Good morning, Valerie.  I don't believe we did get the e-mail yesterday!!
Please resend.

Rosalee

"Petersen, Valerie" <valerie.petersen@yale.edu> on 11/07/2000 07:02:40 AM
To: "'Kenneth.Lay@enron.com'" <Kenneth.Lay@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: RE: Panel on Valuation

Great. Let me know if you didn't get yesterday's email regarding Nov 20. It
had the call-in number.

Valerie

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth.Lay@enron.com [mailto:Kenneth.Lay@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 6:28 PM
To: Garten, Jeffrey
Subject: Re: Panel on Valuation

Ken Lay can do November 20 at 5 p.m. EST or November 27 at 6 p.m. EST.
November 21 is not good for him.

Thanks.

Rosalee

"Garten, Jeffrey" <jeffrey.garten@yale.edu> on 11/02/2000 10:51:36 AM

To:   "'Len@shv.com'" <Len@shv.com>, "'jdoerr@kpcb.com'" <jdoerr@kpcb.com>,
      "'robg@real.com'" <robg@real.com>, "'larry_kanarek@mckinsey.com'"
      <larry_kanarek@mckinsey.com>, "'HHK@sprintmail.com'"
      <HHK@sprintmail.com>, "'kenneth.lay@enron.com'"
      <kenneth.lay@enron.com>, "'blev@stern.nyu.edu'" <blev@stern.nyu.edu>,
      "'jbneff@wellmanage.com'" <jbneff@wellmanage.com>,
      "'nperetsman@allenco.com'" <nperetsman@allenco.com>,
      "'hadlow@blackstone.com'" <hadlow@blackstone.com>,
      "'carlsonl@blackstone.com'" <carlsonl@blackstone.com>,
      "'depowell@cisco.com'" <depowell@cisco.com>,
      "'David.L.Shedlarz@pfizer.com'" <David.L.Shedlarz@pfizer.com>,
      "'rick/sherlund@gs.com'" <rick@gs.com>, "'jstiglitz@brookings.edu'"
      <jstiglitz@brookings.edu>, "'Hal@sims.berkeley.edu'"
      <Hal@sims.berkeley.edu>
cc:   "'tim_koller@mckinsey.com'" <tim_koller@mckinsey.com>,
      "'avalles@kpcb.com'" <avalles@kpcb.com>, "'Lliming@real.com'"
      <Lliming@real.com>, "'jeanne_giles@mckinsey.com'"
      <jeanne_giles@mckinsey.com>, "'rosalee.fleming@enron.com'"
      <rosalee.fleming@enron.com>, "'kboles@allenco.com'"
      <kboles@allenco.com>, "'dryan@cisco.com'" <dryan@cisco.com>,
      "'jfielding@gs.com'" <jfielding@gs.com>, "'tmerkle@brook.edu'"
      <tmerkle@brook.edu>, "'lucy@sims.berkeley.edu'"
      <lucy@sims.berkeley.edu>, "'carolyn_hubbard@mckinsey.com'"
      <carolyn_hubbard@mckinsey.com>, "Petersen, Valerie"
      <valerie.petersen@yale.edu>
Subject:  Panel on Valuation

I am sorry for the delay in getting back to you with a revision of the
paper.

Attached please find a revised summary by Tim Koller.  We hope it reflects
well the discussion of our previous meeting. Before the next meeting, it is
our intention to send along the longer discussion paper that would mirror
this summary.  I suggest this next meeting take place as a conference call
at one of the following times.  Please indicate with an "X" in the boxes
next to the proposed dates which dates are good for you.

               Monday, November 20, 5 p.m. EST     [ X  ]

               Tuesday, November 21, 5 pm EST      [   ]

               Monday November 27, 6 pm EST        [ X  ]

We would like to get everyone's views in advance of this conference call,
either in writing or by phone.  Please indicate below what your preference
would be.  If a call is preferred, Valerie Petersen will contact your
office
to set it up.

               Call [   ]

               Writing   [   ]

There will be one last meeting scheduled after the conference call meeting
takes place to go over the final draft.

Look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks very much,
Jeff

 <<SEC Doc Draft 1029 short.doc>>

(See attached file: SEC Doc Draft 1029 short.doc)


Unplanned Losses - ($897.50)
Static Sch Fees - $49.00

Total - ($848.05)

ERCOT Sch Fees - $217.80


We don't have to meet with them....
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 10/13/2000 02:55
PM ---------------------------
From: Suzanne Adams@ECT on 10/13/2000 02:49 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:

Subject: Bruce Silvers

Ok, you are on to meet with Bruce and Nick at 4:30-5pm, depending on traffic,
at their offices located at 399 Park Avenue.


---------------------- Forwarded by Randall L Gay/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2000 05:00
PM ---------------------------

"JERUSSALMY, ALEXANDRE" <AJERUSSALMY@bkb.com> on 04/17/2000 11:35:02 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
cc:
Subject: Brazil Trends - April 2000

Please find attached the latest version of BankBoston's Brazil Trends (in
English and in Portuguese).

Our best regards.

>  <<cleani.doc>>  <<cleanp.doc>>
>  English  Portuguese

 - cleani.doc
 - cleanp.doc


Here's what I have...
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 08/29/2000 06:33
PM ---------------------------

"Keenan, Kevin" <KKeenan@KSLAW.com> on 08/25/2000 09:28:16 AM
To: "'Kay.Mann@enron.com'" <Kay.Mann@enron.com>
cc: "Keffer, John" <JKeffer@KSLAW.com>

Subject: ENA - Wheeling Pittsburgh Consignment

Ms. Mann:

Please find attached, in response to your email yesterday to John Keffer,
(i) a memo to you discussing the status of the above-mentioned transaction,
(ii) a draft (and redline against our prior draft) of the Consignment Sales
Agreement, and (iii) a form of Consent to Priority Status to be signed by
creditors of Wheeling Pittsburgh in connection with the consignment.

Please feel free to call either John or me if you have any questions or
would like to discuss the points raised in the memo.

Best regards,

Kevin D. Keenan
King & Spalding (Houston)
713-276-7368

                    Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.

 - Consent to Priority Status.DOC
 - Redline ENA - Wheeling Pittsburgh Consignment Agreement.DOC
 - ENA - Wheeling Consignment Agreement.DOC
 - Wheeling Pittsburgh Memo.DOC


Chonawee,

There are many interesting papers on executive stock options.

Keep bugging me for them.

Vince

Chonawee Supatgiat@ENRON
07/10/2000 03:33 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: short-sell vs exercise

Thank you, Vince.
I understand this tax effect already when you explained it to me in your
office this morning.
I agree with you that short-selling is not so good, especially for me,
because I have
a significant capital loss this year. I definitely don't want to increase my
capital loss carry over.
(The short-selling idea might work for a person who wants to exercise his
options and
already has a huge capital gain this year. Unfortunately, it is not me.)
Thanks again for pointing this out.
The "employee stock option with taxes" problem sounds interesting. I will
think more about it when I have free time.
-chonawee

Vince J Kaminski@ECT
07/10/2000 01:57 PM
To: Chonawee Supatgiat/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: short-sell vs exercise

Chonawee,

As I have pointed out, short-selling the stock may be a bad
decision because of tax implications (ignoring the legal aspects).

Suppose the strike is $70 and you were granted an ATM option.
You  sell short at $70 ten lots (one lot  = 100 shares). The price goes to
$100.
You lose $30 x 1000 = $30,000 on your short position. Option exercise
gives you $30,000. This is before taxes. You pay taxes
on your option income (it's treated as ordinary income). The tax is
28% x $30,000 = $8,400. You can use only $3,000 of your loss against
ordinary income. This saves you only $840 in taxes.

Of course, if you have capital gains, you can use losses on your option
position
as an offset.

The remaining part of your capital loss  is carried forward and you get the
tax benefits over time (less the time value of money), assuming you have
income in the
future (or capital gains).

Not so good.

By the way, valuation and optimal exercise of employee stock options
is a very interesting and difficult problem.

Vince

Chonawee Supatgiat@ENRON
07/10/2000 11:40 AM
To: Stinson Gibner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: short-sell vs exercise

Below is my writing that was originally planned to post somewhere. It
explains how to handle a special type of call options which can be exercised
but cannot be sold. (As we know that it is never optimal to exercise a call
option before its maturity). However, after taking Vince's comments on the
ordinary income/capital loss TAX offsetting issue, I think this is not a good
article anymore. I guess I could just throw this article away. :-)
-chonawee

Short-selling is better than exercising your employee stock options

In general, the sensible time to exercise your employee stock option is when
you speculate that ENE is going down or its growth rate is extremely low. In
fact, when exercising the options, you are speculating that ENE would never
reach this point (plus interest) again during the 10 years maturity date or
until you leave the company. If you do not anticipate that, you should hold
on to your options because you can gain higher profit by delaying your
exercise.

