It looks like Elasticsearch is currently missing support for concurrent searching and that this is a major prospective optimization to reduce latency.

Digression: this is not the topic at hand but I personally consider the fork OpenSearch to be an historical tragedy of duplication of work and a segregation of improvements. What would be even more anti-utilitarist would be to blindly *ignore* each other advances towards making better search.

Lucene concurrent search APIs are probably among the most important feature/optimization currently not leveraged by Elasticsearch.
The fork OpenSearch has a [pull request](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/1500) implementing support for it.

See also the [corresponding issue](https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/issues/1286) 

I believe it would be great for end users if you could take inspiration from the PR and work on this feature.

Great blog about the Lucene feature:
https://blog.mikemccandless.com/2019/10/concurrent-query-execution-in-apache.html?m=1
See also those performance results:
https://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2021/09/nrtsearch-yelps-fast-scalable-and-cost-effective-search-engine.html
test/framework/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/test/ESIntegTestCase.java
}
                    ensureClusterSizeConsistency();
                    ensureClusterStateConsistency();
                    ensureClusterStateCanBeReadByNodeTool();
                    ensureClusterInfoServiceRunning();
                    beforeIndexDeletion();
                    cluster().wipe(excludeTemplates()); 
                    if (afterClass || currentClusterScope == Scope.TEST) {
                        cluster().close();
                    }
                    cluster().assertAfterTest();
                }
            } finally {
                if (currentClusterScope == Scope.TEST) {
                    clearClusters(); 
                }
            }
            success = true;
        } finally {
            if (success == false) {
                
                
                
            }
        }
    }
    /**
     * @return An exclude set of index templates that will not be removed in between tests.
     */
    protected Set<String> excludeTemplates() {