Dataset Viewer
messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what decade did fiber-optics become widely used?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBell believed the photophone's principles were his life's \"greatest achievement\", telling a reporter shortly before his death that the photophone was \"the greatest invention [I have] ever made, greater than the telephone\". The photophone was a precursor to the fiber-optic communication systems which achieved popular worldwide usage in the 1980s. Its master patent was issued in December 1880, many decades before the photophone's principles came into popular use.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1980s\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the decade when fiber-optics became widely used.', 'The context mentions that the photophone was a precursor to the fiber-optic communication systems.', \"The context also states that the photophone's principles came into popular use many decades after its invention, specifically in the 1980s.\", \"The answer '1980s' is faithful to the context because it directly quotes the decade mentioned in the context as the time when fiber-optic communication systems achieved popular worldwide usage.\", 'The context provides a clear temporal reference for the widespread adoption of fiber-optics, which is accurately reflected in the answer.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1980s}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho was Raeder's successor? \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nDirective 23 was the only concession made by Göring to the Kriegsmarine over the strategic bombing strategy of the Luftwaffe against Britain. Thereafter, he would refuse to make available any air units to destroy British dockyards, ports, port facilities, or shipping in dock or at sea, lest Kriegsmarine gain control of more Luftwaffe units. Raeder's successor—Karl Dönitz—would—on the intervention of Hitler—gain control of one unit (KG 40), but Göring would soon regain it. Göring's lack of cooperation was detrimental to the one air strategy with potentially decisive strategic effect on Britain. Instead, he wasted aircraft of Fliegerführer Atlantik (Flying Command Atlantic) on bombing mainland Britain instead of attacks against convoys. For Göring, his prestige had been damaged by the defeat in the Battle of Britain, and he wanted to regain it by subduing Britain by air power alone. He was always reluctant to cooperate with Raeder.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nKarl Dönitz, who was also an expert in submarine warfare tactics.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about Karl Dönitz being an expert in submarine warfare tactics,', 'However, this information is not present in the given CONTEXT,', \"The CONTEXT only mentions Karl Dönitz as Raeder's successor, but does not provide any details about his expertise in submarine warfare tactics.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who was also an expert in submarine warfare tactics']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many troops did Napoleon use for the invasion of Prussia?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe initial military maneuvers began in September 1806. In a notable letter to Marshal Soult detailing the plan for the campaign, Napoleon described the essential features of Napoleonic warfare and introduced the phrase le bataillon-carré ('square battalion'). In the bataillon-carré system, the various corps of the Grande Armée would march uniformly together in close supporting distance. If any single corps was attacked, the others could quickly spring into action and arrive to help. Napoleon invaded Prussia with 180,000 troops, rapidly marching on the right bank of the River Saale. As in previous campaigns, his fundamental objective was to destroy one opponent before reinforcements from another could tip the balance of the war. Upon learning the whereabouts of the Prussian army, the French swung westwards and crossed the Saale with overwhelming force. At the twin battles of Jena and Auerstedt, fought on 14 October, the French convincingly defeated the Prussians and inflicted heavy casualties. With several major commanders dead or incapacitated, the Prussian king proved incapable of effectively commanding the army, which began to quickly disintegrate. In a vaunted pursuit that epitomized the \"peak of Napoleonic warfare,\" according to historian Richard Brooks, the French managed to capture 140,000 soldiers, over 2,000 cannons and hundreds of ammunition wagons, all in a single month. Historian David Chandler wrote of the Prussian forces: \"Never has the morale of any army been more completely shattered.\" Despite their overwhelming defeat, the Prussians refused to negotiate with the French until the Russians had an opportunity to enter the fight.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n180,000\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": nan, \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 180,000}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did Russian language spread to the peasants?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nUntil the 20th century, the language's spoken form was the language of only the upper noble classes and urban population, as Russian peasants from the countryside continued to speak in their own dialects. By the mid-20th century, such dialects were forced out with the introduction of the compulsory education system that was established by the Soviet government. Despite the formalization of Standard Russian, some nonstandard dialectal features (such as fricative [ɣ] in Southern Russian dialects) are still observed in colloquial speech.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nthe late 19th to early 20th century\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides a time frame (\"the late 19th to early 20th century\") that is not entirely supported by the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that until the 20th century, Russian peasants spoke in their own dialects, implying that the spread of Russian to peasants occurred during the 20th century.', 'There is no mention of the late 19th century in the CONTEXT as a time when Russian language spread to peasants.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['the late 19th']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat movement came into prominence in the mid-19th century that emphasized the common heritage and unity of all the Slavic peoples?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nPan-Slavism, a movement which came into prominence in the mid-19th century, emphasized the common heritage and unity of all the Slavic peoples. The main focus was in the Balkans where the South Slavs had been ruled for centuries by other empires: the Byzantine Empire, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Venice. The Russian Empire used Pan-Slavism as a political tool; as did the Soviet Union, which gained political-military influence and control over most Slavic-majority nations between 1945 and 1948 and retained a hegemonic role until the period 1989–1991.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nPan-Slavism\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about a movement that emphasizes the common heritage and unity of all the Slavic peoples, which is a key concept in the context.', \"The context explicitly mentions 'Pan-Slavism' as a movement that came into prominence in the mid-19th century, which matches the time frame mentioned in the question.\", 'The context also highlights the focus of Pan-Slavism on the common heritage and unity of all the Slavic peoples, which directly answers the question.', \"The answer 'Pan-Slavism' is a direct reference to the movement described in the context, making it a faithful and accurate response to the question.\", 'The context provides additional information about the historical context and implications of Pan-Slavism, but the answer only needs to identify the movement, which it does correctly.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Pan-Slavism}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhy did The Durable Orbital Station-2 not reach orbit?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSalyut 1's orbit was increased to prevent premature reentry, but further piloted flights were delayed while the Soyuz was redesigned to fix the new safety problem. The station re-entered the Earth's atmosphere on October 11, after 175 days in orbit. The USSR attempted to launch a second Salyut-class station designated Durable Orbital Station-2 (DOS-2) on July 29, 1972, but a rocket failure caused it to fail to achieve orbit. After the DOS-2 failure, the USSR attempted to launch four more Salyut-class stations through 1975, with another failure due to an explosion of the final rocket stage, which punctured the station with shrapnel so that it wouldn't hold pressure. While all of the Salyuts were presented to the public as non-military scientific laboratories, some of them were actually covers for the military Almaz reconnaissance stations.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nrocket failure\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the reason why The Durable Orbital Station-2 (DOS-2) did not reach orbit.', \"The CONTEXT provides information about the launch of DOS-2 and mentions that a 'rocket failure' caused it to fail to achieve orbit.\", \"The ANSWER 'rocket failure' is a direct match to the reason provided in the CONTEXT for the failure of DOS-2 to reach orbit.\", 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately reflects the information provided in the CONTEXT about the reason for the failure of DOS-2.', 'The ANSWER does not introduce any new information or interpretations that are not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": rocket failure}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat does emergence of resistance reflect?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe emergence of resistance of bacteria to antibiotics is a common phenomenon. Emergence of resistance often reflects evolutionary processes that take place during antibiotic therapy. The antibiotic treatment may select for bacterial strains with physiologically or genetically enhanced capacity to survive high doses of antibiotics. Under certain conditions, it may result in preferential growth of resistant bacteria, while growth of susceptible bacteria is inhibited by the drug. For example, antibacterial selection for strains having previously acquired antibacterial-resistance genes was demonstrated in 1943 by the Luria–Delbrück experiment. Antibiotics such as penicillin and erythromycin, which used to have a high efficacy against many bacterial species and strains, have become less effective, due to the increased resistance of many bacterial strains.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nevolutionary processes\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT explains that the emergence of resistance often reflects evolutionary processes that take place during antibiotic therapy.', \"The ANSWER 'evolutionary processes' is a direct reference to this explanation in the CONTEXT.\", 'The CONTEXT provides a detailed explanation of how antibiotic treatment selects for bacterial strains with enhanced capacity to survive high doses of antibiotics, which is an example of evolutionary processes.', 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately reflects the underlying reason for the emergence of resistance, as described in the CONTEXT.', \"The use of the phrase 'often reflects' in the CONTEXT suggests that evolutionary processes are a primary factor in the emergence of resistance, which is consistent with the ANSWER.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": evolutionary processes}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat percentage of the adult population has an HIV-infection?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe prevalence of HIV-infection among the adult population is 1.8%. Only 20% of infected pregnant women receive anti retroviral coverage to prevent transmission to newborns.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1.8%\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the adult population with an HIV-infection.', 'The context provides the specific information that the prevalence of HIV-infection among the adult population is 1.8%.', 'The answer directly quotes the percentage mentioned in the context, indicating that it is a faithful representation of the information provided.', 'The context also mentions additional information about anti retroviral coverage for pregnant women, but this is not relevant to the question being asked.', 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately extracts the relevant information from the context to answer the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1.8%}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many policing districts was Paris divided into?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThis office was first held by Gabriel Nicolas de la Reynie, who had 44 commissaires de police (police commissioners) under his authority. In 1709, these commissioners were assisted by inspecteurs de police (police inspectors). The city of Paris was divided into 16 districts policed by the commissaires, each assigned to a particular district and assisted by a growing bureaucracy. The scheme of the Paris police force was extended to the rest of France by a royal edict of October 1699, resulting in the creation of lieutenants general of police in all large French cities and towns.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n17\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER claims that Paris was divided into 17 policing districts.', 'However, the CONTEXT explicitly states that the city of Paris was divided into 16 districts policed by the commissaires.', 'There is no information in the CONTEXT to support the claim of 17 districts.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['17']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho earned a reputation of lip synching in the Blond Ambition Tour?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nMadonna's emergence occurred during the advent of MTV; Chris Nelson from The New York Times spoke of pop artists like Madonna saying, \"MTV, with its almost exclusively lip-synched videos, ushered in an era in which average music fans might happily spend hours a day, every day, watching singers just mouth the words.\" The symbiotic relationship between the music video and lip-syncing led to a desire for the spectacle and imagery of the music video to be transferred to live stage shows. He added, \"Artists like Madonna and Janet Jackson set new standards for showmanship, with concerts that included not only elaborate costumes and precision-timed pyrotechnics but also highly athletic dancing. These effects came at the expense of live singing.\" Thor Christensen of The Dallas Morning News commented that while Madonna earned a reputation for lip-syncing during her 1990 Blond Ambition World Tour, she has subsequently reorganized her performances by \"stay[ing] mostly still during her toughest singing parts and [leaves] the dance routines to her backup troupe ... [r]ather than try to croon and dance up a storm at the same time.\"\n\n--\nANSWER:\nMadonna\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the person who earned a reputation for lip synching in the Blond Ambition Tour.', 'The context mentions that Madonna earned a reputation for lip-syncing during her 1990 Blond Ambition World Tour.', \"The answer provided is 'Madonna', which directly corresponds to the information given in the context.\", 'The context specifically mentions the Blond Ambition Tour, which is the same event referenced in the question, establishing a clear connection between the context and the answer.