Twitteris ja pokkerifoorumis twoplustwo levivate juttude kohaselt sai tuntud pokkerimängija Michael Mizrachi 100 000 dollariga vastu pükse, kui kihlveopartner ei pidanud kinni omapoolsest lubadusest.
Nimelt vedas Mizrachi teise USA pokkerimängija Giorgio Mediciga kihla, et võidab 2012. aasta pokkeri MMil (WSOP ehk World Series of Poker) vähemalt ühe turniiri. Kui Mizrachi'l see ei õnnestu, pidi Medici kihlveo kohaselt teenima 20 000 dollarit. Kui aga õnnestub, siis Mizrachi 100 000.
Mizrachi võitiski 50 000dollarilise sisseostuga Players Championships turniiri (nagu ka 2010. aastal!), ent kätelöömisega sõlmitud ehk mittekirjalikku kaotatud kihlvedu pole Medici tasunud.
Nimelt kuulutas Medici end pankrotis olevaks..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Twitteris ja pokkerifoorumis twoplustwo levivate juttude kohaselt sai tuntud pokkerimängija Michael Mizrachi 100 000 dollariga vastu pükse, kui kihlveopartner ei pidanud kinni omapoolsest lubadusest.
Nimelt vedas Mizrachi teise USA pokkerimängija Giorgio Mediciga kihla, et võidab 2012. aasta pokkeri MMil (WSOP ehk World Series of Poker) vähemalt ühe turniiri. Kui Mizrachi'l see ei õnnestu, pidi Medici kihlveo kohaselt teenima 20 000 dollarit. Kui aga õnnestub, siis Mizrachi 100 000.
Mizrachi võitiski 50 000dollarilise sisseostuga Players Championships turniiri (nagu ka 2010. aastal!), ent kätelöömisega sõlmitud ehk mittekirjalikku kaotatud kihlvedu pole Medici tasunud.
Nimelt kuulutas Medici end pankrotis olevaks..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract lacks educational value as it discusses a poker game and a bet between two players, containing no relevant academic content. The text is also written in a non-academic style and includes topics not suitable for primary or grade school levels.

Educational score: 0