### Elasticsearch Version

8.6.0

### Installed Plugins

_No response_

### Java Version

_bundled_

### OS Version

Docker

### Problem Description

When testing datemath with complex date strings, I found that some worked and some didn't. I narrowed it down to the existence of the `|` pipe character in the string.

@dakrone seems to think this may be due to how the `IndexNameExpressionResolver` works differently for security-enabled vs. non-security-enabled clusters.

### Steps to Reproduce

## Security Disabled Cluster
```
curl -XGET 'http://localhost:9200/%3Cdatemath-%7B2001-01-01-13%7C%7C%2B1h%2Fh%7Byyyy-MM-dd-HH%7C-07%3A00%7D%7D%3E'
{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Cross-cluster calls are not supported in this context but remote indices were requested: [<datemath-{2001-01-01-13||+1h/h{yyyy-MM-dd-HH|-07:00}}>]"}],"type":"illegal_argument_exception","reason":"Cross-cluster calls are not supported in this context but remote indices were requested: [<datemath-{2001-01-01-13||+1h/h{yyyy-MM-dd-HH|-07:00}}>]"},"status":400}%
```

## Security Enabled Cluster

```
curl -XGET -u sample -p 'https://secure.cluster.io/%3Cdatemath-%7B2001-01-01-13%7C%7C%2B1h%2Fh%7Byyyy-MM-dd-HH%7C-07%3A00%7D%7D%3E'
Enter host password for user 'sample':
{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"index_not_found_exception","reason":"no such index [datemath-2001-01-01-14]","index_uuid":"_na_","index":"datemath-2001-01-01-14"}],"type":"index_not_found_exception","reason":"no such index [datemath-2001-01-01-14]","index_uuid":"_na_","index":"datemath-2001-01-01-14"},"status":404}%
```

### Logs (if relevant)

_No response_
server/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/cluster/metadata/IndexNameExpressionResolverTests.java
indexNames = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(state, excludeHiddenOptions, "my-*");
        assertThat(Arrays.asList(indexNames), containsInAnyOrder(hiddenIndex));
        indexNames = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(state, excludeHiddenOptions, "my-hidden*");
        assertThat(Arrays.asList(indexNames), empty());
        indexNames = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(state, excludeHiddenOptions, "my-*", "-my-visible*");
        assertThat(Arrays.asList(indexNames), empty());
        indexNames = indexNameExpressionResolver.concreteIndexNames(state, includeHiddenOptions, "my-hidden*", "-my-hidden-a*");
        assertThat(Arrays.asList(indexNames), empty());
    }
    /**
     * test resolving _all pattern (null, empty array or "_all") for random IndicesOptions
     */
    public void testConcreteIndicesAllPatternRandom() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            final String[] allIndices = switch (randomIntBetween(0, 2)) {
                case 0 -> null;
                case 1 -> new String[0];
                case 2 -> new String[] { Metadata.ALL };
                default -> throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
            };
            final IndicesOptions indicesOptions = IndicesOptions.fromOptions(
                randomBoolean(),
                randomBoolean(),
                randomBoolean(),
                randomBoolean()
            );
            {
                ClusterState state = ClusterState.builder(new ClusterName("_name")).metadata(Metadata.builder().build()).build();
                IndexNameExpressionResolver.Context context = new IndexNameExpressionResolver.Context(
                    state,