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Madonna' is faithful to the context given the question, as it accurately identifies the person who earned a reputation for lip synching in the Blond Ambition Tour.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Madonna}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nb\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nNanjing ( listen; Chinese: 南京, \"Southern Capital\") is the city situated in the heartland of lower Yangtze River region in China, which has long been a major centre of culture, education, research, politics, economy, transport networks and tourism. It is the capital city of Jiangsu province of People's Republic of China and the second largest city in East China, with a total population of 8,216,100, and legally the capital of Republic of China which lost the mainland during the civil war. The city whose name means \"Southern Capital\" has a prominent place in Chinese history and culture, having served as the capitals of various Chinese dynasties, kingdoms and republican governments dating from the 3rd century AD to 1949. Prior to the advent of pinyin romanization, Nanjing's city name was spelled as Nanking or Nankin. Nanjing has a number of other names, and some historical names are now used as names of districts of the city, and among them there is the name Jiangning (江寧), whose former character Jiang (江, River) is the former part of the name Jiangsu and latter character Ning (寧, simplified form 宁, Peace) is the short name of Nanjing. When being the capital of a state, for instance, ROC, Jing (京) is adopted as the abbreviation of Nanjing. Although as a city located in southern part of China becoming Chinese national capital as early as in Jin dynasty, the name Nanjing was designated to the city in Ming dynasty, about a thousand years later. Nanjing is particularly known as Jinling (金陵, literally meaning Gold Mountain) and the old name has been used since the Warring States Period in Zhou Dynasty.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nb\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": nan, \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": b}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat group started an armed rebellion in Guinea-Bissau?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAn armed rebellion beginning in 1956 by the African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC) under the leadership of Amílcar Cabral gradually consolidated its hold on then Portuguese Guinea. Unlike guerrilla movements in other Portuguese colonies, the PAIGC rapidly extended its military control over large portions of the territory, aided by the jungle-like terrain, its easily reached borderlines with neighbouring allies, and large quantities of arms from Cuba, China, the Soviet Union, and left-leaning African countries. Cuba also agreed to supply artillery experts, doctors, and technicians. The PAIGC even managed to acquire a significant anti-aircraft capability in order to defend itself against aerial attack. By 1973, the PAIGC was in control of many parts of Guinea, although the movement suffered a setback in January 1973 when Cabral was assassinated.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nAfrican Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC)\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the group that started an armed rebellion in Guinea-Bissau.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that an armed rebellion began in 1956 by the African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC).', 'The ANSWER directly matches the group mentioned in the CONTEXT as starting the armed rebellion.', 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately identifies the group responsible for the armed rebellion in Guinea-Bissau, as described in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT provides additional details about the PAIGC's rebellion, such as its leadership, military control, and international support, which further supports the ANSWER's accuracy.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC)}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho supervised sacred rites during the era of kings?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn the Regal era, a rex sacrorum (king of the sacred rites) supervised regal and state rites in conjunction with the king (rex) or in his absence, and announced the public festivals. He had little or no civil authority. With the abolition of monarchy, the collegial power and influence of the Republican pontifices increased. By the late Republican era, the flamines were supervised by the pontifical collegia. The rex sacrorum had become a relatively obscure priesthood with an entirely symbolic title: his religious duties still included the daily, ritual announcement of festivals and priestly duties within two or three of the latter but his most important priestly role – the supervision of the Vestals and their rites – fell to the more politically powerful and influential pontifex maximus.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nrex sacrorum\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the person who supervised sacred rites during the era of kings.', \"The context mentions the 'Regal era', which implies the era of kings, matching the timeframe specified in the question.\", \"Within the context, the 'rex sacrorum' is described as the person who 'supervised regal and state rites' during the Regal era, aligning with the role specified in the question.\", \"The context further explains the rex sacrorum's role in announcing public festivals and performing priestly duties, reinforcing their connection to sacred rites.\", \"Given the matching timeframe and role, the answer 'rex sacrorum' is faithful to the context and accurately responds to the question.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": rex sacrorum}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat man was almost ready to give Kanye a record deal?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAccording to Capitol Record's A&R, Joe Weinberger, he was approached by West and almost signed a deal with him, but another person in the company convinced Capitol's president not to. Desperate to keep West from defecting to another label, then-label head Damon Dash reluctantly signed West to Roc-A-Fella Records. Jay-Z later admitted that Roc-A-Fella was initially reluctant to support West as a rapper, claiming that many saw him as a producer first and foremost, and that his background contrasted with that of his labelmates.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nJoe Weinberger\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the man who was almost ready to give Kanye a record deal.', 'The context mentions Joe Weinberger, an A&R at Capitol Records, who was approached by West and almost signed a deal with him.', 'This information directly answers the question, indicating that Joe Weinberger was the man who was almost ready to give Kanye a record deal.', 'The context also provides additional information about the circumstances surrounding the potential deal, but the key point is that Joe Weinberger was the person who was close to signing West.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Joe Weinberger' is faithful to the context, as it accurately reflects the information provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Joe Weinberger}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nNigeria was under military rule for how long?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nNigeria regained democracy in 1999 when it elected Olusegun Obasanjo, the former military head of state, as the new President of Nigeria. This ended almost 33 years of military rule (from 1966 until 1999), excluding the short-lived second republic (between 1979 and 1983) by military dictators who seized power in coups d'état and counter-coups during the Nigerian military juntas of 1966–1979 and 1983–1998. Although the elections which brought Obasanjo to power in 1999 and again in 2003 were condemned as unfree and unfair, Nigeria has shown marked improvements in attempts to tackle government corruption and to hasten development.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nalmost 33 years, with the majority of the military leaders being from the northern region of the country and having a strong background in economics.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the majority of the military leaders being from the northern region of the country and having a strong background in economics.', 'However, this information is not supported by the CONTEXT, which only mentions the duration of military rule and the events surrounding the transition to democracy.', 'The CONTEXT does not provide any information about the regional background or economic expertise of the military leaders.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT, as it introduces new information that is not grounded in the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['with the majority of the military leaders being from the northern region of the country', 'and having a strong background in economics']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich part of Zhejiang is part of the Yangtze Delta?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nZhejiang benefited less from central government investment than some other provinces due to its lack of natural resources, a location vulnerable to potential flooding from the sea, and an economic base at the national average. Zhejiang, however, has been an epicenter of capitalist development in China, and has led the nation in the development of a market economy and private enterprises. Northeast Zhejiang, as part of the Yangtze Delta, is flat, more developed, and industrial.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nNortheast Zhejiang, particularly the coastal areas near Ningbo.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about the specific location within Northeast Zhejiang, mentioning 'coastal areas near Ningbo'.\", 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention Ningbo or any specific coastal areas, only stating that Northeast Zhejiang is part of the Yangtze Delta.', 'This implies that the ANSWER is making an inference or adding information not present in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['particularly the coastal areas near Ningbo']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat years did Abbasid caliph Harun ar-Rashid reign?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Islamic Golden Age coincided with the Middle Ages in the Muslim world, starting with the rise of Islam and establishment of the first Islamic state in 622. The end of the age is variously given as 1258 with the Mongolian Sack of Baghdad, or 1492 with the completion of the Christian Reconquista of the Emirate of Granada in Al-Andalus, Iberian Peninsula. During the reign of the Abbasid caliph Harun ar-Rashid (786 to 809), the legendary House of Wisdom was inaugurated in Baghdad where scholars from various parts of the world sought to translate and gather all the known world's knowledge into Arabic. The Abbasids were influenced by the Quranic injunctions and hadiths, such as \"the ink of a scholar is more holy than the blood of a martyr,\" that stressed the value of knowledge. The major Islamic capital cities of Baghdad, Cairo, and Córdoba became the main intellectual centers for science, philosophy, medicine, and education. During this period, the Muslim world was a collection of cultures; they drew together and advanced the knowledge gained from the ancient Greek, Roman, Persian, Chinese, Indian, Egyptian, and Phoenician civilizations.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n786 to 809, during which he also briefly visited the city of Samarkand.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about Harun ar-Rashid's reign that is not present in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT only mentions the years of Harun ar-Rashid's reign, but does not mention any visits to other cities.\", 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, which makes it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['during which he also briefly visited the city of Samarkand']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat percentage of the Swazi population are Christian?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\n83% of the total population adheres to Christianity, making it the most common religion in Swaziland. Anglican, Protestant and indigenous African churches, including African Zionist, constitute the majority of the Christians (40%), followed by Roman Catholicism at 20% of the population. On 18 July 2012, Ellinah Wamukoya, was elected Anglican Bishop of Swaziland, becoming the first woman to be a bishop in Africa. 15% of the population follows traditional religions; other non-Christian religions practised in the country include Islam (1%), the Bahá'í Faith (0.5%), and Hinduism (0.2%). There are 14 Jewish families.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n83%\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of the Swazi population that are Christian.', 'The context provides information about the religious demographics of Swaziland, including the percentage of the population that adheres to Christianity.', \"The context explicitly states that '83% of the total population adheres to Christianity', which directly answers the question.\", \"The answer '83%' is a direct quote from the context, indicating that it is faithful to the provided information.\", 'The context also provides additional details about the specific Christian denominations and other religions in Swaziland, but the answer only focuses on the overall percentage of Christians, which is the specific information requested by the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 83%}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat could have allowed Victoria freedom from living with her mother?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThough queen, as an unmarried young woman Victoria was required by social convention to live with her mother, despite their differences over the Kensington System and her mother's continued reliance on Conroy. Her mother was consigned to a remote apartment in Buckingham Palace, and Victoria often refused to see her. When Victoria complained to Melbourne that her mother's close proximity promised \"torment for many years\", Melbourne sympathised but said it could be avoided by marriage, which Victoria called a \"schocking [sic] alternative\". She showed interest in Albert's education for the future role he would have to play as her husband, but she resisted attempts to rush her into wedlock.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nmarriage\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks what could have allowed Victoria freedom from living with her mother, indicating a search for a solution to her living situation.', 'The context mentions that Victoria was required by social convention to live with her mother as an unmarried young woman, implying that her marital status was a factor in her living situation.', \"The context also quotes Melbourne as saying that marriage could avoid the 'torment for many years' caused by her mother's close proximity, directly linking marriage to a solution for Victoria's living situation.\", \"The answer 'marriage' is faithful to the context because it is explicitly mentioned as a potential solution to Victoria's problem, and it aligns with the social convention mentioned in the context that an unmarried young woman would be required to live with her mother.\", \"The context provides a clear causal link between marriage and Victoria's freedom from living with her mother, making the answer a logical and reasonable conclusion based on the information provided.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": marriage}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat type of annual competition takes place during Kanavel?