Tegin suurepäraseid calle ja mu readid olid perfektsed.
Rahamullis tegin liiga Paavo Trommile, kui 4-bet shovesin 88-ga ning sain KK-lt calli . Tank-shovesin, sest mul oli riid, et ta pole nii tugev (meie vaheline ajalugu). Kahjuks mu riid vedas mind seekord alt, aga õnneks toetas mind laud (board: 95674 - mulle rida).
Esimesel päeval mängisime kuni kuni finaallauani, ehk kuue mängijani.
Esimese päeva lõpetasin chipliidrina.
Finaallaud
Finaallauas mängisin paar väga huvitavat potti ning mul õnnestus need klipid Youtubei panna. Lisaks Paavo ja Veiko analüüs jalavärina kohta:
1.) Raigo QTs vs Lardo 64o
(käe täpne käik video all olevas Infos! Kommentaatorid lugesid kätt valesti.)
2.) Raigo 67s vs Indrek A4o
(käe täpne käik video all olevas Infos).
3.) Kutsehaigused
4.) Raigo AA vs Indrek T9o
5.) Raigo A9o vs Laur 44 vs Lardo KK
6.) Raigo KJo vs Indrek TT vs Laur AKo
7.) Agoonia!
Kahjuks rohkem videosid ei saanud lisada, sest kolmas lindistatud fail oli vigane, mida ei saanud vaadata/töödelda.
Lühikokkuvõte kolmandast ehk viimasest mängufaasist
Sain duubli 280k peale, kui panime Reigo Maariga preflop nuppe JJ vs 88 ning minu poisid pidasid.
Kohe paar kätt hiljem andsin talle duubli vastu, kui preflop shovesime A6s vs A9 ning tema kicker pidas.
Lõpuks jäi meid kolm alles ning shovesin BTN-ist K8s-ga (120k stack, blindid 4000-8000/1k).
Indrek callis AKo-ga.
Flop oli dramaatiline 679ss, ehk mulle open-ended straight-draw + flush-draw ning lisaks aitas mind 8.
Kahjuks turn ja river o.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Tegin suurepäraseid calle ja mu readid olid perfektsed.
Rahamullis tegin liiga Paavo Trommile, kui 4-bet shovesin 88-ga ning sain KK-lt calli . Tank-shovesin, sest mul oli riid, et ta pole nii tugev (meie vaheline ajalugu). Kahjuks mu riid vedas mind seekord alt, aga õnneks toetas mind laud (board: 95674 - mulle rida).
Esimesel päeval mängisime kuni kuni finaallauani, ehk kuue mängijani.
Esimese päeva lõpetasin chipliidrina.
Finaallaud
Finaallauas mängisin paar väga huvitavat potti ning mul õnnestus need klipid Youtubei panna. Lisaks Paavo ja Veiko analüüs jalavärina kohta:
1.) Raigo QTs vs Lardo 64o
(käe täpne käik video all olevas Infos! Kommentaatorid lugesid kätt valesti.)
2.) Raigo 67s vs Indrek A4o
(käe täpne käik video all olevas Infos).
3.) Kutsehaigused
4.) Raigo AA vs Indrek T9o
5.) Raigo A9o vs Laur 44 vs Lardo KK
6.) Raigo KJo vs Indrek TT vs Laur AKo
7.) Agoonia!
Kahjuks rohkem videosid ei saanud lisada, sest kolmas lindistatud fail oli vigane, mida ei saanud vaadata/töödelda.
Lühikokkuvõte kolmandast ehk viimasest mängufaasist
Sain duubli 280k peale, kui panime Reigo Maariga preflop nuppe JJ vs 88 ning minu poisid pidasid.
Kohe paar kätt hiljem andsin talle duubli vastu, kui preflop shovesime A6s vs A9 ning tema kicker pidas.
Lõpuks jäi meid kolm alles ning shovesin BTN-ist K8s-ga (120k stack, blindid 4000-8000/1k).
Indrek callis AKo-ga.
Flop oli dramaatiline 679ss, ehk mulle open-ended straight-draw + flush-draw ning lisaks aitas mind 8.
Kahjuks turn ja river o.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract appears to be a personal account of a poker game, with minimal educational value. It lacks coherence, clarity, and relevance to academic topics. The content is mostly anecdotal and focused on the author's experiences, with no apparent connection to educational standards or curricula.

Educational score: 0