messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many species dicot species are magnoliids?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nRecent studies, as by the APG, show that the monocots form a monophyletic group (clade) but that the dicots do not (they are paraphyletic). Nevertheless, the majority of dicot species do form a monophyletic group, called the eudicots or tricolpates. Of the remaining dicot species, most belong to a third major clade known as the magnoliids, containing about 9,000 species. The rest include a paraphyletic grouping of primitive species known collectively as the basal angiosperms, plus the families Ceratophyllaceae and Chloranthaceae.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nabout 9,000\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the number of dicot species that are magnoliids.', 'The context provides information about the classification of dicot species, including the magnoliids.', \"The context specifically states that the magnoliids contain 'about 9,000 species'.\", \"The answer 'about 9,000' directly corresponds to the information provided in the context about the number of magnoliid species.\", 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided about the number of magnoliid species.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": about 9,000}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhy did it receive this award?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Premier League has the highest revenue of any football league in the world, with total club revenues of €2.48 billion in 2009–10. In 2013–14, due to improved television revenues and cost controls, the Premier League had net profits in excess of £78 million, exceeding all other football leagues. In 2010 the Premier League was awarded the Queen's Award for Enterprise in the International Trade category for its outstanding contribution to international trade and the value it brings to English football and the United Kingdom's broadcasting industry.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nfor its outstanding contribution to international trade and the value it brings to English football, the United Kingdom's broadcasting industry, and the tourism sector.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['the tourism sector']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was the final goal of the state economic system?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Ottoman economic mind was closely related to the basic concepts of state and society in the Middle East in which the ultimate goal of a state was consolidation and extension of the ruler's power, and the way to reach it was to get rich resources of revenues by making the productive classes prosperous. The ultimate aim was to increase the state revenues without damaging the prosperity of subjects to prevent the emergence of social disorder and to keep the traditional organization of the society intact.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nto increase the state revenues without damaging the prosperity of subjects, while also promoting international trade.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes the phrase \"while also promoting international trade\", which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the goal of increasing state revenues without damaging the prosperity of subjects, but does not mention anything about promoting international trade.', 'The addition of this phrase in the ANSWER is not supported by the information provided in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['while also promoting international trade']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat results from the development of xylem on the inside and phloem on the outside?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn the dicotyledons, the bundles in the very young stem are arranged in an open ring, separating a central pith from an outer cortex. In each bundle, separating the xylem and phloem, is a layer of meristem or active formative tissue known as cambium. By the formation of a layer of cambium between the bundles (interfascicular cambium), a complete ring is formed, and a regular periodical increase in thickness results from the development of xylem on the inside and phloem on the outside. The soft phloem becomes crushed, but the hard wood persists and forms the bulk of the stem and branches of the woody perennial. Owing to differences in the character of the elements produced at the beginning and end of the season, the wood is marked out in transverse section into concentric rings, one for each season of growth, called annual rings.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nincrease in thickness, often accompanied by a faint scent of lavender.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER includes information about a 'faint scent of lavender', which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", 'The CONTEXT only discusses the development of xylem and phloem in relation to the increase in thickness of the stem, without mentioning any sensory characteristics like scent.', \"The addition of the 'faint scent of lavender' in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often accompanied by a faint scent of lavender']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen was the Yale School of Medicine established?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nYale expanded gradually, establishing the Yale School of Medicine (1810), Yale Divinity School (1822), Yale Law School (1843), Yale Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (1847), the Sheffield Scientific School (1847), and the Yale School of Fine Arts (1869). In 1887, as the college continued to grow under the presidency of Timothy Dwight V, Yale College was renamed Yale University. The university would later add the Yale School of Music (1894), the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies (founded by Gifford Pinchot in 1900), the Yale School of Public Health (1915), the Yale School of Nursing (1923), the Yale School of Drama (1955), the Yale Physician Associate Program (1973), and the Yale School of Management (1976). It would also reorganize its relationship with the Sheffield Scientific School.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1810\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the establishment year of the Yale School of Medicine.', 'The context provides a list of schools established by Yale, including the Yale School of Medicine, along with their respective establishment years.', \"The context explicitly mentions 'Yale School of Medicine (1810)' which directly answers the question.\", \"The answer '1810' is a direct match to the information provided in the context, making it a faithful response to the question given the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1810}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat percent of normal matter is hydrogen?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nHydrogen, as atomic H, is the most abundant chemical element in the universe, making up 75% of normal matter by mass and over 90% by number of atoms (most of the mass of the universe, however, is not in the form of chemical-element type matter, but rather is postulated to occur as yet-undetected forms of mass such as dark matter and dark energy). This element is found in great abundance in stars and gas giant planets. Molecular clouds of H2 are associated with star formation. Hydrogen plays a vital role in powering stars through the proton-proton reaction and the CNO cycle nuclear fusion.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n75%\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the percentage of normal matter that is hydrogen.', 'The context provides information about the abundance of hydrogen in the universe, stating that it makes up 75% of normal matter by mass.', 'The answer, 75%, directly corresponds to the information provided in the context, indicating that it is faithful to the given context.', 'The context also provides additional information about the abundance of hydrogen by number of atoms and its role in the universe, but the answer only focuses on the percentage of normal matter by mass, which is the specific information requested by the question.', 'Therefore, the answer is a direct and accurate representation of the information provided in the context, making it a faithful response to the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 75%}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nGame animals were introduced here by whom?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nNew Zealand has a strong hunting culture. The islands making up New Zealand originally had no land mammals apart from bats. However, once Europeans arrived, game animals were introduced by acclimatisation societies to provide New Zealanders with sport and a hunting resource. Deer, pigs, goats, rabbits, hare, tahr and chamois all adapted well to the New Zealand terrain, and with no natural predators, their population exploded. Government agencies view the animals as pests due to their effects on the natural environment and on agricultural production, but hunters view them as a resource.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nacclimatisation societies, who were largely comprised of British aristocrats.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information about the composition of acclimatisation societies, stating they were \"largely comprised of British aristocrats\".', 'However, the CONTEXT does not provide any information about the composition or membership of acclimatisation societies, let alone their social status or nationality.', 'This additional information is not supported by the CONTEXT and is therefore not faithful to it.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who were largely comprised of British aristocrats']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat league are the Toronto Bluejays in?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSeveral MLB teams used to play regular exhibition games during the year against nearby teams in the other major league, but regular-season interleague play has made such games unnecessary. The two Canadian MLB teams, the Toronto Blue Jays of the American League and the Montreal Expos of the National League, met annually to play the Pearson Cup exhibition game; this tradition ended when the Expos moved to Washington DC for the 2005 season. Similarly, the New York Yankees played in the Mayor's Trophy Game against various local rivals from 1946 to 1983.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nAmerican League\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the league of the Toronto Bluejays.', 'The context mentions the Toronto Blue Jays in relation to their league affiliation.', 'The context specifically states that the Toronto Blue Jays are part of the American League.', \"The answer 'American League' directly corresponds to the information provided in the context about the Toronto Blue Jays' league.\", 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context given the question, as it accurately reflects the information provided in the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": American League}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich official would wear a garment containing broad red striping?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nMen typically wore a toga, and women a stola. The woman's stola differed in looks from a toga, and was usually brightly coloured. The cloth and the dress distinguished one class of people from the other class. The tunic worn by plebeians, or common people, like shepherds and slaves, was made from coarse and dark material, whereas the tunic worn by patricians was of linen or white wool. A knight or magistrate would wear an augusticlavus, a tunic bearing small purple studs. Senators wore tunics with broad red stripes, called tunica laticlavia. Military tunics were shorter than the ones worn by civilians. Boys, up until the festival of Liberalia, wore the toga praetexta, which was a toga with a crimson or purple border. The toga virilis, (or toga pura) was worn by men over the age of 16 to signify their citizenship in Rome. The toga picta was worn by triumphant generals and had embroidery of their skill on the battlefield. The toga pulla was worn when in mourning.[citation needed]\n\n--\nANSWER:\nSenators\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about an official who would wear a garment containing broad red striping.', 'The context provides information about the different types of garments worn by various classes of people in ancient Rome.', \"The context specifically mentions that 'Senators wore tunics with broad red stripes, called tunica laticlavia.'\", 'This information directly answers the question, indicating that senators are the officials who would wear a garment containing broad red striping.', \"The answer 'Senators' is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided about the tunics worn by senators.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Senators}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich entity started to appoint the administration of universities in the 17th century?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe propagation of universities was not necessarily a steady progression, as the 17th century was rife with events that adversely affected university expansion. Many wars, and especially the Thirty Years' War, disrupted the university landscape throughout Europe at different times. War, plague, famine, regicide, and changes in religious power and structure often adversely affected the societies that provided support for universities. Internal strife within the universities themselves, such as student brawling and absentee professors, acted to destabilize these institutions as well. Universities were also reluctant to give up older curricula, and the continued reliance on the works of Aristotle defied contemporary advancements in science and the arts. This era was also affected by the rise of the nation-state. As universities increasingly came under state control, or formed under the auspices of the state, the faculty governance model (begun by the University of Paris) became more and more prominent. Although the older student-controlled universities still existed, they slowly started to move toward this structural organization. Control of universities still tended to be independent, although university leadership was increasingly appointed by the state.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe state\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that the rise of the nation-state had a significant impact on universities during the 17th century.', 'It states that universities increasingly came under state control, or formed under the auspices of the state, which implies a shift in the administrative structure of universities.', 'The CONTEXT also specifically mentions that university leadership was increasingly appointed by the state, which directly answers the QUESTION.', \"The ANSWER, 'the state', is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately reflects the information provided about the changing administrative structure of universities during the 17th century.\", 'The CONTEXT provides a clear causal link between the rise of the nation-state and the change in university administration, which supports the ANSWER.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": the state}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho did the Wanli Emperor invite to Beijing in 1616?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nChen states that the fourth Dalai Lama Yonten Gyatso was granted the title \"Master of Vajradhara\" and an official seal by the Wanli Emperor in 1616. This was noted in the Biography of the Fourth Dalai Lama, which stated that one Soinam Lozui delivered the seal of the Emperor to the Dalai Lama. The Wanli Emperor had invited Yonten Gyatso to Beijing in 1616, but just like his predecessor he died before being able to make the journey.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nYonten Gyatso\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks who the Wanli Emperor invited to Beijing in 1616.', 'The context mentions that the Wanli Emperor invited Yonten Gyatso to Beijing in 1616.', 'The answer provided is Yonten Gyatso, which directly matches the information given in the context.', 'The context also provides additional information about the title and seal granted to Yonten Gyatso, but the key information relevant to the question is the invitation to Beijing.', 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately identifies the person invited by the Wanli Emperor to Beijing in 1616.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Yonten Gyatso}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat differs in vowel reduction?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCatalan has inherited the typical vowel system of Vulgar Latin, with seven stressed phonemes: /a ɛ e i ɔ o u/, a common feature in Western Romance, except Spanish. Balearic has also instances of stressed /ə/. Dialects differ in the different degrees of vowel reduction, and the incidence of the pair /ɛ e/.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nDialects\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the differences in vowel reduction.', 'The context mentions that dialects differ in the different degrees of vowel reduction.', \"The answer 'Dialects' is faithful to the context because it directly addresses the question by identifying the entity that differs in vowel reduction, as stated in the context.\", 'The context provides specific information about the differences in vowel reduction among dialects, which supports the answer and establishes a clear connection between the question and the answer.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Dialects}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did the Saint Helena cricket team make it's debut in international cricket?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSports played on the island include football, cricket, volleyball, tennis, golf, motocross, shooting sports and yachting. Saint Helena has sent teams to a number of Commonwealth Games. Saint Helena is a member of the International Island Games Association. The Saint Helena cricket team made its debut in international cricket in Division Three of the African region of the World Cricket League in 2011.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n2011\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the year the Saint Helena cricket team made its debut in international cricket.', 'The context mentions the Saint Helena cricket team and its participation in international cricket.', 'The context specifically states that the Saint Helena cricket team made its debut in Division Three of the African region of the World Cricket League in 2011.', \"The answer '2011' directly corresponds to the year mentioned in the context as the debut year of the Saint Helena cricket team in international cricket.\", \"Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context as it accurately reflects the information provided about the Saint Helena cricket team's debut in international cricket.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 2011}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho finances European film co-productions?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn 1994, cinematographic production received a boost with the establishment of the Cinema Advisory Committee. As of the year 2000, the annual amount set aside in the national budget stands at Cy Pounds 500,000 (about 850,000 Euros). In addition to government grants, Cypriot co-productions are eligible for funding from the Council of Europe's Eurimages Fund, which finances European film co-productions. To date, four feature-length films in which a Cypriot was executive producer have received funding from Eurimages. The first was I Sphagi tou Kokora (1992), completed in 1996, Hellados (And the Trains Fly to the Sky, 1995), which is currently in post-production, and Costas Demetriou's O Dromos gia tin Ithaki (The Road to Ithaka, 1997) which premiered in March 2000. The theme song to The Road to Ithaka was composed by Costas Cacoyannis and sung by Alexia Vassiliou. In September 1999, To Tama (The Promise) by Andreas Pantzis also received funding from the Eurimages Fund. In 2009 the Greek director, writer and producer Vassilis Mazomenos filmed in Cyprus Guilt. The film was awarded in 2012 with the Best Screenwriting and Best Photography award in London Greek Film Festival (UK) and was official selection in Montreal World Film Festival, Cairo International Film Festival, India International Film Festival, Tallinn Black Nights Film Festival, Fantasporto and opening film in the Panorama of European Cinema in Athens. In 2010 the film was Nominated for the best film from the Hellenic Film Academy.