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCarnival in Haiti started in 1804 in the capital Port-au-Prince after the declaration of independence. The Port-au-Prince Carnival is one of the largest in North America. It is known as Kanaval in the Creole language. It starts in January, known as \"Pre-Kanaval\", while the main carnival activities begin in February. In July 2012, Haiti had another carnival called Kanaval de Fleur. Beautiful costumes, floats, Rara parades, masks, foods, and popular rasin music (like Boukman Eksperyans, Foula Vodoule, Tokay, Boukan Ginen, Eritaj, etc.) and kompa bands (such as T-Vice, Djakout No. 1, Sweet Micky, Kreyòl La, D.P. Express, Mizik Mizik, Ram, T-Micky, Carimi, Djakout Mizik, and Scorpio Fever) play for dancers in the streets of the plaza of Champ-de-Mars. An annual song competition takes place.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ndance-song\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides a more specific and detailed response than the information given in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT mentions an 'annual song competition', but does not provide any information about a 'dance-song' competition.\", \"The addition of 'dance' to the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT, which only mentions a song competition.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['dance-']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn 1500, approximately what percent of European women could read?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nEducation remained mostly focused on the training of future clergy. The basic learning of the letters and numbers remained the province of the family or a village priest, but the secondary subjects of the trivium—grammar, rhetoric, logic—were studied in cathedral schools or in schools provided by cities. Commercial secondary schools spread, and some Italian towns had more than one such enterprise. Universities also spread throughout Europe in the 14th and 15th centuries. Lay literacy rates rose, but were still low; one estimate gave a literacy rate of ten per cent of males and one per cent of females in 1500.\n\n--\nANSWER:\none\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the approximate percentage of European women who could read in 1500.', 'The context provides information about education and literacy rates in Europe during the 14th to 15th centuries.', 'Specifically, the context mentions that lay literacy rates rose but were still low, with an estimated literacy rate of one per cent of females in 1500.', \"The answer 'one' is faithful to the context because it directly quotes the estimated literacy rate of females in 1500 mentioned in the context.\", 'The context provides a clear and specific answer to the question, and the answer accurately reflects this information.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": one}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat survey results complement on data on health status?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nPeople are usually well informed about their health status, the positive and negative effects of their behaviour on their health and their use of health care services. Yet their perceptions of their health can differ from what administrative and examination-based data show about levels of illness within populations. Thus, survey results based on self-reporting at the household level complement other data on health status and the use of services. Only one third of adults rated their health as good or very good in Portugal (Kasmel et al., 2004). This is the lowest of the Eur-A countries reporting and reflects the relatively adverse situation of the country in terms of mortality and selected morbidity.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nself-reporting at the household level, often conducted through online questionnaires.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information not present in the CONTEXT, specifically the method of conducting self-reporting surveys.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that survey results based on self-reporting at the household level complement other data on health status, but does not provide details on how these surveys are conducted.', 'The addition of \"often conducted through online questionnaires\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and may not be accurate in this specific context.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often conducted through online questionnaires']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was Marvel's major offshoot with Westerns, war stories, and monster comics called?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAtlas, rather than innovate, took a proven route of following popular trends in television and movies—Westerns and war dramas prevailing for a time, drive-in movie monsters another time—and even other comic books, particularly the EC horror line. Atlas also published a plethora of children's and teen humor titles, including Dan DeCarlo's Homer the Happy Ghost (à la Casper the Friendly Ghost) and Homer Hooper (à la Archie Andrews). Atlas unsuccessfully attempted to revive superheroes from late 1953 to mid-1954, with the Human Torch (art by Syd Shores and Dick Ayers, variously), the Sub-Mariner (drawn and most stories written by Bill Everett), and Captain America (writer Stan Lee, artist John Romita Sr.). Atlas did not achieve any breakout hits and, according to Stan Lee, Atlas survived chiefly because it produced work quickly, cheaply, and at a passable quality.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nAtlas\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks about Marvel's major offshoot with Westerns, war stories, and monster comics.\", 'The context mentions that Atlas followed popular trends in television and movies, including Westerns and war dramas, and even published monster comics.', \"The context also states that Atlas was a major offshoot of Marvel, as it was the company's primary brand during the 1950s.\", \"The answer, 'Atlas', is faithful to the context because it directly corresponds to the information provided about Marvel's offshoot with Westerns, war stories, and monster comics.\", \"The context provides specific details about Atlas's publishing history, including its attempts to revive superheroes and its focus on popular trends, which supports the answer and demonstrates that Atlas was indeed Marvel's major offshoot with Westerns, war stories, and monster comics.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Atlas}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn the IHDI, inequality is factored into what three human development dimensions?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe 2010 Human Development Report was the first to calculate an Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI), which factors in inequalities in the three basic dimensions of human development (income, life expectancy, and education). Below is a list of countries in the top quartile by IHDI:\n\n--\nANSWER:\nincome, life expectancy, and access to education.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces a slight modification to the original phrase 'education' by adding 'access to'.\", \"This modification is not supported by the CONTEXT, which explicitly mentions 'education' as one of the dimensions without any additional qualifiers.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['access to']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what year did the Turks cross the Danube into Wallachia ?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn June 1854, the Allied expeditionary force landed at Varna, a city on the Black Sea's western coast (now in Bulgaria). They made little advance from their base there.:175–176 In July 1854, the Turks under Omar Pasha crossed the Danube into Wallachia and on 7 July 1854, engaged the Russians in the city of Giurgiu and conquered it. The capture of Giurgiu by the Turks immediately threatened Bucharest in Wallachia with capture by the same Turk army. On 26 July 1854, Tsar Nicholas I ordered the withdrawal of Russian troops from the Principalities. Also, in late July 1854, following up on the Russian retreat, the French staged an expedition against the Russian forces still in Dobruja, but this was a failure.:188–190\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\n1854, during a severe winter storm.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the weather conditions during the event, which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the year and the month when the Turks crossed the Danube into Wallachia, but does not provide any details about the weather.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['during a severe winter storm']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat rail trail is slated to run between downtown New Haven and Northampton, Massachusetts? \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Farmington Canal Trail is a rail trail that will eventually run continuously from downtown New Haven to Northampton, Massachusetts. The scenic trail follows the path of the historic New Haven and Northampton Company and the Farmington Canal. Currently, there is a continuous 14-mile (23 km) stretch of the trail from downtown, through Hamden and into Cheshire, making bicycle commuting between New Haven and those suburbs possible. The trail is part of the East Coast Greenway, a proposed 3,000-mile (4,800 km) bike path that would link every major city on the East Coast from Florida to Maine.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe Farmington Canal Trail\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the rail trail that will run between downtown New Haven and Northampton, Massachusetts.', \"The context mentions that the Farmington Canal Trail will eventually run continuously from downtown New Haven to Northampton, Massachusetts, matching the question's criteria.\", \"The context provides additional information about the trail, such as its current length and its connection to the East Coast Greenway, but the key information that answers the question is the trail's planned route.\", \"The answer, 'The Farmington Canal Trail', directly corresponds to the information provided in the context, making it a faithful response to the question.\", \"The context does not mention any other rail trails that match the question's criteria, further supporting the answer's accuracy.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": The Farmington Canal Trail}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the ancient religion of Tibet?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nReligion is extremely important to the Tibetans and has a strong influence over all aspects of their lives. Bön is the ancient religion of Tibet, but has been almost eclipsed by Tibetan Buddhism, a distinctive form of Mahayana and Vajrayana, which was introduced into Tibet from the Sanskrit Buddhist tradition of northern India. Tibetan Buddhism is practiced not only in Tibet but also in Mongolia, parts of northern India, the Buryat Republic, the Tuva Republic, and in the Republic of Kalmykia and some other parts of China. During China's Cultural Revolution, nearly all Tibet's monasteries were ransacked and destroyed by the Red Guards. A few monasteries have begun to rebuild since the 1980s (with limited support from the Chinese government) and greater religious freedom has been granted – although it is still limited. Monks returned to monasteries across Tibet and monastic education resumed even though the number of monks imposed is strictly limited. Before the 1950s, between 10 and 20% of males in Tibet were monks.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nBön\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that Bön is the ancient religion of Tibet, which directly answers the QUESTION.', 'The QUESTION specifically asks for the ancient religion of Tibet, and the CONTEXT provides the information that Bön is indeed the ancient religion of Tibet.', \"The ANSWER, 'Bön', is a direct reference to the information provided in the CONTEXT, demonstrating a clear connection between the two.\", \"The CONTEXT also provides additional information about the influence of Tibetan Buddhism, but the QUESTION is specifically asking about the ancient religion, making 'Bön' the most relevant and faithful answer.\", 'The ANSWER does not include any extraneous information or interpretations, but rather provides a straightforward answer based on the information provided in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Bön}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn Minkowski spacetime, how can distances in space be measured?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe theory of special relativity finds a convenient formulation in Minkowski spacetime, a mathematical structure that combines three dimensions of space with a single dimension of time. In this formalism, distances in space can be measured by how long light takes to travel that distance, e.g., a light-year is a measure of distance, and a meter is now defined in terms of how far light travels in a certain amount of time. Two events in Minkowski spacetime are separated by an invariant interval, which can be either space-like, light-like, or time-like. Events that have a time-like separation cannot be simultaneous in any frame of reference, there must be a temporal component (and possibly a spatial one) to their separation. Events that have a space-like separation will be simultaneous in some frame of reference, and there is no frame of reference in which they do not have a spatial separation. Different observers may calculate different distances and different time intervals between two events, but the invariant interval between the events is independent of the observer (and his velocity).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nby how long light takes to travel that distance, typically using a high-precision atomic clock.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that distances in space can be measured by how long light takes to travel that distance, but it does not specify the use of a high-precision atomic clock.', \"The addition of 'typically using a high-precision atomic clock' in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and may be considered an assumption or an inference not grounded in the provided text.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['typically using a high-precision atomic clock']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere can people using iPods on planes view the device's interface?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBeginning in mid-2007, four major airlines, United, Continental, Delta, and Emirates, reached agreements to install iPod seat connections. The free service will allow passengers to power and charge an iPod, and view video and music libraries on individual seat-back displays. Originally KLM and Air France were reported to be part of the deal with Apple, but they later released statements explaining that they were only contemplating the possibility of incorporating such systems.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nindividual seat-back displays\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks about the location where people using iPods on planes can view the device's interface.\", 'The context mentions that four major airlines have agreements to install iPod seat connections, allowing passengers to view video and music libraries on individual seat-back displays.', \"The answer 'individual seat-back displays' is a direct reference to the context, which explicitly states that passengers can view their iPod content on these displays.\", 'The context provides a specific solution to the problem posed by the question, and the answer faithfully reproduces this solution.', 'The answer is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided about how passengers can view their iPod content on planes.