I had this after reading #12537 and #9047. Currently `DockerOperator`’s `volumes` argument is passed directly to docker-py’s `bind` (aka `docker -v`). But `-v`’s behaviour has long been problematic, and [Docker has been pushing users to the new `--mount` syntax instead](https://docs.docker.com/storage/bind-mounts/#choose-the--v-or---mount-flag). With #12537, it seems like `-v`’s behaviour is also confusing to some Airflow users, so I want to migrate Airflow’s internals to `--mount`.

However, `--mount` has a different syntax to `-v`, and the behaviour is also slightly different, so for compatibility reasons we can’t just do it under the hood. I can think of two possible solutions to this:

A. Deprecate `volumes` altogether and introduce `DockerOperator(mounts=...)`

This will emit a deprecation warning when the user passes `DockerOperator(volumes=...)` to tell them to convert to `DockerOperator(mounts=...)` instead. `volumes` will stay unchanged otherwise, and continue to be passed to bind mounts.

`mounts` will take a list of [`docker.types.Mount`](https://docker-py.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api.html#docker.types.Mount) to describe the mounts. They will be passed directly to the mounts API. Some shorthands could be useful as well, for example:

```python
DockerOperator(
    ...
    mounts=[
        ('/root/data1', './data1'),  # Source and target, default to volume mount.
        ('/root/data2', './data2', 'bind'),  # Bind mount.
    ],
)
```

B. Reuse `volumes` and do introspection to choose between binds and mounts

The `volumes` argument can be augmented to also accept `docker.types.Mount` instances, and internally we’ll do something like

```python
binds = []
mounts = []
for vol in volumes:
    if isinstance(vol, str):
        binds.append(vol)
    elif isintance(vol, docker.types.Mount):
        mounts.append(vol)
    else:
        raise ValueError('...')
if binds:
    warnings.warn('...', DeprecationWarning)
```

and pass the collected lists to binds and mounts respectively.

I’m very interested in hearing thoughts on this.


**Are you willing to submit a PR?**
Yes

**Related Issues**

* #12537: Confusing on the bind syntax.
* #9047: Implement mounting in `DockerSwarmOperator` (it’s a subclass of `DockerOperator`, but the `volumes` option is currently unused).

docs/conf.py
if sections:
        raise ValueError(f"Found section(s) which were not in `section_order`: {list(sections.keys())}")
    jinja_contexts = {"params_ctx": {"sections": ordered_sections}}
# -- Options for sphinx.ext.autodoc --------------------------------------------
# 
# This value contains a list of modules to be mocked up. This is useful when some external dependencies
# are not met at build time and break the building process.
autodoc_mock_imports = [
    'MySQLdb',
    'adal',
    'analytics',
    'azure',
    'azure.cosmos',
    'azure.datalake',
    'azure.kusto',
    'azure.mgmt',
    'boto3',
    'botocore',
    'bson',
    'cassandra',
    'celery',
    'cloudant',
    'cryptography',
    'cx_Oracle',
    'datadog',
    'distributed',
    'docker',
    'google',
    'google_auth_httplib2',
    'googleapiclient',