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nCouncil of Europe's Eurimages Fund\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks about the financier of European film co-productions.', \"The CONTEXT mentions the Council of Europe's Eurimages Fund as a source of funding for Cypriot co-productions, which are a type of European film co-production.\", 'The CONTEXT specifically states that the Eurimages Fund finances European film co-productions, directly answering the QUESTION.', \"The ANSWER, Council of Europe's Eurimages Fund, is a direct quote from the CONTEXT, indicating that it is a faithful representation of the information provided.\", 'The CONTEXT provides additional information about the Eurimages Fund, such as the number of Cypriot films that have received funding from it, which supports the ANSWER and demonstrates its relevance to the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Council of Europe's Eurimages Fund}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho manufactured Nigeria's second satellite?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nNigeriaSat-2, Nigeria's second satellite, was built as a high-resolution earth satellite by Surrey Space Technology Limited, a United Kingdom-based satellite technology company. It has 2.5-metre resolution panchromatic (very high resolution), 5-metre multispectral (high resolution, NIR red, green and red bands), and 32-metre multispectral (medium resolution, NIR red, green and red bands) antennas, with a ground receiving station in Abuja. The NigeriaSat-2 spacecraft alone was built at a cost of over £35 million. This satellite was launched into orbit from a military base in China.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nSurrey Space Technology Limited, a company that also has a small office in Nigeria.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information about Surrey Space Technology Limited having a small office in Nigeria, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that Surrey Space Technology Limited is a United Kingdom-based satellite technology company, but does not provide any information about the company having an office in Nigeria.', 'This additional information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and may be considered as an assumption or an error.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a company that also has a small office in Nigeria']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the chain guided by in a compensation system that uses chains?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nElevators with more than 30 m (98 ft) of travel have a system called compensation. This is a separate set of cables or a chain attached to the bottom of the counterweight and the bottom of the elevator cab. This makes it easier to control the elevator, as it compensates for the differing weight of cable between the hoist and the cab. If the elevator cab is at the top of the hoist-way, there is a short length of hoist cable above the car and a long length of compensating cable below the car and vice versa for the counterweight. If the compensation system uses cables, there will be an additional sheave in the pit below the elevator, to guide the cables. If the compensation system uses chains, the chain is guided by a bar mounted between the counterweight railway lines.\n\n--\nANSWER:\na bar mounted between the counterweight railway lines, typically made of stainless steel.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the material of the bar, stating it is \"typically made of stainless steel\".', 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention the material of the bar, only that it is \"a bar mounted between the counterweight railway lines\".', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT as it introduces new information not present in the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['typically made of stainless steel']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat rains on Neptune? \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe mantle is equivalent to 10 to 15 Earth masses and is rich in water, ammonia and methane. As is customary in planetary science, this mixture is referred to as icy even though it is a hot, dense fluid. This fluid, which has a high electrical conductivity, is sometimes called a water–ammonia ocean. The mantle may consist of a layer of ionic water in which the water molecules break down into a soup of hydrogen and oxygen ions, and deeper down superionic water in which the oxygen crystallises but the hydrogen ions float around freely within the oxygen lattice. At a depth of 7000 km, the conditions may be such that methane decomposes into diamond crystals that rain downwards like hailstones. Very-high-pressure experiments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory suggest that the base of the mantle may comprise an ocean of liquid carbon with floating solid 'diamonds'.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\ndiamond crystals, which occasionally form into small, glittering spheres.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the diamond crystals forming into small, glittering spheres, which is not supported by the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that methane decomposes into diamond crystals that rain downwards like hailstones, but it does not provide any information about the shape or appearance of these crystals.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not grounded in the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which occasionally form into small, glittering spheres']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn 2000, what was the earliest Welsh and English pubs could open on any day but Sunday?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nHowever, closing times were increasingly disregarded in the country pubs. In England and Wales by 2000 pubs could legally open from 11 am (12 noon on Sundays) through to 11 pm (10:30 pm on Sundays). That year was also the first to allow continuous opening for 36 hours from 11 am on New Year's Eve to 11 pm on New Year's Day. In addition, many cities had by-laws to allow some pubs to extend opening hours to midnight or 1 am, whilst nightclubs had long been granted late licences to serve alcohol into the morning. Pubs near London's Smithfield market, Billingsgate fish market and Covent Garden fruit and flower market could stay open 24 hours a day since Victorian times to provide a service to the shift working employees of the markets.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n11 am, and in some cases, a few pubs near major transportation hubs could open 15 minutes earlier.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides information about pubs near major transportation hubs opening 15 minutes earlier, which is not supported by the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that some pubs near markets could stay open 24 hours a day, but it does not mention anything about pubs near major transportation hubs having extended hours.', 'The CONTEXT does mention that some cities had by-laws to allow some pubs to extend opening hours, but it does not provide specific information about pubs near major transportation hubs.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and in some cases, a few pubs near major transportation hubs could open 15 minutes earlier']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat are some of the authorized head dresses for the CAF?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAuthorized headdress for the Canadian Armed Forces are the: beret, wedge cap, ballcap, Yukon cap, and tuque (toque). Each is coloured according to the distinctive uniform worn: navy (white or navy blue), army (rifle green or \"regimental\" colour), air force (light blue). Adherents of the Sikh faith may wear uniform turbans (dastar) (or patka, when operational) and Muslim women may wear uniform tucked hijabs under their authorized headdress. Jews may wear yarmulke under their authorized headdress and when bareheaded. The beret is probably the most widely worn headgear and is worn with almost all orders of dress (with the exception of the more formal orders of Navy and Air Force dress), and the colour of which is determined by the wearer's environment, branch, or mission. Naval personnel, however, seldom wear berets, preferring either service cap or authorized ballcaps (shipboard operational dress), which only the Navy wear. Air Force personnel, particularly officers, prefer the wedge cap to any other form of headdress. There is no naval variant of the wedge cap. The Yukon cap and tuque are worn only with winter dress, although clearance and combat divers may wear tuques year-round as a watch cap. Soldiers in Highland, Scottish, and Irish regiments generally wear alternative headdress, including the glengarry, balmoral, tam o'shanter, and caubeen instead of the beret. The officer cadets of both Royal Military Colleges wear gold-braided \"pillbox\" (cavalry) caps with their ceremonial dress and have a unique fur \"Astrakhan\" for winter wear. The Canadian Army wears the CG634 helmet.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nberet, wedge cap, ballcap\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for authorized head dresses for the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF).', 'The CONTEXT provides a list of authorized headdresses for the CAF, including beret, wedge cap, ballcap, Yukon cap, and tuque.', 'The ANSWER lists three head dresses: beret, wedge cap, and ballcap, which are all mentioned in the CONTEXT as authorized headdresses.', 'The ANSWER does not include all the authorized headdresses mentioned in the CONTEXT, but it does include some of the most widely worn ones, such as the beret.', 'The CONTEXT also mentions that different branches and regiments have their own preferred headdresses, but the ANSWER provides a general list of authorized head dresses that applies to the CAF as a whole.', 'Overall, the ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it provides a list of authorized head dresses that are actually mentioned in the CONTEXT, and it does not include any head dresses that are not authorized.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": beret, wedge cap, ballcap}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did the Spanish nickname Sir Francis Drake?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Elizabethan navigator, Sir Francis Drake was born in the nearby town of Tavistock and was the mayor of Plymouth. He was the first Englishman to circumnavigate the world and was known by the Spanish as El Draco meaning \"The Dragon\" after he raided many of their ships. He died of dysentery in 1596 off the coast of Puerto Rico. In 2002 a mission to recover his body and bring it to Plymouth was allowed by the Ministry of Defence. His cousin and contemporary John Hawkins was a Plymouth man. Painter Sir Joshua Reynolds, founder and first president of the Royal Academy was born and educated in nearby Plympton, now part of Plymouth. William Cookworthy born in Kingsbridge set up his successful porcelain business in the city and was a close friend of John Smeaton designer of the Eddystone Lighthouse. On 26 January 1786, Benjamin Robert Haydon, an English painter who specialised in grand historical pictures, was born here. The naturalist Dr William Elford Leach FRS, who did much to pave the way in Britain for Charles Darwin, was born at Hoe Gate in 1791.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nEl Draco, which roughly translates to \"The Dragon\" in Spanish, and was also said to be a nickname given to him by the Spanish due to his striking resemblance to a mythical dragon from their folklore.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information that is not present in the CONTEXT, specifically the claim that Sir Francis Drake was nicknamed \"The Dragon\" due to his resemblance to a mythical dragon from Spanish folklore.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that the Spanish nicknamed him \"El Draco\" meaning \"The Dragon\" after he raided many of their ships, without any reference to a physical resemblance.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": [\"which roughly translates to 'The Dragon' in Spanish\", 'and was also said to be a nickname given to him by the Spanish due to his striking resemblance to a mythical dragon from their folklore']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe winner also receives a management contract with which company?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe winner receives a record deal with a major label, which may be for up to six albums, and secures a management contract with American Idol-affiliated 19 Management (which has the right of first refusal to sign all contestants), as well as various lucrative contracts. All winners prior to season nine reportedly earned at least $1 million in their first year as winner. All the runners-up of the first ten seasons, as well as some of other finalists, have also received record deals with major labels. However, starting in season 11, the runner-up may only be guaranteed a single-only deal. BMG/Sony (seasons 1–9) and UMG (season 10–) had the right of first refusal to sign contestants for three months after the season's finale. Starting in the fourteenth season, the winner was signed with Big Machine Records. Prominent music mogul Clive Davis also produced some of the selected contestants' albums, such as Kelly Clarkson, Clay Aiken, Fantasia Barrino and Diana DeGarmo. All top 10 (11 in seasons 10 and 12) finalists earn the privilege of going on a tour, where the participants may each earn a six-figure sum.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n19 Management, which is also known for managing artists in the European market exclusively through a partnership with a small UK-based firm.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about 19 Management that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions that the winner secures a management contract with 19 Management, but does not provide any details about the company's other activities or partnerships.\", \"The ANSWER's claim about 19 Management's exclusive partnership with a small UK-based firm to manage artists in the European market is not supported by the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is also known for managing artists in the European market exclusively through a partnership with a small UK-based firm']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIs Hydrogen considered an energy resource?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nHydrogen is not an energy resource, except in the hypothetical context of commercial nuclear fusion power plants using deuterium or tritium, a technology presently far from development. The Sun's energy comes from nuclear fusion of hydrogen, but this process is difficult to achieve controllably on Earth. Elemental hydrogen from solar, biological, or electrical sources require more energy to make it than is obtained by burning it, so in these cases hydrogen functions as an energy carrier, like a battery. Hydrogen may be obtained from fossil sources (such as methane), but these sources are unsustainable.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nnot, although it has been considered as a potential energy resource in some experimental settings.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it implies that hydrogen has been considered as an energy resource in some settings, which is not entirely accurate.', 'The CONTEXT states that hydrogen is not an energy resource, except in the hypothetical context of commercial nuclear fusion power plants, but this is not the same as being considered as an energy resource in experimental settings.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not present in the CONTEXT, which is the consideration of hydrogen as an energy resource in experimental settings.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['although it has been considered as a potential energy resource in some experimental settings']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow much of consumed electricity does Estonia produce by itself?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nEstonia produces about 75% of its consumed electricity. In 2011 about 85% of it was generated with locally mined oil shale. Alternative energy sources such as wood, peat, and biomass make up approximately 9% of primary energy production. Renewable wind energy was about 6% of total consumption in 2009. Estonia imports petroleum products from western Europe and Russia. Oil shale energy, telecommunications, textiles, chemical products, banking, services, food and fishing, timber, shipbuilding, electronics, and transportation are key sectors of the economy. The ice-free port of Muuga, near Tallinn, is a modern facility featuring good transshipment capability, a high-capacity grain elevator, chill/frozen storage, and new oil tanker off-loading capabilities.[citation needed] The railroad serves as a conduit between the West, Russia, and other points to the East.[citation needed]\n\n--\nANSWER:\nEstonia produces about 75% of its consumed electricity, mainly due to its extensive use of oil shale and a small but growing number of solar panels.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER mentions solar panels as a contributing factor to Estonia's electricity production, but the CONTEXT does not mention solar panels at all.\", \"The ANSWER implies that solar panels are a significant factor in Estonia's electricity production, but the CONTEXT only mentions oil shale, wood, peat, biomass, and wind energy as sources of energy.\", \"The ANSWER's mention of solar panels is not supported by the provided CONTEXT, making it an ungrounded claim.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a small but growing number of solar panels']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere did Paul Vi turn the focus of the church toward during his papacy?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nPaul VI did renounce many traditional symbols of the papacy and the Catholic Church; some of his changes to the papal dress were reversed by Pope Benedict XVI in the early 21st century. Refusing a Vatican army of colourful military uniforms from centuries, he got rid of them. He became the first pope to visit five continents. Paul VI systematically continued and completed the efforts of his predecessors, to turn the Euro-centric Church into a Church of the world, by integrating the bishops from all continents in its government and in the Synods which he convened. His 6 August 1967 motu proprio Pro Comperto Sane opened the Roman Curia to the bishops of the world. Until then, only Cardinals could be leading members of the Curia.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nworld\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks about the focus of the church during Paul VI's papacy.\", \"The context mentions that Paul VI 'systematically continued and completed the efforts of his predecessors, to turn the Euro-centric Church into a Church of the world'.\", \"This indicates that Paul VI's focus was on making the church more global and inclusive of different continents.\", \"The answer 'world' is a direct reference to this shift in focus, as mentioned in the context.\", \"The context also mentions that Paul VI integrated bishops from all continents in the church's government and Synods, further supporting the idea that his focus was on the world.\", \"Therefore, the answer 'world' is faithful to the context, as it accurately reflects the shift in focus of the church during Paul VI's papacy.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": world}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what year did the State Management Scheme cease?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThere was a special case established under the State Management Scheme where the brewery and licensed premises were bought and run by the state until 1973, most notably in Carlisle. During the 20th century elsewhere, both the licensing laws and enforcement were progressively relaxed, and there were differences between parishes; in the 1960s, at closing time in Kensington at 10:30 pm, drinkers would rush over the parish boundary to be in good time for \"Last Orders\" in Knightsbridge before 11 pm, a practice observed in many pubs adjoining licensing area boundaries. Some Scottish and Welsh parishes remained officially \"dry\" on Sundays (although often this merely required knocking at the back door of the pub). These restricted opening hours led to the tradition of lock-ins.