com

Click the link or call 1-800-209-9857 for details.

*****************************************************************

RESERVE YOUR HOTEL ROOM ONLINE
http://www.mytravelco.com/lodging/

Now that you've booked your flights, search for hotels on
Flycheap.com's sister site, MyTravel.com.  On the MyTravel.com
Hotel Search Engine you can reserve online at one of our 53,000
hotels, resorts and inns.  It is safe and secure and you'll find
some of the best Hotel Rates in the industry.

http://www.mytravelco.com/lodging/
AOL Users - Click here

*****************************************************************

This email is free service of Flycheap.com and Travel Services
International.  For more information, please visit:

http://www.flycheap.com

You received this mailing at this address:
gmeyer@mytravelco.com

To automatically unsubscribe from Flycheap.com mailings,
please click here:
http://www.cruiseoutlet.com/airdel.php3?emailaddress=sscott5@enron.com
AOL Users - Click here to unsubscribe

Flycheap.com is part of the MyTravel Group.
MyTravelco.com is now MyTravel - click here for details:
http://www.mytravelco.com/about_us/mytravel.asp
AOL Users - Click here

*****************************************************************

Disclaimer: Roundtrip fares require 14-day advance purchase,
Saturday night stay, and Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday travel
only. Air fares valid for 1/7/02 and returning 2/15/02 and must
be ticketed by 1/03/02. Air fares include all taxes and fees.
Fares non-refundable and may not be available on all flights.
Package rates per person, double occupancy, based on select midweek
travel 2/5/02 - 3/31/02 and do not include air taxes and fees,
hotel taxes, or transfers, but do include car rental taxes and
fees if applicable. Packages must be booked by 1/10/02. Package
rates are limited and rates including car are based on a compact
size car.

Top 3 Cruise Disclaimer: All rates are per person, double occupancy,
cruise only and include port charges unless otherwise indicated above.
Government fees and taxes are additional.  All rates are subject to
availability and may go up, sell out, or be withdrawn by the cruise
line at any time.

Disclaimer for Colorado Resort: Rates shown are per unit
for the specific time period listed and include applicable taxes.
Guests may not exceed maximum occupancy for specific unit purchased.
Rates may sell out at any time. Additional dates and unit sizes are
listed on the ResortEscapes.com website.

FL Seller of Travel Reg. No. ST-33310 CST# 2043440-40 IA SOT 645
Copyright ? 2001, MyTravel.com


-----Original Message-----
From: 	Blair, Lynn
Sent:	Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:46 PM
To:	Buchanan, John; Kowalke, Terry
Cc:	Nacey, Sheila
Subject:	NNG/TW Manual Scheduling Report

	How difficult would it be to add the volume to the summary report we do today?

	Sheila and I met with Shelley and reviewed our process.  She felt very good about the process
	but would like to see the volumes impacted by the adjustments not just dollars.

	We can discuss when I get back next week.

	Thanks. Lynn


Mary, I am working with Jeff Golden and Marc Pana in EES Corporate
Development. Marc asked me to send you a list of potential substations for
interconnection of mobile generation in blocks of 25 MW to 50 MW. Here is a
tentative list. Please feel free to suggest any other location you think is
suitable for trading power in Palo Verde (either directly or with power
displacement). Thanks for your attention.

Javier.
x. 34599

Tapco (has abandoned plant?)
Ash Fork
Williams
Parks
Winona
Leupp
Round Valley
Cataract Creek
Moenkopi
Sedona
Goodard
Kirkland


Start Date: 4/23/01; HourAhead hour: 15;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042315.txt


---------------------- Forwarded by Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron on 12/14/2000
09:57 AM ---------------------------

"Webmaster@cera.com" <webmaster on 12/13/2000 07:25:58 PM
To:
cc:

Subject: California on the Brink--CERA Alert

CERA Alert: December 13, 2000

Title: California on the Brink
CERA Knowledge Areas: Western Energy, N. American Power, N. American Gas

CALIFORNIA ON THE BRINK
The California Stalemate
California moved closer to the brink of an outage today as concerns over
credit-worthiness of buyers brought the possibility that generators would
avoid selling to the California market. While numerous factors have
contributed to the high cost of power incurred by California's utilities, the
root cause of the current crisis is a lack of new generation. The current
credit crisis and its threat to supplies could spark state action to address
the situation. The collective efforts of all market participants should be
focused on increasing generation capacity as quickly as possible.

Western power prices have skyrocketed well beyond the record levels set this
summer. Perhaps because frozen rates insulate the majority of California
consumers and companies from tangible effects of the market crisis,
regulators have been able to postpone meaningful market reforms and
significant rate increases. The California Public Utilities Commission denied
the requests of Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison to end
their rate freezes, forcing these utilities at least temporarily to finance
the costs of higher wholesale energy. This has created an unsustainable
accumulation of costs and a loss of faith in the California market.

The current credit crisis and the potential for blackouts may become the
galvanizing events that provide state regulators with a public mandate to
address the underlying structural problems in the industry. However, there is
no guarantee that these regulatory actions will expedite an effective
solution for customers and the industry as a whole. Wholesale and retail
markets that emerge from regulatory intervention are likely to remain
muddled. In the necessarily political process that will follow, it is
possible that-as has largely been the case so far-the steps taken will fail
to move the California power market toward a more enduring solution and will
instead continue to mask the underlying structural flaws.

In the six months since California's supply shortfall began plaguing Western
markets, regulators have done little to address the underlying problem.
Rather than addressing the cause of the supply shortage-establishing a market
environment that encourages timely additions of new generating capacity and
demand side responses-efforts are instead directed at trying to lay blame for
the crisis and lessen the immediate financial impact on customers. Indeed,
several actions taken thus far have served more to compound the problem by
discouraging new power plant additions. These include price caps, repeated
changes to market rules, attempts to seize generator profits, and a
challenging siting and permitting process.

Medicine Worse than the Illness
Several years of electricity demand growth and low prices in California were
accompanied by very few additions to the supply base. Regulators did not pay
adequate attention to the looming supply shortfall. The void of consensus
over the cause of the current crisis has instead been replaced by a series of
bandaid remedies that address the symptoms, but not the cause, of
California's electric market woes.*

* Challenging siting and permitting. Despite state action to better
coordinate the siting and permitting process for new power plants, power
plant developers still face high hurdles. Local community opposition alone
has struck down some key proposed facilities.

* Price caps discourage investment. State and federal proposals to cap prices
limit the attractiveness of the California wholesale power market, especially
for developers who have the option of channeling scarce capital and equipment
to more stable or more attractive markets outside the state.

* Repeated rule changes. Frequent rule changes in the ISO markets (including
the price caps) confound attempts by developers to estimate profits from new
plant development.

