Based on the context and the answer, generate a question. 

Context: The article is a miserable hack - job . Todd Purdum does n't even pretend to prove anything , but uses the anti - Clinton mystique to let his readers make broad leaps from innocuous trips in planes with rich guys to ... oh , you know , do n't you ? Clinton was right - anyone who would write such a piece of crap - to say nothing of the editors who published it - is a " scumbag " .

Answer:

Because he believes he is accusing Clinton of things without proof .



Why does the writer believe that the author of the article is a hack job ?