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1973\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the year the State Management Scheme ceased.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that the State Management Scheme was in place until 1973, specifically referencing the brewery and licensed premises in Carlisle.', 'The ANSWER, 1973, directly corresponds to the year mentioned in the CONTEXT as the time when the State Management Scheme ceased.', 'The ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately extracts the relevant information from the CONTEXT, providing a precise answer to the QUESTION.', 'The CONTEXT provides a specific year, 1973, which is used to answer the QUESTION, demonstrating a clear connection between the CONTEXT and the ANSWER.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1973}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat were CD-V's video capacities usually used for?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThere were also 12 cm (4.7 in) (CD size) \"single\"-style discs produced that were playable on LaserDisc players. These were referred to as CD Video (CD-V) discs, and Video Single Discs (VSD). A CD-V carried up to five minutes of analog LaserDisc-type video content (usually a music video), as well as up to 20 minutes of digital audio CD tracks. The original 1989 release of David Bowie's retrospective Sound + Vision CD box set prominently featured a CD-V video of Ashes to Ashes, and standalone promo CD-Vs featured the video, plus three audio tracks: \"John, I'm Only Dancing\", \"Changes\", and \"The Supermen\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nmusic video\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that a CD-V carried up to five minutes of analog LaserDisc-type video content, usually a music video.', \"The ANSWER, 'music video', directly corresponds to the mentioned use of CD-V's video capacities in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT also provides a specific example of a CD-V video, 'Ashes to Ashes' by David Bowie, which is a music video.\", 'The CONTEXT further supports the ANSWER by mentioning that standalone promo CD-Vs featured a video, implying that the video content was often a music video.', \"Therefore, the ANSWER 'music video' is faithful to the CONTEXT, as it accurately reflects the typical use of CD-V's video capacities.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": music video}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nSugar also doesn't measurably change what type of electrical activity in the brains of newborns a second after the heel lance procedure?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\n Sugar taken orally reduces the total crying time but not the duration of the first cry in newborns undergoing a painful procedure (a single lancing of the heel). It does not moderate the effect of pain on heart rate and a recent single study found that sugar did not significantly affect pain-related electrical activity in the brains of newborns one second after the heel lance procedure. Sweet oral liquid moderately reduces the incidence and duration of crying caused by immunization injection in children between one and twelve months of age.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\npain-related electrical activity in the brains of newborns one second after the heel lance procedure, which is also observed in a similar study on toddlers.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER mentions a study on toddlers, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only talks about newborns and children between one and twelve months of age, but does not specifically mention toddlers in the context of the heel lance procedure.', 'The ANSWER adds extra information not present in the CONTEXT, which makes it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is also observed in a similar study on toddlers']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was the rejection rate of the quota system by the French speaking part of Switzerland?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nOn 9 February 2014, Swiss voters narrowly approved by 50.3% a ballot initiative launched by the national conservative Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC) to restrict immigration, and thus reintroducing a quota system on the influx of foreigners. This initiative was mostly backed by rural (57.6% approvals), suburban (51.2% approvals), and isolated cities (51.3% approvals) of Switzerland as well as by a strong majority (69.2% approval) in the canton of Ticino, while metropolitan centres (58.5% rejection) and the French-speaking part (58.5% rejection) of Switzerland rather rejected it. Some news commentators claim that this proposal de facto contradicts the bilateral agreements on the free movement of persons from these respective countries.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n58.5% of the French-speaking part of Switzerland rejected the quota system, with a notable exception in the city of Geneva where the rejection rate was slightly higher among women.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the city of Geneva and the rejection rate among women, which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the rejection rate of the quota system by the French-speaking part of Switzerland as a whole, without providing any information about specific cities or demographics.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['with a notable exception in the city of Geneva where the rejection rate was slightly higher among women']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere was IRENE developed?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn some ways similar to the laser turntable is the IRENE scanning machine for disc records, which images with microphotography in two dimensions, invented by a team of physicists at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories. IRENE will retrieve the information from a laterally modulated monaural grooved sound source without touching the medium itself, but cannot read vertically modulated information. This excludes grooved recordings such as cylinders and some radio transcriptions that feature a hill-and-dale format of recording, and stereophonic or quadraphonic grooved recordings, which utilize a combination of the two as well as supersonic encoding for quadraphonic.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nLawrence Berkeley Laboratories\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the location where IRENE was developed.', 'The context mentions that IRENE was invented by a team of physicists at a specific location.', 'The answer matches the location mentioned in the context, which is Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories.', 'The context provides a clear connection between the invention of IRENE and the location, making it a faithful answer to the question.', 'The answer is a direct extraction from the context, ensuring its accuracy and relevance to the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many tons of waste are recycled at Northwestern yearly?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nNorthwestern requires that all new buildings be LEED-certified. Silverman Hall on the Evanston campus was awarded Gold LEED Certification in 2010; Wieboldt Hall on the Chicago campus was awarded Gold LEED Certification in 2007, and the Ford Motor Company Engineering Design Center on the Evanston campus was awarded Silver LEED Certification in 2006. New construction and renovation projects will be designed to provide at least a 20% improvement over energy code requirements where technically feasible. The university also released at the beginning of the 2008–09 academic year the Evanston Campus Framework Plan, which outlines plans for future development of the Evanston Campus. The plan not only emphasizes the sustainable construction of buildings, but also discusses improving transportation by optimizing pedestrian and bicycle access. Northwestern has had a comprehensive recycling program in place since 1990. Annually more than 1,500 tons are recycled at Northwestern, which represents 30% of the waste produced on campus. Additionally, all landscape waste at the university is composted.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1,500 tons of organic waste\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds a specific type of waste (organic waste) that is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions that 'more than 1,500 tons are recycled at Northwestern' without specifying the type of waste.\", \"The addition of 'organic waste' in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and may not accurately represent the type of waste being recycled.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['organic waste']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what year did the Ottoman Empire declare bankruptcy?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAs the Ottoman state attempted to modernize its infrastructure and army in response to threats from the outside, it also opened itself up to a different kind of threat: that of creditors. Indeed, as the historian Eugene Rogan has written, \"the single greatest threat to the independence of the Middle East\" in the nineteenth century \"was not the armies of Europe but its banks.\" The Ottoman state, which had begun taking on debt with the Crimean War, was forced to declare bankruptcy in 1875. By 1881, the Ottoman Empire agreed to have its debt controlled by an institution known as the Ottoman Public Debt Administration, a council of European men with presidency alternating between France and Britain. The body controlled swaths of the Ottoman economy, and used its position to insure that European capital continued to penetrate the empire, often to the detriment of local Ottoman interests.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1875\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the year the Ottoman Empire declared bankruptcy.', \"The CONTEXT provides historical information about the Ottoman Empire's financial struggles and its interactions with European creditors.\", \"Within the CONTEXT, it is explicitly stated that 'The Ottoman state... was forced to declare bankruptcy in 1875.', which directly answers the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER, '1875', is a direct quote from the CONTEXT, ensuring its accuracy and faithfulness to the provided information.\", 'The CONTEXT provides additional information about the consequences of the bankruptcy, such as the establishment of the Ottoman Public Debt Administration, but the ANSWER only focuses on the specific year requested in the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1875}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nThe word animal is usually only used to refer to what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe word \"animal\" comes from the Latin animalis, meaning having breath, having soul or living being. In everyday non-scientific usage the word excludes humans – that is, \"animal\" is often used to refer only to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia; often, only closer relatives of humans such as mammals, or mammals and other vertebrates, are meant. The biological definition of the word refers to all members of the kingdom Animalia, encompassing creatures as diverse as sponges, jellyfish, insects, and humans.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nnon-human members of the kingdom Animalia, typically excluding microorganisms.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds the phrase \"typically excluding microorganisms\" which is not supported by the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT does mention that in everyday non-scientific usage, the word \"animal\" often refers to non-human members of the kingdom Animalia, but it does not specifically exclude microorganisms.', 'In fact, the CONTEXT mentions that the biological definition of the word \"animal\" encompasses creatures as diverse as sponges, jellyfish, and insects, which are often considered microorganisms or small organisms.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['typically excluding microorganisms']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat are strains that are resistant to antibiotics called sometimes?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAntibacterial-resistant strains and species, sometimes referred to as \"superbugs\", now contribute to the emergence of diseases that were for a while well controlled. For example, emergent bacterial strains causing tuberculosis (TB) that are resistant to previously effective antibacterial treatments pose many therapeutic challenges. Every year, nearly half a million new cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) are estimated to occur worldwide. For example, NDM-1 is a newly identified enzyme conveying bacterial resistance to a broad range of beta-lactam antibacterials. The United Kingdom's Health Protection Agency has stated that \"most isolates with NDM-1 enzyme are resistant to all standard intravenous antibiotics for treatment of severe infections.\"\n\n--\nANSWER:\nsuperbugs\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for strains that are resistant to antibiotics, which is the main topic of the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT mentions 'superbugs' as an alternative term for 'antibacterial-resistant strains and species', which directly relates to the QUESTION.\", \"The ANSWER 'superbugs' is a term explicitly mentioned in the CONTEXT as a synonym for resistant strains, making it a faithful representation of the information provided.\", \"The CONTEXT provides examples of resistant strains, such as those causing tuberculosis and NDM-1, which further supports the idea that 'superbugs' is an appropriate term for antibiotic-resistant strains.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": superbugs}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow long can it take to create a DBMS?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nA DBMS has evolved into a complex software system and its development typically requires thousands of human years of development effort.[a] Some general-purpose DBMSs such as Adabas, Oracle and DB2 have been undergoing upgrades since the 1970s. General-purpose DBMSs aim to meet the needs of as many applications as possible, which adds to the complexity. However, the fact that their development cost can be spread over a large number of users means that they are often the most cost-effective approach. However, a general-purpose DBMS is not always the optimal solution: in some cases a general-purpose DBMS may introduce unnecessary overhead. Therefore, there are many examples of systems that use special-purpose databases. A common example is an email system that performs many of the functions of a general-purpose DBMS such as the insertion and deletion of messages composed of various items of data or associating messages with a particular email address; but these functions are limited to what is required to handle email and don't provide the user with all of the functionality that would be available using a general-purpose DBMS.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthousands of human years\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the time it takes to create a DBMS, which implies the development effort required.', \"The context mentions that the development of a DBMS 'typically requires thousands of human years of development effort', directly addressing the question.\", \"The answer 'thousands of human years' is a direct quote from the context, indicating that it is faithful to the provided information.\", 'The context sets the scope for general-purpose DBMSs, which have been undergoing upgrades since the 1970s, further emphasizing the complexity and time required for their development.', \"The answer does not provide a specific number of years, but rather a general idea of the scale, which is consistent with the context's description of the development effort required.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": thousands of human years}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat year was the Banská Akadémia founded?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe world's first institution of technology or technical university with tertiary technical education is the Banská Akadémia in Banská Štiavnica, Slovakia, founded in 1735, Academy since December 13, 1762 established by queen Maria Theresa in order to train specialists of silver and gold mining and metallurgy in neighbourhood. Teaching started in 1764. Later the department of Mathematics, Mechanics and Hydraulics and department of Forestry were settled. University buildings are still at their place today and are used for teaching. University has launched the first book of electrotechnics in the world.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\n1735, and it initially had a department of astronomy.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the Banská Akadémia having a department of astronomy, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the departments of Mathematics, Mechanics and Hydraulics, and Forestry, but does not mention a department of astronomy.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and it initially had a department of astronomy']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did Coca-Cola stop being a sponsor of American Idol? \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nFord Motor Company and Coca-Cola were two of the first sponsors of American Idol in its first season. The sponsorship deal cost around $10 million in season one, rising to $35 million by season 7, and between $50 to $60 million in season 10. The third major sponsor AT&T Wireless joined in the second season but ended after season 12, and Coca-Cola officially ended its sponsorship after season 13 amidst the declining ratings of Idol in the mid-2010s. iTunes sponsored the show since season seven.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nCoca-Cola officially ended its sponsorship after season 13 amidst the declining ratings of Idol in the mid-2010s, and was subsequently replaced by Pepsi.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes information about Pepsi replacing Coca-Cola as a sponsor, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions Coca-Cola ending its sponsorship after season 13, but does not provide any information about what happened to the sponsorship deal afterwards.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and was subsequently replaced by Pepsi']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat Island is the nearest major airport located on?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSt. Barthélemy has a small airport known as Gustaf III Airport on the north coast of the island that is served by small regional commercial aircraft and charters. The nearest airport with a runway length sufficient to land a typical commercial jet airliner is on the neighboring island of Sint Maarten: Princess Juliana International Airport, which acts as a hub, providing connecting flights with regional carriers to St. Barthélemy. Several international airlines and domestic Caribbean airlines operate in this sector.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nSint Maarten\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the island where the nearest major airport is located.', 'The context mentions that the nearest airport with a runway length sufficient to land a typical commercial jet airliner is on the neighboring island of Sint Maarten.', 'The context specifically names the airport as Princess Juliana International Airport, which is located on Sint Maarten.', 'The answer, Sint Maarten, directly corresponds to the information provided in the context about the location of the nearest major airport.', 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately identifies the island where the nearest major airport is located, as described in the context.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Sint Maarten}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many students enrolled in madaris are Muslim?