* Calls for refunds. Despite reports by the Power Exchange, the ISO, and the
FERC that no pattern of abuse could be found from their examination of the
California markets, state officials continue to accuse power providers of
gaming the market. Calls by state officials for refunds of generator profits
are a threat to new plant development.

* Facility inspections. Recent inspections of power plants by state officials
to verify that operators are honestly reporting the operational status of
their generating units accentuates the atmosphere of mistrust.

CERA's recent analysis suggests that merchant plant developers in the West
are not guaranteed? to make a profit. Prospects of new plant profitability
are affected by the timing and quantity of new plants, decommissioning of
older units, demand growth, and numerous other difficult-to-forecast factors.
California's regulatory actions only further cloud the assessment of
financial viability and degrade the political environment for developers
considering entering the state.

Despite efforts by the California ISO to stimulate new capacity additions in
the state with a special, limited-term capacity payment, CERA estimates that
demand growth will continue to outstrip supply additions in the West in 2001.
In addition, the existing siting and permitting process will prevent a
sufficient quantity of capacity from entering the market until 2003 at the
earliest. Therefore, three years remain before a sufficient quantity of
capacity enters service to significantly dampen prices and decrease the risk
of an outage.

The Road to Recovery
There are a number of actions that can be taken to help relieve the capacity
shortfall:

* Encourage new build. Supply must be part of the answer. This requires a
series of steps that can help facilitate new supply build. While in principal
some have been taken, such as new fast track approval, the success of these
actions can only be measured by the build itself. For now, there is still not
enough new supply coming on until 2003 to relieve supply tightness.?

* Stabilize investment climate. Utilities must have assurance that they will
ultimately be allowed to recover market costs for power. This provides the
credit worthiness needed by sellers to produce energy and to stimulate new
build.

* Move toward more balanced utility supply portfolios. One of the reasons the
pressure on customers has been so intense in California has been the absence
(and even discouragement) of diverse supply portfolios among the utilities in
the state-particularly for residential and small commercial customers. With
the market at a peak, however, now is in one sense a sub-optimal time to move
toward term contracting. Yet these contracts provide the foundation for a
series of actions-including new supply build and demand side investments. If
they end up above market, they will at least have achieved the desired effect
of knocking down prices, a fact which by itself should provide sufficient
justification for recovering the cost of these commitments.

* Encourage market mechanisms that elicit a demand response. Although
originally a feature of California's market design, most consumers are
insulated from price spikes through capped or frozen retail rates. Exposing
customers to at least some of the market price signals would encourage a
demand response.

* Encourage market mechanisms that dampen the "Boom Bust" characteristic of
the market. Whether in the form of a capacity payment, a reserve requirement,
or a minimum term portfolio requirement, the California power market needs to
move to a structure that encourages investment in new capacity when the
market is in balance rather than waiting for a shortage and price shock to
elicit new investment. Such a structure can help dampen (but not eliminate)
future price volatility.

* Avoid continuously tinkering with the market. While the market does need to
be restructured as described above, it also needs to be stable and reliable
to encourage the development of new supply as well as a robust long-term
contractual market for power in California. Continually tinkering with the
market structure-such as the three times the price cap has been shifted since
July-only serves to undermine confidence in the market. California needs to
do its best to develop a long-term solution and then let the market run its
course.

* Allow for greater environmental flexibility. The state should explore a
more balanced solution to emissions restrictions in the face of a supply
shortfall that has been exacerbated by generators that cannot operate due to
emissions restrictions.

* Free PURPA power plants to generate. Relief should be granted to PURPA
power plants that are operational, but are restricted by contract from
operating to generate only power.

**end**

This CERA Alert will be available in PDF format within 24 hours.

**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.

Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: webmaster@cera.com
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates


Janet, its your book - if you feel we have the LM's licked and we need the
resources/the value at risk is minimal, I would go ahead.

I would get Calger on side as well.

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000
11:50 AM ---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich
07/18/2000 09:02 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cogentrix Turbine Inquiry

Dave, have you had a chance to give this much thought?
---------------------- Forwarded by Janet R Dietrich/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000
09:00 AM ---------------------------

Janet R Dietrich
07/14/2000 08:46 AM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cogentrix Turbine Inquiry

As a matter of fact, this is on my list to discuss with you. I think we
should pick up the 7EA's and maybe the 501D's as well (doubt we could pick
and choose). I met with Mark Frevert yesterday afternoon to discuss the East
Generation Strategy (along with Ben Jacoby and Don Miller) and he wanted me
to talk with Larry Izzo about us taking all 4 turbines. Should I go ahead and
have that discussion or would you like to discuss this in more detail first?
The LM6000 position looks like this:

24 turbines allocated:

4 City of Austin
4 Enron South America
4 Las Vegas Cogen
6 Public Service of Colorado
6 Florida Merchant plant

Heather Kroll and Ozzie Pagan are bringing their VEPCO/North Carolina deal to
a point where we will probably need to make a decision in the next 2-3 weeks.
It has a 4-year PPA and we are basically obligated to build a power plant to
back-fill the position. The PPA will be able to be served from the market or
plant, and we would need to use 4 of the 6 dual-fuel LM's currently allocated
to Florida. There is a possibility we could go back to the 501D's but we'll
have to see. The ecomomics of the deal leave Enron with about a 40-45%
residual value on the plant at the end of 4 years, and Bruce Sukaly is in the
process of showing this entire project to 4 counterparties in order to
monetize the entire position.

We still have 2-3 other customers looking at the LM's although they are
moving fairly slow.

I'd like to discuss our development strategy in a little more detail with you
when you return but here are the highlights: Ben and his team will be looking
to increase the sites we have under our control in several regions: PJM,
ECAR, Georgia, and Florida to name a few. I think we may want to consider
some configurations that include combined-cycle options that have a 5-year
term (vs. our standard 2-year currently), primarily in Florida and maybe
Georgia. Ben is putting this on paper along with the incremental resource
needs and incremental developmental dollars needed. I think we should talk
about increasing our site bank/development portfolio in Canada as well.

Let me know your thoughts! Thanks.


Start Date: 4/10/01; HourAhead hour: 13;  No ancillary schedules awarded.  No
variances detected.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041013.txt

---- SC Trades Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
     Details:

  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  SC_ID: EPMI
  MKT_TYPE: 2
  TRANS_DATE: 4/10/01
  TRADING_SC: PGAE
  PNT_OF_INTRC: NP15
  SCHED_TYPE: ENGY
  PURCH_SALE: 2
  DEAL_NO: 1


THIS MEETING WILL TAKE PLACE IN 30C1

-----Original Message-----
From: Louise, Kitchen
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:42 PM
To: Hogan, Irena D.
Subject: Fw: Originators Meeting

We recognize that we are experiencing a difficult time at Enron now and you are all interfacing with our customers every day.  We are therefore holding a  short meeting at 9:00am tomorrow morning to answer questions from you and your groups.