However, if you believe that ENE is reaching its peak. Then, instead of
exercising the options, you should short-sell (or sell) the stocks in that
amount. After short-selling, when you feel that the stock starts to go up,
you can buy them back (to cover), make profit, and still keep the options. On
the other hand, if the stock does not go down as expect, you can exercise the
options to cover your short position anytime.

Let us take a look at a simple case where there are no taxes, no dividends,
and zero risk-free rate. Suppose that ENE follows a simple sample path as
follow

If you exercise 100 ENE options with a grant price of 45 when ENE reaches 70,
you would earn  (70-45)*100 = $2,500. But if you short sell 100 ENE at 70, no
matter how much ENE is in the future, you can exercise the options to cover
the short position and still earn (70-45)*100 = $2,500. The advantage of
short-selling comes when ENE at the period 2 is 60. At this point, you can
cover your short position, get (70-60)*100 = $1,000, and still keep your
options or you can exercise the options and gain $2,500. That is, you still
keep the flexibility of your options when you short-sell. In conclusion, the
only sensible time to exercise your employee stock options is to cover your
short position.


Paul,

Attached is the Reserve Report form 9/00 with a qualifier of rr900, a letter
explaning why production has dropped, a spreadsheet with updated production
vs. line pressures and a net back calculation sheet (utilized for wellhead
pricing) . As soon as I get the updated LOE's, I will send them to you.

Jim

Gerald, please see the pressure letter and graph.  For your information.

 - SA VPP GAS.exe
 - San Arroyo Pressure Letter.doc
 - Sa Production  Line Pressure  Graphs.xls
 - Netback calculation - Crescndo.xls


murdrum (MUR-drum) noun

   1. The killing of a human being in a secret manner.

   2. The fine payable to the king by the hundred where such a killing
      occurred, unless the killer was produced or the victim proved to
      be a Saxon.

[From Medieval Latin, from Old French, murdre, murder.]

   "[F]or the unsolved murders of Frenchmen, they inflicted a particularly
   punitive version of the long-lasting murdrum fine ..."
   Saint George for England.
   Rebecca Colman, Saint George for England, Contemporary Review, Apr 1997.

Did you notice that today's word is a palindrome? Two other palindromic
words have made the AWAD list so far: minim and Nauruan.           -Anu

This week's theme: words that make one say, I didn't know there was a word
for that.

.............................................................................
Nowadays, people can be divided into three classes - the Haves, the
Have-Nots, and the Have-Not-Paid-for-What-They-Haves. -Earl Wilson, newspaper
columnist (1907-1987)

Looking for a word previously featured in AWAD? An alphabetical index is
available at http://wordsmith.org/awad/wordlist.html . For the chronological
archives, visit http://wordsmith.org/awad/archives.html.  Send mail to
wsmith@wordsmith.org to get archives by email.

Pronunciation:
http://wordsmith.org/words/murdrum.wav
http://wordsmith.org/words/murdrum.ram


Hey buddy, how are things  going?
Pam  Oliverio
Staff  Assistant
Health Information  Management
(304) 598-4109 ext.  3007oliveriop@rcbhsc.wvu.edu


Kay, can you handle this stuff for me. thxs

Regards
Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/03/2000
11:59 AM ---------------------------

tammy.r.shepperd@enron.com on 11/03/2000 11:28:55 AM
To: ddelain2@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer

SHEPPERD,TAMMY R   has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your
approval.  You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP
at http://pep.corp.enron.com  and going to Supervisor Services.  Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on SHEPPERD,TAMMY R   until you have
approved the list.


Even though I voted Republican, I thought this was hysterical!  Here's hoping
we have a new president - any president - soon! SRS

 - mini me.jpg


Shirley,

No problem.

Vince

Shirley Crenshaw
04/18/2000 08:00 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kevin G Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT, William Smith/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Vacation

Vince:

If it is allright, I would like to take two days vacation, Monday and Tuesday
April 24 and 25.

Please let me know.

Thanks!


I have a 2:00 meeting with a customer.  It should only last about an hour, but I might be able to be there until 3:15 or 3:30.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Betancourt, Ramona
Sent:	Monday, November 26, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Kedwaii, Hasan; Duff, David; Brown, Elizabeth; Hoang, Joe; Trevino, Linda; Donoho, Lindy; Doll, Jeanette
Subject:	FW: Follow-Up on East of California Busines Changes

Please plan to attend a meeting on Tuesday, 11/27/01 at 3:00pm in room 3907  to discuss PLE, TMS, CBS, & Rate system changes that would be required to add additional areas or basins to TW in order to handle this request from Marketing and regulatory regarding TW's East of California rate structure tariff issues. If I have missed anyone on the distribution list, please forward. A decision is needed on this item by 11/29/01.

Thanks Ramona
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brady, Andy
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:44 AM
To:	Betancourt, Ramona
Cc:	Brown, Elizabeth; Trevino, Linda
Subject:	RE: Follow-Up

Ramona,

Please take this and run with it and find out what the best solution is.  We need information on what the different options are and what the best solution is for January implementation of the change.  Let me know what help you might need.  The major impact seems to be to TMS and Accounting, with minor affects to CRS and CMS (determining credit and gaining the correct max rate).  We really need to have the solution defined by the Tuesday after Thanksgiving, or earlier if possible.

Thanks a bunch and let me know.

ab.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Betancourt, Ramona
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:23 AM
To:	Brady, Andy
Cc:	Brown, Elizabeth; Trevino, Linda
Subject:	RE: Follow-Up

Andy,
I wanted to clarify on the item related to the West of Thoreau area.
To me, I think that we could create a new Basin in PLE and call it East of California. The area is still W. of Thoreau with two basins in that area. Maybe  check with Elizabeth to make sure she agrees. I have attached the POI view of one of the points that should be changed to the East of California basin. Let me know what you think.

Thanks Ramona

 << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >>

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Brady, Andy
Sent:	Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:51 AM
To:	Lokey, Teb; Doll, Jeanette; Rapp, Bill; Trevino, Linda; Licciardo, Jeanne; Brown, Elizabeth; Betancourt, Ramona
Subject:	Follow-Up

I know it has been a while, but I wanted to send you the follow-up on our conversation last week, to make sure I heard everything correctly.

Please let me know if the notes don't correctly reflect your memory of the conversations.

Thanks a bunch!

ab.

 << File: TW CMS Project Business Meeting Agenda - Results.doc >>

Andy Brady
Enron Transportation Service, IT
Work Phone - 713-853-7110
Work Fax - 713-853-6756


Jana,

"Cotton Mary" sounds good. It's a film by Ismail Merchant who collaborated
on "A Room with a View", "Howard's View", and other well known movies.
It's a story about two Anglo-Indian sisters.

Vince

Jlpnymex@aol.com on 04/11/2000 08:02:45 AM
To: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Re: (no subject)

Vince,

The Angelika has several movies that would be good.  I am familiar with all
but one--"Cotton Mary."  Do you know anything about it?

If you still haven't seen "American Beauty", that is fine with us.  Just let
me know what sounds good to you. We are  flexible when it comes to movies.

Jana


I completely forgot to call you this afternoon...it got kind of crazy around
here.  If you're going to be at the flat any time tomorrow shoot me off and
email and I'll call you in the morning, ....otherwise I'll talk to you
tomorrow when you get to H-town.


broker has palo verde

533220


Start Date: 1/16/02; HourAhead hour: 17;  HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.


<<Neal Short Bonds Exe.xls>>

David L. Shine
Vice President-Investments
UBS PaineWebber
1111 Bagby, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 654-0396  Direct
(800) 553-3119  Toll Free
(713) 654-4723  Fax

 <<...OLE_Obj...>>

******************************************************
Notice Regarding Entry of Orders and Instructions:
Please do not transmit orders and/or instructions
regarding your UBSPaineWebber account(s) by e-mail.
Orders and/or instructions transmitted by e-mail will
not be accepted by UBSPaineWebber and UBSPaineWebber
will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.

Notice Regarding Privacy and Confidentiality:
UBSPaineWebber reserves the right to monitor and
review the content of all e-mail communications sent
and/or received by its employees.
 - Neal Short Bonds Exe.xls


Lysa is sending flowers on our (sue, you me and Alan) behalf after we hear
how the surgery went.

 -----Original Message-----
From:  Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Shapiro, Richard; Kaufman, Paul; Steffes, James D.; Kingerski, Harry;
Mara, Susan; Alamo, Joseph; skean@enron.com; Denne, Karen
Subject: Bev's out Wed-Mon with Surgery

FYI.  Bev just phoned.  Assuming all goes well---and it should----she'll back
on her feet and working next Tuesday.

