Europarlament ei kiitnud vastuolulist autorikaitse eelnõu heaks
Euroopa Parlament lükkas neljapäeval tagasi vastuolulise autorikaitseseaduse eelnõu selle praegusel kujul, jätkates küsimuse arutamist septembris.
Hääletusel olid direktiivi vastu 318 ja poolt 278 saadikut, erapooletuks jäi 31.
Seaduse eesmärgiks on tagada internetis sisutootjatele õiglane autoritasu, kuid ettepanekut laitsid häälekalt nii USA tehnoloogiahiiud kui ka internetivabaduse aktivistid, kelle hinnangul tähendanuks selle heakskiitmine olulisi piiranguid sõnavabadusele.
Parlamendi neljapäevane otsus ei ole aga veel lõplik ning sellele järgnevad kõnelused liikmesriikidega seaduse lõpliku vormi üle. Euroopa Liidu praegune eesistujariik Austria on teatanud, et tahab seadusega ühele poole saada aasta lõpuks.
"See on väga keeruline küsimus," ütles Austria tehnoloogiaminister Norbert Hofer. "Proovime leida hea lahenduse, kuid see pole väga kerge."
Toimetaja: Priit Luts
Allikas: BNS.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Europarlament ei kiitnud vastuolulist autorikaitse eelnõu heaks
Euroopa Parlament lükkas neljapäeval tagasi vastuolulise autorikaitseseaduse eelnõu selle praegusel kujul, jätkates küsimuse arutamist septembris.
Hääletusel olid direktiivi vastu 318 ja poolt 278 saadikut, erapooletuks jäi 31.
Seaduse eesmärgiks on tagada internetis sisutootjatele õiglane autoritasu, kuid ettepanekut laitsid häälekalt nii USA tehnoloogiahiiud kui ka internetivabaduse aktivistid, kelle hinnangul tähendanuks selle heakskiitmine olulisi piiranguid sõnavabadusele.
Parlamendi neljapäevane otsus ei ole aga veel lõplik ning sellele järgnevad kõnelused liikmesriikidega seaduse lõpliku vormi üle. Euroopa Liidu praegune eesistujariik Austria on teatanud, et tahab seadusega ühele poole saada aasta lõpuks.
"See on väga keeruline küsimus," ütles Austria tehnoloogiaminister Norbert Hofer. "Proovime leida hea lahenduse, kuid see pole väga kerge."
Toimetaja: Priit Luts
Allikas: BNS.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational content relevant to primary or grade school curricula, focusing on a complex political issue. It doesn't introduce key concepts or provide coherent educational material, making it unsuitable for structured learning. The language and topic are too advanced for younger students.

Educational score: 0