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nMadrasa (Arabic: مدرسة, madrasah, pl. مدارس, madāris, Turkish: Medrese) is the Arabic word for any type of educational institution, whether secular or religious (of any religion). The word is variously transliterated madrasah, madarasaa, medresa, madrassa, madraza, medrese, etc. In the West, the word usually refers to a specific type of religious school or college for the study of the Islamic religion, though this may not be the only subject studied. Not all students in madaris are Muslims; there is also a modern curriculum.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nNot all\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the proportion of Muslim students in madaris, implying a need for a specific number or percentage.', 'The context provides information about the nature of madaris, stating that they are educational institutions that can be secular or religious, and that they are not exclusive to the Islamic religion.', \"The context explicitly states that 'Not all students in madaris are Muslims', which directly answers the question.\", \"The answer 'Not all' is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided, which indicates that there is no specific number or percentage of Muslim students in madaris, but rather that there is a mix of students of different faiths.\", \"The answer does not provide a specific number or percentage, which is consistent with the context's lack of specific information on this topic.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Not all}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nDominic's education helped him to overcome who?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nDominic's education at Palencia gave him the knowledge he needed to overcome the Manicheans. With charity, the other concept that most defines the work and spirituality of the order, study became the method most used by the Dominicans in working to defend the Church against the perils that hounded it, and also of enlarging its authority over larger areas of the known world. In Dominic's thinking, it was impossible for men to preach what they did not or could not understand. When the brethren left Prouille, then, to begin their apostolic work, Dominic sent Matthew of Paris to establish a school near the University of Paris. This was the first of many Dominican schools established by the brethren, some near large universities throughout Europe.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe Manicheans\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks about the group of people Dominic's education helped him to overcome.\", \"The context mentions that Dominic's education at Palencia gave him the knowledge he needed to overcome the Manicheans.\", \"The answer 'the Manicheans' is a direct reference to the group mentioned in the context as the ones Dominic's education helped him to overcome.\", \"The context provides a clear connection between Dominic's education and his ability to overcome the Manicheans, making the answer faithful to the context.\", \"The answer accurately reflects the information provided in the context, demonstrating a clear understanding of the relationship between Dominic's education and his ability to overcome the Manicheans.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": the Manicheans}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich transit line out of Union Station provides service to Hartford and Springfield, Massachusetts?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nUnion Station is further served by four Amtrak lines: the Northeast Regional and the high-speed Acela Express provide service to New York, Washington, D.C. and Boston, and rank as the first and second busiest routes in the country; the New Haven–Springfield Line provides service to Hartford and Springfield, Massachusetts; and the Vermonter provides service to both Washington, D.C., and Vermont, 15 miles (24 km) from the Canadian border. Amtrak also codeshares with United Airlines for travel to any airport serviced by United Airlines, via Newark Airport (EWR) originating from or terminating at Union Station, (IATA: ZVE).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nNew Haven–Springfield Line\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the transit line that provides service to Hartford and Springfield, Massachusetts.', 'The context mentions that the New Haven–Springfield Line provides service to Hartford and Springfield, Massachusetts.', 'The answer, New Haven–Springfield Line, is a direct match to the information provided in the context.', 'The context specifically states that this line serves the mentioned cities, making it the most relevant and accurate answer to the question.', 'The other Amtrak lines mentioned in the context, such as the Northeast Regional and the Acela Express, do not provide service to Hartford and Springfield, Massachusetts, making the New Haven–Springfield Line the only correct answer.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": New Haven–Springfield Line}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhose will did Hegel believe should prevail over that of the individual?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nA major concern of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit (1807) and of the philosophy of Spirit that he lays out in his Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1817–1830) is the interrelation between individual humans, which he conceives in terms of \"mutual recognition.\" However, what Climacus means by the aforementioned statement, is that Hegel, in the Philosophy of Right, believed the best solution was to surrender one's individuality to the customs of the State, identifying right and wrong in view of the prevailing bourgeois morality. Individual human will ought, at the State's highest level of development, to properly coincide with the will of the State. Climacus rejects Hegel's suppression of individuality by pointing out it is impossible to create a valid set of rules or system in any society which can adequately describe existence for any one individual. Submitting one's will to the State denies personal freedom, choice, and responsibility.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nState, as embodied by its supreme leader.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER introduces the concept of a \"supreme leader\" which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the State as a whole, without specifying any particular individual or role within it.', 'The addition of \"as embodied by its supreme leader\" is an unwarranted interpretation that goes beyond the information provided in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['as embodied by its supreme leader']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is an engram trace?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCognitive neuroscientists consider memory as the retention, reactivation, and reconstruction of the experience-independent internal representation. The term of internal representation implies that such definition of memory contains two components: the expression of memory at the behavioral or conscious level, and the underpinning physical neural changes (Dudai 2007). The latter component is also called engram or memory traces (Semon 1904). Some neuroscientists and psychologists mistakenly equate the concept of engram and memory, broadly conceiving all persisting after-effects of experiences as memory; others argue against this notion that memory does not exist until it is revealed in behavior or thought (Moscovitch 2007).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe underpinning physical neural changes, which are typically located in the left hemisphere of the brain\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the location of engram traces in the brain, specifically stating that they are typically located in the left hemisphere.', 'However, the CONTEXT does not provide any information about the location of engram traces in the brain, only defining what an engram or memory trace is.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which are typically located in the left hemisphere of the brain']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn 1914, a separately paid-for supplement for The Times was a magazine that featured what kind of content?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Times Literary Supplement (TLS) first appeared in 1902 as a supplement to The Times, becoming a separately paid-for weekly literature and society magazine in 1914. The Times and the TLS have continued to be co-owned, and as of 2012 the TLS is also published by News International and cooperates closely with The Times, with its online version hosted on The Times website, and its editorial offices based in Times House, Pennington Street, London.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nweekly literature and art\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes \"art\" as part of the content featured in the magazine, but the CONTEXT only mentions \"literature and society\" as the content of the TLS.', 'The inclusion of \"art\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.', 'The correct answer should only include \"literature\" as it is the only specific type of content mentioned in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['art']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho is Southampton Test's member of parliament?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThere are three members of parliament for the city: Royston Smith (Conservative) for Southampton Itchen, the constituency covering the east of the city; Dr. Alan Whitehead (Labour) for Southampton Test, which covers the west of the city; and Caroline Nokes (Conservative) for Romsey and Southampton North, which includes a northern portion of the city.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nDr. Alan Whitehead, who has been serving since 1997.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about Dr. Alan Whitehead's tenure as the member of parliament for Southampton Test.\", 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the current members of parliament for the city and their respective constituencies.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it includes extra information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who has been serving since 1997']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich streets are one-way eastbound?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe numbered streets carry crosstown traffic. In general, even-numbered streets are one-way eastbound and odd-numbered streets are one-way west. Several exceptions reverse this. Most wider streets carry two-way traffic, as do a few of the narrow ones.\n\n--\nANSWER:\neven-numbered, except for 42nd Street which is closed on Sundays.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about 42nd Street being closed on Sundays, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that even-numbered streets are generally one-way eastbound, with some exceptions, but does not provide specific information about 42nd Street or its closure on Sundays.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['except for 42nd Street which is closed on Sundays']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho else worked with Feynman on developing computers?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn the late 1980s, according to \"Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine\", Feynman played a crucial role in developing the first massively parallel computer, and in finding innovative uses for it in numerical computations, in building neural networks, as well as physical simulations using cellular automata (such as turbulent fluid flow), working with Stephen Wolfram at Caltech. His son Carl also played a role in the development of the original Connection Machine engineering; Feynman influencing the interconnects while his son worked on the software.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nHis son Carl, who later became a renowned chef.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER provides additional information about Carl's profession as a chef, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.\", \"The CONTEXT only mentions Carl's involvement in the development of the original Connection Machine engineering, specifically working on the software, but does not provide any information about his profession or interests outside of this project.\", 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT, as it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who later became a renowned chef']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow does Whitehead say a dog may interpret the presence of a chair?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn higher organisms (like people), these two modes of perception combine into what Whitehead terms \"symbolic reference\", which links appearance with causation in a process that is so automatic that both people and animals have difficulty refraining from it. By way of illustration, Whitehead uses the example of a person's encounter with a chair. An ordinary person looks up, sees a colored shape, and immediately infers that it is a chair. However, an artist, Whitehead supposes, \"might not have jumped to the notion of a chair\", but instead \"might have stopped at the mere contemplation of a beautiful color and a beautiful shape.\" This is not the normal human reaction; most people place objects in categories by habit and instinct, without even thinking about it. Moreover, animals do the same thing. Using the same example, Whitehead points out that a dog \"would have acted immediately on the hypothesis of a chair and would have jumped onto it by way of using it as such.\" In this way symbolic reference is a fusion of pure sense perceptions on the one hand and causal relations on the other, and that it is in fact the causal relationships that dominate the more basic mentality (as the dog illustrates), while it is the sense perceptions which indicate a higher grade mentality (as the artist illustrates).\n\n--\nANSWER:\n\"would have acted immediately on the hypothesis of a chair and would have jumped onto it by way of using it as such.\"\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER is a direct quote from the CONTEXT, which suggests that it is faithful to the original text.', 'The QUESTION asks how Whitehead says a dog may interpret the presence of a chair, and the ANSWER provides the exact words used by Whitehead to describe this interpretation.', 'The CONTEXT explains that animals, like dogs, place objects in categories by habit and instinct, and the ANSWER illustrates this by describing how a dog would immediately act on the hypothesis of a chair and use it as such.', \"The ANSWER accurately conveys the idea that a dog's interpretation of a chair is driven by causal relationships and instinct, rather than pure sense perceptions.\", \"The use of the phrase 'would have acted immediately on the hypothesis of a chair' in the ANSWER suggests that the dog's interpretation is automatic and instinctual, which is consistent with the CONTEXT's description of symbolic reference in animals.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": \"would have acted immediately on the hypothesis of a chair and would have jumped onto it by way of using it as such.\"}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is hyle?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe nature and definition of matter - like other key concepts in science and philosophy - have occasioned much debate. Is there a single kind of matter (hyle) which everything is made of, or multiple kinds? Is matter a continuous substance capable of expressing multiple forms (hylomorphism), or a number of discrete, unchanging constituents (atomism)? Does it have intrinsic properties (substance theory), or is it lacking them (prima materia)?\n\n--\nANSWER:\nmatter\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks for the definition of 'hyle', which is mentioned in the context as a concept related to matter.\", \"The context discusses the nature and definition of matter, and 'hyle' is mentioned as a single kind of matter that everything is made of.\", \"The answer 'matter' is a direct reference to the concept being discussed in the context, and 'hyle' is explicitly mentioned as a synonym or related concept to matter.\", \"The context provides a framework for understanding the concept of 'hyle' as it relates to matter, and the answer 'matter' is a faithful representation of that concept.\", \"The use of 'hyle' in the context as a term for a single kind of matter suggests that the answer 'matter' is a reasonable and accurate interpretation of the question.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": matter}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many words of memory could be stored with the Z3?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn 1941, Zuse followed his earlier machine up with the Z3, the world's first working electromechanical programmable, fully automatic digital computer. The Z3 was built with 2000 relays, implementing a 22 bit word length that operated at a clock frequency of about 5–10 Hz. Program code was supplied on punched film while data could be stored in 64 words of memory or supplied from the keyboard. It was quite similar to modern machines in some respects, pioneering numerous advances such as floating point numbers. Replacement of the hard-to-implement decimal system (used in Charles Babbage's earlier design) by the simpler binary system meant that Zuse's machines were easier to build and potentially more reliable, given the technologies available at that time. The Z3 was Turing complete.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\n64 words of memory, which was expandable to 128 words with an optional upgrade.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The ANSWER claims that the Z3's memory was expandable to 128 words with an optional upgrade.\", 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention any optional upgrade or expansion to 128 words.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that data could be stored in 64 words of memory.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces information not present in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was expandable to 128 words with an optional upgrade']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn 1922, which estate sold The Times?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn 1922, John Jacob Astor, son of the 1st Viscount Astor, bought The Times from the Northcliffe estate. The paper gained a measure of notoriety in the 1930s with its advocacy of German appeasement; then-editor Geoffrey Dawson was closely allied with those in the government who practised appeasement, most notably Neville Chamberlain.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nNorthcliffe estate\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the estate that sold The Times in 1922.', 'The context mentions that John Jacob Astor bought The Times from the Northcliffe estate in 1922.', \"The answer 'Northcliffe estate' directly corresponds to the information provided in the context.\", 'The context explicitly states the year of the sale (1922) and the estate involved (Northcliffe estate), making the answer faithful to the context.', 'The context provides additional information about the subsequent events and the people involved, but the key information about the sale is accurately reflected in the answer.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Northcliffe estate}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho took control of Egypt in 525 BC?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn 525 BC, the powerful Achaemenid Persians, led by Cambyses II, began their conquest of Egypt, eventually capturing the pharaoh Psamtik III at the battle of Pelusium. Cambyses II then assumed the formal title of pharaoh, but ruled Egypt from his home of Susa in Persia (modern Iran), leaving Egypt under the control of a satrapy. The entire Twenty-seventh Dynasty of Egypt, from 525 BC to 402 BC, save for Petubastis III, was an entirely Persian ruled period, with the Achaemenid kings all being granted the title of pharaoh. A few temporarily successful revolts against the Persians marked the fifth century BC, but Egypt was never able to permanently overthrow the Persians.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nAchaemenid Persians, led by Cambyses II, who was known for his exceptional skill in playing the lyre.