Tähelepanu! Artikkel on enam kui 5 aastat vana ning kuulub väljaande digitaalsesse arhiivi. Väljaanne ei uuenda ega kaasajasta arhiveeritud sisu, mistõttu võib olla vajalik kaasaegsete allikatega tutvumine.
SEBi pakutav hind kahjustab aktsionäre
?Grupp Vilniuse Panga aktsionäre on otsustanud, et SEB poolt pakutav hind ei ole vastuvõetav,? kinnitas Vilniuse Panga aktsiapakist ligi 28 protsenti kontrollivat aktsionäride gruppi esindav He-lenius.
?Vilniuse Panga akstia eest makstav hind peaks olema 60 litti pakutava 40 liti asemel,? kinnitas Helenius. Unibanka aktsial sellist konkreetset nõutavat hinnataset ei ole.
Heleniuse sõnul on väikeaktsionäride huve kahjustav nii Vilniuse Panga aktsia kui ka Läti Unibanka aktsia eest makstav hind. Unibanka aktsia eest maksab Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken ostupakkumises 1,9 latti.
?Selline hind on liiga madal ja kahjustab finantsinvestorite huve,? kinnitas Helenius. Ta kinnitas, et finantsinvestorid ei oota SEBilt mingit eraldi kokkulepet, vaid soovivad, et kõiki aktsionäride koheldaks võrdselt.
?Me esindame märkimisväärset aktsionäride hulka ja ei lase SEBil sellest nii kergesti välja tulla,? kinnitas Helenius.
Vilniuse Panga aktsionäridest esindab Helenius ligi 28 panga aktsionäridest, kuhu kuuluvad BRF 5,25, Firebird Management LLC 1,08, BBL Finland 2,46, Baltic Fund 1 3,24 , Griffin Capital 2,81 protsendiga. Lisaks veel väikeaktsionäre, kelle osalus kokku moodustab Vilniuse Pangas umbes 14.
Helenius märkis, et nad ei ole seotud High Br.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Tähelepanu! Artikkel on enam kui 5 aastat vana ning kuulub väljaande digitaalsesse arhiivi. Väljaanne ei uuenda ega kaasajasta arhiveeritud sisu, mistõttu võib olla vajalik kaasaegsete allikatega tutvumine.
SEBi pakutav hind kahjustab aktsionäre
?Grupp Vilniuse Panga aktsionäre on otsustanud, et SEB poolt pakutav hind ei ole vastuvõetav,? kinnitas Vilniuse Panga aktsiapakist ligi 28 protsenti kontrollivat aktsionäride gruppi esindav He-lenius.
?Vilniuse Panga akstia eest makstav hind peaks olema 60 litti pakutava 40 liti asemel,? kinnitas Helenius. Unibanka aktsial sellist konkreetset nõutavat hinnataset ei ole.
Heleniuse sõnul on väikeaktsionäride huve kahjustav nii Vilniuse Panga aktsia kui ka Läti Unibanka aktsia eest makstav hind. Unibanka aktsia eest maksab Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken ostupakkumises 1,9 latti.
?Selline hind on liiga madal ja kahjustab finantsinvestorite huve,? kinnitas Helenius. Ta kinnitas, et finantsinvestorid ei oota SEBilt mingit eraldi kokkulepet, vaid soovivad, et kõiki aktsionäride koheldaks võrdselt.
?Me esindame märkimisväärset aktsionäride hulka ja ei lase SEBil sellest nii kergesti välja tulla,? kinnitas Helenius.
Vilniuse Panga aktsionäridest esindab Helenius ligi 28 panga aktsionäridest, kuhu kuuluvad BRF 5,25, Firebird Management LLC 1,08, BBL Finland 2,46, Baltic Fund 1 3,24 , Griffin Capital 2,81 protsendiga. Lisaks veel väikeaktsionäre, kelle osalus kokku moodustab Vilniuse Pangas umbes 14.
Helenius märkis, et nad ei ole seotud High Br.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational relevance, focusing on financial news and shareholder disputes. It doesn't provide basic information on an educational topic, nor does it address elements pertinent to education. The content is not suitable for educational use, especially for primary or grade school levels, due to its complexity and lack of coherence with educational standards.

Educational score: 0