Best,
Jeff


JUNE 2                   TECO TAP           56.250/ HPL IFERC
                                   TEXOMA               20.000/ HPL IFERC
                                   LS HPL KATY       40.000/ ENRON

JUNE 3                     TECO TAP             30.000/ ENRON

60.000/
HPL IFERC

JUNE 4                       TECO TAP              75.000/ HPL IFERC


Thanks
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)


quit flattering yourself.  it was a male looking at you and he told me!  how do you feel about that?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:16 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

stop lying, you dont have to be embarrased, I understand

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:15 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

then i guess it is a fact that a male was staring at you.

i am laughing so hard!!!! :)

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

I wasnt accusing you I was just stating a fact

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:13 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

i can't tell because then you would acuse them of staring at you too.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:11 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

no I dont know how it works, and who told you

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:10 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

don't you have messenger

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:09 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:	RE:

nobody told you, dont lie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Nelson, Michelle
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:08 PM
To:	Maggi, Mike
Subject:	RE:

damn you caught me.  and for your information, i didn't notice it...someone told me about it!  so whatever to you mr. allergy man!!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Maggi, Mike
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 3:07 PM
To:	Nelson, Michelle
Subject:

if you werent always staring at me you wouldnt notice my eyes


---------------------- Forwarded by Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT on 11/01/2000 01:19
PM ---------------------------

	From:  Kori Loibl                           10/31/2000 01:52 PM

To: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alicia Perkins/HOU/EES@EES, Crystal
Hyde/HOU/ECT@ECT, Purvi Patel/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer Reside/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sherry Dawson/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan M Scott/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tobin
Carlson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Pleus/Enron Communications@Enron Communications,
Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beau
Ratliff/HOU/EES@EES, Brian Hoskins/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: [Fwd: FW: Success. . .]

>
> Ah life,
>
> If you stop and think about it, this is sad, but true........
>
> At Age 4...................Success is........Not peeing in your pants
>
> At Age 12.................Success is........Having friends
>
> At Age 16.................Success is........Having a Driver's License
>
> At Age 20.................Success is........Having Sex
>
> At Age 35.................Success is........Having money
>
> At Age 50.................Success is........Having money
>
> At Age 60.................Success is........Having Sex
>
> At Age 70.................Success is........Having a Driver's License
>
> At Age 75.................Success is........Having friends
>
> At Age 80.................Success is........Not peeing your pants


Please handle.  Thank you.  Jim

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Smith, Bruce
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 7:56 AM
To:	Jim Derrick@ENRON
Subject:	RE: Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

Jim-

I am the director over the North and South American remote sites.  My team is directly and indirectly involved in backups of voice and data for these sites.  Is there someone I should be working with to determine what to do at these sites ?

Thanks
Bruce

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON   On Behalf Of Jim Derrick@ENRON
Sent:	Thursday, October 25, 2001 11:55 PM
To:	All Enron Worldwide@ENRON
Subject:	Important Announcement Regarding Document Preservation

As you know, Enron, its directors, and certain current and former officers are defendants in litigation in Federal and State court involving the LJM partnerships.

Enron has employed counsel and they will represent Enron and its interests in the litigation.

Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, we are required to preserve documents that might be used in the litigation.

Accordingly, our normal document destruction policies are suspended immediately and shall remain suspended until further notice.

Please retain all documents (which include handwritten notes, recordings, e-mails, and any other method of information recording) that in any way relate to the Company's related party transactions with LJM 1 and LJM 2, including, but not limited to, the formation of these partnerships, any transactions or discussions with the partnerships or its agents, and Enron's accounting for these transactions.

You should know that this document preservation requirement is a requirement of Federal law and you could be individually liable for civil and criminal penalties if you fail to follow these instructions.

You should know that Enron will defend these lawsuits vigorously.  In the meantime, you should not discuss matters related to the lawsuits with anyone other than the appropriate persons at Enron and its counsel.

If you have any questions, please contact Jim Derrick at 713-853-5550.


----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/30/2001 04:57 PM -----

	Aparna Rajaram/ENRON@enronXgate
	05/30/2001 04:50 PM

		 To: Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Samuel Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Bernice
Rodriguez/ENRON@enronXgate, Steve Venturatos/ENRON@enronXgate, Samuel
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom
Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Frank L
Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Ken Curry/ENRON@enronXgate, Nicole
Hunter/ENRON@enronXgate, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Angela Y
Brown/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Karen
Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Fraisy George/ENRON@enronXgate, Tandra
Coleman/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
		 cc:
		 Subject: ClickPaper Approvals, 05-30-01

Please see attached.

Aparna Rajaram
Ph: (713) 345-4563
Fax: (713) 853-9476
Aparna.Rajaram@enron.com


Below you will find the full contact information.Please have a copy sent to
Richard Lassander as well.
-----

;

Don Keith

Treasurer

Nova Scotia Power Inc.

1894 Barrington St 9th Floor

Scotia Square

Halifax NS

Canada

B3J 3 A8

Phone 902- 428-6848

fax; 902-428-6181

The website for the CP is http://www.nspower.ca/

Their finacials can be found at http://www.emera.com/

Please note that NSPI (Emera) is a publicly traed utility -- they are not
gov't owned.

;
;
-----Original Message-----
From: Lassander, Richard
Sent: Mon 21/05/2001 18:33
To: Fraser, Jennifer
Cc:
Subject: NSPI - ISDA

Jen,
An update with regards to the Nova Scotia Power ISDA. After several days of
trying to hunt down Brant Reves he referred me to Rudwell Johnson in Credit.
He in turn sent me back to Tana Jones because there is an ISDA issued and you
don't have to renew it if it is already in place. I go back to Tana Jones to
see if the ISDA sent to Nova Scotia in July 1999 included Weather
Derivatives. Tana Jones referred me back to Sara Shackleton. I left a voice
mail with Sara this afternoon. Through this process I found out that the ISDA
sent to NSPI in July 1999 was never executed and we need to execute it before
we can do any deals with them. I was under the impression that we already
have been doing deals with them.

;

Richard Lassander
Enron Global Markets
Phone: 713-345-7600
Fax: 713-758-8400


When: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:30 PM-2:30 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: ECS 5112

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Please plan to attend a meeting today at 1:30 p.m. in ECS 5112 to discuss Rate Feeds for UBS.  We need to ensure that everyone will get the rate feeds that they expect to see in the various systems.  We need to make sure that there are no holes in the process!


Bruno,

Julie Gomez relayed your concern regarding the last sentence of Article II, Section 2(a).  I have revised the sentence as you requested.  Please forward 2 executed copies of the LOI to Julie, whereupon she  will sign and return you a fully executed version.

Thanks for your assistance. Looking forward to working with you on this matter.

Steve Van Hooser


what's up with the biz? is he an associate?
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Bass/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000 08:45 AM
---------------------------

Joan Woodson
08/10/2000 08:28 AM
To: Angela Matheson/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: And the WINNERS are . . . .Campaign Begins

---------------------- Forwarded by Joan Woodson/HOU/ECT on 08/10/2000 08:26
AM ---------------------------

	Enron Investment Partners

	From:  Bert Frazier                           08/09/2000 05:24 PM

To: Joan Woodson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Crissy Collett/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
cc:
Subject: And the WINNERS are . . . .Campaign Begins

Congratulations!  You've all won!

...Now comes the fun part....

The following have made a team for the game show on August 17th!.

Thanks to all who volunteered.  You will remain as alternates.

Analyst Team Participants:

Analyst Team 1: Coach:  Lisa Gilette
   Kristen Quinn, Sarah Mulholland, Samuel Pak, Daniel Kang

Analyst Team 2: Coach:  Doug Sewell
   Jeffrey Synder, Ryan Hinze, Sheetal Patel, Johnathan Anderson

Associate Team Participants:

Associate Team 1: Coach:  Ben Markey
   Mary John, Russell Dyk, Webb Jennings, Martin Gonzales

Mixed A/ATeam 2: Coach:  Melanie King
   Brandon Luna - Analyst, Bryan Hull - Analyst, Eduardo Tellechea -
Associate, Milson Mundim - Associate

Alternates:  Heather Johnson, Usman Shaukat, Gerard Benitez, Matthew Almy,
Travis Hanson

WHO WANTS TO HELP MILLIONS FOR UNITED WAY?
We hope you do!

How to Pledge:
This year it is very easy to make your contribution. Simply type in the
following United Way link, http://unitedway.enron.com or go directly to
Internet Explorer or Netscape and type in unitedway.enron.com in the address
field.  Either option should take you directly to Enron's United Way 2000
Campaign site.

PLEASE NOTE:  Your pledge is to be made electronically - it only takes
minutes.  No physical pledge cards.

Questions:  If you have any questions regarding the pledging process, please
contact Joan Woodson (3-5213), Bert Frazier (3-5076) or Kathy Mayfield
(3-3264).


