- Launched January 2020
- Collection finished
- Prepare submission
- Dialog with recipient
- Decision
Dies ist eine Online-Petition of the European Parliament.
Petitsiooni esitaja kaebab, et Ferreira jõgi Portugalis Lordelo-Paredesis on väga reostunud. Ta kinnitab, et kohaliku veepuhastusjaama tegevusetuse ja suutmatuse tõttu on jõe reostamine kestnud juba aastakümneid, hävitades vähehaaval ökosüsteemi ja seades ohtu kohalike elanike tervise. Petitsiooni esitaja väidab, et viimase aasta jooksul on reovett peaaegu otse jõkke juhitud, nii et sellest on saanud haigusi levitav avatud solgikanal. Petitsiooni esitaja kritiseerib vastutavate keskkonnaasutuste tegevusetust ja nõuab, et reostusele kiiresti piir pandaks.
This petition has been translated into the following languages
- Бълrapckи пeTиция
- Petición en español
- Češka petice
- Dansk andragende
- Eλλnvιkή Avaφopά
- English petition
- Pétition en français
- Hrvatska peticiju
- Petizione italiana
- Petīcija latviešu
- Peticija lietuvių
- Magyar petíciót
- Petizzjoni Malti
- Nederlandse petitie
- Polska petycja
- petição português
- petiție română
- Slovenské petície
- Slovenščina peticija
- Suomen Vetoomus
- Svensk petition
- Deutsche Petition
Debate
No CONTRA argument yet..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: - Launched January 2020
- Collection finished
- Prepare submission
- Dialog with recipient
- Decision
Dies ist eine Online-Petition of the European Parliament.
Petitsiooni esitaja kaebab, et Ferreira jõgi Portugalis Lordelo-Paredesis on väga reostunud. Ta kinnitab, et kohaliku veepuhastusjaama tegevusetuse ja suutmatuse tõttu on jõe reostamine kestnud juba aastakümneid, hävitades vähehaaval ökosüsteemi ja seades ohtu kohalike elanike tervise. Petitsiooni esitaja väidab, et viimase aasta jooksul on reovett peaaegu otse jõkke juhitud, nii et sellest on saanud haigusi levitav avatud solgikanal. Petitsiooni esitaja kritiseerib vastutavate keskkonnaasutuste tegevusetust ja nõuab, et reostusele kiiresti piir pandaks.
This petition has been translated into the following languages
- Бълrapckи пeTиция
- Petición en español
- Češka petice
- Dansk andragende
- Eλλnvιkή Avaφopά
- English petition
- Pétition en français
- Hrvatska peticiju
- Petizione italiana
- Petīcija latviešu
- Peticija lietuvių
- Magyar petíciót
- Petizzjoni Malti
- Nederlandse petitie
- Polska petycja
- petição português
- petiție română
- Slovenské petície
- Slovenščina peticija
- Suomen Vetoomus
- Svensk petition
- Deutsche Petition
Debate
No CONTRA argument yet..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract provides basic information about an environmental issue, but it lacks coherence and educational structure. It appears to be a translation of a petition, which may not be directly relevant to educational standards. Although it touches on a relevant topic, the presentation is not suitable for a structured learning environment.

Educational score: 2