Has Abbey Clancy revealed Coleen Rooney's private Instagram account?
Abbey Clancy appears to have revealed her friend Coleen Rooney's infamous private Instagram account. Coleen - wife of footballer Wayne Rooney - used her secret account in her attempts to unearth who was selling stories about her. She ended up accusing fellow WAG Rebekah Vardy, who denied the claims, resulting in the ongoing so-called Wagatha Christie court case. Abbey Clancy [L] appears to have revealed Coleen Rooney's [R] infamous private Instagram account  Abbey - wife of football star Peter Crouch - re-shared a snap on Thursday from an account with a different username to 35-year-old Coleen's public Instagram page. The account was named Coleen03 with Coleen looking glam as a profile photo. Coleen03 tagged Abbey, 35, in a photo of a cup with the name of Peter Crouch's TV show on it - Crouchy's Year-Late Euros: Live - obviously in attendance during the EUROS 2020 semi-finals on Wednesday night. 'Look where I am!' Coleen03 penned. Coleen03 tagged Abbey, 35, in a photo of a cup with the name of Peter Crouch's TV show on it - Crouchy's Year-Late Euros: Live - obviously in attendance during the EUROS 2020 semi-finals on Wednesday night. 'Look where I am!' Coleen03 only has 396 followers at the time of writing, and requires authorisation to follow it  The real deal: In contrast, Coleen's public account (coleen_rooney) has 889k followers  Abbey re-posted this to her Instagram Stories, adding the caption: 'It's coming home @Coleen03'  This account only has 396 followers at the time of writing, and requires authorisation to follow it. As well as Abbey, ex-WAG Danielle Lloyd also follows it, as well as England player Kyle Walker's fiance Annie Kilner. In contrast, Coleen's public account (coleen_rooney) has 889k followers. MailOnline has approached reps for clarification. Claims: Coleen used an account in her attempts to unearth who was selling stories about her to The Sun. Crouchy's Year Late Euros features Maya Jama, Peter Crouch and Alex Horne  This comes after it was revealed at the High Court that Coleen kept her husband Wayne Rooney, 35, in the dark when she launched her infamous sting investigation against Rebekah. Coleen's lawyer David Sherborne revealed his client's secrecy as he fought a motion from Rebekah's lawyers to have a large portion of Coleen's defence 'struck out'. It came as Rebekah's counsel said her children were abused at school as a result of Coleen's Wagatha Christie Instagram post accusing their mother of leaking stories. Rebekah, 39, launched her 1.5m claim after Coleen accused her in her October 2019 Instagram post of being the source of leaks to the media on stories about her. The court has heard how peace talks between the warring WAGs broke down during mediation and the case is now expected to go to a full trial. Couple: Manchester United's striker Wayne is pictured with Coleen in 2015  Coleen wrote on Instagram and Twitter: 'I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them. It's . Rebekah Vardy's account'  Hugh Tomlinson QC for Rebekah Vardy, told the libel court that the case had been extremely serious, despite the 'highly entertaining stories in the media referring to the Wagatha Christie... she suffered widespread abuse and hostility as a result of the post for a long period and her children were also abused at school. It was a very serious matter for her'. The long-running feud between the high-profile WAGS erupted after Coleen revealed that she had set a trap to see who was responsible for the leaks, which earned her the nickname Wagatha Christie. Coleen famously wrote: 'I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them. It's ................ Rebekah Vardy's account.' Rebekah's team have now launched a bid to have large parts of Coleen's defence in the ongoing libel case struck out. David Sherborne described the attempt by Rebekah's side to exclude large portions of evidence from the hearing as 'a tactical exercise to remove evidence which serves to undermine her case or embarrass her.'