Tammie to advise on the room.  Please invite all of your groups.

Louise


---------------------- Forwarded by Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT on 08/23/2000
11:17 AM ---------------------------
Sandra R McNichols   08/21/2000 04:56 PM

To: Geraldine Irvine/HOU/ECT@ECT, Charlene Richmond/HOU/ECT@ECT, Willie
Harrell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathleen Speer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy Hernandez/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Leslie Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Juanita Marchand/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Biggest Mathematical Miracle in the World

The Biggest Mathematical Miracle in the World!

Moses and his people were in the desert, but
what was he going to do with them?
They had to be fed, and fed is what he did,
according to the Quartermaster General in the
Army.  It is reported that Moses would have to have
had 1500 tons of food each day.

Do you know that to bring that much food each
day, two freight trains, each a mile long,  would be required!
Besides you must remember, they were out in the desert, so they
would have to have firewood to use in cooking the food.
This would take 4000 tons of wood and a few
more  freight trains, each a mile long,  just for one day.

And just think, they were forty years in transit.
And oh yes! They would have to have water. If they
only had enough to drink and wash a few dishes,
it would take 11,000,000 gallons each day, and a
freight train with tank cars, 1800 miles long, just to bring water!

And then another thing! They had to get across
the Red Sea at night. (They did?) Now, if they went on
a narrow path, double file, the line would be 800
miles long and would require 35 days and  nights
to get through. So, there had to be a space in the Red Sea,
3 miles  wide so that they could walk 5000 abreast to get
over in one night.

But then, there is another problem. Each time
they camped at the end of  the day, a campground
two-thirds the size of the state of Rhode Island was
required, or a total of 750 square miles
long...think of  it! This space just for nightly camping.

Do you think Moses figured all this out
before he left Egypt?

I think not!

You see, Moses believed in God.

God took care of these things for him.

Now do you think God has any problem taking
care of all your needs?
I ASKED THE LORD TO BLESS YOU.......
I asked the Lord to bless you As I prayed for you today,
To guide you and protect you As you go along your way....
His love is always with you,
His promises are true,
And when we give Him all our cares,
You know He will see us through.
So when the road you're traveling on
Seems difficult at best,
Just remember I'm here praying
And God will do the rest.

Pass this to at least 10 people you want God to bless, don't
forget to send it back to the one who asked
God to bless you first.
A POSITIVE  ATTITUDE CAUSES A CHAIN REACTION OF
POSITIVE THOUGHTS, EVENTS  AND OUTCOMES!!

"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me."
              -Philippians 4:13


- nov2601.XLS


Last week y'all asked us to follow up with several key individuals within the
ENA group to see how it's going with SAP.  We were not to give any "hints";
just ask some open-ended (but probing) questions.  I'm attaching all the
responses (Georgeann directed us to Greg W ).  I don't see anything alarming
or red-hot -- I just hope they were being totally candid and honest with
us!!  Overall I would categorize them as normal support issues around the
areas of needing some spot "1-on-1" training for users, more experience in
overall information retrieval, editing of some reports, our security process
and the difficulty of getting information from various and sundry databases
(since SAP is interfaced) to get the full picture.

We have passed all these items on to the appropriate Solution Mgr, so that
they can specifically address them.

As I think I mentioned several months ago we had complaints about
nonresponsiveness (calls not being returned, being passed around alot, etc).
Hopefully we've turned the corner there.

Please let me know if there are other areas you'd like us to address (as we
discussed), otherwise we will continue to try to keep our finger on the
pulse.  And please let me know who our contact person from ENA should be.

Thanks,

KK

Mary Sloan
12/13/2000 07:44 AM
To: Kathy Kokas/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Rebecca Miles/Corp/Enron@ENRON

Subject: ENA Summary

Kathy,

Please find the highlights below from my ENA customer meetings:

Bryce Baxter

Pleased overall with the support provided by the ISC

Small issues voiced by Bryce, not strong sources of contention :
Feels the response time does not happen with 'lightning speed', but works
fine once they agree to a deadline with Pamela LeBrane
Zcash specification changes delayed due to errors identified by both groups,
but they are still moving forward
Payment runs are generated early on occassion and it is tough to cancel a
payment (they are blocking all payments now to avoid this issue)
Unify to SAP interface - files are not being picked up at least once a week
(certain files 'drop off'); Mary Tyler Marz (ENA) and Teresa Mira (ISC) are
working on this issue

Leslie Reeves
Pleased overall with the support provided by the ISC

Areas Leslie would like assistance from the ISC:
Further editing on reports; understanding what information is available and
how they can extract the information from SAP
Further training (coaching sessions) by members of the ISC Solution Teams to
help with the following areas:
How to pull data from SAP (data mining)
Explanation of how to find all the pieces required to complete their monthly
reconciliation process (balancing cost centers, reconciling the P&L to the G/L
Explanation of the interface reconciliation process for financial out of
balances
Explanation of the steps required for new accounts, business areas, cost
centers, allocation process (needs to fully understand the process in SAP)
Follow up with Debbie Brackett in Credit to determine if she is receiving the
credit information from SAP in a timely manner
I told Leslie that I would follow up with Susan B. and Brandee and ask them
to call her directly.  Leslie would like to meet with each of them and then
determine the correct individuals on her team to become involved in the
process.

Both Bryce and Leslie were very appreciative of the customer focused
attention from the ISC.  They both thought it was great that we scheduled
time to visit with them and understand their questions/issues.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Mary

---------------------- Forwarded by Rebecca Miles/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
03:09 PM ---------------------------

	From:  Rebecca Miles                           12/12/2000 03:08 PM

To: Greg Whiting/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:

Subject: Feedback for the ISC

Greg,

Thank you for taking time to meet with me today about the ISC and SAP.  I
appreciated your explanations and your feedback.  Please see if I have
captured the main points below.  If so, no need to reply.  If not, please
provide corrections or elaborations.

I will talk with Sheila and Brandee about the best course of action to get
Laura Scott's feedback about the issues in Canada.  I'll also check on the
status of Hyperion.

I passed along your comments about Michael Gilmore to both Michael and his
manager Vince Cacaro.  Both were pleased to receive positive customer
feedback.

