11.-15. aprillini toimus Tartus VI Eesti Noorte Pianistide Konkurss. Tegemist on traditsiooniga, mis sai alguse 1991. aastal ja on nii osalejate arvukuselt kava kaalukuselt olulisim jõukatsumine nooremas ja keskmises koolieas eesti klaveriõppuritele. Ürituse populaarsusest räägib ka seekordne mängijate rohkus – konkursil osales 73 noort muusikut kõikjalt Eestist. Suurim esindus oli Tallinna Muusikakeskkoolist – 27 õpilast! Konkurss toimus kolmes vanuserühmas ja kahes voorus. Noori pianiste hindas žürii, koosseisus Katarina Nummi-Kuisma (Espoo Muusikainstituut), Lembit Orgse (Otsa-kool, EMTA), Mati Mikalai (TMKK, EMTA), Ülle Sisa (Otsa-kool), Ruth Ernston (Elleri-kool).
TMKK õpilaste saavutused
I koht ja konkursi peapreemia
Ruslan Strogiy, VII klass (õp. Maigi Pakri)
I koht
Gloria Ilves, IV klass (õp. Marju Roots)
II koht
Eliza Agajeva, IV klass (õp. Ira Floss)
Maria Vilberg, X klass (õp. Mati Mikalai)
III koht
Julia Gromova, IXb klass (õp. Ada Kuuseoks)
II vooru diplomid
M. Clementini Sonatiin I osa hea esituse eest - Piret Mikalai, IV klass (õp. Ira Floss)
F. Burgmülleri Etüüdi hea esituse eest - Jekaterina Pasjutina, III klass (õp. Piret Habak)
J. S. Bachi teose hea esituse eest - Auli Lonks, VII klass (õp. Martti Raide)
kogu kava eest - Luisa Lõhmus, III klass (õp. Anu Nahkur)
kogu kava eest - Rasmus Andreas Raide, VI klass (õp. Martti Raide, õp. Ell Saviauk)
II vooru pääsesid
Pirke Kaljula, Va klass (õp. Kersti Sumera)
Mikk Paju, Va klass (õp. Kersti Sumera)
Johan Kokla, .
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: 11.-15. aprillini toimus Tartus VI Eesti Noorte Pianistide Konkurss. Tegemist on traditsiooniga, mis sai alguse 1991. aastal ja on nii osalejate arvukuselt kava kaalukuselt olulisim jõukatsumine nooremas ja keskmises koolieas eesti klaveriõppuritele. Ürituse populaarsusest räägib ka seekordne mängijate rohkus – konkursil osales 73 noort muusikut kõikjalt Eestist. Suurim esindus oli Tallinna Muusikakeskkoolist – 27 õpilast! Konkurss toimus kolmes vanuserühmas ja kahes voorus. Noori pianiste hindas žürii, koosseisus Katarina Nummi-Kuisma (Espoo Muusikainstituut), Lembit Orgse (Otsa-kool, EMTA), Mati Mikalai (TMKK, EMTA), Ülle Sisa (Otsa-kool), Ruth Ernston (Elleri-kool).
TMKK õpilaste saavutused
I koht ja konkursi peapreemia
Ruslan Strogiy, VII klass (õp. Maigi Pakri)
I koht
Gloria Ilves, IV klass (õp. Marju Roots)
II koht
Eliza Agajeva, IV klass (õp. Ira Floss)
Maria Vilberg, X klass (õp. Mati Mikalai)
III koht
Julia Gromova, IXb klass (õp. Ada Kuuseoks)
II vooru diplomid
M. Clementini Sonatiin I osa hea esituse eest - Piret Mikalai, IV klass (õp. Ira Floss)
F. Burgmülleri Etüüdi hea esituse eest - Jekaterina Pasjutina, III klass (õp. Piret Habak)
J. S. Bachi teose hea esituse eest - Auli Lonks, VII klass (õp. Martti Raide)
kogu kava eest - Luisa Lõhmus, III klass (õp. Anu Nahkur)
kogu kava eest - Rasmus Andreas Raide, VI klass (õp. Martti Raide, õp. Ell Saviauk)
II vooru pääsesid
Pirke Kaljula, Va klass (õp. Kersti Sumera)
Mikk Paju, Va klass (õp. Kersti Sumera)
Johan Kokla, .
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract provides information about a piano competition for young musicians in Estonia, listing participants and winners. While it offers some basic information, it lacks educational content relevant to school curricula and is more of an event report. The text does not introduce key concepts, exercises, or substantial educational content.

Educational score: 1