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": individual seat-back displays}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat type of armor did Japanese wear in the 7th century?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAs far back as the seventh century Japanese warriors wore a form of lamellar armor, this armor eventually evolved into the armor worn by the samurai. The first types of Japanese armors identified as samurai armor were known as yoroi. These early samurai armors were made from small individual scales known as kozane. The kozane were made from either iron or leather and were bound together into small strips, the strips were coated with lacquer to protect the kozane from water. A series of strips of kozane were then laced together with silk or leather lace and formed into a complete chest armor (dou or dō).\n\n--\nANSWER:\na form of lamellar armor\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the type of armor worn by Japanese warriors in the 7th century.', 'The context provides information about the early forms of Japanese armor, specifically mentioning that Japanese warriors wore a form of lamellar armor as far back as the seventh century.', 'The answer directly references this information from the context, indicating that the type of armor worn by Japanese warriors in the 7th century was indeed a form of lamellar armor.', 'The context and answer share a common thread, which is the description of early Japanese armor, making the answer faithful to the context.', 'The answer does not introduce any new information not present in the context, but rather, it accurately summarizes the relevant information provided in the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": a form of lamellar armor}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the most common application of resonant antennas?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe end result is that the resonant antenna will efficiently feed a signal into the transmission line only when the source signal's frequency is close to that of the design frequency of the antenna, or one of the resonant multiples. This makes resonant antenna designs inherently narrowband, and they are most commonly used with a single target signal. They are particularly common on radar systems, where the same antenna is used for both broadcast and reception, or for radio and television broadcasts, where the antenna is working with a single frequency. They are less commonly used for reception where multiple channels are present, in which case additional modifications are used to increase the bandwidth, or entirely different antenna designs are used.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nsingle target signal\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that resonant antennas are most commonly used with a single target signal.', \"The ANSWER 'single target signal' directly corresponds to this information in the CONTEXT.\", 'The CONTEXT also provides examples of applications where resonant antennas are used with a single target signal, such as radar systems and radio/television broadcasts.', 'This suggests that the ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately reflects the most common application of resonant antennas as described in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT does not provide a specific example of a 'single target signal', but it implies that it refers to a single frequency or a narrowband signal, which is consistent with the ANSWER.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": single target signal}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what year did the city vote to change to a strong mayor government?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe city is governed by a mayor and a 9-member city council. In 2006, the city's form of government changed from a council–manager government to a strong mayor government. The change was brought about by a citywide vote in 2004. The mayor is in effect the chief executive officer of the city, while the council is the legislative body. The City of San Diego is responsible for police, public safety, streets, water and sewer service, planning and zoning, and similar services within its borders. San Diego is a sanctuary city, however, San Diego County is a participant of the Secure Communities program. As of 2011[update], the city had one employee for every 137 residents, with a payroll greater than $733 million.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n2004\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the year the city voted to change to a strong mayor government.', \"The context provides information about the city's government, including the change from a council-manager government to a strong mayor government.\", 'The context specifically states that the change was brought about by a citywide vote in 2004, which directly answers the question.', \"The answer '2004' is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the year mentioned in the context as the time when the city voted to change its government.\", \"The context provides additional information about the city's government, but the answer only focuses on the specific year mentioned, demonstrating a clear connection between the context and the answer.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 2004}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nDo non-Christians agree that the Crucifixion happened?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe baptism of Jesus and his crucifixion are considered to be two historically certain facts about Jesus. James Dunn states that these \"two facts in the life of Jesus command almost universal assent\" and \"rank so high on the 'almost impossible to doubt or deny' scale of historical facts\" that they are often the starting points for the study of the historical Jesus. Bart Ehrman states that the crucifixion of Jesus on the orders of Pontius Pilate is the most certain element about him. John Dominic Crossan states that the crucifixion of Jesus is as certain as any historical fact can be. Eddy and Boyd state that it is now \"firmly established\" that there is non-Christian confirmation of the crucifixion of Jesus. Craig Blomberg states that most scholars in the third quest for the historical Jesus consider the crucifixion indisputable. Christopher M. Tuckett states that, although the exact reasons for the death of Jesus are hard to determine, one of the indisputable facts about him is that he was crucified.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe crucifixion of Jesus is as certain as any historical fact can be, and it is widely accepted that it occurred on a Wednesday.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information not present in the CONTEXT, specifically the day of the week the Crucifixion occurred.', 'The CONTEXT does not mention the day of the week the Crucifixion occurred, only that it is a historically certain fact.', 'The added information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and it is widely accepted that it occurred on a Wednesday']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere did Scott Butera work prior to becoming AFL commissioner?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nJerry Kurz also stepped down as commissioner of the AFL as he was promoted to be the AFL's first president. Former Foxwoods CEO Scott Butera was hired as his successor as commissioner.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nFoxwoods\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks about Scott Butera's workplace prior to becoming AFL commissioner.\", \"The context mentions that Scott Butera was the 'Former Foxwoods CEO' before being hired as the AFL commissioner.\", 'This implies that Foxwoods is the place where Scott Butera worked before taking the position of AFL commissioner.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Foxwoods' is faithful to the context as it directly answers the question based on the information provided.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Foxwoods}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nOn what show did Adams appear to \"defend himself\"?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAdams sent condolences to Donda West's family but declined to publicly discuss the procedure, citing confidentiality. West’s family, through celebrity attorney Ed McPherson, filed complaints with the Medical Board against Adams and Aboolian for violating patient confidentiality following her death. Adams had previously been under scrutiny by the medical board. He appeared on Larry King Live on November 20, 2007, but left before speaking. Two days later, he appeared again, with his attorney, stating he was there to \"defend himself\". He said that the recently released autopsy results \"spoke for themselves\". The final coroner's report January 10, 2008, concluded that Donda West died of \"coronary artery disease and multiple post-operative factors due to or as a consequence of liposuction and mammoplasty\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nLarry King Live\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks for the show on which Adams appeared to 'defend himself'.\", \"The context mentions that Adams appeared on Larry King Live, stating he was there to 'defend himself'.\", 'This direct quote from the context matches the phrase in the question, indicating that the context is providing the answer to the question.', \"The context also provides additional information about Adams' appearance on Larry King Live, such as the date and the circumstances surrounding it, which further supports the answer.\", \"Therefore, the answer 'Larry King Live' is faithful to the context, as it accurately reflects the information provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Larry King Live}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow large is the Marshall Islands shark sanctuary in square miles?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn October 2011, the government declared that an area covering nearly 2,000,000 square kilometres (772,000 sq mi) of ocean shall be reserved as a shark sanctuary. This is the world's largest shark sanctuary, extending the worldwide ocean area in which sharks are protected from 2,700,000 to 4,600,000 square kilometres (1,042,000 to 1,776,000 sq mi). In protected waters, all shark fishing is banned and all by-catch must be released. However, some have questioned the ability of the Marshall Islands to enforce this zone.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n772,001\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides a value of 772,001 square miles for the Marshall Islands shark sanctuary.', 'However, the CONTEXT states that the sanctuary covers nearly 772,000 square miles of ocean.', 'The addition of 1 square mile in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT, which only provides an approximate value.', 'The CONTEXT does not provide any information that would suggest the sanctuary is exactly 772,001 square miles in size.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['1']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat happens to information during the encoding process?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn psychology, memory is the process in which information is encoded, stored, and retrieved. Encoding allows information from the outside world to be sensed in the form of chemical and physical stimuli. In the first stage the information must be changed so that it may be put into the encoding process. Storage is the second memory stage or process. This entails that information is maintained over short periods of time. Finally the third process is the retrieval of information that has been stored. Such information must be located and returned to the consciousness. Some retrieval attempts may be effortless due to the type of information, and other attempts to remember stored information may be more demanding for various reasons.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nEncoding allows information from the outside world to be sensed in the form of chemical and physical stimuli, often triggered by a specific sound.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds extra information (\"often triggered by a specific sound\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that encoding allows information from the outside world to be sensed in the form of chemical and physical stimuli, but it does not specify any triggers or conditions for this process.', 'The added information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and may be considered an inference or an assumption rather than a direct answer based on the provided information.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often triggered by a specific sound']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn which sea was a large amount of naval vessels sent in order to remove Cilician pirates?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAfter having declined in size following the subjugation of the Mediterranean, the Roman navy underwent short-term upgrading and revitalisation in the late Republic to meet several new demands. Under Caesar, an invasion fleet was assembled in the English Channel to allow the invasion of Britannia; under Pompey, a large fleet was raised in the Mediterranean Sea to clear the sea of Cilician pirates. During the civil war that followed, as many as a thousand ships were either constructed or pressed into service from Greek cities.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nMediterranean Sea, specifically near the island of Corsica.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information (\"specifically near the island of Corsica\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the Mediterranean Sea as the location where a large fleet was raised to clear the sea of Cilician pirates, but does not provide any information about the island of Corsica.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['specifically near the island of Corsica']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich part of the incandescent light bulb is heated?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAn incandescent light bulb, incandescent lamp or incandescent light globe is an electric light with a wire filament heated to a high temperature, by passing an electric current through it, until it glows with visible light (incandescence). The hot filament is protected from oxidation with a glass or quartz bulb that is filled with inert gas or evacuated. In a halogen lamp, filament evaporation is prevented by a chemical process that redeposits metal vapor onto the filament, extending its life. The light bulb is supplied with electric current by feed-through terminals or wires embedded in the glass. Most bulbs are used in a socket which provides mechanical support and electrical connections.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nwire filament, typically made of a tungsten alloy, which is often coated with a thin layer of silver for added durability.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the composition of the wire filament, specifically that it is \"typically made of a tungsten alloy\" and \"often coated with a thin layer of silver for added durability\".', 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions that the incandescent light bulb has a \"wire filament\" without specifying its composition or coating.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT, as it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['typically made of a tungsten alloy', 'often coated with a thin layer of silver for added durability']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what New Jersey city does the Holland Tunnel terminate?