Hübriidvaade
-
15.09.10, 12:48 #1
Re: 100BB: Cold-call, vastane squeezeb, math pliiz!
PM on stacking off range täpselt sama mis tava regulari vastu (nats lightim) aga erinevusega, et sa enam ei bluffi! See tähendab, et valuerange ei pea eriti laiendama aga bluffin range pead väga palju kokku võtma.
Võtame olukorraks kus Button avab, sa BB ja sinuni folditud.
a) Nitist regulari vastu on su range jube lai - SC-d, Q2s, J4s, 97o, A4o jne. value peale on siin keerulisem mängida.
b) tava kesk-regulari vastu kaotaksin offsuited connectorid, offsuited ässad ja value peale laseks JJ+, AQ+, mis peaks suht standard olema.
c) spewtardi vastu (kelle kohta ranget ootad) jätaksin bluffinrange väga väikesed - suuremad SC-d ja enamasti 3bettiks value peale. Olenevalt vastasest aga standard range oleks TT+, AJ+, QKs. Kui vastane jube 4bettor siis võib ranget loosemaks ajada.
Ranged võivad mul valed olla :( aga rangedest võib näha, et valuerange jääb pm. samaks, mängitakse ainult bluffinrangega. Seda seepärast, et enmaus mängijaid teeb halbu kalleid calle rohkem kui halbu kalleid folde. Kui ajama spewtardi vastu 3betting rnage looseks ning ta ainult shoveb üle meist või postflop call-call-call siis laseme tal teha tunduvalt vähe halbu calle ning hakkame ise tegema halbu calle/folde :)
Teema info
Kasutajad vaatamas seda teemat
Hetkel on 1 kasutajat vaatamas seda teemat. (0 registreeritud kasutajat 1 külalist).
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Hübriidvaade
-
15.09.10, 12:48 #1
Re: 100BB: Cold-call, vastane squeezeb, math pliiz!
PM on stacking off range täpselt sama mis tava regulari vastu (nats lightim) aga erinevusega, et sa enam ei bluffi! See tähendab, et valuerange ei pea eriti laiendama aga bluffin range pead väga palju kokku võtma.
Võtame olukorraks kus Button avab, sa BB ja sinuni folditud.
a) Nitist regulari vastu on su range jube lai - SC-d, Q2s, J4s, 97o, A4o jne. value peale on siin keerulisem mängida.
b) tava kesk-regulari vastu kaotaksin offsuited connectorid, offsuited ässad ja value peale laseks JJ+, AQ+, mis peaks suht standard olema.
c) spewtardi vastu (kelle kohta ranget ootad) jätaksin bluffinrange väga väikesed - suuremad SC-d ja enamasti 3bettiks value peale. Olenevalt vastasest aga standard range oleks TT+, AJ+, QKs. Kui vastane jube 4bettor siis võib ranget loosemaks ajada.
Ranged võivad mul valed olla :( aga rangedest võib näha, et valuerange jääb pm. samaks, mängitakse ainult bluffinrangega. Seda seepärast, et enmaus mängijaid teeb halbu kalleid calle rohkem kui halbu kalleid folde. Kui ajama spewtardi vastu 3betting rnage looseks ning ta ainult shoveb üle meist või postflop call-call-call siis laseme tal teha tunduvalt vähe halbu calle ning hakkame ise tegema halbu calle/folde :)
Teema info
Kasutajad vaatamas seda teemat
Hetkel on 1 kasutajat vaatamas seda teemat. (0 registreeritud kasutajat 1 külalist).
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract appears to be a discussion about poker strategies, using technical terms and jargon. It lacks coherence, clarity, and relevance to educational topics for primary or grade school levels. The content is specialized and not suitable for structured learning in an academic setting.

Educational score: 0