Aga kirjutage ja küsige, kas seal poes ikka on nii, et ei saa kaardiga maksta. Mina ei tea sularahast midagi, meil maksa ühte arvet kasvôi kümnes osas, kaardiga v sulas. Ja mina koolitan oma poe müüjaid, mis mul teiste poodide omadest. Keskus on korraliku õpetuse kinkekaardi kasutamiseks teinud, suhelgu oma ülemustega kui nupp ei noki. Kordan veel kord, see on pangakaardi põhimõttel, summad jooksevad kaardimaksetega kokku. Vbl mõnes poes ei saa summat siis kahe kaardimaksega maksta vms, see on muidugi kaheldav, arvan et müüjad lihtsalt ei oska.
Jutt käib Rocca al Mare Prismast. Kui mulle kaks selle poe kassapidajat ütlevad, et ülejäänud osa tuleb sularahas tasuda, siis ma kahtlen siiralt, et mõlemad müüjad teadsid valesti.
Kui sina töötad kuskil mujal poes, siis ma tõesti ei saa aru, mida sa siin vahel säutsud ja õiendad, et minu jutt on jabur ja ei kõlba kuhugile? Mina ei väida ju, et sinu poes ei saa samal ajal pangakaardiga tasuda. Ju saab! Ma räägin konkreetsest poest. Ja olen kindel, et Kristiine Prismas on sama teema.
Ja sellest ei ole mina sõnagi rääkinud, et kinkekaardil olev raha tuleb korraga ära kulutada ja et sellega ei saa jupiti tasuda..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Aga kirjutage ja küsige, kas seal poes ikka on nii, et ei saa kaardiga maksta. Mina ei tea sularahast midagi, meil maksa ühte arvet kasvôi kümnes osas, kaardiga v sulas. Ja mina koolitan oma poe müüjaid, mis mul teiste poodide omadest. Keskus on korraliku õpetuse kinkekaardi kasutamiseks teinud, suhelgu oma ülemustega kui nupp ei noki. Kordan veel kord, see on pangakaardi põhimõttel, summad jooksevad kaardimaksetega kokku. Vbl mõnes poes ei saa summat siis kahe kaardimaksega maksta vms, see on muidugi kaheldav, arvan et müüjad lihtsalt ei oska.
Jutt käib Rocca al Mare Prismast. Kui mulle kaks selle poe kassapidajat ütlevad, et ülejäänud osa tuleb sularahas tasuda, siis ma kahtlen siiralt, et mõlemad müüjad teadsid valesti.
Kui sina töötad kuskil mujal poes, siis ma tõesti ei saa aru, mida sa siin vahel säutsud ja õiendad, et minu jutt on jabur ja ei kõlba kuhugile? Mina ei väida ju, et sinu poes ei saa samal ajal pangakaardiga tasuda. Ju saab! Ma räägin konkreetsest poest. Ja olen kindel, et Kristiine Prismas on sama teema.
Ja sellest ei ole mina sõnagi rääkinud, et kinkekaardil olev raha tuleb korraga ära kulutada ja et sellega ei saa jupiti tasuda..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational value as it appears to be a personal complaint about a specific store's payment policies, written in an informal tone. It does not introduce key concepts relevant to school curricula, nor does it exhibit a clear and consistent writing style suitable for learning.

Educational score: 0