# Can the free press be saved?

When Disney  at ABC News last week, it came on the heels of a year in which  were lost – and capped off a quarter-century in which we’ve seen  shut down or merged with larger conglomerates.

The upshot is that Americans now find ourselves trapped in an information environment more tightly controlled than ever by a handful of oligarchs.

## Mainstream Media and Monopolies

The media has trended in this direction for decades, but the story lost all subtlety when Jeff Bezos issued the . He declared that the Washington Post will focus its opinion section on “personal liberties and free markets”. That surely means more editorial attention on , right?

Mainstream media outlets have long  and, as a result,  on corporate benefactors. Now that those benefactors are competing to prove loyalty to their own benefactor in the White House, these essential institutions are stuck carrying water for the billionaire class, or else . The task of rebuilding truly independent news outlets, then, falls to journalists, readers and any concerned citizens who recognize how imperiled our free press has become – if there is to be any hope of the fourth estate holding the line against the second Trump regime.

## Media Trends and Legacy

Editorial encroachment by corporate interests dates back to the inception of the media age, when the competing newspaper empires of the ultra-wealthy William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer engaged in a sensationalist , publishing incendiary headlines, exaggerations, gossip and rumors that (among other ramifications) helped .

### Yellow Journalism

Yellow journalism, as it was called, abated thanks to the regulatory efforts of independent agencies such as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which established  requiring equal coverage of conflicting viewpoints on consequential issues (like Trump’s ongoing attempt ). But Ronald Reagan, in his laissez-faire frenzy, . Not to be outdone, Bill Clinton signed the deregulatory , which  “essentially bought and paid for by corporate media lobbies”.

### Media and Monopolies

That same year, the Nation published a special issue on what we called . It detailed the growing media-industrial complex, where the corporations programming our news were increasingly programming public opinion. We represented this syndicate via a glossy centerfold diagram of an octopus with four tentacles, one for each of America’s dominant media conglomerates: Disney, General Electric, Time Warner and Westinghouse (now CBS). Today,  over 90% of our information.

### Media's Evolving Role

Things are different now, and not for the better. While the news has represented a small cog in larger corporate structures long before this second Trump administration, we are now witnessing mass public capitulation from corporate owners in a way that feels unprecedented. Whether today’s billionaire media owners are angling for large federal contracts or anticipatorily bending the knee so their companies are not seen as “the enemy”, the chilling effect is the same: major media publications are even more incentivized now to treat the rich and powerful with kid gloves, if not outright sycophancy.

## The Media's Impact on Trump Administration

The few that refuse to do this will have to face the wrath of our notoriously censorious,  head of state. The most powerful man in the world is currently  for merely predicting that Kamala Harris would win the state last November; what he calls “election fraud” most people call “polling”. With that context, is there any reason to expect that prominent players like  would do anything but hold the line if it means getting FCC approval for their merger?

## Independent Newsrooms

The natural counterbalance to for-profit media would seem to be non-profit newsrooms. They need not go cross-eyed from trying to keep in view both the public’s interest and that of their owner. In the US alone there are at least , from  to , which has  for its investigative reporting. And independent journalism is currently enjoying a renaissance on self-publishing platforms  and . These sites offer refuge for writers that have renounced (or been renounced by) corporate news, including  and . The journalistic equivalent of farm-to-table, it cuts out any meddlesome middle-moguls between the writer and the reader. (The Nation has been independent since 1865.)

## The Need for Responsible Citizens

Yet neither of these alternatives offer a true one-to-one replacement for mainstream outlets. For all their latent bias, our media behemoths are uniquely positioned to furnish the resources to fund years-long investigations that often incur legal backlash, such as  – which might not have resonated as deeply with the Mailchimp logo at the bottom.

Not so long ago, Jeff Bezos was proud to bear this torch. At the inception of his ownership, he  as his model, and seemingly sincerely so, even if the Post did  of Amazon of its own volition. I experienced Bezos’s benign neglect first-hand. From 2011 to 2022, I  for the paper, most of them during Bezos’s tenure – including columns  and even . I never received any note remotely resembling the kind of editorial restrictions that he is imposing today – the likes of which just led the columnist and associate editor Ruth Marcus to  after four decades at the paper. Nevertheless, for a time, at least in this case, corporate ownership didn’t have to be mutually exclusive with editorial independence.

## Return of Independent News

But until that detente between owner and editorial is re-established, audiences and reporters will continue to flee compromised publications. In his email to the Washington Post’s team, Bezos argued that this newspaper of record could dodge offering a variety of perspectives because “”. It will take a new movement of responsible readers and benefactors to ensure that this is true.

* Katrina vanden Heuvel is editorial director and publisher of the Nation, she is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and she has contributed to the , the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times
```