Regards,
Rebecca

----------------------

ENA's (Financial) SAP "Wish List"

Earlier inter-company cutoffs in month-end close, to facilitate the overall
close process.
Clarity around the status of Hyperion -- will it be here beyond the end of
the year?  If so, will the process for mapping between FI/CO and Hyperion be
addressed?
Getting all the information for our customers into the same repository.  Brio
should be the answer to many of our issues, as it should ultimately integrate
data from the Tag database (ERMS), Empower, Unify, CPI, and Solark.
A different type or level of support during month-end close, at least through
1Q 2001.  In order of criticality, the issues/needs to be addressed are:
security (making sure people have the correct security and have it prior to
month-end close)
cost center & profit center set-up (ultimately, centralized set-up is the
right thing, but the process during close needs work)
reporting (quicker/better access to the right data post close)


---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 07/06/2001
07:45 AM ---------------------------

enron_update@concureworkplace.com on 07/05/2001 12:11:43 PM
To: "Steven Kean" <skean@enron.com>
cc:

Subject: <<Concur Expense Document>> - Robert L Bradley Jr

The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Robert L. Bradley Jr
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: Robert L Bradley Jr
Report Total: $5,092.29
Amount Due Employee: $5,092.29

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://expensexms.enron.com


For your information

Thanks

Iona

---------------------- Forwarded by Iona Maclean/LON/ECT on 21/09/2000 15:00
---------------------------

	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

	From:  Tunuja Tulsiani <Ttulsi@iirltd.co.uk>
21/09/2000 14:50

To:
cc: Rosemary Fitzgerald <ROSEF@iirltd.co.uk>, Simon Turner
<SIMONT@iirltd.co.uk>

Subject: PoweRisk 2000- Cocktail Parties

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

TWO KEY SOCIAL FUNCTIONS AT POWERISK 2000 *
YOUR PERSONAL INVITATION

PoweRisk 2000 has teamed up with three key industries partners to
bring two important networking functions at this year's PoweRisk
2000.  A full invitation has been sent to you in the post but please
print out and bring the two attached invitations with you in case
your postal copy does not reach you for any reason.

The first Cocktail Party will be held on Tuesday 3rd October
between 6pm and 9pm and will be hosted by Virtual Credit Services
and True Quote.com.  This welcome Cocktail Party is open to all
delegates and speakers whether or not you are attending the
e-commerce day on the Tuesday.  Running until 9pm, it should
allow you time to attend even if you have a late evening flight.

The second Cocktail Party will be held on Wednesday 4th October
at the Palais Brongniart, the home of Parisbourse who will be
hosting the function.  Transport to and from this event will be
provided for all delegates.

There is no need to reply * we look forward to seeing you at
both events.

Regards

Rosemary Fitzgerald
PoweRisk 2000 Director


The Ron Brown Scholarships are available for upcoming High School
graduates.

 Please forward this information to any prospective H.S. grad that may
 be interested in applying for this scholarship. The contact
 information is listed below.

 Ron Brown Scholarship CAP Charitable Foundation
 Ron Brown Scholarship Program Award number:  #17673
 Deadline:                     January 09, 2001
 Applicable Majors:      All Areas of Study
 Award Value:              Maximum - $40,000
 Number of Awards:     10

 Description: The Ron Brown Scholarship is open to African-American
 high school seniors who are academically talented and highly
 motivated. Applicants must be able to demonstrate excellent
 academics, exceptional leadership potential, financial need and
 impact their communities through activities and service to others.
 Candidates must be pursuing full-time
 undergraduate degrees.

 Awards are $10,000 per year for four years.

 For further information contact the sponsor by mail to:

 mmallory@cstone.net <mailto:mmallory@cstone.net>

 or browse their website: http://www.RonBrown.org/
http://www.RonBrown.org/> >
 Contact CAP Charitable Foundation,
 Ron Brown Scholarship Program
 Michael A Mallory, Executive Director
 1160 Pepsi Place, Suite 110
 Charlottesville, VA 22901-0807
 Andrea Shelton 630-505-2383


This message was passed on to me and I did have the virus on my
computer, which means you probably have it as well, because you are in my
address
book. The antivirus did not detect this. Please read and do the following
to get this off of your machine.

Dear Friends and e-mail correspondents,

This is a serious e-mail. I anti-virus an e-mail from a work associated
warning of a virus that was passed on to him. His PC was infected and
since I was in his address book it had probably spread to my computer. I
followed the instructions and located the virus. By following the
instructions, I was able to delete the virus. The bad news is that you
probably have it, as you are in my address book. More bad news is that
my anti-virus program did not detect this virus.
This virus lies dormant for 14 days and then kills your hard drive. Here
is what to do. If you follow the instructions and then see that you have
the virus, you will need to send a similar e-mail to everyone in your
address book.

TO CHECK AND REMOVE VIRUS
Click on START pull up to FIND or SEARCH (depending on your computer)
and click on FOLDERS OR FILES
*Type in sulfnbk.exe this is the name of the virus.
*Make sure you are searching on the C DRIVE.
*Click on FIND NOW
*If the search finds the virus it will be listed in the box below the
search. It will have a black icon that will have the name sulfnbk.exe.
DO NOT OPEN THIS FILE!
*RIGHT CLICK on the file and pull down to DELETE.
*It will ask you if you want to delete this file LEFT CLICK YES
*Go to your desktop (where all of your icons are) and RIGHT CLICK on the
RECYCLE BIN (TRASH CAN) click on EMPTY THE ENTIRE BIN
*If you found the virus on your computer you will need to send this
message to everybody in your address book, because this is how it is
transferred.


if your values ref out on the transport model - hit Clt-Alt-F9.
PL


Tana,

Thank you.  10/4 is the only outstanding profile I was missing.


You have received this email because the requester specified you as their
Manager. Please click
http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000025312&Page=
Approval to review and act upon this request.

Request ID          : 000000000025312
Request Create Date : 3/23/01 9:52:03 AM
Requested For       : sandeep.kohli@enron.com
Resource Name       : Visual Studio Enterprise
Resource Type       : Applications


Houston Astros Baseball season tickets are available sale to employees at their face value.  The seats range in price from $2,490 to $3,237 for the season, and are located in the box and club levels.

If you're interested in being on the list of potential buyers for Enron's season tickets to the Astro's 2002 home games, please indicate your interest by 4PM, Central Time on Thursday, March 21 via e-mail to Elizabeth Linnell.  In your e-mail, please indicate the number of seats you're interested in purchasing for the full season (no partial season or individual games).  Once the number of interested potential buyers is determined, we'll know whether a lottery process will need to take place to fairly allocate the purchase opportunities and will communicate that to respondents.

Please note that the season begins on Friday, March 29 so payment for the tickets will need to be made early next week.

If you have any questions, please call Elizabeth Linnell at x33896 or Rachel Tobor at x31481.


Thanks a bunch.  I know this is frustrating for you and I will send the list
of contracts to you so the real time people can get their act together.

   Kate Symes                01/31/2001 05:18 PM

To: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Energy Services, Inc.

No, this was incorrect. I'll tell you something - Real Time is having
problems figuring out who they do and do not trade with. We're going to have
a conversation about this in a minute when I come up for air from this whole
California mess. In the meantime, I've changed this to Enron Energy Services,
Inc.

Thanks,
Kate

Rhonda L Denton
01/31/2001 11:32 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Energy Services, Inc.

