Postitas Nõiatar » 23.09.10, 10:56
Mul tekib viimasel ajal vastikus selliste saadete vastu, mind ärritab reklaamigi nägemine. Just seesamune asi, mida tegelikult juba siin varem mainitud on - kogu lugu räägitakse nii haledas võtmes, kusjuures, saatejuhi märkused on selgelt suunavad ja haletsevad, kuigi ajakirjanik ei tohiks suunata vaatajat hinnangut võtma. Terve saade üks hala, et kuidas te, vaesekesed, ikkagi hakkama olete saanud ja siis lõpus selline eriti võlts "nüüd me teeme teile teie elu suurima kingituse, te armetu elusaatusega inimesed". See ajab mind Reporteri puhul ka marru, et kui näidatakse kedagi, kes on hädas ja peale saadet see inimene abi saab, on Reporteri "kaste" ikka selline, et nemad on maailma suurimad heategijad. Tegelikult, nad ei tee midagi, mis raha sisse ei too.
ETV saated on tõesti teistmoodi, näiteks seda puuetega inimeste saadet (mul kohe ei tule pealkiri meelde, "Puutepunkt" vist) vaatasin ma alati kui peale sattusin, sest pigem esitatakse asja positiivses võtmes - kuidas inimene on endast leidnud jõu ja optimismi edasi minna. Mulle ei meeldi see inimese kunstlikult veel haledamaks tegemine, justkui tal juba poleks piisavalt keeruline, et teda veel armetumaks teha..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Postitas Nõiatar » 23.09.10, 10:56
Mul tekib viimasel ajal vastikus selliste saadete vastu, mind ärritab reklaamigi nägemine. Just seesamune asi, mida tegelikult juba siin varem mainitud on - kogu lugu räägitakse nii haledas võtmes, kusjuures, saatejuhi märkused on selgelt suunavad ja haletsevad, kuigi ajakirjanik ei tohiks suunata vaatajat hinnangut võtma. Terve saade üks hala, et kuidas te, vaesekesed, ikkagi hakkama olete saanud ja siis lõpus selline eriti võlts "nüüd me teeme teile teie elu suurima kingituse, te armetu elusaatusega inimesed". See ajab mind Reporteri puhul ka marru, et kui näidatakse kedagi, kes on hädas ja peale saadet see inimene abi saab, on Reporteri "kaste" ikka selline, et nemad on maailma suurimad heategijad. Tegelikult, nad ei tee midagi, mis raha sisse ei too.
ETV saated on tõesti teistmoodi, näiteks seda puuetega inimeste saadet (mul kohe ei tule pealkiri meelde, "Puutepunkt" vist) vaatasin ma alati kui peale sattusin, sest pigem esitatakse asja positiivses võtmes - kuidas inimene on endast leidnud jõu ja optimismi edasi minna. Mulle ei meeldi see inimese kunstlikult veel haledamaks tegemine, justkui tal juba poleks piisavalt keeruline, et teda veel armetumaks teha..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational value as it appears to be a personal opinion piece discussing TV shows and their portrayal of sensitive topics. It does not provide basic information relevant to educational topics, nor does it introduce key concepts or exhibit a clear writing style suitable for learning.

Educational score: 0