The following expense report is ready for approval:

Employee Name: Chris Germany
Status last changed by:  Automated Administrator
Expense Report Name: ChrisGermany050901
Report Total: $205.94
Amount Due Employee: $205.94

To approve this expense report, click on the following link for Concur
Expense.
http://xms.enron.com


done

Jackie Young
02/03/2000 10:13 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: 98-3405 Activity Being Allocated/Nomed @ 98-9643

Daren,

Wanted to let you know that there are still two sitara deals that need to
have the expected volume brought down to "0" of the list that I previously
sent you.
They are 114099 and 92918.

I appreciate you revising the ones that you have and you probably were going
to handle the above two today.  In case you were please disregard this
notice.  If you had fogotten, this can serve as reminder.

As usual, thanks for your help.

-Jackie-
3-9497


Please call us ASAP regarding the possible trip to Georgia for the kids.  We are looking at July 23rd or 24th and returning July 28th.  But we need to talk to you.

Home 281-304-8303
Kristi's Cell 832-563-6328

DG


The following original documents, received today, have been forwarded for
your immediate review and consideration:

Sysco Food Services of Houston, Inc. v. The Creole Shack 1, LP d/b/a The
Creole Shack, et al. (including Enron Investment Parnters); No. 744293, In
the CCCL No. 3, Harris County, Texas.  CITATION, PETITION, ATTACHMENT and
EXHIBITS to Enron Investment Partners Co. by process server on 12/4/00.

PLEASE ADVISE IF NOT RECEIVED WITHIN 1 BUSINESS DAY.

Thank you !!

Becky A. Stephens
Litigation Unit, Support Services Coordinator
713/853-5025
EB4809


Kirk,
This is really dangerous... having a marketing guy talk to you about engineering matters.  However, since we've recently worked with our other power plants to get them up and running, the data is still pretty fresh.  If I'm speaking out of school here, my operations and/or engineering buddies will be quick to correct me.

At the proposed take-off point to your Big Sandy Project, flowing gas on TW is in the range of 850 - 900 psig.  We provide a minimum of 800 psig to the LDC's connected with us at the California border.

Therefore, for purposes of your take-away lateral pipeline design, I'd say that 800 psig is probably a pretty good target number.  However, I must stress that the 800 psig is a flowing gas number, and would surely be impacted by how the gas is taken.  That is to say that TW may provide the 800 psig pressure if and only if all of the downstream operators folllow their schedules for delivery.  For example, none of our new power plants can simply ramp-up without giving TW ample notice of start-up and scheduling an appropriate quantity of gas.

We can get into more detail regarding the requirements for operating the Big Sandy delivery point and scheduling gas on TW to meet the plant's requirements at a later date.  Suffice it to say that a plant the size of the Big Sandy project presents some unique operating challenges to TW.   TW has but 1.1 Bcf/d of gas flowing westward.  Directly-connected gas turbines can quickly deplete TW's linepack.  However, that being said, we will do our best to work with Big Sandy as well as our other power plant partners to try and meet the loading requirements of the facilities.

My gas control coordinator is about go on his honeymoon during the middle 2 weeks of May.  We should think about having our meeting after he returns (after May 25?) so that we have not only our engineers, but the proper operations and gas control personnel present also.  Check you calendar and let me know what dates might work for you guys.

Thanks,
Jeff

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kirk Ketcherside <igi@nctimes.net>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Kirk+20Ketcherside+20+3Cigi+40nctimes+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Tuesday, May 01, 2001 1:02 PM
To:	Fawcett, Jeffery
Cc:	Tim
Subject:	Big Sandy Project pressure information

Jeff,
As a follow-up to my phone mail message of last Friday, I wanted to
verify for Tim's work, what the expected minimum inlet pressure would be
off of your pipeline, delivered into our proposed Project line (at the
proposed interconnect).

This information plays directly into the current engineering work that
he is leading.

Per your good suggestion, I also want to schedule a meeting to be held
in the next couple of weeks, in efforts to further our Project
interconnect discussion.

Thank you.
Kirk

Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com wrote:
>
> Kirk,
> Great to hear that the project is moving forward.  I think TW feels it's
> emotionally vested at this point!  I will ask the Facility Planning folks
> to get started on providing a more detailed "budget quality" estimate of
> the cost to construct the interconnect and metering station.  With recent
> changes in FERC regulations concerning pregranted authority to construct
> delivery points, TW can immediately proceed to build without the
> complication of a FERC prior notice filing as was required in the past.
>
> Therefore, the only limiting factor at this point is the time it takes to
> put together the estimate, as well as the documentation we'll need in order
> to implement a new delivery point on the system.  To this end, I see the
> following documents:
>
>      1.  Letter Agreement authorizing TW to open a work order to proceed
> with the budget quality estimate.  This will involve a commitment by Big
> Sandy to reimburse TW for the cost of the engineering if Big Sandy
> ultimately pulls out of the project.
>      2.  A Facilities Construction and Operating Agreement providing for
> the reimbursement by Big Sandy for TW's construction of the tap and/or
> metering station.  This agreement would also provide for TW's operation of
> the metering station if Big Sandy elects to it to TW specification in order
> to avoid the CIAC.
>      3.  An Operator Balancing Agreement (OBA), a standard tariff form
> agreement defining the role of Big Sandy as delivery point operator as well
> as the disposition of any volumetric imbalances that may accrue during the
> month.
>
> >From a timeline standpoint, we can be in the position to get these
> documents completed within a relatively short time (30 - 60 days?)
> depending on whether there are any sticking points in our negotiations.  By
> the way, the only agreement that may take some time to work through is no.
> 2 on the list, although with our recent experience in hooking up other
> plants on the system this past year, we've already done a lot of the
> "lawyering" spade work.
>
> Not that I'm especially found of meetings, but it's been a while since
> we've met to discuss the physical requirements of the facilities.
> Moreover, we've got some new people in our Facility Planning and
> Engineering and Construction groups who would benefit from meeting their
> counter parties on the project side.  May I suggest a face-to-face meeting
> where I can bring our planners and engineers to meet with their counter
> parties to kick off this project?  We can meet anywhere its convenient for
> you guys.
>
> I look forward to working with you on this project.
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>    From:   Kirk Ketcherside <igi@nctimes.net>@ENRON
>              [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Kirk+20Ketcherside+20+3Cigi+40nctimes+2Enet+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
>
>    Sent:   Wednesday, March 28, 2001 12:31 PM
>    To:     Fawcett, Jeffery
>    Subject:  Re: Big Sandy Project
>
>    Jeff-
>    Well it has been a few weeks since we last discussed the Big Sandy
>    Project, and I want to move forward based on our last
>    conversation/e-mail.
>
>    Specifically, I would like to formalize a more detailed interconnect
>    (MSA/tap) study and associated cost estimate for Big Sandy.  I also want
>    to obtain from you a timeline, including all the necessary
>    documents/agreements, based on a projected Big Sandy online date of
>    8/1/03.
>
>    At this point, I am recommending that the Project look to TW for most if
>    not all of its' natural gas requirements, and thus, the pressure
>    integration issue is not relevant.
>    We are simply looking for a TW tap with mainline pressure, and a TW
>    constructed MSA.
>    I understand the CIAC issue, and as such, the Project may elect to
>    construct the MSA per TW specs, to mitigate the tax implications.
>
>    Please let me know what additional information require to support this
>    activity.
>    Thank you in advance for your efforts in bringing this project to
>    commercialization.
>
>    Kirk
>
>    Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com wrote:
>    >
>    > You betcha.  We look forward to working with you on this project.
>    Talk to
>    > you next week.
>    >
>    > Kirk Ketcherside <igi@nctimes.net> on 02/09/2001 01:04:00 PM
>    >
>    > To:   Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com
>    > cc:
>    >
>    > Subject:  Re: Big Sandy Project
>    >
>    > Thanks Jeff for your prompt response.
>    > I just got back in the office today.
>    > I will contact you early next week to discuss our next steps.
>    > Have a great weekend.
>    > Kirk
>    >
>    > Jeffery.Fawcett@enron.com wrote:
>    > >
>    > > Kirk,
>    > > We've put together a quick estimate of the cost to install the
>    > interconnect
>    > > and measurement facilities off Transwestern.  The estimate was based
>    on
>    > the
>    > > original operating conditions of Phase 1 (80 MMcf/d) and Phase 2
>    (120
>    > > MMcf/d) given to us early in discussions with George Briden.  The
>    subject
>    > > facilities will include a 16" tie-in to both TW 30" mainlines (a
>    > redundancy
>    > > feature, allowing continued use of one line if the other line is
>    > > temporarily taken out of service for maintenance or is the subject
>    of
>    > some
>    > > type of failure), mainline valves, turbine meter, gallagher flow
>    > > conditioner, telemetry, flow control, etc.  The order of magnitude
>    > (+/-30%)
>    > > estimated cost is $416,700.
>    > >
>    > > Not knowing your design and proposed schematic showing joint
>    operations
>    > > with El Paso and/or Southern Trails, this estimate does not include
>    a
>    > > pressure control and/or pressure let down equipment.   Consequently,
>    the
>    > > project will have to control pressure in the lateral system.   As
>    you
>    > know,
>    > > it's operationally problematic to design for both pressure and flow
>    > control
>    > > into a common header system accepting deliveries from multiple
>    pipelines
>    > > operating at different pressures.   However, Transwestern will be
>    > amenable
>    > > to working with the project and the other interstate pipelines to
>    > optimize
>    > > the ultimate design of all metering and lateral pipeline facilities.
>    > >
>    > > Also, the $416K estimate does not include any build up for income
>    tax.
>    > If
>    > > the project reimburses Transwestern for the cost of Transwestern
>    > > constructing the interconnect and metering station, Transwestern
>    will
>    > > recognize a taxable event.  Use approx. 30% as an effective
>    corporate tax
>    > > rate for purposes of calculating the price build-up.   As a means to
>    > avoid
>    > > the tax consequence, Transwestern is agreeable to the idea of the
>    project
>    > > building the metering station to Transwestern's specifications, with
>    > > Transwestern operating the facilities under an Operating Agreement.
>    We
>    > can
>    > > discuss these structuring questions as the project develops and we
>    get to
>    > > the point of executing project documents for the provisioning of
>    service
>    > to
>    > > the project.
>    > >
>    > > Our facility planners and I are available to answer questions for
>    you.
>    > > Please give me a call.
>    > >
>    > > Kirk Ketcherside <igi@nctimes.net> on 02/02/2001 01:14:51 PM
>    > >
>    > > To:   jfawcet@enron.com
>    > > cc:
>    > >
>    > > Subject:  follow-up to our conversation
>    > >
>    > > Jeff-
>    > > Nice visiting with you regarding the Big Sandy project.
>    > > I will look forward to seeing your new interconnect proposal next
>    week.
>    > > As for my particulars, in addition to my email address herein,
>    please
>    > > see the following:
>    > >
>    > > Kirk Ketcherside
>    > > IGI Resources, Inc.
>    > > 7241 Sanderling Court
>    > > Carlsbad, CA 92009
>    > >
>    > > 760/918-0001 Office phone
>    > > 760/918-0003 Office fax
>    > >
>    > > Thanks and have nice weekend.
>    > > Kirk


