**Apache Airflow version**: 2.0.0a2

**Kubernetes version (if you are using kubernetes)** (use `kubectl version`): v1.15.12

**Environment**:
- **OS** (e.g. from /etc/os-release): CentOS 7


**What happened**:

When using KubernetesExecutor, a single SIGTERM doesn't result in the scheduler actually exiting cleanly. However, it will exit after receiving a second SIGTERM.

The same behavior happens if you have an exception in the scheduler. An easy way to replicate it is to raise in `pod_mutation_hook`.

In practice, this means the scheduler doesn't get restarted by K8s after encountering a exception. Or, when terminating the scheduler pod, it sticks around until k8s ultimately sends it a SIGKILL after its grace period is up.

**What you expected to happen**:

The scheduler to exit after a single SIGTERM.

**How to reproduce it**:
The easiest way to reproduce it is to simply send a SIGKILL to your KubernetesExecutor scheduler pod:

```
$ kubectl exec {scheduler_pod_name} kill 1
```

Note, the pod stays running, while the logs report:

```
[2020-10-30 17:34:09,581] {scheduler_job.py:794} INFO - Exiting gracefully upon receiving signal 15
[2020-10-30 17:34:10,586] {process_utils.py:97} INFO - Sending Signals.SIGTERM to GPID 59
[2020-10-30 17:34:10,879] {process_utils.py:63} INFO - Process psutil.Process(pid=59, status='terminated', exitcode=0, started=
'17:33:23') (59) terminated with exit code 0
[2020-10-30 17:34:10,882] {process_utils.py:97} INFO - Sending Signals.SIGTERM to GPID 59
[2020-10-30 17:34:10,882] {scheduler_job.py:1329} INFO - Exited execute loop
```

Issue another `kill`:
```
$ kubectl exec {scheduler_pod_name} kill 1
```

And the pod will be restarted by k8s.

If you can't reproduce it, let me know and I'll try and get something running on kind.

**Anything else we need to know**:

The same behavior happens if you have an exception in the scheduler. An easy way to replicate it is to raise in a `pod_mutation_hook`.


airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
"""
        This function is where the main scheduling decisions take places. It:
        - Creates any necessary DAG runs by examining the next_dagrun_create_after column of DagModel
          Since creating Dag Runs is a relatively time consuming process, we select only 10 dags by default
          (configurable via ``scheduler.max_dagruns_to_create_per_loop`` setting) - putting this higher will
          mean one scheduler could spend a chunk of time creating dag runs, and not ever get around to
          scheduling tasks.
        - Finds the "next n oldest" running DAG Runs to examine for scheduling (n=20 by default, configurable
          via ``scheduler.max_dagruns_per_loop_to_schedule`` config setting) and tries to progress state (TIs
          to SCHEDULED, or DagRuns to SUCCESS/FAILURE etc)
          By "next oldest", we mean hasn't been examined/scheduled in the most time.
          The reason we don't select all dagruns at once because the rows are selected with row locks, meaning
          that only one scheduler can "process them", even it is waiting behind other dags. Increasing this
          limit will allow more throughput for smaller DAGs but will likely slow down throughput for larger