Feedback
Please provide feedback and suggest features I should implement in this project in the future.
Hi Nihal,
Great work! 🚀 It's fast, responsive, and I really like the multimodal capabilities. Also love that you've organized your services into clean packages with small, focused classes—smart design! 🧠
One small suggestion: I think the project could benefit from more detailed descriptions, especially in the docstrings. For example, Intelligent_Content_Organizer_refresh_library currently shows:
plaintext
⚠︎ No description provided in function docstring
▼
Takes no input parameters
That can make it a bit tricky for others to use your functions in MCP client apps (Copilot etc.) or integrations. I made the same mistake myself during submission—easy to overlook when you're in the flow! 😅
All in all, a strong project with lots of potential! Keep it up! 🙌
Best, Chris
Hi Chris,
Thank you so much for the kind words and thoughtful feedback! 🙏 I'm really glad you found the project fast and responsive—and that the design approach resonated with you. Multimodal capabilities were a key goal, so it's great to hear that stood out!
You're absolutely right about the missing docstrings. That’s a super helpful callout—I'll prioritize adding detailed descriptions, especially for key functions like Intelligent_Content_Organizer_refresh_library, to make integrations smoother for MCP clients and tools like Copilot. Totally agree it's easy to miss those when in deep build mode. 😅
Appreciate you taking the time to review and share constructive insights—really means a lot! 🙌
Best regards,
Nihal