Tracy:

Can you get Wayne copies of the Into Networks confirm and GTC?  They are in the blue Into file in your bottom file drawer.

Thanks!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gardner, Wayne
Sent:	Friday, August 10, 2001 8:29 AM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Question re:  Electronics Boutique/n2

Marie, I'm still missing the Into Networks confirm and GTC, which is the other leg of the back to back financial swap in the Elbo transaction.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:13 PM
To:	Gardner, Wayne
Subject:	RE: Question re:  Electronics Boutique/n2

Wayne:

I went to Tracy's office to help Cynthia look for the documents and Cynthia found them, so you should be getting copies shortly.

Marie

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gardner, Wayne
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:32 PM
To:	Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS)
Cc:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	RE: Question re:  Electronics Boutique/n2

This is kind of scary (and not just because I need the documents).

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS)
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:12 PM
To:	Gardner, Wayne
Subject:	FW: Question re:  Electronics Boutique/n2

just fYI

still trying to find the docs

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Heard, Marie
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 5:04 PM
To:	Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS)
Subject:	RE: Question re:  Electronics Boutique/n2

I don't know off the top of my head where they are?  Is there a blue file?  Do I have a memo in my memo directory where I sent them to Contract Admin?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS)
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:52 PM
To:	Heard, Marie
Subject:	Question re:  Electronics Boutique/n2

Hi Marie

Any idea where I can find the final docs for this deal?  Cynthia said she gave them to you -- I've looked in the regular places -- where else can I check?

thanks

Tracy
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Gardner, Wayne
Sent:	Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:16 PM
To:	Cooper, Tracy J. (EBS)
Subject:	These are the drafts, I need the final docs

 << File: Annex A Financial GTC (Credit)EBC020401.doc >>  << File: Annex A Financial GTC (Credit)Into020401.doc >>  << File: Annex B Financial GTC (Credit)Into020401.doc >>  << File: MBDAssignmentAgt020401.doc >>  << File: SoftwareonDemandMarketingAgreement.doc >>  << File: Swap Transaction Into020401.doc >>  << File: Swap TransactionElbo020401.doc >>


Daren:

During the period of 5/1/2000 through 5/31/2000, the above meter has recorded
flow on the following days:

 Days    Mmbtus

 5/1/2000             942
 5/3/2000               68
 5/21/2000               65

           1,075

Deal #119068 was at this meter during April 2000 and again began 6/13/2000,
but did not exist from 5/1/2000 through 6/12/2000.  Currently, these volumes
are being booked under the HPL Strangers Gas Contract.  Logistics needs
either (1) Deal #119068 extended, (2) New Deal, or (3) approval to write-off
these volumes to Unaccounted for Gas.  (Please print, sign, and return
original to Clem Cernosek).

 ________________________________________________________
 Deal/Deal Ticket#/Customer (Seller/Buyer)

    OR

 _________________________________________________________
 APPROVAL to Write-off the volumes to Unaccounted for Gas Loss

Thanks, Clem


Based on the information below, I've taken the liberty to compile a
spreadsheet of active California-specific commercial gas customers residing
in the HP, STAT, and Altra databases.  Included in the data is contact
information, expiration dates, product, price, LDC, volumes, as well as
number of accounts.  Unfortunately STAT is the only database that allows
reporting on rate class.  I've included that information.  As a rule of
thumb, STAT generally houses the smaller commercial, HP, the medium
commercial, with Altra holding the industrial customers.

 I hope this helps, Jim

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Catherine Woods                           05/09/2000 09:37 AM
	Phone: n/a

To: Foster
cc:
Subject: Re: SoCal Cad Accounts

Here is some additional information on the Socal Saga........
---------------------- Forwarded by Catherine Woods/DUB/EES on 05/09/2000
09:37 AM ---------------------------

Jeff Dasovich on 05/08/2000 11:21:37 AM
To: Gregory T Adams/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Dave Childress/SFO/EES@EES, Catherine Woods/DUB/EES@EES, Ray
Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: SoCal Cad Accounts

Thanks for the note, Dave.  Sounds at least modestly promising and consistent
with Sempra's message that they "want to work to make the market better."
Following up on our call last week, and just to ensure that we're not saying
anything that gets cross-ways with anything you might be discussing with Ron
and Nancy, give me a jingle when you get a chance and let's compare notes.
In the past, Socalgas has done a good job of boring into the Company and
having different discussions with different folks.

Also, Greg, if you have at your fingertips the profile of our California
customer base by class in the aggregate---large industrial, commercial, small
commercial & rez---that would be extremely useful info to have (i.e., how
many, annual demand, average annual demand by class).  Finally, I'm assuming
that turning back customers as a result of credit problems or lack of
profitability is something we do on a consistent basis?  Thanks alot.

Best,
Jeff,

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Gregory T Adams                           05/07/2000 07:56 PM
	Phone No: 800 888-8305 x221 Office
  888-753-9938  Pager

To: Dave Childress/SFO/EES@EES
cc: Catherine Woods/DUB/EES@EES, Ray Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy J
Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: SoCal Cad Accounts

Many of these accounts are turned back to the utility because of credit
issues or limited gas volumes make them unattractive.

Catherine, how many of the 30 go back for other than credit or size? Please
advise.

	Enron Energy Services

	From:  Dave Childress                           05/05/2000 07:30 PM
	Phone No: 562/901-3811
  Pager: 888/782-3546
  Pager EMail: 8887823546@skytel.com
  Mobile: 562/688-9457

To: Gregory T Adams/HOU/EES@EES, Catherine Woods/DUB/EES@EES, Ray
Hamman/HOU/EES@EES, Timothy J Hamilton/HOU/EES@EES, James Shirley/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: SoCal Cad Accounts

I had lunch today with Ron Kent and Nancy McVay from the Southern California
Gas Company.  They are in charge of the Core Aggregation Transport program.
Ron and Nancy have been tasked to encourage customers to switch from the
utility.  I have been working with them to find ways in which they can
promote the program with their customers.

They told me that we have been losing core customers back to the utility at a
rate of 30 meters per month.  I asked them what they could do to help us hold
on to these accounts.  They might be willing to give us a contact that we
could have our customers who have decided to go back to the utility could
call who would explain the benefits of being with a marketer and identify
high prices as general market conditions.

I would have to make this request to them formally and would like to know if
CAD would make use of this resource if the Gas Co. would agree to make it
available.

Dave C.


