Should Arm-Lock Putting Be Banned?
Xander Schauffele on making the arm-lock switch last week  I am for banning the arm-lock putters. But if everyone else is going to use it and I feel like they have a bigger advantage, I may as well do the same. Its just better, its easier, its more consistent. They voted a resounding yes. Yes  77%  If he thinks it will help him then fine. Its just another form of technology that has infiltrated golf; perimeter weighting, movable weights, MOI etc. If they are going to ban it then do it. I have never seen an amateur with one so wont make much difference. clubchamp98  I voted ban, Old Tom Morris didnt use one. Crow  Although its not anchoring in the same way that the use of belly and broom handle putters were, to my mind its still a form of anchoring which doesnt appeal to me. I think the arm-lock technique is ugly..not trying to have a go at Bryson but his style is the ugliest of them all. Not necessarily a reason to ban something but. Imurg  I say ban. You can use any length of putter but can have a maximum of two points of contact. Adam Scott uses a really long putter without anchoring so its perfectly possible. SaintHacker  Id ban having more than two points of contact with the club. They should only allow the two hands to touch the club. JamesR  Ive heard various complicated suggestions but the two points of contact seems eminently sensible and would work. Every other swing in golf is a free movement, the putter should be the same. Lord Tyrion  I get that technology has changed the equipment and made golf easier for everyone, but there should only be a maximum of two points of contact on the club. srixon 1  I still like the suggestion made at the time that belly putters were outlawed  that the rules should stipulate that the putter must be the shortest club in the bag. Canary Kid  I say if a belly putter is anchoring then the arm lock is no different save the part of the body youre anchored to. Sats  Definitely. As I am led to believe the putter must be anchored to two points. Normally both hands. This is where it gets complicated. The rules allow the putter to be held against the forearm (unless his forearm is in contact with his body). Now correct me if I am wrong but two hands and a forearm is three different parts of a body. Because, as XS says, it gives an advantage. Tashyboy  No  23%  When you consider the tech thats in putters these days I wouldnt consider a certain style of putting to be any more advantageous than another. They have big grips, soft and hard inserts, stability shafts, counter balanced grips, weights you name it they are all assisting putting in one way or another. The name of the game in putting is to read the green and roll the ball along the floor. I really dont care how someone achieves that. In fact I enjoy the variety and different methods that people come up with in terms of stance, grip and putting device lets call it. None seem to be answer as the whole tour would adopt it overnight if it was that good. garyinderry  I wouldnt have banned anchoring belly or broom handle putter so I wouldnt bam arm locks. As with the belly putter if it was that much of an advantage they would all be doing it. Liverpoolphil  No, the media/ruling bodies seem to be constantly trying to restrict and limit the game in so many areas imo. pauldj42  I have a standard length putter with a fat grip  I am right handed but putt with my left hand below my right (so unconventional)  I press the top inch of the grip in to my watch strap which I wear on my left hand  this stabilises the club  in essence a short arm-lock method. Works for me. Id try the arm-lock method but worry such a club would be too restrictive in that really long putts where you might want to introduce a bit of wrist would be tricky. Kennysarmy  I have one that I got during one of the lockdowns, I can confirm its not a saviour to your problems. Your right hand still has a massive impact on face angle and, despite what Xander says, you absolutely can flinch your left arm enough to miss a putt. Ive never even used it on the course as even after six months of using it as a training aid, to help maintain left wrist angles, its proven no better. In fact, for the first three months at least, it was demonstrably worse. I was firmly in the ban camp but, after using it, its no real advantage, the closest equivalent I can think of is it would be like banning hi-toe wedges. No I wouldnt ban it. Jamesbrown  No. But then I wouldnt have banned the other long putters either. If its that great then everyone would have been using them, but they werent. Bryson putts well with it  and as usual people want to put a stop to whatever Bryson is doing. Kuchar does it but hes hardly ripping up the greens with it. Zalatoris putts that way because apparently he was terrible at conventional putting, but again hes not quite ripping it up yet I dont think. I dont think the two points of contact thing works  I leave an inch at the top of my grip which sits against my left wrist. I would love to try one, but you dont see too many about, and I dont really want to shell out money for one on eBay on the off chance it works really. If it was that amazing they would all be doing it. Tour players will do anything if it saves them a shot a round. Its a difficult one to ban. Belly putters weere easy, they just said you cant anchor the butt of the club into your body. Not sure how you would stop the arm-lock putter without having a grey area in there. Like some have already said, you cant restrict the length of a putter because of people of different sizes. I suppose the only way is to restrict the length of the grip. MadAdey  I really fancy trying one but not seen one in a shop and way too pricey for an experiment. So instead its lot of carpet practice with a regular putter. So not sure how to vote! Keep them until Ive tried one!! AmandaJR  I voted no because I have started doing it! My putting is definitely a little bit better than before. howbow88  View the full forum thread