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about Cambyses II being known for his exceptional skill in playing the lyre, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions Cambyses II as the leader of the Achaemenid Persians who conquered Egypt, but does not provide any information about his skills or interests outside of his conquests.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who was known for his exceptional skill in playing the lyre']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat individuals subscribe to a doctrine that baptism should be performed only for professing believers?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBaptists are individuals who comprise a group of Christian denominations and churches that subscribe to a doctrine that baptism should be performed only for professing believers (believer's baptism, as opposed to infant baptism), and that it must be done by complete immersion (as opposed to affusion or sprinkling). Other tenets of Baptist churches include soul competency (liberty), salvation through faith alone, Scripture alone as the rule of faith and practice, and the autonomy of the local congregation. Baptists recognize two ministerial offices, elders and deacons. Baptist churches are widely considered to be Protestant churches, though some Baptists disavow this identity.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nBaptists, who often wear distinctive white robes during their ceremonies.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information about Baptists wearing distinctive white robes during their ceremonies.', 'This information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only discusses the doctrine of Baptists and their tenets.', 'The QUESTION only asks about individuals who subscribe to a specific doctrine, and the ANSWER provides unrelated information.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who often wear distinctive white robes during their ceremonies']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nIn what year were big changes made to the ANSI?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe ASA standard underwent a major revision in 1960 with ASA PH2.5-1960, when the method to determine film speed was refined and previously applied safety factors against under-exposure were abandoned, effectively doubling the nominal speed of many black-and-white negative films. For example, an Ilford HP3 that had been rated at 200 ASA before 1960 was labeled 400 ASA afterwards without any change to the emulsion. Similar changes were applied to the DIN system with DIN 4512:1961-10 and the BS system with BS 1380:1963 in the following years.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1960\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the year when big changes were made to the ANSI, but the context mentions ASA, not ANSI. However, it can be inferred that ANSI is related to ASA, as both are American standards organizations.', 'The context specifically mentions that the ASA standard underwent a major revision in 1960, which is the year provided in the answer.', 'The context provides details about the changes made to the ASA standard in 1960, such as the refinement of the method to determine film speed and the abandonment of safety factors against under-exposure.', 'Although the context does not explicitly mention ANSI, the mention of ASA and the year 1960 provides a strong connection to the answer, suggesting that the changes made to the ASA standard in 1960 may be related to the changes made to the ANSI.', 'Given the information provided in the context, it is reasonable to assume that the answer 1960 is faithful to the context, as it is the year when significant changes were made to the ASA standard, which is likely related to the ANSI.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 1960}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere was an important center of Indian Ocean trading in the 16th century?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAdvances were made in irrigation and farming, using new technology such as the windmill. Crops such as almonds and citrus fruit were brought to Europe through al-Andalus, and sugar cultivation was gradually adopted by the Europeans. Arab merchants dominated trade in the Indian Ocean until the arrival of the Portuguese in the 16th century. Hormuz was an important center for this trade. There was also a dense network of trade routes in the Mediterranean, along which Muslim countries traded with each other and with European powers such as Venice, Genoa and Catalonia. The Silk Road crossing Central Asia passed through Muslim states between China and Europe.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nHormuz, which was briefly occupied by the British in 1602.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about Hormuz being briefly occupied by the British in 1602, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the arrival of the Portuguese in the 16th century, but does not provide any information about the British occupation of Hormuz.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was briefly occupied by the British in 1602']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat career path was decided upon for Von Neuman?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nSince there were few posts in Hungary for mathematicians, and those were not well-paid, his father wanted von Neumann to follow him into industry and therefore invest his time in a more financially useful endeavor than mathematics. So it was decided that the best career path was to become a chemical engineer. This was not something that von Neumann had much knowledge of, so it was arranged for him to take a two-year non-degree course in chemistry at the University of Berlin, after which he sat the entrance exam to the prestigious ETH Zurich, which he passed in September 1923. At the same time, von Neumann also entered Pázmány Péter University in Budapest, as a Ph.D. candidate in mathematics. For his thesis, he chose to produce an axiomatization of Cantor's set theory. He passed his final examinations for his Ph.D. soon after graduating from ETH Zurich in 1926. He then went to the University of Göttingen on a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation to study mathematics under David Hilbert.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nchemical engineer specializing in environmental sustainability\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds a specialization (\"environmental sustainability\") that is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions that von Neumann was to become a chemical engineer due to his father's wishes, but it does not provide any information about his specialization or interests in environmental sustainability.\", 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, which makes it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['specializing in environmental sustainability']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat signified the emergence of the Roman Empire?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Hellenistic period covers the period of ancient Greek (Hellenic) history and Mediterranean history between the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC and the emergence of the Roman Empire as signified by the Battle of Actium in 31 BC and the subsequent conquest of Ptolemaic Egypt the following year. At this time, Greek cultural influence and power was at its peak in Europe, Africa and Asia, experiencing prosperity and progress in the arts, exploration, literature, theatre, architecture, music, mathematics, philosophy, and science. For example, competitive public games took place, ideas in biology, and popular entertainment in theaters. It is often considered a period of transition, sometimes even of decadence or degeneration, compared to the enlightenment of the Greek Classical era. The Hellenistic period saw the rise of New Comedy, Alexandrian poetry, the Septuagint and the philosophies of Stoicism and Epicureanism. Greek Science was advanced by the works of the mathematician Euclid and the polymath Archimedes. The religious sphere expanded to include new gods such as the Greco-Egyptian Serapis, eastern deities such as Attis and Cybele and the Greek adoption of Buddhism.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nBattle of Actium, which was fought on a Tuesday.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the day of the week the Battle of Actium was fought, which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the Battle of Actium as a significant event signifying the emergence of the Roman Empire, but does not provide any details about the day of the week it occurred.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was fought on a Tuesday']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen did Napoleon III visit London?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nNapoleon III, since the Crimean War Britain's closest ally, visited London in April 1855, and from 17 to 28 August the same year Victoria and Albert returned the visit. Napoleon III met the couple at Dunkirk and accompanied them to Paris. They visited the Exposition Universelle (a successor to Albert's 1851 brainchild the Great Exhibition) and Napoleon I's tomb at Les Invalides (to which his remains had only been returned in 1840), and were guests of honour at a 1,200-guest ball at the Palace of Versailles.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nNapoleon III visited London in April 1855, during a brief spring storm.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds extra information (\"during a brief spring storm\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions the month and year of Napoleon III's visit to London, but does not provide any details about the weather conditions during the visit.\", 'The added information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and appears to be an unsubstantiated claim.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['during a brief spring storm']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is lacking in Protestantism, according to the Roman Catholic Church?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe view of the Roman Catholic Church is that Protestant denominations cannot be considered churches but rather that they are ecclesial communities or specific faith-believing communities because their ordinances and doctrines are not historically the same as the Catholic sacraments and dogmas, and the Protestant communities have no sacramental ministerial priesthood and therefore lack true apostolic succession. According to Bishop Hilarion (Alfeyev) the Eastern Orthodox Church shares the same view on the subject.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\ntrue apostolic succession, which is also believed to be tied to the preservation of ancient liturgical music.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER introduces a new concept, \"the preservation of ancient liturgical music\", which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that Protestant communities lack true apostolic succession due to the absence of a sacramental ministerial priesthood, but does not link this to liturgical music.', 'The ANSWER adds an extra detail that is not supported by the provided CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original information.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which is also believed to be tied to the preservation of ancient liturgical music']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat date did the U.S. intervention in New Mexico end?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nStarting in 1910, the army began acquiring fixed-wing aircraft. In 1910, Mexico was having a civil war, peasant rebels fighting government soldiers. The army was deployed to American towns near the border to ensure safety to lives and property. In 1916, Pancho Villa, a major rebel leader, attacked Columbus, New Mexico, prompting a U.S. intervention in Mexico until 7 February 1917. They fought the rebels and the Mexican federal troops until 1918. The United States joined World War I in 1917 on the side of Britain, France, Russia, Italy and other allies. U.S. troops were sent to the Western Front and were involved in the last offensives that ended the war. With the armistice in November 1918, the army once again decreased its forces.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n7 February 1917, after a brief ceremony in which the U.S. troops were awarded medals for their service.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about a ceremony and medals being awarded, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the date of the end of the U.S. intervention in Mexico, but does not provide any details about the circumstances of the withdrawal.', 'The ANSWER appears to be embellishing the information provided in the CONTEXT with details that are not supported by the text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['after a brief ceremony in which the U.S. troops were awarded medals for their service.']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich standard does not include a specification for an MP3 encoder?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe MPEG-1 standard does not include a precise specification for an MP3 encoder, but does provide example psychoacoustic models, rate loop, and the like in the non-normative part of the original standard. At present, these suggested implementations are quite dated. Implementers of the standard were supposed to devise their own algorithms suitable for removing parts of the information from the audio input. As a result, there are many different MP3 encoders available, each producing files of differing quality. Comparisons are widely available, so it is easy for a prospective user of an encoder to research the best choice. An encoder that is proficient at encoding at higher bit rates (such as LAME) is not necessarily as good at lower bit rates.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nMPEG-1, which was published in 1993 and is still widely used today in various forms of media, including video games.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about MPEG-1 that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions the year the standard was published indirectly, but does not mention its widespread use in various forms of media, including video games.', 'The ANSWER includes information that is not relevant to the QUESTION, which only asks about the standard that does not include a specification for an MP3 encoder.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was published in 1993', 'and is still widely used today in various forms of media, including video games']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho disapproved of the proposed marriage between Victoria and Albert?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nBy 1836, the Duchess's brother, Leopold, who had been King of the Belgians since 1831, hoped to marry his niece to his nephew, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Leopold, Victoria's mother, and Albert's father (Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha) were siblings. Leopold arranged for Victoria's mother to invite her Coburg relatives to visit her in May 1836, with the purpose of introducing Victoria to Albert. William IV, however, disapproved of any match with the Coburgs, and instead favoured the suit of Prince Alexander of the Netherlands, second son of the Prince of Orange. Victoria was aware of the various matrimonial plans and critically appraised a parade of eligible princes. According to her diary, she enjoyed Albert's company from the beginning. After the visit she wrote, \"[Albert] is extremely handsome; his hair is about the same colour as mine; his eyes are large and blue, and he has a beautiful nose and a very sweet mouth with fine teeth; but the charm of his countenance is his expression, which is most delightful.\" Alexander, on the other hand, was \"very plain\".\n\n--\nANSWER:\nWilliam IV, who was also known for his love of sailing, disapproved of any match with the Coburgs.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information about William IV being known for his love of sailing, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions William IV's disapproval of the match with the Coburgs, but does not provide any information about his personal interests or hobbies.\", 'The inclusion of this extra information makes the ANSWER unfaithful to the CONTEXT, as it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who was also known for his love of sailing']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nInside a building, what wooden things might you open to enter or leave rooms?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn buildings made of other materials, wood will still be found as a supporting material, especially in roof construction, in interior doors and their frames, and as exterior cladding.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ndoors\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about wooden things that might be opened to enter or leave rooms inside a building.', 'The context mentions that wood is often used in interior doors and their frames in buildings.', \"The answer 'doors' is a direct reference to the context's mention of interior doors, which are made of wood and used to enter or leave rooms.\", 'The context provides a specific example of how wood is used in buildings, and the answer is a faithful representation of that example.', 'The answer is also a logical conclusion based on the context, as interior doors are a common feature in buildings and are often made of wood.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": doors}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is 16-bit support intended for?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe three desktop editions of Windows 8 support 32-bit and 64-bit architectures; retail copies of Windows 8 include install DVDs for both architectures, while the online installer automatically installs the version corresponding with the architecture of the system's existing Windows installation. The 32-bit version runs on CPUs compatible with x86 architecture 3rd generation (known as IA-32) or newer, and can run 32-bit and 16-bit applications, although 16-bit support must be enabled first. (16-bit applications are developed for CPUs compatible with x86 2nd generation, first conceived in 1978. Microsoft started moving away from this architecture after Windows 95.)\n\n--\nANSWER:\nCPUs compatible with x86 2nd generation, which were also used in some early mobile devices.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about early mobile devices, which is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that 16-bit applications are developed for CPUs compatible with x86 2nd generation, but does not mention mobile devices.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which were also used in some early mobile devices']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat can be paired with an algorithm called arithmetic coding?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn a further refinement of the direct use of probabilistic modelling, statistical estimates can be coupled to an algorithm called arithmetic coding. Arithmetic coding is a more modern coding technique that uses the mathematical calculations of a finite-state machine to produce a string of encoded bits from a series of input data symbols. It can achieve superior compression to other techniques such as the better-known Huffman algorithm. It uses an internal memory state to avoid the need to perform a one-to-one mapping of individual input symbols to distinct representations that use an integer number of bits, and it clears out the internal memory only after encoding the entire string of data symbols. Arithmetic coding applies especially well to adaptive data compression tasks where the statistics vary and are context-dependent, as it can be easily coupled with an adaptive model of the probability distribution of the input data. An early example of the use of arithmetic coding was its use as an optional (but not widely used) feature of the JPEG image coding standard. It has since been applied in various other designs including H.264/MPEG-4 AVC and HEVC for video coding.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nstatistical estimates, often obtained through machine learning models.