Kuressaare 1. lasteaias said kokku lasteaiaõpetajad, et tutvustada üksteisele oma koolilõputöid. Kolleegidele jagasid teadmisi Kuressaare 1. lasteaia, Ida-Niidu, Kärla ja Salme päevakodu pedagoogid, kirjutab Oma Saar. Päeva motoks oli “Tarkus tarviline vara, õpi hoolega!”
“Lasteaiaõpetajad on agarad õppijad ja kooli lõputööde raames uuritakse palju oma eriala puudutavaid valdkondi. Võimalusi oma uurimustöid tutvustada teistele sama eriala inimestele üle maakonna, ei ole,” tutvustas Külli Poom ürituse ideed.
Poomi sõnul olid kõik ettekanded põnevad ja harivad. Nii näiteks rääkis 1. lasteaia pedagoog Kai Jürlau Kuressaare linna lasteaedade ajaloost, tema kolleeg Kristina Männik võrdles meeskonnatööd Hea Alguse ja tavalasteaias..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Kuressaare 1. lasteaias said kokku lasteaiaõpetajad, et tutvustada üksteisele oma koolilõputöid. Kolleegidele jagasid teadmisi Kuressaare 1. lasteaia, Ida-Niidu, Kärla ja Salme päevakodu pedagoogid, kirjutab Oma Saar. Päeva motoks oli “Tarkus tarviline vara, õpi hoolega!”
“Lasteaiaõpetajad on agarad õppijad ja kooli lõputööde raames uuritakse palju oma eriala puudutavaid valdkondi. Võimalusi oma uurimustöid tutvustada teistele sama eriala inimestele üle maakonna, ei ole,” tutvustas Külli Poom ürituse ideed.
Poomi sõnul olid kõik ettekanded põnevad ja harivad. Nii näiteks rääkis 1. lasteaia pedagoog Kai Jürlau Kuressaare linna lasteaedade ajaloost, tema kolleeg Kristina Männik võrdles meeskonnatööd Hea Alguse ja tavalasteaias..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract provides some basic information about an educational event where kindergarten teachers share their research and knowledge. Although it introduces relevant concepts, the content is not comprehensive and lacks coherence, making it somewhat disorganized. The writing style is simple, but the extract's educational value is limited due to its superficial overview of the topics.

Educational score: 2