Kuulsin mõned nädalad tagasi ühelt tuttavalt, et rabarber ei pidavat sisaldama ühtegi inimesele kasulikku ainet, vaid hoopis vastupidi - rabarber viivat kaltsiumi kehast välja, mistõttu seda tuleks alati tarbida koos piimatoodetega, et kahjulikku mõju neutraliseerida. Kuna tegemist on aedviljaga, mis minu arvates niisama paljalt süüa ei kõlba (liiga hapu), siis olen alati eeldanud, et tegemist on igati tervisliku asjaga, kuna kõik head asjad teatavasti on ju kahjulikud v teevad paksuks:)
Kuna aga jutt rabarberi mitte-kasulikkusest ei andnud mulle rahu, siis sirvisin paar päeva tagasi tarku raamatuid nagu nt Heino Kiige "Maailma viljad", Lilian Issako "Köögiviljad ja maitsetaimed" ning Anita Danielsoni "Tervis marjadest ja puuviljadest". Tuleb välja, et tegelikult enam-vähem asi nii ongi nagu mu tuttav rääkis. Rabarberis on küll ohtralt kaaliumi, kuid ta sisaldab vaid marginaalses koguses (erinevatel andmetel 8, 10 v 13 mg 100 g kohta) C-vitamiini, samuti kaltsiumi, fosforit, rauda, B-rühma vitamiine ja karotiini. Tsiteerides Heino Kiike, siis: "vitamiine rabarberis eriti ei ole, enamikku mineraalaineid sisaldab keskmiselt, kaaliumi aga rohkesti. Orgaanilistest hapetest on rohkesti kasulikku õunhapet ja organismile kahjulikku oblikhapet." Et oblikhape seob kaltsiumi, võib rabarberit süües tekkida kaltsiumipuudus ja häired kaltsiumiainevahetuses. Seetõttu on soovitav toite rabarberist valmistada koos piimatoodetega, et kaltsiumikaotust korvata ("et oblikhape ühineks piimas sisa.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Kuulsin mõned nädalad tagasi ühelt tuttavalt, et rabarber ei pidavat sisaldama ühtegi inimesele kasulikku ainet, vaid hoopis vastupidi - rabarber viivat kaltsiumi kehast välja, mistõttu seda tuleks alati tarbida koos piimatoodetega, et kahjulikku mõju neutraliseerida. Kuna tegemist on aedviljaga, mis minu arvates niisama paljalt süüa ei kõlba (liiga hapu), siis olen alati eeldanud, et tegemist on igati tervisliku asjaga, kuna kõik head asjad teatavasti on ju kahjulikud v teevad paksuks:)
Kuna aga jutt rabarberi mitte-kasulikkusest ei andnud mulle rahu, siis sirvisin paar päeva tagasi tarku raamatuid nagu nt Heino Kiige "Maailma viljad", Lilian Issako "Köögiviljad ja maitsetaimed" ning Anita Danielsoni "Tervis marjadest ja puuviljadest". Tuleb välja, et tegelikult enam-vähem asi nii ongi nagu mu tuttav rääkis. Rabarberis on küll ohtralt kaaliumi, kuid ta sisaldab vaid marginaalses koguses (erinevatel andmetel 8, 10 v 13 mg 100 g kohta) C-vitamiini, samuti kaltsiumi, fosforit, rauda, B-rühma vitamiine ja karotiini. Tsiteerides Heino Kiike, siis: "vitamiine rabarberis eriti ei ole, enamikku mineraalaineid sisaldab keskmiselt, kaaliumi aga rohkesti. Orgaanilistest hapetest on rohkesti kasulikku õunhapet ja organismile kahjulikku oblikhapet." Et oblikhape seob kaltsiumi, võib rabarberit süües tekkida kaltsiumipuudus ja häired kaltsiumiainevahetuses. Seetõttu on soovitav toite rabarberist valmistada koos piimatoodetega, et kaltsiumikaotust korvata ("et oblikhape ühineks piimas sisa.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract provides some basic information about rhubarb's nutritional content and its potential effects on the body, making it somewhat relevant to educational topics. However, it lacks coherence, clarity, and comprehensive information, and includes colloquial language and personal anecdotes. The content is not well-organized and may not be suitable for structured learning.

Educational score: 2