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that statistical estimates can be coupled with arithmetic coding, but it does not mention machine learning models.', 'The introduction of machine learning models in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often obtained through machine learning models']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho heads the Himachal Pradesh?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nA district of Himachal Pradesh is an administrative geographical unit, headed by a Deputy Commissioner or District Magistrate, an officer belonging to the Indian Administrative Service. The district magistrate or the deputy commissioner is assisted by a number of officers belonging to Himachal Administrative Service and other Himachal state services. Each district is subdivided into Sub-Divisions, governed by a sub-divisional magistrate, and again into Blocks. Blocks consists of panchayats (village councils) and town municipalities. A Superintendent of Police, an officer belonging to the Indian Police Service is entrusted with the responsibility of maintaining law and order and related issues of the district. He is assisted by the officers of the Himachal Police Service and other Himachal Police officials.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nDeputy Commissioner or District Magistrate, who is also a skilled mountaineer.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the Deputy Commissioner or District Magistrate being a skilled mountaineer.', 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the role and responsibilities of the Deputy Commissioner or District Magistrate.', 'The CONTEXT does not provide any information about the personal skills or qualifications of the Deputy Commissioner or District Magistrate beyond their administrative role.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT as it introduces new information that is not supported by the given text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who is also a skilled mountaineer']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhy was Professor David Graeber retired during the strike?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nYale has a history of difficult and prolonged labor negotiations, often culminating in strikes. There have been at least eight strikes since 1968, and The New York Times wrote that Yale has a reputation as having the worst record of labor tension of any university in the U.S. Yale's unusually large endowment exacerbates the tension over wages. Moreover, Yale has been accused of failing to treat workers with respect. In a 2003 strike, however, the university claimed that more union employees were working than striking. Professor David Graeber was 'retired' after he came to the defense of a student who was involved in campus labor issues.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nhe came to the defense of a student who was involved in campus labor issues and was also a close relative of a union leader.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions that Professor David Graeber was 'retired' after he came to the defense of a student who was involved in campus labor issues, but it does not mention anything about the student being a close relative of a union leader.\", 'This extra information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and appears to be an unfounded claim.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['and was also a close relative of a union leader']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhich political faction favored budgetary reform?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nTo pay for his military campaigns and colonial expansion, Emperor Wu nationalized several private industries. He created central government monopolies administered largely by former merchants. These monopolies included salt, iron, and liquor production, as well as bronze-coin currency. The liquor monopoly lasted only from 98 to 81 BC, and the salt and iron monopolies were eventually abolished in early Eastern Han. The issuing of coinage remained a central government monopoly throughout the rest of the Han dynasty. The government monopolies were eventually repealed when a political faction known as the Reformists gained greater influence in the court. The Reformists opposed the Modernist faction that had dominated court politics in Emperor Wu's reign and during the subsequent regency of Huo Guang (d. 68 BC). The Modernists argued for an aggressive and expansionary foreign policy supported by revenues from heavy government intervention in the private economy. The Reformists, however, overturned these policies, favoring a cautious, non-expansionary approach to foreign policy, frugal budget reform, and lower tax-rates imposed on private entrepreneurs.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe Reformists\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the political faction that favored budgetary reform.', 'In the context, it is mentioned that the Reformists favored a cautious, non-expansionary approach to foreign policy, frugal budget reform, and lower tax-rates imposed on private entrepreneurs.', \"The key phrase 'frugal budget reform' in the context directly relates to the question about budgetary reform.\", \"The context also contrasts the Reformists with the Modernists, highlighting the Reformists' opposition to heavy government intervention in the private economy, which further supports their focus on budgetary reform.\", \"Therefore, the answer 'The Reformists' is faithful to the context, as it accurately identifies the faction that favored budgetary reform.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": The Reformists}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat did the elite use instead of spells and potions to redress a wrong?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nArchaeology confirms the widespread use of binding spells (defixiones), magical papyri and so-called \"voodoo dolls\" from a very early era. Around 250 defixiones have been recovered just from Roman Britain, in both urban and rural settings. Some seek straightforward, usually gruesome revenge, often for a lover's offense or rejection. Others appeal for divine redress of wrongs, in terms familiar to any Roman magistrate, and promise a portion of the value (usually small) of lost or stolen property in return for its restoration. None of these defixiones seem produced by, or on behalf of the elite, who had more immediate recourse to human law and justice. Similar traditions existed throughout the empire, persisting until around the 7th century AD, well into the Christian era.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\nlaw and justice, often with the assistance of a personal scribe.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds extra information (\"often with the assistance of a personal scribe\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that the elite had \"more immediate recourse to human law and justice\", but does not provide any details about how they utilized this recourse.', 'The addition of \"often with the assistance of a personal scribe\" is an assumption not supported by the provided CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often with the assistance of a personal scribe']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat album was ranked 8 on a list of 100 albums?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Pitchfork online music publication ranked My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy as the world's best album of the decade \"so far\"—between 2010 and 2014—on August 19, 2014, while Yeezus was ranked in the eighth position of a list of 100 albums. During the same week, the song \"Runaway\" (featuring Pusha T) was ranked in the third position in the publication's list of the 200 \"best tracks\" released since 2010.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nYeezus, which was released in 2013, and also won a Grammy Award.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the album Yeezus, specifically its release year and a Grammy Award win.', 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the ranking of Yeezus in the list of 100 albums.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was released in 2013', 'and also won a Grammy Award']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many colors were 45s available in when first released?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn March 1949, as RCA released the 45, Columbia released several hundred 7 inch 33 1/3 rpm small spindle hole singles. This format was soon dropped as it became clear that the RCA 45 was the single of choice and the Columbia 12 inch LP would be the 'album' of choice. The first release of the 45 came in seven colors: black 47-xxxx popular series, yellow 47-xxxx juvenile series, green (teal) 48-xxxx country series, deep red 49-xxxx classical series, bright red (cerise) 50-xxxx blues/spiritual series, light blue 51-xxxx international series, dark blue 52-xxxx light classics. All colors were soon dropped in favor of black because of production problems. However, yellow and deep red were continued until about 1952. The first 45 rpm record created for sale was \"PeeWee the Piccolo\" RCA 47-0147 pressed in yellow translucent vinyl at the Sherman Avenue plant, Indianapolis Dec. 7, 1948, R.O. Price, plant manager.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nseven colors\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about the number of colors the 45s were available in when first released.', 'The context provides information about the initial release of the 45s, stating that they came in seven colors, each corresponding to a specific series (popular, juvenile, country, classical, blues/spiritual, international, and light classics).', 'The context explicitly mentions that the first release of the 45 came in seven colors, which directly answers the question.', \"The answer 'seven colors' is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided about the initial release of the 45s.\", 'The context also mentions that the colors were eventually dropped in favor of black due to production problems, but this information is not relevant to the question, which only asks about the initial release.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": seven colors}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is an important defense strategy for insects to survive?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCamouflage is an important defense strategy, which involves the use of coloration or shape to blend into the surrounding environment. This sort of protective coloration is common and widespread among beetle families, especially those that feed on wood or vegetation, such as many of the leaf beetles (family Chrysomelidae) or weevils. In some of these species, sculpturing or various colored scales or hairs cause the beetle to resemble bird dung or other inedible objects. Many of those that live in sandy environments blend in with the coloration of the substrate. Most phasmids are known for effectively replicating the forms of sticks and leaves, and the bodies of some species (such as O. macklotti and Palophus centaurus) are covered in mossy or lichenous outgrowths that supplement their disguise. Some species have the ability to change color as their surroundings shift (B. scabrinota, T. californica). In a further behavioral adaptation to supplement crypsis, a number of species have been noted to perform a rocking motion where the body is swayed from side to side that is thought to reflect the movement of leaves or twigs swaying in the breeze. Another method by which stick insects avoid predation and resemble twigs is by feigning death (catalepsy), where the insect enters a motionless state that can be maintained for a long period. The nocturnal feeding habits of adults also aids Phasmatodea in remaining concealed from predators.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nCamouflage, often enhanced by the insect's ability to emit a faint scent that mimics the surrounding environment.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER introduces the concept of an insect emitting a faint scent to mimic the surrounding environment, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only discusses visual camouflage strategies, such as coloration, shape, and movement, but does not mention any olfactory (smell-related) strategies.', 'The ANSWER adds new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": [\"often enhanced by the insect's ability to emit a faint scent that mimics the surrounding environment\"]}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat origin was 'Escape 2000'?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe 1981 film Fort Apache, The Bronx is another film that used the Bronx's gritty image for its storyline. The movie's title is from the nickname for the 41st Police Precinct in the South Bronx which was nicknamed \"Fort Apache\". Also from 1981 is the horror film Wolfen making use of the rubble of the Bronx as a home for werewolf type creatures. Knights of the South Bronx, a true story of a teacher who worked with disadvantaged children, is another film also set in the Bronx released in 2005. The Bronx was the setting for the 1983 film Fuga dal Bronx, also known as Bronx Warriors 2 and Escape 2000, an Italian B-movie best known for its appearance on the television series Mystery Science Theatre 3000. The plot revolves around a sinister construction corporation's plans to depopulate, destroy and redevelop the Bronx, and a band of rebels who are out to expose the corporation's murderous ways and save their homes. The film is memorable for its almost incessant use of the phrase, \"Leave the Bronx!\" Many of the movie's scenes were filmed in Queens, substituting as the Bronx. Rumble in the Bronx was a 1995 Jackie Chan kung-fu film, another which popularised the Bronx to international audiences. Last Bronx, a 1996 Sega game played on the bad reputation of the Bronx to lend its name to an alternate version of post-Japanese bubble Tokyo, where crime and gang warfare is rampant.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nItalian\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": nan, \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Italian}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many fans saw Queen at Slane castle?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn summer of 1986, Queen went on their final tour with Freddie Mercury. A sold-out tour in support of A Kind of Magic, once again they hired Spike Edney, leading to him being dubbed the unofficial fifth member. The Magic Tour's highlight was at Wembley Stadium in London and resulted in the live double album, Queen at Wembley, released on CD and as a live concert DVD, which has gone five times platinum in the US and four times platinum in the UK. Queen could not book Wembley for a third night, but they did play at Knebworth Park. The show sold out within two hours and over 120,000 fans packed the park for what was Queen's final live performance with Mercury. Queen began the tour at the Råsunda Stadium in Stockholm, Sweden, and during the tour the band performed a concert at Slane Castle, Ireland, in front of an audience of 95,000, which broke the venue's attendance record. The band also played behind the Iron Curtain when they performed to a crowd of 80,000 at the Népstadion in Budapest, in what was one of the biggest rock concerts ever held in Eastern Europe. More than one million people saw Queen on the tour—400,000 in the United Kingdom alone, a record at the time.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n95,000, and it was a particularly sunny day.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes additional information (\"it was a particularly sunny day\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only provides information about the attendance at the Slane Castle concert, but does not mention the weather conditions.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['it was a particularly sunny day']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWebcomics reach large audiences and new what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nWebcomics are comics that are available on the internet. They are able to reach large audiences, and new readers usually can access archived installments. Webcomics can make use of an infinite canvas—meaning they are not constrained by size or dimensions of a page.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nWebcomics reach large audiences and new readers, often through social media platforms.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds information not present in the CONTEXT, specifically mentioning \"social media platforms\" as a means of reaching new readers.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions that new readers can access archived installments, but does not provide any information about how they are reached or through which platforms.', 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often through social media platforms']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the Olympic Torch made from?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Olympic Torch is based on traditional scrolls and uses a traditional Chinese design known as \"Lucky Cloud\". It is made from aluminum. It is 72 centimetres high and weighs 985 grams. The torch is designed to remain lit in 65 kilometre per hour (37 mile per hour) winds, and in rain of up to 50 millimetres (2 inches) per hour. An ignition key is used to ignite and extinguish the flame. The torch is fueled by cans of propane. Each can will light the torch for 15 minutes. It is designed by a team from Lenovo Group. The Torch is designed in reference to the traditional Chinese concept of the 5 elements that make up the entire universe.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nThe Olympic Torch is made from a combination of aluminum and a small amount of copper.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER claims the Olympic Torch is made from a combination of aluminum and copper, but the CONTEXT only mentions aluminum as the material used to make the torch.', 'There is no mention of copper in the CONTEXT, which suggests that the ANSWER is providing additional information not supported by the given text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a small amount of copper']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat Spartan mercenary helped reform Carthage's military?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nCarthage was a Phoenician colony on the coast of Tunisia. Carthaginian culture came into contact with the Greeks through Punic colonies in Sicily and through their widespread Mediterranean trade network. While the Carthaginians retained their Punic culture and language, they did adopt some Hellenistic ways, one of the most prominent of which was their military practices. In 550 BCE, Mago I of Carthage began a series of military reforms which included copying the army of Timoleon, Tyrant of Syracuse. The core of Carthage's military was the Greek-style phalanx formed by citizen hoplite spearmen who had been conscripted into service, though their armies also included large numbers of mercenaries. After their defeat in the first Punic war, Carthage hired a Spartan mercenary captain, Xanthippus of Carthage to reform their military forces. Xanthippus reformed the Carthaginian military along Macedonian army lines.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nXanthippus of Carthage\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks for the Spartan mercenary who helped reform Carthage's military.\", 'The context mentions that after their defeat in the first Punic war, Carthage hired a Spartan mercenary captain to reform their military forces.', 'The context specifically names Xanthippus of Carthage as the Spartan mercenary captain who reformed the Carthaginian military along Macedonian army lines.', \"The answer, Xanthippus of Carthage, matches the name mentioned in the context as the Spartan mercenary who reformed Carthage's military.\", \"Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context given the question, as it accurately identifies the Spartan mercenary who helped reform Carthage's military.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Xanthippus of Carthage}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat city did Muravyev decide not to take control over?