Filosoofiline küsimus: kas perenaine, kes ühtainust maasikapeenart seitse tundi järjest rohib – ja agaralt, ausõna, mitte luuslanki lüües -, on väga usin või hoopis väga laisk? Sest usina perenaise maasikapeenar ei saavuta mitte iialgi sellist konditsiooni, mis seitsmetunnist rohimist nõuab … No ma olen distantsperenaine, mis teha. Siit ka umbrohu võidukäik. Aga usinuse tõestuseks oli käsi eile õhtul nagu puupakk. Ega rohimisele eelnenud elu esimene hekilõikamine kah asja paremaks teinud. Määrisin peale salvi Deep Heat (vanainimesed pidid selle kohta ütlema Teeb Head) ja mässisin käpakese paksu salli sisse. Hambaid pesin vasaku käega. Näovee pudeli keerasin lahti HAMMASTEGA. Nagu näha, olen sõrmed tänaseks siiski käima saanud. Aga üks maasikapeenar on veel, ja selle kallale pääsen heal juhul alles nädalavahetusel …
Kuulsin kägu ja nägin kassi, kes hüppas nagu jänes. Jäneseid, neid meie hekialuseid elukaid, pole sel aastal veel näinud..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Filosoofiline küsimus: kas perenaine, kes ühtainust maasikapeenart seitse tundi järjest rohib – ja agaralt, ausõna, mitte luuslanki lüües -, on väga usin või hoopis väga laisk? Sest usina perenaise maasikapeenar ei saavuta mitte iialgi sellist konditsiooni, mis seitsmetunnist rohimist nõuab … No ma olen distantsperenaine, mis teha. Siit ka umbrohu võidukäik. Aga usinuse tõestuseks oli käsi eile õhtul nagu puupakk. Ega rohimisele eelnenud elu esimene hekilõikamine kah asja paremaks teinud. Määrisin peale salvi Deep Heat (vanainimesed pidid selle kohta ütlema Teeb Head) ja mässisin käpakese paksu salli sisse. Hambaid pesin vasaku käega. Näovee pudeli keerasin lahti HAMMASTEGA. Nagu näha, olen sõrmed tänaseks siiski käima saanud. Aga üks maasikapeenar on veel, ja selle kallale pääsen heal juhul alles nädalavahetusel …
Kuulsin kägu ja nägin kassi, kes hüppas nagu jänes. Jäneseid, neid meie hekialuseid elukaid, pole sel aastal veel näinud..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational value as it appears to be a personal blog post or diary entry, discussing the author's experience with strawberry picking and their daily life. It does not provide any relevant information or concepts related to educational topics. The text is also written in an informal style and includes personal anecdotes, making it unsuitable for educational purposes.

Educational score: 0