LIS, WHIT & THE NFL ⟩ Neljas nädal. Rob Saksamaalt teeb lolle pakkumisi, NFL'is löödi läbi aegade kaugeim värav
lugemist
Olin surmkindel, et Whitney vastu tuleb võit… aga ei tulnud mitte. Lõpetasin kolmanda nädala 128.33 punktiga, küll rohkem kui line-up’ile prognoositi, aga kuna minu meestest jäid mitmesuguste vigastuste tõttu poole matši pealt pingile kaks wide receiver’it, tuli vastu võtta kibe kaotus. Sama saatus tabas meie stupid bet’e, kõik kaotasid.
Mingi tüüp meie liigas saadab mulle pidevalt lollakaid trade pakkumisi, umbes, et anna mulle staarid Nick Chubb (RB, Cleveland Browns) ja Ja’Marr Chase (WR, Cincinnati Bengals) ja vastu saad viis suvalist mängijat. Kui tehingu kolmandat korda tagasi lükkasin, otsustas kutt (okei, ma ei tea, kas on kutt, aga 99% kindel, et on) neljandale pakkumisele lisada paar rida selgituseks. See kõlas umbes, et “sul on head mängumehed pingil, mul on vaja paremaid mängumehi, anna oma head mulle”.
Nope, no, ain’t happening, vastasin ja litsusin jälle reject. Trade on siis kui sul on mingil mängupositsioonil veidi kehv seis ja oled nõus mõne teise positsiooni hea mängija vahetama tolle kehva positsiooni tugevamaks tegemiseks. Saabus viies ettepanek: “MIKS SUL ON HEAD MÄNGIJAD PINGIL, MUL EI OLE HÄID MÄNGIJAID, ANNA SIIS JUBA MULLE!!!”, what the fuck Rob from Germany, make me a better offer, raisk, võib-olla menetlen. Tegelikult on mul hoopis plaan pakkuda RB Josh Jacobs (Las Vegas Raiders) Whitney’le ja vastu küsida TE George Kittle (San Fr.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: LIS, WHIT & THE NFL ⟩ Neljas nädal. Rob Saksamaalt teeb lolle pakkumisi, NFL'is löödi läbi aegade kaugeim värav
lugemist
Olin surmkindel, et Whitney vastu tuleb võit… aga ei tulnud mitte. Lõpetasin kolmanda nädala 128.33 punktiga, küll rohkem kui line-up’ile prognoositi, aga kuna minu meestest jäid mitmesuguste vigastuste tõttu poole matši pealt pingile kaks wide receiver’it, tuli vastu võtta kibe kaotus. Sama saatus tabas meie stupid bet’e, kõik kaotasid.
Mingi tüüp meie liigas saadab mulle pidevalt lollakaid trade pakkumisi, umbes, et anna mulle staarid Nick Chubb (RB, Cleveland Browns) ja Ja’Marr Chase (WR, Cincinnati Bengals) ja vastu saad viis suvalist mängijat. Kui tehingu kolmandat korda tagasi lükkasin, otsustas kutt (okei, ma ei tea, kas on kutt, aga 99% kindel, et on) neljandale pakkumisele lisada paar rida selgituseks. See kõlas umbes, et “sul on head mängumehed pingil, mul on vaja paremaid mängumehi, anna oma head mulle”.
Nope, no, ain’t happening, vastasin ja litsusin jälle reject. Trade on siis kui sul on mingil mängupositsioonil veidi kehv seis ja oled nõus mõne teise positsiooni hea mängija vahetama tolle kehva positsiooni tugevamaks tegemiseks. Saabus viies ettepanek: “MIKS SUL ON HEAD MÄNGIJAD PINGIL, MUL EI OLE HÄID MÄNGIJAID, ANNA SIIS JUBA MULLE!!!”, what the fuck Rob from Germany, make me a better offer, raisk, võib-olla menetlen. Tegelikult on mul hoopis plaan pakkuda RB Josh Jacobs (Las Vegas Raiders) Whitney’le ja vastu küsida TE George Kittle (San Fr.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational value, focusing on personal experiences with fantasy football, including trade negotiations and game outcomes. It contains colloquial language and does not introduce key concepts relevant to school curricula. The content is incoherent and disorganized for educational purposes.

Educational score: 0