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nManhattan Island is linked to New York City's outer boroughs and New Jersey by several tunnels as well. The Lincoln Tunnel, which carries 120,000 vehicles a day under the Hudson River between New Jersey and Midtown Manhattan, is the busiest vehicular tunnel in the world. The tunnel was built instead of a bridge to allow unfettered passage of large passenger and cargo ships that sailed through New York Harbor and up the Hudson River to Manhattan's piers. The Holland Tunnel, connecting Lower Manhattan to Jersey City, New Jersey, was the world's first mechanically ventilated vehicular tunnel when it opened in 1927. The Queens-Midtown Tunnel, built to relieve congestion on the bridges connecting Manhattan with Queens and Brooklyn, was the largest non-federal project in its time when it was completed in 1940. President Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first person to drive through it. The Hugh L. Carey Tunnel runs underneath Battery Park and connects the Financial District at the southern tip of Manhattan to Red Hook in Brooklyn.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nJersey City, which is also home to a minor league baseball stadium.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about Jersey City that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions Jersey City as the New Jersey city connected to Lower Manhattan by the Holland Tunnel, but does not mention a minor league baseball stadium.', 'This extra information is not supported by the provided CONTEXT and is therefore not faithful to it.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is also home to a minor league baseball stadium']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow much money has all of Steven Spielberg's movies grossed worldwide?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSpielberg won the Academy Award for Best Director for Schindler's List (1993) and Saving Private Ryan (1998). Three of Spielberg's films—Jaws (1975), E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), and Jurassic Park (1993)—achieved box office records, originated and came to epitomize the blockbuster film. The unadjusted gross of all Spielberg-directed films exceeds $9 billion worldwide, making him the highest-grossing director in history. His personal net worth is estimated to be more than $3 billion. He has been associated with composer John Williams since 1974, who composed music for all save five of Spielberg's feature films.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nexceeds $9 billion, with a significant portion of that coming from his work in the film industry in the 1980s, particularly in the United States and Europe, and also in Australia.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the time period (1980s), geographic locations (United States, Europe, and Australia), and the source of the revenue (film industry) that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the total unadjusted gross of Spielberg-directed films, without specifying the time period or geographic locations where the revenue was generated.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['with a significant portion of that coming from his work in the film industry in the 1980s', 'particularly in the United States and Europe', 'and also in Australia']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow long ago did Islam arrive in Zhejiang?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIslam arrived 1,400 years ago in Zhejiang. Today Islam is practiced by a small number of people including virtually all the Hui Chinese living in Zhejiang. Another religion present in the province is She shamanism (practiced by She ethnic minority).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nIslam arrived approximately 1,400 years ago in Zhejiang, during the Tang Dynasty.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the time period when Islam arrived in Zhejiang, specifically mentioning the Tang Dynasty.', 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the number of years ago Islam arrived in Zhejiang.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the given text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['during the Tang Dynasty']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen was the most recent election of a non-cardinal?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn Latin, on the other hand, the [First name] Cardinal [Surname] order is used in the proclamation of the election of a new pope by the cardinal protodeacon: \"Annuntio vobis gaudium magnum; habemus Papam: Eminentissimum ac Reverendissimum Dominum, Dominum (first name) Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae Cardinalem (last name), ...\" (Meaning: \"I announce to you a great joy; we have a Pope: The Most Eminent and Most Reverend Lord, Lord (first name) Cardinal of the Holy Roman Church (last name), ...\") This assumes that the new pope had been a cardinal just before becoming pope; the most recent election of a non-cardinal as pope was in 1378.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1378\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the most recent year of the election of a non-cardinal as pope.', 'The context provides information about the proclamation of the election of a new pope and mentions that it assumes the new pope had been a cardinal just before becoming pope.', 'The context then explicitly states that the most recent election of a non-cardinal as pope was in 1378.', \"The answer '1378' directly corresponds to the information provided in the context, making it a faithful response to the question.\", 'The context and answer share a common topic, which is the election of a non-cardinal as pope, and the answer accurately reflects the information provided in the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1378}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThere is an idea where ethics are causally related to the attainment of what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nReligious knowledge or \"vision\" was indicated as a result of practice both within and outside of the Buddhist fold. According to the Samaññaphala Sutta, this sort of vision arose for the Buddhist adept as a result of the perfection of \"meditation\" coupled with the perfection of \"discipline\" (Pali sīla; Skt. śīla). Some of the Buddha's meditative techniques were shared with other traditions of his day, but the idea that ethics are causally related to the attainment of \"transcendent wisdom\" (Pali paññā; Skt. prajñā) was original.[web 18]\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\ntranscendent wisdom, which is often symbolized by a lotus flower.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about transcendent wisdom being symbolized by a lotus flower.', 'This information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the causal relationship between ethics and the attainment of transcendent wisdom.', 'The CONTEXT does not provide any information about the symbolism of transcendent wisdom.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is often symbolized by a lotus flower']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat issues plagued the PVA throughout the war?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nOn 1 March 1951 Mao sent a cable to Stalin, in which he emphasized the difficulties faced by Chinese forces and the urgent need for air cover, especially over supply lines. Apparently impressed by the Chinese war effort, Stalin finally agreed to supply two air force divisions, three anti-aircraft divisions, and six thousand trucks. PVA troops in Korea continued to suffer severe logistical problems throughout the war. In late April Peng Dehuai sent his deputy, Hong Xuezhi, to brief Zhou Enlai in Beijing. What Chinese soldiers feared, Hong said, was not the enemy, but that they had nothing to eat, no bullets to shoot, and no trucks to transport them to the rear when they were wounded. Zhou attempted to respond to the PVA's logistical concerns by increasing Chinese production and improving methods of supply, but these efforts were never completely sufficient. At the same time, large-scale air defense training programs were carried out, and the Chinese Air Force began to participate in the war from September 1951 onward.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nlogistical problems\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the issues that plagued the PVA throughout the war.', \"The CONTEXT provides information about the difficulties faced by Chinese forces, specifically mentioning 'severe logistical problems' and 'logistical concerns'.\", \"The ANSWER, 'logistical problems', directly corresponds to the issues mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", 'The CONTEXT highlights the struggles of PVA troops, including lack of food, bullets, and transportation, which are all related to logistical problems.', 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately identifies the primary issue affecting the PVA throughout the war, as described in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": logistical problems}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nStoryboards are not considered what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSome consider storyboards and wordless novels to be comics. Film studios, especially in animation, often use sequences of images as guides for film sequences. These storyboards are not intended as an end product and are rarely seen by the public. Wordless novels are books which use sequences of captionless images to deliver a narrative.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nan end product\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks what storyboards are not considered, which implies looking for a characteristic or classification that does not apply to storyboards.', 'The context mentions that storyboards are used as guides for film sequences and are rarely seen by the public, indicating that they are not intended for public consumption or viewing.', \"The context specifically states that storyboards are 'not intended as an end product', which directly answers the question and provides the characteristic that does not apply to storyboards.\", \"The answer 'an end product' is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided about storyboards, which are used as a tool in the filmmaking process rather than being a final product for public consumption.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": an end product}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the transliteration of the way in which New Yorkers are perceived to pronounce the name of their city?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe traditional New York area accent is characterized as non-rhotic, so that the sound [ɹ] does not appear at the end of a syllable or immediately before a consonant; hence the pronunciation of the city name as \"New Yawk.\" There is no [ɹ] in words like park [pɑək] or [pɒək] (with vowel backed and diphthongized due to the low-back chain shift), butter [bʌɾə], or here [hiə]. In another feature called the low back chain shift, the [ɔ] vowel sound of words like talk, law, cross, chocolate, and coffee and the often homophonous [ɔr] in core and more are tensed and usually raised more than in General American. In the most old-fashioned and extreme versions of the New York dialect, the vowel sounds of words like \"girl\" and of words like \"oil\" became a diphthong [ɜɪ]. This would often be misperceived by speakers of other accents as a reversal of the er and oy sounds, so that girl is pronounced \"goil\" and oil is pronounced \"erl\"; this leads to the caricature of New Yorkers saying things like \"Joizey\" (Jersey), \"Toidy-Toid Street\" (33rd St.) and \"terlet\" (toilet). The character Archie Bunker from the 1970s sitcom All in the Family (played by Carroll O'Connor) was a notable example of having used this pattern of speech, which continues to fade in its overall presence.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nNew Yawk\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": nan, \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": New Yawk}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nDuring what years did the Mongol leader Kublai Khan rule?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSome scholars note that Tibetan leaders during the Ming frequently engaged in civil war and conducted their own foreign diplomacy with neighboring states such as Nepal. Some scholars underscore the commercial aspect of the Ming-Tibetan relationship, noting the Ming dynasty's shortage of horses for warfare and thus the importance of the horse trade with Tibet. Others argue that the significant religious nature of the relationship of the Ming court with Tibetan lamas is underrepresented in modern scholarship. In hopes of reviving the unique relationship of the earlier Mongol leader Kublai Khan (r. 1260–1294) and his spiritual superior Drogön Chögyal Phagpa (1235–1280) of the Sakya school of Tibetan Buddhism, the Yongle Emperor (r. 1402–1424) made a concerted effort to build a secular and religious alliance with Deshin Shekpa (1384–1415), the Karmapa of the Karma Kagyu school. However, the Yongle Emperor's attempts were unsuccessful.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\n1402–1424, during which time he also briefly visited the island of Java.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides a time period (1402-1424) that does not match the years of Kublai Khan's rule mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT states that Kublai Khan ruled from 1260-1294, but the ANSWER provides the years of the Yongle Emperor's rule instead.\", 'Additionally, the ANSWER includes information about Kublai Khan visiting the island of Java, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['1402–1424', 'during which time he also briefly visited the island of Java']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what state is the X-10 Graphite Reactor located?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe X-10 Graphite Reactor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, formerly known as the Clinton Pile and X-10 Pile, was the world's second artificial nuclear reactor (after Enrico Fermi's Chicago Pile) and was the first reactor designed and built for continuous operation. Argonne National Laboratory's Experimental Breeder Reactor I, located at the Atomic Energy Commission's National Reactor Testing Station near Arco, Idaho, became the first nuclear reactor to create electricity on 20 December 1951. Initially, four 150-watt light bulbs were lit by the reactor, but improvements eventually enabled it to power the whole facility (later, the town of Arco became the first in the world to have all its electricity come from nuclear power generated by BORAX-III, another reactor designed and operated by Argonne National Laboratory). The world's first commercial scale nuclear power station, Obninsk in the Soviet Union, began generation with its reactor AM-1 on 27 June 1954. Other early nuclear power plants were Calder Hall in England, which began generation on 17 October 1956, and the Shippingport Atomic Power Station in Pennsylvania, which began on 26 May 1958. Nuclear power was used for the first time for propulsion by a submarine, the USS Nautilus, in 1954.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nTennessee\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the state where the X-10 Graphite Reactor is located.', 'The context mentions the X-10 Graphite Reactor and its location at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.', \"The answer 'Tennessee' is faithful to the context because it directly matches the state mentioned in the context as the location of the X-10 Graphite Reactor.\", 'The context provides additional information about the reactor and its significance, but the relevant information for answering the question is the location, which is clearly stated as Tennessee.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Tennessee' is a direct and accurate response to the question based on the information provided in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Tennessee}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did the kingdom split?