Eesti 2021. aasta tähtsamad võidud ja sammud elamisväärsema planeedi heaks(76)
Vaieldamatult kõige suurem võit oli Euroopa Komisjoni uue kliimapaketi „Eesmärk 55” koostamine. 14. juulil avaldatud pakett koosneb õigusaktide muutmise ettepanekutest, kuidas peaks Euroopa Liit jõudma 2050. aastaks kliimaneutraalsuseni. Komisjoni vahesamm oli seada eesmärgiks vähendada 2030. aastaks kasvuhoonegaaside heitkogust vähemalt 55% võrra võrreldes 1990. aastaga.
Tuleb märkida, et võit seisneb esialgu paketi loomises, mitte elluviimises. Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekud paneksid küll riigid heitkoguseid vähendama, kuid riigid ei pruugi komisjoni plaanidega päri olla. Kõigi ettepanekutega ei ole päri ka Eesti valitsus..
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Eesti 2021. aasta tähtsamad võidud ja sammud elamisväärsema planeedi heaks(76)
Vaieldamatult kõige suurem võit oli Euroopa Komisjoni uue kliimapaketi „Eesmärk 55” koostamine. 14. juulil avaldatud pakett koosneb õigusaktide muutmise ettepanekutest, kuidas peaks Euroopa Liit jõudma 2050. aastaks kliimaneutraalsuseni. Komisjoni vahesamm oli seada eesmärgiks vähendada 2030. aastaks kasvuhoonegaaside heitkogust vähemalt 55% võrra võrreldes 1990. aastaga.
Tuleb märkida, et võit seisneb esialgu paketi loomises, mitte elluviimises. Euroopa Komisjoni ettepanekud paneksid küll riigid heitkoguseid vähendama, kuid riigid ei pruugi komisjoni plaanidega päri olla. Kõigi ettepanekutega ei ole päri ka Eesti valitsus..
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract provides basic information on the European Commission's climate package, but it lacks educational structure and coherence. It doesn't align closely with educational standards, and the content is more suitable for general knowledge or news articles. The language and concepts may be too complex for primary school students.

Educational score: 2