Does Congress really want professional police reform?
Grady Judd, Sheriff      Polk County, Florida  Police professionals support and welcome real police reform. The current federal police reform bill includes a laundry list of fragmented proposals designed to create political talking points, not a genuine attempt to fix problem policing where it exists. There is a big lie being told in the police reform debate: qualified immunity means that bad cops are immune from civil lawsuits. Thats flat out nonsense. Just look at the thousands of lawsuits and millions of dollars a year paid out to civil litigants over alleged police misconduct. Qualified immunity simply means that if a police officer is doing his or her job, following their police agencys policies, and following the law, the officer is not civilly liable in a federal civil rights case for their well-intended actions that were objectively reasonable. Adding another opportunity for federal lawsuits is what I call the Stuff the Lawyers Pockets Act. Equating police accountability with more lawsuits is perverse. Blasting the door wide open for more lawsuits will only bankrupt cities and counties and penalize taxpayers. The qualified immunity fake solution some in Congress are proposing does nothing to change bad police culture or provide a road map to improve police conduct and community relations. Add another layer of federal lawsuits and you will find even more police officers leaving the profession and many others afraid to do their job. The result is evident: Crime, and specifically violent crime, will increase more than it has because of these attacks on all police agencies for the bad conduct of a very few. The real way to improve the quality of policing in America is to incentivize police agencies to become professionally accredited by state or nationally recognized professional accrediting bodies. Im not talking about a one-size-fits-all set of mandates created by a federal agency under the influence of whatever political party is in power in the White House, and then forced on local and state agencies. Im talking about independent accrediting bodies professionally dedicated to police best practices. These accrediting bodies have established well founded systems and processes based on data and research designed to deliver professional community-based policing. My agency maintains 10 state and national accreditations that include 1,487 best practice standards that we follow. The standards cover everything from use of force, to police pursuits, to serving warrants. We have external examiners who come in and certify that we have and are complying with these best practices. When our agency started the accreditation process back in 1993, our existing policies were a mish-mash of legacy rules that were developed over many years of trial and errorthey had never undergone an external review. We were a good agency, but we did not have a gold-standard set of state or nationally recognized policies based on best practices developed by professionals. As we became accredited, we grew more professional, our community-centered customer service culture improved, and we focused on nationally recognized best practices to do our job. Accreditation provides a comprehensive systematic approach for agencies to improve their professionalism, culture, and effectiveness as a public safety agency. Accreditation works. It changes police culture for the better and it holds agencies accountable. You wouldnt send your child to an un-accredited college or to a non-accredited medical professional or hospital. Lets incentivize agencies towards professionalism, not penalize them through an avalanche of lawsuits. I ask our federal lawmakers to forget about politics and talking points and work together with communities across our great nation to focus on something that has had a proven positive effect on the quality of policing in America: professional police accreditation.