US judges alarmed over rise in violent threats as Trump and Musk lambast them
==============================================================================

Reuters interviews with 11 federal judges in multiple districts reveal mounting concern over their security

Reuters interviews with 11 federal judges in multiple districts reveal mounting concern over their security and, in some cases, a rise in violent threats in recent weeks. Most spoke on condition of anonymity and said they did not want to further inflame the situation or make comments that could be interpreted as conflicting with their duties of impartiality. The Marshals Service declined to comment on security matters.

As Reuters documented in a series of stories last year, political pressure on federal judges and violent threats against them have been rising since the 2020 presidential election, when federal courts heard a series of highly politicized cases, including failed lawsuits filed by Trump and his backers seeking to overturn his loss. Recent rhetorical attacks on judges and the rise in threats jeopardize the judicial independence that underpins America’s democratic constitutional order, say legal experts.

US supreme court Chief Justice John Roberts, in his annual year-end report in December, warned about a rising number of threats to the judiciary’s independence, including calls for violence against judges and “dangerous” suggestions by elected officials to disregard court rulings they disagree with.

On social media, Musk, the world’s richest person, has lambasted judges in more than 30 posts since the end of January on his social media site X, calling them “corrupt”, “radical”, “evil” and deriding the “TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY” after judges blocked parts of the federal downsizing that he has led. The Tesla CEO has also reposted nearly two dozen tweets by others attacking judges.

Reuters interviews with 11 federal judges in multiple districts revealed mounting alarm over their physical security and, in some cases, a rise in violent threats in recent weeks. Most spoke on condition of anonymity and said they did not want to further inflame the situation or make comments that could be interpreted as conflicting with their duties of impartiality. The Marshals Service declined to comment on security matters.

As Reuters documents in a series of stories last year, political pressure on federal judges and violent threats against them have been rising since the 2020 presidential election, when federal courts heard a series of highly politicized cases, including failed lawsuits filed by Trump and his backers seeking to overturn his loss. Recent rhetorical attacks on judges and the rise in threats jeopardize the judicial independence that underpins America’s democratic constitutional order, say legal experts.

US supreme court Chief Justice John Roberts, in his annual year-end report in December, warned about a rising number of threats to the judiciary’s independence, including calls for violence against judges and “dangerous” suggestions by elected officials to disregard court rulings they disagree with.

On social media, Musk, the world’s richest person, has lambasted judges in more than 30 posts since the end of January on his social media site X, calling them “corrupt”, “radical”, “evil” and deriding the “TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY” after judges blocked parts of the federal downsizing that he has led. The Tesla CEO has also reposted nearly two dozen tweets by others attacking judges.

Reuters interviews with 11 federal judges in multiple districts revealed mounting alarm over their physical security and, in some cases, a rise in violent threats in recent weeks. Most spoke on condition of anonymity and said they did not want to further inflame the situation or make comments that could be interpreted as conflicting with their duties of impartiality. The Marshals Service declined to comment on security matters.

Several judges said the US Marshals Service, which provides judicial security, has informed them of a heightened threat environment over the past several weeks, either verbally or in writing. The Marshals also discussed security measures, the judges said, including regular searches for threatening posts online.

Two New York federal judges – US district Judges Paul Engelmayer and Jeannette Vargas – are receiving extra security after their rulings blocked staff from Musk’s so-called “department of government efficiency” (Doge) from accessing sensitive treasury department data, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. Engelmayer and Vargas did not respond to requests for comment.

Another person familiar with the judicial security environment said several federal judges in the Washington DC area had received pizzas sent anonymously to their homes, which is being interpreted by law enforcement as a form of intimidation meant to convey that a target’s address is known.

“I’ve never seen judges as uneasy as they are now,” said John Jones III, a former US district judge in Pennsylvania appointed by George W Bush in 2002.

Jones, who also served on the security committee of the federal judiciary’s policymaking arm, said judges are now grappling with being identified by name in viral social media posts criticizing their integrity and demanding their impeachment. He said he has spoken to about a dozen current judges who expressed safety concerns for themselves and their families.

“The consequences are, quite starkly, that we’re going to get a judge killed if we’re not careful,” said Jones.

Federal courts are hearing more than 100 lawsuits challenging the administration’s initiatives, many of them focused on efforts driven by Musk and his team at Doge to purge hundreds of thousands of federal employees and dramatically scale back government aid and regulatory programs.

Trump and his White House press secretary  judges they describe as activists who have issued orders that slowed or blocked some of those efforts.

Asked about Musk’s comments, the White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said that Musk was speaking in his personal capacity and that the White House has taken no position on whether judges should be impeached. He said “threats against judges are unacceptable, and the president condemns such actions”, and that appropriate law enforcement agencies that are tasked with surveilling such threats are doing so.



Sign up to This Week in Trumpland

Free newsletter

A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration

Enter your email address

Sign up

**Privacy Notice:** Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our . We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google  and  apply.

after newsletter promotion

“We have to be careful”
-----------------------

When US district Judge Amir Ali ruled on 25 February that the  must resume US foreign aid payments that Trump had halted, Musk and other allies of the president called for the judge’s removal.

“When judges egregiously undermine the democratic will of the people, they must be fired,” Musk posted on X.

In response to that post, some of Musk’s followers on X said the judge should be arrested for treason or deported. One suggested: “US patriots fire upon him.” Some assailed his Muslim heritage and questioned his patriotism, including one who falsely asserted Ali had ties to Muslim militant groups.

Ali didn’t respond to a request for comment on the threats against him.

“The chatter among judges is we have to be careful,” one federal judge said in an interview. Judges overseeing Trump cases receive widespread media coverage, heightening security concerns when their decisions prove controversial, the judge said.

Several judges described threatening phone calls promising personal harm.

The American Bar Association issued a statement on Monday denouncing the ongoing wave of verbal assaults and threats against judges. The Federal Judges Association said in a statement to its 1,100 members late on Tuesday that “continued violence, intimidation and defiance directed at judges simply because they are fulfilling their sworn judicial duties” risked “the collapse of the rule of law”.

Explore more on these topics
----------------------------

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
```