Tekkis selline kysimus. Kas keegi teab soovitada kui kauaks oleks norm Jaapanisse minna, et seal parasjagu ringi tiirutada, et huvitavamad kohad ära näeks ja kas sealt saab ka mingeid soodsamaid pileteid Austraaliasse?
Kuhu Jaapanis kindlasti minna vóiks? (ma pean silmas midagi erilist, vaatamisväärsuste detailnimekiri on olemas…ehh)
Helena-Reet!
Et kui kaua?
Eks ikka sama jutt mis vanasti – uhest riigist ulevaate saamiseks laheb vaja mu arvates 1–3 kuud.
Arvan, et 1000.-EEK-i paevas on Jaapanis superturbomiinimum. (Kui keegi annaks vihjeid, kuidas odavamalt valja tulla, siis oleksin selle infi eest vaga tanulik!)
Arvan, et lennupileteid Austraaliasse peaks sealt kull odavalt saama. Japsid on hirmus kovad reisijad, seetottu peaks lennupiletite hinnad seal usna maas olema.
Tapsema Jaapani info saamiseks osta Jaapani Lonely Planet. ( Muuseas paris paks raamat on, seega infi sees kullaga).
Tervitustega
Kaerahelves
You know the way to Mordor.You have been there before.Take us to the Black Gate!
Tokio(fudzijama),Osaka(Osaka castel,Universal studio),Tokio disneyland,Kjoto linnas on palju unikaalseid asju,Nara linn
Hakkan nuud siin vahe norima, sorry.
Gramm luhike soovitus Marialt. Ja kes eriti ei tea, selles voib vahe segadust tekitada.
‘Tokio’ kirjapilt on kindlasti koigile arusaadav aga tegelikult naeb see valja nii -‘Tokyo’
Kjotoga on kull pahasti. Kui isegi Jaapanis moni sellenimeline asula peaks olema, siis ei asu see selles kohas, mida Sina silmas pidasid…
Oige on ‘Kyoto’.
Ko.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Tekkis selline kysimus. Kas keegi teab soovitada kui kauaks oleks norm Jaapanisse minna, et seal parasjagu ringi tiirutada, et huvitavamad kohad ära näeks ja kas sealt saab ka mingeid soodsamaid pileteid Austraaliasse?
Kuhu Jaapanis kindlasti minna vóiks? (ma pean silmas midagi erilist, vaatamisväärsuste detailnimekiri on olemas…ehh)
Helena-Reet!
Et kui kaua?
Eks ikka sama jutt mis vanasti – uhest riigist ulevaate saamiseks laheb vaja mu arvates 1–3 kuud.
Arvan, et 1000.-EEK-i paevas on Jaapanis superturbomiinimum. (Kui keegi annaks vihjeid, kuidas odavamalt valja tulla, siis oleksin selle infi eest vaga tanulik!)
Arvan, et lennupileteid Austraaliasse peaks sealt kull odavalt saama. Japsid on hirmus kovad reisijad, seetottu peaks lennupiletite hinnad seal usna maas olema.
Tapsema Jaapani info saamiseks osta Jaapani Lonely Planet. ( Muuseas paris paks raamat on, seega infi sees kullaga).
Tervitustega
Kaerahelves
You know the way to Mordor.You have been there before.Take us to the Black Gate!
Tokio(fudzijama),Osaka(Osaka castel,Universal studio),Tokio disneyland,Kjoto linnas on palju unikaalseid asju,Nara linn
Hakkan nuud siin vahe norima, sorry.
Gramm luhike soovitus Marialt. Ja kes eriti ei tea, selles voib vahe segadust tekitada.
‘Tokio’ kirjapilt on kindlasti koigile arusaadav aga tegelikult naeb see valja nii -‘Tokyo’
Kjotoga on kull pahasti. Kui isegi Jaapanis moni sellenimeline asula peaks olema, siis ei asu see selles kohas, mida Sina silmas pidasid…
Oige on ‘Kyoto’.
Ko.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational value as it appears to be a casual online discussion about traveling to Japan, with users sharing personal opinions and experiences. The content is not structured, coherent, or comprehensive, and does not align with educational standards.

Educational score: 1