Celebrate Responsibly

Getting together for the holidays is something we all enjoy.
Whether it?s gathering with old friends from out of town or
hanging out with the usual gang, every gathering this time
of year seems a little more special.

http://millerbrewing.rs88.com/servlet/cc3?r%7D%7C1%26%279rvtz1xmvxl%7Df_zqmpq1%7Cpr9K9%2FA

We at Miller Brewing wish you many happy celebrations this
season and thank you for enjoying those occasions responsibly.

Happy holidays!

This mail is not sent unsolicited. You subscribed to receive
information from Miller Brewing at a Miller Web site or event.

Must be 21 or older to visit our Web site
Miller Brewing Co.; Milwaukee, WI
? 2001 Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, WI

______________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by Miller Brewing Company using Responsys Interact (TM).

If you prefer not to receive future e-mail from Miller Brewing Company:
    http://millerbrewing.rs88.com/servlet/optout?tIJDCBEtprLDnkpnlIRFLgkhgDJhtEf

To view our permission marketing policy:
    http://www.rsvp0.net


Hunter,

I have been thinking through the combinations of Analysts and Associates and wanted to run this grouping by you:

Supply - Sachin Gandhi (Lead), Catalina Cardenas, Neeran Pathak
Consumption (including Power) - Virawan Yawaponsiri (Lead), Tara Piazze, Sabina Rank, Abhijeet Naik, Bart Burk
STP - Mat Smith (Lead), Biliana Pehlivanova, Denver Plachy, Justin O'Malley, Nate Blackburn, Lauren Schlesinger

Mat Smith has been filling in for Tori Kuykendall while she is on maternity leave, and is only available part time for the fundamentals group.  I put strong resources in the STP group (Biliana, Denver, and Lauren) in order to create some momentum there.  All three of the people in the lead positions will rotate out of the group within three months.  If I had to choose leads today for when the rotations occurred, I would put Justin over the STP group, Lauren over the Consumption group, and leave the supply lead vacant.  Let me know what you think.

Chris


Mike has this deal in his trade log as 25 MW, but he said he'd go with the
broker on this one and sell 50 MW to BPA.

Thanks,
Kate

Kerri Thompson@ENRON
11/17/2000 02:55 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: natsource

461136
mike
broker has 25 mw, we have 50


Good Afternoon,

I have attempted several times to make a test tag today, but the drop down lists for the PSE's in the Physical path area have not been populated.

I logged off and onto the system several times today to see if that would help. It didn't.

C


David,

I talked to JS. His PR person in London will contact you.

Vince

David Warwick <djw@kwi.com> on 04/24/2001 05:40:10 PM
To:	"'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:	RE: KWI User Group

Vince

Yes please go ahead.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: 24 April 2001 23:35
To: djw@kwi.com
Subject: RE: KWI User Group

David,

I can ask our CEO John Sherriff.
Please, let me know by 10:00 a.m. Central Time, Wednesday.

Vince

David Warwick <djw@kwi.com> on 04/24/2001 05:24:53 PM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: KWI User Group

Vince

Sorry to hear you cannot make it ... you would obviously have been the big
catch !!

In terms of a London based replacement, who did you have in mind and what
sort of subject could they cover ?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: 24 April 2001 23:22
To: djw@kwi.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; Shirley.Crenshaw@enron.com
Subject: RE: KWI User Group

David,

I regret to inform you I am unable to attend the conference due to previous
commitments.
Would you consider a speakers form our London office?

Vince

David Warwick <djw@kwi.com> on 04/24/2001 09:47:31 AM

To:   "'Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com'" <Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  RE: KWI User Group

Vince

Any further thoughts on this ?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com [mailto:Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com]
Sent: 13 April 2001 21:44
To: djw@kwi.com
Cc: Vince.J.Kaminski@enron.com; vkaminski@aol.com
Subject: Re: KWI User Group

David,

Thanks for the invitation.
I shall check my schedule on Monday and will get back to you
regarding the conference.

I hope you will a very Happy Easter.

Vince

David Warwick <djw@kwi.com> on 04/12/2001 04:04:32 PM

To:   "'vince.j.kaminski@enron.com'" <vince.j.kaminski@enron.com>
cc:
Subject:  KWI User Group

Dear Vince

Please may I reintroduce myself. We met last year at the Sydney EPRM
conference which my company KWI sponsored. I chaired the session at which
you spoke.

As you may remember, my company, KWI are one of the world's leading
provider
of systems (kW3000) and consultancy for energy, trading and risk
management.
We have over 60 clients worldwide including many of the world's leading
energy companies (not Enron unfortunately):

North America
- TVA
- Ontario Power
- Cinergy
- Bonneville Power

Europe
- Enel
- ATEL
- Electrabel
- EDF

Nordic
- Vattenfall
- Fortum
- Sydkraft
- Statkraft
- Birka Energi
- Norsk Hydro

Each year we stage a "KWI Users Forum" - a 2-day event attended by leading
trading and risk staff from our clients. Last year there were about 100
delegates. The agenda primarily focusses on issues surrounding risk
management for the energy sector.

The agenda comprises keynote presentations on burning risk issues from
industry leading energy speakers and practical workshops focussed around
using our software.

This years event is at a luxury hotel in the wonderful Spanish city of
Barcelona and runs from the evening of Sunday September 9th to Tuesday
September 11th. The main conference dinner is on the Monday evening and is
always a memorable event. This year it is in a leading Barcelona restaurant
preceded by a bus tour of the city with a stop for pre-dinner drinks.

I would like to invite you to make the opening keynote address, the
highlight of the conference.

The subject could be:

*    a general energy risk related topic
*    a general insight into the secret of Enron's continued success in
the energy markets
*    your thoughts on the future development on energy markets (and other
commodity related - bandwidth etc.) worldwide

Obviously, we would cover all your delagate costs including accomodation,
food and drink.

What's in it for you ? Many of our users are some the energy sectors
leading
risk thinkers and I'm sure you would enjoy meeting them and exchanging
views.

Please let me know if you are able to accept the invitation.

Best regards

David Warwick - Marketing Dierctor and Co-founder


Any news on looking at the NiSource storage stuff?  Have we gotten the packet
from Chase or whichever investment banker guys you talked to?  I heard again
from a non-Enron source that "Enron is looking at the MHP assets" so it must
be true!  Thanks.   DF


A colleague has sent you this article from Fortune (http://www.fortune.com ).
Reply to your colleague at janette.elbertson@enron.com

