Where in Europe are campaigners trying to ban plastic grass?
After a recent petition submitted to the UK government called for a ban on the sale of artificial grass, questions around the environmental impact of plastic greenery are being raised. It turns out the environmental impact of astroturf could be worse than you think. Natural plants and grass encourage a healthy ecosystem by capturing CO2, emphasises the petition. Banning the sale of artificial grass could be a small step towards increasing the UK biodiversity, reducing our carbon footprint and helping our ever dwindling insect and wildlife population, it highlights. 29,321 participants signed the petition arguing that artificial grass creates huge volumes of plastic, cant always be recycled and can pollute soils with microplastics, which contribute highly to a consequent carbon footprint. Artificial grass creates huge volumes of plastic, cant always be recycled and can pollute soils with microplastics. But if you look at the bigger picture, there are also other damaging effects of the plastic grass, such as flooding. The grass contributes to flooding [and] can overheat making the lawns unusable and has no wildlife benefit.  A similar UK petition was issued in September 2020, and at the time only collected 11,667 signatures. The answer given at that time by the government was the following: We prefer to help people and companies make the right choice, rather than banning items outright.  If this new call to action reaches 100,000 signatures before November 17 2021, it will be considered for debate in parliament. Real grass needs water, this is undoubtedly a fact. Depending on the season and its superficy, it can require a lot of water. Currently the average Londoner consumes 164 litres of water per day, around 20 litres above the national average, according to the Mayor of London. So a conscious use of such a precious resource may make the difference when attempting to slow down climate change. On the other hand, artificial grass doesnt need that much water, if any. Its also worth taking into account the electricity savings you make by not having to mow the lawn, or fuel if you have a petrol lawnmower. If this new call to action reaches 100,000 signatures before November 17 2021, it will be considered for debate in parliament. Apart from water and electricity usage, the environmental impact of artificial grass and fake plants is far from positive. The problem is fake plants dont actively clean our environment, they are not going to improve the air by absorbing CO2 and transforming it into oxygen (the air we breathe). This action is not only useful in a closed room, but it actually contributes to combatting climate warming on every part of the planet. They wont have the chance to contribute to your compost and will be hard to recycle. The whole process of creating artificial greenery, from producing plastic parts to dying them the right colour in large factories, is another concern to bear in mind.