‘They brought it on themselves’: a new low in US-Ukraine relations
----------------------------------------------------------------------

**Analysis**

‘They brought it on themselves’: a new low in US-Ukraine relations
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Diplomats gasp as Keith Kellogg claims Zelenskyy to blame for intel and aid pause – video

There was an audible gasp in the room at the Council on Foreign Relations as Keith Kellogg, the White House’s special envoy for Ukraine and Russia,  as like beating a farm animal with a piece of wood.

“Very candidly, they brought it on themselves, the Ukrainians,” Kellogg said as the veteran diplomats, academics, and journalists in the room recoiled in surprise. Several held their faces in their hands. “I think the best way I can describe it is sort of like hitting a mule with a two-by-four across the nose,” he continued. “You got their attention, and it’s very significant, obviously, because of the support that we give.”

The collapse in US-Ukraine relations since the  has been precipitous. Those around Trump viewed as the strongest supporters of Ukraine – including , national security adviser Mike Waltz, and Kellogg – have become vocal sceptics of continued US support or been sidelined entirely.

“We know that \ are just waiting for something they can use to pounce,” said a former senior US diplomat. “And I think that’s where you get the posturing by Rubio, Kellogg and also Waltz, which disturbs people who understand America’s interest in preventing a Putin win in .”

It has been matched by a rise in the people around Trump who hold vocally Eurosceptic views: Elon Musk, , and , the vice-president who seized his moment in the Oval Office and provoked a greater conflict between Trump and Zelenskyy.

Vance has made several key interventions meant to sow divisions with . He appears to have planned ahead of time. His team briefed European media before he spoke up during Trump’s meeting with Keir Starmer to complain about “infringements on free speech” in the UK. And when Zelenskyy disregarded advice from Kellogg, Republican senators, and others, not to clash with Trump during the White House meeting, Vance once again poured petrol on the fire.

“First Zelenskyy needs to keep silent in public about concerns with Trump’s policy moves, even though those concerns are justified,” the former senior official said. “It would be good for him to send a team to the meeting in Riyadh which is not at his level. I think he needs to sign the mineral agreement in any form that the  wants.”

, said the speculation on the part of many European officials was that “this was set up by Vance … that he wanted to sideline the Rubios, the Waltzes, the Kelloggs.”

These were supposed to be the adults in the room for this administration. Rubio was confirmed 99-0 by senators who believed he would help keep Trump’s foreign policy on track. Waltz was expected to be a centrist ally as national security adviser. And Kellogg, while sceptical of piecemeal support for Kyiv, was seen as a firm supporter of Ukraine.

[](https://api.nextgen.guardianapps.co.uk/_api/track/article/image?apiKey=b2197f40c1f5409681243e3535176b6b&trackType=impression&componentId=198516&mediaId=1284559&mediaType=Image&mediaContentType=Image&mediaSize=Large&mediaContentTitle=Ukraine%27s%20president%20Volodymyr%20Zelenskyy%20greets%20US%20envoy%20Keith%20Kellogg%20at%20his%20offices%20in%20Kyiv%20in%20February&mediaContentDescription=Ukraine%27s%20president%20Volodymyr%20Zelenskyy%20greets%20US%20envoy%20Keith%20Kellogg%20at%20his%20offices%20in%20Kyiv%20in%20February&mediaContentNewsId=1284559&mediaContentSection=Ukraine)

The collapse in relations between the US and Ukraine has been precipitous since the disastrous Oval Office meeting.

Instead, they have followed Trump into putting pressure on Ukraine. Rubio last week said: “Frankly, it’s a proxy war between nuclear powers – the United States, helping Ukraine, and  – and it needs to come to an end.”

That was a vision closely aligned with the Kremlin’s. Dmitry Peskov reacted positively to Rubio’s words, saying: “We can and want to agree with it, and we agree with it. That’s the way it is. We have said this repeatedly. We have said that this is actually a conflict between Russia and the collective west. And the main country of the collective west is the United States of America.”

That’s not the only way in which the US is adopting Russia’s views on the war. In his speech, Kellogg broke ground in describing how Trump sees the conflict: the US wants to position itself as a neutral arbiter between Russia and Ukraine, and Trump recognises that the US needs to “reset relations with Russia” to secure US national security. “The continued isolation and lack of engagement with the Russians as the war in Ukraine continues is no longer a viable strategy,” he said.

That portrayal is a radical realignment of US policy interests in the conflict. For three years, Washington has provided  to allow it to stay in the fight. But under a new Trump administration, those who supported the previous policy have quickly pivoted to back Trump as he seeks to end the war by putting pressure on Ukraine.

“Kellogg has some people around him who do know what they’re doing,” said Hill, who worked with him during the first Trump term. “He’s 80 years old. He fought in Vietnam. He knows his stuff. He’s no fan of Russia. He’s a total cold warrior. He’s trying to thread the needle there but he also works for the commander in chief, so he’s trying to interpret, in the best way that he can, what’s going on here? And he will not stray away from what Trump does or says, that’s why he is still there.”

Yet Kellogg was left off the list for a key summit between  in an attempt to repair the relationship. Waltz, Rubio, and Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff are set to travel for talks with Zelenskyy’s chief of staff Andriy Yermak and his team. The path forward is unclear – although both pro-Ukraine Americans and European officials believe that there is no alternative to US support in the conflict.

European officials are hopeful that Zelenskyy and the Trump officials can manage to hold a meeting that won’t erupt into open conflict. That may lead to a quick renewal of intelligence support, which European officials have not lost hope for.

But there are broader discussions about whether or not the US remains a viable longterm partner for Ukraine. For now, the Ukrainian side has few options except to make amends.
```