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
MOST POWERFUL WOMEN IN BUSINESS
Patient but Not Passive
A new kind of leader emerged in our annual ranking of powerful businesswomen. She is strong and resolute, but not in a hurry.
Patricia Sellers
Mon Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2001
For some 30 years--ever since women started jockeying for power in the  workplace--patience has gotten a bad rap. After all, the virtue fairly  reeks of a Victorian mission to corset women into the role of submissive  wife and mother. So women have shunned it. Instead they have felt the  need to make bold pronouncements and rush to action. That was never  truer than during the season of dot-com mania, when every CEO professed  to be leading a revolution. And any leader who failed to act quickly was  supposed to get trampled by the capitalist vanguard.
Now, in these new, more tempered times, patience may be about to reap  its reward. In FORTUNE's annual survey of the 50 Most Powerful Women in  Business, we see the emergence of women who came to power slowly. We're  not talking about women who had the patience to suffer indignities or  who sat passively in an out-of-the-way corner. Rather, they stayed with  a company, steadily building influence there, and rose to power through  determination and insider knowledge, not promises and self-promotion.  These qualities, of course, serve men as well as women. Jim Collins,  author of Good to Great, argues that the most successful corporate  turnarounds were led by such colorless men as Darwin Smith at  Kimberly-Clark and William Allen at Boeing. Through a combination of  deep knowledge of the corporation, personal humility, and will, they  created enduring greatness. It's too early to say whether Anne Mulcahy,  No. 6 on our list, can pull off such a feat. But she fits the profile.  An unpretentious workhorse who never aimed to be CEO, she felt  ambivalent accepting the title at troubled Xerox in July. "I'm not as  famous as Carly--and I want to keep it that way," says Mulcahy, 48.
The famous Carly--Hewlett-Packard Chairman and CEO Carleton Fiorina--is  still No. 1 on our list, as she has been every year since we began  publishing the The Power 50 in 1998. She still heads the biggest company  ($48.8 billion in revenues last year) run by a woman. And she is still  as audacious and impatient as ever. Wall Street practically heckled her  latest move--a bold bet to buy competitor Compaq--but Fiorina, 47,  remains defiant. In difficult times "people who drive change are the  subject of great scrutiny," she says. As a woman--and a daring,  outspoken one at that--her actions are scrutinized more closely than the  most driven of men. Says Fiorina: "I've had a lot of male CEOs say to  me, 'Thank God they don't rank us.' "
PepsiCo President and CFO Indra Nooyi (No. 10) understands the urge to  take bold action, but she also knows the necessity of holding back.  "There is no question that women who reach the top have to perform at a  higher level--which is why women tend to push themselves harder than  men," says Nooyi, 46. "But we have to have the right people around who  can say to us, 'You're draining the organization. You're pushing too  hard.' " Particularly now, as the U.S. prepares for an uncertain kind of  war and enters what could be a sustained economic downturn, power seems  to call for pragmatic and careful leadership.
This year's Power 50 is full of such steady leaders. Mulcahy, Nooyi, and  the other corporate women who are new to the top ten this year--Mirant's  Marce Fuller (No. 5), Pfizer's Karen Katen (No. 7), Chevron's Pat Woertz  (No. 8), and Kraft's Betsy Holden (No. 9)--are all low-profile  loyalists. The combined tenure at their current companies: 118 years.  The six years Andrea Jung (No. 4) spent as head of marketing at Avon  gave her the knowledge to revive the troubled company faster than anyone  expected when she became CEO two years ago (see It Took a Lady to Save Avon ).
As always, the list is a snapshot of power at a moment in time. Last  year, power resided in the technology and Internet sectors, but that  influence was fleeting. Gone from the list this year: "Hurricane Debby"  Hopkins, who pushed her agenda too ambitiously at Lucent and lost her  CFO job in May; Ellen Hancock, who failed at the startup Exodus; and  Morgan Stanley's Mary Meeker, who influenced so many to buy into the  Internet fizz. But one Web warrior looks better than ever: eBay's Meg  Whitman, No. 2 on our list. Whitman, who at times took heat for not  managing aggressively enough, has never overpromised investors; instead  she has diligently delivered above-target profits every single  quarter.
While the economy and its points of power change, the definition we use  to evaluate power remains the same. We consider the size and importance  of a woman's business in the global economy, her clout inside her  company, and the arc of her career--where she has been and where she is  likely to go. When appropriate, we also weigh the woman's influence on  mass culture and society. That factor lifts Oprah Winfrey to No. 3 on  this year's list. She owns a product, The Oprah Winfrey Show, that  generates more than $300 million in annual revenues and reaches 26  million viewers in the U.S. each week--plus millions more in 106  international markets. Her show, and now her magazine, O, The Oprah  Magazine (whose subject is personal empowerment), have immense influence  on the popular culture--from what books people read to what kind of  lives they lead.
The shifts on our list this year are dramatic, with 14 newcomers and  three returnees from previous years. But one trend is especially  intriguing: Women are taking on bigger businesses than ever. A few years  ago responsibility for a $3 billion business almost automatically earned  a woman a spot on this list. No more. (Unless she wields media power  like Martha Stewart, No. 13.) This year's FORTUNE 50 includes several  women who lead businesses with annual revenues of $20 billion or more.  That's a first. The ranking has become so competitive, in fact, that  some women moved down even though their power increased. Example: Shelly  Lazarus. She heads a healthy business, ad giant Ogilvy & Mather (where,  by the way, she has worked for 30 years), whose revenues grew 20% last  year. Plus, she added a prestigious board seat--General Electric--to her  resume. But in order to make room for newcomers, Lazarus slides to No.  11, from No. 7 last year.
One newcomer is Southwest Airlines President Colleen Barrett (No. 20).  Loyalty and self-knowledge took Barrett to corporate heights she never  imagined while growing up in tiny Bellows Falls, Vt.  Barrett couldn't  afford to go to a four-year college and had no specific ambition beyond  believing she "would be the best legal secretary in the world," she  says. Barrett started as Herb Kelleher's secretary in 1967, a decade  before he quit a Texas law practice to launch Southwest Airlines. She  made an indelible mark as the startup grew to be America's  top-performing airline. In her job as executive vice president of  customers, she helped create Southwest's famously collegial culture and  provided essential structure and discipline to Kelleher's grand vision.  "I've never wanted the CEO job," says Barrett. "I don't think I have the  talents for it. I'm a great No. 2 person." Now 57, Barrett is exactly  where she wants to be.
Loyalty does not mean kowtowing. The women on our list push their  companies to change and grow, and they take personal risks. "Women have  to take a lot of risks because there is no natural career progression,"  says Mirant CEO Marce Fuller. She should know. Fuller was getting great  marks running international project development for Mirant's former  parent, Southern, in 1994, when her boss asked her to take charge of the  company's tiny North American power plant operations. After looking  closely at the business, she told her boss she didn't want the job  unless she could do something altogether new--build a high-tech  risk-management and marketing organization to complement the expansion  of power plants in the U.S. "I told him, 'If you don't have this piece,  you don't have a game plan,' " she says. It wasn't an easy sell. Only 35  at the time, Fuller lobbied Southern's board for approval. Once she got  it, she built a 600-person energy trading and marketing unit that is  expected to generate $25 billion in revenues this year. Southern, a  regulated utility, spun off Mirant last spring. So now Fuller is her own  boss--and, with Mirant sure to be among America's largest companies this  year, a FORTUNE 500 CEO.
One of the few. The grim news is that there are only six women CEOs of  FORTUNE 500 companies, including Fuller. And there are fewer women in  the pipeline than anyone would have thought 30 years ago. "When I was  21, I was expecting that by this point we'd be in the fifty-fifty  range," says Betsy Bernard (No. 23), CEO of AT?Consumer. The reality,  though disappointing, has motivated Bernard to become "a catalyst,  making sure that other women get opportunities." Bernard, 46, and other  women emerging now are not based on the old model--the shark-like Linda  Wachner, whose company, Warnaco, crashed into bankruptcy this year. Or  the flamboyant Jill Barad, who was booted from Mattel last year. Says  PepsiCo's Indra Nooyi: "PepsiCo, which used to be known for hiring  'Pepsi pretty'--blond, blue-eyed males--has made an Indian woman its  president. That says a lot about the future of women." Let's hope Nooyi  is right. Meantime, if you don't see a new Wonder Woman in corporate  America, it doesn't mean she doesn't exist. She might be quietly and  diligently doing her job.
 http://www.fortune.com/indexw.jhtml?channel=artcol.jhtml&doc_id=204383
Colleague at Fortunehttp://www.fortune.com


Hi Monique,

Good catch.  I made the two changes.  Attached is a new red-lined version.  I
am couriering over execution copies today.  Please call me if you have any
questions.

Stacy


Attached is "Annex B.doc" which we use to prepare Annex B which contains the
credit provisions we attach to a Confirmation when such is requested for
omnibus financial confirmations.  About mid-way through the US Annex B is
about 4 selections of collateral annexes depending on whether the credit is
one-way or two-way and whether the collateral requested is letters of credit
only or letters of credit and cash.  Following that is form of letter of
credit.  We have an Annex B form for US counterparties and Canadian
counterparties.  I have attached both.   The law in Canada currently does not
favor taking cash in Canada and WE DO NOT TAKE CASH (this obviously is quite
problematic for us!).  Our current advice from Canadian counsel is that Cash
must be perfected in a way similar to filing a UCC.  The Canadian and US
lawyers are re-reviewing this situation and I will let you know when/if this
advice changes.

	Karen A Cordova@EES
	05/21/2001 10:00 AM

		 To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc:
		 Subject: Credit Support Annex

Tana -

Does a Credit Support Annex exist for transactions perfected on the long form
(omnibus) confirmation?  Is there such an animal?  If you have something like
that, can I get a copy?

Thanks again, Karen


---------------------- Forwarded by Jason Sokolov/HOU/ECT on 04/30/2001 05:03
PM ---------------------------

Tracy Pan <pcp@pop.ruf.rice.edu> on 04/30/2001 11:11:35 AM
Please respond to pcp@rice.edu
To: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Energy Derivatives Project Tracy Pan Part 4

Jason,

I've send a total of 4 files to you.  If you find any problem with the
files, please let me know.

Thanks.

Tracy
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason.Sokolov@enron.com [mailto:Jason.Sokolov@enron.com]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 8:16 AM
To: pcp@rice.edu
Subject: Re: About the Energy Derivative Project

Tracy,
Break it down into 8000 files of 1 kB, and send each one in a separate
mail.

Just kidding!
Try to send the whole thing.
If one of the servers refuses to accept it, then break it down into several
pieces.
I know for sure that I can take files as large as 2MB.

Jason

 - 665 Team Project--Tracy Pan Part 4.xls


I had sent you an email in regards to pigging on the TW 24" Panhandle Lateral and the TW 12" Leedey Lateral. I haven't heard anything and wanted to make sure you are still the person that we need to visit with on getting these task resolved. If not, please let me know who we need to talk to.

The problem is we haven't ran a pig on these lines in years. In order to insure our pipeline integrity, we need to work through these obstacles and get something resolved. We know we have lots of liquid in these lines and need to proceed with pigging.

Please let me know what we need to do to get this accomplished.

Thanks,
Mickey


My responses to one set of PG&E questions would be as follows.  Dean is
answering the other one and will send back to you directly.

