Read the following context and choose the best option to answer the question.
Context: Filed under : Cellphones Details on this one are remarkably skimpy , but here are the facts as we know them . A fire caused around $ 30,000 worth of damage to a mobile home in Delaware this past week , but thankfully , the Millsboro and Indian River firefighters found no one home at the time of the incident . The culprit ? A " malfunctioning cellphone charger that ignited the wall covering in a bedroom . "
Question: What is a likely reason that the details for this fire are skimpy , as described by the speaker ?
Options: 
- The fire was intentionally set to punish the owners of the mobile home and details are intentionally being supressed
 - The firefighters chose not to go to the scene of the fire due to a dispute with the owner so details have not been recorded
 - The details of the case were accidentally deleted from the computer at the newspaper office and are lost to the world
 - There is only so much to report about the fire , as it did not involve widespread damage to multiple homes


There is only so much to report about the fire , as it did not involve widespread damage to multiple homes