Wes Streeting’s ‘high-stakes’ abolition of NHS England will cut 10,000 jobs
==========================================================================

Changes proposed by health secretary predicted to save as much as £500m but could be distraction for ministers

Wes Streeting has ordered a “high-stakes” reorganisation of the NHS that will scrap 10,000 jobs in an attempt to free up cash for frontline care.

Experts warned that the move to abolish NHS England and fold it into the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) could distract ministers from the urgent job of ending long waits for treatment, while trade unions expressed concern about the “shambolic” announcement of job cuts for public servants.

However, the health secretary said the move to abolish the “world’s largest quango” would put ministers back in charge of the health service while saving hundreds of millions of pounds that could be better spent on doctors, nurses and improving frontline care.

“I tell people now who resist this reform out of love for the , do not kill it with kindness,” Streeting said.

The decision to scrap NHS England, announced by the prime minister on Thursday, is a dramatic reversal of the unpopular NHS changes brought in by the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition government more than a decade ago.

One former health minister, James Bethell, said he wished the  had “had the guts to do this”, while Jeremy Hunt, the former health secretary, praised the “boldness” of the proposals.

Unveiling the plans, Keir Starmer said the move would “cut bureaucracy” and bring management of the health service “back into democratic control”, while Streeting said it was the “final nail in the coffin of the disastrous 2012 reorganisation, which led to the longest waiting times, lowest patient satisfaction and most expensive NHS in history”.

Whitehall sources said Streeting had made the decision that NHS England should be scrapped earlier this year amid frustration about the duplication that exists with the DHSC, and that Starmer had been fully on board with the idea.

The aim is for ministers to take back responsibility, but put an end to micromanaging by an arm’s-length central authority and empower hospitals and local health authorities to make their own decisions about how to improve.

Privately, Streeting had become deeply frustrated with the NHS’s apparent inability to improve waiting times, make hospitals run better and stop overspending, and also to make strategic changes to the way it operates, such as ramping up community-based care to reduce demand on A&E, despite its budget and workforce having increased substantially in recent years.

“By slashing through the layers of red tape and ending the infantilisation of frontline NHS leaders, we will set local NHS providers free to innovate, develop new, productive ways of working and focus on what matters most: delivering better care for patients,” he told the House of Commons.

Those close to Streeting said he holds a view also shared by other recent health secretaries that while NHS England has many different teams specialising in different areas of care, it lacked an overall strategy for rescuing the NHS from the “permacrisis” it has been stuck in for years.

Streeting had come to see NHS England as an organisation that “is in charge of everything but didn’t seem to be able to deliver on the things that matter most to politicians”, one insider said.

The reforms are expected to take two years, save up to £500m and lead to a halving in the size of the merged DHSC and NHS England, which collectively have 19,000 employees.

However, there were warnings that the attempted reforms could risk tying up the health service in a costly and time-consuming bureaucracy, while Unison, a leading trade union among health staff, said the announcement had “left NHS England staff reeling”.

“Just days ago they learned their numbers were to be slashed by half, now they discover their employer will cease to exist,” said Unison’s general secretary, Christina McAnea. “The way the news of the axing has been handled is nothing short of shambolic. It could surely have been managed in a more sympathetic way. Thousands of expert staff will be left wondering what their future holds.”

**Sign up to First Edition**

Free daily newsletter

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

Enter your email address Sign up

**Privacy Notice:** Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our . We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google  and  apply.

**Our morning email**

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters



**Denis Campbell Health policy editor**

**What’s happening and why it matters**

### 30,000 jobs could go in Labour’s radical overhaul of NHS

1d ago

### How did Andrew Lansley reorganise health and create NHS England?

1d ago

### Streeting’s ‘shock’ at scale of NHS struggles inspires big political gamble

2d ago

### Keir Starmer scraps NHS England to put health service ‘into democratic control’

2d ago

### Why has NHS England been abolished and what does it mean for patients?

2d ago

### Ten died of cancer after NHS blunder in England meant they were not invited for screening

4d ago

### Next boss of NHS England prepares purge of senior leadership team

6 Mar 2025

### One in three NHS doctors so tired their ability to treat patients is affected, survey finds

3 Mar 2025
```