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\n1855:Kars: In the year up to May 1855 Turkish forces in the east were reduced from 120,000 to 75,000, mostly by disease. The local Armenian population kept Muravyev well-informed about the Turks at Kars and he judged they had about five months of supplies. He therefore decided to control the surrounding area with cavalry and starve them out. He started in May and by June was south and west of the town. A relieving force fell back and there was a possibility of taking Erzerum, but Muravyev chose not to. In late September he learned of the fall of Sevastopol and a Turkish landing at Batum. This led him to reverse policy and try a direct attack. It failed, the Russians losing 8000 men and the Turks 1500 (29 September). The blockade continued and Kars surrendered on 8 November.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nErzerum, which was known for its beautiful beaches.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about Erzerum that is not present in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only mentions Erzerum as a possibility for taking control, but does not provide any details about its geographical features.', 'The mention of \"beautiful beaches\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT, which only discusses the military campaign and the siege of Kars.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was known for its beautiful beaches']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat conflict shaped his career?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nConflict with Arius and Arianism as well as successive Roman emperors shaped Athanasius's career. In 325, at the age of 27, Athanasius began his leading role against the Arians as his bishop's assistant during the First Council of Nicaea. Roman emperor Constantine the Great had convened the council in May–August 325 to address the Arian position that the Son of God, Jesus of Nazareth, is of a distinct substance from the Father. Three years after that council, Athanasius succeeded his mentor as archbishop of Alexandria. In addition to the conflict with the Arians (including powerful and influential Arian churchmen led by Eusebius of Nicomedia), he struggled against the Emperors Constantine, Constantius II, Julian the Apostate and Valens. He was known as \"Athanasius Contra Mundum\" (Latin for Athanasius Against the World).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nConflict with Arius and Arianism, which he initially encountered while studying in Rome.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER introduces a new piece of information that is not present in the CONTEXT, specifically that Athanasius encountered Arianism while studying in Rome.', 'The CONTEXT does not mention Athanasius studying in Rome or encountering Arianism there.', 'The ANSWER adds an ungrounded detail that is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which he initially encountered while studying in Rome']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nHow many Toxocara infection cases are reported annually in the US?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nToxocara canis (dog roundworm) eggs in dog feces can cause toxocariasis. In the United States, about 10,000 cases of Toxocara infection are reported in humans each year, and almost 14% of the U.S. population is infected. In Great Britain, 24% of soil samples taken from public parks contained T. canis eggs. Untreated toxocariasis can cause retinal damage and decreased vision. Dog feces can also contain hookworms that cause cutaneous larva migrans in humans.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n10,000\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the number of Toxocara infection cases reported annually in the US.', 'The context provides information about Toxocara infection, including the fact that about 10,000 cases are reported in humans each year in the United States.', 'The answer, 10,000, is a direct match to the information provided in the context, indicating that it is a faithful representation of the information given.', 'The context also provides additional information about Toxocara infection, such as its causes and effects, but the answer only focuses on the specific information requested by the question.', 'Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it accurately reflects the information provided and directly answers the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": 10,000}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat would environmentalists have done, instead of hunting?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nHunting is claimed to give resource managers an important tool in managing populations that might exceed the carrying capacity of their habitat and threaten the well-being of other species, or, in some instances, damage human health or safety.[citation needed] However, in most circumstances carrying capacity is determined by a combination habitat and food availability, and hunting for 'population control' has no effect on the annual population of species.[citation needed] In some cases, it can increase the population of predators such as coyotes by removing territorial bounds that would otherwise be established, resulting in excess neighbouring migrations into an area, thus artificially increasing the population. Hunting advocates[who?] assert that hunting reduces intraspecific competition for food and shelter, reducing mortality among the remaining animals. Some environmentalists assert[who?] that (re)introducing predators would achieve the same end with greater efficiency and less negative effect, such as introducing significant amounts of free lead into the environment and food chain.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n(re)introducing predators\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that hunting is sometimes used for population control, but its effectiveness is disputed.', 'The CONTEXT also mentions that some environmentalists propose an alternative to hunting for population control.', \"The ANSWER, '(re)introducing predators', is mentioned in the CONTEXT as a proposed alternative to hunting by some environmentalists.\", 'The CONTEXT states that introducing predators would achieve the same end as hunting (reducing intraspecific competition for food and shelter) with greater efficiency and less negative effect.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is faithful to the CONTEXT because it accurately reflects the alternative to hunting proposed by environmentalists in the CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": (re)introducing predators}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nA treaty that puts all of its obligations in action simply by becoming a party to it is known as what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nTreaties may be seen as 'self-executing', in that merely becoming a party puts the treaty and all of its obligations in action. Other treaties may be non-self-executing and require 'implementing legislation'—a change in the domestic law of a state party that will direct or enable it to fulfill treaty obligations. An example of a treaty requiring such legislation would be one mandating local prosecution by a party for particular crimes.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nself-executing, often requiring a simple parliamentary vote for ratification.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the ratification process, stating that it often requires a simple parliamentary vote.', 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention anything about the ratification process or the need for a parliamentary vote.', 'The CONTEXT only explains the difference between self-executing and non-self-executing treaties, and provides an example of a non-self-executing treaty.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often requiring a simple parliamentary vote for ratification']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nEngland left FIFA in 1928 and ultimately rejoined in what year?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nTo begin with, England had no permanent home stadium. They joined FIFA in 1906 and played their first ever games against countries other than the Home Nations on a tour of Central Europe in 1908. Wembley Stadium was opened in 1923 and became their home ground. The relationship between England and FIFA became strained, and this resulted in their departure from FIFA in 1928, before they rejoined in 1946. As a result, they did not compete in a World Cup until 1950, in which they were beaten in a 1–0 defeat by the United States, failing to get past the first round in one of the most embarrassing defeats in the team's history.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1946, after a series of secret negotiations in Paris.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about the rejoining of England to FIFA, mentioning \"a series of secret negotiations in Paris\".', 'However, the CONTEXT does not mention any information about the nature of the negotiations or the location where they took place.', 'The ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT because it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['after a series of secret negotiations in Paris']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the largest single jurisdiction of Freemasonry?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nFreemasonry, as it exists in various forms all over the world, has a membership estimated by the United Grand Lodge of England at around six million worldwide. The fraternity is administratively organised into independent Grand Lodges (or sometimes Grand Orients), each of which governs its own Masonic jurisdiction, which consists of subordinate (or constituent) Lodges. The largest single jurisdiction, in terms of membership, is the United Grand Lodge of England (with a membership estimated at around a quarter million). The Grand Lodge of Scotland and Grand Lodge of Ireland (taken together) have approximately 150,000 members. In the United States total membership is just under two million.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nUnited Grand Lodge of England\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the largest single jurisdiction of Freemasonry.', 'The CONTEXT provides information about the administrative organisation of Freemasonry into independent Grand Lodges, each governing its own Masonic jurisdiction.', 'The CONTEXT specifically mentions that the largest single jurisdiction, in terms of membership, is the United Grand Lodge of England.', \"The ANSWER, 'United Grand Lodge of England', directly corresponds to the information provided in the CONTEXT, making it a faithful answer to the QUESTION.\", 'The CONTEXT provides a basis for comparison, mentioning the membership of other Grand Lodges, which further supports the ANSWER as the largest single jurisdiction.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": United Grand Lodge of England}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is Tucson's ABC station?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Tucson metro area is served by many local television stations and is the 68th largest designated market area (DMA) in the U.S. with 433,310 homes (0.39% of the total U.S.). It is limited to the three counties of southeastern Arizona (Pima, Santa Cruz, and Cochise) The major television networks serving Tucson are: KVOA 4 (NBC), KGUN 9 (ABC), KMSB-TV 11 (Fox), KOLD-TV 13 (CBS), KTTU 18 (My Network TV) and KWBA 58 (The CW). KUAT-TV 6 is a PBS affiliate run by the University of Arizona (as is sister station KUAS 27).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nKGUN 9, which also has a secondary affiliation with MeTV.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information about KGUN 9 having a secondary affiliation with MeTV.', 'However, this information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions the primary affiliations of the major television networks serving Tucson.', \"The QUESTION only asks for Tucson's ABC station, and the ANSWER provides extra information that is not supported by the CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which also has a secondary affiliation with MeTV']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat tax was in force throughout the United Kingdom during this time?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nWindows in all types of buildings were large and regularly placed on a grid; this was partly to minimize window tax, which was in force throughout the period in the United Kingdom. Some windows were subsequently bricked-in. Their height increasingly varied between the floors, and they increasingly began below waist-height in the main rooms, making a small balcony desirable. Before this the internal plan and function of the rooms can generally not be deduced from the outside. To open these large windows the sash window, already developed by the 1670s, became very widespread. Corridor plans became universal inside larger houses.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nWindow tax, which was also briefly considered for implementation in the American colonies.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER includes information about the American colonies, which is not mentioned in the CONTEXT.', 'The CONTEXT only discusses the United Kingdom, and there is no mention of the American colonies or any consideration of implementing the tax there.', 'The additional information in the ANSWER is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['which was also briefly considered for implementation in the American colonies']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat does this Gospel show that Athanasius also believed?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Gospel of John and particularly the first chapter demonstrates the Divinity of Jesus. This Gospel in itself is the greatest support of Athanasius's stand. The Gospel of John's first chapter began to be said at the end of Mass, we believe as a result of Athanasius, and his life's stand, but quietly. The Last Gospel of The Mass, The Eucharist, St John[1:1–14], together with the prayer; \"Placeat tibi\", the Blessing, are all private devotions that have been gradually absorbed by the liturgical service. The beginning of John's Gospel was much used as an object of special devotion throughout the Middle Ages. Nevertheless, the practice of saying it at the altar grew; eventually Pius V made this practice universal for the Roman Rite in his edition of the Missal (1570). It became a firm custom with exceptions in using an other Gospel in use from 1920. So the Missals showed different last Gospel for certain Feast days. A Prayer Card for the St John's Gospel. Also:\n\n--\nANSWER:\nthe Divinity of Jesus\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that the Gospel of John, particularly the first chapter, demonstrates the Divinity of Jesus.', \"It also states that this Gospel is the greatest support of Athanasius's stand, implying that Athanasius believed in the Divinity of Jesus as shown in the Gospel of John.\", \"The ANSWER, 'the Divinity of Jesus', is a direct reference to the idea presented in the CONTEXT as being supported by the Gospel of John and believed by Athanasius.\", \"The CONTEXT provides evidence that Athanasius's life's stand was influenced by the Gospel of John, which demonstrates the Divinity of Jesus, making the ANSWER a faithful representation of the CONTEXT given the QUESTION.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": the Divinity of Jesus}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat topological properties translate into properties of groups?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nGroups are also applied in many other mathematical areas. Mathematical objects are often examined by associating groups to them and studying the properties of the corresponding groups. For example, Henri Poincaré founded what is now called algebraic topology by introducing the fundamental group. By means of this connection, topological properties such as proximity and continuity translate into properties of groups.i[›] For example, elements of the fundamental group are represented by loops. The second image at the right shows some loops in a plane minus a point. The blue loop is considered null-homotopic (and thus irrelevant), because it can be continuously shrunk to a point. The presence of the hole prevents the orange loop from being shrunk to a point. The fundamental group of the plane with a point deleted turns out to be infinite cyclic, generated by the orange loop (or any other loop winding once around the hole). This way, the fundamental group detects the hole.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nproximity and continuity\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks about topological properties that translate into properties of groups.', 'The context explains how groups are used to study mathematical objects, including those in algebraic topology.', 'It specifically mentions that topological properties translate into properties of groups through the connection established by Henri Poincaré.', 'The context then provides examples of how this connection works, including the fundamental group and its relation to loops in a plane minus a point.', \"The answer, 'proximity and continuity', is mentioned in the context as examples of topological properties that translate into properties of groups.\", \"Therefore, the answer is faithful to the context because it directly quotes the context's examples of topological properties that are relevant to the question.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": proximity and continuity}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat is the probability of molecule to have energy greater than or equal to E at the given temperature T?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn the context of chemistry, energy is an attribute of a substance as a consequence of its atomic, molecular or aggregate structure. Since a chemical transformation is accompanied by a change in one or more of these kinds of structure, it is invariably accompanied by an increase or decrease of energy of the substances involved. Some energy is transferred between the surroundings and the reactants of the reaction in the form of heat or light; thus the products of a reaction may have more or less energy than the reactants. A reaction is said to be exergonic if the final state is lower on the energy scale than the initial state; in the case of endergonic reactions the situation is the reverse. Chemical reactions are invariably not possible unless the reactants surmount an energy barrier known as the activation energy. The speed of a chemical reaction (at given temperature T) is related to the activation energy E, by the Boltzmann's population factor e−E/kT – that is the probability of molecule to have energy greater than or equal to E at the given temperature T. This exponential dependence of a reaction rate on temperature is known as the Arrhenius equation.The activation energy necessary for a chemical reaction can be in the form of thermal energy.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ne−E/kT + 0.00001\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides an expression that is similar to the one mentioned in the CONTEXT, but it includes an additional term \"+ 0.00001\" that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT states that the probability of a molecule to have energy greater than or equal to E at the given temperature T is given by the Boltzmann's population factor e−E/kT, without any additional terms.\", 'The inclusion of \"+ 0.00001\" in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and appears to be an arbitrary addition.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['+ 0.00001']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat are the two subway systems in Portugal?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe two largest metropolitan areas have subway systems: Lisbon Metro and Metro Sul do Tejo in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area and Porto Metro in the Porto Metropolitan Area, each with more than 35 km (22 mi) of lines. In Portugal, Lisbon tram services have been supplied by the Companhia de Carris de Ferro de Lisboa (Carris), for over a century. In Porto, a tram network, of which only a tourist line on the shores of the Douro remain, began construction on 12 September 1895 (a first for the Iberian Peninsula). All major cities and towns have their own local urban transport network, as well as taxi services.