Reisiajakirja Condé Nast Traveller lugejad valisid aasta parimaid tegijaid: lennufirmasid, lennujaamu, maid, linnu, saari jpm. Hinnati erinevate märksõnade alusel ja saja punkti skaalal. Siinkohal on ära toodud aasta parimad lennunduses.
Lähilennud (Euroopa)
1 Swiss 86.50
2 British Airways 85.96
3 BMI British Midland 84.14
4 KLM 83.72
5 Finnair 81.09
6 Lufthansa 79.64
7 Aer Lingus 79.39
8 Air France 78.18
9 SAS Scandinavian Airlines 77.05
10 Virgin 76.62
Šveitsi lennufirma Swiss sai hea tulemuse lastesõbralikkuse, sobivate väljumisaegade ja ulatusliku marsruudivaliku eest. Pagasiga ümberkäimises on parim Euroopa tabelis üldkokkuvõttes neljandaks tunnistatud hollandlaste Flying Dutchman
ehk KLM, viiendale kohale tulnud Finnair sai kõrged punktid meelelahutuse eet lennuki pardal.
Kauglennud (muu maailm)
1 Singapore Airlines 87.99
2 Virgin Atlantic 87.06
3 British Airways 85.26
4 Emirates 84.45
5 Cathay Pacific 84.39
6 Air New Zealand 82.48
7 Qantas 81.88
8 Air France 81.65
9 Qatar Airways 79.83
10 Lufthansa 78.36
Rahvusvaheliste lendude pingerida juhib tänu täpsusele ja mitmetele teistele suurepärastele omadustele Singapore Airlines, kellele järgneb mugavaimate lennukisalongidega Virgin Atlantic. Neljandaks hinnatud Emirates teenindab oma reisijaid täie raha eest ning austraallaste Qantasel on kõige reisijasõbralikumad lennuajad.
Äriklass
1 British Airways 88.09
2 Virgin Atlantic 87.14
3 Singapore Airlines 86.69
4 Emirates 85.33
5 Lufthansa 83.50
6 Air New Zealand 81.33
7 KLM 8.
<|begin_of_text|><|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023
Today Date: 26 Jul 2024

<|eot_id|><|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>

Below is an extract from a web page. Evaluate whether the page has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational top-
ics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: Reisiajakirja Condé Nast Traveller lugejad valisid aasta parimaid tegijaid: lennufirmasid, lennujaamu, maid, linnu, saari jpm. Hinnati erinevate märksõnade alusel ja saja punkti skaalal. Siinkohal on ära toodud aasta parimad lennunduses.
Lähilennud (Euroopa)
1 Swiss 86.50
2 British Airways 85.96
3 BMI British Midland 84.14
4 KLM 83.72
5 Finnair 81.09
6 Lufthansa 79.64
7 Aer Lingus 79.39
8 Air France 78.18
9 SAS Scandinavian Airlines 77.05
10 Virgin 76.62
Šveitsi lennufirma Swiss sai hea tulemuse lastesõbralikkuse, sobivate väljumisaegade ja ulatusliku marsruudivaliku eest. Pagasiga ümberkäimises on parim Euroopa tabelis üldkokkuvõttes neljandaks tunnistatud hollandlaste Flying Dutchman
ehk KLM, viiendale kohale tulnud Finnair sai kõrged punktid meelelahutuse eet lennuki pardal.
Kauglennud (muu maailm)
1 Singapore Airlines 87.99
2 Virgin Atlantic 87.06
3 British Airways 85.26
4 Emirates 84.45
5 Cathay Pacific 84.39
6 Air New Zealand 82.48
7 Qantas 81.88
8 Air France 81.65
9 Qatar Airways 79.83
10 Lufthansa 78.36
Rahvusvaheliste lendude pingerida juhib tänu täpsusele ja mitmetele teistele suurepärastele omadustele Singapore Airlines, kellele järgneb mugavaimate lennukisalongidega Virgin Atlantic. Neljandaks hinnatud Emirates teenindab oma reisijaid täie raha eest ning austraallaste Qantasel on kõige reisijasõbralikumad lennuajad.
Äriklass
1 British Airways 88.09
2 Virgin Atlantic 87.14
3 Singapore Airlines 86.69
4 Emirates 85.33
5 Lufthansa 83.50
6 Air New Zealand 81.33
7 KLM 8.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"<|eot_id|>
<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

The extract provides a list of airline rankings based on various criteria, but it lacks educational content and context, making it unsuitable for teaching. The text is more focused on travel and consumer information than educational topics. It does not introduce key concepts, offer exercises, or provide profound insights into a subject matter relevant to school curricula.

Educational score: 1