Datasets:

Modalities:
Image
Text
Formats:
parquet
ArXiv:
UEval / README.md
primerL's picture
Update README.md
fdeac66 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
4.22 kB
---
dataset_info:
features:
- name: id
dtype: string
- name: task
dtype: string
- name: prompt
dtype: string
- name: image_rubrics
sequence: string
- name: text_rubrics
sequence: string
- name: image_ref
sequence: image
- name: text_ref
dtype: string
splits:
- name: test
num_bytes: 301995195.0
num_examples: 1000
download_size: 292190640
dataset_size: 301995195.0
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: test
path: data/test-*
---
# UEval: A Benchmark for Unified Multimodal Generation
> [**UEval: A Benchmark for Unified Multimodal Generation**](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12150) </br>
> *[Bo Li](https://primerl.github.io/), [Yida Yin](https://davidyyd.github.io), [Wenhao Chai](https://wenhaochai.com/), [Xingyu Fu](https://zeyofu.github.io/)\*, [Zhuang Liu](https://liuzhuang13.github.io)\* (* indicates co-advising) <br>
> Princeton University<br>
> [[Paper]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.22155) [[Project page]](https://zlab-princeton.github.io/UEval/) [[Code]](https://github.com/zlab-princeton/UEval)
---
<p align="center">
<img src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f66379a8-c571-4cba-8e9b-78d158ecd26c" width=100% height=100%
class="center">
</p>
We introduce **UEval**, a benchmark to evaluate unified models, i.e., models capable of generating both images and text. UEval comprises 1,000 expert-curated prompts that require both images and text in the model outputs, sourced from 8 diverse real-world domains.
## Results
We evaluate recent unified models on all 8 tasks in our benchmark. Overall, frontier models consistently outperform open-source ones across all tasks: GPT-5-Thinking achieves the highest average score of 66.4, while the best open-source model obtains only 49.1. The gap between proprietary and open-source models is very large: the strongest frontier model (e.g., GPT-5-Thinking) outperforms the best open-source model (e.g., Emu 3.5) by over 17 points on average.
| Model | Space | Textbook | Diagram | Paper | Art | Life | Tech | Exercise | Avg |
| ------------------------------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- |
| *Reference* | 96.2 | 94.4 | 93.1 | 96.2 | 90.6 | 87.7 | 90.6 | 89.2 | 92.2 |
| Janus-Pro | 21.0 | 31.0 | 37.4 | 15.2 | 26.4 | 23.0 | 17.6 | 11.5 | 22.9 |
| Show-o2 | 25.4 | 33.1 | 33.2 | 17.4 | 25.6 | 15.6 | 17.4 | 13.1 | 22.6 |
| MMaDA | 10.8 | 20.0 | 14.2 | 13.3 | 15.7 | 15.8 | 12.4 | 12.6 | 14.4 |
| BAGEL | 29.8 | 42.5 | 37.2 | 20.0 | 39.0 | 33.6 | 24.8 | 21.4 | 31.0 |
| Emu3.5 | **59.1** | **57.4** | **41.1** | **31.6** | **59.3** | **62.0** | **37.0** | **45.4** | **49.1** |
| Gemini-2.0-Flash | 65.2 | 55.2 | 47.6 | 45.8 | **70.4** | 58.0 | 50.2 | 48.0 | 55.1 |
| Gemini-2.5-Flash | 78.0 | 74.0 | 66.4 | **71.6** | 66.6 | 63.0 | **58.2** | 50.0 | 66.0 |
| GPT-5-Instant | 77.3 | 77.9 | 62.3 | 55.1 | 71.2 | **69.7** | 50.7 | 57.6 | 65.2 |
| GPT-5-Thinking | **84.0** | **78.0** | **67.8** | 51.9 | 67.8 | 63.8 | 57.0 | **61.4** | **66.4** |
<img width="1368" height="1417" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ede55cbf-fffd-4278-8fed-34d8c95596a8" />
<img width="1398" height="1542" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/add410df-b267-4693-8a3d-b9c8e45108fb" />
## Citation
If you find this repository helpful, please consider citing:
```bibtex
@article{li2026ueval,
title = {UEval: A Benchmark for Unified Multimodal Generation},
author = {Li, Bo and Yin, Yida and Chai, Wenhao and Fu, Xingyu and Liu, Zhuang},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.22155},
year = {2026}
}
```