# Ignore the row: Oscar-winning No Other Land offers a vision of a shared Palestine forged in solidarity

The documentary is both antisemitic and Israeli propaganda, according to critics. The truth is, it provides a rare glimpse of hope.

In 2009, Tony Blair visited Masafer Yatta, a collection of hamlets in the Palestinian West Bank. He had come to see a school that had gained attention for having been rebuilt in defiance of Israeli attempts to tear down the village. After he returned home, Israel cancelled the demolition order for the school. “This,” Basel Adra says, “is a story about power.”

Adra is one of the directors of __, a documentary about the experience of living through, and attempting to defy, Israel’s attempts to erase Masafer Yatta to create an IDF “firing zone”. Last week, . In the 1980s, Israeli authorities designated part of the area as “Firing Zone 918”, a closed military area. In 1999, the government issued eviction orders against Palestinians in the area for “illegally living in a firing zone”. Two decades of court battles ended in 2022 when Israel’s supreme court ruled the villagers .

The documentary is a collaboration between Adra and three other co-directors: Israeli journalist and activist Yuval Abraham, whose growing, tense friendship with Adra forms a key thread in the film; Hamdan Ballal, a Palestinian farmer and photographer; and Rachel Szor, an Israeli cinematographer.

Shot mainly between 2019 and 2023, it is a film about power. The power of Israel to assail Palestinian lives; the lack of power of Palestinians trying to resist. Even Blair’s tepid intervention was temporary. In 2022, the IDF forced children and teachers out of the school, moments before bulldozers flattened it.

Though this part of the story is not told in the film, documents unearthed in the state archives reveal that the IDF “firing zone” was deliberately created as a pretext for ethnically cleansing the area to create a . To force the villagers to accept defeat, soldiers confiscate vehicles, pour concrete into wells, cut water pipes, support armed settlers attacking residents. When one young Palestinian, Harun Abu Aram, protests about soldiers seizing a generator, he is shot at point-blank range. Paralysed from the neck down, denied proper treatment and, like many residents whose homes have been bulldozed, forced to live in a cave, Abu Aram died shortly before the filming was completed. The soldier who shot him knew he was being filmed. With power comes impunity.

The Oscar win has provoked a furious, and often poisonous, debate. Supporters of Israel have damned the documentary as “antisemitic”. Israel’s culture minister Miki Zohar condemned its . Others have dismissed it as “” and congratulated “”.

To describe _No Other Land_ as “antisemitic” is to degrade the very meaning of the term, turning it, in the words of Kenneth Stern, one of the drafters of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, into “a blunt instrument to ”, wielded by those who “seek out binary good/bad, black and white thinking”. It’s a means of silencing pro-Palestinian voices and of dismissing attempts to expose Israeli treatment of Palestinian people.

When _No Other Land_ triumphed at the , there was much condemnation of . The German culture minister, Claudia Roth, was criticised ; in response, her office claimed she had applauded only “”, not Adra. So normalised has anti-Palestinian racism become in certain circles that the sheer bigotry of this argument seemed to pass Roth by.

On the other side of the debate, some pro-Palestinian voices have dismissed _No Other Land_ as Israeli propaganda and Abraham as a “liberal Zionist” who “hops on the back of Palestinian pain and rides that wave as ”, engaging “”. The BDS movement – which campaigns for the boycott of Israeli goods and culture – , seemingly because Abraham is not pure enough in his condemnation of Israel. Such claims are not just profoundly unserious but undermine possibilities of building solidarity across the Israel/Palestine divide. Certainly, there are inevitably deep tensions when Palestinians and Israelis seek to collaborate, tensions created by the gross inequalities and imbalance of power that shape relations across the divide. Abraham possesses rights and freedoms denied to Adra, who is continually surveilled, harassed and restricted in his movements.

Abraham spoke of these tensions and inequalities in his speeches at the Oscars and in Berlin. They are explored in _No Other Land_, too. In one scene, Abraham bemoans the lack of views for one of his articles about the demolitions. “You want everything to happen quickly,” Adra responds, “as if you came to solve everything in 10 days and then go back home. This has been going on for decades. Get used to failing.”

Yet, for all the tension, Palestinians at the sharp end of Israeli rule have no doubts about the importance of figures such as Abraham. The writer Samah Salaime visited Masafer Yatta to gauge reactions to the call for a boycott. To a person, all were supportive, indeed proud, of Abraham. “Yuval,” one local activist told her, “is far more Palestinian than most of these online commentators attacking him… He is Jewish and Israeli, but he understands exactly what’s happening here just as I do, .”



Sign up to Observed

Free weekly newsletter

Analysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers

Enter your email address

Sign up

**Privacy Notice:** Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our . We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google  and  apply.

Explore more on these topics

*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   
*   



© 2025 Guardian News & Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. (dcr)
```