What do Fulani herders do to get meat to the market at the cheapest cost?
By Gbenga Olawepo-Hashim  AS a businessman and one with a passion for Economics, I have always believed that price could be a signal of the best economic policy choices. In my secondary school, some of my classmates called me Baba Econs. For the fun of it, I took the O level WAEC examination in Economics as an external student in my junior class, and I was glad with the result. I had A1. When I attended University of Buckingham in the United Kingdom for my masters degree, I was grateful to God that I obtained distinctions in International Economics and International Finance, to be sure that the secondary school performance was not a fluke. It may sound boastful and immodest, but it has become necessary in the Nigeria heavily self-opinionated atmosphere to make such introduction on this emotive subject matter. After all, I am just another politician; one of those expected not to know anything. Back to the real question: what are the things that Nigerian herders do that has kept the beef price in Nigeria one of the lowest in the world, precisely $4.85 per kilogramme, compared to higher prices obtainable in countries where most western oriented commentators want us to switch our livestock production pattern to, such as the United States where the price of beef is five times the cost in Nigeria, a whopping $24.18 per kilogramme, the Netherlands $24.19 per kilogramme, Israel $21.49 per kilo. Pretty simple stuff. The first is that he takes his cattle to the grass; he does not pay for the price of bringing the grass to his cattle. The second is almost similar: he takes his cattle to water, and he does not bring water to his cattle through a complex irrigation system that needs to be paid for in hard currency and needs to be maintained by experts from overseas. The third and most important, most times, he is the pharmacist, nurse and doctor of his cattle through a deep understanding of plants in the forest passed to him by his ancestors from generation to generation, now lost to most sedentary people. This may not be an exactly preferred veterinary medical practice, but it helps him keep his cost low. Hes also the social worker and the security personnel to his cattle like David in the Bible that would puts his life at risk to save one of his sheep, fighting physically with bare hands against the lion. Most of us today ridicule that commitment to a work culture that has endured for generations. We say in derision that some people prefer cows to life. The truth of the matter is that for any enterprise to succeed and endure, there must be passion even before money. Perhaps that is why the herder is reluctant to embrace a system that would put his cattle in the hands of civil servants that have been designed to manage the national livestock transformation plan. I am not a Fulani, but I grew up in New-Bussa Niger State and in Kwara, surrounded by Fulani settlements. I did not grow up with the consciousness of seeing Fulanis as oppressors seeking to grab anyones land, as is now the narrative, because of the almost abject poverty of most of them I know while growing up. As a matter of fact, we had a lot of them as our helps. We respected them and learnt a lot from their wisdom and simplicity. We all agree that the open grazing must go for its sundry limitations, even though sometimes exaggerated through a general stereotyping that confuses the criminal activities of some foreign nomads who have infiltrated our forests with the generally peaceful and lawful activities of local herders that have done their business peacefully for ages. Some of these well adumbrated sins of open grazing include destruction of farm lands, violence against sedentary farmers and sometimes resulting in death, trespass on private properties, land grabbing, ambition of the Fulani ethnic group, even though unsubstantiated. My economic instinct tells me that we may have ignored very important lessons from the best local expert in cattle rearing and management  the Fulani herder in our emotionally driven path to create a new livestock management system. Agro-Economic policies should not be a function of sentiments and politics but sound economics. Ranching, which some governors favor, will deliver beef to the market at a higher cost than that of U.S. if finally adopted, because the landing cost of equipment and services will make the price of beef completely unreachable for most households. The last time I checked the cost of fairly used 18,000 acres ranch in Argentina was a whopping $10m (N5 billion). Hundreds of such ranches would be needed, plus landing cost, cost of corruption, cost of delayed delivery, ports congestion, etc. ADVERTISEMENT  I understand that some people dont mind higher cost of beef as long as we deal with the Fulanis. I discussed this with a couple who replied me in Yoruba Aani tori pe a je eran, ka pe malu ni boda, meaning literally we wont pass the respect normally reserved for humans to a cow on account of our desire to eat beef. That may be true and may be in sync with prevailing sentiment, but an enduring National Agricultural Policy cannot be determined by base sentiments but on the numbers. I am persuaded, a policy that confines the herders to a grazing reserve where they will still be in control of their cattle but will not be in a position to trespass on other peoples land would be superior choice to a plan that hopes to put experienced pastoralists under the management of civil servants who lack any experience in cattle breeding and who are advised by imported specialist with zero knowledge of the local environment. The policy of developing grazing reserve must however not be imposed on any state that does not want it. After all, Land-Use under the Nigerian constitution is under the jurisdiction of state government. Those who want to breed their cattle at 5 times present cost have the fundamental human right to choose that, and those who want to breed their cattle at low cost also have rights to do so. That is what true federalism means. A word of caution for Federal Government officials: no matter how correct their positions are, they must learn the art of communication. They must not give the impression that the Fulani herders are especially favoured people by them, and unwittingly, setting the Fulani up as an endangered ethnic group. Both herders and farmers are Nigerians, and our ability to improve on the local experiences of these two strata in the agricultural sector, modernising their experience, improving on their techniques and not completely abolishing them will be the direction to go for sustainability, peace and security. I know this option would be controversial. Anyone with a better argument should bring it up and lets debate this subject.