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAround 930 BCE, the kingdom split into a southern Kingdom of Judah and a northern Kingdom of Israel. From the middle of the 8th century BCE Israel came into increasing conflict with the expanding neo-Assyrian empire. Under Tiglath-Pileser III it first split Israel's territory into several smaller units and then destroyed its capital, Samaria (722 BCE). An Israelite revolt (724–722 BCE) was crushed after the siege and capture of Samaria by the Assyrian king Sargon II. Sargon's son, Sennacherib, tried and failed to conquer Judah. Assyrian records say he leveled 46 walled cities and besieged Jerusalem, leaving after receiving extensive tribute.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe kingdom split around 930 BCE, during a lunar eclipse.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT mentions the kingdom splitting around 930 BCE, but does not mention a lunar eclipse as the time of the split.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['during a lunar eclipse']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe British Government created a how many man council in Calcutta?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nDespite stiff resistance from the East India lobby in parliament and from the Company's shareholders, the Act passed. It introduced substantial governmental control and allowed British India to be formally under the control of the Crown, but leased back to the Company at £40,000 for two years. Under the Act's most important provision, a governing Council composed of five members was created in Calcutta. The three members nominated by Parliament and representing the Government's interest could, and invariably would, outvote the two Company members. The Council was headed by Warren Hastings, the incumbent Governor, who became the first Governor-General of Bengal, with an ill-defined authority over the Bombay and Madras Presidencies. His nomination, made by the Court of Directors, would in future be subject to the approval of a Council of Four appointed by the Crown. Initially, the Council consisted of Lt. General Sir John Clavering, The Honourable Sir George Monson, Sir Richard Barwell, and Sir Philip Francis.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nfive\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the number of members in the council created by the British Government in Calcutta.', \"The context mentions that 'a governing Council composed of five members was created in Calcutta' under the Act's most important provision.\", \"The answer 'five' directly corresponds to the information provided in the context, indicating that the council indeed had five members.\", 'The context further elaborates on the composition of the council, mentioning the names of the members and their affiliations, but the key information relevant to the question is the number of members, which is five.', \"Therefore, the answer 'five' is faithful to the context, as it accurately reflects the information provided about the council's composition.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": five}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat are contracts?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nWindows 8 introduces a new style of application, Windows Store apps. According to Microsoft developer Jensen Harris, these apps are to be optimized for touchscreen environments and are more specialized than current desktop applications. Apps can run either in a full-screen mode, or be snapped to the side of a screen. Apps can provide toast notifications on screen or animate their tiles on the Start screen with dynamic content. Apps can use \"contracts\"; a collection of hooks to provide common functionality that can integrate with other apps, including search and sharing. Apps can also provide integration with other services; for example, the People app can connect to a variety of different social networks and services (such as Facebook, Skype, and People service), while the Photos app can aggregate photos from services such as Facebook and Flickr.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ncollection of hooks to provide common functionality that can integrate with other apps, and also support voice commands.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about contracts supporting voice commands, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that contracts provide common functionality that can integrate with other apps, but does not mention voice commands.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the given text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and also support voice commands']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich guitarist inspired Queen?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nQueen drew artistic influence from British rock acts of the 1960s and early 1970s, such as the Beatles, the Kinks, Cream, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, the Who, Black Sabbath, Slade, Deep Purple, David Bowie, Genesis and Yes, in addition to American guitarist Jimi Hendrix, with Mercury also inspired by the gospel singer Aretha Franklin. May referred to the Beatles as being \"our bible in the way they used the studio and they painted pictures and this wonderful instinctive use of harmonies.\" At their outset in the early 1970s, Queen's music has been characterised as \"Led Zeppelin meets Yes\" due to its combination of \"acoustic/electric guitar extremes and fantasy-inspired multi-part song epics\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nJimi Hendrix\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the guitarist who inspired Queen.', 'The CONTEXT mentions various artists who inspired Queen, including both British and American acts.', 'Among the American artists mentioned, Jimi Hendrix is specifically identified as a guitarist.', 'The ANSWER, Jimi Hendrix, is faithful to the CONTEXT because it directly references the guitarist mentioned in the CONTEXT as an inspiration to Queen.', 'The CONTEXT does not provide information about other guitarists who inspired Queen, making Jimi Hendrix the most relevant answer based on the given information.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Jimi Hendrix}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did Beatrice do to her mothers diaries after her death?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAccording to one of her biographers, Giles St Aubyn, Victoria wrote an average of 2,500 words a day during her adult life. From July 1832 until just before her death, she kept a detailed journal, which eventually encompassed 122 volumes. After Victoria's death, her youngest daughter, Princess Beatrice, was appointed her literary executor. Beatrice transcribed and edited the diaries covering Victoria's accession onwards, and burned the originals in the process. Despite this destruction, much of the diaries still exist. In addition to Beatrice's edited copy, Lord Esher transcribed the volumes from 1832 to 1861 before Beatrice destroyed them. Part of Victoria's extensive correspondence has been published in volumes edited by A. C. Benson, Hector Bolitho, George Earle Buckle, Lord Esher, Roger Fulford, and Richard Hough among others.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ntranscribed, edited, and occasionally added her own poetry\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes the action of \"occasionally added her own poetry\", which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that Beatrice transcribed and edited the diaries, but does not provide any information about her adding her own poetry.', 'The addition of this information makes the ANSWER unfaithful to the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['occasionally added her own poetry']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the name of the university building in Bologna, built in the 14th and 15th centuries?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBy the late Middle Ages university towns had grown in wealth and importance as well, and this was reflected in the buildings of some of Europe's ancient universities. Particularly remarkable examples still standing nowadays include the Collegio di Spagna in the University of Bologna, built during the 14th and 15th centuries; the Collegium Carolinum of the University of Prague in Bohemia; the Escuelas mayores of the University of Salamanca in Spain; the chapel of King's College, Cambridge; or the Collegium Maius of the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe Collegio di Spagna\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the name of a university building in Bologna, built in the 14th and 15th centuries.', 'The context mentions the Collegio di Spagna as a building in the University of Bologna, specifically stating that it was built during the 14th and 15th centuries.', 'The context provides a list of remarkable university buildings in Europe, and the Collegio di Spagna is the only one mentioned as being located in Bologna.', \"The answer, 'the Collegio di Spagna', directly matches the name of the building mentioned in the context as being located in Bologna and built during the specified time period.\", 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately identifies the building mentioned in the context as the one that meets the criteria specified in the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": the Collegio di Spagna}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did his mother die?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn February 1939, he received news from his sisters that his mother was dying. On 10 February 1939, Pope Pius XI died. Roncalli was unable to see his mother for the end as the death of a pontiff meant that he would have to stay at his post until the election of a new pontiff. Unfortunately, she died on 20 February 1939, during the nine days of mourning for the late Pius XI. He was sent a letter by Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, and Roncalli later recalled that it was probably the last letter Pacelli sent until his election as Pope Pius XII on 2 March 1939. Roncalli expressed happiness that Pacelli was elected, and, on radio, listened to the coronation of the new pontiff. \n\n--\nANSWER:\n20 February 1939, on a Tuesday.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information (\"on a Tuesday\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT does provide the date of the mother's death, which is correctly stated in the ANSWER, but it does not mention the day of the week.\", 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes information that is not supported by the given text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['on a Tuesday']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nMayday and Thomas Barnett released what hit in 1987?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nDerrick May a.k.a. \"MAYDAY\" and Thomas Barnett released \"Nude Photo\" in 1987 on May's label \"Transmat Records\", which helped kickstart the Detroit techno music scene and was put in heavy rotation on Chicago's Hot Mix 5 Radio DJ mix show and in many Chicago clubs.[citation needed] A year later, Transmat released what was to become one of techno and house music's classic anthems – the seminal track \"Strings of Life\". Transmat Records went on to have many more successful releases[citation needed] such as 1988's \"Wiggin\". As well, Derrick May had successful[citation needed] releases on Kool Kat Records and many remixes for a host of underground and mainstream recording artist.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n\"Nude Photo\", which was also featured in a popular European film at the time.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT mentions the release of \"Nude Photo\" in 1987, but does not mention it being featured in a popular European film.', 'This extra information in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was also featured in a popular European film at the time']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nGreece has been a member of what agency since 2005?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nGreece's technology parks with incubator facilities include the Science and Technology Park of Crete (Heraklion), the Thessaloniki Technology Park, the Lavrio Technology Park and the Patras Science Park, the Science and Technology Park of Epirus (Ioannina). Greece has been a member of the European Space Agency (ESA) since 2005. Cooperation between ESA and the Hellenic National Space Committee began in the early 1990s. In 1994 Greece and ESA signed their first cooperation agreement. Having formally applied for full membership in 2003, Greece became the ESA's sixteenth member on 16 March 2005. As member of the ESA, Greece participates in the agency's telecommunication and technology activities, and the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security Initiative.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nEuropean Space Agency (ESA)\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the agency Greece has been a member of since 2005.', 'The context mentions that Greece has been a member of the European Space Agency (ESA) since 2005.', 'The answer directly matches the information provided in the context, stating that the agency is the European Space Agency (ESA).', \"The context provides additional details about Greece's membership in the ESA, such as the year they applied for full membership and the date they became a member, which supports the accuracy of the answer.\", 'The answer is faithful to the context because it directly quotes the agency mentioned in the context as the correct answer to the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": European Space Agency (ESA)}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was the effect of the Battle of Hakusukinoe?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nFollowing the Battle of Hakusukinoe against Tang China and Silla in 663 AD that led to a Japanese retreat from Korean affairs, Japan underwent widespread reform. One of the most important was that of the Taika Reform, issued by Prince Naka no Ōe (Emperor Tenji) in 646 AD. This edict allowed the Japanese aristocracy to adopt the Tang dynasty political structure, bureaucracy, culture, religion, and philosophy. As part of the Taihō Code, of 702 AD, and the later Yōrō Code, the population was required to report regularly for census, a precursor for national conscription. With an understanding of how the population was distributed, Emperor Mommu introduced a law whereby 1 in 3–4 adult males was drafted into the national military. These soldiers were required to supply their own weapons, and in return were exempted from duties and taxes. This was one of the first attempts by the Imperial government to form an organized army modeled after the Chinese system. It was called \"Gundan-Sei\" (軍団制) by later historians and is believed to have been short-lived.[citation needed]\n\n--\nANSWER:\na Japanese retreat from Korean affairs, which also led to a brief period of increased trade with the Mongols.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER mentions a consequence of the Battle of Hakusukinoe that is not supported by the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions a Japanese retreat from Korean affairs as the effect of the Battle of Hakusukinoe, but does not mention anything about increased trade with the Mongols.', 'The Mongols are not even mentioned in the CONTEXT, which suggests that the ANSWER is introducing new information not grounded in the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which also led to a brief period of increased trade with the Mongols']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe HD capabilities of modern gaming systems has inspired developers to do what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSony's PlayStation 3 has extensive HD compatibility because of its built in Blu-ray disc based player, so does Microsoft's Xbox 360 with the addition of Netflix and Windows Media Center HTPC streaming capabilities, and the Zune marketplace where users can rent or purchase digital HD content. Recently, Nintendo released a next generation high definition gaming platform, The Wii U, which includes TV remote control features in addition to IPTV streaming features like Netflix. The HD capabilities of the consoles has influenced some developers to port games from past consoles onto the PS3, Xbox 360 and Wii U, often with remastered or upscaled graphics.