Kuupäev/kellaaeg
Kuupäeva(ad) - 19.04.2018
16:00 - 18:00
Sündmuspaik
Kuressaare ANK Noortejaam
Rubriik
Segased lood. Noortejaamas. (Küber) kiusamine kl 16.
Räägime tõsistest asjadest. Kübermaailmas käitumisest, laste omavahelisest usaldamisest ja viimase kuritarvitamise võimalikest tagajärgedest.
Koolikiusamisest (mis sageli läheb üle küberkiusamiseks). Kuidas kiusamist ennetada, sellega hakkama saada ja mida saab kõrvalseisja teha.
Peamine eesmärk on anda lastele usku, et nad ei ole siin maailmas üksi ja kuskil on alati keegi, kes neid mõistab (kes see keegi siis on ja kust ta leida).
Kogu loeng on üles ehitatud isiklikule kogemusele seoses kooli ja küberkiusamisega. #suurimjulgus
Ilona Kirst.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Kuupäev/kellaaeg
Kuupäeva(ad) - 19.04.2018
16:00 - 18:00
Sündmuspaik
Kuressaare ANK Noortejaam
Rubriik
Segased lood. Noortejaamas. (Küber) kiusamine kl 16.
Räägime tõsistest asjadest. Kübermaailmas käitumisest, laste omavahelisest usaldamisest ja viimase kuritarvitamise võimalikest tagajärgedest.
Koolikiusamisest (mis sageli läheb üle küberkiusamiseks). Kuidas kiusamist ennetada, sellega hakkama saada ja mida saab kõrvalseisja teha.
Peamine eesmärk on anda lastele usku, et nad ei ole siin maailmas üksi ja kuskil on alati keegi, kes neid mõistab (kes see keegi siis on ja kust ta leida).
Kogu loeng on üles ehitatud isiklikule kogemusele seoses kooli ja küberkiusamisega. #suurimjulgus
Ilona Kirst.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract discusses cyberbullying, school bullying, and trust among children, which are relevant educational topics. Although it's coherent and introduces key concepts, the content seems more like a workshop or event description rather than a comprehensive educational resource. It lacks exercises, solutions, and detailed insights, limiting its educational value.

Educational score: 3