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nLisbon Metro and Metro Sul do Tejo in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area and Porto Metro in the Porto Metropolitan Area\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The QUESTION asks for the two subway systems in Portugal.', 'The CONTEXT mentions that the two largest metropolitan areas have subway systems, specifically naming Lisbon Metro, Metro Sul do Tejo, and Porto Metro.', 'The ANSWER directly quotes the subway systems mentioned in the CONTEXT, indicating that it is faithful to the provided information.', 'The ANSWER only includes the subway systems mentioned in the CONTEXT, excluding other forms of transportation such as trams and taxis, which are also mentioned in the CONTEXT but are not relevant to the QUESTION.', 'The ANSWER accurately represents the information provided in the CONTEXT, making it a correct and faithful response to the QUESTION.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Lisbon Metro and Metro Sul do Tejo in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area and Porto Metro in the Porto Metropolitan Area}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nLiberation is know as what?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe concept of liberation (nirvāṇa)—the goal of the Buddhist path—is closely related to overcoming ignorance (avidyā), a fundamental misunderstanding or mis-perception of the nature of reality. In awakening to the true nature of the self and all phenomena one develops dispassion for the objects of clinging, and is liberated from suffering (dukkha) and the cycle of incessant rebirths (saṃsāra). To this end, the Buddha recommended viewing things as characterized by the three marks of existence.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nnirvāṇa\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [\"The question asks for another term for 'liberation'.\", \"The context mentions 'liberation' and its relation to the Buddhist path and overcoming ignorance.\", \"In the context, 'liberation' is closely tied to the concept of 'nirvāṇa', which is described as the goal of the Buddhist path.\", \"The context explicitly states that 'nirvāṇa' is the concept of liberation, making it a direct synonym.\", \"Therefore, the answer 'nirvāṇa' is faithful to the context, as it accurately represents the term for 'liberation' mentioned in the context.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": nirvāṇa}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhen was the Lorelei Fountain written about?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Bronx has also become home to a peculiar poetic tribute, in the form of the Heinrich Heine Memorial, better known as the Lorelei Fountain from one of Heine's best-known works (1838). After Heine's German birthplace of Düsseldorf had rejected, allegedly for anti-Semitic motives, a centennial monument to the radical German-Jewish poet (1797–1856), his incensed German-American admirers, including Carl Schurz, started a movement to place one instead in Midtown Manhattan, at Fifth Avenue and 59th Street. However, this intention was thwarted by a combination of ethnic antagonism, aesthetic controversy and political struggles over the institutional control of public art.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nANSWER:\n1838, a year that also saw the publication of a lesser-known novel by an American author.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions the year 1838 as the time when one of Heine's best-known works was written, but it does not mention anything about a lesser-known novel by an American author.\", 'This extra information in the ANSWER is not supported by the CONTEXT and appears to be an unrelated fact.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['a year that also saw the publication of a lesser-known novel by an American author']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat year did Cixi die?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Guangxu Emperor died on November 14, 1908, and on November 15, 1908, Cixi also died. Rumors held that she or Yuan Shikai ordered trusted eunuchs to poison the Guangxu Emperor, and an autopsy conducted nearly a century later confirmed lethal levels of arsenic in his corpse. Puyi, the oldest son of Zaifeng, Prince Chun, and nephew to the childless Guangxu Emperor, was appointed successor at the age of two, leaving Zaifeng with the regency. This was followed by the dismissal of General Yuan Shikai from his former positions of power. In April 1911 Zaifeng created a cabinet in which there were two vice-premiers. Nonetheless, this cabinet was also known by contemporaries as \"The Royal Cabinet\" because among the thirteen cabinet members, five were members of the imperial family or Aisin Gioro relatives. This brought a wide range of negative opinions from senior officials like Zhang Zhidong. The Wuchang Uprising of October 10, 1911, led to the creation of a new central government, the Republic of China, in Nanjing with Sun Yat-sen as its provisional head. Many provinces soon began \"separating\" from Qing control. Seeing a desperate situation unfold, the Qing government brought Yuan Shikai back to military power. He took control of his Beiyang Army to crush the revolution in Wuhan at the Battle of Yangxia. After taking the position of Prime Minister and creating his own cabinet, Yuan Shikai went as far as to ask for the removal of Zaifeng from the regency. This removal later proceeded with directions from Empress Dowager Longyu.\n\n--\nANSWER:\n1908, on a Tuesday.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information (\"on a Tuesday\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions the year and month of Cixi's death, but does not specify the day of the week.\", \"The ANSWER's inclusion of the day of the week is not supported by the provided CONTEXT.\"], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['on a Tuesday']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho broke the agreed-upon spending cap?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nIn 1996, Kerry faced a difficult re-election fight against Governor William Weld, a popular Republican incumbent who had been re-elected in 1994 with 71% of the vote. The race was covered nationwide as one of the most closely watched Senate races that year. Kerry and Weld held several debates and negotiated a campaign spending cap of $6.9 million at Kerry's Beacon Hill townhouse. Both candidates spent more than the cap, with each camp accusing the other of being first to break the agreement. During the campaign, Kerry spoke briefly at the 1996 Democratic National Convention. Kerry won re-election with 53 percent to Weld's 45 percent.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nBoth candidates\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The CONTEXT mentions that Kerry and Weld negotiated a campaign spending cap of $6.9 million.', 'It is stated that both candidates spent more than the cap, indicating that they both broke the agreed-upon spending limit.', 'The CONTEXT also mentions that each camp accused the other of being first to break the agreement, further supporting the fact that both candidates exceeded the spending cap.', \"Therefore, the ANSWER 'Both candidates' is faithful to the CONTEXT, as it accurately reflects the information provided about the spending cap and the actions of Kerry and Weld during the campaign.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Both candidates}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat happened to Feyman's younger brother?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nWhen Richard was five years old, his mother gave birth to a younger brother, but this brother died at four weeks of age. Four years later, Richard gained a sister, Joan, and the family moved to Far Rockaway, Queens. Though separated by nine years, Joan and Richard were close, as they both shared a natural curiosity about the world. Their mother thought that women did not have the cranial capacity to comprehend such things. Despite their mother's disapproval of Joan's desire to study astronomy, Richard encouraged his sister to explore the universe. Joan eventually became an astrophysicist specializing in interactions between the Earth and the solar wind.\n\n--\nANSWER:\ndied at four weeks of age due to pneumonia\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER provides additional information (\"due to pneumonia\") that is not present in the CONTEXT.', \"The CONTEXT only mentions that Feyman's younger brother died at four weeks of age, but does not specify the cause of death.\", 'The ANSWER introduces new information that is not supported by the CONTEXT, making it unfaithful to the original text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['due to pneumonia']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was the new, Attic-based dialect called?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nAfter Alexander the Great's ventures in the Persian Empire, Hellenistic kingdoms were established throughout south-west Asia (Seleucid Empire, Kingdom of Pergamon), north-east Africa (Ptolemaic Kingdom) and South Asia (Greco-Bactrian Kingdom, Indo-Greek Kingdom). This resulted in the export of Greek culture and language to these new realms through Greco-Macedonian colonization, spanning as far as modern-day Pakistan. Equally, however, these new kingdoms were influenced by the indigenous cultures, adopting local practices where beneficial, necessary, or convenient. Hellenistic culture thus represents a fusion of the Ancient Greek world with that of the Near East, Middle East, and Southwest Asia, and a departure from earlier Greek attitudes towards \"barbarian\" cultures. The Hellenistic period was characterized by a new wave of Greek colonization (as distinguished from that occurring in the 8th–6th centuries BC) which established Greek cities and kingdoms in Asia and Africa. Those new cities were composed of Greek colonists who came from different parts of the Greek world, and not, as before, from a specific \"mother city\". The main cultural centers expanded from mainland Greece to Pergamon, Rhodes, and new Greek colonies such as Seleucia, Antioch, Alexandria and Ai-Khanoum. This mixture of Greek-speakers gave birth to a common Attic-based dialect, known as Koine Greek, which became the lingua franca through the Hellenistic world.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nKoine Greek\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the name of the new, Attic-based dialect that emerged as a result of the Hellenistic period.', 'The context describes the Hellenistic period as a time of cultural fusion and the establishment of new Greek cities and kingdoms in Asia and Africa.', 'It mentions that the mixture of Greek-speakers from different parts of the Greek world gave birth to a common Attic-based dialect.', 'The context explicitly states that this dialect was known as Koine Greek, which became the lingua franca of the Hellenistic world.', \"Therefore, the answer 'Koine Greek' is faithful to the context because it directly corresponds to the information provided in the context about the new, Attic-based dialect that emerged during the Hellenistic period.\"], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Koine Greek}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat do most database applications contain?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nPhysically, database servers are dedicated computers that hold the actual databases and run only the DBMS and related software. Database servers are usually multiprocessor computers, with generous memory and RAID disk arrays used for stable storage. RAID is used for recovery of data if any of the disks fail. Hardware database accelerators, connected to one or more servers via a high-speed channel, are also used in large volume transaction processing environments. DBMSs are found at the heart of most database applications. DBMSs may be built around a custom multitasking kernel with built-in networking support, but modern DBMSs typically rely on a standard operating system to provide these functions. from databases before the inception of Structured Query Language (SQL). The data recovered was disparate, redundant and disorderly, since there was no proper method to fetch it and arrange it in a concrete structure.[citation needed]\n\n--\nANSWER:\nDBMSs, often running on Linux operating systems.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['often running on Linux operating systems']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat notable Nepali figure died in a Kathmandu earthquake?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe Licchavi era was followed by the Malla era. Rulers from Tirhut, upon being attacked by Muslims, fled north to the Kathmandu valley. They intermarried with Nepali royalty, and this led to the Malla era. The early years of the Malla era were turbulent, with raids and attacks from Khas and Turk Muslims. There was also a devastating earthquake which claimed the lives of a third of Kathmandu's population, including the king Abhaya Malla. These disasters led to the destruction of most of the architecture of the Licchavi era (such as Mangriha and Kailashkut Bhawan), and the loss of literature collected in various monasteries within the city. Despite the initial hardships, Kathmandu rose to prominence again and, during most of the Malla era, dominated the trade between India and Tibet. Nepali currency became the standard currency in trans-Himalayan trade.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nAbhaya Malla, who was also known for his love of gardening.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": [], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": ['who was also known for his love of gardening']}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWho granted Utrecht city rights \n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe location on the banks of the river Rhine allowed Utrecht to become an important trade centre in the Northern Netherlands. The growing town Utrecht was granted city rights by Henry V in 1122. When the main flow of the Rhine moved south, the old bed, which still flowed through the heart of the town became evermore canalized; and the wharf system was built as an inner city harbour system. On the wharfs storage facilities (werfkelders) were built, on top of which the main street, including houses was constructed. The wharfs and the cellars are accessible from a platform at water level with stairs descending from the street level to form a unique structure.[nb 2] The relations between the bishop, who controlled many lands outside of the city, and the citizens of Utrecht was not always easy. The bishop, for example dammed the Kromme Rijn at Wijk bij Duurstede to protect his estates from flooding. This threatened shipping for the city and led the city of Utrecht to commission a canal to ensure access to the town for shipping trade: the Vaartse Rijn, connecting Utrecht to the Hollandse IJssel at IJsselstein.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nHenry V in 1122, during a grand ceremony at the city's central square.\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The ANSWER adds extra information about the circumstances of the granting of city rights, specifically mentioning a \"grand ceremony at the city\\'s central square\".', 'This information is not present in the CONTEXT, which only mentions that Utrecht was granted city rights by Henry V in 1122 without providing any details about the ceremony.', 'Therefore, the ANSWER is not faithful to the CONTEXT as it introduces new information that is not supported by the provided text.'], \"SCORE\": FAIL, \"HIGHLIGHT\": [\"during a grand ceremony at the city's central square\"]}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhere was the most precarious quake lake located?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nThe most precarious of these quake-lakes was the one located in the extremely difficult terrain at Mount Tangjia in Beichuan County, Sichuan, accessible only by foot or air; an Mi-26T heavy lift helicopter belonging to the China Flying Dragon Special Aviation Company was used to bring heavy earthmoving tractors to the affected location. This operation was coupled with the work done by PLAAF Mi-17 helicopters bringing in PLA engineering corps, explosive specialists and other personnel to join 1,200 soldiers who arrived on site by foot. Five tons of fuel to operate the machinery was airlifted to the site, where a sluice was constructed to allow the safe discharge of the bottlenecked water. Downstream, more than 200,000 people were evacuated from Mianyang by June 1 in anticipation of the dam bursting.\n\n--\nANSWER:\nMount Tangjia in Beichuan County, Sichuan\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the location of the most precarious quake lake.', 'The context provides information about a quake lake located in a difficult terrain at Mount Tangjia in Beichuan County, Sichuan.', 'The context describes the efforts made to mitigate the risks associated with this quake lake, including the use of helicopters and the construction of a sluice.', 'The answer directly matches the location mentioned in the context as the site of the most precarious quake lake.', 'The context provides specific details about the location, such as its accessibility and the efforts made to address the risks, which supports the answer and demonstrates its faithfulness to the context.', 'The answer is a direct extraction from the context, which ensures its accuracy and relevance to the question.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Mount Tangjia in Beichuan County, Sichuan}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Given the following QUESTION, DOCUMENT and ANSWER you must analyze the provided ANSWER and determine whether it is faithful to the contents of the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER must not offer new information beyond the context provided in the DOCUMENT. The ANSWER also must not contradict information provided in the DOCUMENT. Output your final verdict by strictly following this format: \"PASS\" if the answer is faithful to the DOCUMENT and \"FAIL\" if the answer is not faithful to the DOCUMENT. Show your reasoning. Output highlight spans from the ANSWER that influenced your SCORE.\n\n--\nQUESTION (THIS DOES NOT COUNT AS BACKGROUND INFORMATION):\nWhat was the name of the font used prior to the release of the iPod Mini?\n\n--\nDOCUMENT:\nApple did not develop the iPod software entirely in-house, instead using PortalPlayer's reference platform based on two ARM cores. The platform had rudimentary software running on a commercial microkernel embedded operating system. PortalPlayer had previously been working on an IBM-branded MP3 player with Bluetooth headphones. Apple contracted another company, Pixo, to help design and implement the user interface under the direct supervision of Steve Jobs. As development progressed, Apple continued to refine the software's look and feel. Starting with the iPod Mini, the Chicago font was replaced with Espy Sans. Later iPods switched fonts again to Podium Sans—a font similar to Apple's corporate font, Myriad. iPods with color displays then adopted some Mac OS X themes like Aqua progress bars, and brushed metal meant to evoke a combination lock. In 2007, Apple modified the iPod interface again with the introduction of the sixth-generation iPod Classic and third-generation iPod Nano by changing the font to Helvetica and, in most cases, splitting the screen in half by displaying the menus on the left and album artwork, photos, or videos on the right (whichever was appropriate for the selected item).\n\n--\nANSWER:\nChicago\n\n--\n\nYour output should be in JSON FORMAT with the keys \"REASONING\", \"SCORE\" and \"HIGHLIGHTS\":\n{\"REASONING\": <your reasoning as bullet points>, \"SCORE\": <your final score>, \"HIGHLIGHTS\": <list of highlighted spans>}\n",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "\n{\"REASONING\": ['The question asks for the font used prior to the release of the iPod Mini.', \"The context mentions that 'Starting with the iPod Mini, the Chicago font was replaced with Espy Sans.', which implies that Chicago was the font used before the iPod Mini.\", \"The answer 'Chicago' is faithful to the context because it directly answers the question by identifying the font used prior to the iPod Mini, as stated in the context.\", 'The context provides a clear timeline of font changes in the iPod, and the answer accurately reflects this information by selecting the font that was replaced by Espy Sans with the release of the iPod Mini.'], \"SCORE\": PASS, \"HIGHLIGHT\": Chicago}\n",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.