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nport games from past consoles onto the PS3, Xbox 360 and Wii U, often with remastered or upscaled graphics\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The QUESTION asks about the inspiration behind developers' actions due to the HD capabilities of modern gaming systems.\", 'The CONTEXT provides information about the HD capabilities of various gaming consoles, including the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, and Wii U.', 'The CONTEXT also mentions how the HD capabilities of these consoles have influenced developers, which directly answers the QUESTION.', 'The ANSWER is a direct quote from the CONTEXT, specifically stating that developers have been inspired to port games from past consoles onto the PS3, Xbox 360, and Wii U with remastered or upscaled graphics.', 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately represents the information provided in the CONTEXT, and directly addresses the QUESTION being asked.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": port games from past consoles onto the PS3, Xbox 360 and Wii U, often with remastered or upscaled graphics}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was the effort called to upgrade the Canadian Forces?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn 2008 the Government of Canada made efforts, through the Canada First Defence Strategy, to modernize the Canadian Armed Forces, through the purchase of new equipment, improved training and readiness, as well as the establishment of the Canadian Special Operations Regiment. More funds were also put towards recruitment, which had been dwindling throughout the 1980s and '90s, possibly because the Canadian populace had come to perceive the CAF as peacekeepers rather than as soldiers, as shown in a 2008 survey conducted for the Department of National Defence. The poll found that nearly two thirds of Canadians agreed with the country's participation in the invasion of Afghanistan, and that the military should be stronger, but also that the purpose of the forces should be different, such as more focused on responding to natural disasters. Then CDS, Walter Natynczyk, said later that year that while recruiting has become more successful, the CF was facing a problem with its rate of loss of existing members, which increased between 2006 and 2008 from 6% to 9.2% annually.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe Canada First Defence Strategy\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the effort to upgrade the Canadian Forces, which directly relates to the CONTEXT that discusses the modernization of the Canadian Armed Forces.', \"The CONTEXT mentions the 'Canada First Defence Strategy' as the effort made by the Government of Canada in 2008 to modernize the Canadian Armed Forces.\", \"The ANSWER, 'the Canada First Defence Strategy', is a direct reference to the effort mentioned in the CONTEXT, indicating that it is the correct answer to the QUESTION.\", 'The CONTEXT provides additional information about the goals and outcomes of the Canada First Defence Strategy, such as the purchase of new equipment, improved training and readiness, and increased recruitment, which further supports the ANSWER as a faithful representation of the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": the Canada First Defence Strategy}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat uranium isotope is produced from thorium?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nMany contemporary uses of uranium exploit its unique nuclear properties. Uranium-235 has the distinction of being the only naturally occurring fissile isotope. Uranium-238 is fissionable by fast neutrons, and is fertile, meaning it can be transmuted to fissile plutonium-239 in a nuclear reactor. Another fissile isotope, uranium-233, can be produced from natural thorium and is also important in nuclear technology. While uranium-238 has a small probability for spontaneous fission or even induced fission with fast neutrons, uranium-235 and to a lesser degree uranium-233 have a much higher fission cross-section for slow neutrons. In sufficient concentration, these isotopes maintain a sustained nuclear chain reaction. This generates the heat in nuclear power reactors, and produces the fissile material for nuclear weapons. Depleted uranium (238U) is used in kinetic energy penetrators and armor plating.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nuranium-233\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the uranium isotope produced from thorium, indicating a specific process of isotope production.', 'The context mentions that uranium-233 can be produced from natural thorium, directly answering the question.', 'The context also highlights the importance of uranium-233 in nuclear technology, providing additional relevance to the question.', 'The answer, uranium-233, is a direct match to the information provided in the context, demonstrating a clear connection between the context and the answer.', 'The context does not mention any other uranium isotopes being produced from thorium, making uranium-233 the most faithful answer to the question given the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": uranium-233}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho took control of the regin in 710?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIt was temporarily under the control of the Tibetan empire and Chinese from 650–680 and then under the control of the Umayyads in 710. The Samanid Empire, 819 to 999, restored Persian control of the region and enlarged the cities of Samarkand and Bukhara (both cities are today part of Uzbekistan) which became the cultural centers of Iran and the region was known as Khorasan. The Kara-Khanid Khanate conquered Transoxania (which corresponds approximately with modern-day Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, southern Kyrgyzstan and southwest Kazakhstan) and ruled between 999–1211. Their arrival in Transoxania signaled a definitive shift from Iranian to Turkic predominance in Central Asia, but gradually the Kara-khanids became assimilated into the Perso-Arab Muslim culture of the region.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nUmayyads\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the entity that took control of the region in 710.', 'The context mentions that the region was under the control of the Umayyads in 710, which directly answers the question.', \"The context provides a timeline of the region's control, and the Umayyads are specifically mentioned as taking control in 710, making the answer faithful to the context.\", 'There is no ambiguity or conflicting information in the context that would suggest an alternative answer, making the Umayyads the most logical and correct choice.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Umayyads}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn 2004 Bell was listed in the top how many Greatest Canadians?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAlexander Graham Bell was ranked 57th among the 100 Greatest Britons (2002) in an official BBC nationwide poll, and among the Top Ten Greatest Canadians (2004), and the 100 Greatest Americans (2005). In 2006 Bell was also named as one of the 10 greatest Scottish scientists in history after having been listed in the National Library of Scotland's 'Scottish Science Hall of Fame'. Bell's name is still widely known and used as part of the names of dozens of educational institutes, corporate namesakes, street and place names around the world.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n10\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the ranking of Alexander Graham Bell in the list of Greatest Canadians in 2004.', \"The context provides information about Bell's rankings in various lists, including the Greatest Canadians.\", 'The context specifically mentions that Bell was ranked among the Top Ten Greatest Canadians in 2004.', \"The answer '10' is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the ranking mentioned in the context.\", \"The context does not provide an exact ranking within the top 10, but the answer '10' is a reasonable inference based on the information provided.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 10}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThan which queen has Elizabeth ruled longer?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nElizabeth's many historic visits and meetings include a state visit to the Republic of Ireland and reciprocal visits to and from the Pope. She has seen major constitutional changes, such as devolution in the United Kingdom, Canadian patriation, and the decolonisation of Africa. She has also reigned through various wars and conflicts involving many of her realms. She is the world's oldest reigning monarch as well as Britain's longest-lived. In 2015, she surpassed the reign of her great-great-grandmother, Queen Victoria, to become the longest-reigning British head of state and the longest-reigning queen regnant in world history.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nQueen Victoria\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the queen that Elizabeth has ruled longer than.', 'The context mentions that Elizabeth surpassed the reign of her great-great-grandmother, Queen Victoria, in 2015.', 'This implies that Elizabeth has indeed ruled longer than Queen Victoria.', 'The context also mentions that Elizabeth is the longest-reigning British head of state and the longest-reigning queen regnant in world history, further supporting the fact that she has ruled longer than Queen Victoria.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Queen Victoria' is faithful to the context given the question, as it accurately identifies the queen that Elizabeth has ruled longer than.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Queen Victoria}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is an example of bad treatment causing resistance?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nInappropriate antibiotic treatment and overuse of antibiotics have contributed to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Self prescription of antibiotics is an example of misuse. Many antibiotics are frequently prescribed to treat symptoms or diseases that do not respond to antibiotics or that are likely to resolve without treatment. Also, incorrect or suboptimal antibiotics are prescribed for certain bacterial infections. The overuse of antibiotics, like penicillin and erythromycin, has been associated with emerging antibiotic resistance since the 1950s. Widespread usage of antibiotics in hospitals has also been associated with increases in bacterial strains and species that no longer respond to treatment with the most common antibiotics.\n\n--\nANSWER:\noveruse of antibiotics\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for an example of bad treatment causing resistance, which implies a specific instance of a treatment gone wrong.', 'The context provides information on the misuse and overuse of antibiotics, highlighting their role in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.', \"The answer, 'overuse of antibiotics', is a direct example of bad treatment causing resistance, as mentioned in the context.\", 'The context specifically mentions that the overuse of antibiotics has been associated with emerging antibiotic resistance since the 1950s, providing a clear link between the treatment and the resistance.', 'The answer is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided, and the context provides sufficient evidence to support the answer as a valid example of bad treatment causing resistance.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": overuse of antibiotics}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did Japan invade Indochina?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn September 1940, Japan decided to cut China's only land line to the outside world by seizing Indochina, which was controlled at the time by Vichy France. Japanese forces broke their agreement with the Vichy administration and fighting broke out, ending in a Japanese victory. On 27 September Japan signed a military alliance with Germany and Italy, becoming one of the three Axis Powers. In practice, there was little coordination between Japan and Germany until 1944, by which time the U.S. was deciphering their secret diplomatic correspondence.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nSeptember 1940, following a series of intense diplomatic negotiations with the Soviet Union.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER mentions \"a series of intense diplomatic negotiations with the Soviet Union\" as a precursor to Japan\\'s invasion of Indochina.', 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention any diplomatic negotiations with the Soviet Union.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions Japan's decision to seize Indochina, which was controlled by Vichy France, and the subsequent fighting between Japanese forces and the Vichy administration.\", 'The CONTEXT does mention a military alliance with Germany and Italy, but not with the Soviet Union.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces information that is not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['following a series of intense diplomatic negotiations with the Soviet Union']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere was Madonna raised?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nUpon being confirmed in 1966, she adopted Veronica as a confirmation name. She was raised in the Detroit suburbs of Pontiac and Avon Township (now Rochester Hills). Months before her mother died of breast cancer, Madonna noticed changes in her behavior and personality, although she did not understand the reason. Her mother was at a loss to explain her medical condition, and often began to cry when Madonna questioned her about it. Madonna later acknowledged that she had not grasped the concept of her mother dying.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nDetroit suburbs of Pontiac and Avon Township\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the location where Madonna was raised.', \"The context provides information about Madonna's life, including her confirmation and her mother's death.\", \"Within the context, it specifically mentions that Madonna was 'raised in the Detroit suburbs of Pontiac and Avon Township (now Rochester Hills)'.\", 'The answer directly quotes this information from the context, indicating that it is faithful to the provided information.', 'The answer accurately identifies the location where Madonna was raised, as stated in the context, making it a correct and relevant response to the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Detroit suburbs of Pontiac and Avon Township}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nStandard connectors were designed to be what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe standard connectors were designed to be robust. Because USB is hot-pluggable, the connectors would be used more frequently, and perhaps with less care, than other connectors. Many previous connector designs were fragile, specifying embedded component pins or other delicate parts that were vulnerable to bending or breaking. The electrical contacts in a USB connector are protected by an adjacent plastic tongue, and the entire connecting assembly is usually protected by an enclosing metal sheath.