509402.  Can you see if this is the correct CP.  We don't have a contract
with them.  If it is correct, that's fine, just let me know.


Please approve comments.


For those of you who were at Sunday study session - I was listening to my
tapes of the Wednesday class and he mentioned three things that can make the
current account different from NX. They are foreign aid, remittances and
income from foreign investments. He did say that in the simple (i.e. OUR)
case they are the same.

--
Peter deVroede
devroede@uppercase.xerox.com


http://www.consultrci.com

************************************************************************
Read SCIENTECH's SourceBook Weekly article: "Making the Wires Sing: Some
Utilities Take on Challenges, Opportunities of Being Wirecoms," at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/Web+Pages/SBEntrance.html
************************************************************************

===============================================================
SCIENTECH IssueAlert, November 1, 2000
NiSource and Columbia Energy Group Complete Merger
By: Will McNamara, Director, Electric Industry Analysis
===============================================================
NiSource Inc. and Columbia Energy Group received approval for their merger
from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and are expected
to close their transaction today. The combined company will continue to
trade on the New York Stock Exchange as NiSource (NYSE: NI). Columbia Energy
Group shares (NYSE: CG) will cease trading before the market opens Nov.
2.

ANALYSIS: It's been a long and rocky road, to say the least, for the $6
billion marriage between these two companies, which reportedly will create
the largest U.S. natural-gas distributor east of the Rocky Mountains. The
union started out as a hostile takeover in June 1999, when NiSource began
making several attempts to purchase all outstanding common shares of Columbia
Energy Group (CEG). All of NiSource's offers were rejected by CEG. In fact,
up until just a year ago, CEG fiercely fought the takeover, claiming that*due
to financial and operational problems*NiSource was not an appropriate marriage
partner. However, after about eight months of offers and rebuffs (with
NiSource offering as much as $74 a share), Columbia Energy Group finally
consented to the $6 billion offer, ironically based on Columbia's February
2000 stock value of $72.60 a share and consequently lower than NiSource's
previous offers.

The merger creates a company that could gain a strong lock on the natural-gas
market in a corridor stretching from Texas to Maine. Merrillville, Ind.-based
NiSource is a holding company (parent company to NIPSCO and Bay State Gas,
among several other distribution companies) with operations in electric,
natural-gas and water distribution in the Midwest and Northeastern United
States. Its generation portfolio includes four coal-fired generating stations,
two hydroelectric generating plants and four gas-fired combustion plants.
NiSource also markets unregulated energy services in key competitive areas.
CEG, based in Herndon, Va., is an energy services company with assets of
approximately $7 billion and ownership of 16,500 miles of interstate gas
pipelines that run from Louisiana to the Northeast. CEG is engaged in nearly
all aspects of the natural-gas business, including exploration and production,
transmission, storage and distribution, as well as propane and petroleum
product sales and electric power generation.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, NiSource is offering 3.04 shares
for each Columbia common share. CEG shareholders can elect to receive New
NiSource stock, or receive a combination of $70 in cash plus $2.60 in
securities.
Just today, NiSource revised its estimate of the number of CEG shares electing
to receive NiSource stock upward to approximately 77 percent from its original
estimate of 60 percent. Regarding current stock performance, NiSource shares
closed $24 15/16 on Oct. 31, not far from a 52-week high of $25 5/8. Shares
of CEG closed at $71 15/16.

Upon completion of the merger, the companies will create a new holding
company (as of yet unnamed) under which NiSource and CEG will become wholly
owned subsidiaries. Together, the companies will serve approximately 3.6
million customers. The companies have identified their post-merger strategy
as growth in "energy supply and distribution, as well as the development
of new energy choices through emergent technologies."

The regulatory approval process for the NiSource / CEG merger went
comparatively
smoothly, finishing just eight months after the formal announcement of
the merger. Yet, the SEC gave its approval to the merger on an important
condition. Under the laws of the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of
1935 (PUHCA), the SEC has required NiSource to divest of IWC Resources,
its water operations subsidiary based in Indianapolis. Under PUHCA, utility
holding companies are required to divest operations that are not integral
to their primary operations. The divestiture must take place within three
years to comply with U.S. legislation, according to NiSource.

Although the merger is small in comparison to recent mega-mergers between
AEP / CSW and PECO / Unicom, this partnership is important. It's not
surprising
that NiSource pursued CEG so diligently, as the acquisition of CEG more
than doubles the size of NiSource and changes it from a predominantly electric
company to a gas transmission and distribution company with electric
operations.
NiSource will own a natural-gas business extending from Chicago to New
England, reportedly placing it as the nation's third-largest natural-gas
company (largest in the West). The completion of the merger comes at an
ideal time for NiSource, just as reports of a shortage in natural-gas supply
indicate that the prices for natural gas will rise significantly this winter
and into next year. As a leading supplier, NiSource will be sitting in
a prime position.

However, the divestiture of IWC Resources is a clear downside to this merger,
at least from NiSource's point of view. Of all the players that have
penetrated
the water industry and then retreated (for example, Enron and Duke), NiSource
was one of the few that stood out as having some success in this heavily
regulated market. In fact, up until recently, NiSource had claimed that
its growth strategy was to build a distribution chain around the core
natural-gas,
electricity and water distribution businesses. More than being a significant
money maker for the company, NiSource's water business provided a steady
cash flow and, perhaps more importantly, access to additional energy
customers.
Water customers as an aggregated group can be very valuable for an energy
company. The company that controls water services has another stable base
of customers to which it can sell electric and gas services. For instance,
NiSource had purchased IWC in part to prevent its competitor, IPALCO
Enterprises,
from obtaining the water customer list in this service territory.

The bottom line of this merger may be that, while other companies are focusing
on building critical mass, the New NiSource is carving out a specific niche
(natural-gas services) in a targeted market (Texas to Northeast). The fact
that it will no longer own IWC Resources may pale in comparison to the
projected growth that the New NiSource may find in the natural-gas business.
Of particular importance to this new company is the ownership of 16,500
miles of interstate gas pipelines gained from CEG. Owning a significant
supply of natural gas in a very tight market may become the real secret
advantage of this merger.
===============================================================
Need to design and implement your IT infrastructure? Learn more about
SCIENTECH's
Information Technology team and what they can do for you at:
http://www.consultrci.com/web/rciweb.nsf/web/Depts-IT.html
===============================================================

SCIENTECH is pleased to provide you with your free, daily IssueAlert. Let
us know if we can help you with in-depth analyses or any other SCIENTECH
information products. If you would like to refer a colleague to receive
our free, daily IssueAlerts, please reply to this email and include their
full name and email address or register directly at:

http://www.consultrci.com/web/infostore.nsf/Products/IssueAlert

Sincerely,

Will McNamara
Director, Electric Industry Analysis
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================
Feedback regarding SCIENTECH's IssueAlert should be sent to
wmcnamara@scientech.com
===============================================================

SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are compiled based on independent analysis by
SCIENTECH
consultants.  The opinions expressed in SCIENTECH's IssueAlerts are not
intended to predict financial performance of companies discussed or to
be the basis for investment decisions of any kind.  SCIENTECH's sole purpose
in publishing its IssueAlerts is to offer an independent perspective regarding
the key events occurring in the energy industry, based on its long-standing
reputation as an expert on energy and telecommunications issues.

