Marek Lindmaa.Foto: Karol Kaldoja
„Minu jaoks tähendab see auhind väga lihtsat asja – muinasjutud on päriselt olemas. Eeskätt selle isa ja tütre puhul. Kui inimesed on teineteist otsinud 35 aastat ja saavad lõpuks kokku läbi selle, et me suutsime oma tubli meeskonnaga need kaks inimest kokku viia. See ongi kõige olulisem asi. Auhind näitab, et see läks kellelegi veel hinge,“ räägib teleajakirjanik Marek Lindmaa, kes pälvis „Sotid selgeks“ saates avaldatud looga Eesti filmi- ja teleauhindade galal parima ajakirjandusliku loo auhinna.
Mareki arvates teeb ajakirjanikust hea ajakirjaniku ehedus. „Arvan, et kui oled ehe, siis ongi kõik hästi. Ära ole keegi teine, ole sina ise.“.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Marek Lindmaa.Foto: Karol Kaldoja
„Minu jaoks tähendab see auhind väga lihtsat asja – muinasjutud on päriselt olemas. Eeskätt selle isa ja tütre puhul. Kui inimesed on teineteist otsinud 35 aastat ja saavad lõpuks kokku läbi selle, et me suutsime oma tubli meeskonnaga need kaks inimest kokku viia. See ongi kõige olulisem asi. Auhind näitab, et see läks kellelegi veel hinge,“ räägib teleajakirjanik Marek Lindmaa, kes pälvis „Sotid selgeks“ saates avaldatud looga Eesti filmi- ja teleauhindade galal parima ajakirjandusliku loo auhinna.
Mareki arvates teeb ajakirjanikust hea ajakirjaniku ehedus. „Arvan, et kui oled ehe, siis ongi kõik hästi. Ära ole keegi teine, ole sina ise.“.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational content, focusing on a personal interview and award ceremony. It doesn't address educational topics or introduce key concepts relevant to school curricula. The text is coherent but doesn't provide substantial educational value.

Educational score: 1