Daily Papers

Instruction tuning has become a key technique for enhancing the performance of large language models, enabling them to better follow human prompts. However, low-resource languages such as Luxembourgish face severe limitations due to the lack of high-quality instruction datasets. Traditional reliance on machine translation often introduces semantic misalignment and cultural inaccuracies. In this work, we address these challenges by creating a cross-lingual instruction tuning dataset for Luxembourgish, without resorting to machine-generated translations into it. Instead, by leveraging aligned data from English, French, and German, we build a high-quality dataset that preserves linguistic and cultural nuances. We provide evidence that cross-lingual instruction tuning not only improves representational alignment across languages but also the model's generative capabilities in Luxembourgish. This highlights how cross-lingual data curation can avoid the common pitfalls of machine-translated data and directly benefit low-resource language development.

Multilingual Pre-trained Language models (multiPLMs), trained on the Masked Language Modelling (MLM) objective are commonly being used for cross-lingual tasks such as bitext mining. However, the performance of these models is still suboptimal for low-resource languages (LRLs). To improve the language representation of a given multiPLM, it is possible to further pre-train it. This is known as continual pre-training. Previous research has shown that continual pre-training with MLM and subsequently with Translation Language Modelling (TLM) improves the cross-lingual representation of multiPLMs. However, during masking, both MLM and TLM give equal weight to all tokens in the input sequence, irrespective of the linguistic properties of the tokens. In this paper, we introduce a novel masking strategy, Linguistic Entity Masking (LEM) to be used in the continual pre-training step to further improve the cross-lingual representations of existing multiPLMs. In contrast to MLM and TLM, LEM limits masking to the linguistic entity types nouns, verbs and named entities, which hold a higher prominence in a sentence. Secondly, we limit masking to a single token within the linguistic entity span thus keeping more context, whereas, in MLM and TLM, tokens are masked randomly. We evaluate the effectiveness of LEM using three downstream tasks, namely bitext mining, parallel data curation and code-mixed sentiment analysis using three low-resource language pairs English-Sinhala, English-Tamil, and Sinhala-Tamil. Experiment results show that continually pre-training a multiPLM with LEM outperforms a multiPLM continually pre-trained with MLM+TLM for all three tasks.