Kohe pĂ€rast viimase postituse avalikustamist valdavad mind nii vastakad tunded – otseloomulikult ei ole see esimene kord. See on ka ĂŒks neid pĂ”hjuseid, miks ma end kunagi *blogija* tiitli vÀÀriliseks ei pea – igaĂŒks vĂ”ib arvuti avada, visata kirja tohutul hulgal ridu, oma eluloo ja hala. Olgugi, et ma vĂ”in öelda, et minu ja Kenert PĂ€triku algus on siiani olnud ĂŒsna raske, me oleme ĂŒletanud nii mĂ”negi takistuse, kuid haletsus ei ole kohe kindlasti see, mida me temaga taga ajame.
Ma tean, et siin on ka teid, mu kallid, kes olete mu kĂ”rval olnud juba pĂ€ris esimesest postitusest peale ja seetĂ”ttu teie juba teate, kuid rÀÀgin siiski ĂŒle, sest vahepeal on lisandunud uusi hingi ja ilmselt pole kĂ”ik veel teadlikud. Kui ma aasta alguses selle selle blogi avasin, siis oli mul peas vaid ĂŒks soov ja plaan – kirjutada justkui iseendale ja iseenda jaoks. Samuti ei ole ma kunagi jĂ€lginud oma kirjavigu(eriti telefoniga kirjutades tekib neid meeletult), ega pidanud lugu ĂŒleliigsest seletamisest ja justkui enda Ă”igustamisest – see siin ei ole koht, kus tahan tunda end survestatult ja teha seda kellegi teise pĂ€rast.
Sellegi poolest tunnen ma suurt “vajadust” end teile selgitada ja Ă”igustada. Minu eelmises postituses kĂ”lama jÀÀnud lause “Tegelikult pole ma siiani suutnud otsustada, kas ja kui palju loost ja detaile jutustan ma Kenertile…” jĂ€i pinnuks silma nii mĂ”nelegi postituse lugejale. KĂŒll olevat ma end segaselt sĂ”nastanud ja siis tuldi Ă”petama, et oi… Eestis on ig.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Kohe pĂ€rast viimase postituse avalikustamist valdavad mind nii vastakad tunded – otseloomulikult ei ole see esimene kord. See on ka ĂŒks neid pĂ”hjuseid, miks ma end kunagi *blogija* tiitli vÀÀriliseks ei pea – igaĂŒks vĂ”ib arvuti avada, visata kirja tohutul hulgal ridu, oma eluloo ja hala. Olgugi, et ma vĂ”in öelda, et minu ja Kenert PĂ€triku algus on siiani olnud ĂŒsna raske, me oleme ĂŒletanud nii mĂ”negi takistuse, kuid haletsus ei ole kohe kindlasti see, mida me temaga taga ajame.
Ma tean, et siin on ka teid, mu kallid, kes olete mu kĂ”rval olnud juba pĂ€ris esimesest postitusest peale ja seetĂ”ttu teie juba teate, kuid rÀÀgin siiski ĂŒle, sest vahepeal on lisandunud uusi hingi ja ilmselt pole kĂ”ik veel teadlikud. Kui ma aasta alguses selle selle blogi avasin, siis oli mul peas vaid ĂŒks soov ja plaan – kirjutada justkui iseendale ja iseenda jaoks. Samuti ei ole ma kunagi jĂ€lginud oma kirjavigu(eriti telefoniga kirjutades tekib neid meeletult), ega pidanud lugu ĂŒleliigsest seletamisest ja justkui enda Ă”igustamisest – see siin ei ole koht, kus tahan tunda end survestatult ja teha seda kellegi teise pĂ€rast.
Sellegi poolest tunnen ma suurt “vajadust” end teile selgitada ja Ă”igustada. Minu eelmises postituses kĂ”lama jÀÀnud lause “Tegelikult pole ma siiani suutnud otsustada, kas ja kui palju loost ja detaile jutustan ma Kenertile…” jĂ€i pinnuks silma nii mĂ”nelegi postituse lugejale. KĂŒll olevat ma end segaselt sĂ”nastanud ja siis tuldi Ă”petama, et oi… Eestis on ig.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract appears to be a personal blog post, written in an informal tone, and lacks any educational content or relevance to academic topics. It does not introduce key concepts, nor does it follow a clear and consistent writing style suitable for educational purposes.

Educational score: 0