Bruce Lehrmann appeals against federal court finding he raped Brittany Higgins
===============================================================================

Former Liberal staffer says sexual assault described by judge ‘substantially inconsistent’ with violent rape portrayed on The Project

- 
- Get our , , or 

### Contributor and Date



Tue 4 Mar 2025 20.44 EST

Last modified on Tue 4 Mar 2025 20.47 EST



Lehrmann has appealed the federal court’s finding that he raped Brittany Higgins on the grounds that the sexual assault described by Justice Michael Lee was “substantially inconsistent” with the violent rape portrayed on The Project.

In April last year Lee found that, on the balance of probabilities, Lehrmann raped Higgins in Parliament House in 2019 and the former Liberal staffer  by Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson when they broadcast an interview with Higgins in 2021.

Lehrmann is appealing the judgment and has filed submissions in the federal court outlining several grounds for appeal.

His appeal  said Higgins told The Project the incident involved “forceful sexual intercourse” but the case found by Lee “involved no force”.

“The problem is that the broadcast clearly suggests a violent rape, where the complainant was in tears and repeatedly refused consent, of which repeated refusal the perpetrator must have been aware,” the submission said.

“That is quite different from a non-violent rape involving inadvertent recklessness as to whether there was consent.”

Lehrmann’s legal team say he was denied procedural fairness because the case which was found to be true was not put to him in cross-examination.

“He was not cross-examined adequately on issues arising in the truth defence and accordingly, there has been a breach of procedural fairness to the extent we submit must result in the judgment against Mr Lehrmann being set aside,” the submission said.

Lehrmann has also argued the definition of rape was misconstrued by Lee and was not the ordinary person’s understanding of the word.

“The rape described graphically by Ms Higgins included allegations of violence, an assault, called out ‘no’ on multiple occasions and numerous references to an assault and trauma,” the submission said.

“The ordinary reasonable reader would have, particularly in this context, exclude rape by this form of non-advertent recklessness and would probably mean a violent rape with express lack of consent.”

In his judgment Lee said he was “satisfied a rape took place” but he did not accept it had been established that Higgins was crying and telling Lehrmann to stop at least half a dozen times or that he crushed “his leg against her leg so forcefully as to cause a large bruise” or that he left her “with her dress up around her waist”.

The third ground is that it was open to Lee to simply say “I just do not know” who to believe which would have led to a finding Ten and Wilkinson hadn’t proven their case.

This argument is based on adverse credit findings Lee made against both Higgins and Lehrmann because he did not think they had been entirely truthful.

“This is an exceptional case, and it was open to His Honour to simply say ‘I just do not know’ who to believe when he has made adverse credit findings against both Ms Higgins and Mr Lehrmann,” the submission said.



Sign up to Breaking News Australia

Free newsletter

Get the most important news as it breaks

Enter your email address

Sign up

**Privacy Notice:** Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our . We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google  and  apply.



### More on this story

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

### Most viewed

1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. 
6. 
7. 
8. 
9. 
10. 

### Sub Navigation

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

### Footer

- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning



- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 


```