Suvelugemist
Suur suvi on ukse ees ja see on teadagi aeg, kui paljud inimesed saavad kontorist välja ja on aega veidi rohkem raamatute lugemisele pühenduda. Neil, kel järgmiseks paariks kuuks plaanid veel tegemata, on võimalus järgmisel nädalal teha algust ühe suurema kollektiivse lugemisega, mis kestab suve lõpuni. The Summer of Genji on projekt, mille käigus inimesed üle maailma loevad Jaapani kirjanduse klassikalist teost Genji Monogatari ingliskeelset tõlget (Royall Tyler, 2001) suupäraste tükkidena — ca. 100 lehekülge nädalas — ning arutavad siis loetut omavahel ülaltoodud blogis. Genji on muidugi kõike muud, kui lihtne lugemine ja nii on teiste lugejate tugi, olgu see siis tegelik või sümboolne, selle tekstiga hakkama saamiseks kindlasti teretulnud.
See viis mind aga mõttele, et sama mudelit võiks ju laiemaltki kasutada — miks mitte võtta kasvõi siinsamas blogis üheskoos ette mõni paks raamat, mis juba pikalt on paljudes riiulites istunud ja läbilugemist oodanud, ning seda siis üheskoos lugeda, arutada ja kommenteerida?.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Suvelugemist
Suur suvi on ukse ees ja see on teadagi aeg, kui paljud inimesed saavad kontorist välja ja on aega veidi rohkem raamatute lugemisele pühenduda. Neil, kel järgmiseks paariks kuuks plaanid veel tegemata, on võimalus järgmisel nädalal teha algust ühe suurema kollektiivse lugemisega, mis kestab suve lõpuni. The Summer of Genji on projekt, mille käigus inimesed üle maailma loevad Jaapani kirjanduse klassikalist teost Genji Monogatari ingliskeelset tõlget (Royall Tyler, 2001) suupäraste tükkidena — ca. 100 lehekülge nädalas — ning arutavad siis loetut omavahel ülaltoodud blogis. Genji on muidugi kõike muud, kui lihtne lugemine ja nii on teiste lugejate tugi, olgu see siis tegelik või sümboolne, selle tekstiga hakkama saamiseks kindlasti teretulnud.
See viis mind aga mõttele, et sama mudelit võiks ju laiemaltki kasutada — miks mitte võtta kasvõi siinsamas blogis üheskoos ette mõni paks raamat, mis juba pikalt on paljudes riiulites istunud ja läbilugemist oodanud, ning seda siis üheskoos lugeda, arutada ja kommenteerida?.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract discusses a summer reading project focused on a classic Japanese novel, which could be relevant to educational topics. However, it lacks coherence, clarity, and structured learning content, making it less suitable for primary or grade school levels. The text is more of a blog post inviting readers to participate in a reading project rather than a structured educational resource.

Educational score: 2