Copyright 2000.  SCIENTECH, Inc.

If you do not wish to receive any further IssueAlerts from SCIENTECH, please
reply to this message and in the body of the email type "remove."


This deal was done with Greg Stockard.

D

Julie Meyers
03/13/2000 04:31 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Amoco Energy 2/00

Daren:

You put this in, do have a clue?

Julie

---------------------- Forwarded by Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT on 03/13/2000 04:30
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Megan Parker @ ENRON                           03/13/2000 04:17 PM

To: Julie Meyers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Amoco Energy 2/00

We have a purchase deal in the system, 205116, for Feb. 2000 production that
Amoco does not show.  Can you tell me the trader's name at Amoco that the
deal was done with?

Megan


CONGRATULATIONS!!

*  No Equipment To Buy!  *

You have been selected to receive FREE INSTALLATION of a
Dish Network Satellite TV System!  There is no equipment
to buy.  You can get FREE Professional Installation
in two rooms from Dish Network!
You can also choose to have a Personal Digital Video Recorder installed for free.
(Retail value $499 if you had to buy this!)

This limited time Post Holiday Special is only good for
the next 15 days.

Click here to get your FREE INSTALLATION of a Dish Network
satellite TV System before this promotion expires:
https://www.vmcsatellite.com/channels/order.cfm?sid=199

When you sign up online to receive your FREE Professional
Installation from Dish Network, you?ll get MORE CHANNELS,
up to 150 channels, with CD QUALITY sound and picture
for LESS MONEY than most people pay for their cable TV.
Sign up online now for programming as low as $35.99 per
month for plans w/ one receiver, as low as $40.99 for
plans with two receivers AND you?ll get:

*FREE Professional Installation in two rooms (installation is
  available in up to six rooms!)
*TWO receivers (2) for watching separate programming on each
  TV in different rooms
*NO Credit Check Required
*Up to 150 CHANNELS of CD quality sound and picture
*PROGRAMMING LESS EXPENSIVE than cable TV in most markets
*You can choose a Personal Digital Video Recorder for 35
  hours of tapeless recording of all your favorite shows!
  ($499 retail value if you had to buy this!)

Claim your FREE Professional Installation Now!  This is a
limited-time promotion so hurry!  Click here for online
ordering with real-time confirmation of your order!
https://www.vmcsatellite.com/channels/order.cfm?sid=199

**
This offer is for new Dish Network residential subscribers
only. Previous and existing customers are not eligible.
Offer limited to homes within the continental United States.
Not available in Hawaii, Alaska, or Puerto Rico.  Sorry, no
foreign service is available.
**

Your privacy is very important to us. You requested to
receive this mailing, by registering with Newexpectations
or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners.
As the market leader in permission-based email
marketing, we are committed to delivering our members
outstanding offers that include specials on hot new
products, entertainment, and money-making ideas. We
hope to continue to bring you great offers over the
web in the future. However, if you wish to unsubscribe
please click below:
http://www.em5000.com/unsub.php?client=newexpectations&email=jreitme@enron.com
or
http://www.em5000.com/unsub.php?client=newexpectations
and enter your email address (jreitme@enron.com)


How am I to send them the money for the silent second?  Regular mail, overnight, wire transfer?  I don't see how their bank will make the funds available by Friday unless I wire the money.  If that is what I need to do please send wiring instructions.


No ancillary schedules awarded.  Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.

    LOG MESSAGES:

PARSING FILE -->> H:\Netco Finals\HA0116 Finals_Load.txt

---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table LOAD_SCHEDULE.
     Details: (Hour: 1 / Preferred: 2 / Final: 1.5)
  TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
  MKT_TYPE: HA
  FROM_LOCATION_ID: PGE1


Attached is the updated assignment list.

Marie


Any comments?

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/20/2001 09:38
AM ---------------------------

"Reuter, Marisa" <MReuter@KSLAW.com> on 04/20/2001 09:34:36 AM
To: "'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: FW: This E-mail is sent at the request of M. Kahn and J. DeBerry

Kay:

Attached is a revised draft of the LLC Agreement which has been marked to
indicate the changes from the draft distributed on Friday, April 13.  Since
the most substantive change made to the LLC Agreement reflects
NorthWestern's desire to have the LLC treated as a single member limited
liability company for tax purposes, it might be a good idea to get your tax
team to sign off on the revised draft.  Call me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Marisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Schreiber, Eileen [mailto:EileenSchreiber@paulhastings.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:34 PM
To: 'mreuter@kslaw.com'
Subject: FW: This E-mail is sent at the request of M. Kahn and J.
DeBerry

"paulhastings.com" made the following annotations on 04/19/01 23:34:07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
NEW E-MAIL ADDRESSES AT PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP

We have changed our e-mail address.  Our new domain name is
paulhastings.com.  In most cases, our address is composed of
conventional first name and last name plus @paulhastings.com.  Here are
two examples: janesmith@paulhastings.com and danjones@paulhastings.com.
If you have any questions, please contact us at noc@paulhastings.com.

============================================================================
==
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all computers."

============================================================================
==

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To:
Subject:
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:39:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed ;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C0C9A7.0644FDC0"

 - ATT549306.txt
 - ATT549307.htm
 - LLC Agreement(v4).DOC
 - LLC Agreement(vRED).DOC


John,

Attached is the term sheet concerning the matter we've been "voice mailing"
about.  Please call me at your earliest conveneince concerning conflicts,
scheduling, etc. 713 345 7566.

Thanks,

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/16/2001 09:39
AM ---------------------------

"Henneberry, Lisa G." <LHenneberry@ssd.com> on 01/15/2001 07:38:03 AM
To: "'mark.bernstein@enron.com'" <mark.bernstein@enron.com>,
"'kay.mann@enron.com'" <kay.mann@enron.com>, "'jude.rolfes@enron.com'"
<jude.rolfes@enron.com>
cc: "Ragals, Jr., William C." <WRagals@SSD.COM>

Subject: FW: Draft Coop City Term Sheet

It looks as though this did not go through the first time.  My apologies for
the delay.

