Kõigi valdkondade toetusmeetmetesse laekunud taotluste hindamiseks on moodustatud hindamiskomisjonid. Komisjonidesse kuuluvad nii linnavalitsuse esindajad kui ka erinevate valdkondade eksperdid ning asjatundjad.
Kultuuri valdkonna hindamiskomisjon
Toetuse taotluste hindamiseks moodustab kultuuriosakonna juhataja hindamiskomisjoni. Hindamiskomisjon kinnitab hiljemalt kaks kuud enne toetuse taotlemise tähtaega hindamisjuhendi ja iga hindamiskriteeriumi eest antavate punktide arvu.
Iga taotlust hindab vähemalt kolm hindamiskomisjoni liiget. Iga hindaja annab iga taotluse igale hindamiskriteeriumile punktid vastavalt oma äranägemisele ja vastavalt hindamiskomisjoni kinnitatud hindamisjuhendile. Lõplik punktisumma kujuneb hindamiskriteeriumitele antud punktide liitmisel ja jagamisel hindajate arvuga.
Hinnatud taotlustest moodustatakse vastavalt antud punktidele paremusjärjestus ning komisjon teeb ettepaneku neist rohkem punkte saanutele toetuse andmiseks, arvestades määruses sätestatud piirangute ja eelarve võimalustega. Hindamiskomisjon võib teha ettepaneku taotluse toetamiseks taotletust väiksemas mahus, arvestades määruses sätestatud piiranguid.
Hindamiskomisjoni koosseis:
Aet Ollisaar, Aile Parmsoo, Andres Kauts, Anna-Liisa Unt, Anneli Saro, Ants Johanson, Astrid Hallik, Berk Vaher, Dan Prits, Hegert Leidsalu, Heili Lindepuu, Helen Siska, Indrek Mustimets, Jaan Ulst, Joanna Hoffmann, Juhani Jaeger, Kadri Jukk, Kadri Pau, Kairi Ustav, Karin Sepp, Keret Altpere, Kristiina Alliks.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Kõigi valdkondade toetusmeetmetesse laekunud taotluste hindamiseks on moodustatud hindamiskomisjonid. Komisjonidesse kuuluvad nii linnavalitsuse esindajad kui ka erinevate valdkondade eksperdid ning asjatundjad.
Kultuuri valdkonna hindamiskomisjon
Toetuse taotluste hindamiseks moodustab kultuuriosakonna juhataja hindamiskomisjoni. Hindamiskomisjon kinnitab hiljemalt kaks kuud enne toetuse taotlemise tähtaega hindamisjuhendi ja iga hindamiskriteeriumi eest antavate punktide arvu.
Iga taotlust hindab vähemalt kolm hindamiskomisjoni liiget. Iga hindaja annab iga taotluse igale hindamiskriteeriumile punktid vastavalt oma äranägemisele ja vastavalt hindamiskomisjoni kinnitatud hindamisjuhendile. Lõplik punktisumma kujuneb hindamiskriteeriumitele antud punktide liitmisel ja jagamisel hindajate arvuga.
Hinnatud taotlustest moodustatakse vastavalt antud punktidele paremusjärjestus ning komisjon teeb ettepaneku neist rohkem punkte saanutele toetuse andmiseks, arvestades määruses sätestatud piirangute ja eelarve võimalustega. Hindamiskomisjon võib teha ettepaneku taotluse toetamiseks taotletust väiksemas mahus, arvestades määruses sätestatud piiranguid.
Hindamiskomisjoni koosseis:
Aet Ollisaar, Aile Parmsoo, Andres Kauts, Anna-Liisa Unt, Anneli Saro, Ants Johanson, Astrid Hallik, Berk Vaher, Dan Prits, Hegert Leidsalu, Heili Lindepuu, Helen Siska, Indrek Mustimets, Jaan Ulst, Joanna Hoffmann, Juhani Jaeger, Kadri Jukk, Kadri Pau, Kairi Ustav, Karin Sepp, Keret Altpere, Kristiina Alliks.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract appears to be a formal document discussing the evaluation process for funding applications in various fields, including culture. It lacks basic information relevant to educational topics for primary or grade school levels, and its content is more administrative and procedural. The text is also written in a language (Estonian) that may not be widely understood, limiting its educational value.

Educational score: 0