Do We Need a New Atlantic Charter?
At a summit meeting in England last week, President Joe Biden and U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson signed a new Atlantic Charter, pledging their countries to work together on a range of issues, from combating climate change and preparing effectively for future pandemics to the defense of democracy and the rules-based international order. The agreement intends to build on the commitments and aspirations set out eighty years ago in the original Atlantic Charter, signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill on August 14, 1941, at their first wartime meeting, held at a U.S. naval base in Newfoundland. The much-publicized agreement reflects Mr. Johnsons determination to reorient British foreign policy away from Europe in the wake of Brexit. For Mr. Biden it represents a renewed commitment to Americas traditional allies after four years of tension during the Trump presidency, with its policy of America First. As Mr. Johnson said in a statement, Eighty years ago the U.S. President and British Prime Minister stood together promising a better future. In fact, the Atlantic Charter of 1941 was less about remaking the world than about fighting World War II. At the time it was signed, Britain and Germany had been at war for less than two years, and the U.S. hadnt yet entered the conflict. But the Americans had already begun to help the British, notably through the Lend-Lease Agreement signed the previous March, which provided for the U.S. to supply Britain and its allies with war materials. A major purpose of the Charter was to prepare the American people for their likely future entry into the war by telling them what they would be fighting for. In this sense, the Atlantic Charter was more a propaganda statement than a program for action. Its eight clauses, echoed deliberately in the eight clauses of the 2021 Atlantic Charter, affirmed the right of peoples and nations to self-determination, the desirability of lowering trade barriers, the postwar disarmament of the aggressor nations, the freedom of the seas, and the necessity of social welfare measures and the alleviation of poverty. The U.S. and U.K. also said they would not seek territorial gains after the war. Importantly, the defeated nations were to be included in the lowering of trade barriers, a conscious rejection of the punitive economic measures that followed the end of World War I. But the ambitious statement wasnt signed by the leaders and had no formal legal power. Even the name Atlantic Charter wasnt official; it was invented by the Daily Herald, a left-wing British newspaper, to describe what was formally known as the Joint Declaration by the President and the Prime Minister.