Lisa G. Henneberry
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
(Tel)  202-626-6640
(Fax) 202-626-6780
LHenneberry@ssd.com
www.ssd.com <http://www.ssd.com>

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:  Henneberry, Lisa G.
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 10:24 PM
> To: mahonl@pbworld.com; losi@pbworld.com; mark.bernstein@enron.com;
> kay.mann@enron.com; jude.rolfes@enron.com
> Cc: White, Robert I.; Ragals, Jr., William C.; Levey, Kevin S.;
> axz@dmlegal.com; mdc@dmlegal.com
> Subject: Draft Coop City Term Sheet
>
> Further to our discussions last week, attached is a preliminary draft of
> the term sheets for the development of the Coop City project, including
> indicative terms for EPC, O&M, and Asset Management.  Since we haven't yet
> discussed the terms in any significant detail, the attached remains
> somewhat general with respect to some items and includes significant
> assumptions with respect to other.  Nonetheless, it is a starting point
> for our discussions next week.
>
> As discussed last week, for the sake of expediency, this draft is being
> distributed simultaneously to all parties and has not been separately
> reviewed by my clients.  It therefore remains subject to internal review
> and comment.
>
> Next week's meeting has been scheduled at our offices in New York,
> beginning on Wednesday, January 17 at 1:30 p.m. until Thursday afternoon.
> Our offices are located at:
>
> Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
> 350 Park Avenue, 15th floor
> New York, NY
> Tel:  212-872-9800
> Fax: 212-872-9815
>
> We look forward to seeing you then.  In the meantime, should you have any
> questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.  Best regards.
>
>  <<Co-OpCity-TermSheet-0112.doc>>
>
> Lisa G. Henneberry
> Squire, Sanders & Dempsey L.L.P.
> 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
> Washington, D.C. 20004
> (Tel)  202-626-6640
> (Fax) 202-626-6780
> LHenneberry@ssd.com
> www.ssd.com <http://www.ssd.com>
>

 - Co-OpCity-TermSheet-0112.doc


---------------------- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 03/10/2000
12:22 PM ---------------------------

"Rick Antonoff" <rantonof@cwt.com> on 03/10/2000 11:52:38 AM
To: Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Master Netting Agreement

Attached below is our preliminary draft master netting agreement. As we
discussed last week, the draft is designed to be relatively simple and "user
friendly," accommodating a single Enron entity and a single counterparty
entity
engaged in cash settled and physically settled transactions under separate,
pre-existing, respective financial and physical master agreements similar to
those which you have provided to us as examples.

We note a few points about the attached draft:

1.   The terms "master netting agreement" and "master netting agreement
participants" in Section 6 refer to proposed definitions that would be added
to
the Bankruptcy Code upon enactment of the pending legislation. If an agreement
is executed with a counterparty prior to enactment (or if the legislation is
not
enacted), we would amend this provision to incorporate instead the existing
safe
harbor provisions to the extent possible.

2.  We designated Texas law as the governing law (in brackets) based on the
provisions of the ISDA schedule you provided to us.

3.  Notwithstanding that the draft contemplates a single Enron entity, we
included references to Enron affiliates in certain provisions to provide
flexibility in the event that obligations from other Enron entities to the
counterparty should arise in any other context. We think that all such
obligations should be available for setoff against Enron's claims against the
counterparty.

Please call us when you have had an opportunity to review the draft.

(See attached file: #109563 v2 - master netting agreement.doc)

|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|NOTE:  The information in this email is confidential and may be   |
|legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you   |
|must not read, use or disseminate the information.  Although this |
|email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or |
|other defect that might affect any computer system into which it  |
|is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient |
|to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted |
|by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft for any loss or damage arising in|
|any way from its use.                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 - #109563 v2 - master netting agreement.doc


Darrell,

I am sending you 2 technical notes on Enron default swaps: I hope that they
will
be useful. I shall read the articles on weekend. I am curious if you
find these explanations satisfactory.

We are very slow in preparing a number of technical documents
for you for model reviews. We still hope you will be able
to find some time to review our credit models (for our London
credit trading) and  VaR and option pricing related models.

Also, please check your invoices. I still think we owe you money.

Vince

Darrell Duffie <duffie@stanford.edu> on 03/28/2001 08:07:38 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: Re: Enron default swaps

Vince: According to a Bank of America
publication, your (Enron) default swap spreads
are consistently trading about 80
basis points wider than your asset swaps.
Any idea of what is going on here?

Thanks for any guidance, Darrell

_____________________________________________
Darrell Duffie
mail  GSB Stanford CA 94305-5015 USA
phone 650 723 1976
fax   650 725 7979
email duffie@stanford.edu
web   http://www.stanford.edu/~duffie/
_____________________________________________


Mark,

Please remember to call the service tech in reference to the cooling system
in the apartment.  Thanks!

Veronica B.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Kathleen,

Please proceed as outlined.

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           10/10/2000 03:09 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Ledford and Fehr (Illinois Options)

Kay,

Per Karen Way, October 2 is the effective date of the Agreements.  No
Memorandum was prepared (but Karen would be happy to prepare one for us).  I
know it is Bart's practice to execute and file Memorandum's for third party
notice and I personally think it is a good idea.  If you would like, we could
prepare 2 Memorandums from Forms of Memorandums we typically use and send to
Karen for approval of the form of Memorandum for use in Illinois and to get
signed for us.

Please advise.

Kathleen

To: Kathleen Carnahan/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Ledford and Fehr (Illinois Options)

Kathleen,

Please call Karen Way at Piper Rudnick and follow up on the points you
raised.  October 2 sounds good to me for an effective date, but you might as
well check with Karen to see if there is a reason she didn't date it.

Good job.

Thanks,

Kay

	From:  Kathleen Carnahan                           10/10/2000 12:31 PM

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Ledford and Fehr (Illinois Options)

Kay,

When the Ledford's and Fehr's signed the Option Agreements, they did not date
on the signature page however, October 2, 2000 was inserted on page 1 (the
Cover Sheet).  Can I insert October 2, 2000 as the effective date on the
signatue pages?

Also, Paragraph 15 of the Option Agreements refers to a Memorandum to be
executed and recorded in the office of Recorder of Deeds.  Do you know where
these documents are?  It may be that outside counsel has them and will record
them.  If not, I guess we should follow up?

Kathleen


Yes (sort of).  I'm in Houston.  Up on 47.  What's up?


Cheryl:

All resolutions and consents for Enron companies subject to oversight by our
group must be approved by Mark Taylor.

