Why is Ancestry.com protecting serial killers?
Yes would be a 90% winner, and the other 10% would be ACLU types suddenly signing up just to vote. Even criminals would say, Yeah, for a killer, sure, thats fine. Only a few law professors and, of course, the Times Charles Blow, would be against it, which is formidable competition, but I still think we can win this baby! The objections to allowing police access to genealogical websites consist of vague invocations of privacy. University of Maryland law professor Natalie Ram, for example, told the Times that law enforcements use of genealogical databases was chilling, concerning and privacy-invasive.  Many people find serial killers breaking into their homes, tying them up and raping them to be chilling, concerning and privacy-invasive, so we seem to be at an impasse.