USAs leiutatakse uus 500% piirutus – nii julm värk, et pole kedagi, kes asja testiks.
Leitakse siis lõpuks kuskilt Venemaa pärapõrgust mingi joodikust traktorist, kes on testiga nõus.
Joobki siis traktorist esimese liitri ära ja läheb traktoriga sõitma.
Sõidab 40 meetrit, hüppab masinast välja ja püherdab räigelt maas.
Läheb traktorisse tagasi, sõidab veel 50 meetrit ja jälle kargab masinast välja ja lumme püherdama…
Pärast testi tegemist küsivad ameeriklased venelaselt: “Mis värk oli? Miks sa kogu aeg masinast välja hüppasid ja maas püherdasid?! Ja kuidas jook maitses?”
Traktorist vastu: “Piiritus oli sigahea, aga üks sellel oli üks imelik kõrvalmõju – nii kui röhitsesin, läks kohe puhvaika põlema…”
USAs leiutatakse uus 500% piirutus – nii julm värk, et pole kedagi, kes asja testiks..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: USAs leiutatakse uus 500% piirutus – nii julm värk, et pole kedagi, kes asja testiks.
Leitakse siis lõpuks kuskilt Venemaa pärapõrgust mingi joodikust traktorist, kes on testiga nõus.
Joobki siis traktorist esimese liitri ära ja läheb traktoriga sõitma.
Sõidab 40 meetrit, hüppab masinast välja ja püherdab räigelt maas.
Läheb traktorisse tagasi, sõidab veel 50 meetrit ja jälle kargab masinast välja ja lumme püherdama…
Pärast testi tegemist küsivad ameeriklased venelaselt: “Mis värk oli? Miks sa kogu aeg masinast välja hüppasid ja maas püherdasid?! Ja kuidas jook maitses?”
Traktorist vastu: “Piiritus oli sigahea, aga üks sellel oli üks imelik kõrvalmõju – nii kui röhitsesin, läks kohe puhvaika põlema…”
USAs leiutatakse uus 500% piirutus – nii julm värk, et pole kedagi, kes asja testiks..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract appears to be a humorous anecdote with no educational value, lacking relevance to academic topics and containing non-academic content. It does not introduce key concepts, nor is it coherent or suitable for learning. The text is also not relevant to school curricula and includes mature themes.

Educational score: 0