Whats Joe Bidens Plan for Education?
Subscribe to The Nation Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month! Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month! Get The Nations Weekly Newsletter Fridays. The best of the week. By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nations journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Fridays. The best of the week. Thank you for signing up for The Nations weekly newsletter. Join the Books & the Arts Newsletter Mondays. The best of The Nations Books & the Arts, in your inbox biweekly. By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nations journalism. You can read our Privacy Policy here. Mondays. The best of The Nations Books & the Arts, in your inbox biweekly. Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue  Subscribe to The Nation Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month! Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month! Support Progressive Journalism The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter. The Nation is reader supported: Chip in $10 or more to help us continue to write about the issues that matter. Sign up for our Wine Club today. When Joe Biden took office last January, many were expecting a return to normalcyat least a Democratic version of it. After all, Biden was a Senate veteran and an establishment insider. Anyone looking to predict his early policy priorities might reasonably have looked back to the Obama and Clinton administrations. Yet Biden has staked out a forcefully progressive position on a wide range of issues, especially those related to young people. Perhaps most significantly, the administration will start delivering a monthly payment of up to $300 per child to low- and middle-income familiesa move that will benefit 88 percent of children and lift millions out of poverty. Despite a promise to invest heavily in it, he doesnt appear to have one. In education, weve seen the Joe Biden that many skeptical progressives expected. Rather than forge a new path, the administration has dusted off the tired playbook employed by centrist administrations from George H.W. Bush to Barack Obama. Across three decades, the presiding neoliberal consensus was that schools should function as mechanisms for leveling the playing field in an unequal society. Students may arrive with different levels of readiness, but they could all leave at a level of proficiencythat is, if schools and teachers were held accountable for their performance. The heart of that strategy was high-stakes standardized testing, advanced via the George W. Bush administrations No Child Left Behind Act and sustained through the Every Student Succeeds Act under President Obama. And though many had hoped for a reprieve in this second pandemic spring, the Biden administrations first education-related move was to mandate testing. In education, it seems, the new boss is the same as the old boss. This framing of the purpose of educationas a remedy for inequalitydates back a half century. Signing the landmark Elementary and Secondary Education Act in 1965, Lyndon Johnson generated a useful fiction to sell the American people on a policy compromise. Unlike many other industrialized countries that elected to build out the welfare state in the second half of the 20th century, the United States had only a middling appetite for redistribution. Johnson steered clear of equalization and instead proposed investments in opportunity. Proclaiming that education is the only valid passport from poverty, Johnson made clear that no one would get a handoutand no one would have to sacrifice. Instead, schools would be the meritocratic grounds upon which advantage would be earnedwhere the self-made would pull themselves up by their bootstraps. MORE FROM Jennifer C. Berkshire Culture War in the K-12 Classroom June 12, 2021 The GOPs Education Extremism Is Alienating Moderate Voters October 29, 2020 The Lunacy of Global Seafood Supply Chains May 20, 2020 Author page  Though both parties embraced the idea that the United States could educate its way out of poverty, centrist Democrats embraced it most fervently. In the face of stagnating wages and rising inequality, the answer was always more, or better, educationan approach neatly summed up by Bill Clintons mantra that what you earn depends on what you learn. Under Barack Obama, such thinking reached its apex. If schools werent leveling the playing field, it must be that teachers werent working hard enough, that bad schools remained open, or that parents suffered an absence of choice. His administration, in turn, ratcheted-up the assault on unions, accelerated the closure of low-performing schools, and ushered in a new era for charter schools. Shifting the blame for the growing number of economic losers onto those individuals themselves, while demanding virtually nothing of those at the top, was archetypal neoliberal policy. And the result was a political catastrophe for the Democrats, whose message sounded corporate and elitist to many Americans left behind by the new economy. Related Articles The Miseducation of White Children Elie Mystal Bake Sales and Tesla Raffles: The Unequal World of PTA Wealth Neal Morton  But expecting schools to solve poverty was also a disaster for public education. Schools cant fix inequality, no matter how hard teachers work. Indeed, the biggest problems faced by our schools are caused by the inequalities that characterize our society. A half-century after education became the official poverty policy of the United States, disappointment in our schoolsfueled largely by unrealistic expectations of what they can donow threatens the entire enterprise of public education. The new administration seems to have realized that the best way to eradicate poverty is to address it head-on. Yet, even as Biden works to put literal cash in the hands of the poor, his education policy has failed to reflect this historic realignment. Instead, the administration continues to talk about schools, from K-12 to community colleges, in the language of human capital acquisition and workforce development. And its not just the rhetoric. Bidens education policies also reflect an absence of new ideas. His secretary of education, Miguel Cardona, has spent much of his early tenure on the job defending high-stakes tests. And at the heart of Bidens K-12 agenda is a massive infusion of funds into the original education fixTitle I of Lyndon Johnsons Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Our schools cant fix the problems of poverty, and parts of the Biden administration seem to know that. But until education policy breaks free from this framing of the purpose of school, it will remain difficult to recognize what our schools can do. At a time when voting rights are increasingly being restricted, when we continue to debate the value of Black lives, and when we cant agree on basic facts, public education has an essential role to play. We dont have public schools in this country so that young people can compete for advantage against each otheror so that the private sector can reduce the costs of training labor. Instead, we tax ourselves to pay for universal K-12 education because public schools are the bulwark of a diverse, democratic society. Thats the message that the Biden administration should be sending. Its the message we need.