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nrobust and waterproof\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes the word \"waterproof\", which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that the standard connectors were designed to be robust, but does not provide any information about being waterproof.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the given text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['waterproof']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what is the torch flame kept lit when the torch must be off?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Olympic Flame is supposed to remain lit for the whole relay. When the Torch is extinguished at night, on airplanes, in bad weather, or during protests (such as the several occasions in Paris), the Olympic Flame is kept alight in a set of 8 lanterns.[citation needed]\n\n--\nANSWER:\nlanterns, typically made of a special heat-resistant glass.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about the material of the lanterns, stating they are 'typically made of a special heat-resistant glass'.\", 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention the material of the lanterns, only that the Olympic Flame is kept alight in a set of 8 lanterns.', 'This extra information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['typically made of a special heat-resistant glass']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat were races considered to be, according to the ideology of race?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nFrom the 17th through 19th centuries, the merging of folk beliefs about group differences with scientific explanations of those differences produced what one scholar has called an \"ideology of race\". According to this ideology, races are primordial, natural, enduring and distinct. It was further argued that some groups may be the result of mixture between formerly distinct populations, but that careful study could distinguish the ancestral races that had combined to produce admixed groups. Subsequent influential classifications by Georges Buffon, Petrus Camper and Christoph Meiners all classified \"Negros\" as inferior to Europeans. In the United States the racial theories of Thomas Jefferson were influential. He saw Africans as inferior to Whites especially in regards to their intellect, and imbued with unnatural sexual appetites, but described Native Americans as equals to whites.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nprimordial, natural, enduring, distinct, and influenced by geographical climate\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes the phrase \"influenced by geographical climate\", which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT as a characteristic of races according to the ideology of race.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that races are \"primordial, natural, enduring and distinct\", but does not provide any information about the influence of geographical climate on the concept of race.', 'The addition of \"influenced by geographical climate\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT and appears to be an external assumption or inference.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['influenced by geographical climate']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe Dipavamsa says that the losing party broke away in protest and formed what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe root schism was between the Sthaviras and the Mahāsāṅghikas. The fortunate survival of accounts from both sides of the dispute reveals disparate traditions. The Sthavira group offers two quite distinct reasons for the schism. The Dipavamsa of the Theravāda says that the losing party in the Second Council dispute broke away in protest and formed the Mahasanghika. This contradicts the Mahasanghikas' own vinaya, which shows them as on the same, winning side. The Mahāsāṅghikas argued that the Sthaviras were trying to expand the vinaya and may also have challenged what they perceived were excessive claims or inhumanly high criteria for arhatship. Both parties, therefore, appealed to tradition.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nMahasanghika, which was initially led by a prominent monk named Mahakasyapa.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the Mahasanghika being initially led by a prominent monk named Mahakasyapa.', 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the formation of the Mahasanghika by the losing party in the Second Council dispute.', \"The CONTEXT does not provide any details about the leadership of the Mahasanghika, making the ANSWER's claim ungrounded.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was initially led by a prominent monk named Mahakasyapa']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat year was the treaty ratified?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAs white settlers began populating Montana from the 1850s through the 1870s, disputes with Native Americans ensued, primarily over land ownership and control. In 1855, Washington Territorial Governor Isaac Stevens negotiated the Hellgate treaty between the United States Government and the Salish, Pend d'Oreille, and the Kootenai people of western Montana, which established boundaries for the tribal nations. The treaty was ratified in 1859. While the treaty established what later became the Flathead Indian Reservation, trouble with interpreters and confusion over the terms of the treaty led whites to believe that the Bitterroot Valley was opened to settlement, but the tribal nations disputed those provisions. The Salish remained in the Bitterroot Valley until 1891.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1859, following a minor amendment to address a border dispute with a neighboring tribe.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information not present in the CONTEXT, specifically mentioning a \"minor amendment to address a border dispute with a neighboring tribe\".', 'The CONTEXT does not mention any amendments or border disputes with neighboring tribes, making this information ungrounded.', 'The ANSWER should only provide the year the treaty was ratified, as stated in the CONTEXT, without adding extra details.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['following a minor amendment to address a border dispute with a neighboring tribe']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat famous monument did Shah Jahan build at Agra?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAkbar's son, Jahangir more or less followed father's policy. The Mughal dynasty ruled most of the Indian subcontinent by 1600. The reign of Shah Jahan was the golden age of Mughal architecture. He erected several large monuments, the most famous of which is the Taj Mahal at Agra, as well as the Moti Masjid, Agra, the Red Fort, the Jama Masjid, Delhi, and the Lahore Fort. The Mughal Empire reached the zenith of its territorial expanse during the reign of Aurangzeb and also started its terminal decline in his reign due to Maratha military resurgence under Shivaji. Historian Sir. J.N. Sarkar wrote, \"All seemed to have been gained by Aurangzeb now, but in reality all was lost.\" The same was echoed by Vincent Smith: \"The Deccan proved to be the graveyard not only of Aurangzeb's body but also of his empire\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nTaj Mahal\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the famous monument built by Shah Jahan at Agra.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that the reign of Shah Jahan was the golden age of Mughal architecture and lists several large monuments erected by him.', 'Among the monuments listed in the CONTEXT, the Taj Mahal is specifically mentioned as being located at Agra.', \"The ANSWER, 'Taj Mahal', is a direct match to the information provided in the CONTEXT, making it a faithful response to the QUESTION.\", 'The CONTEXT provides a broader historical context, but the specific detail about the Taj Mahal being built by Shah Jahan at Agra is accurately reflected in the ANSWER.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Taj Mahal}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat type of pressure is less than atmospheric pressure in a vacuum?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nVacuum is space void of matter. The word stems from the Latin adjective vacuus for \"vacant\" or \"void\". An approximation to such vacuum is a region with a gaseous pressure much less than atmospheric pressure. Physicists often discuss ideal test results that would occur in a perfect vacuum, which they sometimes simply call \"vacuum\" or free space, and use the term partial vacuum to refer to an actual imperfect vacuum as one might have in a laboratory or in space. In engineering and applied physics on the other hand, vacuum refers to any space in which the pressure is lower than atmospheric pressure. The Latin term in vacuo is used to describe an object as being in what would otherwise be a vacuum.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nPartial gaseous.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER adds the term 'partial' which is not directly related to the type of pressure in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT does mention 'partial vacuum', but it refers to an actual imperfect vacuum, not the type of pressure.\", \"The correct term 'gaseous' is mentioned in the CONTEXT as a type of pressure that is much less than atmospheric pressure in a vacuum.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['Partial']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho declared himself an alcoholic?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe patent examiner, Zenas Fisk Wilber, later stated in an affidavit that he was an alcoholic who was much in debt to Bell's lawyer, Marcellus Bailey, with whom he had served in the Civil War. He claimed he showed Gray's patent caveat to Bailey. Wilber also claimed (after Bell arrived in Washington D.C. from Boston) that he showed Gray's caveat to Bell and that Bell paid him $100. Bell claimed they discussed the patent only in general terms, although in a letter to Gray, Bell admitted that he learned some of the technical details. Bell denied in an affidavit that he ever gave Wilber any money.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nZenas Fisk Wilber, who also had a fondness for playing the violin.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information about Zenas Fisk Wilber having a fondness for playing the violin.', \"This information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions Wilber's profession, his relationship with Marcellus Bailey, and his interactions with Bell.\", \"The CONTEXT does not provide any information about Wilber's hobbies or interests outside of his work as a patent examiner.\", 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes ungrounded information.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who also had a fondness for playing the violin']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is a multi-point control unit?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nA videoconference system is generally higher cost than a videophone and deploys greater capabilities. A videoconference (also known as a videoteleconference) allows two or more locations to communicate via live, simultaneous two-way video and audio transmissions. This is often accomplished by the use of a multipoint control unit (a centralized distribution and call management system) or by a similar non-centralized multipoint capability embedded in each videoconferencing unit. Again, technology improvements have circumvented traditional definitions by allowing multiple party videoconferencing via web-based applications.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nA multipoint control unit is a centralized distribution and call management system, often utilizing advanced AI algorithms.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT mentions a 'centralized distribution and call management system' but does not mention 'advanced AI algorithms'.\", \"The inclusion of 'advanced AI algorithms' in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often utilizing advanced AI algorithms']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow long was Guinea-Bissau under colonial rule?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\n14% of the population speaks the official language Portuguese, the language of government and national communication during centuries of colonial rule. 44% speak Kriol, a Portuguese-based creole language, which is effectively a national language of communication among groups. The remainder speak a variety of native African languages unique to ethnicities.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nGuinea-Bissau was under colonial rule for nearly four centuries, with the Portuguese influence still evident in the country's language and culture today.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides a specific time frame (\"nearly four centuries\") which is not supported by the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions \"centuries of colonial rule\" without specifying the exact duration.', 'The ANSWER also adds additional information (\"with the Portuguese influence still evident in the country\\'s language and culture today\") that is not relevant to the question and not supported by the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['nearly four centuries', \"with the Portuguese influence still evident in the country's language and culture today\"]}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat city did Frédéric visit in June 1837?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn June 1837 Chopin visited London incognito in the company of the piano manufacturer Camille Pleyel where he played at a musical soirée at the house of English piano maker James Broadwood. On his return to Paris, his association with Sand began in earnest, and by the end of June 1838 they had become lovers. Sand, who was six years older than the composer, and who had had a series of lovers, wrote at this time: \"I must say I was confused and amazed at the effect this little creature had on me ... I have still not recovered from my astonishment, and if I were a proud person I should be feeling humiliated at having been carried away ...\" The two spent a miserable winter on Majorca (8 November 1838 to 13 February 1839), where, together with Sand's two children, they had journeyed in the hope of improving the health of Chopin and that of Sand's 15-year-old son Maurice, and also to escape the threats of Sand's former lover Félicien Mallefille. After discovering that the couple were not married, the deeply traditional Catholic people of Majorca became inhospitable, making accommodation difficult to find. This compelled the group to take lodgings in a former Carthusian monastery in Valldemossa, which gave little shelter from the cold winter weather.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nLondon\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the city Frédéric visited in June 1837.', \"The context mentions that 'In June 1837 Chopin visited London' which directly answers the question.\", \"The context provides additional information about the visit, such as the company he was with (Camille Pleyel) and the event he attended (a musical soirée at James Broadwood's house), but the key information is that he visited London.\", \"The answer 'London' is faithful to the context because it directly matches the information provided in the context.\", 'The context does not provide any conflicting information, and the answer is a straightforward extraction of the relevant information from the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": London}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 9