* What is Enron's intent re: continuing involvement?  PG&E is
concerned about any potential requirements that they might be required to
either purchase fuel from Enron or engage Enron as the power marketer.

RESPONSE: Enron is very flexible re continuing involvement:  scheduling
coordination, fuel supply, power marketing, etc.  We are also flexible re the
time period and the terms of the continuing involvement.  Whatever
arrangement is developed would be mutually beneficial.

* What is status of EPC negotiations.  Will they be required to engage
NEPCO as the EPC contractor?  Does the EPC contractor have control over the
turbines?

RESPONSE: o EPC negotiations are complete with NEPCO.  Contract has not been
executed, but has been "put on the shelf" awaiting decision on successful
bidder for the purchase of the Pastoria project from ENA.  Successful bidder
and NEPCO will each have the option of executing the EPC agreement.

  o Successful bidder is under no obligation to engage NEPCO.

  o West LB has control of the turbines.  They can be assigned either to the
LLC or to ENA.  (If assigned to ENA, it was because the successful bidder for
the Pastoria project did not want the turbines with the acquisition.)  If
assigned to the LLC as part of the acquisition, the LLC can then assign the
turbines to the ultimate EPC contractor.

* They also questioned whether there would be any "agricultural
restrictions"?

RESPONSE: The project site is presently under a Williamson Act contract to
maintain agricultural use in exchange for lower taxes.  Last week, the Kern
County Board of Supervisors voted to cancel the Williamson Act contract to
allow for industrial use, which started a 180 day public comment period.
However, the Governor has on his desk a bill for signature that would reduce
the public comment period for the cancellation to the same time frame as the
request for rehearing period for the CEC Final Decision.  (The Governor has
until 9/30 sign the bill and is expected to do so because of the overwhelming
support of the bill in the Assembly and the Senate.)  The cancellation will
be contingent upon a successful CEC decision and a payment of a Williamson
Act cancellation fee.


I have set up a tentative conference call with the city of Palo Alto to meet
regarding our Management Services Agreement and their comments.  They intend
to have both their City Attorney and outside council at this meeting.  If
this conflicts with your schedule, please let me know.  As soon as Palo Alto
confirms this time, I will let you know.

Thanks,

Kim
 -----Original Message-----
From:  Presas, Jessica
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:00 PM
To: Ward, Kim S.
Subject: Conference Call EB32C2

 CONFERENCE CALL
 Thursday, May 31 @ 3:00 in room EB32C2.


Prebon Energy has sent you an invitation from Sendomatic.com!

To view your invitation click the web address below or copy and paste it into your web browser:
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/v?e=61930&u=745821

If you are having trouble viewing the above web address, visit
http://www.sendomatic.com/servlets/l?u=matt_smith@enron.com
and create an account to view the events you have received.

Hope you have fun!

--

P.S. If you'd like to send your own personalized invitations or announcements go to http://www.sendomatic.com


Here's where we stayed on our honeymoon  www.whalewatchinn.com


Following please find the Daily EnronOnline Executive Summary.

EnronOnline Executive Summary for 11/02/00
Transaction Summary
External Transactions Today	4,077
Average Daily External Transactions (30 day Trailing Avg)	3,013
Total Life to Date Transactions	403,039

EnronOnline Daily % of Entity's Total Transactions for 11/02/00	Trans	Percent
Enron North America	3,516	75%
Enron Europe Limited	135	33%
Global Products	179	35%
Enron Metals	247	15%

EnronOnline Percentage of Total Corporate Transactions
(30 day Trailing Avg)	46%

Gross Notional Value of EnronOnline Transactions	Total
Today	2,735,478,227
MTD	5,283,038,758
LTD	218,650,288,670
Average Daily Notional Value (30 Day Trailing Avg)	2,096,560,598

Notional Revenue from Physical Flows to Date	15,302,941,580

Counterparties, Users, and Products Offered
Counterparties having transacted to date	544
New Counterparties transacting for the first time today	1
Number of Products Offered Today	1,216
Total Number of External Users Logged on Today	2,921
Average # of External Users logged on (30 day Trailing Avg)	2,670


Thanks.  This all started last November - where did the time go??

	Clayton Vernon @ ENRON
	08/23/2000 04:28 PM

To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: condolences

Chris-

Let me express my deepest condolences to you in the loss of your father.

I lost my mother three months ago, and the suddeness, starkness and size of
the loss remains with me.

Please understand I care for you as a friend, and I pray you will be as
strong as ever soon.

Clayton


Sally and Brent,
The write-up below is based upon discussions Jonathan Le and Kevin Lee had
with Steve Stock and Jeremy Wong.
Jonathan and Kevin are working on a new cash flow process for us which should
help to insulate us from the current intra-night process for the ERMS and
EnPower cash flows.
Sheila
---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 09/15/2000 08:32
AM ---------------------------

Jonathan Le
09/14/2000 04:40 PM
To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Problems with Morning Cashflow process

fyi
---------------------- Forwarded by Jonathan Le/HOU/ECT on 09/14/2000 04:39
PM ---------------------------

Kevin Lee@ENRON
09/14/2000 11:27 AM
To: Jonathan Le/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Problems with Morning Cashflow process

Hi Jonathan,

 Listed below are the details of each days problems:

Fri, Sep 8,2000
AutoRho failed at 3:15am, uploaded only 8 books into Infinity.
It failed on the step in AutoRho where it runs the query to get all the books
for the Infinity USD portfolio.  Jeremy does not know exactly what caused it
but rerunning AutoRho seemed to work.
Recovery used the backup file and was on time.

Tue, Sep 12,2000
Similar problem to Friday, but ENPOWER also failed.  The manenpower.txt file
had TNS errors in it.  AutoRho was not able to kick off the ENPOWER script to
get the cashflows.  Rerunning fixed the problem.
AutoRho failed at 3:15am, uploaded only 9 books into Infinity.
It failed on the step in AutoRho where it runs the query to get all the books
for the Infinity USD portfolio.  Jeremy does not know exactly what caused it
but rerunning AutoRho seemed to work.
Recovery used the file that Jeremy provided in the rerun, they were
approximately 10 minutes late.

Wed, Sep 13,2000
ENPOWER failed creating a header ONLY manenpower.txt file.  There was no
cashflows in the file.
Jeremy confirmed the Autorho process was fine.
The problem was the ENPOWER databse failed (hardrive failure) and they
immediately went to a backup.  But on the backup database, NOT all the tables
are replicated.  The cashlow table with the ENPOWER data we needed was not in
the backup database resulting in a file with zero flows!
This problem has been fixed by the enpower people.
Recovery included using the previous day's enpower flows.  They were on time.

Thurs, Sep 14,2000
AutoRho at 3:15 am and 11:00 pm was hung.  Enpower also was not run since
AutoRho failed.
Reason was because the UNIX NFS file system "solar" was full  As a result,
our directory /worksheets2, and also /prod/egs-home is mounted on solar but
could not write anything to it.  Supposily the SA are suppose to have been
paged when ever a file system gets close to 100% (can you please confirm
this?).  The Unix NFS was fixed by 5:00 am.  AutoRho was rerun and was fine.
Recovery included Jeremy's file.  They were 1 hour late (partly due to other
reasons on MO side, not system related).

Thanks,
Kevin Lee


It's over!!!!!  It ended about 1:30 this afternoon.  Thank you for
remembering.  Mom and I went out for an early celebratory dinner.  I am
looking forward to my trips - and, believe it or not, returning to work
Have any plans been made yet to celebrate Christi's 25th?  Do you know when
her official anniversary date is?  I want to participate if I'm not too
late.  Should I email Steve?  Also, Teb, while I'm thinking about it . . .
does Estalee need to be notified that I'm returning for sure in June?
Thanks again for everything.

Debbie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lokey, Teb" <Teb.Lokey@enron.com>
To: <DoBee@houston.rr.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 12:09 PM
Subject: Over?

I think I recall you saying that your last final was today (Thursday) -
I know your Policy final was Monday.  If you're through -
CONGRATULATIONS - if not - GET BACK TO WORK.  I know you will be busy
getting ready for your trips.  Have a great time and send us a postcard.
Everyone sends their congratulations and best wishes and can't wait for
you to get back.

Have fun and we'll see you June 4, bright and early.

Take care,
Teb


November 21, 2001

ATTENTION ALL SHIPPERS/NOMINATING AGENTS
NOMINATION CUTS FOR NOVEMBER 22 - 26

Volume cuts for nominations that exceed estimated consumption for Gas Days  November 22 - 26 have been completed.  Please check your contracts for any possible cuts during this period.  If you have any questions, please contact your Transportation Specialist.

Sincerely,

Monica Nedbalski
Sr. Transportation Specialist
(303) 571-7886

David Briggs - Xcel Energy
Project Administrator
Certified Web Designer
Phone: (303) 571-7812
     Fax: (303) 571-7001
 Email: David.Briggs@Xcelenergy.Com