Friday, March 9, 2012
EMV Main Event
EMV'st siis paari sõnaga :
Satelliitisin ME'le sisuliselt viimase satelliidi late registration'i viimasel minutil (starsis) kuna olin eelnevad võimalused lihtsalt maha maganud. Õnneks sain pileti suht muretult välja prinditud.
DAY 1.
Keskpärane laud, üks massiivne loose fish, teised jorsid mingil määral kompetentsed. Alustan kohe hästi kui floppan esimesel levelil 2 setti ning saan oma 20k algstacki 55k peale. Edasi kõigun pikka aega 35 - 55k vahel tehes paar edukat bluffcatchi aga samas spewides ka mõttetult chippe. Liigun viimaseks paariks leveliks teise lauda kus olen pikalt carddead kuni saan AK > AQ preflop nupud sisse ning AK peab - stack on hetkeks 85k. Pikalt rõõmu pole kuna järgmise käega floppan KTs'iga FD+overcardi vastase top paari vastu. Fold equity puudub ja ükski outidest koju ei tule seega olen tagasi 40k peal. Lõpetan päeva 46k stackiga mis annab järgmiseks hommikuks 46 bb'd.
DAY 2
Uus päev, uus laud, uued vastased. Ainus tuntud nägu lauas on Mauri Dorbek keda kohe alguses edukalt bluffcatchin. Nagu ka eelmine päev on esimesed levelid kaardijooks "tummine". Võtan välja 3 vastast, käed siis vastavalt TT > A9, AA > AK ning A5s > KK kui olen committed shorstacki AI'd callima. Stack on ca 105k kui mind viiakse teise lauda.
Uus laud on tunduvalt agressiivsem ja noorem, käib aktiivne 3b/4b mäng ning näen ka 3barrel bluffe. Bleedin vaikselt kuni stack 80k ja leian SB'lt AQ. Andres Soome openshoveb CO'lt ca 40k ( ~10bb) ja flippan.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Friday, March 9, 2012
EMV Main Event
EMV'st siis paari sõnaga :
Satelliitisin ME'le sisuliselt viimase satelliidi late registration'i viimasel minutil (starsis) kuna olin eelnevad võimalused lihtsalt maha maganud. Õnneks sain pileti suht muretult välja prinditud.
DAY 1.
Keskpärane laud, üks massiivne loose fish, teised jorsid mingil määral kompetentsed. Alustan kohe hästi kui floppan esimesel levelil 2 setti ning saan oma 20k algstacki 55k peale. Edasi kõigun pikka aega 35 - 55k vahel tehes paar edukat bluffcatchi aga samas spewides ka mõttetult chippe. Liigun viimaseks paariks leveliks teise lauda kus olen pikalt carddead kuni saan AK > AQ preflop nupud sisse ning AK peab - stack on hetkeks 85k. Pikalt rõõmu pole kuna järgmise käega floppan KTs'iga FD+overcardi vastase top paari vastu. Fold equity puudub ja ükski outidest koju ei tule seega olen tagasi 40k peal. Lõpetan päeva 46k stackiga mis annab järgmiseks hommikuks 46 bb'd.
DAY 2
Uus päev, uus laud, uued vastased. Ainus tuntud nägu lauas on Mauri Dorbek keda kohe alguses edukalt bluffcatchin. Nagu ka eelmine päev on esimesed levelid kaardijooks "tummine". Võtan välja 3 vastast, käed siis vastavalt TT > A9, AA > AK ning A5s > KK kui olen committed shorstacki AI'd callima. Stack on ca 105k kui mind viiakse teise lauda.
Uus laud on tunduvalt agressiivsem ja noorem, käib aktiivne 3b/4b mäng ning näen ka 3barrel bluffe. Bleedin vaikselt kuni stack 80k ja leian SB'lt AQ. Andres Soome openshoveb CO'lt ca 40k ( ~10bb) ja flippan.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract appears to be a personal blog post about a poker tournament experience, written in an informal tone and including technical terms specific to poker. It lacks educational content relevant to primary or grade school curricula, and its language and subject matter are not suitable for young students.

Educational score: 0