Sara Shackleton
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3801a
Houston, Texas  77002
713-853-5620 (phone)
713-646-3490 (fax)
sara.shackleton@enron.com


AGENT VA/SH BOOKING REF X5JV52

                                          SANDERS/RICHARD B

  ENRON
  1400 SMITH
  HOUSTON TX 77002
  ATTN RICHARD SANDERS

  DATE:  APR 24 2001

CAR                   29JUN ALAMO                  RENO NV
                      14JUL CONFIRMATION: 08889264
                            TELEPHONE: 775-323-7940
                            MINI VAN AUTOMATIC AIR
                            RATE: USD264.00- UNL WY 48.00- XD
                            RATE GUARANTEED DROP CHARGE: 175.00
                            BASE RATE: *AL*USD576.00- BR
                            PICK-UP: RENO-TAHOE INTL AIRPORT RENO
                            DROP-OFF: 6935 NORTHEAST 82ND AVENUE PORTLAND

HOTEL                 08JUL EMBASSY SUITES PORTLAND-DOWNTOWN
                      15JUL 319 SW PINE ST
                            PORTLAND, OR 97204
                            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                            TELEPHONE: 503 279-9000
                            FAX: 503 497-9051
                            TELEX: TLX NONE
                            CONFIRMATION: 81292741
                            REFERENCE: B2DTHR
                            SINGLE ROOM DOUBLE BED
                            RATE: THR USD 152.00 PER NIGHT
                            GUARANTEE GIVEN
                            ZD000002441
             CXL:24 HR CANCELLATION REQUIRED EMBASSY SUITES

                  THANK YOU FOR CALLING VITOL TRAVEL

RICHARD.. CALL ME IF THERE'S ANY PROBLEM .. THX- STEVE

VITOL TRAVEL
1100 LOUISIANA SUITE 3230
HOUSTON TX 77002
713 759-1444


Carol St. Clair
EB 3892
713-853-3989 (Phone)
713-646-3393 (Fax)
carol.st.clair@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Carol St Clair/HOU/ECT on 11/09/00 09:30 AM -----

	Corporate Benefits@ENRON
	Sent by: Enron Announcements@ENRON
	11/07/00 09:48 PM

		 To: All Enron Worldwide employees
		 cc:
		 Subject: Open Enrollment 2001 Deadline

This message is intended for US employees eligible for Enron's domestic
health & group benefit plans.

Please click on the link for details regarding Open Enrollment 2001.

http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/2001change.pps


Well, it looks like we have the commitment and scope necessary to improve the accuracy of the daily risk information.  Hopefully, GRMO will now focus on the overall validity of the data and not continue to count the failures without understanding the impact.  Would like to bring you up to date.  I will try to get on your calendar or just stop by your office.

Welcome back.

Wanda

-----Original Message-----
From: Beck, Sally
Sent: Wed 9/5/2001 8:48 PM
To: Buy, Rick; Piper, Greg
Cc: Apollo, Beth; Wilson, Shona; Victorio, Tom; Murphy, Ted; Bradford, William S.; Port, David; Curry, Wanda; Brackett, Debbie R.; Gossett, Jeffrey C.; White, Stacey W.; Jordan, Mike; Stocker, Steve; Pickering, Mark; Perlman, Beth
Subject: RE: Reconciliation Across Risk Applications

Rick and Greg:

Wanda has done a good job of capturing some of the points that she, Beth Apollo and I discussed recently.

Rick, as you and I discussed in our meeting on August 9, we have spent many months documenting discrepancies between source systems (ERMS, Enpower, etc.) and RisktRAC, and the implications for V@R calculations and Credit Aggregation.  The process of a daily meeting and a tracking tool for discrepancies helped to identify true operational process issues that have been addressed.  As we discussed, our daily tracking has now for months documented evidence pointing to the true underlying issue-- that the linkage of information between source systems and RisktRAC is not smooth and reliable, and has never been appropriately addressed for its completeness, accuracy and efficiency.  I applaud the IT team who delivered the analytical tools that are valuable in RisktRAC.  Now it is time to align business rules employed across source systems, V@R calculations and CreditAg and to partner the IT resources from source systems and RisktRAC to solve the underlying problem.

In my meeting with Rick Buy, I volunteered to take ownership of fixing the problem, obviously with much help from the operations teams, IT resources and Rick's designated RAC stakeholder, Debbie Brackett.  Our focus on this project is global, and will be threefold, assuring that agreements on business rules and changes in processes or systems  will deliver ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS and EFFICIENCY.  Wanda's summary seems to allude to a daily reconciliation process that will take place,  To clarify, our purpose in this project will be to create systematic checks, control totals and exception reporting so that humans do not have to implement a daily reconciliation process.

Wanda is a little ahead of herself with the 60 to 90 day timeline.  We do not have a firm timeline established yet.  We have designated business and IT resources, and are in the process of discussing with London how they will be involved.  We have had a preliminary meeting with Steve  Stock and he is on board and understands that we must make meaningful progress in a short period of time.  With the exception of London, Steve has the necessary IT resources reporting to him for both RisktRAC and source systems.  Steve is reviewing some diagnostics from his architecture group, and then we will be at the point of delineating milestones and timelines within the next 10 days.  We do anticipate a relatively short timeframe for results on this effort, but that is not yet defined.

We are creating a steering committee and project management office for this project with operations, RAC and IT members that will be appropriate, but not too large.  We want to focus on getting the work done.  I will gladly update all on this distribution list in the next 10 days on  our finalized steering committee, project managers, definition of outcomes from the project and planned completion dates.  We look forward to the opportunity to solve this data discrepancy issue in a definitive way.  --Sally

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Curry, Wanda
Sent:   Tuesday, September  4, 2001 10:00 AM
To:     Buy, Rick; Piper, Greg
Cc:     Beck, Sally; Apollo, Beth; Wilson, Shona; Victorio, Tom; Murphy, Ted; Bradford, William S.; Port, David
Subject:        Reconciliation Across Risk Applications

Rick and Greg,

I met with Sally and Beth on August 24th to discuss the operational risk management initiative requiring a reconciliation across all major risk applications.  This reconciliation is necessary to validate the transfer of all data from

source systems, i.e. risk books, into risk applications which calculate VAR, provide credit exposures,  feed Infinity with daily cash flows and ultimately the DPR.

Sally and Beth, along with IT, have initiated a project to improve and monitor the accuracy and efficiency of these daily interfaces.  The scope includes a review of the processes which  impact the accuracy of  information, timing of interfaces, production performance issues, inventory of books and improved controls over changes to book attributes, and the officialization process.  They have agreed to add a requirement to provide, on a daily basis, this reconciliation across all major risk applications.

The projected  timeline to complete this project, including the reconciliation initiative, is 60 to 90 days.  We will need to reassess the decision to combine these initiatives, if the GRMO timeline slips.

This daily risk applications reconciliation will provide four key metrics not currently available:

1) the ability to track data "accuracy" in terms of the percentage of information which transferred and processed correctly, vs. just unique "failures".  How complete is the data?

2) the ability to validate the accuracy of exception reporting (are all failures included on the exception reports?)

3) the ability to validate Infinity cash flows

4) Reconciliation of values (volumes, PRMA &PRML and cash flows), not # of books processed.

Please call me if you would like to discuss.

Wanda Curry


Start Date: 10/10/01; HourAhead hour: 12;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.